FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/11/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/11/2015. Appendix D

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/11/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/11/2015. Appendix D"

Transcription

1 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/11/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/11/2015 Appendix D

2 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK PART 60 PRESENT: Hon. Marcy S. Friedman, J.S.C. IN RE: PART 60 RMBS INVESTOR LITIGATION Index No /2015 THIS DOCUMENT APPLIES TO ALL CASES PART 60 RMBS INVESTOR ACTIONS [PROPOSED] CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

3 It is hereby ORDERED that disclosure shall proceed as follows: (1) PREAMBLE (a) This Case Management Order ( CMO ) shall govern each of the actions assigned to the master file known as Part 60 RMBS Investor Litigation by the Master Filing Order of this Court dated August 28, 2015, together with any subsequently filed actions that are assigned to the Part 60 RMBS Investor Litigation master file (together, the Investor Actions ) unless ordered by the Court. This CMO is to be construed as separately entered in each of the Investor Actions. To the extent that this CMO refers to parties to an Investor Action, such language shall be construed as applying to parties to a specific Investor Action and not to all parties in all Investor Actions. (b) The Court finds that cooperation among counsel and parties in the Investor Actions is necessary to achieve efficiencies and coordination among the Investor Actions. The communication, transmission or dissemination of information among the plaintiffs and their counsel, and among defendants and their counsel, shall not be deemed a waiver of the attorney-client privilege, the protection afforded by the attorney work-product doctrine, the protection afforded material prepared for litigation, the joint prosecution or joint defense privilege, the common-interest doctrine, or any other privilege or immunity to which a party may be entitled. Any cooperative efforts, as described, shall not, in any way, be used against any of the parties, shall not constitute or be cited as evidence of conspiracy, concerted action, or any wrongful conduct, and shall not be communicated during dispositive motions or at trial. The exchange of information or documents by counsel will not, by itself, render such information or documents privileged. Nothing in this paragraph shall in any way affect the applicability of any privileges or protection against disclosure otherwise available under law. (2) STEERING COMMITTEES (a) Appointment of Steering Committees to act on behalf of Plaintiffs and Defendants in the Investor Actions will facilitate communications among the Court and counsel, minimize duplication of effort, facilitate coordination of joint positions, and provide for the efficient progress and control of these litigations. (b) Subject to the right of any party to any particular action to present individual positions to the Court, the Steering Committees are vested by the Court with the following responsibilities and duties: (i) To consider and propose future case management orders or amendments thereto; (ii) To coordinate, to the extent practicable, briefing with respect to motions where common issues briefing has been ordered by the Court; Page 2

4 (iii) To coordinate the argument of such motions; (iv) To coordinate the selection of counsel to act as spokespersons at conferences; (v) To call meetings of counsel for Plaintiffs and/or Defendants in the Investor Actions, as applicable, for the purpose of proposing joint actions, including but not limited to response to questions and suggestions of the Court or of parties with regard to order, schedules, briefs or stipulations; (vi) To notify other Plaintiffs or Defendants counsel in the Investor Actions, as applicable, of communications received from the Court; (vii) To notify other Plaintiffs or Defendants counsel in the Investor Actions, as applicable, of common issues being briefed before the Special Master before the opening brief is filed, to the extent such common issues are brought to the respective Steering Committees attention in advance of the filing; and (viii) To maintain a master list of all counsel in the Investor Actions. (c) The Plaintiff Steering Committee for the Investor Actions shall be comprised of the following Plaintiffs counsel: Joel H. Bernstein, Labaton Sucharow LLP; and John J.D. McFerrin-Clancy, McFerrin-Clancy PLLC (d) The Defendant Steering Committee for the Investor Actions shall be comprised of the following Defendants counsel: Richard W. Clary, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP; and James Rouhandeh, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP. (e) The Steering Committees for the Investor Actions shall coordinate with one another and with the Steering Committees for the Putback Cases and the Monoline Cases to achieve, to the extent appropriate, uniformity of coordination procedures across the RMBS Investor Actions, Putback Cases and Monoline Cases. (f) Notwithstanding the appointment of the Steering Committees, each counsel of record shall have the right to participate in all proceedings before the Court as fully as such counsel would have the right to do absent this CMO and to the extent such counsel deems necessary. Page 3

5 (g) The Steering Committees shall not have the right to bind any party as to any matter without the express consent of counsel for that party. (h) Notwithstanding their participation on a Steering Committee, the members of the Steering Committees shall remain free to represent the interest and positions of their respective clients at all times. For the avoidance of doubt, firms and lawyers participating on a Steering Committee shall not be considered counsel for any party in the Investor Actions other than the party or parties on behalf of whom that firm and lawyer has appeared as of record. (i) To facilitate communications between the Court and the Steering Committees, the following Liaison Counsel are hereby appointed: Joel H. Bernstein, Labaton Sucharow LLP (for the Plaintiff Steering Committee); and Richard W. Clary, Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP (for the Defendant Steering Committee). (3) BILL OF PARTICULARS (See CPLR 3130(1)): (a) Demand for a bill of particulars shall be served by N/A on or before N/A. (b) Bills of particulars shall be served by N/A on or before N/A. (4) DOCUMENT PRODUCTION: (a) Responses and/or Objections to any demand for discovery and inspection shall be served on or before 30 days from service of the demand. Documents responsive to any demand not objected to shall be produced or made available for inspection on a schedule agreed to by the parties. (b) Requests for Production can be served beginning upon the later of the entry of this CMO by the Court or the expiration of the initial time to move to dismiss, or in the absence of a motion to dismiss, answer, in a given Investor Action (for each Investor Action, the Opening Date ). (c) Party document discovery shall be substantially completed on or before 10 months after the Opening Date. Party document discovery, including service of any document discovery motions subject to the terms of this CMO, shall be completed by 12 months after the Opening Date. (d) Non-party document discovery shall be completed on or before 16 months after the Opening Date. Page 4

6 (e) For the avoidance of doubt, this CMO does not authorize materials produced in one Investor Action to be produced to parties in a different Investor Action, nor shall any materials produced in one Investor Action be deemed to have been produced in any other Investor Action. A party may designate any production as being made across more than one Investor Action where it believes it is appropriate to do so. (f) For any requests for production that pertain to the same Defendant Group, 1 plaintiffs in the Investor Actions that bring claims against the same Defendant Group shall coordinate and serve a joint set of requests for documents on the Defendant Group in the actions in which a member of the Defendant Group is a party. For any requests for documents that pertain to a Plaintiff Group, 2 defendants in the Investor Actions that are subject to claims by the same Plaintiff Group shall coordinate and serve a joint set of requests for production on each Plaintiff Group across the actions in which a member of the Plaintiff Group is a party. Each party in an individual Investor Action may serve supplemental requests for production relating to that action. (g) Any requests for production served before January 16, 2015 in any of the Investor Actions shall remain in place, subject to further order of the Court. (h) The parties in the Investor Actions are to meet and confer regarding a protocol governing privilege reviews and logs (per Commercial Division Rule 11-b) by one month from the Opening Date. (5) INTERROGATORIES: (a) Answers and/or Objections to any interrogatory shall be served on or before 30 days from service of the interrogatory. (b) Interrogatories can be served beginning upon the Opening Date; and may be served thereafter for 13 months. 1 Defendant Group refers to any of the following groups of defendants: Credit Suisse (Asset Backed Securities Corp.; Credit Suisse (USA), Inc.; Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Securities Corp.; Credit Suisse Holdings (USA), Inc.; Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC; Credit Suisse First Boston Mortgage Acceptance Corp.; Credit Suisse Management LLC and DLJ Mortgage Capital, Inc.); Goldman Sachs (Goldman Sachs Real Estate Funding Corp.; Goldman, Sachs & Co., GS Mortgage Securities Corp.; Goldman Sachs Mortgage Company; and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.); Morgan Stanley (Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC; Morgan Stanley Capital I, Inc.; Saxon Funding Management LLC; Morgan Stanley Mortgage Capital Holdings LLC; Morgan Stanley; Saxon Asset Securities Company; Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I, Inc.; Morgan Stanley Credit Corporation; and Saxon Mortgage Inc.); Natixis (Natixis Real Estate Holdings LLC, successor-in-interest to Natixis Real Estate Capital Inc. f/k/a IXIS Real Estate Capital Inc); and RBS (The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc.; RBS Holdings USA, Inc.; RBS Securities, Inc.; RBS Acceptance, Inc.; RBS Financial Products Inc.; and Financial Assets Securities Corp.) 2 Plaintiff Group refers to any of the following groups of plaintiffs: DZ Bank (Deutsche Zentral- Genossenschaftsbank AG, New York Branch, d/b/a DZ Bank AG, New York Branch ); HSH Nordbank (HSH Nordbank AG; HSH Nordbank AG, Luxembourg Branch; HSH Nordbank Securities S.A.; and Carrera Capital Finance Limited); IKB (IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG and IKB International S.A. in Liquidation); and LBBW (Landesbank Baden-Württemberg; Georges Quay Funding I Limited; and Spencerview Asset Management Limited). Page 5

7 (c) For any interrogatories that pertain to the same Defendant Group, plaintiffs in the Investor Actions that bring claims against the same Defendant Group shall coordinate and may serve up to 20 joint interrogatories, including subparts, in the actions in which a member of the Defendant Group is a party. For any interrogatories that pertain to a Plaintiff Group, defendants in the Investor Actions that are subject to claims by the same Plaintiff Group shall coordinate and may serve up to 20 joint interrogatories, including subparts, in the actions in which a member of the Plaintiff Group is a party. Each Defendant Group and Plaintiff Group in an individual Investor Action may serve up to five supplemental interrogatories, including subparts, relating to that action. (d) Any interrogatories served before January 16, 2015 in any of the Investor Actions shall remain in place, subject to further order of the Court. (6) ELECTRONIC DISCOVERY, if any: Have all parties met and conferred about how electronic discovery will be conducted? Yes X No Have the parties entered into a stipulation governing electronic discovery? Yes X No The parties have entered into a stipulation governing electronic discovery: See Part 60 Investor Actions - Stipulation and Order Regarding ESI Document Production Protocol, filed June 15, 2015, and other directives with respect to electronic discovery: See Part 60 Investor Actions - Stipulation and Order for the Production and Exchange of Confidential Information, filed July 13, 2015 (the Protective Order ). (7) DEPOSITIONS: (a) Plaintiffs depositions, Defendants depositions and non-party depositions shall be completed on or before 16 months after the Opening Date. (b) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties to a particular Investor Action, depositions shall not commence until 12 months after the Opening Date. (c) The Parties shall submit a proposed deposition protocol to the Special Master on or before 10 months after the Opening Date. If the parties are unable to agree on a deposition protocol on or before 10 months after the Opening Date, the parties shall submit their positions concerning their dispute to the Special Master by that date. The deposition protocol shall address cross-noticing of depositions across the Investor Actions. Page 6

8 (8) OTHER DISCLOSURES AND PRODUCTION: (a) Plaintiffs Priority Document Production. Within 45 days from the Opening Date (except that to the extent that the parties in a given Investor Action have mutually agreed to exchange the documents identified in Paragraphs 8(a)(i)-(iii) earlier than 45 days from the Opening Date, this CMO does not supersede or in any way prohibit such earlier exchange), each plaintiff in each of the Investor Actions shall perform a reasonable search of its centralized repositories and produce the following materials as they were maintained in the regular course of business to the extent that they can be located: (i) all documentation reflecting plaintiff s acquisition and ownership of the certificates at issue in the action and documents reflecting the disposition (if any) of the certificates at issue in the action; (ii) all agreements or documentation concerning plaintiff s standing to pursue the claims in the action; (iii) organizational charts that describe or identify personnel, departments, committees, groups or entities involved in the purchase of at-issue RMBS during the relevant time period; (b) Defendants Priority Document Production. Within 45 days from the Opening Date (except that to the extent that the parties in a given Investor Action have mutually agreed to exchange the documents identified in Paragraphs 8(b)(i)-(iv) earlier than 45 days from the Opening Date, this CMO does not supersede or in any way prohibit such earlier exchange), each defendant in each of the Investor Actions shall perform a reasonable search of its centralized repositories and produce the following materials as they were maintained in the regular course of business to the extent that they can be located: (i) loan tapes that the defendant reasonably believes reflect the final population of loans for each of the securitizations at issue in the action; (ii) organizational charts that describe or identify personnel, departments, committees, groups or entities involved in the origination of mortgage loans underlying at-issue RMBS, or the securitization or sale of at-issue RMBS during the relevant time period; (iii) closing sets of the securitizations at issue in the action. To the extent that the closing sets contain executed or final copies of agreements and other documents prepared in connection with the issuance of the securitizations those documents shall also be produced; and (iv) working group lists for the securitizations at issue in the action. (c) Loan Files and Guidelines. Within four months from the Opening Date, or 60 days from a plaintiff s service of a document request identifying the sample of loan files intended for re-underwriting purposes, whichever is latest, each defendant in each of the Investor Actions shall perform a reasonable search of its centralized repositories and produce the following materials to the extent that they can be located: Page 7

9 (i) any loan files that are at issue in the action; and (ii) underwriting guidelines of any originators disclosed in the relevant prospectus supplements (i.e., originators that originated 10 percent or more of the loans underlying the certificates at issue in the action). In the event that Loan Files and Guidelines are stored only in hard copy format, the deadlines specified above shall be extended to six months from the Opening Date, or 120 days from a plaintiff s service of a document request identifying the sample of loan files intended for re-underwriting purposes, whichever is latest. If necessary, the parties in each case will meet and confer regarding a stipulated procedure to determine promptly the underwriting guidelines that shall apply to each loan plaintiffs will place at issue and the contents of the loan files for such loans. Any disputes regarding such a stipulated procedure shall be referred to the Special Master for resolution. (d) Search Terms and Custodians. The following schedule shall apply for the exchange of, and agreement upon, initial search terms and the identification of initial custodians to the extent such exchange and agreement is applicable or relevant to a party s collection of documents and has not yet taken place in a particular Investor Action as of the date hereof. All dates are to be calculated from (i) the date on which a producing party is required by rule to serve written responses and objections to requests for production of documents, (ii) the date on which the parties exchange the priority documents identified in 8(a)-(b), or (iii) the date of entry of this CMO, whichever is latest. In the event the parties are unable to reach agreement on search terms and custodians, the parties shall refer the dispute to the Special Master for resolution. Parties Exchange Proposed Custodian Lists: 25 days Parties Finalize Initial Custodian Lists: 40 days Receiving Party Identifies Proposed Initial Search Terms: 40 days Producing Party Responds to Proposed Initial Search Terms: 60 days Parties Finalize Initial Search Terms: 75 days (9) END OF FACT DISCOVERY: All fact discovery shall be completed on or before 16 months from the Opening Date. Page 8

10 (10) EXPERT DISCOVERY, if any: (a) For each Investor Action, Plaintiffs shall identify their intended re-underwriting sample of loan files together with a supplemental sample of additional loan files on or before two months from the date on which production of loan tapes under Paragraph 8(b)(i) was completed in that Investor Action. The parties will negotiate in good faith to attempt to reach agreement as to parameters concerning the size of the supplemental sample, and if unable to reach agreement will bring that issue to the Special Master. Plaintiffs may seek further loan files by agreement of the parties or with leave from the Special Master for good cause shown. (b) Plaintiffs' expert reports shall be due one month after the completion of fact discovery. (c) Defendants' experts' rebuttals of Plaintiffs' expert reports shall be due four months after service of plaintiffs' expert reports. (d) Plaintiffs' reply expert reports shall be due two months after service of any corresponding defendants' expert reports. (e) Expert depositions shall be completed within two months of service of plaintiffs' reply expert reports. (11) IMPLEADER: Impleader shall be completed on or before 12 months from the Opening Date. (12) END DATE FOR ALL DISCLOSURE: (a) All fact disclosure shall be completed on or before 16 months from the Opening Date; all expert disclosure shall be completed on or before 25 months from the Opening Date. (b) Any stipulation staying discovery or other proceedings or extending or otherwise modifying any provision of this CMO must be so ordered by the Court, provided that interim discovery deadlines may be extended with the approval of the Special Master so long as such extension does not extend the end date for fact discovery or the end date for expert discovery. (c) Subject to further order of the Court, this CMO does not amend, alter or supersede any existing so-ordered agreement of the parties in any individual Investor Action to stay discovery or other proceedings. Page 9

11 (13) COMPLIANCE CONFERENCE: The Special Master shall convene and conduct discovery compliance conferences on a regular basis. (14) DISPOSITIVE MOTIONS: (a) The Parties shall submit a proposed joint schedule for dispositive motions on or before 12 months from the Opening Date. If the parties are unable to agree on a schedule for dispositive motions on or before 12 months from the Opening Date, the parties shall submit their positions on any disputes to the Court by that date. (15) NOTE OF ISSUE: Plaintiffs shall file a note of issue/certificate of readiness no later than seven days after the close of expert discovery. A copy of this order shall be served and filed with the note of issue. (16) MODIFICATION: (a) Parties seeking relief from any provision of the CMO for good cause shown shall notify the Court by a two-page joint letter setting forth, with specificity, the parties position(s) with respect to the reasons for such relief. The Court will consider such requests on a case-by-case basis. The Court will schedule a further appearance by the parties or briefing, as appropriate. Individual cases should adhere to the discovery deadlines set forth in this CMO whenever reasonably possible. Extensions of interim deadlines shall be made pursuant to paragraph 12(b) above. (b) Any party that seeks a stay of discovery in a particular case shall submit a formal application to the Court requesting such a stay. Such application shall be made by notifying the Court by a two-page joint letter setting forth with specificity the parties position(s) with respect to the reasons for such relief. The Court will consider such requests on a case-by-case basis. The Court will schedule a further appearance by the parties or briefing as appropriate. (c) The parties should exercise restraint in requesting stays pending motions to dismiss or otherwise. The parties are referred to the transcript of the Court s conference call with liaison counsel on August 26, 2015, filed in index number /13, at page 14, for discussion of possible circumstances in which a stay of discovery may be approved. (d) Cases assigned to this Part subsequent to the date of entry of the CMO shall be bound by the CMO unless otherwise ordered by the Court. The parties in such cases shall notify Page 10

12 the Court of any objections to the CMO within 20 days of the filing of the RJI in the respective case. (e) This order is subject to further review and revision by the Court as discovery proceeds. THE DATES SET FORTH HEREIN MAY NOT BE ADJOURNED EXCEPT WITH APPROVAL OF THE COURT. THE PARTIES MUST BRING COPIES OF ALL DISCLOSURE ORDERS TO ALL CONFERENCES. Page 11

13 ADDITIONAL DIRECTIVES In addition to the directives set forth above, it is furthered ORDERED as follows: SO ORDERED: Dated: Marcy S. Friedman, J.S.C. Page 12

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/03/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2015. ExhibitA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/03/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2015. ExhibitA FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2015 06:04 PM INDEX NO. 650312/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2015 ExhibitA SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEW YORK COUNTYOFNEW YORK BANK HAPOALIM B.M., vs.

More information

COMMERCIAL DIVISION PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ORDER PURSUANT TO PART 202 OF THE UNIFORM CIVIL RULES FOR THE SUPREME COURT KINGS COUNTY

COMMERCIAL DIVISION PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ORDER PURSUANT TO PART 202 OF THE UNIFORM CIVIL RULES FOR THE SUPREME COURT KINGS COUNTY COMMERCIAL DIVISION PRELIMINARY CONFERENCE ORDER PURSUANT TO PART 202 OF THE UNIFORM CIVIL RULES FOR THE SUPREME COURT KINGS COUNTY DATE 200 Plaintiff(s) -against- Index # Defendant(s) Plaintiff is represented

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 3. Present: Hon. EILEEN BRANSTEN MICHAEL SWEENEY, Index No.: /2017.

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 3. Present: Hon. EILEEN BRANSTEN MICHAEL SWEENEY, Index No.: /2017. Index Number: 650053/2017 Page 1 out of 15 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK: PART 3 MICHAEL SWEENEY, Present: Hon. EILEEN BRANSTEN vs. Plaintiff, Index No.: 650053/2017 RJI Filing

More information

It is hereby STIPULATED by and between all parties to the within action that disclosure shall proceed and be completed as follows:

It is hereby STIPULATED by and between all parties to the within action that disclosure shall proceed and be completed as follows: FILED: ORANGE COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2017 04:17 PM INDEX NO. EF006661-2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40-1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2017 COMPLIANCE CONFERENCE DATE (all parties shall appear): SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE

More information

X X

X X FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 0/1/1 1: PM INDEX NO. 1/1 NYSCEF DOC. NO. RECEIVED NYSCEF: 0/1/1 1 1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY : CIVIL TERM : PART 0 --------------------------------------------X

More information

HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Merrill Lynch Mtge. Lending, Inc NY Slip Op 32257(U) November 3, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Merrill Lynch Mtge. Lending, Inc NY Slip Op 32257(U) November 3, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: HSBC Bank USA, N.A. v Merrill Lynch Mtge. Lending, Inc. 2016 NY Slip Op 32257(U) November 3, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652727/14 Judge: Marcy Friedman Cases posted with a "30000"

More information

Baxter International Inc. One Baxter Parkway Deerfield, Illinois 60015

Baxter International Inc. One Baxter Parkway Deerfield, Illinois 60015 EXECUTION COPY Baxter International Inc. One Baxter Parkway Deerfield, Illinois 60015 January 11, 2016 Shire plc 5 Riverwalk, Citywest Business Campus Dublin 24 Republic of Ireland Attention: Bill Mordan,

More information

scc Doc 74 Filed 10/13/17 Entered 10/13/17 14:26:37 Main Document Pg 1 of 7

scc Doc 74 Filed 10/13/17 Entered 10/13/17 14:26:37 Main Document Pg 1 of 7 Pg 1 of 7 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re: LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC., et al., Debtors. LEHMAN BROTHERS HOLDINGS INC., LEHMAN BROTHERS SPECIAL FINANCING INC., LEHMAN

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015. Exhibit 1.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015. Exhibit 1. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/2015 05:15 PM INDEX NO. 652471/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015 Exhibit 1 Document1 SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SNI/SI

More information

Federal Hous. Fin. Agency v UBS Real Estate Sec., Inc NY Slip Op 31458(U) July 27, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /12

Federal Hous. Fin. Agency v UBS Real Estate Sec., Inc NY Slip Op 31458(U) July 27, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /12 Federal Hous. Fin. Agency v UBS Real Estate Sec., Inc. 2016 NY Slip Op 31458(U) July 27, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651282/12 Judge: Marcy Friedman Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

THE COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF RECORD IN COLORADO CHAPTER 10 GENERAL PROVISIONS

THE COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF RECORD IN COLORADO CHAPTER 10 GENERAL PROVISIONS THE COLORADO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR COURTS OF RECORD IN COLORADO CHAPTER 10 GENERAL PROVISIONS RULE 86. PENDING WATER ADJUDICATIONS UNDER 1943 ACT In any water adjudication under the provisions of

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/04/ :19 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 293 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/04/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/04/ :19 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 293 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/04/2018 At IAS Part 60 of the Supreme Court of the State ofnew York, held in for the County of New York, at the Courthouse located at 60 Centre Street, New York, New York on the day of, 2018 P R E S E N T : Hon.

More information

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA 2019 GERMAN BANK CDS PROTOCOL

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA 2019 GERMAN BANK CDS PROTOCOL International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA 2019 GERMAN BANK CDS PROTOCOL published on February 6, 2019 by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. The International Swaps

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/2010 INDEX NO /2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 54 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2010

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/2010 INDEX NO /2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 54 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2010 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/2010 INDEX NO. 603751/2009 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 54 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2010 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK MBIA INSURANCE CORPORATION, Plaintiff,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA PLAINTIFF(S), Plaintiff(s), Case No. RG CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER RE: DESIGNATED DEFENSE COUNSEL DEFENDANTS, et al., ASSIGNED FOR ALL PRE-TRIAL PURPOSES TO: DEPARTMENT

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ALAMEDA Plaintiff Case No. RG11 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER re: DESIGNATED DEFENSE COUNSEL, et al., ASSIGNED FOR ALL PRE-TRIAL PURPOSES TO: JUDGE JO-LYNNE Q. LEE DEPARTMENT

More information

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS

WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS WYOMING RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR CIRCUIT COURTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1. Scope. 2. Applicability. 3. Pleadings. 3.1. Commencement of action [Effective until June 1 2018.] 3.1. Commencement of action

More information

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES COMPREHENSIVE JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective October 1, 2010 JAMS COMPREHENSIVE ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution

More information

ONONDAGA COUNTY JUSTICES AND LOCAL RULES

ONONDAGA COUNTY JUSTICES AND LOCAL RULES ONONDAGA COUNTY JUSTICES AND LOCAL RULES 473 474 Commercial Division NY Supreme Court Onondaga County Chambers and Part Information Justice Karalunas Court Part Supreme Court of the State of New York Onondaga

More information

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423

Case 3:16-cv CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423 Case 3:16-cv-00625-CRS-CHL Document 36 Filed 06/29/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 423 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY AT LOUISVILLE INSIGHT KENTUCKY PARTNERS II, L.P. vs. LOUISVILLE/JEFFERSON

More information

CPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES. Non-Administered. Arbitration Rules. Effective March 1, tel fax

CPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES. Non-Administered. Arbitration Rules. Effective March 1, tel fax CPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES Non-Administered Arbitration Rules Effective March 1, 2018 tel +1.212.949.6490 fax +1.212.949.8859 www.cpradr.org CPR International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. versus Civil Action 4:17 cv 02946

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION. versus Civil Action 4:17 cv 02946 Case 4:17-cv-02946 Document 3 Filed in TXSD on 10/03/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION United States District Court Southern District of Texas

More information

ARIAS U.S. RULES FOR THE RESOLUTION OF U.S. INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE DISPUTES

ARIAS U.S. RULES FOR THE RESOLUTION OF U.S. INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE DISPUTES 1. INTRODUCTION ARIAS U.S. RULES FOR THE RESOLUTION OF U.S. INSURANCE AND REINSURANCE DISPUTES 1.1 These procedures shall be known as the ARIAS U.S. Rules for the Resolution of U.S. Insurance and Reinsurance

More information

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION It appearing that there are certain actions pending in this Court in which plaintiffs claim damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing

More information

COUNTY OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL

COUNTY OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In the Matter of the Application of WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, THE BANK OF NEW YORK Index No. 657387/2017

More information

LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B

LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B 124 NORTH CAROLINA ROBESON COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION LOCAL RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE FOR THE SUPERIOR COURTS OF JUDICIAL DISTRICT 16B Rule 1. Name. These rules shall

More information

The Avoidance Procedures

The Avoidance Procedures The Avoidance Procedures 1. Notice of Applicability: A. The Avoidance Procedures apply only to Avoidance Actions commenced by the Trustee after the approval of these Avoidance Procedures in which (a) the

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Plaintiff, Civil Action File No.: v. Defendant. CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER By stipulation and agreement of the parties,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE Event Service of Complaint Scheduled Time Total Time After Complaint Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks Initial

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/ :09 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 369 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2018. Exhibit B

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/10/ :09 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 369 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2018. Exhibit B Exhibit B SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YO COUN1YOFNEWYO PART3 --------- )( NORDDEUTSCHE LANDESBANK GIROZENTRALE and HANNOVER FUNDING COMPANY LLC, Present: Hon. Eileen Bransten Index No.: ------- 651695/2015

More information

202.5-b. Electronic Filing in Supreme Court; Consensual Program.

202.5-b. Electronic Filing in Supreme Court; Consensual Program. 202.5-b. Electronic Filing in Supreme Court; Consensual Program. (a) Application. (1) On consent, documents may be filed and served by electronic means in Supreme Court in such civil actions and in such

More information

Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018

Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018 Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Nassau IAS Trial Part 22 Part Rules Updated: January 25, 2018 Justice: Law Secretary: Secretary: Part Clerk: Hon. Sharon M.J. Gianelli, J.S.C. Karen L.

More information

BA CREDIT CARD TRUST FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED TRUST AGREEMENT. dated as of October 1, between

BA CREDIT CARD TRUST FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED TRUST AGREEMENT. dated as of October 1, between EXECUTION COPY BA CREDIT CARD TRUST FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED TRUST AGREEMENT dated as of October 1, 2014 between BA CREDIT CARD FUNDING, LLC, as Beneficiary and as Transferor, and WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY,

More information

Case KG Doc 2912 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : :

Case KG Doc 2912 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : : Case 15-11874-KG Doc 2912 Filed 08/17/17 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re HH LIQUIDATION, LLC, et al. 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 15-11874 (KG) (Jointly

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/17/ :55 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 468 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/17/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/17/ :55 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 468 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/17/2015 FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/17/2015 0855 PM INDEX NO. 652382/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 468 RECEIVED NYSCEF 07/17/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------

More information

CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT

CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT This CONTINUING DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT (this Disclosure Agreement ) is entered into as of July 1, 2018 by and between ERIE COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY (the Authority ) and MANUFACTURERS

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51-

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION. Case No. 51- IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION Case No. 51-, vs. Plaintiff, Defendants. ORDER SETTING JURY TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE

More information

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures

Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures RESOLUTIONS, LLC s GUIDE TO DISPUTE RESOLUTION Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures 1. Scope of Rules The RESOLUTIONS, LLC Streamlined Arbitration Rules and Procedures ("Rules") govern binding

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO.3

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO.3 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION IN RE: ENGLE PROGENY CASES TOBACCO LITIGATION Pertains To: All Cases CASE NO.; 08-CA-80000 DIVISION

More information

By-Laws and Rules of the Citizens Police Review Board of the City of Albany, New York

By-Laws and Rules of the Citizens Police Review Board of the City of Albany, New York By-Laws and Rules of the Citizens Police Review Board of the City of Albany, New York The Citizens Police Review Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board ) shall seek to fulfill the purpose and goals

More information

THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event

More information

Ownit Mtge. Loan Trust v Merrill Lynch Mtge. Lending, Inc NY Slip Op 32303(U) December 7, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:

Ownit Mtge. Loan Trust v Merrill Lynch Mtge. Lending, Inc NY Slip Op 32303(U) December 7, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: Ownit Mtge. Loan Trust v Merrill Lynch Mtge. Lending, Inc. 2015 NY Slip Op 32303(U) December 7, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 651370/2014 Judge: Marcy S. Friedman Cases posted with

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) UNIFORM SCHEDULING ORDER Case 2:13-cv-00685-WKW-CSC Document 149 Filed 12/01/16 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHERN DIVISION GARNET TURNER individually and on behalf of

More information

Case 2:12-md CMR Document 437 Filed 04/01/13 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:12-md CMR Document 437 Filed 04/01/13 Page 1 of 6 Case 2:12-md-02342-CMR Document 437 Filed 04/01/13 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN RE: ZOLOFT (SERTRALINE HYDROCHLORIDE) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

More information

EMIR PORTFOLIO RECONCILIATION, DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND DISCLOSURE. (2) (full legal name of company) (the Counterparty).

EMIR PORTFOLIO RECONCILIATION, DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND DISCLOSURE. (2) (full legal name of company) (the Counterparty). EMIR PORTFOLIO RECONCILIATION, DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND DISCLOSURE THIS AGREEMENT is dated as of [INSERT] and is made BETWEEN: (1) HSBC UK BANK PLC (HSBC); and (2) (full legal name of company) (the Counterparty).

More information

Arbitration Rules. Administered. Effective July 1, 2013 CPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES. International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution

Arbitration Rules. Administered. Effective July 1, 2013 CPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES. International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution International Institute for Conflict Prevention & Resolution CPR PROCEDURES & CLAUSES Administered Arbitration Rules Effective July 1, 2013 30 East 33rd Street 6th Floor New York, NY 10016 tel +1.212.949.6490

More information

STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES

STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES Effective JULY 15, 2009 STREAMLINED JAMS STREAMLINED ARBITRATION RULES & PROCEDURES JAMS provides arbitration and mediation services from Resolution Centers

More information

NOTICE OF A JUDICIAL INSTRUCTION PROCEEDING IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE MODIFIED PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH JPMORGAN

NOTICE OF A JUDICIAL INSTRUCTION PROCEEDING IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE MODIFIED PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH JPMORGAN NOTICE OF A JUDICIAL INSTRUCTION PROCEEDING IN CONNECTION WITH THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE MODIFIED PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH JPMORGAN NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN TO THE HOLDERS OF CERTIFICATES, NOTES OR

More information

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS Rule 1:18. Pretrial Scheduling Order. A. In any civil case the parties, by counsel of record, may agree and submit for approval

More information

THIRTEENTH AMENDED STANDSTILL AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, on November 3, 2008, Donald J. Trump, 401 Mezz Venture LLC,

THIRTEENTH AMENDED STANDSTILL AGREEMENT. WHEREAS, on November 3, 2008, Donald J. Trump, 401 Mezz Venture LLC, SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., Index No. 403021/2009 Plaintiffs, -against- DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS, et al., Defendants. DEUTSCHE BANK TRUST

More information

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Last Revised 12/1/2006 ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Rules & Procedures for Arbitration RULE 1: SCOPE OF RULES A. The arbitration Rules and Procedures ( Rules ) govern binding arbitration of disputes or claims

More information

BYLAWS OF CAPITAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation ARTICLE I NAME

BYLAWS OF CAPITAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation ARTICLE I NAME BYLAWS OF CAPITAL FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION a California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation ARTICLE I NAME The name of this corporation shall be Capital Facilities Development Corporation (the

More information

AGREEMENT OF TRUST RECITALS

AGREEMENT OF TRUST RECITALS AGREEMENT OF TRUST THIS AGREEMENT OF TRUST (the Agreement ) is made as of December 7, 2016, by and among Ascensus Investment Advisors, LLC (the Administrator ), Ascensus College Savings Recordkeeping Services,

More information

the Affidavit of Michael O. Ware, sworn to February 5, 2016 (the Ware Affidavit ), in

the Affidavit of Michael O. Ware, sworn to February 5, 2016 (the Ware Affidavit ), in At an IAS Part of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, in the County Courthouse at 60 Centre Street, New York, New York, on the day of February 2016. P R E S E N T, J.S.C. In

More information

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant. NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION -CVD-, ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant. ) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard

More information

COMPLEX BUSINESS LITIGATION DIVISION PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

COMPLEX BUSINESS LITIGATION DIVISION PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPLEX BUSINESS LITIGATION DIVISION PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA SECTION 1 PHILOSOPHY, SCOPE AND GOALS 1.1 - Citation to Procedure 1.2

More information

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 380. Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information.

GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 380. Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information. GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 0 H 1 HOUSE BILL 0 Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information. (Public) Sponsors: Representatives Glazier, T. Moore, Ross, and Jordan (Primary Sponsors).

More information

MARCY S. FRIEDMAN Justice. The following papers, numbered 1 to were read on this motion to dismiss. No (s). Answering Affidavits - Exhibits

MARCY S. FRIEDMAN Justice. The following papers, numbered 1 to were read on this motion to dismiss. No (s). Answering Affidavits - Exhibits FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 9/3/214 9:39 AM INDEX NO. 653429/212 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 9/3/214 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK NEW YORK COUNTY PRESENT: MARCY S. FRIEDMAN Justice PART

More information

SELECTED INVESTMENT ADVISOR AGREEMENT PREFERRED APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC.

SELECTED INVESTMENT ADVISOR AGREEMENT PREFERRED APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC. SELECTED INVESTMENT ADVISOR AGREEMENT PREFERRED APARTMENT COMMUNITIES, INC. THIS SELECTED INVESTMENT ADVISOR AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of the date indicated on Exhibit A attached hereto (this

More information

COURT RULES OF THE HONORABLE RICHARD MOTT, J.S.C. 401 Union Street Columbia County Courthouse (Temporary)

COURT RULES OF THE HONORABLE RICHARD MOTT, J.S.C. 401 Union Street Columbia County Courthouse (Temporary) REVISED12/12/13 COURT RULES OF THE HONORABLE RICHARD MOTT, J.S.C. Mailing Address: Physical Address: 401 Union Street Columbia County Courthouse (Temporary) Hudson, New York 12534 621 Route 23B Claverack,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 LENNELL DUNBAR, Plaintiff, v. EMW INC., Defendant. Case No.: :-CV-00- JLT SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. Pleading Amendment Deadline:

More information

JUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

JUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES JUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES SUPREME COURT COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND GENERAL IAS PART COURTROOM 242 60 CENTRE STREET NEW YORK, NY 10007 PHONE: 646-386-3265 FAX: 212-374-0452 Law

More information

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016 FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 10/28/2016 03:08 PM INDEX NO. 25877/2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX CARL BAILEY, Plaintiff, Index No.:

More information

Case 1:08-cv EGS Document 19 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:08-cv EGS Document 19 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:08-cv-01689-EGS Document 19 Filed 12/12/08 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE POLAR BEAR ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT LISTING AND 4(d) RULE LITIGATION Misc. Action

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY Plaintiff(s, Case No. v. Division 3 Defendant(s. CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER Now on this day of, 20, this matter is called and

More information

VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION BYLAWS

VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION BYLAWS VALERO ENERGY CORPORATION BYLAWS (Amended and Restated effective as of May 12, 2016) ARTICLE I. MEETINGS OF STOCKHOLDERS Section 1. Date, Time and Location of Annual Meeting. The annual meeting of stockholders

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK. Index No /2018

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK. Index No /2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK In the matter of the application of U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION,

More information

PART RULES HONORABLE MARIA G. ROSA New York State Supreme Court Dutchess County Supreme Court 10 Market Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601

PART RULES HONORABLE MARIA G. ROSA New York State Supreme Court Dutchess County Supreme Court 10 Market Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 PART RULES HONORABLE MARIA G. ROSA New York State Supreme Court Dutchess County Supreme Court 10 Market Street Poughkeepsie, New York 12601 Phone: 845-431-1752 Fax: 845-486-2227 (1-3-2013 and effective

More information

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:15-cv LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7 Case 1:15-cv-08240-LTS Document 29 Filed 03/11/16 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK QUANTUM STREAM INC., Plaintiff(s), No. 15CV8240-LTS-FM PRE-TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER

More information

BYLAWS HIPAA COLLABORATIVE OF WISCONSIN, INC.

BYLAWS HIPAA COLLABORATIVE OF WISCONSIN, INC. BYLAWS OF HIPAA COLLABORATIVE OF WISCONSIN, INC. Page REFERENCE TABLE TO BYLAWS OF HIPAA COLLABORATIVE OF WISCONSIN, INC. Page ARTICLE I - OFFICES... 1 ARTICLE II - PURPOSES... 1 ARTICLE III - BOARD OF

More information

Annex A. Proposed National Instrument Security Holder Rights Plans. Table of Contents

Annex A. Proposed National Instrument Security Holder Rights Plans. Table of Contents Annex A Proposed National Instrument 62-105 Security Holder Rights Plans Table of Contents PART 1 DEFINITIONS AND INTERPRETATION 1. Definitions PART 2 EFFECTIVENESS OF RIGHTS PLAN 2. Requirements 3. Scope

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-4182 "K" (2) PERTAINS TO: BARGE Mumford v. Ingram C.A. No. 05-5724 Boutte

More information

SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO

SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO Chief Justice Directive 11-02 SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE Reenact and Amend CJD 11-02 for Cases Filed January 1, 2012 through June 30, 2015 I hereby reenact and amend CJD 11-02

More information

JAMS International Arbitration Rules & Procedures

JAMS International Arbitration Rules & Procedures JAMS International Arbitration Rules & Procedures Effective September 1, 2016 JAMS INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION RULES JAMS International and JAMS provide arbitration and mediation services from Resolution

More information

Royal Park Invs. SA/NV v Morgan Stanley

Royal Park Invs. SA/NV v Morgan Stanley Royal Park Invs. SA/NV v Morgan Stanley 2017 NY Slip Op 30732(U) April 12, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653695/2013 Judge: Charles E. Ramos Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

GENERAL RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA BUSINESS COURT. Amended and Effective January 1, Rule Title Page No.

GENERAL RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA BUSINESS COURT. Amended and Effective January 1, Rule Title Page No. GENERAL RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA BUSINESS COURT Amended and Effective January 1, 2017 Rule Title Page No. 1 Purpose and Scope 1 2 Mandatory Business Court Designation 3 3

More information

Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Mississippi Bar Convention Summer School for Lawyers 2016

Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Mississippi Bar Convention Summer School for Lawyers 2016 Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure The Mississippi Bar Convention Summer School for Lawyers 2016 History The impetus to change these Rules was the May 2010 Conference on Civil Litigation

More information

CIVIL DIVISION I PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA

CIVIL DIVISION I PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION I PROCEDURES FOR THE THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COURT, IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA SECTION 1 PHILOSOPHY, SCOPE AND GOALS 1.1 - Citation to Procedures 1.2 - Purpose and Scope

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 163A Article 8 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 163A Article 8 1 Article 8. Lobbying. Part 1. General Provisions. 163A-250. Definitions. (a) As used in this Part, the following terms mean: (1) Reserved. (3) Designated individual. A legislator, legislative employee,

More information

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER

INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Hoffman v. Comdata Network, Inc. Doc. 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JOLENE L. HOFFMAN, Plaintiff, v. COMDATA NETWORK, INC., Defendant. Civil

More information

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA RESOLUTION STAY JURISDICTIONAL MODULAR PROTOCOL

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA RESOLUTION STAY JURISDICTIONAL MODULAR PROTOCOL International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA RESOLUTION STAY JURISDICTIONAL MODULAR PROTOCOL published on 3 May 2016 by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. The International

More information

31 U.S.C. Section 3733 Civil investigative demands

31 U.S.C. Section 3733 Civil investigative demands CLICK HERE to return to the home page 31 U.S.C. Section 3733 Civil investigative demands (a) In General. (1)Issuance and service. Whenever the Attorney General, or a designee (for purposes of this section),

More information

Case 1:12-cv DLC Document 89-2 Filed 08/03/12 Page 1 of 20 EXHIBIT 2

Case 1:12-cv DLC Document 89-2 Filed 08/03/12 Page 1 of 20 EXHIBIT 2 Case 1:12-cv-02826-DLC Document 89-2 Filed 08/03/12 Page 1 of 20 EXHIBIT 2 Case 1:12-cv-02826-DLC Document 89-2 Filed 08/03/12 Page 2 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW

More information

Case 4:02-cv SPF-FHM Document 1550 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 10/05/2006 Page 1 of 12

Case 4:02-cv SPF-FHM Document 1550 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 10/05/2006 Page 1 of 12 Case 4:02-cv-00072-SPF-FHM Document 1550 Filed in USDC ND/OK on 10/05/2006 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA IN RE WILLIAMS SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document

More information

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA 2017 OTC EQUITY DERIVATIVES T+2 SETTLEMENT CYCLE PROTOCOL

International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA 2017 OTC EQUITY DERIVATIVES T+2 SETTLEMENT CYCLE PROTOCOL International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ISDA 2017 OTC EQUITY DERIVATIVES T+2 SETTLEMENT CYCLE PROTOCOL published on July 28, 2017 by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc.

More information

Case 1:11-cv GBD-JCF Document 167 Filed 06/29/12 Page 1 of 7

Case 1:11-cv GBD-JCF Document 167 Filed 06/29/12 Page 1 of 7 Case 1:11-cv-02890-GBD-JCF Document 167 Filed 06/29/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK THE UNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, AMERITAS LIFE INSURANCE CORP. and

More information

BYLAWS OF UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED. A Delaware Corporation (Effective as of August 15, 2017) ARTICLE I OFFICES, CORPORATE SEAL

BYLAWS OF UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED. A Delaware Corporation (Effective as of August 15, 2017) ARTICLE I OFFICES, CORPORATE SEAL BYLAWS OF UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED A Delaware Corporation (Effective as of August 15, 2017) ARTICLE I OFFICES, CORPORATE SEAL Section 1.01. Registered Office. The address of the corporation s registered

More information

RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE

RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the following amendments to the Rules of Appellate Procedure were adopted to take effect on January 1, 2019. The amendments were approved

More information

~/

~/ IN THE CIRCIDT COURT OF THE TIDRTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION IN RE: ENGLE PROGENY CASES TOBACCO LITIGATION Pertains to: All Cases ------------------------~/ CASE

More information

CHAPTER 4 ENFORCEMENT OF RULES

CHAPTER 4 ENFORCEMENT OF RULES 400. GENERAL PROVISIONS CHAPTER 4 ENFORCEMENT OF RULES 401. THE CHIEF REGULATORY OFFICER 402. BUSINESS CONDUCT COMMITTEE 402.A. Jurisdiction and General Provisions 402.B. Sanctions 402.C. Emergency Actions

More information

FILED: NIAGARA COUNTY CLERK 08/15/ :34 AM INDEX NO. E157285/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/15/2017 EXHIBIT F

FILED: NIAGARA COUNTY CLERK 08/15/ :34 AM INDEX NO. E157285/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/15/2017 EXHIBIT F EXHIBIT F Case 1:14-md-02543-JMF Document 812 Filed 04/06/15 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------x

More information

OWNER S QUARTERS #1003 CRESCENT SHORES ASSOCIATION

OWNER S QUARTERS #1003 CRESCENT SHORES ASSOCIATION EXHIBIT C BYLAWS OF OWNER S QUARTERS #1003 CRESCENT SHORES ASSOCIATION THE BYLAWS OF Owner s Quarters #1003 Crescent Shores Association (the "Association") are promulgated pursuant to the Vacation Time

More information

NO Attorney for Judgment Creditor: Audrey Udashen 23 Assistant Attorney General

NO Attorney for Judgment Creditor: Audrey Udashen 23 Assistant Attorney General I STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, NO. 10 CONSENT DECREE V. PROVIDENCE HEALTH & 1 SERVICES-WASHINGTON; SWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES; 1 SWEDISH EDMONDS 1 Defendant.

More information

Phoenix Light SF Ltd. v Credit Suisse AG 2015 NY Slip Op 30658(U) April 16, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge:

Phoenix Light SF Ltd. v Credit Suisse AG 2015 NY Slip Op 30658(U) April 16, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Phoenix Light SF Ltd. v Credit Suisse AG 2015 NY Slip Op 30658(U) April 16, 2015 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653123/13 Judge: Charles E. Ramos Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) / STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION PLAINTIFF NAME v. DEFENDANT NAME Case No. Hon. Richard N. LaFlamme / PLAINTIFF S COUNSEL NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE AND

More information

PROTOCOL FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN SUFFOLK COUNTY SUPREME COURT

PROTOCOL FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN SUFFOLK COUNTY SUPREME COURT I. Introduction: PROTOCOL FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN SUFFOLK COUNTY SUPREME COURT This document has been drafted after consultation with Suffolk County District Administrative Judge C. Randall Hinrichs and

More information

CHASE ISSUANCE TRUST FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED TRUST AGREEMENT. by and between. CHASE CARD FUNDING LLC, as Transferor and Beneficiary.

CHASE ISSUANCE TRUST FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED TRUST AGREEMENT. by and between. CHASE CARD FUNDING LLC, as Transferor and Beneficiary. EXECUTION COPY CHASE ISSUANCE TRUST FOURTH AMENDED AND RESTATED TRUST AGREEMENT by and between CHASE CARD FUNDING LLC, as Transferor and Beneficiary and WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, as Owner Trustee Dated

More information

MIGA SANCTIONS PROCEDURES ARTICLE I

MIGA SANCTIONS PROCEDURES ARTICLE I MIGA SANCTIONS PROCEDURES As adopted by MIGA as of June 28, 2013 ARTICLE I INTRODUCTORY PROVISIONS Section 1.01. Purpose of these Procedures. These MIGA Sanctions Procedures (the Procedures ) set out the

More information

THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT SUPREME COURT RICHMOND COUNTY UNIFORM CIVIL TERM RULES

THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT SUPREME COURT RICHMOND COUNTY UNIFORM CIVIL TERM RULES THIRTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT SUPREME COURT RICHMOND COUNTY UNIFORM CIVIL TERM RULES The following uniform rules have been adopted by all Richmond County Supreme Court Justices in order to decrease the

More information

LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM RULES (Prev. Rev. 10/06/00) Effective May 1, Preamble

LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM RULES (Prev. Rev. 10/06/00) Effective May 1, Preamble LOUISIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION LAWYER DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM RULES (Prev. Rev. 10/06/00) Effective May 1, 2010 Preamble The purpose of the Lawyer Dispute Resolution Program is to give timely, reasonable,

More information