IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. [insert individual case information] ) ) MDL NO.
|
|
- Beverly Banks
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK [insert individual case information] ) ) MDL NO ) ) ) PLAINTIFF S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Rule 33 (A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff [insert plaintiff name] propounds the following Second Set of Interrogatories to Defendant Merck. INSTRUCTIONS (a) Each interrogatory set forth herein refers to information in the custody, control, and possession of Defendant or known to Defendant, as well as in the custody, control, and possession of or known to Defendant s counsel, representative, agents, servants, investigators, and consultants, and unless otherwise privileged, their counsel, employees, representatives, agents, servants, investigators and consultants. (b) If there is a claim of privilege with respect to any interrogatory, please identify every such document in the response, and include in the identification a description of the document, the date of the document, the names of the addresses and addressers, the identity and address of every person to whom a copy was given or communicated, the general subject matter of the document, a statement of the facts constituting the basis for any claim of privilege, and the specific basis on which the privilege is claimed. 1
2 (c) Each interrogatory, as provided by law, shall be answered separately and fully in writing under oath, unless it is objected to, in which event the reasons for the objection shall be stated. The answers are to be signed by the person making them, and the objections signed by the attorney making them. Answers to these interrogatories, or objections in lieu thereof, shall be served within 30 days from the service of this document. (d) If you cannot respond to an interrogatory for any other reason, respond to the extent possible, stating your reasons for your inability to respond in full. (e) These interrogatories shall be deemed continuing, to the full extent required or permitted under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 (c), so as to require supplementation when Defendant obtains access, custody, possession or control of any information not previously provided, which is responsive to any of these interrogatories. (f) The headings used herein are for guidance and clarity only and should not be deemed to restrict or broaden any request. DEFINITIONS 1. Defendant is used to refer to defendant Merck and/or its predecessor(s). 2. YOU, YOUR, YOURS, or MERCK refers to Defendant MERCK AND COMPANY, as well as all its partners, director, officers, employees servants, agents, attorney, joint ventures, or other representatives, including all corporations and entities affiliated with MERCK AND COMPANY and any other named Defendants in this lawsuit. The terms YOU or YOUR shall also include all predecessor business entities, as well as any predecessor s partners, directors, officers, employees, 2
3 servants, agents, joint ventures or other representatives. The terms YOU or YOUR shall also include all foreign subsidiaries or foreign parent companies, as well as any foreign subsidiaries or parent companies partners, directors, officers, employees, servants, agents, joint ventures or other representatives. 3. FDA means the United States Department of Health & Human Services, United States Food & Drug Administration, any committee, subcommittee or advisory committee thereto, and any person, employee or agent acting as a representative thereof. 4. PDR is used to refer to the Physicians Desk Reference. 5. Oral and Dental Complications shall refer to medical or dental conditions, diseases, or adverse events involving the teeth, maxilla, mandible, palate, and gums, including but not limited to the temporomandibular joint. 6. Physician refers to any healthcare provider, regardless of degree or specialty, including but not limited to medical doctors, allopathic physicians, osteopathic physicians, dentists, oral surgeons, maxillofacial surgeons, periodonists, endodontists, orthodontists, physicians assistants, or nurse practitioners. 7. Dental or Medical Association shall refer to any formal association of physicians, including national, state and foreign associations, including but not limited to the American Dental Association, the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Endodontists, the American Bone 3
4 and Mineral Society, and the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. 8. Document is used in its broadest sense, and means the original and any non-identical copy, regardless of origin or location. Typical categories of material included within the term document are: books, pamphlets, periodicals, memoranda (including those of telephone and in-person conversations), letters, reports, notes, telegraphs, statements, s, records, diaries, minutes, bulletins, circulars, brochures, studies, instructions, working papers, charts, work assignments, drawings, prints, flow sheets, graphs, invention disclosures, photographs, photomicrographs, microfilm, medical and hospital records and reports, x- ray photographs, drafts, advertisements, catalogs, paper, indices, tapes, disc, data sheet, or data processing material, or any handwritten, recorded, transcribed, punched, taped, filmed, or graphic matter, however, produced or reproduced in Defendant s possession, custody, or control or to which Defendants have had access. 9. Each demand hereinafter set forth not only calls for your knowledge, but also for all knowledge that is available to you by reasonable inquiry, including inquiry of your employees, representatives, agents, and attorneys. 10. If you cannot answer the following demands in full and complete detail after exercising due diligence to secure the information to do so, please so state and answer to the extent possible, specifying in each instance your inability to answer the remainder and stating whatever information or 4
5 knowledge you have concerning the unanswered portions, and to the best of your knowledge the names, addresses, and telephone numbers of all persons and organizations where such information is, will be or is believed to be. 11. In answering these demands, you are requested to answer each demand and subdivision thereof fully, completely and separately. You are hereby notified that at least as to those demands that are unanswered or as to which you claim an inability to answer fully and completely for the reason that discovery is continuing, the undersigned will apply to the court for an order directing that these demands be deemed continuing; that upon acquiring any information response thereto after the service of answers hereto, you will be required to serve supplemental answers containing such later acquired information; and that you will be precluded at the trial of this action from introducing evidence relating to the subject matter of these demands which you have not disclosed by these answers or by supplemental answers thereto. 12. If any interrogatory is deemed to call for the production of privileged or otherwise protected information or materials, YOU must provide the following information in a written response, designating and identifying such information withheld from production on grounds of privilege: (a) (b) The reason for withholding the information A statement of the legal basis for the claim of privilege, work product or other ground for non-disclosure. (c) A brief description of the information, including: 5
6 (i) (ii) The date; The number of pages, attachments, and appendices if a documents; (iii) The name(s) of the source(s) or preparer(s) of the information and identification by employment and title of each such person; (iv) The name of each person who was involved with or has had access to or custody of the information, together with an identification of each such person; (v) (vi) The present custodian(s); and The subject matter of the information, and in the case of any information relating or referring to a meeting or conversation, identification of such meeting or conversation, in sufficient detail to enable the Court to determine eth propriety of any claim of privilege. 6
7 INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT MERCK & COMPANY INTERROGATORY NO. 1: Please identify all persons who provided information responsive to these interrogatories indicating the person s name, address, relationship to the defendant and to which interrogatory or interrogatories they provided answers. INTERROGATORY NO. 2: In Plaintiff=s Profile Form, plaintiff identified his/her prescribing health care provider(s) (hereinafter plaintiff s prescribing healthcare providers ). If you have ever retained any of plaintiff=s prescribing healthcare providers as a Athought leader,@ a member of Merck=s Speaker Program, a Merck Clinical Investigator, or a consultant in any other capacity on the subject of osteoporosis, osteonecrosis, and/or any other conditions, please state: a) The identity of the heath care provider consultant:. b) The dates they were affiliated with Merck: c) The amount of money Merck paid in expenses, honoraria and fees, per calendar year. d) Please identify (via title, author, location, etc.) or produce all consulting agreements and contracts. 7
8 INTERROGATORY NO. 3: For each of plaintiff=s prescribing healthcare providers identified in Interrogatory 2 above, please state whether they were ever invited to attend and/or did in fact attend any Merck sponsored conferences or events. If your answer is Ayes,@ please state: a) The identity of the health care provider attendee:. b) The title, location and date of the speaker=s program attended: c) The topic of the speaker=s program: d) All speakers at the speaker=s Program: e) Please provide or identify the agenda/brochure for the conference or program INTERROGATORY NO. 4: For each of plaintiff=s prescribing healthcare providers, please state whether the provider(s) have ever requested information concerning Fosamax or Fosamax Plus D, its indications, its effects and/or its risks. If you answer is yes, please state: 8
9 a) The identity of the healthcare provider(s): b) Please identify (via title, author, location, etc.) and produce the document(s) which refer to your communication with plaintiff s prescribing healthcare provider(s). c) Please identify (via name, last known address and phone number) the Merck sales INTERROGATORY NO. 5: representative(s) ( detailer(s) ) assigned to the prescribing healthcare provider(s) listed in subsection a) above, for the time period during which plaintiff was receiving prescriptions from the provider. With respect to each of plaintiff=s prescribing healthcare providers, please state whether you have currently or have ever had access to any database or information which purports to track any of plaintiff s prescribing healthcare providers prescribing practices with respect to Fosamax, Fosamax Plus D, or any other osteoporosis medication (including, but not limited to the products(s) prescribed, the number of prescriptions, the number of refills, number of samples and the time frame when these products were prescribed or (re)filled): If your answer is yes, please state: a) The identity of the healthcare provider(s): b) The database(s) which you are describing, including their title(s), author(s), location(s). 9
10 INTERROGATORY NO. 6 Did you advertise Fosamax or Fosamax Plus D in the Media Market that plaintiff lived at the time that he/she took Fosamax or Fosamax Plus D? If yes, please identify: (a) the advertisement and the intended media marketplace (b) the nature of the media (print, t.v., radio, etc.) (c) the identity of the media outlet (d) the dates that advertisements ran and the cost of the campaign INTERROGATORY NO. 7: If you advertised Fosamax or Fosamax Plus D in the Media Market that plaintiff s prescribing healthcare provider(s) office(s) were located at the time plaintiff Fosamax or Fosamax Plus D, please identify: (a) the advertisement and the intended media marketplace (b) the nature of the media (print, t.v., radio, etc.) (c) the identity of the media outlet 10
11 (d) the dates that advertisements ran and the cost of the campaign (DEFENDANT) Name: By: Print Its: STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of, 2007, by, as for (defendant) and he/she is personally known to me or has produced as identification, and did not take an oath. NOTARY PUBLIC Type Name: My Commission Expires: Commission No.: 11
12 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE On this day of, 2007, I certify that I mailed a copy of the foregoing by first class U.S. Mail to the following: VENABLE LLP HUGHES HUBBARD & REED, LLP Paul F. Strain, Esq. Norman C. Kleinberg M. King Hill, Esq. Theodore V.H. Mayer David J. Heubeck, Esq. William J. Beausoleil Two Hopkins Plaza, Suite 1800 One Battery Park Plaza Baltimore, MD New York, NY LEVIN, PAPANTONIO, THOMAS, MITCHELL ECHSNER & PROCTOR, P.A. TIMOTHY M. O BRIEN Florida Bar No.: South Baylen Street, Suite 600 (32502) P.O. Box Pensacola, FL FAX:
FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 02/07/ :50 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/07/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS ----------------------------------------------------------------------x EDDIE SOTO and INGRID SOTO Index No. 714043/2016 -against- GLOBAL LIBERTY
More informationJanuary 24, Via Electronic Transmission
January 24, 2008 Via Electronic Transmission James T. Dove, M.D., F.A.C.C. President American College of Cardiology 2400 N Street, NW Washington, D.C. 20037 Dear Dr. Dove: The United States Senate Committee
More informationAPPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES
APPENDIX I SAMPLE INTERROGATORIES CAUSE NO. ' IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff, ' ' V. ' JUDICIAL DISTRICT ' ' Defendant. ' OF COUNTY, TEXAS DEFENDANT S INTERROGATORIES TO PLANTIFF TO: PLAINTIFF,, by service
More informationDIVISION OF ST. THOMAS/ ST. JOHN PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES TO DEFENDANT WAHEED HAMED
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS UNITED CORPORATION, ) vs. WAHEED HAMED, DIVISION OF ST. THOMAS/ ST. JOHN ) Case No. ST -13 -CV -102 ) PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF Plaintiff, ) INTERROGATORIES TO
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT APPEARANCE POWDERZ, INC.
STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM WITHOUT APPEARANCE IN THE INVESTIGATION OF: POWDERZ MEDICAL APOTHECARY POWDERZ, INC TOXIN
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/15/ :09 AM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/15/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------X X Index 0 655065/2017 SCOTT KRAUSE,. DEFENDANT'S FIRST Plaintiff,. NOTICE FOR
More informationSample. Index No: [Insert] RJI No: [Insert] PLAINTIFF S NOTICE TO PRODUCE
STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT COUNTY OF [Insert County] [Insert Caption] vs. Plaintiff Defendant To: Defendant [Insert Name] Index No: [Insert] RJI No: [Insert] Hon. [Insert] PLAINTIFF S NOTICE TO PRODUCE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION SHELTON CHARLES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. A-06CA158LY TEXAS LOTTERY COMMISSION AND GARY GRIEF IN HIS INDIVIDUAL
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION Landlord And Tenant Branch
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION Landlord And Tenant Branch ) [PLAINTIFF S NAME], ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) NOTE: Generally, only 10 interrogatories are allowed. v. ) L&T No. [CASE NUMBER]
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION Landlord and Tenant Branch
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION Landlord and Tenant Branch [PLAINTIFF S NAME], Plaintiff, NOTE: Generally, only 10 requests for production are allowed. v. LT No. [CASE NUMBER]
More informationDecember 12, Via facsimile transmission: Mitchell A. Leon President DesignWrite Inc. 175 Wall Street Princeton, NJ 08540
Via facsimile transmission: 609-924-6648 Mitchell A. Leon President DesignWrite Inc. 175 Wall Street Princeton, NJ 08540 Dear Mr. Leon: December 12, 2008 The United States Senate Committee on Finance (Committee)
More informationDISTRICT COURT CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
ELECTRONICALLY SERVED //0 :0 AM Case Number: A-1--C 1 DAVID T. SPURLOCK, JR., ESQ. State Bar No. 00 THE LAW OFFICES OF KARL H. SMITH Arroyo Crossing Parkway, Suite 00 Las Vegas, NV Phone: (0) 0-00 david.spurlock@farmersinsurance.com
More informationDEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 08/28/2016 02:19 PM INDEX NO. 32209/2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 39 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/28/2016 SUPREME COURT: STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX X Index No: Federal National Mortgage
More informationDecember 12, Via Electronic Transmission
December 12, 2008 Via Electronic Transmission Bernard J. Poussot Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Wyeth 5 Giralda Farms Madison, New Jersey 07940 Dear Mr. Poussot: The United States Senate
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CODE REVISION COMMISSION on Behalf of and For the Benefit of the GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF GEORGIA, and the STATE OF
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. Case No.: 2012 CA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA BERNARD LONG and VERONICO L. RON FLORES Plaintiffs, v. Case No.: 2012 CA 001980 KENNETH DETZNER in his official capacity
More informationIn the Superior Court Allen County, Indiana Cause No.. 02D PL-499
In the Superior Court Allen County, Indiana Cause No.. 02D01-0210-PL-499 WILLIAM G. BERGHOFF ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) TOWER BANK & TRUST COMPANY, ) et al., ) ) Defendants. ) WILLIAM G. BERGHOFF S FIRST
More informationStandard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)
Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j) Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j), "[t]he Supreme Court, by administrative order, may approve standard forms of interrogatories for different classes
More informationFILED: ORANGE COUNTY CLERK 03/17/ :37 PM
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF ORANGE ---------------------------------------------------------------------------X QUALITY CHOICE HEALTHCARE, INC. d/b/a QUALITY CHOICE CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE
More informationTHE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE. Docket No CV Sanjeev Lath
THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE HILLSBOROUGH, SS. NORTHERN DISTRICT SUPERIOR COURT Docket No. 216-2016-CV-00327 Sanjeev Lath v. Oak Brook Condominium Owners' Association, Board of Directors, Warren Mills, Vickie
More informationIN THE DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF CASS, NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF CASS, NORTH DAKOTA Sierra Corporate Design, Inc., Plaintiff, v. File No. 09-05-C-01660 David Ritz, Defendant. DEFENDANT DAVID RITZ S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
More informationStandard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)
Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j) Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j), "[t]he Supreme Court, by administrative order, may approve standard forms of interrogatories for different classes
More informationInformation or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories
Information or instructions: Combined discovery requests, admissions, production of documents and interrogatories 1. The practitioner may desire to combine Request for Admissions, Interrogatories and Request
More informationCAUSE NO. 18-C STREETS TO SHEETS ANIMAL IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW RESCUE Plaintiff, v. NO. 1
CAUSE NO. 18-C-3491 STREETS TO SHEETS ANIMAL IN THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW RESCUE Plaintiff, v. NO. 1 MUTTS & MAYHEM ANIMAL ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS RESCUE and SELENA SCHMIDT Defendants. DEFENDANT MUTTS & MAYHEM
More informationPursuant to Rule 34, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff, by his attorneys,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RANDALL J. PALMER, vs. Plaintiff, PLAINTIFF S DEMAND FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS and CITY OF SARATOGA SPRINGS PLANNING
More informationPlaintiff, Defendant. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Acme Home & Garden, LLC demands answers
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Acme Home & Garden, LLC, v. John Doe, Plaintiff, Defendant. DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Contract Court File No.: xx-cv-xx-xxx PLAINTIFF ACME
More informationFILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016
FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 10/28/2016 03:08 PM INDEX NO. 25877/2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX CARL BAILEY, Plaintiff, Index No.:
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOSE JIMENEZ MORENO and MARIA JOSE LOPEZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs,
More informationS FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES, FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS,
DISTRICT COURT, CITY & COUNTY OF DENVER, STATE OF COLORADO Court Address: 1437 Bannock Street Denver, CO 80209 Clerk of Division 9: (720) 865-8612 Plaintiff: Lion Capital, L.L.C., a Colorado Limited Liability
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/18/ :44 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 130 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/18/2015
1 of 23 2 of 23 Exhibit A 3 of 23 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/18/2015 03:44 PM INDEX NO. 162228/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 130 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/18/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF
More informationU.S. Department of Justice
U.S. Department of Justice CRANSTON, RI O292O This Civil Investigative Demand is issued pursuant to the False Claims Act,3l U.S.C. $$ 3729-3733, in the course of an investigation to determine whether there
More informationMedicaid Fraud Control Unit Investigative Subpoena Duces Tecum
STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL CHARLES J. CRIST, JR. ATTORNEY GENERAL Medicaid Fraud Control Unit Investigative Subpoena Duces Tecum To: Geneva Pharmaceuticals, Inc. c/o Sandoz, Inc. 2555
More informationStandard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)
Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j) Under amended Supreme Court Rule 213(j) (eff. January 1, 1996), "[t]he Supreme Court, by administrative order, may approve standard forms of interrogatories
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/08/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/08/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ELIMIR PILAZA, Plaintiff, Index No. 506405/2017 -against- FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., FRESENIUS NATIONAL MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., SHIEL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOSE JIMENEZ MORENO and MARIA JOSE LOPEZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA Charlotte Division In re: TSI Holdings, LLC 1 et al., DEBTORS. CASE NO. 17-30132 CHAPTER 7 Jointly Administered TRUSTEE
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF DEFENDANT S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COUNTY, ARKANSAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF vs. CASE NO. CV DEFENDANT DEFENDANT S FIRST INTERROGATORIES TO PLAINTIFF Pursuant to Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure, you are hereby served
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 8 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 8 th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ALACHUA COUNTY, FLORIDA US RIGHT TO KNOW, Case No. 01 2017 CA 002426 v. Plaintiff, UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES, Defendant. / DEFENDANT-INTERVENER
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 12/22/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 132 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/22/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ASTORIA 48TH STREET CAPITAL, INC. INDEX NO. 504376/2015 Plaintiff, -against- DEFENDANT AND OP EQUITIES, LLC THIRD-PARTY Defendant OP EQUITIES, LLC
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. v. * Case No. 17-cv-2006-EH * * * * * * * * * * * * *
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND JUDICIAL WATCH, INC., * Plaintiff * v. * Case No. 17-cv-2006-EH LINDA H. LAMONE, et al., * Defendants. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * DEFENDANT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOSE JIMENEZ MORENO and MARIA JOSE LOPEZ, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, vs. Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) McCONNELL, et al., ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Civ. No. 02-0582 ) (CKK, KLH, RJL) FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION et al., ) Defendants. ) ) ) NATIONAL
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/13/ :56 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 50 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/13/2018
Supreme Court of ter State of grin Pork County of Reto gnrh --------------------------------------------------------------X â â â â â â â â â â â â â â â : JACK ELO, ELO GROUP LLC and ELO REALTY CORP.,
More informationCAUSE NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF [INSERT PROPERTY] JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CAUSE NO. THE STATE OF TEXAS IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF V. COUNTY, TEXAS [INSERT PROPERTY] JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANT S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS, INTERROGATORIES, AND PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS Pursuant to
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division CASE NO CIV-SIMONTON
,, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Miami Division CASE NO. 97-3924-CIV-SIMONTON JERRY GREENBERG, individually, and IDAZ GREENBERG, individually, vs. Plaintiffs, NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC
More informationFILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :37 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS VERTULIE O. PIERRE-LOUIS, Plaintiff, Index No.: 710940/2016E -against- FLAMBOUYANT TRANSPORTATION INC., EUGENE C. HAMILTON, and ALYSSA LOUISE DEVOE,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: : : Chapter 11 WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC., et al., : Case No. 08-1229 : (MFW) Jointly : Debtors. : : INTERROGATORIES OF EDWARD F.
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/26/ :52 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 19 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/26/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------x Index No. 655709/2016 JOHN WOODWARD, KRISTINE WOODWARD and G.O.L.A. d/b/a WOODWARD
More informationIf You Are A Third-Party Payor that Paid or Reimbursed for All or Part of the Cost of Ovcon 35, A Summary of Your Rights and Choices:
United States District Court District of Columbia If You Are A Third-Party Payor that Paid or Reimbursed for All or Part of the Cost of Ovcon 35, A Proposed Class Action Settlement May Affect Your Rights
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PALM BEACH DIVISION CASE NO CIV-KAM
NORMAN HIRSCH, MATTHEW DWYER, and RALPH WILLARD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PALM BEACH DIVISION CASE NO. 13-80456-CIV-KAM
More informationPLAINTIFF RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT LINDA LAJOIE FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: 2014 CA 2505 ON JOSE GILBERTO SERRANO, Plaintiff, vs. PUNITIVE DAMAGES PERSONAL INJURY HERITAGE PARTNERS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JAMES TRACY, Plaintiff, Case No. 9:16-cv-80655-RLR v. FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, a/k/a FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY,
More informationCase Doc Filed 11/22/17 Entered 11/22/17 17:35:58 Desc Exhibit 2 Page 1 of 6
2 Page 1 of 6 I. DEFINITIONS 1. And as well as or shall be construed either disjunctively or conjunctively as necessary to bring within the scope of these discovery requests any information that might
More information1. Intent. 2. Definitions. OCERS Board Policy Administrative Hearing Procedures
1. Intent OCERS Board Policy The Board of Retirement of the Orange County Employees Retirement System ( OCERS ) specifically intends that this policy shall apply to and shall govern in each administrative
More informationState your full name, social security number, date of birth, residence address, and telephone number.
Name of Petitioner/Plaintiff Address of Petitioner/Plaintiff City, State, Zip Phone IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR COUNTY, STATE OF FLORIDA YOUR NAME, PLAINTIFF'S FIRST SET OF INTERROGATORIES PROPOUNDED,Petitioner/Plaintiff
More informationATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM C/O:
ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ECONOMIC CRIMES SUBPOENA DUCES TECUM CASE NO.: L-05-3-1121 TO: C/O: MURPHY OIL USA, INC. CT CORPORATION SYSTEM 200 Peach Street 1200 S. Pine Island Road El
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/13/ :29 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/13/2016
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 10/13/2016 10:29 AM INDEX NO. 513727/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 10 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/13/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK JUDY E. HINDS, as Executor of the Estate of EARL
More informationTHE COURTS. Title 207 JUDICIAL CONDUCT
1920 Title 207 JUDICIAL CONDUCT PART IV. COURT OF JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE [207 PA. CODE CH. 3] Amendment to Rules Relating to Initiation of Formal Changes; Doc. No. 1 JD 94 Per Curiam: Order And Now, this
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2013 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2013
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/11/2013 INDEX NO. 155113/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 41 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/11/2013 EXHIBIT E SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ILLINOIS UNION INSURANCE
More informationINVENTION DISCLOSURE REPORT & ASSIGNMENT
INVENTION DISCLOSURE REPORT & ASSIGNMENT NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HYGIENE OFFICE OF MENTAL HEALTH OFFICE FOR PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES OFFICE OF ALCOHOLISM AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SERVICES
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/15/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 43 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/15/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------X Index No.: 152438/2017 JANE DOE #3, JANE DOE #4, JANE DOE #5, and JANE
More informationCASE 0:13-cv PJS-LIB Document 59-1 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA COURT FILE NO.
CASE 0:13-cv-00955-PJS-LIB Document 59-1 Filed 02/27/14 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Harvey Duranseau, Plaintiff, v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S
More informationLOCAL RULES of the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CLARION COUNTY
LOCAL RULES of the COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF CLARION COUNTY Supplementing the Rules of Civil Procedure Promulgated by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Effective July 1, 2005 Hon. James G. Arner President
More informationHave you received a request for discovery?
Have you received a request for discovery? *What is it? -Discovery simply is asking for more information from you. This type of request is a general document and its form is not tailored to individual
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ) DAVID SABEL, et al., ) ) Case No. 3:97CV-02022 RNC Plaintiffs. ) ) v. ) PLAINTIFFS FIRST REQUEST ) FOR PRODUCTION OF ) DOCUMENTS DANBURY
More informationANTITRUST CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND
STATE OF FLORIDA Department of Legal Affairs OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Tallahassee, Florida ANTITRUST CIVIL INVESTIGATIVE DEMAND TO: Diebold Election Systems, Inc. No. 06-040 c/o CT Corporation System
More informationFILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 09/26/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/26/2016
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 09/26/2016 01:45 PM INDEX NO. 607940/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/26/2016 1 of 20 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROXANNE CHRISTIAN and
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/29/ :53 AM INDEX NO /2017
INDEX NO. 805075/2017 FILED : NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02:38 PM SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------------X X MARIA
More informationCase 3:16-md VC Document Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT A
Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 2448-1 Filed 01/09/19 Page 1 of 18 EXHIBIT A Case 3:16-md-02741-VC Document 2448-1 Filed 01/09/19 Page 2 of 18 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
More informationDURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE DECISIONS (Medical Power of Attorney) I,, born, designate
THE IOWA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION Official Form No. 121 FOR THE LEGAL EFFECT OF THE USE OF THIS FORM, CONSULT YOUR LAWYER DURABLE POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE DECISIONS (Medical Power of Attorney) I,,
More informationSTATE OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. Plaintiff, Defendants.
[YOUR NAME] [YOUR ADDRESS] Telephone: [YOUR PHONE NUMBER] [YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS] Fax: [YOUR FAX NUMBER] STATE OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1 1 1 1 1, a [single/married man/woman], v. Plaintiff,
More informationASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN ) PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, INC. ) etc., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs ) CIVIL ACTION NO
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN ) PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS, INC. ) etc., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 93 0399 vs. ) JUDGE LAMBERTH HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON,
More informationAPPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS. Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury
APPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury Cases (Except Medical Malpractice Cases): Superior Court All questions must be answered
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re Chapter 11 WASHINGTON MUTUAL, INC., et al., 1 Case No. 08-12229 (MFW) (Jointly Administered) Debtors. CLAIMANT ANDREW ESCHENBACH S REQUEST
More informationCase 1:06-md JFK -JCF Document 953 Filed 10/22/10 Page 1 of 24
Case 1:06-md-01789-JFK -JCF Document 953 Filed 10/22/10 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------X IN RE: : MASTER FILE FOSAMAX PRODUCTS
More informationAAA Healthcare. Payor Provider Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures. Available online at adr.org/healthcare
AAA Healthcare Payor Provider Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures Available online at adr.org/healthcare Rules Amended and Effective November 1, 2014 Rules Amended and Effective November 1, 2014.
More informationAPPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS. Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury
APPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury Cases (Except Medical Malpractice Cases): Superior Court All questions must be answered
More informationBULK USER AGREEMENT RECITALS
BULK USER AGREEMENT This BULK USER AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is entered into this day of 20 by and between the ( Company ), and the Recorder of County, Indiana (the County Recorder or County ). Both shall
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/08/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 195 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/08/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------x TATIANA BRUNETTI, individually, and as a member suing derivatively on behalf
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2011 H 1 HOUSE BILL 380. Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information.
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 0 H 1 HOUSE BILL 0 Short Title: Amend RCP/Electronically Stored Information. (Public) Sponsors: Representatives Glazier, T. Moore, Ross, and Jordan (Primary Sponsors).
More informationAPPEALS AND GRIEVANCES Section 7. Overview
Overview The Plan maintains a member grievance system that includes a grievance process, an appeal process, an External Independent Review process and access to the Medicaid Hearing system. An appeal is
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY. Peter S. Holmes, Kent C. Meyer, Jessica Nadelman, Attorneys of Record for Defendant
Honorable Lori K. Smith 1 1 1 1 DAVE WORKMAN, an individual; and THE SECOND AMENDMENT FOUNDATION, INC., a Washington nonprofit corporation, v. SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY Plaintiffs,
More informationBritish Columbia. Health Professions Review Board. Rules of Practice and Procedure for Reviews under the Health Professions Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c.
British Columbia Health Professions Review Board Rules of Practice and Procedure for Reviews under the Health Professions Act, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 183 These rules for reviews to the Health Professions Review
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/28/ :10 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 51 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/28/2017. Exhibit UU
Exhibit UU SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Index No. 12230/2015 COUNTY OF KINGS: IAS PART 73 DIANNASAPP^ETAL, Plaintiffs, -against- CLARK WILSON INC., ET AL., Defendants. PLAINTIFFS' FIRST SET OF
More informationPART III Discovery CHAPTER 8. Overview of the Discovery Process KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY THE EXTENT OF ALLOWABLE DISCOVERY
PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8 Overview of the Discovery Process The Florida Rules of Civil Procedure regulate civil discovery procedures in the state. Florida does not require supplementary responses to
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2013
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2013 INDEX NO. 500743/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS BERGMANN DHAITI and NOYESSE DHAITI, -against-
More informationCase 1:12-cv JFK Document 9 Filed 11/20/12 USDC SDNY Page 1 of 13 DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #:
Case 1:12-cv-07798-JFK Document 9 Filed 11/20/12 USDC SDNY Page 1 of 13 DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DATE FILED: Nov. 20, 2012 ---------------------------------------
More informationCase 2:05-cv SRC-CLW Document 567 Filed 08/06/13 Page 1 of 15 PageID: 24935
DERIVATIVE & ERISA LITIGATION Civil Action No. 05-1151 (SRC) (CLW) IN RE MERCK & CO.. INC. SECURITIES, MDL No. 1658 (SRC) DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case 2:05-cv-02367-SRC-CLW
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/08/ :16 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/08/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK â â â â -- â - - X THE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY as subrogee of ANNA BERNSTEIN, Index No.: 158889/2016 Plaintiff, COMBINED DEMANDS -against- FOUNDATIONS
More informationAMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF THE MEDICAL SOCIETY OF VIRGINIA EFFECTIVE OCTOBER 16, 2016 ARTICLE I NAME AND PURPOSE
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 AMENDED AND RESTATED BYLAWS OF THE MEDICAL
More informationPLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to CPLR 3101, 3120, et. seq., Defendant
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/09/2016 05:14 PM INDEX NO. 162228/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 156 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/09/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------
More informationPARTY OF RECORD INFORMATION PACKET
PARTY OF RECORD INFORMATION PACKET THE HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADOPTED LOBBYING ORDINANCE NO. 03-26, AS AMENDED. PRIOR TO MEETING PRIVATELY WITH A BOARD MEMBER, COUNTY ATTORNEY,
More informationMISSISSIPPI MODEL PUBLIC RECORDS RULES with comment
Rule No. MISSISSIPPI MODEL PUBLIC RECORDS RULES with comment Adopted: March 5, 2010 Table of Contents Page No. INTRODUCTORY COMMENTS...2 Statutory authority and purpose...2 Format of model rules...3 Model
More informationLOCAL RULES FOR MANDATORY ARBITRATION 1 SCOPE AND PURPOSE OF RULES
LOCAL RULES FOR MANDATORY ARBITRATION 1 SCOPE AND PURPOSE OF RULES LMAR 1.1 APPLICATION OF RULES The purpose of mandatory arbitration of civil actions under chapter 7.06 RCW, as implemented by the Mandatory
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CAROLYN WHITE, Individually, and as Executrix of the ESTATE OF JERE F. WHITE, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. TENOLD TRANSPORTATION
More informationITB-PW Concrete psi with Fiber Mesh. Required Submittals
Required Submittals 1. All addenda (signed and dated) 2. Summary of Litigation (if not applicable, please state so) 3. License Sanctions (if not applicable, please state so) 4. References 5. The following
More informationFILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :17 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX MARIA L. GONZALEZ, Index No.: 21159/2016E -against- Plaintiff, DEMAND FOR VERIFIED BILL OF PARTICULARS HAFEEZA REALTY LLC., MOHAMMED AHSANUDDIN, and
More informationCase 3:16-cv Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 68 SUBPOENA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
FORM NLRB-32 Case 3:16-cv-00987 Document 1-1 Filed 02/29/16 Page 1 of 68 SUBPOENA To Custodian of Records, 1455 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103 As requested by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NATIONAL
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TRUSTEE S FIRST DISCOVERY REQUESTS TO SOLAR INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES GMHB
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In re: ENERGY CONVERSION DEVICES, INC., et al., 1 Debtors. Chapter 11 Case No. 12-43166 (Jointly Administered) Judge Thomas
More informationIMPORTANT NOTICE...3 INTRODUCTION...4. Standard Arbitration Clause...5. Administrative Fees...5 HEALTHCARE PAYOR PROVIDER RULES -- REGULAR TRACK...
AAA Healthcare Payor Provider Arbitration Rules Effective Date: January 31, 2011 To access the AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules and Mediation Procedures with the previous versions of Fee Schedules, visit
More information