UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No. 02 CV 8334 (WCC)

Save this PDF as:
 WORD  PNG  TXT  JPG

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civil Action No. 02 CV 8334 (WCC)"

Transcription

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE ATLAS AIR WORLDWIDE HOLDINGS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No. 02 CV 8334 (WCC) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES, AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING This notice provides you with important information in connection with the settlement of a lawsuit concerning Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. ( Atlas or the Company ). Your rights may be affected by this Notice. If you wish to recover money you must act by December 21, You should read this Notice carefully. TO: (1) ALL PERSONS AND ENTITIES WHO PURCHASED OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRED THE COMMON STOCK OF ATLAS BETWEEN APRIL 18, 2000 AND OCTOBER 15, 2002, INCLUSIVE; AND (2) ALL PERSONS AND ENTITIES WHO PURCHASED OR OTHERWISE ACQUIRED ATLAS COMMON STOCK ISSUED PURSUANT, OR TRACEABLE, TO ATLAS S REGISTRATION STATEMENT FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ( SEC ) ON MAY 7, 1999 AND PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT FILED WITH THE SEC ON SEPTEMBER 18, 2000, IN CONNECTION WITH ATLAS S SECONDARY PUBLIC OFFERING IN SEPTEMBER 2000 (THE SECONDARY OFFERING ) AND WHO WERE DAMAGED THEREBY (THE SETTLEMENT CLASS ). A federal court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. The Settlement of the above-captioned action (the Action ) will provide a settlement fund consisting of $5,950,000 in cash for the benefit of investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Atlas common stock during the relevant period or pursuant to the Secondary Offering. The Settlement represents an average recovery of $.32 per share (for the 18,646,695 million outstanding shares available for purchase). This average is an estimate, and is before the deduction of any Court approved fees and expenses. See Statement of Recovery and Question 9 below for more detail. The Settlement resolves class litigation over whether certain of Atlas present or former officers and directors - Richard H. Shuyler, Brian H. Rowe 1, Douglas A. Carty, Stanley J. Gadek, James T. Matheny, and Stuart G. Weinroth (the Individual Defendants ), and Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated ( Morgan Stanley ) (collectively, the Defendants ) issued false and misleading press releases and other statements concerning the Company s revenue and earnings in violation of the federal securities laws. See Question 2 below for more detail. Lead Plaintiff s Counsel will apply to the Court for an award of attorneys fees from the Gross Settlement Fund not to exceed thirty percent (30%), and reimbursement of expenses of no greater than $125,000, or an average of $.09 per share. Your actual recovery, if any, may vary depending on your purchase/acquisition price and sales price and the number of Proof of Claim and Release forms ( Proofs of Claim ) that are filed. Lead Plaintiff s Counsel has litigated the Action on a contingent fee basis, and has advanced the expenses of litigation with the expectation that if it were successful in recovering money for the Settlement Class, it would receive fees and be reimbursed for its expenses from the Gross Settlement Fund, as is customary in this type of litigation. Your legal rights are affected whether you act, or do not act. Read this notice carefully. YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT GO TO A HEARING The only way to receive a payment. Get no payment. This is the only option that allows you to ever be part of any other lawsuit against the Defendants about the legal claims being released in this Action. See Question 13 below. File with the Clerk of Court your written concerns or objections to the Settlement, the Plan of Allocation or the request for attorneys fees and expenses. Ask to speak in Court about the fairness of the Settlement. DO NOTHING You will receive no payment, and give up your right to file your own lawsuit or participate in any other lawsuit against the Defendants or the Released Parties concerning the legal claims being released in the Action. 1 Brian H. Rowe died on February 22, 2007 and references to Brian H. Rowe herein, and in any other document effectuating the Settlement provided for herein, shall include the Estate of Brian H. Rowe.

2 These rights and options and the deadlines to exercise them are explained in this notice. The Court in charge of this Action still has to decide whether to approve the Settlement. Payments will be made if the Court approves the Settlement, the Settlement becomes final after the resolution of all appeals, and after the claims processing procedure is complete. Further information regarding this Settlement may be obtained by contacting Lead Plaintiff s Counsel: Katharine M. Ryan or Kay E. Sickles, Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler, LLP, 280 King of Prussia Road, Radnor, PA 19087, Telephone: Statement of Recovery Lead Plaintiff estimates that approximately 18,646,695 shares of Atlas common stock were purchased or otherwise acquired during the Class Period, and damaged as a result of the purported acts or omissions alleged in the litigation. Lead Plaintiff estimates that the average recovery per damaged share of Atlas common stock under the Settlement will be $.32 per damaged share before the deduction of attorneys fees, costs and expenses, as approved by the Court. The actual recovery per damaged share will depend on: (1) the number of claims filed; (2) when Settlement Class Members purchased or acquired their shares during the Class Period; (3) whether Settlement Class Members either sold their shares during the Class Period, or held their shares past the end of the Class Period; (4) administrative costs, including the costs of notice, for the Action; and (5) the amount awarded by the Court for attorneys fees, costs and expenses. Distributions to the Settlement Class Members will be made based on the Plan of Allocation set forth in this Notice. See the Plan of Allocation on pages 4-5. The Circumstances of the Settlement For the Plaintiffs, the principal reason for the Settlement is to provide a benefit to the Settlement Class now. This benefit, which is substantial, must be compared to the risk that no recovery might be achieved after contested motions, a contested trial and likely appeals, possibly years into the future. While Lead Plaintiff s Counsel was prepared to go to trial and was confident in its ability to present a case, it recognizes that a trial is a risky proposition and that Lead Plaintiff and the Settlement Class might not have prevailed. In addition, the claims advanced by the Settlement Class involve numerous complex legal, financial, and technological issues, requiring extensive expert testimony, which would add considerably to the expense and duration of the litigation. Even after extensive investigation and discovery, questions remain regarding the extent of Defendants liability, the extent a jury would find them liable, and the true measure of the Settlement Class damages. Here, Lead Plaintiff faced the additional hurdle that the primary insurer had disclaimed coverage and a substantial possibility existed that very little insurance coverage would be available to fund a settlement or satisfy a verdict in this case, as well as the other litigation arising out of the conduct alleged by Lead Plaintiff. For the Defendants, who deny all allegations of wrongdoing or liability whatsoever, the principal reason for the Settlement is to eliminate the expense, risks, and potentially uncertain outcome of litigation. WHAT THIS NOTICE CONTAINS BASIC INFORMATION PAGE 1. Why did I receive this notice package? What is this lawsuit About? Why is this Action a class action? Why is there a settlement? How do I know if I am part of the Settlement? Are there exceptions to being included in the Settlement Class? I am still not sure I am included? What does the Settlement provide? How much will my payment be? How can I receive a payment? When will I receive my payment? What am I giving up to receive a payment? How do I exclude myself from the Settlement? If I do not exclude myself, can I sue the Defendants later for the claims that I am releasing in this Settlement? If I exclude myself can I obtain a payment from this Settlement? Do I have a lawyer in this case? How will the lawyers be paid? How do I notify the Court that I do not like the Settlement? What is the difference between objecting and requesting exclusion from the Settlement? When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the Settlement? Do I have to come to the hearing? May I speak at the hearing? What happens if I do nothing at all?... 7 SPECIAL NOTICE TO BROKERS... 8 GETTING MORE INFORMATION

3 BASIC INFORMATION 1. Why did I receive this notice package? You or someone in your family may have purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of Atlas between April 18, 2000 and October 15, 2002, inclusive, or pursuant, or traceable, to Atlas s Registration Statement filed with the SEC on May 7, 1999 and Prospectus Supplement filed with the SEC on September 18, 2000, in connection with Atlas s Secondary Offering. If the description above applies to you, you have a right to know about the proposed Settlement of this Action, and about all of your options. 2. What is this lawsuit about? Lead Plaintiff filed its Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint (the Complaint ) on October 17, The Complaint alleged that Defendants issued false and misleading press releases and other statements in an effort to orchestrate and implement a scheme of improper accounting manipulations whereby they: (i) failed to timely expense uncollectible receivables; (ii) failed to write-off obsolete and slow-moving spare part inventory; (iii) improperly and inconsistently capitalized maintenance expenses; and (iv) failed to timely recognize impairment charges to aircraft and related equipment held for use, in violation of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act ), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the SEC. The Complaint also asserted that the Company s Registration Statement for the Secondary Offering filed with the SEC on May 7, 1999 as well as the Prospectus Supplement filed with the SEC on September 18, 2000 contained materially false and misleading statements in violation of Sections 11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the Securities Act ). The Complaint further alleged that, as a result of Defendants alleged conduct, the price of Atlas common stock was inflated, and that members of the Settlement Class were damaged as a result of the inflated value of Atlas common stock. Defendants filed motions to dismiss the Complaint beginning on December 17, Lead Plaintiff opposed Defendants motions to dismiss on February 24, 2004, and Defendants filed reply memoranda in support of their motions to dismiss on April 19, 2004 and April 20, By order dated July 7, 2004, the Court denied these motions to dismiss with respect to Defendants Shuyler, Carty, Gadek, Weinroth and Morgan Stanley, and denied in part and granted in part these motions to dismiss with respect to Defendants Rowe and Matheny. With respect to Defendant Rowe, the Court sustained the Section 11 and 15 claims, but dismissed the Exchange Act claims. With respect to Defendant Matheny, the Court sustained the Exchange Act claims as well as the Section 11 claim, but dismissed the Section 15 claim. Thereafter the parties engaged in formal discovery. Defendants filed their answers to the Complaint on August 26, 2004, and Lead Plaintiff filed a motion for class certification on September 9, By order dated December 8, 2004, Lead Plaintiff s Counsel and counsel for the Defendants ( Defendants Counsel ) agreed to stay all proceedings for three months in order to engage in settlement discussions. These settlement discussions included two formal mediation sessions with the Honorable Herbert Stettin on January 31, 2005 and April 8, 2005 and several telephone negotiations before the parties reached the proposed Settlement. A long time elapsed between the verbal agreement by the parties to resolve the Action and the dissemination of this Notice due to the need to resolve an ongoing SEC investigation. That SEC investigation has now been resolved. 3. Why is this Action a class action? In a class action, one or more people called Lead Plaintiff(s) (in this case, Lead Plaintiff Messner & Smith), sue on behalf of people who have similar claims. All these people and/or entities are referred to collectively as a class, or individually as class members. One court resolves the issues for all class members, except for those who exclude themselves from the class. 4. Why is there a settlement? The Court did not decide in favor of Lead Plaintiff or the Defendants. Instead, Lead Plaintiff and Defendants agreed to a settlement. As explained above, the Lead Plaintiff and its attorneys think the Settlement is best for all Settlement Class Members. 5. How do I know if I am part of the Settlement? The Settlement Class includes (i) all persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired the common stock of Atlas between April 18, 2000 and October 15, 2002, inclusive (the Class Period ), and were damaged thereby (the Section 10(b) Class ), and (ii) all persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired Atlas common stock issued pursuant, or traceable, to the Company s Registration Statement filed with the SEC on May 7, 1999 and Prospectus Supplement filed with the SEC on September 18, 2000, in connection with the Company s secondary public offering in September 2000, and were damaged thereby (the Section 11 Class, and together with the Section 10(b) Class, the Settlement Class ). 6. Are there exceptions to being included in the Settlement Class? Yes. Excluded from the Settlement Class are Atlas, the Defendants in this Action, any member of the immediate family (parents, spouses, siblings, and children) of any of the Defendants, any person, firm, trust, corporation, officer, director or other individual or entity in which Atlas or any Defendant has or had a controlling interest or which is related to or affiliated with Atlas or any of the Defendants, and the legal representatives, heirs, successors in interest or assigns of any such excluded party. 3

4 Also excluded from the Settlement Class are persons or entities who exclude themselves by filing a request for exclusion in accordance with the requirements set forth in this Notice as described in Question 13 below. If one of your mutual funds purchased or owns shares of Atlas common stock, that alone does not make you a Settlement Class Member. You are a Settlement Class Member only if you directly purchased or otherwise acquired shares of common stock during the Class Period. Contact your broker to see if you purchased or otherwise acquired Atlas common stock during that period. 7. I am still not sure whether I am included? If you are still not sure whether you are included, you can ask for free help. You can call or visit for more information. Or you can fill out and return the claim form described on page 5, in Question 10, to see if you qualify. 8. What does the Settlement provide? The Defendants and their insurers have agreed to create a Settlement Fund consisting of $5,950,000. The balance of this fund, after deduction of Court awarded attorneys fees and expenses and settlement administration costs, including the cost of this Notice, will be divided among all Settlement Class Members who send in valid claim forms. 9. How much will my payment be? PLAN OF ALLOCATION OF NET SETTLEMENT FUND AMONG SETTLEMENT CLASS MEMBERS If you are entitled to a payment, your share of the Net Settlement Fund will depend on the number of valid claim forms that Settlement Class Members submit, how many shares of Atlas common stock you purchased or acquired, and when you bought/acquired and sold your shares. By following the Plan of Allocation described here you can calculate your Recognized Claim. The Claims Administrator will distribute the Net Settlement Fund, that is, the Gross Settlement Fund, less taxes owed, all administrative costs, including the costs of notice, and attorneys fees and expenses, as awarded by the Court, according to the Plan of Allocation after the deadline for submission of Proofs of Claim has passed. The Claims Administrator shall determine each Authorized Claimant s pro rata share of the Net Settlement Fund based upon each Authorized Claimant s Recognized Claim. The Recognized Claim formula is not intended to be an estimate of the amount of what a Settlement Class Member might have been able to recover after a trial; nor is it an estimate of the amount that will be paid to Authorized Claimants pursuant to the Settlement. The Recognized Claim formula is the basis upon which the Net Settlement Fund will be proportionately allocated to the Authorized Claimants. Recognized Claims Transactional Basis In order to recover damages on a given transaction, shares must suffer an actual monetary loss; i.e. (i) for shares that were purchased/acquired and sold during the Class Period the purchase price must be greater than the sales price; or (ii) for shares that were purchased during the Class Period and held at the end of the Class Period, the purchase price must be greater than $ Offsetting Gains and Losses For shares purchased during the Class Period which are sold at a gain during the Class Period, such gains will be used to offset Class Period losses from both shares purchased/acquired and sold during the Class Period and losses resulting from decline in value from shares purchased at prices in excess of $1.695 per share during the Class Period and held at the end of the Class Period. Acquisition For shares acquired through means other than open market purchases, the purchase price shall be deemed to be the reported closing price on the day of acquisition for purposes of this plan of allocation. The Basis for the Calculation of Your Recognized Claim The following proposed Plan of Allocation reflects the proposition that the price of Atlas common stock was artificially inflated from the beginning of the Class Period on April 18, 2000 through the end of the Class Period on October 15, 2002, the day before Atlas October 16, 2002 press release, announcing, among other things, the Company s need to restate its 2000 and 2001 financial results. In addition, the Plan of Allocation provides that those who both purchased/acquired and sold during the Class Period have not been damaged in connection with the allegations of the Complaint to the same extent that other Settlement Class Members were damaged as they have benefited to a certain extent by selling at an artificially-inflated rate and these Settlement Class Members will also receive a discounted recovery to reflect that they are releasing their claims in the Action. 4

5 1. For shares of common stock purchased/acquired between April 18, 2000 and October 15, 2002: A. For shares sold between October 16, 2002 and January 13, 2003, the Recognized Loss shall be the LESSER of: (1) $0.905 per share; or (2) the difference between the purchase price per share and the sales price per share for each share sold. B. For shares retained at the end of trading on January 13, 2003, the Recognized Loss shall be the LESSER of: (1) $0.905 per share; or (2) the difference between the purchase price per share and $ C. For shares sold between April 18, 2000 and October 15, 2002, the Recognized Loss shall be the LESSER of: (1) $ ($0.905 multiplied by 10%) per share; or (2) 10% of the difference between the purchase price per share and the sales price per share for each share sold. Each Authorized Claimant shall be paid the percentage that each Authorized Claimant s claim bears to the total of the claims of all Authorized Claimants. The Court has reserved jurisdiction to allow, disallow or adjust the claim of any Settlement Class Member on equitable grounds. Each Claimant is deemed to have submitted to the jurisdiction of the Court with respect to the Claimant s claim, and the claim will be subject to investigation and discovery under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, provided that such investigation and discovery shall be limited to that Claimant s status as a Settlement Class Member and the validity and amount of that Claimant s claim. No discovery shall be allowed on the merits of the Action. The date of purchase, acquisition or sale is the contract or trade date and not the settlement date. All profits will be subtracted from all losses to determine the net recognized loss of each Settlement Class Member. Therefore, you need to list all purchases and acquisitions, and sales of Atlas common stock during the relevant time period. Brokerage commissions and transfer taxes paid by you in connection with your purchase/acquisition and sale of Atlas common stock should be included in the total purchase price and net of the total proceeds. For purposes of determining whether a Claimant had a gain from his, her or its overall transactions in Atlas common stock during the Class Period or suffered a loss, the Claims Administrator shall: total the amount paid for all Atlas common stock purchased or otherwise acquired during the Class Period by the Claimant (the Total Purchase Amount ); match any sales of Atlas common stock during the Class Period first against the Claimant s opening position in the common stock (the proceeds of those sales will not be considered for purposes of calculating gains or losses); total the amount received for sales of the remaining Atlas shares sold during the Class Period (the Sales Proceeds ); and ascribe a value of $1.695 for Atlas common stock purchased or otherwise acquired during the Class Period and still held at the end of the Class Period ( Holding Value ). The difference between (i) the Total Purchase Amount and the (ii) sum of the Sales Proceeds and Holding Value, will be deemed a Claimant s gain or loss on his, her or its overall transactions in Atlas common stock during the Class Period. No distribution will be made on a claim where the potential distribution amount is $5.00 or less in cash. Payments pursuant to the Plan of Allocation will be final and conclusive against all Settlement Class Members. All Settlement Class Members whose claims are not approved by the Court will be barred from participating in distributions from the Net Settlement Fund, but otherwise shall be bound by all of the terms of the Settlement, including the terms of the Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal to be entered in the Action and will be barred from bringing any Released Claim against any Released Parties (as those terms are defined in the Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement of the Litigation (the Stipulation ), which is available on the Internet at or through the mail upon request). 10. How can I receive a payment? To qualify for payment, you must submit a Proof of Claim form. A Proof of Claim is enclosed with this Notice. You may also obtain a Proof of Claim on the Internet at Read the instructions carefully, fill out the form, include all the documents the form asks for, sign it, and mail it postmarked no later than December 21, When will I receive my payment? The Court will hold a hearing on November 9, 2007, to decide whether to approve the Settlement. Even if the Court approves the Settlement, there may be appeals. It is always uncertain whether appeals, if any, can be resolved, and resolving them can take time, perhaps several years. In addition, the Claims Administrator must process all of the Proof of Claim and Release forms. The processing is complicated and will take many months. Please be patient. 2 Pursuant to Section 21(D)(e)(1) of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, in any private action arising under this title in which the plaintiff seeks to establish damages by reference to the market price of a security, the award of damages to the plaintiff shall not exceed the difference between the purchase or sale price paid or received, as appropriate, by the plaintiff for the subject security and the mean trading price of that security during the 90-day period beginning on the date on which the information correcting the misstatement or omission that is the basis for the action is disseminated to the market. $1.695 is the mean trading price of Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. common stock during the 90-day period beginning on October 16, 2002 and ending on January 13,

6 12. What am I giving up to receive a payment? Unless you exclude yourself, you are staying in the Settlement Class, and that means that you cannot sue, continue to sue, or be part of any other lawsuit against the Defendants or the Released Parties about the claims being released in this Settlement. It also means that all of the Court s orders will apply to you and legally bind you, and you will release your claims in this Action against the Defendants. The terms of the release are included in the claim form that is enclosed. 13. How do I exclude myself from the Settlement? You can exclude yourself from the Settlement. If you do not want a payment from the Settlement, but you want to keep the right to sue or continue to sue the Defendants about the claims you would be releasing in this Settlement, then you must take steps to exclude yourself from the Settlement. This is sometimes referred to as opting out of the class. To exclude yourself from the Settlement, you must send a letter by mail saying that you want to be excluded from In re Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 02CV8334(WCC). Please sign the letter and include your name, address, telephone number, and information concerning your purchase(s) and acquisition(s) of Atlas common stock during the period between April 18, 2000 and October 15, 2002, inclusive, including the dates of each such purchase/acquisition, the number of shares and price paid for each share purchased/acquired, and the dates, Sale price, and number of shares sold. You cannot exclude yourself on the telephone or by . You must mail your exclusion request postmarked no later than October 12, 2007 to: Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. Securities Litigation Exclusions c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator PO Box 9180 Dublin, Ohio If you exclude yourself from the Settlement Class, you will not receive a settlement payment, and you cannot object to the Settlement. If you exclude yourself in the manner required above, you will not be legally bound by anything that happens in this Action, and you may be able to sue (or continue to sue) the Defendants in the future through your own lawyer and at your own expense. 14. If I do not exclude myself, can I sue the Defendants later for the claims that I am releasing in this Settlement? No. Unless you exclude yourself, you give up any right to sue the Defendants and any Released Party for the claims that this Settlement releases. You must exclude yourself from the Settlement Class to bring or to continue your own lawsuit. Remember, the exclusion deadline is October 12, If I exclude myself, can I obtain a payment from this Settlement? No. If you exclude yourself, do not send in a claim form to ask for any money. 16. Do I have a lawyer in this case? The Court ordered that the following lead counsel and their law firm will represent you and the other Settlement Class Members: Katharine M. Ryan and Kay E. Sickles, Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler, LLP ( SBTK ), 280 King of Prussia Road, Radnor, PA The SBTK lawyers are called Lead Plaintiff s Counsel. If you want to be represented by your own lawyer, you may hire one at your own expense. 17. How will the lawyers be paid? Lead Plaintiff s Counsel is moving the Court to award attorneys fees from the Settlement Fund in an amount not greater than thirty percent (30%) of the Gross Settlement Fund and for reimbursement of its expenses up to a maximum amount of $125,000, plus interest on such expenses at the same rate as earned by the Settlement Fund. Lead Plaintiff s Counsel, without further notice to the Settlement Class, may subsequently apply to the Court for fees and expenses incurred in connection with administering and distributing the settlement proceeds to the members of the Settlement Class and any proceedings after the Settlement Fairness Hearing. 18. How do I notify the Court that I do not like the Settlement? If you are a Settlement Class Member you can object to the Settlement if you do not like any part of it. To object, you must send a letter stating that you are a Settlement Class Member, information concerning your purchases/acquisitions of Atlas common stock during the Class Period, that you object to the Settlement, and stating the reasons why you object. In your objection, you must include your name, address, telephone number, and your signature. You must also include information concerning your purchase(s), acquisition(s) and sale(s), including the number of shares and the dates of purchase, acquisition and sale. Mail the objection postmarked no later than October 12, 2007, to: 6

7 COURT LEAD PLAINTIFF S COUNSEL Clerk of Court United States District Court Southern District of New York 300 Quarropas Street Room 630 White Plains, NY Katharine M. Ryan, Esq. Kay E. Sickles, Esq. Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler, LLP 280 King of Prussia Road Radnor, PA DEFENSE COUNSEL Brian H. Polovoy, Esq. SHEARMAN & STERLING LLP 599 Lexington Avenue New York, NY Counsel for Defendant Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (sued as Morgan Stanley Dean Witter) David E. Nachman, Esq. DLA PIPER US LLP 1251 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY Counsel for Defendant Brian H. Rowe Anthony M. Radice, Esq. MORRISON & FOERSTER, LLP 1290 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY Counsel for Defendant Richard H. Shuyler John G. Despriet, Esq. SMITH GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP Promenade II, Suite Peachtree Street, N.E. Atlanta, GA Counsel for Defendant Stanley J. Gadek L. Norton Cutler, Esq. PERKINS COIE LLP 1899 Wynkoop Street, Suite 700 Denver, CO Counsel for Defendant Stuart G. Weinroth John B. Harris, Esq. STILLMAN, FRIEDMAN & SHECHTMAN, P.C. 425 Park Avenue New York, NY Counsel for Defendants Douglas A. Carty and James T. Matheny 19. What is the difference between objecting and requesting exclusion from the Settlement? Objecting is simply telling the Court that you do not like something about the Settlement. You can object only if you stay in the Settlement Class. Excluding yourself is telling the Court that you do not want to be part of the Settlement Class and this Settlement. If you exclude yourself, you have no basis to object because the case no longer affects you. 20. When and where will the Court decide whether to approve the Settlement? The Court will hold a Settlement Fairness Hearing at 10:30 a.m. on November 9, 2007, at the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 300 Quarropas Street, Room 630, White Plains, New York , in Courtroom 620. At this hearing the Court will consider whether the Settlement and the Plan of Allocation are fair, reasonable and adequate. If there are written objections, the Court will consider them. The Court will also listen to people who have asked in writing by October 12, 2007 to speak at the hearing. The Court may also decide how much to award Lead Plaintiff s Counsel for attorneys fees and expenses. 21. Do I have to come to the hearing? No. Lead Plaintiff s Counsel will answer any questions the Court may have. 22. May I speak at the hearing? If you have filed an objection as provided above, you may ask the Court for permission to speak at the Settlement Fairness Hearing. To do so, you must include with your objection the statement, I hereby give notice that I intend to appear at the Settlement Fairness Hearing in Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 02CV8334(WCC). Be sure to include your name, address and telephone number, identify the date(s), price(s), and number(s) of shares of all purchases and acquisitions of the common stock of Atlas you made during the Class Period, and sign the letter. If you intend to have any witnesses testify or to introduce any evidence at the Settlement Fairness Hearing, you must list the witnesses and evidence in your objection. Your Notice of Intention to Appear must be served on the Clerk of the Court, Lead Plaintiff s Counsel, and Defense Counsel at the addresses shown in the answer to Question 18 no later than October 12, You cannot speak at the hearing if you exclude yourself. 23. What happens if I do nothing at all? If you do nothing, you will not receive any money from this Settlement. But, unless you exclude yourself in the manner required above, you will not be able to start a lawsuit, continue with a lawsuit, or be part of any other lawsuit against Atlas and the Released Parties about the Released Claims, ever again. 7

8 SPECIAL NOTICE TO SECURITIES BROKERS AND OTHER NOMINEES The Court has Ordered that if you purchased one or more shares of Atlas common stock during the Class Period as nominee for a beneficial owner, then within ten (10) days after you receive this Notice, you must either: (a) send a copy of this Notice and the accompanying Proof of Claim and Release form by first class mail to all such beneficial owners; or (b) provide a list of the names and addresses of such beneficial owners to the Claims Administrator: Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator PO Box 9180 Dublin, Ohio GETTING MORE INFORMATION This notice summarizes the proposed Settlement. More details are contained in the Stipulation. You can obtain a copy of the Stipulation by visiting If you have questions regarding how to obtain copies of documents related to this Settlement, completing your Proof of Claim, correspondence you have received from the Claims Administrator, or the calculation of your Recognized Claim, you may contact the administrator for the distribution of Settlement Fund toll free at or write Atlas Air Worldwide Holdings, Inc. Securities Litigation, c/o The Garden City Group, Inc., Claims Administrator, P.O. Box 9180, Dublin, Ohio For further information regarding this Settlement, you may contact Lead Plaintiff s Counsel: DO NOT CONTACT THE COURT Kay E. Sickles, Esq. Schiffrin Barroway Topaz & Kessler, LLP 280 King of Prussia Road Radnor, PA Telephone: (610)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn MARJORIE MISHKIN, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, ZYNEX, INC., f/k/a

More information

Plaintiff, Defendants.

Plaintiff, Defendants. United States District Court For the District Court of Massachusetts WILTOLD TRZECIAKOWSKI, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. GSI GROUP INC., SERGIO EDELSTEIN and ROBERT BOWEN,

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION If you purchased or otherwise acquired Corinthian Colleges, Inc. ( Corinthian ) common stock between August 23, 2010 and April 14, 2015 (both dates inclusive)

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: The only way to get a payment. See Questions

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: The only way to get a payment. See Questions UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x IN RE HIBERNIA FOODS, PLC SECURITIES LITIGATION ------------------------------------------------------------- THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL

More information

X : : X NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING

X : : X NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS FEES AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN RE: THERAGENICS CORP. SECURITIES LITIGATION X : : X CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:99-CV-0141 (TWT) NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS

More information

Questions? Call toll-free (888) or visit

Questions? Call toll-free (888) or visit UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE COMMVAULT SYSTEMS, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION Civil Action No. 14-5628 (PGS)(LHG) NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT;

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT POPTECH, L.P., individually, and on behalf of a class of others similarly situated, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 310-cv-967 (SRU) v. STEWARDSHIP

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. 14 Civ (KMW) CLASS ACTION IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Case No. 14 Civ (KMW) CLASS ACTION IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE SALIX PHARMACEUTICALS, LTD. Case No. 14 Civ. 8925 (KMW) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF (I) PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT; (II)

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) In re MOBILEIRON, INC. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Lead Case No. 1-15-cv-284001 CLASS ACTION Assigned to:

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION THE ERICA P. JOHN FUND, INC., et al., On Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:02-CV-1152-M

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN F. HUTCHINS, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, vs. NBTY, INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. Civil Action No.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x IN RE INTERPUBLIC SECURITIES 02 Civ. 6527 (DLC) LITIGATION CLASS ACTION x HENRY KARPUS, Derivatively on behalf of Nominal Defendant, The Interpublic

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CLASS ACTION In re ST. JUDE MEDICAL, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civ. No. 0:10-cv-00851-SRN-TNL CLASS ACTION TO: NOTICE OF PROPOSED

More information

THE HONORABLE CATHERINE SHAFFER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY RICHARD HARVEY, CLASS ACTION

THE HONORABLE CATHERINE SHAFFER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY RICHARD HARVEY, CLASS ACTION THE HONORABLE CATHERINE SHAFFER SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY RICHARD HARVEY, Plaintiff, v. DAVID P. ANASTASI, et al., Lead Case No. 08-2-31902-4 SEA CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION IN RE DIAMOND FOODS, INC., SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates to: All Actions Case No.: 11-cv-05386-WHA NOTICE

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT:

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT: Superior Court for the State of Connecticut Judicial District of Hartford If you were a customer of Starion Energy s variable rate electricity supply services you could receive a cash payment from a class

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Case No. 08-CV Division No. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF JOHNSON COUNTY, KANSAS CIVIL COURT DEPARTMENT RICHARD TYNER, III, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, vs. Plaintiff, EMBARQ CORPORATION, THOMAS A. GERKE, WILLIAM

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case 2:11-cv-03701-DMG-MRW Document 87-4 Filed 12/21/12 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:1484 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----------------------------------------------------X Case

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE ALLERGAN, INC. PROXY VIOLATION SECURITIES LITIGATION Case No. 8:14-cv-2004-DOC (KES) CLASS ACTION Honorable David O.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION JEROME JENSON, BETTY TAIT, EILEEN HORTON and JOSEPH RISSE, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiffs,

More information

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <<SequenceNo>>

*CLMNTIDNO* - UAA - <<SequenceNo>> RAMIREZ V JCPENNEY CORP ERISA CLASS ACTION ADMINISTRATOR C/O RUST CONSULTING INC - 5514 PO BOX 2572 FARIBAULT MN 55021-9572 IMPORTANT LEGAL MATERIALS *CLMNTIDNO* - UAA -

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : x

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK X : : : : : : : : : : : : : : x BARBARA E. BERNARD, COURMANT AND W APNER ASSOCIATES AND ROBERT SUTHERLAND, on behal f of themselves and all others similarly situated, -against- Plaintiffs, UBS W ARBURG LLC AND ANTON W AHLMAN, Defendants.

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE SALOMON ANALYST LEVEL 3 LITIGATION 02 Civ. 6919 (GEL) NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING IF YOU PURCHASED

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BECKLEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BECKLEY ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) In re MASSEY ENERGY CO. SECURITIES LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BECKLEY Civil Action No. 5:10-cv-00689-ICB NOTICE

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE: 2008 FANNIE MAE ERISA 09-CV-01350-PAC LITIGATION MDL No. 2013 NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS MIGHT BE AFFECTED IF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA JOHN GIDDIENS, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated Case No. 12-cv-02624-LDD CLASS ACTION Plaintiff, v. FIRST ADVANTAGE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK NEW JERSEY CARPENTERS HEALTH FUND, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. DLJ MORTGAGE CAPITAL, INC., CREDIT SUISSE

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION MEMORANDUM

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION MEMORANDUM 3 0 J~::~ 2016 NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION MEMORANDUM DATE: JUNE 23, 2016 SECURITY DESCRIPTION: MERCK & COMPANY INC. ISIN: US5893311077 HEARING DATE: JUNE 28, 2016 EXCLUSION DATE: MAY 14, 2016 PROOF OF CLAIM

More information

Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1598 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 3:15-cv PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1598 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 3:15-cv-07350-PGS-DEA Document 66-4 Filed 10/12/17 Page 1 of 31 PageID: 1598 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 In re: Amicus Therapeutics, Inc Securities Litigation

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION LOUIS GRASSO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, No. CV 06-02639 vs. Plaintiff, CLASS ACTION VITESSE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING DONNA MOORE, FRENCHOLA HOLDEN, and KEITH MCMILLON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiffs,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) IN RE LERNOUT & HAUSPIE ) CIVIL ACTION NO. SECURITIES LITIGATION ) 00-CV-11589 (PBS) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ALL ACTIONS ) ) NOTICE OF PROPOSED

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA If You Received a Letter from the Law Firm of Phelan Hallinan & Schmieg, LLP Dated between October 23, 2009 and October 22,

More information

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT

NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT NOTICE TO CLASS MEMBERS RE: PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT If you purchased goods or services using a credit card from a Lowe s store in Massachusetts

More information

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT If you were a borrower with a loan secured by a property in Massachusetts and were assessed two or more late fees by EMC Mortgage Corporation ("EMC") at any time during the period

More information

If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit from a proposed Class Action Settlement.

If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit from a proposed Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If you are a current or former paying member of Angie s List, Inc., you may get a payment or benefit

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civ. No. 09-CIV-1951 (DLC) ECF CASE PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Civ. No. 09-CIV-1951 (DLC) ECF CASE PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE In re General Electric Co. Sec. Litig. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Civ. No. 09-CIV-1951 (DLC ECF CASE PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE To recover from the Net Settlement Fund as

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RUDMAN, ET AL., v. CHC GROUP, LTD., ET AL., Civil Action No. 15-cv-3773 (LAK) NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT FAIRNESS HEARING,

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION Harris v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. Case No.:4:06-cv-00175-KGB If You Are or

More information

Notice of Settlement of Nationwide Class Action

Notice of Settlement of Nationwide Class Action UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN Notice of Settlement of Nationwide Class Action If You Performed at any Deja Vu-Affiliated Nightclub as an Exotic Dancer, a Proposed Class Action

More information

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights.

If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect your rights. United States District Court for the Northern District of California If you received a call offering a SolarCity product between November 6, 2011 and October 16, 2017, a class action settlement may affect

More information

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT

EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT QUESTIONS? VISIT Bias v. Wells Fargo & Company et al., Case No. 4:12-cv-00664-YGR NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION Para ver este aviso en español, se puede visitar www.biasvwellsfargo.com. IF YOU HAVE OR HAD

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Did you own property near and downwind from the former Rocky Flats Nuclear Weapons Plant (in Jefferson County, northwest of Denver, Colorado) on

More information

RECEIVE YOUR SHARE EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT GO TO THE FINAL APPROVAL HEARING

RECEIVE YOUR SHARE EXCLUDE YOURSELF OBJECT GO TO THE FINAL APPROVAL HEARING United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT REGARDING UNSOLICITED FASCIMILE ADVERTISEMENTS The Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA If you purchased goods using a credit card from a Sur La Table store in California during the period of time between February

More information

Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc

Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc EXHIBIT A-1 Notice of Pendency and Partial Settlement of Class Action to Investors of Thema International Fund plc TO: All persons and entities who owned shares either of Thema International Fund plc or

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Anthony Williams et al. v. Duke Energy International, Inc. et al. Case No. 1:08-cv-00046 NOTICE OF (I) PROPOSED SETTLEMENT;

More information

A FEDERAL COURT ORDERED THIS NOTICE THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : : :

A FEDERAL COURT ORDERED THIS NOTICE THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : : : A FEDERAL COURT ORDERED THIS NOTICE THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION FROM A LAWYER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ANGELA FULLER, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, v.

More information

NOTICE OF PARTIAL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE FOLLOWING CLASS

NOTICE OF PARTIAL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT TO ALL MEMBERS OF THE FOLLOWING CLASS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS NOTICE OF PARTIAL CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT In re Enron Corporation ERISA Litigation ) No. H-01-3913 (Consolidated Cases) ) ) TO ALL MEMBERS

More information

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No.

Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No. Dr. David S. Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Case No. 0:15-cv-60716-WPD If you made a purchase at a Godiva store in the United States

More information

If You purchased a Rescue It! Product You Could Get Benefits from a Class Action Settlement

If You purchased a Rescue It! Product You Could Get Benefits from a Class Action Settlement IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION If You purchased a Rescue It! Product You Could Get Benefits from a Class Action Settlement A Federal Court authorized

More information

Carlos Guarisma v. Microsoft Corporation. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No.

Carlos Guarisma v. Microsoft Corporation. United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Case No. Carlos Guarisma v. Microsoft Corporation United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida Case No. 1:15-cv-24326-CMA If you made a purchase at a Microsoft retail store using a credit card

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP. FOREX TRANSACTIONS LITIGATION No. 12-MD-2335 (LAK) (JLC) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Southeastern Pennsylvania

More information

DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA

DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA DISTRICT COURT OF TULSA COUNTY, OKLAHOMA If you paid Overdraft Fees related to a BOKF, N.A.* Debit Card, check card, or ATM card, you could receive a payment or Account credit from a class action settlement.

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ARTHUR HATTENSTY, ET AL. V. BESSIRE AND CASENHISER, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC540657 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION ESSEX COUNTY. Docket No. ESX-L

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION ESSEX COUNTY. Docket No. ESX-L In re Bradley Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Shareholder Litigation SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY LAW DIVISION ESSEX COUNTY Docket No. ESX-L-4370-07 NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF SETTLEMENT OF SHAREHOLDER CLASS ACTION OFFICIAL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO Have you purchased and used Align probiotic supplements, but received no digestive relief or other digestive benefit? If so, you may be entitled to

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF DERIVATIVE ACTIONS AND OF SETTLEMENT HEARING TO ALL HOLDERS OF BARNES & NOBLE, INC. STOCK ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2007

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF DERIVATIVE ACTIONS AND OF SETTLEMENT HEARING TO ALL HOLDERS OF BARNES & NOBLE, INC. STOCK ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF DERIVATIVE ACTIONS AND OF SETTLEMENT HEARING TO ALL HOLDERS OF BARNES & NOBLE, INC. STOCK ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2007 This Notice is being sent to let you know of the proposed

More information

THE 55th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Cause No ; Christopher Garcia, et al. v. Camden Stonebridge, et al.

THE 55th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS. Cause No ; Christopher Garcia, et al. v. Camden Stonebridge, et al. THE 55th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS Cause No. 2016-74799; Christopher Garcia, et al. v. Camden Stonebridge, et al. A class action settlement involving administrative billing fees allegedly

More information

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT AFFECTS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS.

PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT AFFECTS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS. PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY AS IT AFFECTS YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS. The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Garo Madenlian, et al. v. Flax USA, Inc. Civil Litigation No. SACV13-01748 JVS (JPRx) If you purchased flax milk sold in the United States by Flax USA, Inc.,

More information

This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. Attention Purchasers of RUST-OLEUM Painter s Touch Ultra Cover 2X spray paint, RUST-OLEUM Painter's Touch 2X Ultra Cover spray paint, RUST-OLEUM PaintPlus Ultra Cover 2X spray paint, RUST-OLEUM American

More information

DATED: May 7, 2014 B,Ii~ DATED: May 2014 Barnes & Thornburg LLP (Attorney for Defendant Motorola Mobility, LLC) BY:~-- BENJAMIN H. RICHMAN Edelson PC (Attorney for Plaintiff and the Class) -29- Exhibit

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. ERISA LITIGATION II Master File No.: 08-CV-5722 (LTS) (DCF) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: All Actions NOTICE

More information

Case 2:11-cv RSL Document 138 Filed 10/01/12 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:11-cv RSL Document 138 Filed 10/01/12 Page 1 of 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case :-cv-00-rsl Document Filed 0/0/ Page of The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik 0 JASON MOOMJY, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, HQ SUSTAINABLE MARITIME INDUSTRIES,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MEMPHIS DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MEMPHIS DIVISION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE MEMPHIS DIVISION IN RE CONCORD EFS, INC. ) SECURITIES LITIGATION ) No. 02-2697 Ma Judge Mays NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MICHAEL HALTMAN, et al., Case No. 92-3388 CBM Plaintiffs, Consolidated Class Action vs. AURA SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Defendants. BARRY ABRAMS,

More information

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705

Case 2:06-cv R-CW Document 437 Filed 10/12/12 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:7705 Case :0-cv-00-R-CW Document Filed // Page of Page ID #:0 0 JOSEPH J. TABACCO, JR. # Email: jtabacco@bermandevalerio.com NICOLE LAVALLEE # Email: nlavallee@bermandevalerio.com BERMAN DeVALERIO One California

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 4:14-cv-11191-LVP-MKM Doc # 95 Filed 11/20/15 Pg 1 of 19 Pg ID 3450 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION NEW YORK STATE TEACHERS RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Individually and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. A court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. A court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE A court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. If you receive this Notice, you have been identified as someone

More information

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE

PROOF OF CLAIM AND RELEASE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE CHINA MOBILE GAMES & ENTERTAINMENT GROUP, LTD SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE NO. 1:14-CV-04471 (KMW) This Document Relates To: All Actions Deadline

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE FREMONT GENERAL CORPORATION LITIGATION Case No.: CV07-02693 JHN(FFMX) CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FAIRNESS

More information

Case 1:09-md BSJ Document Filed 02/16/11 Page 1 of 150 EXHIBIT A

Case 1:09-md BSJ Document Filed 02/16/11 Page 1 of 150 EXHIBIT A Case 1:09-md-02027-BSJ Document 252-1 Filed 02/16/11 Page 1 of 150 EXHIBIT A Case 1:09-md-02027-BSJ Document 252-1 Filed 02/16/11 Page 2 of 150 Case 1:09-md-02027-BSJ Document 252-1 Filed 02/16/11 Page

More information

Case: 1:15-cv SJD Doc #: 38-1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 607

Case: 1:15-cv SJD Doc #: 38-1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 607 Case: 1:15-cv-00748-SJD Doc #: 38-1 Filed: 10/27/17 Page: 1 of 10 PAGEID #: 607 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Vicki Linneman et al. v. Vita-Mix Corporation,

More information

United States District Court, Northern District of California NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT REGARDING ADT RESIDENTIAL SECURITY SYSTEMS

United States District Court, Northern District of California NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT REGARDING ADT RESIDENTIAL SECURITY SYSTEMS United States District Court, Northern District of California NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT REGARDING ADT RESIDENTIAL SECURITY SYSTEMS The Court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation from

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In re COVAD SECURITIES LITIGATION, This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS. Master File No. C-00-3891-PJH CLASS ACTION NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER CASES

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER CASES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION IN RE SWISHER HYGIENE, INC. SECURITIES AND DERIVATIVE LITIGATION X X MDL DOCKET NO: 3:12-MD-2384-GCM ALL MEMBER

More information

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT

YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT If you purchased a NIVEA Good-Bye Cellulite or My Silhouette! Product, between January 1, 2007 and April 1, 2012 you could get a payment from a class action settlement. (A state court authorized this notice.

More information

If You Were Sent a Text Message from CITGO Petroleum Corporation, You May Be Entitled to a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

If You Were Sent a Text Message from CITGO Petroleum Corporation, You May Be Entitled to a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If You Were Sent a Text Message from CITGO Petroleum Corporation, You May Be Entitled to a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. A federal

More information

Cynthia Casey v. Orange County s Credit Union

Cynthia Casey v. Orange County s Credit Union Cynthia Casey v. Orange County s Credit Union NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS ACTION AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT READ THIS NOTICE FULLY AND CAREFULLY; THE PROPOSED SETTLEMENT MAY AFFECT YOUR RIGHTS! IF YOU HAD A CHECKING

More information

Case 1:11-cv KBF Document Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 15

Case 1:11-cv KBF Document Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 15 Case 1:11-cv-07533-KBF Document 135-3 Filed 12/06/13 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x

More information

These rights and options and the deadlines to exercise them are explained below.

These rights and options and the deadlines to exercise them are explained below. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA If you were sued by LVNV Funding, LLC, you may benefit from this class action settlement. The case is titled Linda Byrd v. LVNV

More information

A federal court authorized this important notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A federal court authorized this important notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA If you paid a real estate agent to help you sell property in Beaufort or Jasper County between January 14, 2006 and September 17, 2007, you

More information

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS LEGAL NOTICE BY ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS If you received an automated call to your cell phone and were transferred to a State Farm Agent between January

More information

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to TD Bank, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement.

If You Paid Overdraft Fees to TD Bank, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If You Paid Overdraft Fees to TD Bank, You May Be Eligible for a Payment from a Class Action Settlement. A federal court directed this

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION

NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF EMPLOYMENT DISCRIMINATION CLASS ACTION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) NICOLE COGDELL, et al., ) ) Case No. SACV 12-01138 AG (ANx) Plaintiffs, ) ) Honorable Andrew J. Guilford v. ) ) THE WET SEAL,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT If You Played NCAA Division I Men s or Women s Basketball or FBS Football

More information

If you bought Aggrenox directly from Boehringer Ingelheim you could get a payment from a class action settlement.

If you bought Aggrenox directly from Boehringer Ingelheim you could get a payment from a class action settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT If you bought Aggrenox directly from Boehringer Ingelheim you could get a payment from a class action settlement. A federal court authorized

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Amended Class Action Settlement

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Amended Class Action Settlement UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Notice of Amended Class Action Settlement The original Interstate Batteries Class Action Settlement has been amended, and the Court

More information

ECF CASE ECF CASE NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION. A Federal Court authorized this Notice

ECF CASE ECF CASE NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION. A Federal Court authorized this Notice UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE: GEROVA FINANCIAL GROUP, LTD. SECURITIES LITIGATION CASE No.: 11-md-2275-SAS ECF CASE This document relates to: In re STILLWATER CAPITAL

More information

Attention IMVU Users Who Purchased Certain Audio Files On IMVU Before December 1, 2010 This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully.

Attention IMVU Users Who Purchased Certain Audio Files On IMVU Before December 1, 2010 This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. Attention IMVU Users Who Purchased Certain Audio Files On IMVU Before December 1, 2010 This notice may affect your rights. Please read it carefully. A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

If you paid Overdraft Fees to M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank, you may be eligible for a payment from a Class Action Settlement.

If you paid Overdraft Fees to M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank, you may be eligible for a payment from a Class Action Settlement. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA If you paid Overdraft Fees to M & I Marshall & Ilsley Bank, you may be eligible for a payment from a Class Action Settlement. A federal

More information

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action

Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action Notice of Pendency and Proposed Settlement of Class Action IF YOU WERE CHARGED A FUEL SURCHARGE OR FUEL/ENVIRONMENTAL FEE IN FLORIDA BY SOUTHERN WASTE SYSTEMS, LLC D/B/A SUN DISPOSAL ( SWS ) FROM 01/14/12

More information

Case 1:08-cv PAC Document 56 Filed 02/02/2010 Page 1 of 42

Case 1:08-cv PAC Document 56 Filed 02/02/2010 Page 1 of 42 DOCSTOR: i767262\4 Case 1:08-cv-00933-PAC Document 56 Filed 02/02/2010 Page 1 of 42 IJSDC SDNY U.S. Pre-Approval Order DpCEI `:_ ELECTR(NICAL - UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DOC #` --- SOUTHERN DISTRICT

More information

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer.

A federal court authorized this Notice. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA In Re: Monitronics International, Inc. Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation Case No. 1:13-md-02493 If you received telemarketing

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/06/ :28 PM

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/06/ :28 PM FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 09/06/2016 08:28 PM INDEX NO. 103948/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 71 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/06/2016 EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT A SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING THEREON

NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION, SETTLEMENT, AND HEARING THEREON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY SANDRA BALABAN, On Behalf of Civil Action No. 02-4852 Herself And All Others Similarly Situated, v. Plaintiff, Hon. Joel A. Pisano HENRY B. SCHACHT,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IMPORTANT NOTICE The only official website from which to submit a claim is www.accountholdsettlement.com/claim. DO NOT submit a claim from any other website, including any website titled Paycoin c. PayPal

More information

Uniroyal Technology Corporation Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator PO Box 9000 #6388 Merrick, NY

Uniroyal Technology Corporation Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator PO Box 9000 #6388 Merrick, NY Must be Postmarked No Later Than June 28, 2006 UNR Uniroyal Technology Corporation Securities Litigation c/o The Garden City Group, Inc. Claims Administrator *P-UNRF-APOC/1* PO Box 9000 #6388 Merrick,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :0-cv-0-RSWL-RZ Document Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 Christopher Kim, Esq. (Bar No. 000 Lisa J. Yang, Esq. (Bar No. 0 LIM RUGER & KIM, LLP 0 West Seventh Street, Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone:

More information