MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS June 2, 2010 DANIEL SULLIVAN PATRICIA CASTELLI JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS June 2, 2010 DANIEL SULLIVAN PATRICIA CASTELLI JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE"

Transcription

1 MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS June 2, 2010 MEMBERS PRESENT: WILLIAM MOWERSON DANIEL SULLIVAN PATRICIA CASTELLI JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE ABSENT: NONE ALSO PRESENT: Dennis Michaels, Esq. Deputy Town Attorney Ann Marie Ambrose, Official Stenographer Deborah Arbolino, Administrative Aide This meeting was called to order at 7: 00 P.M. by Mr. Mowerson, Chairman. Hearings on this meeting's agenda, which are made a part of this meeting, were held as noted below: PUBLISHED ITEMS APPLICANTS DECISIONS CONTINUED ITEM: MIGGE DENIED ZBA# / 3 / 70; CS zone NEW ITEMS: CHIAPPA RHOMBUS INC VARIANCE ZBA# / 6 / 18; CS zone APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS RASCH SIDE YARD VARIANCE ZBA# / 1 / 65; R-22 zone APPROVED BIEDERMANN FRONT YARD VARIANCE ZBA# / 5 / 14; RG zone APPROVED DONOVAN FRONT YARD AND ZBA# / 2 / 26; R-40 zone SIDE YARD VARIANCES APPROVED ALUF PLASTICS CONTINUED ZBA #10-37 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS / 2 / 16; LI zone OTHER BUSINESS: In response to requests from the Orangetown Planning Board, the Zoning Board of Appeals: RESOLVED, to approve the action of the Acting Chairperson executing on behalf of the Board its consent to the Planning Board acting as Lead Agency for the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) coordinated environmental review of actions pursuant to SEQRA Regulations (b)(3) the following applications: Metro

2 PCS New York LLC, Co-location of Wireless Telecommunications Facility Plan, 568 Route 303, Blauvelt, New York, / 1 / 19; Lo zone; 115 Route 303 Internal Commercial Subdivision Plan Review, 115 Route 303, Tappan, New York, 77.07/ 2/ 1; Li zone; and FURTHER RESOLVED, to request to be notified by the Planning Board of SEQRA proceedings, hearings, and determinations with respect to these matters. THE DECISIONS RELATED TO THE ABOVE HEARINGS are inserted herein and made part of these minutes. The verbatim minutes, as recorded by the Board's official stenographer for the above hearings, are not transcribed. There being no further business to come before the Board, on motion duly made, seconded and carried, the meeting was adjourned at 11:20 P.M. Dated: June 2, 2010 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF ORANGETOWN SIGN SET BACK VARIANCE DENIED Deborah Arbolino Administrative Aide DECISION To: Tom Migge ZBA # Main Street Date: April 21, 2010 Tappan, New York May 19, 2010 June 2, 2010 FROM: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: Town of Orangetown ZBA#10-17: Application of Thomas Migge for a variance from Chapter 43 (Zoning) of the Code of the Town of Orangetown Section 3.11, CS District, Column 5 #6 B (2) Signs not attached to a building shall be setback 20 from the front lot line; 0 setback proposed) for a sign for an existing business.. The premises is located at 98 Main Street, Tappan New York, and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 77.11, Block 3, Lot 70; CS zone. Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on the following Wednesdays, April 21, 2010, May 19, 2010, and June 2, 2010 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter set forth. At the April 21, 2010 meeting Donald Brenner, Attorney, and Tom Migge appeared and testified. The following documents were presented to the Board over the course of all of the meetings: 1. A copy of the proposed signs. 2. A street plan showing the proposed location of the pylon sign. 3. A letter dated March 1, 2010 from the County of Rockland Department of Planning signed by Salvatore Corallo, Commissioner of Planning.

3 4. Two letters dated March 3, 2010 and May 19, 2010 (with map attachment) from the Tappantown Historical Society signed by Carol LaValle, President, in opposition to the signs. 5. Eight photographs of the area submitted by Carol LaValle. 6. A memorandum dated 4/12/10 from Leonard C. Post, Deputy Building Inspector. 7. Historic Areas Board of Review Decision #10-02 dated February 9, 2010 and a draft Historic Areas Board of Review Decision #10-02a dated May 11, Historic Areas Board of Review Decision #10-02a dated May 11, A memorandum dated 5/26/10 from John Giardiello, P.E., Director, Office of Building, Zoning and Planning Administration and Enforcement, Town of Orangetown. 10. Two letters from the Tappantown Historical Society dated May 26, 2010 and June 2, 2010 from Carol La Valle, president. At the April 21, 2010 meeting Mr. Mowerson made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously. At the meeting of May 19, 2010 on advice of Dennis Michaels, Deputy Town Attorney, counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Mowerson moved for a Board determination that the foregoing application is a Type II action exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations (c) (7); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. The motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried as follows: Ms. Castelli, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; Ms. Albanese, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; and Mr. Mowerson, aye. At the meeting of April 21, 2010 Donald Brenner, Attorney testified that the applicant received approval for the larger sign at the Historic Board meeting in February; that the pylon sign is 24 sq. ft.; that 40 sq. ft. is permitted in the CS zone; and that they would like a continuance to get clarification from the Building Department. Public Comment: No public comment. At the meeting on May 19, 2010 Tom Migge appeared. Tom Migge testified that he went to the Historic Areas Board of Review and got a 7-0 vote to approve the sign with a modification to the height of the sign and a recommendation to set it back two feet from the wall; that he needs the two signs to showcase his products and to use if he can rent his other space to another business; that he is licensed to sell securities and cannot combine that on the same sign as the insurance products that he sells; that he is frustrated because he doesn t feel that it is fair that he has to justify the need for a sign to do business in this town; that the Tack Box has 80 sq. ft. glass windows to showcase her goods; that he doesn t have that ability; that Joe s Barber Shop has four signs; that he had a sign that the County Highway Department removed when they were doing the work on Main Street; that the sidewalks were built within the last two years; that he purchased his building ten years ago; that he has renovated it; that he supports the community; that there is a clause in the code that states If in existence note #6 General Accessory Uses in CS District that should apply to his sign because he had a sign before the work was done on Main Street; that he is before the Zoning board for the set back of the sign because he already got approval for the sign and its size from the Historic Board; that he has no objecting neighbors or other businesses complaining about his proposed sign; that he cannot hang a sign like the wine store because there is no place to hang it; that he has never seen the minutes of the meeting of the Tappantown Historic Society that shows that they are against his sign; and that he would like a continuance. Public Comment: Tom LaValle, Main Street, Tappan, stated that the Building Inspector asked the historic Board to make a decision whether the size of the sign was based on the R-15 or the CS

4 District; and that the memorandum from the Inspector seemed to lean on the side of the R-15 District. Carol LaValle, Tappantown Historic Society President, stated that she is speaking for the Society; that they are clearly against the monument sign being permitted under the CS District when the code say that the R-15 District should be used for the Historic District; that there still isn t any clarification as to why they chose to go with community shopping instead of R-15 requirements; that they didn t determine what takes precedent in the area; that Gulio s is under new ownership and they might come in next to change their sign; that one of the Historic Board members stated that the two signs were redundant; that the corner buildings in the Historic District have multiple signs to be seen from several roads; that she would ask the Board to concur with the County letter and deny the application. At the June 2, 2010 meeting Donald Brenner, Attorney appeared. Donald Brenner, attorney, testified that the applicant has appeared before the Historic Board, Town of Orangetown twice and the proposed sign was approved; at the May 11, 2010 meeting the size of the sign was discussed and voted 7-0 for approval; that the decision stated that the application was referred back to the Board because of Town Code section 12.5 entitled Uses permitted in the Tappan Historic Area ; that this section at subpart A CS Districts, at subsection (3) states as follows: Permitted: All uses and regulations described and permitted in columns 5, 6 and 7 of the table of general use regulations, except that signs shall conform to the requirements of an R-15 district unless otherwise permitted by the Board of Review ; that the attorney for the Historic Board further stated that the Migge site is located in the CS zone, pursuant to the Town Code, if the Historic Board wishes, the Board can permit Mr. Migge to follow the CS district regulations; that the Historic Board discussed the size, placement and height of the sign and voted 7-0 to approve the sign while lowering the height of the sign; and they even commented that they were aware that the applicant was seeking a setback of two feet from the Zoning board; that the Historic Areas Board of Review is the deciding board for aesthetics in this area, not the Tappantown Historic Society; that these two groups do not always agree; that there are no minutes of any meeting of this group to prove that the person complaining is representing a group; that it could be personal opinion; that the County Planning Board denies every sign application because they feel the code should be revised rather than granting sign variances; that the original proposal was for a 0 set back and they are requesting a 2 setback now; that as far as setting precedent, every case stands on its own. Public Comment: Carol LaValle, President of the Tappantown Historic Society, testified that the historic board revisited the height of the sign based on signs that she submitted; that Gulio s is 15 sq. ft., and the dentist is 12 sq. ft.; that whether 40 sq. ft. is permitted in the CS zone does not change the impact of the proposed sign; that we feel that it is a bad decision for the whole district; that it sets a terrible precedent; that they are looking for a way to protect the area from further proliferation of signs in the Historic Area; that the County denied the setback and the granting of the variance would have a serious negative impact on the area. The Board members made personal inspections of the premises the week before each meeting and found them to be properly posted and as generally described on the application. A satisfactory statement in accordance with the provisions of Section 809 of the General Municipal Law of New York was received. Mr. Mowerson made a motion to close the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS: After personal observation of the property, hearing all the testimony and reviewing all the documents submitted, the Board found and concluded that the benefits to the applicant if the variance(s) are granted do not outweigh the detriment to the health, safety and

5 welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant, for the following reasons: 1. The requested sign set back variance for the proposed monument sign will produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood and a detriment to nearby properties. The proposed monument sign would be the only monument sign in this portion of the historic district that is positioned above the sidewalk and, as proposed at two feet from the walkway, would be imposing. 2. The requested sign set back variance will have an adverse effect or impact on the physical and environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The proposed monument sign would be the only monument sign in this portion of the historic district that is positioned above the sidewalk and, as proposed at two feet from the walkway, would be imposing. 3. The benefits sought by the applicant can be achieved by other means feasible for the applicant to pursue other than by obtaining the sign set back variance. The applicant has sufficient signage on the building. 4. The requested sign set back variance is substantial and would have an adverse effect or impact on the physical and environmental conditions of the area.. The proposed monument sign would be the only monument sign in this portion of the historic district that is positioned above the sidewalk and, as proposed at two feet from the walkway, would be imposing. DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board: RESOLVED, that the application for the requested sign set back variance is DENIED; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part. The foregoing resolution to deny the application for the requested sign set back variance was presented and moved by Ms. Castelli, seconded by Ms. Salomon, and carried as follows: Mr. Sullivan, nay; Ms. Albanese, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; Ms. Castelli, aye; and Mr. Mowerson, nay. The Administrative Aide to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this decision and file a certified copy thereof in the office of the Town Clerk. DATED: June 2, 2010 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF ORANGETOWN Deborah Arbolino Administrative Aide DECISION SECTION VARIANCES APPROVED

6 To: Joe Chiappa, P.E. ZBA # N. John Street Date: June 2, 2010 Pearl River, New York FROM: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: Town of Orangetown ZBA#10-33: Application of Joe Chiappa for variances from Chapter 43 (Zoning) of the Code of the Town of Orangetown, Section 3.11, CS District, Column 5, General Accessory Uses, #5, Column 7, #3; and Article 5, Section 5.226, Fences & Walls ( 6 permitted, 12 proposed) for temporary storage.. The premises is located at 11 John Street, Pearl River New York, and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 68.16, Block 6, Lot 18; CS zone. Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on Wednesday, June 2, 2010 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter set forth. Joseph Chiappa and Donald Brenner, Attorney, appeared and testified. The following documents were presented: 1. Hand drawing of site plan based on plot plan by Barboue & Jost 10/4/1961 signed and sealed by Joseph D. Chiappa, P.E. dated 4/6/10, with a picture of the existing temporary storage & screening. 2. A letter dated May 28, 2010 from the County of Rockland Department of Planning signed by Salvatore Corallo, Commissioner of Planning. 3. A letter dated April 23, 2010 from the County of Rockland Department of Health signed by Scott McKane, P.E. 4. A letter dated April 27, 2010 from the County of Rockland Department of Highways from Joseph Arena, Principal Engineering Technician. 5. A letter dated May 21, 2010 from the County of Rockland Sewer District No. 1 from Joseph LaFiandra, Engineer II. 6. A letter dated May 24, 2010 from the County of Rockland Drainage Agency signed by Edward F. Devine, Executive Director. 7. Four pictures submitted by neighbor of the site. Mr. Mowerson made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried unanimously. On advice of Dennis Michaels, Deputy Town Attorney, counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Mowerson moved for a Board determination that the foregoing application is a Type II action exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations (c) (9), (10), (12) and /or (13); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. The motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried as follows: Ms. Castelli, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; Ms. Albanese, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; and Mr. Mowerson, aye. Donald Brenner, Attorney, testified that Mr. Chiappa purchased the old Burns Glass property which dates back to the 1950 s; that there is one residence and one commercial use on the property; that when Mr. Chiappa went for his C.O. on the property he was told that he needed a variance for the storage units and the fencing; that he is a professional engineer and has a consulting company; that he needs the storage to keep some of the tools used for his business out of the weather; that Mr. Burns put the storage back there but there was so much brush that it was probably more hidden; that his client is prepared to put up a new stockade fence for more screening; that there is an electronic store with four parking spaces and the engineer s space with storage in the rear like Burns Glass; that the map submitted by the neighborhood cannot be used over the Building Inspector s determination; that there is no contamination of Cherry Brook; and the property is in a CS zone and these uses are permitted in the zone.

7 Joseph Chiappa testified that he worked for Mr. Burns when he was in High School and that storage was always out in the back, as least since 1986; that he has been cleaning up the property since he acquired it last fall; that the property has been neglected for a several years; that in an effort to clean it up he removed two old wooden sheds and took out a lot of brush; that he moved one of the storage containers to make room for another one; that he created a screen over it that matches the roof line of the container and when he spoke to the neighbor about this he seemed to like the idea; that the vehicles are used for his business and if the economy was better several of them would have been sold; that one of the vehicles is a cherry picker and the other is a boring truck, an auger, a highway safety truck and a pick-up truck; that there are tall pine trees and shrubbery in the area and that there is not enough room or sunlight to plant more shrubbery as a screening. Public Comment: Niall Kenny, 102 East Washington Avenue, testified that he is objecting to the variance; that he complained last November about the view from his family room; that he met the applicant last November and was told that he was doing renovations and after that four trucks showed up; that a portion of the property is zoned residential; that 60 from those trucks is the creek and he worries about the environmental impact of the trucks on the creek; that is unsafe for children; that this impacts the value of his property; that the trucks are over ½ ton and that he should get a violation for accessory parking; that this property detracts from the neighborhood; that Burns parked his trucks in the front, never in the rear for his neighbors; and that he objects to the variance. The Board members made personal inspections of the premises the week before the meeting and found them to be properly posted and as generally described on the application. A satisfactory statement in accordance with the provisions of Section 809 of the General Municipal Law of New York was received. Mr. Mowerson made a motion to close the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS: After personal observation of the property, hearing all the testimony and reviewing all the documents submitted, the Board found and concluded that the benefits to the applicant if the variance(s) are granted outweigh the detriment (if any) to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant, for the following reasons: 1. The requested Zoning Code Section variances, with the imposed conditions, will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. The applicant shall replace the damaged stockade fence with a new stockade fence, with the good side facing out, within 30 days of the filing of this Decision; the Office of Building Planning Zoning and Administration shall determine if the ½ ton vehicles parked on the lot are in compliance with code requirements for this zone; and the applicant has agreed to remove three such trucks within one year from the filing of this Decision. The applicant shall remove all items that are on top of the temporary storage units and no items shall be higher than the black geotech style fencing that is screening the rear of the lot. 2. The requested Zoning Code Section variances will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. The applicant shall replace the damaged stockade fence with a new stockade fence, with the good side facing out, within 30 days of the filing of this Decision; the Office of Building Planning Zoning and Administration shall determine if the ½ ton vehicles parked on the lot are in compliance with code requirements for this zone; and the applicant has agreed to remove three such trucks within one year from the filing of this Decision. The applicant shall remove all items that are on top of the temporary storage units and no items shall be

8 higher than the black geotech style fencing that is screening the rear of the lot. 3. The benefits sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by other means feasible for the applicant to pursue other than by obtaining variances. 4. The requested Section variances, although substantial, will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions of the area The applicant shall replace the damaged stockade fence with a new stockade fence, with the good side facing out, within 30 days of the filing of this Decision; the Office of Building Planning Zoning and Administration shall determine if the ½ ton vehicles parked on the lot are in compliance with code requirements for this zone; and the applicant has agreed to remove three such trucks within one year from the filing of this Decision. The applicant shall remove all items that are on top of the temporary storage units and no items shall be higher than the black geotech style fencing that is screening the rear of the lot. 5. The applicant purchased the property subject to Orangetown s Zoning Code (Chapter 43) and is proposing a new addition and/or improvements, so the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration was relevant to the decision of the Board of Appeals, but did not, by itself, preclude the granting of the area variances. DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board: RESOLVED, that the application for the requested Zoning Code Section variances are APPROVED with the following SPECIFIC CONDITIONS: (1) the applicant shall replace the damaged stockade fence with a new stockade fence, with the good side of the fence facing out, within 30 days of the stamping and filing of this Decision; (2) the applicant shall remove all items and materials on top of the outdoor storage units within thirty days of the stamping and filing of this Decision and no items shall be higher than the geotech style fence screening; (3) the applicant shall remove the following three vehicles: the boring/auger truck, cherry picker and highway safety truck within one year of the stamping and filing of this Decision; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part. General Conditions: (i) The approval of any variance or Special Permit is granted by the Board in accordance with and subject to those facts shown on the plans submitted and, if applicable, as amended at or prior to this hearing, as hereinabove recited or set forth. (ii) Any approval of a variance or Special Permit by the Board is limited to the specific variance or Special Permit requested but only to the extent such approval is granted herein and subject to those conditions, if any, upon which such approval was conditioned which are hereinbefore set forth. (iii) The Board gives no approval of any building plans, including, without limitation, the accuracy and structural integrity thereof, of the applicant, but same have been submitted to the Board solely for informational and verification purposes relative to any variances being requested. (iv) A building permit as well as any other necessary permits must be obtained within a reasonable period of time following the filing of this decision and prior to undertaking any construction contemplated in this decision. To the extent any variance or Special Permit granted herein is subject to any conditions, the building department shall not be obligated to issue any necessary permits where any such condition imposed should, in the sole judgment of the building department, be first complied with as contemplated hereunder. Occupancy will not be made until, and unless, a Certificate of Occupancy is

9 issued by the Office of Building, Zoning and Planning Administration and Enforcement which legally permits such occupancy. (v) Any foregoing variance or Special Permit will lapse if any contemplated construction of the project or any use for which the variance or Special Permit is granted is not substantially implemented within one year of the date of filing of this decision or that of any other board of the Town of Orangetown granting any required final approval to such project, whichever is later, but in any event within two years of the filing of this decision. Merely obtaining a Building Permit with respect to construction or a Certificate of Occupancy with respect to use does not constitute substantial implementation for the purposes hereof. The foregoing resolution to approve the application for the requested Section variances with specific conditions was presented and moved by Ms. Salomon, seconded by Ms. Castelli, and carried as follows: Mr. Sullivan, aye; Ms. Albanese, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; Ms. Castelli, aye; and Mr. Mowerson, aye. The Administrative Aide to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this decision and file a certified copy thereof in the office of the Town Clerk. DATED: June 2, 2010 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF ORANGETOWN Deborah Arbolino Administrative Aide SIDE YARD VARIANCE APPROVED DECISION To: Stuart Rasch ZBA # Sickletown Road Date: June 2, 2010 Pearl River, New York FROM: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: Town of Orangetown ZBA#10-34: Application of Stuart Rasch for a variance from Chapter 43 (Zoning) of the Code of the Town of Orangetown Section 3.12, R-22 District, Group I, Column 9 (Side Yard: 25 required, 16.5 proposed) for the installation of a pool at an existing singlefamily residence. The premises is located at 40 Sickletown Road, Pearl River New York, and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 69.19, Block 1, Lot 65; R-22 zone. Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on Wednesday, June 2, 2010 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter set forth. Stuart and Caroline Rasch appeared and testified. The following documents were presented:

10 1. Copy of survey showing the pool. 2. A letter dated May 28, 2010 from the County of Rockland Department of Planning signed by Salvatore Corallo, Commissioner. 3. A letter dated May 24, 2010 from the County of Rockland Drainage Agency signed by Edward F. Devine, Executive Director. 4. A letter dated May 21, 2010 from the County of Rockland Sewer District No. 1 signed by Joseph LaFiandra, Engineer II. 5. A letter dated April 30, 2010 from the County of Rockland Department of Health signed by Scott McKane, P.E. 6. A letter dated May 17, 2010 from the County of Rockland Department of Highways signed by Joseph Arena, Principal Engineering Technician. 7. A letter dated May 14, 2010 from the County of Rockland Department of Highways signed by Joseph Arena, Principal Engineering Technician. Mr. Mowerson made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously. On advice of Dennis Michaels, Deputy Town Attorney, counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Mowerson moved for a Board determination that the foregoing application is a Type II action exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations (c) (9), (10), (12) and /or (13); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. The motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried as follows: Ms. Albanese, aye; Ms. Castelli, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; and Mr. Mowerson, aye. Stuart Rasch testified that they were re-doing the deck and pool and decided that they would like to add a spa; that they found out that they needed a variance for the side yard for the spa when they were going to get the certificate of occupancy; that the pool was there when they purchased the house; that they have owned the house since 1993 and they have a C.O. for the pool; that on the pool side of the house there is an existing retaining wall that was there when they purchased the house; that the house on that side is much higher than they are and no one enters the yard from that area; and that the other side of the yard has a shed. Carolyn Rasch testified that they have owned the house since 1993 and that they have two children aged 15 and 10. Public Comment: No public comment. The Board members made personal inspections of the premises the week before the meeting and found them to be properly posted and as generally described on the application. A satisfactory statement in accordance with the provisions of Section 809 of the General Municipal Law of New York was received. Mr. Mowerson made a motion to close the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS: After personal observation of the property, hearing all the testimony and reviewing all the documents submitted, the Board found and concluded that the benefits to the applicant if the variance(s) are granted outweigh the detriment (if any) to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant, for the following reasons: 1. The requested side yard variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. Similar pools/

11 spas have been constructed in the area. 2. The requested side yard variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. Similar pools/ spas have been constructed in the area. 3. The benefits sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by other means feasible for the applicant to pursue other than by obtaining variances. 4. The requested side yard variance, although substantial, will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions of the area. Similar pools/ spas have been constructed in the area. 5. The applicant purchased the property subject to Orangetown s Zoning Code (Chapter 43) and is proposing a new addition and/or improvements, so the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration was relevant to the decision of the Board of Appeals, but did not, by itself, preclude the granting of the area variances. DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board: RESOLVED, that the application for the requested side yard variance is APPROVED; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part. General Conditions: (i) The approval of any variance or Special Permit is granted by the Board in accordance with and subject to those facts shown on the plans submitted and, if applicable, as amended at or prior to this hearing, as hereinabove recited or set forth. (ii) Any approval of a variance or Special Permit by the Board is limited to the specific variance or Special Permit requested but only to the extent such approval is granted herein and subject to those conditions, if any, upon which such approval was conditioned which are hereinbefore set forth. (iii) The Board gives no approval of any building plans, including, without limitation, the accuracy and structural integrity thereof, of the applicant, but same have been submitted to the Board solely for informational and verification purposes relative to any variances being requested. (iv) A building permit as well as any other necessary permits must be obtained within a reasonable period of time following the filing of this decision and prior to undertaking any construction contemplated in this decision. To the extent any variance or Special Permit granted herein is subject to any conditions, the building department shall not be obligated to issue any necessary permits where any such condition imposed should, in the sole judgment of the building department, be first complied with as contemplated hereunder. Occupancy will not be made until, and unless, a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Office of Building, Zoning and Planning Administration and Enforcement which legally permits such occupancy. (v) Any foregoing variance or Special Permit will lapse if any contemplated construction of the project or any use for which the variance or Special Permit is granted is not substantially implemented within one year of the date of filing of this decision or that of

12 any other board of the Town of Orangetown granting any required final approval to such project, whichever is later, but in any event within two years of the filing of this decision. Merely obtaining a Building Permit with respect to construction or a Certificate of Occupancy with respect to use does not constitute substantial implementation for the purposes hereof. The foregoing resolution to approve the application for the requested side yard variance was presented and moved by Ms. Albanese, seconded by Mr. Sullivan, and carried as follows: Ms. Salomon, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; Ms. Albanese, aye; Ms. Castelli, aye; and Mr. Mowerson, aye. The Administrative Aide to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this decision and file a certified copy thereof in the office of the Town Clerk. DATED: June 2, 2010 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF ORANGETOWN Deborah Arbolino Administrative Aide DECISION FRONT YARD VARIANCE APPROVED To: Leo and Elaine Biedermann ZBA # South William Street Date: June 2, 2010 Pearl River, New York FROM: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: Town of Orangetown ZBA#10-35: Application of Leo and Elaine Biedermann for a variance from Chapter 43 (Zoning) of the Code of the Town of Orangetown, Section 3.12, RG District, Column 8 (Front Yard: 25 required, 15.2 existing and proposed) for the addition of a carport at an existing single-family residence. The premises is located at 119 South William Street, Pearl River New York, and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 68.20, Block 5, Lot 14; RG zone. Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on Wednesday, June 2, 2010 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter set forth. Leo Biedermann appeared and testified. The following documents were presented: 1. Survey dated October 1, 2009 revised October 10, 2009 by Robert R. Rahnefeld, L.S. 2. Five pages of plans and notes for the proposed new carport. 3. Three letters in support of the application.

13 Mr. Mowerson made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously. On advice of Dennis Michaels, Deputy Town Attorney, counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Mowerson moved for a Board determination that the foregoing application is a Type II action exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations (c) (9), (10), (12) and /or (13); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. The motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried as follows: Ms. Castelli, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; Ms. Albanese, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; and Mr. Mowerson, aye. Leo Biedermann testified that they would like to remove the existing cheap carport and rebuild a nice new one that would look better; that the house was purchased with the existing carport; that they have owned the house since 1987 but they do not live in it; that they would like to replace the carport for the tenant that has lived there for quite a while; and that they would like to rebuild along the same line of the house. Public Comment: No public comment. The Board members made personal inspections of the premises the week before the meeting and found them to be properly posted and as generally described on the application. A satisfactory statement in accordance with the provisions of Section 809 of the General Municipal Law of New York was received. Mr. Mowerson made a motion to close the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS: After personal observation of the property, hearing all the testimony and reviewing all the documents submitted, the Board found and concluded that the benefits to the applicant if the variance(s) are granted outweigh the detriment (if any) to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant, for the following reasons: 1. The requested front yard variance will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. Similar garages and carports have been constructed in the area. 2. The requested front yard variance will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. Similar garages and carports have been constructed in the area. 3. The benefits sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by other means feasible for the applicant to pursue other than by obtaining variances. 4. The requested front yard variance, although substantial, will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions of the area. Similar garages and carports have been constructed in the area. 5. The applicant purchased the property subject to Orangetown s Zoning Code (Chapter 43) and is proposing a new addition and/or improvements, so the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration was relevant to the decision of the Board of Appeals, but did not, by itself, preclude the granting of the area variances.

14 DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board: RESOLVED, that the application for the requested front yard variance is APPROVED; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part. General Conditions: (i) The approval of any variance or Special Permit is granted by the Board in accordance with and subject to those facts shown on the plans submitted and, if applicable, as amended at or prior to this hearing, as hereinabove recited or set forth. (ii) Any approval of a variance or Special Permit by the Board is limited to the specific variance or Special Permit requested but only to the extent such approval is granted herein and subject to those conditions, if any, upon which such approval was conditioned which are hereinbefore set forth. (iii) The Board gives no approval of any building plans, including, without limitation, the accuracy and structural integrity thereof, of the applicant, but same have been submitted to the Board solely for informational and verification purposes relative to any variances being requested. (iv) A building permit as well as any other necessary permits must be obtained within a reasonable period of time following the filing of this decision and prior to undertaking any construction contemplated in this decision. To the extent any variance or Special Permit granted herein is subject to any conditions, the building department shall not be obligated to issue any necessary permits where any such condition imposed should, in the sole judgment of the building department, be first complied with as contemplated hereunder. Occupancy will not be made until, and unless, a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Office of Building, Zoning and Planning Administration and Enforcement which legally permits such occupancy. (v) Any foregoing variance or Special Permit will lapse if any contemplated construction of the project or any use for which the variance or Special Permit is granted is not substantially implemented within one year of the date of filing of this decision or that of any other board of the Town of Orangetown granting any required final approval to such project, whichever is later, but in any event within two years of the filing of this decision. Merely obtaining a Building Permit with respect to construction or a Certificate of Occupancy with respect to use does not constitute substantial implementation for the purposes hereof. The foregoing resolution to approve the application for the requested front yard variance was presented and moved by Mr. Sullivan, seconded by Ms. Salomon, and carried as follows: Mr. Sullivan, aye; Ms. Albanese, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; Ms. Castelli, aye; and Mr. Mowerson, aye. The Administrative Aide to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this decision and file a certified copy thereof in the office of the Town Clerk. DATED: June 2, 2010 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF ORANGETOWN BUILDING INSPECTOR B.vW. Deborah Arbolino

15 DECISION FRONT YARD AND SIDE YARD VARIANCES APPROVED To: Steven and Deborah Donovan ZBA # Marycrest Road Date: June 2, 2010 West Nyack, New York FROM: ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS: Town of Orangetown ZBA#10-36: Application of Steven and Deborah Donovan for variances from Chapter 43 (Zoning) of the Code of the Town of Orangetown, Section 3.12, Column 1, R-40 District, Group E, Columns 8 (Front Yard: 50 required, 42.8 existing non-conforming) and 9 (Side Yard: 30 required, 21.4 existing non-conforming) for the addition of a garage. The premises is located at 23 Marycrest Road, West Nyack, New York, and are identified on the Orangetown Tax Map as Section 69.06, Block 2, Lot 26; R-40 zone. Heard by the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Orangetown at a meeting held on Wednesday, June 2, 2010 at which time the Board made the determination hereinafter set forth. Steven and Deborah Donovan appeared and testified. The following documents were presented: 1. Architectural plans dated April 21, 2010 (2 pages) signed or sealed by Harold J. Goldstein, Architect. 2. Survey dated 10/7/09 with the latest revision date of 4/22/10 signed and sealed by Anthony R. Celentano, L.S. 3. Four pictures of the existing structure. Mr. Mowerson made a motion to open the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Salomon and carried unanimously. On advice of Dennis Michaels, Deputy Town Attorney, counsel to the Zoning Board of Appeals, Mr. Mowerson moved for a Board determination that the foregoing application is a Type II action exempt from the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA), pursuant to SEQRA Regulations (c) (9), (10), (12) and /or (13); which does not require SEQRA environmental review. The motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried as follows: Ms. Salomon, aye; Ms. Castelli, aye; Ms. Albanese, aye; Mr. Sullivan, aye; and Mr. Mowerson, aye. Steven Donovan testified that this structure was on the property when they were in the process of building the house; that they want to keep it and make it more usable; that they would like to add onto it on the side of the house that will not require a variance; that they are planning to put a new door on the garage and to side it to match the house. Deborah Donovan testified that the addition would permit the space to hold a car; that the present size is too small and it is used for storage; that there are three people in the family; and this space would be her husbands space. Public Comment: No public comment. The Board members made personal inspections of the premises the week before the

16 meeting and found them to be properly posted and as generally described on the application. A satisfactory statement in accordance with the provisions of Section 809 of the General Municipal Law of New York was received. Mr. Mowerson made a motion to close the Public Hearing which motion was seconded by Ms. Castelli and carried unanimously. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS: After personal observation of the property, hearing all the testimony and reviewing all the documents submitted, the Board found and concluded that the benefits to the applicant if the variance(s) are granted outweigh the detriment (if any) to the health, safety and welfare of the neighborhood or community by such grant, for the following reasons: 1. The requested front yard and side yard variances will not produce an undesirable change in the character of the neighborhood or a detriment to nearby properties. Similar garages exist in the area. 2. The requested front yard and side yard variances will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions in the neighborhood or district. Similar garages exist in the area. 3. The benefits sought by the applicant cannot be achieved by other means feasible for the applicant to pursue other than by obtaining variances. 4. The requested front yard and side yard variances, although substantial, will not have an adverse effect or impact on the physical or environmental conditions of the area. Similar garages exist in the area. 5. The applicant purchased the property subject to Orangetown s Zoning Code (Chapter 43) and is proposing a new addition and/or improvements, so the alleged difficulty was self-created, which consideration was relevant to the decision of the Board of Appeals, but did not, by itself, preclude the granting of the area variances. DECISION: In view of the foregoing and the testimony and documents presented, the Board: RESOLVED, that the application for the requested front yard and side yard variances are APPROVED; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that such decision and the vote thereon shall become effective and be deemed rendered on the date of adoption by the Board of the minutes of which they are a part. General Conditions: (i) The approval of any variance or Special Permit is granted by the Board in accordance with and subject to those facts shown on the plans submitted and, if applicable, as amended at or prior to this hearing, as hereinabove recited or set forth. (ii) Any approval of a variance or Special Permit by the Board is limited to the specific variance or Special Permit requested but only to the extent such approval is granted herein and subject to those conditions, if any, upon which such approval was conditioned which are hereinbefore set forth. (iii) The Board gives no approval of any building plans, including, without limitation, the accuracy and structural integrity thereof, of the applicant, but same have been submitted to the Board solely for informational and verification purposes relative to any variances being requested.

17 (iv) A building permit as well as any other necessary permits must be obtained within a reasonable period of time following the filing of this decision and prior to undertaking any construction contemplated in this decision. To the extent any variance or Special Permit granted herein is subject to any conditions, the building department shall not be obligated to issue any necessary permits where any such condition imposed should, in the sole judgment of the building department, be first complied with as contemplated hereunder. Occupancy will not be made until, and unless, a Certificate of Occupancy is issued by the Office of Building, Zoning and Planning Administration and Enforcement which legally permits such occupancy. (v) Any foregoing variance or Special Permit will lapse if any contemplated construction of the project or any use for which the variance or Special Permit is granted is not substantially implemented within one year of the date of filing of this decision or that of any other board of the Town of Orangetown granting any required final approval to such project, whichever is later, but in any event within two years of the filing of this decision. Merely obtaining a Building Permit with respect to construction or a Certificate of Occupancy with respect to use does not constitute substantial implementation for the purposes hereof. The foregoing resolution to approve the application for the requested front yard and side yard variances was presented and moved by Ms. Castelli, seconded by Ms. Albanese, and carried as follows: Mr. Sullivan, aye; Ms. Albanese, aye; Ms. Salomon, aye; Ms. Castelli, aye; and Mr. Mowerson, aye. The Administrative Aide to the Board is hereby authorized, directed and empowered to sign this decision and file a certified copy thereof in the office of the Town Clerk. DATED: June 2, 2010 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS TOWN OF ORANGETOWN By Deborah Arbolino DISTRIBUTION: APPLICANT ZBA MEMBERS SUPERVISOR TOWN BOARD MEMBERS TOWN ATTORNEY DEPUTY TOWN ATTORNEY OBZPAE BUILDING INSPECTOR J.P. Administrative Aide TOWN CLERK HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT ASSESSOR DEPT. of ENVIRONMENTAL MGMT. and ENGINEERING FILE,ZBA, PB CHAIRMAN, ZBA, PB, ACABOR

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 17, 2010 JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE DANIEL SULLIVAN

MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 17, 2010 JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE DANIEL SULLIVAN MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 17, 2010 MEMBERS PRESENT: PATRICIA CASTELLI JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE ABSENT: WILLIAM MOWERSON DANIEL SULLIVAN ALSO PRESENT: Dennis Michaels, Esq. Deputy Town

More information

MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS May 6, 2009

MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS May 6, 2009 MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS May 6, 2009 MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: DANIEL SULLIVAN NANETTE ALBANESE WILLIAM MOWERSON JOAN SALOMON PATRICIA CASTELLI ALSO PRESENT: Dennis Michaels, Esq. Deputy Town Attorney

More information

MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS September 9, 2009 WILLIAM MOWERSON JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE

MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS September 9, 2009 WILLIAM MOWERSON JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS September 9, 2009 MEMBERS PRESENT: PATRICIA CASTELLI WILLIAM MOWERSON JOAN SALOMON ABSENT: DANIEL SULLIVAN NANETTE ALBANESE ALSO PRESENT: Dennis Michaels, Esq. Deputy Town

More information

MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS February 3, 2010 JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE DANIEL SULLIVAN

MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS February 3, 2010 JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE DANIEL SULLIVAN MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS February 3, 2010 MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: PATRICIA CASTELLI JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE DANIEL SULLIVAN WILLIAM MOWERSON ALSO PRESENT: Dennis Michaels, Esq. Deputy Town

More information

MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS April 2, 2008 WILLIAM MOWERSON NANETTE ALBANESE DANIEL SULLIVAN

MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS April 2, 2008 WILLIAM MOWERSON NANETTE ALBANESE DANIEL SULLIVAN MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS April 2, 2008 MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: PATRICIA CASTELLI WILLIAM MOWERSON NANETTE ALBANESE DANIEL SULLIVAN JOHN DOHERTY ALSO PRESENT: Dennis Michaels, Esq. Deputy Town Attorney

More information

MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 3, 2010 JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE DANIEL SULLIVAN

MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 3, 2010 JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE DANIEL SULLIVAN MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 3, 2010 MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: PATRICIA CASTELLI JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE DANIEL SULLIVAN WILLIAM MOWERSON ALSO PRESENT: Dennis Michaels, Esq. Deputy Town Attorney

More information

MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FEBRUARY 2, 2011

MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FEBRUARY 2, 2011 MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS FEBRUARY 2, 2011 MEMBERS PRESENT: JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE PATRICIA CASTELLI DANIEL SULLIVAN ABSENT: WILLIAM MOWERSON ALSO PRESENT: Dennis Michaels, Esq. Deputy Town

More information

MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS May 5, 2010 DANIEL SULLIVAN PATRICIA CASTELLI JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE

MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS May 5, 2010 DANIEL SULLIVAN PATRICIA CASTELLI JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE MINUTES ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS May 5, 2010 MEMBERS PRESENT: WILLIAM MOWERSON DANIEL SULLIVAN PATRICIA CASTELLI JOAN SALOMON NANETTE ALBANESE ABSENT: NONE ALSO PRESENT: Dennis Michaels, Esq. Deputy Town

More information

Zoning Board of Appeals 2919 Delaware Avenue, RM 14 Kenmore, NY (716) Zoning Board of Appeals

Zoning Board of Appeals 2919 Delaware Avenue, RM 14 Kenmore, NY (716) Zoning Board of Appeals Zoning Board of Appeals 2919 Delaware Avenue, RM 14 Kenmore, NY 14217 (716) 877-8800 Zoning Board of Appeals www.tonawanda.ny.us Regular ~ Minutes ~ Town Clerk Melissa Brinson Wednesday, January 19, 2011

More information

TOWN OF ORANGETOWN ARCHITECTURE AND COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD OF REVIEW - MEETING OF OCTOBER 6, 2011

TOWN OF ORANGETOWN ARCHITECTURE AND COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD OF REVIEW - MEETING OF OCTOBER 6, 2011 TOWN OF ORANGETOWN ARCHITECTURE AND COMMUNITY APPEARANCE BOARD OF REVIEW - MEETING OF OCTOBER 6, 2011 MEMBERS PRESENT: James Dodge, Vice Chairperson; Jill Fieldstein; Michael Bosco; Larry Vail; Paul Papay

More information

BOROUGH OF INTERLAKEN MINUTES- PLANNING BOARD JANUARY 22, :30 P.M. BOROUGH HALL, 100 GRASSMERE AVENUE

BOROUGH OF INTERLAKEN MINUTES- PLANNING BOARD JANUARY 22, :30 P.M. BOROUGH HALL, 100 GRASSMERE AVENUE BOROUGH OF INTERLAKEN MINUTES- PLANNING BOARD JANUARY 22, 2018 7:30 P.M. BOROUGH HALL, 100 GRASSMERE AVENUE A meeting of the PLANNING BOARD of the Borough of Interlaken, Monmouth County, New Jersey was

More information

The meeting was called to order by Chairman Dan Kasaris at 7:00 p.m.

The meeting was called to order by Chairman Dan Kasaris at 7:00 p.m. The Board of Zoning Appeals of the City of North Royalton met on November 25, 2014 to hold a Public Hearing in the Council Chambers at 14600 State Road. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Dan

More information

Town of Farmington 1000 County Road 8 Farmington, New York 14425

Town of Farmington 1000 County Road 8 Farmington, New York 14425 Page 1 of 21 Town of Farmington Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes APPROVED June 25, 2018 Town of Farmington 1000 County Road 8 Farmington, New York 14425 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Established July

More information

Members: Mr. Prager Chairman Mr. Rexhouse Member Mr. Casella Member Mr. Johnston Member--Absent Mr. Galotti Member

Members: Mr. Prager Chairman Mr. Rexhouse Member Mr. Casella Member Mr. Johnston Member--Absent Mr. Galotti Member MINUTES Town of Wappinger October 14, 2014 Town Hall 20 Middlebush Road Wappinger Falls, NY Summarized Minutes Members: Mr. Prager Chairman Mr. Rexhouse Member Mr. Casella Member Mr. Johnston Member--Absent

More information

Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes. Wednesday, January 16, :00 PM

Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes. Wednesday, January 16, :00 PM TOWN OF BETHLEHEM John Clarkson Town Supervisor Daniel W. Coffey Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes Wednesday, January 16, 2013 7:00 PM I. Call to Order A Regular Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals

More information

MEETING OF THE FEBRUARY 25, 2014 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING NO. 2 PAGE NO. 1

MEETING OF THE FEBRUARY 25, 2014 ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING NO. 2 PAGE NO. 1 PAGE NO. 1 ADEQUATE NOTICE OF THIS MEETING HAS BEEN PROVIDED AS IS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 231, PUBLIC LAW 1975 AND BY RESOLUTION 2004-8, WITH THE REQUEST OF THE HOME NEWS AND TRIBUNE AND THE SENTINEL NEWSPAPERS

More information

Proper notice of this meeting was given as required by the Open Public Meetings Act on January 8, 2016.

Proper notice of this meeting was given as required by the Open Public Meetings Act on January 8, 2016. Call to Order: The regular meeting of the Monroe Township Planning Board was called to order at 7:04 p.m. by Chairman O Brien. The Board saluted the flag. Roll call was as follows: Present Mr. Caligiuri,

More information

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1255

ORDINANCE NUMBER 1255 ORDINANCE NUMBER 1255 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PERRIS, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTIONS 19.50 AND 19.61 OF THE ZONING CODE TO EXTEND THE APPROVAL PERIOD

More information

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF VAN BUREN BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS REGULAR MEETING MINUTES May 11, 2010

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF VAN BUREN BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS REGULAR MEETING MINUTES May 11, 2010 CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF VAN BUREN BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS REGULAR MEETING MINUTES May 11, 2010 Chairperson Watkins called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Present: Glass, Kryza, Werner, Jahr, Wardwell, McKenna

More information

Zoning Board of Appeals 1 DRAFT

Zoning Board of Appeals 1 DRAFT 12-02-14 Zoning Board of Appeals 1 A regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Cooperstown was held in the Village Office, 22 Main Street, Cooperstown, New York on December 2, 2014

More information

Public hearing to adopt Ordinance 1375 C.S. amending Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Martinez Municipal Code

Public hearing to adopt Ordinance 1375 C.S. amending Title 15, Buildings and Construction, of the Martinez Municipal Code CITY OF MARTINEZ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA December 4, 2013 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mayor and City Council Don Salts, Deputy Public Works Director Mercy G. Cabral, Deputy City Clerk Public hearing to adopt Ordinance

More information

REGULATIONS FOR THE VILLAGE OF NORTH CHEVY CHASE

REGULATIONS FOR THE VILLAGE OF NORTH CHEVY CHASE REGULATIONS FOR THE VILLAGE OF NORTH CHEVY CHASE CHAPTER 3 BUILDING PERMITS Article 1. General Provisions Section 3-101 Definitions Section 3-102 Applicable Requirements Article 2. Village Building Permits

More information

TOWN OF STILLWATER ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS August 27, 7:30 PM STILLWATER TOWN HALL

TOWN OF STILLWATER ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS August 27, 7:30 PM STILLWATER TOWN HALL August 27, 2012 @ 7:30 PM STILLWATER TOWN HALL Present: Chairperson James R. Ferris (JF), Donald D Ambro (DD), William Ritter (WR), Richard Rourke (RR) and Christine Kipling (CK) Also Present: Daryl Cutler(DC),

More information

TOWN OF VESTAL ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MARGARET A. JOHNSTON DECISION

TOWN OF VESTAL ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MARGARET A. JOHNSTON DECISION In the Matter of the Application of TOWN OF VESTAL MARGARET A. JOHNSTON DECISION For a variance as required by chapter 24, Article IV, Division 2, Section 24-180 (b) (3) a and b of the Code of The Town

More information

City Attorney's Synopsis

City Attorney's Synopsis Eff.: Immediate ORDINANCE NO. AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BURBANK EXTENDING AND AMENDING AN INTERIM DEVELOPMENT CONTROL ORDINANCE WHICH TEMPORARILY PROHIBITS THE ISSUANCE OF CERTAIN

More information

TOWN OF SOUTHPORT 1139 Pennsylvania Avenue Elmira, NY 14904

TOWN OF SOUTHPORT 1139 Pennsylvania Avenue Elmira, NY 14904 TOWN OF SOUTHPORT 1139 Pennsylvania Avenue Elmira, NY 14904 Minutes Approved To include Amendment-Page 5 by Board of Appeals 2/27/2018 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING 6:30 pm PUBLIC HEARING

More information

A SUMMARY OF THE MINUTES OF THE GLEN RIDGE PLANNING BOARD HELD IN THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING. October 21, 2015

A SUMMARY OF THE MINUTES OF THE GLEN RIDGE PLANNING BOARD HELD IN THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING. October 21, 2015 A SUMMARY OF THE MINUTES OF THE GLEN RIDGE PLANNING BOARD HELD IN THE MUNICIPAL BUILDING October 21, 2015 OPMA & Roll Call The meeting was called to order at 8:00 p.m. and Mr. Zichelli read the Sunshine

More information

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 17, 2015

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS March 17, 2015 Minutes of the meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Amherst which was held in the Amherst Municipal Building, located at 5583 Main Street, Williamsville, New York, on Tuesday, March 17,

More information

Farmington Zoning Board of Appeals Resolution SEQR Resolution - Type II Action File: ZB #

Farmington Zoning Board of Appeals Resolution SEQR Resolution - Type II Action File: ZB # Farmington Zoning Board of Appeals Resolution SEQR Resolution - Type II Action File: ZB # 0401-17 Applicant: Lamar Outdoor Advertising Action: Area Variance, to erect a 225.75 square foot freestanding

More information

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO A by-law to amend "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No "...

CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO A by-law to amend Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No ... CITY OF SURREY BY-LAW NO. 11302 A by-law to amend "Surrey Zoning By-law, 1979, No. 5942." As amended by Bylaw No: 15501, 10/18/04; 17706, 07/26/12... THIS IS A CONSOLIDATED BYLAW PREPARED BY THE CITY OF

More information

Department of Municipal Licenses and Inspections Zoning Board of Appeals 1 JFK Memorial Drive Braintree, Massachusetts 02184

Department of Municipal Licenses and Inspections Zoning Board of Appeals 1 JFK Memorial Drive Braintree, Massachusetts 02184 Department of Municipal Licenses and Inspections Zoning Board of Appeals 1 JFK Memorial Drive Braintree, Massachusetts 02184 Joseph C. Sullivan Mayor Meeting Minutes August 26, 2014 IN ATTENDANCE: Stephen

More information

VILLAGE OF LAKE BLUFF ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW. Tuesday, September 5, :00 P.M.

VILLAGE OF LAKE BLUFF ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW. Tuesday, September 5, :00 P.M. VILLAGE OF LAKE BLUFF ARCHITECTURAL BOARD OF REVIEW Tuesday, September 5, 2017 7:00 P.M. VILLAGE HALL BOARD ROOM 40 E. CENTER AVENUE, LAKE BLUFF, ILLINOIS AGENDA 1. Call to Order and Roll Call 2. Consideration

More information

Ordinance # SECTION 1: General Provisions. A. Administration

Ordinance # SECTION 1: General Provisions. A. Administration Ordinance #700-005 An ordinance for the purpose of promoting health, safety, order, convenience and general welfare of the people of the City of Hewitt by regulating within the corporate limits the use

More information

Zoning Board of Appeals Overview

Zoning Board of Appeals Overview Zoning Board of Appeals Overview Introduction Zoning Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) Zoning Enforcement Officer (ZEO) Appellant Interpretations Use variances Proof of unnecessary hardship Area variances

More information

City of Aurora BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING MINUTES November 8, 2017

City of Aurora BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING MINUTES November 8, 2017 City of Aurora BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING MINUTES November 8, 2017 The Aurora Board of Zoning Appeals met in a regularly scheduled meeting on Wednesday, November 8, 2017, in Council Chambers of Aurora

More information

Article V - Zoning Hearing Board

Article V - Zoning Hearing Board Section 500 POWERS AND DUTIES - GENERAL (also see Article IX of the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code) '500.1 Membership of Board: The membership of the Board shall consist of five (5) residents

More information

Zoning Board of Appeals Overview. A Division of the New York Department of State

Zoning Board of Appeals Overview. A Division of the New York Department of State Zoning Board of Appeals Overview 2 Introduction Zoning Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) Zoning Enforcement Officer (ZEO) Appellant Interpretations Use variances Proof of unnecessary hardship Area variances

More information

ONEIDA COUNTY 48 GENESEE STREET, NEW HARTFORD, NEW YORK Telephone: x2332 Fax:

ONEIDA COUNTY 48 GENESEE STREET, NEW HARTFORD, NEW YORK Telephone: x2332 Fax: SUPERVISOR Paul A. Miscione DEPUTY SUPERVISOR Anthony J. Trevisani TOWN ATTORNEY Herbert J. Cully TOWN of NEW HARTFORD ONEIDA COUNTY 48 GENESEE STREET, NEW HARTFORD, NEW YORK 13413-2397 Telephone: 315-733-7500

More information

GUILFORD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Draft MINUTES December 5, 2012

GUILFORD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Draft MINUTES December 5, 2012 Draft 12/5/2012 GUILFORD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Draft MINUTES December 5, 2012 Call to order: The meeting was called to order at 7:30 p.m. by Chairman Dennis Dostert. Present were members: Dostert, Montaine,

More information

Owner Information Name: Address of property applying for the variance: Telephone #: address: Mailing address if different:

Owner Information Name: Address of property applying for the variance: Telephone #:  address: Mailing address if different: Date: Village of Lawrence 196 Central Ave Lawrence, NY 11559 516-239-4600 Board of Zoning Appeals Application Owner Information Name: Address of property applying for the variance: Telephone #: Email address:

More information

BOROUGH OF UPPER SADDLE RIVER PLANNING BOARD MEETING MINUTES THURSDAY, AUGUST 27, 2015

BOROUGH OF UPPER SADDLE RIVER PLANNING BOARD MEETING MINUTES THURSDAY, AUGUST 27, 2015 BOROUGH OF UPPER SADDLE RIVER PLANNING BOARD MEETING MINUTES THURSDAY, AUGUST 27, 2015 Mr. Virgona called the meeting to order at 7:40 p.m. The following statement was read: Pursuant to The Open Public

More information

MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF ATLANTIC BEACH BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING 65 THE PLAZA, ATLANTIC BEACH, NY DECEMBER 21, 2017

MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF ATLANTIC BEACH BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING 65 THE PLAZA, ATLANTIC BEACH, NY DECEMBER 21, 2017 Meeting #12 DRAFT MINUTES OF THE VILLAGE OF ATLANTIC BEACH BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS MEETING 65 THE PLAZA, ATLANTIC BEACH, NY 11509 CALL TO ORDER DECEMBER 21, 2017 At 8:00 PM called the meeting to order.

More information

TOWN OF WALLINGFORD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS JUNE 20, 2011 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES

TOWN OF WALLINGFORD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS JUNE 20, 2011 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES Zoning Board of Appeals 1 TOWN OF WALLINGFORD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS JUNE 20, 2011 REGULAR MEETING MINUTES A regular meeting of the Wallingford Zoning Board of Appeals was held Monday, at 7:00 p.m. in

More information

Town of Farmington 1000 County Road 8 Farmington, New York 14425

Town of Farmington 1000 County Road 8 Farmington, New York 14425 Page 1 of 51 Town of Farmington Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Minutes APPROVED June 20, 2017 Town of Farmington 1000 County Road 8 Farmington, New York 14425 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Tuesday, June 20,

More information

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CONCORD DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: .c 1 1 1 ORDINANCE NO. - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CONCORD MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER 1 (ZONING), ARTICLE III (DISTRICTS AND DISTRICT REGULATIONS), DIVISION (R-, R-, R-., R-, R-, R-1, R-, R-, R-0 SINGLE- FAMILY

More information

RESOLUTION. The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chair and, upon the roll being duly called, the following members were:

RESOLUTION. The meeting was called to order by the Vice Chair and, upon the roll being duly called, the following members were: RESOLUTION A regular meeting of the County of Oswego Industrial Development Agency (the Agency ) was convened in public session on April 2, 2014 at 9:00 a.m., at 44 West Bridge Street, Oswego, New York.

More information

CITY OF AURORA OHIO BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Meeting Minutes July 8, 2015

CITY OF AURORA OHIO BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Meeting Minutes July 8, 2015 CITY OF AURORA OHIO BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Meeting Minutes July 8, 2015 The Aurora Board of Zoning Appeals met in a regularly scheduled meeting Wednesday, July 8, 2015 in the Council Chambers at City

More information

MINUTES OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF THE VILLAGE OF SAGAPONACK IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK AND STATE OF NEW YORK

MINUTES OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF THE VILLAGE OF SAGAPONACK IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK AND STATE OF NEW YORK MINUTES OF ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING OF THE VILLAGE OF SAGAPONACK IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHAMPTON, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK AND STATE OF NEW YORK A duly held public meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of

More information

Members of the Board present: J.C. Konnor, J. A. Leonetti, E. J. Hummel as Mayor s Designee, and Mrs. L. J. Schnell presiding.

Members of the Board present: J.C. Konnor, J. A. Leonetti, E. J. Hummel as Mayor s Designee, and Mrs. L. J. Schnell presiding. BRANT BEACH, NEW JERSEY OCTOBER 13, 2016 A Regular Public Meeting of the Land Use Board of the Township of Long Beach was held in the Multi-Purpose Room in the Administration Building, 6805 Long Beach

More information

TOWN OF PITTSFORD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AGENDA March 18, 2019

TOWN OF PITTSFORD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AGENDA March 18, 2019 TOWN OF PITTSFORD ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS AGENDA March 18, 2019 PUBLIC HEARING FOR AN AREA VARIANCE 507 Allens Creek Road, Tax # 137.20-2-6.21, Applicant is requesting relief from Town Code 185-113 (B)

More information

CITY OF ESCONDIDO. Planning Commission and Staff Seating AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION. 201 North Broadway City Hall Council Chambers. 7:00 p.m.

CITY OF ESCONDIDO. Planning Commission and Staff Seating AGENDA PLANNING COMMISSION. 201 North Broadway City Hall Council Chambers. 7:00 p.m. CITY OF ESCONDIDO Planning Commission and Staff Seating JEFF WEBER Chairman DON ROMO Vice-Chair JAMES MCNAIR Commissioner STAN WEILER Commissioner OWEN TUNNELL Principal Engineer MICHAEL COHEN Commissioner

More information

Members of the Board present: Commissioner R. H. Bayard, Mrs. M. P. Cleary, D.A. Southwick and R. S. VanBuren presiding.

Members of the Board present: Commissioner R. H. Bayard, Mrs. M. P. Cleary, D.A. Southwick and R. S. VanBuren presiding. BRANT BEACH, NEW JERSEY MARCH 10, 2010 A Regular Public Meeting of the Land Use Board of the Township of Long Beach was held in the Multi-Purpose Room in the Administration Building, 6805 Long Beach Boulevard,

More information

Waterford Township Planning Board Regular Meeting September 17 th, 2013

Waterford Township Planning Board Regular Meeting September 17 th, 2013 Waterford Township Planning Board Regular Meeting September 17 th, 2013 The regular meeting of the Waterford Township Planning Board was called to order by Chairman Tom Giangiulio followed by the salute

More information

OFFICIAL MINUTES NIAGARA FALLS PLANNING BOARD JUNE 14th, 2017

OFFICIAL MINUTES NIAGARA FALLS PLANNING BOARD JUNE 14th, 2017 OFFICIAL MINUTES NIAGARA FALLS PLANNING BOARD JUNE 14th, 2017 A meeting of the Niagara Falls Planning Board was held Wednesday, June 14th, 2017 at 6:01 PM in Council Chambers, City Hall, 745 Main Street,

More information

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM

PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA MEMORANDUM City and County of Broomfield, Colorado To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: John Hilgers, Planning Director Michael Sutherland, Planner Meeting Date

More information

TOWNSHIP OF CLARK Ordinance No. Adopted. Introduced: January 20, 2015 Public Hearing: February 17, Motion: O Connor Motion:

TOWNSHIP OF CLARK Ordinance No. Adopted. Introduced: January 20, 2015 Public Hearing: February 17, Motion: O Connor Motion: TOWNSHIP OF CLARK Ordinance No. Adopted Introduced: January 20, 2015 Public Hearing: February 17, 2015 Motion: O Connor Motion: Seconded: Hund Seconded: AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND VARIOUS ARTICLES OF CHAPTER

More information

August 17, 2012 STAFF REPORT

August 17, 2012 STAFF REPORT COUNTY OF PRINCE WILLIAM 5 County Complex Court, Prince William, Virginia 22192-9201 PLANNING (703) 792-6830 Metro 631-1703, Ext. 6830 FAX (703) 792-4758 OFFICE Internet www.pwcgov.org Christopher M. Price,

More information

ACT OF DEPOSIT. done on the day and date above, above given before the undersigned competent witnesses and me, Notary, after a reading of the whole.

ACT OF DEPOSIT. done on the day and date above, above given before the undersigned competent witnesses and me, Notary, after a reading of the whole. BY: GREENLEAVES MASTER ASSOCIATION PARISH OF ST. TAMMANY ACT OF DEPOSIT ************************************************************************************************************** ** BE IT KNOWN, that

More information

MINUTES BOROUGH OF MADISON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

MINUTES BOROUGH OF MADISON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES BOROUGH OF MADISON ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Regular Meeting, September 13, 2018 at 7:30 P.M., Hartley Dodge Memorial, 50 Kings Road, Madison, New Jersey. 1. CALL TO ORDER BY CHAIRPERSON A regular

More information

City of Northfield Planning & Zoning Board 1600 Shore Road Northfield, New Jersey Telephone (609) , ext. 127 Fax (609)

City of Northfield Planning & Zoning Board 1600 Shore Road Northfield, New Jersey Telephone (609) , ext. 127 Fax (609) City of Northfield Planning & Zoning Board 1600 Shore Road Northfield, New Jersey 08225 Telephone (609) 641-2832, ext. 127 Fax (609) 646-7175 Minutes: May 1, 2008 Notice of this meeting had been given

More information

Department of Planning and Development

Department of Planning and Development VILLAGE OF SOMERS Department of Planning and Development VARIANCE APPLICATION Owner: Mailing Address: Phone Number(s): To the Village of Somers Board of Appeals: Please take notice that the undersigned

More information

The meeting was called to order by Chair Dever at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Lomita City Hall, Narbonne Avenue, Lomita, CA.

The meeting was called to order by Chair Dever at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Lomita City Hall, Narbonne Avenue, Lomita, CA. April 14, 2008 A REGULAR MEETING OF THE LOMITA PLANNING COMMISSION OPENING CEREMONIES Next Resolution No. 2008 1. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chair Dever at 7 p.m. in the Council Chambers,

More information

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OVERVIEW. Zoning. Zoning requires a safety valve. Divides municipality into districts Goal: avoid

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OVERVIEW. Zoning. Zoning requires a safety valve. Divides municipality into districts Goal: avoid ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OVERVIEW New York State Department of State Zoning Divides municipality into districts Goal: avoid incompatible land uses Regulates: Land use Density Placement of structures on

More information

LAND USE REVIEW BOARD February 20, 2019 REGULAR MEETING

LAND USE REVIEW BOARD February 20, 2019 REGULAR MEETING REGULAR MEETING The following are the minutes of the Land Use Review Board of the Borough of Ship Bottom, Ocean County, New Jersey, which was held in Borough Hall, 1621 Long Beach Blvd., Ship Bottom, New

More information

WHITE PLAINS PLANNING BOARD MINUTES FOR THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 20, John Ioris, Lynn Oliva, Anna Cabrera, Leonard Gruenfeld and Sarina Russell

WHITE PLAINS PLANNING BOARD MINUTES FOR THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 20, John Ioris, Lynn Oliva, Anna Cabrera, Leonard Gruenfeld and Sarina Russell WHITE PLAINS PLANNING BOARD MINUTES FOR THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 20, 2018 MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: CB REPRESENTATIVE: COMMON COUNCIL: STAFF MEMBERS: John Ioris, Lynn Oliva, Anna Cabrera, Leonard

More information

City of Jacksonville Beach. Agenda. Board of Adjustment 7:00PM

City of Jacksonville Beach. Agenda. Board of Adjustment 7:00PM JACl{SONVILLE BEACH City of Jacksonville Beach Agenda Board of Adjustment 11 North Third Street Jacksonville Beach, Florida Tuesday, December 4, 2018 MEMORANDUM TO: 7:00PM Council Chambers Members of the

More information

SPECIAL SECTIONS 500.

SPECIAL SECTIONS 500. SPECIAL SECTIONS 500. Notwithstanding the "R3" zone designation, the lands delineated on Schedule "B" of this By-law as "R3-500" shall only be used for single-family detached dwellings in cluster development

More information

Minutes of: July 19, 2016 Date Approved: Sept. 15, 2016 Date Filed/Village Clerk: July 19, 2016 TUCKAHOE PLANNING BOARD TUCKAHOE VILLAGE HALL 7:30pm

Minutes of: July 19, 2016 Date Approved: Sept. 15, 2016 Date Filed/Village Clerk: July 19, 2016 TUCKAHOE PLANNING BOARD TUCKAHOE VILLAGE HALL 7:30pm Minutes of: July 19, 2016 Date Approved: Sept. 15, 2016 Date Filed/Village Clerk: July 19, 2016 TUCKAHOE PLANNING BOARD TUCKAHOE VILLAGE HALL 7:30pm Present: Absent : Chairperson Ann Marie Ciaramella Commissioner

More information

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Town of North Greenbush 2 Douglas Street Wynantskill, NY 12198

ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Town of North Greenbush 2 Douglas Street Wynantskill, NY 12198 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Town of North Greenbush 2 Douglas Street Wynantskill, NY 12198 Attendance: Richard French (Chairman), Thomas McGraw, Leanne Hanlon (Secretary), Michael Miner (Building Department),

More information

CITY OF NORTH RIDGEVILLE BOARD OF ZONING AND BUILDING APPEALS Procedure for filing an Appeal, Conditional Use, Variances or Home Occupation Approvals

CITY OF NORTH RIDGEVILLE BOARD OF ZONING AND BUILDING APPEALS Procedure for filing an Appeal, Conditional Use, Variances or Home Occupation Approvals CITY OF NORTH RIDGEVILLE BOARD OF ZONING AND BUILDING APPEALS Procedure for filing an Appeal, Conditional Use, Variances or Home Occupation Approvals An appeal(s) from the decision of the Administrative

More information

ARTICLE XI ENFORCEMENT, PERMITS, VIOLATIONS & PENALTIES

ARTICLE XI ENFORCEMENT, PERMITS, VIOLATIONS & PENALTIES ARTICLE XI ENFORCEMENT, PERMITS, VIOLATIONS & PENALTIES SECTION 1101. ENFORCEMENT. A. Zoning Officer. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be administered and enforced by the Zoning Officer of the Township

More information

ORDINANCE NO. 867 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16 OF THE DACONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SITE PLANS AND USES IN THE C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONE DISTRICT

ORDINANCE NO. 867 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16 OF THE DACONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SITE PLANS AND USES IN THE C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONE DISTRICT ORDINANCE NO. 867 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16 OF THE DACONO MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING SITE PLANS AND USES IN THE C-1 COMMERCIAL ZONE DISTRICT WHEREAS, Chapter 16 of the Dacono Municipal Code sets forth

More information

Town of Copake Zoning Board of Appeals ~ Meeting Minutes of May 25, 2017 ~

Town of Copake Zoning Board of Appeals ~ Meeting Minutes of May 25, 2017 ~ Town of Copake Zoning Board of Appeals ~ Meeting Minutes of May 25, 2017 ~ The regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Copake was held on May 25, 2017, at the Copake Town Hall, 230

More information

The regular meeting of the ROOTSTOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS was held on Tuesday, December 20, 2016 at 7:00 P.M. at the Rootstown Town Hall.

The regular meeting of the ROOTSTOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS was held on Tuesday, December 20, 2016 at 7:00 P.M. at the Rootstown Town Hall. The regular meeting of the ROOTSTOWN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS was held on Tuesday, December 20, 2016 at 7:00 P.M. at the Rootstown Town Hall. Those present: Troy Cutright Jennifer Milnes Derek Ball Gary

More information

WHEREAS, after proper notice and public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended City Council approval of Conditional Use Permit 10-04; and

WHEREAS, after proper notice and public hearing, the Planning Commission recommended City Council approval of Conditional Use Permit 10-04; and RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIGNAL HILL, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 10-04, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT AND OPERATE A ROOFTOP WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITY

More information

Stillwater Town Board January 18, :00 PM Stillwater Town Hall

Stillwater Town Board January 18, :00 PM Stillwater Town Hall Stillwater Town Board January 18, 2018 7:00 PM Stillwater Town Hall Present: Councilman Artie Baker Councilman Chris D Ambro Councilwoman Lisa Bruno Councilwoman Ellen Vomacka Supervisor Ed Kinowski Also

More information

MINUTES MANCHESTER-BY-THE-SEA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. Meeting May 23, 2018

MINUTES MANCHESTER-BY-THE-SEA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. Meeting May 23, 2018 MINUTES MANCHESTER-BY-THE-SEA ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS Meeting May 23, 2018 Members Present: Bridget Murray, (Chairman), James Diedrich (Clerk), Sarah Mellish, John Binieris, and Kathryn Howe. Members Not

More information

- CODE OF ORDINANCES Chapter 14 - PLANNING ARTICLE II. - RESIDENTIAL FENCE REGULATIONS

- CODE OF ORDINANCES Chapter 14 - PLANNING ARTICLE II. - RESIDENTIAL FENCE REGULATIONS Sec. 14-21. - Short title. Sec. 14-22. - Definitions. Sec. 14-23. - Purpose. Sec. 14-24. - Scope. Sec. 14-25. - Permit requirements. Sec. 14-26. - Fence types, dimensions and specifications. Sec. 14-27.

More information

Town of Windsor, County of Broome, State of New York

Town of Windsor, County of Broome, State of New York Town of Windsor, County of Broome, State of New York A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION BY INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS, INC., FOR A TOWER SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL TO AUTHORIZE APPLICANT

More information

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 15, 2006 AT 8:00 P.M.

ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 15, 2006 AT 8:00 P.M. ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING MINUTES FEBRUARY 15, 2006 AT 8:00 P.M. Mr. Sobieski called the meeting to order by reading the following statement: As Chairman and Presiding Officer of the Colts Neck

More information

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. 02C-09

CITY OF MERCER ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. 02C-09 CITY OF MERCER ISLAND ORDINANCE NO. 02C-09 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MERCER ISLAND, WASHINGTON AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 99C-13 TITLED CITY OF MERCER ISLAND UNIFIED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, AND CODIFIED AT

More information

NONCONFORMING USES, BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES OR LOTS

NONCONFORMING USES, BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES OR LOTS NONCONFORMING USES, BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES OR LOTS 7.1 NONCONFORMING USES 7.1.1 Any lawful use of the land, buildings or structures existing as of the date of adoption of these Regulations and located in

More information

ARTICLE XIV ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

ARTICLE XIV ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS --------~ -~----- ------------------------------------------------- A. Purpose and Intent ARTICLE XIV ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS The purpose of this Article is to provide for the creation of a Zoning Board

More information

Town of Copake Zoning Board of Appeals ~ Meeting Minutes of September 27, 2018 ~

Town of Copake Zoning Board of Appeals ~ Meeting Minutes of September 27, 2018 ~ Town of Copake Draft Zoning Board of Appeals ~ Meeting Minutes of September 27, 2018 ~ The meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Copake was held on September 27, 2018 at the Copake Town

More information

Procedure for Filing a Site Plan Exemption

Procedure for Filing a Site Plan Exemption Procedure for Filing a Site Plan Exemption Dear Applicant, The Mayor and Borough Council adopt Ordinances which regulate the use of land in the Borough of Metuchen ( Borough ). The purpose of these land

More information

BOROUGH OF BERLIN PLANNING BOARD MEETING January 10, 2011

BOROUGH OF BERLIN PLANNING BOARD MEETING January 10, 2011 BOROUGH OF BERLIN PLANNING BOARD MEETING January 10, 2011 Jack Gangluff, Chairman, called the meeting of the Board to order and stated that it was being held in compliance with the Open Public Meetings

More information

MINUTES OF THE WHITEFISH BAY BOARD OF APPEALS Wednesday, August 9, 2006

MINUTES OF THE WHITEFISH BAY BOARD OF APPEALS Wednesday, August 9, 2006 MINUTES OF THE WHITEFISH BAY BOARD OF APPEALS Wednesday, August 9, 2006 A meeting of the Whitefish Bay Board of Appeals was held in the Village Hall, 5300 North Marlborough Drive, Whitefish Bay, Wisconsin

More information

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS BUTLER MEMORIAL HALL JULY 16, 2018

MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS BUTLER MEMORIAL HALL JULY 16, 2018 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS BUTLER MEMORIAL HALL JULY 16, 2018 The Regular Meeting was called to order at 6:00 P.M. by Chairman Randy Bogar. Board Members present were John Montrose,

More information

Article 14: Nonconformities

Article 14: Nonconformities Section 14.01 Article 14: Nonconformities Purpose Within the districts established by this resolution, some lots, uses of lands or structures, or combinations thereof may exist which were lawful prior

More information

ARTICLE F. Fences Ordinance

ARTICLE F. Fences Ordinance ARTICLE F Fences Ordinance SEC. 10-6-60 FENCES. (a) Fences. Fences are a permitted accessory use in any district and may be erected provided that the fence is maintained in good repair, that the finished

More information

Accessory Buildings (Portion pulled from Town Code Updated 2015)

Accessory Buildings (Portion pulled from Town Code Updated 2015) Accessory Buildings (Portion pulled from Town Code Updated 2015) SECTION 1: TITLE 13 entitled Zoning, Chapter 2 entitled General Provisions, Section 13-2-10 entitled Building Location, Subsection 13.2.10(b)

More information

Amended Bill No. 26, Ordinance No. 26, Session 2012 ARTICLE 1701 BOCA National Building Code

Amended Bill No. 26, Ordinance No. 26, Session 2012 ARTICLE 1701 BOCA National Building Code Amended Bill No. 26, Ordinance No. 26, Session 2012 ARTICLE 1701 BOCA National Building Code 1701.01 Adoption and file copies. 1701.02 Amendments to adopted code. 1701.03 Saving clause. 1701.04 Enforcement

More information

City of Jacksonville Beach

City of Jacksonville Beach City of Jacksonville Beach Agenda 11 North Third Street Jacksonville Beach, Florida Board of Adjustment Wednesday, January 2, 2019 7:00 PM Council Chambers MEMORANDUM TO: Members of the Board of Adjustment

More information

ALPHABETICAL ORDINANCES

ALPHABETICAL ORDINANCES ZONING 31-37 07/17/37 : An Ordinance districting and zoning the Town of Cocoa Beach, for the purpose of regulating the location of trades, industries, apartment houses, dwellings and other uses of property

More information

HARVEY CEDARS, NJ Friday, September 2, 2016

HARVEY CEDARS, NJ Friday, September 2, 2016 HARVEY CEDARS, NJ Friday, September 2, 2016 The regular meeting of the Board of Commissioners of the Borough of Harvey Cedars, NJ was called to order by Mayor Oldham at 4:35pm. Commissioners Gerkens and

More information

ORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:

ORDINANCE NO. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BELMONT AMENDING REGULATIONS FOR ALLOWABLE HOME SIZE IN R-1 DISTRICTS IN THE BELMONT ZONING ORDINANCE (ORDINANCE NO. 360) THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BELMONT

More information

Ordinance No. O Page 1 of 5

Ordinance No. O Page 1 of 5 ORDINANCE NO. O-2008- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLACENTIA AMENDING SECTION 8.06.030 OF CHAPTER 8.06 OF TITLE 8 OF THE PLACENTIA MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH ADDITIONAL CONDITIONS CONSTITUTING

More information

REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Dearborn, Michigan. July 11, 2016

REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Dearborn, Michigan. July 11, 2016 REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION Dearborn, Michigan July 11, 2016 The regular meeting was called to order at 7:01 p.m. by Chairperson Siwik. Upon roll call, the following members were present:

More information

1. Appellant(s)/Owner(s) Name: 2. Address: Phone #:

1. Appellant(s)/Owner(s) Name: 2. Address: Phone #: KC/of-variance-2_app.doc INC. VILLAGE OF OLD FIELD BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS Return all required information to Inc. Village of Old Field - Village Clerk 207 Old Field Road P.O. Box 2724 Setauket, New York

More information

Members of the Board absent: Mrs. V. E. Applegate and Mayor J. H. Mancini.

Members of the Board absent: Mrs. V. E. Applegate and Mayor J. H. Mancini. BRANT BEACH, NEW JERSEY JULY 11, 2012 A Regular Public Meeting of the Land Use Board of the Township of Long Beach was held in the Multi-Purpose Room in the Administration Building, 6805 Long Beach Boulevard,

More information