CHAPTER VI. a human being has an essential right to live, particularly that a human being
|
|
- Jeffry Ross
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Chapter - VI Capital Punishment and the Human Rights in India
2 CHAPTER VI CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AND HUMAN RIGHTS IN INDIA INTRODUCTION Human Rights or Right to life is a phrase that describes the belief that a human being has an essential right to live, particularly that a human being has the right not to be killed by another human being. The concept of a right to life is central to debate on the issues of capital punishment. The debate about the death penalty does not usually employ the terminology of human rights. Nevertheless, the use of the death penalty intersects with international law and is challenged by it. Hence, international law and an analysis based on human rights are useful means to address the death penalty issue. The reasons why countries have abolished the death penalty in increasing numbers vary. For some nations, it was a broader understanding of human rights (Spain abandoned the last vestiges of the death penalty in 1995 stating that...the death penalty has no place in the general penal system of an advanced, civilized society... Similarly, Switzerland abolished death penalty because it constituted a flagrant violation of the right to life and dignity... 1 Defining the death penalty as a human rights issue is a critical first step, but some countries which resist aggressively use the death penalty. When the United Nations General Assembly considered a resolution in Roger hood, the death penalty : A Worldwide perspective,clarendon press,oxford,
3 to restrict the death penalty and encourage moratorium on executions, Singapore asserted that capital punishment is not a human rights issue. In the end, 74 countries abstained from voting on the resolution and it failed. 2 However, for an increasing number of countries the death penalty is a critical human rights issue. In 1997, the U.N High Commission for Human Rights approved a resolution stating that the abolition of the death penalty contributes to the enhancement of human dignity and to the progressive development of human rights. 3 This resolution was strengthened in subsequent resolutions by a call for a restriction of offences for which the death penalty can be imposed and for a moratorium on all executions, leading eventually to abolition. Challenging the death penalty is not seen solely as an internal matter among nations. Many European countries, along with Canada, Mexico and South Africa have resisted extraditing persons to countries like the United States unless there are assurances that the death penalty will not be sought. The European Union has made the abolition of death penalty a precondition for entry into the union, resulting in halting of executions in many eastern European countries which have applied for membership. 4 Civil society is based upon the concept of human Rights which are essential not merely to fulfill biological need of the mankind but as well as for the dignity of the individuals. 2 Richard C. Dieter, The Death Penalty and HumanRights : U.S. Death Penalty and International Law. 3 United Nations High Commission for Human Rights Resolution/CN.4/1997/12(April 3, 1997) 4 Death Penalty Information centre,
4 Every Democratic constitution tries to recognize the concept of Human Rights is one way or the others. Indian constitution recognizes the concept of Human Rights through its preamble. Human Rights are implied as civil liberties (fundamental rights) and democratic Rights (Directive principles of state policy) in the Indian constitution. These Rights are essential for the full development of the Human personality and for Human happiness. Undoubtedly Human Rights have always been regarded as the backbone of every democratic set up. 5 The right to life is not as inviolable as it might seem at first sight. There are a number of situations where states may deprive individuals of life itself and to which international human rights law does not raise an objection. The use of the death penalty is one such example. Human rights law does not prohibit the use of the death penalty as a punishment for crimes but does encourage its abolition and seek to limit its use. 6 Critics of the death penalty commonly argue that the death penalty specifically and explicitly violates the right to life clause stated in most modern constitutions and human right treaties, including the Indian Constitution under Art-21, etc. Human rights are the basic, inherent, immutable and inalienable rights to which a person is entitled simply by virtue of his being born a human. They are such rights which are to be made available as a matter of right. The Constitution and legislation of a civilized country recognize them since they are so quintessentially part of every human being. That is why every 5 Charanjeet Singh; Human Rights in India-problems and prospects 6 Willam A. Schabas, The Abolition of the death Penalty in International Law,OUP,Oxford,
5 democratic country committed to Rule of Law put into force mechanisms for their enforcement and protection th Law Commission Report The Law Commission in its 35 th report said that the risk involved in abolition of the capital punishment could not be undertaken in the present state of country. No single arrangement for abolition or retention can decide the issue. In arriving at any conclusion, the need for protecting the society in general and individual human being must be born in mind on a consideration of all issues involved; the commission is of opinion that capital punishment could be retained in the present state of the country. 7 Until there were several death penalty was executed but is carries no positive effect, there cannot be deterrent effect in this society. In the sense that the offender has committed murder, deterrent effect of death penalty has failed on him. On the other hand different types of homicide can be made on the basis of social environment and the personality of the offender. Therefore the efficiency of death penalty in such cases should be judged in the light of surrounding conditions. Considered from this standpoint the habitual offenders and sex psychopaths are abnormal persons who developed a kind of mania for their crime without bothering about its gravity or evil effect. There is yet another category of criminals who take pleasure in killing human life without any apparent reason. They commit murder only for the sake of 7 35 th Report of Law Commission of India ( Govt. of India,1967) p
6 fun. They commit murder only for they derive some kind of pleasure in watching their victim dyeing in pain and torture. Needless to say that death sentence is perhaps the only appropriate punishment for such beastly offenders. 6.2 Retention of Capital Punishment - How Far Justified? The history of human civilization reveals that during no period of time death penalty has been discarded as a mode of punishment. The retention of capital punishment in society there has some specific circumstances those who are not only incorrigible, but who are immensely dangerous to the society and they commit cold-blooded murders in calculated manner. Particularly in agricultural countries like India, the real problem of death penalty arises in case of murders committed during agrarian riots and disputes relating to the possession or ownership of the land property. In this case the offenders are well aware of the consequences of their act. but they fall a prey to criminality due to the passion, excitement or anger. In fact, they do not aware of the consequences instead those consequences to follow. Hence, they cannot be categorized the as professional killer. Dr. Sethna carried intensive study on criminal cases in Bombay High Court and concluded that out of 507 cases of homicide only % they were premeditated while remaining 73.72% were unpremeditated. Thus cost of the homicides is due to ill-will, emotions, irresistible temper or manic excitement and capital punishment serves no deterrent purpose in such cases. 259
7 The Supreme Court of India for awarding capital punishment gives some directions to avoid the capital punishment. There have alternative sentence are given to the capital punishment at the time of awarding death sentence court is free to award either death sentence or life imprisonment. 8 Unlike formerly when death was the rule and life term the exception for recorded reason, there should be recorded special reasons in death sentence. Death sentence need not be inflicted except in rarest of the rare case and gravest cases of extreme culpability. The choice as to which one of two punishment provided for murder is the proper one in a given case will depend upon the particular circumstances of that case and the court has to exercise its discretion judiciary and on well recognized principle after balancing all the mitigating and aggravating circumstances of the crime. The Court also should see whether there is something uncommon about crime, which renders sentence of Imprisonment of life inadequate and calls for death sentence. The nature of the crime and the circumstances of the offender should be so revealing that the criminal is a menace to the society and the sentence of imprisonment of life would be inadequate. The sentence of death should be reserved for the rarest of rear cases after due consideration after a due consideration of both mitigating and aggravating circumstances. Retention Preferred to Abolition 8 Dr.chandrika Sharma,death sentence:repeal or Retention Riddle(2004)PL Web Jur
8 Death penalty, affects as it does the very existence of the human being, has been agitating the minds of the penologist all over the world. The public opinion is divided on this question. Though battle of arguments is going on between the two opposite way of thinking, i.e. retentions and abolitionists and sometimes the situation gets to brink. The parliaments in India have been constantly struggling to repeal the provisions relating to death penalty from the penal code from the past several years. 9 The first proposal on this issue was tabled in Lok Sabha in But it was subsequently withdrawn at the instance of the then Home Minister Sardar Vallabhabhai Patel who characterized it as the most un-opportune proposal. The matter came up for debate again in Rajya Sabha in 1958 but it again met the same fate. The subject was, however, accepted for discussion in Rajya Sabha in 1962 but the general opinion of the House favored in retention of death penalty realizing that time had not yet come when its repeal from the statute book could be justified. Consequently, the proposal was dropped. The retentionists in the House opposed abolition of death sentence on the ground that its retention in the Statute Book acted as an effective deterrent for hardened and habitual murderers and dangerous criminals whose elimination from the society was inevitable the members also pleaded that the government was already lenient in commenting death sentence to that of life imprisonment wherever it was possible. 9 //html//google.com/article on-.retention_preferred_to_abolition.id_
9 The question of abolition of death sentence was considered at length in a seminar on Capital Punishment in India 10 which was largely attended by number of eminent jurists, Judges, academic lawyers, legislators etc. the consensus was in favor of retention of capital punishment in view of the deteriorating law and other situation in the country. Those who advocated abolition of death penalty, however, suggested that it shall be fitting tribute to the memory of late Mahatma Gandhi if death penalty is abolished in India at the occasion of Gandhi Centenary celebrations in that years. But the receptionists argued that the cause of non violence is equally served if the causes of explicit violence regardless of ideals involved are visited with implicit violence of capital punishment and stressed on its application in such.a manner that its harshness is mitigated but efficiency retained. The Report of the Convention of International Congress of Criminal law which was held n New Delhi on 8, 9 and 10 th February, 1982 concluded that the general consensus was clearly in favor of retention of death penalty though its use may to be restricted to rarest of rare cases. Despite strong plea for abolition by Justice V.R. Krishna lyer, the former. Judge of the Supreme Court of India, The convention justified retention of capital punishment, though to be used sparingly. Inaugurating the congress Mr. M. Hidayatullah, the then Vice - President of India and former Chief Justice of the Supreme court of India, observed that the doctrine of rarest of rare case evolved in the India jurisprudence for the use of death penalty is capable of 10 The seminar on abolition on death penalty was held in Delhi in October;
10 discounting the possible errors and abuse of this sanction and therefore, a dispassionate approach to this problem in the context of the mounting crime was not necessary. This mid way approach seems to be most appropriate particularly in the context of modern Indian society where the machinery of police as well as the magistracy is hardly adequate to tackle the problem of crime and criminals effectively. The object of punishment should be achieved by extending necessary safeguards to life and property of persons but at the same time by limiting their liberty so as to eliminate crime. Those who denounced this kind of punishment argued that capital punishment has not served its deterrent object at all. Capital punishment may be preventive, but at hot cost and under what circumstances? Crimes are very often committed, not by persons who are normal human beings or under normal circumstances, it is not even certain.that a murderer would repeat the murder again. He might have committed this heinous crime under extra ordinary circumstances. If the state were to kill that man it could at best have only the dubious satisfaction of having preventing a crime, which probably would never have been committed, but it must be noted that in such a case in its anxiety to prevent a crime. The state itself has committed the greatest crime of taking away the life of a man. Professor Henting draws our attention to another silent defect of the capital punishment: No thinking person can claim that our law of evidence and the law of procedure are full proof, and always lead us inevitably to the 263
11 truth. It is possible that there are judicial errors, and in such a. case, capital punishment once it is awarded and the person executed, cannot be revoked. Thus there have been cases where, after execution of an alleged murderer, the true murderer is caught, but can the mischief be remedied? It is argued that it is therefore better to save nine murderers from capital punishment than to inflict on one who may be infect innocent. It is therefore argued that this type of extreme punishment is neither effective nor just and should be abolished. 6.3 Law Commissions Report on Capital Punishment In response to the resolution moved in the Parliament in 1962 on the abolition of the capital punishment, the government of India referred the question to the law commission. The commission decided to take up this subject separately for the revision of the general criminal law in view of its importance. The commission presented its report to the Lok Sabha on November 18,1971, in which it inter alia observed : ; Even after all the arguments in support of abolition of capital punishment are taken into account, there does not remain a residuum of cases where it is absolutely impossible to enlist any sympathy on the side of the criminal 11 the commission further expressed a view that retribution involved in capital punishment does not connote the primitive concept of eye for an eye but it is an expression of public indignation at a shocking crime, which can better be described as reprobation nd and 48 th Report Of the Law Commission of India
12 Therefore, the commission did not recommend any material change in the offences which are at present punishable with death under the Indian Penal code. As regards the question of exempting certain categories of persons from death sentence, the Jaw commission in its 42 nd report published in June 1971 suggested that: 1) Children below 18 years of age (at the time of commission of the crime) should not be sentenced to death. 2) It is not necessary to exempt women generally from the death penalty. 3) It is unnecessary to insert a statutory provision relating to diminished responsibility in the statute book. 4) An attempt to commit suicide should cease to be an offense in India. The present law in this regard is harsh and unjustifiable and it should be replaced. 12 Thus, the law commission strongly feels that capital punishment acts as an effective, deterrent which is the most important object and even if all objects were to be kept aside, this object would by itself furnished a rational basis for its retention. In its concluding remarks, the commission observed paramount need for maintaining law and other in this country, we cannot risk the experiment of abolition. This is perhaps the most appropriate approach to the problem of capital punishment so far as Indian Criminal justice system is concerned. 12 In Rahiman Naghhusan Patanaik v. Union of India,A.I.R. 1994, SC
13 In 1961, another resolution was moved in Rajya Sabha by Savitri Devi Nigan. This time only six members were in favor of the abolition of death penalty and the rest advocated its retention, in 1962, a resolution was moved by Raghunath Singh and received serious attention. It was withdrawn only after the Government assured the house that a decision would be taken after a detailed consideration of matter. The question was referred to the law commission of India which submitted 35 th report on Capital punishment to the government in September The Law Commission Report of 1972 also favored the retention. It is argued that in view of the peculiar conditions prevailing in the Country, it would be an unwise more to abolish it. However, the Commission laid down the condition that the court should give reasons before imposing this extreme penalty. The commission specified that children who were below 18 at the time of commission of crime should not be sentenced to death. But it did not exempt women from death penalty. It also recommended that executions be Certain, humane, quick and decent. In the 156th report, the Law Commission of India (1997) favorer a cautions approach and pleaded to retention as an exceptional penalty. The Justice A. N. Mulla Committee on Jail Reforms is understood to have recommend amendment in Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code so that death is prescribed as one of the punishments only in cases of murder with aggravating circumstances. In other cases of murder, the committee is understood to have suggested that courts be given 266
14 discretion to impose imprisonment for life or for a shorter term. Imprisonment for life should be for a fixed term, extendable over a reasonable period of time which may be determined by legislature and incorporated in the India Penal Code. 13 We have not been referred to any large-scale studies of crime statistic compiled in this country with the object of estimating the need of protection of the society against the murderers. The only authoritative study is that of the law commission of India published in 1967, 35 th report. After collecting as much available material as possible and assessing the views expressed in the west both by abolitionist and the receptionist, The law commission has come to its conclusion at Para 262 to 264. These paragraphs are summarized by the commission as follows at page 354 of the report. The issues of abolition or retention have to be decided on a balancing of the various arguments for and against the retention. No single argument for abolition or retention can decide the issue. In arriving at any conclusion on the subject, the need of protecting society in general and individual human beings, must be born in mind. It is not difficult to rule but the validity of or the strength behind, many of the arguments for abolition nor does the commission treat lightly. The argument based on the irrevocability of the sentence of death, the need for modern approach, severity of the capital punishment and the strong feelings 13 The Indian Express, April 4,
15 shown by certain sections of the public opinion in stressing deeper question of human values. Having regard, however, to the conditions in India, to the variety of the social upbringing of its inhabitants, to the disparity in the level of morality and education in the country, to the vastness of its area, to the diversity of it population and to the paramount need for maintaining law and order in the country at the present juncture India can not risk the experiment of abolition of capital punishment. Arguments, which would be valid in respect of one area of the world, may not hold well in respect of another area, in this context. Similarly, even in abolition in some parts of India may not make a material difference. It may fraught with serious consequences in other parts.on a consideration on all the issues involved, the commission is on the opinion that the capital punishment should be retained in the present state of the country. A very responsible body has come to the above conclusion after considering all the relevant factors. On the conclusion thus; offered to us it will be difficult to hold that capital punishment as such is unreasonable or not required in the public interest. Following are the main points that have weighted with us in arriving at this conclusion. a. Basically, every human beings dreads death. 268
16 b. Death, as a penalty, stands on totally different level from imprisonment of life or any other punishment. A difference is one of the quality and not merely of degree. c. Those who are specifically qualified to express an opinion on the subject, including particularly the majority of the replies received from the State government, judges, members of Parliament and legislature and members of the bar and police officers are definitely of the view that the deterrent object of the capital punishment is achieved in a fair measure in India. d. As a conduct of prisoners released from jail (after undergoing imprisonment of life) it would be difficult to come to a conclusion, without studies extending over a long period of years. e. Whether any other punishment can possess all the advantages of capital punishment is a matter of doubt. f. Statistics of the other countries are inconclusive on the subject of they are not regarded as proving the deterrent effect neither can they be regarded as conclusively disproving it. The most practicable and representative public opinion of India was very well summed up by our first Prime Minister Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru : At one time I was strongly opposed to death penalty and in theory my opposition still continues. And yet with all my repugnance for executions, I 269
17 feel that some method or eliminating utterly undesirable human being will have to be adopted and used with discretion. 14 Similarly, Mrs. Indira Gandhai stated as : I am personally in favour of abolition of capital punishment. But certain crimes were heinous in nature and deserved punishments Venugopal Rao, Facets of crime in India (1962); pg The Times Of India, March 3,
Address on Death Penalty 10 th October 2012 at IIC Centre
Address on Death Penalty 10 th October 2012 at IIC Centre (by: Sankar Sen, IPS (Retd.), Senior Fellow, Institute of Social Sciences and former Director General, National Human Rights Commission) In India
More informationCHAPTER 19. Ch. 19. Sentences. Part A] Part A GENERAL
Ch. 19 Part A] CHAPTER 19 Sentences Part A GENERAL 1. The award of suitable sentence depends on a variety of considerations The determination of appropriate punishment after the conviction of an offender
More informationFUNCTIONING OF THE LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA
National Law University, Delhi From the SelectedWorks of Mubashshir Sarshar 2008 FUNCTIONING OF THE LAW COMMISSION OF INDIA Mubashshir Sarshar, National Law University, Delhi Available at: http://works.bepress.com/mubashshir/5/
More informationThe Death Penalty: A Worldwide View. Dr Jack Tsen-Ta Lee School of Law, SMU 27 May 2017
The Death Penalty: A Worldwide View Dr Jack Tsen-Ta Lee School of Law, SMU 27 May 2017 Overview We will take a brief look at the following worldwide trends concerning the death penalty in 2016: Death sentences.
More informationWORLD CONGRESS ON HUMAN RIGHTS
- 6 MAY 1991 Item l(d),^^ /^»\ ^\^, NEW DELHI- 1990 WORLD CONGRESS ON HUMAN RIGHTS DECEMBER 10-15, 1990 Civil and Political Rights: Protection of Personal Integrity ABOLITION OF THE DEATH PENALTY (Paper
More informationTHE TASKFORCE ON THE REVIEW OF THE MANDATORY NATURE OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN KENYA MARYANN NJAU-KIMANI
THE TASKFORCE ON THE REVIEW OF THE MANDATORY NATURE OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN KENYA MARYANN NJAU-KIMANI BACKGROUND The Penal Code and the Kenya Defence Forces Act provide for offences that fetch the death
More informationAfrican Commission on Human and Peoples Rights. Continental Conference on the Death Penalty, 2-4 July 2014, Cotonou, Benin
African Commission on Human and Peoples Rights Government of the Republic of Benin Continental Conference on the Death Penalty, 2-4 July 2014, Cotonou, Benin A comparative perspective form Africa: Protocols
More informationIS THE DEATH PENALTY A SUCCESSFUL DETERRENT TO CRIME? By Mahuva Shetty 145 & Serah Jacob 146
IS THE DEATH PENALTY A SUCCESSFUL DETERRENT TO CRIME? By Mahuva Shetty 145 & Serah Jacob 146 Introduction: When dealing with the question how deterrent a death penalty, also called capital punishment,
More informationUnited Nations Convention against Torture: New Zealand s sixth periodic review, 2015 shadow report
13 February 2015 Secretariat of the Committee against Torture United Nations Office at Geneva Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) CH-1211 Geneva 10 Switzerland cat@ohchr.org United
More informationFebruary 14, 2018 Japan Federation of Bar Associations
JFBA Opinion concerning the Japanese Government s Comments on the Draft General Comment No.36 on Article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights February 14, 2018 Japan Federation
More informationINTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON THE DEATH PENALTY
INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS ON THE DEATH PENALTY Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION... 1 2 GENERAL HUMAN RIGHTS PRINCIPLES... 1 3 ABOLITION... 2 4 INTERNATIONAL TREATIES FAVOURING ABOLITION... 3 5 NON-USE...
More informationGRAVE AND SUDDEN PROVOCATION AS A MITIGATING FACTOR TO CRIMINAL LIABILITY UNDER INDIAN PENAL CODE
An Open Access Journal from The Law Brigade (Publishing) Group 200 GRAVE AND SUDDEN PROVOCATION AS A MITIGATING FACTOR TO CRIMINAL LIABILITY UNDER INDIAN PENAL CODE Written by Kuldeep Singh Research Scholar
More informationCHAPTER 14 PUNISHMENT AND SENTENCING CHAPTER OUTLINE. I. Introduction. II. Sentencing Rationales. A. Retribution. B. Deterrence. C.
CHAPTER 14 PUNISHMENT AND SENTENCING CHAPTER OUTLINE I. Introduction II. Sentencing Rationales A. Retribution B. Deterrence C. Rehabilitation D. Restoration E. Incapacitation III. Imposing Criminal Sanctions
More informationMassachusetts Sentencing Commission Current Statutes Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 211E 1-4 (2018)
Massachusetts Sentencing Commission Current Statutes Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 211E 1-4 (2018) DISCLAIMER: This document is a Robina Institute transcription of statutory contents. It is not an authoritative
More informationJames Hamilton, Director of Public Prosecutions, Ireland International Society for the Reform of Criminal Law Conference 15 July 2008, Dublin
A SINGLE OFFENCE OF UNLAWFUL KILLING? Ever since the abolition of the death penalty as a punishment for murder, arguments have arisen in favour of merging the offences of murder and manslaughter into a
More informationoutside and saw that the light in front of the house of Inderjit Singh was on and two Sikh youths armed with Kirpans stained with blood were shouting
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Criminal Appeal Nos. 786-789 of 2003 Decided On: 28.05.2009 State of Punjab Vs. Manjit Singh and Ors. Hon'ble Judges: Mukundakam Sharma and B.S. Chauhan, JJ. Mukundakam Sharma,
More informationChapter 9. Sentencing, Appeals, and the Death Penalty
Chapter 9 Sentencing, Appeals, and the Death Penalty Chapter Objectives After completing this chapter, you should be able to: Identify the general factors that influence a judge s sentencing decisions.
More informationBRIEF STUDY OF CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS REGARDING PRISON SYSTEM AND INMATES IN INDIA
BRIEF STUDY OF CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS REGARDING PRISON SYSTEM AND INMATES IN INDIA Priyadarshi Nagda University College of Law, MLS University, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India ABSTRACT No nation of the world
More information2/21/2011 AMERICAN CORRECTIONS 9 TH EDITION. Three elements:
AMERICAN CORRECTIONS 9 TH EDITION Chapter Four The Punishment of Offenders Learning Objectives 1. Understand the goals of punishment. 2. Be familiar with the different forms of the criminal sanction. 3.
More informationInhuman sentencing of children in Barbados
Inhuman sentencing of children in Barbados Report prepared for the Child Rights Information Network ( www.crin.org ), July 010 Introduction Capital punishment is unlawful for persons under 18 at the time
More informationAct XXXVIII of 1996 on International Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters. Chapter I GENERAL RULES
Act XXXVIII of 1996 on International Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters Chapter I GENERAL RULES Section 1 The purpose of this Act is to regulate cooperation with other states in criminal matters. Section
More informationspecial or local laws for various offences. Presently, death penalty is provided under the IPC for various offences such as Section 121, Section 132,
V PREFACE CAPITAL PUNISHMENT AND ITS DELAYED EXECUTION: A CRITICAL STUDY is a very debatable topic. Capital punishment means a sentence of death. It is the severest i.e. an extreme point of sentence. The
More informationSentencing Policy in Nepal
Sentencing Policy in Nepal, Ganesh Bhattrai Sentencing Policy in Nepal Ganesh Bhattarai * Abstract Punishment in any form is inevitable end of conviction. However, mere conviction does not necessarily
More informationExchange of views on the question of abolition of capital punishment
Human Dimension Implementation Meeting Warsaw 11-22 September 2017 Working Session 12 : Rule of Law I Contribution of the Council of Europe Exchange of views on the question of abolition of capital punishment
More informationLandmark Case MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCE FOR MURDER R. v. LATIMER
Landmark Case MANDATORY MINIMUM SENTENCE FOR MURDER R. v. LATIMER Prepared for the Ontario Justice Education Network by a Law Student from Pro Bono Students Canada R. v. Latimer (2001) Facts Tracy Latimer
More informationLEGAL RIGHTS - CRIMINAL - Right Against Self-Incrimination
IV. CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS ICCPR United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, ICCPR, A/50/40 vol. I (1995) 72 at paras. 424 and 432. Paragraph 424 It is noted with concern that the provisions
More informationCrimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Standard Minimum Sentencing) Act 2002 No 90
New South Wales Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment (Standard Minimum Contents Page 1 Name of Act 2 2 Commencement 2 3 Amendment of Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 No 92 and other Acts 2 Schedules
More informationInternational covenant on civil and political rights CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT
UNITED NATIONS CCPR International covenant on civil and political rights Distr. GENERAL CCPR/C/DZA/CO/3 12 December 2007 ENGLISH Original: FRENCH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Ninety-first session Geneva, 15
More informationAMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM VOLUME II: RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES Howard Gillman Mark A. Graber Keith E. Whittington. Supplementary Material
AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONALISM VOLUME II: RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES Howard Gillman Mark A. Graber Keith E. Whittington Supplementary Material Chapter 11: The Contemporary Era Criminal Justice/Punishments/Juvenile
More informationUN Secretary-General's 2013 report to the Human Rights Council on the death penalty
UN Secretary-General's 2013 report to the Human Rights Council on the death penalty Submission by Foundation for Human Rights Initiative (FHRI) and Penal Reform International (PRI) Brief about Penal Reform
More informationDETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE PUNISHMENT AND THE NEED FOR SENTENCING GUIDELINES V. PRIYA KRITHIKA DEVI
DETERMINATION OF APPROPRIATE PUNISHMENT AND THE NEED FOR SENTENCING GUIDELINES V. PRIYA KRITHIKA DEVI V th Year BA BL (Hons.) School of Excellence in law It is a common knowledge that even though a convict
More informationInhuman sentencing of children in Tuvalu
Inhuman sentencing of children in Tuvalu Report prepared for the Child Rights Information Network ( www.crin.org ), December 2010 Introduction There is no death penalty in Tuvalu, but child offenders may
More informationPenal Code (Amendment) Bill
Bill No. 33/2012. Penal Code (Amendment) Bill Read the first time on 15th October 2012. A BILL intituled An Act to amend the Penal Code (Chapter 224 of the 2008 Revised Edition). Be it enacted by the President
More informationExplanatory Report to the Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons
Explanatory Report to the Convention on the Transfer of Sentenced Persons Strasbourg, 21.III.1983 European Treaty Series - No. 112 Introduction 1. The Convention of the Transfer of Sentenced Persons, drawn
More informationSENTENCING AND PROPORTIONALITY. LTC Harms Japan 2017
SENTENCING AND PROPORTIONALITY LTC Harms Japan 2017 TRIPS obligation Member countries have to provide for remedies for counterfeiting and piracy, which must include imprisonment and/or monetary fines,
More informationwhich has been cancelled due to a state or federal appeal. Two inmates have remained on death row for more than three decades.
M E M O R A N D U M Pursuant to authority granted in Article IV, 9 of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, I am today exercising my power as Governor to grant a temporary reprieve to inmate Terrence Williams.
More informationSUMMARY OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE TASK FORCE ON THE REVIEW OF THE MANDATORY DEATH PENALTY
SUMMARY OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE TASK FORCE ON THE REVIEW OF THE MANDATORY DEATH PENALTY 3 October 2018 BACKGROUND In December 2017, in a case called Francis Muruatetu and others versus the Republic,
More informationMALAWI. A new future for human rights
MALAWI A new future for human rights Over the past two years, the human rights situation in Malawi has been dramatically transformed. After three decades of one-party rule, there is now an open and lively
More informationDEATH PENALTY M. Ravi
THE IRREFUTABLE CASE AGAINST DEATH PENALTY M. Ravi THE SINGAPORE STORY In Memory Ridzuan Ali 1985-2017 Executed by the State on Friday 19 May 2017 for trafficking 72.5g of heroin because the Attorney General
More informationCONSTITUTION of the COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
CONSTITUTION of the COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA Article Preamble I. Declaration of Rights II. The Legislature III. Legislation IV. The Executive V. The Judiciary Schedule to Judiciary Article VI. Public
More informationS G C. Reduction in Sentence. for a Guilty Plea. Definitive Guideline. Sentencing Guidelines Council
S G C Sentencing Guidelines Council Reduction in Sentence for a Guilty Plea Definitive Guideline Revised 2007 FOREWORD One of the first guidelines to be issued by the Sentencing Guidelines Council related
More informationChapter 6 Sentencing and Corrections
Chapter 6 Sentencing and Corrections Chapter Objectives Describe the different philosophies of punishment (goals of sentencing). Understand the sentencing process from plea bargaining to conviction. Describe
More informationCase 4:04-cr WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 11 U S. DIS i iilc I C(;CII?.I EAST LtiN I11S I t<i(; I i\l<k!
FILED Case 4:04-cr-00035-WRW Document 416 Filed 10/31/2007 Page 1 of 11 U S. DIS i iilc I C(;CII?.I EAST LtiN I11S I t
More informationTitle 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE
Title 17-A: MAINE CRIMINAL CODE Chapter 7: OFFENSES OF GENERAL APPLICABILITY Table of Contents Part 2. SUBSTANTIVE OFFENSES... Section 151. CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY... 3 Section 152. CRIMINAL ATTEMPT... 4 Section
More informationSTATUS OF DEATH PENALTY AND LIFE IMPRISONMENT IN INDIA AND NORWAY: A CRITICAL COMPARISON OF THE TWO EXTREMES
An Open Access Journal from The Law Brigade (Publishing) Group 277 STATUS OF DEATH PENALTY AND LIFE IMPRISONMENT IN INDIA AND NORWAY: A CRITICAL COMPARISON OF THE TWO EXTREMES Written by Sayesha Chadha*
More informationRECOMMENDATION No. R (99) 22 OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS TO MEMBER STATES CONCERNING PRISON OVERCROWDING AND PRISON POPULATION INFLATION
RECOMMENDATION No. R (99) 22 OF THE COMMITTEE OF MINISTERS TO MEMBER STATES CONCERNING PRISON OVERCROWDING AND PRISON POPULATION INFLATION (Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 30 September 1999 at
More informationCitation: R. v. Finck, 2017 NSPC 73. Matthew Finck. Restriction on Publication: Pursuant to s of the Criminal Code DECISION ON SENTENCE
PROVINCIAL COURT OF NOVA SCOTIA Citation: R. v. Finck, 2017 NSPC 73 Date: 20171129 Docket: 8074143/8074144 Registry: Amherst Between: Her Majesty the Queen v. Matthew Finck Restriction on Publication:
More informationCrimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment Bill 2007
First print New South Wales Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Amendment Bill 2007 Explanatory note This explanatory note relates to this Bill as introduced into Parliament. Overview of Bill The object of this
More informationR v DOBSON & NORRIS. Central Criminal Court. 4 January Sentencing Remarks of Mr Justice Treacy
R v DOBSON & NORRIS Central Criminal Court 4 January 2012 Sentencing Remarks of Mr Justice Treacy The Offence 1. The murder of Stephen Lawrence on the night of 22 nd April 1993 was a terrible and evil
More informationEUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC) MODEL PROVISIONS FOR COUNCIL OF EUROPE CRIMINAL LAW CONVENTIONS
Strasbourg, 3 July 2015 cdpc/docs 2014/cdpc (2014) 17 - e CDPC (2014) 17rev5 EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC) MODEL PROVISIONS FOR COUNCIL OF EUROPE CRIMINAL LAW CONVENTIONS Document prepared
More informationSUPREME COURT ON DEATH PENALTY
Open Access Journal available at jlsr.thelawbrigade.com 38 SUPREME COURT ON DEATH PENALTY Written by Dr. Suman Yadav* & Amol Shetty** * Assistant Professor ** 3rd Year BBA LLB Student, UWSL, Gandhinagar
More informationSection 9 Causation 291
Section 9 Causation 291 treatment, Sharon is able to leave the hospital and move into an apartment with a nursing assistant to care for her. Sharon realizes that her life is not over. She begins taking
More informationCRIMINAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA (KZ-1) GENERAL PART. Chapter One FUNDAMENTAL PROVISIONS. Imposition of Criminal Liability Article 1
CRIMINAL CODE OF THE REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA (KZ-1) GENERAL PART Chapter One FUNDAMENTAL PROVISIONS Imposition of Criminal Liability Article 1 (1) Criminal liability in the Republic of Slovenia may be imposed
More informationAbolish the death penalty.
1.1 is World Day Abolish the death penalty. It s a better world without it. 22-212 1 Years of World Coalition against the Death Penalty october 1 th 212 world day against the death penalty WORLD COALITION
More informationCONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE & OTHER CRUEL INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT and its Optional Protocol
CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE & OTHER CRUEL INHUMAN OR DEGRADING TREATMENT OR PUNISHMENT and its Optional Protocol Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Cambodia OHCHR Convention
More informationPrivacy Issues and RTI
Presentation by Narayan Varma at a Seminar on RTI-Key to Good Governance organised by ISTM, DOPT, Government of India On 29.10.2010 Privacy Issues and RTI INDEX 1. Introduction 2. Article 21 of the Constitution
More informationAbolition of the death penalty
Dimension Implementation Conference Warsaw, 24 September 5 October 2012 Working Session 5: Rule of Law II Contribution of the Council of Europe Abolition of the death penalty A violation of fundamental
More informationConsideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 19 of the Convention. Concluding observations of the Committee against Torture
United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Distr.: General 26 June 2012 Original: English CAT/C/ALB/CO/2 Committee against Torture Forty-eighth
More informationJUDGMENT. Earlin White v The Queen
[2010] UKPC 22 Privy Council Appeal No 0101 of 2009 JUDGMENT Earlin White v The Queen From the Court of Appeal of Belize before Lord Rodger Lady Hale Sir John Dyson JUDGMENT DELIVERED BY Sir John Dyson
More informationExplanatory Report to the European Convention on the Suppression of Terrorism
Explanatory Report to the European Convention on the Suppression of Terrorism Strasbourg, 27.I.1977 European Treaty Series - No. 90 Introduction I. The European Convention on the Suppression of Terrorism,
More informationUGC NET/SET LAW OPTIONAL PAPER Which one of the following is not correct with reference to John Austin s Command theory? 1) Divine law is law
UGC NET/SET LAW OPTIONAL PAPER Which one of the following is not correct with reference to John Austin s Command theory? 1) Divine law is law properly so called 2) The law of honour is law improperly so
More informationTHE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY. No: 19/2003/QH11
THE NATIONAL ASSEMBLY No: 19/2003/QH11 SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIET NAM Independence - Freedom - Happiness ----- o0o ----- Ha Noi, Day 26 month 11 year 2003 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE (No. 19/2003/QH11 of November
More informationGerman Citation: OLG Bamberg in SJZ 1950, 207 or OLG Bamberg m. Anm. in SJZ (3) Provincial High Court and Court of Appeal [Oberlandesgericht] Bamberg
German Citation: OLG Bamberg in SJZ 1950, 207 or OLG Bamberg m. Anm. in SJZ (3) 1950, S. 207 210. 1 Criminal Law [207] Provincial High Court and Court of Appeal [Oberlandesgericht] Bamberg 239 Penal Code
More informationTHE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2015
AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 154 of 2015 THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2015 A 17 of 2014. 1 of 1956. 5 18 of 2013. 10 BILL further to amend the Whistle Blowers Protection Act,
More informationTHE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR PECULIAR POSITION OF THE STATE: THE State of Jammu and Kashmir holds a peculiar position under the construction of India. If forms a part of the territory of India as defined
More informationSociology 3395: Criminal Justice and Corrections. Class 17: Sentencing and Punishment
Sociology 3395: Criminal Justice and Corrections Class 17: Sentencing and Punishment Upon conviction, a court must come up with an appropriate sentence for an offender. Our CJS believes that this must
More informationKEYNOTE SPEECH. by Thomas HAMMARBERG. Council of Europe Commissioner for Human Rights
Strasbourg, 18 February 2009 CommDH/Speech(2009)1 9 th Informal ASEM Seminar on Human Rights Human Rights in criminal justice systems KEYNOTE SPEECH by Thomas HAMMARBERG Council of Europe Commissioner
More informationTHE PREVENTION OF BRIBERY OF FOREIGN PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND OFFICIALS OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS BILL, 2011
AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 26 of 2011 THE PREVENTION OF BRIBERY OF FOREIGN PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND OFFICIALS OF PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATIONS BILL, 2011 A BILL to prevent corruption relating
More informationWhat is a Money Bill?
MONEY BILLS What is a Money Bill? Under article 110(1) of the Constitution, a Bill is deemed to be a Money Bill if it contains only provisions dealing with all or any of the following matters, namely:
More informationCONTENTS CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1-15 CHAPTER II HUMAN RIGHTS AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE: A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE
CONTENTS Page Nos. Certificate i Acknowledgements ii-iii List of Abbreviations iv-vi List of Cases vii-xiii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1-15 2. Importance of the Study 3. Objectives and Scope of the Study 4.
More informationCHAPTER 1 BASIC RULES AND PRINCIPLES
CHAPTER 1 BASIC RULES AND PRINCIPLES Section I. GENERAL 1. Purpose and Scope The purpose of this Manual is to provide authoritative guidance to military personnel on the customary and treaty law applicable
More informationCrime and Punishment Reading
Crime and Punishment Reading 1 2 Every society has laws defining crimes. Every society punishes people who commit those crimes. But how should the state punish the guilty? Consider these four cases: 3
More information- To provide insight into the extent to which crimes are committed during unsupervised
Summary Reason and research questions When an accused is sentenced, for example to a conditional hospital order, he is at liberty within certain limits to institute appeal to the court of appeal or Supreme
More informationConcluding observations by the Human Rights Committee : Peru. 15/11/2000. CCPR/CO/70/PER. (Concluding Observations/Comments)
Page 1 of 5 Concluding observations by the Human Rights Committee : Peru. 15/11/2000. CCPR/CO/70/PER. (Concluding Observations/Comments) Convention Abbreviation: CCPR HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Seventieth
More informationDraft Statute for an International Criminal Court 1994
Draft Statute for an International Criminal Court 1994 Text adopted by the Commission at its forty-sixth session, in 1994, and submitted to the General Assembly as a part of the Commission s report covering
More informationSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
(Bench Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2007 1 NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes
More information*Please note that this translation is missing the following amendments to the Act: JUVENILE COURTS ACT. (Official Gazette no. 111/1997) PART ONE
Please note that the translation provided below is only provisional translation and therefore does NOT represent an official document of Republic of Croatia. It confers no rights and imposes no obligations
More informationEvolution of Animal Cruelty Law in India
+ Evolution of Animal Cruelty Law in India National Judicial Academy (August 17, 2018) Mihir Samson Advocate + Early view of animals in the law The origins of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act,
More informationTHE CONSTITUTION (SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR COURTS OF JUDICATURE) (PRACTICE) DIRECTIONS, 2013 ARRANGEMENT OF PARAGRAPHS
THE CONSTITUTION (SENTENCING GUIDELINES FOR COURTS OF JUDICATURE) (PRACTICE) DIRECTIONS, 2013 Paragraph ARRANGEMENT OF PARAGRAPHS PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Title. 2. Application. 3. Objectives of these Practice
More informationHearing on Reevaluating the Effectiveness of Federal Mandatory Minimum Sentences
Written Statement of Antonio M. Ginatta Advocacy Director, US Program Human Rights Watch to United States Senate, Committee on the Judiciary Hearing on Reevaluating the Effectiveness of Federal Mandatory
More informationTHE INDIAN PENAL CODE (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2016
1 AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 190 of 2016 THE INDIAN PENAL CODE (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2016 By SHRI BAIJAYANT PANDA, M.P. 5 10 A BILL further to amend the Indian Penal Code, 1860. BE it enacted by Parliament
More informationQ. What is Bail? Q. What is a Bailable and Non-Bailable offence?
Q. What is Bail? The purpose of arrest and detention of a person is primarily to make sure that the person appears before the court at the time of trial and if he is found guilty and is sentenced to imprisonment,
More informationUnited Arab Emirates Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review
Public amnesty international United Arab Emirates Submission to the UN Universal Periodic Review Third session of the UPR Working Group of the UN Human Rights Council 1 12 December 2008 AI Index: MDE 25/006/2008
More informationSENATE, Nos. 171 and 2471 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 212th LEGISLATURE
LEGISLATIVE FISCAL ESTIMATE SENATE COMMITTEE SUBSTITUTE FOR SENATE, Nos. 171 and 2471 STATE OF NEW JERSEY 212th LEGISLATURE DATED: NOVEMBER 21, 2007 SUMMARY Synopsis: Type of Impact: Eliminates the death
More informationCOR160 Essential Academic Writing Skills Individual Assignment 02 January 2014 Presentation
COR160 Essential Academic Writing Skills Individual Assignment 02 January 2014 Presentation SIM UNIVERSITY TMA02-1 TUTOR-MARKED ASSIGNMENT 02 This tutor-marked assignment is worth 50% of the final mark
More informationCONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
Page 1 of 11 CONVENTION AGAINST TORTURE and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment The States Parties to this Convention, Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed
More informationCHAPTER VII PROSECUTION. 1.Sanction for prosecution
CHAPTER VII PROSECUTION 1.Sanction for prosecution Under Section 19 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, it is necessary for the prosecuting authority to have the previous sanction of the appropriate
More informationComments of the Committee on Judicial Accountability on the Judges Enquiry Bill, 2006.
1 COMMITTEE ON JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY 66 Lawyers Chambers Supreme Court of India, New Delhi Members: Ram Jethmalani Shanti Bhushan D.S. Tewatia Anil B. Divan Indira Jaisingh Kamini Jaiswal Prashant Bhushan
More informationContemporary Challenges to Executive Power: The Constitutional Scheme and Practice in India. Dr. V. Vijayakumar
Contemporary Challenges to Executive Power: The Constitutional Scheme and Practice in India Dr. V. Vijayakumar The Constitution of India that is modeled on the Government of India Act, 1935, deviates from
More informationINHUMAN SENTENCING OF CHILDREN IN SWAZILAND
CAMPAIGN REPORT INHUMAN SENTENCING OF CHILDREN IN SWAZILAND Summary When the Children s Protection and Welfare Act came into force in July 2013, 1 it implemented wide reaching reforms of the juvenile justice
More informationIN THE MATTER OF I.M.M.J. (ILF-West Bank Ramallah 5261/2013) (Attorney Nour Bustami)
ILF West Bank The International Legal Foundation West Bank CASE NOTES Spring and Summer 2014 *** This edition of the ILF-West Bank Case Notes covers the development of ILF-West Bank s motions practice
More informationEXTRADITION ACT Act 7 of 2017 NOT IN OPERATION ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES
EXTRADITION ACT Act 7 of 2017 NOT IN OPERATION ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES Clause PART I PRELIMINARY 16. Proceedings after arrest 1. Short title 17. Search and seizure 2. Interpretation Sub-Part C Eligibility
More informationSentencing Act Examinable excerpts of PART 1 PRELIMINARY. 1 Purposes
Examinable excerpts of Sentencing Act 1991 as at 10 April 2018 1 Purposes PART 1 PRELIMINARY The purposes of this Act are (a) to promote consistency of approach in the sentencing of offenders; (b) to have
More informationPreamble of the Indian Constitution
Page131 CHAPTER IV COMPENSATORY DISCRIMINATION IN FAVOUR OF SCHEDULED CASTES AND SCHEDULED TRIBES UNDER THE INDIAN CONSTITUTION Preamble of the Indian Constitution India begins with the Preamble of the
More informationReport of the Republic of El Salvador pursuant to United Nations General Assembly resolution 66/103
-1- Translated from Spanish Report of the Republic of El Salvador pursuant to United Nations General Assembly resolution 66/103 The scope and application of the principle of universal jurisdiction With
More informationAppellant. JOHN DAVID WRIGHT Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA831/2013 [2014] NZCA 119 BETWEEN AND THE QUEEN Appellant JOHN DAVID WRIGHT Respondent Hearing: 12 March 2014 Court: Counsel: Judgment: Wild, Goddard and Clifford
More information214 Part III Homicide and Related Issues
214 Part III Homicide and Related Issues THE LAW Kansas Statutes Annotated (1) Chapter 21. Crimes and Punishments Section 21-3401. Murder in the First Degree Murder in the first degree is the killing of
More informationTHE PLURINATIONAL STATE OF BOLIVIA Embassy of The Hague The Netherlands
THE PLURINATIONAL STATE OF BOLIVIA Embassy of The Hague The Netherlands INFORMATION ON THE PLAN OF ACTION FOR ACHIEVING UNIVERSALITY AND FULL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ROME STATUTE I. BACKGROUND The International
More informationOBJECTS AND REASONS
2014-09-01 OBJECTS AND REASONS This Bill would amend the Offences Against the Person Act, Cap. 141 to abolish the mandatory imposition of the penalty of death for the offence of murder. 2 Arrangement of
More informationVictim-Centred Considerations for the Consultation on the Review of Record Suspensions. Submission to Public Safety Canada
Victim-Centred Considerations for the Consultation on the Review of Record Suspensions Submission to Public Safety Canada Submitted by Sue O Sullivan, Federal Ombudsman for Victims of Crime December 2016
More information