RASHTRASANT TUKADOJI MAHARAJ NAGPUR UNIVERSITY S. Dr. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR COLLEGE OF LAW, NAGPUR MOOT PROBLEM 1
|
|
- Ferdinand McLaughlin
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 RASHTRASANT TUKADOJI MAHARAJ NAGPUR UNIVERSITY S Dr. BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR COLLEGE OF LAW, NAGPUR 14 th JUSTA CAUSA NATIONAL LAW FESTIVAL MOOT PROBLEM 1 Ram Rahim Joseph (RRJ) is a right handed Indian Citizen who has been living in the city of Nagpur since quite some time. As of the year 2015, his age is 49 years. He is a respected member of the society and is a well known figure in the region around Nagpur. That, on 25 th December 2014, owing to Christmas, RRJ was celebrating Christmas at a social function which was organized by a charity association. During the function, RRJ suffered a small paralytic attack, which came to be diagnosed on 26 th December 2014 as a neoplasm in the left hemithorax, with erosion of ribs and vertebrae detected. That, RRJ was getting treated in the Government Owned and Controlled Medical College and Hospital at Sonegaon, (GOCMCHS) which is a suburban area of Nagpur and was in the vicinity to RRJ s house. The said neoplasm was not benign, in situ, or malignant in nature. That, the cardiothoracic surgeon as well as the neurosurgeon who were treating RRJ knew that the condition of RRJ was critical and also that in order to save RRJ s live some drugs which are not normally available within India would have to be administered, though their efficacy in RRJ s case was questionable. While having a casual chat with some friends over the weekend, one of the doctors happened to mention this to Mr. Matrix, in the presence of the other doctor. Mr. Matrix owns and controls a huge pharmaceutical company which is engaged in research and designing of new drugs as well as manufacturing them. During research, it came to be known that the special type of tumour that Mr. RRJ was suffering from is in fact curable by 100 % when a combination of specific drugs is administered to him. However, the said research was merely done via using computer stimulation and no animate objects were tested with this finding. Accordingly, a combination of Isothipendyl, Sotalol, Phencylidine and Paracetamol came to be prepared by Mr. Matrix s company. Subsequently, Devil s Cure Inc., Mr. Matrix s company, applied to the licensing authority for permission to manufacture this new combination drug by 1 Drafted by Deoul Pathak, Advocate, Nagpur Page 1 of 5
2 making necessary payments as well by doing necessary paper work. However, the data as is required to be submitted under clause (2) of the relevant section of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940 did not come to be submitted. The entire procedure came to be done on 2 nd February The said application came to be rejected on 3 rd February Thereafter, on 4 th, the next day, an application came to be made for conducting clinical trials. The said application came to be allowed. That, Devil s Cure Inc. sought the tests to be conducted at GOCMCHS. The same request was also allowed. The said trials at GOCMCHS were approved conditionally by the Ethics Committee, subject to the following conditions: a. That, consent of all patients being treated with the drug under testing was mandatory in writing, in the form of an affidavit before the duly qualified notary and the said affidavit was to be prepared in the language which was understood by the patient b. That, consent of patient s relative (necessarily a class one heir) was necessary in writing, in the form of an affidavit before the duly qualified Executive Magistrate and the said affidavit was to be prepared in the language which was understood by the patient as well as his relative in common c. That, the patient gave up his right to file any proceedings before any judicial / quasi judicial body, in case of any medical negligence d. That, the patient was made aware of all the treatment administered, in writing e. That, it would be mandatory for Devil s Cure Inc. to adhere to all provisions of necessary Indian laws regarding public liability insurance. That, needless to mention, RRJ was one of the subjects who was tested with the said newly prepared combination drug. That, unfortunately, due to complications arising in treatment, the DNA of RRJ underwent a small change, which resulted in his ability to do loco motor movements of the last toe of the left leg being hampered. This was despite of the ex majore cautela being taken by the Doctors treating RRJ. Unfortunately, the situation and condition of RRJ as demonstrated also required for administration of Imatinib Mesylate, which is a therapeutic drug for chronic myeloid leukemia, the sole marketing rights for which, then, due to some interim orders were with another company called as Baarish, whose drugs came to be known to the Doctors and Mr. Page 2 of 5
3 Matrix s company by way of their coming soon teasers, claiming cure to the said disease. Since, the drugs of Baarish were also under trials, with due permission from the Ethical Committee in Indian Institute for Medical Sciences (IIMS), it became mandatory for Devil s Cure Inc. to add Baarish as a co-applicant in its application for permission of clinical trials, by way of an amendment. The said amendment was permitted. Being aggrieved by this utter hopelessness, RRJ filed a criminal proceeding against both the Doctors - cardiothoracic surgeon and neurosurgeon Dr.Mr. Tea and Dr.Ms. Coffee alleging medical negligence and consequent attempt to murder, grievous hurt, hurt, bodily harm, et cetera. That, RRJ, through his relative Akku Yadav also filed a proceeding before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum on the same grounds of medical negligence claiming a compensation of Rs. 8,00,00,000/- (Rupees Eight Crores Only). That, RRJ also filed a Writ Petition before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court praying that he should be granted a permanent sum of money for the harassment done to him on account of those medical trials out of the funds and proceeds of the income of the pharmaceutical companies as his share and contribution to the drugs being sold in the market cannot be negated. The said Writ Petition was dismissed. The Letters Patent Appeal before the Division Bench is pending. Additionally, another proceeding was also filed by RRJ against Dr.Mr. Tea and Dr.Ms. Coffee alleging breach of confidentiality and breach of right to privacy as his medical details were leaked to Mr. Matrix, without his consent. That, Baarish Pvt. Ltd. filed a infringement of patent suit against Devil s Cure Inc. before the Principal Civil Judge of Original Jurisdiction at Nagpur claiming that since they were co-applicants in the application for medical trials, the combination drugs cannot be exploited by Devil s Cure Inc. alone. In addition, they sought sharing of license / grant of compulsory licensing in their favour from the IPAB at Mumbai. Since the turnover of Baarish Pvt. Ltd. was more than INR 700,00,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Hundred Crores only) and that of Devil s Cure Inc. was barely INR 2,00,000/- (Rupees Two Lakhs only), and also since Devil s Cure Inc. felt that all the litigations were being sponsored by Baarish Pvt. Ltd., Devil s Cure Inc. filed an application before the Competition Commission of India alleging misuse / abuse of dominant position in the market. In the meantime, due to a lot of publicity / newspaper reports, Causes in Common, a very reputed NGO based in New Delhi, filed an application under Section 6(1) of the Public Liability Insurance Act, 1991, in the nature of a PIL, by using the proviso thereto, claiming compensation for RRJ and his family members. Similarly, owing to the widespread reporting in newspapers, the Medical Council of Page 3 of 5
4 India along with the Indian Medical Association jointly filed criminal proceedings against Baarish Pvt. Ltd., Devil s Cure Inc., the Ethics Committee of GOCMCHS, Dr.Mr. Tea and Dr.Ms. Coffee (jointly and severally) for offences punishable under the provisions of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, read along with the Rules framed thereunder and also the provisions of the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisement) Act, All this counter litigations drew the attention of the Medical Council of India and they approached the Supreme Court for appointing a special judge for deciding all the litigations together, regardless of jurisdictions, (territorial, pecuniary or otherwise), regardless of hierarchy of judges, et cetera. Considering the same to be a one of special case, and falling under the rarest of rare cases, (for RRJ died during the pendency of this application), the Supreme Court allowed the application and directed that all the matters shall be heard by the Special Division Bench of the Nagpur Bench of the Hon ble High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The composite matter is fixed for final arguments before the Special Division Bench in RRJ, MCI, IMA, CiC (versus) Devil s Cure Inc., Baarish Pvt. Ltd., Ethics Committee of GOCMCHS and Dr.Mr. Tea and Dr.Ms. Coffee, where all the above mentioned issues are sufficiently proved and other medical terms are to be covered using documentary evidence at the stage of final arguments. The said writ petition is listed for arguments on 6 th March 2016 as per High Court website. Devil s Cure Inc. and Baarish Pvt. Ltd. have filed a writ petition (Devil s Cure Inc. and Baarish Pvt. Ltd. (versus) State of Maharashtra, Union of India, RRJ and others) before the Nagpur Bench of the Bombay High Court inter alia challenging the applicability and constitutional validity on the following grounds: a. That the provisions of the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisement) Act, 1954, and Drugs and Cosmetics Act, are in violation of the principles laid down under Article 14 and Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India b. That, the petition filed by RRJ against them for breach of privacy and confidentiality is not maintainable, for the same is not a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution of India c. That, another limb of arguments is that the Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable Advertisement) Act, 1954, and Drugs and Cosmetics Act have been passed by the Central Government in complete violation of the law and especially the provisions of the Schedule VII to the Constitution of India as Health is a Subject at Entry no. 6 in List II and therefore, the Central Government had no locus to make the law in the first place. Page 4 of 5
5 That, the respondents have filed a reply and relied upon various factors, some of them being Entry 19 and 26, of List III of Schedule VII, amongst others and have invoked the Doctrine of Eclipse, Occupied Field, Pith and Substance, et cetera to support their arguments and opposed the writ petitions. Argue accordingly. Notes for Arguments: (Guidelines for Participants) 1. Teams are expected to argue the Writ Petition - (Devil s Cure Inc. and Baarish Pvt. Ltd. (versus) State of Maharashtra, Union of India, RRJ and others) before the Nagpur Bench of the Hon ble High Court of Judicature at Bombay only. 2. However, teams are expected to draft their arguments by keeping in mind the contradictory stances taken by each party, against each other, in other litigations as well. 3. Certain provisions of law have been intentionally not provided for / have been provided for in an incomplete manner. The teams are expected to fill up the same. Page 5 of 5
THE COMMERCIAL COURTS, COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2018
AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 123 of 2018 5 THE COMMERCIAL COURTS, COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2018 A BILL to amend the Courts, Division
More informationTHE TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2009
AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 136 of 2009 THE TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2009 A BILL to amend the Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994. WHEREAS it is expedient to amend
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2018 DIST. MUMBAI In the matter of Articles 14, 21 and 226 of the Constitution of India; And In the
More informationLEGAL DEVELOPMENTS. The important legal updates from the previous quarter are summarized below: Trade Marks Rules, 2017 Notified
z This Newsletter brings to you the IP updates during the first quarter of this year. The first quarter saw remarkable changes in trademark practice and procedure in India. With substantial changes in
More informationTime allowed : 3 hours Maximum marks : 100. Total number of questions : 6 Total number of printed pages : 8
OPEN BOOK EXAMINATION Roll No... : 1 : 344 Time allowed : 3 hours Maximum marks : 100 Total number of questions : 6 Total number of printed pages : 8 NOTE : Answer ALL Questions. 1. Read the following
More informationIN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 181 of 2017
1 IN THE NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION (Arising out of Order dated 27 th July, 2017 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Mumbai
More informationThe Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objection Advertisement) Act, R. Muralidharan Advocate, Patent Agent Law Lecturer Krishna and Saurastri
The Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objection Advertisement) Act, 1954 R. Muralidharan Advocate, Patent Agent Law Lecturer Krishna and Saurastri Summary Historical Perspective The Drugs and Magic Remedies (Objectionable
More information4. COMPARISON OF THE INDIAN PATENT LAW WITH THE PATENT LAWS IN U.S., EUROPE AND CHINA
4. COMPARISON OF THE INDIAN PATENT LAW WITH THE PATENT LAWS IN U.S., EUROPE AND CHINA Provisions of the Indian patent law were compared with the relevant provisions of the patent laws in U.S., Europe and
More informationthe court may be enabled to make a complete decree between the parties [and] prevent future litigation by taking away the necessity of a multiplicity
CLASS ACTION SUITS UNDER THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 1986 Sushma Sosha Philip Introduction: Class Action suits originated as a means of overcoming the impracticalities imposed by a large group of plaintiffs/petitioners
More informationPatent Enforcement in India
Patent Enforcement in India Intellectual property assets are touted as the cornerstone of competitiveness in international trade and are the driving factors behind socio-economic development in India.
More informationTHE CONSUMER PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002 THE CONSUMER PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002 ( 62 OF 2002 ) { Passed by Rajya Sabha on 11.3.
THE CONSUMER PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002 The Act has been brought in force from 15.03.2003 wide Notification F.O. No. 270(E) date 10.03.2003 THE CONSUMER PROTECTION (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2002 ( 62 OF 2002
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 221/2017 & I.A.A 12707/2015
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 221/2017 & I.A.A 12707/2015 EKO INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT. LTD.... Plaintiff Through Mr. Sumit Roy, Advocate versus MR. SUSHIL KUMAR YADAV Through
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: versus
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 20.04.2010 + WP (C) 13338/2009 APOLLO TYRES LTD, KOCHI Petitioner - versus UNION OF INDIA... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case:-
More informationINDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM THE PRIMARY ORIGINS OF LAW: The Indian Constitution customary law case law, and Statutes (legislation).
INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM The Indian Legal System is one of the oldest legal systems in the entire history of the world. It has altered as well as developed over the past few centuries to absorb inferences from
More informationNATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI. Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 788 of 2018
NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI (Arising out of Order dated 10 th October, 2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority (National Company Law Tribunal), Kolkata Bench, Kolkata, in C.P.
More informationThe Patent Failure of Novartis with Gleevec
1 The Patent Failure of Novartis with Gleevec The Indian Supreme Court s verdict on the Novartis patent application has garnered a lot of attention as having set a stringent standard of nonobviousness
More information: 1 : Time allowed : 3 hours Maximum marks : 100. Total number of questions : 6 Total number of printed pages : 7
OPEN BOOK EXAMINATION Roll No : 1 : NEW SYLLABUS Time allowed : 3 hours Maximum marks : 100 Total number of questions : 6 Total number of printed pages : 7 NOTE : Answer ALL Questions. 1. Read the case
More informationIn the High Court of Judicature at Madras
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2017 H. Navas Basha 24/21, Bharathidasan Street Nehru Nagar Velachery Chennai 600 042 vs 1. The Bar Council of India
More information*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE. Versus
*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CM(M) No.807/2008. % Date of decision:1 st December, 2009 M/S ANSAL PROPERTIES & INFRASTRUCTURE LTD & ANR. Petitioner Through: Mr Prem Kumar and Mr Sharad C.
More informationCONTEMPT APPLICATION No. 09 OF Ram Gopal Sharma. Applicant. Versus. Sh Sanjay Mitra IAS (WB:82), Defence Secretary, 101-A, South
1 Court No. 1 HON BLE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION No. 09 OF 2018 Ram Gopal Sharma. Applicant Versus Sh Sanjay Mitra IAS (WB:82), Defence Secretary, 101-A, South
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: W.P.(C) 5568/2017 & CM No /2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 18.09.2017 + W.P.(C) 5568/2017 & CM No. 23379/2017 M/S EPSILON PUBLISHING HOUSE PVT LTD... Petitioner Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS... Respondents
More informationM/s. BDR Pharmaceuticals International Pvt. Ltd Applicant VERSUS
BDR Pharmaceuticals International Pvt. Ltd v. Bristol Myers Squibb Company Controller of Patents, Patents Office, Mumbai (BEFORE CHAITANYA PRASAD, CONTROLLER) M/s. BDR Pharmaceuticals International Pvt.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION. WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.933 OF Dr. RAM LAKHAN SINGH. PETITIONER
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No.933 OF 2014 Dr. RAM LAKHAN SINGH. PETITIONER VERSUS STATE GOVERNMENT OF UTTAR PRADESH THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY.
More informationTHE COMMERCIAL COURTS, COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2018
AS PASSED BY LOK SABHA ON 01.08.18 Bill No. 123-C of 18 THE COMMERCIAL COURTS, COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND COMMERCIAL APPELLATE DIVISION OF HIGH COURTS (AMENDMENT) BILL, 18 A BILL to amend the Commercial Courts,
More informationCORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY Workshop on Corporate Social Responsibility Introduction & Overview of the Presentation Regulatory Framework Non Compliances & Penalties Analysis of Sections 134, 135 &
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: versus M/S R.S. SALES CORPORATION & ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 28.07.2016 + CS(COMM) 644/2016 ADITYA BIRLA NUVO LIMITED versus M/S R.S. SALES CORPORATION & ANR... Plaintiff... Defendants Advocates who
More informationMAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No.1, 13th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400 005 Tel. No. 022 22163964/65/69 Fax 022 22163976 E-mail: mercindia@merc.gov.in
More informationSmt. Yallwwa & Ors vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr on 16 May, 2007
Supreme Court of India Smt. Yallwwa & Ors vs National Insurance Co. Ltd. & Anr on 16 May, 2007 Author: S.B. Sinha Bench: S.B. Sinha, Markandey Katju CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 2674 of 2007 PETITIONER: Smt.
More informationTHE TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS AND TISSUES ACT, 1994 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
SECTIONS THE TRANSPLANTATION OF HUMAN ORGANS AND TISSUES ACT, 1994 1. Short title, application and commencement. 2. Definitions. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY CHAPTER II AUTHORITY FOR THE
More information[Abstract prepared by the PCT Legal Division (PCT )] Case Name: TRYTON MEDICAL INC. V. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
[Abstract prepared by the PCT Legal Division (PCT-2017-0001)] Case Name: TRYTON MEDICAL INC. V. UNION OF INDIA & ORS Jurisdiction: HIGH COURT OF DELHI (INDIA) Abstract: The petitioners entered the national
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION. CCP (Co.) No. 8 of 2008 COMPANY PETITION NO. 215 OF 2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI COMPANY JURISDICTION CCP (Co.) No. 8 of 2008 IN COMPANY PETITION NO. 215 OF 2005 Reserved on: 26-11-2010 Date of pronouncement : 18-01-2011 M/s Sanjay Cold Storage..Petitioner
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION. TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 567 of 2017 JANHIT MANCH & ANR...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS WITH
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION TRANSFER PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 567 of 2017 JANHIT MANCH & ANR...PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS....RESPONDENT(S) WITH
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1534 OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.1439 of 2017) N. Harihara Krishnan Appellant Versus J. Thomas Respondent
More informationTHE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2012
1 AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 136 of 2012 THE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2012 A BILL further to amend the Competition Act, 2002. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-third Year of the Republic
More informationSCOPE Forum of Conciliation & Arbitration (SFCA) (As amended upto 2017)
SCOPE Forum of Conciliation & Arbitration (SFCA) (As amended upto 2017) OBJECT The main object of SCOPE Forum of Conciliation and Arbitration (ADR) is to serve in settling disputes between Public Sector
More informationCompany Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 33 of Alongwith Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 34 of 2017
1 NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI COMPANY APPELLATE JURISDICTION Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 33 of 2017 (arising out of Order dated 07.04.2017 passed by the National Company
More information.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. I.A. No /2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004
.. IN HIGH COURT OF DELHI:AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE I.A. No. 11454/2006 in C.S.(OS) No.795/2004 Judgment Reserved on: 09.08.2011 Judgment Pronounced on: 02.11.2011 MADAN LAL KHANNA
More informationThe Patents (Amendment) Act,
!"# The Patents (Amendment) Act, 2005 1 [NO. 15 OF 2005] CONTENTS [April 4, 2005] Sections Sections 1. Short title and commencement 40. Amendment of Section 57 2. Amendment of Section 2 41. Substitution
More informationJUDGMENT. (Hon ble Arijit Pasayat, J.) Leave granted.
2009 NTN (Vol. 40) [IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA] Hon ble Arijit Pasayat & Hon ble Lokeshwar Singh Panta, JJ. Civil Appeal No. 5166 of 2006 with Civil Appeal No. 5167 of 2006 Benara Valves Ltd. & Others
More informationCA/PL 7/99 Orig.: German Munich, SUBJECT: Revision of the EPC: Articles 52(4) and 54(5) President of the European Patent Office
CA/PL 7/99 Orig.: German Munich, 2.3.1999 SUBJECT: Revision of the EPC: Articles 52(4) and 54(5) DRAWN UP BY: ADDRESSEES: President of the European Patent Office Committee on Patent Law (for opinion) SUMMARY
More informationWRIT PETITION NO OF Dr. Madhav Vishwanath Dawalbhakta (Decd) through LRs. Dr. Nitin M. Dawalbhakta & Ors. Versus
Vidya Amin IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4217 OF 2018 Dr. Madhav Vishwanath Dawalbhakta (Decd) through LRs. Dr. Nitin M. Dawalbhakta & Ors. Versus
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. versus P.V. KANAKARAJ TRADING AS. Through None. % Date of Decision : 05 th December, 2017
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(COMM) 1307/2016 M/S. KHUSHI RAM BEHARI LAL... Plaintiff Through Mr. Ajay Amitabh Suman with Mr. Kapil Kumar Giri and Mr. Pankaj Kumar, Advocates versus
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :SERVICE MATTER WP(C) No.8133/2011 & CM No.2004/2012 Date of Decision:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :SERVICE MATTER WP(C) No.8133/2011 & CM No.2004/2012 Date of Decision: 14.02.2012 Deepak Kumar Through Mr.A.K.Trivedi, Advocate. Petitioner versus Union
More informationASIAN PATENT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION
ASIAN PATENT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION 63 rd Council Meeting Penang, Malaysia Patent Committee Report: INDIA Hari Subramaniam & Calab Gabriel 1 India: Patents 2014 There have been several changes in statutory
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 RAMESHWAR PRASAD SHRIVASTAVA AND ORS.
1 Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5802 OF 2018 RAMESHWAR PRASAD SHRIVASTAVA AND ORS. Appellants VERSUS DWARKADHIS PROJECTS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.... Respondents
More informationTNT India Private Limited } Petitioner versus Principal Commissioner of } Customs (II) and Ors. } Respondents
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2876 OF 2015 TNT India Private Limited } Petitioner versus Principal Commissioner of } Customs (II)
More informationDVAT LATEST AMENDMENTS
SNSC 13/06/2014 DVAT LATEST AMENDMENTS Latest Circulars Circular Dt. 02/06/2014 Summer break from 02/06/2014 to 30/06/2014. During this period the AOs will not pass any Ex-parte orders for non-appearance
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment Pronounced on: versus -...Respondent
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on: 19.01.2011 + Test.Cas. 75/2008 Smt. Geeta Devi Goel.. Petitioner - versus - State...Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the
More informationCase No. 02 of Shri V. P. Raja, Chairman Shri S. B. Kulkarni, Member Shri V. L. Sonavane, Member
Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No. 1, 13th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai - 400005 Email: mercindia@mercindia.org.in Website: www.mercindia.org.in Case
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS. 265-266 OF 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P.(Criminal) Nos. 1815-1816 of 2016) DINESH KUMAR KALIDAS PATEL... APPELLANT
More informationMr. Sunil Singh, Advocate : Mr. Dhananjay Kr. Dubey, Sr. S.C. I
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3788 of 2015 1. Mira Sinha, wife of late Amrendra Kumar 2. Jaydeep Kumar, son of late Amrendra Kumar 3. Avhinav Amresh, son of late Amrendra Kumar
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 694 OF Union of India... Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 694 OF 2015 Shiva Kant Jha... Petitioner(s) Versus Union of India... Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T R.K. Agrawal,
More informationMAHARASHTRA ACT No. IX OF 1977
GOVERNMENT OF MAHARASHTRA LAW AND JUDICIARY DEPARTMENT MAHARASHTRA ACT No. IX OF 1977 THE MAHARASHTRA ANIMAL PRESERVATION ACT, 1976 (As modified up to the 4 th March, 2015) PRINTED IN INDIA BY THE MANAGER,
More informationTHE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007
1 AS PASSED BY LOK SABHA ON 6.9.2007 Bill No. 70-C of 2007 12 of 2003. THE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007 A BILL to amend the Competition Act, 2002. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-eighth
More informationTHE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007
1 TO BE INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 70 of 2007 12 of 2003. THE COMPETITION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2007 A BILL to amend the Competition Act, 2002. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-eighth Year of
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1374 OF 2008
Chittewan 1/9 1. WP 1374-08.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1374 OF 2008 Sea Face Park Co operative Housing Societies Petitioner Versus
More informationSCHEME FOR RELIEF AND REHABILITATION OF OFFENCES (BY ACIDS) ON WOMEN AND CHILDREN NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR WOMEN
SCHEME FOR RELIEF AND REHABILITATION OF OFFENCES (BY ACIDS) ON WOMEN AND CHILDREN NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR WOMEN Statement of object and reasons In most cases, acid attacks permanently disfigure, debilitate
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA W.P. Nos. 63936/2012 & 64365/2012 (S-REG) BETWEEN: 1. RAMA S/O. NARAYAN
More informationAIR(SC) 5384; ; JLJR(SC) 131; MPWN(SC) 138; ; SCC
This Product is Licensed to Mohammed Asif Ansari, Rajasthan State Judicial Academy, Jodhpur 2016 0 AIR(SC) 5384; 2016 4 Crimes(SC) 190; 2017 1 JLJR(SC) 131; 2016 3 MPWN(SC) 138; 2016 12 Scale 269; 2017
More informationMaintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007
Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 Preamble.- AN ACT to provide for more effective provisions for the maintenance and welfare of parents and senior citizens guaranteed and
More informationIJRFM Volume 2, Issue 5 (May 2012) (ISSN ) WORKING OF REDRESSAL AGENCIES ABSTRACT
WORKING OF REDRESSAL AGENCIES Dr. Prof. Hawa Singh* Monika Singh** ABSTRACT India is a vast country where a majority of consumers are poor, helpless & disorganised. It is now realised that every consumer
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)NO OF 2017
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL)NO. 15804 OF 2017 ROJER MATHEW PETITIONER VERSUS SOUTH INDIAN BANK LIMITED AND ORS RESPONDENTS O R
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.571 OF 2017 Om Sai Punya Educational and Social Welfare Society & Another.Petitioners Versus All India Council
More informationThe Protection from Domestic Violence Bill, 2002
The Protection from Domestic Violence Bill, 2002 A BILL to protect the rights of women who are victims of violence of any kind occurring within the family and to provide for matters connected therewith
More informationPatentable Subject Matter and Medical Use Claims in the Pharmaceutical Sector
Patentable Subject Matter and Medical Use Claims in the Pharmaceutical Sector 2012 LIDC Congress, Prague, 12 October 2012 Dr. Simon Holzer, Attorney-at-Law, Partner 3 October 2012 2 Introduction! Conflicting
More informationJHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION RANCHI. Case No. 21 & 23 of 2010 ORDER
JHARKHAND STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION RANCHI Case No. 21 & 23 of 2010 Dated: 6 th October 2010 Shri Mukhtiar Singh, Chairperson Shri T. Munikrishnaiah, Member (Tech) ORDER IN THE MATTER OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2011) :Versus:
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4043 OF 2015 (Arising out of SLP(C) No.10173 of 2011) Central Bank of India Appellant :Versus: C.L. Vimla & Ors.
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) versus
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.A. 5/2015 & IA 2340/2015 (for stay) Judgment reserved on February 05, 2015 Judgment delivered on February 13, 2015 M/S VARUN INDUSTRIES LTD & ORS... Appellants
More informationTHE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961
Sections:. Short title and commencement. 2. Definitions. 3. Registrar and Deputy Registrars. THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 96 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 4. Appeals from decisions of a single Judge of the
More informationTHE EDUCATIONAL TRIBUNALS BILL, 2010
TO BE INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA CLAUSES THE EDUCATIONAL TRIBUNALS BILL, 2010 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Applicability of Act. 3. Definitions.
More informationMeghalaya Public Service Commission, Limitations of Functions
Meghalaya Public Service Commission, Limitations of Functions (As amended upto march 1984) Regulations 1972 Instruction regarding direct recruitment through the Public Service Commission issued by the
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.M.C. No. 233/2014 Date of decision: 14th February, 2014.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.M.C. No. 233/2014 Date of decision: 14th February, 2014 DR. ZUBAIR UL ABIDIN Through: Mr.Suraj Rathi, Adv.... Petitioner versus STATE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS OF State of Tamil Nadu.Appellant.
1 Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.423-424 OF 2018 State of Tamil Nadu.Appellant Versus S. Martin Etc.. Respondents J U D G M E N T Uday
More informationASIAN PATENT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION. 62 nd Council Meeting. Hanoi, Vietnam. Patent Committee Report: INDIA. Hari Subramaniam, Neeti Dewan, Sanjay Kumar
ASIAN PATENT ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION 62 nd Council Meeting Hanoi, Vietnam Patent Committee Report: INDIA Hari Subramaniam, Neeti Dewan, Sanjay Kumar 1 India: Patents 2013 There have been no changes in statutory
More informationBar and Bench (
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI (ORIGINAL (C.) WRIT JURISDICTION) WRIT PETITION (C.) NO. OF 2017 [Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India] IN THE MATTER OF : A Public Interest
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2019 MANTRI CASTLES PVT. LTD & ANR. WITH
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA REPORTABLE CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 1232 OF 2019 R V PRASANNAKUMAAR & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS MANTRI CASTLES PVT. LTD & ANR. Respondent(s) WITH CIVIL
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: EHTESHAM QUTUBUDDIN SIDDIQUE. versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 16.01.2019 + W.P.(C) 9773/2018 EHTESHAM QUTUBUDDIN SIDDIQUE... Petitioner versus CPIO, INTELLIGENCE BUREAU... Respondent Advocates who appeared
More informationLEGISLATIVE NOTE. No. 4/LN/Ref/March 2018 THE CONSUMER PROTECTION BILL, 2018
MEMBERS' REFERENCE SERVICE LARRDIS LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT NEW DELHI LEGISLATIVE NOTE For the use of Members of Parliament NOT FOR PUBLICATION No. 4/LN/Ref/March 2018 THE CONSUMER PROTECTION BILL, 2018 Prepared
More informationPre Conception and Pre Natal Diagnostics Techniques Act
Pre Conception and Pre Natal Diagnostics Techniques Act PNDT ACT Maharashtra was first State to enact Maharashtra regulation of use of PNDT Act in 1987 Pre Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act was passed in
More informationFOOD SAFETY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN
FOOD SAFETY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL JAIPUR, RAJASTHAN Appeal Filing No. 820170076 Nestle India Ltd., through Nominee Shri Dharmendra Hansraj Kotak, Nestle India Ltd., M-5A, Connaught Circus, New Delhi (Head
More informationTHE NATIONAL SOLAR ENERGY AUTHORITY BILL, 2012
1 AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 81 of 2012 THE NATIONAL SOLAR ENERGY AUTHORITY BILL, 2012 By SHRI HANSRAJ GANGARAM AHIR, M.P. A BILL to provide for the constitution of an Authority for the purpose
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 7504 of 2013 M/s Narayani Fuels Private Limited through its Director, Dhanbad Petitioner Versus 1. Punjab National Bank through its Chairman, New
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE. versus
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8444/2011 Date of Decision: 29 th September, 2015 REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY... Petitioner Through Mr.
More informationTHE NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY BILL, 2008
TO BE INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 75 of 2008 THE NATIONAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY BILL, 2008 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY CLAUSES 1. Short title, extent and application. 2. Definitions.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE LPA 776 OF 2012, CMs No. 19869/2012 (stay), 19870/2012 (additional documents), 19871/2012 (delay) Judgment Delivered on 29.11.2012
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PIL WRIT PETITION NO.70 OF 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PIL WRIT PETITION NO.70 OF 2006 Kirit Somaiya & ors. Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors....Ptitioners...Respondents Shri Rajeev
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P.(C) 4784/2014 and CM No.9529/2014 (Stay)
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4784/2014 and CM No.9529/2014 (Stay) Pronounced on: December 11, 2015 M/S IMS MERCANTILES PVT. LTD.... Petitioner Through: Mr.Bharat Gupta with Mr.Saurabh
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2018
MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION (Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2018 Revenue Bar Association New No. 115
More informationREGISTRAR GENERAL, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Standing Counsel for CBI with Mr. Tarun Verma, Advocate.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Rev. P. No. 120 of 2010 % Date of Reserve: July 29, 2010 Date of Order: 12 th August, 2010 12.08.2010 MOHAN LAL JATIA... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Sud,
More informationMODEL ANSWERS FOR MAIN EXAM QUESTION PAPER B.PHARM. Vth SEMESTER-2013; SUBJECT: FORENSIC PHARMACY & ETHICS-V
1 P a g e MODEL ANSWERS FOR MAIN EXAM QUESTION PAPER B.PHARM. Vth SEMESTER-2013; SUBJECT: FORENSIC PHARMACY & ETHICS-V SECTION: A Q I. What is technical education as per AICTE Act? Answer. Programmes of
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 Date of decision: 19th April, 2011 W.P.(C) 8647/2007
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 Date of decision: 19th April, 2011 W.P.(C) 8647/2007 JINGLE BELL AMUSEMENT PARK P. LTD. Through: Mr. V.K. Goel, Advocate... Petitioner
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 636 OF 2017 [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 636 OF 2017 [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 7186 of 2014] Dr. Sou Jayshree Ujwal Ingole.... Appellant(s) Versus
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2014 (arising out of SLP(C)No.3909 of 2012) JACKY.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4453 OF 2014 (arising out of SLP(C)No.3909 of 2012) JACKY. APPELLANT VERSUS TINY @ ANTONY & ORS..RESPONDENTS J UD
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Co. Pet. 8/2015
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Co. Pet. 8/2015 Madhusudan Mandal, Residing at 35E Mahanirban Road, Ground Floor, Post Office- Gariahat, Kolkata-700029,
More informationINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT (IJM)
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT (IJM) ISSN 0976-6502 (Print) ISSN 0976-6510 (Online) Volume 7, Issue 2, February (2016), pp. 177-182 http://www.iaeme.com/ijm/index.asp Journal Impact Factor (2016):
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment pronounced on: 4 th January, versus CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment pronounced on: 4 th January, 2016 + CS(OS) No.2934/2011 J.C BAMFORD EXCAVATORS LIMITED & ANR... Plaintiffs Through Mr.Pravin Anand, Adv. with Ms.Vaishali
More information2 4. RahulRaj Mall Notice to be served upon its Authorized Representative Notice to be served its Authorized Representative Dumas Road, Magdalla, Sura
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: SURAT WRIT PETITION NO. OF 2018 (PIL) (EXTRA ORDINARY JURISDICTION) Ref: In the matter of Public Interest Litigation related to collection and levy
More informationTHE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY ACT, 1997
THE NATIONAL ENVIRONMENT APPELLATE AUTHORITY ACT, 1997 (Act No.22 of 1997) [ Dated 26.3.1997 ] An Act to provide for the establishment of a National Environment Appellate Authority to hear appeals with
More informationTHE WAQF PROPERTIES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORISED OCCUPANTS), BILL, 2014
1 AS INTRODUCED IN THE RAJYA SABHA Bill No. VIII of 14 36 of 19. 24 of 198. THE WAQF PROPERTIES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORISED OCCUPANTS), BILL, 14 A BILL to provide for the eviction of unauthorised occupants
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) 2877 of 2003 & CM APPL No. 4883/2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2877 of 2003 & CM APPL No. 4883/2003 Reserved on: February 9, 2010 Date of decision: February 22, 2010 DR. RAVINDER SINGH... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj
More information