BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
|
- Garry O’Connor’
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Lawrence J. Rosenfeld (SBN 00 lawrence.rosenfeld@squirepb.com SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US LLP 1 E. Washington Street, Suite 00 Phoenix, AZ 00 Telephone: (0-000 Facsimile: (0-1 Attorneys for Intervenors In the Matter of: American Medical Response of Maricopa, LLC, Applicant. BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS No. 1A-EMS-00-DHS (EMS No. INTERVENORS PRE-HEARING MEMORANDUM OF LAW (Assigned to the Honorable Tammy L. Eigenheer In this Memorandum, Intervenors generally set forth the statutes and regulations applicable to the present application. As, of course, the parties respective evidentiary presentations have not yet been made, Intervenors will, in their Post-Hearing Memorandum (and in their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law specifically tie these governing principles to the evidentiary record. Applicant has applied for a Certificate of Necessity for virtually all of Maricopa County, for both emergency transports and for non-emergency prescheduled/interfacility transports. There is no dispute that each of the seven Intervenors currently holds and each for many years has held CONs to provide emergency and nonemergency ambulance services within the area Applicant has applied for. (Indeed, virtually all of the Intervenors have held CONs in Maricopa County for the entirety of the thirty-year period since adoption of Arizona s current ambulance regulatory model, and
2 have, in fact, provided these services for many years pre-dating enactment of the CON laws. Irrespective of the corporate parent of these seven CON-holders, each entity is separately responsible for assuring that it meets the requirements of its own certificate. All seven of these CONs have been renewed by DHS within the past two years, including several that have been renewed in recent months. With the exception of one CON which is up for renewal later this year, none of these CONs have renewal dates earlier than mid-1. Specifically: CON # CON-holder Most Recent Renewal Date Scheduled for Renewal Comtrans Ambulance Service, Inc. March, 1 April 0, Canyon State Ambulance April, 1 May 1, Southwest Ambulance of Casa Grandé September, 1 1 Professional Medical Transport October, 1 Emergency Medical Transport (American Ambulance September 0, October 1, 1 June, 1 August 1, 1 Southwest Ambulance April, 1 May 1, 1 Rural/Metro (Maricopa November, 1 November 0, 1 Given that these CON-holders, collectively, currently provide ambulance service coverage throughout the entirety of the geographic area applied for, Applicant here, in addition to being required to satisfy the extensive requirements applicable to every CON applicant (A.A.C. R--0(A(1 and (A(; A.A.C. R--0(A(1, (, and (, must also carry the burden of proof with respect to an additional set of requirements, which, among other factors, necessitates that it establish that the presently-certificated providers are not adequately meeting the ambulance service needs within their respective - -
3 certificated service areas. The burden of proof on all of these matters rests squarely upon the Applicant, A.A.C. R--1(B. The standard of proof is preponderance of the evidence, A.A.C. R--1(A. Any entity wishing to operate an ambulance service in the State of Arizona may do so only after being granted a CON by DHS, A.R.S pertinent part: This statute requires, in a. That a CON applicant demonstrate that public necessity requires the proposed service or any part of the service, A.R.S. -(B(; and b. That a CON applicant demonstrate that it is fit and proper to provide the service, A.R.S. -(B(. Fit and proper requires an assessment as to whether an applicant has the expertise, integrity, fiscal competence and resources to provide ambulance service in the service area, A.R.S. -(. Public Necessity. As BEMSTS Guidance Document GD-0-PHS-EMS explains, the CON statutes and rules establish a requirement that anyone seeking to start an ambulance service... must be able to demonstrate that there is a public necessity for the proposed service. In order to establish public necessity, an applicant must prove that an identified population needs or requires all or part of the services of a ground ambulance service, A.A.C. R--01(. Public necessity in this context includes a review of whether there is a public need for additional ambulance transports that the incumbent providers are not meeting; the extent to which granting a new CON will adversely financially impact the current providers (A.A.C. R--0(B(; and 1 The Arizona Legislature, through its enactment of the CON statutes, mandated a fully regulated ambulance industry. The Arizona Department of Health Services ( DHS, through its Bureau of Emergency Medical Sources and Trauma System ( BEMSTS, regulates ambulance services in this State, including the CON application and renewal process. See, A.R.S. - through. In addition, DHS has adopted rules pertaining to the regulation of ambulances and ambulance services. See, Arizona Administrative Code ( A.A.C. --1 through. As the attorneys for Applicant explained in a CON proceeding where their client held a CON in the applied-for area, and therefore opposed the granting of a CON to a putative new ambulance service, WEBSTER s II, New Riverside University Dictionary defines necessary, when used as an adjective, as absolutely required. (emphasis added See Docket No. 1A EMS-01-DHS (EMS No., Hearing Memo Regarding Convalescent and Interfacility Transport Definitions, at p., lines -, filed September,
4 whether the existing providers performance is substandard (as defined in A.A.C. R- -01(0. In addition to addressing all of the matters identified in A.A.C. R-- 0(A(1 and (A(, as there are here multiple established, presently-certificated providers in the proposed service area, all of the following circumstances must also be considered: That ground ambulance service presently exists throughout the entirety of the applicant s proposed service area (A.A.C. R--0(A((a; Response times (including the fact that the actual response times achieved by the certificated providers are superior to the response times proposed by the applicant; A.A.C. R--0(C(, and that each of the certificated providers in the applied-for service area is compliant with the response times approved by DHS (A.A.C. R--0(A((b; That certificate holders are available throughout the entirety of the applicant s proposed service area (A.A.C. R--0(A((c; and That emergency medical services are available throughout the entirety of the applicant s proposed service area (A.A.C. R--0(A((d. In this regard, it bears mention that the fact that A.R.S. -(A states that a CON does not confer a property right is in no respect inconsistent with the fact that these statutes and regulations, by their explicit terms, impose upon an applicant, inter alia, an obligation to establish that public necessity requires an additional ambulance service in an area that is already being fully served, and that it do so by addressing in a concrete, non-speculative way, all of the factors set forth therein. The property rights statute CONs impose response time requirements only for emergency transports; there are no specific response time requirements with respect to non-emergency responses. - -
5 does not reduce, in any respect, the statutory and regulatory showings a CON applicant must make in these circumstances. Rates. Additionally, an applicant s proposed rates must also be carefully scrutinized by the trier-of-fact. The Director has the authority to determine, fix, alter, and regulate rates and charges for the provision of ambulance services, including rates and charges for ALS service, BLS service, mileage, standby/waiting, subscription service contracts and other contracts related to ambulance services. A.R.S. -(A(1; A.R.S. -; A.A.C. R--1, et seq. The Director may consider any information or documents that may assist in evaluating the application or the proposed rates and charges. A.A.C. R--0(A(; A.A.C. R--01(A(. See also, A.R.S. - (A(1, which requires that a CON-holder s rates be just, reasonable and sufficient; and A.A.C. R--0(C (defining just, reasonable, and sufficient rates, and requiring that the rates provide for a rate of return that is at least % of gross revenue, calculated using the accrual method of accounting according to generally accepted accounting principles, unless the certificate holder requests a lower rate of return. Incident to its consideration of an application, the trier-of-fact should appropriately take into account whether the proposed rates, even if determined just, reasonable, and sufficient, will inject needless additional cost into the overall expense structure within the applied-for area (taking into account, among other considerations, that there are certain fixed overhead expenses that cannot be eliminated or reduced pro rata to adjust for the loss of transports, with the result that public rates and charges are thereby unnecessarily driven upward. This consequence, needless to say, is not of benefit to the public and more so is that the case where the current providers are, demonstrably, meeting the need. The purpose of statutes like A.R.S. -(A, which provide that a privilege to operate (like a license or a CON does not confer a property right, is to make clear that the possessor of that operating right does not have a legal basis to claim just compensation, in an eminent domain proceeding, if that license is taken away through the state s exercise of its police power. See, for example, Hooper v. Daniels, Ariz. 0, 0, P.d 0 (. - -
6 Intervenors respectfully submit that, based upon consideration of all of the relevant facts and circumstances, Applicant s application should be denied. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this th day of August, 1. This document has been electronically filed ( this th day of August, 1. s/ Helen Bell s/ Lawrence J. Rosenfeld Lawrence J. Rosenfeld SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US LLP 1 E. Washington Street, Suite 00 Phoenix, AZ 00 Attorneys for Intervenors - -
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
0 0 MARK BRNOVICH Firm Bar No. 0000 Attorney General Kevin D. Ray (#00) Molly Bonsall (#0) Assistant Attorneys General West Washington Street Phoenix, Arizona 00 Telephone: (0) - Facsimile: (0) -000 E-mail:
More informationBEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Applicant ABC Ambulance ( ABC ), through counsel undersigned, hereby
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 BURCH & CRACCHIOLO, P.A. 702 East Osborn Road Phoenix, Arizona 85014 Telephone (602 274-7611 Bryan F. Murphy, SBA #006414 bmurphy@bcattorneys.com James M. Stipe, SBA #014666 jstipe@bcattorneys.com
More informationBEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Professional Medical Transport, Inc., dba PMT Ambulance ( PMT ), R/M Arizona
Philip R. Wooten (0000 PHILIP R. WOOTEN, P.C. 1 East Equestrian Trail Phoenix, Arizona 0-0 (0-0 (0-1 (Fax Email: philip.wooten@azbar.org Attorney for PMT Ambulance, American Ambulance, Comtrans Ambulance
More informationBEFORE THE OFFICE OF. Applicant. Southwest Ambulance of Casa Grande, Inc., dba Southwest Ambulance and Rescue of
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP ATIORNEYS AT LAW SUITE EAST CAMELBACK ROAD PHOENIX, ARIZONA () - Lawrence J. Rosenfeld, SBN Attorneys for Intervenors SW General, Inc. dba Southwest Ambulance; and Southwest Ambulance
More informationIN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS Shawn Stole Construction Inc., COMPLAINANT, v. Micela Properties Inc., License No: 00 RESPONDENT. No. 0A--ROC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION 1 1 1 1 0 1 HEARING:
More informationBEFORE THE OFFICE OF. Applicant. Southwest Ambulance of Casa Grande, Inc., dba Southwest Ambulance and Rescue of
GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW SUITE EAST CAMELBACK ROAD PHOENIX, ARIZONA () - Lawrence J. Rosenfeld, SBN Attorneys for Intervenors SW General, Inc. dba Southwest Ambulance; and Southwest Ambulance
More informationMILENA WALLACE, a single woman, Plaintiff/Appellant,
NOTICE: NOT FOR PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZ. R. SUP. CT. 111(c), THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE MILENA
More informationUPL ADVISORY OPINION NO (March 2012)
UPL ADVISORY OPINION NO. 12-01 (March 2012) SUMMARY This is an advisory opinion regarding the scope of legal services that non-lawyers employed by (or who are principals/owners of) community association
More informationMARC KROON, Petitioner/Appellee, TRICIA KROON, Respondent/Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV FC
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court *** Filed *** 08/01/2011 8:00 AM THE HON. CRANE MCCLENNEN CLERK OF THE COURT T. Melius Deputy HONORABLE MARIANNE BAYARDI (001) v. JOSEPH W FANNIN (001) BENJAMIN C RUNKLE
More informationAOR DIRECT L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, Petitioner,
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE AOR DIRECT L.L.C., an Arizona limited liability company, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE LORI HORN BUSTAMANTE, Judge of the SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA,
More informationIN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS. Appellants, Respondent,
1 1 David G. Derickson, State Bar No. 000 John P. Kaites, State Bar No. 01 Michael S. Love, State Bar No. 0 RIDENOUR, HIENTON & LEWIS, P.L.L.C. Chase Tower 1 North Central Avenue, Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona
More informationmay recover its non-taxable costs as part of an award of attorneys fees under Arizona
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA En Banc AHWATUKEE CUSTOM ESTATES ) Supreme Court MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, INC., ) No. CV-97-0495-PR an Arizona non-profit corporation, ) ) Court of Appeals Plaintiff-Appellee,
More informationSnell & Wilmer. Phoenix, Arizona
Snell & Wilmer L.L.P. LAW OFFICES One Arizona Center, 00 E. Van Buren, Suite 0 Phoenix, Arizona 00-02.2.000 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 L. William Staudenmaier (#0) wstaudenmaier@swlaw.com SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES AND SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAM, INC.
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES AND SOUTHWEST KEY PROGRAM, INC. This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into between the State of Arizona, by and through
More informationPETER T. ELSE, Plaintiff/Appellant, ARIZONA CORPORATION COMMISSION, Defendant/Appellee, SUNZIA TRANSMISSION LLC, Intervenor/Appellee.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION
More informationOFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE
Annette Cohen Acohenrn@yahoo.com PO Box 1 Sun City West, AZ Telephone:..00 Pro-Se for Petitioner OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF REAL ESTATE IN AND FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA Annette
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case 2:15-cv-00972-NVW Document 1 Filed 05/28/15 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Quarles & Brady LLP Firm State Bar No. 00443100 Renaissance One Two North
More informationSUPERIOR COUT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 MARC J. VICTOR, P.C. 0 S. Alma School Road, Suite Chandler, AZ Telephone: (0 - Fax: (0-0 Marc J. Victor SBN 0 Marc@AttorneyForFreedom.com Charity Clark SBN 0 Charity@AttorneyForFreedom.com
More informationRALPH JOHN CHAPA, Plaintiff/Appellant, MATTHEW B. BARKER. Defendant/Appellee, No. 1 CA-CV
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION
More informationIn re the Matter of: DENNIS MICHAEL SMITH, Petitioner/Appellant, TRICIA ANN FREDERICK, Respondent/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV
NOTICE: NOT FOR PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c); ARCAP 28(c); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT
More informationTHE STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, SAMER WAHAB ABDIN, Petitioner. No. 2 CA-CR PR Filed May 31, 2016
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO THE STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent, v. SAMER WAHAB ABDIN, Petitioner. No. 2 CA-CR 2016-0103-PR Filed May 31, 2016 THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT
More informationNOTICE OF FINAL RULEMAKING TITLE 16. TAX APPEALS CHAPTER 4. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PREAMBLE
NOTICE OF FINAL RULEMAKING TITLE 16. TAX APPEALS CHAPTER 4. STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION PREAMBLE 1. Articles, Parts, and Sections Affected Rulemaking Action Article 1 New Article R16-4-101 R16-4-102 R16-4-103
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
MARC J. VICTOR, P.C. 0 South Alma School Road, Suite Chandler, Arizona (0 - Fax (0-0 Marc J. Victor - SBN 0 Marc@AttorneyForFreedom.com Attorneys for Defendant IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
More informationTERRON TAYLOR AND OZNIE R. MANHERTZ, Petitioners, Respondent, and. No. 2 CA-SA Filed September 25, 2014
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO TERRON TAYLOR AND OZNIE R. MANHERTZ, Petitioners, v. HON. KAREN J. STILLWELL, JUDGE PRO TEMPORE OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, IN AND FOR THE
More informationARIZONA PUBLIC SAFETY PERSONNEL RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Defendant/Appellee. No. 1 CA-CV
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE PIVOTAL COLORADO II, L.L.C., a Delaware limited liability company; MILLARD R. SELDIN, an Arizona resident; SCOTT A. SELDIN, an Arizona resident; SCOTT-SELDIN
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County. Cause No.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE STATE OF ARIZONA, EX REL. DAVID RABER, v. HONGLIANG WANG, Plaintiffs/Appellees, Defendant/Appellant. 1 CA-CV 11-0560 DEPARTMENT C O P I N I O N Appeal
More informationJENNIFER NUNEZ f/k/a JENNIFER GORDON, Petitioner,
NOTICE: NOT FOR PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz.R.Sup.Ct. 111(c; ARCAP 28(c; Ariz.R.Crim.P. 31.24 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE
More informationBashir v. the Honorable Susanna C. Pineda, 2011 WL , 226 Ariz. 351, 248 P.3d 199, 601 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13 (Ariz. App., 2011)
226 Ariz. 351 248 P.3d 199 601 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 13 Nadia H. BASHIR, Petitioner, v. The Honorable Susanna C. PINEDA, Judge of the Superior Court of the State of Arizona, in and for the County of Maricopa,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) No. 1 CA-CV 09-0174 LEBARON PROPERTIES, LLC, an ) Arizona limited liability company,) DEPARTMENT A ) ) Plaintiff/Appellee, ) O P I N I O N ) v. )
More informationSTATE OF ARIZONA, Appellee, MICHAEL PETRAMALA, Appellant. No. 1 CA-CR
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION
More informationVOTING RIGHTS ACT SUBMISSION
TERRY GODDARD ATTORNEY GENERAL Office of the Attorney General State of Arizona Jessica G. Funkhouser Direct Line (602) 542-7826 VOTING RIGHTS ACT SUBMISSION VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS/OVERNIGHT DELIVERY TO: Mr.
More informationM-11 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Petitioner/Appellant,
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE M-11 LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, Petitioner/Appellant, v. DANIEL GOMMARD and ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, MOTOR VEHICLE DIVISION, Respondents/Appellees. No.
More informationAppeals Board No. T B DECISION AFFIRMED
Arizona Department of Economic Security Appeals Board Appeals Board No. T-1006207-001-B In the Matter of: XXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXXXX, XXX XXXXX X. XXXX XXXXX, XXXXX #X XXXXXXX, XX XXXXX ESA, UI TAX SECTION,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c); ARCAP 28(c); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT
More informationCase reg Doc 82 Filed 03/24/15 Entered 03/24/15 18:04:39
Stephen D. Lerner (Bar No. 2067841) Karol Denniston (pro hac vice pending) Mark A. Salzberg (pro hac vice pending) Kristin E. Richner (Bar No. 4962510) SQUIRE PATTON BOGGS (US) LLP 30 Rockefeller Plaza
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY CV /20/2016 HON. DAVID K. UDALL
Michael K. Jeanes, Clerk of Court *** Filed *** 06/22/2016 8:00 AM HON. DAVID K. UDALL CLERK OF THE COURT K. Tiero Deputy W D AT THE CANYON L L C, et al. ALI J FARHANG v. WAYLON HONGA, et al. DALE SAMUEL
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County. Cause No.
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c; ARCAP 28(c; Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT OF
More informationAPPELLEE SEDONA CASA CONTENTA'S RESPONSE TO AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF
CXDWXPit GELB, a single woman, Appellant, VS. 1 DEPARTMENT OF FIRE, BUILDING & LIFE SAFETY, a 1 political subdisivion of the State of Arizona; SEDONA CASA CONTENTA, HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, 1 Appellees.
More informationCase KG Doc 3307 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 15-11874-KG Doc 3307 Filed 11/21/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Chapter 11 HH Liquidation, LLC, et al., 1 Case No. 15-11874 (KG Debtors. (Jointly
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c); ARCAP 28(c); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT
More informationAA AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, an Arizona corporation, Plaintiff/Appellee, JOHN LEWANDOWSKI, an unmarried man, Defendant/Appellant.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
1 1 Quarles & Brady LLP Firm State Bar No. 000 Renaissance One Two North Central Avenue Phoenix, AZ 00-1 TELEPHONE 0..0 Proposed Attorneys for Debtors and Debtors-in- Possession John A. Harris (#0) john.harris@quarles.com
More informationCase reg Doc 46 Filed 03/19/15 Entered 03/19/15 13:57:13
Stephen D. Lerner (Bar No. 2067841) Karol Denniston (pro hac vice pending) Kristin E. Richner (Bar No. 4962510) (212) 872-9800 (Phone) (212) 872-9815 (Fax) stephen.lerner@squirepb.com karol.denniston@squirepb.com
More informationSupreme Court of the United States
No. 16-801 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, v. Petitioner, SF MARKETS, L.L.C. DBA SPROUTS FARMERS MARKET, Respondent. On Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to the
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE TARUN VIG, an unmarried man, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. NIX PROJECT II PARTNERSHIP, an Arizona general partnership, Defendant/Appellee No. 1 CA-CV 08-0112
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c); ARCAP 28(c); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT
More informationIN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 0 Walker and Sons Inc. dba Katrol Construction -v- COMPLAINANT License No: B-.-C of Sygnos Inc. RESPONDENT No. 0A--ROC ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGE DECISION HEARING:
More informationCase BLS Doc 129 Filed 12/08/17 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 17-12377-BLS Doc 129 Filed 12/08/17 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE x In re Chapter 11 ExGen Texas Power, LLC, et al., 1 Case No. 17-12377 (BLS) Debtors.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c); ARCAP 28(c); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 2 3 4 Michael Kielsky, SBN #021864 4802 E. Ray Rd., #23-255 Phoenix, AZ 85044 TEL (602 903-5123 FAX (602 532-7777 Attorney for Plaintiff 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT. Gregory Pellerin, Petitioner. vs. Superior Court for Nevada County, Respondent,
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT Gregory Pellerin, Petitioner vs. Superior Court for Nevada County, Respondent, The People of the State of California, Real Party in Interest.
More informationv. THEME TECH CORPORATION, a Nevada corporation; GIBRAN SANDOVAL and JESSICA SANDOVAL, husband and wife, Defendants/Appellees. No.
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE TAMMY FELIPE, as surviving parent of ISRAEL FELIPE, individually and on behalf of JOSE FELIPE, the statutory beneficiaries under A.R.S. 12-612; MADELYN PEREZ,
More informationMIDLAND FUNDING LLC, Plaintiff/Appellee, YARED AMELGA, Defendant/Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County. Cause No.
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c; ARCAP 28(c; Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT OF
More informationIN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
0 0 David G. Derickson, State Bar No. 000 John P. Kaites, State Bar No. 0 Michael S. Love, State Bar No. 0 RIDENOUR, HIENTON & LEWIS, P.L.L.C. Chase Tower 0 North Central Avenue, Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona
More informationOVERTURNING AGENCY DECISIONS
Page 1 of 7 OVERTURNING AGENCY DECISIONS Presented by Adriane J. Hofmeyr Quarles & Brady LLP Tuesday, June 20, 2017 10:20 pm to 11:05 am 11th Annual Specialized CLE for In-House Counsel Hotel Palomar,
More informationIN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 1 Andrew S. Gordon (000 Roopali H. Desai (0 COPPERSMITH SCHERMER & BROCKELMAN PLC 00 North Central Avenue, Suite Phoenix, Arizona 00 Telephone: (0 1-0 Facsimile: (0-0 agordon@csblaw.com rdesai@csblaw.com
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED TRANSMISSION CONTROL AGREEMENT. Among The California Independent System Operator Corporation and Transmission Owners
AMENDED AND RESTATED TRANSMISSION CONTROL AGREEMENT Among The California Independent System Operator Corporation and Transmission Owners Section TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. DEFINITIONS... 2. PARTICIPATION IN
More informationalg Doc 17 Filed 03/06/13 Entered 03/06/13 10:17:28 Main Document Pg 1 of 6
12-14815-alg Doc 17 Filed 03/06/13 Entered 03/06/13 101728 Main Document Pg 1 of 6 Robert L. Geltzer, as Chapter 7 Trustee of the Debtor (RG 4656) 1556 Third Avenue, Suite 505 New York, New York 10128
More informationBEFORE THE ARIZONA BOARD OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH EXAMINERS
BEFORE THE ARIZONA BOARD OF BEHAVIORAL HEALTH EXAMINERS In the Matter of: Lisa Dodd, LPC-0, Licensed Professional Counselor, In the State of Arizona. Respondent CASE NO. 00-00 CONSENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER
More informationSnell & Wilmer IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Leslie Feldman, et al.,
Case :-cv-00-dlr Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 One Arizona Center, 00 E. Van Buren, Suite 00 0 Brett W. Johnson (#0) Sara J. Agne (#00) Joy L. Isaacs (#00) SNELL & WILMER One Arizona Center 00 E. Van
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE RSP ARCHITECTS, LTD., ) No. 1 CA-CV 12-0545 a Minnesota corporation, ) ) Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) v. ) DEPARTMENT C ) FIVE STAR DEVELOPMENT RESORT
More informationCase 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 19
Case 1:15-cv-06177 Document 1 Filed 08/06/15 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------- )( ABU ASHRAF, on behalf
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c; ARCAP 28(c; Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT OF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ROBERT BEHRENS and TERI BEHRENS, husband and wife, individually and as parents and next friend of CHRISTOPHER BEHRENS and MATTHEW BEHRENS, minors,
More informationLHC GROUP, INC. 901 Hugh Wallis Road South Lafayette, Louisiana 70508
To Our Stockholders: LHC GROUP, INC. 901 Hugh Wallis Road South Lafayette, Louisiana 70508 You are cordially invited to attend the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of LHC Group, Inc. to be held on Thursday,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Case :-cv-0-gms Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 ERNEST GALVAN (CA Bar No. 0)* KENNETH M. WALCZAK (CA Bar No. )* ROSEN, BIEN & GALVAN, LLP Montgomery Street, 0th Floor San Francisco, California 0- Telephone:
More informationmew Doc 861 Filed 07/11/17 Entered 07/11/17 14:42:10 Main Document Pg 1 of 6
Pg 1 of 6 BARNES & THORNBURG LLP 11 South Meridian Street Indianapolis, Indiana 46204 Telephone: (317) 236-1313 Facsimile: (317) 231-7433 Michael K. McCrory Admitted pro hac vice Attorneys for Rolls-Royce
More informationIn re the Marriage of: DENISE K. EKVALL, Petitioner/Appellee, DAVID D. ESTRADA, Respondent/Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-00-dgc Document Filed 0// Page of PIEKARSKI & BRELSFORD, P.C. E Indian School Rd., Ste. 0 Phoenix AZ 0 Phone: (0 - Fax: (0 - Christopher J. Piekarski, AB# 0 Nathan J. Brelsford, AB# 0 Attorneys
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
1 1 1 1 1 0 1 Firm, Attorney at Law State Bar Number: Address: Telephone: Facsimile: Attorneys for Defendant SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES THE PEOPLE OF
More informationSTATE OF ARIZONA ex rel. WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERY, Maricopa County Attorney, Petitioner,
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION
More informationEDWARD A. TIMMINS, JR. and ANN M. TIMMINS, Defendants/Appellants. No. 1 CA-CV FILED
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE THOMAS M. BAUMGARTNER and JULIE B. BAUMGARTNER; DANIEL CROSS and CATHY CROSS; CLYDE CUMING and BETSY CUMING; GARY ENGELS and DENISE ENGELS; LARRY PUTNAM and
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff/Appellant,
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE MANUEL SALDATE, a married man, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. WILLIAM G. MONTGOMERY, MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY ex rel. MARICOPA COUNTY ATTORNEY S OFFICE, an
More informationBEFORE THE STATE OF ARIZONA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) INTRODUCTION
BEFORE THE STATE OF ARIZONA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS In the Matter of: James C. Pierce, D.C. Holder of License No. 8359 For the Practice of Chiropractic In the State of Arizona Case No.: 2015-080
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Appeal from the Superior Court in Maricopa County
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c; ARCAP 28(c; Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT OF
More informationNo. 2 CA-CV Filed September 30, 2014
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION TWO IN RE $70,070 IN U.S. CURRENCY No. 2 CA-CV 2014-0013 Filed September 30, 2014 Appeal from the Superior Court in Pinal County Nos. S1100CV201301076 and S1100CV201301129
More informationCase: JGR Doc#:505 Filed:05/18/16 Entered:05/18/16 12:20:06 Page1 of 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO ) ) ) ) ) )
Case:15-22848-JGR Doc#:505 Filed:05/18/16 Entered:05/18/16 12:20:06 Page1 of 3 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO In re: Atna Resources Inc., et al. Debtors. 1 Chapter 11 Jointly Administered
More informationADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS
1 David G. Derickson, State Bar No. 000 John P. Kaites, State Bar No. 01 Michael S. Love, State Bar No. 0 RIDENOUR, HIENTON & LEWIS, P.L.L.C. Chase Tower 1 North Central Avenue, Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA En Banc
SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA En Banc PAULINE COSPER, ) Arizona Supreme Court ) No. CV-11-0083-PR Petitioner, ) ) Court of Appeals v. ) Division One ) No. 1 CA-SA 10-0266 THE HONORABLE JOHN CHRISTIAN REA, )
More informationNEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT NO
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE LLC LETTER OF ACCEPTANCE, WAIVER, AND CONSENT NO. 2017-06-00020 TO: RE: New York Stock Exchange LLC IMC Financial Markets, Respondent CRD No. 104143 During the period August 25,
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY. No.
0 0 David Burnell Smith AZ Bar No. 0 N th St. Scottsdale, AZ Larry Klayman Pro Hac Vice Pending 00 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Suite 00 Washington, D.C. 000 Telephone: (0) -000 Email: leklayman@gmail.com Attorneys
More informationNAPD Formal Ethics Opinion 16-1
NAPD Formal Ethics Opinion 16-1 Question: The Ethics Counselors of the National Association for Public Defense (NAPD) have been asked to address the following scenario: An investigator working for Defense
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-01151 Document 1 Filed 06/13/17 Page 1 of 7 WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, 516 Alto St Santa Fe, NM 87501 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA vs. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES
More informationCACH, LLC, a limited liability company, Plaintiff/Appellee, NANCY M. MARTIN and ROBERT MARTIN, Defendants/Appellants. No.
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION
More informationrdd Doc 299 Filed 08/09/17 Entered 08/09/17 16:05:59 Main Document Pg 1 of 13
Pg 1 of 13 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 250 West 55th Street New York, New York 10019 Telephone: (212 468-8000 Facsimile: (212 468-7900 Lorenzo Marinuzzi Jonathan I. Levine Daniel J. Harris Benjamin W. Butterfield
More informationBEFORE THE PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE PROCEDURAL HISTORY. On March 6, 2018, the State Bar of Arizona moved for Interim Suspension
BEFORE THE PRESIDING DISCIPLINARY JUDGE IN THE MATTER OF A MEMBER OF THE STATE BAR OF ARIZONA, PETER STROJNIK, Bar No. 006464 Respondent. PDJ-2018-9018 ORDER OF INTERIM SUSPENSION [State Bar No. 18-0615]
More informationRobert s Rules: How they apply to your board. Susan Segal, Esq. Gust Rosenfeld
Robert s Rules: How they apply to your board Susan Segal, Esq. Gust Rosenfeld Background Robert s Rules of Order were originally drafted for a large body a general assembly. Compiled by U.S. Army General
More informationNOTICE OF FINAL RULEMAKING TITLE 12. NATURAL RESOURCES CHAPTER 4. GAME AND FISH COMMISSION PREAMBLE
NOTICE OF FINAL RULEMAKING TITLE 12. NATURAL RESOURCES CHAPTER 4. GAME AND FISH COMMISSION PREAMBLE 1. Article, Part, or Section Affected (as applicable) Rulemaking Action R12-4-202 Amend 2. Citations
More informationDecember 5, SUBJECT: Jurisdictional Determination for Superior Ready Mix Concrete s Mission Gorge Plant and Quarry Project Site
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS 5900 LA PLACE COURT, SUITE 100 CARLSBAD, CALIFORNIA 92008-8832 December 5, 2016 Arnold Veldkamp, Superior Ready Mix Concrete c/o
More informationAppeal from the Superior Court of Yavapai County. Cause No. P-1300-CR The Honorable Thomas B. Lindberg, Judge AFFIRMED
NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c); ARCAP 28(c); Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT
More informationDIVISION ONE. ARIZONA REGISTRAR OF CONTRACTORS, Defendant/Appellant. No. 1 CA-CV
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE SHELLEY MAGNESS and COLORADO STATE BANK & TRUST COMPANY, N.A., Co-Trustees of The Shelley Magness Trust UDA 6/25/2000, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. ARIZONA REGISTRAR
More informationFINAL RULES: Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program 1
FINAL RULES: Long-Term Care Ombudsman Program 1 REGULATORY LANGUAGE AND PERTINENT PREAMBLE LANGUAGE *Note: Effective July 1, 2016 the Administration for Community Living (ACL) consolidated their regulations
More informationMARK E. SCHLUSSEL, Petitioner,
IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION ONE MARK E. SCHLUSSEL, Petitioner, v. THE HONORABLE DOUGLAS GERLACH, Judge of the SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, in and for the County of MARICOPA, Respondent
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Alycia A. Degen, SBN adegen@sidley.com Bradley J. Dugan, SBN 0 bdugan@sidley.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP West Fifth Street, Suite 000 Los Angeles, California 001 Telephone: +1 1-000 Facsimile: +1 1-00 Attorneys
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF MARICOPA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Court Chatter. (Hon.
Michael K Jeanes, Clerk of Court *** Electronically Filed *** K. Curtner, Deputy 2/7/2015 4:08:42 PM Filing ID 6392290 L. KIRK NURMI #020900 LAW OFFICES OF L. KIRK NURMI 2314 East Osborn Phoenix, Arizona
More informationIN RE: THOMAS C. No. 1 CA-MH SP
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION. UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE. IN THE ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION
More information