IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, Date of Reserve: Date of Order:

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, Date of Reserve: Date of Order:"

Transcription

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 Date of Reserve: Date of Order: OMP No. 36/2009 Competent Investment Limited... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayyar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raktim Gogoi, Advocate Versus GL Asia Mauritius II Cayman Ltd. and Ors.... Respondents SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, J. 1. This petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 has been filed by the petitioner stating therein that petitioner was a company incorporated under Law of Mauritius and respondents no. 1-3 are also companies not based in India and incorporated in Cayman Islands and Port Louis, Mauritius. Respondent no. 4 is a company incorporated in India having registered office at Goa. Respondent no. 5 is a company of Singapore (the legal identity of R-4 is not disclosed). Respondent no. 6 is a private limited company incorporated in India having its office at Janpath. The petitioner claims that it entered into a Call Option Agreement with respondents no. 1 and 2 on and in terms of this agreement, respondents no. 1 and 2 had to restructure their operation in Mauritius in a manner so that the respondent no. 2 transferred 30% paid up capital of respondent no. 4 to respondent no.3. It is submitted the project to be undertaken as per this agreement was development of a hospitality project comprising of a hotel, restaurant and luxury suites etc. at the land owned by respondent no.4 at village Cavelossim in Goa. On behalf of the petitioner, the agreement was executed in Delhi and on the part of respondents no. 1 and 2, the same was executed in Singapore and a scanned copy was mailed from there. The agreement was to become effective on acquisition of 100% equity shares by respondents no. 1 of respondent no. 2. These shares were acquired on but the respondents failed to perform their part of operation as per the agreement and sought extension of time upto Under the garb of this extension of time, respondents sought to sell the land in Goa where the hospitability project was to be developed. This fact came to the knowledge of M/s Pinfold Overseas

2 and a dispute arose with the broker, who was trying to arrange the transactions, Pinfold Overseas filed an arbitration petition/application in Court of Principal District, South Goa wherein respondents No. 1, 2 and 4 along with S.R Holding I Limited were made parties. The petitioner was not made a party in the said proceedings. Pinfold Overseas obtained an interim injunction from the Principal District, South Goa on The petitioner filed an application for impleadment but the same was objected to by Pinfold Overseas and respondents no. 1, 2 and 4 and S.R. Holding Limited I Limited on the ground that the petitioner was not a privy to the Call Option Agreement dated The petitioner claims that the agreement provides that until and unless the said agreement was terminated, the respondents could not issue equity shares or any security convertible into shares, without the consent of the petitioner and respondents were also restrained from selling any part of the land in terms of clause 6.3. While the petitioner has always been ready and willing to perform his part of the obligation under the agreement, the respondents had not performed their part of the agreement and the cause of action arose, when the petitioner was stopped by respondents from issuing Debentures Subscription Agreement by seeking extension of time upto and the respondents, under the garb of this extension of time tried to violate the terms of the agreement and attempted to sell the land at Goa. It is prayed that this Court should entertain the petition and restrain respondents and its servants, agents, assignees etc. from issuing any equity share or any security convertible into equity shares except as provided under clause 6.3 of the agreement. This Court should also issue injunction restraining respondents or their agents from selling, transferring, mortgaging or creating any third party rights directly or indirectly in the land at Goa, meant for hospitality project. The third relief sought is that the respondents and its agents/servants should be restrained from raising any loan as provided in clause 6.3 of the agreement for any amount or for sum of Rs.150 crores. 2. Relevant part of the arbitration agreement a part of the two Call Option Agreements relied upon by the petitioner, reads as under: 19. Governing Law and Arbitration 19.1 This Agreement and all questions of its interpretation shall be construed in accordance with the laws of England, without regard to its principles of conflicts of laws In this clause 19 the Seller and the Company shall be deemed to be one party and the Grantee shall be deemed to be the other Party Any dispute, controversy, claim or difference of any kind whatsoever arising out or in connection with the Agreement (the Dispute ) shall first be attempted to be resolved by discussions and consultations between the Grantee and the Seller in good faith for a period of thirty (30) days after written notice has been sent by registered mail by any Party to the other Party (the Consultation Period ). If the Dispute remains unresolved upon expiration of the Consultation Period, then any Party may submit the Dispute exclusively to arbitration conducted by the Singapore International Arbitration Centre ( SIAC ), for arbitration in Singapore which shall be conducted in accordance with International Arbitration rules of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre ( SIAC Rules ) rules in effect at the time the application for arbitration is made, as may be amended by the rest of this section. The language of the arbitration proceedings and written decisions or correspondence shall be English.

3 3. The agreement also contains a definition clause and the definition of Applicable Law as given in the agreement is as under: Applicable Law shall mean any law, rule, regulation, ordinance, order, treaty, judgment, decree bye-law, terms of any governmental approval, administrative instruction, directive, guideline or any other norm prescribed by any state organ or any decision of, or determination by any court tribunal, governmental department or agency or any state authority, having the force of law, if any country having jurisdiction over any of the Parties or over their assets or over the Company and shall include, along with any of the foregoing, any injunction, permit or decision of any central state, local or municipal government, authority, agency, tribunal, court or other body in Mauritius the Cayman Island and the United States of America, as such Applicable Law may exist from time to time. 4. In view of the arbitration agreement and looking at the memo of parties, this Court asked the petitioner to address the arguments on maintainability of this petition/application. It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the agreement was executed partly at Delhi and partly in Singapore and therefore cause of action exists in Delhi. Reliance was also placed on Section 8 of the agreement, wherein it is provided that parties were also at liberty to take resort to specific performance of the agreement without prejudice to the right of the parties to pursue other remedies in case of a breach of any obligation. It is was submitted that since the agreement provided to settle all disputes and controversies through arbitration, since a dispute had arisen, it gave a right to the petitioner to invoke arbitration clause at Singapore International Arbitration Centre. In the meantime, the land is to be protected and the respondents are to be restrained from taking steps contrary to the agreement (para 21 of the application). In para 17 of the application, it is stated by the petitioner that in case the respondents are successful in selling the land, the agreement will become unenforceable as the sole objective of the said agreement was to develop hotel and hospitality business on the said land. However, during arguments, the Counsel for the petitioner stated that petitioner gives up the relief regarding injunction on selling and transferring the land in Goa and the Court should consider restraining respondents and their servants/agents from issuing equity shares or any security or from raising loan. 5. In order to exercise jurisdiction under Section 9, the Court has to see if the matter was covered under Section 2(e) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, which defines the Court as the Court which could entertain application under Section 9. The first and foremost requirement for exercising jurisdiction under Section 9 is, if on the cause of action mentioned in Section 9 of the petition, a suit had been filed, whether the Court would have been able to entertain the suit. Although, the petitioner during arguments has given up the relief in respect of injunction regarding land in Goa but the entire application shows that the main grievance of the petitioner was that the respondents were trying to sell the land in Goa and petitioner was apprehensive that it would frustrate the entire project. It is to be noted that the other affected party has taken up the matter in appropriate Court ie. the Court of Principal District at Goa and filed an application there for necessary relief, whereas, the petitioner has chosen to file this petition/application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act invoking jurisdiction of Delhi Court without a cause of action being there within Delhi Court. It is nowhere mentioned

4 in the petition/application as to when cause of action arose in respect of reliefs a) and c) or the respondents made any effort to issue equity share or any security convertible into equity shares or the respondent had made effort to raise loan. The entire application is silent on the cause of action for these two reliefs. Para 25 of the application about cause of action reads as under: 25) The cause of action has arisen on the day when the Members of the Project Management Committee of respondent no. 4 along with respondent no. 5 and 6 entered into a Negotiation in Delhi for development of hotel project on the said land. The cause of action further arose when the Members of the Project Management Committee and respondent no. 5 s Delhi Office Respondent no. 6 agreed upon to creation of the petitioner, M/s Pinfold Overseas Pvt. Ltd. S.R.Holding I Limited and S.R.Holding II Limited in different countries to give effect to the Understanding which was entered between the parties. The cause of action further arose when the petitioner executed the said Agreement in Delhi. The cause of action further arose when the Deed of Adherence was executed and sent to Delhi. The cause of action further arose when the respondent failed to fulfill the obligations in terms of the said Agreement. The cause of action further arose when the respondents illegally tried to sell the said land. The cause of action further arose when the petitioner was stopped by the respondents from issuing the Debentures Subscription Agreement by seeking extension of time upto The cause of action further arose when the respondents under the garb of said extension of time tried to violate the terms of the said Agreement and attempted to sell the said land. The cause of action continues to arise in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents. 6. This para itself shows that only action which the petitioner feared was an attempt to sell the land at Goa by the respondents; no other para describes of any effort made by the respondents in terms of prayers a) and c). 7. There is another reason for dismissing this application; respondent no. 6 against whom relief has been sought is not a party to the Call Option Agreement dated The parties to the said Agreement are GL Asia Mauritius II Cayman Ltd., Rollway Partners Limited and Competent Investments Limited i.e. petitioner, respondent no. 1 and respondent no.2. SR Holding II Limited is party to the Deed of Adherence which provides that SR Holding II Limited became party to the agreement on execution of deed of adherence on 5th November, 2008 i.e. the date of its execution. However, neither Sunset Resort Limited (respondent no.4) nor respondent no.5 nor respondent no.6 are the parties to the arbitration agreement and they have been made parties in the petition/application under Section 9. Section 9 application can be filed only against those entities who are party to the arbitration clause. No relief can be obtained under Section 9 against those entities, who are not party to the arbitration clause, since arbitration clause is not binding on those who are not parties to it. I, therefore, consider that this petition/application is ought to be dismissed on this ground as well. 8. I, therefore, dismiss this application on the ground of non- maintainability because of the application having made against parties, who are not parties to the arbitration agreement and because of this Court lacking territorial jurisdiction. The petition is hereby dismissed.

5 Sd./- February 05, 2009 SHIV NARAYAN DHINGRA, J.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Dated of Reserve: July 21, Date of Order : September 05, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Dated of Reserve: July 21, Date of Order : September 05, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Dated of Reserve: July 21, 2008 Date of Order : September 05, 2008 CM(M) No.819/2007 Rajiv Sud...Petitioner Through: Mr. Ravi Gupta

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: July 01, 2009 Date of Order: July 03, 2009 + OMP 338/2009 % 03.07.2009 SAMHO GUNYOUNG CO. LTD.... Petitioner Through : Mr. Debo K. Deori, Adv.

More information

CRP No. 216/2014 VERSUS. Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. CRP No. 220/2014 VERSUS. Bajrang Tea manufacturing Co. [P] Ltd.

CRP No. 216/2014 VERSUS. Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. CRP No. 220/2014 VERSUS. Bajrang Tea manufacturing Co. [P] Ltd. IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) The Federal Bank Ltd. Petitioner VERSUS Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. Respondents CRP No. 220/2014 The Federal

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, OMP No.356/2004. Date of decision : 30th November, 2007

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, OMP No.356/2004. Date of decision : 30th November, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 OMP No.356/2004 Date of decision : 30th November, 2007 AHLUWALIA CONTRACTS (INDIA) LTD. Through : PETITIONER Mr.

More information

+OMP 191/2009 % M/s Delhi Apartments Pvt. Ltd. Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. D. Moitra, Advocates

+OMP 191/2009 % M/s Delhi Apartments Pvt. Ltd. Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. D. Moitra, Advocates * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Reserve: September 09, 2009 Date of Order: October 12, 2009 +OMP 191/2009 % 12.10.2009 M/s Delhi Apartments Pvt. Ltd....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep

More information

THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2015

THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2015 1 AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 252 of 2015. THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2015 A BILL to amend the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. BE it enacted by Parliament in the

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI: NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment pronounced on: 07.03.2012 I.A. No.13124/2011 in CS (OS) No.1674/2011 SURENDRA KUMAR GUPTA Through Mr. J.S. Mann, Adv....

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION. CM No of 2005 in W.P. (C) No of 1987

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION. CM No of 2005 in W.P. (C) No of 1987 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : LAND ACQUISITION CM No. 15134 of 2005 in W.P. (C) No. 1043 of 1987 Orders reserved on : 26th July, 2006 Date of Decision : 7th August, 2006 LATE BAWA HARBANS

More information

Final Judgment on Police Protection Case by Supreme Court Of India 2007 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

Final Judgment on Police Protection Case by Supreme Court Of India 2007 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Final Judgment on Police Protection Case by Supreme Court Of India 2007 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 5460-5466 OF 2004 MORAN M. BASELIOS MARTHOMA MATHEWS

More information

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) No. 134 of 2017

IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) No. 134 of 2017 1 IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION Company Appeal (AT) (Insol.) No. 134 of 2017 [Arising out of Order dated 25 th July, 2017 passed by the Adjudicating Authority

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 Judgment delivered on:

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 Judgment delivered on: THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 Judgment delivered on: 10.10.2013 OMP 234/2013 NSSL LIMITED...PETITIONER Vs HPCL-MITTAL ENERGY LIMITED & ANR....RESPONDENTS

More information

- versus - MAHAMEDHA URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. & ORS

- versus - MAHAMEDHA URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. & ORS IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION Judgment Reserved on: 24th February, 2011 Judgment Pronounced on: 28th February, 2011 CS(OS) No. 2305/2010 SUSHMA SURI & ANR... Plaintiffs

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1534 OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.1439 of 2017) N. Harihara Krishnan Appellant Versus J. Thomas Respondent

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. W.P.(C) No of Reserved on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. W.P.(C) No of Reserved on: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.18028 of 2005 Reserved on: 5.10.2006 Date of Decision: November 21, 2006 Ram Jatan Tripathi... PETITIONER Through Mr. H.K.Chaturvedi,

More information

Arbitration Agreement

Arbitration Agreement Arbitration Agreement (Domestic & International Arbitrations) Written By S. Ravi Shankar Advocate on Record Supreme Court of India Senior Partner - Law Senate Law Firm National President - Arbitration

More information

THE STATE SUITS LIMITATION BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES (These notes form no part of the Bill but are intended only to indicate its general purport)

THE STATE SUITS LIMITATION BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES (These notes form no part of the Bill but are intended only to indicate its general purport) THE STATE SUITS LIMITATION BILL 2017 EXPLANATORY NOTES (These notes form no part of the Bill but are intended only to indicate its general purport) The Bill seeks to repeal and replace the existing Crown

More information

Ashan Devi & Anr vs Phulwasi Devi & Ors on 19 November, 2003

Ashan Devi & Anr vs Phulwasi Devi & Ors on 19 November, 2003 Supreme Court of India Ashan Devi & Anr vs Phulwasi Devi & Ors on 19 November, 2003 Author: Dharmadhikari Bench: Shivaraj V. Patil, D.M. Dharmadhikari. CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 3130 of 2002 Special Leave

More information

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 16 th February, Versus

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision: 16 th February, Versus *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.815/2007 % Date of decision: 16 th February, 2010 OIL AND NATURAL GAS CORPORATION LTD.... Petitioner Through: Mr. V.N. Kaura with Ms. Paramjit Benipal

More information

POST AND TELEGRAPH BENEFIT ASSOCIATION [Cap. 480

POST AND TELEGRAPH BENEFIT ASSOCIATION [Cap. 480 [Cap. 480 CHAPTER 480 Ordinance No. 14 of 1947. AN ORDINANCE TO INCORPORATE THE. Short title. POSI& Telegraph Benefit Association incorporated. General objects. Committee of management. 1. This Ordinance

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 12210/2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 12210/2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005 Date of Decision: 16.01.2012 W.P.(C) 12210/2009 NORTHERN ZONE RAILWAY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE THRIFT AND CREDIT SOCIETY LTD...

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017 Om Sai Punya Educational and Social Welfare Society & Another.Petitioners Versus All India Council

More information

EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL

EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL EASTERN CARIBBEAN SUPREME COURT IN THE COURT OF APPEAL ANGUILLA AXAHCVAP2013/0010 In the Matter of the Companies Act (c. C65) In the Matter of Leeward Isles Resorts Limited (In Liquidation) BETWEEN: [1]

More information

BERMUDA LABOUR RELATIONS ACT : 15

BERMUDA LABOUR RELATIONS ACT : 15 QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA LABOUR RELATIONS ACT 1975 1975 : 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 5A 5B 5C 5D 5E 5F 5G 5H 5I 5J 5K 5L 5M 5N 5O 5P Interpretation Application of Act PART I PART II ARBITRATION,

More information

THE EDUCATIONAL TRIBUNALS BILL, 2010

THE EDUCATIONAL TRIBUNALS BILL, 2010 TO BE INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA CLAUSES THE EDUCATIONAL TRIBUNALS BILL, 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Applicability of Act. 3. Definitions.

More information

FACTUAL NOTE IN RESPECT OF BHATHA LAND (BLOCK NO. 610) FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN PUBLISHED BY THE BANK FOR ITS SALE

FACTUAL NOTE IN RESPECT OF BHATHA LAND (BLOCK NO. 610) FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN PUBLISHED BY THE BANK FOR ITS SALE 1 FACTUAL NOTE IN RESPECT OF BHATHA LAND (BLOCK NO. 610) FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS BEEN PUBLISHED BY THE BANK FOR ITS SALE Against three mortgages of agricultural lands situated in villages Pal and Bhatha admeasuring

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 5568/2017 & CM No /2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 5568/2017 & CM No /2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 18.09.2017 + W.P.(C) 5568/2017 & CM No. 23379/2017 M/S EPSILON PUBLISHING HOUSE PVT LTD... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS... Respondents

More information

PART I ARBITRATION - CHAPTER I

PART I ARBITRATION - CHAPTER I INDIAN BARE ACTS THE ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 No.26 of 1996 [16th August, 1996] An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to domestic arbitration, international commercial arbitration

More information

Source: BOOK: International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration, J. Paulsson (ed.), Suppl. 30 (January/2000)

Source: BOOK: International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration, J. Paulsson (ed.), Suppl. 30 (January/2000) Source: BOOK: International Handbook on Commercial Arbitration, J. Paulsson (ed.), Suppl. 30 (January/2000) The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (No. 26 of 1996), [16th August 1996] India An Act

More information

M/S UTC FIRE & SECURITY INDIA LTD Through: Ms Jasleen K. Oberoi and Ms Surbhi Mehta, Advs.

M/S UTC FIRE & SECURITY INDIA LTD Through: Ms Jasleen K. Oberoi and Ms Surbhi Mehta, Advs. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 O.M.P. 529/2014 Judgement reserved on: 08.12.2014 Judgement pronounced on: 27.01.2015. M/S UTC FIRE & SECURITY INDIA

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Decided on: versus CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Decided on: versus CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE DEEPA SHARMA JUDGMENT * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decided on: 23.05.2017 + CS(COMM) 89/2017 and IA Nos. 13470/2014 & 21815/2014 LOUIS VUITTON Through:... Plaintiff Mr Pravin Anand, Mr Dhruv Anand, Ms. Udita

More information

INVESTMENT AGREEMENT. relating to [COMPANY NAME]

INVESTMENT AGREEMENT. relating to [COMPANY NAME] Dated 2017 THE INVESTOR and THE FOUNDERS and THE COMPANY [and OTHERS] INVESTMENT AGREEMENT relating to [COMPANY NAME] TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTERPRETATION... 1 2. INVESTMENT... 4 3. COMPLETION... 5 4. WARRANTIES...

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRADE MARK Order Reserved on: Date of Decision: January 29, 2007 CS(OS)No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRADE MARK Order Reserved on: Date of Decision: January 29, 2007 CS(OS)No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRADE MARK Order Reserved on: 09.01.2007 Date of Decision: January 29, 2007 CS(OS)No.2749 OF 2000 Prestige Housewares Ltd. & Anr.... Plaintiffs Through:

More information

306 EAST 81ST STREET UPPER EAST SIDE, MANHATTAN RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE WITH GROUND FLOOR RETAIL

306 EAST 81ST STREET UPPER EAST SIDE, MANHATTAN RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE WITH GROUND FLOOR RETAIL 306 EAST 81ST STREET UPPER EAST SIDE, MANHATTAN RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSE WITH GROUND FLOOR RETAIL PRINCIPAL REGISTRATION AND CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT THIS REGISTRATION AND CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT (this

More information

Through: Versus. Through: 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Yes. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest?

Through: Versus. Through: 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? Yes. 3. Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest? *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + OMP No.552/2006 % Date of decision : 06.07.2009 Sh. Surender Pal Singh Through:. Petitioner Mr. Amit Bansal & Ms. Manisha Singh, Advocates for petitioner. Versus

More information

This report is a copyright of Nishith Desai Associates. No reader should act on the basis of any statement contained herein

This report is a copyright of Nishith Desai Associates. No reader should act on the basis of any statement contained herein 93-B MITTAL COURT, NARIMAN POINT MUMBAI 400 021 INDIA. TEL: +91 22 5669 5000 FAX: +91-22 5669 5001 220 CALIFORNIA AVENUE., SUITE 201 PALO ALTO, CA 94306 USA. TEL: +1 650 325 7100 FAX: +1 650 325 7300 PRESTIGE

More information

308 EAST 109TH STREET I NEW YORK, NY

308 EAST 109TH STREET I NEW YORK, NY EXCLUSIVE OFFERING MEMORANDUM 308 EAST 109TH STREET I NEW YORK, NY LUXURY MIXED-USE ELEVATOR BUILDING IN EAST HARLEM EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Eastern Consolidated, as exclusive agent, is pleased to offer for

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 WP(C) No.14332/2004 Pronounced on : 14.03.2008 Sanjay Kumar Jha...

More information

PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA ARBITRATION ACT NO. 11 OF 1995

PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA ARBITRATION ACT NO. 11 OF 1995 PARLIAMENT OF THE DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF SRI LANKA ARBITRATION ACT NO. 11 OF 1995 (Certified on 30 th June-1995) Arbitration Act. No. 11 of 1995 1 (Certified on 30 th June-1995) L.D. O.10/93

More information

Exclusive Offering Memorandum. 21 Crosby Street. Prime Corner SoHo Mixed-Use Building

Exclusive Offering Memorandum. 21 Crosby Street. Prime Corner SoHo Mixed-Use Building Exclusive Offering Memorandum 21 Crosby Street Prime Corner SoHo Mixed-Use Building PRINCIPAL REGISTRATION AND CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT THIS REGISTRATION AND CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT (this Agreement

More information

Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 56, No. 9, 26th January, 2017

Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 56, No. 9, 26th January, 2017 Legal Supplement Part C to the Trinidad and Tobago Gazette, Vol. 56, No. 9, 26th January, 2017 No. 6 of 2017 Second Session Eleventh Parliament Republic of Trinidad and Tobago HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

More information

REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT CHAPTER 88:01 ACT 23 OF 1972

REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT CHAPTER 88:01 ACT 23 OF 1972 REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ACT CHAPTER 88:01 ACT 23 OF 1972 Amended by 42 of 1972 11 of 1975 25 of 1977 44 of 1978 59/1978 60/1978 61/1978 2 of 1979 136/1980 137/1980 3 of 1987

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012. Versus

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012. Versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR RECOVERY Date of decision: 17th July, 2013 RFA 383/2012 DESIGN WORKS Through: Mr. Kuldeep Kumar, Adv.... Appellant Versus ICICI BANK LTD... Respondent

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8 TH DAY OF APRIL 2015 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE VINEET SARAN AND THE HON BLE MRS.JUSTICE S SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO.57422 OF 2013 (CESTAT)

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner.

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner. THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 30.07.2010 + WP (C) 11932/2009 M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner - versus THE VALUE ADDED TAX OFFICER & ANR... Respondent

More information

SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC)

SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC) GUIDE TO INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC) Written By S. Ravi Shankar Advocate on Record - Supreme Court of India National President of Arbitration Bar of India

More information

Royal Trust Corporation of Canada Act

Royal Trust Corporation of Canada Act ROYAL TRUST CORPORATION OF CANADA c. 69 1 Royal Trust Corporation of Canada Act being a Private Act Chapter 69 of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1978 (effective April 25, 1978). NOTE: This consolidation

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(C)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(C) 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(C) No. 3768 of 2015 ------ M/s Tata Steel Limited, an existing Company under previous Company Law, through Mrs. MeenaLall wife of Shri BehariLall,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Crl. M.(C ) No. 1514/2007. Judgment reserved on: September 05, 2008

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. Crl. M.(C ) No. 1514/2007. Judgment reserved on: September 05, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Crl. M.(C ) No. 1514/2007 Judgment reserved on: September 05, 2008 Judgment delivered on: November 03, 2008 Suresh Jindal...

More information

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P.(C) No.2037/1992 & CM No.3935/1992 (for interim relief). Versus

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P.(C) No.2037/1992 & CM No.3935/1992 (for interim relief). Versus *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 20 th September, 2010. + W.P.(C) No.2037/1992 & CM No.3935/1992 (for interim relief). % SH. SATISH CHAND KAPOOR (DECEASED) THROUGH LR s Through:...

More information

11. To give effect to this guarantee, the IRBI may act as though the guarantors were the principal debtor to the IRBI. 6. The appellant sanctioned the

11. To give effect to this guarantee, the IRBI may act as though the guarantors were the principal debtor to the IRBI. 6. The appellant sanctioned the Hon'ble Judges: Dalveer Bhandari and H.L. Dattu, JJ. Dalveer Bhandari, J. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Civil Appeal No. 4613 of 2000 Decided On: 18.08.2009 Industrial Investment Bank of India Ltd. Vs.

More information

COMPANY LIMITED BY SHARES (Incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956)

COMPANY LIMITED BY SHARES (Incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956) COMPANY LIMITED BY SHARES (Incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956) The following regulations comprised in these Articles of Association were adopted by the Board of Directors of the company in their

More information

SETTLEMENT DEED AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT DEED AND RELEASE DATED ------------ SETTLEMENT DEED AND RELEASE BETWEEN (1) GEN FIT LIMITED (2) PV FIT LIMITED (3) TIMOTHY [x] BIRT AND (4) SIAC WIND ENERGY (UK) LIMITED CONTENTS CLAUSE 1. Definitions and interpretation...

More information

55 West 17 th Street I

55 West 17 th Street I Exclusive Offering Memorandum 55 West 17 th Street I Flatiron, Manhattan, New York I Retail Condominium at the Base of Toll Brothers City Living s New Construction Luxury Residential Building PRINCIPAL

More information

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus. 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus. 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 23 rd July, 2010. + W.P.(C) 11305/2009, CM No.10831/2009 (u/s 151 CPC for stay), CM No.9694/2010 (u/o1 Rule 10 of CPC for impleadment) & CM No.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2017 S.L.P.(c) No.27722/2017) (D.No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No OF 2017 S.L.P.(c) No.27722/2017) (D.No. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No. 16850 OF 2017 (@ S.L.P.(c) No.27722/2017) (D.No.21033/2017) REPORTABLE Himangni Enterprises.Appellant(s) VERSUS Kamaljeet Singh

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Judgment reserved on: Judgment delivered on: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Judgment reserved on: 15.03.2011 Judgment delivered on: 18.03.2011 RSA No.243/2006 & CM No.10268/2006 SHRI.D.V. SINGH & ANR...Appellants

More information

CHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT. Section A

CHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT. Section A CHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT Section A Article 9.1: Definitions For the purposes of this Chapter: Centre means the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) established by the ICSID Convention;

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005. Judgment decided on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005. Judgment decided on: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, 1956 W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005 Judgment decided on: 14.02.2011 C.D. SINGH Through: Mr Ranjan Mukherjee, Advocate....Petitioner

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO. 1021 OF 2016 M/s Andrew Telecommunications India Pvt. Ltd., Plot No. N-2, Phase IV, Verna Industrial Estate, Verna, Salcette, Goa-403 722, India.

More information

A Presentation by. Years of Expert Professional Services

A Presentation by. Years of Expert Professional Services A Presentation by Years of Expert Professional Services 1 1. History of Competition Law 2. Objectives of Competition Law 3. Competition Law & Regulations 4. Legislation In India.Competition Act, 2002 2

More information

BERMUDA BERMUDA INTERNATIONAL CONCILIATION AND ARBITRATION ACT : 29

BERMUDA BERMUDA INTERNATIONAL CONCILIATION AND ARBITRATION ACT : 29 QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA BERMUDA INTERNATIONAL CONCILIATION AND ARBITRATION ACT 1993 1993 : 29 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Short Title PART I PRELIMINARY

More information

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE. Versus

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE. Versus *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.807/2008. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & ANR. Petitioner Through: Mr Prem Kumar and Mr Sharad C.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.5517 OF 2007

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL No.5517 OF 2007 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.5517 OF 2007 Nadiminti Suryanarayan Murthy(Dead) through LRs..Appellant(s) VERSUS Kothurthi Krishna Bhaskara Rao &

More information

India. Neerav Merchant. Majmudar & Partners Mumbai. Law firm bio

India. Neerav Merchant. Majmudar & Partners Mumbai. Law firm bio India Neerav Merchant Majmudar & Partners Mumbai nmerchant@majmudarindia.com Law firm bio 1. What are the current challenges to enforcement of multi-tiered dispute resolution clauses? At the outset, in

More information

AGREEMENT WITH BUILDER THIS AGREEMENT MADE BETWEEN:

AGREEMENT WITH BUILDER THIS AGREEMENT MADE BETWEEN: AGREEMENT WITH BUILDER THIS AGREEMENT MADE BETWEEN: LUX RESIDENTIAL WARRANTY PROGRAM INC., a federally incorporated corporation doing business in Atlantic Canada AND BUILDER COMPANY NAME: ADDRESS: POSTAL

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Writ Petition (Civil) No of 2008 and CM No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Writ Petition (Civil) No of 2008 and CM No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Writ Petition (Civil) No. 7230 of 2008 and CM No.13974 of 2008 Decided on: October 03, 2008 1. The Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs

More information

THE PLAZA AT CRYSTAL RUN

THE PLAZA AT CRYSTAL RUN Exclusive Offering Memorandum THE PLAZA AT CRYSTAL RUN Middletown, Orange County, New York Shopping Center 211 NORTH GALLERIA DRIVE PRINCIPAL REGISTRATION AND CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT THIS REGISTRATION

More information

The Specific Relief Act, 1963

The Specific Relief Act, 1963 The Specific Relief Act, 1963 [47 OF 1963] SPECIFIC RELIEF ACT, 1963 [47 OF 1963] An Act to define and amend the law relating to certain kinds of specific relief. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fourteenth

More information

AGREEMENT WITH BUILDER. NAME or COMPANY NAME: ADDRESS:

AGREEMENT WITH BUILDER. NAME or COMPANY NAME: ADDRESS: Rev. 04/15 AGREEMENT WITH BUILDER THIS AGREEMENT MADE BETWEEN: ATLANTIC HOME WARRANTY ( AHW ), a body corporate, carrying on business in the Atlantic Provinces and NAME or COMPANY NAME: ADDRESS: POSTAL

More information

Through :Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Ms. Abhiruchi Arora, Mr. Akhil Sachar and Ms. Jaishree Shukla, Advs.

Through :Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Ms. Abhiruchi Arora, Mr. Akhil Sachar and Ms. Jaishree Shukla, Advs. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE IA No. 16809/2010 (u/o 7 R 10 & 11 r/w Sec. 151 CPC) in CS(OS) No. 1830/2010 IA No. 16756/2010 (u/o 7 R 10 & 11 r/w Sec. 151 CPC)

More information

KNOWLEDGE REPONERE. (A Weekly Bulletin) (06 to 10, 13 to 17 and 20 to 24 November, 2017)

KNOWLEDGE REPONERE. (A Weekly Bulletin) (06 to 10, 13 to 17 and 20 to 24 November, 2017) KNOWLEDGE REPONERE (A Weekly Bulletin) (06 to 10, 13 to 17 and 20 to 24 November, 2017) All rights reserved. No part of this Publication may be translated or copied in any form or by any means without

More information

World Assurance Group, Inc. Supplemental Information. April 7, 2015

World Assurance Group, Inc. Supplemental Information. April 7, 2015 World Assurance Group, Inc. Supplemental Information April 7, 2015 Item 1.01 Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement. On March 30, 2015, World Media & Technology Corp., a Nevada corporation ( WRMT or

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CELLULAR OPERATORS ASS.O.I. & ORS. - Versus -

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CELLULAR OPERATORS ASS.O.I. & ORS. - Versus - THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 15.01.2010 + W.P.(C) 583/2007 CELLULAR OPERATORS ASS.O.I. & ORS... Petitioner - Versus - NIVEDITA SHARMA & ORS... Respondent Advocates who

More information

INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR CHANGING AN ADULT S NAME

INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR CHANGING AN ADULT S NAME INSTRUCTION SHEET FOR CHANGING AN ADULT S NAME The forms presented in this packet are designed to guide you in the preparation of your change of name. You must type in the required information as it applies

More information

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 3964/2017 INDO ARYA CENTRAL TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS),

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 3964/2017 INDO ARYA CENTRAL TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), $~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 3964/2017 Date of Decision: 12 th March, 2018 INDO ARYA CENTRAL TRANSPORT LIMITED & ORS.... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sachin Datta,

More information

Amendments to Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

Amendments to Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 NPPO DIGEST #01 PAGE 1 #01, NOVEMBER 2015 Amendments to Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Ashok Sharma The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 ( Act ) has been amended by the Arbitration and Conciliation

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO of 2008 BHARGAVA & ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD.& ORS...

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO of 2008 BHARGAVA & ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD.& ORS... 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5099 of 2008 BHARGAVA & ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD.& ORS... APPELLANTS VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.. RESPONDENTS W I T H CIVIL APPEAL

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT. ITA No.572 of 2011 RESERVED ON: MAY 19, 2011 PRONOUNCED ON: JULY 11, 2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT. ITA No.572 of 2011 RESERVED ON: MAY 19, 2011 PRONOUNCED ON: JULY 11, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INCOME TAX ACT ITA No.572 of 2011 RESERVED ON: MAY 19, 2011 PRONOUNCED ON: JULY 11, 2011 COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX... APPELLANT through : Mr. Sanjeev

More information

Sale of NPL accounts by Dena Bank Invitation for submission of EoI

Sale of NPL accounts by Dena Bank Invitation for submission of EoI Sale of NPL accounts by Dena Bank Invitation for submission of EoI Dena Bank (or the Bank ) invites Expression of Interest from ARCs, Banks, FIs and eligible NBFCs for the proposed sale of its Non Performing

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) No.887/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 VERSUS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) No.887/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 VERSUS IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CM(M) No.887/2014 DATE OF DECISION : 25th September, 2014 SMT. SALONI MAHAJAN Through: Mr. Puneet Saini, Advocate....Petitioner

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. W.P. Crl. No. 1029/2010. Decided on: 9th August, 2011.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. W.P. Crl. No. 1029/2010. Decided on: 9th August, 2011. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE W.P. Crl. No. 1029/2010 Decided on: 9th August, 2011. DEEPAK GARG Through: Mr. Vijay Agarwal, Advocate.... Petitioner versus

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P.(C) 4784/2014 and CM No.9529/2014 (Stay)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P.(C) 4784/2014 and CM No.9529/2014 (Stay) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4784/2014 and CM No.9529/2014 (Stay) Pronounced on: December 11, 2015 M/S IMS MERCANTILES PVT. LTD.... Petitioner Through: Mr.Bharat Gupta with Mr.Saurabh

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI (Original Civil jurisdiction under the Financial Institutions (Recovery Ordinance, 2001 SUIT NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI (Original Civil jurisdiction under the Financial Institutions (Recovery Ordinance, 2001 SUIT NO. AMENDED TITLE OF THE PLANT PURSUANT TO ORDER DT 16.9.2004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI (Original Civil jurisdiction under the Financial Institutions (Recovery Ordinance, 2001 SUIT NO. B-69 OF

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EXCISE ACT, 1944 CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE NOS. 48/2012 & 49/2012 Date of decision: 2nd August, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EXCISE ACT, 1944 CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE NOS. 48/2012 & 49/2012 Date of decision: 2nd August, 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EXCISE ACT, 1944 CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE NOS. 48/2012 & 49/2012 Date of decision: 2nd August, 2013 HINDUSTAN INSECTICIEDES LTD.... Appellant Through Mr.

More information

FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT

FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT FOREIGN JUDGMENTS (RECIPROCAL ENFORCEMENT) ACT Arrangement of Sections 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. Part 1: Registration of Foreign Judgments 3. Power to extend Part I of Act to countries giving

More information

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Issued Date: 3 January 2011

TERMS OF REFERENCE. Issued Date: 3 January 2011 TERMS OF REFERENCE Issued Date: 3 January 2011 Last Revised Date: 21 March 2017 List of Revisions Revision No. Revision Date Effective Date Revision 1 23 November 2015 1 December 2015 Revision 2 21 March

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS) ACT, Date of decision: 8th February, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS) ACT, Date of decision: 8th February, 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS) ACT, 1971 Date of decision: 8th February, 2012 WP(C) NO.11374/2006 OCEAN PLASTICS & FIBRES (P) LIMITED

More information

$~OS-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH

$~OS-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT NATH $~OS-5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 1320/2014 Date of Decision: January 16, 2018 LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER... Plaintiff Through Mr.Dhruv Anand, Ms.Udita Patro & Mr.Shamim Nooreyezdan

More information

THE SICK TEXTILE UNDERTAKINGS (NATIONALISATION) ACT, 1974 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

THE SICK TEXTILE UNDERTAKINGS (NATIONALISATION) ACT, 1974 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS THE SICK TEXTILE UNDERTAKINGS (NATIONALISATION) ACT, 1974 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY SECTIONS 1. Short title and commencement. 2. Definitions. CHAPTER II ACQUISITION OF THE RIGHTS OF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2011) :Versus:

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2011) :Versus: 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4043 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.10173 of 2011) Central Bank of India Appellant :Versus: C.L. Vimla & Ors.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2012 OF 2011 The Commissioner of Income Tax 10, Aayakar Bhavan, M. K. Road, Mumbai-400020...Appellant.

More information

Phased Development Agreement Authorization Bylaw No. 4899, 2016 (Sewell s Landing)

Phased Development Agreement Authorization Bylaw No. 4899, 2016 (Sewell s Landing) District of West Vancouver Phased Development Agreement Authorization Bylaw No. 4899, 2016 (Sewell s Landing Effective Date: October 24, 2016 1089614v2 District of West Vancouver Phased Development Agreement

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between. And

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between. And REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV 2012-00877 Between BABY SOOKRAM (as Representative of the estate of Sonnyboy Sookram, pursuant to the order of Mr. Justice Mon

More information

BERMUDA TRADE UNION ACT : 171

BERMUDA TRADE UNION ACT : 171 QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA TRADE UNION ACT 1965 1965 : 171 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Interpretation Exclusions Objects Purposes of

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF EASTERN CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1995 BETWEEN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE IN THE MATTER OF EASTERN CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1995 BETWEEN REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. CV2015-04009 IN THE MATTER OF EASTERN CREDIT UNION CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED AND IN THE MATTER OF THE COMPANIES ACT 1995 BETWEEN

More information

MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION

MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION MEMORANDUM OF ASSOCIATION AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION (Amended upto September 93) C E N T R E F O R S O C I A L S T U D I E S, University Campus, Udhna-Magdalla Road, SURAT - 395 007 Memorandum of Association

More information

Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010

Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (No. 42 of 2010*) An Act to consolidate the law to regulate the acceptance and utilisation of foreign contribution or foreign hospitality by certain individuals

More information

For personal use only

For personal use only Annexure A This is Annexure A of 3 pages referred to in Form 604 signed by me dated 18 November 2011 3. Details of relevant interests Holder of relevant interest India Equities Fund Limited Nature of relevant

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRAI ACT, 1997 WP(C) 617/2013 & CM No.1167/2013 (interim relief) DATE OF ORDER :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRAI ACT, 1997 WP(C) 617/2013 & CM No.1167/2013 (interim relief) DATE OF ORDER : IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : TRAI ACT, 1997 WP(C) 617/2013 & CM No.1167/2013 (interim relief) DATE OF ORDER : 13.03.2013 IDEA CELLULAR LIMITED & ANR....Petitioners Through: Mr. Maninder

More information

THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION BILL, 2011

THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION BILL, 2011 AS PASSED BY LOK SABHA ON 27TH DECEMBER, 11 CLAUSES Bill No. 97-C of THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION BILL, 11 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Provisions

More information