I. Plaintiff is seeking a remedy not pleaded in the Amended Statement of Claim
|
|
- Mitchell McDonald
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Dr. Jeremy Cooperstock 436 Strathcona Ave. Westmount, QC H3Y 2X1 January 12, 2017 Administrator Federal Court of Canada Thomas D Arcy McGee Building 90 Sparks Street, 5th floor Ottawa ON K1A 0H9 Dear Sir or Madam: Re: United Airlines, Inc. v. Jeremy Cooperstock Federal Court File No.: T I am the Defendant in this file and request that this letter be brought to the attention of Mr. Justice Phelan, the Trial Judge for this proceeding. I am writing in response to the two letters from counsel for the Plaintiff, dated January 10, I. Plaintiff is seeking a remedy not pleaded in the Amended Statement of Claim Throughout the present action, the sole injunctive relief sought by Plaintiff, as pleaded in the Amended Statement of Claim, was: (g) an interim, interlocutory and permanent injunction restraining the Defendant from, either directly or indirectly, further infringing the Plaintiff s said copyrights and from further directing public attention to his wares, services and business in a confusing manner all as set out above, and, in particular, from using or displaying, on the internet or in any other way, the Plaintiff s Trade-marks; The use of the untied.com domain name was not raised in the pleadings. On the contrary, the Plaintiff maintained in its Amended Statement of Claim (bottom of P4, attached herewith as Annex A) and its Closing Submissions (para. 198, P65, attached herewith as Annex B): Plaintiff is not seeking to prevent the Defendant from operating a website where individuals can express their views about the Plaintiff and in Plaintiff s answers to written examination, dated February 6, 2014 (attached as Annex C): No decision was made by the Plaintiff or others on its behalf to work on shutting down the Untied.com website and as such, there is no process to describe.
2 January 12, 2017 Page 2 of 13 The injunction now sought by the Plaintiff to bar the Defendant from using the untied.com domain name for his criticism of United Airlines, which the Defendant has maintained since 1997, is a mischevious attempt of trial by ambush and denying the Defendant his right to due process. As the Defendant reiterated during his closing submissions, untied.com does not offer wares or services as understood by the Trade-Marks Act. Even if this Honourable Court were to find in favour of the Plaintiff, it does not entitle the Plaintiff to a remedy that was not pleaded and that the Plaintiff explicitly stated it would not be seeking. Therefore, the Court ought to ignore this latest request by the Plaintiff. II. Plaintiff s Exhibit P-54 The Plaintiff is seeking to induce the Court to commit a palpable and overriding error with respect to the facts. Far from speaking to the likelihood of confusion in Canada, Plaintiff s Exhibit P-54 represents a spurious selection of complaints from passengers not isolated to Canadians, and spanning only the time period of June 2012 to December That is, the exhibit ignores the contents of the approximately 23,000 complaints received by untied.com from October 1998 through May 2012, all of which were provided to the Plaintiff. In so doing, the exhibit attempts to mislead the Court into the erroneous impression that the occasional reference to a complaint ID assigned by untied.com was somehow correlated with the Defendant s parody of the United Airlines website. Although the Court denied the Defendant the opportunity to respond to the Plaintiff s tendentious and misleading portrayal of the evidence, as contained in Exhibit P-54, it bears notice that passenger complaints making reference to an untied.com-assigned complaint ID similarly appear sporadically in previous years, e.g., in December 1998, October 1999, December 1999, May 2000, July 2000, March 2001, May 2001, February 2002, March 2004, August 2004, December 2004, March 2005, September 2005, October 2005, December 2005, February 2006, April 2006, June 2006, September 2006, February 2007, March 2007, July 2007, December 2007, March 2008, etc. In other words, consistent with the analysis of non-redacted MileagePlus numbers conducted by Mr. Ron Hall, if there was any confusion as to the source of the complaint ID numbers, this has been the case, at an insignificant level, throughout the entire history of untied.com, i.e., starting long before the Defendant began parodying the Plaintiff s logos. Since the Defendant was denied the opportunity of making a reply, following cross-examination, and thereby, not allowed to rebut the Plaintiff s tendentious evidence, and since the Plaintiff misrepresented this evidence as constituting Complaints on UNTIED.COM from Canadian customers, it is respectfully submitted that the Court ought to exclude Plaintiff s Exhibit P-54 from consideration.
3 January 12, 2017 Page 3 of 13 III. Brief of Defendant s Exhibits Since the Plaintiff consented to electronic service of documents on February 6, 2013, and did not rescind this consent, the Defendant provided the Defendant s Book of Trial Exhibits to the Plaintiff in electronic format. The Plaintiff s purported inability to obtain clarity as to what the Defendant submitted to the Court is disingenuous. As the Defendant clearly stated in his letter of January 3, 2017, I am hereby attaching a PDF of the Defendant s Book of Trial Exhibits, containing the specific pages that were accepted into evidence during trial. A hardcopy of this book, with physical tabs, has also been sent to the Court by courier. The electronic (PDF) copy of the Defendant s Book of Trial Exhibits, provided both to the Court and to the Plaintiff, is digitally tabbed with bookmarks that allow for direct identification of the pages that belong to each exhibit. The Defendant hereby provides an undertaking to the Court that the documents contained in the Defendant s Book of Trial Exhibits, as provided by the Defendant, both in electronic and hardcopy format, are unaltered as to content. However, the Defendant s Book of Trial Exhibits corrects some of the erroneous index titles as appear in the version produced by the Plaintiff, and avoids the misprinting artifacts contained in the Plaintiff s version. For example: Exhibit D-4 should not contain watermark artifacts, as appear on pages 6 and 10 of the Plaintiff s version Exhibit D-6, which the Plaintiff erroneously described as United airlines website homepage, May 26, 1998, is actually the homepage of untied.com of that date Exhibit D-16 is not solely an from Sibername.com, as appears in the Plaintiff s index, but in fact contains two s, one from Sibername.com and a second from Namebay.com Exhibit D-18 should not contain three copies of the banner of the Internet Archive WayBack Machine, occluding some of the text on page 2 and completely obscuring the important text on page 3, as it does in the Plaintiff s version Exhibit D-24 should not contain large ink artifacts obscuring the text of the passenger complaint, as it does in the Plaintiff s version Sincerely yours, Dr. Jeremy Cooperstock Cc: Me Jay Zakaïb, Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP Me Frédéric Lussier, Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP encl.
4 Annex A
5
6
7
8 Annex B
9
10 Annex C
11 Court File No. T FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: UNITED AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiff AND JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Defendant ANSWERS TO WRITTEN EXAMINATION I, Scott Wilson, of the City of Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A., affirm that the answers set out in Exhibit "A" to this affidavit to the questions dated January 8, 2015 submitted by the Defendant are true, to the best of my information, knowledge and belief. SWORN before me at the City of Chicago this_jl' day of -.r A N, / /t; /7 A Commissioner, etc. --- c-) -S-cott Wilson "OFFICIAL SEAL" KAREN M. BLAIN NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF ILLINOIS My Commission Expires May 11, 2017
12 Exhibit "A" 1. Describe the process of how the decision or decisions of the Plaintiff or others on its behalf to work on shutting down the Untied.com website was reached, including the timeline and names of those who were involved in the decision or decisions. Answer: No decision was made by the Plaintiff or others on its behalf to work on shutting down the Untied.com website and as such, there is no process to describe. 2. Produce all documents related to the decision or decisions of the Plaintiff or others on its behalf to work on shutting down the Untied.com website, including but not limited to internal memos, s and other correspondence, minutes of meetings, and notes making reference to shutting down the Untied.com website. Answer: No decision was made by the Plaintiff or others on its behalf to work on shutting down the Untied.com website and as a result, there are no documents relating to such a decision. 3. Produce a complete trace of how the information reached Mr. Wittig that efforts were being contemplated and/or being made to work on shutting down the Untied.com website. Answer: No efforts were being contemplated and/or made to work on shutting down the Untied.com website. The of Mr. Wittig is merely an example of voice messages received by the Plaintiff, Jeff Wittig, as a result of the Defendant having posted, on its Untied.com website, Jeff Wittig's contact information. The exchange relates to the efforts of the Plaintiff to have the contact information of Mr. Wittig and Ms. Jessica Rossman removed from the Untied.com website. These efforts culminated m the commencement of a proceeding in Quebec Superior Court (No ). 4. What action or actions were taken by the Plaintiff or others on its behalf in the effort to shut down the Untied.com website? Answer: As explained above, no decision was made by the Plaintiff to shut down the Untied.com website and as such no action or actions were taken by the Plaintiff or others on its behalf
13 to do so. 5. Produce all documents related to the discussions, deliberations, and efforts of the Plaintiff or others on its behalf to shut down the Untied.com website, including but not limited to internal memos, s and other correspondence, minutes of meetings, and notes making reference to the efforts to shut down the Untied.com website. Answer: No decision was made by the Plaintiff to shut down the Untied.com website and no actions were taken to do so. As a result, there are no documents pertaining to discussions, deliberations and efforts of the Plaintiff or others on its behalf to shut down the Untied.com website.
SUPERIOR. (Civil Division) and. and. and. and. vs.
CANADA SUPERIOR (Civil Division) COURT PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL No: 500-17-074743-124 UNITED AIR LINES, INC., a legal person, duly constituted according to law, having its principal place
More informationDEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY
Court File No.: T-2084-12 FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: UNITED AIR LINES, INC. and CONTINENTAL AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiffs and DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Defendant DEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY Dated: January 18,
More informationUNITED AIRLINES, INC. and JEREMY COOPERSTOCK ORDER AND REASONS
Date: 20140703 Docket: T-2084-12 Citation: 2014 FC 645 Montréal, Quebec, July 3, 2014 PRESENT: Prothonotary Richard Morneau BETWEEN: UNITED AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiff and JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Defendant ORDER
More informationCourt of Queen s Bench
Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgment With Personal Service Court of Queen s Bench Registering an out of Province Judgment in Alberta when: the document starting your action was personally served OR the Defendant
More informationDEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY
Court File No.: T-2084-12 FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: UNITED AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiff and DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Defendant DEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY Dated: January 31, 2014 DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK 392 Grosvenor
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.
Court File No. CV-12-9545-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF A PLAN OF
More informationFederal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2000
Federal High Court (Civil Procedure) Rules 2000 Commencement: 1st May 2000 In exercise of the powers conferred on me by section 254 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 and all powers
More informationONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION PRACTICE GUIDELINE
ONTARIO SECURITIES COMMISSION PRACTICE GUIDELINE 1. APPLICATION AND INTERPRETATION... 1 (1) APPLICATION... 1 2. FILING DOCUMENTS... 1 (1) REDACTIONS... 1 (2) MERITS HEARING FOR AN ENFORCEMENT PROCEEDING...
More informationFEDERAL COURT STATEMENT OF CLAIM TO THE DEFENDANT
Court FileNo. T-1 ~-ef:1 FEDERAL COURT RED LABEL VACATIONS INC., carrying on business as REDTAG.CA or REDTAG.CA VACATIONS or both Plaintiff and 411 TRAVEL BUYS LIMITED carrying on business as 411 TRA VELBUYS.CA,
More informationFEDERAL COURT. Anamaria Carla Taban. and. Her Majesty the Queen MOTION RECORD
Court File No.: T-2467-14 FEDERAL COURT Anamaria Carla Taban and Plaintiff Her Majesty the Queen MOTION RECORD Defendant On plaintiff s motion to request that that the proceeding continue as a specially
More informationCourt of Queen s Bench
Reciprocal Enforcement of Judgment NO Personal Service Court of Queen s Bench Registering an out of Province Judgment in Alberta when: the document starting your action was NOT personally served AND the
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION PETITION FOR RULE TO SHOW CAUSE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, CHANCERY DIVISION E. Kwan Choi, individually and on behalf of Urantia Foundation, et al., plaintiff, v. K. Richard Keeler, et al., defendants.
More informationFeedback on Revised Guidelines for Obtaining Meaningful Online Consent
April 26, 2018 Via email: Melanie.Millar-Chapman@priv.gc.ca Melanie Millar-Chapman Manager, Policy and Research, Policy Research and Parliamentary Affairs Directorate Office of the Privacy Commissioner
More informationAFFIDAVIT ESSENTIALS
AFFIDAVIT ESSENTIALS When? Originating Applications Interlocutory Applications & Summary Judgment may be based on knowledge, information and belief, but must provide source UCPR 295, 430(2); Evidence Act
More informationUpon reading and filing the affirmation of Lawrence E. Tofel, sworn to on the 5th
At an IAS Part of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held at the Courthouse, 60 Centre Street, New York, New York on the day of, 2016 P R E S E N T: Hon. Justice. LANTAU HOLDINGS LTD., Plaintiff,
More informationInternet and E-Commerce Law in Canada
Internet and E-Commerce Law in Canada VOLUME 18, NUMBER 11 Cited as (2017-18), 18 I.E.C.L.C. MARCH 2018 RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN, EH? CANADA S PRIVACY COMMISSIONER SAYS LAW REQUIRES SEARCH ENGINE DE-INDEXING
More informationELECTRONIC FILING REQUIREMENTS. Stanislaus County Superior Court Civil Division
PERMISSIVE efiling ELECTRONIC FILING REQUIREMENTS Stanislaus County Superior Court Civil Division Effective May 2, 2016, documents may be filed electronically in general civil cases for limited and unlimited
More informationIN THE MATTER OF A COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO THE CANADIAN INTERNET REGISTRATION AUTHORITY ( CIRA ) DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY ( the POLICY )
IN THE MATTER OF A COMPLAINT PURSUANT TO THE CANADIAN INTERNET REGISTRATION AUTHORITY ( CIRA ) DOMAIN NAME DISPUTE RESOLUTION POLICY ( the POLICY ) Dispute Number: Complainant: Registrant: Disputed Domain
More informationCALGARY. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, RSC 1985, c C-36, AS AMENDED
COURT FILE NUMBER 1301-14151 COURT OF QUEEN S BENCH OF ALBERTA JUDICIAL CENTRE CALGARY IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, RSC 1985, c C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE BUSINESS
More informationState Reporting Bureau
[2.003] 0 SC 056 State Reporting Bureau Queensland Government Department of Justice and Attorney-General Transcript of Proceedings Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must
More informationSUPERIOR COURT PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL R. ROBITAILLE. -vs.- -and-
1 CANADA PROVINCE OF QUEBEC DISTRICT OF MONTREAL NO: 500-06-000325-056 (Class Action) SUPERIOR COURT R. ROBITAILLE Petitioner -vs.- YAHOO! INC., a corporation created by virtue of the laws of the United
More informationOffice of Information Technology Legislative Affairs Agency
Office of Information Technology Legislative Affairs Agency TABLE OF CONTENTS SEARCHING WITHIN BASIS...1 BILLS & LAWS... 2 ACTIONS BY DATE... 3 AWAITING ACTIONS...4 BILLS IN COMMITTEE... 5 GOVERNOR S VETOES...6
More informationAFFIDAVIT OF DAVID A. SCHEFFEL IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR ADMISSIONS OF THOMAS P. SWIGERT AND ERIN E. CONTI PRO HAC VICE
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/11/2016 05:19 PM INDEX NO. 655306/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/11/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationCase 4:02-cv Document 538 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 4:02-cv-01486 Document 538 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Joseph J. Tabacco, Jr. (75484 Christopher T. Heffelfinger (118058 BERMAN
More informationRULE 13.1 Filing and service electronic-transmission filings
RULE 13.1 Filing and service electronic-transmission filings (A) Facsimile filings. In conformity with App.R. 13, pleadings and other papers may be filed with the Hamilton County Clerk of Courts by facsimile
More information1. Our names are Jane Donahue and Holly Sims and we reside at 760 Cumberland Head Rd
STATE OF NEW YORK TO THE COMMISSIONER OF EDUCATION: 1. Our names are Jane Donahue and Holly Sims and we reside at 760 Cumberland Head Rd Plattsburgh, NY 12901 and 1334 Cumberland Head Road Plattsburgh,
More informationDECOMMODlFICA TION LLC, BURNING MAN PROJECT AND BLACK ROCK CITY, LLC, DOING BUSINESS AS BURNING MAN. and
01/13/2015 15:35 415-973-2154 C.A.S. PAGE 02/12 Federal Court Cour h\derale Date: 20150113 Docket: T-939-14 Toronto, Ontario, January 13, 2015 PRESENT: The Honoumble Mr. Justice Hughes BETWEEN: DECOMMODlFICA
More information: : : : : : : : : : : :
The Law Offices of EDWARD HARRINGTON HEYBURN, ESQ., LLC Edward Harrington Heyburn, Esq. Attorney Identification No. 024161997 7 Poplar Run East Windsor, New Jersey 08520 Tel. (609) 240-5578 Fax (609) 228-5115
More informationRE: Abuse of court process and violation of the court rules by Madame Justice Francine Van Melle of the Superior Court of Justice
Jan 29, 2002. Sadrudin Chatur 586 Chamberlain Road Burlington, Ontario L7L2V5 The Canadian Judicial Council 112 Kent Street Ottawa Ontario K1A 0W8 Attention: Judicial Complaints Department Dear Sirs or
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST. IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c.
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No. CV-15-11192-00CL IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES CREDITORS ARRANGEMENT ACT, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-36, AS AMENDED AND IN THE MATTER OF SECTION
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION RANDALL TOWNSEND, PLAINTIFF, v. CHARLES H. SCRUGGS III., CASE NO. 05-0911 Individually, DIVISION
More informationNote: If there are convictions on file with the RCMP, the processing time can exceed 120 days.
INTERNATIONAL FINGERPRINTING SCAN TO DIGITAL SERVICE Commissionaires offers a service for Canadians and foreign residents living abroad who need to provide a Canadian criminal record check using fingerprints
More informationLR IN CAMERA SUBMISSIONS AND SEALED DOCUMENTS.
LR 10-5. IN CAMERA SUBMISSIONS AND SEALED DOCUMENTS. (c) Papers submitted for in camera inspection shall not be filed with the Court, but shall be delivered to chambers of the appropriate judge, and shall
More informationOffice of the Commissioner of Lobbying Ottawa, Ontario September 24, The Lobbyists Code of Conduct A Consultation Paper
Office of the Commissioner of Lobbying Ottawa, Ontario September 24, 2013 The Lobbyists Code of Conduct A Consultation Paper INTRODUCTION The Lobbying Act (the Act) gives the Commissioner of Lobbying
More informationIntroductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario
Introductory Guide to Civil Litigation in Ontario Table of Contents INTRODUCTION This guide contains an overview of the Canadian legal system and court structure as well as key procedural and substantive
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT IN THE MATTER OF THE PROCEEDS OF CRIME ACT 1996 AND 2005 MICHAEL F. MURPHY AND
THE SUPREME COURT SC No. 172/98 SC No. 129/06 SC No. 293/08 SC Nos. 295 & 296/12 SC No. 320/08 SC No. 276 & 277/12 SC No. 235/06 SC No. 71/06 SC No. 86/06 SC Nos. 278 & 279/12 SC No. 327/08 SC Nos. 275
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1
Case: 1:16-cv-02212 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SIOUX STEEL COMPANY A South Dakota Corporation
More informationDEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY (Defendant s motion for testimony via videoconference)
Court File No.: T-2084-12 FEDERAL COURT BETWEEN: UNITED AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiff and DR. JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Defendant DEFENDANT / MOVING PARTY REPLY (Defendant s motion for testimony via videoconference)
More informationTHE LAW OF DOMAIN NAMES & TRADE-MARKS ON THE INTERNET Sheldon Burshtein
THE LAW OF DOMAIN NAMES & TRADE-MARKS ON THE INTERNET Sheldon Burshtein TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: SECTION 1.1 1.1(a) 1.1(b) 1.1(c) SECTION 1.2 SECTION 1.3 CHAPTER 2: SECTION 2.1 2.1(a) 2.1(b) 2.1(c)
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) (IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY)
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE (COMMERCIAL LIST) (IN BANKRUPTCY AND INSOLVENCY) Court File No. 31-2117602 Estate File No. 31-2117602 IN THE MATTER OF THE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO MAKE A PROPOSAL OF ALAN
More informationAffidavit - General (Three Page)
Affidavit - General (Three Page) An Affidavit is used to to tell the court all of the relevant facts that are necessary to explain your position in the application. When filling out the Affidavit, make
More informationUNITED AIRLINES, INC. and JEREMY COOPERSTOCK REASONS FOR JUDGMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTIONS: PARAGRAPH # I. Introduction [1] - [2]
Date: 20170623 Docket: T-2084-12 Citation: 2017 FC 616 BETWEEN: UNITED AIRLINES, INC. Plaintiff and JEREMY COOPERSTOCK Defendant REASONS FOR JUDGMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTIONS: PARAGRAPH # I. Introduction
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI BENNETT, COLEMAN & COMPANY. MR. AJAY KUMAR & ORS... Defendants Through None
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI #15 + CS(COMM) 21/2019 BENNETT, COLEMAN & COMPANY LIMITED & ANR.... Plaintiffs Through Ms. Mamta R. Jha with Mr. Vipul Tiwari and Ms. Shipra Philip, Advocates
More informationDigital Appellate Record Standards for the Supreme Court of Virginia and Court of Appeals of Virginia
Digital Appellate Record Standards for the Supreme Court of Virginia and Court of Appeals of Virginia A. The Digital Appellate Record ("DAR"). 1. The Digital Appellate Record is a collection of Portable
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE DIVISIONAL COURT
Page 1 of 15 Home Feedback Site Map Français Home Court of Appeal for Ontario Superior Court of Justice Ontario Court of Justice Location Superior Court of Justice Divisional Court Appeal Information Package
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/19/ :26 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 63 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/19/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK HAYDEN ASSET VIII, LLC, Plaintiff -against- ' AFFIRMATION IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO COMPEL PUBLIC SERVICE MUTUAL INSURANCE Index No.:
More informationTHE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER Pursuant to Part II, Article 73-a of the New Hampshire Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 51, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire adopts
More information202.5-b. Electronic Filing in Supreme Court; Consensual Program.
202.5-b. Electronic Filing in Supreme Court; Consensual Program. (a) Application. (1) On consent, documents may be filed and served by electronic means in Supreme Court in such civil actions and in such
More informationPURDUE PHARMA AND EURO-CELTIQUE S.A. and PURDUE PHARMA. and COLLEGIUM PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. MAPI LIFE SCIENCES CANADA INC. AND THE MINISTER OF HEALTH
Date: 20180221 Dockets: T-856-17 T-824-17 Citation: 2018 FC 199 Ottawa, Ontario, February 21, 2018 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice O'Reilly Docket: T-856-17 BETWEEN: PURDUE PHARMA AND EURO-CELTIQUE
More informationMichael A. Loberg Professional Corporation Barrister & Solicitor. February 26, 2015 By
Michael A. Loberg Professional Corporation Barrister & Solicitor 1000 Bankers Hall West 888 3rd Street SW Calgary, AB T2P 5C5 Direct: (403) 668-6561 Office: (403) 444-6935 Fax: (403) 668-6505 February
More informationSTRATEGIC DIRECTIONS SUPPORTED: Leadership; Organizational Sustainability.
DATE: January 12, 2017 TO: FROM: S. Michael Rummel, Chair Finance and Committee Alex Ty Kovach Executive Director RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of a Resolution awarding a two-year contract for Legislative
More informationApplying for Employment Authorization for Your VAWA Client
Chapter 17 Applying for Employment Authorization for Your VAWA Client R ecipients of an approved VAWA petition are also granted deferred action status for a period of fifteen months. Under this status
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS SUMMIT COUNTY, OHIO IN RE: ) MISC. NO. 325 RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE OF ) THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, GENERAL ) AMENDMENT DIVISION AMENDMENT OF LOCAL ) COURT RULES RULE
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 52 Filed: 12/23/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:463
Case: 1:13-cv-07750 Document #: 52 Filed: 12/23/14 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:463 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JENNY MILMAN and ELLEN THOMAS, ) on Behalf
More informationPPG-06 FAMILIES ANONYMOUS, INC. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY AND LIMITED LICENSE
PPG-06 FAMILIES ANONYMOUS, INC. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY POLICY AND LIMITED LICENSE Adopted by the World Service Board August 20, 2016 (Review August 2018) CONTENTS 1. PURPOSE... 1 2. DEFINITIONS... 1 3.
More informationCase: EEB Doc#:19 Filed:12/04/14 Entered:12/04/14 15:24:27 Page1 of 6
Case:14-26132-EEB Doc#:19 Filed:12/04/14 Entered:12/04/14 15:24:27 Page1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Bankruptcy Judge Elizabeth E. Brown CLINE MINING CORPORATION, Bankruptcy
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/06/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2006 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2016. Exhibit 21
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/06/2016 06:18 PM INDEX NO. 111768/2006 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 32 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2016 Exhibit 21 SCAf.r.EllONWIOl11l1,---------------------- SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ECO ADVENTURE HOLDINGS, LLC and OZARK MOUNTAIN ZIPLINE, LLC, v. Plaintiffs, ADVENTURE ZIPLINES OF BRANSON LLC,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) NELL TOUSSAINT. and MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) File Number: 34336 BETWEEN NELL TOUSSAINT Applicant Appellant and MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent Respondent
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
International Oddities Inc v. Domestic Oddities Wholesale Distribution LLC et al Doc. 1 1 1 1 1 Mark B. Mizrahi Esq. (State Bar # mmizrahi@wrslawyers.com Lance M. Pritikin, Esq. (State Bar #0 lpritikin@wrslawyers.com
More informationCHAPTER SEVENTEEN Applying for Employment Authorization for Your VAWA Client
CHAPTER SEVENTEEN Applying for Employment Authorization for Your VAWA Client R eceipts of an approved VAWA petition are also granted deferred action: status for a period of fifteen months. Under this status
More informationPetition for Ex-Parte Order
$5.00 Petition for Ex-Parte Order (Petition, Affidavit, Order) When to Use: Filing Fees: Method of Payment: Where to File: Copies: Additional Information: You have specific facts set forth in an affidavit;
More informationCase3:08-cv EDL Document52 Filed10/30/09 Page1 of 6
Case:0-cv-0-EDL Document Filed/0/0 Page of Jason K. Singleton, State Bar #0 jason@singletonlawgroup.com Richard E. Grabowski, State Bar # rgrabowski@mckinleyville.net SINGLETON LAW GROUP L Street, Suite
More informationmg Doc 8303 Filed 03/13/15 Entered 03/13/15 16:14:27 Main Document Pg 1 of 23
Pg 1 of 23 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------- ) In re: ) Case No. 12-12020 (MG) ) RESIDENTIAL CAPITAL, LLC, et al.,
More informationNOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPOSE SETTLEMENT OF CLASS PROCEEDING HEATHER ROBERTSON V. THOMSON AND OTHERS
NOTICE OF HEARING TO PROPOSE SETTLEMENT OF CLASS PROCEEDING HEATHER ROBERTSON V. THOMSON AND OTHERS If you are a writer, artist or photographer, wherever you reside, please read this notice carefully as
More informationEXHIBIT 2 Page 1 of 5
EXHIBIT Page of 0 0 RESOLUTION NO. 0- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, PERTAINING TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT; PROVIDING
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) NELL TOUSSAINT. and
S.C.C. File No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA (ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL) BETWEEN: NELL TOUSSAINT Applicant Appellant and MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent Respondent
More informationCanada: Electronic Commerce Law Overview
Canada: Electronic Commerce Law Overview Stikeman Elliott LLP Canada: Electronic Commerce Law Overview... 2 Jurisdiction... 2... 2 Dealing with the Uncertainty... 4 Electronic Commerce Legislation... 4...
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Case 1:16-cv-04110-TWT Document 1 Filed 11/02/16 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA IRONBURG INVENTIONS LTD. a United Kingdom Limited Company, Plaintiff,
More informationHUMBOLDT BRONCOS MEMORIAL FUND INC. IN THE MATTER OF THE INFORMAL PUBLIC APPEALS ACT, SS 2014, c THIRD AFFIDAVIT OF DARRIN DUELL
COURT FILE NUMBER Q.B. No. 1038 of 2018 COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH FOR SASKATCHEWAN JUDICIAL CENTRE APPLICANT SASKATOON HUMBOLDT BRONCOS MEMORIAL FUND INC. IN THE MATTER OF THE INFORMAL PUBLIC APPEALS ACT,
More informationHILLSBOROUGH COUNTY AVIATION AUTHORITY AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO SPACE RENTAL AGREEMENT TAMPA INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIR CANADA.
AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO SPACE RENTAL AGREEMENT Board Date: PREPARED BY: REAL ESTATE DEPARTMENT ATTN: MARSHA DANIELSON P. O. BOX 22287 TAMPA, FLORIDA 33622 AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO SPACE RENTAL AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KEITH F. BELL, Ph.D., : Plaintiff : : v. : Civil Action No. : : COMPLAINT FOR KING S COLLEGE, : Copyright Infringement : and
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST
ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST Court File No: CV-12-9780-00CL BETWEEN: MARCUS WIDE of Grant Thornton (British Virgin Islands) Limited, and HUGH DICKSON, of Grant Thornton Specialist
More informationPASSPORT AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM INSTRUCTIONS Last revised: 5/26/09
PASSPORT AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM INSTRUCTIONS Last revised: 5/26/09 1. PURPOSE: 1.1. Those who wish to become Members of our Ministry are required by the following document to correct all government records
More informationWRITTEN SUBMISSIONS OF THE RESPONDENT: REPLY TO RESPONSE OF THE MINISTER OF HEAL TH OF BRITISH COLUMBIA
PATENTED MEDICINE PRICES REVIEW BOARD IN THE MATTER OF the Patent Act, R.S.C., 1985, c. P-4, as amended AND IN THE MATTER OF Alexion Pharmaceuticals Inc. (" Respondent" ) and the medicine " Soliris" WRITTEN
More informationHigh Court of Judicature at Allahabad. Notice
High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Notice Advocates and parties appearing in person are hereby informed that from 21 August 2017 onwards, the fresh and listed Company matters, Civil Revisions and Transfer
More informationORDER NO September 2010
Arbitration under the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules BRITISH CARIBBEAN BANK LTD. (CLAIMANT) V. THE GOVERNMENT OF BELIZE (RESPONDENT) ORDER NO. 1 6 September 2010 CONSIDERING: (A) (B) The notice for the Preparatory
More informationI. ZNAMENSKY SELEKCIONNO-GIBRIDNY CENTER LLC V.
(Press control and right arrow for the same effect) (Press control and left arrow for the same effect) znamensky X Français English Home > Ontario > Superior Court of Justice > 2009 CanLII 51197
More informationREAD THIS BEFORE COMPLETING THE FORMS!!! INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING
READ THIS BEFORE COMPLETING THE FORMS!!! INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING WARNING!!! YOU SHOULD CONSULT AN ATTORNEY BEFORE USING THESE FORMS. THESE FORMS DO NOT CONTAIN ANY LEGAL ADVICE. ALL
More informationFAQs: Commissioning vs. Notarizing a Document
FAQs: Commissioning vs. Notarizing a Document Commissioner for Taking Affidavits (and Statutory Declarations) 1. As a lawyer, what do I need to do to become a commissioner? Section 1(1) of the Ontario
More informationREPORT WITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF IN RELATION TO INFORMATION REQUESTED FROM SASKATCHEWAN GOVERNMENT INSURANCE
FILE NO. - 2003/022 REPORT WITH RESPECT TO THE APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF IN RELATION TO INFORMATION REQUESTED FROM SASKATCHEWAN GOVERNMENT INSURANCE [1] By access to Information Request Form dated March
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. Reasons for Judgment Respecting Costs
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA Re: Section 29 of the Court Order Enforcement Act and the Registration of a Foreign Judgment Against John Tolman, Mrs. John Tolman, Bob Alpen and Mrs. Bob Alpen
More informationIN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA KEVIN POLITE, EUNICE ELISE YOUNG, Plaintiffs, Civil Action v. No. CITY OF DECATUR, GEORGIA, Defendant. SUMMONS TO THE ABOVE NAMED DEFENDANT: CITY
More informationVERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE &C Page 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 respond in full as required by the CPRA. What little they did say, however, demonstrates that they have violated the CRL. Parties
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department P.O. Box 7288, Capitol Station Albany, NY
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department P.O. Box 7288, Capitol Station Albany, NY 12224-0288 Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court (518) 471-4777 fax (518) 471-4750
More informationSPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT
SPONSORSHIP AGREEMENT This Agreement is made as of the [DAY] day of [MONTH], [YEAR] Purchase Order Number: BETWEEN: AND: EXPORT DEVELOPMENT CANADA 150 Slater Street Ottawa, Ontario K1A 1K3 (herein referred
More informationState Reporting Bureau
State Reporting Bureau jsbo?t] (3SC 34 Queensland Government Department of justice and Attorney-General Transcript of Proceedings Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must
More informationSale of NPL accounts by Dena Bank Invitation for submission of EoI
Sale of NPL accounts by Dena Bank Invitation for submission of EoI Dena Bank (or the Bank ) invites Expression of Interest from ARCs, Banks, FIs and eligible NBFCs for the proposed sale of its Non Performing
More informationTHE QUEEN'S BENCH WINNIPEG CENTRE. APPLICATION UNDER Queens Bench Rule 14.05(2)(c)(iv) WESTERN CANADA WILDERNESS COMMITTEE, - and -
File No. CI 11-01-72733 THE QUEEN'S BENCH WINNIPEG CENTRE APPLICATION UNDER Queens Bench Rule 14.05(2)(c)(iv) BETWEEN: WESTERN CANADA WILDERNESS COMMITTEE, Applicant, - and - THE GOVERNMENT OF MANITOBA,
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES. Claimant. Respondent. (ICSID Case No. ARB/xx/xxx) [DRAFT] PROCEDURAL ORDER NO.
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES Claimant v. Respondent (ICSID Case No. ARB/xx/xxx) [DRAFT] PROCEDURAL ORDER NO. [1] Members of the Tribunal [ ], President of the Tribunal [ ],
More informationGOING IT ALONE. A Step-by-Step Guide to Representing Yourself on Appeal in Indiana
GOING IT ALONE A Step-by-Step Guide to Representing Yourself on Appeal in Indiana INTRODUCTION How to Use this Guide The purpose of this guide Before you go it alone Parts of this guide APPEALS IN INDIANA
More informationFACTUM OF FRONTLINE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION (Motion returnable January 9, 2013)
Court File No. 31-1696322 ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST IN THE MATTER OF THE PROPOSAL OF FRONTLINE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, A COMPANY INCORPORATED PURSUANT TO THE LAWS OF THE PROVINCE
More informationRegistrar Agreement Version 1.14, March 27, 2014
Registrar Agreement Version 1.14, March 27, 2014 This Registrar Agreement (the Agreement ), between the Canadian Internet Registration Authority ( CIRA ) and the party identified on the execution page
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS BINDER 1. Trade-Marks Act Annotated
TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 BINDER 1 Foreword... i Preface... v Note from the Editor-in-Chief... vii Table of Contents... 1 Table of Cases... 11 Index... 101 Table of Concordance... 151 Trade-Marks Act Annotated
More informationFor Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy
Information & Instructions: Petition to enforce foreign judgment 1. The following form, Petition to Enforce Foreign Judgment, is used to enforce a judgment obtained in a state other than Texas. 2. In order
More informationCANADIAN INTERNET LAW UPDATE 2017
CANADIAN INTERNET LAW UPDATE 2017 by Bradley J. Freedman Borden Ladner Gervais LLP www.blg.com This paper summarizes selected developments in Canadian Internet law during 2017. Internet law is a vast area
More information1. Rice and Chau are residents of Cook County, Illinois, and respectively the
v. Case No. Respondent VERIFIED PETITION FOR DISCOVERY (SUPREME COURT RULE 224) Petitioning this Court for Pre-Suit Discovery against Respondent Yahoo, Inc., ("Yahoo") pursuant to Supreme Court rule 224,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Justin Alexander, Inc. ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:17-cv-4402 ) John Does 1-72 ) Judge Andrea R. Wood ) ) Magistrate Judge
More informationFOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ANNEX D. Classified Information Procedures Act: Statute, Procedures, and Comparison with M.R.E. 505
ANNEX D Classified Information Procedures Act: Statute, Procedures, and Comparison with M.R.E. 505 Classified Information Procedures Act, 18 United States Code Appendix 1 1. Definitions (a) "Classified
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. B. Notice of Application dated April 12, Written Representations of the Applicants (Moving Parties)
1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Tab 1 Notice of Motion dated June 25, 2013 2. Affidavit of Rizwan Khan dated June 25, 2013 A. CEAA Registry posting of the Responsible Authorities decision statement dated March 14,
More information