Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 1 of 25

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 1 of 25"

Transcription

1 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 1 of 25 ROBERT B. SYKES (#3180 bob@sykesinjurylaw.com ALYSON E. CARTER (#9886 alyson@sykesinjurylaw.com ROBERT B. SYKES & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 311 South State Street, Suite 240 Salt Lake City, Utah Telephone ( Facsimile ( Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION NATASHA CHILD, vs. Plaintiff, KENNETH HAMMOND, an Ogden City Police Officer, JON GREINER, Ogden City Chief of Police, OGDEN CITY, and JOHN and JANE DOES 1-15, Defendants. COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Case No. 1:08-cv-147 Judge Tena Campbell Plaintiff Natasha Child complains and alleges for a cause of action against Defendants as follows:

2 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 2 of 25 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT This is a civil rights action in which the Plaintiff seeks relief for the Defendants violations of her rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution, specifically the Fourth Amendment, which right is further secured by the Civil Rights Act of 1871, 42 U.S.C and 1988, and by the laws and the Constitution of the State of Utah. Plaintiff seeks damages, both compensatory and punitive damages; affirmative and equitable relief; an award of attorney s fees, costs, and interest; and other and further relief as this Court deems just and equitable. This is further an action at law to redress a deprivation under color of statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage of a right, privilege, and immunity secured to the Plaintiff by the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, and under the law and statutes of the State of Utah. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This action arises under the United States Constitution and federal law, particularly under the provisions of the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States, and 42 U.S.C and The Fourth Amendment provides, in pertinent part, The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, -2-

3 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 3 of 25 supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. (Original spelling; emphasis added. 2. This action also arises under the Constitution of the State of Utah Article I, Section 14 which provides, under the Declaration of Rights, the following: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures shall not be violated; and no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause supported by oath or affirmation, particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or thing to be seized. (Emphasis added. 3. This action seeks redress for violations of the civil rights laws of both the United States in the State of Utah. Jurisdiction is therefore invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C and 42 U.S.C Section 1983 provides a civil action for a deprivation of rights, in pertinent part, as follows: Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress,... (Emphasis added. -3-

4 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 4 of The claims made in this Complaint occurred and arose in the State of Utah, in this District, and in the Central Division. Venue is therefore proper under 28 U.S.C Plaintiff is seeking damages pursuant to the claims for relief specified below in amounts to be proved at trial. PARTIES 6. Plaintiff Natasha Child ( Natasha is a citizen of the United States of America and is a resident of Clinton, County of Davis, State of Utah. 7. Defendant Kenneth Hammond ( Hammond, at all times relevant herein, was a law enforcement officer employed by the Ogden City Police Department ( OCPD, City of Ogden, State of Utah. 8. Defendant Jon Greiner ( Greiner, at all times relevant herein, was the Chief of Police of the OCPD, and Hammond s supervisor, and had knowledge of his activities and history for several years prior to the events described herein, including his tendencies to abuse female suspects. 9. John or Jane Doe No. 1, at all times relevant herein, was an indirect or a direct supervisor of Hammond and had knowledge of his activities and history for several years prior to the events described herein, including his tendencies to abuse female suspects. -4-

5 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 5 of John or Jane Doe No. 2, at all times relevant herein, was an indirect or a direct supervisor of Hammond and had knowledge of his activities and history for several years prior to the events described herein, including his tendencies to abuse female suspects. 11. John or Jane Doe No. 3, and several other John or Jane Does, at all times relevant herein, was or were an indirect or a direct supervisor[s] of Hammond and had knowledge of his activities and history for several years prior to the events described herein, including his tendencies to abuse female suspects. 12. Defendant Ogden City ( Ogden is a municipal corporation and is a political subdivision of Weber County and the State of Utah. As part of its corporate powers, and at all times relevant herein, Ogden maintained a Police Department as a Division of Ogden. Hammond was an officer and employee of Ogden and the OCPD. 13. This action is brought against Hammond and the other Defendants in his/their individual and official capacities. Their authority to act was derived from Utah State law and/or the commands and directives of his/their superiors. All of the acts of the individuals and entities listed in the preceding paragraphs were performed under color of the laws, statutes, ordinances, -5-

6 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 6 of 25 regulations, policies, customs, and usages of the State of Utah and the City of Ogden. 14. This action is also brought against the Ogden City as a person liable under 42 U.S.C Plaintiff will serve notice of her pendent state claims, if any, against the Defendants pursuant to Utah law. These claims will be amended into this Complaint at a later time. However, Plaintiff denies that notice is required of any of the current claims in this Complaint since all current claims deal with constitutional violations under 42 U.S.C and other statutes and constitutional provisions, and state law notice of civil rights claims is not required. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 16. On or about May 18, 2008, at approximately 1:30 a.m., Hammond was assisting Utah Highway Patrol (UHP officers in Ogden, Utah, in a search for Corey Child, who had shortly before escaped custody even though he had been handcuffed. 17. Corey had been pulled over by the Highway Patrol for an alleged DUI. Before he was taken into custody, he called his wife Natasha on his cell phone and told her he was being pulled over. Natasha then began to drive to -6-

7 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 7 of 25 the location where Corey said he would be. She arrived moments after he was recaptured and was in custody. 18. Hammond and the UHP officers found Corey in the back yard of a residence still in handcuffs. They regained custody of him without incident, as Corey did not resist being recaptured. Natasha had arrived about the time of Corey s recapture, and witnessed Hammond escorting Corey from the backyard. After the recapture, Hammond walked Corey between two houses toward the street, followed a few feet behind by two other officers and Natasha. It was quite dark or dimly lit at the time. 19. Unbeknownst to Hammond, Natasha was observing her husband s recapture from the yard of the residence, just a few feet away. 20. As Hammond was walking Corey, still in handcuffs, toward the street, Natasha joined the other officers as they followed Hammond and Corey up the driveway. Corey was not resisting or causing trouble for Hammond or the other officers at that moment. 21. Before reaching the street, without provocation, Hammond kicked the legs out from underneath the unresisting and handcuffed Corey, and knocked him to the ground. Hammond then elbowed Corey in the head, and kneed him in the back. -7-

8 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 8 of Natasha cried out, I m a witness to that! Hammond appeared surprised by her presence, saying, Where the hell did you come from? Who are you? 23. Natasha told Hammond that she was Corey s wife. For no apparent reason, Hammond told the other officers to arrest her. The officers did so, and she was placed into handcuffs. 24. Hammond and Corey continued up the driveway and approached the sidewalk in front of the house. Hammond then kicked the legs out from the handcuffed and unresisting Corey again, knocking him to the ground. Hammond then forcefully stomped on Corey s exposed ankle, while on the ground, handcuffed and incapacitated, saying, Try to run now! 25. The pain was almost unbearable, and Corey thought Hammond had broken his ankle and asked for an ambulance. 26. The other officers took custody of Corey, and Hammond took custody of Natasha, putting his own handcuffs on her and taking her out of another patrol car where she had initially been placed. 27. Natasha was scared to be alone with Hammond because she had seen the unprovoked violence Hammond had visited on Corey just a few minutes -8-

9 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 9 of 25 before. She begged the other officers to take her instead of letting her go alone with Hammond down a dark street. The other officers refused to help. 28. Hammond s vehicle was about a block and a half away, so he compelled Natasha to walk down the dark street with him to his vehicle. 29. From the moment he took custody of Natasha, Hammond was extremely aggressive and threatening. Among other things, even though she was initially compliant and non-resisting, he threatened to punch her, and thereafter he pushed her, jabbed her in the back, and lifted the handcuffs up as she was walking, in order to make it extremely painful and difficult. Natasha was fearful that Hammond s actions would break her wrists or arms. 30. These threats and physical abuse constituted an independent Fourth Amendment violation and constituted an unconstitutional provocation of an otherwise compliant prisoner. 31. Natasha was very frightened. Having seen what Hammond did to Corey, and experiencing what he was doing to her, Natasha was justifiably afraid for her physical safety, especially as Hammond directed her away from the other officers and into the darkness of a dimly lit street, where there were no witnesses. As Hammond continued down the dark street, threatening and abusing -9-

10 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 10 of 25 her as he went, Natasha became more resistant, and tried to fight off Hammond s violence, as she yelled and cried out for help. 32. As the handcuffed Natasha struggled, her pants began to fall down. She pleaded for Hammond to let her pull them up, but he refused and raised her handcuffed hands nearly up to the back of her neck, preventing her from attending to her needs for modesty. She pleaded with him to please stop, but Hammond continued to apply force to the handcuffs behind Natasha s back, causing even more pain. 33. Natasha was finally able to get her pants pulled up a little bit. However, as she did this, Hammond seemed to get more aggressive and angry. 34. At one point, on the dark street, Hammond slammed Natasha down on the ground and fell on top of her with all his weight. She was badly hurt. Natasha became extremely frightened. After Hammond raised her up, he forced her to continue walking toward his patrol car, and Natasha s pants started to fall down again. Natasha struggled to keep them pulled up. 35. At that point, the two of them were almost to Hammond s patrol car when Natasha felt a tug on her left side as Hammond pulled Natasha s pants down to her ankles. Hammond then stated now you don t have to worry about them. -10-

11 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 11 of Natasha feared for her life and began to cry as she was being assaulted by Hammond. 37. Natasha was embarrassed, humiliated and scared when they arrived at the patrol car, as her pants were still down. Natasha was wearing only G String underwear. 38. When they arrived at Hammond s patrol car, Hammond pushed the handcuffed Natasha, whose pants were still pulled down, up against his car. Hammond then pushed his body against Natasha s, and Natasha could feel his pants and belt against her almost naked body. 39. After that, another officer finally pulled up and could see that Natasha was extremely upset and crying and could see that her pants were down. She yelled to that officer for help. That officer got out of his car, came over and pulled up Natasha s pants, and took her from Officer Hammond. He told her to sit in the car for a minute to calm down. 40. Natasha was injured in that the handcuff abuse caused severe pain and strain. Additionally, she was bruised over much of her body, including calf, thigh, arm and head. She still, to this day, has left arm and should pain and reduced mobility. -11-

12 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 12 of Natasha was charged with public intoxication, interfering with an arrest, resisting an officer and a disorderly conduct. All the charges were later dismissed by the court. 42. Natasha was further damaged because when Hammond knocked Natasha down on the first occasion, and placed his body on top of hers, the keys to her truck slipped out of her pants pocket. Apparently, somebody in the neighborhood found the keys, stripped the new tires off of the truck, and stole all the property out of it, and did approximately $10,000 worth of damage to it. Natasha is thus entitled a judgment against Defendants for this sum. 43. Based on information and belief, Greiner and John and Jane Does 1-3 knew, or should have known, for years that Hammond abused female suspects, and did inappropriate things to them during the course of arrests. Despite this knowledge, these Defendants took no action to discipline him or prevent these matters from happening. As a result, Plaintiff suffered the abuse set forth herein. -12-

13 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 13 of 25 FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION Excessive Force On Natasha Child Against Officer Hammond... In Violation Of The Fourth Amendment Cognizable Under 42 U.S.C Plaintiff incorporates by reference the above allegations. 45. The security of one s privacy against arbitrary intrusion by the police which is at the core of the Fourth Amendment is basic to a free society. 46. The proper focus in determining the reasonableness of force used is on the events immediately confronting officers when they decide to use force. Force is not reasonable when a suspect is non-violent and poses no threat. Furthermore, force is not permitted at all when there is no need to use force. Force is excessive when greater than reasonable under the circumstances. Reasonableness depends on not only when a seizure is made, but also on how it is carried out. 47. An arrest accompanied by excessive force violates the Fourth Amendment. Even when some force is justified, the amount of force actually used may be excessive. Thus, when a police officer uses excessive force, a plaintiff may recover damages against that police officer under the Civil Rights Act. -13-

14 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 14 of The test to determine if the force used in this case was excessive includes: a. the severity, or lack of severity, of the alleged crime in issue; b. whether the person against whom the force was used posed an immediate threat to the safety of the police or others; and c. whether the person against whom the force was used was actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight (trying to get away. When these factors are considered in context, it is clear that the force used here was excessive because Plaintiff had not committed nor was accused of a severe crime, and did not constitute an immediate threat to the safety of the officers or to others, and was not actively resisting arrest or attempting to evade arrest by flight at the time of the excessive force. 49. A police officer may not reasonably use greater levels of force when alternative courses of action involving uses of lesser levels of force are open to him. The standards of decency in modern society do not permit the imposition of needless harm. Thus, Officer Hammond violated Natasha s Fourth Amendment rights when he repeatedly threatened her with violent harm, placed his body -14-

15 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 15 of 25 violently on top of hers, repeatedly pushed her and shoved her, violently lifted up the handcuffs so as to cause unnecessary pain, and pulled her pants down. 50. The use of any force by officers simply because a suspect is argumentative, contentious, or vituperative is illegal. Force can only be used to overcome physical resistance or threatened force, and a lack of provocation or need to use force would make any use of force excessive. The use of more force than is necessary, or of force for an improper purpose, is illegal. In this case, Hammond s actions violated all of these principles in that, inter alia, he forcefully and unnecessarily used the aforementioned force against Plaintiff. 51. Handcuffing someone inappropriately, or with unnecessary pressure or violence so as to cause pain or discomfort, is excessive force and violates the Fourth Amendment. Hammond thus violated Natasha s rights as he walked her to his patrol car. 52. A police officer is liable for a use of excessive force when he causes an escalation of events that lead to the plaintiff s injury. In this case, Officer Hammond is liable for excessive force because he caused, by means of unconstitutional threats, intimidation and physical violence, an escalation of events that led to Natasha s injury as well as a deprivation of her rights. -15-

16 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 16 of When a police officer intentionally or recklessly provokes a violent confrontation, where the provocation is an independent Fourth Amendment violation as it was here, the officer then may be held liable for an otherwise defensive use of force. Thus, even if Officer Hammond might reasonably have used force in the arrest of Natasha if she had been resisting without provocation, Hammond is still liable for using excessive force because his reckless and unconstitutional provocation created the need to use force. The basis of liability for Officer Hammond s subsequent use of force is the initial constitutional violation. 54. Unjustified striking, beating, or infliction of bodily harm gives rise to liability under 42 U.S.C. Section Thus, when Hammond inappropriately struck, dragged, pulled and roughly handled Natasha, he violated her Fourth Amendment constitutional rights. 55. Beating and kicking restrained suspects who are in the control of the police is plainly excessive force. The need for force is nonexistent when a suspect is handcuffed and not trying to resist or escape. There is no occasion for the use of any force against a prisoner who quietly submits, and no matter how difficult it is to apprehend a prisoner, the law does not permit officers to beat him/her once he/she is securely in custody. Officer Hammond thus violated -16-

17 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 17 of 25 Natasha s Fourth Amendment rights when he treated her roughly, as described above, when she was handcuffed and not trying to escape. 56. Non-consensual, inappropriate touching may violate the Fourth Amendment. Thus, Hammond violated Natasha s Fourth Amendment constitutional rights when he inappropriately fell or placed his body on top of Natasha s, when he pulled her pants down to her ankles, and when he placed his body forcefully against the semi-naked Natasha and pushed her against his car. 57. A classic Fourth Amendment violation occurs when an officer uses excessive force in creating a situation which causes a plaintiff to use force which results in police using additional, responsive force. A claim of excessive force may be based on a showing that an officer used excessive force in creating the situation which caused a plaintiff to take the actions she did. In this case, Officer Hammond violated Natasha s civil rights when, among other things set forth in the facts above, he was unnecessarily rough with her, as herein described, which caused her to be frightened and to justifiably resist his advances and violence. 58. The violation of Natasha Child s rights are actionable under 42 U.S.C. 1983, and Natasha is entitled to judgment against Hammond, as well -17-

18 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 18 of 25 as Ogden City, in an amount to be proved at trial, plus costs and attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C Natasha is entitled to punitive damages against Hammond, as allowed by law, since Hammond s actions were intentional, reckless, wanton, malicious, and/or oppressive. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION Unconstitutional Custom, Policy or Practice and Failure to Supervise and Train Against Ogden, Jon Greiner, Chief of Police, and Does 1-15 as to Natasha Child... In Violation Of The Fourth Amendment Cognizable Under 42 U.S.C Plaintiff incorporates by reference the above allegations. 61. The Defendant Ogden City ( Ogden is a person for purposes of a 1983 action. Ogden may therefore be sued directly for monetary, declaratory, or injunctive relief for its policies, customs, or practices that violate Natasha s constitutionally protected rights. 62. At all times relevant to this Complaint, Hammond, as a police officer in the OCPD, was acting under the direction and control of Ogden City, which acted through its agents and employees who were responsible to supervise -18-

19 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 19 of 25 its officers and operations, and for making the policies of the Police Department. One of Ogden s agents, under which Hammond operated, was Jon Greiner, chief of police of Ogden City. 63. John or Jane DOES 1-3 were direct or indirect supervisors of Hammond, who acted under their direction, knowledge and control. These Does were also agents of OCPD and Ogden City, and were under Greiner s supervision. 64. A 42 U.S.C claim may be asserted against a city and/or its supervisors based on allegations of negligence in hiring, training, and supervising employees. Additionally, failure to have a written or other policy in place, or having a policy in place that is customarily not followed, may make the city or a supervisor liable for the deprivation of a person s civil rights that results because of the failure of policy. 65. Greiner and Does 1-3 essentially adopted a policy of allowing their subordinate, Hammond, to abuse and assault female suspects. This constituted a knowing failure to act or supervise wrongful actions of a subordinate, which became so consistent that they have become a custom. The failure of the government to respond to a supervisory need in such a manner shows deliberate indifference by the Defendants to the risks of constitutional violations against women, and is a basis for liability. In this case, the custom or policy to allow -19-

20 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 20 of 25 Hammond to continue to operate and be employed by Ogden City, after it knew or should have known that he was abusing female suspects, directly caused the abuse sustained by Natasha Child in the early morning hours of May 18, In essence, the failure of Ogden City and its police chief and supervisors to supervise Hammond, and to allow him to be employed and to be on patrol by himself at night, enabled Hammond to abuse Child as he did in the early morning hours of May 18, Deliberate indifference is determined by analyzing whether the government knew or should have known of the risk of constitutional violations. Either actual notice or constructive notice is sufficient to show deliberate indifference. Here, Hammond s long history of abusing female suspects, which was known or should have been known to Greiner and Does 1-3, provides actual or constructive notice of the risk of constitutional violations on women suspects and demonstrates deliberate indifference. 67. A public entity and supervisory officials may be liable under Section 1983 when it is shown that a governmental policy or custom was the moving force that led to the deprivation of a constitutional right. Defendants could have prevented the abuse against Natasha had they exercised proper supervision and control over Hammond. Thus, the deliberate indifference of these -20-

21 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 21 of 25 Defendants to Natasha s constitutional rights was the moving force behind the constitutional violation. 68. A government body may be liable if it has a policy of inaction and such inaction amounts to a failure to protect constitutional rights. In this case, deliberate inaction or acquiescence in a long-standing practice by these Defendants constituted a failure to protect Natasha Child s constitutional rights. 69. The deliberate indifference standard may be satisfied when the government has actual or constructive notice that its action or failure to act is substantially certain to result in a constitutional violation, and it consciously or deliberately chooses to disregard the risk of harm. Thus, these Defendants are liable to Natasha Child because their failure to act resulted in a substantial certainty that some female suspects, such as Natasha Child, would suffer abuse from Hammond. The notice to these Defendants is established by the existence of a pattern of wrongful conduct known to these Defendants. This pattern of knowing wrongful conduct meant that it was highly predictable or plainly obvious that, as a consequence, someone like Natasha Child would be abused or injured by Hammond s conduct. The OCPD s failure, through Greiner and supervisors, to adequately address recurring situations presented an obvious potential for -21-

22 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 22 of 25 constitutional violations. Barney v. Pulsipher, 143 F.3d 1299, (10th Cir. 1998(quoted in Carr v. Castle, 337 F.3d 1221, 1228 (10th Cir In this case, Greiner and other policymakers in the OCPD and Ogden City had long-established knowledge, either actual or constructive, of a potential serious problem with Hammond s treatment of women suspects, such that the need for corrective action or supervision was obvious, and the policymakers failure to investigate or rectify the situation thus evidenced a deliberate indifference. 71. Where the chief of police and/or senior government officials knew or should have known of a pattern of unconstitutional acts or omissions by members of its police force, then the chief, the senior officials, the government, or all of them, may be held liable for the consequences of such conduct. Personal participation in the deprivation is not required for imposition of liability, but setting in motion a series of acts by others which the actor knows or reasonably should know would cause Hammond to inflict the constitutional injury imposes liability for that injury. Here, Greiner and Does 1-3, at a minimum, are liable to Natasha Child for their deliberate indifference to her rights and for their failure to act on information which they knew indicating that unconstitutional acts or omissions were occurring. They are also liable for their gross negligence in failing -22-

23 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 23 of 25 to supervise subordinates and Hammond, who were committing wrongful acts against women suspects. Greiner and Does 1-3 thus exhibited gross negligence and deliberate indifference to a high risk that Plaintiff s civil rights would be violated, and this neglect caused and enabled Hammond to violate Natasha Child s civil rights. 72. When a police chief acquiesces in a department s practice, he is liable for constitutional violations that result. It may be inferred that a police chief was aware of a pervasive activity in his department. Refusing to seriously investigate an incident or to discipline an involved officer may constitute a pattern of ratification of bad conduct and of recklessly ignoring evidence that government employees had violated Plaintiff s constitutional rights. In this case, Natasha Child complained about her treatment by Hammond to police officials, who took no action, and conducted no investigation. This indicated ratification of the pattern of conduct and constituted deliberate and reckless indifference to the constitutional rights of Natasha. 73. When the complaint about Hammond s activity was made by Natasha Child to a female police officer at police headquarters, she was told that Hammond had a long history of abusing female suspects. However, the procedure for investigation of these complaints, and for reprimand, and/or for discipline, is -23-

24 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 24 of 25 so inadequate or flawed as to constitute ratification of unconstitutional conduct. As a result, Greiner, as a chief of police, and Does 1-3, are all liable for the unconstitutional conduct of the police. 74. The violation of Natasha s rights are actionable under 42 U.S.C. 1983, and Natasha is entitled to judgment against the City in an amount to be proved at trial, plus costs and attorneys fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C JURY DEMAND Plaintiff requests a jury trial on all issues in this case. REQUEST FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff demands judgment against Defendants as follows: 1. For general compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial; 2. For special damages as are shown at trial, including $10,000 for damage to her vehicle and loss of property; 3. For punitive damages against the named individuals as may be allowed by law; 4. For pre-judgment interest on the damages assessed by the verdict of the jury, as allowed by law; -24-

25 Case 1:08-cv TC Document 2 Filed 12/09/2008 Page 25 of For Plaintiff s costs and reasonable attorney fees incurred herein, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1988; and 6. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. th DATED this 9 day of December, ROBERT B. SYKES & ASSOCIATES, P.C. /s/ Robert B. Sykes ROBERT B. SYKES ALYSON E. CARTER Attorneys for Plaintiff Q:\CLIEN T\2017 Child\2. P\2.1 CASE\Complaint wpd -25-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ROBERT B. SYKES (#3180 bob@sykesinjurylaw.com ALYSON E. CARTER (#9886 alyson@sykesinjurylaw.com ROBERT B. SYKES & ASSOCIATES, P.C. 311 South State Street, Suite 240 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case :0-cv-000-DGC Document Filed 0//0 Page of Steven E. Harrison, Esq. (No. 00) N. Patrick Hall, Esq. (No. 0) WALLIN HARRISON PLC South Higley Road, Suite 0 Gilbert, Arizona Telephone: (0) 0-0 Facsimile:

More information

Case 2:10-cv TS Document 2 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:10-cv TS Document 2 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 9 Case 210-cv-01126-TS Document 2 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 9 MARK A. FLORES (8429) CORPORON & WILLIAMS, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff 405 South Main Street, Suite 700 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone 801-328-1162

More information

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10 Case 2:17-cv-00377 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION DEVON ARMSTRONG vs. CIVIL ACTION NO.

More information

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/16 Page 1 of 11 CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-1020

Case 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 08/30/16 Page 1 of 11 CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-1020 Case 1:16-cv-01020 Document 1 Filed 08/30/16 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION BREAION KING, Plaintiff v. THE CITY OF AUSTIN, TEXAS, AND OFFICER BRYAN

More information

Case 3:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Case 3:14-cv Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA Case 3:14-cv-17321 Document 1 Filed 05/30/14 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA STEVEN MATTHEW WEBB, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No.:

More information

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 5 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:06-cv JJF Document 5 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:06-cv-00366-JJF Document 5 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ALICE WALKER, individually CIVIL ACTION and as guardian, of her husband,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON DREW WILLIAMS, JASON PRICE, COURTNEY SHANNON vs. Plaintiffs, CITY OF CHARLESTON, JAY GOLDMAN, in his individual

More information

Case 2:18-cv PMW Document 2 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 2:18-cv PMW Document 2 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH, CENTRAL DIVISION Case 2:18-cv-00445-PMW Document 2 Filed 06/06/18 Page 1 of 21 MARK L. SHURTLEFF (USB 4666) SHURTLEFF LAW FIRM, PC P.O. Box 900873 Sandy, Utah 84090 (801) 441-9625 mark@shurtlefflawfirm.com Attorney for

More information

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/29/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 10/29/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA Case 3:18-cv-01452 Document 1 Filed 10/29/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 NATHANIEL DEVERS; CORY SHIMENSKY; and, STEPHEN SHIMENSKY, Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA

More information

)(

)( Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC Document 1 Filed 04/26/07 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------)( LUMUMBA BANDELE, DJIBRIL

More information

to redress his civil and legal rights, and alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan, is a resident of Nutley, New Jersey.

to redress his civil and legal rights, and alleges as follows: 1. Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan, is a resident of Nutley, New Jersey. MICHAEL D. SUAREZ ID# 011921976 SUAREZ & SUAREZ 2016 Kennedy Boulevard Jersey City, New Jersey 07305 (201) 433-0778 Attorneys for Plaintiff, Anthony Truchan Plaintiff, ANTHONY TRUCHAN vs. SUPERIOR COURT

More information

Case 3:15-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 PageID.1 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:15-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 PageID.1 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-ajb-ksc Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 0 Daniel M. Gilleon (SBN 00) The Gilleon Law Firm 0 Columbia Street, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 Tel:.0./Fax:.0. dmg@mglawyers.com Steve Hoffman (SBN

More information

COMPLAINT NATURE OF THE ACTION PARTIES

COMPLAINT NATURE OF THE ACTION PARTIES Case 6:17-cv-06004-MWP Document 1 Filed 01/03/17 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DUDLEY T. SCOTT, Plaintiff, -vs- CITY OF ROCHESTER, MICHAEL L. CIMINELLI,

More information

Case: 4:17-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/19/17 Page: 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI

Case: 4:17-cv Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/19/17 Page: 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI Case: 4:17-cv-02017 Doc. #: 1 Filed: 07/19/17 Page: 1 of 14 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI KAREN POWELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Cause No.: 4:17-CV-2017

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0-VC Document Filed// Page of RACHEL LEDERMAN (SBN 0) Rachel Lederman & Alexsis C. Beach Attorneys at Law Capp Street San Francisco, CA Telephone:..00; Fax:..0 Email: rachel@beachledermanlaw.com

More information

Case 1:12-cv S-LDA Document 1 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT

Case 1:12-cv S-LDA Document 1 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND COMPLAINT Case 1:12-cv-00574-S-LDA Document 1 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF RHODE ISLAND GENERAL JONES, Plaintiff vs. CITY OF PROVIDENCE, by and through

More information

2:16-cv HAB # 1 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION

2:16-cv HAB # 1 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION 2:16-cv-02046-HAB # 1 Page 1 of 9 E-FILED Friday, 19 February, 2016 02:32:45 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION

More information

TAMALA BEMIS, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF EUGENE, OFFICER BRAD HANNEMAN, NO. 622, and TEN UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS [ DOES 1-10], inclusive, Defendants.

TAMALA BEMIS, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF EUGENE, OFFICER BRAD HANNEMAN, NO. 622, and TEN UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS [ DOES 1-10], inclusive, Defendants. Case :-cv-0-jr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Jeff Dominic Price SBN 00 Broadway, Suite Santa Monica, California 00 jeff.price@icloud.com Tel. 0.. Attorney for the plaintiff TAMALA BEMIS, Plaintiff, vs.

More information

2:13-cv BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1

2:13-cv BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1 2:13-cv-12772-BAF-MKM Doc # 1 Filed 06/24/13 Pg 1 of 14 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MICHAEL DWAYNE THOMAS Vs Plaintiff, Judge Magistrate Case No:

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 1 1 1 0 1 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. 1) Americans for Safe Access Webster St., Suite 0 Oakland, CA Telephone: () - Fax: () 1-0 Counsel for Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO Dale K. Galipo, Esq. (SBN 0) dalekgalipo@yahoo.com 00 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 0 Woodland Hills, California Telephone:

More information

Case: 3:17-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/24/17 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 1

Case: 3:17-cv TMR Doc #: 1 Filed: 05/24/17 Page: 1 of 7 PAGEID #: 1 Case 317-cv-00183-TMR Doc # 1 Filed 05/24/17 Page 1 of 7 PAGEID # 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON DARYL WALLACE C/O Gerhardstein & Branch Co.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK : PATRICIA WALLACE and COURTNEY : DOPP, : : COMPLAINT Plaintiffs, : : v. : Civil Action Number : THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY, : MICHAEL AMATO,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN LEO HARDY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. ) CITY OF MILWAUKEE, EDWARD FLYNN ) OFFICER MICHAEL GASSER, ) OFFICER KEITH GARLAND, JR. ) and unknown

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service Case 1:09-cv-00155-JRH-WLB Document 1 Filed 12/09/09 Page 1 of 22 DUSTIN MYERS and RODNEY MYERS. Plaintiffs, VS. MURRY BOWMAN, Individually, and as the Chief Magistrate of Jefferson County, Georgia; WILEY

More information

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/09/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/09/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 Case: 1:14-cv-06959 Document #: 1 Filed: 09/09/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RICKY WILLIAMS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00-ajb-ksc Document Filed // Page of R. Dale Dixon, Jr., (SBN ) dale@daledixonlaw.com Phillip A. Medlin (SBN ) phillip@daledixonlaw.com LAW OFFICES OF DALE DIXON 0 W. Broadway, Suite 00 San Diego,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Case 1:13-mi-99999-UNA Document 2231 Filed 10/18/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION MARTHE BIEN-AIME, R.N., * * Plaintiff, * * CIVIL ACTION

More information

Case 1:11-cv JBS-AMD Document 37 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:11-cv JBS-AMD Document 37 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 111-cv-02300-JBS-AMD Document 37 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID 223 MARK B. FROST & ASSOCIATES BY Mark B. Frost BY Ryan M. Lockman Pier 5 at Penn s Landing 7 N. Columbus Blvd. Philadelphia, PA

More information

Case 4:08-cv SNL Document 1 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 4:08-cv SNL Document 1 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION Case 4:08-cv-00364-SNL Document 1 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION BRETT DARROW, Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v. Cause No.

More information

CASE 0:12-cv PJS-TNL Document 15 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

CASE 0:12-cv PJS-TNL Document 15 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:12-cv-00824-PJS-TNL Document 15 Filed 08/14/12 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil File No.:12-CV-824 (PJS/TNL) WILLIAM DEMONE WALKER ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) AMENDED

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X JANE DOE, -against- Plaintiff, COUNTY OF ULSTER, ULSTER COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT,

More information

Case 1:13-cv MKB-RER Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiff, Defendants. REYES, M.J PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

Case 1:13-cv MKB-RER Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiff, Defendants. REYES, M.J PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Case 1:13-cv-00076-MKB-RER Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 tv 13-0076 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------- Y ANAHIT PAPILLA x r COMPLAINT AND JURY

More information

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5 Case:0-cv-00-WHA Document Filed0//0 Page of Wayne Johnson, SBN: Law Offices of Wayne Johnson P.O. Box 0 Oakland, CA 0 (0) - Attorney for Plaintiffs 0 LYNART COLLINS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 06-cv-01964-WYD-CBS STEVEN HOWARDS, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO VIRGIL D. GUS REICHLE, JR., in his individual and official capacity,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Case No.:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. Case No.: Case :-cv-0-smb Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Marc J. Victor, SBN 00 Jody L. Broaddus, SN 00 ATTORNEYS FOR FREEDOM South Price Road Chandler, Arizona Phone: (0) -0 Fax: (0) -00 Marc@AttorneyForFreedom.com

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN Case 1:15-cv-01336-PLM-PJG ECF No. 1 filed 12/23/15 Page 1 of 18 PageID.1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NATALIE THOMPSON, as next friend for D.B., a minor, Plaintiff, Case No.

More information

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/18/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1

Case: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/18/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 Case: 1:14-cv-01159 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/18/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LAURA KUBIAK, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:12-cv-00738-MJD-AJB Document 3 Filed 03/29/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Melissa Hill, v. Plaintiff, Civil File No. 12-CV-738 MJD/AJB AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND

More information

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/02/10 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1

Case: 1:10-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/02/10 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1 Case: 1:10-cv-05593 Document #: 1 Filed: 09/02/10 Page 1 of 17 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION KURT KOPEK, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY

More information

Case 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7 Case 2:06-cv-05977-FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY -------------------------------------------------------X SALEEM LIGHTY, -against- Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHREVEPORT DIVISION GREGORY V. TUCKER, ) ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. Plaintiff, ) ) JUDGE v. ) ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE CITY OF SHREVEPORT,

More information

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 Case 6:14-cv-00227-JDL Document 1 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ROBERT SCOTT MCCOLLOM Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION

More information

4 Tel: ( Fax: (62 ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL HOLGUIN,

4 Tel: ( Fax: (62 ) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL HOLGUIN, 1 Dan Stormer (S.B. #101967) Yirginia Keeny (S.B. #139568) 2 HADSELL STORMER KEENY RICHARDSON & RENICK, LLP 3 128 North Fair Oaks Avenue, Ste. 204 Pasadena~ CA 91103-3645 4 Tel: (626 585-9600 Fax: (62

More information

Case 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17

Case 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17 Case 2:17-cv-14382-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: KELLY DOE, vs. Plaintiff, EVAN CRAMER,

More information

Case 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 9:15-cv-80521-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JEAN PAVLOV, individually and as Personal Representative

More information

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Eastern District Court Case No. 1:11-cv Jordan et al v. The City of New York et al.

PlainSite. Legal Document. New York Eastern District Court Case No. 1:11-cv Jordan et al v. The City of New York et al. PlainSite Legal Document New York Eastern District Court Case No. 1:11-cv-02637 Jordan et al v. The City of New York et al Document 19 View Document View Docket A joint project of Think Computer Corporation

More information

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 04/24/17 Page 1 of 23

Case 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 04/24/17 Page 1 of 23 Case 4:17-cv-01268 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 04/24/17 Page 1 of 23 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION KHALIL EL-AMIN, Plaintiff, V. CIVIL ACTION NO.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 1:07-cv-00158-RBK-JS Document 14 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 1 of 10 Joseph C. Grassi, Esquire BARRY, CORRADO, GRASSI & GIBSON, P.C. 2700 PACIFIC AVENUE WILDWOOD, NEW JERSEY 08260 (609) 729-1333 (phone)

More information

Case 3:15-cv JLS-JMA Document 1 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JURISDICTION AND VENUE

Case 3:15-cv JLS-JMA Document 1 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JURISDICTION AND VENUE Case :-cv-0-jls-jma Document Filed 0// Page of Andrew C. Schwartz (State Bar No. ) A Professional Corporation North California Blvd., Walnut Creek, California Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - schwartz@cmslaw.com

More information

Case 5:13-cv PSG-AJW Document 22 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 20 Page ID #:256

Case 5:13-cv PSG-AJW Document 22 Filed 01/21/14 Page 1 of 20 Page ID #:256 Case :-cv-00-psg-ajw Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: S. DOUGLAS ST., SUITE 0, EL SEGUNDO, CA 0 Telephone: ()--0; Facsimile: (00) - Case :-cv-00-psg-ajw Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: COMES

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Paul Scott Seeman, Civil File No. Plaintiff, v. Officer Joshua Alexander, Officer B. Johns, Officer Michael Thul, Officers John Does 1-10, and City of

More information

3:14-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION

3:14-cv SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD DIVISION 3:14-cv-03087-SEM-TSH # 1 Page 1 of 10 E-FILED Wednesday, 26 March, 2014 02:37:15 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS SPRINGFIELD

More information

Case: 1:18-cv MPM-DAS Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/03/18 1 of 16 PageID #: 1

Case: 1:18-cv MPM-DAS Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/03/18 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 Case: 1:18-cv-00193-MPM-DAS Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/03/18 1 of 16 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNTIED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION MORKITER JONES PLAINTIFF VS. CAUSE

More information

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13

Case 2:16-cv RSL Document 1 Filed 08/05/16 Page 1 of 13 Case :-cv-0-rsl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 MICHELLE P. CHUN FOOK; and YOLANDA C. COOPER, v. Plaintiffs, CITY OF SEATTLE, a Washington

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA. Plaintiff, Defendants. INTRODUCTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MONTANA. Plaintiff, Defendants. INTRODUCTION Case 1:18-cv-00040-SPW Document 1 Filed 02/22/18 Page 1 of 16 Shahid Haque BORDER CROSSING LAW FIRM 7 West 6th Avenue, Ste. 2A Helena, MT 59624 (406) 594-2004 Matt Adams (pro hac vice application forthcoming)

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 2:05-cv-05323-JAG-MCA Document 1 Filed 11/04/2005 Page 1 of 10 ALGEIER WOODRUFF, P.C. 60 Washington Street Morristown, NJ 07960 (973) 539-2600 Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

More information

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/19/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/19/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar # BENJAMIN NISENBAUM, Esq./State Bar # LATEEF H. GRAY, Esq./State Bar #00 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA CASE 0:17-cv-05116 Document 1 Filed 11/15/17 Page 1 of 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Anthony Promvongsa, Civil Action No: v. Plaintiff, Joe Joswiak; Tim Gaul; Dan Brouillet; Troy

More information

Case3:09-cv EMC Document1 Filed08/28/09 Page1 of 8

Case3:09-cv EMC Document1 Filed08/28/09 Page1 of 8 Case:0-cv-00-EMC Document Filed0//0 Page of LAW OFFICES OF PANOS LAGOS Panos Lagos, Esq. / SBN 0 Woodminster Lane Oakland, CA 0 ( 0)0-0 ( 0)0-FAX panoslagos@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiff, OSCAR JULIUS

More information

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/04/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/04/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 Case: 1:15-cv-01920 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/04/15 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ESTATE OF ROSHAD MCINTOSH, ) Deceased, by Cynthia

More information

Case 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION

Case 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION Case 2:10-cv-01141-HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION VERSUS CITY OF COVINGTON, RICHARD PALMISANO, JACK WEST,

More information

Plaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege

Plaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege NEW YORK STATE COURT OF CLAIMS --------------------------------------------------------------X JANET E. ENOCH, STEVE O. HINDI, and MICHAEL KOBLISKA, Claimants, -against- THE STATE OF NEW YORK, T. D AMATO,

More information

Case 2:16-at Document 1 Filed 08/04/16 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:16-at Document 1 Filed 08/04/16 Page 1 of 9 Case :-at-00 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. SBN ADANTÉ D. POINTER, Esq. SBN MELISSA C. NOLD, Esq. SBN 0 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre Oakport Street, Suite

More information

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE --------------------------------------------------------------------X JANET E. ENOCH, STEVE O. HINDI, AND MICHAEL KOBLISKA, - against Plaintiff(s),

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND GREGORY SMITH Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1350 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20004 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEANETTE MYRICK, in her individual capacity, 1901

More information

Summary of Investigation SiRT File # Referral from RCMP - PEI December 4, 2017

Summary of Investigation SiRT File # Referral from RCMP - PEI December 4, 2017 Summary of Investigation SiRT File # 2017-036 Referral from RCMP - PEI December 4, 2017 John L. Scott Interim Director June 12, 2018 Background: On December 4, 2017, SiRT Interim Director, John Scott,

More information

Case 1:06-cv VM-HBP Document 1 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 9

Case 1:06-cv VM-HBP Document 1 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 9 Case 1:06-cv-05206-VM-HBP Document 1 Filed 07/10/06 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------X KENNETH

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION SARAH COFFEY, KRIS HERMES, and ) COMPLAINT ERIN STALNAKER, ) ) DEMAND FOR JURY Plaintiffs, ) TRIAL v. ) ) DAVID LANGFELLOW, in his individual

More information

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION Case 1:18-cv-00498-RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 LISA COLE, Plaintiff, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY DEPARTMENT

More information

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 Case: 1:12-cv-04082 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LORETTA MURPHY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.

More information

Case 3:12-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 17

Case 3:12-cv Document 1 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 17 Case 3:12-cv-05987 Document 1 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA LASHONN WHITE, Plaintiff, vs. No. COMPLAINT CITY OF TACOMA, RYAN KOSKOVICH,

More information

Case 3:18-cv GMS Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 15

Case 3:18-cv GMS Document 1 Filed 03/27/18 Page 1 of 15 Case :-cv-00-gms Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Katherine Belzowski, Staff Attorney State Bar Number 0 NAVAJO NATION DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE P.O. Box 00 Window Rock, Arizona (Navajo Nation ( -0 Paul Gattone

More information

Case 4:08-cv RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION

Case 4:08-cv RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION Case 4:08-cv-00139-RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION GEORGE VICTOR GARCIA, on behalf of himself and the class of

More information

the Sheriff, Contra Costa County and DOES 1-20 seized his medical marijuana and destroyed it

the Sheriff, Contra Costa County and DOES 1-20 seized his medical marijuana and destroyed it 0 0 the Sheriff, Contra Costa County and DOES -0 seized his medical marijuana and destroyed it without notice or a hearing, as Michael Lee first learned at the hearing on his motion for the return of his

More information

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 Case: 1:16-cv-08107 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION LAFAYETTE THOMAS, ) ) Plaintiff, )

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA EASTERN DIVISION RECEIVED SANDRA LOVE, as parent and next ) friend of B.L., a minor; and ) PATRICIA PERKINS, as parent and ) next friend of

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMY JOHNSTON and ) GREGORY LAGROSA, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. ) HOMESTEAD BORO, ) a Pennsylvania municipality, and ) FRANCIS

More information

case 2:14-cv PPS-JEM document 15 filed 09/21/14 page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION

case 2:14-cv PPS-JEM document 15 filed 09/21/14 page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION case 2:14-cv-00234-PPS-JEM document 15 filed 09/21/14 page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA HAMMOND DIVISION NICHOLAS KINCADE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) NO: 2:14-CV-234-PPS-JEM

More information

Plaintiff, )( CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:11-CV-523. against defendants City of Houston, Officer H.J. Morales, individually and in an official capacity,

Plaintiff, )( CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:11-CV-523. against defendants City of Houston, Officer H.J. Morales, individually and in an official capacity, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DIVISION OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION HATICE CULLINGFORD, )( V. )( THE CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS, )( OFFICER H. J. MORALES JR., and JOHN DOE OFFICERS; )( Plaintiff, )( CIVIL

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service 0 0 A. James Clark, #000 CLARK & ASSOCIATES S. Second Avenue, Ste. E Yuma, AZ Telephone ( - Attorneys for Plaintiff KYLE HAWKEY, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI`I ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT. Introduction

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAI`I ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT. Introduction AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERITES UNION OF HAWAII FOUNDATION BRENT T. WHITE 7391 P.O. Box 3410 Honolulu, HI 96801 Telephone: (808 522-5907 Facsimile: (808 522-5909 Attorney for Plaintiff IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

Lennox S. Hinds, Esq. Stevens, Hinds & White, P.C. 42 Van Doren Avenue Somerset, NJ

Lennox S. Hinds, Esq. Stevens, Hinds & White, P.C. 42 Van Doren Avenue Somerset, NJ Case Case 3:07-cv-02314-JAP-JJH 1:33-av-00001 Document Document 939 1 Filed Filed 05/16/2007 Page Page 1 of 111 of 11 Lennox S. Hinds, Esq. Stevens, Hinds & White, P.C. 42 Van Doren Avenue Somerset, NJ

More information

Case 2:14-cv GAM Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:14-cv GAM Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 214-cv-05454-GAM Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA KIA GAYMON, MICHAEL GAYMON and SANSHURAY PURNELL, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO DELVIN BATES, v. Plaintiff, PHRED DIXON, a Bernalillo County Sheriff s Deputy, Defendant. follows: COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND EQUITABLE

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Charlottesville Division JESSIE M. CASELLA, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MATT BORDERS, individually and ) in his official capacity, )

More information

Case 1:14-cv Document 10 Filed in TXSD on 09/25/14 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:14-cv Document 10 Filed in TXSD on 09/25/14 Page 1 of 11 Case 1:14-cv-00133 Document 10 Filed in TXSD on 09/25/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION DIGNA O. QUEZADA CUEVAS, Plaintiff, v.

More information

Case 1:07-cv NLH-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 12

Case 1:07-cv NLH-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 12 Case 1:07-cv-03792-NLH-AMD Document 1 Filed 08/10/2007 Page 1 of 12 BY: Brian M. Puricelli, Esquire KRAVITZ AND PURICELLI 691 Washington Crossing Road Newtown PA 18940 (215) 504-8115 ATTORNEY ID # 5146

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Case 8:10-cv-02411-JDW-EAJ Document 1 Filed 10/27/10 Page 1 of 10 PageID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION BELINDA BROADERS, AS PARENT, NATURAL GUARDIAN AND FOR AND

More information

Case 1:17-cv RBK-JS Document 1 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:17-cv RBK-JS Document 1 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 117-cv-06876-RBK-JS Document 1 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 14 PageID 1 Katherine D. Hartman, Esquire (027091991) ATTORNEYS HARTMAN, CHARTERED 68 East Main Street Moorestown, NJ 08057 Ph (856) 235-0220

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION Case 4:16-cv-00156-RC Document 1 Filed 03/03/16 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION JOHN TOPPINGS and STEPHANIE TOPPINGS, PLAINTIFFS,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-cv-12698

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-cv-12698 2:17-cv-12698-AJT-RSW Doc # 1 Filed 08/17/17 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION TRACY LEROY SMITH, vs. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 17-cv-12698

More information

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7 Case 3:14-cv-01601-BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7 PAMELA S. HEDIGER, OSB #913099 pam@eechlaw.com LAURIE J. HART, OSB #052766 laurie@eechlaw.com PO Box 781-0781 Telephone: 541.754.0303 Fax: 541.754.1455

More information

Case 5:16-cv RWS-CMC Document 1 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1

Case 5:16-cv RWS-CMC Document 1 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 Case 5:16-cv-00016-RWS-CMC Document 1 Filed 01/29/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION EVELYN GRIGSBY and DENNIS GRIGSBY,

More information

9/10/2018 4:20 PM 18CV40045 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

9/10/2018 4:20 PM 18CV40045 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH /0/0 :0 PM CV00 0 0 BLANCA AGUIRRE, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON Plaintiff, vs. PORT OF PORTLAND, a Municipal Corporation, DOES through, POLLIN HOTELS II, LLC, an Oregon limited liability

More information

U NITED STATES DISTRICT C OURT tor the

U NITED STATES DISTRICT C OURT tor the Case 1:12-cv-00992-RWS Document 1 Filed 02/08/12 Page 1 of 7 J\0 440 (Rev. 12/09 Summons in a Civil Action Chelsea Elliot and Jeanne Mansfield P/ainriff v. The City of New York, New York Police Department,

More information

Case 5:19-cv HNJ Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 20

Case 5:19-cv HNJ Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 20 Case 5:19-cv-00070-HNJ Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 20 FILED 2019 Jan-14 AM 08:02 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 2:17-cv-13241-BAF-DRG Doc # 1 Filed 10/03/17 Pg 1 of 20 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION SHARON STEIN, as Personal Representative of the Estate of JOHN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Defendants. : : June 26, 2018 COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Defendants. : : June 26, 2018 COMPLAINT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT : : JOSUE MATTA : : Plaintiff : : v. : : : Christopher Dadio; Luther Cuffee; John Slaven; : And Victor Colon, in their individual capacities : : : Defendants.

More information