Arbitration Law Developments in 2014
|
|
- Patrick Montgomery
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Arbitration Law Developments in 2014 A) Introduction Singapore is now among the top five arbitral seats in the world. With its ever- increasing popularity, there has been a surge of arbitration-related litigation in the Singapore courts. In this Legal Update, we take a look at some of the noteworthy Singapore cases in the area of arbitration law in 2014, as well as their implications and influence. B) Arbitration Agreements Arbitration is based on the consent of the parties to submit their dispute before the tribunal. Therefore, before there can be any arbitration, there must first be an arbitration agreement. Arbitration agreements, while often standard in form, are sometimes complex in application. The cases below deal with the applicability and terms of an effective arbitration clause. (i) R1 International Pte Ltd v Lonstroff AG [2014] SGCA 56 Anti-suit injunction in support of arbitration Incorporation of arbitration clause through standard terms In this case, the Singapore Court of Appeal had occasion to grant the apex court s first known successful anti-suit injunction in support of arbitration, overturning a decision of the High Court. The Court also made important observations on the incorporation of standard terms and conditions intended to supplement key commercial terms that had been concluded orally or by . The parties had entered into a series of five commodities trading agreements. In each instance, an confirming the quantity and price of rubber to be delivered from the Supplier to the Purchaser was exchanged. The Supplier would then send its standard terms and conditions to the Purchaser. These terms contained an arbitration clause providing that disputes were to be resolved by arbitration. A dispute arose over the second transaction, and the Purchaser brought a claim against the Supplier before the Swiss Courts. The Supplier then sought an anti-suit injunction before the Singapore Courts. The question arose as to whether the Supplier s terms, and thus the arbitration clause, had been incorporated into the agreement. The Court held that the Supplier s terms had in fact been incorporated, and granted the Supplier s antisuit injunction. On the facts, the Court held that the parties had contemplated that the basic terms of the agreement would be supplemented by a set of standard terms, particularly due to the size and scope of the transaction and the industry practice. The Court also accepted that the applicable standard terms would be the Supplier s terms, as the Purchaser s acceptance of delivery, payment of invoice, and failure to raise any objection to the Supplier s terms indicated acceptance. The Supplier was successfully represented by Paul Tan of Rajah & Tann Singapore. (ii) Oei Hong Leong v Goldman Sachs International [2014] 3 SLR 1217 Separate contracts with competing arbitration and jurisdiction clauses Whether parties intended for arbitration clause to apply The dispute in this case was unusual in that it could potentially fall under either of two separate contracts between the parties; one of which contained an arbitration clause, while the other contained a non- 1
2 exclusive jurisdiction clause. The High Court had to determine which contract applied, and thus whether the dispute should go before the Courts or an arbitral tribunal. The Plaintiff client brought a claim against the Defendant investment bank for fraudulent misrepresentation leading to loss-making trades. The Defendant then sought to stay the proceedings, relying on an arbitration clause in an Account Agreement Pack between the parties. The Plaintiff in turn contended that a non-exclusive jurisdiction clause in a Master Agreement applied instead. The Court approached the issue as a question of the dispute resolution clause that the parties objectively intended to apply. This required an ascertainment of the parties intentions, which could turn on which contract had the closer connection to the claims. It was held that the Account Agreement Pack had a closer connection to the present dispute as the claims hinged on a clause within that agreement, which also contained a possible defence. The Account Agreement Pack also governed the parties banker-customer relationship out of which the alleged misrepresentation occurred. Therefore, the arbitration clause applied, and the Defendant s stay of proceedings was granted. (iii) FirstLink Investments Corp Ltd v GT Payment Pte Ltd [2014] SGHCR 12 Arbitration agreement lacking choice of governing law Determining validity and proper law of agreement It is not uncommon for parties to omit an express choice of law governing their international arbitration agreements, focusing on their contractual obligations rather than the potential breakdown of the relationship. In this case, the High Court provided guidance on how it would determine the governing law of an arbitration agreement in the absence of an express choice. The Plaintiff had contracted to use the Defendant s online payment service. The contract contained an arbitration clause which provided that Any claim will be adjudicated by Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, but did not specify a governing law. Nonetheless, the Court held that the law of Sweden would govern the arbitration agreement. The Court upheld the general methodology of identifying the proper law of an arbitration agreement, which entails seeking the express choice, followed by the implied choice, and then the law which the arbitration agreement has its closest and most real connection with in the absence of any choice. While each case would turn on its own facts, the Court endorsed looking to the law of the seat of arbitration as the proper law. Here, the specific reference of disputes to the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce evinced an objective intention to elect the lex arbitri of Sweden as the curial law applicable to the arbitration. In the absence of factors pointing to the contrary, the law of Sweden would apply. C) Conduct of Arbitration In the course of actually conducting the arbitration, there are a number of issues that may arise requiring the assistance of the Courts to resolve. In this next section, we look at a couple of cases dealing with awards and arbitrators. (i) PT Perusahaan Gas Negara (Persero) TBK v CRW Joint Operation (Indonesia) [2014] SGHC 146 Interim or provisional arbitral awards Enforceability before Singapore Courts 2 It is not uncommon for arbitral tribunals to issue provisional awards, particularly for disputes in industries such as construction, where the immediacy of remedies is vital. Here, the High Court was faced
3 with the question of what constitutes a provisional award, and whether such awards are enforceable before the Singapore Courts. The case involved a series of variation claims under a construction contract incorporating the FIDIC Conditions of Contract for Construction 1999, in which the dispute resolution system allows a contractor to obtain a speedy adjudication for payment from the employer, while maintaining the employer s entitlement to arbitrate the underlying merits of the payment obligation at a later time. The initial interim award for payment may thus be seen as provisional. Here, the contractor in question had obtained an arbitral award to enforce the employer s payment obligation pending final resolution of the underlying claim. The employer sought to challenge this award, alleging that it was prohibited under Singapore statute due to its provisional nature. However, the High Court held that provisional awards are not prohibited by Singapore legislation, thus clarifying a longstanding issue of arbitral validity in a manner that is consistent with Singapore s proarbitration position. In any event, the Court was prepared to hold that the award in question was not provisional, but was final and binding as to the employer s payment obligation. This decision is of particular importance to the construction industry, where the enforceability of provisional awards is vital. Contractors invariably perform services in advance of payment, and where a payment dispute arises, the interrupted cash flow can have serious or even permanent consequences for the contractor. A security of payment regime thus allows for contractors to resolve payment disputes on a prompt albeit provisional basis. The case has since gone on appeal to the Court of Appeal, with the apex court reserving judgment. It thus remains to be seen what the final outcome regarding the enforceability of provisional awards will be. (ii) PT Central Investindo v Franciscus Wongso [2014] 4 SLR 978 Application for removal of arbitrator Impartiality of arbitrator In this case, the Plaintiff and Defendant were parties to an arbitration, for which the Plaintiff sought to remove the arbitrator. The Plaintiff alleged that his conduct demonstrated an apparent bias against the Plaintiff. The complaints centred around the timeline of certain directions which had been issued by the arbitrator, in particular one direction whereby the arbitrator directed the Plaintiff to respond to a fresh claim by the Defendant within one day, allegedly denying them a reasonable opportunity to be heard. The Court recognised that an arbitrator could be removed if there were actual, imputed or apparent bias. For apparent bias, the test was whether a reasonable and fair minded person with knowledge of the relevant facts would entertain a reasonable suspicion that the circumstances surrounding the proceedings might result in the proceedings being affected by apparent bias if the arbitrator were not removed. On the facts, the Court held that there was no apparent bias on the part of the arbitrator. In issuing the various timelines for response, the arbitrator was acting within his wide case-management powers, and had not displayed any objective lack of impartiality. In any event, the Plaintiff had been given a reasonable opportunity to be heard, as the Plaintiff actually had more than one day to respond to the fresh claim, but failed to make use of this chance to respond. While the removal application was pending, the arbitrator went ahead to issue his award. The Plaintiff had also applied to have this award set aside on largely the same complaints, but this application was rejected by the Court as well. D) Setting Aside & Enforcement of Award After an award has been issued, the arbitration might be at an end, but the parties then have to go about enforcing the award, or else attempt to challenge or set aside the award. The cases below demonstrate 3
4 some of the grounds upon which an arbitral award may be set aside, as well as the challenges that may arise when enforcing an award. (i) BLC v BLB [2014] 4 SLR 79 Setting aside of arbitral award Arbitrator s failure to refer to or address issues This decision involved an application to set aside an arbitral award on the grounds of breach of natural justice. The Court of Appeal had to consider the extent to which an arbitrator had to consider and address issues that had been raised by the parties in his award. In the course of the arbitration, the parties had submitted separate lists of issues to be tried to the arbitrator. In his award, the arbitrator allowed the Appellant s claim against the Respondent, and also dismissed the Respondent s counterclaim. The Respondent sought to set aside the award for breach of natural justice, submitting that the arbitrator had failed to deal with the counterclaim as he had extensively adopted the Appellant s list of issues. While the High Court granted the Respondent s application, the decision was overturned by the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal found that the arbitrator did in fact apply his mind to the counterclaim and did render a decision in respect of the counterclaim. The issues in the claim and the counterclaim were inextricably linked, and so the arbitrator need not explicitly identify the legal basis of the counterclaim in the award. The Court highlighted that, when considering whether an arbitrator has addressed an issue in a setting aside application, the Court should not be drawn into the substantive merits, and should guard against attempts by the disgruntled party to abuse the application process by putting forward points or issues which it had failed to put before the arbitrator in the first place. (ii) ADG V ADI [2014] 3 SLR 481 Setting aside of arbitral award Arbitrator refusing to reopen proceedings on basis of anticipated new evidence Like the case above, this decision also involved an application to set aside an arbitral award on the grounds of breach of natural justice. Here, the tribunal had declared proceedings in the arbitration closed on 4 June 2013, and rejected the Plaintiffs application to reopen proceedings on 9 June The Plaintiffs anticipated that new evidence would become available by this date (and such evidence did in fact materialise), and they alleged that, by denying them the opportunity to produce such evidence, the tribunal had breached their right to be heard. The High Court found against the Plaintiffs, holding that the tribunal had not acted unfairly in declaring proceedings closed on 4 June, or in refusing to reopen them. It had sufficiently consulted the parties by informing them of the proposed course of action and giving a deadline for comment, and the Plaintiffs did not then complain of the deadline for an application for reopening. Further, having overseen the entire proceedings, the tribunal was well placed to make the case management decision that the anticipated evidence lacked sufficient certainty and specificity to justify reopening the proceedings. The Court highlighted that it would retain a position of minimal curial intervention when determining a tribunal s breach, particularly when it related to a procedural or case management decision, as parties who choose to arbitrate in Singapore agree to give the tribunal a wide and flexible discretion. To that end, the tribunal is expected to provide a full opportunity to present one s case, but this does not equate to an unqualified right to present submissions and evidence at any time of the party s choosing. This decision demonstrates the Singapore Courts policy of non-interference when it comes to arbitration, stepping in only when truly necessary. Parties seeking the recourse of the Courts to invalidate arbitral awards should thus ensure that actual injustice or abuse was incurred, rather than mere dissatisfaction with the decision. 4
5 (iii) Manuchar Steel Hong Kong Limited v Star Pacific Line Pte Ltd [2014] 4 SLR 832 Enforcement of arbitral award Enforcement against non-party on grounds of single economic entity principle In this case, the claimant wanted to enforce an arbitration award against a non-party to the arbitration agreement on the premise that the non-party and the debtor were a single economic entity, as they were allegedly operationally unified and their employees were treated interchangeably. The High Court thus had to consider the applicability of the single economic entity principle in Singapore, under which companies within a group that operate as a single economic entity would be deemed to share liability for any wrongdoing. Importantly, the Court held that the single economic entity concept does not apply in Singapore. Rather, the Court chose to uphold the basic tenet of company law that a company and its shareholders are separate legal persons. While the Court can pierce the corporate veil in certain exceptional situations, the single economic entity concept goes too far beyond this, as it is not based on any abuse or impropriety, and spreads the liability across all members of the group. It is not uncommon for companies within a group to be closely associated. In some instances, there may be some form of operational unity, or else an overlap in management. However, this in itself does not mean that they may be considered as one legal entity; instead, each company is treated in law as having its own separate legal personality. Parties should therefore exercise great caution and restraint should they wish to enforce an award against a related, but non-party to an arbitration simply on the basis that the related non-party is purportedly part of the same group and shares some similarities with the actual contracting party. 5
6 Contacts Ng Kim Beng Partner D (65) F (65) kim.beng.ng@rajahtann.com Paul Tan Partner D (65) F (65) paul.tan@rajahtann.com Please feel free to also contact the Knowledge and Risk Management Group at eoasis@rajahtann.com 6
7 Our regional presence Our regional contacts RAJAH & TANN Singapore RAJAH & TANN REPRESENTATIVE OFFICE China Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP 9 Battery Road #25-01 Straits Trading Building Singapore T HR F sg.rajahtannasia.com Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP Shanghai Representative Office Unit , Shui On Plaza, 333 Huai Hai Middle Road Shanghai , People's Republic of China T F cn.rajahtannasia.com R&T SOK & HENG Cambodia RAJAH & TANN NK LEGAL Myanmar R&T Sok & Heng Law Office Vattanac Capital Office Tower, Level 17, No. 66 Preah Monivong Boulevard, Sangkat Wat Phnom Khan Daun Penh, Phnom Penh, Cambodia T / 113 F kh.rajahtannasia.com *in association with Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP Rajah & Tann NK Legal Myanmar Company Limited Office Suite 007, Inya Lake Hotel No. 37, Kaba Aye Pagoda Road, Mayangone Township, Yangon, Myanmar T / / F mm.rajahtannasia.com 7
8 ASSEGAF HAMZAH & PARTNERS Indonesia RAJAH & TANN Thailand Assegah Hamzah & Partners Menara Rajawali 16th Floor Jalan DR. Ide Anak Agung Gde Agung Lot #5.1 Kawasan Mega Kuningan, Jakarta 12950, Indonesia T F * Assegaf Hamzah & Partners is an independent law firm in Indonesia and a member of the Rajah & Tann Asia network. Rajah & Tann (Thailand) Limited 973 President Tower, 12th Floor, Units 12A-12F Ploenchit Road, Lumpini, Pathumwan Bangkok 10330, Thailand T F th.rajahtannasia.com RAJAH & TANN Lao PDR RAJAH & TANN LCT LAWYERS Vietnam Rajah & Tann (Laos) Sole Co., Ltd. Phonexay Village, 23 Singha Road, House Number 046/2 Unit 4, Saysettha District, Vientiane Capital, Lao PDR T F la.rajahtannasia.com Rajah & Tann LCT Lawyers Ho Chi Minh City Office Saigon Centre, Level 13, Unit 2&3 65 Le Loi Boulevard, District 1, HCMC, Vietnam T / F CHRISTOPHER & LEE ONG Malaysia Hanoi Office East Tower - LOTTE Center Hanoi building, Level 30, Christopher & Lee Ong Unit 3003, 54 Lieu Giai Street, Ba Dinh, Hanoi, Vietnam Level 22, Axiata Tower, No. 9 Jalan Stesen Sentral 5, Kuala Lumpur Sentral, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia T F *in association with Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is one of the largest full service law firms in Singapore, providing high quality advice to an impressive list of clients. We place strong emphasis on promptness, accessibility and reliability in dealing with clients. At the same time, the firm strives towards a practical yet creative approach in dealing with business and commercial problems. As the Singapore member firm of the Lex Mundi Network, we are able to offer access to excellent legal expertise in more than 100 countries. Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP is part of Rajah & Tann Asia, a network of local law firms in Singapore, China, Lao PDR, Vietnam, Thailand and Myanmar, as well as associate and affiliate offices in Malaysia, Cambodia, Indonesia and the Middle East. Our Asian network also includes regional desks focused on Japan and South Asia. The contents of this Update are owned by Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP and subject to copyright protection under the laws of Singapore and, through international treaties, other countries. No part of this Update may be reproduced, licensed, sold, published, transmitted, modified, adapted, publicly displayed, broadcast (including storage in any medium by electronic means whether or not transiently for any purpose save as permitted herein) without the prior written permission of Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP. Please note also that whilst the information in this Update is correct to the best of our knowledge and belief at the time of writing, it is only intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter and should not be treated as a substitute for specific professional advice for any particular course of action as such information may not suit your specific business and operational requirements. It is to your advantage to seek legal advice for your specific situation. In this regard, you may call the lawyer you normally deal with in Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP or the Knowledge & Risk Management Group at eoasis@rajahtann.com. 8
Developments in International Arbitration, Construction & Projects in 2015
Developments in International Arbitration, Construction & Projects in 015 This Client Update summarises some of the notable developments in Singapore case law in 015 in the fields of International Arbitration,
More informationSingapore High Court Decides on Set-Offs and Costs Implications
Dispute Resolution Singapore High Court Decides on Set-Offs and Costs Implications Introduction In a commercial dispute, it is not uncommon for there to be both claims and counterclaims between the same
More informationCLIENT UPDATE 2016 JULY. Updated Patent Registry Guidelines: Criteria for Allowing Post-Grant Amendments in Light of Recent Singapore Cases
Updated Patent Registry Guidelines: Criteria for Allowing Post-Grant Amendments in Light of Recent Singapore Cases The Registry of Patents has issued updated guidelines on the assessment of patent post-grant
More informationSingapore Court Rejects Application to Adjourn Enforcement Proceedings Pending Setting Aside Challenge in Arbitral Seat
Singapore Court Rejects Application to Adjourn Enforcement Proceedings Pending Setting Aside Challenge in Arbitral Seat Introduction In Man Diesel & Turbo SE v I.M. Skaugen Marine Services Pte Ltd [2018]
More informationNavigating the Framework for Claiming against an Insolvent Company
Navigating the Framework for Claiming against an Insolvent Company Introduction Once a company enters liquidation, its creditors are subject to the statutory framework and common law principles for pursuing
More informationSingapore Court Refuses Ship Arrest for Foreign Court Proceedings
Singapore Court Refuses Ship Arrest for Foreign Court Proceedings Introduction The right to a ship arrest is often a key issue in maritime disputes, as it provides an essential form of security, and incentivises
More informationForeign Employee Quota Request and Renewal of Work Permit for Foreigners for 2019
Labour Foreign Employee Quota Request and Renewal of Work Permit for Foreigners for 2019 Notification No. 028/18 on foreign employees quota request and renewal of validity of work permit for foreigners
More informationThe Scope of Police Power to Seize Property
Dispute Resolution The Scope of Police Power to Seize Property Introduction The Police are empowered to seize certain property in the course and for purposes of their investigations. However, this power
More informationHigh Court Rules That It Has No Original Jurisdiction To Revoke Patents
High Court Rules That It Has No Original Jurisdiction To Revoke Patents Introduction In patent infringement suits, it is a common defence to assert that the claims of the patent in question are invalid.
More informationDetermining The Proper Law Of An Arbitration Agreement
Determining The Proper Law Of An Arbitration Agreement Introduction An arbitration agreement is a unique clause in a contract because it exists separately from the contract in which it is found. Therefore,
More informationSingapore Court Enforces China Ruling in Landmark Judgment
Singapore Court Enforces China Ruling in Landmark Judgment Introduction The Singapore High Court has issued a landmark judgment in what is believed to be the first instance of enforcement of a judgment
More informationThe Supreme Court Enacts Regulation on Online Court Case Administration
The Supreme Court Enacts Regulation on Online Court Case Administration After implementing the Case Tracking Information System (Sistem Informasi Penelusuran Perkara) as a form of transparency and accountability
More informationDevelopments in Commercial Law in 2015
Developments in Commercial Law in 2015 Introduction This Client Update summarises some of the notable developments in Singapore case law in 2015 in the fields of Shipping & International Trade, Company
More informationDistinguishing Between Guarantees And Performance Bonds
Distinguishing Between Guarantees And Performance Bonds Introduction While guarantees and performance bonds are closely related branches grown from the same legal root, they are in fact very different
More informationThe Development Of The Singapore International Commercial Court
The Development Of The Singapore International Commercial Court Background At the start of 2013, Chief Justice Sundaresh Menon mooted the possibility of creating the Singapore International Commercial
More informationAgent s Failed Attempt To Rank Its Expenses As Sheriff s Expenses In Ship Arrests
Agent s Failed Attempt To Rank Its Expenses As Sheriff s Expenses In Ship Arrests Introduction Ship arrests are vital in providing security in admiralty actions. However, even when the vessel is eventually
More informationDetermining The Terms Of An Oral Contract
Determining The Terms Of An Oral Contract Introduction Contracts do not always exist as formal documents detailed in written word. In informal commercial contexts, contracts sometimes arise through spoken
More informationIndonesian Court Strikes Down Agreement on Language Grounds
Indonesian Court Strikes Down Agreement on Language Grounds In a disquieting ruling (the Decision ) that has been noted internationally, the West Jakarta District Court recently annulled a contract between
More informationThe Big Shift Singapore s Move To A Positive Grant System Kicks In From 14 February 2014
The Big Shift Singapore s Move To A Positive Grant System Kicks In From 14 February 2014 Background The patent laws of Singapore were amended on 10 July 2012 to transform the patent registration regime
More informationAdmission of Foreign Counsel in Singapore
Admission of Foreign Counsel in Singapore Introduction Singapore has geared itself towards becoming an international hub for legal services, and in line with this, the legal sector has gone through some
More informationContractual Interpretation In Singapore: Compatibility With The Evidence Act?
Contractual Interpretation In Singapore: Compatibility With The Evidence Act? Asst Professor Goh Yihan, Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore Three Distinct but Relevant Questions Before examining
More informationCan Entire Agreement And Exclusion Clauses Cure Misrepresentations?
Can Entire Agreement And Exclusion Clauses Cure Misrepresentations? Introduction The case of BSkyB v HP Enterprise Services UK Ltd [2010] QBD 267 (TCC) involved an invitation to tender by the Plaintiff
More informationMargin Calls Must Observe Notice Period
Margin Calls Must Observe Notice Period Introduction In Lam Chi Kin David v Deutsche Bank AG [2010] SGCA 42, the Court of Appeal dealt with the issue of margin loans, a common subject of dispute in recent
More informationCIPAA As At April 2018 What is Conditional Payment Clause and When is it Void? Is CIPAA Prospective or Retrospective? Or A Hybrid?
CIPAA As At April 2018 What is Conditional Payment Clause and When is it Void? Is CIPAA Prospective or Retrospective? Or A Hybrid? Introduction The Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012
More informationIntellectual Property Case Updates - Malaysia
Case Updates - Malaysia Apex Court Ruled That A Trade Description Order Premised On Trade Mark Infringement May Be Applied For And Granted On An Ex Parte Basis Facts Tan Kim Hock Product Centre Sdn Bhd
More informationForfeiture Clause In Incentive Award Plan Did Not Constitute Restraint In Trade
Forfeiture Clause In Incentive Award Plan Did Not Constitute Restraint In Trade Introduction It is common today for employers to incorporate an incentive award plan into their employment contracts, or
More informationSecurity of payment under FIDIC contracts: more secure, for now
INSIGHT Security of payment under FIDIC contracts: more secure, for now January 28, 2015 Written by Eugene Tan, Tia Starey and Rupert Coldwell The High Court of Singapore recently handed down an important
More informationRecognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Vietnam
CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Vietnam Hanh Tran, Partner, DFDL Vietnam Ho Chi Minh City 12 November 2018 BANGLADESH CAMBODIA INDONESIA LAO P.D.R.
More informationStaying court proceedings in favour of arbitration
On the publication of the second edition of Singapore International Arbitration Law and Practice (2 nd edition) (LexisNexis, 2018), David Joseph QC and David Foxton QC, the editors, offer some thoughts
More informationArbitral tribunals; Decisions; Dispute adjudication boards; Enforcement; FIDIC forms of contract; Jurisdiction; Singapore
An Excellent Decision From Singapore Which Should Enhance the Enforceability of Decisions of Dispute Adjudication Boards the Second Persero Case before the Court of Appeal Christopher R Seppälä * Arbitral
More informationContract & Arbitration Law Developments In 2012
Contract & Arbitration Law Developments In 2012 Introduction 2012 saw a number of developments in the areas of contract and arbitration law. Over the course of the year, we have kept you informed with
More informationthe governing law of the Agreement is New York law; and
The Singapore High Court considers the issue of whether there is a binding independent arbitration agreement, when parties dispute the existence of the underlying contract 16 November 2016 Introduction
More informationCONTACT US. Background
April 2015 Arbitration Singapore Court of Appeal espouses standards to be met when setting aside an arbitral award; reinforces Singapore s pro-arbitration policy CONTACT US In a judgment delivered on 31
More informationSingapore Court Should Not Have Set Aside ICC Award Enforcing Dispute Adjudication Board Decision
MEALEY S TM International Arbitration Report Singapore Court Should Not Have Set Aside ICC Award Enforcing Dispute Adjudication Board Decision by Chris Seppälä White & Case LLP Paris A commentary article
More informationARBITRAL AWARD HELD ENFORCEABLE DESPITE APPLICANT S FAILURE TO FILE EXPERT WITNESS STATEMENT
NOVEMBER 2014 1 ARBITRAL AWARD HELD ENFORCEABLE DESPITE APPLICANT S FAILURE TO FILE EXPERT WITNESS STATEMENT The Singapore High Court recently issued its decision in the case of Triulzi Cesare SRL v Xinyi
More informationA DAB Decision between the Notice of Dissatisfaction and the Enforcement in ICC Arbitration
A DAB Decision between the Notice of Dissatisfaction and the Enforcement in ICC Arbitration Oana Soimulescu Partner, Soimulescu & Soltan, Bucharest 1 I. Introduction A lot has been said about the issue
More informationElectronic Transactions Act Repealed And Re-Enacted
Electronic Transactions Act Repealed And Re-Enacted Overview The Electronic Transactions Act ("ETA") (Cap 88), passed in Parliament on 19 May 2010, came into operation on 1. The ETA seeks to provide for
More informationCommercial Arbitration 2017
Commercial Arbitration 2017 Last verified on Tuesday 27th June 2017 Vietnam K Minh Dang, Do Khoi Nguyen, Ian Fisher and Luan Tran YKVN LLP Infrastructure 1. The New York Convention Is your state a party
More informationThe legal justification for the enforcement of a binding DAB decision under the FIDIC 1999 Red Book
The legal justification for the enforcement of a binding DAB decision under the FIDIC 1999 Red Book Taner Dedezade Corbett & Co International Construction Lawyers Ltd, London In a previous article, the
More informationClient Update August 2009
Highlights Introduction...1 Brief Facts...1 Issue...2 Ruling Of The Court...2 Concluding Words...7 When Is An Innocent Party Entitled To Terminate A Contract? Introduction It is often not difficult deciding
More informationRESERVE POWERS OF MANAGEMENT MAY DEVOLVE TO SHAREHOLDERS WHEN BOARD IS DEADLOCKED
NOVEMBER 2014 1 RESERVE POWERS OF MANAGEMENT MAY DEVOLVE TO SHAREHOLDERS WHEN BOARD IS DEADLOCKED In the recent case of TYC Investment Pte Ltd & Ors v Tay Yun Chwan Henry & Anor [2014] SGHC 192 (10 October
More informationClient Update June 2008
Highlights Relevance Of This Update Introduction Facts Of The Case High Court Ruling...2 The Decision Of The Court Of Appeal Foreseeability Of Damage Proximity The Class Of Persons Whose Claims Should
More information10th Anniversary Edition The Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook. Singapore
10th Anniversary Edition 2016-2017 The Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook Singapore 2017 Arbitration Yearbook Singapore Singapore Chan Leng Sun, S.C. 1 and Tan Weiyi 2 A. Legislation and
More informationCASE UPDATE. Singapore Court Considers Basis To Order a Party to be Joined to an Arbitration. Introduction
Singapore Court Considers Basis To Order a Party to be Joined to an Arbitration Introduction Facts 1. The Singapore Court in The Titan Unity (No 2) [2014] SGHCR 4 recently dealt with the difficult question
More informationBermuda-Form Insurance Coverage Arbitrations in London: Key Issues and Practical Considerations
Bermuda-Form Insurance Coverage Arbitrations in London: Key Issues and Practical Considerations Webinar September 30, 2010 Copyright 2010 by K&L Gates LLP. All rights reserved. Participants Moderator:
More informationCourts and Arbitration A Question of Balance?
Courts and Arbitration A Question of Balance? Recent Developments in Singapore law Chong Yee Leong Partner, Rajah & Tann LLP 24 April 2008 1 Setting The Scene The current economic climate and arbitration
More informationINTERNATIONAL DAYS BOLSTERING COOPERATION
INTERNATIONAL DAYS BOLSTERING COOPERATION OCTOBER 30 & 31 ST 2017 AT RAFFLES HOTEL LE ROYAL PHNOM PENH DIVERSE PERSPECTIVES ON ASEAN AND EU FROM PROFESSORS, LAWYERS, PUBLIC NOTARIES, LEGAL ADVISERS, EXPERTS
More informationINTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION QUARTERLY
International Arbitration June 2012 INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION QUARTERLY The new CIETAC Arbitration Rules 2012: implications for arbitrations in the PRC China International Economic and Trade Arbitration
More informationCHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT. Section A
CHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT Section A Article 9.1: Definitions For the purposes of this Chapter: Centre means the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) established by the ICSID Convention;
More informationRHB Research 01 April THAILAND EQUITY Investment Research. Charter Amendments
THAILAND EQUITY Investment Research Veena Naidu, Head of Research +66 (2) 862 9752 veena.na@th.oskgroup.com April-Stock Picks Stock Target (THB) BAY 41.00 BBL 290.00 AMATA 35.00 TICON 31.00 THAI 36.90
More informationEU-ASEAN: Natural Partners 35 Years of Friendship and Cooperation
EU-ASEAN: Natural Partners 35 Years of Friendship and Cooperation EU-ASEAN a common DNA As the two major regional integration initiatives in the world, ASEAN and the EU are indeed natural partners and
More informationConsolidated text PROJET DE LOI ENTITLED. The Arbitration (Guernsey) Law, 2016 * [CONSOLIDATED TEXT] NOTE
PROJET DE LOI ENTITLED The Arbitration (Guernsey) Law, 2016 * [CONSOLIDATED TEXT] NOTE This consolidated version of the enactment incorporates all amendments listed in the footnote below. It has been prepared
More informationCASE UPDATE. The High Court Considers the Status and Scope of an Arbitration Agreement in the Context of a Termination of the Main Contract
The High Court Considers the Status and Scope of an Arbitration Agreement in the Context of a Termination of the Main Contract 6 June 2018 Introduction 1. In the recent decision of Nippon Catalyst Pte
More informationAstro v. Lippo: Hong Kong Court Clarifies The Discretion Found In Article V Of The New York Convention, But Holds Firm On Time Limits
MEALEY S 1 International Arbitration Report Astro v. Lippo: Hong Kong Court Clarifies The Discretion Found In Article V Of The New York Convention, But Holds Firm On Time Limits by Chiann Bao Skadden,
More informationJapan Arbitration Update: New JCAA Rules Comparison of Key Asian Arbitral Institutions
Japan Arbitration Update: New JCAA Rules Comparison of Key Asian Arbitral Institutions INTRODUCTION As we reported recently, the published new Commercial Arbitration Rules earlier this year. The new JCAA
More informationARBITRATION AND COMPETITION LAW NEW PROSPECTS OF RECOVERY FOR VICTIMS OF ANTITRUST INFRINGEMENTS
ARBITRATION AND COMPETITION LAW NEW PROSPECTS OF RECOVERY FOR VICTIMS OF ANTITRUST INFRINGEMENTS REPRINTED FROM: CORPORATE DISPUTES MAGAZINE JUL-SEP 2014 ISSUE corporate CDdisputes Visit the website to
More informationClient Alert March 2017
Dispute Resolution Singapore Client Alert March 2017 Rong Shun Engineering & Construction Pte Ltd v C.P. Ong Construction Pte Ltd For More Information: Nandakumar Ponniya Principal +65 6434 2663 nandakumar.ponniya
More informationLegal Business. Overview Of Court Procedure. Memoranda on legal and business issues and concerns for multiple industry and business communities
Memoranda on legal and business issues and concerns for multiple industry and business communities Overview Of Court Procedure 1 Rajah & Tann 4 Battery Road #26-01 Bank of China Building Singapore 049908
More informationSINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC)
GUIDE TO INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION IN SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE (SIAC) Written By S. Ravi Shankar Advocate on Record - Supreme Court of India National President of Arbitration Bar of India
More informationThe Arbitration Act, 1992
1 The Arbitration Act, 1992 being Chapter A-24.1* of the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1992 (effective April 1, 1993) as amended by the Statutes of Saskatchewan, 1993, c.17; 2010, c.e-9.22; 2015, c.21; and
More informationDevelopments in Construction Law in Singapore (2014)
Developments in Construction Law in Singapore (2014) Ho Chien Mien Partner Litigation and Dispute Resolution 20 January 2015 1 H P Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd v Chin Ivan [2014] SGHC 137 Architect
More informationADR INSTITUTE OF CANADA, INC. ADRIC ARBITRATION RULES I. MODEL DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE
ADR INSTITUTE OF CANADA, INC. ADRIC ARBITRATION RULES I. MODEL DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAUSE Parties who agree to arbitrate under the Rules may use the following clause in their agreement: ADRIC Arbitration
More informationEnforcing International Arbitral Awards in the UAE and The DIFC Courts: A conduit jurisdiction
Enforcing International Arbitral Awards in the UAE and The DIFC Courts: A conduit jurisdiction Simon Roderick Yacine Francis April 2016 www.allenovery.com 2 Meeting you today Simon Roderick Partner Dubai
More informationTHE SINGAPORE APPROACH TO THE ADJOURNMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO ENFORCE A FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD
Published on 6 September 2018 THE SINGAPORE APPROACH TO THE ADJOURNMENT OF PROCEEDINGS TO ENFORCE A FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARD Margaret Joan LING LLB (National University of Singapore); Partner, Litigation
More informationHONG KONG (Updated January 2018)
Arbitration Guide IBA Arbitration Committee HONG KONG (Updated January 2018) Glenn Haley Haley Ho & Partners in Association with Berwin Leighton Paisner (HK) 25 th Floor, Dorset House Taikoo Place, 979
More informationARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013)
ARBITRATION RULES OF THE SINGAPORE INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION CENTRE SIAC RULES (5 TH EDITION, 1 APRIL 2013) 1. Scope of Application and Interpretation 1.1 Where parties have agreed to refer their disputes
More informationSingapore High Court: Unravelling the unwind of accumulator contracts.
February 2016 Singapore High Court: Unravelling the unwind of accumulator contracts. Introduction On 10 February 2016, the Singapore High Court in Tan Poh Leng Stanley v UBS AG [2016] SGHC 17 delivered
More informationSeat v Venue. 8 May
Seat v Venue Is the Arbitration governed by Malaysian Arbitration Act 2005? Seat of Arbitration as distinct from Venue Lex Arbitri not Lex Contractus Jurisdictional Law of the Arbitration Is Seat = Malaysia?
More informationEmergency arbitrators: can they be useful to the construction industry?
Louise Barrington Aculex Transnational Dispute Resolution Services, Hong Kong, Paris & Toronto Emergency arbitrators: can they be useful to the construction industry? Employer about to call your bond?
More informationADJUDICATION: RAISING OBJECTIONS TO THE ADJUDICATOR S JURISDICTION OR BREACH OF SOP ACT AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE OPPORTUNITY
ADJUDICATION: RAISING OBJECTIONS TO THE ADJUDICATOR S JURISDICTION OR BREACH OF SOP ACT AT THE EARLIEST POSSIBLE OPPORTUNITY Grouteam Pte Ltd v UES Holdings Pte Ltd [2016] SGCA 59 In Summary This Singapore
More informationSetting aside an international arbitration award based on deficient pleadings
Setting aside an international arbitration award based on deficient pleadings DARIUS CHAN * Kempinski Hotels SA v PT Prima International Development [2011] SGHC 171 If it isn t pleaded, you can t consider
More informationA guide to civil litigation and arbitration in Hong Kong, from a Mainland perspective
A guide to litigation and arbitration in Hong Kong October 12014 A guide to civil litigation and arbitration in Hong Kong, from a Mainland perspective 1. Brief description of the civil litigation process
More informationQuarella SpA v Scelta Marble Australia Pty Ltd [2012] SGHC 166
MEALEY S TM International Arbitration Report Quarella SpA v Scelta Marble Australia Pty Ltd [2012] SGHC 166 by Andrew Battisson and Sunil Mawkin Allen & Overy LLP Singapore A commentary article reprinted
More informationEU-ASEAN: Natural Partners
EU-ASEAN: Natural Partners EU-ASEAN a common DNA As the two major regional integration initiatives in the world, ASEAN and the EU are natural partners and it is no wonder our cooperation has flourished
More informationArbitration Act CHAPTER Part I. Arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement. Introductory
Arbitration Act 1996 1996 CHAPTER 23 1 Part I Arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement Introductory 1. General principles. 2. Scope of application of provisions. 3. The seat of the arbitration.
More informationThe World Intellectual Property Organization
The World Intellectual Property Organization The World Intellectual Property Organization is an international organization dedicated to ensuring that the rights of creators and owners of intellectual property
More informationGetting ready for Ontario s new Construction Act. Understanding the key changes and how to prepare for them. Howard Krupat
Getting ready for Ontario s new Construction Act Understanding the key changes and how to prepare for them Howard Krupat Getting ready for Ontario s new Construction Act Understanding the key changes and
More informationVIETNAM LAWS ONLINE DATABASE License Agreement Multi-user (Special)
VIETNAM LAWS ONLINE DATABASE License Agreement Multi-user (Special) A multi-user (special) subscription to the Vietnam Laws Online Database is governed by the terms and conditions of this License Agreement.
More informationOpening Remarks at ASEM Trust Fund Meeting
Opening Remarks at ASEM Trust Fund Meeting Christian A. Rey, Manager, Quality and Results Central Operational Services Unit East Asia and Pacific Region, the World Bank June 28, 2006 Good morning. It is
More informationCHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT. Section A: Investment
CHAPTER 9 INVESTMENT Section A: Investment ARTICLE 9.1: DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this Chapter: (d) covered investment means, with respect to a Party, an investment in its territory of an investor
More informationSingapore International Commercial Court issues first decision. A Legal Update from Dechert's International Arbitration Group
Singapore International Commercial Court issues first decision A Legal Update from Dechert's International Arbitration Group June 2016 Following the establishment of the Singapore International Commercial
More informationThe Gap in Sub-Clause 20.7 of The 1999 FIDIC Contracts for Major Works
The Gap in Sub-Clause 20.7 of The 1999 FIDIC Contracts for Major Works by Nael G. Bunni, BSc, MSc, PhD, CEng, FICE, FIEI, FIStructE, FCIArb, FIAE, MConsEI. Chartered Engineer, Conciliator & Registered
More informationCourts and Arbitration A Question of Balance?
Courts and Arbitration A Question of Balance? Recent Developments in Singapore law Sundaresh Menon Senior Partner, Rajah & Tann 11 1 Setting the scene The current economic climate and arbitration Well-functioning
More informationASEAN Protocol on Enhanced Dispute Settlement Mechanism
ASEAN Protocol on Enhanced Dispute Settlement Mechanism The Governments of Brunei Darussalam, the Kingdom of Cambodia, the Republic of Indonesia, the Lao People s Democratic Republic, Malaysia, the Union
More informationArbitration Act 1996
Arbitration Act 1996 An Act to restate and improve the law relating to arbitration pursuant to an arbitration agreement; to make other provision relating to arbitration and arbitration awards; and for
More informationArbitration Rules of the Court of International Commercial Arbitration of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Romania
Arbitration Rules of the Court of International Commercial Arbitration of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of Romania adopted by the Board of the Court of International Commercial Arbitration in force
More informationHOW TO DEVELOP SUCCESSFUL REAL ESTATE PROJECTS IN THE MEKONG REGION? THAILAND, CAMBODIA, MYANMAR, LAOS & VIETNAM Presented by: Marc Townsend,
HOW TO DEVELOP SUCCESSFUL REAL ESTATE PROJECTS IN THE MEKONG REGION? THAILAND, CAMBODIA, MYANMAR, LAOS & VIETNAM Presented by: Marc Townsend, Managing Director, CBRE Vietnam May 15, 2014 1 EMERGING MARKETS
More informationView Esteem Sdn Bhd v Bina Puri Holdings Bhd*
CIDB Construction Law Report 2016 View Esteem Sdn Bhd v Bina Puri Holdings Bhd* COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA CIVIL APPEAL NO: W 02(C)(A) 1507 09/2015 HAMID SULTAN BIN ABU BACKER JCA, PRASAD SANDOSHAM ABRAHAM
More informationTHE ROLE OF THE COURTS IN THE ARBITRATION PROCESS
THE ROLE OF THE COURTS IN THE ARBITRATION PROCESS 22 April 2010 Presentation by Ng Kim Beng Partner, International Arbitration Practice (65) 6232 0182 Key Points Courts in Singapore will uphold arbitration
More informationENFORCEMENT OF DAB DECISIONS IN ARBITRATION PART I. by Giovanni Di Folco and Mark Tiggeman
ENFORCEMENT OF DAB DECISIONS IN ARBITRATION PART I Enforcement of a DAB Decision in Arbitration, Part I Page 3 of 16 Giovanni Di Folco Giovanni Di Folco is the Senior Partner of the international consulting
More informationEU-Singapore Trade & Investment
www.europe.org.sg EU-Singapore Trade & Investment The European Union European Union 500 million citizens 27 member states Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland,
More informationCase Note. Nicholas POON* LLB (Summa) (Singapore Management University); Justices Law Clerk, Supreme Court of Singapore.
(2014) 26 SAcLJ on Jurisdiction 269 Case Note SETTING ASIDE PRELIMINARY RULINGS ON JURISDICTION International Research Corp plc v Lufthansa Systems Asia Pacific Pte Ltd [2014] 1 SLR 130 and PT Asuransi
More information10th Anniversary Edition The Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook. Malaysia
10th Anniversary Edition 2016-2017 The Baker McKenzie International Arbitration Yearbook Malaysia 2017 Arbitration Yearbook Malaysia Malaysia Elaine Yap 1 A. Legislation and rules A.1 Legislation Arbitration
More informationComplaints against Government - Judicial Review
Complaints against Government - Judicial Review CHAPTER CONTENTS Introduction 2 Review of State Government Action 2 What Government Actions may be Challenged 2 Who Can Make a Complaint about Government
More informationLEGAL ISSUES AFFECTING RELIGIOUS FREEDOM: ASIA AREA JULY 8, 2015
LEGAL ISSUES AFFECTING RELIGIOUS FREEDOM: ASIA AREA JULY 8, 2015 Asia Area: Background Includes 22 countries/territories Of the 22, the LDS Church has activities or operations in 18 Nothing in Bhutan,
More informationPublished on e-first 1 June AGENCY LAW
Published on e-first 1 June 2018 3. AGENCY LAW Pearlie KOH LLB (Hons) (National University of Singapore), LLM (University of Melbourne); Advocate & Solicitor (Singapore); Associate Professor, Singapore
More informationFreight Investor Solutions DMCC Terms of Business
Freight Investor Solutions DMCC Terms of Business 1. COMMENCEMENT 1.1 The term Agreement hereunder shall mean collectively these Terms of Business ( Terms ), and Freight Investor Solutions DMCC Order Execution
More informationWhat Constitutes a Supplementary Award of CIETAC Arbitration? A Recent Interpretation by a Hong Kong Court
What Constitutes a Supplementary Award of CIETAC Arbitration? A Recent Interpretation by a Hong Kong Court Steven Wei SU* In an action brought before the Court of First Instance of High Court of Hong Kong
More informationDispute Resolution Around the World. Vietnam
Dispute Resolution Around the World Vietnam Dispute Resolution Around the World Vietnam 2013 Dispute Resolution Around the World Vietnam Table of Contents 1. Legal System... 1 2. Courts... 2 3. Legal
More informationRULES OF ARBITRATION
RULES OF ARBITRATION IN FORCE AS FROM 1 NOVEMBER 2016 Palais Brongniart, 16 place de la Bourse, 75002 Paris, France www.delosdr.org. secretariat@delosdr.org MODEL CLAUSES... 2 SEAT AND LANGUAGES S CHEDULES
More information