The Public Interest and Prosecutions
|
|
- Arline Rich
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Public Interest and Prosecutions Gordon Anthony * Introduction 1. This is a short paper about the public interest and how the term is used in the context of prosecutorial decision-making. It develops three main points. The first is that the term has multiple uses in public law and that these set the background for understanding more specific uses of the term in relation to prosecutions. The second (well known) point is that the decision whether it is in the public interest to bring a particular prosecution is a matter for the Public Prosecution Service (PPS) acting under the authority of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). 1 Such decisions are taken in the light of a corresponding Code for Prosecutors 2, and the courts have long emphasized that they are reluctant to interfere with decisions taken under that Code and/or related statutory provisions. 3 This is thus the third point to be made: that it is only in the most extreme of circumstances that the choices of the PPS/DPP will be interfered with by the courts The paper begins with some general comments on the idea of the public interest and the different ways in which it can be used in public law. It then notes some of the public interest considerations that are contained in the Code for Prosecutors and explains how those are factored into the decision-making processes of the PPS/DPP. The commentary under the final heading returns to the point about the courts reluctance to engage in the review of the choices of the PPS/DPP. The multiple uses of the public interest 3. Perhaps the first comment that should be made about the public interest is that it is a term that escapes precise definition. Although the term is in common usage in law and politics, it is widely recognized that the public interest is a vague term that can (arguably) mean anything or nothing at one and the same time. 5 At a * Professor of Public Law, Queen s University Belfast; Barrister-at-Law. 1 Justice (Northern Ireland) Act 2002, ss The Code is available through 3 See, e.g., Re Shuker s Application [2004] NI E.g., Re Cranston s Application [2001] NIQB 40 (PPS decision to prefer certain charges was an abuse of process). 5 For an overview of debates see B Bozeman, Public Values and Public Interest (Georgetown University Press, Washington, 2007) ch 1. 1
2 philosophical level, it is sometimes also said that the public interest presupposes the existence of a political community with one bloc interest which can be safeguarded by governmental decision-making. For some commentators, this means that the idea of the public interest is essentially anti-democratic because it assumes that the legitimate interests of individuals can indeed, should be subject to the invented wishes of a majority community. Other commentators have taken a less hostile view when suggesting that different individuals will often have shared interests and that these can be pooled within some broader notion of the public interest Whatever the strengths or weaknesses of such arguments, the public interest occupies a central place in much of public law. What follows are some of the main and not always complementary ways in which the term can be used: i. The public interest in upholding the rule of law. The courts have used this to justify the expansion of judicial review and, for instance, to allow pressure groups to bring proceedings in court. 7 ii. iii. iv. Public decision-makers take decisions in the public interest. It is sometimes said that public bodies do not have interests of their own and that they make decisions altruistically and on behalf of the public. An example of such a decision-maker would be the PPS/DPP. 8 There is a public interest in protecting fundamental rights. The point here is that rights can act as a brake on governmental power and that this, in itself, is a good thing. An example would the public interest in freedom of expression, as that allows individuals to critique public decision-makers and thereby (potentially) to hold them to account. 9 There can be a public interest justification for limiting fundamental rights. Notwithstanding point iii, above, the common law and the European Convention on Human Rights also recognise that the wider interests of the community may mean that some individual rights should be limited. An example is the right to privacy, which may be limited for reason of, among other things, the prevention of crime See further V Held, The Public Interest and Individual Interests (Basic Books, New York, 1970). 7 E.g., R v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, ex p World Development Movement Ltd [1995] 1 WLR On such ideas see further D Oliver, Psychological Constitutionalism (2010) 69 Cambridge Law Journal 639, Derbyshire CC v Times Newspaper Ltd [1993] AC See Art 8(2) ECHR. 2
3 v. It is in the public interest to limit the liability of the police when they are investigating crime. This has been a highly controversial point in the case law, as it has meant that the families of deceased individuals have been unable to sue the police even when there have been credible allegations of police negligence. The corresponding justification has been one of public policy: the vital police function of the investigating crime which benefits wider society would be undermined if finite resources were diverted so as to defend legal proceedings. 11 vi. Public interest immunity. This is a rule of evidence whereby a public body asks a court or tribunal to exclude from the proceedings before it certain material that is held by the public body. It has long been a controversial rule, and the courts do not lightly accede to requests for evidence to be suppressed. The rule exists as a further outworking of point iv, above, as it limits aspects of the individual s right to a fair trial (guaranteed at common law and under Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights). 12 The public interest and prosecutorial decisions 5. Of course, the central focus of this paper is the role that the public interest plays in prosecutorial decision-making. As has already been seen above at point 2.ii, the PPS/DPP is a public body and should, in that broader sense, be motivated solely by serving the public interest. However, in the particular setting of prosecutorial decisions, the public interest also plays a much more elaborate role within the test that the PPS/DPP uses when deciding whether to proceed with criminal charges. Here, the Code for Prosecutors requires the PPS/DPP to ask whether there is sufficient evidence to provide a reasonable prospect of conviction and, if so, whether the public interest requires prosecution. 13 While a decision not to prosecute will be inevitable where there is insufficient evidence to support charges, the matter is more complex when there is sufficient evidence but the PPS/DPP decides that it would not be in the public interest to proceed. In that instance, the PPS/DPP is exercising a very wide discretion, and one that the courts are reluctant to intrude upon (see paragraphs 7 9, below). 6. The question of when the public interest will militate against prosecution is not left unaddressed in the Code for Prosecutors, which contains an indicative list of considerations that may lead the PPS/DPP to make a no prosecution order. The Code s starting point, here, is the presumption is that the public interest requires 11 See, most famously, Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire [1989] AC For recent consideration of the rule see Al-Rawi v Security Services [2012] 1 AC See the Code for Prosecutors, at sections
4 prosecution where there has been a contravention of the criminal law In some instances the serious nature of the case will make the presumption a very strong one (the Code then lists public interest considerations that would favour prosecution 14 ). However, the Code also notes that there may be circumstances in which prosecution is not required in the public interest. Some of the corresponding reasons, listed at paragraph of the Code, are: i. Where the court is likely to impose a very small or nominal penalty. ii. iii. iv. Where the loss or harm can be described as minor and was the result of a single incident, particularly if it was caused by an error of judgement or a genuine mistake. Where the offence is not of a serious nature and is unlikely to be repeated. Where there has been long passage of time between an offence taking place and the likely date of trial unless: (a) the offence is serious; (b) delay has been caused in part by the defendant; (c) the offence has only recently come to light; or (d) the complexity of the offence has resulted in a lengthy investigation. v. Where a prosecution is likely to have a detrimental effect on the physical or mental health of a victim or witness, particularly where they have been put in fear. vi. vii. viii. ix. Where the defendant is elderly or where the defendant is a child or a young person. Where the defendant was at the time of the offence or trial suffering from significant mental or physical ill-health. Where the defendant has put right the loss or harm that was caused (although defendants must not be able to avoid prosecution simply because they pay compensation). Where the recovery of the proceeds of crime can more effectively be pursued by civil action brought by the Serious Organised Crime Agency. 14 These include i. the seriousness of the offence i.e. where a conviction is likely to result in a significant penalty; ii. where the defendant was in a position of authority or trust and the offence is an abuse of that position; iii. where the defendant was a ringleader or an organiser of the offence; iv. where the offence was premeditated; v. where the offence was carried out by a group; vi. where the offence was carried out pursuant to a plan in pursuit of organised crime; vii. where the offence involved the possession or use of a firearm, imitation firearm or other weapon such as a knife; and viii. where the offence was motivated by hostility against a person because of their race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, disability, religion, political beliefs, age or the like. 4
5 x. Where details may be made public that could harm sources of information, international relations or national security. The judicial control of prosecutorial decisions 7. The fact that the PPS/DPP enjoys a wide discretion under the Code has been noted in many cases, where the courts have said that judicial intervention will be rare in the extreme 15 and sparingly exercised 16. It is to emphasized that this does not mean that the PPS/DPP occupies a more generally privileged position within the criminal justice system, as the courts will be rigorous in ensuring that the PPS/DPP observes all laws of evidence etc within the context of the criminal trial. However, where the courts will exercise restraint is in the context of judicial review proceedings that challenge a decision whether or not to prosecute, as the courts consider that the PPS/DPP is best placed to evaluate all relevant information and to reconcile the interests of the victim with those of the accused and the wider public interest. This triangulation of interests is understood to bring a considerable degree of complexity to the role of the PPS/DPP, and the courts have therefore said that intervention by way of judicial review can be expected to be very much the exception rather than the rule. As Lord Steyn said in Kebeline: I would rule that absent dishonesty or mala fides or exceptional circumstances, the decision of the Director to consent to the prosecution of the applicants is not amenable to judicial review This imperative of self-restraint can be seen in two well-known cases that, while not concerned with the Code for Prosecutors, arose in analogous prosecutorial/investigative settings. The first is Re Shuker s Application 18, which concerned a challenge to a decision of the Attorney-General whereby he had elected not to de-schedule charges that had been brought against the applicant under the Terrorism Act 2000 (this meant that the applicant would be tried without a jury). The applicant challenged the decision on a range of grounds, which included a breach of the rules of procedural fairness. An initial question for the Divisional Court was whether the decision of the Attorney-General was even justiciable, as counsel for the Attorney-General had argued that the choice at hand was not open to judicial scrutiny. While the Divisional Court was not willing to accept that argument in its entirety, it did accept that the Attorney-General had a very broad discretion and that the Court should be slow to intervene in the decision-making process. Moreover, on the argument that there had been a breach of the rules of procedural fairness notably of the applicant s right to be heard in advance of the Attorney-General s 15 R v Inland Revenue Commissioners, ex parte Mead [1993] 1 All ER 772, R v DPP, ex p C [1995] 1 Crim App R 136, R v DPP, ex p Kebeline [2000] 2 AC 326, [2004] NI
6 decision being taken the Court held that such grounds for review did not apply in the given context. As Kerr LCJ (as he then was) put it: Ultimately the question whether the Attorney General should be subject to judicial review in respect of decisions about de-scheduling must be answered in a way that takes account of the particular features of this process of decision-making. We have concluded that it is not a process which is suitable for the full panoply of judicial review superintendence. In particular, we do not consider that the decision is amenable to review on the basis that it failed to comply with the requirements of procedural fairness. The exercise involved in deciding whether offences should be de-scheduled is in some respects akin to the decision whether to prosecute. It involves the evaluation of material that will frequently be of a sensitive nature and the assessment of recommendations made by or on behalf of the Director of Public Prosecutions based on his appraisal of matters that may not be admissible in evidence or whose disclosure would be against the public interest. This is par excellence a procedure on which the courts should be reluctant to intrude. It is, moreover, a task that has been entrusted by Parliament to the Attorney General and while this will not in all circumstances render judicial review impermissible, it signifies a further reason for reticence The other case is R (Corner House Research) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office. 20 The applicant challenged a decision of the Director whereby he had discontinued an investigation into allegations of corruption in BAE System s dealings with officials in Saudi Arabia. The investigation had been commenced on the basis of the Director s powers under section 1(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 1987 as read with sections of the Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (the latter provisions giving effect to the UK s obligations under the OECD Convention on Combatting Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions, 1997). 21 As the investigation progressed, the Saudi authorities made an explicit threat that they would withdraw cooperation with the UK on matters of anti-terrorism, and there were very real concerns within the UK government that this would put British lives on British streets at risk. The Director s decision to discontinue was therefore taken with reference to the public interest in public safety, and Corner House challenged that decision with reference to the competing public interest in upholding the rule of law (on which see 2.i, above). The applicant initially succeeded in the Divisional Court, which held that the Director had acted unlawfully by, in effect, surrendering his discretion in the face of the Saudi threat. However, the House of Lords allowed the Director s appeal. Having noted the breadth of the discretion that is generally entrusted to public prosecutors under UK law, the House of Lords emphasized again the limited role that the courts should play when 19 [2004] NI 367, And for subsequent application of Shuker see Re Arthurs Application [2010} NIQB [2009] 1 AC See now the Bribery Act
7 decisions are challenged by way of judicial review. The House also noted that the facts of the case had placed the Director in an impossible situation and that he had been entitled, in law, to make the decision to discontinue. As Lord Bingham expressed it: The Director was confronted by an ugly and obviously unwelcome threat. He had to decide what, if anything, he should do The issue in these proceedings is not whether his decision was right or wrong but whether it was a decision which the Director was lawfully entitled to make In the opinion of the House the Director s decision was one he was lawfully entitled to make. It may indeed be doubted whether a responsible decision-maker could, on the facts before the Director, have decided otherwise. 22 Conclusion 10. This paper has provided a short account of how the term the public interest is used in the context of prosecutorial decision-making. It has emphasized that the PPS/DPP has a broad discretion when making decisions about whether to prosecute. While the corresponding decisions of the office may sometimes prove (politically) controversial, this does not mean that the decisions are also unlawful. On the contrary, the case law has established that it is only in the most extreme circumstances that a prosecutorial choice will be reviewed by the courts, for instance where a decision is vitiated by dishonesty or bad faith. In the absence of that, it is clear that day-to-day decisions about the public interest have been entrusted to the PPS/DPP. 22 [2009] 1 AC 756, 844-4, paras
Your Ref: The Director
Direct Dial: 020 7650 1248 Email: jbeagent@leighday.co.uk Mr Robert Wardle Your Ref: The Director Our Ref: RS/JB/CAAT Serious Fraud Office Date: 18 th December 2006 Elm House 10-16 Elm Street London WC1X
More informationBRIBERY ACT 2010: JOINT PROSECUTION GUIDANCE OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE AND THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
BRIBERY ACT 2010: JOINT PROSECUTION GUIDANCE OF THE DIRECTOR OF THE SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE AND THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS Contents Introduction The Act in its wider context The legal framework Transitional
More informationCouncil meeting 15 September 2011
Council meeting 15 September 2011 Public business GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) Recommendation: The Council is asked to agree the GPhC prosecution policy (England and Wales) at Appendix 1.
More informationDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS INTERIM GUIDELINES ON THE HANDLING OF CASES WHERE THE JURISDICTION TO PROSECUTE IS SHARED WITH PROSECUTING AUTHORITIES OVERSEAS (The Guidelines) INTRODUCTION 1. Investigators
More informationOPINION. Relevant provisions of the Draft Bill
OPINION 1. I have been asked to advise as to whether sections 12-15 (and relevant related sections) of the Draft Constitutional Renewal Bill are constitutional, such that they are compatible with the UK
More informationGRENADA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GRENADA AND THE WEST INDIES ASSOCIATED STATES HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) AND
'. GRENADA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GRENADA AND THE WEST INDIES ASSOCIATED STATES HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE (CIVIL) CLAIM NO. GDAHCV2010/0551 BETWEEN: KERTBRIZAN AND Applicant DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
More information29 September To Our Clients and Friends:
THE DRAFT BRIBERY BILL 29 September 2009 To Our Clients and Friends: At a moment when the U.K. Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has announced its first ever successful prosecution for corporate bribery in the
More informationPROPOSED REFORMS TO JUDGE-ALONE TRIALS IN THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY
251 MANU JAIRETH [(2011) PROPOSED REFORMS TO JUDGE-ALONE TRIALS IN THE AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY MANU JAIRETH POSTSCRIPT: On 17 February 2011 the ACT Government introduced the Criminal Proceedings Legislation
More information5.9 PRIVATE PROSECUTIONS
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS GUIDELINE OF THE DIRECTOR ISSUED UNDER SECTION 3(3)(c) OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS ACT March 1, 2014 -2- TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION... 2
More informationData Protection Bill [HL]
[AS AMENDED IN PUBLIC BILL COMMITTEE] CONTENTS PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1 Overview 2 Protection of personal data 3 Terms relating to the processing of personal data PART 2 GENERAL PROCESSING CHAPTER 1 SCOPE
More informationThe Code. for Crown Prosecutors
The Code for Crown Prosecutors January 2013 Introduction 1.1 The Code for Crown Prosecutors (the Code) is issued by the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) under section 10 of the Prosecution of Offences
More informationTHE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN ARRESTED
THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN ARRESTED A REVIEW OF THE LAW IN NORTHERN IRELAND November 2004 ISBN 1 903681 50 2 Copyright Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission Temple Court, 39 North Street Belfast
More informationANTI-TERRORISM AND CRIME ACT 2003 Chapter 6
Copyright Treasury of the Isle of Man Crown Copyright reserved See introductory page for restrictions on copying and reproduction ANTI-TERRORISM AND CRIME ACT 2003 Chapter 6 Arrangement of sections PART
More informationSection 37 of the NSW ICAC Act
Silent Corruption Section 37 of the NSW ICAC Act 24 April 2009 Mark Polden Level 9, 299 Elizabeth Street, Sydney NSW 2000 DX 643 Sydney Phone: 61 2 8898 6500 Fax: 61 2 8898 6555 www.piac.asn.au Introduction
More informationPOLICE (DETENTION AND BAIL) BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES
POLICE (DETENTION AND BAIL) BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. These Explanatory Notes relate to the Police (Detention and Bail) Bill as brought from the House of Commons on 7th July 2011. They have
More informationDisclosure: Responsibilities of a Prosecuting Authority
Disclosure: Responsibilities of a Prosecuting Authority Julie Norris A. Introduction The rules of most professional disciplinary bodies are silent as to the duties and responsibilities vested in the regulatory
More informationSubmission on Theft, Fraud and Bribery and related offences in the Criminal Code
Submission on Theft, Fraud and Bribery and related offences in the Criminal Code Simon Bronitt and Miriam Gani Faculty of Law, ANU 31 October 2003 In broad terms, we are supportive of the ACT government's
More informationCollins, J., & Ashworth, A. (2016). Householders, Self-Defence and the Right to Life. Law Quarterly Review, 132,
Collins, J., & Ashworth, A. (2016). Householders, Self-Defence and the Right to Life. Law Quarterly Review, 132, 377-382. Peer reviewed version License (if available): CC BY-NC Link to publication record
More informationThe City of London Law Society Competition Law Committee
The City of London Law Society Competition Law Committee RESPONSE TO THE COMPETITION AND MARKETS AUTHORITY CONSULTATION ON THE CARTEL OFFENCE PROSECUTION GUIDANCE AND TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS, INFORMATION
More informationINVESTIGATION OF ELECTRONIC DATA PROTECTED BY ENCRYPTION ETC DRAFT CODE OF PRACTICE
INVESTIGATION OF ELECTRONIC DATA PROTECTED BY ENCRYPTION ETC CODE OF PRACTICE Preliminary draft code: This document is circulated by the Home Office in advance of enactment of the RIP Bill as an indication
More informationHuman Trafficking (Further Provisions and Support for Victims) Bill [HL]
Human Trafficking (Further Provisions and Support for Victims) Bill [HL] CONTENTS PART 1 OFFENCES Offences and aggravating factors 1 Human trafficking offences 2 Aggravating factors 3 Amendments to the
More informationThe Mental Health of Children and Young People in Northern Ireland
The Mental Health of Children and Young People in Northern Ireland In Northern Ireland over 20% of children under 18 years of age suffer significant mental health problems 2012/13 7.9% of the mental health
More information1. Why did the UK set up a system of special advocates:
THE UK EXPERIENCE OF SPECIAL ADVOCATES Sir Nicholas Blake, High Court London NOTE: Nicholas Blake was a barrister who acted as special advocate from 1997 to 2007 when he was appointed a judge of the High
More informationEQUALITY COMMISSION FOR NORTHERN IRELAND
EQUALITY COMMISSION FOR NORTHERN IRELAND Policy for the Provision of Legal Advice And Assistance Equality Commission for Northern Ireland Equality House 7 9 Shaftesbury Square BELFAST BT2 7DP Telephone
More informationPOLICY AGAINST BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION. Introductory Guidance. This policy has been introduced in response to the Bribery Act 2010 ( the Act )
POLICY AGAINST BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION Introductory Guidance This policy has been introduced in response to the Bribery Act 2010 ( the Act ) The Act creates four key offences:- Active bribery (the offence
More informationVictims of Crime Etc (Rights, Entitlements and Related Matters) Bill
Victims of Crime Etc (Rights, Entitlements and Related Matters) Bill CONTENTS 1 Victims 2 Duty to notify police of child sexual abuse 3 Establishment and conduct of homicide reviews 4 Statutory duty on
More informationGOVERNMENT CHALLENGES TO THE RULES ON STANDING IN JUDICIAL REVIEW MEET STRONG AND EFFECTIVE OPPOSITION
GOVERNMENT CHALLENGES TO THE RULES ON STANDING IN JUDICIAL REVIEW MEET STRONG AND EFFECTIVE OPPOSITION R (on the application of O) v Secretary of State for International Development [2014] EWHC 2371 (QB)
More informationIN THE MATTER OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES CHAPTER 2 OF THE LAWS OF SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES REVISED EDITION 1990.
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES HIGH COURT CIVIL CLAIM NO. 41 OF 2008 IN THE MATTER OF THE CONSTITUTION OF SAINT VINCENT AND THE GRENADINES
More informationPSNI Manual of Policy, Procedure and Guidance on Conflict Management. Chapter 1: Legal Basis and Human Rights PB 4/13 18 RESTRICTED
Chapter 1: Legal Basis and Human Rights PB 4/13 18 Chapter 1 PSNI Manual of Policy, Procedure and Guidance on Conflict Management Legal Basis and Human Rights Page No Introduction 20 Context 20 Police
More informationInvestigatory Powers Bill
Investigatory Powers Bill [AS AMENDED ON REPORT] CONTENTS PART 1 GENERAL PRIVACY PROTECTIONS Overview and general privacy duties 1 Overview of Act 2 General duties in relation to privacy Prohibitions against
More informationCODE OF ETHICS FOR THE POLICE SERVICE OF NORTHERN IRELAND
CODE OF ETHICS FOR THE POLICE SERVICE OF NORTHERN IRELAND CODE OF ETHICS FOR THE POLICE SERVICE OF NORTHERN IRELAND This Code will be made available free on request in accessible formats such as in Braille,
More informationCRITIQUE OF THE SARA BILL
CRITIQUE OF THE SARA BILL The principles of state asset recovery, compliance with the UN Convention against Corruption, reduction of crime are commendable. Civil asset forfeiture, while used in an increasing
More informationForce Communications Centre
Force Communications Centre Welfare Checks Policy Version Version 1.1 Policy Version Date 05 April 2018 Policy Review Date 1 st October 2018 Policy Ownership Head of FCC Portfolio Holder Assistant Chief
More informationNumber 28 of Criminal Justice (Victims of Crime) Act 2017
Number 28 of 2017 Criminal Justice (Victims of Crime) Act 2017 Number 28 of 2017 CRIMINAL JUSTICE (VICTIMS OF CRIME) ACT 2017 CONTENTS PART 1 PRELIMINARY Section 1. Short title and commencement 2. Interpretation
More informationTHE LAW COMMISSION SIMPLIFICATION OF CRIMINAL LAW: KIDNAPPING AND RELATED OFFENCES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHILD ABDUCTION
THE LAW COMMISSION SIMPLIFICATION OF CRIMINAL LAW: KIDNAPPING AND RELATED OFFENCES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHILD ABDUCTION PART 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This is one of two summaries of our report on kidnapping and
More informationHuman Trafficking and Exploitation (Further Provisions and Support for Victims) Bill [HL]
Human Trafficking and Exploitation (Further Provisions and Support for Victims) Bill [HL] CONTENTS PART 1 OFFENCES Offences and aggravating factors 1 Human trafficking offences 2 Aggravating factors 3
More informationDonohoe v Ireland: Belief Evidence and the European Court of Human Rights
Donohoe v Ireland: Belief Evidence and the European Court of Human Rights This article shall critically analyses the decision of the European Court of Human Rights ("ECtHR") in Donohoe v Ireland 1 and
More informationInformation Note: United Kingdom (UK) referendum on membership of the European Union (EU) and the Human Rights issues
Information Note: United Kingdom (UK) referendum on membership of the European Union (EU) and the Human Rights issues A referendum on whether the UK should remain in the EU will take place on Thursday
More informationBefore : THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE OF ENGLAND AND WALES LORD JUSTICE GROSS and MR JUSTICE MITTING Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2012] EWCA Crim 2434 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CRIMINAL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM CAMBRIDGE CROWN COURT His Honour Judge Hawksworth T20117145 Before : Case No: 2012/02657 C5 Royal
More informationResponse to the European Commission s proposed European Data Protection Regulation (COM (2012) 11 final) February 2013
Response to the European Commission s proposed European Data Protection Regulation (COM (2012) 11 final) 1 21 February 2013 The Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) supports the statements submitted
More informationCriminal Finances Bill
[AS AMENDED IN PUBLIC BILL COMMITTEE] CONTENTS PART 1 PROCEEDS OF CRIME CHAPTER 1 INVESTIGATIONS Unexplained wealth orders: England and Wales and Northern Ireland 1 Unexplained wealth orders: England and
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF A BAIL APPLICATION. Between MARLON BOODRAM AND THE STATE RULING ON APPLICATION FOR BAIL
REBUPLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF A BAIL APPLICATION Between MARLON BOODRAM AND THE STATE Before the Hon. Mr. Justice Hayden A. St.Clair-Douglas Appearances
More informationAPPELLATE COMMITTEE REPORT. HOUSE OF LORDS SESSION nd REPORT ([2007] UKHL 50)
HOUSE OF LORDS SESSION 2007 08 2nd REPORT ([2007] UKHL 50) on appeal from:[2005] NIQB 85 APPELLATE COMMITTEE Ward (AP) (Appellant) v. Police Service of Northern Ireland (Respondents) (Northern Ireland)
More informationExplanatory Notes to Terrorism Act 2000
Explanatory Notes to Terrorism Act 2000 2000 Chapter 11 Crown Copyright 2000 Explanatory Notes to Acts of the UK Parliament are subject to Crown Copyright protection. They may be reproduced free of charge
More informationinvestigation and that there were no proposals for an effective investigation in the very cases that were the subject of those judgments.
Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission Response to the proposed Coroners (Practice and Procedure) (Amendment) Rules (Northern Ireland) 2002 January 2002 The Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission is
More informationTHE ANTHONY GRAINGER INQUIRY FAMILY S NOTE ON THE LAW ON THE TEST FOR SELF-DEFENCE
THE ANTHONY GRAINGER INQUIRY FAMILY S NOTE ON THE LAW ON THE TEST FOR SELF-DEFENCE 1. For convenience, this note repeats the submissions the family make regarding the test for self-defence at an inquiry,
More informationJoint protocol between Police Scotland and the Crown Office & Procurator Fiscal Service. In partnership challenging domestic abuse
Joint protocol between Police Scotland and the Crown Office & Procurator Fiscal Service In partnership challenging domestic abuse Purpose 1. We recognise that domestic abuse can have a significant and
More informationCERTIFYING AND INVESTIGATING DEATHS IN ENGLAND, WALES AND NORTHERN IRELAND THOMPSONS RESPONSE TO THE REVIEW OF CORONERS
CERTIFYING AND INVESTIGATING DEATHS IN ENGLAND, WALES AND NORTHERN IRELAND THOMPSONS RESPONSE TO THE REVIEW OF CORONERS CONGRESS HOUSE GREAT RUSSELL STREET LONDON WC1B 3LW Telephone: 020 7290 0000 Fax:
More informationIntentional injuries to the person
Intentional injuries to the person Deals with trespass to the person, which has 3 forms: assault, battery and false imprisonment. Each is an individual tort in it s own right. The torts are actionable
More informationTHE BRIBERY ACT 2010 POLICY STATEMENT AND PROCEDURES
THE BRIBERY ACT 2010 POLICY STATEMENT AND PROCEDURES DECEMBER 2011 CONTENTS Page 1. Introduction 2 2. Objective of This Policy 3 3. The Joint Committee s Commitment to Action 3 4. Policy Statement Anti-Bribery
More informationData Protection Bill [HL]
[AS AMENDED IN COMMITTEE] CONTENTS PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1 Overview 2 Terms relating to the processing of personal data PART 2 GENERAL PROCESSING CHAPTER 1 SCOPE AND DEFINITIONS 3 Processing to which this
More informationThe Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 15.b of the Statute of the Council of Europe,
Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)1 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the Council of Europe Probation Rules (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 20 January 2010 at the 1075th meeting of the
More informationGUIDELINES ON PROSECUTING CASES INVOLVING COMMUNCATIONS SENT VIA SOCIAL MEDIA
GUIDELINES ON PROSECUTING CASES INVOLVING COMMUNCATIONS SENT VIA SOCIAL MEDIA Introduction 1. These guidelines set out the approach that prosecutors should take when making decisions in relation to cases
More informationCaribbean Community (CARICOM) Secretariat
The Employment (Equal Opportunity and Treatment ) Act, 1991 : CARICOM model legi... Page 1 of 30 Caribbean Community (CARICOM) Secretariat Back to Model Legislation on Issues Affecting Women CARICOM MODEL
More informationChildren and Young People (Information Sharing) (Scotland) Bill. Response to the call for evidence. Alistair Sloan
Children and Young People (Information Sharing) (Scotland) Bill Response to the call for evidence by Alistair Sloan Introduction [1] This is a formal response to the call for evidence by the Education
More informationKENYA - THE CONSTITUTION
KENYA - THE CONSTITUTION Article 70 Whereas every person in Kenya is entitled to the fundamental rights and freedoms of the individual, that is to say, the right, whatever his race, tribe, place of origin
More informationRules of Procedure and Evidence*
Rules of Procedure and Evidence* Adopted by the Assembly of States Parties First session New York, 3-10 September 2002 Official Records ICC-ASP/1/3 * Explanatory note: The Rules of Procedure and Evidence
More informationProtection, enforcement and prosecutions policy
Protection, enforcement and prosecutions policy northernrail.org Index page 1. Introduction 3 2. General Principles 3 3. Penalty 4 4. Category of Offences 4-5 5. Who Prosecutes 5 6. Juvenile Offenders
More informationClaim No: CO/3214/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT. THE QUEEN on the application of SUSAN WILSON & OTHERS
Claim No: CO/3214/2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT BETWEEN: - THE QUEEN on the application of SUSAN WILSON & OTHERS -and- THE PRIME MINISTER -and- THE ELECTORAL
More informationThe House of Lords looked at the perception of bias and whether such presence breached a defendant's right to fair trial.
The House of Lords in the case of Regina v Abdroikov, Green and Williamson, [2007] UKHL 37 [2007] 1 W.L.R. 2679, decided on 17 October 2007, examined the issue of jury composition, specifically considering
More information-v- (1) SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT. (2) COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OF THE METROPOLIS Respondents
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL B E T W E E N THE QUEEN C1/2014/0607 on the Application of David MIRANDA Appellant -v- (1) SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT (2) COMMISSIONER OF POLICE OF THE METROPOLIS
More informationThe Scope of the Rule of Law and the Prosecutor some general principles and challenges
The Scope of the Rule of Law and the Prosecutor some general principles and challenges It gives me great pleasure to speak today at the 18 th Annual Conference and General Meeting of the International
More informationSerious Crime Bill (HL) Briefing for House of Commons Second Reading
Serious Crime Bill (HL) Briefing for House of Commons Second Reading June 2007 For further information contact: Sally Ireland, Senior Legal Officer (Criminal Justice) Tel: (020) 7762 6414 Email: sireland@justice.org.uk
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT J. WILSON, KARAKATSANIS, AND BRYANT JJ. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Ministry of Attorney General and Toronto Star and Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario, 2010 ONSC 991 DIVISIONAL COURT FILE NO.: 34/09 DATE: 20100326 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL
More informationDecision 156/2011 Mr Ralph Lucas and the University of Glasgow
Information relating to graduating students Reference No: 201000572 Decision Date: 8 August 2011 Kevin Dunion Scottish Information Commissioner Kinburn Castle Doubledykes Road St Andrews KY16 9DS Tel:
More informationJUDGMENT. R v Sally Lane and John Letts (AB and CD) (Appellants)
REPORTING RESTRICTIONS APPLY TO THIS CASE Trinity Term [2018] UKSC 36 On appeal from: [2017] EWCA Crim 129 JUDGMENT R v Sally Lane and John Letts (AB and CD) (Appellants) before Lady Hale, President Lord
More informationFreedom from harm, freedom of speech
Freedom from harm, freedom of speech Implementing No Platform policies This briefing explains these policies and details legal advice on their use in students unions Introduction Most students unions want
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES
21.5.2016 L 132/1 I (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES DIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/800 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 11 May 2016 on procedural safeguards for children who are suspects or accused persons
More informationTHE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT BILL, MEMORANDUM.
BILLS SUPPLEMENT No. 13 17th November, 2006 BILLS SUPPLEMENT to the Uganda Gazette No. 67 Volume XCVIX dated 17th November, 2006. Printed by UPPC, Entebbe by Order of the Government. Bill No. 18 International
More informationCase Note. Carty v London Borough Of Croydon. Andrew Knott. I Context
Case Note Carty v London Borough Of Croydon Andrew Knott Macrossans Lawyers, Brisbane, Australia I Context The law regulating schools, those who work in them, and those who deal with them, involves increasingly
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Baden-Clay [2013] QSC 351 PARTIES: THE QUEEN (Applicant) FILE NO/S: 467 of 2013 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: v GERARD ROBERT BADEN-CLAY (Respondent)
More informationNote on the Cancellation of Refugee Status
Note on the Cancellation of Refugee Status Contents Page I. INTRODUCTION 2 II. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS AND LEGAL PRINCIPLES 3 A. General considerations 3 B. General legal principles 3 C. Opening cancellation
More informationDerbyshire Constabulary SIMPLE CAUTIONING OF ADULT OFFENDERS POLICY POLICY REFERENCE 06/122. This policy is suitable for Public Disclosure
Derbyshire Constabulary SIMPLE CAUTIONING OF ADULT OFFENDERS POLICY POLICY REFERENCE 06/122 This policy is suitable for Public Disclosure Owner of Doc: Head of Department, Criminal Justice Date Approved:
More informationAnnex - Summary of GDPR derogations in the Data Protection Bill
Annex - Summary of GDPR derogations in the Data Protection Bill The majority of the provisions in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) will automatically become UK law on 25 May 2018. However,
More informationCOUNTER-TERRORISM AND SECURITY BILL
COUNTER-TERRORISM AND SECURITY BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. These Explanatory Notes relate to the Counter-Terrorism and Security Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 26 November 2014.
More informationModern Slavery (Victim Support) Bill [HL]
Modern Slavery (Victim Support) Bill [HL] EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Member in charge of the Bill, Lord McColl of Dulwich, are published separately as HL Bill 4 EN.
More informationREGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS
REGULATORY IMPACT ANALYSIS August 2010 Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting victims, repealing Framework
More informationCROSS AND TAPPER ON EVIDENCE
CROSS AND TAPPER ON EVIDENCE Twelfth edition COLIN TAPPER, MA, BCL Emeritus Professor of Law, University of Oxford OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS CONTENTS Preface to the 12th edition v Extractfrom the preface
More informationJUDGMENT. In the matter of an application by Kevin Maguire for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland)
Hilary Term [2018] UKSC 17 On appeal from: [2015] NIQB 4 JUDGMENT In the matter of an application by Kevin Maguire for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) before Lord Kerr Lord Reed Lord Hughes Lady Black
More informationVictims of Crime (Rights, Entitlements, and Notification of Child Sexual Abuse) Bill [HL]
Victims of Crime (Rights, Entitlements, and Notification of Child Sexual Abuse) Bill [HL] CONTENTS 1 Overview 2 Victims 3 Victims code of practice 4 Enforcement of the victims code of practice Area victims
More information2006 No (N.I. 15) NORTHERN IRELAND. The Water and Sewerage Services (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Northern Ireland) Order 2006
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2006 No. 1946 (N.I. 15) NORTHERN IRELAND The Water and Sewerage Services (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Northern Ireland) Order 2006 Made - - - - 19th July 2006 Coming into operation
More informationWho this guidance is for and when it should be used
References to Good medical practice updated in March 2013 Guidance for the Investigation Committee and case examiners when considering allegations about a doctor s involvement in encouraging or assisting
More informationJustice Committee Post-legislative scrutiny of the Police and Fire Reform (Scotland) Act 2012
Justice Committee Post-legislative scrutiny of the Police and Fire Reform (Scotland) Act 2012 Written submission from the Scottish Human Rights Commission The Scottish Human Rights Commission was established
More informationDomestic Violence, Crime and Victims Bill [HL]
[AS AMENDED IN STANDING COMMITTEE E] CONTENTS PART 1 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ETC Amendments to Part 4 of the Family Law Act 1996 1 Breach of non-molestation order to be a criminal offence 2 Additional considerations
More informationFREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST THE ATTORNEY GENERAL S LEGAL ADVICE ON THE IRAQ MILITARY INTERVENTION ADVICE
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST THE ATTORNEY GENERAL S LEGAL ADVICE ON THE IRAQ MILITARY INTERVENTION ADVICE 1. The legal justification for the Government s decision to participate in military action
More informationLEGALActs SUPPLEMENT. THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS ACT 2008 Act No. 32 of 2008 I assent
LEGALActs SUPPLEMENT 2008 497 to the Government Gazette of Mauritius No. 95 of 27 September 2008 THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS ACT 2008 Act No. 32 of 2008 I assent 19 th September 2008 Acting President of the
More informationThe Law Commission BAIL AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 GUIDANCE FOR BAIL DECISION-TAKERS AND THEIR ADVISERS. (LAW COM No 269)
The Law Commission BAIL AND THE HUMAN RIGHTS ACT 1998 (LAW COM No 269) GUIDANCE FOR BAIL DECISION-TAKERS AND THEIR ADVISERS GUIDANCE FOR BAIL DECISION-TAKERS AND THEIR ADVISERS General principles applicable
More informationCES DISCIPLINARY POLICY & PROCEDURE
St. Bridget s Catholic Primary School Mission Statement As a family, we learn, support and care for one another in God s love. We reach for the stars. May your life in this world be a happy one. CES DISCIPLINARY
More informationVan Colle v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Police. Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex [2008] UKHL 50, [2009] 1 AC 225 HL
Van Colle v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Police, Smith v Chief Constable of Sussex [2008] UKHL 50, [2009] 1 AC 225 HL Summary Van Colle v Chief Constable of Hertfordshire Police From September to December
More informationBefore : THE PRESIDENT THE VICE-PRESIDENT MR PETER SCOTT QC (1) MS JENNY PATON (2) C2 (3) C3 (4) C4 (5) C5. and
IN THE INVESTIGATORY POWERS TRIBUNAL Before : Case Nos: IPT/09/01/C IPT/09/02/C IPT/09/03/C IPT/09/04/C IPT/09/05/C Date: 29 July 2010 THE PRESIDENT THE VICE-PRESIDENT SHERIFF PRINCIPAL JOHN McINNES QC
More informationThe course of justice and inquiries exception (regulation 12(5)(b))
ICO lo The course of justice and inquiries exception (regulation 12(5)(b)) Environmental Information Regulations Contents Overview... 2 What the EIR say... 2 General principles of regulation 12(5)(b)...
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2015
CLAIM No. 292 of 2014 BETWEEN: IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2015 IN THE MATTER OF Section 113 of the Supreme Court of Judicature Act, Chapter 91 of the Laws of Belize AND IN THE MATTER OF an Application
More informationin partnership, challenging DOMESTIC ABUSE
in partnership, challenging DOMESTIC ABUSE Joint Protocol Between Association Of Chief Police Officers In Scotland (ACPOS) and Crown Office And Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS) DOMESTIC ABUSE PURPOSE
More informationForced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007
Forced Marriage (Civil Protection) Act 2007 2007 CHAPTER 20 An Act to make provision for protecting individuals against being forced to enter into marriage without their free and full consent and for protecting
More informationCRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH, MINISTRY OF JUSTICE CROWN COUNSEL POLICY MANUAL
CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH, MINISTRY OF JUSTICE CROWN COUNSEL POLICY MANUAL ARCS/ORCS FILE NUMBER: 55100-00 SUBJECT: EFFECTIVE DATE: October 2, 2009 updated March 1, 2018 POLICY CODE: CHA 1 CROSS-REFERENCE:
More informationAnti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill
EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Home Office, are published separately as HL Bill 2 EN. EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Lord Taylor of Holbeach has made the following
More informationBERMUDA JUSTICE PROTECTION ACT : 49
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA JUSTICE PROTECTION ACT 2010 2010 : 49 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Citation Interpretation PART 1 PRELIMINARY PART 2 THE JUSTICE PROTECTION
More informationGuidance on making referrals to Disclosure Scotland
Guidance on making referrals to Disclosure Scotland Introduction 1 This document provides guidance on our power to refer information to Disclosure Scotland (DS) when certain referral grounds are met. The
More informationAnyComms Plus. End User Licence Agreement. Agreement for the provision of data exchange software licence for end users
AnyComms Plus End User Licence Agreement Agreement for the provision of data exchange software licence for end users i March 2018 V4 Terms & Conditions Definitions and Interpretation Commencement Date
More informationChapter 3: Bail. Chapter 3.2: Adjournments (pp )
Chapter 3: Bail Chapter 3.2: Adjournments (pp 139-143) In Visvaratnam v Brent Magistrates Court [2009] EWHC 3017 (Admin); (2010) 174 JP 61, Openshaw J (at [18]) said that the prosecution must not think
More information