Case 3:14-cv SI Document 25 Filed 04/24/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 405
|
|
- Stanley Shaw
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 3:14-cv SI Document 25 Filed 04/24/14 Page 1 of 14 Page ID#: 405 Kevin C. Brague, OSB No kbrague@k-hlaw.com KIVEL AND HOWARD, LLP 111 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1775 Portland, Oregon Phone: Fax: Attorney for Plaintiffs IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION J.F, a minor by and through his parents and next friends, JAMES AND KERRI FLETCHER; v. Plaintiffs, MULTNOMAH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 1J, dba PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS, an Oregon public school; MAUDE LAMONT, an individual acting in her personal and representative capacity; JOHN ROBINSON, an individual acting in his personal and representative capacity; and BRIAN CHATARD, an individual acting in his personal and representative capacity; Case No. 3:14-cv SI PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT MULTNOMAH COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT S MOTION TO DISSOLVE TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND CROSS- MOTION TO EXTEND THE APRIL 16, 2014 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER TO MAY 2, 2014 ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED Defendants. LOCAL RULE 7-1 CERTIFICATION In compliance with Local Rule 7-1, the parties made a good faith effort through personal or telephone conferences to resolve the dispute and have been unable to do so. / / / / / / Page 1 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT S MOTION
2 Case 3:14-cv SI Document 25 Filed 04/24/14 Page 2 of 14 Page ID#: 406 A. Introduction PLAINTIFF S RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISSOLVE TRO As the court and Defendant know, a TRO is appropriate when a plaintiff demonstrates that serious questions going to the merits were raised and the balance of hardships tips sharply in the plaintiff s favor. Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, (9 th Cir. 2011). The TRO in this case issued subsequent to an evidentiary hearing at which time the court analyzed Plaintiffs evidence regarding the serious questions going to the merits and balanced the hardships and found that a TRO should issue. The facts and evidence have not changed. The serious question and issues raised by the court, and which form the basis of Defendant s Motion, are these, specifically: [T]he serious question is, if there is a hearing and if there is an opportunity to be heard, but at that hearing or as a result of that hearing there is insufficient evidence presented, yet action is taken, does that violate procedural due process? See Transcript of TRO Hearing - Tr. 96. and, So even if there was, however, application of the 24/7 policy here such that there would be evidence that J.F. did violate the 24/7 policy, that would then lead to the question of whether or not that policy is lawful in Oregon as within the school district's proper authority to regulate activity outside of school grounds and outside of school hours. See Tr B. The District Denied J.F. Procedural Due Process under the First Serious Question J.F. s procedural due process was violated by the District and Vice Principal Lamont because their imposed discipline of J.F. deprived J.F. of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. See U.S. Const. Amend XIV. Protected property rights are created by sources such as state statutes and protected liberty interests is read broadly for men to enjoy the privileges essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness. Bd. of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 572, 577 (1972). The case of Goss v. Lopez, 419 U.S. 565, 573 (1975) holds that a student has a Page 2 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT S MOTION
3 Case 3:14-cv SI Document 25 Filed 04/24/14 Page 3 of 14 Page ID#: 407 property interest in education which requires minimum due process. The immediate issue, then, is the nature of J.F. s property and liberty interest in this case based on the fact before the court. J.F. s discipline from the District for his off-campus, beyond school hours conduct violated his property and liberty interest in his education. It has long been held that an education is simply not rote book learning in the highly controlled classroom environment. Rather, education comprehends not merely the instruction received, but the whole experience of moral, intellectual, and physical training. Black s Law Dictionary, 4 th ed., p It can hardly be argued that education would not encompass the development of academic and career skills which would necessarily include such things as the arts, debate, strategy, intellectual, social, and physical development and achievement. Oregon embodies and adheres to this definition and recognizes it as part of its statutes governing the State s education. See O.R.S and O.R.S Specifically, O.R.S (5) states, in relevant part, that the school system shall: (5) Supports the physical and cognitive growth and development of students. * * * * * (7) Provides opportunities for students to learn, think, reason, retrieve information, use technology and work effectively alone and in groups; (8) Provides for rigorous academic content standards and instruction in mathematics, science, English, history, geography, economics, civics, physical education, health, the arts and world languages; * * * * * 1 citing Barbers Comm'n v. Hardeman, 31 Ala. App. 626, 629 (1945) [Education is not necessarily derived from the study of books in school but everything that a man learns by conversation, by reading, by observation or by experience contributes to his education. Education is the process of developing and training the powers and capabilities of human beings.] Page 3 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT S MOTION
4 Case 3:14-cv SI Document 25 Filed 04/24/14 Page 4 of 14 Page ID#: 408 (12) Provides students with the knowledge and skills that lead to an active, healthy lifestyle; Oregon s pronouncements and statutes recognizes athletics and extra-curricular activities as mandatory parts of its public elementary and secondary schools which provides the statutory basis under Roth and Goss for finding a property and liberty interest in extra-curricular school sponsored or adopted activities. Additionally, Federal law through Title IX also provides a basis for finding extracurricular school sponsored or adopted activities, a procedural due process property and liberty interest. Title IX prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. See 20 U.S.C.S (June 23, 1972, P.L ). The District receives Federal financial assistance through multiple Federal grants by and through the Oregon Department of Education, as well as direct Federal grants. A Title IX program or activity includes high school sports and other extra-curricular activities. As such, every student has a Federally recognized due process property and liberty interest in their high school s extra-curricular activities, sports, and clubs. In addition, Section 1983 applies in this case because Defendants acted under color of statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of state and Federal law. See 42 U.S.C Thus, under the development of Oregon s statutes and Title IX, Oregon s Legislature and the U.S. Congress have recognized the importance of the property and liberty interest in extracurricular activities. Notably, Whipple v. OSAA, 52 Or.App. 419 (1981), relied upon by the District for holding no procedural due process property or liberty interest, was decided a decade prior to the Oregon Educational Act for the 21 st Century which now provides the statutory basis for the property and liberty interest denied by the District to J.F. See O.R.S et seq. (1991). The District s reliance upon Wood v. Strickland, 420 U.S. 308 (1975) is also not applicable to this case because the conduct at issue in Strickland was the spiking of a punch bowl at a school Page 4 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT S MOTION
5 Case 3:14-cv SI Document 25 Filed 04/24/14 Page 5 of 14 Page ID#: 409 function. Id. at 311. Strickland is not a case concerning off-campus conduct, beyond school hours. Perhaps not surprisingly, there is a dearth of case law involving schools punishing offcampus behavior. Therefore, the case of Riggan v. Midland Independent School Dist., 86 F.Supp.2d 647 (2000) is instructive and persuasive. Riggan was a public high school student who followed his principal to another teacher s house after seeing the principal at a local restaurant, and then took pictures of the principal s suburban parked on a public street. Id. at 650. This occurred off school grounds and after school hours. Rumors were persistent about the principal engaging in sexual misconduct. Riggan never disclosed the pictures or took any other action. The principal then pursued punishment against Riggan and had him suspended, assigned to an alternative school, excluded from graduation ceremonies, and required two letters of apology. Id. at 652. Two other students involved received far less punishment. Id. The court rejected the school s claim that exclusion from graduation ceremonies did not deprive the student of a protected property interest. Id. at In looking at the whole picture, the court found the school denied the student procedural due process. It also found that the principal was biased and the charges against Riggan were unclear so as to not provide him meaningful notice of what he had done wrong. Id. at Riggan is appropriately followed in this case. Here, J.F. was accused in planning to buy alcohol on school grounds and during school hours which was not true. In fact, the text messages relied upon by Vice Principal Lamont were not products of J.F. and were produced to him. Later, Vice Principal Lamont admitted that there were no text messages between J.F. and any other student. See Tr. 61. In other words, the District has and had no evidence that J.F. participated in any drug related activity during school hours and on school grounds. As such, this is not an issue of an error of judgment, but rather malfeasance or negligence. Further, as held in Riggan, the actual bias of Vice Principal Lamont violated J.F. s procedural due process because she was unable, in any way, to function fairly as a trier of fact. Riggan at 656. Vice Page 5 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT S MOTION
6 Case 3:14-cv SI Document 25 Filed 04/24/14 Page 6 of 14 Page ID#: 410 Principal Lamont s bias was testified to at the TRO hearing, and apparent in the tape recorded meeting with Plaintiffs. See Tr. 13 and 56. The Riggan case illustrates that there are violations of procedural due process in the school setting when the school administrators punish students for off-campus, beyond school hours conduct where the evidence is insufficient or based on speculation and there is bias on the part of the administrator doling out punishment. Accordingly, Procedural due process is violated when there is insufficient evidence presented and a school nevertheless continues with a disciplinary suspension. C. The District Denied J.F. Procedural Due Process under the Second Serious Question One of the principal facts to keep in mind throughout this case and analysis is that Plaintiff s conduct occurred off-campus and outside of school hours. As such, the school cases relied upon by Defendant are distinguishable because in those cases the student conduct occurred on campus and either during school or at a school function. That is not the case here. Here, the only on-campus, during school activity were the text messages between two other students which did not involve or concern J.F. See Tr Further, Plaintiffs must reiterate that the punishment imposed was wrong and the discipline was not for J.F. s on-campus, during school conduct, but was an over-reach of authority neither granted, nor authorized by law. 2 The District s policies are based on Oregon statute and its policies cite the statute relied upon. In this case, the policy at issue is AD policy which specific statutory authority comes from O.R.S as stated in the policy. Notably, the 24/7 athlete policy is without statutory authority. As a matter of law O.R.S proscribes the contours of discipline subject to 2 It has been said that when the schoolroom is entered by a pupil, the authority of the parent ceases and that of the teacher begins; when the pupil is sent to his home, the authority of the teacher ends, and that of the parent is resumed. Neuhaus v. Federico, 12 Or.App. 314, 321 (1973). Page 6 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT S MOTION
7 Case 3:14-cv SI Document 25 Filed 04/24/14 Page 7 of 14 Page ID#: 411 suspension or expulsion related to drugs, in relevant part, as follows: (a) May allow discipline, suspension or expulsion for conduct that includes, but is not limited to:... * * * * * (c) Possession or distribution of tobacco, alcohol, drugs or other controlled substances[.] This particular statute is important because it forms the legal foundation upon which the District formed its Alcohol, Other Drugs, & Tobacco policy ( AD). See Decl. Lamont, Ex. 3, pg. 6. The District does not have the legal or statutory authority to discipline J.F. for off-campus, after school hours conduct because J.F. was never in possession of, and never distributed alcohol that is the statutory limitation imposed upon the District. In short, the District s Policy AD exceeds the scope of the statutory authority found at O.R.S Pursuant to O.R.S (4) this court may find and decree that the Policy exceeds the statutory authority of the agency. That is the appropriate finding here because the specific contours of O.R.S are limited to possession or distribution of tobacco, alcohol, drugs, or controlled substances while at school. This specific statutory prohibition concerning alcohol (the only relevant issue here) does not include off-campus, beyond school hours planning. The District s policy exceeds its statutory authority and is punishing students, specifically J.F. without due process notice. The overall limitation of the school s authority is found within the text of O.R.S in the following language: (1) Public school students shall comply with rules for the government of such schools, pursue the prescribed course of study, use the prescribed textbooks and submit to the teachers' authority. (2) Each district school board shall adopt written policies for the discipline, suspension or expulsion of any refractory student. See O.R.S The limitation of the school s authority is recognized by the limiting language of rules for the Page 7 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT S MOTION
8 Case 3:14-cv SI Document 25 Filed 04/24/14 Page 8 of 14 Page ID#: 412 government of such schools and refractory student. The government of public schools is limited to the school, school events, and school bus stops. See Neuhaus v. Federico, 12 Or.App. 314, 321 (1973), See also TRO Hearing Ex. 2 / Decl. Lamont Ex. 1, pg The District s own policy recognizes its limitation to school grounds and activities during school hours. J.F. did not violate O.R.S To the extent the District s policies exceed its own definition and the scope of O.R.S , then it is meting out discipline which exceeds its legal authority. As such, it is a constitutional violation of J.F. s rights because there was not sufficient due process notice. Additionally, the limiting language the legislature s chose to use of refractory student in O.R.S further evidences the limited scope of the District s authority. First, the statute authorizes only policies for the government of schools and students. When a student is not at a school activity or on school grounds, they are minor children subject to the responsibility of their parents and the juvenile laws. See O.R.S and , and O.R.S. 419A.010 et seq. By using the term refractory student the Legislature envisioned policies to work with stubborn, obstinate, and hard to manage students under a process of escalating consequences. 4 The order of consequences set forth by the Legislature are discipline, suspension, then expulsion. See O.R.S Here, the District and Vice Principal Lamont, as stated in the recording, abdicated their judgment in favor of blindly following policy to immediate suspension. Such zero tolerance policies and abdication of administrator responsibility does little else but feed the school to prison pipeline and deny educational opportunities to students and refractory students. See Suppl. Decl. Kerri Fletcher, Ex. 1, Out of School Suspension and Expulsion, PEDIATRICS, Feb. 3 Possession, selling, drug or alcohol-impaired learning, or use of alcohol, drugs or facsimiles is not tolerated in schools, on school grounds, at school activities by students, staff or other persons. Additionally, this rule applies to students during school hours regardless of location. 4 See Webster s New Twentieth Century Dictionary, 2 nd ed. 1975, pg for definition of refractory. Page 8 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT S MOTION
9 Case 3:14-cv SI Document 25 Filed 04/24/14 Page 9 of 14 Page ID#: Page 9 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT S MOTION
10 Case 3:14-cv SI Document 25 Filed 04/24/14 Page 10 of 14 Page ID#: 414 D. Plaintiffs are not relitigating a school decision, but opposing unlawful school conduct. The District makes much about Plaintiffs exercising their constitutional right to seek redress in the court for their extra-statutory and illegal discipline of J.F. Plaintiffs rush to court for relief was based on a ticking clock and the devastating effect of missed opportunities for potential colleges and junior colleges to scout J.F. for post-secondary school opportunities. The punishment imposed which was based on off-campus beyond school hours conduct was specifically designed to deny those opportunities to J.F. This is not to say that some punishment or consequence was not appropriate. There was punishment to J.F. and negative consequences, but that punishment was a parent obligation not a school one. Further, the District is partly responsible for Plaintiffs seeking relief in court. As admitted, Vice Principal Lamont told and wrote to Plaintiffs that to appeal her decision required notification to Greg Wolleck, School Supervisor by telephone or writing within 5 days of receipt of the letter. See Decl. Kerri Fletcher Ex. 1. That information was wrong. Kerri Fletcher notified Mr. Wollack via on April 6 th seeking an urgent appeal. On April 9 th, Mr. Wollack responded stating the appeal goes to the principal. April 10 th after 5:00 p.m. Mr. Chatard responded admitting the appeal should go to him and that his secretary would contact the Plaintiffs on Friday, April 11 th to set up an appeal hearing. Decl. Kerri Fletcher Ex. 2. Ms. Kersey, the school secretary, contacted the Plaintiffs on Monday, April 14 th to set up an appeal hearing on April 16 th. See Decl. Kerri Fletcher Ex. 3. J.F. s lacrosse team had scheduled games for April 8 th, 10 th, and 15 th (this last game J.F. was appropriately benched by the coach not the school or school district). The TRO was granted on April 16, J.F. has been the object of interest from colleges and junior colleges for his lacrosse skills and has received expressions of that interest. See Tr. 28. As a direct result of the District s unlawful discipline of J.F. for off-campus, beyond school hours conduct, he has been irreparably harmed in missing many opportunities to continue honing and demonstrating his skills to Page 10 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT S MOTION
11 Case 3:14-cv SI Document 25 Filed 04/24/14 Page 11 of 14 Page ID#: 415 interested colleges and junior colleges. The Court received evidence and testimony and ultimately held, albeit with reservation, that J.F. would suffer irreparable harm. See Tr The District has not, and cannot show any detriment to it arising out of J.F. s suspension. In fact, the District s General Counsel (who is not a teacher, educator, or licensed administrator) only opines about broad educational policies and goals. There is not a single factual instance of any example of any detriment to the District. The whole of Ms. Patterson s declaration is based on unsubstantiated fear of what could, possibly, occur, maybe, sometime in the future. The District relies upon the Court s dicta in Requa v. Kent Sch. Dist. No. 415, 492 F.Supp.2d 1272 (WD Wash 2007) for the proposition that the School District s ability to punish students would be undermined by a TRO. Of significant importance is the distinguishing fact that the student s conduct (filming a teacher s butt) in Kent Sch. Dist. occurred during school and on campus. Here, there is no undermining the school s discipline because it is punishing J.F. for off-campus conduct that occurred outside school hours. The District also relies upon Boucher v. Sch. Bd. of the Sch. Distr. of Greenfield, 134 F.3d 821 (7 th Cir. 1998) which also concerns conduct that occurred at school during school hours and which also harmed to the school computer systems. The case of Brown v. Plainfield Cmty. Consol. Dist. 202, 500 F.Supp.2d 996 (ND Ill 2007) is likewise distinguishable because it involved the inappropriate physical touching of a teacher by a student at school and during school hours. Again, there is no undermining the school s discipline here because the District is punishing J.F. for off-campus conduct that occurred outside school hours. The District does not have a legitimate state interest in a minor child s off-campus conduct that does not occur during school hours. The District and Ms. Patterson present speculative risks to their customs and policies for disciplining students to maintain order, yet there is no instance, factual record, or basis for their position. As noted above, much of this process is a result of the Wilson High School administration not being aware of their own process which delayed and prolonged their own Page 11 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT S MOTION
12 Case 3:14-cv SI Document 25 Filed 04/24/14 Page 12 of 14 Page ID#: 416 decision making process. Now, the District complains of the consequences for overreaching in its efforts to suspend J.F. Regardless, the unlawful, ill-defined, zero tolerance policy at issue here should be decreed as exceeding the statutory authority of the school district. E. Conclusion The TRO issued by the court was and remains appropriate in this case because J.F. presented serious questions going to the merits and balancing the hardships tips sharply in J.F. s favor. Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Cottrell, 632 F.3d 1127, (9 th Cir. 2011). Moreover, the District cannot demonstrate some critical public interest that would be injured by the grant of the TRO. Id. at Thus, the court having found in favor of J.F. previously should deny Defendant s Motion to Dissolve based on the foregoing arguments and analysis. PLAINTIFF S CROSS-MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF THE TRO Plaintiffs move the court for an order, for good cause, to extend the Temporary Restraining Order for a like period, or until at least May 2, 2014 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(2). LEGAL MEMORANDUM The facts giving rise the TRO have not changed. The answers and analysis to the Court s serious questions favor Plaintiffs and extending the TRO to May 2, Recently, Principal Chatard, after consulting with the District s attorneys and reading the TRO hearing transcript, upheld Vice Principal Lamont s decision to suspend J.F. See Decl. Kerri Fletcher. Accordingly, an extension of the TRO is appropriate. Per the Court s request and notice, the TRO expires on April 29, 2014 and on that same day is a scheduled lacrosse game between Wilson High School and Marist High School in Eugene, Oregon. If the TRO ends and is not extended, then J.F. s suspension resumes effect and Page 12 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT S MOTION
13 Case 3:14-cv SI Document 25 Filed 04/24/14 Page 13 of 14 Page ID#: 417 he will be prohibited from participating in that game. The next athletic competition J.F. will be permitted participation is on May 2, 2014 against Hood River, but at Wilson High School. There are five subsequent lacrosse games after May 2 nd. The issue, then, is will J.F. suffer irreparable harm for missing the April 29 th lacrosse game. To be candid, J.F. may not be able to show irreparable harm is likely for missing a single athletic competition. Of course, missing one or two games in a season is much different than missing a month of games when there is a demonstrated interest by colleges and community colleges in J.F. s lacrosse abilities. Presently, J.F. has not been able to confirm the appearance or interest of a scout or recruiter for the April 29 th competition. Nevertheless, the University of Oregon is nearby and it is conceivable that a member of the University of Oregon lacrosse team coaching staff may be at the game. Admittedly, without confirmation of a scout or similar representative, irreparable injury is not likely. DATED: April 24, KIVEL & HOWARD LLP By /s/ Kevin C. Brague Kevin C. Brague, OSB No kbrague@k-hlaw.com Attorney for Plaintiffs Page 13 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT SCHOOL DISTRICT S MOTION
14 Case 3:14-cv SI Document 25 Filed 04/24/14 Page 14 of 14 Page ID#: 418 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I served the foregoing PLAINTIFF S *** on the party listed below by the following indicated method or methods: Michael Porter, Esq. Mike.porter@millernash.com Andrea M. Barton, Esq. Andrea.barton@millernash.com 111 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 3400 Portland, OR Attorneys for Defendants by electronic means through the U.S. District Court, District of Oregon s CM/ECF document filing system. by mailing a full, true and correct copy thereof in a sealed, first-class postage paid envelope, addressed to the address as shown above, with the U.S. Postal Service at Portland, Oregon, on the date set forth below. by causing a full, true, and correct copy thereof to be hand-delivered to the attorney at the attorney s last known office address listed above on the date set forth below. by faxing a full, true, and correct copy thereof to the attorney at the fax number shown above, which is the last-known fax number for the attorney s office, on the date set forth below. DATED: April 24, /s/ Kevin Brague Kevin C. Brague, OSB No Attorney for Plaintiffs Page 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Case 3:14-cv PK Document 5 Filed 04/09/14 Page 1 of 17 Page ID#: 40
Case 3:14-cv-00581-PK Document 5 Filed 04/09/14 Page 1 of 17 Page ID#: 40 Kevin C. Brague, OSB No. 050428 kbrague@k-hlaw.com KIVEL AND HOWARD, LLP 111 SW Fifth Avenue, Suite 1775 Portland, Oregon 97204
More informationDiscrimination and Harassment Complaints and Investigations Administrative Procedure (3435)
Discrimination and Harassment Complaints and Investigations Administrative Procedure (3435) Complaints The law prohibits coworkers, supervisors, managers, and third parties with whom an employee comes
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS JOHN DOE, ) Plaintiff ) CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:16cv-30184-MAP v. ) ) WILLIAMS COLLEGE, ) ) Defendant. ) ) PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE EX
More informationDATE ISSUED: 10/17/ of 4 UPDATE 98 DGBA(LEGAL)-P
(LEGAL) UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION TEXAS CONSTITUTION FEDERAL LAWS SECTION 504 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TITLE IX The District shall take no action abridging the freedom of speech or the right of
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH. Oral Argument Requested
// :: PM CV 1 1 1 MICHAEL BOYLE, v. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Plaintiff, CITY OF PORTLAND, a municipal corporation, Defendant. FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH Oral Argument Requested Case
More informationEmployee COMPLAINT FORM - LEVEL ONE. 1. Name: 2. Address: 3. Telephone number: ( ) 4. Campus:
EXHIBIT A Employee COMPLAINT FORM - LEVEL ONE To file a formal complaint, please fill out this form completely and submit it by hand delivery, fax, or U.S. mail to the appropriate administrator within
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
Wilcox v Bastiste et al Doc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 0 JADE WILCOX, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiffs, JOHN BASTISTE and JOHN DOES
More informationDEALING WITH UNAUTHORIZED & PROBLEMATIC VISITORS
DEALING WITH UNAUTHORIZED & PROBLEMATIC VISITORS Presentation by Alan B. Harris August 3, 2016 This memorandum addresses legislative tools available to deal with unauthorized visitors and problematic visitors
More informationDoe v. Valencia College United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Sarah Baldwin *
Sarah Baldwin * On September 13, 2018, the Eleventh Circuit concluded that the district court did not err in holding that Valencia College did not violate Jeffery Koeppel s statutory or constitutional
More informationConcord School District Policy #520 Safe School Zone
Concord School District Policy #520 Safe School Zone Introduction It is the policy of the Concord School District that all school buildings, property, bus stops and routes and associated areas shall be
More informationCITRUS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT STUDENT SERVICES
CITRUS COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT STUDENT SERVICES AP 5520 References: STUDENT DISCIPLINE PROCEDURES Education Code Sections 66017, 66300, 72122, 76030 et seq., and 76120; California Penal Code Section
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON
// ::0 PM CV 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH OREGON PUBLIC BROADCASTING, a public benefit corporation, v. Plaintiff, PORTLAND PUBLIC SCHOOLS, a public entity,
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Daniel Borden, : Appellant : : v. : : No. 77 C.D. 2014 Bangor Area School District : Argued: September 8, 2014 BEFORE: HONORABLE DAN PELLEGRINI, President Judge
More informationCase 3:12-cv DPJ-FKB Document 10 Filed 06/28/12 Page 1 of 10
Case 3:12-cv-00436-DPJ-FKB Document 10 Filed 06/28/12 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON DIVISION JACKSON WOMEN S HEALTH ORGANIZATION, on
More informationCase 3:02-cv JE Document 32 Filed 07/24/02 Page 1 of 12
Case :0-cv-00-JE Document Filed 0//0 Page of 0 0 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON NIKE USA, INC., ) ) Civil No. 0--JE Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) DAUNTE CULPEPPER, ) OPINION & ORDER
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE
Case 1:03-cv-00103-MJK Document 1 Filed 06/09/03 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE ~_... : ""Tt.," '. ".. ' 1 ',. I' i ~ i'~, : ~ ~- c: r ~> ~ ;'~\ ~ ~ -~
More informationKENNESAW YOUTH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION BY-LAWS. Revised and Adopted: March 2016
KENNESAW YOUTH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION BY-LAWS Revised and Adopted: March 2016 BYLAWS OF KENNESAW YOUTH FOOTBALL ASSOCIATION, INC Article I. Name Section 1. The organization shall be known as the "Kennesaw
More informationSUSPENSION AND EXPULSION
RIVER EDGE BOARD OF EDUCATION FILE CODE: 5114* River Edge, NJ 07661 Policy SUSPENSION AND EXPULSION While the board believes that positive approaches to acceptable behavior are usually more effective,
More informationCase 3:16-cv MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13
Case 3:16-cv-01907-MO Document 1 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 13 Daniel Snyder, OSB No. 783856 dansnyder@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com Carl Post, OSB No. 061058 carlpost@lawofficeofdanielsnyder.com John Burgess,
More informationFair Play Policy and Procedures
1 Fair Play Policy and Procedures Issued: February 1998 1 st Revision: September 1998 2 nd Revision: November 1999 3 rd Revision: August 2006 Approved by the Board of Directors Basketball Ontario August
More informationNorthGreneUnitDistrictNo.3 7:190-AP8 Page1of5. Students
Page1of5 Students Administrative Procedure North Greene Junior High School Student Discipline Grades 6, 7, and 8 The following discipline procedures are used to attempt to have students correct their behavior
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO
Case 4:14-cv-00007-EJL Document 40 Filed 01/17/14 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO RALPH MAUGHAN, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, WESTERN WATERSHEDS PROJECT, WILDERNESS WATCH,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
Rel: 11/06/2009 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama A p
More informationPolicy Prohibiting Sexual Harassment. A. Statement of Policy
Article V.C.1. Policy Prohibiting Sexual Harassment A. Statement of Policy Sexual harassment is a form of sex discrimination which violates Section 703 of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as
More informationIn-School Detention, Suspension and Expulsion
Page 1 of 6 In-School Detention, Suspension and Expulsion Each principal or designee has the authority: to impose in-school detention, temporary suspension, or emergency suspension; to deny admission of
More informationCase 2:15-cv CAS-E Document 19 Filed 09/28/15 Page 1 of 36 Page ID #:96
Case :-cv-0-cas-e Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 HAILYN J. CHEN (State Bar No. ) hailyn.chen@mto.com SARA N. TAYLOR (State Bar No. ) sara.taylor@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP South Grand
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION
Case Document 14 Filed 02/15/13 Page 1 of 13 Page ID#: 157 S. AMANDA MARSHALL, OSB #95437 United States Attorney District of Oregon KEVIN DANIELSON, OSB #06586 Assistant United States Attorney kevin.c.danielson@usdoj.gov
More informationCase 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 06/24/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1
Case 3:14-cv-01013-BR Document 1 Filed 06/24/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID#: 1 David J. Hollander, OSB #782452 Jovanna L. Patrick, OSB #111339 Hollander, Lebenbaum & Gannicott 1500 SW First Avenue, Suite 700
More informationDISCRIMINATION, HARASSMENT AND BULLYING COMPLAINT PROCEDURE Policy Code: 1720/4015/7225
The board takes seriously all complaints of unlawful discrimination, harassment and bullying. The process provided in this policy is designed for those individuals who believe that they may have been discriminated
More informationUnited States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 6-21-2000 United States of America v. The City of Belen, New Mexico Judge Paul J. Kelly Jr. Follow this
More informationDefendants Motion to Dissolve Temporary Restraining Order. Defendants Annise Parker and the City of Houston ( the City ), (collectively
CAUSE NO. 2013-75301 JACK PIDGEON AND LARRY HICKS, PLAINTIFFS, V. MAYOR ANNISE PARKER AND CITY OF HOUSTON, DEFENDANTS. IN THE DISTRICT COURT HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS 310TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Defendants Motion
More informationSTUDENTS Regulation 2610
STUDENTS Discipline Student Discipline Prohibited Conduct The following are descriptions of prohibited conduct and potential consequences for violations. Building-level administrators are authorized to
More informationPlaintiff-Appellee, JIN SONG LIN, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court No SCC-0008-CRM Superior Court No OPINION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS COMMONWEALTH OF THE NORTHERN MARIANA ISLANDS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. JIN SONG LIN, Defendant-Appellant. Supreme Court No. 2014-SCC-0008-CRM
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Junior Gonzalez, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 740 C.D. 2016 : Submitted: October 14, 2016 Bureau of Professional and : Occupational Affairs, : Respondent : BEFORE:
More informationCase 3:14-cv BR Document 79 Filed 02/06/15 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:14-cv-01279-BR Document 79 Filed 02/06/15 Page 1 of 6 David B. Markowitz, OSB No. 742046 DavidMarkowitz@MarkowitzHerbold.com Lisa A. Kaner, OSB No. 881373 LisaKaner@MarkowitzHerbold.com Dallas S.
More informationSchool site administrators may use discretion when warranted to provide other means of correction to suspension and/or expulsion.
SAN JUAN UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT K-12 Pupil Behavior Guidelines 2015-2016 The K-12 Pupil Behavior Guidelines are designed to allow school administration to assess incidents on an individual basis, and
More informationIN WHITMAN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF WASHINGTON ROBERT BARBER, Petitioner, NO. Respondent. I. PETITION CONTENTS
IN WHITMAN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF WASHINGTON ROBERT BARBER, Petitioner, NO. 0 vs. WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Respondent. 0 ) The Petitioner I. PETITION CONTENTS The Petitioner is Mr. Robert Barber,
More informationWILKES-BARRE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT
WILKES-BARRE AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT 1. Policy Public School Code 1310; Civil Rights Act Title VI: 42 USC 2000d et seq.; 1972 Ed. Am. Act. Title IX: 20 USC 1681; 42 USC 12101 et seq,; ADEA: 29 USC 621 et
More informationDiscrimination and Harassment Procedures for Reporting and Investigating Complaints
Discrimination and Harassment Procedures for Reporting and Investigating Complaints Reporting Procedures 1. Any student or other person (who is not a school employee, independent contractor, or school
More informationCase 2:11-cv SLB Document 96 Filed 09/30/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:11-cv-02746-SLB Document 96 Filed 09/30/11 Page 1 of 8 FILED 2011 Sep-30 PM 03:17 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE. STATE OF WASHINGTON, et al., CASE NO. C JLR.
Case 2:17-cv-00141-JLR Document 52 Filed 02/03/17 Page 1 of 7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE STATE OF WASHINGTON,
More informationCase 1:18-cv RP Document 30 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-00085-RP Document 30 Filed 05/15/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION JOHN DOE, Plaintiff, v. 1:18-CV-85-RP THE UNIVERSITY OF
More informationCase 1:14-cv MPK Document 45 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 1:14-cv-00215-MPK Document 45 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TINA DEETER, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. 14-215E
More informationCold Spring Harbor Laboratory Student Code of Conduct Policy
1. Introduction and Statement of Purpose Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Student Code of Conduct Policy The following Policy is adopted in compliance with Section 6430 of the New York Education Law and shall
More informationCase 2:10-cv RLH -GWF Document 127 Filed 06/29/11 Page 1 of 10
Case :0-cv-0-RLH -GWF Document Filed 0// Page of 0 SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 shawn@manganolaw.com SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD. 0 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 0 Las Vegas, Nevada -0 Tel: (0) 0-0
More informationThis policy and regulation outlines the requirements for investigation and recommendation for pupil expulsion and the appeal process.
Pupil Expulsion # Adopted: March 21, 1977 Last Reviewed/Revised: October 3, 2016 Purpose This policy and regulation outlines the requirements for investigation and recommendation for pupil expulsion and
More informationCase 1:16-cv RJL Document 114 Filed 09/02/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:16-cv-00236-RJL Document 114 Filed 09/02/16 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF THE UNITED STATES, LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF ALABAMA,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO RWZ. NANCY K. GARRITY, JOANNE CLARK and ARTHUR GARRITY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CIVIL ACTION NO. 00-12143-RWZ NANCY K. GARRITY, JOANNE CLARK and ARTHUR GARRITY v. JOHN HANCOCK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
More information3357: Discrimination Grievance Procedures
3357:13-15-031 Discrimination Grievance Procedures (A) The purpose of these procedures is to provide a prompt and equitable resolution for complaints or reports of discrimination based upon race, color,
More informationCase 1:11-cv AWI-JLT Document 3 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 3
Case 1:11-cv-02071-AWI-JLT Document 3 Filed 01/06/12 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DAVID J. RAPPORT - SBN 054384 RAPPORT AND MARSTON 405 West Perkins
More informationBarbados Community College
Barbados Community College Code of Student Conduct 1. PREAMBLE Students of the Barbados Community College (BCC) are expected to conduct themselves in a manner that is supportive of the mission of the institution.
More informationChapter 19 Procedures for Disciplinary Action and Appeal
Chapter 19 Procedures for Disciplinary Action and Appeal Bargaining unit refer to contract 19.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS ON DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS 19.1.1 DISCIPLINARY ACTION ONLY PURSUANT TO THIS RULE: A permanent
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON. Plaintiff, Defendants.
Kenneth R. Davis, II, OSB No. 97113 davisk@lanepowell.com William T. Patton, OSB No. 97364 pattonw@lanepowell.com 601 SW Second Avenue, Suite 2100 Portland, Oregon 97204-3158 Telephone: 503.778.2100 Facsimile:
More informationPURPOSE SCOPE DEFINITIONS
UAMS ADMINISTRATIVE GUIDE NUMBER: 3.1.48 DATE: 04/16/2014 REVISION: PAGE: 1 of 10 SECTION: ADMINISTRATION AREA: GENERAL ADMINISTRATION SUBJECT: TITLE IX, SEX DISCRIMINATION, SEXUAL HARASSMENT, SEXUAL ASSAULT,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ) DAVID SABEL, et al., ) ) Case No. 3:97CV-02022 RNC Plaintiffs. ) ) v. ) PLAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST ) FOR PRODUCTION OF ) DOCUMENTS DANBURY
More informationOregon State Bar Minimum Continuing Legal Education Rules and Regulations (As amended effective June 1, 2014)
Oregon State Bar Minimum Continuing Legal Education Rules and Regulations (As amended effective June 1, 2014) Purpose It is of primary importance to the members of the bar and to the public that attorneys
More informationWEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Notification Regarding UNIFORM COMPLAINT PROCEDURES. Revised
WEST CONTRA COSTA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Notification Regarding UNIFORM COMPLAINT PROCEDURES Revised This document constitutes the district s uniform complaint procedures policy. Uniform Complaint
More informationCase 3:13-cv JAH-KSC Document 1 Filed 02/06/13 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-000-jah-ksc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Christopher C. Saldaña, Esq. (SBN LAW OFFICES OF CHRISTOPHER C. SALDAÑA 0 Tenth Avenue, 0 th Floor San Diego, California 0 Telephone: ( - Facsimile:
More informationProcedure for Adjusting Grievances
Procedure for Adjusting Grievances 8 VAC 20-90-10 et seq. Adopted by the Board of Education effective May 2, 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I Definitions...3 Part II Grievance Procedure...5 Part III Procedure
More informationEEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC
Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program 1-14-2013 EEOC v. Merrill Pine Ridge, LLC Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/condec
More information10/30/2017 7:04 PM 17CV47399 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) PARTIES
/0/ :0 PM CV 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH FREEDOM FOUNDATION, a Washington nonprofit corporation, v. Plaintiff, CITY OF PORTLAND, an Oregon municipal corporation,
More informationCase 3:14-cv BR Document 82 Filed 02/09/15 Page 1 of 6
Case 3:14-cv-01279-BR Document 82 Filed 02/09/15 Page 1 of 6 Brenna K. Legaard, OSB #001658 Email: blegaard@schwabe.com Jeffrey S. Eden, OSB #851903 Email: jeden@schwabe.com SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT,
More informationCase 3:11-cv BR Document 39 Filed 07/11/11 Page 1 of 15 Page ID#: 565
Case 3:11-cv-00593-BR Document 39 Filed 07/11/11 Page 1 of 15 Page ID#: 565 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION SI CHAN WOOH, Plaintiff, 3:11-CV-00593-BR OPINION
More informationUNIFORM COMPLAINT PROCEDURES
Except as the Governing Board may otherwise specifically provide in other district policies, these uniform complaint procedures (UCP) shall be used to investigate and resolve only the complaints specified
More informationJudgment Rendered DEe
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2009 CA 0800 CREIG AND DEBBIE MENARD INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THEIR MINOR SON GILES MENARD VERSUS LOUISIANA HIGH SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION Judgment
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BATON ROUGE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BATON ROUGE DIVISION TERRANCE PATRICK ESFELLER ) Civil Action Number Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) SEAN O KEEFE ) in his official capacity as the Chancellor
More informationCase 3:12-cv SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 23
Case 3:12-cv-00071-SI Document 153 Filed 01/07/13 Page 1 of 23 Steven A. Kraemer, OSB No. 882476 E-mail: sak@hartwagner.com Gregory R. Roberson, OSB No. 064847 E-mail: grr@hartwagner.com Of Attorneys for
More informationSTATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE
STATE BOARD FOR TECHNICAL AND COMPREHENSIVE EDUCATION PROCEDURE PROCEDURE NUMBER: 3-2-106.2 PAGE: 1 of 11 TITLE: STUDENT CODE PROCEDURES FOR ADDRESSING ALLEGED ACTS OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:18-cv-10407-AJT-APP Doc # 1 Filed 02/02/18 Pg 1 of 27 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PAMELA SMOCK, v. Plaintiff, Case No. Hon. MARK SCHLISSEL, REGENTS
More informationDiscrimination Complaint Procedure
Discrimination Complaint Procedure Summary SUNY Delhi, in its continuing effort to seek equity in education and employment, and in support of federal and state anti-discrimination legislation, has adopted
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT BRIDGEPORT AND PORT JEFFERSON STEAMBOAT COMPANY, ET AL., Plaintiffs, CASE NO. 3:03 CV 599 (CFD) - against - BRIDGEPORT PORT AUTHORITY, July 13, 2010
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : ORDER
Case 113-cv-00544-RWS Document 16 Filed 03/04/13 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION THE DEKALB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT and DR. EUGENE
More informationCase 7:18-cv DC Document 18 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND/ODESSA DIVISION
Case 7:18-cv-00034-DC Document 18 Filed 03/16/18 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MIDLAND/ODESSA DIVISION EMPOWER TEXANS, INC., Plaintiff, v. LAURA A. NODOLF, in her official
More informationWhat Schools Should Know About New Title IX Rules
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com What Schools Should Know About New Title
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Farley v. EIHAB Human Services, Inc. Doc. 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ROBERT FARLEY and : No. 3:12cv1661 ANN MARIE FARLEY, : Plaintiffs : (Judge Munley)
More informationNo UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM J. PAATALO APPELLANT
No. -1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WILLIAM J. PAATALO APPELLANT 1 1 1 vs. U. S. DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON RESPONDENT APPEAL FROM THE JUDGMENT OF THE US DISTRICT
More informationCase: 1:15-cv Document #: 32 Filed: 12/07/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:86
Case: 1:15-cv-07588 Document #: 32 Filed: 12/07/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:86 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JANE DOE, a Minor, by and through
More informationALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS
Rel: 06/09/2017 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate
More informationCase: 1:12-cv Document #: 171 Filed: 09/30/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:5200
Case: 1:12-cv-08594 Document #: 171 Filed: 09/30/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:5200 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DAVID JOHNSON, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs,
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 11. : : Petitioner, : : Respondent.
Case 117-cv-00554 Document 1 Filed 01/25/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------ x ORACLE CORPORATION,
More informationBEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON DR 10, UE 88, UM 989
BEFORE THE PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF OREGON DR 10, UE 88, UM 989 In the Matters of The Application of Portland General Electric Company for an Investigation into Least Cost Plan Plant Retirement, (DR
More informationCase 1:16-cv AJT-MSN Document 30 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID# 552
Case 1:16-cv-00307-AJT-MSN Document 30 Filed 04/25/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID# 552 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division BRISTOL UNIVERSITY, v. Plaintiff,
More informationDISMISSAL, SUSPENSION & DEMOTION
AR 4218 A. Purpose and Scope To provide guidance and direction for the Governing Board and appropriate administrative personnel regarding the dismissal, suspension, and demotion of classified employees.
More informationTENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF SAFETY, Department/, Petitioner, vs. CSGP 06-52VINCENT TUROCY, Grievant/, Respondent
University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Department of State, Opinions from the Administrative Procedures Division Law 4-19-2007 TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CHAMPAIGN COUNTY : : : : : : : : : :... O P I N I O N
[Cite as Champaign Cty. Court of Common Pleas v. Fansler, 2016-Ohio-228.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT CHAMPAIGN COUNTY CHAMPAIGN COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS v. Plaintiff-Appellee
More informationPenfield Rangers Soccer Club BYLAWS
Penfield Rangers Soccer Club BYLAWS 1 Article I - Organization and Purpose 1. Name The name of this organization shall be the Penfield Rangers Soccer Club, a New York State incorporated organization, with
More informationALABAMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 20 X 22 RULES OF PRACTICE (TOBACCO) TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABC Board Chapter 20 X 22 ALABAMA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL BOARD ADMINISTRATIVE CODE CHAPTER 20 X 22 RULES OF PRACTICE (TOBACCO) TABLE OF CONTENTS 20 X 22.01 20 X 22.02 20 X 22.03 Rules Of Practice Hearing
More information*Please note that this translation is missing the following amendments to the Act: JUVENILE COURTS ACT. (Official Gazette no. 111/1997) PART ONE
Please note that the translation provided below is only provisional translation and therefore does NOT represent an official document of Republic of Croatia. It confers no rights and imposes no obligations
More informationDISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE
ARS Lac St-Louis HIVER WINTER 2018/2019 2018/2019 DISCIPLINE DISCIPLINE ARS Lac St-Louis En vigueur du 1er novembre au 30 avril ARS Lac St-Louis In effect from 1 November to 30 April ARS Lac St-Louis Table
More informationCase 4:15-cv RLY-DML Document 1 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1
Case 4:15-cv-00093-RLY-DML Document 1 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA AT NEW ALBANY LINDA G. SUMMERS, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) CASE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :0-cv-0-B-BLM Document Filed 0/0/0 Page of 0 ROBERT S. BREWER, JR. (SBN ) JAMES S. MCNEILL (SBN ) MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP 0 B Street, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 Telephone:() -00 Facsimile: () -0
More informationCase 3:08-cv HA Document 43 Filed 05/26/09 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 555
Case 3:08-cv-01178-HA Document 43 Filed 05/26/09 Page 1 of 12 Page ID#: 555 Amy R. Alpera, OSB No. 840244 Email: aalpern@littler.com Neil N. Olsen, OSB No. 053378 Email: nolsen@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-00-wqh-ags Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 0 Helen I. Zeldes (SBN 00) helen@coastlaw.com Andrew J. Kubik (SBN 0) andy@coastlaw.com COAST LAW GROUP, LLP 0 S. Coast Hwy 0 Encinitas, CA 0 Tel:
More informationLouisiana State University System 3810 West lakeshore Drive Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808
Louisiana State University System 3810 West lakeshore Drive Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70808 Office of the President 225/578-2111 225/578-5524 fax Permanent Memorandum No. 73 {PM-73} Effective June 18, 2014
More information558 March 28, 2019 No. 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON
558 March 28, 2019 No. 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON John S. FOOTE, Mary Elledge, and Deborah Mapes-Stice, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. STATE OF OREGON, Defendant-Appellant. (CC 17CV49853)
More informationCase 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11
Case :-cv-0-jsc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of WILLIAM C. JOHNSON, ESQ. (State Bar No. ) BENNETT & JOHNSON, LLP 0 Harrison Street, Suite 00 Oakland, California Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) -0 william@bennettjohnsonlaw.com
More informationPolicy Number: Policy Name: Conditions of Service for Academic Professionals
Policy Revision Dates: 12/2012, 4/90, 11/86, 12/83 Page 1 6-302 Conditions of Service for Academic A. Appointment Procedures 1. The President shall establish procedures for securing recommendations for
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS
DOYLE BYRNES, 6702 W. 156 th Terrace Overland Park, KS 66223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF KANSAS Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL JOHNSON COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE,
More informationDISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
ELECTRONICALLY SERVED //0 :0 AM Case Number: A-1--C 1 DAVID T. SPURLOCK, JR., ESQ. State Bar No. 00 THE LAW OFFICES OF KARL H. SMITH Arroyo Crossing Parkway, Suite 00 Las Vegas, NV Phone: (0) 0-00 david.spurlock@farmersinsurance.com
More informationCase: 6:16-cv GFVT Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/30/16 Page: 1 of 19 - Page ID#: 1
Case: 6:16-cv-00309-GFVT Doc #: 1 Filed: 12/30/16 Page: 1 of 19 - Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LONDON DIVISION Electronically Filed on December 30, 2016 J.S. AND
More information