Judgment Rendered OCT B
|
|
- Kory Warner
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2008 CE 2166 uj M BLANCHE BAYLOCK VERSUS J ry DARDENNE LOUISIANA SECRETARY OF STATE IN HIS FFICIAL CAPACITY AND ANGIE LAPLACE COMMISSIONER OF ELECTIONS IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY Judgment Rendered OCT B On Appeal from the Eighteenth Judicial District Court in and for the Parish of Iberville State of Louisiana Trial Court No The Honorable Alvin Batiste Jr Judge Presiding Blanche Baylock St Gabriel La PlaintiffAppellant In Proper Person William E Crawford Jr David Sanders Bridget B Denicola Baton Rouge La Counsel for Defendants Appellees Jay Dardenne Secretary of State in his official capacity and Angie LaPlace Commissioner of Elections in her official capacity BEFORE CARTER cj WHIPPLE GUIDRY DOWNING AND McCLENDON JJ 1 i UU
2 PER CURIAM This is an election contest challenging the results of the October primary election for Justice of the Peace Justice of the Peace Ward 2 Precincts and 12 and Constable Justice of the Peace Ward 2 Precincts and 12 in lberville Parish Pursuant to La R S this appeal has been given expedited consideration For the reasons that follow we affirm FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Plaintiff Appellant Blanche Baylock was one of four candidates for Justice of the Peace Justice of the Peace Ward 2 in the October primary election The other candidates in the primary election were Jimmy Green III Joseph Oliver Jr and Alexander Wright Sr A certified copy of the tentative results of the election indicated that Ms Baylock received 201 votes Mr Green received 481 votes Mr Oliver received 255 votes and Mr Wright received 440 votes Also on the October ballot were three candidates seeking the office of Constable Justice of the Peace Ward 2 Kevin Brock Keith Edward Gordon and Lloyd Big Red Snowten Mr Brock received 423 votes Mr Gordon received 387 votes and Mr Snowten received 550 votes On October Ms Baylock filed suit in the Eighteenth Judicial District Court challenging the outcome of the election Specifically Ms Baylock asserts that the ballots used in the early voting held September and in the October primary election promoted I See La RS D 2 Jay Dardenne Louisiana Secretary of State and Angie LaPlace Commissioner of Elections were named as defendants in their official capacities in the caption proceedings For ease ofdiscussion we refer to them collectively as the State 2 of these
3 confusion leaving the impression that the Justice of the Peace and Constable share the same performance and are the same official office Ms Baylock sought several forms of relief She asked that all voting from September through October be thrown out Ms Baylock asked that the official ballot be corrected i e redrawn in a manner suggested by her in time for early voting to be held from October through October and for the November election Ms Baylock requested that the official ballot as corrected be published in The Morning Advocate and the Post South Newspaper She also asked that the Louisiana Secretary of State correct any literature whether on paper or in cyberspace Lastly Ms Baylock sought election campaign financial relief The election contest was allotted to Judge Alvin Batiste Jr In response Ms Baylock filed a motion to recuse Judge Batiste and on the day of the hearing on the motion to recuse she filed an amended motion Among other claims Ms Baylock alleged that Mr Gordon a candidate for Constable Justice of the Peace Ward 2 was a campaign contributor to Judge Batiste The motion to recuse was heard on October by Judge William C Dupont and denied that same day The case was then ordered returned to Judge Batiste s division of court for disposition In response to Ms Baylock s petition on October the Louisiana Secretary of State filed a motion to strike the monetary demand contained in Paragraph 10 of Ms Baylock s petition The motion asserted that monetary damages are not an available remedy in an election contest and such reliefmust be sought via an ordinary proceeding 3
4 Later on October Ms Baylock filed requests for production directed to the Secretary of State s office and to the lberville Clerk of Court In accordance with La R S the matter was heard by Judge Batiste on October Judge Batiste took up several outstanding matters prior to beginning trial First considered was Ms Baylock s request for an order of contempt due to the failure of several individuals to appear at trial Due in part to the lack of evidence of service in the record the motion was denied The court granted the State s motion to strike the request for money damages The State s motion to quash Ms Baylock s requests for production was held in abeyance 3 At trial Ms Baylock presented the testimony of eight witnesses She also offered without objection two documents The first document was a chart of qualifications for various candidates including JUSTICE OF THE PEACE and CONSTABLE Justice of the Peace Court The second document was titled the Louisiana Secretary of State Parish Candidate Data for the October election During the proceedings Ms Baylock attempted to offer into evidence an affidavit from Leo Mellieon a letter from Diane Marie Jones a Vote Tally Report with handwritten notations and a copy of Cleo Fields Ticket which lists select candidates for certain offices Each of these items was objected to as hearsay and excluded from evidence 4 The State also offered several items into evidence including certified copies of the sample ballot and election results from the October election for Justice of the Peace Justice of the Peace Ward 2 Parish of 3 We have found no ruling in the record on the State s motion to quash 4 The four items were proffered pursuant to La Code Civ P art
5 lberville and for Constable Justice of the Peace Ward 2 Parish ofiberville After Ms Baylock completed the presentation of her evidence the State moved for an involuntary dismissal On the same day as trial at a m the district court signed two judgments The first judgment granted the defendants motion to strike the monetary demand in paragraph 10 of Ms Baylock s petition The second judgment granted the motion for involuntary dismissal entered judgment in favor of the defendants dismissed plaintiff s petition with prejudice at her cost and pursuant to La R S ordered the release of the voting machines used in the October primary election for Justice of the Peace Justice of the Peace Ward 2 and Constable Justice of the Peace Ward 2 Ms Baylock appeals Ms Baylock lists sixteen issues for this court s consideration To facilitate review we have grouped these sixteen issues into six assignments of error 5 Generally Ms Baylock challenges the trial court s 1 denial of the motion to recuse Judge Batiste 2 grant of the motion to quash the requests for production 3 refusal to hold certain individuals in contempt for failing to appear at trial in particular Secretary of State Jay Dardenne 4 sustaining ofthe objection to the affidavit of Leo Mellieon as hearsay 5 grant of the motion for involuntary dismissal and 6 assessment of costs 5 Ms Baylock s briefconsists of a chronological list of events some of which cannot be verified in the record citations to La Code Civ P arts 151 and 1355 citations to La R S and and a list of cases Generally it is insufficient to merely list authority with no analysis or discussion Assignments oferror that are neither briefed nor argued are considered abandoned Uniform Rules Courts of Appeal Rule However in the interest of judicial efficiency and recognizing the strong public policy in favorof finality of elections this court will examine the issues raised by Ms Baylock 5
6 DISCUSSION Motion to Quash Request for Production Ms Baylock alleges the trial court erred in denying her discovery procedures The law is clear that t he authority for a candidate to conduct discovery under the provisions of this Section shall cease when an action contesting such election to office is filed pursuant to R S B La RS E Ms Baylock s election suit was filed on October On October subsequent to her filing the election contest suit Ms Baylock filed requests for production Under the clear language of La R S E the State was entitled to relief on its motion to quash This assignment of error has no merit Motion to Recuse Judze Batiste Ms Baylock sought to recuse Judge Batiste maintaining that Keith Gordon a candidate for Constable Justice of the Peace Ward 2 is a friend of Judge Batiste who assisted Judge Batiste with his campaign Ms Baylock avers the trial court was biased Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article ISlA as amended by 2008 La Acts 663 SI effective August sets forth the mandatory grounds for recusal of a judge of any court Pertinent to this discussion is La Code Civ P art 15IA 4 which directs that a judge shall be recused when he is biased prejudiced or interested in the cause or its outcome or biased or prejudiced toward or against the parties or the parties attorneys or any witness to such an extent that he would be unable to conduct fair and impartial proceedings The bias or prejudice is required to be of a substantial nature and based on more than conclusory allegations Suazo v 6
7 Suazo p 13 La App 1 Cir So 2d writ denied La So 2d 539 The motion to recuse Judge Batiste was referred to Judge Dupont for a contradictory hearing According to Ms Baylock subpoenas were issued for several individuals who failed to appear at the hearing including Mr Gordon however no service returns were filed into evidence 6 In response to Mr Gordon s absence Ms Baylock moved for a continuance Judge Dupont denied the motion to continue in light of the short time delays associated with election contest suits Mr Green one of Ms Baylock s opponents for Justice of the Peace and Judge Batiste both testified at the hearing Ms Baylock s questioning of Mr Green offered little assistance to her claim as Mr Green testified he was unaware of a relationship between Mr Gordon and Judge Batiste During his testimony Judge Batiste stated that neither he nor his wife is related to any of the candidates running for Constable Judge Batiste testified that he and Mr Gordon are good friends According to Judge Batiste Mr Gordon helped him with his 2002 campaign receiving no more than for assisting in the campaign Judge Batiste did not give a campaign contribution to Mr Gordon in Mr Gordon s recent campaign and he is not supporting any of the candidates in the Justice of the Peace or Constable elections Judge Batiste explained that he did not vote for Mr Gordon or anyone else in the elections at issue because he is outside ofthe voting district Judge Batiste explained My function is to be fair and 6 On appeal Ms Baylock asserts the district court erred in allowing Keith Edward Gordon not to appear There is nothing in the record to indicate the trial court contributed to Mr Gordon s absence from the hearing Moreover Judge Batiste openly described his friendship with Mr Gordon and Mr Gordon s assistance with his 2002 campaign The allegations regarding the men s friendship appear undisputed 7
8 impartial and that s the only way that I can be That s the reason why I ran for this seat and I know that s the for me and for people that appear before me the primary objective is to be fair and impartial At the hearing on the motion to recuse Ms Baylock failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Judge Batiste was biased in favor of Mr Gordon and against Ms Baylock to such an extent that Judge Batiste would be unable to conduct fair and impartial proceedings See La Code Civ P art 15IA 4 Suazo at p So 2d at 652 Moreover our review of the record establishes that the proceedings were conducted in a fair and impartial manner Judge Batiste presided over this expedited summary proceeding in accordance with the laws of this state showing consideration at trial in light of Ms Baylock s decision to represent herself We find no error in the trial court s denial of Ms Baylock s motion to recuse This assignment of error has no merit Motion to Strike Reauest for Monev Damazes In her district court petition Ms Baylock requested election campaign financial relief In response thereto the defendants filed a motion to strike Louisiana Revised Statutes A sets forth the remedies available in an action contesting an election If the party contesting the election is successful the judge may declare the election void and order a new election for all of the candidates or if appropriate the judge may order a restricted election specifying the date of the election the appropriate candidates for the election the office or other position for which the election shall be held and indicating which voters will be eligible to 8
9 vote Money damages are not an available remedy under La RS A for a successful plaintiff We find no error in the trial court s grant of the defendants motion to strike This assignment of error has no merit The Affidavit ofleo Mellieon In support of her claim that the ballot was confusing Ms Baylock attempted to offer into evidence the affidavit of Leo Mellieon The State objected on the basis that the affidavit was hearsay See La Code Evid arts 801C 802 As inadmissible hearsay Mellieon s affidavit was not competent legal evidence and was properly excluded from evidence by the trial court in response to the State s objection 7 Failure to Comvlv with Subvoenas Ms Baylock maintains the trial court erred in denying her the right to question all parties that were subpoenaed In particular Ms Baylock maintains the trial court erred in not holding Secretary of State Jay Dardenne in contempt for failing to appear at the hearing in response to a subpoena Contempt of court is any act or omission tending to obstruct or interfere with the orderly administration ofjustice or to impair the dignity of the court or respect for its authority La Code Civ P art 221 Contumacious failure to comply with a subpoena or summons proof of service of which appears of record is a direct contempt La Code Civ P art 222 Proceedings for contempt must be strictly construed and the law does not favor extending their scope Davis v Harmony House Nursing Home p 5 La App 2 Cir 1O So 2d writ 7 For the same reasons the trial court properly excluded the letter from Diane Marie Jones the Vote Tally Report with handwritten notations and the copy of Cleo Fields Ticket 9
10 denied La So 2d 1143 Moreover contempt proceedings are designed for the vindication of the dignity of the court rather than for the benefit of a litigant Davis at p So 2d at 96 For purposes of evaluating this issue we assume that any individuals failing to comply with subpoenas issued in connection with this expedited civil summary proceeding would at most be subject to civil contempt which requires a lesser burden of proof than criminal contempt See Rogers at pp So 2d at 945 The burden of proof for civil contempt is by a preponderance of the evidence Davis at p So 2d at 96 A trial court is vested with great discretion in determining whether a party should be held in contempt Rogers v Dickens p 7 La App I Cir So 2d Although a trial court s ultimate decision to hold a party in contempt of court is subject to review under the abuse of discretion standard the trial court s predicate factual determinations are reviewed on appeal under the manifest error standard of review Rogers at p So 2d at 945 The record reflects that Zaine Kasem Ms Baylock s daughter was appointed as a private process server At the hearing the trial court observed that no service returns were in the record and Ms Kasem was not present to testify Moreover under La R S A a contradictory hearing must be held before Secretary of State Dardenne as a statewide elected official is compelled to appear as a witness in a civil case In light of the noncompliance with La RS A and the absence of any evidence of willful disobedience of a valid subpoena on the 10
11 part of Secretary of State Dardenne or any of the other individuals named by Ms Baylock we cannot say the trial court abused its discretion in declining to issue an order or orders of contempt This assignment of error has no merit Grant ofthe Motion for Involuntary Dismissal Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure article 1672B provides for the involuntary dismissal of a case after the plaintiff s presentation of evidence Specifically In an action tried by the court without a jury after the plaintiff has completed the presentation of his evidence any party without waiving his right to offer evidence in the event the motion is not granted may move for a dismissal of the action as to him on the ground that upon the facts and law the plaintiff has shown no right to relief The court may then determine the facts and render judgment against the plaintiff and in favor of the moving party or may decline to render any judgment until the close of all the evidence The trial court s grant of an involuntary dismissal on the grounds that the plaintiff has shown no right to relief is subject to the well settled manifest error standard of review Broussard v Voorhies p 4 La App I Cir So 2d writ denied La So 2d 535 Accordingly in order to reverse the trial court s grant of involuntary dismissal we must find after reviewing the record that there is no factual basis for its finding or that the finding is clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous Broussard at p So 2d at 1042 The issue is not whether the trial court was right or wrong but whether its conclusion was reasonable Broussard at p So 2d at 1042 II
12 A party bringing an election contest suit must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that except for substantial irregularities or error fraud or other unlawful activities in the conduct of the election the plaintiff would have qualified for a second party primary election or for a general election or would have been elected La RS IB see La RS B Davis v Malveaux p 9 La App I Cir So 2d Thus the plaintiff s burden is two fold 1 the plaintiff must first prove either fraud or irregularities are present then 2 the plaintiff must prove that but for the fraud or irregularities the outcome of the election would have been different Davis at p So 2d at 76 Ms Baylock s challenge to the ballot was based on the repetition of the phrase Justice of the Peace Ward 2 after both the heading for Justice of the Peace and the heading for Constable g Ms Baylock submits these captions are confusing especially for new voters and the elderly Ms Baylock presented the testimony of eight witnesses Of these eight witnesses none personally found the ballot confusing Two witnesses Jacqueline Jackie Wesley and St Gabriel Chief of Police Kevin Ambeau Sr testified that the ballot was or could be confusing to others Ms Wesley testified that in her opinion the ballot should be changed None of the witnesses testified that ballot confusion interfered with their voting or prevented them from voting for Ms Baylock or any other candidate The trial court reasoned g Louisiana Revised Statutes A l provides in pertinent part that there shall be one constable for the court of each justice of the peace in the several parishes of the state 12
13 YJou failed to prove that there were any irregularities or that the ballot was so confusing that it caused voters to vote in the wrong election and vote for the wrong Y ou failed person to prove that except for this confusion that these people would have voted for you and that you would have made it into either the runoff or that you would have won the election Our examination of the October ballot indicates that different font sizes and headings were used to identify and direct the voter to the portion of the ballot at issue which sets forth the offices as Justice of the Peace and Constable However as appellant correctly notes a smaller font size below both headings states Justice of the Peace Ward 2 Even if the use of the exact language Justice of the Peace Ward 2 under both Justice of the Peace and Constable headings could arguably constitute an irregularity on the record before us we are constrained to find that the appellant did not prove that but for the alleged irregularity the outcome of the election would have been different The record amply supports the trial court s conclusion and we find no error in the grant of the motion for involuntary dismissal and entry of judgment in favor of the defendants This assignment of error is without merit Assessment of Costs Ms Baylock asks that all fees and court costs be waived regardless of whether she wins this appeal The trial court granted Ms Baylock pauper status Pursuant to Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure articles a party granted pauper status is allowed to have her suit continue without bond and without payment of costs as they accrue 9 These articles do not bar assessment of costs None of the Above v Hardy 377 So 2d La App I sl Cir Any procedural matter not specifically provided governed by the Code ofcivil Procedure La R S for in the Election Code shall be
14 We find no error in the trial court s assessment of costs against Ms Baylock This assignment of error has no merit CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons the judgment appealed from is affirmed Costs of this appeal are assessed to the plaintiff appellant Blanche Baylock AFFIRMED 14
Honorable Janice Clark, Judge Presiding
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2013 CA 1803 CAPITAL CITY PRESS, L.L.C. D/B/A THE ADVOCATE AND KORAN ADDO VERSUS LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND HANK DANOS,
More informationAppealed from the Twenty Second Judicial District Court
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2007 CA 2366 FRANCISCO CARVAJAL II VERSUS KELLY J GEORGE Judgment Rendered May 2 2008 w cjj W Appealed from the Twenty
More informationNO CA-1292 CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, ET AL. VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL KEVIN M. DUPART FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * CONSOLIDATED WITH:
CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, ET AL. VERSUS KEVIN M. DUPART CONSOLIDATED WITH: KEVIN M. DUPART VERSUS * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2013-CA-1292 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA CONSOLIDATED WITH:
More informationOffice Of The Clerk. State oflouisiana. www la fcca. ol 2. Notice of Judgment. June Stephen M Irving 111 Founders St Ste 700 Baton Rouge
Christine L Crow Clerk of Court Office Of The Clerk Court of Appeal First Circuit State oflouisiana www la fcca ol 2 Notice of Judgment Post OffIce Box 4408 Baton Rouge LA 70821 4408 225 382 3000 June
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2013 CW 0863 R GERALD BELL, SR. AND LULAROSE S. BELL VERSUS
--- ------~-------- STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2013 CW 0863 R GERALD BELL, SR. AND LULAROSE S. BELL VERSUS LOUISIANA STATE POLICE AND WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH SHERIFF'S OFFICE On Application
More informationNO. 18-CA-453 CHALANDER SMITH FIFTH CIRCUIT VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL
CHALANDER SMITH VERSUS RAVEN WARREN AND ELIANA DEFRANCESCH, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CLERK OF COURT FOR ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH NO. 18-CA-453 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON
More informationJudgment Rendered UUL
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2010 CA 2207 SHERIE BURKART VERSUS RAYMOND C BURKART JR s Judgment Rendered UUL 7 2011 Appealed from the 22nd Judicial District Court In and for the
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2008 KW 1859 VERSUS EARL LANE CONSOLIDATED WITH VERSUS DEBBIE LYNN LONG.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2008 KW 1859 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS EARL LANE CONSOLIDATED WITH STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS DEBBIE LYNN LONG Appealed
More informationNo. 45,202-CA No. 45,203-CA No. 45,204-CA. (Consolidated cases) COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered April 14, 2010. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 45,202-CA No. 45,203-CA No. 45,204-CA (Consolidated cases) COURT OF APPEAL
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA FIRST CIRCUIT VERSUS. Judgment. Appealed from the Nineteenth Judicial District Court
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2006 CA 0453 WHITNEY NATIONAL BANK VERSUS G PcI R E COLEMAN INC COLEMAN RV L L C LOUIS W CHIP BIGNAR BONITA BURATT
More informationHonorable Trudy M White Judge Presiding
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2010 CA 0473 THOMAS NORMAND VERSUS LOUISIANA RISK REVIEW PANEL LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY CORRECTIONS rk Judgment Rendered SEP 10 2010 On Appeal
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 11-256 CHRISTOPHER ATHERTON VERSUS ANTHONY J. PALERMO, SR., ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF CALCASIEU, NO.
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA NO KA-0946 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL MELVIN WILLIAMS FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS MELVIN WILLIAMS * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2011-KA-0946 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT ORLEANS PARISH NO. 500-929, SECTION
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 14-925 LOUISIANA BOARD OF ETHICS Plaintiff-Appellant VERSUS RALPH WILSON Defendant-Appellee ********** APPEAL FROM THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA THROUGH COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2011 CA 0176 MAXINE HUGHES DICKENS VERSUS LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2011 CA 0176 MAXINE HUGHES DICKENS VERSUS LOUISIANA CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE FOR WOMEN STATE OF LOUISIANA Judgment rendered September 14 2011 nnd Appealed
More informationIn and for the Parish of East Baton Rouge State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2009 CA 1464 FIA CARD SERVICES NA VERSUS WILLIAM F WEAVER Judgment Rendered March 26 2010 Appealed from Nineteenth Judicial District Court In and
More informationThe Honorable Janice G Clark Judge Presiding
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2011 CA 0007 JAMES A WILSON AND BRENDA M WILSON VERSUS STATE OF LOUISIANA THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT Judgment Rendered AUG
More informationFREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER JUDGE
RAUL-ALEJANDRO RAMOS VERSUS EBONY D. WRIGHT ALEXANDER AND FRANK "NITTI" ALEXANDER NO. 18-CA-355 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
More informationBEFORE WHIPPLE McDONALD AND McCLENDON JJ
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2010 KA 1354 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS JOSEPH S HAMPTON Judgment Rendered JUN 1 0 2011 1 APPEALED FROM THE TWENTY SECOND
More informationAppealed. Judgment Rendered l iay Joseph Williams COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2008 CA 2223 MEDICAL REVIEW PANEL PROCEEDING OF
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2008 CA 2223 IN RE MEDICAL REVIEW PANEL PROCEEDING OF EMMER WILLIAMS VS JANET E LEWIS M D PCF FILE NO 2006 01385 Judgment Rendered l iay 1 3 2009
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
PAULINE MITCHELL, ET AL. VERSUS STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 05-832 FATHER ROBERT LIMOGES, ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF LAFAYETTE,
More informationJudgment Rendered May Appealed from the
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2008 CA 2289 CARROLL JOHN LANDRY III VERSUS BATON ROUGE POLICE DEPARTMENT Judgment Rendered May 8 2009 Appealed from the Nineteenth Judicial District
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2007 CA 0938 VALERIA ANN PRICE AND WALTER KRODSEL III VERSUS
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2007 CA 0938 VALERIA ANN PRICE AND WALTER KRODSEL III VERSUS WILBERT McCLAY JR M D RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES L L C
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2009 KA 1159 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS RICHARD T PENA. Judgment Rendered December
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2009 KA 1159 f 0Q STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS RICHARD T PENA Judgment Rendered December 23 2009 On Appeal 22nd Judicial
More informationFIRST CIRCUIT RAYMOND ROCHON VERSUS. Judgment Rendered February Appealed from the. Case No Plaintiff Appellant.
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2008 CA 1349 RAYMOND ROCHON VERSUS 4 MR YOUNG CLASSIFICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA GOVERNOR KATHLEEN BLANCO SECRETARY qfj RICHARD STALDER WARDEN BURL CAIN
More informationNo. 52,034-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered May 23, 2018. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 52,034-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * JOANN
More information10W. d Judgment Rendered June Neurology Clinic of Mandeville. Appealed from the Twenty First Judicial District Court.
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2007 CA 1243 10W JEANNETTE M LOPEZ M D PH D A P M C DIB A NEUROLOGY CLINIC OF MANDEVILLE VERSUS HILDA EVANS d Judgment Rendered June 6 2008 Appealed
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT BOBBIE JEAN PATIN VERSUS. Judgment Rendered June Appealed from the
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2007 CA 2394 BOBBIE JEAN PATIN VERSUS LOUISIANA PATIENT S COMPENSATION FUND OVERSIGHT BOARD U nf 1 11 Judgment Rendered June 6 2008 Appealed from the
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 14-1327 LINTON FONTENOT, ET AL. VERSUS NEAL LARTIGUE ********** APPEAL FROM THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF EVANGELINE, NO. 75196-B HONORABLE
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBILCATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2008CA2521 VERSUS. Judgment Rendered June
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBILCATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2008CA2521 F AMIL Y WORSHIP CENTER CHURCH INC VERSUS HEALTH SCIENCE PARK LLC GARY N SOLOMON STEPHEN N JONES AND TERRY
More informationOn Appeal from the Office of Workers Compensation Administration District 9 Docket No
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2011 CA 1242 KENNETH ABNEY VERSUS GATES UNLIMITED LC Judgment Rendered ry 0 4 On Appeal from the Office of Workers Compensation Administration District
More informationJudgment Rendered March
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2007 CA 1589 GRETCHEN DAFFIN VERSUS JAMES BOWMAN McCOOL Judgment Rendered March 26 2008 On Appeal from the Twenty Third Judicial
More informationMARC E. JOHNSON JUDGE
THE CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VERSUS ST. CHARLES PARISH SHERIFF'S OFFICE AND GREG CHAMPAGNE, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SHERIFF OF ST. CHARLES PARISH AND CUSTODIAN OF RECORDS NO. 18-CA-274 FIFTH
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2009 CA 0960 DONNA GRODNER AND DENISE VINET VERSUS
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2009 CA 0960 DONNA GRODNER AND DENISE VINET VERSUS DANIEL E BECNEL JR AND LAW OFFICES OF DANIEL E BECNEL JR Judgment
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA **********
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA 13-1298 STEVE M. MARCANTEL VERSUS TRICIA SOILEAU, ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT
More informationJttJ 57AJJ I MCCI 7. Appealed. Joseph G Jevic III. Nykeba R Walker Shone T Pierre NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. Judgment Rendered MAR
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL JttJ FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2008 CA 1403 MICHAEL X ST MARTIN LOUIS ROUSSEL III WILLIAM A NEILSON ET AL VERSUS STATE OF LOUISIANA AND CYNTHIA
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 12-1311 SUCCESSION OF JOHNSON BRACKINS, III ********** APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ACADIA, DOCKET NO. 2011-20263, DIV.
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT VERSUS. Judgment Rendered September. Appealed from the. In and for the Parish of East Baton Rouge State of Louisiana
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2009 CA 0267 LEONARD WILLIAMS INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF VIRGINIA WILLIAMS VERSUS OUR LADY OF THE LAKE HOSPITAL INC DB A OUR LADY
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA 14-1261 HEATHER MILEY CLOUD VERSUS TOM SCHEDLER IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF LOUISIANA, AND BERT KEITH CAMPBELL **********
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 04-27 CHARLES GANT, JR. VERSUS GLENN ALEXANDER, ET AL. ************ APPEAL FROM THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, PARISH OF IBERIA, NO. 98,849, HONORABLE
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2010 KA 1446 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS YILVER MORADEL PONCE Judgment Rendered March 25 2011 Appealed from the Twenty
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA FIRST CIRCUIT 2008 CA 1831 VERSUS STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY. Judgment Rendered March
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2008 CA 1831 MICHAEL JOHNSON LINDSEY STRECKER VERSUS KEVIN D GONZALES KOLBY GONZALES STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE
More informationAugust 06, :57:01 pm SUSAN M. CHEHARDY CHIEF JUDGE
STEPHEN MICHAEL PETIT, JR. VERSUS RICHARD LYNN DUCOTE AND KYLE ARDOIN, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. 18-CA-452 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT consolidated with ************
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 05-576 consolidated with 05-577 CARLA RACHAL VERSUS STATE OF LOUISIANA, DEPARTMENT OF WILDLIFE & FISHERIES, ET AL. ************ APPEAL FROM THE NINTH JUDICIAL
More informationNo. 49,278-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * MICHAEL DAVID COX Plaintiff-Appellee. Versus
No. 49,278-CA Judgment rendered August 13, 2014. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * MICHAEL
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA Z011R496TW FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2010 CA 2333 MICHAEL GODFREY VERSUS
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA Z011R496TW FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2010 CA 2333 MICHAEL GODFREY VERSUS CITY OF BATON ROUGE PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE Judgment Rendered June 10 2011 1 ryq o On
More information* * * * * * * * APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO , DIVISION E-7 Honorable Madeleine Landrieu, Judge
IN THE MATTER OF HENRY J. HELM * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2011-CA-0914 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO. 2010-12771, DIVISION E-7 Honorable
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2009 CA 0027 VERSUS GUIDE ONE INSURANCE COMPANY AND MCKOWEN BAPTIST CHURCH
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2009 CA 0027 DOROTHY M YOUNG VERSUS GUIDE ONE INSURANCE COMPANY AND MCKOWEN BAPTIST CHURCH Judgment Rendered June 12 2009 w Appealed from the Twentieth
More informationNO. 44,080-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * Versus * * * * * *
Judgment rendered February 25, 2009. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, LSA-CCP. NO. 44,080-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * *
More informationSTEPHEN J. WINDHORST JUDGE
TENISHA CLARK VERSUS WAL-MART STORES, INC. NO. 18-CA-52 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF LOUISIANA
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2007 CU 2423 VERSUS KRISTIN MICHELLE NEZAT. Judgment Rendered May State of Louisiana Docket.
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2007 CU 2423 STEPHEN McDONALD JACOBSON L f Yl I t VERSUS KRISTIN MICHELLE NEZAT Judgment Rendered May 2 2008 On Appeal from
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT ARTHUR MONROE
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2007 CA 0697 BRIAN YANIGA VS ARTHUR MONROE JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 21 2007 ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 14-452 RAYMOND ALEXANDER VERSUS CITY OF ALEXANDRIA, ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF RAPIDES, NO. 245,375 HONORABLE
More informationON APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, DISTRICT 7 STATE OF LOUISIANA NO HONORABLE ELIZABETH A. WARREN, JUDGE PRESIDING
KELLEY R. QUIGLEY VERSUS HARBOR SEAFOOD & OYSTER BAR, LRASIF CLAIMS MANAGEMENT NO. 14-CA-332 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION, DISTRICT
More informationJudgment Rendered December
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2007 CA 0657 SAM HAYNES VERSUS ANDREW HUNTER AND COLBY LAYELLE Judgment Rendered December 21 2007 On Appeal from the Twenty
More informationLA. REV. STAT. ANN. 9:
SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. In this [Act]: (1) Arbitration organization means an association, agency, board, commission, or other entity that is neutral and initiates, sponsors, or administers an arbitration
More informationBLAKE ROBERTSON NO CA-0975 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL LAFAYETTE INSURANCE COMPANY FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
BLAKE ROBERTSON VERSUS LAFAYETTE INSURANCE COMPANY * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2011-CA-0975 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO. 2008-176,
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 13-22 DEBRA GAIL THERIOT AUCOIN FLEMMING VERSUS JAMES BAILEY FLEMMING ********** APPEAL FROM THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF IBERIA, NO.
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2008 CA 1996 FARMCO INC AND BRENT A BEAUVAIS VERSUS M CREER ZELOTES A THOMAS KEITH E MORRIS AND RONADA B MORRIS
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT Riff XU hy Xc 2008 CA 1996 FARMCO INC AND BRENT A BEAUVAIS VERSUS ROBERT RAY MORRIS FRANCES L MORRIS JACQUELINE M CREER ZELOTES A THOMAS KEITH E MORRIS
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER2015 CA 0815 WHITNEY BANK VERSUS C. NORMAN NOLAN, ELIZABETH A. NOLAN, NEN CRUSHED CONCRETE, LLC, NEN LIME, LLC, AND
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA
COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA PRO SE MANUAL Introduction This pamphlet is intended primarily to assist non-attorneys with the basic procedural steps which must be followed when filing
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2008 CA 2592 MARCUS C LEWIS VERSUS. eommission DOCKET NO S 16384
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2008 CA 2592 MARCUS C LEWIS VERSUS LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY SATON ROUGE CAMPUS DATE OF JUDGMENT JUNE 12 2009 ON APPEAL
More informationSHAMEKA BROWN NO CA-0750 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL THE BLOOD CENTER FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
SHAMEKA BROWN VERSUS THE BLOOD CENTER * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2017-CA-0750 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO. 2015-07008, DIVISION
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2014 CA 0606 SUCCESSION OF
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2014 CA 0606 SUCCESSION OF CAROLE STOKLEY' HERNDON On Appeal from the 22nd Judicial District Court Parish of St. Tammany,
More informationJudgment Rendered March
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2008 KA 2012 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS OTIS PIERRE III Judgment Rendered March 27 2009 p Appealed from the Twenty
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA PATRICIA S. PEARSON BROWNING
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CA-00790-COA DENNIS L. PEARSON APPELLANT v. PATRICIA S. PEARSON BROWNING APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/05/2013 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. D. NEIL HARRIS
More informationOCT Judgment Rendered:
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2014 cw 0298 JESSIE MAY PERKINS, JESSIE HARVEY, JR., EVA MAE BURNETI, CHARLES RAY HARVEY, PRESTON HARVEY, MINNIE H. JOHNSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF
More information.J)J-- CLERK Cheryl Quirk La udrieu . J..J~><---- FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER JUDGE VACATED AND REMANDED. COURT OF APPEAL FIFTH erne U1T
MATTHEW MARTINEZ VERSUS NO. 14-CA-340 FIFTH CIRCUIT JEFFERSON PARISH SCHOOL; CHRISTY COURT OF APPEAL PARRIA, DIANE DESPAUX; MICHELLE. OHOA; PRINCETON EXCESS SURPLUS STATE OF LOUISIANA INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2015 CA Judgment Rendered: DE_C_2_3_2_01_5_
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2015 CA 0140 Judgment Rendered: DE_C_2_3_2_01_5_ Appealed from the Nineteenth Judicial District Court In and for the
More information* * * * * * * COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, STEPHEN DUNCAN SAUSSY, JR.
STEPHEN DUNCAN SAUSSY, JR. VERSUS LESLIE A. BONIN D/B/A LESLIE A. BONIN, LLC AND CNA INSURANCE COMPANY * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2012-CA-1755 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT STATE OF LA, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONS **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 13-971 CHARLES CUTLER VERSUS STATE OF LA, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONS ********** APPEAL FROM THE NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF RAPIDES,
More informationFIRST CIRCillT BRIAN K ABELS VERSUS. Judgment Rendered December
STATE OF LOillSIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCillT NUMBER 2006 CA 0366 BRIAN K ABELS VERSUS f UNGARINO AND ECKERT LLC Judgment Rendered December 28 2006 Appealed from the Twenty First Judicial District
More informationWALTER J. ROTHSCHILD JUDGE Panel composed of Judges Susan M. Chehardy, Walter J. Rothschild, and Jude G. Gravois
CECELIA FARACE ABADI1t 12 VERSUS \1 ')') 1 c, L. '02 NO. 12-CA-16 FIFTH CIRCUIT WAYNE BACINO, KAY BACINO AND TONI BACINO MARRONE COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE FIRST PARISH COURT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 15, 2006 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 15, 2006 Session DANIEL MUSIC GROUP, LLC v. TANASI MUSIC, LLC, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 05-0761-II Carol
More informationStanding Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals
Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act 2002-142 Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I--PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS Subpart
More informationMARC E. JOHNSON JUDGE
CHARLES BROOKS VERSUS SHAMROCK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., GHK DEVELOPMENTS, INC., AND WALGREENS LOUISIANA COMPANY, INC. NO. 18-CA-226 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE
More informationMARC E. JOHNSON JUDGE
CLYDE PRICE AND HIS WIFE MARY PRICE VERSUS CHAIN ELECTRIC COMPANY AND ENTERGY CORPORATION AND/OR ITS AFFILIATE NO. 18-CA-162 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH
More informationCOMES NOW Appellant, Douglas Michael Long, Jr. (hereinafter Doug ), by
E-Filed Document Feb 28 2017 15:47:26 2015-CT-00527-SCT Pages: 7 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI DOUGLAS MICHAEL LONG, JR. APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO.: 2015-CA-00527 DAVID J. VITKAUSKAS APPELLEE PETITION
More informationNOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2008 CA 2455 OMAR FERRER VERSUS
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2008 CA 2455 OMAR FERRER VERSUS CAITLIN HARWOOD AND STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY Judgment Rendered June 12 2009 On Appeal
More informationNOT DESIGNATED for PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT VERSUS
NOT DESIGNATED for PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2006 CA 2454 WALTER ANTIN JR TRUSTEE OF THE ANTIN FAMILY II TRUST VERSUS TAREH TEMPLE JAMES LEE AND SAFEWAY INSURANCE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA SCT JACKSON COUNTY CHANCERY COURT KEVIN J. WHITE ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: NO BRIEFS FILED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2010-CA-01099-SCT IN RE: THOMAS COREY MCDONALD AND EDWIN CHESHIRE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/24/2010 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. D. NEIL HARRIS, SR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: ATTORNEY
More informationFIRST CIRCUIT VERSUS
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO. 2017 CA 0672 SAINT JAMES MISSION CHURCH-AIRPORT ROAD VERSUS ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE AFRICAN METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA 04-1619 INTERDICTION OF CAROL CECILE CADE ********** APPEAL FROM THE THIRTY-FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON DAVIS, NO. P-169-85 HONORABLE
More informationFIRST CIRCUIT VERSUS. Judgment Rendered: APR * * * * * Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellee, Linda Rosenberg-Kennett
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COlJRT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO. 2014 CA 1555 LINDA ROSENBERG-KENNETT VERSUS CITY OF BOGALUSA Judgment Rendered: APR 2 4 2015 * * * * * On Appeal from
More informationNO CA-1455 LEON A. CANNIZZARO, JR., DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE PARISH OF ORLEANS, ON BEHALF OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL
LEON A. CANNIZZARO, JR., DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE PARISH OF ORLEANS, ON BEHALF OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY CONSOLIDATED WITH: AMERICAN BANKERS INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 05-484 NICHOLAS ROZAS AND BETTY ROZAS VERSUS KEITH MONTERO AND MONTERO BUILDERS, INC. ************ APPEAL FROM THE SIXTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH
More informationHANS J. LILJEBERG JUDGE
MRB MORTGAGE, INC. VERSUS SHERIFF WAYNE L. JONES, TAX COLLECTOR, ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH, JANET J. SAM AND FEMON J. SAM NO. 13-CA-61 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT CA 17-248 PATRICK SANDEL, ET AL. VERSUS THE VILLAGE OF FLORIEN ********** APPEAL FROM THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF SABINE, NO. 67,941
More informationSTEPHEN J. WINDHORST JUDGE
KEITH GREEN, JR. VERSUS DEMOND LEE, IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE TO RECALL BRIDGET A. DINVAUT, DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE PARISH OF ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST AND PATRICIA M. TROSCLAIR,
More informationl1cc101 G11au J he NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION MAR Judgment Rendered Appealed from the Twenty Third Judicial District Court Attorney for
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2008 CA 1791 STEVEN M JOFFRION SR AND STACY PIERCE JOFFRION VERSUS WILLIAM S FERGUSON AND TONYA S FERGUSON Judgment
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2016 CA 0072 MALAYSIA BROWN VERSUS C & S WHOLESALE SERVICES, INC.
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2016 CA 0072 MALAYSIA BROWN VERSUS C & S WHOLESALE SERVICES, INC. Judgment Rendered: _ OC_T_o_ 4_ 20_16_ Appealed from the Office of Workers' Compensation,
More informationAppealed from the TwentySecond Judicial District Court In and for the Parish of St Tammany
NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2009 CA 2199 EDNA R HORRELL VERSUS GERARDO R BARRIOS AND LISA C MATTHEWS E Judgment Rendered JUL 2 2010 Appealed from
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2008 KA 1849 VERSUS. Judgment rendered February Appealed from the
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2008 KA 1849 STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS DANIEL HINTON JR @ Judgment rendered February 13 2009 Appealed from the 19th Judicial District Court in and for
More informationNo. 48,370-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * * * * * * *
Judgment rendered October 2, 2013. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, LSA-CCP. No. 48,370-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * SANDRA
More informationJUDE G. GRAVOIS JUDGE
SANTO A. DILEO VERSUS JAMES A. HARRY NO. 17-CA-240 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE FORTIETH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST, STATE OF LOUISIANA
More informationROBERT M. MURPHY JUDGE
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS MICHAEL ANTHONY ROBINSON NO. 15-KA-610 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF JEFFERSON, STATE OF
More informationSTATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT consolidated with CW DANNY CLARK AND GREAT LAKES REINSURANCE (UK), PLC **********
STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 10-1281 consolidated with CW 10-918 ROGER CLARK VERSUS DANNY CLARK AND GREAT LAKES REINSURANCE (UK), PLC ********** APPEAL FROM THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
More informationMIDLAND FUNDING LLC NO CA-0659 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL FRANKIE J. KELLY FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *
MIDLAND FUNDING LLC VERSUS FRANKIE J. KELLY * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2011-CA-0659 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM FIRST CITY COURT OF NEW ORLEANS NO. 2008-51454, SECTION
More informationNo. 52,039-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * *
Judgment rendered May 23, 2018. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 52,039-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * KENNETH
More informationTitle 40 LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT. Part I. Workers' Compensation Administration. Subpart 3. Hearing Rules
Title 40 LABOR AND EMPLOYMENT Part I. Workers' Compensation Administration Subpart 3. Hearing Rules Chapter 55. General Provisions... 5 Subchapter A. Definitions... 5 5501. Purpose; Definitions... 5 Subchapter
More information