DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29NCC /2015

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29NCC /2015"

Transcription

1 DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29NCC /2015 BERKENAAN : KAMALASAN A/L TANGARAJOO (NO. K/P: ). PENGHUTANG PENGHAKIMAN EX-PARTE : AmBank (M) Berhad (No. Syarikat: 8515-D) (yang telah mengambil alih kesemua Perniagaan, asetaset dan liabiliti MBF Cards (M sia) Sdn Bhd melalui Perintah Letak Hak bertarikh 25 Jun 2013). PEMIUTANG PENGHAKIMAN 1

2 GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT Introduction [1] This application was filed by the Judgment Debtor (JD) dated to reinstate the Notice of Appeal of which was struck out on as both parties failed to appear before the learned Deputy Registrar. [2] Prior to that the JD had filed on an application to set aside the AORO filed by the Judgment Creditor (JC) but was dismissed by the learned Deputy Registrar on with cost RM500. [3] The parties, in this judgment, will be known as JD and JC. Background Facts [4] The JC is a credit card issuance company (that had taken over all the business, assets and liabilities of MBF Cards (M sia) Sdn Bhd by way of an order of the High Court of Kuala Lumpur of ). 2

3 [5] The JD is a Malaysian citizen, holding a MBF credit card bearing number [6] The JC filed a Notice of Bankruptcy dated (Enclosure No. 1) application at the High Court of Shah Alam against the JD for the recovery of the sum of RM36, as of The Bankruptcy Notice (Enclosure No. 2) provides the details of the claim based on the Judgment dated [7] On an Adjudicating and Receiving Order was granted against the JD. [8] The JD then filed an application dated to set-aside the Adjudicating and the Receiving Order dated with a supporting Affidavit affirmed on and was dismissed by the learned Deputy Registrar on [9] Thereafter, the JD on filed the Notice of Appeal and the hearing was fixed on (Enclosure No. 35). 3

4 [10] The JD s counsel claimed that a search was done at the Bankruptcy Registry and was informed that the said Notice of Appeal to Judge in Chambers was dismissed due to absence of parties on [11] On , the JD filed an application Summon In Chambers to reinstate the Notice of Appeal with supporting affidavits of one Kamalasan A/L Tangarajoo and one Selvam A/L Shanmugam. The JC had filed its affidavit in reply affirmed by one Mohamed Omar Bin Abu Bakar on in reply to the two affidavits of the JD namely Affidavit In Reply 1 (Enclosure No. 43) and Affidavit In Reply 2 (Enclosure No. 44). JD s Submission [12] The learned counsel for the JD submitted that its application is to invoke this Honourable Court s inherent jurisdiction and power to make the necessary order pertaining to its application to reinstate the Notice of Appeal. The counsel for the JD argued that the merits should have been heard based on the authorities, the case of Kesatuan Pekerja-Pekerja 4

5 Malaysia Shipyard & Engineering Sdn Bhd v Malaysia Shipyard & Engineering Sdn Bhd & Anor And Another Appeal [2007] 7 CLJ and the case of Gan Kim Kiat & Brotehrs Realty Sdn Bhd [1983] CLJ. [13] Based on the Affidavit of the JD, the contention was about the Creditor s Petition was not dated and therefore the judgement of consist of non-existence date. It was also submitted that the Deputy Registrar did not include the deductions that is the payment made by the JD and that the Creditor s Petition hearing was conducted earlier than the given date as in the Bankruptcy Notice. [14] The JD relied heavily on the Kesatuan Pekerja-Pekerja (supra) case submitting that the Court of Appeal in that case gave numerous opportunity to perfect the Record of Appeal and adjournment before striking out the appeal. The JD s counsel submitted that it is seeking this Court s vested power to allow its case to be heard as the said Notice of Appeal was struck out before it was heard on merits and that would be prejudicial to the JD. The JD also submitted that the JC can be compensated by way of costs and JC will not suffer prejudice as JC will have the opportunity to be heard. 5

6 JC s Submission [15] The learned counsel for the JC submitted that the JD is not entitled for this application for a number of grounds, mainly that there was an unexplained and unreasonable delay for JD to do the search and respond amounting to two months. The counsel for JC further added that none in the affidavits of the JD explained as to why the JD s counsel did not do anything for 2 months. The counsel for JC argued that the JD s defence is without merits and referred the Court to the High Court decision of Permata Chartered Merchant Bank Bhd v Hiew Fook Realty (Holdings) Sdn Bhd & Ors [1992] 1 MLJ 73. [16] The counsel for JC further submitted that there must be a reasonable explanation to the delay in reinstating the Notice of Appeal as decided in the High Court case of MBf Finance Berhad (8515-D) v Low Son Loo Soon Siong, T/A Delightful Vision Centre [2011] MLJU 379, Namun, prinsip juga mantap bahawa beberapa pra-syarat perlu dipatuhi untuk Mahkamah menggunakan budi bicaranya 6

7 meluluskan permohonan begini. Pertama, perlu ada penjelasan yang munsabah dan mencukupi untuk ketidakhadiran. Kedua, jika permohonan difailkan lewat dan di luar had masa, perlu ada penjelasan yang baik untuk kelewatan. Ketiga, pemohon perlu menunjukkan terdapat merit dalam tuntutannya. Penjelasan yang dikemukakan perlulah sekurang-kurangnya bona fide dan berasaskan kebenaran. Inilah persoalan utama yang berbangkit dalam Rayuan ini, iaitu sama ada alasan-alasan yang diberikan oleh Perayu untuk ketidakhadiran dan kelewatan harus diterima sebagai bona fide dan benar. [17] With respect to the other defences, in particular that the Creditor s Petition was defective as it was contrary to section 99 of the Bankruptcy Act 1967 as it was not dated, the counsel for the JC submitted that the Creditor s Petition was signed prior to filing and was filed two months from the date of the act of bankruptcy and the error was on the form rather than on substance. The counsel for the JC relied on the authority Joseph Phun Yeat Mun Ex Parte ABN-AMRO Bank N.V [1997] 1 LNS 210 which held that the petition although was not dated, it was presented after the act of bankruptcy and therefore the judgment 7

8 debtor was not prejudiced. The JC s counsel also referred to section 131 of the Bankruptcy Act 1967 that the defect was not substantial and argued that it does not prejudice the JD: Re A Debtor Ex P The Debtor v Bowmaker Ltd [1951] 1 CH 313. [18] The JC s counsel further submits that the petition served was regular based on the last known address as in the agreement and a search was made based on the identification card from the National Registration Department. In addition, the JC s counsel argued that this is not the proper forum to question on the service of the Bankruptcy Notice and Creditor Petition. THE COURT S FINDING [19] The JD asserted that this Honourable Court should allow its application to reinstate the Notice of Appeal as their defence is with merits based on several grounds given in the Affidavits of (Enclosure No. 40 and Enclosure No. 41). The main defence is that the delay in applying for reinstatement is due to no information received as to the status of the application of The Affidavit of the JD as 8

9 at Enclosure 40 paragraph 5 stated that there was no complete reply from the e-filing system, atas alasan peguamcara saya tidak dapat balasan sempurna daripada e-filing system yang telah dilakukan oleh peguamcara saya. This was supported by the counsel for the JD in its Affidavit (Enclosure No. 41) at paragraph 4 that the counsel did not receive notification through or update and only when they did the search at the Bankruptcy Registration Department, they found out that the Notice of Appeal was dismissed on [20] The Court heard that the Notice of Appeal was struck out due to non-appearance of the parties. This is a bankruptcy matter governed by the Bankruptcy Act It is incumbent upon the Court to accord its provisions a strict construction. Following section 5(1)(a) of the Bankruptcy Act 1967, the JC s right to serve a petition on the JD when there is a debt amounting to RM30, or more. The JC has an obligation under section 6(2) of the Bankruptcy Act 1967 to prove that 9

10 there is debt owing by the JD, that a bankruptcy action had occurred and that if the JD failed to enter appearance, the petition served is regular. [21] Upon careful perusal of the Creditor Petition (Enclosure No. 9), this Court finds that the JC had served the Bankruptcy Notice on the JD according to the correct methods, that is by way of newspaper advertisement on , by way of a notice put up at the Shah Alam High Court on and served to the JD s last known address on (at paragraph 4 of Enclosure No. 9). The Creditor s Petition stated that the JD had committed bankruptcy six months prior to the Creditor Petition served. The Creditor Petition stated that the amount due is RM36, as of and the details of deductions based on the payment made by JD dated , , , and had been included. [22] It is trite law that the Court retains the discretion to set aside an irregular judgment despite long delay as decided by the Federal Court in the case of Tuan Haji Ahmad Abdul Rahman v Arab-Malaysian Finance Berhad [1996] 1 CLJ 241 where at page 253, it remarked that, 10

11 provided it is satisfied that, (a) no one has suffered prejudice by reason of the defendant s delay; (b) alternatively, where such prejudice has been sustained, it can be met by an appropriate order as to costs; or (c) to let the judgment stand would constitute oppression. (See Attwood v Chichester [1878] 3 QBD 772; Harley v Samson [1914] 30 TLR 450. We would add that under its inherent jurisdiction to prevent an abuse of its proceedings, the Court has power to set aside a judgment in default, despite the defendant s application being out of time if the particular circumstances of the case require the intervention of the Court. (See Beale v McGregor [1886] 2 TLR 311). [23] This Court finds that the JD did not deny that it owes the JC a debt exceeding RM30, The JD s contention on the details that the JC did not include the deductions based on the payment made by the JD is untrue based on the Bankruptcy Notice (Enclosure No. 2) and Creditor Petition (Enclosure No. 9). This Court had a close scrutiny on the 11

12 Affidavits by the JD and the JD s counsel (Enclosure 40 and Enclosure 41 respectively) and found that the purported search made by the counsel for the JD was without date and no proof as to the e-filing problem that had occurred. [24] The Court finds that there was no evidence to show that the JD had raised with the service provider, Formis about the extraction problem based on e-filing system. Based on the JD s counsel s letter of (exhibit S-1 ), there was a discrepancy on how the search was made where it was stated that the JD s counsel contacted the Bankruptcy Registration Department whereas in the Affidavit (Enclosure 41, paragraph 4), it was stated that the search was made at the Bankruptcy Registration Department. I viewed that the JC s statement is more probable to be truthful that the search by JD was made only after 2 months (see Affidavit in Reply at paragraphs 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18, Enclosure 44 and paragraphs of Enclosure 43) based on the affidavit evidence of the JD. [25] I find that the JD in its application for reinstatement did not offer any explanation for the delay of two months. Surely the JD in a 12

13 bankruptcy action which is a quasi-criminal in nature would want to pursue the matter promptly in appealing against the execution of a bankruptcy notice: Affin Bank Berhad v Abu Bakar Bin Ismail (Civil Appeal No.: W-03(IM)-18-02/2016. I find that the delay by the JD s counsel is unjustified and that such delay in reinstating by the counsel for the JD does not give a ground for special leave based on the Federal Court s decision of Chin Hua Sawmill Co Sdn Bhd v Tuan Yusoff Bin Tuan Mohamed [1974] 1 MLJ 58. [26] Based on section 131 of the Bankruptcy Act, the ground for the reinstatement due to defect petition on the basis of no date in the petition does not amount to substantial prejudice and should not be invalidated. I find such ground submitted by the JD unjustified for the petition to be declared invalid and I rely on the case of Joseph Phun Year Mun (supra) case attributed by the JC s counsel that such slight error does not amount to substantial injustice, thus no prejudice for the JD. [27] There were other arguments advanced by the JD but I find them inconsequential. I have answered the main ground that there was no justified reason to allow for the reinstatement of the Notice of Appeal as 13

14 there was no bona fide claim of merits on the part of the JD to warrant for reinstatement. I hereby dismiss the application with cost. Dated: 31 July 2017 (DATIN ZALITA BINTI DATO HJ. ZAIDAN) Judicial Commissioner Shah Alam High Court 14

15 SOLICITORS: APPELLANT/JD : S. SELVAM Tetuan Selvam Shanmugam & Partners Peguambela dan Peguamcara , Office Suite 10 th Floor, Kompleks Mutiara Batu 3 ½ Jalan Ipoh Kuala Lumpur [No. Rujukan: SS&P/938/2016/Bnk] Tel: Fax: RESPONDENT/JC : NOOR FARAZIDAH BINTI ISMAIL Tetuan Vas & Co. Peguamcara & Peguambela No. 14-1, Jalan Remia 5/KS6 Bandar Botanic, Klang Selangor Darul Ehsan [No. Rujukan: V/AM/1217/16] Tel: Fax:

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: 11ANCVC-44-08/2016 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: 11ANCVC-44-08/2016 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: 11ANCVC-44-08/2016 ANTARA YEOH LIANG CHUAN (No. K/P: 481027-07-5351). PERAYU DAN JAGJIT SINGH (mendakwa sebagai

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: /2013

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: /2013 DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA KES KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29-3300-03/2013 PER : YASMIN PEREMA BINTI ABDULLAH (NO. K/P: 730427-05-5030). PERAYU/ PENGHUTANG

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN DALAM KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29NCC /2016 ANTARA. Dan

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN DALAM KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29NCC /2016 ANTARA. Dan DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN DALAM KEBANKRAPAN NO: 29NCC-384-01/16 5 ANTARA Berkenaan : LIM CHENG POW (NRIC NO : 4401-71-5375) Dan Ex-Parte : LIM CHENG POW

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA [BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN] RAYUAN SIVIL NO. J-01(IM) /2014 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA [BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN] RAYUAN SIVIL NO. J-01(IM) /2014 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA [BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN] RAYUAN SIVIL NO. J-01(IM)-296-08/2014 ANTARA KETUA PENGARAH INSOLVENSI, bagi Harta Goh Ah Kai, Bankrap PERAYU DAN 1. GOH AH KAI RESPONDEN- 2. PARKWAY

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA [BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN] RAYUAN SIVIL NO. W-03(IM)-85-07/2014 ANTARA DAN MEDTRONIC AUSTRALASIA PTY LIMITED

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA [BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN] RAYUAN SIVIL NO. W-03(IM)-85-07/2014 ANTARA DAN MEDTRONIC AUSTRALASIA PTY LIMITED DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA [BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN] RAYUAN SIVIL NO. W-03(IM)-85-07/2014 ANTARA AZMAN BIN JUFRI DAN MEDTRONIC AUSTRALASIA PTY LIMITED PERAYU RESPONDEN (Dalam Perkara Mahkamah Tinggi Malaya

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) [RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-02(NCVC)(W) /2013] ANTARA DAN

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) [RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-02(NCVC)(W) /2013] ANTARA DAN DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) [RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-02(NCVC)(W)-143-01/2013] ANTARA 1. MUAFAKAT KEKAL SDN BHD 2. PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN PALM SPRING @ DAMANSARA... PERAYU DAN 1. PESURUHJAYA

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-02(IM)(NCC) ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-02(IM)(NCC) ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-02(IM)(NCC)-3609-2010 ANTARA KEJURUTERAAN BINTAI KINDENKO SDN. BHD.. PERAYU DAN (1) NAM FATT CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD (No:

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W /2014 BETWEEN

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W /2014 BETWEEN DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: W-02-1480-09/2014 BETWEEN ANEKA MELOR SDN. BHD. PERAYU (No. Syarikat: 0227188-T) DAN SERI SABCO (M) SDN BHD RESPONDEN (No. Syarikat:

More information

CIRCULAR 2017/02. Tick ( ) where applicable. Please reply to any of Sara Worldwide Vacations Berhad Member Service Centres by 20 September 2017.

CIRCULAR 2017/02. Tick ( ) where applicable. Please reply to any of Sara Worldwide Vacations Berhad Member Service Centres by 20 September 2017. CIRCULAR 2017/02 Dear Valued Members, Warmest greetings from Easturia Vacation Club! 1. EASTURIA VACATION CLUB 6 th MEMBERS ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING We are pleased to inform that the 6 th Members Annual

More information

CIRCULAR TO SHAREHOLDERS

CIRCULAR TO SHAREHOLDERS THIS CIRCULAR IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION If you are in any doubt as to the course of action you should take, you should consult your stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant

More information

Attestation of Registrable Instruments (Mining) LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT. Act 387 ATTESTATION OF REGISTRABLE INSTRUMENTS (MINING) ACT 1960

Attestation of Registrable Instruments (Mining) LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT. Act 387 ATTESTATION OF REGISTRABLE INSTRUMENTS (MINING) ACT 1960 Attestation of Registrable Instruments (Mining) 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 387 ATTESTATION OF REGISTRABLE INSTRUMENTS (MINING) ACT 1960 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY

More information

MALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT FEDERAL TERRITORY, LABUAN. CIVIL CASE NO: LBN-24NCvC-6/ BETWEEN SEJATI SDN. BHD..

MALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT FEDERAL TERRITORY, LABUAN. CIVIL CASE NO: LBN-24NCvC-6/ BETWEEN SEJATI SDN. BHD.. MALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT FEDERAL TERRITORY, LABUAN CIVIL CASE NO: LBN-24NCvC-6/8-2016 BETWEEN SEJATI SDN. BHD.. PLAINTIFF AND DIRECTOR OF LANDS AND SURVEYS.. 1 ST DEFENDANT SABAH

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. W ANTARA DAN

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. W ANTARA DAN DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. W 02 1329 2005 ANTARA UNITED OVERSEAS BANK (MALAYSIA) SDN BHD DAN UJA SDN BHD PERAYU RESPONDEN (Dalam perkara Saman Pemula No. S3-24-2162-2004

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO (P) ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO (P) ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. 02-4-2004(P) ANTARA 1. JOCELINE TAN POH CHOO 2. THE GROUP EDITOR, NEW STRAITS TIMES 3. THE NEW STRAITS TIMES PRESS (M) BHD Perayu-

More information

MALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT KUCHING SUIT NO II BETWEEN AND

MALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT KUCHING SUIT NO II BETWEEN AND MALAYSIA IN THE HIGH COURT IN SABAH AND SARAWAK AT KUCHING SUIT NO. 22-74-08-II BETWEEN CMS ENERGY SDN BHD (Company No.34309-A) Level 6, Wisma Mahmud Jalan Sungai Sarawak 930 Kuching, Sarawak Plaintiff

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA (DALAM BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12B /2016

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA (DALAM BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12B /2016 DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA (DALAM BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12B-164-09/2016 ANTARA ZI PRODUCTIONS SDN. BHD. (NO PENDAFTARAN SYARIKAT:

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: J /2012 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: J /2012 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: J-02-2627-11/2012 ANTARA MILLENNIUM MEDICARE SERVICES Mendakwa sebagai firma PERAYU DAN NAGADEVAN A/L MAHALINGAM RESPONDEN (Dalam Perkara

More information

the court has jurisdiction to grant a mandatory injunction on an ex parte application in urgent and exceptional cases;

the court has jurisdiction to grant a mandatory injunction on an ex parte application in urgent and exceptional cases; [1986] 1 MLJ 256 BANK ISLAM MALAYSIA BHD v TINTA PRESS SDN BHD & ORS OCJ KUALA LUMPUR ZAKARIA YATIM J CIVIL SUIT NO C2518 OF 1984 20 August 1985 Practice and Procedure Interlocutory mandatory injunction

More information

VALID AND INVALID VARIATION OMISSION OF WORKS MOTHILAL A/L MUNIANDY

VALID AND INVALID VARIATION OMISSION OF WORKS MOTHILAL A/L MUNIANDY VALID AND INVALID VARIATION OMISSION OF WORKS MOTHILAL A/L MUNIANDY A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Master of Science (Construction Contract

More information

BANKRUPTCY (AMENDMENT) ACT

BANKRUPTCY (AMENDMENT) ACT Bankruptcy (Amendment) 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA BANKRUPTCY (AMENDMENT) ACT 2017 2 Laws of Malaysia Date of Royal Assent...... 10 May 2017 Date of publication in the Gazette......... 18 May 2017 Publisher s Copyright

More information

Held (dismissing the application)

Held (dismissing the application) 1 SIA CHENG SOON & ANOR v. TENGKU ISMAIL TENGKU IBRAHIM FEDERAL COURT, PUTRAJAYA ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, CJ; ZAKI TUN AZMI, PCA; ARIFFIN ZAKARIA, FCJ CIVIL APPLICATION NO: 08-151-2007 (N) 15 MAY 2008 [2008]

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN DI MALAYSIA (BINDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: M-02(NCVC)(W) /2016

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN DI MALAYSIA (BINDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: M-02(NCVC)(W) /2016 DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN DI MALAYSIA (BINDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: M-02(NCVC)(W)-1142-06/2016 1. SHA KANNAN 2. KAMBARAMAN SHANMUKHAM...PERAYU PERAYU DAN 1. ARUNACHALAM A/L VENKATACHALAM 2. VENKATACHALAM

More information

D.R. 48/96 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Prosedur Jenayah.

D.R. 48/96 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Prosedur Jenayah. D.R. 48/96 Naskhah Sahih Bahasa Inggeris RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Prosedur Jenayah. [ ] MAKA INILAH DIPERBUAT UNDANG-UNDANG oleh Seri Paduka Baginda Yang di-pertuan

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: W-01(NCVC)(W) /2016 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: W-01(NCVC)(W) /2016 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO.: W-01(NCVC)(W)-308-08/2016 ANTARA 1. KERAJAAN MALAYSIA 2. KEMENTERIAN PERDAGANGAN DALAM NEGERI KOPERASI DAN KEPENGGUNAAN.. PERAYU-

More information

KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH TINGGI (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/ JABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA/ PUBLISHED BY

KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH TINGGI (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/ JABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA/ PUBLISHED BY WARTA KERAJAAN PERSEKUTUAN 29 Jun 2011 29 June 2011 P.U. (A) 210 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH TINGGI (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE HIGH COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/ PUBLISHED

More information

PERMOHONAN PEMBAHARUAN PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A RENEWAL OF PERMIT

PERMOHONAN PEMBAHARUAN PERMIT APPLICATION FOR A RENEWAL OF PERMIT Borang SPAN/P/2 JADUAL KEEMPAT [subkaedah 8(2)/subrule 8(2)] AKTA INDUSTRI PERKHIDMATAN AIR 2006 WATER SERVICES INDUSTRY ACT 2006 KAEDAH-KAEDAH INDUSTRI PERKHIDMATAN AIR (PERMIT) 2007 WATER SERVICES INDUSTRY

More information

KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE FEDERAL COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/ JABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA/ PUBLISHED BY

KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE FEDERAL COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/ JABATAN PEGUAM NEGARA/ PUBLISHED BY WARTA KERAJAAN PERSE EKUTUAN 29 Jun 2011 29 June 2011 P.U. (A) 208 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE KAEDAH-KAEDAH MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN (PINDAAN) 2011 RULES OF THE FEDERAL COURT (AMENDMENT) 2011 DISIARKAN OLEH/

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12NCVC-7-01/2016 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12NCVC-7-01/2016 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12NCVC-7-01/2016 ANTARA OBNET SDN BHD (DAHULU DIKENALI SEBAGAI INTELLIGENT EDGE SOLUTIONS SDN BHD)

More information

GUIDELINES FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION

GUIDELINES FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION MALAYSIAN COMMUNICATIONS AND MULTIMEDIA COMMISSION GUIDELINES FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION JULY 2003 Malaysian Communications and Multimedia Commission Level 11, Menara Dato Onn PWTC, Jalan Tun Ismail 50480

More information

PROSEDUR SIVIL: penyalahgunaan proses Mahkamah - Tidak teratur - Menyalahi undang-undang - Bidangkuasa dan budibicara Mahkamah.

PROSEDUR SIVIL: penyalahgunaan proses Mahkamah - Tidak teratur - Menyalahi undang-undang - Bidangkuasa dan budibicara Mahkamah. 1 Boon Kee Holdings Sdn. Bhd. & Yang Lain LWN. Hotel Gallant Bhd. & Yang Lain Mahkamah Tinggi malaya, Pulau Pinang ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD SAMAN PEMULA NO. 24-988-89 13 JUN 1991 [1991] 1 CLJ Rep 516; [1991]

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT IN MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR (CIVIL DIVISION) ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO. 24FC /2014 BETWEEN ALLIANCE BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD AND

IN THE HIGH COURT IN MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR (CIVIL DIVISION) ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO. 24FC /2014 BETWEEN ALLIANCE BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD AND IN THE HIGH COURT IN MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR (CIVIL DIVISION) ORIGINATING SUMMONS NO. 24FC-1312-10/2014 BETWEEN ALLIANCE BANK MALAYSIA BERHAD PLAINTIFF AND AMROU BAKOUR DEFENDANT GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT ENCLOSURE

More information

Debtors 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT. Act 256 DEBTORS ACT Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006

Debtors 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT. Act 256 DEBTORS ACT Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 Debtors 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 256 DEBTORS ACT 1957 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION

More information

ABDUL AZIZ ISMAIL & ORS v. ROYAL SELANGOR CLUB

ABDUL AZIZ ISMAIL & ORS v. ROYAL SELANGOR CLUB Abdul Aziz Ismail & Ors [2015] 2 MELR v. Royal Selangor Club 325 ABDUL AZIZ ISMAIL & ORS v. ROYAL SELANGOR CLUB Industrial Court, Kuala Lumpur Eddie Yeo Soon Chye Award No: 327 of 2015 [Case No: 13(25)(22)(25)/4-1255/2011]

More information

LEE PEI SZE v. SWIFTLET GARDEN SDN BHD

LEE PEI SZE v. SWIFTLET GARDEN SDN BHD 482 LEE PEI SZE v. SWIFTLET GARDEN SDN BHD Industrial Court, Johor Duncan Sikodol Award No: 167 of 2017 [Case No: 16/4-664/16] 23 January 2017 Dismissal: Probationer Pleadings Allegations of misconduct

More information

Held (dismissing the appeal): Per Abdul Hamid Mohamad FCJ:

Held (dismissing the appeal): Per Abdul Hamid Mohamad FCJ: 1 SEJAHRATUL DURSINA v. KERAJAAN MALAYSIA & ORS FEDERAL COURT, PUTRAJAYA ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, FCJ; PAJAN SINGH GILL, FCJ; ALAUDDIN MOHD SHERIFF, FCJ; RICHARD MALANJUM, FCJ; AUGUSTINE PAUL, FCJ CRIMINAL

More information

PROFILE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTUAL CLAIMS NUR JAZLIANNA BINTI SAMSUDIN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

PROFILE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTUAL CLAIMS NUR JAZLIANNA BINTI SAMSUDIN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA PROFILE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTUAL CLAIMS NUR JAZLIANNA BINTI SAMSUDIN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA PROFILE OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTUAL CLAIMS NUR JAZLIANNA BINTI SAMSUDIN A master s project report submitted

More information

TAWARAN MENGISI JAWATAN SECRETARY GENERAL (SG) OF AFRO-ASIAN RURAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (AARDO)

TAWARAN MENGISI JAWATAN SECRETARY GENERAL (SG) OF AFRO-ASIAN RURAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (AARDO) Ketua Eksekutif FELCRA Berhad Wisma FELCRA Lot PT 4780, Jalan Rejang 50722 KUALA LUMPUR Lembaga Kemajuan Johor Tenggara (KEJORA) Ibu Pejabat KEJORA Jalan Dato' ann, Bandar Penawar 81900 Kota Tinggi,. JOHOR.

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) COMPANIES WINDING-UP NO: 28NCC /2015 BETWEEN AND

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) COMPANIES WINDING-UP NO: 28NCC /2015 BETWEEN AND IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) COMPANIES WINDING-UP NO: 28NCC-1115-12/2015 In the matter of Percetakan Warni Sdn. Bhd. (Company No. 144815-X) And In the matter of Section

More information

MOK YONG KONG & ANOR v MOK YONG CHUAN

MOK YONG KONG & ANOR v MOK YONG CHUAN Page 1 Malayan Law Journal Reports/2002/Volume 2/MOK YONG KONG & ANOR v MOK YONG CHUAN - [2002] 2 MLJ 718-20 February 2002 [2002] 2 MLJ 718 MOK YONG KONG & ANOR v MOK YONG CHUAN COURT OF APPEAL (KUALA

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN DI MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: P-01(NCVC)(W) /2015 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN DI MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: P-01(NCVC)(W) /2015 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN DI MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO: P-01(NCVC)(W)-303-09/2015 ANTARA 1. JUGAJORTHY A/P VISVANATHAN PERAYU PERTAMA 2. JUGAJORTHY A/P VISVANATHAN (Sebagai Pentadbir Harta

More information

STATUTORY INTERPRETATION

STATUTORY INTERPRETATION 1 YONG TECK LEE v. HARRIS MOHD SALLEH & ANOR COURT OF APPEAL, KUALA LUMPUR ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, JCA; MOHD SAARI YUSOFF, JCA; K C VOHRAH, JCA CIVIL APPEAL NO: S-04-75-2001 6 JUNE 2002 [2002] 3 CLJ 422 CIVIL

More information

156 INDUSTRIAL CO-ORDINATION ACT

156 INDUSTRIAL CO-ORDINATION ACT LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 156 INDUSTRIAL CO-ORDINATION ACT 1975 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION

More information

REFERENCE TO THE SHARI AH ADVISORY COUNCIL IN ISLAMIC FINANCE : PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ON CIVIL COURT DECISIONS

REFERENCE TO THE SHARI AH ADVISORY COUNCIL IN ISLAMIC FINANCE : PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ON CIVIL COURT DECISIONS REFERENCE TO THE SHARI AH ADVISORY COUNCIL IN ISLAMIC FINANCE : PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS ON CIVIL COURT DECISIONS Surianom Miskam surianom@kuis.edu.my Noor Aimi Mohamad Puad nooraimi@kuis.edu.my Nurauliani

More information

Bankruptcy petition dismissed where creditor failed in requirement to bring statutory demand to debtor s attention

Bankruptcy petition dismissed where creditor failed in requirement to bring statutory demand to debtor s attention Bankruptcy petition dismissed where creditor failed in requirement to bring statutory demand to debtor s attention Antony Canning v. Irwin Mitchell LLP [2017] EWHC 718 (Ch) Article by David Bowden Executive

More information

MALAYSIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION BERHAD ( MRCB OR THE COMPANY )

MALAYSIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION BERHAD ( MRCB OR THE COMPANY ) MALAYSIAN RESOURCES CORPORATION BERHAD ( MRCB OR THE COMPANY ) MANAGEMENT CONTRACT BETWEEN KWASA UTAMA SDN BHD ( KUSB ) AND MRCB FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF MRCB AS THE MANAGEMENT CONTRACTOR IN CONNECTION WITH

More information

ENFORCEMENT OF CIVIL CASE JUDGMENTS IN MALAYSIA

ENFORCEMENT OF CIVIL CASE JUDGMENTS IN MALAYSIA ENFORCEMENT OF CIVIL CASE JUDGMENTS IN MALAYSIA INTRODUCTION The Malaysian Civil Judicial system is based on common law, much of which has been codified by statute. The hierarchy of courts in Malaysia

More information

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO 02(f)-55-08/2015(B)

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO 02(f)-55-08/2015(B) IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO 02(f)-55-08/2015(B) BETWEEN 1. MAJLIS PEGUAM MALAYSIA.. APPELLANT AND 1. RAJEHGOPAL A/L VELU 2. GANASHALINGAM A/L RAJAH.. RESPONDENTS

More information

Setem (Pindaan) 1 D.R. 14/2010 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Setem Tajuk ringkas dan permulaan kuat kuasa

Setem (Pindaan) 1 D.R. 14/2010 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG. b e r n a m a. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Setem Tajuk ringkas dan permulaan kuat kuasa Setem (Pindaan) 1 D.R. 14/2010 RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b e r n a m a Suatu Akta untuk meminda Akta Setem 1949. [ ] DIPERBUAT oleh Parlimen Malaysia seperti yang berikut: Tajuk ringkas dan permulaan kuat kuasa

More information

EQUITABLE REMEDY: SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE THEN LEE LIAN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

EQUITABLE REMEDY: SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE THEN LEE LIAN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA EQUITABLE REMEDY: SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE THEN LEE LIAN UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA EQUITABLE REMEDY: SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE THEN LEE LIAN A project report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements

More information

Mengikut plaintif, pengubahsuaian bangunan itu telah dimulakan tanpa kebenaran plaintif terlebih dahulu.

Mengikut plaintif, pengubahsuaian bangunan itu telah dimulakan tanpa kebenaran plaintif terlebih dahulu. 1 PERBADANAN PENGURUSAN TAMAN BUKIT JAMBUL lwn. PERBADANAN PEMBANGUNAN BANDAR & LAIN LAGI MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA, PULAU PINANG ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD J GUAMAN SIVIL NO: 21-1-1996 24 SEPTEMBER 1996 [1997]

More information

Perbadanan Kemajuan Negeri Selangor v Selangor Country Club Sdn Bhd

Perbadanan Kemajuan Negeri Selangor v Selangor Country Club Sdn Bhd Page 1 Malayan Law Journal Reports/2017/Volume 2/Perbadanan Kemajuan Negeri Selangor v Selangor Country Club Sdn Bhd - [2017] 2 MLJ 819-24 June 2016 [2017] 2 MLJ 819 Perbadanan Kemajuan Negeri Selangor

More information

ILANGOVAN KRISHNAN v. SHIYA SDN BHD

ILANGOVAN KRISHNAN v. SHIYA SDN BHD 374 ILANGOVAN KRISHNAN v. SHIYA SDN BHD Industrial Court, Johor Mohd Azari Harun Award No: 515 of 2016 [Case No: 16/4-157/15] 27 April 2016 Dismissal: Misconduct due to poor performance Claimant dismissed

More information

NYLEX (MALAYSIA) BERHAD (9378-T) (Incorporated in Malaysia)

NYLEX (MALAYSIA) BERHAD (9378-T) (Incorporated in Malaysia) (Incorporated in Malaysia) MINUTES OF THE 47TH ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING OF THE COMPANY HELD AT SELANGOR BALLROOM 1, DORSETT GRAND SUBANG, SS12/1, 47500 SUBANG JAYA, SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, ON THURSDAY, 19

More information

SETTING ASIDE AN AWARD: ARBITRATOR S MISCONDUCT LEE SEE KIM MB UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

SETTING ASIDE AN AWARD: ARBITRATOR S MISCONDUCT LEE SEE KIM MB UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA SETTING ASIDE AN AWARD: ARBITRATOR S MISCONDUCT LEE SEE KIM MB 091119 UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA SETTING ASIDE AN AWARD: ARBITRATOR S MISCONDUCT LEE SEE KIM A project report submitted in partial fulfillment

More information

CONSTRUING CONTRACT CLAUSE: THE LITERAL RULE CHAI SIAW HIONG UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

CONSTRUING CONTRACT CLAUSE: THE LITERAL RULE CHAI SIAW HIONG UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA CONSTRUING CONTRACT CLAUSE: THE LITERAL RULE CHAI SIAW HIONG UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA CONSTRUING CONTRACT CLAUSE: THE LITERAL RULE CHAI SIAW HIONG A master s project report submitted in fulfillment

More information

CHEMICAL COMPANY OF MALAYSIA BERHAD (5136-T)

CHEMICAL COMPANY OF MALAYSIA BERHAD (5136-T) CHEMICAL COMPANY OF MALAYSIA BERHAD (5136-T) (Incorporated in Malaysia) SUMMARY OF THE 55 th ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING HELD AT JUNIOR BALLROOM, INTERCONTINENTAL KUALA LUMPUR, 165 JALAN AMPANG, 50450 KUALA

More information

THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT ACT (No. 2 of 2016) THE SMALL CLAIMS COURTS RULES, 2017

THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT ACT (No. 2 of 2016) THE SMALL CLAIMS COURTS RULES, 2017 LEGAL NOTICE NO. ARRANGEMENT OF RULES THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT ACT (No. 2 of 2016) THE SMALL CLAIMS COURTS RULES, 2017 1 Short title and commencement 2 Interpretation 3 Filing a claim 4 Serving the statement

More information

AGREEMENT FOR KIB KENANGA AGENCY NETWORK SERVICE

AGREEMENT FOR KIB KENANGA AGENCY NETWORK SERVICE Kenanga Investors Berhad (Co. No. 353563-P) Suite 12.02, 12th Floor Kenanga International Jalan Sultan Ismail 50250 Kuala Lumpur Tel No. : 03-2057 3688 Fax No. : 03-2126 8807 Toll Free: 1-800-88-3737 AGREEMENT

More information

83 CONTINENTAL SHELF ACT

83 CONTINENTAL SHELF ACT LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 83 CONTINENTAL SHELF ACT 1966 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION

More information

LAWS OF MALAYSIA. Act A1140

LAWS OF MALAYSIA. Act A1140 LAWS OF MALAYSIA Act A1140 INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS (AMENDMENT) ACT 2002 2 Laws of Malaysia ACT A1140 Date of Royal Assent... 14 January 2002 Date of publication in the Gazette......... 24 January 2002 Publisher

More information

354 DRAINAGE WORKS ACT

354 DRAINAGE WORKS ACT LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 354 DRAINAGE WORKS ACT 1954 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF THE REVISION OF

More information

D.R. 41/94. b er nama. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Prosedur Jenayah [ ]

D.R. 41/94. b er nama. Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Prosedur Jenayah [ ] D.R. 41/94 Naskhah Sahih Bahasa Inggeris RANG UNDANG-UNDANG b er nama Suatu Akta untuk meminda Kanun Prosedur Jenayah [ ] MAKA INILAH DIPERBUAT UNDANG-UNDAN oleh Seri Paduka Baginda Yang di-pertuan Agong

More information

PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION

PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION PREVENTIVE DETENTION 1 LEE KEW SANG v. TIMBALAN MENTERI DALAM NEGERI, MALAYSIA & ORS FEDERAL COURT, PUTRAJAYA AHMAD FAIRUZ, CJ; SITI NORMA YAAKOB, CJ (MALAYA); ABDUL HAMID MOHAMAD, FCJ CRIMINAL APPEAL NO: 05-23-2004 (J) 2

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12B-22-02/2016 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12B-22-02/2016 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SHAH ALAM DALAM NEGERI SELANGOR DARUL EHSAN, MALAYSIA RAYUAN SIVIL NO: BA-12B-22-02/2016 1. PARIS BIN ARIFF ANTARA 2. ASRINA BINTI MD MISDAR PERAYU-PERAYU DAN WAN YA BIN

More information

ADAM ABDULLAH v. MALAYSIAN OXYGEN BHD

ADAM ABDULLAH v. MALAYSIAN OXYGEN BHD 353 ADAM ABDULLAH v. MALAYSIAN OXYGEN BHD Industrial Court, Kuala Lumpur Mary Shakila G Azariah Award No: 521 of 2012 [Case No: 24/4-906/10] 24 April 2012 Dismissal: Retrenchment - Redundancy - Company

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO: P /2013 BETWEEN AND

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO: P /2013 BETWEEN AND IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF MALAYSIA (APPELLATE JURISDICTION) CIVIL APPEAL NO: P-02-542-03/2013 BETWEEN KHOO TENG CHYE APPELLANT AND 1. CEKAL BERJASA SDN BHD RESPONDENTS 2. LEMBAMAN DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD [Dalam

More information

Law of Arbitration DR. ZULKIFLI HASAN

Law of Arbitration DR. ZULKIFLI HASAN Law of Arbitration DR. ZULKIFLI HASAN Content Award Extension of time for making an award Enforcement of Award Award AA 1952 and UNCITRAL Model Law do not ascribe any meaning to the term award. S-1: A

More information

275 GOVERNMENT FUNDING ACT

275 GOVERNMENT FUNDING ACT Government Funding 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 275 GOVERNMENT FUNDING ACT 1983 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: N-06B-55-09/2016 [RAYUAN JENAYAH NEGERI SEMBILAN : 42LB(A)-21 & 22-04/2015]

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: N-06B-55-09/2016 [RAYUAN JENAYAH NEGERI SEMBILAN : 42LB(A)-21 & 22-04/2015] DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN JENAYAH NO: N-06B-55-09/2016 [RAYUAN JENAYAH NEGERI SEMBILAN : 42LB(A)-21 & 22-04/2015] ANTARA PENDAKWA RAYA PERAYU DAN SUBBARAU @ KAMALANATHAN

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SEREMBAN DALAM NEGERI SEMBILAM DARUL KHUSUS, MALAYSIA PERMOHONAN JENAYAH NO : NA /2017 ANTARA

DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SEREMBAN DALAM NEGERI SEMBILAM DARUL KHUSUS, MALAYSIA PERMOHONAN JENAYAH NO : NA /2017 ANTARA DALAM MAHKAMAH TINGGI MALAYA DI SEREMBAN DALAM NEGERI SEMBILAM DARUL KHUSUS, MALAYSIA PERMOHONAN JENAYAH NO : NA-44-29-08/2017 ANTARA AL FAITOURI BIN KAMAL PEMOHON DAN PENDAKWA RAYA RESPONDEN PENGHAKIMAN

More information

PERINTAH UNIVERSITI DAN KOLEJ UNIVERSITI (PERLEMBAGAAN UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA) (PINDAAN) 2012

PERINTAH UNIVERSITI DAN KOLEJ UNIVERSITI (PERLEMBAGAAN UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA) (PINDAAN) 2012 WARTA KERAJAAN PERSEKUTUAN 22 November 2012 22 November 2012 P.U. (A) 401 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE PERINTAH UNIVERSITI DAN KOLEJ UNIVERSITI (PERLEMBAGAAN UNIVERSITI TUN HUSSEIN ONN MALAYSIA) (PINDAAN)

More information

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR IN THE STATE OF WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN, MALAYSIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) SUIT NO: D BETWEEN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR IN THE STATE OF WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN, MALAYSIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) SUIT NO: D BETWEEN IN THE HIGH COURT OF MALAYA AT KUALA LUMPUR IN THE STATE OF WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN, MALAYSIA (COMMERCIAL DIVISION) SUIT NO: D5-22-1924-1999 BETWEEN TUCK SIN ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD (No. Syarikat:

More information

ISLAMIC FINANCE LITIGATION IN MALAYSIA: AN INTRODUCTION

ISLAMIC FINANCE LITIGATION IN MALAYSIA: AN INTRODUCTION ISLAMIC FINANCE LITIGATION IN MALAYSIA: AN INTRODUCTION Seminar on An Introduction to Islamic Finance. Date Day Time Venue : 20 th July 2017 : Wednesday : 2.00 p.m. 3.30 p.m. : Perak Bar Auditorium HIZRI

More information

Date of last Order. Date of Ruling

Date of last Order. Date of Ruling Date of last Order Date of Ruling TIMA HAJI through the services of K. MWITTAWAISSAKA ADVOCATE,has made an application by Chamber Summons under the Civil Procedure Code 1966 seeking from this court, the

More information

Malaysia Arrest Update on Current Reforms

Malaysia Arrest Update on Current Reforms Malaysia Arrest Update on Current Reforms Lloyd s Maritime Academy Ship Arrest 10 December 2012 2 Introduction What s new: What s not: 2010 Admiralty Court 1964 Admiralty Jurisdiction 2012 Practice Directions

More information

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (COMMERCIAL COURT DIVISION)

THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (COMMERCIAL COURT DIVISION) THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA AT KAMPALA (COMMERCIAL COURT DIVISION) MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 733 OF 2005 (Arising out of H.C.C.S. No. 1018 of 2004) ROSEMARY ELEANOR KARAMAGI

More information

APPENDIX VIII FURTHER INFORMATION 1. DIRECTORS RESPONSIBILITY STATEMENT Our Board has seen and approved the contents of this Circular and they collectively and individually accept full responsibility for

More information

THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 5/4-1546/05 BETWEEN ENCIK SAIFUL NAFIS BIN SHARIFF AND AIRASIA SDN BHD AWARD NO: 2239 OF 2007

THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 5/4-1546/05 BETWEEN ENCIK SAIFUL NAFIS BIN SHARIFF AND AIRASIA SDN BHD AWARD NO: 2239 OF 2007 THE INDUSTRIAL COURT OF MALAYSIA CASE NO: 5/4-1546/05 BETWEEN ENCIK SAIFUL NAFIS BIN SHARIFF AND AIRASIA SDN BHD AWARD NO: 2239 OF 2007 Before : TUAN CHEW SOO HO - CHAIRMAN Venue : The Industrial Court

More information

NOMINEE AGREEMENT. (2)... (NRIC/Company No:...) of...( the Beneficiary ) of the other part.

NOMINEE AGREEMENT. (2)... (NRIC/Company No:...) of...( the Beneficiary ) of the other part. NOMINEE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made the day of, 20 BETWEEN : (1 AMSEC Nominees (Tempatan Sdn Bhd or AMSEC Nominees (Asing Sdn Bhd a company incorporated under the laws of Malaysia whose registered

More information

BINA PURI HOLDINGS BHD. (Company No.: X) (Incorporated in Malaysia under the Companies Act, 1965) CIRCULAR TO TO SHAREHOLDERS

BINA PURI HOLDINGS BHD. (Company No.: X) (Incorporated in Malaysia under the Companies Act, 1965) CIRCULAR TO TO SHAREHOLDERS THIS THIS CIRCULAR IS IS IMPORTANT AND AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If If you you are are in in any any doubt as as to to the the course of of action to to take, take, you you should consult

More information

CLJ. Re: RULES OF COURT 2012 [P.U.(A) 205/2012] P.U.(A) 286/2012 AMENDMENTS

CLJ. Re: RULES OF COURT 2012 [P.U.(A) 205/2012] P.U.(A) 286/2012 AMENDMENTS 1 CLJ Malaysia s Leading Law Publisher 20 September 2012 Dear Sir/Madam Re: RULES OF COURT 2012 [P.U.(A) 205/2012] AMENDMENTS Thank you for your kind support to our publication and for purchasing a copy

More information

THIS CIRCULAR IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION.

THIS CIRCULAR IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. THIS CIRCULAR IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION. If you are in any doubt as to the course of action to be taken, you should consult your stockbroker, bank manager, solicitor, accountant

More information

PAM NORTHERN CHAPTER

PAM NORTHERN CHAPTER PAM NORTHERN CHAPTER SATURDAY, 27 FEBRUARY 2016 DELAY AND DISRUPTION IN CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS BY LIM HOCK SIANG MESSRS PRESGRAVE & MATTHEWS STANDARD CHARTERED BANK CHAMBERS, 2 LEBUH PANTAI, 10300 PENANG,

More information

Bankruptcy Act Chapter B2 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria Arrangement of Rules. Part I

Bankruptcy Act Chapter B2 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria Arrangement of Rules. Part I Bankruptcy Act Chapter B2 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004 Arrangement of Rules Part I Proceedings from Act of Bankruptcy to discharge Acts of Bankruptcy 1. Acts of bankruptcy. 2. Bankruptcy notices.

More information

TARIFF OF COSTS TABLE OF CONTENTS. Fees Payable to Lawyers in the Following Courts and Matters

TARIFF OF COSTS TABLE OF CONTENTS. Fees Payable to Lawyers in the Following Courts and Matters TARIFF OF COSTS TABLE OF CONTENTS SCHEDULE PAGE SCHEDULE 1 Fees Payable to Lawyers in the Following Courts and Matters A In the Court of Appeal... 1 B In the Court of Queen s Bench... 3 C In the Court

More information

Land Conservation LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT. Act 385 LAND CONSERVATION ACT 1960

Land Conservation LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT. Act 385 LAND CONSERVATION ACT 1960 Land Conservation 1 LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 385 LAND CONSERVATION ACT 1960 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA UNDER THE AUTHORITY

More information

PERKHIDMATAN UTAMA. Kod Dokumen: SOK/PIC/SS10 CHECKLIST FOR IKHTISAS APPLICATION PLEASE USE CAPITAL LETTERS. Name:

PERKHIDMATAN UTAMA. Kod Dokumen: SOK/PIC/SS10 CHECKLIST FOR IKHTISAS APPLICATION PLEASE USE CAPITAL LETTERS. Name: PERKHIDMATAN UTAMA PUTRA INTERNATIONAL (PUSAT ANTARABANGSA) UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA 43400 UPM Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia Tel: 603-8946 6048 / 6198 E-mail: intl@upm.edu.my Kod Dokumen: SOK/PIC/SS10 CHECKLIST

More information

BELIZE BANKRUPTCY ACT CHAPTER 244 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSIDIARY LAWS AS AT 31ST OCTOBER, 2003

BELIZE BANKRUPTCY ACT CHAPTER 244 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSIDIARY LAWS AS AT 31ST OCTOBER, 2003 BELIZE BANKRUPTCY ACT CHAPTER 244 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSIDIARY LAWS AS AT 31ST OCTOBER, 2003 This is a revised edition of the Subsidiary Laws, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN, MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. W-02(W) /2015 ANTARA PASUPATHY A/L KANAGASABY DAN

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN, MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. W-02(W) /2015 ANTARA PASUPATHY A/L KANAGASABY DAN DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN, MALAYSIA (BIDANGKUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. W-02(W)-1683-10/2015 ANTARA PASUPATHY A/L KANAGASABY. PERAYU DAN 1. MASTERSKILL (M) SDN BHD 2. SYARIKAT KEMACAHAYA SDN BHD. RESPONDEN-RESPONDEN

More information

Chapter 253. Insolvency Act Certified on: / /20.

Chapter 253. Insolvency Act Certified on: / /20. Chapter 253. Insolvency Act 1951. Certified on: / /20. INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA. Chapter 253. Insolvency Act 1951. ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. PART I PRELIMINARY. 1. Interpretation. act of insolvency

More information

Mechanism of Enforcement and Execution of Muslim Maintenance Order: Court Based System

Mechanism of Enforcement and Execution of Muslim Maintenance Order: Court Based System ISLAMIYYAT 35(2) 2013: 89-100 Mechanism of Enforcement and Execution of Muslim Maintenance Order: Court Based System Mekanisme Penguatkuasaan dan Pelaksanaan Perintah Nafkah Orang Islam: Sistem Berasaskan

More information

Strata Management 1 STRATA MANAGEMENT BILL 2012

Strata Management 1 STRATA MANAGEMENT BILL 2012 Strata Management 1 STRATA MANAGEMENT BILL 2012 ARRANGEMENT OF CLAUSES Par t I PRELIMINARY Clause 1. Short title, application and commencement 2. Interpretation 3. Construction of the Act Par t II ADMINISTRATION

More information

015e.fm Page 1 Monday, March 27, :41 AM LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT. Act 15 SEDITION ACT Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006

015e.fm Page 1 Monday, March 27, :41 AM LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT. Act 15 SEDITION ACT Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 015e.fm Page 1 Monday, March 27, 2006 11:41 AM LAWS OF MALAYSIA REPRINT Act 15 SEDITION ACT 1948 Incorporating all amendments up to 1 January 2006 PUBLISHED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF LAW REVISION, MALAYSIA

More information

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA U.S. POLICIES TOWARD IRAN AND IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL SECURITY IN THE PERSIAN GULF FROM

UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA U.S. POLICIES TOWARD IRAN AND IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL SECURITY IN THE PERSIAN GULF FROM UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA U.S. POLICIES TOWARD IRAN AND IMPLICATIONS FOR REGIONAL SECURITY IN THE PERSIAN GULF FROM 1979 2008 SEYED MOHSEN MIRHOSSEINI FEM 2012 22 U.S. POLICIES TOWARD IRAN AND IMPLICATIONS

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA RAYUAN JENAYAH NO J /2014 BETWEEN AND DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA

DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA RAYUAN JENAYAH NO J /2014 BETWEEN AND DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA RAYUAN JENAYAH NO J-09-27-01/2014 BETWEEN AZMI BIN OSMAN APPELLANT AND PENDAKWA RAYA RESPONDENT DALAM MAHKAMAH RAYUAN MALAYSIA DI PUTRAJAYA RAYUAN JENAYAH NO

More information

DALAM MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. 02(i)-67-09/2012 (W) ANTARA DAN

DALAM MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. 02(i)-67-09/2012 (W) ANTARA DAN 1 DALAM MAHKAMAH PERSEKUTUAN MALAYSIA (BIDANG KUASA RAYUAN) RAYUAN SIVIL NO. 02(i)-67-09/2012 (W) ANTARA AV ASIA SDN BHD Perayu DAN MEASAT BROADCAST NETWORK SYSTEMS SDN BHD Responden (Dalam Mahkamah Rayuan

More information

KAEDAH-KAEDAH SYARIKAT (MEKANISME PENYELAMAT KORPORAT) 2018 COMPANIES (CORPORATE RESCUE MECHANISM) RULES 2018

KAEDAH-KAEDAH SYARIKAT (MEKANISME PENYELAMAT KORPORAT) 2018 COMPANIES (CORPORATE RESCUE MECHANISM) RULES 2018 WARTA KERAJAAN PERSEKUTUAN 28 Februari 2018 28 February 2018 P.U. (A) 64 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GAZETTE KAEDAH-KAEDAH SYARIKAT (MEKANISME PENYELAMAT KORPORAT) 2018 COMPANIES (CORPORATE RESCUE MECHANISM) RULES

More information

PROGRAM PERTUKARAN PELAJAR DAN JARINGAN PENDIDIKAN ANTARABANGSA 2016

PROGRAM PERTUKARAN PELAJAR DAN JARINGAN PENDIDIKAN ANTARABANGSA 2016 PROGRAM PERTUKARAN PELAJAR DAN JARINGAN PENDIDIKAN ANTARABANGSA 2016 Sila Tanda Program yang anda ingin sertai; Program Ke Jepun Siri ( ) Program Ke Korea Siri ( ) London Siri ( ) Australia Siri ( ) Europe

More information

Enforcement of Foreign Judgments. Rebecca Chew 6 June 2002

Enforcement of Foreign Judgments. Rebecca Chew 6 June 2002 Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Rebecca Chew 6 June OVERVIEW ON ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN SINGAPORE (a) Reciprocal Enforcement of Commonwealth Judgments Act (Chapter 264) (b) Reciprocal Enforcement

More information

Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication 1. construction industry payment and adjudication act 2012

Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication 1. construction industry payment and adjudication act 2012 Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication 1 laws OF MALAYSIA construction industry payment and adjudication act 2012 2 Laws of Malaysia Date of Royal Assent...... 18 June 2012 Date of publication

More information