That's Privileged nformation. What internal auditors should know about attorneyclient privilege in corporate legal investigations.
|
|
- Debra Cannon
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 That's Privileged nformation What internal auditors should know about attorneyclient privilege in corporate legal investigations. KENNETH GLASCOCK, jd, CIA. CFSA, CISA, CISSP, CBCP PHOTOGRAPH BY JONNIE MILES IHTERNAl AUDITOR AUGUST 2005
2 FIRST HINT OF MALFEASANCE OR FRAUD, an internal auditor's instinct is often to be involved immediately and directly in the investigation from start to finish. Typically, Internal auditors take such matters personally, as though no impropriety should ever occur on their watch. Although this instinct is common, it's important for audit professionals to remember that the ontrol environment is management's esponsibility, and the manner in which AU&US! 2005 INTERNAL AUDITOR
3 wrongdoings are investigated and reported can have wide-ranging legal, financial, and rcputational consequences for the organization. One factor that can influence these consequences is the legal concept of privilege, or the protection of certain information, records, or advice from being disclosed in litigation. U.S. internal auditors, or those whose companies do business with U.S. firms, should have a basic understanding of how information can be kept privileged under U.S. law and how organizations can conduct an investigation to minimize future litigation exposure. DIFFERING RESPONSIBILITIES In addition to internal auditing and management, the parties involved in an investigation of malfeasance may include the audit committee, in-house counsel, external counsel, regulators, and external auditors. Each of these groups may have differing agendas and be subject to different legal or ethical obligations. Among the parties involved, the interests of the audit committee and the internal auditor arc probably the most closely aligned. However, if the audit committee must comply with the requirements of the U.S. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Rule 10A-3, which addresses implementing Section 301 of the act, the audit committee's responsibilities are more clearly defined than those of the internal auditor. Rule 10A-3 requires audit committees to establish formal procedures to receive, retain, and deal with complaints received hy the company regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, or audit issues; and to facilitate confidential and anonymous suhmissions by the company's employees regarding questionable accounting or audit matters. The rule vests authority in audit committees to engage independent counsel and other advisers as deemed necessary to address legal, accounting, or fmancial reporting issues as they arise. Consistent with congressional intent and SEC expectations, audit committees have an affirmative duty to be skeptical and inquisitive, and to receive adequate information to make an informed judgment. INVESTIGATION CONSIDERATIONS Should an audit committee become aware of a potential issue, it has a duty Attorney-client privilege protects advice rendered by legal counsel and encourages frank and open communication about legal matters between client and attorney. to investigate to protect the interests of the company's investors. However, it's important to remember that the material (e.g, information, documents, or evidence) gathered during this investigation could be discoverable (i.e., ordered by the court to be disclosed), in subsequent private litigation. In other words, an adverse party could request a document such as an audit report in litigation, and if the report is deemed discoverable, the court would enforce the adversary's right to obtain it. Other disadvantages of an investigation include: direct costs, and the inevitable distraction (and loss of productivity) as management and employees expend time and energy cooperating with or fearing the possible or imagined consequences of the investigation. Further, the results of the investigation may require disclosure in the Management Discussion and Analysis section of the financial statements, or in the Legal Proceedings section, both in accordance with SEC Rule S-K, or a discussion of possible loss contingencies as directed by the external auditor. Although the results of an investigation eventually may he discoverable, there are also advantages to company-sponsored investigations, such as helping the defense of a shareholder derivative suit, a governmental inquiry, or a criminal investigation. An investigation performed at a company's direction is likely to be less disruptive than an externally controlled investigation, could help dissuade a regulator from conducting its own investigation, and will assist the board in exercising prudent business judgment. If the purpose ot the investigation is clearly nonlegal, then internal auditors, external auditors, or other subject matter experts can be involved without regard to privilege. However, if litigation is possible or likely, the audit committee may choose to minimize the possibility of discovery by engaging legal counsel to conduct the investigation. Thus, a threshold issue for the committee to consider is whether the investigation has a legal or nonlegal purpose. If the purpose is legal, the committee might also consider whether an oral report will suffice, because a written deliverable creates a potentially discoverable document. ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Whether the resulting materials of the investigation become discoverable depends on the common law attorney-client privilege (ACP). The purpose of the ACP is to protect advice rendered by legal counsel and to encourage frank and open communication about legal matters between client and attorney. Thus, if privilege applies, a third party can't learn about the communications a client has with its legal counsel. The privilege can also apply to notes and reports resulting from an investigation as well as employee interviews. The privilege exists to protect not only the rendering of professional legal advice to those who can act on it, hut also the information provided to the lawyer, which enables him or her to provide such advice. The protection of the privilege extends only to communications and not to facts. Thus, an adverse party might be able to learn a fact, but could not learn exactly what one told an attorney or what advice the attorney gave. Moreover, a fact cannot be concealed merely by revealing it to a lawyer. For example, if a witness were asked on the stand if she made manual journal entries not consistent with INTERNAL AUDITOR AUGUST 2005
4 THAT'S PRIVILEGED I N F O R M A T I O N Generally Accepted Accounting Principles at quarter-end to help make revenue targets, she could not respond, "Sorry, that is soniething my attorney and I discussed. It is therefore privileged information." It's important to note that the privilege belongs to the client {i.e., company) and not the employee. For example, if a company obtains advice, documents, or reports in connection with a lawsuit or prospective lawsuit, the company, not an employee, has a right to decide whether the material will be kept confidential (i.e., privileged). A corporation can hold a privilege through a representative typically a senior manager acting on its behalf. For example, if an adversary seeks an internal or external audit report in connection with litigation, the chief audit executive or other senior manager could assert "privilege" and decline to produce the report. A judge would likely make a case-by-case determination of whether ACP applies. However, an internal audit report likely would not be covered by a privilege. Tbe U.S. Supreme Court addressed the ACP in the case of Upjohn v. United States. The case centered on the disclosure of potentially inappropriate payments made to foreign government officials by a foreign subsidiary of Upjohn. Tbe Internal Revenue Service demanded documents related to a legal investigation conducted by inbouse counsel. Upjobn refused to produce the documents, arguing that tbey were protected by tbe ACP. The Supreme Court held the communications were confidential and protected from disclosure by tbe ACP. The court also found the ACP applicable to certain communications between employees of a corporation and a corporation's counsel, but declined to define a clear test for the development of a privilege, preferring instead a case-by-case analysis that considers all the facts and circumstances of tbe particular situation. In addition, not all federal or state court cases must follow tbe bolding in Upjohn. Tbe ACP can also protect communications with experts (including accountants) and legal counsel provided that legal counsel engaged the experts. If a special counsel is engaged to conduct accounting-related investigations, and he or sbe in turn engages an accounting firm, tbe communications from tbe accounting firm would be protected by the ACP and not discoverable by a potential litigant. internal auditors to provide a report, that report may be privileged because it was prepared in connection with a legal matter. If a legal issue relates only to accounting advice, a WPD privilege is unlikely If the purpose of an investigation is clearly nonlegal, then internal auditors, external auditors, or other subject matter experts can be involved without regard to privilege. WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE As a general rule, accountant workpapers are not likely to be protected by tbe ACP because tbey are not considered client communications. Nonetheless, tbey may be covered by a related privilege known as the Work Product Doctrine (WPD). This privilege Is distinct from, and broader tban, the ACP and extends beyond confidential communications between the attorney and client to any document prepared in anticipation of litigation by or for tbe attorney. For the material to be kept confidential, or privileged by tbe court, it must have been created for tbe purpose of obtaining legal advice and kept confidential. For example, if tbe audit committee engages legal counsel, and legal counsel engages external or Document Retention Guidelines to be recognized. The WPD can protect materials created by lawyers and tbeir engaged experts in anticipation of litigation. However, tbis privilege is more easily overcome by an adverse party, who can demonstrate need or an "undue bardsbip" if tbe materials are not provided. Nonetbeless, if the material sougbt is based on opinions or conclusions, as opposed to being inberently factual, it will be more difficult for the opponent to overcome tbe privilege. Altbougb tbis may seem like a fine point, it could have a bearing on whether legal counsel or internal auditors use a written questionnaire or another potentially less discoverable technique during tbe course of tbe investigation. Courts have beld that the WPD is not as easilv waived as tbe ACP. Tbe kev Strict adherence to an organization's document retention policy is critical to minimizing potential civil or criminal liability. Failure to preserve the appropriate records could result in severe consequences to both individuals and organizations. The following guidelines can help ensure documents are correctly preserved for future legal use. As soon as the decision to conduct an investigation is made, the company should take whatever steps are necessary to create a document retention program. If litigation has commenced, is threatened, or is likely, the organization should act immediately to preserve all relevant records, including s. Title VIM of Sarbanes-Oxley, the Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act of 2002, provides for a 20 year prison sentence for committing the crime of knowingly destroying, altering, or falsifying records in connection with a federal investigation or bankruptcy and a 10-year sentence for the crime of destroying audit records. The Act provides enhanced fines or imprisonment of up to 20 years for corruptly altering, destroying, mutilating, or concealing records, documents, or other objects with the objective of preventing their use in an official proceeding or for obstructing, influencing, or impeding any official proceeding or attempting to do so. AUGUST 7005 INTERNAL AUDITOR 49
5 50 is to prevent disclosure to adversaries. Accordingly, disclosure of confidential records to a government audit agency could be construed as a disclosure to a potential adversary and could compromise the privilege. Any time an organization provides a confidential document to an unrelated entity, in cases wbere communications have been disclosed to third parties sucb as external auditors, underwriters, or even regulators, who can be construed as legal adversaries (i.e., entities witb potentially different interests who may sue, fine, or otherwise sanction the company or its employees). Even par- External auditors usually are outside the circle of third persons with whom the organization's confidential information may be shared without compromise. it becomes more difficult to assert privilege against another party in litigation. In other words, the more widely available a company makes a document, tbe less credible that firm becomes ifit later asserts in litigation that the information is confidential, or privileged. LOSS OF PRIVILEGE Assuming a written deliverable results from the investigation, preserving its confidentiality is key to possible future protection in court under the ACP and WPD. Courts have waived tbe privilege Initiating the Legal Investigation ticipation in an SEC voluntary disclosure program could cause a privilege to be waived. Thus, tbe entity could find itself witb an irreconcilable dilemma. It may be necessary or desirable to disclose tbe communication to the external auditor or a regulator, yet doing so may waive tbe privilege and subject the entity to civil actions from shareholders. A privilege can also be waived through unintentional disclosure. Specific actions that can be taken to protect the privilege include limiting copies of the information, marking the copies "confidential," and granting access Early in the investigative process, employees should be notified by counsel of the investigation. Typically, notice will be written, but could be oral if the matter is especially sensitive. A written notification should: Indicate the nature of the investigation. Indicate the identity of the investigators (i.e., legal counsel). Include a statement that the attorney represents the organization, not the employee. Include a statement that the entity seeks legal advice. Indicate that cooperation is expected and appreciated. Request to maintain confidentiality. Include a notice that information collected may be shared with third parties. Counsel may opt for a written questionnaire. If so, the questionnaire should be marked "privileged," "confidential," or "attorney-cuent communication." If interviews are conducted, counsel may elect to have at least two interviewers in attendance. The interview notes may be consolidated into a memorandum containing the attorneys' impressions. If an employee declines to cooperate, the board should likely take some punitive action against the employee. Some employees may insist on having their own counsel present during the interview. Outside counsel will determine whether to conduct the interview under this or other conditions. INTERNAL AUDITOR AUGUST 7005 on a need-to-know basis. If a communication must be disclosed to a third party, a confidentiality agreement may belp, but by no means will this provide absolute protection. For internal reporting, it also maybe prudent to designate an individual to review tbe document and report directly to a group of disinterested directors. Further, legal counsel should be consulted before summarizing the results of the investigation for public disclosure, as this too may jeopardize the privilege. In short, if the materials become discoverable, the organization may have built the foundation for additional legal actions against itself. EXTERNAL AUDITORS Unless counsel has engaged external auditors, an organization likely will not be able to claim tbeir work as privileged, because federal law does not recognize a privilege for auditor-client communications. However, there is one exception under tbe Internal Revenue Service (irs) Restructuring and Reform Act of 1998 for tax advice provided to a client by a professional qualified under federal law to practice before tbe IRS. The privilege extends only to advice on legal issues in federal court in which the United States is a party. At the state level, only a handful of jurisdictions recognize a privilege for accountant-client communications. Sucb states may offer protection against the compulsory production of workpapers witbout client consent. Where it is recognized by state statute or common law, the privilege belongs to the client, but it can be lost by either the client or the accountant making a disclosure. According to the Supreme Court, in the case of United States v. Arthur Young &L Co., external auditors serve as "pubhc watchdogs," a role that demands independence from the client. A prior Supreme Court case held that external auditors have a public responsibility transcending any employment relationship witb tbe client and owe allegiance to the corporation's creditors and stockholders, as well as to the investing public. Therefore, external auditors usually are outside the circle of third persons with whom confidential information may be shared without compromise.
6 THAT'S P R I V I L E G E D I N F O R M A T I O N Accordingly, there is no guarantee of a work product privilege for auditors or a confidential accountant-client privilege. However, if a special audit team as opposed to a regular year-end audit team - is assembled for the purpose of aiding counsel in providing legal advice, confidences might be shared without compromising a privilege. Potentially, the entity may even use its own certified public accounting firm for the investigation if the firm is engaged separately by counsel for the audit committee or board to assist with a legal matter. However, because the annual audit is not a legal matter, the annual audit work or work performed by the audit team would not be privileged. Thus, it would be safer to engage a different firm for an investigation than the firm engaged for tbe annual audit in order to minimize conflict and confusion. IN-HOUSE COUNSEL Using in-house counsel for an investigation raises many independence issues, as the attorney may fmd him or herseu in the awkward position of investigating superiors. In addition, the in-house attorney must navigate a minefield of professional and ethical obligations, wbicb can be exacerbated by a case of significant malfeasance such as senior management perpetrating an Enron- or WorldCom-sized fraud. Additionally, in-house counsel customarily may provide business advice, which could negatively affect the entity's ability to maintain and preserve the counsel's privileged legal advice. If counsel provided legal advice regarding any of the subject matter, the attorney should not be used. If in-bouse counsel routinely offers business advice or serves on the board, the internal auditor should recommend that outside counsel direct an investigation. This is also advisable if the interests ofthe corporation diverge significantly from those of senior management or members of the board. In-house attorneys must take more precautions to preserve tbe ACP than outside legal advisors because tbey face heightened judicial scrutiny. For example, the in-house counsel should keep an independent filing system for confidential communications and only label truly confidential documents "confidential." Against this backdrop, tbe internal auditor may encounter in-house counsel who decline to share communications witb the internal auditor by citing a need to preserve a privilege. Although this issue does not appear to bave been settled in the courts, a good Internal auditors should be aware that their audit reports could be used against the organization in a court of law, should litigation result. argument can be made tbat internal auditors, by virtue of tbeir board-reporting relationsbip, are part of a small circle of "others" with whom privileged communications can be shared without jeopardizing the privilege. If an internal auditor requests to view a report prepared by outside counsel that is relevant to an ongoing audit, arguably tbe in-house counsel sbould provide the report to the internal auditor. It may be belpful for the internal auditor to cite bis or her board-granted authority typically found in the internal audit charter to access any and all information and materials relevant to an internal audit. Any conflict between inbouse counsel and tbe internal auditor may need to be resolved by the audit committee or tbe full board. The internal auditor, however, should balance tbe need for the report against the possibility that gaining access to the report could inadvertently lead to a loss ofthe privilege. INTERNAL AUDIT INVOLVEMENT Not long ago, the Enron and World- Com cases demonstrated tbe potential legal land mines of significant and widespread fraud. In light of tbose infamous examples, the internal auditor should recognize that it might be best to defer investigations of fraudulent behavior or other wrongdoings to independent legal counsel and tbe experts engaged by legal counsel. Accordingly, tbe internal auditor sbould defer to legal counsel wben tbe counsel is engaged by tbe audit committee. If counsel works for management or was engaged by management, the internal auditor should maintain professional skepticism and address any concerns with the audit committee. Generally, internal audit reports will not be protected by either the ACP or the WPD and could be subject to discovery in litigation. Therefore, auditors should be aware that their audit reports could be used against tbe organization in court should litigation result, and they should, therefore, avoid reaching legal conclusions about whether particular conduct violated rules or regulations. If an internal auditor has reason to believe that a lawsuit or the filing of criminal charges against an organization or an employee of tbe organization is likely, he or she should encourage the audit committee to vote on a resolution that authorizes outside counsel to conduct the investigation. The resolution sbould be clear regarding tbe legal basis for the investigation and mention tbe possibility of litigation as a motivating factor. Tbe attorney's engagement letter will serve as the charter for the investigation, describe tbe scope of the work to be performed, and make reference to the attorney being retained to provide legal advice. This turn of events may be contrary to tbe internal auditor's instinct, but allowing and encouraging this course of action may ultimately be in the organization's best interest. This article is not intended to provide specific legal advice. To comment on this article, the author at kgtascock@theiia.org. AUGUST 200S INTERNAL AUDITOR
7
This Webcast Will Begin Shortly
This Webcast Will Begin Shortly If you have any technical problems with the Webcast or the streaming audio, please contact us via email at: accwebcast@commpartners.com Thank You! Pitfalls and Potholes
More informationDavid J. Bright MAINTAINING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE DURING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND CORPORATE EMPLOYEES
MAINTAINING THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE DURING COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND CORPORATE EMPLOYEES David J. Bright Direct Number: (515) 286-7015 Facsimile: (515) 286-7050 E-Mail: djbright@nyemaster.com
More informationINTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: AVOIDING PITFALLS. Sherilyn Pastor, McCarter & English, LLP (and) Rosemary Stewart, Hollingsworth LLP
INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: AVOIDING PITFALLS Sherilyn Pastor, McCarter & English, LLP (and) Rosemary Stewart, Hollingsworth LLP I. The use of internal investigations has increased significantly. Based on
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER Purpose The purpose of the Audit Committee (the Committee ) of the Board of Directors (the "Board") of Conduent Incorporated (the Company ) shall be to assist in Board oversight
More informationMany Hats, One Set of Rules: Ethical Beartraps for In-House Counsel
Attorney Advertising Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome Models used are not clients but may be representative of clients 777 E. Wisconsin Ave, Milwaukee,WI 53202 414.271.2400 Many Hats, One
More informationSARBANES OXLEY ATTORNEY RESPONSIBILITY STANDARDS
SARBANES OXLEY ATTORNEY RESPONSIBILITY STANDARDS DEBRA G. HATTER, Houston Haynes & Boone State Bar Of Texas 2 ND ANNUAL ADVANCED IN-HOUSE COUNSEL COURSE August 14-15, 2003 San Antonio, Texas CHAPTER 9
More informationTOP TEN PITFALLS ENCOUNTERED IN INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS. March 2008
TOP TEN PITFALLS ENCOUNTERED IN INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS Tom Dillard, Esq., Ritchie, Dillard & Davies, P.C. Anthony Lake, Esq., Gillen Withers & Lake, LLC Joseph P. Griffith, Jr., Esq., Joe Griffith Law
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER Amended and Restated Charter AMENDED AND RESTATED CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PFSWEB, INC. (AS OF MAY 3, 2016) PURPOSE The Audit Committee (the Committee
More informationA Message to Legal Personnel
A Message to Legal Personnel Pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the SEC adopted Part 205, an extensive set of rules that impose new obligations on attorneys (both in-house attorneys and outside
More informationThe SEC proposes to codify the rule as a new Part 205 to Chapter 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
SEC PROPOSES RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT FOR ATTORNEYS APPEARING AND PRACTICING BEFORE THE SEC SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP DECEMBER 16, 2002 On November 21, 2002, the Securities and Exchange Commission
More informationBoard Basics: What a Nonprofit Board Should Know About Meeting in Executive Session
Board Basics: What a Nonprofit Board Should Know About Meeting in Executive Session Rick Marks Partner, DLA Piper LLP (US) & Regina Hopkins D.C. Bar Pro Bono Center February 15, 2017 Today s Webinar What
More informationUNITED CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS, INC. Audit Committee Charter
Approved December 3, 2015 UNITED CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS, INC. Audit Committee Charter Purpose The purpose of the Audit Committee (the Committee ) of the Board of Directors (the Board ) is to: oversee the
More informationEthics: Attorney-Client Privilege, the Work-Product Doctrine, and Employment Investigations. October 5, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Ethics: Attorney-Client Privilege, the Work-Product Doctrine, and Employment Investigations October 5, 2017 2017 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP ETHICS: ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE, THE WORK-PRODUCT DOCTRINE,
More informationGOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. CHARTER (as of February 9, 2016)
GOLDEN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER (as of February 9, 2016) I. Purpose. The primary purpose of the Audit Committee (the Committee ) is to assist the Board of Directors
More informationALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER. (Adopted on September 2, 2014 by the Board of Directors)
I. PURPOSE ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER (Adopted on September 2, 2014 by the Board of Directors) The Audit Committee (the Committee ) of Alibaba Group
More informationNYSE BOARD OF DIRECTORS APPROVES NEW CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND DISCLOSURE STANDARDS AUGUST 23, 2002 S IMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP
NYSE BOARD OF DIRECTORS APPROVES NEW CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND DISCLOSURE STANDARDS SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP AUGUST 23, 2002 On August 16, 2002, the New York Stock Exchange ( NYSE ) publicly filed
More informationIN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND PRIVILEGE ISSUES. B. John Pendleton, Jr. DLA Piper LLP (US) 21 September 2012
IN-HOUSE COUNSEL AND PRIVILEGE ISSUES B. John Pendleton, Jr. DLA Piper LLP (US) 21 September 2012 Objective The goal of the company is to take maximum advantage of the attorneyclient privilege and related
More informationa) Establishment of Committee A committee of the directors to be known as the "Audit Committee" (hereinafter the "Committee") is hereby established.
Charters of committees of Board of Directors of Royal Bank of Canada Excerpted from ROYAL BANK OF CANADA ADMINISTRATIVE RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ROYAL BANK OF CANADA (hereinafter
More informationManaging a Corporate Crisis:
Managing a Corporate Crisis: Strategies for Containing a Crisis and Controlling the Public Narrative While Meeting Ethical Obligations and Maintaining Privilege June 15, 2017 Vincent Cohen Hector Gonzalez
More informationAudit Committee Charter Tyson Foods, Inc.
Approved by the Audit Committee on 8/2/17 Approved by the Board of Directors on 8/10/17 Audit Committee Charter Tyson Foods, Inc. I. PURPOSE The primary function of the Audit Committee (the "Committee")
More informationUNITED CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS, INC. Corporate Governance Guidelines (Approved December 6, 2017 )
UNITED CONTINENTAL HOLDINGS, INC. Corporate Governance Guidelines (Approved December 6, 2017 ) These Corporate Governance Guidelines (the Guidelines ) have been adopted by the Board of Directors (the Board
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER As Amended and Restated by the Board of Directors November 7, 2013
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER As Amended and Restated by the Board of Directors November 7, 2013 Purpose The Audit Committee (the Committee ) is appointed by the Board of Directors (the Board ) of Anadarko Petroleum
More informationCharter Audit and Finance Committee Time Warner Inc.
Charter Audit and Finance Committee Time Warner Inc. The Board of Directors of Time Warner Inc. (the Corporation ; Company refers to the Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries) has adopted this
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Purpose AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The purpose of the Audit Committee (the Committee ) is to assist the Board of Directors (the Board ) of Waters Corporation
More informationAFFIRMATIVE INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
AFFIRMATIVE INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Purpose The purpose of the Audit Committee (the Committee ) of the Board of Directors (the Board ) of Affirmative
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE OF IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED CHARTER
AUDIT COMMITTEE OF IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED CHARTER The Audit Committee (the Committee ) of the Board of Directors (the Board ) of Iron Mountain Incorporated (the Company ) shall consist of a minimum
More informationVALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC.
VALEANT PHARMACEUTICALS INTERNATIONAL, INC. 1. PURPOSE CHARTER OF THE AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE The (the Committee ) of Valeant Pharmaceuticals International, Inc. ( Valeant ) is appointed by the board
More informationShredded Any Good Documents Lately?
Shredded Any Good Documents Lately? Del O Roark Mike - It might be useful to consider reminding the engagement team of our documentation and retention policy. It will be helpful to make sure that we have
More informationResponding to Government Investigations: What to do when the Government Knocks. Gabriel Colwell Partner Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Responding to Government Investigations: What to do when the Government Knocks Gabriel Colwell Partner Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP Today s Agenda Corporate Criminal Liability Enforcement Environment General
More informationPrivileges and In-House Counsel: A User s Guide
Privileges and In-House Counsel: A User s Guide William M. Bosch, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer Thomas C. Indelicarto, VeriSign Inc. Robert N. Weiner, Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer January 11, 2017 apks.com
More informationE*TRADE Financial Corporation a Delaware corporation (the Company ) Audit Committee Charter (as of May 10, 2018)
E*TRADE Financial Corporation a Delaware corporation (the Company ) Audit Committee Charter (as of May 10, 2018) A. Purpose The purpose of the Audit Committee (the Committee ) of the Board of Directors
More informationCIT Group Inc. Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors. Adopted by the Board of Directors October 22, 2003
Last Amended: May 9, 2017 Last Ratified: May 9, 2017 CIT Group Inc. Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors Adopted by the Board of Directors October 22, 2003 I. PURPOSE The purpose of
More informationEMERA INCORPORATED AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER PART I MANDATE AND RESPONSIBILITIES
February 9, 2018 EMERA INCORPORATED PART I MANDATE AND RESPONSIBILITIES Committee Purpose There shall be a committee of the Board of Directors (the Board ) of Emera Inc. ( Emera ) which shall be known
More informationTANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER (adopted with amendments through October 28, 2013)
TANGER FACTORY OUTLET CENTERS, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS CHARTER (adopted 2-24-04 with amendments through October 28, 2013) 1. PURPOSE. The purpose of the Audit Committee (the Committee
More informationInformation Notice I/2016/1
Information Notice I/2016/1 Reporting Company Law Offences by Statutory Auditors under the Companies Act 2014 May 2016 1 Table of Contents Section Subject Pages 1 Introduction 3 2 Duty to report 4-5 3
More informationINDEPENDENCE HOLDING COMPANY CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
INDEPENDENCE HOLDING COMPANY CHARTER OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS PURPOSE The Audit Committee (the Committee ) is appointed by the Board of Directors (the Board ) to assist the Board
More informationTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT The Attorney Conduct Rules (Section 307) DELVACCA Annual General Counsel Forum Union League of Philadelphia
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT The Attorney Conduct Rules (Section 307) DELVACCA Annual General Counsel Forum Union League of Philadelphia September 16, 2003 Section 307 of Sarbanes-Oxley: OVERVIEW Requires the
More informationProper Business Practices and Ethics Policy
Proper Business Practices and Ethics Policy Synopsis 1. Crown Castle International Corp. ( Crown Castle ) and its affiliates 1 strive to conduct their business with honesty and integrity and in accordance
More informationOffice of the Commissioner of Lobbying Ottawa, Ontario September 24, The Lobbyists Code of Conduct A Consultation Paper
Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying Ottawa, Ontario September 24, 2013 The Lobbyists Code of Conduct A Consultation Paper INTRODUCTION The Lobbying Act (the Act) gives the Commissioner of Lobbying
More informationFREDDIE MAC S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES
FREDDIE MAC S CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES The Board of Directors (the Board ) of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ( Freddie Mac or the Company ) has adopted the Corporate Governance Guidelines
More informationANTI-BRIBERY & CORRUPTION POLICY
GABRIEL RESOURCES LIMITED ANTI-BRIBERY & CORRUPTION POLICY 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Board of Directors of Gabriel Resources Ltd. 1 (the Company or "Gabriel") has determined that, on the recommendation of
More informationADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED. Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors I. PURPOSE This Charter specifies the scope of the responsibilities of the Audit Committee (the Committee ) of the Board
More informationSELECT ILLINOIS RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT
ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT COMMISSION ON PROFESSIONALISM The Buck Stops Here: Ethics and Professionalism for In-House Counsel SELECT ILLINOIS RULES OF PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT The Rules listed below are those
More information4. To act as the audit committee for any federally chartered Canadian financial institution beneficially owned by the Bank as determined by the Board.
CHARTER AUDIT COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (the Committee ) has the responsibilities and duties as outlined below: AUDIT
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE MANDATE
AUDIT COMMITTEE MANDATE Last updated December 13, 2016 I. PURPOSE The Audit Committee (the Committee ) is appointed by the Board of Directors (the Board ) of Encana Corporation (the Corporation ) to assist
More informationGOLD FIELDS LIMITED. ( GFI or the Company ) AUDIT COMMITTEE. ( the Committee ) TERMS OF REFERENCE
GOLD FIELDS LIMITED ( GFI or the Company ) AUDIT COMMITTEE ( the Committee ) TERMS OF REFERENCE (Approved by the Board of Directors on 16 August 2016) 2 1. AUTHORITY AND FORMATION 1.1. The Committee is
More informationROYAL BANK OF CANADA ADMINISTRATIVE RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ROYAL BANK OF CANADA
Charters of committees of Board of Directors of Royal Bank of Canada Excerpted from ROYAL BANK OF CANADA ADMINISTRATIVE RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF ROYAL BANK OF CANADA (hereinafter
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES 1. Director Qualifications The Board will have a substantial majority of directors who meet the criteria for independence required by the New York Stock Exchange. The Committee
More informationTechnology and the Threat to the Attorney- Client Privilege Suzanne Valdez
Technology and the Threat to the Attorney- Client Privilege Suzanne Valdez May 17-18, 2018 University of Kansas School of Law Technology and the Threat to the Attorney-Client Privilege Recent Developments
More informationThe attorney-client privilege
BY TIMOTHY J. MILLER AND ANDREW P. SHELBY TIMOTHY J. MILLER is partner and general counsel at Novack and Macey LLP. As co-chair of the firm s legal malpractice defense group, he represents law firms and
More informationCREE, INC. Audit Committee Charter. The Audit Committee (the Committee ) is a standing committee of the Board of Directors appointed:
CREE, INC. As Approved January 28, 2014 Audit Committee Charter Purpose The Audit Committee (the Committee ) is a standing committee of the Board of Directors appointed: Composition for the purpose of
More informationThe New DOJ Cooperation Standards: Do New Standards Change Anything?
PROGRAM MATERIALS Program #1875 September 16, 2008 The New DOJ Cooperation Standards: Do New Standards Change Anything? Copyright 2008 by Thomas O. Gorman, Esq. All Rights Reserved. Licensed to Celesq,
More informationDue Diligence: The Sentencing Guidelines and the Lawyer s Role in Corporate Compliance and Ethics Programs. by Steven Carr
Due Diligence: The Sentencing Guidelines and the Lawyer s Role in Corporate Compliance and Ethics Programs by Steven Carr North Carolina Bar Foundation Continuing Legal Education December 9, 2005 Due Diligence:
More informationAudit Committee Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of JetBlue Airways Corporation
Audit Committee Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of JetBlue Airways Corporation Purpose The purpose of the committee is to oversee on behalf of JetBlue Airways Corporation's (the
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER Mission Statement The primary purpose of the Audit Committee (the Committee ) of the Board of Directors (the Board ) of Alcoa Corporation (the Company ) is: (A) to assist the Board
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER Purpose The Audit Committee ( Committee ) shall assist the Board of Directors (the Board ) in the oversight of (1) the integrity of the financial statements of the Company, (2)
More informationAMEREN CORPORATION CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES
AMEREN CORPORATION CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES The Board of Directors (the Board ) of Ameren Corporation (the Company ) has adopted the following Corporate Governance Guidelines (the Guidelines ) to
More informationHCA HEALTHCARE, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES BOARD OF DIRECTORS
As amended and approved, effective on January 23, 2018 HCA HEALTHCARE, INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES The Board of Directors (the Board ) of HCA Healthcare, Inc. (the Company or HCA ) has adopted
More informationCHARTER of the AUDIT COMMITTEE of DOVER CORPORATION
CHARTER of the AUDIT COMMITTEE of DOVER CORPORATION The Board of Directors of Dover Corporation (the Company ) has adopted and approved this Charter, setting forth the purpose, responsibilities, authority
More informationYUM! Brands, Inc. Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors
YUM! Brands, Inc. Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors (As Amended and Restated Effective as of November 22, 2013) I. Name There will be a committee of the Board of Directors (the "Board")
More informationSEC Investigations. A Guide for Public Company Directors, Officers, and In-House Counsel
SEC Investigations A Guide for Public Company Directors, Officers, and In-House Counsel Table of Contents Introduction...1 Overview of SEC Investigations...2 Summary of Potentially Applicable Statutes...3
More informationTHE PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION) ACT
THE PUBLIC INTEREST DISCLOSURE (WHISTLEBLOWER PROTECTION) ACT Provision PART 1 PURPOSE AND DEFINITIONS Purpose of this Act 1 The purpose of this Act is (a) to facilitate the disclosure and investigation
More informationWHAT TO DO TO START PREPARING FOR DISCOVERY
Managing the Early Stages of Commercial Litigation: Critical First Steps WHAT TO DO TO START PREPARING FOR DISCOVERY Michael Feagley, Partner 312.701.7065 mfeagley@mayerbrown.com Terri Mazur, Partner 212.506.2680
More informationCHARTER of the AUDIT COMMITTEE of APERGY CORPORATION
CHARTER of the AUDIT COMMITTEE of APERGY CORPORATION The Board of Directors (the Board ) of Apergy Corporation (the Company ) has adopted and approved this Charter, setting forth the purpose, responsibilities,
More informationThe gist of MRPC 1.9 is that, even after
Focus on Professional Responsibility Conflicts of Interest The Basics By John W. Allen John W. Allen, chairperson of the State Bar of Michigan s Standing Committee on Professional and Judicial Ethics,
More informationChapter-21. Corporate Governance
Chapter-21 Corporate Governance BSNL, India For Internal Circulation Only 1 Meaning of Corporate Governance Corporate Governance refers to the manner, in which a Corporation is directed, and laws and customs
More informationCHARTER THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA AUDIT AND CONDUCT REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD
CHARTER THE BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA AUDIT AND CONDUCT REVIEW COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD The Audit and Conduct Review Committee of the Board of Directors (the Committee ) has the responsibilities and duties as
More informationWhat Keeps You Up at Night?
What Keeps You Up at Night? Issues of Fraud and Abuse Compliance Series Keeping In House Out of the Doghouse Invoking the Attorney- Client Privilege 37 Offices in 18 Countries 2 Keeping In House Out of
More informationDell Technologies Inc. Corporate Governance Principles. Ethics and Values. Roles of Board and Management
Dell Technologies Inc. Corporate Governance Principles The Board of Directors (the "Board") of Dell Technologies Inc. ("the Company") is committed to the achievement of business success and the enhancement
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER of the Audit Committee of ACCURAY INCORPORATED. (As amended and restated by the Board of Directors effective July 1, 2016)
AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER of the Audit Committee of ACCURAY INCORPORATED (As amended and restated by the Board of Directors effective July 1, 2016) I. Purpose The purpose of the Audit Committee (the Committee
More informationPreparing the Lawyer to Be the Witness
Preparing the Lawyer to Be the Witness Presented by Sam Ramer (Counsel and VP, Government Relations, Symplicity Corporation), Leslie B. Kiernan (Partner, Akin Gump), Kristine L. Sendek-Smith (Partner,
More informationCHIPPEWA CREE TRIBE TITLE34 ATTORNEYS AND LAYS ADVOCATE CODE.
CHIPPEWA CREE TRIBE TITLE34 ATTORNEYS AND LAYS ADVOCATE CODE. ATTORNEYSANDLAYADVOCATE Rule 1.1 Qualifications for admissions as Attorney or Lay Advocate A. Attorneys- No person may practice as an attorney
More informationBlackstone Real Estate Income Trust, Inc.
10-K/A 1 d586373d10ka.htm FORM 10-K/A UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) (Mark One) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
More informationLegal Ethics Issues for Compliance Officers
Legal Ethics Issues for Compliance Officers April 26, 2018 Hruska Law Center Lincoln, NE This page intentionally left blank. Faculty Bios Paul McGreal, J.D., joined Creighton University School of Law on
More informationHANDLING A REGULATORY INVESTIGATION II FA-3
SIFMA COMPLIANCE AND LEGAL DIVISION 2010 ANNUAL SEMINAR NATIONAL HARBOR, MARYLAND May 5 May 7, 2010 HANDLING A REGULATORY INVESTIGATION II FA-3 Elaine Mandelbaum, Esq. (Moderator) Citigroup Corporate and
More informationU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Boston, MA
[S-3] SEC Enforcement Chair: Mitchell E. Herr Holland & Knight Miami, FL Panelists: LeeAnn Gaunt Peter K.M. Chan Kenneth R. Artin U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Boston, MA Morgan Lewis Chicago,
More informationCORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES OF AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP, INC.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES OF AIR TRANSPORT SERVICES GROUP, INC. The Board of Directors has adopted the following Guidelines to help it fulfill its responsibility to stockholders to oversee the work
More informationAUDIT COMMITTEE SLM CORPORATION AND SALLIE MAE BANK CHARTER
Approved: September 7, 2017 AUDIT COMMITTEE SLM CORPORATION AND SALLIE MAE BANK CHARTER PURPOSE The Audit Committee (the Committee ) has been appointed by the Board of Directors (the Company Board ) of
More informationASC NOTICE OF CHANGES TO ASC POLICY CREDIT FOR EXEMPLARY COOPERATION IN ENFORCEMENT MATTERS
ASC NOTICE OF CHANGES TO ASC POLICY 15-601 CREDIT FOR EXEMPLARY COOPERATION IN ENFORCEMENT MATTERS May 4, 2018 Introduction The Alberta Securities Commission (ASC) is adopting changes (Changes) to ASC
More informationOBJECTS AND REASONS. Arrangement of Sections PART I. Preliminary PART II. Licensing Requirements for International Service Providers
1 OBJECTS AND REASONS This Bill would provide for the regulation of the providers of international corporate and trust services and for related matters. Section 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Application
More informationGREENWOOD HALL, INC.
I. PURPOSE This Charter governs the operations and organization of the Audit Committee (the Committee ) of Greenwood Hall, Inc. (the Company ). The Committee is created by the Board of Directors of the
More informationUNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C FORM 10 Q/A. Amendment No. 1
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10 Q/A Amendment No. 1 QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly
More informationBrown & Brown, Inc. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
Brown & Brown, Inc. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER I. Organization and Purpose of the Audit Committee The Audit Committee (the "Committee") is a committee of the Board of Directors ("Board") of Brown & Brown,
More informationREPORTING COMPANY LAW OFFENCES. Information for auditors
REPORTING COMPANY LAW OFFENCES Information for auditors September 2009 The Institute of Certified Public Accountants in Ireland ODCE Information Notice I/2009/4 REPORTING COMPANY LAW OFFENCES Information
More informationHCA HEALTHCARE, INC. AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER
As amended and approved, effective on January 23, 2018 HCA HEALTHCARE, INC. AUDIT AND COMPLIANCE COMMITTEE CHARTER Purpose The primary purposes of the Audit and Compliance Committee (the Committee ) of
More informationETHICS ISSUES FOR PUBLIC ATTORNEYS
ETHICS ISSUES FOR PUBLIC ATTORNEYS Patrick R. Burns First Assistant Director Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility 1500 Landmark Towers 345 St. Peter St. St. Paul, MN 55102 651-296-3952 http://lprb.mncourts.gov
More informationALLOT COMMUNICATIONS LTD.
ALLOT COMMUNICATIONS LTD. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER May, 2017 A. PURPOSE The purpose of the Audit Committee (the Committee ) of the Board of Directors (the Board ) of Allot Communications Ltd., an Israeli
More informationThe Cooper Companies, Inc. Audit Committee Charter
The Cooper Companies, Inc. Audit Committee Charter Revision History DATE REVISION 16 Dec 2003 Original Approval and Adoption 14 Dec 2006 Updated to include Internal Audit Oversight 27 Oct 2011 Updated
More informationETHICS IN DEPENDENCY PRACTICE FOR GUARDIAN AD LITEM ATTORNEYS AND ATTORNEYS AD LITEM. Striving for Excellence
1 ETHICS IN DEPENDENCY PRACTICE FOR GUARDIAN AD LITEM ATTORNEYS AND ATTORNEYS AD LITEM Striving for Excellence Objectives 2 Identify ethical issues in dependency practice for GAL attorneys and Attorneys
More informationCoreLogic, Inc. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER
CoreLogic, Inc. AUDIT COMMITTEE CHARTER (As amended, effective December 6, 2016) The Board of Directors ( Board ) of CoreLogic, Inc. ( Company ) has adopted this charter for its Audit Committee (the Committee
More informationAmended and Restated Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc.
Amended and Restated Charter of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Sally Beauty Holdings, Inc. As Adopted by the Board of Directors August 27, 2012 This Charter sets forth, among other things,
More informationECOLAB INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES
ECOLAB INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES DIRECTORS Composition and Qualifications No more than two Board members shall be from current Management. These Management members normally would be the Chief
More informationCode of Ethics Permanent Rule- Chapter 6 Supersedes: 3/20/2014, 3/12/2015, and 12/10/2015 Date of Board Approval: 04/12/2018
Code of Ethics Permanent Rule- Chapter 6 Supersedes: 3/20/2014, 3/12/2015, and 12/10/2015 Date of Board Approval: 04/12/2018 CENTRAL FLORIDA EXPRESSWAY AUTHORITY CODE OF ETHICS The Central Florida Expressway
More informationWHAT S HAPPENING TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE?
WHAT S HAPPENING TO THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE? PROPOSED FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 502 THE ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE PROTECTION ACT OF 2007 THE MCNULTY MEMORANDUM DABNEY CARR
More informationThe McNulty Memorandum Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations
The McNulty Memorandum Principles of Federal Prosecution of Business Organizations Gabriel L. Imperato, Esq.//Broad and Cassel Fort Lauderdale, Florida Judith Waltz, Esq.//Foley and Lardner LLP San Francisco,
More information1. Role of the Board of Directors ( The Board ) and Director Responsibilities
April 26, 2018 1. Role of the Board of Directors ( The Board ) and Director Responsibilities The role of the Board is to oversee the management of the Corporation and to represent the interests of all
More informationAMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES
AMERICAN AIRLINES GROUP INC. CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES As adopted by the Board of Directors and last amended on January 25, 2017 As set forth in the Certificate of Incorporation (as amended from
More informationWHISTLEBLOWER POLICY. FOR DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES Amended March 1, 2011
WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY FOR DIRECTORS, OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES Amended March 1, 2011 WHISTLEBLOWER POLICY AMENDED MARCH 1, 2011 This Whistleblower Policy of J.B. Hunt Transport Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries
More informationNeurocrine Biosciences, Inc. Corporate Governance Guidelines
Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. Corporate Governance Guidelines The following Guidelines were adopted by the Board of Directors of Neurocrine Biosciences, Inc. on September 3, 2015 I. Purpose. The purpose
More informationSYSCO CORPORATION CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES
Approved May 25, 2017 SYSCO CORPORATION CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES The following guidelines have been approved by the Board of Directors (the Board ) of Sysco Corporation ( Sysco or the Company )
More information