Absolute And Unconditional Guarantees Under New York Law
|
|
- Loreen Neal
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Absolute And Unconditional Guarantees Under New York Law By Steven P. Caley and Philip D. Robben * This article is republished with permission from the July 2003 edition of The Metropolitan Corporate Counsel. In a variety of commercial transactions from lending to leasing a creditor often seeks the security of a third-party s guarantee of payment in the event the primary creditor defaults. Naturally, creditors often seek a guarantee which is iron clad, with the hope that should resort to the guarantee be required, payment will be made quickly and without entanglement in litigation. Fortunately for creditors, New York law recognizes that a properly drafted guarantee frequently can operate as an absolute and unconditional obligation. Several decisions of the federal courts sitting in New York, however, have complicated the matter and present challenges for one seeking to draft an absolute and unconditional guarantee. I. New York Case Law Under New York law, if a contract provides that all of the parties agreements are merged in the written contract, parol evidence is not admissible to vary the terms of the fully integrated contract. 1 New York courts, however, historically have been hostile to attempts by those who commit fraud to use the courts to validate and protect ill-gotten gains. As the New York Court of Appeals noted in its 1957 decision in Sabo v. Delman, a general merger clause is ineffective to exclude parol evidence to show fraudulent inducement. 2 Two years later, in Danann Realty Corp. v. Harris, 3 the Court of Appeals distinguished its decision in Sabo, and held that where a merger clause specifically states that a party was not acting in reliance on representations as to the matters which form the basis for the party s claim of fraudulent inducement, the merger clause would defeat the fraud claim by eliminating the plaintiff s ability to establish reliance, one of the essential elements of fraud. Over 25 years later, the Court of Appeals decided Citibank, N.A. v. Plapinger, 4 the seminal New York decision concerning the validity and enforceability of guarantees which are absolute and * Steven P. Caley is a Partner and Philip D. Robben is an Associate in the firm of Kelley Drye & Warren LLP. The authors were part of the team of Kelley Drye attorneys that represented JPMorgan Chase Bank in JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, discussed herein. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of associate Damon Suden in the preparation of this article.
2 unconditional by their terms. In Plapinger, five banks sued several defendants for millions of dollars owed under the defendants guarantees. Those guarantees stated that they were absolute and unconditional, and further stated that the absolute and unconditional nature of [the] guarantee was irrespective of (i) any lack of validity * * * of the * * * [loan guaranteed] * * * or any other agreement or instrument relating thereto, or (vii) any other circumstance which might otherwise constitute a defense to the guarantee. 5 In response to the banks claims, the defendants alleged that they had been fraudulently induced to sign the guarantees by certain alleged misrepresentations. The Court of Appeals noted that, in Plapinger, unlike Danann Realty, the defendants had not in the plainest language announced and stipulated that [they were] not relying on any representations as to the very matter as to which [they] now [claim they were] defrauded. 6 The Court, however, crafted an alternative basis for decision. In affirming the judgment for the plaintiff banks, it found that the clause under consideration was the result of extended negotiations between sophisticated business people, such that it was unrealistic to expect specificity in the waiver, especially since the parties denominated the guarantee unconditional. 7 Since the Court of Appeals s decision, New York State courts have repeatedly enforced Plapinger type guarantees. 8 In those state court decisions to the contrary, typically, either the form of guarantee was distinguishable or the language of the opinion was dicta. 9 However, several federal decisions since Plapinger arguably construe New York law more narrowly than the New York State Courts. II. Federal Decisions The leading federal decision in this area is the Second Circuit s opinion in Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Yanakas. 10 There, even though the guarantee at issue provided that it was absolute and unconditional, the Second Circuit reversed a grant of summary judgment to the plaintiff bank. The Second Circuit focused on three factors which it held took the Yanakas guarantee out of the Plapinger rule: (a) (b) (c) the Yanakas guarantee was generalized boilerplate, contained in a standard form, over which their was no evidence of any negotiations between the parties; the Yanakas guarantee did not purport to waive any defenses to its own validity, but was only an absolute and unconditional guarantee as to the validity of the underlying debt; and the Yanakas guarantee contained no disclaimer of the existence of or reliance upon representations by the bank and no blanket disclaimer of the type found in Plapinger as to any other circumstance which might otherwise constitute a defense to the Guarantee. 11 After Yanakas, the Second Circuit again had a chance to address the Danann Realty-Plapinger line of cases in Turkish v. Kasenetz. 12 Although that case did not involve a guarantee, the defendants argued that under Yanakas and Danann Realty, the language of the agreement under consideration barred plaintiffs reliance on allegedly false statements. The Second Circuit,
3 however, held that reliance upon the representations was not precluded under the Plapinger rule because, inter alia, the alleged misrepresentations were not extrinsic, oral representations, but rather written representations in the contract itself. 13 There have been subsequent decisions from courts within the Second Circuit that have followed Turkish in this regard. 14 An expansive application of these principles is illustrated by the Southern District decision in JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company. 15 In that case, the plaintiff bank, as agent for two Mahonia companies, initiated an action against eleven insurance companies that had issued six surety bonds in favor of Mahonia. The bonds were obtained by Enron Corp. and guaranteed the obligations of two Enron subsidiaries under six prepaid forward contracts for the sale of oil and gas to Mahonia, as well as Enron Corp. s obligation to make payment under a corporate guarantee in the event of a subsidiary s default. Each of the bonds contained language virtually identical to the guarantee language in Plapinger. 16 Following Enron defaults and the failure of the insurance companies to make payment under the surety bonds, plaintiff filed suit and immediately moved for summary judgment. The defendants responded with allegations that the bonded transactions were not really sales of commodities, but disguised loans, and that Mahonia and plaintiff allegedly had misrepresented or fraudulently concealed this. The district court denied plaintiff s motion, and permitted defendants to pursue discovery. 17 Similar to Turkish, the court concluded that, nothing in the doctrine of Plapinger precludes a defense of fraudulent inducement or concealment premised on fraudulent misrepresentations in the Bonds themselves. 18 The court, however, did not point to any explicit misrepresentation in the Bonds. Instead, it found that, each of the Bonds was premised upon Mahonia s having entered with Enron into a gas or oil Inventory Sale Contract, and each stated that once the commodity is fully delivered, the surety would have no further obligations. 19 Based upon this, the Court found it implicit in the Bonds, that the sureties are being asked to insure the sale and future delivery of a commodity, rather than being asked to insure, unlawfully, a disguised loan transaction. 20 In a recent decision, Judge Marrero of the Southern District of New York declined to follow Liberty Mutual. That case, Valley National Bank v. Greenwich Insurance Company, 21 also involved allegations by insurance companies that they had been defrauded into issuing surety bonds that were absolute and unconditional according to their terms. Indeed, as in Liberty Mutual, the insurance companies alleged that the bond was fraudulently obtained in connection with a disguised loan. The Greenwich Insurance Court, however, granted summary judgment to the plaintiff bank based upon the bond language. The result and language of the decision suggests that the Greenwich Insurance Court may have viewed the Liberty Mutual decision as an anomaly, because of the notoriety surrounding the collapse of Enron. 22 III. Drafting The Absolute And Unconditional Guarantee The decisions discussed above provide some guidance on drafting guarantees so as to increase the chances of enforcement. While nothing can ensure that a court will enforce a given guarantee, and strong indicia of fraud may give a court pause before enforcing even the most carefully worded guarantee, there are several points which any drafter should consider.
4 A. Absolute and Unconditional The most basic feature the guarantee should possess is an explicit statement that the guarantee is absolute and unconditional. B. Waiver of All Defenses The guarantee should also contain language affirming the enforceability of the guarantee despite any other circumstance which might otherwise constitute a defense to the guarantee. Not only was such language included in the Plapinger guarantee, but the Yanakas Court explicitly relied, in part, upon the absence of such language in refusing to enforce the expressly absolute and unconditional Yanakas guarantee. C. No Representations in the Guarantee In light of Turkish and its progeny, the guarantee should avoid any representation which could later form the basis of a fraudulent inducement defense. Of particular importance, the guarantee should avoid incorporating or referencing any representations made in connection with the principal obligation, since a court may hold that those representations are thereby incorporated by reference into the guarantee. D. Express Disclaimer of Reliance on Representations Given the Liberty Mutual Court s reliance on implicit representations, drafters would also be well-advised to include language in any guarantee explicitly stating that the guarantor, in providing the guarantee, is not relying on any explicit or implicit representations by anyone whether oral or in any writing. Such disclaimers of reliance should be as specific as possible to bring the waiver within both Danann Realty and Yanakas. E. Negotiated Guarantee Wherever possible, the use of boilerplate, pre-printed form guarantees should be avoided, and the guarantee should be tailor-made for the particular transaction. If the guarantee is the product of negotiations, it may increase likelihood that a court will find it absolute and unconditional. F. Choice of Law/Choice of Forum Because Danann Realty and Plapinger arose under New York law, the guarantee should include a New York choice of law clause. Furthermore, given the arguably more limited interpretation of this rule in the federal courts in New York, it may be useful to include a choice of forum clause providing for a New York State court as the exclusive forum for any litigation arising from the guarantee See, e.g., Fogelson v. Rackfay Construction Co., 300 N.Y. 334, 340, 90 N.E.2d 881, 884 (1950). 3 N.Y.2d 155, 161, 143 N.E.2d 906, 909, 164 N.Y.S.2d 714, (1957). 5 N.Y.2d 317, 157 N.E.2d 597, 184 N.Y.S.2d 599 (1959). 66 N.Y.2d 90, 485 N.E.2d 974, 495 N.Y.S.2d 309 (1985).
5 Id. at 95, 485 N.E.2d at 977, 495 N.Y.S.2d at 312. Id. at 95, 485 N.E.2d at 976, 495 N.Y.S.2d at 311 quoting Danann Realty Corp. v. Harris, 5 N.Y.2d 317, 320, 157 N.E.2d 597, 599, 184 N.Y.S.2d 599, 602 (1959). Id. at 95, 485 N.E.2d at 977, 495 N.Y.S.2d at 312. See, e.g., Preferred Equities Corp. v. Ziegelman, 190 A.D.2d 784, 593 N.Y.S.2d 548, 549 (2d Dep t 1993); Banco Do Estado De Sao Paulo, S.A. v. Mendes Junior Int l Co., 249 A.D.2d 137, 138, 672 N.Y.S.2d 28, 29 (1st Dep t 1998). See, e.g., Goodridge v. Fernandez, 121 A.D.2d 942, , 505 N.Y.S.2d 144, 147 (1st Dep t 1986) (dicta); Contra, Goodridge v. Harvey Group, Inc., 728 F.Supp. 275, (S.D.N.Y. 1990); see Generale Bank v. Wassel, 779 F. Supp. 310, 319 (S.D.N.Y. 1991) ( Given the ultimate holding in [the federal court decision in] Goodridge, that the disclaimer was valid and binding, and the sweeping interpretation Plapinger has been given in recent years, it is clear that the Appellate Division s Goodridge dicta is not a strong precedent on which a party should rely. ); GTE Auto. Elec. Inc. v. Martin s Inc., 127 A.D.2d 545, , 512 N.Y.S.2d 107, 108 (1st Dep t 1987) (distinguishing language in the notes at issue from that in the Plapinger guarantee). 7 F.3d 310 (2d Cir. 1993). Id. at F.3d 23 (2d Cir. 1994). Id. at 28. See, e.g., JPMorgan Chase Bank v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 189 F. Supp.2d 24, 27 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (discussed infra); Banque Franco-Hellenic De Commerce Int l Et Maritime, S.A. v. Christophides, 905 F. Supp. 182, 192 (S.D.N.Y. 1995). 189 F. Supp. 2d 24 (S.D.N.Y. 2002) (Rakoff, J.). Id. at 27. JP Morgan vigorously disputed defendants allegations and asserted a number of defenses. Following a month-long trial, the case settled shortly before it was to be submitted to the jury. 189 F.Supp.2d at 27. Id. at Id. at 28. No. 02 CV 5069 (VM), 2003 WL (S.D.N.Y. April 1, 2003). Id. at *10.
In these difficult economic times, well-drafted guaranties are a hedge against a
WINNING GUARANTIES In these difficult economic times, well-drafted guaranties are a hedge against a borrower s bankruptcy filing or the return of damaged collateral. Under a properly crafted guaranty,
More informationAt Liberty to Lie? The Viability of Fraud Claims after Disclaiming Reliance By Andrew M. Zeitlin and Alison P. Baker
ARTICLES At Liberty to Lie? The Viability of Fraud Claims after Disclaiming Reliance By Andrew M. Zeitlin and Alison P. Baker Writing for the New York Court of Appeals, Judge Edward R. Finch once wrote,
More informationCORPORATE LITIGATION: THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NON-RELIANCE PROVISIONS. Underlying Principles
CORPORATE LITIGATION: THE EFFECTIVENESS OF NON-RELIANCE PROVISIONS JOSEPH M. MCLAUGHLIN AND YAFIT COHN * SIMPSON THACHER & BARTLETT LLP April 15, 2016 This month we continue our discussion of contractual
More informationWGLO BREAKOUT SESSION - Opinion Issues Relating to the Difference between Amendments and Novations.
WGLO BREAKOUT SESSION - Opinion Issues Relating to the Difference between Amendments and Novations. Bash v Textron Financial Corporation (In re Fair Finance Company) 834 F.3d 651 (6 th Cir. 2016) Does
More informationFinancial Services. New York State s Martin Act: A Primer
xc Financial Services JANUARY 15, 2004 / NUMBER 4 New York State s Martin Act: A Primer New York State s venerable Martin Act gives New York law enforcers an edge over the Securities and Exchange Commission.
More informationSchon Family Found. v Brinkley Capital Ltd NY Slip Op 33027(U) November 27, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2015
Schon Family Found. v Brinkley Capital Ltd. 2018 NY Slip Op 33027(U) November 27, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653664/2015 Judge: Eileen Bransten Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationSecuring the Delinquent Account & Alternative Legal Theories to Collect on Delinquent Accounts
Securing the Delinquent Account & Alternative Legal Theories to Collect on Delinquent Accounts David M. Mannion, Esq. DMannion@BlakeleyLLP.com Blakeley LLP 54 W. 40th Street New York, NY 10018 V. (917)
More informationLithe Method LLC v YHD 18 LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 33195(U) December 3, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2013 Judge: Eileen A.
Lithe Method LLC v YHD 18 LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 33195(U) December 3, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 650759/2013 Judge: Eileen A. Rakower Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e.,
More informationBRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. S & S DEVELOPMENT, INC., Brian K. Swain and Donald K. Stephens, Defendants.
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. S & S DEVELOPMENT, INC., Brian K. Swain and Donald K. Stephens, Defendants. No. 8:13 cv 1419 T 30TGW. Signed May 28, 2014. ORDER JAMES S. MOODY, JR., District
More informationBullet Proof Guaranties
Bullet Proof Guaranties David M. Mannion, Esq. DMannion@BlakeleyLLP.com Blakeley LLP 54 W. 40th Street New York, NY 10018 V. (917) 472-9587 F. (949) 260-0613 www.blakeleyllp.com New York Los Angeles Orange
More informationGUARANTY OF PERFORMANCE AND COMPLETION
EXHIBIT C-1 GUARANTY OF PERFORMANCE AND COMPLETION This GUARANTY OF PERFORMANCE AND COMPLETION ( Guaranty ) is made as of, 200, by FLUOR CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the Guarantor ), to the VIRGINIA
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 2:10-cv-06264-PSG -AGR Document 18 Filed 12/09/10 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:355 CENTRAL DISTRICT F CALIFRNIA Present: The Honorable Philip S. Gutierrez, United States District Judge Wendy K. Hernandez
More informationMEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/23/2016 04:12 PM INDEX NO. 650806/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 29 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/23/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS MELVIN M. KAFTAN, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Appellee, FOR PUBLICATION April 25, 2013 9:10 a.m. v No. 301075 Oakland Circuit Court CAROLE K. KAFTAN, LC No. 09-103826-CK
More informationCase 0:14-cv WPD Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2014 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:14-cv-60975-WPD Document 28 Entered on FLSD Docket 09/05/2014 Page 1 of 8 WENDY GRAVE and JOSEPH GRAVE, vs. Plaintiffs, WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF
More informationContracts Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Spring Contract Terms
Contracts Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Contract Terms I. Construing and Interpreting Contracts A. Purpose: A court s primary concern is to ascertain
More informationTaboola, Inc. v DML News & Entertainment, Inc NY Slip Op 33448(U) December 27, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2017
Taboola, Inc. v DML News & Entertainment, Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 33448(U) December 27, 2018 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 656393/2017 Judge: Margaret A. Chan Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationCase 1:09-cv MGC Document 24 Filed 02/21/13 Page 1 of 12. -against- 09 Civ (MGC)
Case 1:09-cv-06649-MGC Document 24 Filed 02/21/13 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------X ACA GALLERIES, INC., Plaintiff, OPINION AND
More informationCase 3:09-cv RPC Document 23 Filed 02/12/2010 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 3:09-cv-02143-RPC Document 23 Filed 02/12/2010 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA : CABOT OIL & GAS CORPORATION : : CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:09-CV-2143
More informationPRELIMINARY STATEMENT
GUARANTY GUARANTY dated as of, 200_ made by the undersigned (the "Guarantor") in favor of JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and/or any of its subsidiaries and affiliates (individually or collectively, as the context
More informationThis is a securities fraud case involving trading in commercial mortgage-backed
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, -v- 17-CV-3613 (JPO) OPINION AND ORDER JAMES H. IM, Defendant. J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge:
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued March 19, 2015 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-14-00813-CV STEVEN STEPTOE AND PATRICIA CARBALLO, Appellants V. JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., Appellee On Appeal
More informationThe Challenges For CEA Price Manipulation Plaintiffs
The Challenges For CEA Price Manipulation Plaintiffs By Mark Young, Jonathan Marcus, Gary Rubin and Theodore Kneller, Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP Law360, New York (April 26, 2017, 5:23 PM EDT)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Sherfey et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION CHAD SHERFEY, ET AL., ) CASE NO.1:16CV776 ) Plaintiff, ) JUDGE CHRISTOPHER
More informationCase 1:03-cv GWG Document 59 Filed 08/05/2005 Page 1 of 16. Plaintiff, : MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Case 1:03-cv-01586-GWG Document 59 Filed 08/05/2005 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -X CITICORP LEASING,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 23, 2014 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON January 23, 2014 Session BRADFORD E. HOLLIDAY, ET AL. v. HOMER C. PATTON, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Shelby County No. CH-11-1246-3 Kenny
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS CUSTOM DATA SOLUTIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED December 19, 2006 v No. 270752 Macomb Circuit Court PREFERRED CAPITAL, INC., LC No. 04-003376-CK Defendant-Appellant.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
Chapman et al v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al Doc. 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION BILL M. CHAPMAN, JR. and ) LISA B. CHAPMAN, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) )
More informationContracts Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Spring Contract Terms (Expanded)
Contracts Professor Keith A. Rowley William S. Boyd School of Law University of Nevada Las Vegas Contract Terms (Expanded) I. Construing and Interpreting Contracts A. Purpose: A court s primary concern
More informationCase 1:06-cv TPG Document 45 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 11. : : Defendant. :
Case 106-cv-03276-TPG Document 45 Filed 04/29/16 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x MOHAMMAD LADJEVARDIAN, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. THE REPUBLIC OF ARGENTINA, Defendant.
More informationXEROX CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. GRAPHIC MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC., GRAPHIC MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., MHW, INC., AND DAVID TABAH, Defendants,
Page 1 XEROX CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. GRAPHIC MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC., GRAPHIC MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC., MHW, INC., AND DAVID TABAH, Defendants, 11-CV-6397 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN
More informationGurevich v JP Morgan Chase 2013 NY Slip Op 33290(U) July 22, 2013 Supreme Court, Richmond County Docket Number: /13 Judge: John A.
Gurevich v JP Morgan Chase 2013 NY Slip Op 33290(U) July 22, 2013 Supreme Court, Richmond County Docket Number: 150159/13 Judge: John A. Fusco Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Plaintiffs, (SAPORITO, M.J.) MEMORANDUM
Case 3:16-cv-00319-JFS Document 22 Filed 03/29/17 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA STEVEN ARCHAVAGE, on his own behalf and on behalf of all other similarly situated,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/30/ :42 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/30/2015
FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/30/2015 0542 PM INDEX NO. 452951/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 28 RECEIVED NYSCEF 10/30/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationCase 3:16-cv DPJ-FKB Document 31 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION
Case 3:16-cv-00596-DPJ-FKB Document 31 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION ARCHIE & ANGELA HUDSON, on behalf of themselves and all
More informationAlder Run Land LP v. Northeast Natural Energy LLC
2015 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-10-2015 Alder Run Land LP v. Northeast Natural Energy LLC Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANTS MICHAEL C. COOK MAUREEN E. WARD Wooden & McLaughlin LLP Indianapolis, IN ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: JEFFREY C. McDERMOTT MARC T. QUIGLEY AMY J. ADOLAY Krieg DeVault
More informationSOUTHERN GLAZER S WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC. EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION POLICY
SOUTHERN GLAZER S WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC. EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION POLICY Southern Glazer s Arbitration Policy July - 2016 SOUTHERN GLAZER S WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC. EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION POLICY A. STATEMENT
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. August Term, (Argued: January 30, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015) Docket No.
14 781 cv Cohen v. UBS Financial Services, Inc. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term, 2014 (Argued: January 30, 2015 Decided: June 30, 2015) Docket No. 14 781 cv x ELIOT COHEN,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MEMORANDUM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION LORRIE THOMPSON ) ) v. ) NO. 3-13-0817 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL AMERICAN MORTGAGE EXPRESS ) CORPORATION, et al. ) MEMORANDUM
More informationNOTE- All drafts must be pre-approved by Vectren before final execution. Please contact Vectren Credit Risk for assignment of document number.
NOTE- All drafts must be pre-approved by Vectren before final execution. Please contact Vectren Credit Risk for assignment of document number. GUARANTY AGREEMENT GTYSCO##-### THIS GUARANTY AGREEMENT GTYSCO##-###
More informationInternational Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers v Bank of New York Mellon 2014 NY Slip Op 30177(U) January 17, 2014 Supreme Court, New York
International Union of Bricklayers & Allied Craftworkers v Bank of New York Mellon 2014 NY Slip Op 30177(U) January 17, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 653441/2012 Judge: Marcy S. Friedman
More informationPAGES JAUNES OPCO UNIFORM ELCDS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
EXECUTION VERSION PAGES JAUNES OPCO UNIFORM ELCDS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Allen & Overy LLP CONTENTS Clause Page 1. Definitions and Interpretation... 1 2. Settlement Agreement Effective Date... 3 3. Agreement...
More informationNo. 1:13-ap Doc 308 Filed 09/12/16 Entered 09/12/16 14:53:27 Page 1 of 8
No. 1:13-ap-00024 Doc 308 Filed 09/12/16 Entered 09/12/16 14:53:27 Page 1 of 8 Dated: Monday, September 12, 2016 1:27:41 PM IN THE UNITED STATED BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA
More informationFrank Dombroski v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
2013 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 2-4-2013 Frank Dombroski v. JP Morgan Chase Bank NA Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 12-1419
More informationNO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
NO. CAAP-14-0001098 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I RODILLO M. TABUYO, SR. and MERLINA D. TABUYO, Plaintiff-Appellants, v. ROBERT C. REISH and SUSAN N. REISH, INDIVIDUALLY
More informationCase 2:18-cv RLR Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2019 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 2:18-cv-14419-RLR Document 25 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/06/2019 Page 1 of 7 GEICO MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., v. Plaintiffs, TREASURE COAST MARITIME, INC., doing business as SEA TOW TREASURE
More informationMay 7, By E-File and Hand Delivery. Hon. Marcy S. Friedman New York State Supreme Court 60 Centre Street, Part 60 Room 663 New York, NY 10007
May 7, 2015 By E-File and Hand Delivery Peter W. Tomlinson Partner (212) 336-2977 Direct Fax: (212) 336-2343 pwtomlinson@pbwt.com Hon. Marcy S. Friedman New York State Supreme Court 60 Centre Street, Part
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/15/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 42 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/15/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------X CONDUENT BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC (f/k/a XEROX BUSINESS SERVICES, LLC), -against-
More informationThe Nuts and Bolts of Guaranties. Kevin M. Page (713) (office)
The Nuts and Bolts of Guaranties Kevin M. Page kpage@jw.com (713) 752-4227 (office) Topics for Discussion Back to the Basics: First things first When are guaranties issued? Who provides guaranties? Pros
More informationScriptomatic, Inc. v. United States 555 F.2d 364 (3d Cir. Pa. 1977)
Scriptomatic, Inc. v. United States 555 F.2d 364 (3d Cir. Pa. 1977) CLICK HERE to return to the home page United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. Argued February 18, 1977. Decided May 13, 1977.
More informationALI-ABA Course of Study Commercial Lending and Banking Law. April 19-21, 2007 San Francisco, California. Insolvency, Bankruptcy, and Workouts
409 ALI-ABA Course of Study Commercial Lending and Banking Law April 19-21, 2007 San Francisco, California Insolvency, Bankruptcy, and Workouts By Steven H. Felderstein Felderstein Fitzgerald Willoughby
More informationCase jal Doc 11 Filed 06/11/14 Entered 06/11/14 15:40:01 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
Case 13-03061-jal Doc 11 Filed 06/11/14 Entered 06/11/14 15:40:01 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY IN RE: SANTIAGO G. SANTA CRUZ CASE NO. 13-33324(1(7 Debtor(s
More informationIntroduction. The Nature of the Dispute
Featured Article Expanding the Reach of Arbitration Agreements: A Pennsylvania Federal Court Opinion Applies Principles of Agency and Contract Law to Require a Subsidiary-Reinsurer to Arbitrate Under Parent
More informationCase: Document: 31 Date Filed: 03/05/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No.
Case: 08-2252 Document: 31 Date Filed: 03/05/2010 Page: 1 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 08-2252 OLIN CORPORATION, v. Plaintiff - Appellee, P.H. GLATFELTER COMPANY,
More information2014 TEXAS COMPETITIVE ELECTRIC HOLDINGS COMPANY LLC UNIFORM LCDS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
EXECUTION COPY 2014 TEXAS COMPETITIVE ELECTRIC HOLDINGS COMPANY LLC UNIFORM LCDS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This 2014 Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC (this "Agreement") is entered into on May
More informationTHE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC.
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :0-cv-0-IEG -JMA Document Filed 0// Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KAVEH KHAST, Plaintiff, CASE NO: 0-CV--IEG (JMA) vs. WASHINGTON MUTUAL BANK; JP MORGAN BANK;
More informationBuckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna*
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegna* I. INTRODUCTION In a decision that lends further credence to the old adage that consumers should always beware of the small print, the United
More informationThink Twice About That Liability Disclaimer
Page 1 of 5 Portfolio Media. Inc. 860 Broadway, 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Think Twice About That Liability Disclaimer
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 2:10-cv-02106-JWL-DJW Document 36 Filed 07/01/10 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS YRC WORLDWIDE INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 10-2106-JWL ) DEUTSCHE
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION
Case 7:03-cv-00102-D Document 858 Filed 10/18/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID 23956 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS WICHITA FALLS DIVISION VICTORIA KLEIN, et al., Plaintiffs,
More information336 S.W.3d 83 (Ky. 2011), 2010-SC MR, Hathaway v. Eckerle Page S.W.3d 83 (Ky. 2011) Velessa HATHAWAY, Appellant, v. Audra J.
336 S.W.3d 83 (Ky. 2011), 2010-SC-000457-MR, Hathaway v. Eckerle Page 83 336 S.W.3d 83 (Ky. 2011) Velessa HATHAWAY, Appellant, v. Audra J. ECKERLE (Judge, Jefferson Circuit Court), Appellee. and Commonwealth
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEON COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2008 CA 000199 IMERGENT. INC., and STORESONLINE,
More informationPetitioners, 10-CV-5256 (KMW) (DCF) -against- OPINION & ORDER GOVERNMENT OF THE LAO PEOPLE S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X THAI LAO LIGNITE (THAILAND) CO., LTD. & HONGSA LIGNITE (LAO PDR) CO., LTD., Petitioners,
More informationTransit Funding Assoc. LLC v Capital One Equip. Fin. Corp NY Slip Op 32631(U) December 14, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Transit Funding Assoc. LLC v Capital One Equip. Fin. Corp. 2017 NY Slip Op 32631(U) December 14, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652346/2015 Judge: Saliann Scarpulla Cases posted with
More informationCase 2:12-cv GP Document 27 Filed 01/17/13 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:12-cv-02526-GP Document 27 Filed 01/17/13 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SUE VALERI, : Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION v. : : MYSTIC INDUSTRIES
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS JOHNNY S-LIVONIA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED May 19, 2015 v No. 320430 Wayne Circuit Court LAUREL PARK RETAIL PROPERTIES, LLC., LC No. 12-012704-CZ Defendant-Appellee.
More informationAre Arbitrators Right Even When They Are Wrong?: Second Circuit Upholds Arbitral Ruling Allowing Implicit Reference to Class Arbitration
Arbitration Law Review Volume 4 Yearbook on Arbitration and Mediation Article 26 7-1-2012 Are Arbitrators Right Even When They Are Wrong?: Second Circuit Upholds Arbitral Ruling Allowing Implicit Reference
More informationHossain v Hossain 2016 NY Slip Op 30855(U) May 4, 2016 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 17142/13 Judge: Allan B. Weiss Cases posted with a
Hossain v Hossain 2016 NY Slip Op 30855(U) May 4, 2016 Supreme Court, Queens County Docket Number: 17142/13 Judge: Allan B. Weiss Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),
More informationCase 2:04-cv AJS Document 63 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 2:04-cv-00593-AJS Document 63 Filed 03/06/06 Page 1 of 9 R.M.F. GLOBAL, INC., INNOVATIVE DESIGNS, INC., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiffs, 04cv0593
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 01/03/ :26 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 119 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/03/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x RYAN & RODNEY DIAMONDS, INC. : Index No. 155307/2015 Plaintiff, -against-
More informationCase 1:08-cv Document 44 Filed 03/23/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case 1:08-cv-03009 Document 44 Filed 03/23/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KENNETH THOMAS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 08 C 3009 ) AMERICAN
More informationTexas Fiduciary Litigation Update. David F. Johnson
Texas Fiduciary Litigation Update David F. Johnson DISCLAIMERS These materials should not be considered as, or as a substitute for, legal advice, and they are not intended to nor do they create an attorney-client
More informationCurrent Ethics Issues Relating to Opinions:
Current Ethics Issues Relating to Opinions: The Attorney-Client Privilege, the Work-Product Protection, and Rules of Professional Conduct 1.6 & 2.3 Presenters: John K. Villa & Charles Davant Williams &
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2013
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/11/2013 INDEX NO. 650841/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 26 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/11/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK GEM HOLDCO, LLC, -against- Plaintiff,
More information- STATE OF NEW YORK E. SEGA L. Plaintiff(s),
SHORT FORM ORDER SUPREME COURT Present: HON. MARVIN - STATE OF NEW YORK E. SEGA L Justice SHORT FORM ORDER IAS PART 8 GREGORY VOLKOV, NASSAU COUNTY INDEX No. 4854/00 MOTION DATE: 8/21/00 MOTION No. 01,02
More informationNON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P
NON-PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37 VALLEY NATIONAL BANK, SUCCESSOR- IN-THE INTEREST TO THE PARK AVENUE BANK, IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Appellee H. JACK MILLER, ARI
More informationx : : : : : : : : : x Plaintiffs, current and former female employees of defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------- LARYSSA JOCK, et al., Plaintiffs, -v- STERLING JEWELERS, INC., Defendant. -------------------------------------
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA CHARLOTTESVILLE DIVISION HAROLD BLICK, ) Plaintiff, ) ) CASE NO. 3:14-CV-00022 v. ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL
More informationMEDIANNUAIRE PAGES JAUNES OPCO UNIFORM ELCDS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
EXECUTION COPYVERSION MEDIANNUAIRE PAGES JAUNES OPCO UNIFORM ELCDS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Allen & Overy LLP CONTENTS Clause Page 1. Definitions and Interpretation... 1 2. Settlement Agreement Effective Date...
More informationSTOP, before you collaborate, and listen: Threshold conduct which violates W. Va. Code 46A and -128.
STOP, before you collaborate, and listen: Threshold conduct which violates W. Va. Code 46A-2-127 and -128. Randall Saunders, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP Kendra Huff, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough
More informationPlaintiff, : : : : John Sgaliordich is an individual investor who alleges that various investment
-VVP Sgaliordich v. Lloyd's Asset Management et al Doc. 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------ X JOHN ANTHONY SGALIORDICH,
More informationAntares Real Estate Servs. III, LLC v 100 WP Prop.--DOF II, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 31312(U) May 16, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number:
Antares Real Estate Servs. III, LLC v 100 WP Prop.--DOF II, LLC 2014 NY Slip Op 31312(U) May 16, 2014 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 652829/2013 Judge: Shirley Werner Kornreich Cases posted
More informationNOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAR 09 2015 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT In re: ROBERT HARRIS, Debtor, No. 13-60000 BAP No. 11-1600 ROBERT
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 10, 2005 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 10, 2005 Session PATSY C. CATE v. JAMES DANIEL THOMAS A Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Madison County No. 58062 The Honorable Steven Stafford,
More informationCase: Document: Filed: 08/26/2010 Page: 1. NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 10a0548n.06. No.
Case: 09-5705 Document: 006110716860 Filed: 08/26/2010 Page: 1 NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION File Name: 10a0548n.06 No. 09-5705 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ASSURANCE
More informationUnited States Court of Appeals
In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Nos. 15 3326 & 15 3327 BANK OF COMMERCE, et al., Plaintiffs Appellees, v. KENNETH E. HOFFMAN, JR., Defendant Appellant. Appeals from the United
More informationThe Nuts and Bolts of Guaranties
The Nuts and Bolts of Guaranties NAPCO Credit Conference January 23, 2015 Kevin M. Page Associate General Counsel Tenaska, Inc. 1 Back to the Basics: First things first When are guaranties issued? Who
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/03/ :52 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 22 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK XLON BEAUTY, LLC, Index No. 656771/2016 DORIS DAY, v. Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT S MOTION TO DISMISS Defendant. Bowles
More informationThe Supreme Court will shortly be considering
Arbitration at a Cross Road: Will the Supreme Court Hold the Federal Arbitration Act Trumps Federal Labor Laws? By John Jay Range and Bryan Cleveland The Supreme Court will shortly be considering three
More informationWells Fargo Bank N.A. v Webster Bus. Credit Corp NY Slip Op 33850(U) April 13, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /2009 Judge: Richard
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v Webster Bus. Credit Corp. 2010 NY Slip Op 33850(U) April 13, 2010 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 601680/2009 Judge: Richard B. Lowe III Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 11, 2006 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 11, 2006 Session FIDES NZIRUBUSA v. UNITED IMPORTS, INC., ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 03C-1769 Hamilton Gayden,
More informationSonic-Denver T, Inc., d/b/a Mountain States Toyota, and American Arbitration Association, Inc., JUDGMENT AFFIRMED
COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS Court of Appeals No. 10CA0275 Adams County District Court No. 09CV500 Honorable Katherine R. Delgado, Judge Ken Medina, Milton Rosas, and George Sourial, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
More informationGUARANTY OF PERFORMANCE (TL)
EXHIBIT C-2 GUARANTY OF PERFORMANCE (TL) This Guaranty of Performance ( Guaranty ) is made as of April 28, 2005 by Transurban Limited, an Australian corporation (the Guarantor ), to the Virginia Department
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/24/ :27 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/24/2016 12:27 PM INDEX NO. 651454/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/24/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK CRICKET STOCKHOLDER REP,
More informationKonig v Chanin 2011 NY Slip Op 33951(U) August 5, 2011 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: /09 Judge: Shirley Werner Kornreich Cases posted with a
Konig v Chanin 2011 NY Slip Op 33951(U) August 5, 2011 Sup Ct, NY County Docket Number: 100822/09 Judge: Shirley Werner Kornreich Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),
More informationCase 3:07-cv JAP-TJB Document 221 Filed 10/14/2009 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 3:07-cv-00722-JAP-TJB Document 221 Filed 10/14/2009 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE : COMPANY, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil
More informationSECURITY AGREEMENT :v2
SECURITY AGREEMENT In consideration of one or more loans, letters of credit or other financial accommodation made, issued or extended by JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (hereinafter called the "Bank"), the undersigned
More informationPlaintiff, DECISION and ORDER No. 1:14-cv-341(MAT)(JMM) Accadia Site Contracting, Inc. ( Accadia or Plaintiff ),
Accadia Site Contracting, Inc. v. Northwest Savings Bank Doc. 57 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ACCADIA SITE CONTRACTING, INC. -vs- Plaintiff, DECISION and ORDER No. 1:14-cv-341(MAT)(JMM)
More information