SP00-3 Sealed Records Procedures Appellate and Trial Court Rules Standards for sealing. Proposal applies to civil and criminal proceedings

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "SP00-3 Sealed Records Procedures Appellate and Trial Court Rules Standards for sealing. Proposal applies to civil and criminal proceedings"

Transcription

1 Title Sealed Records Procedures Appellate and Trial Court Rules (adopt Cal. Rules of Court, rules.,.,.,., and.; amend rule ; repeal rules and ) Summary The proposed rules would establish standards and procedures for handling requests for sealing cases and documents in the trial and appellate courts. The rules would be effective January, 00. Source Joint Working Group on Sealed Records of the Appellate, Civil and Small Claims, and Criminal Law Advisory Committees Staff Committee Counsel: Patrick O Donnell () - patrick.o donnell@jud.ca.gov Ben McClinton () - ben.mcclinton@jud.ca.gov Joshua Weinstein () - joshua.weinstein@jud.ca.gov Discussion The Supreme Court has requested that the Judicial Council propose rules to guide the resolution of motions to file sealed documents. The courts are frequently presented with requests and stipulations to file documents under seal. The sealing of records poses difficult First Amendment issues concerning the right of public access to court proceedings and documents. (See generally NBC Subsidiary (KNBC- TV), Inc. v. Superior Court () 0 Cal.th ; see also id. at 0 0, fn..) A number of appellate decisions have indicated a need for guidance to the courts. For example, Champion v. Superior Court () 0 Cal. App.d laments the absence of guidance for courts on the issue of sealing records: [C]ustoms and practices vary greatly and little written guidance exists. (Id. At.) Standards for sealing. The NBC Subsidiary case established standards for the appellate and trial courts to follow. The court must expressly find that (i) there exists an overriding interest supporting closure and/or sealing; (ii) there is a substantial probability that the interest will be prejudiced absent closure and/or sealing; (iii) the proposed closure and/or sealing is narrowly tailored to serve the overriding interest; and (iv) there is no less restrictive means of achieving the overriding interest. (NBC Subsidiary (KNBC-TV), Inc., supra, 0 Cal.th at.) Proposal applies to civil and criminal proceedings. The proposed rules would apply to civil and criminal cases and to appeals and original proceedings, i.e., to any record that requires a court order to

2 be placed under seal. Trial court proposal. The proposed rules indicate that the sealing of cases or documents is disfavored (rule.(b)) and require specific findings before an order sealing records may be made (rule.(d)). An overriding interest must be demonstrated that overcomes the right of public access to court records (rule.(c)). The required demonstration and findings correspond to the requirements in NBC Subsidiary. The proposed rules distinguish between records requested to be placed under seal and those made confidential by statute or rule (rule.(a)()). The proposed rules cover only the former type of records, i.e., those requested to be sealed by court order. The rules do not allow a record to be filed under seal by stipulation, nor do they allow a sealing order to be based solely on an agreement or a stipulation of the parties (rule.(a)). To assist the court in the document-by-document review that is required before a record is sealed (rule.(e)()), the proposal allows a court to order references in cases involving voluminous documents, at the expense of the party seeking to seal the records (rule.(e)()). New rules. and. (to replace repealed rules and ). Two current rules of court would be repealed, and their contents would be relocated to the new rules on sealed records in the trial courts. Rule (Request for secrecy of filing) requires that a request that a complaint in an attachment proceeding not be made public include a declaration containing certain statements. This rule would be relocated and renumbered as rule.. The title of the rule would be changed to Request for delayed public disclosure, which more accurately describes the nature of the request and the temporary relief available under Code of Civil Procedure section.00. Rule (Confidential in-camera proceedings) would be repealed. This rule s first paragraph would become new rule.. The rest of the rule would be relocated to more appropriate locations in the new rules on sealed records.

3 The overall result of these changes should be to clarify the scope and contents of rules and, and to move them to more logical and accessible locations in the rules. Note: Applicability to discovery materials. The proposed rules do not expressly address discovery materials that are neither used at trial nor submitted as a basis for adjudication (not a filed record). The First Amendment generally does not compel public access to such documents. (See NBC Subsidiary (KNBC-TV), Inc., supra, 0 Cal.th at 0 0, fn. ). Additional rules to cover discovery materials, stipulated protective orders, and related matters. ***Public suggestions regarding discovery provisions are welcome. Appellate court proposal. Records not sealed by the trial court would not be filed under seal in the reviewing court (rule.(b)). On its own or a party s motion, a reviewing court would be allowed to order previously sealed records unsealed after a noticed hearing (rule.(d) and (e)). Note: Comment is invited on the proposal in rule.(d) to allow a reviewing court to unseal a record sealed by the trial court on its own motion after a noticed hearing. Although no duty is imposed, the proposal allows a court to protect the public s interest in having access to court records and proceedings without a formal application by a party or another interested person under proposed rule.(e). A motion procedure is proposed for sealing a record not previously filed in the trial court (for example, in original proceedings) upon a showing of an overriding interest (rule.(f)). The court may not allow a record to be sealed by stipulation (rule.(f)()). Under proposed rule (e), the sealed records procedures in rule. would apply to original proceedings in the appellate courts. Note: Use of must instead of shall in the new appellate rules. Following the convention adopted as part of the project to rewrite all the rules on appeal, these proposed rules employ the less ambiguous must to indicate a required action and may to indicate a permitted action or discretion. Must not means

4 is required not to or is disallowed. May not means is not permitted to or is disallowed from. (See Garner, Bryan A., A Dictionary of Modern Legal Usage (d ed., Oxford University Press) Words of Authority, pp..) NOTE: Proposals invited on handling confidential records. These proposals do not attempt to address issues that arise concerning treatment of confidential records those made confidential by statute or rule and thus not requiring a court order. Those issues may be the subjects of later rule proposals. The Appellate, Civil and Small Claims, and Criminal Law Advisory Committees invite your proposals for handling such confidential information and records. Attachment Deadline for comments: August, 000

5 PROPOSED RULES Sealed Records Procedures in the Appellate and Trial Courts Rules.,.,.,., and. would be added to the California Rules of Court; rules and would be repealed; and rule would be amended effective January, 00, to read: 0 0 APPELLATE COURT RULES Rule.. Sealed records (a) [Applicability and definition of record ] () This rule applies to sealed records and to records proposed to be sealed in the reviewing court and in original proceedings under rule. This rule does not apply to records that are required to be kept confidential by statute or other rule. () Unless the context indicates otherwise, record as used in this rule means all or a portion of any document, paper, exhibit, transcript, or other thing filed or lodged with the court. (b) [Records not sealed by the trial court] A record that was filed or lodged publicly in the trial court and was not ordered sealed by that court may not be filed under seal in the reviewing court. (c) [Records sealed by the trial court] () A record ordered sealed by the trial court that is a part of the case record on appeal or of the record supporting a writ petition must be filed under seal in the reviewing court and must remain sealed unless the reviewing court orders otherwise. () The reviewing court may examine a sealed record. () If all or any portion of the case record on appeal or of the record supporting a writ petition was sealed by the trial court, a party must include in the notice of designation of the case record or in the record supporting the writ petition the following:

6 0 0 0 (i) The sealing order; (ii) The motion to seal the record; and (iii) All documents that were filed in the trial court in support of or in opposition to the motion to seal. (d) [Court s own motion to unseal] The reviewing court may on its own motion order the unsealing of a sealed or conditionally sealed record if the court serves notice of the proposed unsealing to the parties. A party may file opposition to the proposed unsealing within days after the court s notice is filed, or within the time the court orders. (e) [Party s motion to unseal] A party or member of the public may move to unseal a sealed record. If necessary to preserve confidentiality, the motion, any opposition, and any supporting documents may be filed in both a public redacted version and a sealed complete version. (f) [Motion to seal a record not previously filed in the trial court] () A record not previously filed in the trial court must not be filed under seal without a court order. The court must not permit a record to be filed under seal based solely upon the agreement or stipulation of the parties. () A party requesting that a record be filed under seal must file a motion for an order sealing the record. () The court may seal a record only if it makes the findings required by rule.. () The party requesting that a record be filed under seal must lodge it with the court under (h) when the motion is made, unless good cause exists for not lodging it. Pending determination of the motion, the lodged record will be conditionally under seal. () If necessary to prevent disclosure, the motion, any opposition, and any supporting documents may be filed in a public redacted version, and a full version may be lodged conditionally under seal. () If the court does not grant the motion to seal, the clerk must return the lodged record to the submitting party and may not place it in the case file. (g) [References to nonpublic material in public records]

7 0 0 () A record filed publicly in the reviewing court may not disclose material contained in a record that is sealed, conditionally under seal, or subject to a pending motion to seal. () If it is necessary that a motion to seal or unseal a record disclose confidential material, the motion and any supporting papers must be prepared in both a redacted version labeled redacted and a separate full version labeled confidential. (i) In the redacted version, redaction must be limited to those specific portions whose disclosure would undermine the confidentiality of the material under seal or to be placed under seal. (ii) The confidential version must be filed under seal, if the reviewing court has ordered the material to be sealed, or lodged conditionally under seal, if it has not. (h) [Lodging records requested to be placed under seal] () The party requesting that a record be placed under seal must put it in a manila envelope or other appropriate container, seal the envelope or container, and lodge it with the court. () The envelope or container lodged with the court must display prominently the notation, CONDITIONALLY UNDER SEAL. () The party submitting the lodged record must affix to the envelope or container a cover sheet that: (i) Contains all the information required on a caption page under rule ; and (ii) States that the enclosed record is subject to a motion to be placed under seal. () Upon receipt of a record lodged under this rule, the clerk must stamp the affixed cover sheet as lodged [or received (?)] and may not file the record unless the court so orders.

8 0 0 0 Rule. Original proceedings (a) (d) *** (e) [Sealed records] Rule. (Sealed records) applies if a party seeks to lodge or file a record under seal or to unseal a record. (e) (f) *** (f) (g) *** (g) (h) *** (h) (i) *** TRIAL COURT RULES Rule.. Sealed records (a) [Applicability and definition of record ] () Rules.. apply to records sealed or proposed to be sealed by court order. These rules do not apply to records that are required to be kept confidential by statute or other rule. () Unless the context indicates otherwise, record as used in rules.. means all or a portion of any document, paper, exhibit, transcript, or other thing filed or lodged with the court. (b) [Sealing of records disfavored] The public has an interest in access to court records. Unless confidentiality is required by statute or rule, court records are presumed to be open. Orders sealing cases or records filed in an action or a proceeding are disfavored. (c) [Overriding interest necessary to seal records] The court may seal court records only if the court determines that there is an overriding interest that overcomes the right of public access to court records and that all the requirements of (d) are satisfied. Overriding interests that under appropriate circumstances may support the sealing of records include, without limitation, protecting an individual s right to a fair trial, protecting minor victims of sex crimes from further trauma or embarrassment, ensuring the anonymity of juvenile offenders in juvenile court, protecting the privacy interests of

9 0 0 prospective jurors during voir dire, protecting witnesses from embarrassment or intimidation so extreme that it would traumatize them or render them unable to testify, protecting information within the attorney-client privilege, protecting attorney work product, protecting trade secrets, protecting binding contractual obligations not to disclose information, safeguarding national security, and preserving confidential investigative information. (d) [Specific findings required to seal records] The court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it specifically finds that: () An overriding interest supports sealing the record; () There is a substantial probability that the overriding interest will be prejudiced if the record is not sealed; () The proposed sealing is narrowly tailored to serve the overriding interest; and () There is no less restrictive means of achieving the overriding interest. (e) [Scope of order] () An order sealing the record shall (i) be based on a document-bydocument review, (ii) expressly state the findings that support the order, and (iii) direct the sealing of only those documents and pages or, if reasonably practicable, portions of those documents and pages that contain the material that needs to be placed under seal. All other portions of each document or page shall be included in the public file. () If the records that a party is requesting be placed under seal are voluminous, the court may appoint a referee, at the expense of that party, to review the records. Rule.. Procedure for filing records under seal (a) [Court approval required] A record shall not be filed under seal without a court order. The court shall not permit a record to be filed under seal based solely upon the agreement or stipulation of the parties.

10 0 0 (b) [Motion to seal a record] () A party requesting that a record be filed under seal shall file a noticed motion for an order sealing the record. The motion shall be accompanied by a memorandum of points and authorities and a declaration containing facts sufficient to justify the sealing. () The party requesting that a record be filed under seal shall lodge it with the court under (d) when the motion is made, unless good cause exists for not lodging it. Pending the determination of the motion, the lodged record will be conditionally under seal. () If necessary to prevent disclosure, the motion, any opposition, and any supporting documents may be filed in a public redacted version, and a full version may be lodged conditionally under seal. () If the court does not grant the motion to seal, the clerk shall return the lodged record to the submitting party and shall not place it in the case file. (c) [References to nonpublic material in public records] () A record filed publicly in the court shall not disclose material contained in a record that is sealed, conditionally under seal, or subject to a pending motion to seal. () If it is necessary that a motion to seal or unseal a record disclose confidential material, the motion and any supporting papers shall be prepared in both a redacted version labeled redacted and a separate full version labeled confidential. (i) In the redacted version, redaction shall be limited to those specific portions whose disclosure would undermine the confidentiality of the material under seal or to be placed under seal. (ii) The confidential version shall be filed under seal, if the reviewing court has ordered the material to be sealed, or lodged conditionally under seal, if it has not.

11 0 0 (d) [Lodging records requested to be placed under seal] () The party requesting that a record be placed under seal shall put it in a manila envelope or other appropriate container, seal the envelope or container, and lodge it with the court. () The envelope or container lodged with the court shall display prominently the notation, CONDITIONALLY UNDER SEAL. () The party submitting the lodged record shall affix to the envelope or container a cover sheet that: (i) Contains all the information required on a caption page under rule 0; and (ii) States that the enclosed record is subject to a motion to be placed under seal. () Upon receipt of a record lodged under this rule, the clerk shall stamp the affixed cover sheet as lodged [or received (?)] and shall not file the record unless the court so orders. (e) [Order] () If the court grants an order sealing a record, the clerk shall substitute on the envelope or container for the notation required by (d)() a notation prominently stating, SEALED BY ORDER OF THE COURT ON (DATE), and shall replace the cover sheet required by (d)() with a fileendorsed copy of the court s order. () The order shall state whether in addition to records in the envelope or container the order itself, the register of actions, any other court records, or any other records relating to the case are to be sealed. () Sealed records shall not be open to inspection by any person except those expressly authorized by the court order. () A sealed record shall not be unsealed or destroyed except upon order of the court.

12 0 0 0 (f) [Custody of sealed records] Sealed records shall be securely filed and kept separately from the main file in the case. (g) [Custody of voluminous records] If the records to be placed under seal are voluminous and are in the possession of a public agency, the court may by written order direct the agency instead of the clerk to maintain custody of the original records in a secure fashion. If the records are requested by a reviewing court, the trial court shall order the public agency to deliver the records to the clerk for transmission to the reviewing court under these rules. (h) [Motion to unseal records] A party or member of the public, or the court on its own motion, may move to unseal a record. Notice of the motion to unseal shall be filed and served on the parties. The motion, opposition, reply, and supporting documents may be filed in a public redacted version and a sealed complete version if necessary to comply with (c). Rule.. Request for delayed public disclosure In an action in which the prejudgment attachment remedy under Code of Civil Procedure section.0 et seq. is sought, if the plaintiff requests at the time a complaint is filed that the records in the action or the fact of the filing of the action be made temporarily unavailable to the public under Code of Civil Procedure section.00, the plaintiff shall file a declaration stating one of the following: () This action is on a claim for money based on contract against a defendant who is not a natural person. The claim is not secured within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure section.0(b). or () This action is on a claim for money based on contract against a defendant who is a natural person. The claim arises out of the defendant s conduct of a trade, business, or profession, and the money, property, or services were not used by the defendant primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. The claim is not secured within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure section.0(b). Rule.. Confidential in-camera proceedings (a) [Minutes of proceedings] If a confidential in-camera proceeding is held in which a party is excluded from being represented, the clerk shall include in the minutes the nature of the hearing and only such references to writings or witnesses as will not disclose privileged information.

13 0 0 (b) [Sealed records] Records examined by the court in confidence, or copies of them, shall be filed with the clerk under seal and shall not be disclosed without court order. Rule. Request for secrecy of filing A plaintiff who requests that a file or the fact of filing not be made public under section.00 of the Code of Civil Procedure shall file a declaration under oath stating one of the following: () This action is on a claim for money based on contract against a defendant who is not a natural person. The claim is not secured within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure section.0(b). () This action is on a claim for money based on contract against a defendant who is a natural person. The claim arises out of the defendant s conduct of a trade, business, or profession and the money, property, or services was not used by the defendant primarily for personal, family, or household purposes. The claim is not secured within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure section.0(b). Rule. Confidential in-camera proceedings If a confidential in-camera proceeding is held from which a party is excluded from being represented, the clerk shall include in the minutes the nature of hearing and only such references to writings or witnesses as will not disclose privileged information. Writings examined by the court in confidence, or copies of them, shall be filed with the clerk under seal and shall not be disclosed without court order. Sealed envelopes containing confidential materials shall be securely filed and kept separately from the main file in the cause. If writings in the possession of a public agency are voluminous, the court may by written order direct the agency instead of the clerk to maintain custody of the original documents pending appellate review. If the writings are requested by an appellate court, the trial court shall order the public agency to deliver the records to the clerk for transmission to the appellate court under these rules.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. DIVISION [Number]

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. DIVISION [Number] Parts in blue print are instructions to user, not to be included in filed document unless as noted. [NOTE: This sample may be helpful when documents have been sealed by the trial court, appellate counsel

More information

JUDICIARY OF GUAM ELECTRONIC FILING RULES 1

JUDICIARY OF GUAM ELECTRONIC FILING RULES 1 1 1 Adopted by the Supreme Court of Guam pursuant to Promulgation Order No. 15-001-01 (Oct. 2, 2015). TABLE OF CONTENTS DIVISION I - AUTHORITY AND SCOPE Page EFR 1.1. Electronic Document Management System.

More information

Draft Rules on Privacy and Access to Court Records

Draft Rules on Privacy and Access to Court Records Draft Rules on Privacy and Access to Court Records As Approved by the Judicial Council of Virginia, March, 2008 Part Nine Rules for Public Access to Court Records Rule 9:1. Purpose; Construction. Rule

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Plaintiff, Civil Action File No.: v. Defendant. CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER By stipulation and agreement of the parties,

More information

LR IN CAMERA SUBMISSIONS AND SEALED DOCUMENTS.

LR IN CAMERA SUBMISSIONS AND SEALED DOCUMENTS. LR 10-5. IN CAMERA SUBMISSIONS AND SEALED DOCUMENTS. (c) Papers submitted for in camera inspection shall not be filed with the Court, but shall be delivered to chambers of the appropriate judge, and shall

More information

Note: New caption for Rule 1:38 adopted July 16, 2009 to be effective September 1, 2009.

Note: New caption for Rule 1:38 adopted July 16, 2009 to be effective September 1, 2009. RULES GOVERNING THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY PART I. RULES OF GENERAL APPLICATION CHAPTER IV. ADMINISTRATION RULE 1:38. PUBLIC ACCESS TO COURT RECORDS AND ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS Rule 1:38. Public

More information

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW DIVISION 7 FAMILY LAW Rule Effective 700. Subject Matter of the Family Law Court 07/01/2014 700.5 Attorneys and Self Represented Parties 07/01/2011 700.6 Family Law Filings 01/01/2012 701. Assignment of

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015. Exhibit 1.

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/ :15 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015. Exhibit 1. FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/13/2015 05:15 PM INDEX NO. 652471/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 38 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/13/2015 Exhibit 1 Document1 SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SNI/SI

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs, Case :-cv-00-ben-jlb Document Filed 0/0/ PageID. Page of 0 0 VIRGINIA DUNCAN, et al., v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity

More information

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES DIVISION 3 CIVIL RULES Rule Effective Chapter 1. Civil Cases over $25,000 300. Renumbered as Rule 359 07/01/09 301. Classification 07/01/09 302. Renumbered as Rule 361 07/01/09 303. All-Purpose Assignment

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S. TIGAR A. Meeting and Disclosure Prior to Pretrial Conference At least

More information

Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters

Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters Attorney s BriefCase Beyond the Basics Depositions in Family Law Matters Code of Civil Procedure 1985.8 Subpoena seeking electronically stored information (a)(1) A subpoena in a civil proceeding may require

More information

DEPOSITIONS UPON ORAL EXAMINATION. Notice; Method of Taking; Production at Deposition.

DEPOSITIONS UPON ORAL EXAMINATION. Notice; Method of Taking; Production at Deposition. RULE 1.310. DEPOSITIONS UPON ORAL EXAMINATION (a) When Depositions May Be Taken. After commencement of the action any party may take the testimony of any person, including a party, by deposition upon oral

More information

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT Effective April 27, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL PROVISIONS... 1 1. Authority and Applicability.... 1 2. Definitions.... 1 A. Administrative Law

More information

LOCAL RULES OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM. GENERAL RULES (Promulgation Order No , Eff. June 1, 2007)

LOCAL RULES OF THE SUPERIOR COURT OF GUAM. GENERAL RULES (Promulgation Order No , Eff. June 1, 2007) GENERAL RULES (Promulgation Order No. 06-006-02, Eff. June 1, 2007) COL 05312007 Rule GR 1.1. GR 2.1. GR 3.1. GR 4.1. GR 5.1. GR 6.1. GR 7.1. GENERAL RULES Effective June 1, 2007 Title; Effective Date;

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/03/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2015. ExhibitA

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/03/ :04 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2015. ExhibitA FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 04/03/2015 06:04 PM INDEX NO. 650312/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 57 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 04/03/2015 ExhibitA SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEW YORK COUNTYOFNEW YORK BANK HAPOALIM B.M., vs.

More information

Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions

Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instructions RUBY J. KRAJICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT W W W.NYSD.USCOURTS.GOV C L E R K O F C O U R T SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK 500 PEARL STREET, NEW YORK, NY 10007 300 QUARROPAS STREET, W HITE PLAINS, NY 10601

More information

Medina County Court of Common Pleas. Rules of the General Division

Medina County Court of Common Pleas. Rules of the General Division Medina County Court of Common Pleas Rules of the General Division Effective January 1, 2009 1 Rule 1 Rule 2 Rule 3 Rule 4 Rule 5 Rule 6 Rule 7 Rule 8 Rule 9 Rule 10 Rule 11 Rule 12 Rule 13 Rule 14 Rule

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE 1 1 1 1 David Yerushalmi, Esq. (Cal. St. Bar No. ) AMERICAN FREEDOM LAW CENTER 1 West Chandler Heights Road, No. Chandler, Arizona - Tel: () -000; Fax: (01) 0-01 dyerushalmi@americanfreedomlawcenter.org

More information

15A-903. Disclosure of evidence by the State Information subject to disclosure. (a) Upon motion of the defendant, the court must order:

15A-903. Disclosure of evidence by the State Information subject to disclosure. (a) Upon motion of the defendant, the court must order: SUBCHAPTER IX. PRETRIAL PROCEDURE. Article 48. Discovery in the Superior Court. 15A-901. Application of Article. This Article applies to cases within the original jurisdiction of the superior court. (1973,

More information

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES

SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES Justice: HON. THOMAS RADEMAKER Secretary: MARILYN McINTOSH Part Clerk: TRINA PAYNE Phone: (516) 493-3420 Courtroom: (516) 493-3423 Fax:

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER Pursuant to Part II, Article 73-a of the New Hampshire Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 51, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire adopts

More information

RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE

RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE NOTICE Notice is hereby given that the following amendments to the Rules of Appellate Procedure were adopted to take effect on January 1, 2019. The amendments were approved

More information

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. Senate Bill 505

79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Enrolled. Senate Bill 505 79th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--2017 Regular Session Enrolled Senate Bill 505 Printed pursuant to Senate Interim Rule 213.28 by order of the President of the Senate in conformance with presession filing

More information

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN. Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017

ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN. Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017 ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1 Scope... 3 Rule 2 Construction of

More information

PEACE OFFICER PRIVILEGES IN CIVIL LITIGATION: An Introduction to the Pitchess Procedure

PEACE OFFICER PRIVILEGES IN CIVIL LITIGATION: An Introduction to the Pitchess Procedure PEACE OFFICER PRIVILEGES IN CIVIL LITIGATION: An Introduction to the Pitchess Procedure Presented by Tony M. Sain, Esq. tms@manningllp.com MANNING & KASS, ELLROD, RAMIREZ, TRESTER LLP Five Questions Five

More information

RULES OF CIVIL APPELLATE PROCEDURE. Tribal Council Resolution

RULES OF CIVIL APPELLATE PROCEDURE. Tribal Council Resolution RULES OF CIVIL APPELLATE PROCEDURE Tribal Council Resolution 16--2008 Section I. Title and Codification This Ordinance shall be known as the Saint Regis Mohawk Tribal Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure.

More information

Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations Orange County Circuit Civil Division 40 Judge Bob LeBlanc

Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations Orange County Circuit Civil Division 40 Judge Bob LeBlanc Guidelines, Procedures and Expectations Orange County Circuit Civil Division 40 Judge Bob LeBlanc Cindy Brown, Judicial Assistant Phone (407) 836 2012 Email ctjacb1@ocnjcc.org **NOTE: REVISED AND EFFECTIVE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE Event Service of Complaint Scheduled Time Total Time After Complaint Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks Initial

More information

Section 1: Statement of Purpose Section 2: Voluntary Discovery Section 3: Discovery by Order of the Court... 2

Section 1: Statement of Purpose Section 2: Voluntary Discovery Section 3: Discovery by Order of the Court... 2 Discovery in Criminal Cases Table of Contents Section 1: Statement of Purpose... 2 Section 2: Voluntary Discovery... 2 Section 3: Discovery by Order of the Court... 2 Section 4: Mandatory Disclosure by

More information

PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES & PROTOCOL FOR JURY TRIALS & REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Revised March 2, 2018 (to correct web link only)

PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES & PROTOCOL FOR JURY TRIALS & REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Revised March 2, 2018 (to correct web link only) CIRCUIT CIVIL SARASOTA COUNTY PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURES & PROTOCOL FOR JURY TRIALS & REFERRAL TO MEDIATION Revised March 2, 2018 (to correct web link only) I LOCAL RULES, STANDARDS OF PROFESSIONALISM & GOOD

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT Filed 11/16/12 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Petitioner, v. B239849 (Los Angeles County Super.

More information

The State s brief in response to the Cafaro defendants motion to enlarge time, previously filed under seal, shall be unsealed. The Cafaro defendants

The State s brief in response to the Cafaro defendants motion to enlarge time, previously filed under seal, shall be unsealed. The Cafaro defendants IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS MAHONING COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO 2010 CR 800 Plaintiff December 21, 2010 Vs. DECISION AND ORDER ANTHONY M. CAFARO, JR. THE CAFARO COMPANY (A) JUDGE WILLIAM H. WOLFF, JR..

More information

Appendix XXIX-B. Note: Adopted July 27, 2015 to be effective September 1, 2015.

Appendix XXIX-B. Note: Adopted July 27, 2015 to be effective September 1, 2015. Introductory Note: Appendix XXIX-B Note: Adopted July 27, 2015 to be effective September 1, 2015. The Supreme Court of New Jersey endorses the use of arbitration and other alternative dispute resolution

More information

1. CIVIL RULES GENERAL PROVISIONS ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL LITIGATION MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT - UNIFORM LOCAL RULES

1. CIVIL RULES GENERAL PROVISIONS ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL LITIGATION MARIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT - UNIFORM LOCAL RULES 1. CIVIL RULES GENERAL PROVISIONS 1.1 CITATION These civil rules should be cited as "Marin County Rule, Civil" or "MCR Civ" followed by the rule number (e.g., Marin County Rule, Civil 1.1 or MCR Civ 1.1).

More information

THE COURTS. Title 207 JUDICIAL CONDUCT

THE COURTS. Title 207 JUDICIAL CONDUCT 1920 Title 207 JUDICIAL CONDUCT PART IV. COURT OF JUDICIAL DISCIPLINE [207 PA. CODE CH. 3] Amendment to Rules Relating to Initiation of Formal Changes; Doc. No. 1 JD 94 Per Curiam: Order And Now, this

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) /

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION. via telephone (check one) / STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF JACKSON BUSINESS COURT DIVISION PLAINTIFF NAME v. DEFENDANT NAME Case No. Hon. Richard N. LaFlamme / PLAINTIFF S COUNSEL NAME, ADDRESS, PHONE AND

More information

JUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES

JUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES JUSTICE JEFFREY K. OING PART 48 PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES SUPREME COURT COMMERCIAL DIVISION AND GENERAL IAS PART COURTROOM 242 60 CENTRE STREET NEW YORK, NY 10007 PHONE: 646-386-3265 FAX: 212-374-0452 Law

More information

Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois Domestic Relations Division Calendar #62 Richard J. Daley Center, Room 3010 Chicago, Illinois 60602

Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois Domestic Relations Division Calendar #62 Richard J. Daley Center, Room 3010 Chicago, Illinois 60602 Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois Domestic Relations Division Calendar #62 Richard J. Daley Center, Room 3010 Chicago, Illinois 60602 JUDGE TIMOTHY P. MURPHY STANDING ORDERS 1. GENERAL: The purpose

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Orlando Sanchez v. Experian Infomation Solutions Inc. Doc. 1 1 1 Douglas L. Clark (SBN 0) JONES DAY El Camino Real, Suite 0 San Diego, California 0 Telephone: +1... Facsimile: +1... Email: dlclark@jonesday.com

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO LOCAL COURT RULES As Amended Effective January 1, 2018 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Hall of Justice and Records 400 County Center,

More information

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA

COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 1410112131415161718192021223242526272823SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 56789In Re Complex Litigation Matters, Plaintiff(s), v., Defendant(s). CASE NO.: MSC00-00000 ELECTRONIC

More information

Disciplinary Regulations

Disciplinary Regulations Disciplinary Regulations 1 Vision Professional financial planning for all. Our Mission The FPI s mission is to advance and promote the pre-eminence and status of financial planning professionals, while

More information

PROTOCOL FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN SUFFOLK COUNTY SUPREME COURT

PROTOCOL FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN SUFFOLK COUNTY SUPREME COURT I. Introduction: PROTOCOL FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN SUFFOLK COUNTY SUPREME COURT This document has been drafted after consultation with Suffolk County District Administrative Judge C. Randall Hinrichs and

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. MC JFW(SKx)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. MC JFW(SKx) Case :-mc-000-jfw-sk Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 The National Coalition of Association of -Eleven Franchisees, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, -Eleven,

More information

New York State Court of Appeals Rules of Practice. (22 NYCRR Part 500)

New York State Court of Appeals Rules of Practice. (22 NYCRR Part 500) New York State Court of Appeals Rules of Practice (22 NYCRR Part 500) www.courts.state.ny.us/ctapps Effective February 1, 2013 RULES OF PRACTICE: RULE TITLE COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF NEW YORK RULES OF

More information

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant.

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION., ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant. NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE DISTRICT COURT DIVISION -CVD-, ) Plaintiff, ) ) CONSENT STIPULATIONS FOR v. ) ARBITRATION PROCEDURES ), ) Defendant. ) THIS CAUSE came on to be heard

More information

Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Mississippi Bar Convention Summer School for Lawyers 2016

Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Mississippi Bar Convention Summer School for Lawyers 2016 Recent Amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure The Mississippi Bar Convention Summer School for Lawyers 2016 History The impetus to change these Rules was the May 2010 Conference on Civil Litigation

More information

IC Chapter 9. Sealing and Expunging Conviction Records

IC Chapter 9. Sealing and Expunging Conviction Records IC 35-38-9 Chapter 9. Sealing and Expunging Conviction Records IC 35-38-9-1 Sealing arrest records Sec. 1. (a) This section applies only to a person who has been arrested if: (1) the arrest did not result

More information

SUMMARY JURY TRIALS IN NORTH CAROLINA

SUMMARY JURY TRIALS IN NORTH CAROLINA SUMMARY JURY TRIALS IN NORTH CAROLINA Lawrence Egerton, Jr. Egerton & Associates, P.A. Greensboro, NC (336) 273-0508 INTRODUCTION In 1983, Jim Exum, Former Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of North Carolina

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO LOCAL COURT RULES

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO LOCAL COURT RULES SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO LOCAL COURT RULES As Amended Effective January 1, 2011 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Hall of Justice and Records 400 County Center,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS. Case :-cv-00-dms-wvg Document Filed // PageID.0 Page of 0 IN RE: AMERANTH CASES, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NOS. cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS (WVG) cv0 DMS

More information

RULES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS (Revised effective January 1, 2011)

RULES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS (Revised effective January 1, 2011) RULES OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS (Revised effective January 1, 2011) TITLE I. INTRODUCTION Rule 1. Title and Scope of Rules; Definitions. 2. Seal. TITLE II. APPEALS FROM JUDGMENTS AND

More information

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN

INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN INDIVIDUAL RULES AND PROCEDURES JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN Revised: January 3, 2011 Chambers Deputy/Law Clerk United States District Court Jim Reily Southern District of New York (212) 805-0120 500 Pearl

More information

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER

THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER THE STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ORDER Pursuant to Part II, Article 73-a of the New Hampshire Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 51, the Supreme Court of New Hampshire adopts

More information

SAMPLE FORMS - CONTRACTS DATA REQUEST AND RELEASE PROCESS NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT, Form (See Attached Form)

SAMPLE FORMS - CONTRACTS DATA REQUEST AND RELEASE PROCESS NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT, Form (See Attached Form) SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY Revised CAL. P.U.C. SHEET NO. 51719-G LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA CANCELING Original CAL. P.U.C. SHEET NO. 50594-G SAMPLE FORMS - CONTRACTS DATA REQUEST AND RELEASE PROCESS

More information

California Public Records Act. Marco A. Gonzalez March 18, 2015

California Public Records Act. Marco A. Gonzalez March 18, 2015 California Public Records Act Marco A. Gonzalez marco@coastlawgroup.com March 18, 2015 When information which properly belongs to the public is systematically withheld by those in power, the people soon

More information

SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO

SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO Chief Justice Directive 11-02 SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE Reenact and Amend CJD 11-02 for Cases Filed January 1, 2012 through June 30, 2015 I hereby reenact and amend CJD 11-02

More information

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 5 1

NC General Statutes - Chapter 1A Article 5 1 Article 5. Depositions and Discovery. Rule 26. General provisions governing discovery. (a) Discovery methods. Parties may obtain discovery by one or more of the following methods: depositions upon oral

More information

Guidance for Implementation of the Judicial Conference Policy on Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Criminal Case Files

Guidance for Implementation of the Judicial Conference Policy on Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Criminal Case Files Agenda E-6 (Appendix A) Court Admin./Case Mgmt. March 2004 Guidance for Implementation of the Judicial Conference Policy on Privacy and Public Access to Electronic Criminal Case Files In September 2001,

More information

HAWAI'I ELECTRONIC FILING & SERVICE RULES

HAWAI'I ELECTRONIC FILING & SERVICE RULES HAWAI'I ELECTRONIC FILING & SERVICE RULES (SCRU-12-0000409) Adopted and Promulgated by the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai'i Effective September 27, 2010 The Judiciary State of Hawai'i Hawai'i Electronic

More information

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA D064531

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA D064531 Filed 10/8/13 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TERRY ZIMMERMAN, Petitioner, v. D064531 (San Diego County Super. Ct. No. SCD235172) THE

More information

Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals

Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals Standing Practice Order Pursuant to 20.1 of Act 2002-142 Establishing Rules Governing Practice and Procedure in Medical Assistance Provider Appeals TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I--PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS Subpart

More information

CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT Title 3. Civil Rules Division 8. Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 1. General Provisions

CALIFORNIA RULES OF COURT Title 3. Civil Rules Division 8. Alternative Dispute Resolution Chapter 1. General Provisions Page 1 Chapter 1. General Provisions Cal Rules of Court, Rule 3.800 (2009) Rule 3.800. Definitions As used in this division: (1) "Alternative dispute resolution process" or "ADR process" means a process,

More information

Criminal Law Table of Contents

Criminal Law Table of Contents Criminal Law Table of Contents Attorney - Client Relations Legal Services Retainer Agreement - Hourly Fee Appearance of Counsel Waiver of Conflict of Interest Letter Declining Representation Motion to

More information

Department 16 has prepared this document to assist counsel in scheduling motions and reporters in Department 16.

Department 16 has prepared this document to assist counsel in scheduling motions and reporters in Department 16. Location: Stanley Mosk Courthouse Department: 16 (213) 633-0516 Motions in Department 16 Department 16 has prepared this document to assist counsel in scheduling motions and reporters in Department 16.

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/27/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2018

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/27/ :11 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/27/2018 PART 47 RULES HON. PAUL A. GOETZ 80 Centre Street, Room 320 New York, New York 10013 Part Clerk: Jeffrey S. Wilson Phone: 646-386-3743 Fax: 212-618-0528 Court Attorney: Vera Zolotaryova Phone: 646-386-4384

More information

- 6 - the statement will not be filed and will not be a part of the Court s file in the case.

- 6 - the statement will not be filed and will not be a part of the Court s file in the case. - 6 - the statement will not be filed and will not be a part of the Court s file in the case. Rule 27 is added as follows RULE 27. PRIVACY PROTECTION FOR FILINGS MADE WITH THE COURT (a) Redacted Filings:

More information

DUMMERSTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD. Rules of Procedure and Conflict of Interest Policy Adopted April 10, 2006 and amended April 29, 2008

DUMMERSTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD. Rules of Procedure and Conflict of Interest Policy Adopted April 10, 2006 and amended April 29, 2008 DUMMERSTON DEVELOPMENT REVIEW BOARD Rules of Procedure and Conflict of Interest Policy Adopted April 10, 2006 and amended April 29, 2008 Section I: Authority. The Development Review Board (DRB) of the

More information

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ]

Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ] Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ] (a) Required Disclosures; Methods to Discover Additional Matter. (1) Initial Disclosures. Except to the extent

More information

CA State Rule Changes Civil January 18, Presented By Elaine Screechfield Firmwide Litigation Docket Manager Morrison & Foerster LLP

CA State Rule Changes Civil January 18, Presented By Elaine Screechfield Firmwide Litigation Docket Manager Morrison & Foerster LLP CA State Rule Changes Civil January 18, 2018 Presented By Elaine Screechfield Firmwide Litigation Docket Manager Morrison & Foerster LLP Summary of Changes The following slides summarize changes to rules

More information

Filed 5/17/17 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

Filed 5/17/17 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS Filed 5/17/17 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered

More information

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE LAW COURT Effective April 29, 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL PROVISIONS... 1 1. Authority and Applicability.... 1 2. Definitions.... 1 A. Administrative Law

More information

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 2389

SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 2389 SESSION OF 2014 SUPPLEMENTAL NOTE ON SENATE SUBSTITUTE FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 2389 As Recommended by Senate Committee on Judiciary Brief* Senate Sub. for HB 2389 would amend procedures for death penalty appeals

More information

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY TEXAS DISCOVERY Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW 2. 1999 REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY 3. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLANS 4. FORMS OF DISCOVERY A. Discovery Provided for by the Texas

More information

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CIVIL RULE 26(c) FACILITATING USE OF PROTECTIVE ORDERS Civil Rules Committee (March 1995)

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CIVIL RULE 26(c) FACILITATING USE OF PROTECTIVE ORDERS Civil Rules Committee (March 1995) PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO CIVIL RULE 26(c) FACILITATING USE OF PROTECTIVE ORDERS Civil Rules Committee (March 1995) Agenda F-19 (Summary) Rules March 1995 SUMMARY OF THE REPORT OF THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE

More information

GENERAL RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA BUSINESS COURT. Amended and Effective January 1, Rule Title Page No.

GENERAL RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA BUSINESS COURT. Amended and Effective January 1, Rule Title Page No. GENERAL RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE FOR THE NORTH CAROLINA BUSINESS COURT Amended and Effective January 1, 2017 Rule Title Page No. 1 Purpose and Scope 1 2 Mandatory Business Court Designation 3 3

More information

AN ACT to repeal 6.34 (1) (b) and 6.87 (4) (a) 2.; to consolidate, renumber and

AN ACT to repeal 6.34 (1) (b) and 6.87 (4) (a) 2.; to consolidate, renumber and 0-0 LEGISLATURE LRBs0/ SENATE SUBSTITUTE AMENDMENT, TO ASSEMBLY BILL AN ACT to repeal. () (b) and. () (a).; to consolidate, renumber and amend. () (intro.) and (a) and. () (a) (intro.) and.; to amend.0

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Western Alliance Bank v. Jefferson Doc. 1 1 1 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Western Alliance Bank, Plaintiff, :1-cv-01 JWS vs. ORDER AND OPINION Richard Jefferson, [Re: Motions at

More information

ATKINSON-BAKER REPORTER GUIDELINES. December 29, 2015 Revised April 1, 2018

ATKINSON-BAKER REPORTER GUIDELINES. December 29, 2015 Revised April 1, 2018 ATKINSON-BAKER REPORTER GUIDELINES COURT REPORTERS December 29, 2015 Revised April 1, 2018 BEST PRACTICES FOR EXHIBIT HANDLING FOR DEPOSITIONS Following is Best Practices for Exhibit Handling for Depositions

More information

ARTICLE 5.--ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT GENERAL PROVISIONS. K.S.A through shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas

ARTICLE 5.--ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT GENERAL PROVISIONS. K.S.A through shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas ARTICLE.--ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE ACT GENERAL PROVISIONS December, 00-0. Title. K.S.A. -0 through - - shall be known and may be cited as the Kansas administrative procedure act. History: L., ch., ; July,.

More information

INDIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM POLICIES

INDIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM POLICIES INDIANA STATE BAR ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY FEE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM POLICIES Section 1. Purpose 1.1 The purpose of these rules is to provide a structure for the arbitration of fee disputes between members

More information

RULE 24. Compulsory arbitration

RULE 24. Compulsory arbitration RULE 24. Compulsory arbitration (A) Cases for arbitration (1) Any judge of the general division of the Court of Common Pleas may at the case management conference or thereafter order and schedule, by entry,

More information

BRADY DISCOVERY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT (INTERNAL POLICY) Revised April 22, 2010 INTRODUCTION

BRADY DISCOVERY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT (INTERNAL POLICY) Revised April 22, 2010 INTRODUCTION OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY COUNTY OF VENTURA BRADY DISCOVERY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT (INTERNAL POLICY) Revised April 22, 2010 INTRODUCTION The following is an internal policy that addresses

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION JUDGE RAYMOND W. MITCHELL STANDING ORDER.

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION JUDGE RAYMOND W. MITCHELL STANDING ORDER. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT LAW DIVISION JUDGE RAYMOND W. MITCHELL STANDING ORDER March 29, 2012 This Standing Order supercedes all prior Standing Orders regarding pending

More information

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL

LOCAL RULES SUPERIOR COURT of CALIFORNIA, COUNTY of ORANGE DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL DIVISION 8 CRIMINAL Rule Effective Chapter 1. Felony Cases 800. Pretrial Motions in Felony Cases 07/01/98 805. Motions in Capital Cases 07/01/09 806. Subpoena Duces Tecum 07/01/12 Chapter 2. Misdemeanor

More information

Case 1:15-mc ESH Document 17 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Case 1:15-mc ESH Document 17 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Case 1:15-mc-00410-ESH Document 17 Filed 05/18/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA IN RE THE REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CBS BROADCASTING INC., Misc.

More information

CHAPTER 38. Rule 2. Public Access to Administrative Records of the Judicial Branch

CHAPTER 38. Rule 2. Public Access to Administrative Records of the Judicial Branch CHAPTER 38 Rule 2. Public Access to Administrative Records of the Judicial Branch This Rule governs public access to all records maintained for the purpose of managing the administrative business of the

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO LOCAL COURT RULES

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO LOCAL COURT RULES SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN MATEO LOCAL COURT RULES As Amended Effective January 1, 2006 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN MATEO Hall of Justice and Records 400 County Center,

More information

Family Law Rules of Procedure. Table of Contents

Family Law Rules of Procedure. Table of Contents Family Law Rules of Procedure Table of Contents CITATIONS TO OPINIONS ADOPTING OR AMENDING RULES...11 RULE 12.000. PREFACE...14 SECTION I FAMILY LAW RULES OF PROCEDURE...15 RULE 12.003. COORDINATION OF

More information

Stipulated Protective Order and Order 09mc0110, 0111, 0112, 0113 and 0114

Stipulated Protective Order and Order 09mc0110, 0111, 0112, 0113 and 0114 Byrum et al v. Compass Vision, Inc., et al Doc. 0 1 1 1 EDMUND G. BROWN, JR. Attorney General of California JANICE K. LACHMAN, SBN Supervising Deputy Attorney General JOHN PADRICK, SBN 1 Deputy Attorney

More information

Using the New York State Freedom of Information Law

Using the New York State Freedom of Information Law Using the New York State Freedom of Information Law What part of government is covered by FOIL? What information can be obtained under FOIL? o Agency Records o Legislative Records Agency Records Access

More information

PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8. Overview of the Discovery Process KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY THE EXTENT OF ALLOWABLE DISCOVERY

PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8. Overview of the Discovery Process KEY POINTS THE NATURE OF DISCOVERY THE EXTENT OF ALLOWABLE DISCOVERY PART III Discovery CHAPTER 8 Overview of the Discovery Process The Florida Rules of Civil Procedure regulate civil discovery procedures in the state. Florida does not require supplementary responses to

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION Case :-cv-00-jvs-dfm Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 SHELBY PHILLIPS, III, et al. v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN DIVISION Plaintiff(s), UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD

More information

VIRGIN ISLANDS SUPREME COURT RULES (as amended November 2, 2011)

VIRGIN ISLANDS SUPREME COURT RULES (as amended November 2, 2011) VIRGIN ISLANDS SUPREME COURT RULES (as amended November 2, 2011) RULE Rule 1. Scope of Rules; Terms; Sessions; Seal; Filing in Superior Court. (a) Title and Citation (b) Scope of Rules (c) Authority for

More information

Washington, DC Washington, DC 20510

Washington, DC Washington, DC 20510 May 4, 2011 The Honorable Patrick J. Leahy The Honorable Charles Grassley Chairman Ranking Member Committee on the Judiciary Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate United States Senate Washington,

More information

Adopted November 10, 2000, by Chief District Court Judge John W. Smith. See Separate Section on Rules governing Criminal and Juvenile Courts Rule

Adopted November 10, 2000, by Chief District Court Judge John W. Smith. See Separate Section on Rules governing Criminal and Juvenile Courts Rule LOCAL RULES FOR THE DISTRICT COURTS OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FAMILY COURT, DOMESTIC, CIVIL AND GENERAL RULES NEW HANOVER AND PENDER COUNTIES, NORTH CAROLINA Adopted November 10, 2000, by Chief District

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES FOR ELECTRONIC FILING IN CIVIL AND CRIMINAL CASES I. GENERAL INFORMATION A. EFFECTIVE DATE Electronic filing is mandatory,

More information

THE COLORADO CIVIL ACCESS PILOT PROJECT APPLICABLE TO BUSINESS ACTIONS IN CERTAIN DISTRICT COURTS

THE COLORADO CIVIL ACCESS PILOT PROJECT APPLICABLE TO BUSINESS ACTIONS IN CERTAIN DISTRICT COURTS THE COLORADO CIVIL ACCESS PILOT PROJECT APPLICABLE TO BUSINESS ACTIONS IN CERTAIN DISTRICT COURTS FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (LAST UPDATED ON August 26, 2014) This document is intended only to provide

More information

GUIDELINES, PROCEDURES AND EXPECTATIONS OSCEOLA COUNTY CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION 20 (Revised and Effective 05/01/2017)

GUIDELINES, PROCEDURES AND EXPECTATIONS OSCEOLA COUNTY CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION 20 (Revised and Effective 05/01/2017) GUIDELINES, PROCEDURES AND EXPECTATIONS OSCEOLA COUNTY CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION 20 (Revised and Effective 05/01/2017) Judge Margaret H. Schreiber Circuit Judge Wendy Blair, Judicial Assistant Phone: (407)

More information