ADAM ABDULLAH v. MALAYSIAN OXYGEN BHD

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "ADAM ABDULLAH v. MALAYSIAN OXYGEN BHD"

Transcription

1 353 ADAM ABDULLAH v. MALAYSIAN OXYGEN BHD Industrial Court, Kuala Lumpur Mary Shakila G Azariah Award No: 521 of 2012 [Case No: 24/4-906/10] 24 April 2012 Dismissal: Retrenchment - Redundancy - Company reorganisation - Whether retrenchment mala fide - Whether Last In First Out principle violated - Whether retrenchment not genuine The claimant, who at the time of dismissal was the Information Management ( IM ) Operations Manager, was made redundant by the company after it implemented a new SAP System which caused the old AS400 System to be shut down and the IM Operations redundant. The claimant claimed that he was not redundant as his subordinates were not retrenched, and he was also asked to report to one Chong Kah Min, who joined the company very much later than the claimant. The issue for the court to consider was whether there was a genuine retrenchment of the claimant by the company. Held (for the claimant): (1) To justify retrenchment there must first be redundancy. To prove this the company must show that there was a surplus of labour or that the requirement of the job functions of the employee had ceased or had greatly diminished to the extent that the job no longer existed, or that the business required fewer employees of whatever kind resulting from a reorganisation exercise or due to other legitimate reasons for operations. (para 10) (2) In redundancy it is the services of the employee which must be redundant and not his position or title. Evidence showed that the claimant s principal functions as the IM Operations Manager of the company were wide-ranging and continued to exist even with the implementation of the SAP System. (para 24) (3) The company s retrenchment of the claimant on grounds of redundancy was not genuine. There was no evidence adduced by the company that the claimant was not qualified or lacked the necessary skills and expertise to run the restructured department. There was also no evidence adduced why the claimant could not be trained for the post. Someone was obviously needed to run the SAP system and unless the claimant was not suited for the role or could not fit into the new restructured system, he could not be said to be redundant. The job functions still existed and no evidence was tendered to show otherwise or why the company said it had diminished or ceased to exist. Chong Kah Min was simply preferred over the claimant by the company. (paras 20, 22 & 24)

2 354 [2012] 2 MELR (4) By preferring Chong Kah Min and failing to prove that the claimant was made redundant due to his lack of skill or expertise, the retrenchment of the claimant was made in bad faith and in violation of the Last In First Out (LIFO) principle. (para 23) (5) Given the claimant s unblemished work record of 25 years, the company at the very least should have given the claimant a notice of the retrenchment exercise so that he may find alternative employment elsewhere. (para 26) [Reinstatement not ordered. Backwages less the retrenchment benefits and compensation in lieu of reinstatement awarded to the Claimant. No deduction for post dismissal earnings]. Case Commentaries It is now common practice that Industrial Court awards are heard by one Chairman and handed down by another. This practice is the result of the high turnover of Chairmen in the Industrial Court. The Chairman who hands down the award uses the notes prepared by the Chairman who heard the evidence, as well as documentary evidence and submissions prepared by the parties. Although one party to a dispute may object to this practice and demand a de novo or fresh hearing, the objection is usually overruled by the court. The principles relating to redundancy have been repeated many times by the Industrial Court which recognises the right of an employer to decide upon the appropriate size of his workforce and, if he finds that he has surplus workers, he may retrench them. A retrenchment exercise needs to follow certain well-accepted principles in order for it to be accepted by the Industrial Court as genuine and not an attempt to victimise certain individuals. When necessary, the court will examine the evidence relating to the retrenchment exercise and decide whether it was a bona fide or genuine exercise by the employer. Retrenchment is an example of a managerial prerogative. However, action taken under the pretext of redundancy, if proven to be a form of victimisation of the employee, may be struck down by the Industrial Court as this is an unfair labour practice. One of the key principles in determining whether a retrenchment exercise has been fairly conducted is Last in, First out (LIFO). Where this rule is violated, it is likely that the Industrial Court will decide that a retrenchment exercise is without just cause or excuse. If an employee has been retrenched and paid retrenchment benefits and subsequently challenges his or her dismissal; and if the Industrial Court decides that the dismissal was without just cause or excuse and that the employee should be paid compensation by the employer for the loss of

3 355 his employment, the court will deduct from the compensation package an amount equivalent to benefits already paid out to the employee. Case(s) referred to: Carrier International Sdn Bhd v. Rahim Kassim & Ors [2006] 2 ILR 879 (refd) Dr James Alfred v. Koperasi Sanya Bhd & Anor [2001] 3 MLJ 529 (refd) Hariprasad v. Divelkar AIR [1957] SC 121 (refd) Harris Solid State (M) Sdn Bhd & Anor v. Bruno Gentil Pereira & Ors [1996] 4 CLJ 747 (refd) Hong Leong Equipment Sdn Bhd v. Liew Fook Chuan & Other Appeals [1997] 1 CLJ 665 (refd) R Rama Chandran v. Industrial Court of Malaysia & Anor [1997] 1 CLJ 147 (refd) Tuan Syed Hashim bin Tuan Long v. Esso Production Malaysia Inc [1997] 1 LNS 99 (refd) Legislation referred to: Industrial Relations Act 1967, ss 23(6), 30(5) Counsel: For the claimant: S Shanker (Lim Siew Ann with him); M/s S Shanker & Arjunan For the company: V Vijayan; M/s Shearn Delamore & Co AWARD Mary Shakila G Azariah: [1] This reference stems from the dismissal of Encik Adam bin Peter Lum ( the claimant ) by Malaysian Oxygen Bhd ( the company ) on 19 May [2] This reference has been transferred from court 14 to court 27 for the writing of the Award as the former Chairman of court 14 has gone on transfer. This Award is now penned by the learned Chairman court 27. The learned Chairman has been directed by the president to hand down this Award in the interest of justice. The last submission was filed on 5 June 2008 and the matter has been pending since. The court relies on the authority of Bax Global (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd (now known as Schenker Logistic [Malaysia] Sdn Bhd ) v. Sukhdev Singh s/o Pritam Singh and Anor, (R ) where reference was made, inter alia to s 23(6) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 by the learned Judicial Commissioner. It was held in the said case that in order to obviate grave hardship being caused the case need not be heard de novo. Brief Facts [3] The claimant joined the company on 8 September 1975 as a Systems Assistant. At the time of his dismissal he held the post of IM Operations

4 356 [2012] 2 MELR Manager. The claimant was made redundant by the company on 17 May The company implemented the SAP System in the company sometime in 2000, April. With this implementation of the new SAP System the company s old AS 400 system was permanently shutdown and consequently as the company has pleaded the IM Operations became redundant. The claimant avers that the claimant had recruited Chong Kah Min on or about January 1991 and had designated him as System Accountant in the company and later made him assume the position of it development activist. The claimant avers that on or about July 1994 the company attempted Chong Kah Min as IM Manager to head the IM Department and proposed to re-designate the claimant as Data Processing Controller. The claimant avers that he objected to this for several reasons. The claimant pleads that vide the letter dated 17 May 2000 he was informed by the company that he had become redundant and that the company was unable to find any alternative position in the company for the claimant. The claimant contends that he was not redundant as his subordinates were not retrenched and were asked to report to Chong Kah Min. He claims that he had been victimised by the company and that his dismissal was done in bad faith. Redundancy Principles [4] In the case of Harris Solid State (M) Sdn Bhd & Anor v. Bruno Gentil Pereira & Ors [1996] 4 CLJ 747 it was held that: An employer may reorganise his commercial undertaking for any legitimate reasons such as promoting better economic viability. But he must not do so for a collateral purpose, for example, to victimise his workmen for their legitimate participation in union activities. Whether the particular exercise of the managerial power was exercised bona fide or for a collateral reasons is a question of fact that necessarily falls to be decided upon the peculiar circumstances of each case. [5] In other words if the facts when viewed objectively shows that the exercise of the managerial powers by the employer even for a closure of business was for a collateral purpose that is aimed at putting a workman out of job the termination consequent upon such an exercise of power may be struck down by the court as constituting unfair labour practice. In the case of Tuan Syed Hashim bin Tuan Long v. Esso Production Malaysia Inc [1997] 1 LNS 99 where it was stated that the right to reorganise the company is the prerogative of the management to achieve maximum efficiency and effectiveness. This prerogative belongs to the company provided it is done bona fide. If in the process of doing that some workmen had to be laid off, there is ample provisions in the law to provide them with retrenchment benefits. [6] The concept of managerial prerogative is well known by the Industrial Relations Act 1967 and the Employment Act The Industrial Relations Act 1967 as well as case law acknowledges the employer s managerial prerogatives but these managerial prerogatives are not absolute. Where it is shown that the exercise of these prerogatives is not bona fide or amounts to

5 357 unfair labour practice or indicates victimisation, the Industrial Court will not hesitate to strike down such exercise as bad. [7] The courts have held that the managerial prerogatives of the employer are qualified rights and there are important principles to be taken into consideration. To the court it is important that the employer acts fairly and conducts the retrenchment bona fide and untainted by any unfair labour practice. (see Cycle and Carriage Bintang Bhd v. Cheah Hian Lim where the retrenchment was held by the court as genuine and did not constitute dismissal without just cause or excuse). [8] At the other end of the scale is the case of Hong Leong Equipment Sdn Bhd v. Liew Fook Chuan & Other Appeals [1997] 1 CLJ 665 and that of R Rama Chandran v. Industrial Court of Malaysia & Anor [1997] 1 CLJ 147 which recognises that an employee has a right to work and earn a living and apart from this being a fundamental right, it is also akin to property. [9] The issue before the court bearing in mind the afore stated principles of law is whether there was a genuine retrenchment vis-a-vis the claimant. Retrenchment means the discharge of surplus labour or staff by the employer for any reason whatsoever otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action. This is as per SK Das J in Hariprasad v. Divelkar AIR [1957] SC 121 at p 132: It has been held that whether the retrenchment exercise in a particular case is bona fide or otherwise is a question of fact and of degree depending for its resolution upon the peculiar facts and circumstances of each case. It is settled that an employer is entitled to organise his business in the manner he considers best. However his managerial powers must be exercised bona fide. If not, the decision will not be immune from examination by the Industrial Court. The Industrial Court is empowered and indeed duty bound to investigate the facts and circumstances of a particular case to determine whether that exercise of power was in fact bona fide. [10] To sum up to justify retrenchment there must first be redundancy. To prove this the company must show that there was a surplus of labour or that the requirement of the job functions of the employee has ceased or has greatly diminished to the extent that the job no longer exists or that the business requires fewer employees of whatever kind resulting from a reorganisation exercise or due to whatever other legitimate reasons operations. The Company s Evidence [11] The company s sole witness was CW, the current manager of the company. She testified that she joined the company in October Her testimony in court was based on the documents that was kept in the company s file on the claimant. CW testified that she could confirm that the claimant was terminated by the company vide the company s letter dated 17 May It was her testimony that sometime in mid 1994 the parent company began upgrading

6 358 [2012] 2 MELR the operations in respect of all the its group of companies worldwide. She said that the area identified was in respect of the conversion of the systems from what was in place at the material time and that is the AS400 computer system to the SAP system. [12] According to CW the SAP Project in the company started began in October She testified that Chong Kah Min was appointed as the Project Manager as he was then the IM Systems Development Manager whereas the claimant was the Information Management Operations Manager. It was her testimony that with the implementation of the new SAP systems the old AS400 System was shut down and was no longer utilised for the day-to-day operations of the company. She testified that the IM Operations team became redundant and the company terminated the services of the claimant. CW testified that there were 3 personnels in the IM Department. She said that the company retained the services of the computer operator for the purposes of supporting the non- SAP branches which were gradually phased out and the computer operator so retained retired on 24 April CW said that the company also retained the Data Processing Assistant and that she also retired a year later from the company. According to CW the other personnel who was the IM executive in the IM Department was absorbed into the new IM Organisation. It was her evidence that both the claimant and Chong Kah Min had different duties. The Claimant s Evidence [13] The claimant testified that Chong Kah Min joined the company in or about January He said that he was under the impression that Chong Kah Min would report to him as the previous systems analyst reported to him. He said that he learnt that the company had made Chong Kah Min the Systems Accountant and later assumed the IT System Development Manager whilst he (the claimant) would be responsible for the IT Operations of the company. He said that he was told by Stanley Wong the then Finance Manager that he need not worry about his own career advancement in the company and that Chong Kah Min was in a grade lower to him. According to his evidence he said that in July 1994 the company attempted to make Chong Kah Min the IM Manager to head the IM Department and to re-designate him as the Data Processing Controller to which he protested. He testified that he was much more senior to Chong Kah Min and was pioneer in introducing IT in the company. He said that the company did abandone the proposal. It was his testimony that the company vide its memo dated 27 January 1995 announced that Chong Kah Min had been appointed as the IM Systems Development Manager whilst he was re-designated IM Operations Manager. He said that Chong Kah Min received car benefits which he did not. [14] He further testified that he wrote several letters to the company seeking clarifications concerning his job and car entitlement. He said that he had directed his solicitors to write to the company regarding his situation and the company s reply was unsatisfactory. He said that the company had earlier

7 359 through the Human Resource Manager informed him on 23 June 1998 that he would receive his car benefits but failed to implement it. He said that vide their reply dated 28 August 1998 the company said that he was in Grade M4 and was not entitled to car benefits. The claimant said that the company had graded him wrongly as he was in Grade 8 which was the highest grade for Middle Management Grouping. [15] The claimant testified that the SAP was a new integrated system and was implemented in the company late He said that he had to be trained to understand the system but was not given any training by the company despite his request for it. He said that Chong Kah Min was appointed Project Manager for the new system and had a team under him and they were sent periodically to Hong Kong for training. The claimant said that he was told to concentrate on the AS400 systems. He testified that he had implemented four systems in the company before this and was sent for training locally and overseas. [16] The claimant had written to the company on 30 August 1999 inquiring as to when he and his team in the IM Department would be involved in the SAP and receive training for it. He said that the system had entered phase 3 by then. The claimant testified that vide its memo dated 8 September 1999 the company had responded to him saying that the training of the staff will start in October 1999 with the Finance Module. He said that vide another memo the company through Mr Fuller had said that the company was very close to letting the staff know where they will fit into the organisation post SAP and that this will be communicated to him and his staff in the near future. It was his testimony that vide its letter dated 17 May 2000 the company informed him that the AS400 was permanently shut down and his position as Manager of IM Operations was affected. He was made redundant and was dismissed with immediate effect by the company. The claimant said that he was not redundant as support work had to be done locally for the SAP systems. He said that there were works to be done like handling user security and other matters relating to user security, managing the system to ensure that the equipment was in working order and that the telecommunication lines were up all the time to ensure linkage to United Kingdom and the local branches. The claimant testified that his three staffs in his department were directed to report to Chong Kah Min. Referring to the company s memo dated 22 September 2000 the company referred to Chong Kah Min as the IM Manager. It was his evidence that the IM Operations Department in the company was not redundant notwithstanding the information system had changed from AS400 to SAP. He said that there was still information system for him to manage. [17] The claimant testified that he was senior in comparison to Chong Kah Min. He said that he had been with the company for 16 years. He testified that when he was hired AS400 was not in the company. It was introduced in It was his testimony that when he left the company there were still 10 staff remaining including Chong Kah Min.

8 360 [2012] 2 MELR Evaluation [18] The court agrees that the company had the right to reorganise its business and to replace the AS400 with the SAP system. The company s evidence was that the company was not the only entity within the BOC group to undergo restructuring as a result of the introduction of the SAP system. I do not think on the evidence before me that the company acted mala fide in introducing the SAP system into the company and the ensuing restructuring exercise that followed was to cater for the same. But was the claimant s position redundant as a result of the restructuring that was carried out? [19] The company s evidence was given by CW who was the manager of the company having joined the company in October None from the Human Resource or the higher officials came to testify on the restructuring exercise that was carried out by the company that resulted in the claimant being made redundant. Through CW the company has established that the SAP system that was introduced in 2000 had largely affected the IM Department that was headed by the claimant as it brought about the shutting down of the AS400 system managed by the claimant and his team. It however left Chong Kah Min the newly appointed IM Systems Development Manager heading the SAP system. The question is could the claimant who had been the head of the IM Department before Chong Kah Min s entry into the company be retained to head the IM Department and be in charge of the SAP system that took over from AS400? Was the claimant not qualified to manage the SAP system? [20] Gleaning the evidence adduced by the company the claimant was not needed by the company because Chong Kah Min was there and preferred over the claimant by the company. The company did not adduce evidence to show that the claimant was not qualified or lacked the necessary skills and expertise that Chong Kah Min to run the restructured department. There was nothing in the company s case to show why the claimant could not be trained for the post. In fact the company through the David Fuller had indicated that the claimant and his team will receive the requisite training once the SAP was fully functional in the company. There is nothing to say or show why the claimant was not suitable for the new role and that no amount of training could equip him to function within the new department. It seems on the evidence that Chong Kah Min was preferred over the claimant for reasons bests known to the company and that the company had no use for the claimant because Chong Kah Min was and preferred over him. The company had failed to show that the claimant s services were no longer needed by the company. To put it rather bluntly it seems to be that the company did not require the claimant s services because they had Chong Kah Min. [21] The company attempts to justify retaining Chong Kah Min by relying on the job descriptions handled by the claimant and Chong Kah Min. These were job descriptions written in 1996 when the company divided the IM Department into two factions relegating the claimant who was previous to the

9 361 said division in overall charge of the IM Department. The evidence of the company is scanty and does not disclose the full picture much less for the court to work on in determining whether the retrenchment exercise carried on by the company was genuine and in good faith. It does not assist the court in determining whether the claimant was in fact rendered redundant with the implementation of the SAP system. [22] Reorganisation is the prerogative of the employer. It is trite that reorganisation may result in the services of some employees being excess and if so the employer is entitled to discharge such excess. It is incumbent however on the company to show that the services of the claimant were no longer needed or had diminished or expected to cease or diminish. However the evidence before the court does not bear this out. Someone was obviously needed to run the the SAP system and unless the claimant was not suited for the role or could not fit into the new restructured system he cannot be said to be redundant. The claimant testified that he pioneered the IT Department in the company and had introduced four systems in the company prior to this for which he was trained. His evidence was not challenged and remains incontrovertible. [23] Preferring Chong Kah Min barring any insinuations about the claimant lack of skill or expertise to work in the company, is a violation of the Last In First Out principle ( LIFO ). There seems to be some malice or bad faith on the part of the company in the action it has taken towards the claimant. The other staff in his department were retained in the company. In fact two of the staff Agnes Ho and Amy Yau according to the company s evidence were retained in the new IM Organisation as a support staff for the non-sap branches as the same was only gradually phased out. LIFO would require Chong Kah Min being phased unless he was found to be more suitable and qualified for the job. But as I have said this is not what CW had said in court. Her evidence was that Chong Kah Min was appointed as Project Manager as he was then the IM Systems Manager a post he held since It should not be forgotten that prior to him coming into the company the claimant was overall in charge of the IM Department and would have continued to work on the new SAP system if Chong Kah Min was not in the company. In the absence of any evidence that shows that the claimant was not suitable to be trained or to operate the SAP system the court would necessarily have to find that the retrenchment of the claimant was in bad faith and in violation of the LIFO. Having said that the court finds that the claimant s dismissal by the company was without just cause or excuse. The claimant had served the company for nearly 25 years. [24] The claimant had been writing to the company seeking clarifications from his superior as to his position and future in the company. The claimant must have felt something was brewing and that his position was not secured. The company had not been quite forthright with him giving him a false sense of security. From the evidence it is clear that the company had not notified him at all of the impending retrenchment of himself. Under these circumstances and bearing in mind that the claimant had begun questioning the company on the

10 362 [2012] 2 MELR car benefits that Chong Kah Min inter alia enjoyed which was not extended to him it is perceived that the company s retrenchment of the claimant on grounds of redundancy was not genuine. The court agrees with the claimant s solicitor s submission that the reason for his dismissal is highly misconceived. On the evidence his job functions still existed and there was no evidence tendered by the company to show otherwise or why they say it diminished or ceased to exist. All that the company s evidence show is that the AS400 was replaced by a new information system SAP. How incompetent was the claimant in handling this system was not established by the company. It is trite that in redundancy it is the services of the employee which must be redundant and not his position or title. Judging from his principal functions as the IM Operations Manager of the company, as evidenced by the documents adduced in this proceedings it is wide ranging and continued to exist even with the implementation of the SAP system. [25] By not adhering to the principle of LIFO the company had disregarded the Code of Conduct for Industrial Harmony which suggests the steps that an employer ought to take prior to retrenching its workman. In Carrier International Sdn Bhd v. Rahim Kassim & Ors [2006] 2 ILR 879 it was postulated that:... though the Code has no legal force (Penang Seberang Prai Textiles & Government Industry Employees Union v. Dragon & Phoenix [1989] 1 MLJ 48) it is a relevant factor for the purpose of considering the overall reasonableness of the employer s action in dismissal cases. In this regard the learned chairman is correct when he took into consideration the fact that there was no consultation held with the 1st respondent before his dismissal as one of the grounds that the dismissal was without just cause or excuse.... [26] Fair industrial practice would require the company to have given early warning to the claimant that he was going to be retrenched. The claimant had 25 years of unblemished record with the company. The very least the company could have done was to put him on notice of the retrenchment exercise early so that he could find alternative employment elsewhere. [27] Reiterating its earlier findings premised on the evidence before it and taking into consideration s 30(5) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 the court finds that the claimant had been dismissed without any just cause or excuse. [28] The retrenchment of the claimant by the company was bad in law an exercise that was capricious and tainted with mala fide. Accordingly the court shall now make the remedial orders based on the facts of the case. Remedy [29] The court has evaluated the evidence adduced by both sides at the Hearing and thus makes a finding that the claimant succeeds in his claim on the facts and merits of the case. His claim against the company is thus allowed and the following consequential orders following the court s findings in his favour is made:

11 363 (1) Reinstatement Though the claimant had pleaded for reinstatement to his former position with backwages, inter alia the court on the facts that he has past the age of retirement the court finds that it may not be conducive for the court to order reinstatement and hence makes no order that the claimant be reinstated to his former position in the company. (2) Backwages The court deems it that backwages that should be paid to the claimant be limited to 24 months of his last drawn salary. RM7, x 24 months = RM170, The court orders that the backwages should be reduced taking into account the retrenchment benefits that the claimant was paid at the time of his dismissal. Having considered the facts of the case and Dr James Alfred v. Koperasi Sanya Bhd & Anor [2001] 3 MLJ 529, the court makes no deduction for post dismissal earnings as the evidence do not show any gainful employment in so far as the claimant is concerned. (3) Compensation Final Relief The court further orders that the company pays the claimant one month salary for each year of service as compensation in lieu of reinstatement to the claimant. RM7, x 24 = RM170, [30] Having found that the claimant had been dismissed by the company without just cause or excuse the company is ordered to pay the claimant through his solicitors backwages in the sum of RM170, less the retrenchment benefits received by the claimant plus the sum of RM170, as compensation within 30 days from the date hereof. The company shall make the statutory deductions, if any, to the final sum of RM137,

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 2/4-346/15 BETWEEN MOHAMED HASLAM BIN ABDUL RAZAK AND PERUSAHAAN OTOMOBIL NASIONAL SDN BHD

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 2/4-346/15 BETWEEN MOHAMED HASLAM BIN ABDUL RAZAK AND PERUSAHAAN OTOMOBIL NASIONAL SDN BHD INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 2/4-346/15 BETWEEN MOHAMED HASLAM BIN ABDUL RAZAK AND PERUSAHAAN OTOMOBIL NASIONAL SDN BHD AWARD NO. 552 OF 2018 Before : Y.A. PUAN ROSENANI BINTI ABD RAHMAN - Chairman

More information

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 15/4-388/14 BETWEEN YASMIN BINTI HARON AND EXTOL CORPORATION (M) SDN. BHD. AWARD NO: 342 OF 2017

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 15/4-388/14 BETWEEN YASMIN BINTI HARON AND EXTOL CORPORATION (M) SDN. BHD. AWARD NO: 342 OF 2017 INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 15/4-388/14 BETWEEN YASMIN BINTI HARON AND EXTOL CORPORATION (M) SDN. BHD. AWARD NO: 342 OF 2017 Before : Y.A. PUAN REIHANA BTE ABD.RAZAK CHAIRMAN (SITTING ALONE)

More information

ABDUL AZIZ ISMAIL & ORS v. ROYAL SELANGOR CLUB

ABDUL AZIZ ISMAIL & ORS v. ROYAL SELANGOR CLUB Abdul Aziz Ismail & Ors [2015] 2 MELR v. Royal Selangor Club 325 ABDUL AZIZ ISMAIL & ORS v. ROYAL SELANGOR CLUB Industrial Court, Kuala Lumpur Eddie Yeo Soon Chye Award No: 327 of 2015 [Case No: 13(25)(22)(25)/4-1255/2011]

More information

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-173/02 BETWEEN MALAYSIAN AIRLINE SYSTEM BHD. AND KARTHIGESU A/L V. CHINNASAMY AWARD NO : 2230 OF 2005

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-173/02 BETWEEN MALAYSIAN AIRLINE SYSTEM BHD. AND KARTHIGESU A/L V. CHINNASAMY AWARD NO : 2230 OF 2005 INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-173/02 BETWEEN MALAYSIAN AIRLINE SYSTEM BHD. AND KARTHIGESU A/L V. CHINNASAMY AWARD NO : 2230 OF 2005 Before : N. RAJASEGARAN - Chairman (Sitting Alone) Venue:

More information

THE ROLE, FUNCTIONS AND POWERS OF THE INDUSTRIAL COURT IN RELATION TO RETRENCHMENT, TERMINATION AND DISMISSAL TREVOR GEORGE DE SILVA 14TH JANUARY 2009

THE ROLE, FUNCTIONS AND POWERS OF THE INDUSTRIAL COURT IN RELATION TO RETRENCHMENT, TERMINATION AND DISMISSAL TREVOR GEORGE DE SILVA 14TH JANUARY 2009 THE ROLE, FUNCTIONS AND POWERS OF THE INDUSTRIAL COURT IN RELATION TO RETRENCHMENT, TERMINATION AND DISMISSAL TREVOR GEORGE DE SILVA 14TH JANUARY 2009 JW MARRIOT 1 The long title of the Industrial Relations

More information

LEE PEI SZE v. SWIFTLET GARDEN SDN BHD

LEE PEI SZE v. SWIFTLET GARDEN SDN BHD 482 LEE PEI SZE v. SWIFTLET GARDEN SDN BHD Industrial Court, Johor Duncan Sikodol Award No: 167 of 2017 [Case No: 16/4-664/16] 23 January 2017 Dismissal: Probationer Pleadings Allegations of misconduct

More information

AWARD NO. : 1614 OF 2018

AWARD NO. : 1614 OF 2018 INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. : BETWEEN NAZREEN BEGUM BINTI MOHAMED YAACOB AND PETRONAS / PETRONAS CHEMICALS GROUP BERHAD AWARD NO. : 1614 OF 2018 Before Venue : PUAN ANNA NG FUI CHOO - Chairman

More information

JUDGMENT (Court enclosure no. 4)

JUDGMENT (Court enclosure no. 4) IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) IN THE FEDERAL TERRITORY OF KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA CIVIL SUIT NO: WA-22IP-37-09/2017 BETWEEN DARUL FIKIR (Business Registration No.: 000624088-H)

More information

March IR Law Free Newsletter. IR Law provides the following advisory/consultation services to Members and Non-Members*: Disciplinary proceedings

March IR Law Free Newsletter. IR Law provides the following advisory/consultation services to Members and Non-Members*: Disciplinary proceedings IRLaw CORPORATE INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS CONSULTANCY Dear Readers, This is our Free Newsletter, examining some updates on the new Public Holiday for Sarawak, Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) and our usual

More information

AWARD NO. : 1089 OF 2016

AWARD NO. : 1089 OF 2016 INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. : 3/4-106/15 BETWEEN INTAN SOFIA BINTI ZAINUDDIN AND TOI TOI SERVICES SDN. BHD. AWARD NO. : 1089 OF 2016 Before Venue : PUAN ANNA NG FUI CHOO - Chairman (Sitting Alone)

More information

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. : 1/1-8/18 BETWEEN NATIONAL UNION OF HOTEL, BAR & RESTAURANT WORKERS, PENINSULAR MALAYSIA AND

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. : 1/1-8/18 BETWEEN NATIONAL UNION OF HOTEL, BAR & RESTAURANT WORKERS, PENINSULAR MALAYSIA AND INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. : 1/1-8/18 BETWEEN NATIONAL UNION OF HOTEL, BAR & RESTAURANT WORKERS, PENINSULAR MALAYSIA AND ALOR SETAR HOLIDAY VILLA SDN. BHD. AWARD NO. : 1375 OF 2018 CORAM: YA

More information

"collective agreement" means an agreement as to industrial matters;

collective agreement means an agreement as to industrial matters; Page 1 of 36 Short title 1. This Act may be cited as the Industrial Relations Act. Interpretation 2. In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires "award" means an award made by a Court; "collective

More information

NINETY-SEVENTH SESSION. Considering that the facts of the case and the pleadings may be summed up as follows:

NINETY-SEVENTH SESSION. Considering that the facts of the case and the pleadings may be summed up as follows: NINETY-SEVENTH SESSION Judgment No. 2324 The Administrative Tribunal, Considering the complaint filed by Mrs E. C. against the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) on 5 March 2003

More information

110th Session Judgment No. 2991

110th Session Judgment No. 2991 Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal Registry s translation, the French text alone being authoritative. 110th Session

More information

114th Session Judgment No. 3159

114th Session Judgment No. 3159 Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal 114th Session Judgment No. 3159 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering the complaint

More information

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 18(12)/4-411/15 ZAKARIA BIN ISMAIL DAN EASTERN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION BERHAD AWARD NO: 857 OF 2017

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 18(12)/4-411/15 ZAKARIA BIN ISMAIL DAN EASTERN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION BERHAD AWARD NO: 857 OF 2017 INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 18(12)/4-411/15 ZAKARIA BIN ISMAIL DAN EASTERN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL CORPORATION BERHAD AWARD NO: 857 OF 2017 Before : Y.A. TUAN GULAM MUHIADDEEN BIN ABDUL AZIZ CHAIRMAN

More information

MMC Engineering Group Bhd & Anor v Wayss & Freytag (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd

MMC Engineering Group Bhd & Anor v Wayss & Freytag (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd CIDB Construction Law Report 2015 MMC Engineering Group Bhd & Anor v Wayss & Freytag (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd HIGH COURT, KUALA LUMPUR ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO: 24C(ARB) 2 05/2013 MARY LIM THIAM SUAN J 11 MAY

More information

E. Z. (No. 2) v. UNESCO

E. Z. (No. 2) v. UNESCO Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal Registry s translation, the French text alone being authoritative. E. Z. (No. 2)

More information

THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT BAREND JOHANNES JAKOBUS ENGELBRECHT FRASER ALEXANDER (PTY) LTD

THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT BAREND JOHANNES JAKOBUS ENGELBRECHT FRASER ALEXANDER (PTY) LTD THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Not reportable Case No: JS 518/2014 In the matter between: BAREND JOHANNES JAKOBUS ENGELBRECHT Applicant and FRASER ALEXANDER (PTY) LTD Respondent

More information

108th Session Judgment No. 2868

108th Session Judgment No. 2868 Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal 108th Session Judgment No. 2868 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering the complaint

More information

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 18/4-352/2008 TEOH CHYE LYN ALLSTAFF OUTSOURCING SDN. BHD. AWARD NO: 577 OF 2010

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 18/4-352/2008 TEOH CHYE LYN ALLSTAFF OUTSOURCING SDN. BHD. AWARD NO: 577 OF 2010 INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 18/4-352/2008 TEOH CHYE LYN V. ALLSTAFF OUTSOURCING SDN. BHD. AWARD NO: 577 OF 2010 Before : Y.A. RAJENDRAN NAYAGAM CHAIRMAN (Sitting Alone) Venue : Industrial Court

More information

Pilecon Engineering Bhd ABDUL KADIR SULAIMAN, JCA ARIFIN ZAKARIA, JCA NIK HASHIM NIK AB. RAHMAN, JCA 23 FEBRUARY 2007

Pilecon Engineering Bhd ABDUL KADIR SULAIMAN, JCA ARIFIN ZAKARIA, JCA NIK HASHIM NIK AB. RAHMAN, JCA 23 FEBRUARY 2007 COURT OF APPEAL, MALAYSIA Bintulu Development Authority - vs - Coram Pilecon Engineering Bhd ABDUL KADIR SULAIMAN, JCA ARIFIN ZAKARIA, JCA NIK HASHIM NIK AB. RAHMAN, JCA 23 FEBRUARY 2007 Judgment of the

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA IN KUALA LUMPUR (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) IN THE FEDERAL TERRITORY OF KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA WRIT NO: 22IP-29-06/2015 BETWEEN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA IN KUALA LUMPUR (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) IN THE FEDERAL TERRITORY OF KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA WRIT NO: 22IP-29-06/2015 BETWEEN IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA IN KUALA LUMPUR (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) IN THE FEDERAL TERRITORY OF KUALA LUMPUR, MALAYSIA WRIT NO: 22IP-29-06/2015 BETWEEN 1) WORLD GRAND DYNAMIC MARKETING SDN BHD (Company No

More information

PLAINTIFFS' SKELETAL SUBMISSIONS (CROSS-EXAMINATION)

PLAINTIFFS' SKELETAL SUBMISSIONS (CROSS-EXAMINATION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR (CIVIL DIVISION) CIVIL SUIT NO. S2-23 - 38-2006 BETWEEN 1. SARAWAK SHELL BHD (71978-W) 2. SHELL MALAYSIA TRADING SENDIRIAN BERHAD (6078-M) 3. SHELL REFINING

More information

C.-S. v. ILO. 124th Session Judgment No. 3884

C.-S. v. ILO. 124th Session Judgment No. 3884 Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal Registry s translation, the French text alone being authoritative. C.-S. v. ILO 124th

More information

ESSENTIALS OF EMPLOYMENT LAW MALAYSIA & ASIA Topic: MALAYSIAN EMPLOYMENT & INDUSTRIAL LAW : BRIEF OVERVIEW AND SPECIFIC INSIGHTS

ESSENTIALS OF EMPLOYMENT LAW MALAYSIA & ASIA Topic: MALAYSIAN EMPLOYMENT & INDUSTRIAL LAW : BRIEF OVERVIEW AND SPECIFIC INSIGHTS ESSENTIALS OF EMPLOYMENT LAW MALAYSIA & ASIA 2008 Topic: MALAYSIAN EMPLOYMENT & INDUSTRIAL LAW : BRIEF OVERVIEW AND SPECIFIC INSIGHTS 2008 All Rights Reserved. Trevor George De Silva. 1 Malaysian Employment

More information

IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 9/4-2260/06 BETWEEN KHOO EE PENG AND GALAXY AUTOMATION SDN BHD AWARD NO: 656 OF 2009

IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 9/4-2260/06 BETWEEN KHOO EE PENG AND GALAXY AUTOMATION SDN BHD AWARD NO: 656 OF 2009 IN THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 9/4-2260/06 BETWEEN KHOO EE PENG AND GALAXY AUTOMATION SDN BHD AWARD NO: 656 OF 2009 Before : MOHD AMIN FIRDAUS ABDULLAH - CHAIRMAN Venue : INDUSTRIAL COURT

More information

E. Z. v. UNESCO. 125th Session Judgment No. 3934

E. Z. v. UNESCO. 125th Session Judgment No. 3934 Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal Registry s translation, the French text alone being authoritative. E. Z. v. UNESCO

More information

IREKA CORPORATION BERHAD

IREKA CORPORATION BERHAD Page 1 of 7 IREKA CORPORATION BERHAD (Co. No. 25882A) (Incorporated in Malaysia) EXTRACT OF THE MINUTES OF THE FORTYFIRST ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE COMPANY HELD AT DEWAN BERJAYA, BUKIT KIARA EQUESTRIAN

More information

For the appellants Lim Kian Leong (Tony Ng TT, Keith Kwan & Rachel Tan Pak Theen with him); M/s Mohd Zain & Co

For the appellants Lim Kian Leong (Tony Ng TT, Keith Kwan & Rachel Tan Pak Theen with him); M/s Mohd Zain & Co NGAN & NGAN HOLDINGS SDN BHD & ANOR v. CENTRAL MERCANTILE CORPORATION (M) SDN BHD [2010] 3 CLJ 818 COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA HELILIAH MOHD YUSOF JCA, KN SEGARA JCA, RAMLY ALI JCA [CIVIL APPEAL NO: W-02-85-2007]

More information

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-170/02 BETWEEN SEMANGAT RAKYAT SDN. BHD. AND

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-170/02 BETWEEN SEMANGAT RAKYAT SDN. BHD. AND INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-170/02 BETWEEN SEMANGAT RAKYAT SDN. BHD. AND JESUMARAN ANTHONY A/L J. MARIADASS @ MUHAMAD ADAM JESU ABDULLAH AWARD NO : 766 OF 2004 Before : N. RAJASEGARAN -

More information

COMPANY LAW CIVIL PROCEDURE Held: [1] [2]

COMPANY LAW CIVIL PROCEDURE Held: [1] [2] 1 TAN SRI ABDUL AZIZ ZAIN & ORS v. UNITED OVERSEAS LAND LTD & ORS HIGH COURT MALAYA, PULAU PINANG ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD J CIVIL SUIT NO: 22-265-95 12 OCTOBER 1998 [1998] 4 CLJ 321 COMPANY LAW: Suit by Company

More information

Managing Workplace Misconduct

Managing Workplace Misconduct Managing Workplace Misconduct What is Misconduct? BR Ghaiye: Misconduct is not a term of art If the conduct of an employee is of such a character that he is not regarded as worthy of employment it may

More information

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. 4(23)/4-772/13 BETWEEN KAMAL AZIZUL BIN AZIZ AND AMBANK (M) BERHAD AWARD NO : 475 OF 2017

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. 4(23)/4-772/13 BETWEEN KAMAL AZIZUL BIN AZIZ AND AMBANK (M) BERHAD AWARD NO : 475 OF 2017 INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. 4(23)/4-772/13 BETWEEN KAMAL AZIZUL BIN AZIZ AND AMBANK (M) BERHAD AWARD NO : 475 OF 2017 BEFORE: VENUE: Y.A. PUAN SAROJINI A/P KANDASAMY Chairman (Sitting alone)

More information

Country Code: MS 2002 Rev. CAP Reference: 19/1979. Date of entry into force: April 1, 1980 (SRO 8/1980)

Country Code: MS 2002 Rev. CAP Reference: 19/1979. Date of entry into force: April 1, 1980 (SRO 8/1980) Country Code: MS 2002 Rev. CAP. 15.03 Title: Country: EMPLOYMENT ACT MONTSERRAT Reference: 19/1979 Date of entry into force: April 1, 1980 (SRO 8/1980) Date of Amendment: 5/1986; 10/1989; 5/1996 Subject:

More information

Wong Kian Wah v Ng Kien Boon

Wong Kian Wah v Ng Kien Boon IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA Coram: Hamid Sultan Abu Backer, JCA; Abdul Rahman Sebli, JCA; Mary Lim, JCA Wong Kian Wah v Ng Kien Boon Citation: [2018] MYCA 230 Suit Number: Civil Appeal No. W 02(NCVC)(W)

More information

Disciplinary and Dismissal Procedure

Disciplinary and Dismissal Procedure Disciplinary and Dismissal Procedure [Company Name] Drafted by Solicitors Contents Clause 1. Policy statement... 1 2. Who is covered by the procedure?... 1 3. What is covered by the procedure?... 1 4.

More information

View Esteem Sdn Bhd v Bina Puri Holdings Bhd*

View Esteem Sdn Bhd v Bina Puri Holdings Bhd* CIDB Construction Law Report 2016 View Esteem Sdn Bhd v Bina Puri Holdings Bhd* COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA CIVIL APPEAL NO: W 02(C)(A) 1507 09/2015 HAMID SULTAN BIN ABU BACKER JCA, PRASAD SANDOSHAM ABRAHAM

More information

of the United Nations

of the United Nations ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL Judgement No. 770 Case No. 835: SIDIBEH Against: The Secretary-General of the United Nations THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL OF THE UNITED NATIONS, Composed of Mr. Hubert Thierry, Vice-President,

More information

ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL

ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL ASYLUM AND IMMIGRATION TRIBUNAL GK (Long residence immigration history) Lebanon [2008] UKAIT 00011 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at: Field House on 8 January 2008 Before SENIOR IMMIGRATION JUDGE STOREY Between

More information

MALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT FEDERAL TERRITORY, LABUAN. CIVIL CASE NO: LBN-24NCvC-6/ BETWEEN SEJATI SDN. BHD..

MALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT FEDERAL TERRITORY, LABUAN. CIVIL CASE NO: LBN-24NCvC-6/ BETWEEN SEJATI SDN. BHD.. MALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT FEDERAL TERRITORY, LABUAN CIVIL CASE NO: LBN-24NCvC-6/8-2016 BETWEEN SEJATI SDN. BHD.. PLAINTIFF AND DIRECTOR OF LANDS AND SURVEYS.. 1 ST DEFENDANT SABAH

More information

TENNESSEE CODE ANNOTATED 2012 by The State of Tennessee All rights reserved *** CURRENT THROUGH THE 2011 REGULAR SESSION ***

TENNESSEE CODE ANNOTATED 2012 by The State of Tennessee All rights reserved *** CURRENT THROUGH THE 2011 REGULAR SESSION *** TENNESSEE CODE ANNOTATED 2012 by The State of Tennessee All rights reserved *** CURRENT THROUGH THE 2011 REGULAR SESSION *** Tenn. Code Ann. 49-5-503 (2012) 49-5-503. Tenure. Any teacher who meets all

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO (P) ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO (P) ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. 02-4-2004(P) ANTARA 1. JOCELINE TAN POH CHOO 2. THE GROUP EDITOR, NEW STRAITS TIMES 3. THE NEW STRAITS TIMES PRESS (M) BHD Perayu-

More information

$~R-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus

$~R-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus $~R-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 23, 2015 + W.P.(C) 2366/2004 RAJ KUMAR JAIN Through: versus... Petitioner Mr. Pradeep Jain, Mr. Ashish Bansal and Ms. Preety Manderna,

More information

% W.P.(C) No. 5513/2004

% W.P.(C) No. 5513/2004 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Judgment delivered on: November 27, 2015 % W.P.(C) No. 5513/2004 M/S MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI... Petitioner Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate. versus

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :SERVICE MATTER WP(C) No.2772/1999 Reserved on: Date of Decision: February 08, 2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :SERVICE MATTER WP(C) No.2772/1999 Reserved on: Date of Decision: February 08, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :SERVICE MATTER WP(C) No.2772/1999 Reserved on: 13.12.2006 Date of Decision: February 08, 2007 Ramjas College...Petitioner Through Mr. S.K.Luthra, Advocate

More information

JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE PILLAY ON 18 AUGUST Instructed by

JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE PILLAY ON 18 AUGUST Instructed by IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA SITTING IN DURBAN REPORTABLE CASE NO D218/03 DATE HEARD: 2003/08/08 2003/08/18 DATE DELIVERED: In the matter between: HOSPERSA MOULTRIE First Applicant Second Applicant

More information

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT KHULULEKILE LAWRENCE MCHUBA PASSENGER RAIL AGENCY OF SOUTH AFRICA

REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT KHULULEKILE LAWRENCE MCHUBA PASSENGER RAIL AGENCY OF SOUTH AFRICA REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Not Reportable Case no: J 392/14 In the matter between KHULULEKILE LAWRENCE MCHUBA Applicant and PASSENGER RAIL AGENCY

More information

BETWEEN. LAI CHENG OOI (f) (the executrix of the estate of Lee Tain Lee Thien Chiung, deceased) AND

BETWEEN. LAI CHENG OOI (f) (the executrix of the estate of Lee Tain Lee Thien Chiung, deceased) AND IN THE COURT OF APPEAL, MALAYSIA AT PUTRAJAYA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO. S-01(IM)(NCVC)-145-04/2016 [Kota Kinabalu High Court OS No. BKI-24NCVC-44/5-2015] BETWEEN LAI CHENG OOI (f) (the

More information

G. v. WHO. 124th Session Judgment No. 3871

G. v. WHO. 124th Session Judgment No. 3871 Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal Registry s translation, the French text alone being authoritative. G. v. WHO 124th

More information

In re SCHERER SAAVEDRA

In re SCHERER SAAVEDRA SEVENTY-FIFTH SESSION In re SCHERER SAAVEDRA Judgment 1262 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering the complaint filed by Mr. Enrique Scherer Saavedra against the European Southern Observatory (ESO) on

More information

109th Session Judgment No. 2951

109th Session Judgment No. 2951 Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal 109th Session Judgment No. 2951 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering the complaint

More information

THE SINGAPORE APPROACH TO THE ADJOURNMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO ENFORCE A FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD

THE SINGAPORE APPROACH TO THE ADJOURNMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO ENFORCE A FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD Published on 6 September 2018 THE SINGAPORE APPROACH TO THE ADJOURNMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO ENFORCE A FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD Margaret Joan LING LLB (National University of Singapore); Partner, Litigation

More information

A 55 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ACT PART I DEFINITIONS AND DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLES PART II THE PUBLIC SERVICE

A 55 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ACT PART I DEFINITIONS AND DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLES PART II THE PUBLIC SERVICE A 55 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ACT PART I DEFINITIONS AND DECLARATION OF PRINCIPLES 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Interpretation. 3. Principle of accountability. 4. Public administration values. 5. Code

More information

ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL. Decision No. 111 (28 February 2018) v. Asian Development Bank (No. 3)

ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL. Decision No. 111 (28 February 2018) v. Asian Development Bank (No. 3) ASIAN DEVELOPMENT BANK ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL Decision No. 111 Ms. D (28 February 2018) v. Asian Development Bank (No. 3) Lakshmi Swaminathan, President Gillian Triggs, Vice-President Anne Trebilcock

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAN FERNANDO

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAN FERNANDO REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV NO. 2010-04129 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE SAN FERNANDO IN THE MATTER OF THE DECISION OF THE DISCIPLINARY OFFICER COMPLAINTS DIVISION TO INSTITUTE TWO DISCIPLINARY CHARGES

More information

THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. 5(1)/3 702/03 BETWEEN MAYBANK BERHAD AND ASSOCIATION OF MAYBANK CLASS ONE OFFICERS (AMCO)

THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. 5(1)/3 702/03 BETWEEN MAYBANK BERHAD AND ASSOCIATION OF MAYBANK CLASS ONE OFFICERS (AMCO) THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO. 5(1)/3 702/03 BETWEEN MAYBANK BERHAD AND ASSOCIATION OF MAYBANK CLASS ONE OFFICERS (AMCO) AWARD NO. 788 OF 2007 Before: TUAN CHEW SOO HO - CHAIRMAN YM. RAJA ALIZA

More information

Gaming Control Act CHAPTER 4 OF THE ACTS OF as amended by

Gaming Control Act CHAPTER 4 OF THE ACTS OF as amended by Gaming Control Act CHAPTER 4 OF THE ACTS OF 1994-95 as amended by 2003, c. 4, s. 14; 2008, c. 57; 2010, c. 2, ss. 102, 103; 2011, c. 63, ss. 1(b), 4, 5; 2012, c. 23; 2014, c. 34, s. 10 2016 Her Majesty

More information

110th Session Judgment No. 2989

110th Session Judgment No. 2989 Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal 110th Session Judgment No. 2989 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering the complaint

More information

IC Chapter 17. Claims for Benefits

IC Chapter 17. Claims for Benefits IC 22-4-17 Chapter 17. Claims for Benefits IC 22-4-17-1 Rules; mass layoffs; extended benefits; posting Sec. 1. (a) Claims for benefits shall be made in accordance with rules adopted by the department.

More information

Fasda Heights Sdn Bhd - vs - Soon Ee Sing Construction Sdn Bhd

Fasda Heights Sdn Bhd - vs - Soon Ee Sing Construction Sdn Bhd Fasda Heights Sdn Bhd - vs - Soon Ee Sing Construction Sdn Bhd STEVE L.K. SHIM J 25 MARCH 1999 Judgment Steve L.K. Shim J 1. By originating summons dated 20 August 1998, the plaintiff seeks the following

More information

IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA FIRST INSTANCE DIVISION. (Coram: Johnston Busingye, PJ, John Mkwawa, J, Isaac Lenaola, J.

IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA FIRST INSTANCE DIVISION. (Coram: Johnston Busingye, PJ, John Mkwawa, J, Isaac Lenaola, J. IN THE EAST AFRICAN COURT OF JUSTICE AT ARUSHA FIRST INSTANCE DIVISION (Coram: Johnston Busingye, PJ, John Mkwawa, J, Isaac Lenaola, J.) APPLICATION NO. 1 OF 2013 (ARISING FROM APPLICATION NO. 12 OF 2012)

More information

MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN GUAMAN SIVIL NO: 22C-20-09/2014 ANTARA PERBADANAN KEMAJUAN NEGERI SELANGOR DAN

MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN GUAMAN SIVIL NO: 22C-20-09/2014 ANTARA PERBADANAN KEMAJUAN NEGERI SELANGOR DAN MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN GUAMAN SIVIL NO: 22C--09/14 ANTARA PERBADANAN KEMAJUAN NEGERI SELANGOR PLAINTIF DAN 1. PROJEK LEBUHRAYA USAHASAMA BERHAD (No. Syarikat

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2010 01117 BETWEEN CRISTAL ROBERTS First Claimant ISAIAH JABARI EMMANUEL ROBERTS (by his next of kin and next friend Ronald Roberts)

More information

MALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH & SARAWAK AT KOTA KINABALU CIVIL SUIT LEMBAGA PELABUHAN-PELABUHAN SABAH - DEFENDANT J U D G M E N T

MALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH & SARAWAK AT KOTA KINABALU CIVIL SUIT LEMBAGA PELABUHAN-PELABUHAN SABAH - DEFENDANT J U D G M E N T MALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH & SARAWAK AT KOTA KINABALU CIVIL SUIT 22-271-2001 IAY & ASSOCIATES - PLAINTIFF V LEMBAGA PELABUHAN-PELABUHAN SABAH - DEFENDANT 15 IN OPEN COURT THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY

More information

GUTTOO C. v THE STATE OF MAURITIUS

GUTTOO C. v THE STATE OF MAURITIUS GUTTOO C. v THE STATE OF MAURITIUS 2017 SCJ 57 Record No. 103243 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MAURITIUS In the matter of:- C. Guttoo Plaintiff v The State of Mauritius Defendant JUDGMENT The plaintiff is claiming

More information

Pirzada (Deprivation of citizenship: general principles) [2017] UKUT (IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before

Pirzada (Deprivation of citizenship: general principles) [2017] UKUT (IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS. Before Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Pirzada (Deprivation of citizenship: general principles) [2017] UKUT 00196 (IAC) THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Stoke On 24 November 2016 Promulgated on Before

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Writ Petition (C) No. 280/1991 Reserved on : Date of decision :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Writ Petition (C) No. 280/1991 Reserved on : Date of decision : IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Writ Petition (C) No. 280/1991 Reserved on : 20.03.2007 Date of decision : 25.04.2007 IN THE MATTER OF : D.T.C. Petitioner Through : Mr.Alok

More information

Batu Kemas Industri Sdn Bhd v Kerajaan Malaysia & Anor

Batu Kemas Industri Sdn Bhd v Kerajaan Malaysia & Anor Batu Kemas Industri Sdn Bhd v Kerajaan Malaysia & Anor Batu Kemas Industri Sdn Bhd v Kerajaan Malaysia & Anor COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA CIVIL APPEAL NO: A 01 16 01/2013 MOHD ZAWAWI SALLEH JCA, VERNON

More information

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-3029/04 BETWEEN TETUAN B. S. SIDHU & CO. AND SHAMSIAH BINTI ASRI AWARD NO : 227 OF 2006

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-3029/04 BETWEEN TETUAN B. S. SIDHU & CO. AND SHAMSIAH BINTI ASRI AWARD NO : 227 OF 2006 INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-3029/04 BETWEEN TETUAN B. S. SIDHU & CO. AND SHAMSIAH BINTI ASRI AWARD NO : 227 OF 2006 Before : N. RAJASEGARAN - CHAIRMAN (Sitting Alone) Venue : Industrial

More information

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-864/02 BETWEEN MALAYSIAN WETLANDS FOUNDATION AND DEVENDIRAN S.T. MANI AWARD NO : 917 OF 2005

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-864/02 BETWEEN MALAYSIAN WETLANDS FOUNDATION AND DEVENDIRAN S.T. MANI AWARD NO : 917 OF 2005 INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO : 15/4-864/02 BETWEEN MALAYSIAN WETLANDS FOUNDATION AND DEVENDIRAN S.T. MANI AWARD NO : 917 OF 2005 Before : N. RAJASEGARAN - Chairman (Sitting Alone) Venue : Industrial

More information

2.4 To do all things that are incidental or conducive to the attainment of the objects of the league or any one of them.

2.4 To do all things that are incidental or conducive to the attainment of the objects of the league or any one of them. UK YOUTH DEVELOPMENT LEAGUE CONSTITUTION 1. Name 1.1 The name of the League shall be UK Youth Development League (hereinafter referred to as the League ). The name of any commercial sponsor may be incorporated

More information

UNRWA DISPUTE TRIBUNAL

UNRWA DISPUTE TRIBUNAL UNRWA DISPUTE TRIBUNAL Case No.: UNRWA/DT/SFO/2008/14 Date: 26 July 2012 Original: English Before: Registry: Registrar: Judge Bana Barazi Amman Laurie McNabb ABU AL HASAN v. COMMISSIONER GENERAL OF THE

More information

TRANSPORT (DIVISION OF FUNCTIONS) ACT. Act No. 31, 1932.

TRANSPORT (DIVISION OF FUNCTIONS) ACT. Act No. 31, 1932. TRANSPORT (DIVISION OF FUNCTIONS) ACT. Act No. 31, 1932. An Act to provide for the appointment of a Commissioner for Railways, a Commissioner for Road Transport and Tramways, and a Commissioner for Main

More information

CHAPTER 20 FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM SUBCHAPTER 20-1 PREAMBLE RULE PURPOSE

CHAPTER 20 FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM SUBCHAPTER 20-1 PREAMBLE RULE PURPOSE CHAPTER 20 FLORIDA REGISTERED PARALEGAL PROGRAM SUBCHAPTER 20-1 PREAMBLE RULE 20-1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this chapter is to set forth a definition that must be met in order to use the title paralegal,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA LABOUR DIVISION AT DAR ES SALAAM REVISION NO 305 OF 2010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA LABOUR DIVISION AT DAR ES SALAAM REVISION NO 305 OF 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA LABOUR DIVISION AT DAR ES SALAAM REVISION NO 305 OF 2010 TANZANIA BUILDING WORKS LTD. APPLICANT VERSUS ALLY MGOMBA & 4 OTHERS RESPONDENTS (Original CMA/DSM/TEM/337/09) 17/09/2012

More information

ARBITRATION APPEAL PROCEDURE OF MICHIGAN

ARBITRATION APPEAL PROCEDURE OF MICHIGAN Daniel #2 ARBITRATION APPEAL PROCEDURE OF MICHIGAN IN THE MATTER OF THE ARBITRATION BETWEEN: EMPLOYER and EMPLOYEE Gr. Termination 7/29/96 ARBITRATOR: WILLIAM P. DANIEL FACTS The claimant worked as a Switch

More information

Arbitration Act CHAPTER Part I. Arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement. Introductory

Arbitration Act CHAPTER Part I. Arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement. Introductory Arbitration Act 1996 1996 CHAPTER 23 1 Part I Arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement Introductory 1. General principles. 2. Scope of application of provisions. 3. The seat of the arbitration.

More information

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 25/4-278/06 ENCIK RAVINDAR SINGH A/L JESWANT SINGH AND ISLAND AIR SDN BHD AWARD NO: 175 OF 2009

INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 25/4-278/06 ENCIK RAVINDAR SINGH A/L JESWANT SINGH AND ISLAND AIR SDN BHD AWARD NO: 175 OF 2009 INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 25/4-278/06 ENCIK RAVINDAR SINGH A/L JESWANT SINGH AND ISLAND AIR SDN BHD AWARD NO: 175 OF 2009 BEFORE VENUE : DATO JALALDIN HJ. HUSSAIN CHAIRMAN (Sitting Alone) :

More information

BERMUDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REGULATIONS 2001 BR 81 / 2001

BERMUDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REGULATIONS 2001 BR 81 / 2001 QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REGULATIONS 2001 BR 81 / 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 1A 2 3 4 5 5A 6 6A 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Citation and commencement Purpose Interpretation

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL DR JOSEPHINE OJIAMBO THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT

IN THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL DR JOSEPHINE OJIAMBO THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT CSAT APL/41 IN THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL IN THE MATTER OF DR JOSEPHINE OJIAMBO APPLICANT and THE COMMONWEALTH SECRETARIAT RESPONDENT Before the Tribunal constituted by Mr David Goddard

More information

THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 5/4-1546/05 BETWEEN ENCIK SAIFUL NAFIS BIN SHARIFF AND AIRASIA SDN BHD AWARD NO: 2239 OF 2007

THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 5/4-1546/05 BETWEEN ENCIK SAIFUL NAFIS BIN SHARIFF AND AIRASIA SDN BHD AWARD NO: 2239 OF 2007 THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 5/4-1546/05 BETWEEN ENCIK SAIFUL NAFIS BIN SHARIFF AND AIRASIA SDN BHD AWARD NO: 2239 OF 2007 Before : TUAN CHEW SOO HO - CHAIRMAN Venue : The Industrial Court

More information

ICC Rules of Conciliation and Arbitration 1975

ICC Rules of Conciliation and Arbitration 1975 ICC Rules of Conciliation and Arbitration 1975 (in force as from 1st June 1975) Optional Conciliation Article 1 (ADMINISTRATIVE COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION. CONCILIATION COMMITTEES) 1. Any business dispute

More information

Legal Aspects of Islamic Finance LCA4592 DR. ZULKIFLI HASAN

Legal Aspects of Islamic Finance LCA4592 DR. ZULKIFLI HASAN Legal Aspects of Islamic Finance LCA4592 DR. ZULKIFLI HASAN Contents n Islamic finance cases n 1987-2002 n 2003-2007 n 2008-2011 1987-2002 n Tinta Press Sdn Berhad v BIMB (1987) 1 MLJ 474; 1 CLJ 474: IJarah

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA IN SHAH ALAM IN THE STATE OF SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA SUMMONS WRIT NO: BETWEEN AND

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA IN SHAH ALAM IN THE STATE OF SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA SUMMONS WRIT NO: BETWEEN AND IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA IN SHAH ALAM IN THE STATE OF SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA SUMMONS WRIT NO: 22-753-2005 BETWEEN WING FAH ENTERPRISE SDN BHD PLAINTIFF AND MATSUSHITA ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS (M)

More information

THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT

THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT THE LABOUR COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, HELD AT JOHANNESBURG JUDGMENT Reportable Case no: JS 1505/16 In the matter between: MOQHAKA LOCAL MUNICIPALITY Applicant and FUSI JOHN MOTLOUNG SHERIFF OF THE HIGH COURT,

More information

BINASAT COMMUNICATIONS BERHAD (Company No D) NOMINATION COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE

BINASAT COMMUNICATIONS BERHAD (Company No D) NOMINATION COMMITTEE TERMS OF REFERENCE 1. MEMBERSHIP The Board of Directors shall elect the Nomination Committee (the Committee ) members from amongst themselves, comprising exclusively of Non-Executive Directors, a majority of whom are Independent

More information

Ticketing Code of Practice

Ticketing Code of Practice Sixth Edition - Effective 1 January 2016 Live Performance Australia Ticketing Code of Practice PART A: INTRODUCTION 2 1. Relationship to the Consumer Code 2 2. Consumer Laws 2 3. Display and provision

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: 11ANCVC-44-08/2016 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: 11ANCVC-44-08/2016 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: 11ANCVC-44-08/2016 ANTARA YEOH LIANG CHUAN (No. K/P: 481027-07-5351). PERAYU DAN JAGJIT SINGH (mendakwa sebagai

More information

EUROPEAN EXTERNAL ACTION SERVICE

EUROPEAN EXTERNAL ACTION SERVICE C 12/8 Official Journal of the European Union 14.1.2012 EUROPEAN EXTERNAL ACTION SERVICE Decision of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy of 23 March 2011 establishing

More information

Police Service Act 2009

Police Service Act 2009 Police Service Act 2009 SAMOA POLICE SERVICE ACT 2009 Arrangement of Provisions PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1. Short title and commencement 2. Interpretation PART 2 THE SAMOA POLICESERVICE 3. Continuation of the

More information

CHAPTER 497 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ACT

CHAPTER 497 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ACT PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION [CAP. 497. 1 CHAPTER 497 PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ACT To affirm the values of public administration as an instrument for the common good, to provide for the application of those values

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (L) No of 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (L) No of 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (L) No. 4484 of 2008 Birendra Kumar Singh Petitioner -V e r s u s- Secretary, Foundary Forge Co-operative Society Ltd., Dhurwa, Ranchi CORAM: - HON BLE MR.

More information

Act (2011:427) on European Works Councils

Act (2011:427) on European Works Councils Act (2011:427) on European Works Councils Page 1 of 11 Translation from Swedish SFS 2011:427 Source: Swedish Government Offices legal databases Issued: 4 April 2011 Updated: Act (2011:427) on European

More information

the court has jurisdiction to grant a mandatory injunction on an ex parte application in urgent and exceptional cases;

the court has jurisdiction to grant a mandatory injunction on an ex parte application in urgent and exceptional cases; [1986] 1 MLJ 256 BANK ISLAM MALAYSIA BHD v TINTA PRESS SDN BHD & ORS OCJ KUALA LUMPUR ZAKARIA YATIM J CIVIL SUIT NO C2518 OF 1984 20 August 1985 Practice and Procedure Interlocutory mandatory injunction

More information

Minister of Human Resources, Malaysia v Diamet Klang (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd and another appeal [2015] 2 AMR 659; [2013] 1 LNS * 1466 (CA)

Minister of Human Resources, Malaysia v Diamet Klang (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd and another appeal [2015] 2 AMR 659; [2013] 1 LNS * 1466 (CA) Legal Updates April 2015 Cases Administrative Law Minister of Human Resources, Malaysia v Diamet Klang (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd and another appeal [2015] 2 AMR 659; [2013] 1 LNS * 1466 (CA) Whether (i) minister

More information

7 01 THE WORKFORCE GROUP (PTY) (LTD) A...

7 01 THE WORKFORCE GROUP (PTY) (LTD) A... IN THE HIGH COURT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA NORTH GAUTENG, PRETORIA Case number 57110/2011 In the matter of THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR THE COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER First Applicant

More information

THE LMAA SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE

THE LMAA SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE THE LONDON MARITIME ARBITRATORS ASSOCIATION THE LMAA SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE and COMMENTARY (Revised 1st January 2006) 1. INTRODUCTION THE LMAA SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE These provisions shall be known as

More information

ECM LIBRA FINANCIAL GROUP BERHAD ( ECM or the Company ) (Company No K) (Incorporated in Malaysia)

ECM LIBRA FINANCIAL GROUP BERHAD ( ECM or the Company ) (Company No K) (Incorporated in Malaysia) ECM LIBRA FINANCIAL GROUP BERHAD ( ECM or the Company ) (Company No. 713570-K) (Incorporated in Malaysia) MINUTES of the Thirteenth Annual General Meeting of ECM Libra Financial Group Berhad held at Dewan

More information

Order F05-25 MINISTRY OF HEALTH. Errol Nadeau, Adjudicator. August 10, 2005

Order F05-25 MINISTRY OF HEALTH. Errol Nadeau, Adjudicator. August 10, 2005 Order F05-25 MINISTRY OF HEALTH Errol Nadeau, Adjudicator August 10, 2005 Quicklaw Cite: [2005] B.C.I.P.C.D. No. 33 Document URL: http://www.oipc.bc.ca/orders/orderf05-33.pdf Office URL: http://www.oipc.bc.ca

More information