BROWN & PARTNERS LLP TORT SUMMARIES FEBRUARY 2016
|
|
- Alberta Banks
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case Name Howell v. Jatheeskumar, 2016 ONSC 1381 Date March 7, 2016 Justice Lemay J. Issue(s) Motion by the plaintiff to add own her insurer TD General Insurance Company (TD) under the OPCF 44R. In addition, to extend the time for service of the Statement of Claim on the defendant Milan Auto (Milan), and for substituted service on Milan. Facts The limitation period expired on February 22, The plaintiff attempted to serve Milan on August 27, 2014, and was told Milan moved. The Plaintiff made no further attempts to find and serve Milan until after the limitation period expired, and outside the deadline for service of the claim. Five months later, counsel located Milan (not having tried earlier). Milan s employees refused to accept service, and the owner advised the process server by telephone that he would return the following week. Counsel made no further attempts to serve Milan and only delivered the motion record to Milan by regular mail. Counsel provided no evidence that Milan continued to operate at the same location at the time of the motion. The motion to add TD as a party is granted, subject to TD s right to rely on the Limitations Act. The motion to extend the time for service and substituted service as against Milan is dismissed. Reasons Adding TD: Under the Court of Appeal s decision in Schmitz v. Lombard, TD was added as a defendant. however, as the plaintiff never properly added Milan, TD may rely on the provisions in the OPCF 44R that require the plaintiff to sue all appropriate parties. Milan Auto: The Plaintiff led no evidence to rebut the presumption of prejudice. The earliest Milan knew of the claim was 18 months after the limitations period expired. This itself created prejudice. There was no explanation of the delay. The motions to extend the time for service of the claim and for substituted service failed. 1
2 Case Name Tuffnail v. Meekes, 2016 ONSC 710 Date February 23, 2016 Justice Rady J. Issue(s) Motion by the defendants, Optimist Club of Downie, The Township of Perth and Doug Hearn, for summary judgement dismissing the action and a crossclaim against them. Facts Single vehicle accident on September 13, 2009 in Oxford County, Ontario. The vehicle was driven by Meekes. Tuffnail and Petrie were passengers. The car left the road and struck a tree. Petrie was killed and Tuffnail was badly injured. Two actions were commenced, one by Tuffnail and his family, the other by Petrie s family. The plaintiffs allege that prior to the accident Tuffnail, Petrie and Meekes had attended a wedding reception hosted by Tom Bolton at the Downie Optimist Community Centre. It was alleged that Meekes consumed alcohol and was intoxicated at the time of the accident. Tom had rented the community centre and held a Special Occasion Liquor Licence Permit. The plaintiffs named the following defendants: Meekes (driver); Tom (host of wedding reception); The Township of Perth (owner of the hall); Downie Optimist Centre (non-profit club); and Hern (hall manager) The plaintiffs allege that the named defendants were occupiers of the community centre or they over-served alcohol to Meekes. Tom crossclaimed against the moving defendants for contribution and indemnity in negligence for breaching their duty under the Liquor License Act. Reasons The defendants are entitled to summary judgment dismissing Tom Bolton s crossclaim against them. According to section 1 of the Occupiers Liability Act an occupier includes someone who is in physical possession of premises. The evidence demonstrates that the township was neither in possession nor had a physical presence at the hall, so it cannot be an occupier. Similarly, neither the Optimist Club nor Hearn were in possession of the hall, in control over its condition or the activities carried on there. Section 3 of the OLA provides that a duty of care exists to those entering the premises to ensure their reasonable safety while there. In this case, the accident occurred off the hall premises and therefore, the Act does not apply. This is dispositive of any claim made under the OLA as against the township as well as the Optimist Club and Hearn. At common law, liability flows from the fact that the commercial host creates and controls the risk of harm to patrons and third parties. Liability is also imposed by statute, the Liquor License Act. If liability exists, it rests upon the person selling the alcohol, who in this case is Bolton (liquor license holder). There is no evidence that either the township, the Optimist Club or Hearn 2
3 sold alcohol to anyone. The evidence was clear that Hearn did not hold the liquor license for the hall, did not sell alcohol at the reception and acted within the scope of employment duties which did not require him to be responsible for the training of employees serving alcohol and for supervising guests at the reception. (Note This is a very limited definition of physical possession of the premises under the OLA) Because the moving defendants cannot be found liable under the OLA or for over-service of alcohol they are not joint tortfeasors vis-a-vis Tom, and any claims against them were dismissed. 3
4 Case name Trepkov v. Jaworski, 2016 ONSC 1267 Date February 19, 2016 Date of Loss October 28, 2009 Jutice Issue A.M. Mullins Are collateral benefits received from the plaintiff s own insurer when she settled her AB claim to be deducted from the jury s award? The jury award is to be reduced by the AB contribution. Facts A jury trial of the plaintiff s claims concluded in June 2014 The jury awarded $3,510 for future costs of health care All other damages including out of pocket expenses to date were assessed at $0 The plaintiff settled her AB claim on August 26, 2011, with $13,550 allotted to past and future medical benefits The plaintiff argued that AB medical benefits are only payable for 10 years following the accident and if the jury included any portion of its award for a period after 10 years, the court could not make the deduction. Reasons Although there was evidence from the plaintiff s future care cost expert that some of the costs extended beyond the 10 year mark, there was no evidence that some or any of the costs would first arise beyond the 10 year mark. The jury award ought to be reduced by the sum received by the AB insurer pursuant to s of the Insurance Act. Thus, the plaintiff was not entitled to judgment of $3,510 nor postjudgment interest. 4
5 Case name Foniciello et al. v. Bendall and Acculine, et al., 2016 ONSC 111 Date February 17, 2016 Date of Loss August 19, 2006 Jutice J. R. Henderson Issue What quantum of damages were the plaintiff and FLA claimants entitled to? The plaintiff, Joe (age 44 at time of accident) was awarded: General Damages $275, Future Loss of Income $524, Past Medical/Rehabilitation Expenses $51, (net of collateral benefits) Future Medical/Rehabilitation Expenses $1,899, Attendant Care Expenses $765, (the decision was silent regarding any ATC available under the AB claim) Management Fee (5% of above amounts) $3,515, x 5% = $175, The plaintiff s sister, Mary was awarded: Non-Pecuniary FLA Damages $50, Future Counseling Expenses $10, Value of Services Provided $122, The mother was awarded FLA damages of $25,000 and the 2 daughters, $40,000 each. Facts Joe s motorcycle was struck by a van causing him to suffer a traumatic brain injury that left him in a semi-conscious state for approximately five months Although he had no significant ongoing physical impairments, he will have permanent cognitive, intellectual, and behavioural impairments He had been a welder at Ford for 8 years at the time of the accident Joseph s sister, Mary is a trained RN and had played a significant role in Joseph s rehabilitation and acted as his power of attorney 60% of liability was on the defendant driver and 40% was on the company making pavement markings at the time the injuries were not disputed, just the amount of damages Reasons General damages: the witnesses were credible and reliable. Joe required cues and repetitive routines to complete daily activities. Neuropsychological testing by the plaintiff and defendant s expert agreed on his limited functioning abilities. His brain injury had not improved and he was four times more likely to develop dementia. Case law had a range of $200,000 to $300,000 for generals. Loss of income: there was no past loss after all collateral deductions. In fact, there was a balance of $76,703, which was to be deducted from his future loss of income claim. The judge accepted that he would have continued working at Ford until it closed in 2011 then been recalled by Ford in January 2013 and worked there until retirement. The judge reduced Joe s future loss by 10% in order to adjust for the contingency that he seemed less likely than the average worker to participate in work as he aged as that was not his 5
6 primary focus in life. Future Med/Rehab: surveillance showed Joe could independently drive his vehicle, attend the gym, buy food and groceries, go to the movies and Tim Hortons. As Joe had learned routines, he would require less therapy in the future than in the past, with a goal to maintaining his current level of function. The award included neuropsychological counselling, OT services, rehabilitation therapy services (less frequently than requested by Joe), case management, gym membership, medications, brain injury support group costs, and GPS, for the rest of his life. 2 years of speech language pathology was also awarded. Golf fees, internet, travel expenses, office equipment costs were denied as a person would have those even if they were not in an accident. 50% of the costs for a data plan, iphone upgrade and laptop was accepted as he needed better software and was heavily reliant on the items. Attendant Care: Given the surveillance evidence, he only needed 2 hours/day with a PSW to get his day organized, to the age of 60. Given his chances of developing dementia, he would need 16 hours/day from age 60 to end of life, which was reduced by 75% for negative contingencies regarding the rate of dementia, what age he would get it at and if he would get it even with no accident. FLA Claims: factors considered included how good their relationship was pre-accident, how much Joe did for them i.e. take to appointments, and if the claimants had to take care of Joe postaccident. Mary was awarded some reimbursement of caregiver services, discounted by 60%, as she had been on call for Joe but he had other full-time professional help. 6
KY DRAM SHOP MEMO II
I. Kentucky s Dram Shop Act KY DRAM SHOP MEMO II KRS 413.241 Legislative finding; limitation on liability of licensed sellers or servers of intoxicating beverages; liability of intoxicated person (1) The
More informationIN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE * * * *
IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE * * * * JANE HEALY, Plaintiff, CASE NO.: CR09-100 vs. DEPT. NO.: 1 CHARLES RAYMOND, an individual, ALLEGRETTI
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO. Crljenica, T., Counsel for Perth Insurance Company/Responding Party REASONS FOR DECISION
RE: BEFORE: COUNSEL: CITATION: Charway v. TD General Insurance Company et al., 2017 ONSC 4593 COURT FILE NO.: CV-14-511937 MOTION HEARD: 11042017 SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO Jessica Charway, Plaintiff/Moving
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS VALERIE RISSI, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED July 21, 2015 v No. 321691 Muskegon Circuit Court WILLIAM CURTIS and LC No. 11-48124-NI AUTO-OWNERS/HOME-OWNERS INSURANCE
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JOSEPH MOORE and CINDY MOORE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, UNPUBLISHED November 27, 2001 V No. 221599 Wayne Circuit Court DETROIT NEWSPAPER AGENCY, LC No. 98-822599-NI Defendant-Appellee.
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE. ) ) Plaintiffs ) ) ) Defendant ) ) DECISION ON MOTION:
CITATION: Rush v. Via Rail Canada Inc., 2017 ONSC 2243 COURT FILE NO.: CV-14-507160 DATE: 20170518 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN: Yael Rush and Thomas Rush Plaintiffs and Via Rail Canada Inc.
More informationv. Record No OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN March 3, 2000 MATT MARY MORAN, INC., ET AL.
Present: Compton, 1 Lacy, Hassell, Keenan, Koontz,and Kinser, JJ., and Poff, Senior Justice TERESA F. ROBINSON, ADMINISTRATOR, ETC. v. Record No. 990778 OPINION BY JUSTICE BARBARA MILANO KEENAN March 3,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE B ~ and ~
SCHEDULE OF COSTS PRECEDENTS PRECEDENT C IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE 1999 - B - 9999 QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION BRIGHTON DISTRICT REGISTRY BETWEEN AB ~ and ~ CD Claimant Defendant CLAIMANT'S BILL OF COSTS
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE JESSICA LOVEJOY. and
Court File No.: ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: JESSICA LOVEJOY Plaintiff and HOMER SIMPSON, MARGE SIMPSON, OTTO MANN, SHELBYVILLE SHIPPING, THE TOWN OF SPRINGFIELD, and DUFF GENERAL INSURANCE
More informationPERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS
PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS Frequently Asked Questions 1. Can I make a claim? If you have been injured because of the fault of someone else, you can claim financial compensation through the courts. 2. Who can
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS GRACE MADEJSKI, Individually, and as Personal Representative of the Estate of ANNA MADEJSKI, Deceased, FOR PUBLICATION June 15, 2001 9:15 a.m. Plaintiff-Appellant, v
More informationv No Oakland Circuit Court
S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNPUBLISHED July 25, 2017 Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant-Appellee, v No. 332597 Oakland Circuit Court MICHAEL
More informationPERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS
PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS Frequently Asked Questions 1. Can I make a claim? If you have been injured because of the fault of someone else, you can claim financial compensation through the courts. The dependants
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Evidence And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Paul sued David in federal court
More informationAS TABLED IN THE HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY
AS TABLED IN THE HOUSE OF ASSEMBLY A BILL entitled LIQUOR LICENCE AMENDMENT ACT 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 Citation Amends section 1 Amends sections 10, 35, 40 and 42 Inserts section 17A Amends
More informationThe important role played by legal nurse consultants in all phases of civil cases, with a Case Example. By Paul Parks RN, LNC
The important role played by legal nurse consultants in all phases of civil cases, with a Case Example By Paul Parks RN, LNC In this presentation I will give an example of a civil case from start to finish.
More informationLiquor Amendment (Kings Cross Plan of Management) Act 2013 No 76
New South Wales Liquor Amendment (Kings Cross Plan of Management) Act 2013 No 76 Contents 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 Schedule 1 Amendment of Liquor Act 2007 No 90 3 Schedule 2 Amendment of Liquor
More informationPREPARING THE CASE AGAINST THE TAVERN
PREPARING THE CASE AGAINST THE TAVERN Robert M Durante November 2003 2 INTRODUCTION Commercial host liability cases are challenging and always interesting No two cases are ever the same The case law in
More informationMBE Civil Procedure Sample Test Questions
MBE Civil Procedure Sample Test Questions The National Conference of Bar Examiners provides these Civil Procedure sample questions as an educational tool for candidates seeking admission to the bar within
More informationQuestion 1. On what theory or theories might damages be recovered, and what defenses might reasonably be raised in actions by:
Question 1 A state statute requires motorcyclists to wear a safety helmet while riding, and is enforced by means of citations and fines. Having mislaid his helmet, Adam jumped on his motorcycle without
More informationTHIS AGREEMENT is made on the [insert day] day of [insert month] [insert year]
This is a sample not the full document Buy the full document in Word format. Select from the following options: Single Document compactlaw.co.uk/agency-agreement.html Business Pack compactlaw.co.uk/business-pack.html
More informationCivil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Act 2002 No 92
New South Wales Civil Liability Amendment (Personal Responsibility) Act 2002 No 92 Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Civil Liability Act 2002 No 22 2 4 Consequential repeals
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
NO. VANCOUVER REGISTRY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA BETWEEN TIGRA WOODS PLAINTIFF AND ON-COURSE GOLF GOODS AND EQUIPMENT INC. NOTICE OF CIVIL CLAIM DEFENDANT This action has been started by
More informationEvidence Study & Review Session One Learning from Multiple Choice
Evidence Study & Review Session One Learning from Multiple Choice Directions: Please move into groups of three or four people. First, as a group, decide what you think are the key big picture concepts
More informationCASE NO. 1D Charles F. Beall, Jr. of Moore, Hill & Westmoreland, P.A., Pensacola, for Appellant.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JOHN R. FERIS, JR., v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D12-4633
More informationORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIAN ROBISON, et al APPELLANTS VS. NO. 2009-CA-00383 ENTERPRISE RENT -A-CAR COMPANY APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LARRY KLEIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED January 19, 2016 v No. 323755 Wayne Circuit Court ROSEMARY KING, DERRICK ROE, JOHN LC No. 13-003902-NI DOE, and ALLSTATE
More informationPlease read this document carefully The terms below apply to the use of Facilities for the Match
Please read this document carefully The terms below apply to the use of Facilities for the Match In particular, we ask you to note the following: The Club is acting as agent on behalf of the Manchester
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO
BETWEEN COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO CITATION: Downer v. The Personal Insurance Company, 2012 ONCA 302 Ryan M. Naimark, for the appellant Lang, LaForme JJ.A. and Pattillo J. (ad hoc) John W. Bruggeman,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between MICHAEL LEO SLATER. And ESTHER RUBY SLATER
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV 2014 00488 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Between MICHAEL LEO SLATER Claimant And ESTHER RUBY SLATER Defendant Before the Honourable Mr Justice Ronnie Boodoosingh Appearances:
More informationIT S THE MOST WONDERFUL TIME OF THE YEAR EXAMINING SOCIAL HOST LIABILITY IN ONTARIO
IT S THE MOST WONDERFUL TIME OF THE YEAR EXAMINING SOCIAL HOST LIABILITY IN ONTARIO In a scenario that is unfortunately, not uncommon, a person hosts a party for friends, family members or co-workers.
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Ryan Stahon, No. 2224 C.D. 2012 Appellant Argued November 12, 2013 v. Harborcreek Township and Bambi Denning BEFORE HONORABLE DAN PELLEGRINI, President Judge HONORABLE
More informationSAMPLE. Dear Member: CONSULTATION SERVICES
Dear Member: As part of payment of the membership fee and abiding by the terms and conditions of this Contract and any attachments, you will receive the legal services (the "Services") as outlined in this
More informationJeffrey V. Hill Bodyfelt Mount LLP 707 Southwest Washington St. Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon (503)
Jeffrey V. Hill Bodyfelt Mount LLP 707 Southwest Washington St. Suite 1100 Portland, Oregon 97205 (503) 243-1022 hill@bodyfeltmount.com LIQUOR LIABILITY I. Introduction Liquor Liability the notion of holding
More informationSentencing Act Examinable excerpts of PART 1 PRELIMINARY. 1 Purposes
Examinable excerpts of Sentencing Act 1991 as at 10 April 2018 1 Purposes PART 1 PRELIMINARY The purposes of this Act are (a) to promote consistency of approach in the sentencing of offenders; (b) to have
More informationOFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT CLERK Circuit Court of St. Louis County 105 South Central Avenue Clayton, Missouri 63105
JOAN M. GILMER Circuit Clerk OFFICE OF THE CIRCUIT CLERK Circuit Court of St. Louis County 105 South Central Avenue Clayton, Missouri 63105 This pamphlet is intended to assist you in filing a Small Claims
More informationCivil Liability Act 1936
Version: 1.8.2017 South Australia Civil Liability Act 1936 An Act to consolidate certain Acts relating to wrongs. Contents Part 1 Preliminary 1 Short title 2 Act to bind the Crown 3 Interpretation 4 Application
More informationNMDLA Winter 2009 Article. Coverage and UM/UIM
NMDLA Winter 2009 Article State Court Opinions By John S. Stiff, Esq. and Ann L. Keith, Esq. Stiff, Keith & Garcia, LLC. - Albuquerque NM Bar Bulletin October 5, 2009 Vol. 48, No. 40 Coverage and UM/UIM
More informationAlcohol Beverage Liability: Legal Update and Best Practices
Alcohol Beverage Liability: Legal Update and Best Practices 2017 Hospitality Law Conference April 24, 2017 Houston, Texas Elizabeth A. DeConti, Esq. GrayRobinson, P.A. 401 East Jackson Street, Suite 2700
More informationIN THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF UTAH, UTAH COUNTY, PROVO DEPARTMENT
ANTHONY HOWELL (9506) UTAH COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER ASSOC. Attorney for Defendant 245 North University Ave. Provo, Utah 84601 Telephone: (801) 852-1070 IN THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, STATE OF UTAH,
More informationPreparing and Trying Negligence Cases
Ottawa Law School March 5, 2018 Preparing and Trying Negligence Cases Presented by: DAVID F. MACDONALD, Partner *David MacDonald Law Professional Corporation 1-888-223-0448 647-290-7291 cell dmacdonald@thomsonrogers.com
More informationLiquor Amendment (3 Strikes) Act 2011 No 58
New South Wales Liquor Amendment (3 Strikes) Act 2011 No 58 Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 Schedule 1 Amendment of Liquor Act 2007 No 90 3 New South Wales Liquor Amendment (3 Strikes) Act
More informationIN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE. Plaintiff v. Defendant TRIAL BRIEF OF PLAINTIFF
1 1 1 CASE NO. ========================================================== IN THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE ==========================================================
More informationSomething Old, Something New: The Partial Final Judgment Rule
Something Old, Something New: The Partial Final Judgment Rule by Monica Taylor Monday James J. O Keeffe Gentry Locke Rakes & Moore, LLP trial court. Under the terms of the new rule, both the interests
More informationNeal v Ambulance Service of New South Wales: a postscript to (2007) 5 e Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care Article number
Neal v Ambulance Service of New South Wales: a postscript to (2007) 5 e Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care Article number 990235. Michael Eburn Senior Lecturer School of Law University of New England
More informationSAMPLE. Dear Member: CONSULTATION SERVICES
Dear Member: The Member and all Covered Persons will receive the legal services (the "Services") as outlined in this Contract and any attachments. This is in return of your payment of the membership fee
More informationCustomer will bring an action against Businessman under a negligence theory.
Customer (C) v. Businessman (B) Customer will bring an action against Businessman under a negligence theory. Negligence requires a Breach of a Duty that Causes Damages. A. Duty B had a duty to drive as
More informationRight to sue; In the course of employment (proceeding to and from work).
SUMMARY 892/91 DECISION NO. 892/91 Brunino v. Principe PANEL: McCombie; Thomspon; Nipshagen DATE: 11/05/92 Right to sue; In the course of employment (proceeding to and from work). Two defendants in a civil
More informationNeal v Ambulance Service of New South Wales: a postscript to (2007) 5 e Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care Article number
Neal v Ambulance Service of New South Wales: a postscript to (2007) 5 e Journal of Emergency Primary Health Care Article number 990235. Michael Eburn Senior Lecturer School of Law University of New England
More informationLICENSE OF OCCUPATION
790 Elm Tree Road! Little Britain, ON K0M 2C0! Phone: (705) 879-4442 E-Mail: info@mariposaestates.ca Web: www.mariposacreekestates.com BETWEEN: LICENSE OF OCCUPATION Mariposa Creek Estates (Hereinafter
More informationMBE PRACTICE QUESTIONS SET 1 EVIDENCE
MBE PRACTICE QUESTIONS SET 1 EVIDENCE Copyright 2016 by BARBRI, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS DAVID W. MCGUIRE, Individually as Next Friend of TY N. MCGUIRE, Plaintiff-Appellee, FOR PUBLICATION November 15, 2005 9:10 a.m. v No. 251950 Wayne Circuit Court DEANNA
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CHRISTOPHER DIRLA and APRIL DIRLA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, UNPUBLISHED May 25, 2010 v No. 292676 Schoolcraft Circuit Court SENEY SPIRIT STORE & GAS STATION and LC No.
More informationFall 1997 December 20, 1997 SAMPLE ANSWER TO MID-TERM EXAM QUESTION 1
Professor DeWolf Torts I Fall 1997 December 20, 1997 SAMPLE ANSWER TO MID-TERM EXAM QUESTION 1 This case is based upon McLeod v. Cannon Oil Corp., 603 So.2d 889 (Ala. 1992). In that case the court reversed
More informationLiquor Amendment (Kings Cross Plan of Management) Act 2012 No 91
New South Wales Liquor Amendment (Kings Cross Plan of Management) Act 2012 No 91 Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 Schedule 1 Amendment of Liquor Act 2007 No 90 3 Schedule 2 Amendment of Liquor
More information2.1 In this Membership Plan and By-law, the following words have the meanings set forth opposite them:
1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 The Home Club (the "Club") is a golf club owned and operated by ClubLink Corporation or its affiliates ("ClubLink"). Membership in the Home Club ("Membership") provides a Member with
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D, this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral
More informationTorts Tutorial Chapter 6 Joint Tortfeasors
INTRODUCTION This program is designed to provide a review of basic concepts covered in a first-year torts class and is based on DeWolf, Cases and Materials on Torts (http://guweb2.gonzaga.edu/~dewolf/torts/text
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs ) Defendant ) DECISION ON COSTS
BROCKVILLE COURT FILE NO.: 05-0083 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE B E T W E E N: DUSKA BARKLEY, PEYTON BARKLEY, Jonathan A. Schwartzman, for the Plaintiffs MARATHA BARKLEY, by their Litigation Guardian,
More informationLegal Framework: Advance Care Planning Gippsland Region Palliative Consortium and McCabe Centre for Law and Cancer (Cancer Council Victoria)
Legal Framework: Advance Care Planning Gippsland Region Palliative Consortium and McCabe Centre for Law and Cancer (Cancer Council Victoria) Claire McNamara, Legal Officer 1300 309 337 www.publicadvocate.vic.gov.au
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 9, 2002 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE December 9, 2002 Session MICHAEL D. MATTHEWS v. NATASHA STORY, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hawkins County No. 10381/5300J John K. Wilson,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA. No / Filed February 9, Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Mitchell E.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 0-895 / 10-1016 Filed February 9, 2011 WILLEY, O'BRIEN, L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. UNION INSURANCE COMPANY OF PROVIDENCE and WEST BEND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,
More informationPlaying the Percentages: A Study of Comparative Fault. By Lee M. Mendelson Mendelson, Goldman & Schwarz Los Angeles, CA
Playing the Percentages: A Study of Comparative Fault By Lee M. Mendelson Mendelson, Goldman & Schwarz Los Angeles, CA Allocation of Fault Systems for Allocating Fault 1. Pure Contributory Negligence
More informationEnterprise Recon. Software License Agreement
Enterprise Recon Software License Agreement As the Licensee, you should carefully read the following terms and conditions before using, installing, copying, distributing, or transmitting this software.
More informationWhen do parole authorities owe a duty of care to those injured by prisoners on parole? By Martin Cuerden
When do parole authorities owe a duty of care to those injured by prisoners on parole? By Martin Cuerden The responsibility of parole authorities for offences com m itted by those on parole is a topical
More informationAviva Canada Inc. & Aviva Insurance Company of Canada, Defendants
SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE - ONTARIO CITATION: Romanko v. Aviva, 2017 ONSC 2393 COURT FILE NO.: 07-CV-38350PD2 DATE: 20170419 RE: BEFORE: Omelian Romanko & Neonila Romanko, Plaintiffs AND: Aviva Canada
More informationFALL 2001 December 15, 2001 FALL SEMESTER SAMPLE ANSWER
TORTS I PROFESSOR DEWOLF FALL 2001 December 15, 2001 FALL SEMESTER SAMPLE ANSWER QUESTION 1 This question is based on Henderson v. Fields, 2001 WL 1529262 (Mo.App. W.D., Dec 04, 2001), in which the court
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1086/15
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1086/15 BEFORE: R. McCutcheon: Vice-Chair HEARING: May 28, 2015 at Toronto Oral hearing Post-hearing activity completed on September 10, 2015
More informationTitle 28-A: LIQUORS. Chapter 100: MAINE LIQUOR LIABILITY ACT. Table of Contents Part 8. LIQUOR LIABILITY...
Title 28-A: LIQUORS Chapter 100: MAINE LIQUOR LIABILITY ACT Table of Contents Part 8. LIQUOR LIABILITY... Section 2501. SHORT TITLE... 3 Section 2502. PURPOSES... 3 Section 2503. DEFINITIONS... 3 Section
More informationCASE NO. COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. The Plaintiff, CHARLESETTA WALKER, as CONSERVATOR FOR THE PERSON,
Electronically Filed 06/28/2013 01:01:15 PM ET IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 9 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL CIRCUIT JURISDICTION CASE NO. CHARLESETTA WALKER, as CONSERVATOR
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D02-691
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2003 DEBBIE CARTER, ETC., ET AL, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D02-691 CAPRI VENTURES, INC., ETC., ET AL, Appellee. Opinion
More informationWORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 955/09
WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 955/09 BEFORE: J. Josefo: Vice-Chair HEARING: May 13, 2009 at Ottawa Oral DATE OF DECISION: June 16, 2009 NEUTRAL CITATION: 2009 ONWSIAT 1450
More informationStandard of Care A Comparative Case Study. Colleen Sinclair City of Calgary Law Department
Standard of Care A Comparative Case Study Colleen Sinclair City of Calgary Law Department Occupiers Liability Act Duty of Care to Visitors 5. An occupier of premises owes a duty to every visitor on the
More informationRECENT INAPPROPRIATE LIMITATIONS ON SEVERAL LIABILITY
RECENT INAPPROPRIATE LIMITATIONS ON SEVERAL LIABILITY By: David H. Levitt * Hinshaw & Culbertson Chicago In 1986, the Illinois legislature enacted 735 ILCS 5/2-1117. That statute provided that defendants
More informationMENTAL HEALTH (JERSEY) LAW 2016
Mental Health (Jersey) Law 2016 Arrangement MENTAL HEALTH (JERSEY) LAW 2016 Arrangement Article PART 1 5 INTERPRETATION, APPLICATION AND OTHER GENERAL PROVISIONS 5 1 Interpretation... 5 2 Minister s primary
More informationCONDENSED OUTLINE FOR TORTS I
Condensed Outline of Torts I (DeWolf), November 25, 2003 1 CONDENSED OUTLINE FOR TORTS I [Use this only as a supplement and corrective for your own more detailed outlines!] The classic definition of a
More informationOF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. GABRIEL D. SIERRA, a minor, ** by and through his mother and next friend, CHRISTINA DUARTE ** SIERRA and CHRISTINA DUARTE
More informationIsobel Kennedy, SC Law Library
8 th ANNUAL NATIONAL PROSECUTORS CONFERENCE SATURDAY, 19 MAY 2007 DUBLIN CASTLE CONFERENCE CENTRE Isobel Kennedy, SC Law Library ~ Defence of Diminished Responsibility 1.GENERAL 8 th Annual National Prosecutors
More informationLICENSE OF OCCUPATION
LICENSE OF OCCUPATION Country Gardens RV Park Ltd. (Owner) - AND Name: Date of Birth: (Site User/Contracting Party: hereinafter the OCCUPANT ) #1 Name: Date of Birth: (Site User/Contracting Party: hereinafter
More informationCASE NO. 1D Peter D. Webster and Christine Davis Graves of Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant/Cross-Appellee.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA COMPANION PROPERTY & CASUALTY INSURANCE CO., v. Appellant/Cross-Appellee, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND
More informationNora Barrett. Victoria Hotel, Galway (Represented by V.P. Shields & Son, Solicitors) Equal Status Act Equality Officer Decision DEC-S
1 Equal Status Act 2000 Equality Officer Decision DEC-S2002-007 Nora Barrett V Victoria Hotel, Galway (Represented by V.P. Shields & Son, Solicitors) File Ref ES/2001/102 Date Of Issue 28/02/2002 2 OFFICE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 19, 2008
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs February 19, 2008 CHERYL L. GRAY v. ALEX V. MITSKY, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 03C-2835 Hamilton V.
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Torts And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Autos, Inc. manufactures a two-seater
More informationNew York Practice: A Defendant s Litigation Guide
New York Practice: A Defendant s Litigation Guide By: Warren S. Koster, Esq. Callan, Koster, Brady & Brennan INTRODUCTION This memorandum will explain the basic tenets of New York Practice from the initiation
More informationCase Name: Laudon v. Roberts. Between Rick Laudon, Plaintiff, and Will Roberts and Keith Sullivan, Defendants. [2010] O.J. No.
Page 1 Case Name: Laudon v. Roberts Between Rick Laudon, Plaintiff, and Will Roberts and Keith Sullivan, Defendants [2010] O.J. No. 315 2010 ONSC 433 Court File No. 02-B5188 Counsel: B. Keating, for the
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS 2.1 GENERAL RIGHT OF ACTION UNDER C.R.S LIMITED RIGHT OF ACTION UNDER C.R.S
TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 OVERVIEW OF WRONGFUL DEATH LAW IN COLORADO........................................... 1 Chapter 2 COLORADO S WRONGFUL DEATH ACT................... 3 2.1 GENERAL RIGHT OF ACTION
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS MARRY BORLIK, v Plaintiff-Appellant, SIME EDWARD LJUBICIC, REBECCA LYNN HAMERLE and THOMAS FEITTEN, UNPUBLISHED November 4, 1997 No. 185723 Oakland Circuit Court LC No.
More informationNegligence 1. Duty of Care 2. Breach of duty of care p 718 c) p 724
Negligence 1. Duty of Care Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] AC 562 - a duty of care could exist in any situation where loss, damage or injury to one party was reasonable foreseeable (foreseeable harm) - the
More informationTHE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL
PRIOR PRINTER'S NOS., 0 PRINTER'S NO. THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF PENNSYLVANIA SENATE BILL No. 1 Session of 1 INTRODUCED BY RAFFERTY, DINNIMAN, MARTIN, SABATINA, TARTAGLIONE, SCAVELLO, AUMENT AND WARD, NOVEMBER,
More informationCASE NO. 1D Joseph Christopher Acoff was convicted after a jury trial of leaving the scene
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JOSEPH CHRISTOPHER ACOFF, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE
More informationto Headlight, Dolmans Solicitors motoring news bulletin. In this edition we cover:
Headlight motoring news welcome to Headlight, Dolmans Solicitors motoring news bulletin. In this edition we cover: case summaries exaggeration Carl Fletcher v Anthony Keatley (a minor) [2017] improper
More informationCivil Law is known as Private Law. Regulates disputes between individuals; between parties; and between individuals and parties.
Civil Disputes Civil Law is known as Private Law. Regulates disputes between individuals; between parties; and between individuals and parties. The main purpose of Civil Law is to compensate victims. Civil
More informationCrimes Amendment (Road Accidents) (Brendan s Law) Act 2005 No 74
New South Wales Crimes Amendment (Road Accidents) (Brendan s Law) Act 2005 No 74 Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Crimes Act 1900 No 40 2 4 Amendment of other Acts 2 Schedule
More information5 TH WORLD CONGRESS ON ADULT GUARDIANSHIP (WCAG 2018, SEOUL)
5 TH WORLD CONGRESS ON ADULT GUARDIANSHIP (WCAG 2018, SEOUL) Contact Point: The Organizing Committee of 5th world congress on Adult Guardianship Tel. +82-2-2220-4279 Fax. +82-2-2220-0985 E-mail wcag2018@gmail.com
More informationMitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11, [2009] 1 AC 874, [2009] 2 WLR 481, [2009] 3 All ER 205 HL
Mitchell v Glasgow City Council [2009] UKHL 11, [2009] 1 AC 874, [2009] 2 WLR 481, [2009] 3 All ER 205 HL Summary James Mitchell, 72, was attacked in July 2001 with an iron bar by his neighbour, James
More informationChapter II, Book III, Code Civil Of Intentional and Unintentional Wrongs
Chapter II, Book III, Code Civil Of Intentional and Unintentional Wrongs Art. 1382 (now Art. 1240) Any act whatever of man, which causes damage to another, obliges the one by whose fault it occurred, to
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA FREDRIC ELLIOTT, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, vs. CHINA GREEN AGRICULTURE, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE
Filed 11/14/14; pub. order 12/5/15 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE EILEEN ANNOCKI et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. B251434
More informationBELIZE SHOPS ACT CHAPTER 287 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000
BELIZE SHOPS ACT CHAPTER 287 REVISED EDITION 2000 SHOWING THE LAW AS AT 31ST DECEMBER, 2000 This is a revised edition of the law, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under the authority of the Law
More informationModerated by: Eugene Felton, Jr., Esq.
Moderated by: Eugene Felton, Jr., Esq. I. Actual Facts Matter II. Damages III. Venue IV. Reputation of Defendant V. Reputation of Plaintiff VI. Costs of Litigation VII. Immunity Issues Screening for Successful
More information