Filing# E-Filed 02/02/ :23:45 AM

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Filing# E-Filed 02/02/ :23:45 AM"

Transcription

1 Filing# E-Filed 02/02/ :23:45 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 11th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO CA 02 GEORGE I. ELSO, RECEIVED, 2/3/2017 9:49 AM, Mary Cay Blanks, Third District Court of Appeal vs. Defendant/ Appellant, ALYSSA ELSO, MICHAEL ELSO and JUAN C. ELSO Plaintiffs/ Appellees. NOTICE OF APPEAL OF FINAL ORDER NOTICE IS GIVEN that GEORGE I. ELSO, Defendant/ Appellant, pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.11 O(b ), appeals to the Third District Court of Appeal, the final Order of this Court rendered on January 4, The nature of the Order is the Final Default Judgment in Favor of Plaintiffs and against Defendant, George I. Elso Only, attached hereto as Exhibit" 1 ". Also attached as Composite Exhibit "2" are the underlying Orders Denying George I. Elso's Motion to Set Aside Order Granting Plaintiffs Motion for Judicial Default and Denying George I. Elso's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying His Motion to Set Aside Judicial Default. Respectfully submitted, Isl Juan C. Zorrilla Juan C. Zorrilla, Esquire Fla. Bar No jzorilla@fowler-white.com SlATE. OF FLORIDA, COUNTY OF MIAMI-DADE

2 CASE NO CA 02 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing Notice of Appeal has been ed on this 2nd day of February, 2017 to: Raphael Lopez, Esq., Courthouse Tower, 44 West Flagler Street, Suite 2075, Miami, Florida 33130, rl@lopezroca.com; Carlos De Lerman, Esq., Lerman & Whitebook, P.A., 2611 Hollywood Boulevard, Hollywood, FL 33020, carlos@lwlawfla.com; Juan C. Elso, 9520 S.W. 6th Street, Miami FL 33173, j.c.elso@aol.com; and Jorge E. Silva, Esq., 236 Valencia Avenue, Coral Gables, FL 33134, Jsilva@silvasilva.com Isl Juan C. Zorrilla Juan C. Zorrilla, Esquire Fla. Bar No jzorilla@.fowler-white.com , V. I 2

3 Exhibit '' 1 ''

4 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 11th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION ALYSSA ELSO, MICHAEL ELSO, and JUAN C. ELSO, CASE NO.: CA 02 vs. Pla intiffs GEORGE I. ELSO, LUIS A. TORRENS, and XLT INVESTMENT CORP., Defendants. XLT INVESTMENT CORP., a Florida corporation, Counter-Plaintiff, vs. GEORGE I. ELSO, MIRIAM V. ELSO, ALYSSA ELSO, MICHAEL ELSO, JUAN C. ELSO and SILVERCREST LAKES ESTATES HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, Counter-Defendants. FINAL DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFFS AND AGAINST DEFENDANT, GEORGE I. ELSO ONLY THIS CAUSE having come before the Court on Plaintiffs Motion for Fina l Judgment Against Defendant, George I. Elsa, and the Court having reviewed the motion and record, and after considering arguments of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

5 GRANTED. 1. Plaintiffs Motion for.final Judgment Against Defendant, George I. Else is hereby 2. Final Judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiffs, Alyssa Else, Michael Elso and Juan C. Elso against Defendant, George I. Elso as to Counts I, Ill, IV, V and VI of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint, and the Court hereby cancels and rescinds the Quit Claim Deed dated April 3, 2003, recorded in Official Record Book 21170, Page 2492 of the records in and for Miami Dade County, Florida, executed by Plaintiff Juan C. Else in favor of George I. Else and Miriam Elso, concerning the Property which is the subject of this action, whose legal description is: SILVERCREST LAKE ESTATES, PB T LOT 5 BLK 1, LOT SIZE SQ FT FAU & Pursuant to this Final Judgment, the recorder of deeds in and for Miami Dade County is directed to enter a notation on the margin of the Quit Claim Deed in Official Record Book 21170, Page 2492 indicating that this Deed is cancelled and rescinded. 4. As to Count Ill, the Court nullifies and sets aside the fraudulent transfer effectuated by Defendant George I. Else on February 7, 2013, pursuant to the execution of a Warranty Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure, recorded in Official Record Book 28488, Page 4271 concerning the above described property, referenced in paragraph two of this Fina l Judgment, and directs the recorder of deeds enter a notation on the margin of the Warranty Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure indicating that the Deed is hereby cancelled, rescinded, and set aside. 5. The Court finds that Plaintiffs are the prevailing party in this litigation, as to Defendant George I. Else only, and reserves jurisdiction on the issues of attorney's fees and/or court costs incurred by Pla intiffs, including any fees and costs incurred to enforce the terms of 2

6 this Fina l Judgment aga inst George I. Elsa, and to enter further orders that are proper to compel compliance with this Final Judgment. 6. Th is Judgment does not adjudicate claims, defenses or counterclaims between Plaintiffs and XLT Investment Corp. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida, on 01/04/17. No Further Judicial Action Required on THIS MOTION CLERK TO RECLOSE CASE IF POST JUDGMENT The parties served with this Order are indicated in the accompanying 11th Circuit confirmation which includes all s provided by the submitter. The movant shall IMMEDIATELY serve a true and correct copy of this Order, by mail, facsimile, or hand-delivery, to all parties/counsel of record for whom service is not indicated by the accompanying 11th Circuit confirmation, and file proof of service with the Clerk of Court. Signed original order sent electronically to the Clerk of Courts for filing in the Court file. Copies furnished to: All counsel of record. 3

7 Composite Exhibit ''2 ''

8 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 11th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION ALYSSA ELSO, MICHAEL ELSO, and JUAN C. ELSO, CASE NO.: CA 02 vs. Plaintiffs GEORGE I. ELSO, LUIS A. TORRENS, and XLT INVESTMENT CORP., Defendants. XLT INVESTME NT CORP., a Florida corporation, vs. Counter-Plaintiff, GEORGE I. ELSO, MIRIAM V. ELSO, ALYSSA ELSO, MICHAEL ELSO, JUAN C. ELSO and SILVERCREST LAKES ESTATES HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION, Counter-Defendants. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT GEORGE I. EL.SO'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR JUDICIAL DEFAULT THIS CAUSE came before the Court on August 4, 2016 on Defendant George I. Elsa's Motion to Set Aside Order Granting Pla intiff's Motion for Judicia l Default, and the Court having reviewed the motion, affidavits, the response in opposition, and other pertinent portions of the file, and after considering arguments of counsel, and being otherwise fully advised of the

9 pleadings of record and case law cited by the parties, upon review and cons ideration of the above, the Cou rt makes t he foll owing findings of fact and conclusions of law: 1. Plaintiffs fi led suit aga inst Defendant, George I. Elso, on November 6, Defendant, George I. Elsa, subsequently filed two sepa rate motions, a Motion to Quas h Service of Process and a Motion t o Dism iss the Complaint based on Pla intiffs' failure to j oin XLT INVESTMENT CORP., which Defendant cla imed was an indispensible pa rty based on their having filed an action for foreclosure with respect to the property which is the subject of this action. 3. On January 11, and February 20, 2013, respective ly, this Honorable Court entered Orders denying Defendant George I. Elsa's Motion to Quash Service of Process and Motion to Dism iss. This Court directed the Defendant to submit an answer within five (5) days from the entry of t he Order. 4. On March 7, 2013, 15 days after the court ordered him to answer within 5 days, Defenda nt George I. Elsa, through counsel, filed an answer and affirmative defenses to the complaint; however, his answer fa iled to apprise the Court and/or Pla int iffs that on or about Februa ry 7, 2013, Defendant George I. Elsa had executed a Warranty Deed in Lieu of Foreclosu re, and transf erred his purported interest in the property which is t he subject of this action, to XLT Investment Corp. Moreover, this was not disclosed duri ng oral argument before t his Court on February 20, After learning of the aforementioned Warranty Deed that Defendant George I. Elsa had executed in lieu of foreclosure, on June 12, 2013, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Leave to Amend their Complaint, attached their proposed amended complaint, and scheduled the 2

10 hearing on the motion to amend for June 24, Defendant George I. -Elsa, through counsel, acknowledged in writing having received a copy of Plaintiffs Motion for Leave to Amend, the proposed amended complaint, as well as t he notice of hearing schedu led for June 24, The record further evidences that on June 17, 2013, Pla intiffs filed a Motion to Strike Defendant George I. Elsa's Answer and Affirmative Defenses and for Entry of Judgment based on Defendant George I. Elsa's purported fraud upon the Court. Defenda nt George I. Elsa also acknowledges receipt of said motion to strike. This Motion, however, was held in abeyance as a resu lt of Defendant George I. Elsa's pro se bankruptcy fil ing which occurred on June 18, On June 24, 2013, the Honorable Spencer Eig entered an Order granting Plaintiffs' Motion For Leave to Fil e an Amended Complaint, which added two parties, and included add it iona l counts aga inst Defendant George I. Elsa. Based on Defendant George I. Elsa's filing of a bankruptcy petition, Judge Eig stayed the pending action as to Defendant George I. Elsa and ordered pursuant to the applicable rules of civil procedure, that Defendant George I. Elsa would have twenty (20) days after the bankruptcy stay is lifted to fi le a responsive pleading to the amended complaint. 9. It is undisputed that Defendant George I. Elsa received notice of the entry of Judge Eig's Order. 10. The record revea ls and Defendant George I. Elsa acknowledges that on March 27, 2014, George I. Elsa's bankruptcy petition was dismissed, and on April 28, 2014 the bankruptcy case was closed. 3

11 11. Although Plaintiffs, pu rsuant to Judge Eig's Order of June 24, 2013 could have moved for a Judicial Default sooner, they waited until June 4, 2014 to fi le a Motion for Jud icial Default based on Defendant George I. Elsa's fa ilure to t imely fi le a responsive pleading w ithin twenty (20) days after the termination of his bankruptcy case. 12. On July 24, 2014, Judge Spencer Eig entered a Judicial Default against Defendant George I. Elsa for failure to appear or fi le any answer or other pleading to the amended compla int as required by law. 13. On or about July 10, 2015, the Defendant George I. Elsa filed this Motion to Set As ide Default. 14. The Court held a full hearing and finds that there is no evidence that Defendant George I. Elsa exercised due dil igence in contacting or attempting to contact his attorney or take other defensive measures to respond to the amended complaint, nor does the record demonstrate that Defendant George I. Elsa made any effort to hire a new attorney or to otherwise update his address with the Clerk of Cou rt. Defendant Elsa was fully aware of the case and that his bankruptcy case was dism issed. 15. The record shows no record activity being taken on behalf of Defendant George I. Elsa until Ju ly 10, 2015, approxi mately one year after t he ent ry of the subject j udicial default, at which time the Defendant submitted a Motion to Set Aside Jud icial Default. To date, Defendant George I. Elsa has not filed an answer to the amended complaint. As a matter of law the Court finds that he has failed to provide sufficient evidence to show a meritorious defense. 4

12 16. In order for the Court to set aside a Judicial Default as requested by Defendant George Elso, pursuant to Rule 1.540, the burden of proof is on the Defendant to establish that t he Defendant's failure to timely respond resulted from mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. 17. The affidavit of the Defendant fails to establish the existence of any mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. Although there appears to be neglect of this lawsuit by t he Defendant, the record evidence and affidavits filed in this matter reveal a knowing or intentional neglect as opposed to an excusable neglect. A. Relief From Judgment, Decrees, or Orders Generally Rule 1.SOO(d) and 1.540(b) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure provide this Court with the discretionary power to set aside an entry of defau lt ; however, the authority under Rule may only be invoked when very specific criteria have been met. Florida law requ ires the pa rty who moves to vacat.e the entry of a default to demonstrate excusable neglect, a meritorious defense, and due diligence in order for the trial cou rt to vacate a default. See North Shore Hosp., Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849 (Fla. 1962); Church of Christ Written in Heaven of Georgia v. Church of Christ Written in Heaven of Miami, 94 7 So.2d 557 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); B.C. Builders Supply Co., Inc. v. Maldonado, 405 So.2d 1345 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). The requirement that the defendant demonstrate excusable neglect requ ires more than a conclusory statement. A party moving to vacate a default must set forth facts expla ining or justifying the mistake or inadvertence by affidavit or other sworn statement,... and fai lure to do so will prevent the appellate court from finding a gross abuse of discretion. 5

13 Id. at Defendant George I. Else's answer to the original complaint did not carry over as a response to the amended complaint and there is no evidence setting forth a meritorious defense. Geer v. Jacobsen, 880 So.2d 717, 720 (Fla.2d DCA 2004) (Defendant's previous ly filed notice and motion did not carry over as a response to the amended comp laint, and Defendant did not otherwise respond to amended complaint). In this case, the defendant rather than making an effort to comply with the requirements of Rule or the progeny of cases which require a party present evidence of excusable neglect and a meritorious defense, instead asserted in a conclusory manner that the default was improperly obtained, thus rel ieving the defendant from the requirement of establishing a meritorious defense and inadvertence or excusable neglect. Although courts fav or the disposition of cases on their merits, it is axiomatic that a trial court abuses its discretion when it sets aside a default based on a legal ly insufficient motion to vacate. See Geer, 880 So.2d at 720. B. The Court's June 24, 2013 Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint was Properly Entered. Although Defendant suggested that Judge Eig's June 24, 2013 Order was improperly entered in violation of the bankruptcy court's automatic stay, on the contrary, the record evidence demonstrates that the Court took affirmative steps to protect Defendant George I. Elsa's interests and notified Plaintiffs, as per the Order, that no action could be taken against Defendant/Debtor George I. Elsa until such time as the bankruptcy stay was lifted. The Court finds that bankruptcy proceedings do not, merely by virtue of their ma intenance, terminate an action already pending in a non-bankruptcy court, to which the bankrupt is a party, Conner v. Walker, 291 U.S. 1, 54 S.Ct. 257, 78 L.Ed. 613 (1934), the action simply rema ins dormant 6

14 with respect to the bankrupt debtor only and is revived by the lifting of the stay or dismissal of the bankruptcy action. See Barton-Ma/ow Co. v. Gorman Co. of Ocala, Inc., 558 So.2d 519, 521 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (citing Baker v. Bloom, 146 A.D.2d 859, 536 N.Y.S.2d 267 (A.O. 3rd Dept. 1989). The Court further finds that the June 24, 2013 Order granting Pla intiffs Motion for Leave to Amend the Complaint did not authorize any act in furtherance of the case aga inst Defendant George I. Elso, but did authorize Plaintiffs to simply add two defendants, XLT Investment Corp., and Luis Torrens. Notwithstanding the broad scope of 11 U.S.C. 362, the automatic stay does not protect non-debtors from litigation, even from ob ligations that involve the debtor. See In Re Colony Beach, 2015 WL (M.D. Fla. 3/18/15). Here, Plaintiffs were amending their complaint to pursue cla ims regarding the subject property aga inst XLT Investment Corp. and Luis Torrens, Esq., and the Order entered by Judge Eig specifically prohibited Plaintiffs from taking any action, during the pendency of the bankruptcy proceedings, against Defendant/Debtor George Elso. Indeed, the claims against George Elsa did not proceed until his stay ended by virtue of the dismissal of his bankruptcy filing, and thereafter he had 20 days to respond. The Court specifically f inds that it was not divested of jurisdiction to permit the civil action to proceed against the non-debtor defendants in th is case, Defendants XLT Investment Corp. and Luis Torrens, Esq., or to enter administrative and substantive orders, so long as the orders not adversely affect or jeopardize the bankruptcy proceed ings and/or estate. See Shop in the Grove, LTD., v. Union Federal Sav. and Loan..., 425 So.2d 1138 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Goldstein v. Harris, 768 So.2d 1146 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (Trial court did not err in finding that automatic stay in bankruptcy proceeding, 7

15 even if it were in effect, did not strip court of power to enforce civil contempt order through writ of bodily attachment, as contempt order did not require payment of money but on ly production of financial records, and thus did not affect bankruptcy estate). C. Defendant George I. Elsa's Default was Willful. In order to establish willfulness, Plaintiff need not show bad faith on the part of Defendant, but must show more than mere negligence or carelessness. Courts have found defaults willful where the conduct of the adversary was egregious and was not satisfactorily explained. See Commonwealth Fed. Sav. and Loan Ass'n v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271 (Fla 1990); Mercer v. Raine, 443 So.2d 944 (Fla. 1983); Dage v. Deutsche Bank Nat. Trust Co., 95 So.3d 1021, 1023 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012). In the instant case, Defendant argues that he was surprised to learn in May of 2015 that a default had been entered on July 24, 2014, despite the fact that he was fully cognizant that his federal bankruptcy petition had been dismissed on March 27, Defendant's motion and affidavit fail to set forth any due diligence and frivolously asserts that George I. Elsa should not be required to comply with the mandates of Rule in establ ishing due diligence and a meritorious defense because the default arose from lack of notice. For the reasons aforementioned and the record before the Court, this Court finds those arguments unpersuasive. ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: Defendant's Motion to Set Aside Default and For Related Relief is hereby DENIED. DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida, on 08/22/16.

16 MONICA GORDO CIRC::UIT COURT JUDGE No Further Judicial Action Required on THIS MOTION CLERK TO RECLOSE CASE IF POST JUDGMENT The parties served with this Order are indicated in the accompanying 11th Circuit confirmation which includes all s provided by the submitter. The movant shall IMMEDIATELY serve a true and correct copy of this Order, by mail, facsimile, or hand-delivery, to all parties/counsel of record for whom service is not indicated by the accompanying 11th Circuit confirmation, and file proof of service with the Clerk of Court. Signed original order sent electronically to the Clerk of Courts for filing in the Court file. Copies furnished to: Juan C. Zorrilla, Esq. jzorrilla@fowler-white.com Raphael Lopez, Esq. rl@lopezroca.com Carlos Lerman, Esq. carlos@lwlawfla.com 9

17 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO CA Ol SECTION: 02 Elso, Alyssa; Elso, Michael; Elso, Juan C Plaintiff, vs. Elso, George I; Torrens, Luis A; Xlt Investment Corp Defendant. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT, GEORGE I. ELSO'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER DENYING HIS MOTION TO SET ASIDE JUDICIAL DEFAULT THIS CAUSE having come before the court, and the court having reviewed Defendant, George I. Elsa's Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying his Motion to Set Aside Judicial Default, Plaintiff's Opposition, and being fully advised in the premises it is hereby: ORDERED that defendant's motion is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers at Miami-Dade County, Florida this 30th day of November, cc: All counsel of Record MONICA GORDO CIRCUIT COURT JUDGE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC ********************************************** EDWARD HOWLAND, Petitioner, vs.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC ********************************************** EDWARD HOWLAND, Petitioner, vs. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC07-2054 ********************************************** EDWARD HOWLAND, Petitioner, vs. BARRY S. SCHRAGER, Respondent, **********************************************

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D LT. CASE NO.: CA-13

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO.: 3D LT. CASE NO.: CA-13 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT RECEIVED, 10/26/2016 3:44 PM, Mary Cay Blanks, Third District Court of Appeal SFL PROPERTY HOLDING LLC, v. Appellant, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA APPEAL FROM THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA APPEAL FROM THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CORAL BAY SECTION C HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, Petitioner. Case No.: 3D07-2315 MIAMI-DADE COUNTY Respondent Lower Tribunal Case No.: 2007-5354-CA-01 APPEAL FROM THE THIRD DISTRICT

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 17, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D14-21 Lower Tribunal No. 12-6752 David Ledo, Appellant,

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 5, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D17-532 Lower Tribunal No. 16-12697 Felix Sencion, etc.,

More information

MOTION TO VACATE FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW

MOTION TO VACATE FINAL JUDGMENT OF FORECLOSURE AND INCORPORATED MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 13th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY, FLORIDA LIQUIDATED INVESTMENTS, LLC., n/k/a CITICOMPANY HOLDINGS, INC. CASE NO: 2009-xxxxx CA 01 Plaintiff, v. HECTOR R.

More information

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY S FEES AND COSTS. THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Defendant s Motion for Attorney s Fees

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY S FEES AND COSTS. THIS MATTER came before the Court upon Defendant s Motion for Attorney s Fees LIBERTY HOME EQUITY SOLUTIONS INC. FORMERLY KNOWN AS GENWORTH FINANCIAL HOME EQUITY ACCESS INC., IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 2016-8579-CA-01

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA EMERGENCY, VERIFIED MOTION TO VACATE FINAL JUDGMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA EMERGENCY, VERIFIED MOTION TO VACATE FINAL JUDGMENT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA WACHOVIA MORTGAGE, FSB f/k/a WORLD SAVINGS BANK, v. Plaintiff, Case No. 52-2008-CA-017220 JULIANNA ZAKRZEWSKA, et.

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL THIRD DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RECEIVED, 12/21/2016 10:21 AM, Mary Cay Blanks, Third District Court of Appeal SOLO AERO CORP., a Florida corporation, vs. Petitioner, AMERICA-CV

More information

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO AMEND AND FOR LEAVE TO ADD CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF S MOTION TO AMEND AND FOR LEAVE TO ADD CLAIM FOR PUNITIVE DAMAGES IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA ANDRE MILES and PATRICIA EMERY, on behalf of their son, ANDRE K. EMERY, v. Plaintiffs, CASE NO: 14-19008 CA MIAMI POSTAL

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA David Olivencia, Daliz Financial Services, Inc., and LDL Accountant and Associates CPAS, LLC, CASE NO.: 2015-CA-9565-O

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC Third DCA Case Nos. 3D / 3D L.T. Case No CA 15

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. SC Third DCA Case Nos. 3D / 3D L.T. Case No CA 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. SC08-1877 Third DCA Case Nos. 3D07-2875 / 3D07-3106 L.T. Case No. 04-17958 CA 15 VALAT INTERNATIONAL HOLDINGS, LTD. Petitioner, vs. MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC. Respondent.

More information

FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC (Lower Tribunal Case 3D ) RENE CARABALLO, Petitioner,

FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC (Lower Tribunal Case 3D ) RENE CARABALLO, Petitioner, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC07-1264 (Lower Tribunal Case 3D05-2512) RENE CARABALLO, Petitioner, v. LAZCAR INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Florida Corporation, Respondent. PETITIONER=S INITIAL BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

More information

The 2008 Florida Statutes

The 2008 Florida Statutes The 2008 Florida Statutes CHAPTER 702 FORECLOSURE OF MORTGAGES, AGREEMENTS FOR DEEDS, AND STATUTORY LIENS 702.01 Equity. 702.03 Certain foreclosures validated. 702.035 Legal notice concerning foreclosure

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PERRY TANKSLEY, Petitioner, vs. 214 MAIN STREET CORP. and 3B REALTY NORTH, INC., Sup. Ct. Case No: SC07-272 Second DCA Case No: 2D06-768 Respondents. *********************************/

More information

DIRECTIONS FOR FILING A MOTION TO SET ASIDE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN DISTRICT COURT

DIRECTIONS FOR FILING A MOTION TO SET ASIDE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN DISTRICT COURT DIRECTIONS FOR FILING A MOTION TO SET ASIDE A DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN DISTRICT COURT [If the default judgment comes from Small Claims Court, go to that court and ask the small claims clerk for information

More information

Appellant Seay Outdoor Advertising, Inc. argues that the trial court committed

Appellant Seay Outdoor Advertising, Inc. argues that the trial court committed IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA SEAY OUTDOOR ADVERTISING, INC., v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed February 4, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D14-832 Lower Tribunal No. 12-29331 M.W., a minor,

More information

Filing # E-Filed 09/24/ :52:23 PM

Filing # E-Filed 09/24/ :52:23 PM Filing # 32454277 E-Filed 09/24/2015 02:52:23 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PASCO COUNTY, FLORIDA THROUGH RELINQUISHMENT OF JURISDICTION BY THE DISTRICT COURT OF FLORIDA

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2009

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2009 Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2009 Opinion filed April 29, 2009. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D08-1299 Lower Tribunal No.

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 24, 2016. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D15-1448 Lower Tribunal No. 07-46108 Eliahu Abukasis,

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 20, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D16-1927 Lower Tribunal No. 14-6370 Nationstar Mortgage,

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 19, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D11-2586 Lower Tribunal No. 10-47730 U.S. Bank National

More information

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: 98,448 SAUL ZINER, Petitioner, NATIONSBANK, N.A., Respondent. RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No.: 98,448 SAUL ZINER, Petitioner, NATIONSBANK, N.A., Respondent. RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No.: 98,448 SAUL ZINER, Petitioner, v. NATIONSBANK, N.A., Respondent. RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF ON APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH DISTRICT STATE OF FLORIDA

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA LAND SALES, CONDOMINIUMS, AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION ALI JOSE LOPEZ, CLEMENCIA BARRIGA, GILBERTO

More information

CASE NO. 1D Sally B. Fox and Brian J. Hooper of Emmanuel, Sheppard & Condon, Pensacola, for Appellant.

CASE NO. 1D Sally B. Fox and Brian J. Hooper of Emmanuel, Sheppard & Condon, Pensacola, for Appellant. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA THE PANAMA CITY GENERAL PARTNERSHIP, v. Appellant, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed July 02, 2014. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D13-461 Lower Tribunal No. 11-21566 Ocean Bank, Appellant,

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 1, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D17-71 Consolidated: 3D16-2901 Lower Tribunal Nos.

More information

IN Tl le SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SCl3-153 L. T. CASR NOS.; 4DI J-4801, CA COCE

IN Tl le SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SCl3-153 L. T. CASR NOS.; 4DI J-4801, CA COCE E]cctronically Filed 07/01/2013 (M:47:23 PM ET RECEIVED. 7/]/2013 l6:48:35. Thomas D. Hall. Clerk. Supreme Court IN Tl le SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SCl3-153 L. T. CASR NOS.; 4DI J-4801,

More information

Supreme Court of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Supreme Court of Florida PER CURIAM. No. SC11-697 ROMAN PINO, Petitioner, vs. THE BANK OF NEW YORK, etc., et al., Respondents. [December 8, 2011] The issue we address is whether Florida Rule of Appellate

More information

FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE FOR FRAUD ON THE COURT AND SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FRAUD UPON THE COURT AND FOR CIVIL SANCTIONS

FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE FOR FRAUD ON THE COURT AND SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FRAUD UPON THE COURT AND FOR CIVIL SANCTIONS IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA IVY ROBINSON AND GLASFORD ROBINSON, CASE NO: 2015-019927 CA 01 Plaintiffs, vs. SAFEPOINT INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed August 9, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D16-2445 Lower Tribunal No. 11-32903 The Bank of New

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed April 26, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D16-849 Lower Tribunal No. 04-20174 Coral Gables Imports,

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2013

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2013 Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2013 Opinion filed December 26, 2013. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D13-1008 Lower Tribunal No.

More information

RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF

RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC03-1365 Lower Tribunal No.: 4D02-4510 RESPONDENT S ANSWER BRIEF GARY A. BARCUS Appellant/Petitioner vs. GROVE AT GRAND PALMS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellee/Respondent

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM Appellants, v. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM Appellants, v. Case No. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2009 SCOTT KRUEGER AND CYNTHIA KRUEGER, Appellants, v. Case No. 5D08-1880 PAUL E. PONTON, JR. AND MARLENE E. PONTON,

More information

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 3D L.T. CASE NO

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 3D L.T. CASE NO SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. SC10-2453 DISTRICT COURT CASE NO. 3D 09-161 L.T. CASE NO. 05-15300 BARBARA J. TUCKER, Petitioner, vs. LPP MORTGAGE LTD., f/k/a LOAN PARTICIPANT PARTNERS,

More information

Appellants, CASE NO.: CVA v. Lower Court Case No.: 2007-CC-3656

Appellants, CASE NO.: CVA v. Lower Court Case No.: 2007-CC-3656 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA SYBIL and CLEVELAND DAVIS, Appellants, CASE NO.: CVA1 07-59 v. Lower Court Case No.: 2007-CC-3656 DE ALBANY CONSTRUCTION

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DOUGLAS D. STRATTON, STRATTON & FEINSTEIN, P.A. and DAVID LESMAN Case No.: 3D11-205 Consolidated: 3D11-20 Petitioners, vs. 6000 INDIAN CREEK, LLC, et al., L/T Case No.:

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 28, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D17-2756 Lower Tribunal No. 15-5478 Deer Valley Realty,

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed January 11, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D15-2576 Lower Tribunal No. 12-19409 Heartwood 2,

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D., 2007

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D., 2007 Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D., 2007 Opinion filed April 11, 2007. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D06-2436 Lower Tribunal No.

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2012

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2012 Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, July Term, A.D. 2012 Opinion filed December 4, 2013. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D11-897 Lower Tribunal No. 10-51885

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CASE NO: 2D L.T. CASE NO: 2011-CA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CASE NO: 2D L.T. CASE NO: 2011-CA IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT CASE NO: 2D14-0061 L.T. CASE NO: 2011-CA-011993 U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, N.A., Appellant, v. JENNIFER CAPE. Appellee. INITIAL

More information

FINAL ORDER AFFIRMING TRIAL COURT in favor of Appellee, Silver Glen Homeowners Association, Inc. ( Sliver Glen ). This

FINAL ORDER AFFIRMING TRIAL COURT in favor of Appellee, Silver Glen Homeowners Association, Inc. ( Sliver Glen ). This IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA MULVA H. PEARSON, v. Appellant, CASE NO.: 2014-CV-000028-A-O Lower Case No.: 2012-CC-010207-O SILVER GLEN HOMEOWNERS

More information

FINAL ORDER REVERSING TRIAL COURT. Eviction entered June 2, 2014 in favor of Appellees, Herbert and Joann Greene ( the

FINAL ORDER REVERSING TRIAL COURT. Eviction entered June 2, 2014 in favor of Appellees, Herbert and Joann Greene ( the IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA SHALONDA E. WILKS, v. Appellant, CASE NO.: 2014-CV-000036-A-O Lower Case No.: 2014-CC-004299-O HERBERT GREENE and JOANN

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DIGICAST NEW MEDIA, INC., Petitioner, -vs- FIERA.COM, INC., Respondent. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA DIGICAST NEW MEDIA, INC., Petitioner, -vs- FIERA.COM, INC., Respondent. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SCO3-418 THIRD DISTRICT CASE NO. 3D02-441 LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 01-24419 CA 22 DIGICAST NEW MEDIA, INC., Petitioner, -vs- FIERA.COM, INC., Respondent. APPEAL FROM

More information

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT GREG HOWARD, Appellant, v. DAVID GUALT, Appellee. No. 4D18-1451 [October 31, 2018] Appeal of non-final order from the Circuit Court for

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Third District Court of Appeal Case No. 3D09-1314 Lower Court Case No. 08-39632 CA 04 (11 th Judicial Circuit) VENEZIA LAKES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not-for-profit

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC04- EDNA DE LA PENA, Petitioner, vs. SUNSHINE BOUQUET COMPANY and HORTICA, Respondents.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC04- EDNA DE LA PENA, Petitioner, vs. SUNSHINE BOUQUET COMPANY and HORTICA, Respondents. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO: SC04- EDNA DE LA PENA, Petitioner, vs. SUNSHINE BOUQUET COMPANY and HORTICA, Respondents. PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION Richard Zaldivar, Esquire Jay M. Levy,

More information

FINAL JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS STRIKING THE PLEADINGS OF PLAINTIFF

FINAL JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS STRIKING THE PLEADINGS OF PLAINTIFF IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MIAMI DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA JOHANNA FADDIS, CASE NO. 11-27981CA 30 v. THE CITY OF HOMESTEAD, JUDY WALDMAN, ELVIS MALDONADO, STEPHEN SHELLEY,

More information

RESPONDENT S AMENDED ANSWER BRIEF TO PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

RESPONDENT S AMENDED ANSWER BRIEF TO PETITIONER S JURISDICTIONAL BRIEF FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC09-2312 Court of Appeal Case No. 3D09-821 District Court Case No. 08-72076 ELIEZIER LEAL AND CLARA LEON, v. Petitioners, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY,

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 10, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D17-2798 Lower Tribunal No. 17-991 Ralph Robles and

More information

COUNSEL MUST APPEAR IN PERSON FOR ALL FORECLOSURE HEARINGS. TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE IS NOT PERMITTED.

COUNSEL MUST APPEAR IN PERSON FOR ALL FORECLOSURE HEARINGS. TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE IS NOT PERMITTED. MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR ESCAMBIA COUNTY (Effective July 1, 2015) COUNSEL MUST APPEAR IN PERSON FOR ALL FORECLOSURE HEARINGS. TELEPHONIC APPEARANCE IS NOT PERMITTED. EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2015,

More information

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER, LLC S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA PETITIONER CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER, LLC S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CRESCENT MIAMI CENTER, LLC, vs. Petitioner, Supreme Court Case No. SC03-2063 THIRD DCA CASE NO. 02-3002 LT Case No. 00-21824 DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent.

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed October 31, 2018. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D17-531 Lower Tribunal No. 15-26358 Darcy Santos,

More information

CASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED.

CASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 16 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY CASE NO: Vs. Plaintiff Defendants / FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER THIS CASE having been reviewed by the

More information

IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT. Lower Tribunal Case Number: 1D Case Number: SC05-957

IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT. Lower Tribunal Case Number: 1D Case Number: SC05-957 IN THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT Lower Tribunal Case Number: 1D03-4621 Case Number: SC05-957 ANN LYON, ETC., vs. Petitioner/ Appellant, KEITH SANFORD, ET AL. Respondent/ Appellee. AMENDED PETITIONER S BRIEF

More information

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Stevens 2016 NY Slip Op 32404(U) December 7, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2008 Judge:

Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Stevens 2016 NY Slip Op 32404(U) December 7, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /2008 Judge: Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v Stevens 2016 NY Slip Op 32404(U) December 7, 2016 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 104120/2008 Judge: Manuel J. Mendez Cases posted with a "30000" identifier,

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. 5D

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA. Case No. 5D IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FOR THE FIFTH DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA RECEIVED, 2/10/2017 6:32 PM, Joanne P. Simmons, Fifth District Court of Appeal Case No. 5D17-0287 On Appeal from a Final Order of

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2011

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2011 Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2011 Opinion filed May 04, 2011. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D11-275 Lower Tribunal No. 08-59283

More information

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT MICHAEL LESINSKI, Appellant, v. SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, Appellee. No. 4D17-40 [September 6, 2017] Appeal of non-final order

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 4, 2011

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 4, 2011 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 4, 2011 KAY SAUER v. DONALD D. LAUNIUS DBA ALPHA LOG CABINS Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sevier County No. 2008-00419-IV

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA FRANK J. BOTTIGLIERI, M.D., Petitioner, CASE NO.: 2015-CA-000426-O Lower Case No.: 2014-CC-000126-O v. LAW OFFICES

More information

Case No.: 2008-CA O

Case No.: 2008-CA O IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA DOUGLAS MICHAEL GUETZLOE, WRIT NO.: 08-51 Petitioner, vs. Case No.: 2008-CA-21379-O STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. Petition

More information

NO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAIfI

NO. CAAP IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAIfI NO. CAAP-11-0000166 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAIfI KARPELES MANUSCRIPT LIBRARY, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STELLA FAYE DUARTE; MORYLEE FERNANDEZ, and JOHN and MARY DOES 1-10,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. Case No.: CI-19

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA. Case No.: CI-19 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA EVERHOME MORTGAGE COMPANY, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 09-4672-CI-19 RONALD J. POWNALL, et al. Defendants. / EMERGENCY

More information

Case 0:06-cv JIC Document 97 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/10/2013 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 0:06-cv JIC Document 97 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/10/2013 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 0:06-cv-61337-JIC Document 97 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/10/2013 Page 1 of 6 KEITH TAYLOR, v. Plaintiff, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, Defendant. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT

More information

MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS

MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MARTIN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2401 S.E. MONTEREY ROAD STUART, FL 34996 DOUG SMITH Commissioner, District 1 November 26, 2018 Telephone: (772) 288-5925 Fax: (772) 288-5439 Email: eelder@martin.fl.us

More information

CASE NO. and. Appellants,

CASE NO. and. Appellants, CASE NO. (Circuit Court Case No. and Appellants, v. DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS TRUSTEE IN TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS FOR ASSET- BACKED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. DCA No. 4D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. Case No. DCA No. 4D IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Case No. DCA No. 4D10-2310 KENNEDY TRINLEY & SANTINO, P.L., a Florida limited liability company, and EARL MAYER, JR., Petitioners, v. BARBARA SHULGASSER-PARKER, as Personal

More information

CASE NO.: 2014-CV A-O Lower Case No.: 2013-SC O

CASE NO.: 2014-CV A-O Lower Case No.: 2013-SC O IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA TOM GALATI, Appellant, CASE NO.: 2014-CV-000077-A-O Lower Case No.: 2013-SC-005104-O v. WEST COLONIAL AUTO, INC. d/b/a

More information

Defendants. / FINAL JUDGMENT AWARDING ATTORNEY S FEES AND COSTS TO DEFENDANT HOWDEN INSURANCE BROKERS LIMITED

Defendants. / FINAL JUDGMENT AWARDING ATTORNEY S FEES AND COSTS TO DEFENDANT HOWDEN INSURANCE BROKERS LIMITED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA CIRCUIT CIVIL DIVISION INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE SEGUROS, CASE NO. 10-33653 CA 04 JUDGE BRONWYN C. MILLER Plaintiff,

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES

STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION DIVISION OF FLORIDA CONDOMINIUMS, TIMESHARES AND MOBILE HOMES IN RE: PETITION FOR ARBITRATION M.E.D.-79, CORP. and QUATTRO MANAGEMENT,

More information

In the Supreme Court of Florida

In the Supreme Court of Florida In the Supreme Court of Florida CASE NO. SC06-1808 GARY DOEHLA, Petitioner, v. JAMES J. CLINTON, III, Respondent. ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE THIRD DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL PETITIONER S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC09- L.T. Case No. 4D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. CASE NO. SC09- L.T. Case No. 4D IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC09- L.T. Case No. 4D08-1429 COLUMBIA HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF SOUTH BROWARD, d/b/a WESTSIDE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, a foreign For profit corporation,

More information

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. L.T. No. 1D

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. L.T. No. 1D IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA ROBERT ANDERSON Petitioner, VS. Case No. SC07-306 L.T. No. 1D06-2486 FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S BRIEF ON JURISDICTION On petition for discretionary

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Court of Appeal s Case No.: 4D JAN KRZYNOWEK, Petitioner, -vs- TZVI SCHACHTER

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Court of Appeal s Case No.: 4D JAN KRZYNOWEK, Petitioner, -vs- TZVI SCHACHTER IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA CASE NO. Court of Appeal s Case No.: 4D06-2266 JAN KRZYNOWEK, Petitioner, -vs- TZVI SCHACHTER Respondent. ON PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FOURTH

More information

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED OF FLORIDA NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT PROFESSIONAL GOLF GLOBAL GROUP, LLC and LYNN VAN ARCHIBALD, Appellants,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Supreme Court Case No. SC th DCA Case No. 4D RESPONDENTS BRIEF ON JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA. Supreme Court Case No. SC th DCA Case No. 4D RESPONDENTS BRIEF ON JURISDICTION IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA ALEXANDER SCHULTZ vs.. Petitioner Supreme Court Case No. SC04-2318 4th DCA Case No. 4D03-3286 WALDEMAR K. SCHICKEDANZ et al., Respondents / RESPONDENTS BRIEF

More information

OF FLORIDA. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jerald Bagley, Judge. Knecht & Knecht and Harold C. Knecht, Jr., for appellant.

OF FLORIDA. An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jerald Bagley, Judge. Knecht & Knecht and Harold C. Knecht, Jr., for appellant. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, A.D. 2005 BEATRIZ L. LABBEE, Appellant, vs. JAMES

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2010

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2010 Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida, January Term, A.D. 2010 Opinion filed February 24, 2010. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D09-1558 Lower Tribunal

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Lower Case No.: 2012-TR A-E

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Lower Case No.: 2012-TR A-E IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA GORDON H. GROLAND, Appellant, CASE NO.: 2012-CV-000092-A-O Lower Case No.: 2012-TR-008295-A-E v. STATE OF FLORIDA,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA Filing # 15572814 Electronically Filed 07/03/2014 05:32:02 PM RECEIVED, 7/3/2014 17:33:34, John A. Tomasino, Clerk, Supreme Court MOHAMMAD ANWAR FARID AL-SALEH, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed June 21, 2017. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D16-430 Lower Tribunal No. 14-20811 Luz Mery Salcedo,

More information

v. CASE NO.: CVA Lower Court Case No.: 2004-SC-1811-O

v. CASE NO.: CVA Lower Court Case No.: 2004-SC-1811-O IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. CASE NO.: CVA1 08-76 Lower Court Case No.: 2004-SC-1811-O JEAN

More information

Case acs Doc 52 Filed 08/20/15 Entered 08/20/15 16:11:30 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY

Case acs Doc 52 Filed 08/20/15 Entered 08/20/15 16:11:30 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY Case 14-34747-acs Doc 52 Filed 08/20/15 Entered 08/20/15 16:11:30 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY In re: ) ) CLIFFORD J. AUSMUS ) CASE NO. 14-34747 ) CHAPTER 7

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Jan 13 2014 16:30:11 2013-CA-01004 Pages: 21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA HUDSON VS. LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2013-CA-01004

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 8:15-CV-197-T-17MAP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. CASE NO. 8:15-CV-197-T-17MAP Jensen v. Palmer Doc. 12 CARL R. JENSEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 8:15-CV-197-T-17MAP BARBARA A. PALMER, v. Defendant/ Third Party Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR MARION COUNTY, FLORIDA, CASE NO. Plaintiff, vs., Defendant. / ORDER SCHEDULING PRETRIAL CONFERENCE AND NON-JURY TRIAL Pursuant to Plaintiff

More information

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 16, 2015. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. No. 3D15-557 Lower Tribunal No. 11-31116 PennyMac Corp.,

More information

IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN AND FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN AND FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN THE SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL IN AND FOR THE STATE OF FLORIDA RICK KOIS, v. Appellant, VERICREST FINANCIAL, INC., Case No.: 2D12- L.T. No.: 2011-CA-00060 WH Appellee. / ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT

More information

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT ARCHANA SINGH and DENNIS MASSEY, Appellants, v. DEV T. KUMAR, Appellee. No. 4D17-241 [October 11, 2017] Appeal from the Circuit Court for

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO.: 2013-CA-5265-O

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA. v. CASE NO.: 2013-CA-5265-O IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA JOHN M. BECKER, Petitioner, v. CASE NO.: 2013-CA-5265-O THE UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL FLORIDA BOARD OF TRUSTEES, an agency

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA HFC COLLECTION CENTER, INC., Appellant, CASE NO.: 2013-CV-000032-A-O Lower No.: 2011-CC-005631-O v. STEPHANIE ALEXANDER,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC: L.T. Case No. 3D CASTELO DEVELOPMENTS, LLC. Petitioner, NAKIA RAWLS, et al. Respondents.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. SC: L.T. Case No. 3D CASTELO DEVELOPMENTS, LLC. Petitioner, NAKIA RAWLS, et al. Respondents. Electronically Filed 10/24/2013 05:29:35 PM ET RECEIVED, 10/24/2013 17:33:39, Thomas D. Hall, Clerk, Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA L.T. Case No. 3D12-1332 CASTELO DEVELOPMENTS, LLC Petitioner,

More information

Case 1:11-mc MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2011 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 1:11-mc MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2011 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 1:11-mc-22432-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/07/2011 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PROFESSIONAL SHREDDING OF WISCONSIN, INC., a Wisconsin corporation,

More information

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA JORGE PALACIO and ELIZABETH R. PALACIO, v. Appellants, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA Flagler Hospital, Inc., a/a/o Johnnie Cole, CASE NO.: 2015-CV-67-A-O Lower Court Case No.: 2012-SC-12268-O Appellant,

More information