IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA GLENN BENDER, vs» NORFOLK IRON & METAL COMPANY, APPEAL FROM THE NEBRASKA WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION COURT

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA GLENN BENDER, vs» NORFOLK IRON & METAL COMPANY, APPEAL FROM THE NEBRASKA WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION COURT"

Transcription

1 I IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA o GLENN BENDER, vs» Plaintiff-Appellee, NORFOLK IRON & METAL COMPANY, APPEAL FROM THE NEBRASKA WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION COURT Judge Ted W. Vrana Judge Mark A. Buchholz Judge Paul E. LeClair o o Defendant-Appellant. BRIEF OF APPELLANT o SUPREME COURT OF NEBRASKA BY: OF: Lynn A. Melson Walter E. Zink II BAYLOR, EVNEN, CURTISS, GRIMIT & WITT 1200 American Charter Center Lincoln, Nebraska (402) JUN 2? 1986

2 i INDEX Subject Index Pages Statement of the Case 1 Assignments of Error 2 Propositions of Law 3 Statement of Facts 4 Argument: I. WHERE PLAINTIFF HAS NOT PROVEN EACH OF THE INDISPENSABLE ELEMENTS OF HIS CLAIM BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE HE IS NOT ENTITLED TO AN AWARD OF COMPENSATION A. THE CLAIMANT'S OWN TESTIMONY, TOGETHER WITH THE MEDICAL TESTIMONY AND RECORDS, FAIL TO SUPPORT ANY CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CLAIMANT'S SUBJECTIVE SYMPTOMS OF PAIN, AND THE ACCIDENT OF OCTOBER 31, II. WHERE A VOCATIONAL PLAN IS BASED UPON AN EMPLOYEE'S PHYSICAL COMPLAINTS WHICH MAY NOT RESULT IN A PERMANENT DISABILITY AND WHERE THE EMPLOYEE MAY BE ABLE TO RETURN TO WORK FOR WHICH HE HAS PREVIOUS TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE HE IS NOT ENTITLED TO VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION SERVICES Conclusion 13 CASES CITED Aldrich v. ASARCO, Inc., 221 Neb. 126, 375 N. W. 2d 150 (1985) 11 Caradori v. Frontier Airlines, Inc., 213 Neb. 513, 329 N. W. 2d 865 (1983) 11, 12 Husted v. Peter Kiewit & Sons Construction Co., 210 Neb. 109, 313 N.W.2d 248, 250 (1981) Klentz v. TransAmerican Freightliners, Inc., 173 Neb. 53, 112 N.W.2d 405 (1961).. 9

3 ii Mack v. Dale Electronics, Inc., 209 Neb. 367, 307 N. W. 2d 814 (1981) 9 Oline v. Nebraska Natural Gas Co., 177 Neb. 851, 131 N.W.2d 410 (1964) 7 Parrish v. Karlkehm, 186 Neb. 252, 182 N.W.2d 422 (1970) 7 Pocevicius v. Armour Co., 185 Neb. 668, 178 N.W.2d 265 (1970) 7 Powell v. W. G. Pauley Lumber Co., 217 Neb. 707, , 350 N.W.2d 556, 558 (1984) 9 Pruitt v. McMaken Transportation Co., 175 Neb. 477, 122 N.W.2d 236 (1936) 8 Smith v. Stevens, 173 Neb. 723, 114 N.W.2d 724, 7, (1962) Welke v. City of Ainsworth, 179 Neb. 496, 138 N. W. 2d 808 (1965) 7 Wheeler v. Northwestern Metal Co., 175 Neb. 841, 124 N. W. 2d 377 (1963) 8 STATUTES CITED Neb. Rev. Stat. Section (2) (Reissue 1984).. 10 Neb. Rev. Stat. Section (Reissue 1984) 2, 13

4 STATEMENT OF THE CASE A. Nature of Litigation. This is a workmen's compensation case wherein the plaintiff seeks compensation benefits as a result of an accident occurring on October 31, 1984 at which time the plaintiff was employed by the defendant as a shearer operator. He suffered injuries to his right foot as the result of an accident when a heavy metal sheet fell on his foot. Plaintiff has since complained of pain in his right foot and alleges that the pain renders him temporarily totally disabled and entitles him to vocational rehabilitation services. An award on rehearing was entered and an appeal to this Court has followed. B. The Issues Tried Below. The following issues were tried by the Compensation Court on rehearing: 1. Whether the plaintiff continued to be temporarily totally disabled at any time after his return to work on April 15, Whether the plaintiff's application for and receipt of unemployment compensation benefits after his employment with defendant terminated precludes the plaintiff from recovering further temporary total disability benefits. 3. Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an award of vocational rehabilitation. 4. The extent of plaintiff's disability. -1-

5 5. The compensability of certain costs and medical expenses. C. The Issues Decided Below and Judgment. On rehearing, the plaintiff was awarded benefits of $ per week from November 1, 1984 to April 15, 1985 and from April 30, 1985 to November 21, 1985 for temporary total disability compensation and in addition thereto the sum of $ per week for so long in the future as the plaintiff shall remain temporarily totally disabled as a result of the accident. The defendant was required to continue to provide and for such future medical and hospital care and treatment as pay may be reasonably necessary as a result of said accident and injury. The Court found that the plaintiff was unable to perform work for which he had previous training or experience and was entitled to rehabilitation services as provided in Neb. Rev. Stat. Section (Reissue 1984). o ASSIGNMENTS OF ERROR The Workmen's Compensation Court on rehearing erred: 1. In finding that the plaintiff's current disability is causally related to his accident of October 31, In finding that the plaintiff is entitled to vocational rehabilitation services as awarded on rehearing. o -2-

6 PROPOSITIONS OF LAW I. WHERE PLAINTIFF HAS NOT PROVEN EACH OF THE INDISPENSABLE ELEMENTS OF HIS CLAIM BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE HE IS NOT ENTITLED TO AN AWARD OF COMPENSATION. Parrish v. Karlkehm, 186 Neb. 252, 182 N.W.2d 422 (1970) Smith v. Stevens, 173 Neb. 723, 114 N.W.2d 724, 726 (1962) Welke v. City of Ainsworth, 179 Neb. 496, 138 N.W.2d 808 (1965) Wheeler v. Northwestern Metal Co., 175 Neb. 841, 124 N.W.2d 377 (1963) A. THE CLAIMANT'S OWN TESTIMONY, TOGETHER WITH THE MEDICAL TESTIMONY AND RECORDS FAIL TO SUPPORT ANY CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CLAIMANT'S SUBJECTIVE SYMPTOMS OF PAIN, AND THE ACCIDENT OF OCTOBER 31, Caradori v. Frontier Airlines, Inc., 213 Neb. 513, 329 N.W.2d 865 (1983) Husted v. Peter Kiewit & Sons Construction Co., 210 Neb. 109, 313 N.W.2d 248, 250 (1981) Mack v. Dale Electronics, Inc Neb. 367, 307 N.W.2d 814 (1981) Powell v. W. G. Pauley Lumber Co Neb. 707, , 350 N.W.2d 556, 558 (1984) Neb. Rev. Stat. Section (2) (Reissue 1984) II. WHERE A VOCATIONAL PLAN IS BASED UPON AN EMPLOYEE'S PHYSICAL COMPLAINTS WHICH MAY NOT RESULT IN A PERMANENT DISABILITY AND WHERE THE EMPLOYEE CAN RETURN TO WORK FOR WHICH HE HAS PREVIOUS TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE HE IS NOT ENTITLED TO VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION SERVICES. Neb. Rev. Stat. Section (Reissue 1984) -3-

7 STATEMENT OF FACTS On October 31, 1984, the appellee Glen Bender, suffered an injury to his right foot as a result of an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment with Norfolk Iron & Metal Company. At the time of the accident, appellee was employed as a shearer and breaker operator. (3:1). He was assisting in cutting a large piece of metal when it fell on the toes of his right foot. (3:12-21). He received medical care from Dr. Henkel and returned to work, upon the advice of his doctor, on April 15, (4:4-18). On his return to work at Norfolk Iron & Metal Company, Mr. Bender worked full-time for about two weeks as an overhead crane operator. (5:5-8, 10:12-18). The appellee and his employer then had a dispute about a personal loan and the appellee, Bender, left the employ of Norfolk Iron & Metal Company on approximately April 29, (10:19-11:2). Appellee then applied for unemployment compensation benefits and received them for three or four months. (11:6, 11:19-21). During that period of time, the appellee looked for work as a truck driver and in the field of auto repair mechanics and thought these were the types of jobs that he might be able to do. (12:1-10). The appellee testified that, although he could not lift anything heavy or engage in any weight bearing on his foot for any length of time, he could work from a sitting position or a less active position for his foot. (9:15-10:5). -4-

8 Mr. Bender continued to see Dr. Henkel and was referred by him to Dr. Frost. (6:8-14). Dr. Dwight M. Frost of the Immanuel Rshobilitstion C6n16r i.n Omaha first saw the sppsllsg on June 26, (El,5). Dr. Frost examined the appellee's right foot and took x-rays of the injured area. (El,5-6). At that time, Dr. Frost prescribed a physical therapy program at the Lutheran Hospital of Norfolk and provided the appellee with axillary crutches and a prescription for Motrin. The appellee was reexamined on July 17, 1985 by Dr. Frost. (El,8). He recommended that the appellee continue the medication, the of the crutches and his physical therapy program and also use sent him to the Missouri Valley Orthotic & Prosthetic Center in Omaha where they fabricated a plastic insert support for the right shoe. The next reexamination of the appellee occurred on July 24, 1985 at which time Dr. Frost began to suspect that the appellee had a sympathetic dystrophy or a reflex persistence of pain. (El,9-10). He recommended finding a method to interrupt the pain cycle caused by the autonomic system, for example, a sphenopalatine ganglion block. (El,13). Dr. Frost testified that when he initially saw Mr. Bender on June 26, 1985, he had fractures of the second, third and fourth toes and the big toe. (El,18). Dr. Frost also testified that the great or big toe was healed long before the reexamination of August 21, 1985, that it was his opinion that -5-

9 as of August 21, 1985, all fractures had probably reached maximum improvement, and that by the time of his deposition on November 13, 1985, the fractures had completely healed. (El,21). Dr. Frost also testified that the appellee's autonomic condition limited his mobility and that the had not reached maximum improvement of the autonomic appellee condition or sympathetic dystrophy as of the time of the November 13, 1985 deposition. (El,16-17). Dr. Frost was unable to make any determination of permanent partial disability and stated that the likelihood of the claimant's ability to return to his prior employment depended on the success of the treatment for the pain. (El,17). The only medical evidence submitted by appellee is from Dr. Frost. Nowhere in the medical evidence submitted is there any indication that the alleged pain suffered by the appellee and any resulting disability therefrom is causally related to the accident and injury of October 31, Indeed, nowhere in the record is there any medical evidence to establish the plaintiff's fractured toes on his right foot were caused by the accident of October 31, (El,5:17-7:4). o -6-

10 ARGUMENT I. WHERE PLAINTIFF HAS NOT PROVEN EACH OF THE INDISPENSABLE ELEMENTS OF HIS CLAIM BY A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE HE IS NOT ENTITLED TO AN AWARD OF COMPENSATION. Nebraska adheres to the rule that plaintiff must show a causal connection between the accident suffered by him and the alleged disability. Smith v. Stevens. 173 Neb. 723, 114 N.W.2d 724 (1962). Under this doctrine, the appellee is required to show with reasonable certainty that the alleged injury occurred, and that it was caused by an accident arising out of and in the course of the claimant's employment. Since the claimant has the burden of demonstrating that his case falls under the Workmen's Compensation Act, he must offer proof which preponderates in his favor on each of the indispensable elements of his claim. Pocevicius v. Armour Co., 185 Neb. 668, 178 N.W.2d 265 (1970); Welke v. City of Ainsworth, 179 Neb. 496, 138 N.W.2d 808 (1965). If the claimant has not proven each of the essential elements by a preponderance of the evidence he is not entitled to recovery. To this end, this Court has consistently held that although a rule of liberal construction exists with respect to workmen's compensation, this rule applies to the law, and not to the evidence offered to support a claim. See, Parrish v. Karlkehm, 186 Neb. 252, 182 N.W.2d 422 (1970); Oline v. Nebraska Natural Gas Co., 177 Neb. 851, 131 N.W.2d 410 (1964). Since the rule of liberal construction is held to apply only to the law, it does not dispense with the necessity that the claimant prove -7-

11 his right to compensation within the rules required by the Compensation Act. Nor does it permit a court to award compensation where the requisite proof is lacking. Wheeler v. Northwestern Metal Co., 175 Neb. 841, 124 N.W.2d 377 (1963); Pruitt v. McMaken Transportation Co., 175 Neb. 477, 122 N.W.2d 236 (1936). In the instant case the plaintiff seeks compensation for an injury and resultant disability which he contends is completely attributable to an accident which occurred on October 31, 1984, while he was working in the employ of the defendant. In the context of plaintiff's case, he must establish that his injuries occurred as a result of an accident within the meaning of the Compensation Act; that he suffers a residual, permanent disability as a result of the accident and injury; and that there is a casual relation between the injury, his employment, and his disability. Additionally, since plaintiff seeks benefits for vocational rehabilitation, he is required to demonstrate that he is unable to perform work for which he has previous training or experience as a result of his injury, or that he has suffered a reduction in earning power that may be remedied by job retraining. The plaintiff, clearly, has not met his burden with respect to any of these essential elements. A. THE CLAIMANT'S OWN TESTIMONY, TOGETHER WITH THE MEDICAL TESTIMONY AND RECORDS, FAIL TO SUPPORT ANY CAUSAL RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CLAIMANT'S SUBJECTIVE SYMPTOMS OF PAIN, AND THE ACCIDENT OF OCTOBER 31, It is apparent that the plaintiff has failed to establish -8-

12 by a preponderance of the evidence the requisite medical causation between his alleged accident and any disability. Smith v. Stevens, supra. The general rule in Nebraska when an employee is claiming benefits for a subjective condition, as in the case at bar, is as follows: Where the claimed injuries are of such a character as to require skilled and professional persons to determine the cause and extent thereof, the question is one of science. Such a question must necessarily be determined from the testimony of skilled professional persons and cannot be determined from the testimony of unskilled witnesses having no scientific knowledge of such injury. An employee must show by competent medical testimony a causal connection between the alleged injury, the employment and the disability. Mack v. Dale Electronics, Inc Neb. 367, 307 N.W.2d 814 (1981). This rule was stated more recently in Powell v. W. G. Pauley Lumber Co., 217 Neb. 707, , 350 N.W.2d 556, 558 (1984) as follows: [W]here the injury is not of an objective nature, a causal connection between the accident and the disability must be established by expert medical testimony (citations omitted). For medical testimony to be the basis for an award, it must be sufficiently definite and certain that a conclusion can be drawn that there was a causal connection.... (citations omitted) (emphasis added) In addition, it is well-established in Nebraska that a workmen's compensation claim cannot be based on possibility speculation, and if an inference favorable to the claimant or can only be reached on the basis thereof, then he cannot recover. Klentz v. TransAmerican Freightliners, Inc., 173 Neb. 53, 112 N.W.2d 405 (1961). -9-

13 The parties stipulated that on October 31, 1984, while in the employ of the defendant, plaintiff had an accident to his right foot arising out of and in the course of his employment. However, nowhere in the record is there any medical evidence to establish that plaintiff's fractured toes on his right foot were caused by the accident. (El,5:17-7:4). Further complicating the situation is the fact that by July 24, 1985, Dr. Frost felt the plaintiff might have a sympathetic dystrophy (El,9:18-10:5). Not only is Dr. Frost's diagnosis tentative at best a sympathetic dystrophy was "suspected" but there is absolutely no expert medical evidence which causally related this subjective condition to plaintiff's right toe injuries. Neb. Rev. Stat. Section (2) (Reissue 1984) specifically mandates that:... The claimant shall have a burden of proof to establish by a preponderance of the evidence that such unexpected or unforeseen injury was caused by the employment. There shall be no presumption from the mere occurrence of such unexpected or unforeseen injury that the injury was in fact caused by the employment. (emphasis added) Absent any presumption the employee has failed to adduce any expert medical testimony causally relating his purported disability to his accident of October 31, Dr. Frost conceded that as of August 21, 1985, the right toe fractures had either reached maximum improvement or nearly so. In any event, maximum healing of the toe fractures had occurred by the time of his deposition on November 13, 1985 (El,20:24-12). Even assuming that there existed sufficient -10-

14 evidence to causally relate the toe fractures to plaintiff's accident, maximum healing of those fractures had occurred by November 13, 1985 at the latest and any entitlement to temporary total disability then ceased. Aldrich v. ASARGO, Inc., 221 Neb. 126, 130, 375 N.W.2d 150 (1985). Even though the sympathetic dystrophy may require additional treatment, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover therefor as he has not shown that it was causally related to his accident. This Court in discussing the standard of review for an appeal from the Compensation Court has stated that "where there is not sufficient competent evidence in the record to warrant the making of the award, or the findings of fact do not support the award, this Court must modify, reverse or set aside the award." Husted v. Peter Kiewit & Sons Construction Co., 210 Neb. 109, 313 N.W.2d 248, 250 (1981). Husted, supra, held that a doctor's opinion that it was "more likely" the injury occurred on one date rather than another was insufficient testimony on which to find causation. The issue of sufficient medical causation was also adduced in Caradori v. Frontier Airlines, Inc., 213 Neb. 513, 329 N.W.2d 865 (1983). Wherein this Court found that the employee did suffer from the effects of a cervical sprain with attendant pain, but that she had not sustained her burden of proof by merely showing that the condition could have been caused by an accident in the course of employment. The Court found that none of the physicians stated an opinion as to whether -11-

15 Caradori's condition was the result of such an accident. "Whether by accident or design, counsel omitted asking expert medical opinion on causation. We drg not free to retry cases on appeal, or to speculate on the answers treating physicians might have given to questions not asked." Id. at 867. The Court then reversed the Compensation Court's award. Since the defendant has paid to plaintiff temporary disability until he returned to work on April 15, 1985, it total has then fully discharged its obligation in accordance with the compensation laws. Accordingly, the award should be reversed and the cause dismissed. II. WHERE A VOCATIONAL PLAN IS BASED UPON AN EMPLOYEE'S PHYSICAL COMPLAINTS WHICH MAY NOT RESULT IN A PERMANENT DISABILITY AND WHERE THE EMPLOYEE MAY BE ABLE TO RETURN TO WORK FOR WHICH HE HAS PREVIOUS TRAINING AND EXPERIENCE HE IS NOT ENTITLED TO VOCATIONAL REHABILITATION SERVICES. The plaintiff's claim for vocational rehabilitation benefits is not warranted for two reasons. First, the plaintiff testified that he returned to work at Norfolk Iron & Metal Company on April 15, 1985, as an overhead crane operator and left that job because of a personal dispute. He also testified that he then applied for and received unemployment compensation benefits at the Norfolk Job Services Office. He admitted that, during the period in which he received unemployment compensation benefits, he actively sought employment as a truck driver and in the field of auto repair mechanics and that those were the types of jobs that he might be able to do if he did not have to spend long periods of time -12-

16 on his foot (12:1-10). Dr. Frost also testified that Bender was physically capable of performing sedentary work. (El,19:23-20:2). The record, therefore, shows that claimant was able to perform work for which he had previous training or experience and was not entitled to vocational rehabilitation services as provided for at Neb. Rev. Stat. Section (3) (Reissue 1984). As stated at Neb. Rev. Stat. Section (6) (Reissue 1984), vocational rehabilitation can be ordered only where, among other things, the employee "is entitled to compensation for total or partial disability which is or is likely to be permanent.... "As previously stated, the appellee has failed to meet his burden of establishing the medical causation necessary for compensation. Furthermore, the only mention of permanent disability in the record appears in the deposition of the claimant's physician, Dr. Frost, who in fact stated that he could not make a determination as to permanent partial disability. (El,17:17-20). Dr. Frost added that "if this individual is successful in responding to his treatment for the pain, the likelihood of his being able to return to the job that he once had is good." (El,17:22-25). The award of vocational rehabilitation by the Compensation Court was thus both premature and contrary to the evidence. CONCLUSION Appellant respectfully submits that the Compensation Court on rehearing was clearly wrong in finding that the appellee's -13-

17 "suspected" sympathetic dystrophy and any disability which may have resulted was causally related to his accident of October 31, 1984 and in finding that the appellee was entitled to vocational rehabilitation services. There is simply no expert medical evidence in the record to warrant the making of the award. Appellee failed to submit any expert medical testimony which causally relates his purported disability to his accident. Appellee also failed to establish his entitlement to vocational rehabilitation. There is absolutely no evidence that appellee was permanently disabled or that, absent his subjective complaints of pain, appellee was unable to perform work for which he had training or experience. Appellant asks that the award be reversed and the appellee's Petition be dismissed. Respectfully submitted, NORFOLK IRON & METAL COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant By: Of: LYNN A. MELSON WALTER E. ZINK II BAYLOR, EVNEN, CURTISS, GRIMIT & WITT 1200 American Charter Center Lincoln, Nebraska (402)

NO. 47,037-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * Versus * * * * * *

NO. 47,037-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * Versus * * * * * * Judgment rendered April 11, 2012. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, LSA-CCP. NO. 47,037-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * ALVIN

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ORDER AND OPINION FILED APRIL 5, 2005

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ORDER AND OPINION FILED APRIL 5, 2005 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F400506 SMITH W. TOMPKINS COMQUEST, INC. COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INSURANCE CO. CLAIMANT RESPONDENT EMPLOYER RESPONDENT CARRIER ORDER AND OPINION

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Floyd Dare, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1632 C.D. 2010 : Workers Compensation Appeal : Submitted: November 5, 2010 Board (Pennsylvania Conference of : Seventh Day

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE July 26, 2001 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE July 26, 2001 Session IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE July 26, 2001 Session STEVEN RAY NORFLEET v. J. W. GOAD CONSTRUCTION, INC., ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Chancery

More information

GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION OPINION BY JUSTICE A. CHRISTIAN COMPTON v. Record No February 27, 1998 FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION OPINION BY JUSTICE A. CHRISTIAN COMPTON v. Record No February 27, 1998 FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: All the Justices GEORGIA-PACIFIC CORPORATION OPINION BY JUSTICE A. CHRISTIAN COMPTON v. Record No. 970867 February 27, 1998 CLAUDE F. DANCY FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Code 65.2-503

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE November 30, 2000 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE November 30, 2000 Session IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE November 30, 2000 Session GAF BUILDING MATERIALS v. BOBBY R. GEORGE Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JUANITA RIVERA and JESUS M. RIVERA, Plaintiffs-Appellants, UNPUBLISHED July 24, 2007 v No. 274973 Oakland Circuit Court ESURANCE INSURANCE CO, INC., LC No. 2005-071390-CK

More information

Miller, John v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.

Miller, John v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 9-16-2015 Miller, John v.

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F DAVID RIDDLE, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED JANUARY 4, 2005

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F DAVID RIDDLE, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED JANUARY 4, 2005 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F301506 DAVID RIDDLE, EMPLOYEE MAVERICK TRANSPORTATION, INC., EMPLOYER LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE CO., INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT

More information

Special Damages. Nebraska Law Review. R. M. Van Steenberg District Judge of the 17th Judicial District of Nebraska. Volume 38 Issue 3 Article 7

Special Damages. Nebraska Law Review. R. M. Van Steenberg District Judge of the 17th Judicial District of Nebraska. Volume 38 Issue 3 Article 7 Nebraska Law Review Volume 38 Issue 3 Article 7 1959 Special Damages R. M. Van Steenberg District Judge of the 17th Judicial District of Nebraska Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nlr

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F ROGER KESTERSON, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 19, 2007

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F ROGER KESTERSON, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 19, 2007 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F510194 ROGER KESTERSON, EMPLOYEE BAILEY LOGGING, EMPLOYER CAPITOL CITY INSURANCE CO., INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 18, 2005 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 18, 2005 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON May 18, 2005 Session BERNICE WALTON WOODLAND AND JOHN L. WOODLAND v. GLORIA J. THORNTON An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Fayette County No. 4390 Jon

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LISA DELK, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED April 26, 2011 v No. 295857 Wayne Circuit Court STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE LC No. 07-727377-NF INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

More information

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL

IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL IN THE NEBRASKA COURT OF APPEALS MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT ON APPEAL TFF, INC. V. ST. ELLEN 100 NOTICE: THIS OPINION IS NOT DESIGNATED FOR PERMANENT PUBLICATION AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS PROVIDED

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. E KATHLEEN T. CORDRY, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. E KATHLEEN T. CORDRY, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. E812752 KATHLEEN T. CORDRY, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT HEALTHCOR HOLDING, INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT CONTINENTAL CASUALTY CO., CARRIER RESPONDENT OPINION

More information

CASE NO. 1D Joseph R. North of the North Law Firm, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellant.

CASE NO. 1D Joseph R. North of the North Law Firm, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellant. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA NADINE GORE, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D09-6406

More information

Thompson, Gary v. MESA INTERIOR CONST. CO., INC.

Thompson, Gary v. MESA INTERIOR CONST. CO., INC. University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 10-14-2016 Thompson, Gary

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F TRAVIS L. ROSS, EMPLOYEE

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F TRAVIS L. ROSS, EMPLOYEE BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F302435 TRAVIS L. ROSS, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT COOPER TIRE & RUBBER CO., SELF-INSURED EMPLOYER RESPONDENT CROCKETT ADJUSTMENT, TPA RESPONDENT OPINION

More information

NO. 44,080-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * Versus * * * * * *

NO. 44,080-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * Versus * * * * * * Judgment rendered February 25, 2009. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, LSA-CCP. NO. 44,080-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * *

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE. LINDA HARRIS v. AMERICAN BREAD COMPANY

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE. LINDA HARRIS v. AMERICAN BREAD COMPANY IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE LINDA HARRIS v. AMERICAN BREAD COMPANY Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 95-2768-I No. M1998-00611-SC-WCM-CV Filed - June 13, 2000 JUDGMENT ORDER This

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F MARVIN G. WOODBERRY, EMPLOYEE H & H CONCRETE CO., EMPLOYER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F MARVIN G. WOODBERRY, EMPLOYEE H & H CONCRETE CO., EMPLOYER BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F501804 MARVIN G. WOODBERRY, EMPLOYEE H & H CONCRETE CO., EMPLOYER AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO., TPA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Shenandoah Valley School District : and School Claims Service, LLC, : Petitioners : : v. : No. 547 C.D. 2014 : Submitted: August 29, 2014 Workers Compensation

More information

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 6 May Appeal by plaintiff from opinion and award filed 18 January

NO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 6 May Appeal by plaintiff from opinion and award filed 18 January NO. COA02-470 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 6 May 2003 PHIL S. TAYLOR, Employee, Plaintiff, v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, Employer, GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, Carrier, Defendants. Appeal by plaintiff

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F SANDRA GREEN, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED MARCH 17, 2005

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F SANDRA GREEN, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED MARCH 17, 2005 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F310775 SANDRA GREEN, EMPLOYEE H & L POULTRY PROCESSING, EMPLOYER COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INSURANCE CO./ AIG CLAIM SERVICES, INC. (TPA), INSURANCE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE September 19, 2003 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE September 19, 2003 Session IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE September 19, 2003 Session SHARON A. BATTLE v. METHODIST MEDICAL CENTER Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA * * * * * * * *

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA * * * * * * * * -a-slz 2012 S.D. 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA PATRICK KENDALL, SR., v. JOHN MORRELL & COMPANY, Appellant, Appellee. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT

More information

v No Macomb Circuit Court HOME-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, LC No AV also known as AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, I.

v No Macomb Circuit Court HOME-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, LC No AV also known as AUTO-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, I. S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S PAUL GREEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED January 2, 2018 v No. 333315 Macomb Circuit Court HOME-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, LC No. 2015-004584-AV

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT WCA **********

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT WCA ********** STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT WCA 05-1343 EVERGREEN PRESBYTERIAN MINISTRIES VERSUS BRENDA WALLACE ********** APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION - DISTRICT 2 PARISH OF CALCASIEU,

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. E907655 JOSEPH GARRETT, EMPLOYEE SDS TRANSPORTATION, EMPLOYER CALIFORNIA COMPENSATION INSURANCE COMPANY, INSURANCE

More information

Arellano v. Industrial Commission, 545 P.2d 446, 25 Ariz.App. 598 (Ariz. App., 1976)

Arellano v. Industrial Commission, 545 P.2d 446, 25 Ariz.App. 598 (Ariz. App., 1976) Page 446 545 P.2d 446 25 Ariz.App. 598 Mariano G. ARELLANO, Petitioner, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION of Arizona, Respondent, Kitchell Contractors, Inc., Respondent Employer, Industrial Indemnity Company,

More information

Foutch, James v. Burkeen Trucking Company

Foutch, James v. Burkeen Trucking Company University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 3-10-2016 Foutch, James v.

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Patricia Pujols, : : Petitioner : : v. : No. 2278 C.D. 2014 : Workers Compensation Appeal : Submitted: May 1, 2015 Board (Good Shepherd Rehab : Hospital), : :

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F BILLY RAY THARP, EMPLOYEE JUSTICE FARMS, INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F BILLY RAY THARP, EMPLOYEE JUSTICE FARMS, INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F311119 BILLY RAY THARP, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT JUSTICE FARMS, INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. 1 COMMERCE & INDUSTRY INSURANCE CO., CARRIER RESPONDENT

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F OPINION FILED FEBRUARY 9, 2005

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F OPINION FILED FEBRUARY 9, 2005 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F214745 DWIGHT D. SEAGRAVES, EMPLOYEE DELTA CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES, EMPLOYER GAB ROBINS, INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT

More information

Dupree, Andrew v. Tepro, Inc.

Dupree, Andrew v. Tepro, Inc. University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 2-17-2017 Dupree, Andrew v.

More information

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department

State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department Decided and Entered: March 1, 2007 501014 JAMIE ACTON, v Respondent, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STEPHEN O. NALLEY, Doing Business

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA John Zebley, : Petitioner : : v. : No. 1690 C.D. 2008 : Submitted: January 9, 2009 Workers' Compensation Appeal Board : (A. J. Appliance), : Respondent : BEFORE:

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Special Action Industrial Commission

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF ARIZONA DIVISION ONE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Special Action Industrial Commission NOTICE: THIS DECISION DOES NOT CREATE LEGAL PRECEDENT AND MAY NOT BE CITED EXCEPT AS AUTHORIZED BY APPLICABLE RULES. See Ariz. R. Supreme Court 111(c; ARCAP 28(c; Ariz. R. Crim. P. 31.24 IN THE COURT OF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON August 31, 2000 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON August 31, 2000 Session IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON August 31, 2000 Session LINDA HARRIS v. HERITAGE MANOR OF MEMPHIS Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby

More information

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA

COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA COURT OF APPEALS OF VIRGINIA Present: Chief Judge Felton, Judges Powell and Alston Argued at Chesapeake, Virginia VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER COMPANY AND DOMINION RESOURCES INC. MEMORANDUM OPINION * BY v.

More information

petition for identification only but not as evidence and was proffered by Claimant FINAL MERITS ORDER

petition for identification only but not as evidence and was proffered by Claimant FINAL MERITS ORDER STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGES OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS MIAMI DISTRICT OFFICE Maikel Adrian Rodriguez, Employee /Claimant, vs. USA BOUQUET LLC /AmTrust North America

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F CHARLES NUNN, Employee. EXPRESS FLEET MAINTENANCE, Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F CHARLES NUNN, Employee. EXPRESS FLEET MAINTENANCE, Employer BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F212497 CHARLES NUNN, Employee EXPRESS FLEET MAINTENANCE, Employer TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION

More information

Louisiana Workers Compensation Decisions December 2017 By Patrick F. Robinson

Louisiana Workers Compensation Decisions December 2017 By Patrick F. Robinson Louisiana Workers Compensation Decisions December 2017 By Patrick F. Robinson PatrickRobinson@allengooch.com Supreme Court First Circuit Second Circuit Third Circuit Christus Health Southwest Louisiana

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT. In Case No , Appeal of Harriet Redmond, the court on June 5, 2018, issued the following order:

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT. In Case No , Appeal of Harriet Redmond, the court on June 5, 2018, issued the following order: THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT In Case No. 2017-0458, Appeal of Harriet Redmond, the court on June 5, 2018, issued the following order: The claimant, Harriet Redmond, appeals an order of the

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PETER BALALAS, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED August 2, 2012 v No. 302540 Wayne Circuit Court STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANY, LC No. 08-109599-NF Defendant-Appellant.

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,816 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. ISIDRO MUNOZ, Appellant, MARIA LUPERCIO, Appellee.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 116,816 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. ISIDRO MUNOZ, Appellant, MARIA LUPERCIO, Appellee. NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 116,816 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS ISIDRO MUNOZ, Appellant, v. MARIA LUPERCIO, Appellee. MEMORANDUM OPINION Appeal from Ford District Court; SIDNEY

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, Employee

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, Employee BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F508997 ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ, Employee RED DRAGON CHINESE RESTAURANT, INC., Uninsured Employer CLAIMANT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED JANUARY 31, 2006

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 23, 2010

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 23, 2010 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F907651 EARL BEARD, EMPLOYEE PACE INDUSTRIES, LLC EMPLOYER ZURICH INSURANCE, INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Holy Redeemer Health System, Petitioner v. No. 1054 C.D. 2014 Submitted November 14, 2014 Workers Compensation Appeal Board (Dowling), Respondent BEFORE HONORABLE

More information

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS

ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS REL: 11/30/2007 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM v. Case No. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2011 PATRICIA PARRISH, Appellant, CORRECTED v. Case No. 5D09-3903 CITY OF ORLANDO, Appellee. / Opinion filed February

More information

[Cite as State ex rel. Sears Logistics Serv., Inc. v. Cope (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 393.]

[Cite as State ex rel. Sears Logistics Serv., Inc. v. Cope (2000), 89 Ohio St.3d 393.] [Cite as State ex rel. Sears Logistics Serv., Inc. v. Cope, 89 Ohio St.3d 393, 2000-Ohio-206.] THE STATE EX REL. SEARS LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC., APPELLEE, v. COPE, APPELLANT; INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON December 9, 2004 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON December 9, 2004 Session IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON December 9, 2004 Session LOUCINDRA TAYLOR V. AMERICAN PROTECTION INSURANCE CO., ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Chancery

More information

No COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO 1979-NMCA-012, 92 N.M. 504, 590 P.2d 652 January 23, 1979 COUNSEL

No COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW MEXICO 1979-NMCA-012, 92 N.M. 504, 590 P.2d 652 January 23, 1979 COUNSEL 1 LANE V. LEVI STRAUSS & CO., 1979-NMCA-012, 92 N.M. 504, 590 P.2d 652 (Ct. App. 1979) Ernestine LANE, Plaintiff-Appellant, vs. LEVI STRAUSS & CO., Defendant-Appellee. No. 3591 COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Brian McTague, : Petitioner : : v. : : Workers Compensation Appeal : Board (Frank Martz Coach : Company), : No. 1485 C.D. 2008 Respondent : Submitted: December

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F J. B. HUNT TRANSPORT RESPONDENT

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F J. B. HUNT TRANSPORT RESPONDENT BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F601032 DONALD WILSON CLAIMANT J. B. HUNT TRANSPORT RESPONDENT INSURANCE COMPANY-STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA INSURANCE CARRIER RESPONDENT OPINION

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT **********

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ********** STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 13-149 DIANNE DENLEY, ET AL. VERSUS SHERRI B. BERLIN, ET AL. ********** APPEAL FROM THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF CADDO, NO. 536,162 HONORABLE

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS MARILYN CHIRILUT and NICOLAE CHIRILUT, UNPUBLISHED November 23, 2010 Plaintiffs-Appellants/Cross- Appellees, v No. 293750 Oakland Circuit Court WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2017 WY 42

IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2017 WY 42 IN THE SUPREME COURT, STATE OF WYOMING 2017 WY 42 APRIL TERM, A.D. 2017 April 27, 2017 IN THE MATTER OF THE WORKER S COMPENSATION CLAIM OF: KAREN HARDY, Appellant (Petitioner), v. S-16-0220 STATE OF WYOMING,

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F LATOYA NESBITT, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT OUACHITA COUNTY MED. CTR., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F LATOYA NESBITT, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT OUACHITA COUNTY MED. CTR., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F309992 LATOYA NESBITT, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT OUACHITA COUNTY MED. CTR., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT RISK MANAGEMENT RESOURCES, TPA RESPONDENT OPINION

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ORDER AND OPINION FILED MAY 2, 2007

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ORDER AND OPINION FILED MAY 2, 2007 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F603699 CHRIS KOLLN HANKE BROTHERS AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO. CLAIMANT RESPONDENT EMPLOYER RESPONDENT CARRIER ORDER AND OPINION FILED MAY

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F PHILLIP ROGERS, EMPLOYEE AREA AGENCY ON AGING, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F PHILLIP ROGERS, EMPLOYEE AREA AGENCY ON AGING, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F210164 PHILLIP ROGERS, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT AREA AGENCY ON AGING, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. 1 RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, CARRIER RESPONDENT NO.

More information

If this opinion indicates that it is FOR PUBLICATION, it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports.

If this opinion indicates that it is FOR PUBLICATION, it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. If this opinion indicates that it is FOR PUBLICATION, it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S TRINA

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT Knoxville February 26, 2007 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT Knoxville February 26, 2007 Session IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT Knoxville February 26, 2007 Session BOBBY CHRIS COUCH V. LIBERTY MUTUAL INS. CO. & JACKSON MANUFACTURING CO. Direct Appeal

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F HARTFORD UNDERWRITES INS. CO. CARRIER OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 24, 2008

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F HARTFORD UNDERWRITES INS. CO. CARRIER OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 24, 2008 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F801328 LILA MOORE LABARGE, INC. HARTFORD UNDERWRITES INS. CO. CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 24, 2008 Hearing

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PASTOR IDELLA WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED February 2, 2016 v No. 323343 Kent Circuit Court NATIONAL INTERSTATE INSURANCE LC No. 13-002265-NO COMPANY, and

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************ STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 13-178 BETTY ISAAC VERSUS REMINGTON COLLEGE ************ APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO. 2010-4910, DIV. E HONORABLE

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F GEORGE S. KING, EMPLOYEE WYLIE CONSTRUCTION, UNINSURED EMPLOYER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F GEORGE S. KING, EMPLOYEE WYLIE CONSTRUCTION, UNINSURED EMPLOYER BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F505880 GEORGE S. KING, EMPLOYEE WYLIE CONSTRUCTION, UNINSURED EMPLOYER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED JANUARY 31, 2006 Hearing before Administrative

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON May 17, 1996

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON May 17, 1996 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON May 17, 1996 JIMMY JOHNSON, ) OBION CHANCERY ) NO. 18,315 Plaintiff, ) ) Hon. William Michael Maloan v. ) Chancellor

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JOYCE KAPP, as Next Friend of ELIZABETH JOHNSON, UNPUBLISHED March 6, 2001 Plaintiff-Appellant, v No. 216020 Kent Circuit Court MARK A. EVENHOUSE, M.D. and LAURELS LC

More information

FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 80 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA

FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 80 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA FOR IMMEDIATE NEWS RELEASE NEWS RELEASE # 80 FROM: CLERK OF SUPREME COURT OF LOUISIANA The Opinions handed down on the 19th day of October, 2004, are as follows: BY KIMBALL, J.: 2004- C-0181 LAURA E. TRUNK

More information

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District In the Missouri Court of Appeals Western District HARLEY-DAVIDSON MOTOR COMPANY, INC., v. KENNETH JONES, Appellant, Respondent, TREASURER OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI-CUSTODIAN OF THE SECOND INJURY FUND, Respondent.

More information

Bucher, David v. Diversco/ABM Industries, Inc.

Bucher, David v. Diversco/ABM Industries, Inc. University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 11-18-2015 Bucher, David v.

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F HELMSMAN MANAGEMENT, TPA OPINION FILED JANUARY 8, 2009

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F HELMSMAN MANAGEMENT, TPA OPINION FILED JANUARY 8, 2009 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F804297 KIMBORAH ALLEN FRANKLIN ELECTRIC HELMSMAN MANAGEMENT, TPA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED JANUARY 8, 2009 Hearing before

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F MARY J. PICKETT, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED OCTOBER 13, 2005

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F MARY J. PICKETT, EMPLOYEE OPINION FILED OCTOBER 13, 2005 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F408271 MARY J. PICKETT, EMPLOYEE BEVERLY HEALTHCARE MONTICELLO, EMPLOYER AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO./ CONSTITUTION STATE SERVICE CO. (TPA),

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 24, 2012 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 24, 2012 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 24, 2012 Session SUSAN DANIEL V. BRITTANY SMITH Appeal from the Circuit Court for Coffee County No. 35636 L. Craig Johnson, Judge No. M2011-00830-COA-R3-CV

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS SPECTRUM HEALTH HOSPITALS, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED February 21, 2017 v No. 329907 Kent Circuit Court FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, LC No. 15-000926-AV Defendant-Appellee.

More information

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Nolan S. Winn, Judge.

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Nolan S. Winn, Judge. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA LEROY KNIGHT, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D12-3341

More information

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. W. James Condry, II, Judge.

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. W. James Condry, II, Judge. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA BRANDYWINE CONVALESCENT CARE and ASSOCIATED INDUSTRIES INSURANCE COMPANY, INC., NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ZOELLA SMITH, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, TPA

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ZOELLA SMITH, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, TPA BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F407014 ZOELLA SMITH, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT ELECTROLUX HOME PRODUCTS, SELF-INSURED EMPLOYER GALLAGHER BASSETT SERVICES, TPA RESPONDENT RESPONDENT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO E OPINION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO E OPINION Filed 5/16/06; pub. order 6/14/06 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO MICHELE LAZAN, Plaintiff and Respondent, E038572 v. COUNTY OF

More information

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Nolan S. Winn, Judge.

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Nolan S. Winn, Judge. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA DEBORAH O'CONNOR, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D14-0623

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. E911072/F TAMMY MCCULLOUGH, Employee. FAMILY DOLLARS, Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. E911072/F TAMMY MCCULLOUGH, Employee. FAMILY DOLLARS, Employer BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. E911072/F100246 TAMMY MCCULLOUGH, Employee FAMILY DOLLARS, Employer TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION

More information

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA County of Allegheny (Sheriff) and : UPMC Benefits Management : Services, Inc., : Petitioners : No. 311 C.D. 2010 : Submitted: August 13, 2010 v. : : Workers Compensation

More information

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Doris E. Jenkins, Judge.

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Doris E. Jenkins, Judge. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JOSE JUAN ANDINO-RIVERA, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO.

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G CATHERINE WILLIAMSON, Employee. BUTTERFIELD TRAIL VILLAGE, INC.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G CATHERINE WILLIAMSON, Employee. BUTTERFIELD TRAIL VILLAGE, INC. BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. G205226 CATHERINE WILLIAMSON, Employee BUTTERFIELD TRAIL VILLAGE, INC., Employer STAR INSURANCE COMPANY, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE October 22, 2008 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE October 22, 2008 Session IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE October 22, 2008 Session AAA COOPER TRANSPORTATION v. J. J. LEWIS Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Hamilton

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JOSEPH MOORE and CINDY MOORE, Plaintiffs-Appellants, UNPUBLISHED November 27, 2001 V No. 221599 Wayne Circuit Court DETROIT NEWSPAPER AGENCY, LC No. 98-822599-NI Defendant-Appellee.

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT ************ STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 07-805 TOBY P. ARMENTOR VERSUS SAFEWAY INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. ************ APPEAL FROM THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF LAFAYETTE, NO.

More information

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Margaret E. Sojourner, Judge.

CASE NO. 1D An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Margaret E. Sojourner, Judge. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA REBECCA ROSE, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D11-4843

More information

31tt the 6upremce Court of OYjio

31tt the 6upremce Court of OYjio 31tt the 6upremce Court of OYjio,M41 STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, vs. Relator-Appellant, INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, et al., Case No. 2012-1057 On Appeal from the Franklin

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G FAYETTEVILLE HEALTH & REHAB., Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G FAYETTEVILLE HEALTH & REHAB., Employer BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G109532 ELENA STEWART FAYETTEVILLE HEALTH & REHAB., Employer CLAIMANT RESPONDENT PENNSYLVANIA MFGERS ASSOC. INS, RESPONDENT Insurance Carrier/TPA

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F705745 TOMMY WILLIAMS, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT REMINGTON ARMS CO., INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. 1 GALLAGHER BASSETT

More information

Jackson, Michael v. Transwood

Jackson, Michael v. Transwood University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 2-20-2018 Jackson, Michael

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F OPINION FILED MAY 3, 2006

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F OPINION FILED MAY 3, 2006 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F502587 BEN LAMMERS, EMPLOYEE HOME DEPOT, INC., EMPLOYER AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO., INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS SHARI RATERINK and MARY RATERINK, Copersonal Representatives of the ESTATE OF SHARON RATERINK, UNPUBLISHED May 3, 2011 Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant, v No. 295084

More information

Amos, Harvey v. Goodman Global Group

Amos, Harvey v. Goodman Global Group University of Tennessee, Knoxville Trace: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims and Workers' Compensation Appeals Board Law 10-20-2016 Amos, Harvey v.

More information

v No Oakland Circuit Court

v No Oakland Circuit Court S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N C O U R T O F A P P E A L S LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, UNPUBLISHED July 25, 2017 Plaintiff/Cross-Defendant-Appellee, v No. 332597 Oakland Circuit Court MICHAEL

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F LEE S TRUCKING, INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT No. 1

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F LEE S TRUCKING, INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT No. 1 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F506046 ROBERT STEED, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT LEE S TRUCKING, INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT No. 1 ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO., INSURANCE CARRIER RESPONDENT

More information

Case dml11 Doc 7044 Filed 07/11/12 Entered 07/11/12 16:06:41 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2

Case dml11 Doc 7044 Filed 07/11/12 Entered 07/11/12 16:06:41 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2 Case 08-45664-dml11 Doc 7044 Filed 07/11/12 Entered 07/11/12 16:06:41 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 2 Mark C. Brodeur (03052020) Brodeur Law Firm 350 Founders Square 900 Jackson Street Dallas, Texas 75202

More information