Employment and Discrimination Tribunal
|
|
- Jasper Rodgers
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Employment and Discrimination Tribunal Case number: [2017]TRE077 Date: 22/08/17 Before: Mr Michael Salter, Deputy Chairman Claimant: Respondent: Mr Guy Dickson Ocean Rig Offshore Management Limited For the Claimant: For the Respondent Advocate L Ingram. Advocate D Read. Reserved Judgment The Claimant falls outside of the limitation placed on the rights to claim protection from unfair and wrongful dismissal contained within Article 101 of the Employment (Jersey) Law 2003 and so this Tribunal has no jurisdiction to hear his claims. Reasons Introduction 1. These are my reasons for the above judgment, after hearing the submissions from the parties representatives I wished to consider my judgment and so, rather than have the parties wait around at Tribunal I reserved my decision. Background The Claimant s case as formulated in his JET1 2. The Claimant s complaint, as formulated in his Form JET1, presented to the Tribunal on 26th May 2017 and admitted on 30th May 2017 is, in short, as an employee of the Respondent he was unfairly dismissed and that that dismissal was wrongful.
2 The Respondent s Response 3. In its Form JET2, admitted on the 16th June 2017, the Respondent denied the Tribunal had jurisdiction to hear the claim and requested the matter be struck out under Rule 18 of the Employment and Discrimination Tribunal (Procedure)(Jersey) Order Case Management to date 4. The matter came before Deputy Chair Preston on 7th July 2017 when an Interim Hearing was set down for Thursday, 24th August 2017 to determine the jurisdiction of the Tribunal. Various case management directions were also given to ensure the matter was effective on the 24th August The Interim Hearing 5. The matter came before me for that Interim Hearing. The hearing had a one-day time estimate. 6. The Claimant was present and represented by Advocate Mr. L. Ingram. 7. The Respondent was present in the form of Mr. C. Strachan and was represented by Advocate Mr. D. Read. Particular Points that have arisen 8. At the outset of the day, as a matter of housekeeping, Advocate Read provide me with a signed affidavit of Mr. Strachan. The Affidavit had been served unsigned and there was some correspondence between the parties and the Tribunal about this leading up to the hearing. 9. At the request of Advocate Read, Advocate Ingram agreed that the Claimant would also provide his evidence in affidavit form as the evidence he had provided in advance of the hearing was in the form of a witness statement.
3 Documents and Evidence Witness Evidence 10. As would be expected in a case concerning interpretation and application of law I heard no witness evidence, however I had been provided with and had read in advance of the hearing the witness statement of the claimant and affidavit of Mr. Strachan. Bundle 11. To assist me in determining the application I have before me today an agreed bundle consisting of some [266] pages consisting of: Claimant s Documents (a) Claimant s skeleton argument; (b) Witness statement of the Claimant with attachment dated August 2016; (c) Article 101 of the Employment (Jersey) Law 2003 (as amended); (d) Decisions of: Wagner v Aviation Staffing Company Limited /09, Mackender and others v Feldia AG and others [1967] QB.D. 590; Compagnie Tunisiene de Navigation SA v Compagnie D Armement Maritime [1969] WLR 1138; Lawson v Serco [2006] ICR 250; Duncombe v Secretary of State for Children Schools and Families (No 2) [2011] ICR 1312; Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Limited [2012] ICR 389; Bates van Winkelhoff v Clyde & Co LLP and another [2013] ICR 883; Dhunna v CreditSights Ltd [2015] ICR 105; Respondent s documents (e) Respondent s Skeleton Argument (f) Affidavit of Craig Strachan; (g) Extract from Employment (Jersey) Law 2003;
4 (ii) S196 Employment Rights Act 1996; (iii) Case Law: Wagner (as above); Ingham v Incat Technical Services Limited /09; Public Services Committee v Maynard [1996] JLR 343; Vilsmeier v AI Airports International and another [2014] JRC 257; Todd v British Midland Airways Ltd [1978] ICR Appended to the JET1 was a contract of Employment between the Claimant and Respondent dated 01 October 2016 and entitled Onshore Rotational Contract of employment which I have also considered. Submissions 13. I had written skeleton arguments from both parties which I had read in advance. Both parties supplemented their arguments orally. Since the skeletons are in writing it is unnecessary to repeat them here and they are referred to as appropriate in the conclusions. 14. Without wishing to do any injustice to either parties oral submissions they both sought to underline their written submissions and so I do not repeat their oral submissions here. The Facts 15. The Claimant was employed by the Respondent until his dismissal on 6th June 2017 which, he says was summary and without consultation. 16. The Respondent is registered in Jersey. The Respondent accepts the Claimant was an employee of it and that he was dismissed. However, it contends the Claimant was given notice of his dismissal and that his dismissal was on grounds of redundancy (Craig Strachan s Affidavit ( CSA ) paragraph 7) 17. The Claimant was employed on a rotational contract working 28 days on and then a similar time off work (see Claimant s Witness statements ( CWS ) paragraph 6). 18. His contract contained the following clauses (amongst others): 2 Place of Work
5 You will initially be assigned to Athens Corporate office on a rotational basis, which in line with local legislation may require applying for a Visa and may include submitting a Police Clearance. The Company reserves the right to assign/relocate you to any Ocean Rig location dependant upon business requirements 25 Governing Law This agreement shall be governed by and construed under laws of Jersey, and the parties to this agreement submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of Jersey in relation to any claim, dispute or matter arising out of or relating to this agreement 19. This contract was, in fact, the second contract the Claimant had with the Respondent. the first contained a choice of law clause which identified Greek law as the applicable law of the contract (CSA3). 20. At the time of his dismissal the Claimant was located in Athens (CWS7) although he did not hold residents status in Greece (CWS8). When issues were raised by him concerning his contract of employment he was repeatedly referred to jersey law (CWS10). 21. The Claimant never worked for the Respondent in Jersey or had cause to travel to jersey for work purposes. When he was not in Athens the Claimant travelled home to the UK (CSA4). The Claimant accepts he has never been physically present in Jersey for the Respondent (CSA19) 22. The Respondent has one employee in Jersey. It is rare for an other employee of the Respondent to be in Jersey at all (CSA16) The Law Jersey Legislation 23. So far as is relevant the Employment (Jersey) Law 2003 ( E(J)L ) states: 101 Application (1) This Law applies to an employment which requires the person to work wholly or mainly in Jersey.
6 24. The version of the E(J)L I have before me, and which was also provided by the parties and contained in the bundle, is the Revised edition 1 January Article 101 however was substituted by L.10/2013. However, the amendments were not thought relevant (i.e. it was not suggested the Tribunals in other cases involving the application of A101 Wagner and Ingham had a differently worded A101 before them). 25. It is uncontroversial, and so I do not set them out here, that Article 76(1) E(J)L provides this Tribunal with jurisdiction to hear complaints of unfair dismissal and Article 86 E(J)L provides this Tribunal with a limited jurisdiction to hear some claims for breach of contract. United Kingdom Legislation 26. I was referred to section 196 of the Employment Rights Act Authorities 27. I have set out the case law I was referred to by the parties above. Conclusions on the Issue of Jurisdiction 28. I took time assessing and looking through my notes as well as the written statements and documents, I considered with care the submissions, the legal provisions and guidance in case law. Having done this I have decided that Tribunal does not have jurisdiction to hear the Claimant s claims of unfair or wrongful dismissal. I do so for the following reasons. The Tribunal 29. The Jersey Employment and Discrimination Tribunal ( JEDT ) is a creature of statute governed by various Laws and Regulations including the E(J)L, the Employment and Discrimination Tribunal (Jersey) Regulations 2014, the E(J)L and the Employment of States of jersey Employees (Jersey) Law The JEDT has no inherent jurisdiction and can only deal with the closely defined claims it has been granted the power to determine.
7 The Application of Legislation 31. As was stated in Lawson at 254E: legislation is prima facie territorial. The United Kingdom rarely purports to legislate for the whole world 32. This point is no less valid if one substitutes the words States of Jersey for the United Kingdom in the quote above. The reasoning behind this statement is to ensure the comity of nations. 33. Jurisdictions can achieve international comity by express clauses within legislation limiting its application or by having limitations on that application implied into them by case-law. Either of these approaches would mean that territorial boundaries apply to employment rights; so whilst we speak of jurisdictional limits on Tribunals to hear the claim, it is actually the right itself which is limited and the Tribunal, which is a statutory creature, must apply that right to the full extent of that right whilst being conscious of the limits imposed or implied upon that right. A) Great Britain s Approach to Application 34. As both parties have referred me to various authorities emanating from Great Britain I will consider the position there before turning my attention to the position under Jersey law to see if there is any assistance I can obtain from the jurisprudence. 35. Section 196 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 ( ERA ) read: 196 Employment outside Great Britain (1) Sections 1 to 7 and sections 86 to 91 do not apply in relation to employment during any period when the employee is engaged in work wholly or mainly outside Great Britain unless (a) the employee ordinarily works in Great Britain and the work outside Great Britain is for the same employer, or (b) the law which governs his contact of employment is the law of England and Wales or the law of Scotland.
8 (2) The provisions to which this subsection applies do not apply to employment where under the employee s contract of employment he ordinarily works outside Great Britain. 36. This, clearly, excluded employees who ordinarily worked outside of Great Britain from enforcing the rights contained within the ERA. These rights included the right to claim unfair dismissal. However, this section was repealed by the Employment Relations Act 1999 and was not replaced with any alternative wording. 37. This lead the ERA to be silent regarding its territorial scope. This silence resulted in the Tribunals and courts in Great Britain seeking to achieve comity by defining the extent to which the ERA applied to employees working outside of Great Britain. Once it had defined this limit the courts and Tribunals then had to apply those limitations to the cases before them. 38. This question found its way to the Supreme Court in the matter of Lawson and the other authorities I have been referred to. In general terms, the cases subsequent to Lawson appear move away from any understanding that Lord Hoffman s three categories in Lawson are the entire category of worker covered by the legislation and instead move towards a more nuanced and fact sensitive assessment which appears to me to have resulted in two tests: firstly, where an employee worked partly in Great Britain and partly abroad, the question is whether the connection with Great Britain and British employment law is sufficiently strong to enable it to be said that parliament would have regarded it as appropriate for the employment Tribunal to deal with the claim (see for instance Ravat); secondly: where an employee works and lives outside of Great Britain, it will be more appropriate to ask whether his or her employment relationship has a much stronger connections both with Great Britain and with British Employment law than with any other system of law (see for instance Duncombe). 39. Whichever test applies, they both have their genesis in the lack of any express limitation being contained within the ERA. B) The E(J)L Approach to Application 40. The States of Jersey have, however, included within the E(J)L an Article expressly setting out limitations to the application of the Law. This is contained in Article 101 which I have set out above.
9 41. I therefore do not feel that I can take obtain useful guidance from the authorities of Lawson and those which came after it, as they were not addressing the construction of an express limitation clause, but were rather seeking to define the ambit of an implied limitation. 42. Equally, and with all respect due to my predecessors in this Tribunal, I do not gain assistance from the decision in Wagner, which whist referring to A101 says that it finds assistance from Lawson which it considers most helpful (see paragraph 7 of that judgment). It may be that the JEDT in Wagner were relying on Lawson for its interpretation of the base of a pilot (see for instance the reasoning in paragraph 7 and 9 of Wagner), if that is so then it is an issue that does not arise on the facts of the matter before me. 43. A101 also was considered by this Tribunal in Ingham. The facts of Ingham are different from the those in the matter before me however: Mr. Ingham travelled from the UK to Jersey on a weekly basis, working five days a week in Jersey and returning home at weekends. This changed owing to his wife s ill-health, as a result of which he travelled to Jersey five or six times a year. The JEDT concluded that he was still working wholly or mainly in jersey. It appears therefore to me that Ingham involves a factual determination rather than a pronouncement of construction of A101, and one which determined that case in the favour of the Applicant. C) Conclusion on the Jersey and UK Approaches to Application 44. As a result of the above, I consider myself unrestrained by Jersey authority on the application and effect of A101, and equally there is no persuasive influence from the authorities from Lawson to date which I can glean on the point of the Law s application. The E(J)L and Mr. Dickson 45. Having considered the relevant Law and authorities I turn to the case before me. 46. It is an agreed fact that Mr. Dickson never worked in Jersey and never came here for work. His contract specified he was assigned to Athens Corporate Officer. 47. I find therefore that his employment never required him to work in Jersey as is set out in A101.
10 48. The effect of this is, therefore, that the Claimant s case before this Tribunal must cease. The rights contained within the E(J)L, be they for breach of contract or for the right of unfair dismissal, are subject to a limitation on their application which the Claimant falls outside of. 49. If I am wrong on this, then I would have proceeded to assess whether Mr. Dickson could be said to have been working either wholly or mainly in Jersey. In conducting such an assessment I was urged by Advocate Read to consider the comments by Eveleigh LJ in Todd as being of assistance, albeit they are obiter comments in a decision which is of merely persuasive effect. 50. On the agreed facts, I would not have found that Mr. Dickson could be said to have either worked wholly or mainly in Jersey if I were to give those words their plain and usual meanings: on his own case, he never worked in Jersey at all. 51. In these circumstances, I cannot accept the argument from Advocate Ingram that I effectively have a discretion to permit the claim to proceed owing to the choice of law and choice of jurisdiction clause in the contract of employment. Conclusion 52. This being a statutory Tribunal I have no discretion when assessing its jurisdiction. Nor is there an inherent jurisdiction to fall back on. The Claimant falls outside of the limitations which A101 E(J)L places on the rights of unfair dismissal and wrongful dismissal. As such these claims are rejected on the basis that the Tribunal has no jurisdiction to consider them. Authorities Employment and Discrimination Tribunal (Procedure) (Jersey) Order 2016 Employment (Jersey) Law 2003 S196 Employment Rights Act 1996 Wagner v Aviation Staffing Company Limited /09 Ingham v Incat Technical Services Limited /09; Mackender and others v Feldia AG and others [1967] QB.D. 590
11 Compagnie Tunisiene de Navigation SA v Compagnie D Armement Maritime [1969] WLR 1138 Lawson v Serco [2006] ICR 250; Duncombe v Secretary of State for Children Schools and Families (No 2) [2011] ICR 1312; Ravat v Halliburton Manufacturing and Services Limited [2012] ICR 389; Bates van Winkelhoff v Clyde & Co LLP and another [2013] ICR 883; Dhunna v CreditSights Ltd [2015] ICR 105;
Before : HIS HONOUR JUDGE ROBINSON Between :
IN THE COUNTY COURT AT SHEFFIELD On Appeal from District Judge Bellamy Case No: 2 YK 74402 Sheffield Appeal Hearing Centre Sheffield Combined Court Centre 50 West Bar Sheffield Date: 29 September 2014
More informationEMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS. At the Tribunal On 12th December 2002 Judgment delivered on 11 March 2003
Appeal No. EAT/0018/02TM EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 12th December 2002 Judgment delivered on 11 March 2003 Before HIS HONOUR JUDGE J ALTMAN MR
More informationThe Equality Act abroad:
The Equality Act abroad: Implications for higher education institutions Contents Background 2 Scope of the Equality Act: employment issues 4 Scope of the Equality Act: education issues 8 Other relevant
More informationJersey Employment and Discrimination Tribunal
Jersey Employment and Discrimination Tribunal Employment (Jersey) Law 2003 NOTIFICATION OF THE TRIBUNAL S JUDGMENT Case Number: 1912-200/13 Applicant: Mr Mark Wood Respondent: JT (Jersey) Limited Date
More informationBefore: LADY JUSTICE ARDEN LORD JUSTICE LONGMORE and LORD JUSTICE TOULSON Between:
Case No: A3/2006/0902 Neutral Citation Number: [2007] EWCA Civ 471 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION (MR JUSTICE DAVID STEEL) Royal
More informationGafta No.125. Copyright THE GRAIN AND FEED TRADE ASSOCIATION
Effective for contracts dated from 1 st January 2006 Gafta No.125 Copyright THE GRAIN AND FEED TRADE ASSOCIATION ARBITRATION RULES GAFTA HOUSE 6 CHAPEL PLACE RIVINGTON STREET LONDON EC2A 3SH Tel: +44 20
More informationArbitration Act CHAPTER Part I. Arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement. Introductory
Arbitration Act 1996 1996 CHAPTER 23 1 Part I Arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement Introductory 1. General principles. 2. Scope of application of provisions. 3. The seat of the arbitration.
More informationA v B (ABDUCTION: DECLARATION) [2008] EWHC 2524 (Fam) Family Division Bodey J 30 September 2008
[2009] 1 FLR 1253 A v B (ABDUCTION: DECLARATION) [2008] EWHC 2524 (Fam) Family Division Bodey J 30 September 2008 Abduction Rights of custody Court granted parental responsibility before child left jurisdiction
More informationJersey Employment and Discrimination Tribunal
Jersey Employment and Discrimination Tribunal Employment (Jersey) Law 2003 NOTIFICATION OF THE TRIBUNAL S JUDGMENT This award, (subject to the right of appeal to the Royal Court, as set out in the Law)
More informationBETWEEN Miss Eleanor Mahoney CLAIMANT AND Mr Mark Jones. JTC Group TRIBUNAL JUDGMENT. Ms Carol Graham, Group Head of HR
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND DISCRIMINATION TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER: BETWEEN Miss Eleanor Mahoney CLAIMANT AND Mr Mark Jones JTC Group RESPONDENT (1) RESPONDENT (2) TRIBUNAL JUDGMENT Reference: [2017]TRE124 &
More informationJURISDICTION AND CHOICE OF LAW IN EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES. Robert Howe QC, Mark Vinall & Tristan Jones. Contents A. INTRODUCTION... 2
JURISDICTION AND CHOICE OF LAW IN EMPLOYMENT DISPUTES Robert Howe QC, Mark Vinall & Tristan Jones Contents A. INTRODUCTION... 2 B. CHOICE OF LAW... 3 1) THE ROME CONVENTION AND THE ROME I REGULATION...
More informationWales Bill [AS AMENDED IN COMMITTEE] CONTENTS PART 1
[AS AMENDED IN COMMITTEE] CONTENTS PART 1 CONSTITUTIONAL ARRANGEMENTS Permanence of the National Assembly for Wales and Welsh Government 1 Permanence of the National Assembly for Wales and Welsh Government
More informationTHE COURTS ACT. Rules made by the Chief Justice, after consultation with the Rules Committee and the Judges, under section 198 of the Courts Act
THE COURTS ACT Rules made by the Chief Justice, after consultation with the Rules Committee and the Judges, under section 198 of the Courts Act 1. Title These rules may be cited as the Supreme Court (International
More informationLegal Services Act 2007 SRA (Disciplinary Procedure) Rules EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SRA BOARD 15 January 2010 Public Item 6 CLASSIFICATION PUBLIC Summary Legal Services Act 2007 SRA (Disciplinary Procedure) Rules EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. This paper invites the SRA Board to decide on the appropriate
More informationConsultation Response
Consultation Response The Scotland Bill Consultation on Draft Order in Council for the Transfer of Specified Functions of the Employment Tribunal to the First-tier Tribunal for Scotland The Law Society
More informationEducation Act 1976 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER 81. under s. 2. principle. 3. Approval and implementation of proposals submitted.
Education Act 1976 CHAPTER 81 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Comprehensive schools Section 1. The comprehensive principle. 2. Submission of proposals for giving effect to comprehensive principle. 3. Approval
More information2000 No TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT
SI 2000/1551 The Part-time Workers (Prevention of Less Favourable Treatment) Regulations 2000 is accompanied by Guidance Notes which are issued free of charge to all purchasers. STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2000
More information"10. (1) Subject to subsection (3) and section 36(3) below, the following,
DECISION OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER 1. I grant the claimant leave to appeal and I allow his appeal against the decision of the Darlington appeal tribunal dated 7 June 2001. I set aside that decision
More informationAhmad Al-Naimi (t/a Buildmaster Construction Services) v. Islamic Press Agency Inc [2000] APP.L.R. 01/28
CA on Appeal from High Court of Justice TCC (HHJ Bowsher QC) before Waller LJ; Chadwick LJ. 28 th January 2000. JUDGMENT : Lord Justice Waller: 1. This is an appeal from the decision of His Honour Judge
More informationMostafa (Article 8 in entry clearance) [2015] UKUT (IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Mostafa (Article 8 in entry clearance) [2015] UKUT 00112 (IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House On 19 December 2014 Decision & Reasons Re- Promulgated
More informationArbitration Act 1996
Arbitration Act 1996 An Act to restate and improve the law relating to arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement; to make other provision relating to arbitration and arbitration awards; and for
More informationBefore : MR JUSTICE LEWIS Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 4222 (Admin) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Case No: CO/8318/2013 Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Before
More informationLimitation period for breach of fiduciary duty 3 years or 10?
Limitation period for breach of fiduciary duty 3 years or 10? 1. It has never been clearly decided what limitation 1 period applies in Jersey to a claim alleging breach of fiduciary duty against a company
More informationArbitration Act of United Kingdom United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
Arbitration Act of United Kingdom United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (Royaume-Uni - Royaume-Uni de Grande-Bretagne et d'irlande du Nord) ARBITRATION ACT 1996 1996 CHAPTER 23 An Act to
More informationArbitration Rules No.125
Effective for Contracts dated from 1 st September 2016 Arbitration Rules No.125 Copyright Printed in England and issued by Gafta THE GRAIN AND FEED TRADE ASSOCIATION 9 LINCOLN S INN FIELDS, LONDON WC2A
More informationGalliford Try Construction Ltd v Mott MacDonald Ltd [2008] APP.L.R. 03/14
JUDGMENT : Mr Justice Coulson : TCC. 14 th March 2008 Introduction 1. This is an application by the Defendant for an order that paragraphs 39 to 48 inclusive of the witness statement of Mr Joseph Martin,
More informationPART I THE SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT
An Act to provide for the establishment of a Scottish Parliament and Administration and other changes in the government of Scotland; to provide for changes in the constitution and functions of certain
More informationNumber 45 of 2001 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES (PART-TIME WORK) ACT, 2001 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1. Preliminary and General
Number 45 of 2001 PROTECTION OF EMPLOYEES (PART-TIME WORK) ACT, 2001 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART 1 Preliminary and General Section 1. Short title, collective citation and construction. 2. Commencement.
More informationDIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS INTERIM GUIDELINES ON THE HANDLING OF CASES WHERE THE JURISDICTION TO PROSECUTE IS SHARED WITH PROSECUTING AUTHORITIES OVERSEAS (The Guidelines) INTRODUCTION 1. Investigators
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D.2009 BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CLAIMANT
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE A.D.2009 CLAIM NO: 317 OF 2009 BETWEEN: THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CLAIMANT OF BELIZE APPLICANT AND 1.BELIZE TELEMEDIA LTD 2.BELIZE SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT LTD. 1 ST DEFENDANT RESPONDENT
More informationMott MacDonald Ltd v London & Regional Properties Ltd [2007] Adj.L.R. 05/23
JUDGMENT : HHJ Anthony Thornton QC. TCC. 23 rd May 2007 1. Introduction 1. The claimant, Mott MacDonald Ltd ( MM ) is a specialist engineering multi-disciplinary consultancy providing services to the construction
More informationEU Referendum Bill B I L L. Provide for a referendum about the United Kingdom s future relationship with the European Union.
A B I L L TO Provide for a referendum about the United Kingdom s future relationship with the European Union. BE IT ENACTED by the Queen s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of
More informationSUBMISSION FROM THE LORD ADVOCATE UK SUPREME COURT JURISDICTION. Background
SUBMISSION FROM THE LORD ADVOCATE UK SUPREME COURT JURISDICTION Background 1. The First Minister asked a review group, chaired by Lord McCluskey, to examine the relationship between the High Court of Justiciary
More informationMental Capacity (Amendment) Bill [HL]
Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill [HL] EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Department of Health and Social Care, will be published separately as HL Bill 117 EN. EUROPEAN CONVENTION
More informationPRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW : CONFLICT OF LAWS
Arbitration under the Arbitration Act 1996 Aim: To provide a clear outline of the principal issues relating to the legally binding resolution of conflict of laws disputes via arbitration under the Arbitration
More informationIMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL. Before. Mr S L Batiste (Chairman) Mr P R Lane. SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT Appellant.
Heard at Field House J(Article 8- Queue Jumping- Visa Applications-Neighbouring Countries) Kosovo CG [2003] UKIAT 00041 On 4 August 2003 Written 4 August 2003 IMMIGRATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL Before Mr S L
More informationB e f o r e: MR JUSTICE BLAIR Between: THE QUEEN ON THE APPLICATION OF ABDULLAH Claimant
Neutral Citation Number: [2009] EWHC 1771 (Admin) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Case No. CO/11937/2008 Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL Date:
More informationEMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS
Appeal No. EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL 58 VICTORIA EMBANKMENT, LONDON EC4Y 0DS At the Tribunal On 2 March 2007 Before HIS HONOUR JUDGE PETER CLARK (SITTING ALONE) MS P GRAVELL APPELLANT LONDON BOROUGH OF
More informationEMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (ENGLAND & WALES) Presidential Guidance General Case Management
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (ENGLAND & WALES) Presidential Guidance General Case Management 1. This Presidential Guidance was first issued in England & Wales on 13 March 2014 under the provisions of Rule 7 of
More informationBefore: MR RECORDER BERKLEY MISS EASHA MAGON. and ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE INSURANCE PLC
IN THE COUNTY COURT AT CENTRAL LONDON Case No: B53Y J995 Court No. 60 Thomas More Building Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL Friday, 26 th February 2016 Before: MR RECORDER BERKLEY B E T W
More informationEMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL FLEETBANK HOUSE, 2-6 SALISBURY SQUARE, LONDON EC4Y 8JX
Appeal No. EMPLOYMENT APPEAL TRIBUNAL FLEETBANK HOUSE, 2-6 SALISBURY SQUARE, LONDON EC4Y 8JX At the Tribunal On 22 May 2013 Before THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MITTING MS K BILGAN MRS A GALLICO (1) MR ANDREW
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2009
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BELIZE, A.D. 2009 CLAIM NO. 771 AMADA MAZARIEGOS APPLICANT BETWEEN AND SOCIAL SECURITY BOARD RESPONDENT Hearings 2009 9 th October 13 th October 20 th October Miss Darlene M. Vernon
More informationBefore: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE BARLING (President) LORD CARLILE OF BERRIEW QC SHEILA HEWITT. Sitting as a Tribunal in England and Wales BAA LIMITED
Neutral citation [2010] CAT 9 IN THE COMPETITION APPEAL TRIBUNAL Case Number: 1110/6/8/09 Victoria House Bloomsbury Place London WC1A 2EB 25 February 2010 Before: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE BARLING (President)
More informationEmployment Bill [HL]
Employment Bill [HL] EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform, are published separately as HL Bill 13 EN. EUROPEAN CONVENTION
More informationBefore : MR. JUSTICE EDWARDS-STUART Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 4006 (TCC) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN S BENCH DIVISION TECHNOLOGY AND CONSTRUCTION COURT Case No: HT-2014-000022 (Formerly HT-14-372) Royal Courts of Justice
More information2014 No JUDICIAL APPOINTMENTS AND DISCIPLINE. The Judicial Discipline (Prescribed Procedures) Regulations 2014
This Statutory Instrument has been made in consequence of defects in S.I. 2013/1674 and is being issued free of charge to all known recipients of that Statutory Instrument. S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R
More informationThe Freedom of Information (Jersey) Law, 2011
Refusing a request: Writing a refusal notice The Freedom of Information (Jersey) Law, 2011 Published: January 2015 Brunel House, Old Street, St.Helier, Jersey, JE2 3RG Tel: (+44) 1534 716530 Email: enquiries@dataci.org
More informationTHE LMAA TERMS (2006)
THE LONDON MARITIME ARBITRATORS ASSOCIATION THE LMAA TERMS (2006) Effective for appointments on and after 1st January 2006 THE LMAA TERMS (2006) PRELIMINARY 1. These Terms may be referred to as the LMAA
More informationJUDGMENT. Honourable Attorney General and another (Appellants) v Isaac (Respondent) (Antigua and Barbuda)
Easter Term [2018] UKPC 11 Privy Council Appeal No 0077 of 2016 JUDGMENT Honourable Attorney General and another (Appellants) v Isaac (Respondent) (Antigua and Barbuda) From the Court of Appeal of the
More informationChild Maintenance and Other Payments Bill
EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Department for Work and Pensions, will be published separately as Bill 118 EN. EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Mr Secretary Hutton has
More informationJersey Employment and Discrimination Tribunal
Jersey Employment and Discrimination Tribunal Employment (Jersey) Law 2003 NOTIFICATION OF THE TRIBUNAL S JUDGMENT Applicant: Mrs Suzanne MacLagan Respondent: States Employment Board Date: 16 March 2017
More informationEQUITABLE ACCOUNTING AFTER STACK v DOWDEN
EQUITABLE ACCOUNTING AFTER STACK v DOWDEN The typical situation: 1. Mr & Mrs Smith married in 1985 and purchased their home in 1988 with the assistance of a sizeable mortgage from a high street bank. They
More informationBefore: THE SENIOR PRESIDENT OF TRIBUNALS LORD JUSTICE UNDERHILL Between:
Neutral Citation Number: [2017] EWCA Civ 16 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM The Divisional Court Sales LJ, Whipple J and Garnham J CB/3/37-38 Before: Case No: C1/2017/3068 Royal
More informationParliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill
Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Cabinet Office, are published separately as HL Bill 26 EN. EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN
More informationSUPPLEMENT TO CHAPTER 20
Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth (2003) 195 ALR 24 The text on pages 893-94 sets out s 474 of the Migration Act, as amended in 2001 in the wake of the Tampa controversy (see Chapter 12); and also refers
More informationGoods Mortgages Bill
CONTENTS PART 1 INTRODUCTORY 1 Overview PART 2 CREATION OF GOODS MORTGAGES Goods mortgages 2 Goods mortgages 3 Goods mortgages: co-owners 4 Qualifying goods Requirements to be met in relation to instrument
More informationLegal Services Commission v Aaronson No1 [2006] APP.L.R. 05/24
JUDGMENT : Mr Justice Jack : QBD. 24 th May 2006. 1. On 26 August 2005 the Legal Services Commission issued a claim under Part 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules against a firm of solicitors, Aaronson & Co,
More informationLegal Eye Arbitration Bulletin
View the email online July 2012 Legal Eye Arbitration Bulletin Welcome to the latest bulletin from Bristows' Commercial Disputes team. This bulletin has been prepared by the Arbitration group within the
More informationEleventh Meeting of European Labour Court Judges. Florence, 24 October 2003
Eleventh Meeting of European Labour Court Judges Florence, 24 October 2003 New initiatives to make Labour Court hearings more efficient: use of alternative disputes methods, collective (class) action Questionnaire
More informationIMMIGRATION BILL DELEGATED POWERS MEMORANDUM BY THE HOME OFFICE
IMMIGRATION BILL DELEGATED POWERS MEMORANDUM BY THE HOME OFFICE INTRODUCTION 1. This Memorandum identifies the provisions of the Immigration Bill as introduced in the House of Lords which confer powers
More informationTHIRD SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF
CONSEIL DE L EUROPE COUNCIL OF EUROPE COUR EUROPÉENNE DES DROITS DE L HOMME EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS THIRD SECTION DECISION AS TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF Application no. 35605/97 by Max Myer KINGSLEY
More informationMIB Untraced Drivers Agreement
MIB Untraced Drivers Agreement THIS AGREEMENT is made on the 28 th February 2017 between the SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRANSPORT ( the Secretary of State ) and the MOTOR INSURERS BUREAU ( MIB ), whose registered
More informationTHE STATUTES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION ACT (CHAPTER 143A)
THE STATUTES OF THE REPUBLIC OF SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION ACT (CHAPTER 143A) (Original Enactment: Act 23 of 1994) REVISED EDITION 2002 (31st December 2002) Prepared and Published by THE LAW REVISION
More informationInfrastructure Bill [HL]
Infrastructure Bill [HL] LORDS AMENDMENTS TO, CONSEQUENTIAL ON, OR IN LIEU OF, CERTAIN COMMONS AMENDMENTS [The page and line references are to Bill 124, the bill as first printed for the Commons.] After
More informationEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE EQUALITY ACT 2010 (PUBLIC AUTHORITIES AND CONSEQUENTIAL AND SUPPLEMENTARY AMENDMENTS) ORDER NO.
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE EQUALITY ACT 2010 (PUBLIC AUTHORITIES AND CONSEQUENTIAL AND SUPPLEMENTARY AMENDMENTS) ORDER 2011 2011 NO. 1060 1. This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Government
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION ACTS. On 26 November 2015 On 18 December 2015 Delivered Orally. Before UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE GOLDSTEIN. Between
IAC-FH-AR-V1 Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 26 November 2015 On 18 December 2015 Delivered Orally Before UPPER
More informationLORDS AMENDMENTS TO THE ENTERPRISE AND REGULATORY REFORM BILL
LORDS AMENDMENTS TO THE ENTERPRISE AND REGULATORY REFORM BILL [The page and line references are to HL Bill 45, the bill as first printed for the Lords.] Clause 1 1 Page 1, line 10, leave out subsection
More informationIN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERATION OF ST. CHRISTOPHER AND NEVIS ST CHRISTOPHER CIRCUIT (CIVIL)
IN THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE FEDERATION OF ST. CHRISTOPHER AND NEVIS ST CHRISTOPHER CIRCUIT (CIVIL) CLAIM NO. SKBCV2007/0171 IN THE MATTER of the Application by AURELIE
More informationThe Freedom of Information (Jersey) Law, 2011
When to refuse to confirm or deny information is held The Freedom of Information (Jersey) Law, 2011 Published: January 2015 Brunel House, Old Street, St.Helier, Jersey, JE2 3RG Tel: (+44) 1534 716530 Email:
More informationIN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA 3659/98. In the matter between: NATIONAL UNION OF METALWORKERS OF SOUTH AFRICA. Applicant. and
IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA HELD AT JOHANNESBURG Case Number: J 3659/98 In the matter between: NATIONAL UNION OF METALWORKERS OF SOUTH AFRICA Applicant and NISSAN SOUTH AFRICA MANUFACTURING (PTY)
More informationParliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill
Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill EXPLANATORY NOTES Explanatory notes to the Bill, prepared by the Cabinet Office, are published separately as Bill 63 EN. EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE PAUL HACKSHAW. and ST. LUCIA AIR AND SEA PORTS AUTHORITY
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAINT LUCIA CLAIM NO.: SLUHCV2008/0827 BETWEEN: PAUL HACKSHAW Claimant and ST. LUCIA AIR AND SEA PORTS AUTHORITY Defendant APPEARANCES:
More informationJersey Employment and Discrimination Tribunal
Jersey Employment and Discrimination Tribunal Employment (Jersey) Law 2003 NOTIFICATION OF THE TRIBUNAL S JUDGMENT Any award, (subject to the right of appeal to the Royal Court as set out in the Law) is
More information2010 No. 791 COPYRIGHT
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2010 No. 791 COPYRIGHT The Copyright Tribunal Rules 2010 Made - - - - 15th March 2010 Laid before Parliament 16th March 2010 Coming into force - - 6th April 2010 The Lord Chancellor
More informationTHE IMMIGRATION (JERSEY) ORDER 2012
THE IMMIGRATION (JERSEY) ORDER 2012 JERSEY REVISED EDITION OF THE LAWS APPENDIX The Immigration (Jersey) Order 2012 Article 1 L.26/2010 THE IMMIGRATION (JERSEY) ORDER 2012 Sanctioned by Order of Her Majesty
More informationPlanning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 c. 5. Part 3 DEVELOPMENT. Development plan
Page1 38 Development plan Status: Law In Force Amendment(s) Pending Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 c. 5 Part 3 DEVELOPMENT Development plan This version in force from: November 15, 2011 to present
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER AND
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA CLAIM NO. ANUHCV 2007/0423 IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION
More informationImport VAT VAT input tax claim application to Tribunal made out of time - should Tribunal allow to proceed yes
[14] UKFTT 760 (TC) TC03880 Appeal number: TC/13/06459, TC/13/06460 & TC/13/06462 Import VAT VAT input tax claim application to Tribunal made out of time - should Tribunal allow to proceed yes FIRST-TIER
More informationFINANCIAL GUIDANCE AND CLAIMS BILL [HL] EXPLANATORY NOTES
FINANCIAL GUIDANCE AND CLAIMS BILL [HL] EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory Notes relate to the Financial Guidance and Claims Bill [HL] as brought from the House of. These Explanatory
More informationTemporary and Agency Workers (Equal Treatment) Bill
Temporary and Agency Workers (Equal Treatment) Bill CONTENTS 1 Equal treatment of agency workers 2 Comparable direct workers 3 Access to direct employment and protection from unfair treatment 4 Complaints
More informationTHE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN [1] GENERAL AVIATION SERVICES LTD. [2] SILVANUS ERNEST.
THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL SAINT LUCIA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL HCVAP 2012/006 BETWEEN [1] GENERAL AVIATION SERVICES LTD. [2] SILVANUS ERNEST and Appellants [1] THE DIRECTOR
More informationSECTION 44, FREEZING INJUNCTIONS AND FOREIGN ARBITRATIONS: LIMITATIONS ON JURISDICTION
34 [2009] Int. A.L.R.: SECTION 44, FREEZING INJUNCTIONS AND FOREIGN ARBITRATIONS: LIMITATIONS ON JURISDICTION SECTION 44, FREEZING INJUNCTIONS AND FOREIGN ARBITRATIONS: LIMITATIONS ON JURISDICTION PHILIPPA
More informationPhilip Mead AREAS OF EXPERTISE. International & Travel. Call: 1989
Philip Mead Call: 1989 mead@12kbw.co.uk AREAS OF EXPERTISE International & Travel, Personal Injury, Employment & Discrimination, Insurance, Aviation Philip joins the International and Travel Group of 12KBW
More informationSHIPPING PRELIMINARY NOTE
249 SHIPPING PRELIMINARY NOTE General Statute law relating to shipping and navigation applicable within the territory of this State consists partly of legislation of the Parliament of this State, partly
More informationParliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill
Parliamentary Voting System and Constituencies Bill [AS AMENDED IN THE COMMITTEE] CONTENTS A PART 1 VOTING SYSTEM FOR PARLIAMENTARY ELECTIONS The referendum 1 Referendum on the alternative vote system
More informationNumber 33 of 2002 STATUTE LAW (RESTATEMENT) ACT, 2002 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. 8. Laying of restatements before each House of the Oireachtas.
Number 33 of 2002 STATUTE LAW (RESTATEMENT) ACT, 2002 Section 1. Interpretation. 2. Restatement. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 3. Annotations to be included in restatement. 4. Effect of restatement. 5. Evidence
More informationTHE ROMA CASE IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS
Briefing Paper 8.6 www.migrationwatchuk.org THE ROMA CASE IN THE HOUSE OF LORDS 1. In certain countries of Eastern Europe, notably the Czech Republic and Romania, there are large communities of Roma (gypsies)
More informationSanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill [HL]
[AS AMENDED IN PUBLIC BILL COMMITTEE] CONTENTS PART 1 SANCTIONS REGULATIONS CHAPTER 1 POWER TO MAKE SANCTIONS REGULATIONS Power to make sanctions regulations 1 Power to make sanctions regulations 2 Additional
More informationEnforcement of Foreign Judgments. The Usual Rules Apply (no exception for insolvency)
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments The Usual Rules Apply (no exception for insolvency) The Supreme Court has just given judgment (24 October 2012) in Rubin and another v Eurofinance SA and others and New
More informationLokombe (DRC: FNOs Airport monitoring) [2015] UKUT 00627(IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Lokombe (DRC: FNOs Airport monitoring) [2015] UKUT 00627(IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 5 August 2015 Before
More informationJANICE CAMPBELL v THOMAS COOK TOUR OPERATIONS LIMITED [2014] EWCA Civ 1668
JANICE CAMPBELL v THOMAS COOK TOUR OPERATIONS LIMITED [2014] EWCA Civ 1668 Lord Justice Vos: Introduction 1. The central question in this case is whether the provisions of paragraph 33(2) of Schedule 3
More informationNEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES
NEIGHBOURHOOD PLANNING BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory tes relate to the Neighbourhood Planning Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 7. These Explanatory tes have
More informationGoods Mortgages Bill [HL]
Goods Mortgages Bill [HL] CONTENTS PART 1 INTRODUCTORY 1 Overview PART 2 CREATION OF GOODS MORTGAGES Goods mortgages 2 Goods mortgages 3 Goods mortgages: co-owners 4 Qualifying goods Requirements to be
More informationImmigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006
Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Act 2006 CHAPTER 13 CONTENTS Appeals 1 Variation of leave to enter or remain 2 Removal 3 Grounds of appeal 4 Entry clearance 5 Failure to provide documents 6 Refusal
More informationBETWEEN MS ERIN BISSON CLAIMANT AND STATES EMPLOYMENT BOARD ORDER
IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND DISCRIMINATION TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER: BETWEEN MS ERIN BISSON CLAIMANT AND STATES EMPLOYMENT BOARD RESPONDENT ORDER Reference: [2017]TRE203 Date: 16 April 2018 Before: Mrs H G Griffin,
More informationCOMMUNICATION OF ELECTION DOCUMENTS ADVICE
COMMUNICATION OF ELECTION DOCUMENTS ADVICE The advice sought 1. I am instructed to advise the Electoral Commission ( the Commission ) about the permissible methods of communication of certain election
More informationBrexit Paper 4: Civil Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments
1 Brexit Paper 4: Civil Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments Summary The ability to enforce judgments of the courts from one state in another is of vital importance for the functioning of society
More informationBribery Act CHAPTER 23. An Act to make provision about offences relating to bribery; and for connected purposes.
Bribery Act 2010 2010 CHAPTER 23 An Act to make provision about offences relating to bribery; and for connected purposes. [8th April 2010] BE IT ENACTED by the Queen s most Excellent Majesty, by and with
More informationSUPPLEMENTARY LEGISLATIVE CONSENT MEMORANDUM. European Union (Withdrawal) Bill
Introduction SUPPLEMENTARY LEGISLATIVE CONSENT MEMORANDUM European Union (Withdrawal) Bill 1. On 12 September 2017 the First Minister, on behalf of the Scottish Government, lodged a legislative consent
More informationChildren, Schools and Families Act 2010
Children, Schools and Families Act 2010 CHAPTER 26 CONTENTS PART 1 CHILDREN AND SCHOOLS Children with special educational needs etc 1 School inspections: pupils with disabilities or special educational
More information