In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi. Cr.M.P.No.141 of Binod Kumar Singh..Petitioner V E R S U S

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi. Cr.M.P.No.141 of Binod Kumar Singh..Petitioner V E R S U S"

Transcription

1 In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.141 of 2013 Binod Kumar Singh..Petitioner V E R S U S Central Bureau of Investigation through its S.P, (A.C.B), Ranchi Opposite Party CORAM: HON BLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner :Mr.S.N.Prasad For the C.B.I :Mr.M.Khan 13/ One writ application, vide W.P (PIL) No.1531 of 2011 was filed before this Court for issuance of mandamus directing the respondent-state including Vice-Chairman, Ranchi Regional Development Authority, Ranchi, and Chief Executive Officer, Ranchi Municipal Corporation, Ranchi to remove unauthorized structure being used as go-down and shop constructed in the parking area of Chandralok Apartment. During hearing of the case, it was brought to the notice of the court that such permission has been granted by the officials of the Ranchi Regional Development Authority illegally in connivance with the builders and others not for one Apartment but in many of the Apartments. At the same time, it was also brought to the notice of the Court that number of multi storied buildings have been constructed by deviating from their sanctioned maps. Such deviation and alteration made with the connivance of the officials of the Ranchi Regional Development Authority was taken by the Court not only a civil wrongs but also criminal offence as such a space dedicated to common use being used for other purposes amounts to encroachment to the rights of the others. Therefore, the Court did find it proper and appropriate to get the matter be investigated upon by the C.B.I. Accordingly, a formal letter was issued to the C.B.I to institute a case and to proceed with it against the persons

2 2 committed wrong in connivance with the officials of Ranchi Regional Development Authority. Accordingly, an FIR was lodged by the C.B.I against unknown persons under Section 120B read with Sections 420, 468, 471 and also under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(i)(d)of the Prevention of Corrupti9on Act and also under Section 52 of the Jharkhand Regional Development Authority Act, 2001 as well as under Section 82 of the Registration Act. Having lodged the case, the C.B.I took up the investigation. During investigation, the matter relating to sanction of the building plans of M/s. Jagannath Lifecare (P) Limited, Ranchi and M/s. Rani children Hospital and Research (P) Limited were also examined. In that course, it was found that one Dr.Rajesh Kumar, Director of M/s. Rani Children Hospital & Research Center (P) Limited and Dr.Sudhir Kumar, Director of M/s. Jagannath Lifecare (P) Limited had purchased the lands bearing plot no.564, appertaining to Khata No.27 situated under Mouza Hatma from Sri Basant Toppo after getting permission in terms of the provision of Section 49 of the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act. After purchasing the land, M/s. Jagannath Lifecare (P) Limited submitted building construction plan in the year 2008, upon which a case bearing B.C No.269 of 2008 was initiated. On submission of such plan, the applicant according to the case of the C.B.I became apprehensive that map may not be sanctioned as the land over which map was sought to be sanctioned was Public Open Space. Therefore, the plan was again submitted by M/s. Jagannath Lifecare (P) Limited through M/s. Grids Consultants to which this petitioner was one of the partners by showing the plot as plot no.568 upon which a case bearing B.C No.531 of 2008 was initiated.

3 3 In the said case, map was sanctioned by the Ranchi Regional Development Authority by showing plot no.564 as 568 as R.S.plot no.564 situated in Mouza Hatma was Public Open Space. The said map had been prepared under the supervision of this petitioner. In the said map, two roads were shown existing in front of the plot. One was shown to the north of the plot but in fact, no such road was existing. The other road was shown to be of width of 9 meter but, in fact, the land was recorded as Kaisare Hind and width of that road was never of 9 meters. According to the case of the prosecution, this was done by M/s. Grids Consultants to which this petitioner is one of the partners to get the map of the building ( G+4 ) sanctioned in collusion with the officials of the Ranchi Regional Development Authority. On such allegation, charge sheet was submitted against M/s. Jagannath Lifecare (P) Limited and other persons including this petitioner as well as other partners of M/s. Grids Consultants so far building plan relating to M/s. Jagannath Lifecare (P) Limited is concerned. Likewise, charge sheets were also submitted against other accused persons whose culpability was found in getting the map sanctioned for other buildings in contravention of the provisions of the Ranchi Regional Development Authority Act as well as Ranchi Planning Standards & Building Bye-laws, 2002 which was framed by the authority in terms of the provision of Ranchi Regional Development Authority Act, Upon submission of the charge sheet, the court took cognizance of the offences punishable under Section 120B read with Sections 420, 478 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code and also under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(i)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act s well as under Section 52 of the Jharkhand Regional Development Authority Act, 2001.

4 4 Being aggrieved with that order, the petitioner has filed this application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Mr.S.N.Prasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that it is the case of the C.B.I that under the supervision of this petitioner, an Architect, a lay out plan for construction of a building (G+4) was prepared which on its submission by the owner of the land got sanctioned by the authority of the Ranchi Regional Development Authority but the petitioner an Architect is being prosecuted on the premise that the land over which map was sanctioned happens to be the Public Open Space (POS) and that two roads were shown to have been approaching that land but in fact, only one road was in existence but this ground cannot be valid ground for prosecuting an Architect who is supposed to draw a map to be submitted by the owner before the authority of the Ranchi Regional Development Authority for its sanction as no law or regulation is there for fastening responsibility upon an Architect to make investigation over the nature of land before an Architect draws a plan. In this regard it was further submitted that in terms of the provision of Section 32 of the Act, the landlord is supposed to give a lay out plan on the basis of which an Architect is supposed to prepare a sketch map which is sanctioned in terms of the provision as contained in Section 37 of the Act if it is in accordance with the Act, Rule and Regulation. If the land owner on making any misrepresentation gets a map sanctioned, it is liable to be cancelled in terms of the provision as contained in Section 38 of the Act and even the building constructed on such map, can be demolished. Thus, it was submitted that if the map is sanctioned by making any misrepresentation, it is the owner who is to be held responsible and not the Architect. In spite of that, the petitioner is

5 5 being prosecuted which is quite illegal and hence the order taking cognizance is fit to be quashed. As against this, Mr. Khan, learned counsel appearing for the C.B.I submits that when the C.B.I was directed by this Court to make investigation over the matter relating to the buildings constructed by making deviation from the map and also in the matter allowing the builders to use the space of common use for other purposes by the officials of the Ranchi Regional Development Authority, a case was registered. During investigation, it was found that building has been constructed over Public Open Space after the building plan submitted by M/s. Jagannath Lifecare (P) Limited was sanctioned by the officials of the Ranchi Regional Development Authority. The building plan had been prepared by M/ s. Grids Consultants to which this petitioner is one of the partners and under his supervision, the building plan had been prepared. The building plan was shown to have been prepared for construction of building over R.S. plot no.568 but in fact, it was R.S plot no.564 and that in order to have more floors in the building, two roads were shown to have been existing abutting the said plot but in fact, only one road was existing and that width of the road which was existing was shown more than its actual width so as to have have an additional floor which is certainly in contravention of the provisions of the Act and the bye-laws. The petitioner in such situation cannot take plea that it is none of his business to make any enquiry or investigation of the land before drawing building plan as the Architect under the provisions of the Ranchi Planning Standards & Building Bye-laws 2002 (Amended) is duty bound to see that the building plan which is prepared is in accordance with the provision of the Jharkhand Regional Development Authority its regulation and bye-laws. If such responsibility has been fastened under the said bye-laws, even the Architect can be prosecuted it, it

6 6 is found that he by ignoring the provision of the Act, Rule and Regulation has prepared building plan. illegality. Thus, the order taking cognizance never suffers from any From the averment made on behalf of the parties what has emerged is that according to the petitioner, an Architect who prepares building plan is never supposed to make enquiry with respect to the land for which building plan has been prepared, rather building plan is prepared as per the instruction of the land owner whereas the stand which has been taken on behalf of the C.B.I is that even an Architect under the provision of bye-laws named as Ranchi Planning Standards & Building Byelaws, 2002 (Amended) is supposed to adhere to the provision of the Act, Rule and bye-laws. It be stated that it is the case of theprosectuion that building plan was prepared for construction of the building over the plot which had been delineated for Public Open Space and that two roads were shown to have been passing through the land in question but only one road was in existence and that width of the other road was shown more than its actual width so as to have have one additional floor over the building. The question does arise as to whether on account of it this an Architect can be held responsible for commission of the offence under which cognizance of the offence has been taken. In this regard, I may refer to clause c of appendix C of Ranchi Planning Standards & Building Byelaws, 2002 which reads as follows: C Architects who are registered under the council of Architects Act 1972 shall be entitled for a registration as a licensed Technical personnel of R.R.D.A without paying any annual licensing fee for the same. However, if they desire to be enrolled as life-time-licensee of the Authority, a lumpsum payment of Rs.500/- (Rupees Five Hundred) shall have to be made to the Authority as a fee for such

7 7 enrolment, so that the Authority may be able to intimate them by post time-to-time about the provisions of planning standard and Building Byelaws and other relevant information with amendments (if any) in rules and Bye-laws of the Authority. But in case of Architect either already enrolled or likely to be enrolled in future as a R.R.D.A. Licensee, violates any of the rules, regulations, bye-laws and/or planning Standards of R.R.D.A, for the time being in force, his enrolment in R.R.D.A shall be cancelled and the enrolment fee of Rs.500/- charged initially from him shall be forfeited by the Authority. From its perusal, it does appear that an Architect who is registered under the Architect Act 1972 is entitled for a registration as a licensed Technical personnel of R.R.D.A. Further clause C-8 of the Bye-laws speaks about the duties and responsibilities of technical personnel. Relevant provision for the purpose of deciding the issue would be clause (a) and (g) of clause C-8.1 which reads as follows: (a) There shall be conversant with the provisions of the Bihar and Orissa Municipalities Act Patna Municipal Corporation Act, 1951, Bihar Restriction of Use of Land Act, 1948 Rules and Bye-laws made thereunder and as well as the Bihar Town Planning and Improvement Trust Act, 1951, Jharkhand Regional Development Authority Act, 2001 and the regulations made therein and shall prepare plans, sections elevations and other structural details as per the requirements of the clauses above to prescribed scales marking clearly all the dimension etc. Furnishing the Area table and shall, draw specifications. Etc. (g) They shall be held responsible for work executed on site in contravention of provisions of the Bihar and Orissa Municipalities Act, 1922, Patna Municipal Corporation Act, Bihar Rstriction of Uses of Land Act, 1948, Bihar Town Planning and Improvement Trust Act, 1951, Jharkhand Regiional Development Authority Act, 1982, 1975 and Rules and Bye-laws, framed thereunder. The aforesaid two provisions does stipulate that technical person must be conversant with the provision of not only Jharkhand

8 8 Regional Development Authority Act but other related acts, byelaws and rules so that any structural details be made in accordance with the Act and Rules. If there happens to be any contravention of the provision of the Act, Rules or Bye-laws in the matter of construction of the building, technical person can be held responsible. In such situation, the submission advanced on behalf of the petitioner that an Architect cannot be held responsible for building plan being not in conformity with the provision of the Act, Rules and the Bye-laws, is not acceptable. However, it would be seen during trial as to whether the petitioner being an Architect was responsible or not in making building plan as according to the petitioner, the petitioner though was one of the partners of M/s. Grids Consultant but had nothing to do with preparation of building plan wherein it is the case of the C.B.I that under the supervision of this petitioner, building plan had been prepared. Under the situation, the order taking cognizance never warrants to be quashed. In the result, this application stands dismissed. However, before parting with this order, it be observed that any finding recorded for the purpose of disposal of this case may not be prejudicial to the case of the parties. ND/ ( R.R.Prasad, J.)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 911 2007 Ejaj Ahmad Petitioner Vs. 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Binay Kumar Opposite Parties CORAM: HON BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner:

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 4674 of 2012 Mahendra Kumar Ruiya................Petitioner -Versus- 1. State of Jharkhand through. 2. Gautam Kumar Dubey..........Opp. Parties ----------

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, BAIL APPLN. No.1626/2009. Judgment reserved on :20th October, 2011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, BAIL APPLN. No.1626/2009. Judgment reserved on :20th October, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : WILD LIFE PROTECTION ACT, 1972. BAIL APPLN. No.1626/2009 Judgment reserved on :20th October, 2011 Judgment delivered on: 16th January,2012 SUDESH KUMAR

More information

W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI

W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI BY COURT: 1 W.P.(C) No.5740 of 2001 (In the matter of an application under Articles 226 and 226 of the Constitution of India) Parmanand Pandey & Anr.. Petitioners. Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors.....

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : BORDER SECURITY FORCE ACT, 1968 Date of Decision: W.P.(C) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : BORDER SECURITY FORCE ACT, 1968 Date of Decision: W.P.(C) No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : BORDER SECURITY FORCE ACT, 1968 Date of Decision: 21.03.2012 W.P.(C) No.1616/2012 Ex. Constable Mohan Kumar Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents

More information

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Heard learned counsel for the parties. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.27162 of 2011 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar Singh...... Petitioner/s Versus The State Of Bihar......

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 506 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 509 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 512 of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 506 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 509 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 512 of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 506 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 509 of 2013 With W.P.(S) No. 512 of 2013 MariyamTirkey Petitioner (in WPS No. 506/13) Sudarshan Khakha Petitioner (in

More information

The Orissa Saw Mills and Saw Pits (Control) Act, 1991

The Orissa Saw Mills and Saw Pits (Control) Act, 1991 The Orissa Saw Mills and Saw Pits (Control) Act, 1991 This document is available at ielrc.org/content/e9109.pdf For further information, visit www.ielrc.org Note: This document is put online by the International

More information

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI

NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI Company Appeals (AT) No.101 to 105 of 2017 (arising out of Order dated 06.02.2017 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, New Delhi in CP Nos. 16/152/2015,

More information

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus. 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No

*IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. Versus. 2. To be referred to the reporter or not? No *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 23 rd July, 2010. + W.P.(C) 11305/2009, CM No.10831/2009 (u/s 151 CPC for stay), CM No.9694/2010 (u/o1 Rule 10 of CPC for impleadment) & CM No.

More information

ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK FULL BENCH

ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK FULL BENCH ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK FULL BENCH W.A. NO.122 OF 2014 In the matter of a reference made by a Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.09.2014... Sri Kasinath Nayak. Petitioner -Versus- State

More information

FOREIGN CONTRIBUTION (REGULATION) ACT, 1976

FOREIGN CONTRIBUTION (REGULATION) ACT, 1976 FOREIGN CONTRIBUTION (REGULATION) ACT, 1976 [Act No. 49 of Year 1976] An Act to regulate the acceptance and utilisation of foreign contribution or foreign hospitality by certain persons or associations,

More information

CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY. 1. Short title, extent, commencement and application. 2. Definitions. CHAPTER II THE ADVISORY BOARDS

CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY. 1. Short title, extent, commencement and application. 2. Definitions. CHAPTER II THE ADVISORY BOARDS SECTIONS THE CONTRACT LABOUR (REGULATION AND ABOLITION) ACT, 1970 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent, commencement and application. 2. Definitions. 3. Central Advisory

More information

ABSTRACT. G.O.(Ms) No.234 Dated: The appended Notification shall be published in the next issue of the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette.

ABSTRACT. G.O.(Ms) No.234 Dated: The appended Notification shall be published in the next issue of the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette. ABSTRACT Guidelines Tamil Nadu Guidelines under section 113-C of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971 for the Exemption of Buildings and Assessment and Collection of amount for Exemption,

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995 WP(C) No.14332/2004 Pronounced on : 14.03.2008 Sanjay Kumar Jha...

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. W.P. Crl. No. 1029/2010. Decided on: 9th August, 2011.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE. W.P. Crl. No. 1029/2010. Decided on: 9th August, 2011. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE W.P. Crl. No. 1029/2010 Decided on: 9th August, 2011. DEEPAK GARG Through: Mr. Vijay Agarwal, Advocate.... Petitioner versus

More information

CHAPTER 18:01 SOCIETIES

CHAPTER 18:01 SOCIETIES CHAPTER 18:01 SOCIETIES ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title 2. Act not to apply to certain societies 3. Interpretation 4. Appointment of Registrar of Societies 5. Societies deemed to be established

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (T) No of 2013 with W.P. (T) No of 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (T) No of 2013 with W.P. (T) No of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (T) No. 1686 of 2013 with W.P. (T) No. 1687 of 2013 M/s. The Rameshwara Jute Mills Ltd, Mining Lessee, through Krishna Kant Dubey, Orissa. Versus Petitioner

More information

TENDER FOR PROVIDING CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR MASTER PLAN FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL DEVICES PROJECT AT THONNAKKAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

TENDER FOR PROVIDING CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR MASTER PLAN FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL DEVICES PROJECT AT THONNAKKAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM TENDER FOR PROVIDING CONSULTANCY SERVICES FOR MASTER PLAN FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF MEDICAL DEVICES PROJECT AT THONNAKKAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM JANUARY 2018 HITES (A FULLY OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF HLL LIFECARE

More information

THE BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS ACT, 1986

THE BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS ACT, 1986 THE BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS ACT, 1986 No. 63 of 1986 [ 23rd December, 1986. ] An Act to provide for the establishment of a Bureau for the harmonious development of the activities of standardisation,

More information

PUNJAB PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (LICENSING AND CONTROL)

PUNJAB PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (LICENSING AND CONTROL) PUNJAB PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (LICENSING AND CONTROL) ORDER, 2003 GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB DEPARTMENT OF FOOD, CIVIL SUPPLIES AND CONSUMER AFFAIRS (FOOD DISTRIBUTION-I BRANCH) The 14 th February, 2003.

More information

THE MULTI-STATE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2010

THE MULTI-STATE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2010 1 TO BE INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 123 of 2010 39 of 2002. 5 10 THE MULTI-STATE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2010 A BILL to amend the Multi-State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002. BE

More information

RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE LICENSING OF MEAT SHOPS IN NASHIK

RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE LICENSING OF MEAT SHOPS IN NASHIK 1 RULES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE LICENSING OF MEAT SHOPS IN NASHIK State: Maharashtra Details of licensing are as follows: Meat Shops are regulated as per the directions of Bombay Provincial Municipal

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.M.C. No. 233/2014 Date of decision: 14th February, 2014.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.M.C. No. 233/2014 Date of decision: 14th February, 2014. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRL.M.C. No. 233/2014 Date of decision: 14th February, 2014 DR. ZUBAIR UL ABIDIN Through: Mr.Suraj Rathi, Adv.... Petitioner versus STATE

More information

Standing Counsel for TNPSC

Standing Counsel for TNPSC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.20439 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 E.Bamila.. Petitioner Vs. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005. Judgment decided on:

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI. SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005. Judgment decided on: IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : Bihar Shops and Establishment Act, 1956 W.P.(C) No. 5114/2005 Judgment decided on: 14.02.2011 C.D. SINGH Through: Mr Ranjan Mukherjee, Advocate....Petitioner

More information

Court of the State Election Commissioner, Jharkhand, Ranchi. Order

Court of the State Election Commissioner, Jharkhand, Ranchi. Order Court of the State Election Commissioner, Jharkhand, Ranchi Order Smt. Jiren Sinku Member, Panchayat Samiti Megahatuburu and Ex-Pramukh, Noamundi Block vs Presiding Officer cum- Sub - Divisional Officer

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BETWEEN : Dated the 7 th day of August 2012 : B E F O R E : HON BLE MR.JUSTICE : V.JAGANNATHAN CRIMINAL PETITION No. 2746 / 2012 1. M/S ORCLE FINANCIAL SERVICES

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PERMANENT REGISTRATION. Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 8745/2011 & C.M. Nos.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PERMANENT REGISTRATION. Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 8745/2011 & C.M. Nos. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PERMANENT REGISTRATION Date of Decision: 16.01.2012 W.P.(C) 8745/2011 & C.M. Nos.19767-68/2011 RANGNATHAN PRASAD MANDADAPU... Petitioner Through: Ms. Suman

More information

KARNATAKA ACT NO 09 OF 2013 THE KARNATAKA LIFTS, ESCALATORS AND PASSENGER CONVEYORS ACT, 2012 Arrangement of Sections

KARNATAKA ACT NO 09 OF 2013 THE KARNATAKA LIFTS, ESCALATORS AND PASSENGER CONVEYORS ACT, 2012 Arrangement of Sections KARNATAKA ACT NO 09 OF 2013 THE KARNATAKA LIFTS, ESCALATORS AND PASSENGER CONVEYORS ACT, 2012 Arrangement of Sections STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS Sections: 1. Short title, extent and commencement

More information

KARNATAKA ACT NO 09 OF 2013 THE KARNATAKA LIFTS, ESCALATORS AND PASSENGER CONVEYORS ACT, 2012 Arrangement of Sections Sections: 1.

KARNATAKA ACT NO 09 OF 2013 THE KARNATAKA LIFTS, ESCALATORS AND PASSENGER CONVEYORS ACT, 2012 Arrangement of Sections Sections: 1. KARNATAKA ACT NO 09 OF 2013 THE KARNATAKA LIFTS, ESCALATORS AND PASSENGER CONVEYORS ACT, 2012 Arrangement of Sections Sections: 1. Short title, extent and commencement 2. Definitions 3. Permission to erect

More information

THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORKPLACE (PREVENTION, PROHIBITION AND REDRESSAL) ACT, 2013 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORKPLACE (PREVENTION, PROHIBITION AND REDRESSAL) ACT, 2013 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS THE SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORKPLACE (PREVENTION, PROHIBITION AND REDRESSAL) ACT, 2013 SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. 3. Prevention of sexual harassment. ARRANGEMENT

More information

THE PRIVATE SECURITY AGENCIES (REGULATION) ACT, 2005 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

THE PRIVATE SECURITY AGENCIES (REGULATION) ACT, 2005 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTIONS THE PRIVATE SECURITY AGENCIES (REGULATION) ACT, 2005 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. 3. Appointment of Controlling Authority. 4. Persons or Private

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (Cr.) No.261 of 2014 Md. Mansoor @ Mansoor Alam @ Manser Nauwa, son of Kalam Nauwa, R/o Wasseypur, P.O. Bhulinagar, P.S. Bank Moare, District Dhanbad.....

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.W. J.C. No. 72 of 1999 (R) with C.W. J.C. No. 74 of 1999 (R) Urmila Devi Petitioner [CWJC No. 72/99 (R)] 1. Pushpa Devi 2. Urmila Devi... Petitioners [CWJC

More information

THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIES (FACILITATION) ACT,

THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIES (FACILITATION) ACT, 1 THE KARNATAKA INDUSTRIES (FACILITATION) ACT, 2002 Arrangement of Sections Statement of Objects and Reasons Sections: 1. Short title and commencement 2. Definitions 3. State High Level Clearance Committee

More information

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI. KANUBHAI M PATEL HUF - Petitioner(s) Versus

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI. KANUBHAI M PATEL HUF - Petitioner(s) Versus IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5295 of 2010 WITH SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5296 OF 2010 AND SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5297 OF 2010 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA

More information

CHAPTER 22:01 FIRE PREVENTION ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

CHAPTER 22:01 FIRE PREVENTION ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Fire Prevention 3 CHAPTER 22:01 FIRE PREVENTION ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTION 1. Short title. 2. Interpretation. 3. Fire Advisory Board. 4. Duties of Board. 5. Entry and inspection of premises. 6.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN. Writ Petition Nos /2017 (T-IT)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN. Writ Petition Nos /2017 (T-IT) 1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23 RD DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN Writ Petition Nos.1339-1342/2017 (T-IT) Between : Flipkart

More information

Karnataka Industries Facilitation Act

Karnataka Industries Facilitation Act Karnataka Industries Facilitation Act An Act to provide for the promotion of industrial development and facilitation of new investments to simplify the regulatory frame work by reducing procedural requirements

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.PATIL AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE PRADEEP D. WAINGANKAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.PATIL AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE PRADEEP D. WAINGANKAR 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF MAY 2014 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.PATIL AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE PRADEEP D. WAINGANKAR BETWEEN WRIT APPEAL NO.2828

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner.

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. % Judgment delivered on: M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner. THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 30.07.2010 + WP (C) 11932/2009 M/S MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P. LTD Petitioner - versus THE VALUE ADDED TAX OFFICER & ANR... Respondent

More information

CONTENTS. Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, Preamble

CONTENTS. Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, Preamble CONTENTS Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 Sections Preamble 1. Short title, extent and application 2. Interpretation 3. Submission of draft standing orders 4. Conditions for certification

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CHANGE OF LAND USE MATTER Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 5180/2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CHANGE OF LAND USE MATTER Date of Decision: W.P.(C) 5180/2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : CHANGE OF LAND USE MATTER Date of Decision: 25.04.2013 W.P.(C) 5180/2012 NEERA SHARMA... Petitioner Through: Mr S.K. Rungta, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prashant

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 19 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 19 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY 1 R IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 19 TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE RAM MOHAN REDDY WRIT PETITION No.29795/2014 (LB-BBMP) BETWEEN: SRI KAMLESH KUMAR,

More information

THE CENTRAL SILK BOARD (AMENDMENT) ACT, # No. 42 of $ [13th September, 2006.]

THE CENTRAL SILK BOARD (AMENDMENT) ACT, # No. 42 of $ [13th September, 2006.] THE CENTRAL SILK BOARD (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2006 # No. 42 of 2006 $ [13th September, 2006.] + An Act further to amend the Central Silk Board Act, 1948. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Fifty-seventh Year

More information

TAMIL NADU BUSINESS FACILITATION ACT 2017

TAMIL NADU BUSINESS FACILITATION ACT 2017 TAMIL NADU BUSINESS FACILITATION ACT 2017 AN ACT TO SUPPORT TAMIL NADU IN ITS ASPIRATION OF BEING ONE OF THE MOST PREFERRED INVESTMENT DESTINATION IN THE COUNTRY, BY ENSURING ADEQUATE INFORMATION AVAILABILITY

More information

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016

Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation Government of India Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs) Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation

More information

COURT NO. 3, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI T.A. No. 60 of 2010 Delhi High Court W.P (C) No. 621 of 2003

COURT NO. 3, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI T.A. No. 60 of 2010 Delhi High Court W.P (C) No. 621 of 2003 COURT NO. 3, ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI T.A. No. 60 of 2010 Delhi High Court W.P (C) No. 621 of 2003 IN THE MATTER OF:...Applicant Through Shri P.D.P Deo counsel for the Applicant.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J GUNJAL. WRIT PETITION Nos /2010 (GM-RES),

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J GUNJAL. WRIT PETITION Nos /2010 (GM-RES), 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED: THIS THE 27 th DAY OF JUNE, 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT J GUNJAL WRIT PETITION Nos. 38220-221/2010 (GM-RES), BETWEEN: WRIT PETITION No.

More information

THE MYSORE BETTING TAX ACT, 1932 [MYSORE ACT NO. IX OF 1932] Arrangements of Sections

THE MYSORE BETTING TAX ACT, 1932 [MYSORE ACT NO. IX OF 1932] Arrangements of Sections 1 THE MYSORE BETTING TAX ACT, 1932 [MYSORE ACT NO. IX OF 1932] Sections: Arrangements of Sections 1. Short Title, Extent and Commencement 2. Definitions 3. Tax on totalisators and payment thereof 3A. Payment

More information

TENDER FOR INTERIOR WORKS AT BANK OF INDIA, JAUNPUR (ALTERNATE PREMISES), Distt.JAUNPUR

TENDER FOR INTERIOR WORKS AT BANK OF INDIA, JAUNPUR (ALTERNATE PREMISES), Distt.JAUNPUR Ref. No.: ZO:CSD:PP:2013-14: Date: 13/08/2013 TENDER FOR INTERIOR WORKS AT BANK OF INDIA, JAUNPUR (ALTERNATE PREMISES), Distt.JAUNPUR Sealed item rate tenders are invited for Interior works on behalf of

More information

THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR WOMEN (PROCEDURE) REGULATIONS, 2016 FOR DEALING WITH COMPLAINTS IN NRI CELL

THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR WOMEN (PROCEDURE) REGULATIONS, 2016 FOR DEALING WITH COMPLAINTS IN NRI CELL THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR WOMEN (PROCEDURE) REGULATIONS, 2016 FOR DEALING WITH COMPLAINTS IN NRI CELL National Commission for Women under section 9(2) of the National Commission for Women Act, 1990 (20

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : COMPANIES ACT 1956 Judgment delivered on: 03.01.2013 WP(C) 668/2012 AND CM No.27/2013 (for directions) & CM No.9851/2012 (for directions) M/S. KLEN & MARSHALLS

More information

Cr.M.P. No of Putul Rani Dey 2. Ravi Chandra Dey 3. Ashish Dey 4. Sangam Dey... Petitioners CORAM :- HON BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K.

Cr.M.P. No of Putul Rani Dey 2. Ravi Chandra Dey 3. Ashish Dey 4. Sangam Dey... Petitioners CORAM :- HON BLE MR. JUSTICE D.K. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr.M.P. No. 1151 of 2007 1. Putul Rani Dey 2. Ravi Chandra Dey 3. Ashish Dey 4. Sangam Dey... Petitioners Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2 Chhaya Rani Bose.. Opposite

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PROPERTY WILL MATTER Reserved on: Pronounced on: RFA (OS) 14/2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PROPERTY WILL MATTER Reserved on: Pronounced on: RFA (OS) 14/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PROPERTY WILL MATTER Reserved on: 10.12.2013 Pronounced on: 15.01.2014 RFA (OS) 14/2013 CAP. VIJAY KUMAR TREHAN.Appellant Through: Sh. Anil Amrit with

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS) ACT, Date of decision: 8th February, 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS) ACT, Date of decision: 8th February, 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : PUBLIC PREMISES (EVICTION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPANTS) ACT, 1971 Date of decision: 8th February, 2012 WP(C) NO.11374/2006 OCEAN PLASTICS & FIBRES (P) LIMITED

More information

THE DANGEROUS MACHINES (REGULATION) ACT, 1983 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS

THE DANGEROUS MACHINES (REGULATION) ACT, 1983 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS SECTIONS THE DANGEROUS MACHINES (REGULATION) ACT, 1983 1. Short title, extent and commencement. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 2. Declaration as to expediency of control by Union. 3. Definitions.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: SUIT FOR POSSESSION Reserved on: 17th July, 2012 Pronounced on 3rd August, 2012 W.P. (C) No.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: SUIT FOR POSSESSION Reserved on: 17th July, 2012 Pronounced on 3rd August, 2012 W.P. (C) No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT: SUIT FOR POSSESSION Reserved on: 17th July, 2012 Pronounced on 3rd August, 2012 W.P. (C) No.865/2000 DIVINE UNITED ORGANISATION Petitioner Through: Mr.

More information

NIGERIAN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING ACT

NIGERIAN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING ACT The Complete Laws of Nigeria Home NIGERIAN URBAN AND REGIONAL PLANNING ACT ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS PART I Plan preparation and administration A: Types and levels of Physical Development Plans SECTION 1.

More information

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 3964/2017 INDO ARYA CENTRAL TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS),

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 3964/2017 INDO ARYA CENTRAL TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS), $~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) No. 3964/2017 Date of Decision: 12 th March, 2018 INDO ARYA CENTRAL TRANSPORT LIMITED & ORS.... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sachin Datta,

More information

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 108/2015 Date of decision: versus

$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 108/2015 Date of decision: versus $~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(CRL) 108/2015 Date of decision: 04.08.2015 GULSHAN SETHI & ORS... Petitioners Through: Ms.Kajal Chandra and Ms.Swati Sinha, Advocates. versus GOVERNMENT

More information

REGISTRAR GENERAL, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Standing Counsel for CBI with Mr. Tarun Verma, Advocate.

REGISTRAR GENERAL, SUPREME COURT OF INDIA... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Pahwa, Standing Counsel for CBI with Mr. Tarun Verma, Advocate. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Crl. Rev. P. No. 120 of 2010 % Date of Reserve: July 29, 2010 Date of Order: 12 th August, 2010 12.08.2010 MOHAN LAL JATIA... Petitioner Through: Mr. K.K. Sud,

More information

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. W.P. No.750/2017. Bar Association Lahar, Dist. Bhind -Versus- State Bar Council of M.

HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR. W.P. No.750/2017. Bar Association Lahar, Dist. Bhind -Versus- State Bar Council of M. HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH : JABALPUR W.P. No.750/2017 Bar Association Lahar, Dist. Bhind -Versus- State Bar Council of M.P and another Shri Sameer Seth, Advocate for the petitioner. Shri R.K. Sahu,

More information

THE CENSUS ACT, 1948 ACT NO. 37 OF [3rd September, 1948.] An Act to provide for certain matters in connection with the taking of census.

THE CENSUS ACT, 1948 ACT NO. 37 OF [3rd September, 1948.] An Act to provide for certain matters in connection with the taking of census. THE CENSUS ACT, 1948 ACT NO. 37 OF 1948 1 [3rd September, 1948.] An Act to provide for certain matters in connection with the taking of census. WHEREAS it is expedient to provide for the taking of census

More information

Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010

Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (No. 42 of 2010*) An Act to consolidate the law to regulate the acceptance and utilisation of foreign contribution or foreign hospitality by certain individuals

More information

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com)

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) DISTRICT : KOLKATA IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE W.P. No. (W) of 2017 In the matter of :- An application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ;

More information

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WRIT PETITION No. 4807/2012 Sri Bipul Chandra Barman S/O Late Ananta Barman Vill Mohkhali & P.O. Gopalthan PS-Belsor,

More information

Himachal Pradesh Town and country Planning Rules, 2014

Himachal Pradesh Town and country Planning Rules, 2014 1 GOVERNMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING DEPARTMENT Himachal Pradesh Town and country Planning Rules, 2014 (Amended upto 2016) Town and country Planning Department Block No.32-A, SDA

More information

CHAPTER VI Prevention and Detection of Offences

CHAPTER VI Prevention and Detection of Offences CHAPTER VI Prevention and Detection of Offences 50. Power of entry, search, arrest and detention. - (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, the Director or

More information

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com)

Bar & Bench (www.barandbench.com) REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 3945 OF 2018 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (C) NO.35786 OF 2016) SISTERS OF ST. JOSEPH OF CLUNY APPELLANT VERSUS THE STATE OF

More information

THE ORISSA GROUND WATER (REGULATION, DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT) BILL, 2011 A BILL

THE ORISSA GROUND WATER (REGULATION, DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT) BILL, 2011 A BILL THE ORISSA GROUND WATER (REGULATION, DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT) BILL, 2011 A BILL TO REGULATE THE DEVELOPMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF GROUND WATER AND MATTERS CONNECTED THEREWITH OR INCIDENTAL THERETO. BE it

More information

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981

THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981 81 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981 82 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981 Rules Contents Page No. 1. Title 83 2. Definition 83

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6105/2011. % SADHNA BHARDWAJ.. Petitioner Through: Mr. Dipak Bhattarcharya, Adv.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6105/2011. % SADHNA BHARDWAJ.. Petitioner Through: Mr. Dipak Bhattarcharya, Adv. * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 6105/2011 Date of decision: 1 st September, 2011 % SADHNA BHARDWAJ.. Petitioner Through: Mr. Dipak Bhattarcharya, Adv. Versus THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH

More information

CRP No. 216/2014 VERSUS. Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. CRP No. 220/2014 VERSUS. Bajrang Tea manufacturing Co. [P] Ltd.

CRP No. 216/2014 VERSUS. Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. CRP No. 220/2014 VERSUS. Bajrang Tea manufacturing Co. [P] Ltd. IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) The Federal Bank Ltd. Petitioner VERSUS Mahendra Kumar Choukhany & Ors. Respondents CRP No. 220/2014 The Federal

More information

BLDG. CONSTR. & FIRE PREV. LOCAL LAW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE PREVENTION

BLDG. CONSTR. & FIRE PREV. LOCAL LAW BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE PREVENTION BLDG. CONSTR. & FIRE PREV. LOCAL LAW 3-1992 BUILDING CONSTRUCTION AND FIRE PREVENTION ARTICLE I ADMINISTRATION AND E NFO RCEMENT OF UNIFORM CODE Sec. 100.0 Designation of Building Inspector Sec 100.1 Acting

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(C)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(C) 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ---- W.P.(C) No. 3768 of 2015 ------ M/s Tata Steel Limited, an existing Company under previous Company Law, through Mrs. MeenaLall wife of Shri BehariLall,

More information

BIHAR ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION

BIHAR ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION BIHAR ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION Vidyut Bhawan-II, J.L. Nehru Marg, Patna 800 021. Case No. 39/2016 IN THE MATTER OF:- PETITION UNDER SECTION 142 OF THE ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 FOR NON COMPLIANCE

More information

THE INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT (STANDING ORDERS) ACT, 1946, ACT NO. 20 OF * [23rd April, 1946.]

THE INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT (STANDING ORDERS) ACT, 1946, ACT NO. 20 OF * [23rd April, 1946.] THE INDUSTRIAL EMPLOYMENT (STANDING ORDERS) ACT, 1946, ACT NO. 20 OF 1946 1* [23rd April, 1946.] An Act to require employers in industrial establishments formally to define conditions of employment under

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No of 2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 5222 of 2012 1 Nirbhay Kr. Shahabadi & another...petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & others Respondents -------- Coram: THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE

More information

The Cinematograph Act, 1952

The Cinematograph Act, 1952 The Cinematograph Act, 1952 1. Short title, extent and commencement. (1) This Act may be called the Cinematograph Act, 1952. (2) Pars I, II and IV extend to the whole of India (Note:- Omitted by Act No.25

More information

- versus - MAHAMEDHA URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. & ORS

- versus - MAHAMEDHA URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. & ORS IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SUIT FOR DECLARATION Judgment Reserved on: 24th February, 2011 Judgment Pronounced on: 28th February, 2011 CS(OS) No. 2305/2010 SUSHMA SURI & ANR... Plaintiffs

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EXCISE ACT, 1944 CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE NOS. 48/2012 & 49/2012 Date of decision: 2nd August, 2013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EXCISE ACT, 1944 CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE NOS. 48/2012 & 49/2012 Date of decision: 2nd August, 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : EXCISE ACT, 1944 CENTRAL EXCISE ACT CASE NOS. 48/2012 & 49/2012 Date of decision: 2nd August, 2013 HINDUSTAN INSECTICIEDES LTD.... Appellant Through Mr.

More information

THE STREET VENDORS (PROTECTION OF LIVELIHOOD AND REGULATION OF STREET VENDING) BILL, 2012

THE STREET VENDORS (PROTECTION OF LIVELIHOOD AND REGULATION OF STREET VENDING) BILL, 2012 AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA THE STREET VENDORS (PROTECTION OF LIVELIHOOD AND REGULATION OF STREET VENDING) BILL, 2012 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES Bill No. 104 of 2012. CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1534 OF 2017 (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No.1439 of 2017) N. Harihara Krishnan Appellant Versus J. Thomas Respondent

More information

METHYLATED SPIRITS ACT

METHYLATED SPIRITS ACT LAWS OF KENYA METHYLATED SPIRITS ACT CHAPTER 120 Revised Edition 2012 [1982] Published by the National Council for Law Reporting with the Authority of the Attorney-General www.kenyalaw.org [Rev. 2012]

More information

THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION BILL, 2011

THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION BILL, 2011 AS PASSED BY LOK SABHA ON 27TH DECEMBER, 11 CLAUSES Bill No. 97-C of THE WHISTLE BLOWERS PROTECTION BILL, 11 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Provisions

More information

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 6 CASE NO.: Appeal (civil)

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 6 CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) http://judis.nic.in SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Page 1 of 6 CASE NO.: Appeal (civil) 5656-5914 1990 PETITIONER: THE GOVT. OF TAMIL NADU Vs. RESPONDENT: PV. ENTER. REP. BY SCM JAMULUDEEN & ORS. DATE OF JUDGMENT:

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE OF SUMMONS. Crl. M.C. No. 18/2012 & Crl.M.A. No.59/2012 (stay)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE OF SUMMONS. Crl. M.C. No. 18/2012 & Crl.M.A. No.59/2012 (stay) IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE OF SUMMONS Crl. M.C. No. 18/2012 & Crl.M.A. No.59/2012 (stay) Reserved on: 7th February, 2012 Decided on: 5th March, 2012 SWISS TIMING LTD. Petitioner

More information

id:

id: No.E.11020/2/2015-Sec-VI Government of India Department of Space *** Antariksh Bhavan New BEL Road Bengaluru - 560 231 November2.\, 2017 Subject: Seeking comments on Draft "Space Activities Bill, 2017"

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 Date of Reserve : Date of Decision :

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 Date of Reserve : Date of Decision : IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI LAND REFORMS ACT, 1954 Date of Reserve : 14.02.2013 Date of Decision : 28.05.2013 LPA 858/2004 BANWARI LAL SHARMA Through: Mr. P.S. Bindra, Advocate....

More information

IN THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL

IN THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL Page 1 of 18 IN THE ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL REGIONAL BENCH, GUWAHATI. OA. NO. 23/2012 P R E S E N T HON BLE MR. JUSTICE H. N. Sarma, Member (J) HON BLE CMDE MOHAN PHADKE (Retd), Member (A) Smti Anupama Sinha

More information

GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE THE CLINICAL ESTABLISHMENTS REGISTRATION & REGISTRATION BILLL OF 2006.

GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE THE CLINICAL ESTABLISHMENTS REGISTRATION & REGISTRATION BILLL OF 2006. GOVERNMENT OF RAJASTHAN MINISTRY OF HEALTH & FAMILY WELFARE THE CLINICAL ESTABLISHMENTS REGISTRATION & REGISTRATION BILLL OF 2006. An act to provide for the registration and regulation of clinical establishment

More information

INVITATION FOR COMMENTS

INVITATION FOR COMMENTS F.No.6/8/2015-BO.II Ministry of Finance Department of Financial Services *** Jeevan Deep Building, 3 rd Floor, 10, Sansad Marg, New Delhi-110 001 Date: 17 th November, 2016 INVITATION FOR COMMENTS Subject:

More information

The Orissa Electricity (Duty) Act, 1961.

The Orissa Electricity (Duty) Act, 1961. The Orissa Electricity (Duty) Act, 1961. An Act to levy a duty on the consumption of electrical energy on the State of Orissa. Be it enacted by the legislature of the State of Orissa in the Twelfth year

More information

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORKPLACE (PREVENTION, PROHIBITION AND REDRESSAL) ACT & RULES, 2013

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORKPLACE (PREVENTION, PROHIBITION AND REDRESSAL) ACT & RULES, 2013 FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON SEXUAL HARASSMENT OF WOMEN AT WORKPLACE (PREVENTION, PROHIBITION AND REDRESSAL) ACT & RULES, 2013 State Resource Center for Women Women & Child Development Department Government

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. I.A. No. 4 OF 2012 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2011

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. I.A. No. 4 OF 2012 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2011 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION I.A. No. 4 OF 2012 IN CIVIL APPEAL NO. 10535 OF 2011 NON-REPORTABLE Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, NOIDA & Anr. Appellants Versus Mange Ram

More information

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P.(C) 4784/2014 and CM No.9529/2014 (Stay)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P.(C) 4784/2014 and CM No.9529/2014 (Stay) * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 4784/2014 and CM No.9529/2014 (Stay) Pronounced on: December 11, 2015 M/S IMS MERCANTILES PVT. LTD.... Petitioner Through: Mr.Bharat Gupta with Mr.Saurabh

More information

THE BLACK MONEY (UNDISCLOSED FOREIGN INCOME AND ASSETS) AND IMPOSITION OF TAX BILL, 2015

THE BLACK MONEY (UNDISCLOSED FOREIGN INCOME AND ASSETS) AND IMPOSITION OF TAX BILL, 2015 AS PASSED BY LOK SABHA ON 11 MAY, Bill No. 84-C of THE BLACK MONEY (UNDISCLOSED FOREIGN INCOME AND ASSETS) AND IMPOSITION OF TAX BILL, ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES CHAPTER I CLAUSES PRELIMINARY 1. Short title,

More information

CITIZENS RIGHT TO GRIEVANCE REDRESS BILL, A Bill. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-second Year of the Republic of India as follows:-

CITIZENS RIGHT TO GRIEVANCE REDRESS BILL, A Bill. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-second Year of the Republic of India as follows:- 1 CITIZENS RIGHT TO GRIEVANCE REDRESS BILL, 2011 A Bill to lay down an obligation upon every public authority to publish citizens charter stating therein the time within which specified goods shall be

More information