BRIEF OF APPELLANT, MISSISSIPPI TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION

Save this PDF as:

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "BRIEF OF APPELLANT, MISSISSIPPI TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION"

Transcription

1 E-Filed Document Feb :12: SA Pages: 17 IN THE TIIE SUPREME SU1'REME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO SA SA-01l81 MISSISSIPPI TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION APPELLANT VERSUS UNITED ASSETS, LLC APPELLEE EE BRIEF OF APPELLANT, MISSISSIPPI TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION On Appeal from the Special Court COUl't of Eminent Domain of Forrest County, Mississippi Cause No. C ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED Jack H. Pittman MSB#04394 Christopher M. Howdeshell MSB #10688 Pittman Law Firm Post Office Drawer Hattiesburg, MS Telephone: (601) Facsimile: (601) Attorneys for Appellant

2 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION APPELLANT VERSUS CAUSE NO SA-OI 181 UNITED ASSETS, LLC APPELLEE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned counsel of record certifies that the fo llow ing listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the Justices of the Supreme Court and/or the Judges of the Court of Appeals may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal. For Appellant: I. Mississippi Transportation Commission, Appellant (Mr. Mike Tagert; Mr. Dick Hall; and Mr. Tom King). 2. Jack H. Pittman, Esq., Counsel for Appellant. 3. Christopher M. Howdeshell, Esq., Counsel for Appellant. 4. United Assets, LLC, Appellee; (Mr. Louis J. Tortorich, Jr.). 5. Mark D. Herbert, Esq., Counsel for Appellee. 6. Lisa A. Reppeto, Esq., Counsel for Appellee. 7. Sabrina B. Ruffin, Esq., Counsel for Appellee. 8. Honorable Michael W. McPhail, Trial Court Judge I.

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS CERTlFICA TE OF INTERESTED PERSONS I. TABLE OF CONTENTS ii. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES iii. STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES I STATEMENT OF THE CASE I A. NATURE OF THE CASE I B. STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT I C. COURSE OF THE PROCEEDINGS I D. STATEMENT OF TH E FACTS SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT ARGUMENT I. THE TRIAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY ALLOWING A.PPELLEE'S EXPERT TO TESTIFY TO THE VALUE OF APPELLEE'S REMA.INING PROPERTY WITHOUT PROVlDING ANY MARKET DATA TO SUPPORT THE VALUE II. Ill. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN NOT GRANTING A.PPELLANT'S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL T HE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN NOT GRANTING A.PPELLANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT CONCLUSION II CERTlFICATE OF SERVICE II.

4 TABLE OF AUTHORlTffiS CASES Adcock v. Miss. Transp. Comm'n, 981 So.2d 942, 946 (Miss. 2008) , 9, 10 Edmonds v. State, 955 So.2d 787, 792 (Miss. 2007) , Gulf South Pipeline Co., LP v. Pitre, 35 So.3d 494 (Miss. 20 I , 7, II Hemphill v. Mississ ippi State Highway Comm'n, 145 So.2d 455 (Miss. 1962) Johnson v. st. Dominic's Jackson Memoriall-losp So.2d 20, 23 (Miss. 2007)... 9, 10 Miss. State Hwy. Comm'n v. Hillman, 198 So. 565, 569 (Miss. 1940) Mississippi State Highway Comm'n v. Stout, 134 So.2d 467 (Miss ) Mississippi Transp. Comm'n v. McLemore, 863 So.2d 31, 38 (Miss. 2003) Rebelwood, Ltd. v. Hinds County, 544 So.2d 1356, 1360 (Miss. 1989) Troupe v, McAuley, 955 So.2d 848, 856 (Miss. 2007) OTHER AUTHORITY Mississippi Rule of Evidence Ill.

5 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES 1. Whether the Forrest County Special Court of Eminent Domain abused its discretion by allowing the appraiser for the Appellee to testify to the va lue of Appellee's remaining property without providing any market data to support the value. 2. Whether the Trial Court erred in denying Appellant's Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict. 3. Whether the Trial COUl1 en"cd in denying Appellant's Motion for a New Trial. STATEMENT OF THE CASE A. Nature of the Case. This matter involved an eminent domain proceeding filed by the Mississippi Transportation Commission (hereinafler "Appellant") in the Special Cow1 of Eminent Domain of Forrest County. Mississippi. B. Statement Regarding Oral Argument. Pursuant to Mississippi Rule of Appellate Procedure 34, Appellant respectfully requests oral argument. This appeal involves complicated engineering plans and evidentiary issues regarding testimony of experts that could create precedent for subsequent eminent domain cases. Appellant herein respectfully submits that the adjudicative process will be substantially aided by oral argument. C. Course of Proceedings and Disposition Below. On October \6, 20 12, Appellant herein filed a Complaint to Condemn in the Special Court of Eminent Domain of Forrest County, Mississippi to acquire real property and certain access rights from United Assets, LLC (hereinafter "Appellee"), as described in Exhibit "A" Page 1 of 13

6 attached to the Complaint. (R ; R.E. 4). Service of process was completed accordingly, and the Court entered an Order Granting Plaintiff Right ofimmediate Title and Possession 10 the property pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated , el. seq. on the 9 lh day of April, (R ; R.E. 5). Trial of this matter was eventually scheduled for May 19, (R. 189; R.E. 6). Prior to trial, Appellant herein filed an Amended Statement of Values asserting total compensation and damage in the amount of$826, (R ; R.E. 7). Appellee's Second Amended Statement of Values filed prior to trial asserted just compensation in the amount of$2,255, This Statement of Values also asserted that the after value octhe property, or the value of the property remaining after the acquisition, was $30, (R ; R.E. 8). After two days of testimony, the jury returned a verdict awarding Appellee $1,620, (R. 232; R.E. 9). Final Judgment in this amount was entered on June 4, (R ; R.E. 2). On June 9, 2014, Appellee filed a Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or for a New Trial and Additur, and, on that same date, Appellant filed a Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or for a New Trial. (R ; R.E. to). The motions were heard by the Court on August 6, 20 t4, and the COW1 denied both motions by Order dated the 13" day of August, (R ; R.E. 3). It is from the Final Judgment and Order denying Appellant's Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or for a New Trial that Appellant prosecutes this appeal. D. Statement of the Facts. Appellee owns acres in the northeast quadrant of the interseclion of Interstate 59 and Evelyn Gandy Parkway. also known as State Route 42. Appellant initiated eminent domain proceedings to acqujre acres and access certain rights from Appellee as described in the Complaint, leaving 11.5 acres. (Tr. 85; Exhibit P-l, P-2; R.E. 11). Prior to condemnation, the Page 2 of 13

7 property was vacant except for an old house and a shed. (Tr. 133; R.E. 12). The property acquired from Appellee was needed to expand the intersection oflntcrstate 59 and Evelyn Gandy Parkway because of increased traffic. (Tr. 82; R.E. 13). The project involved two phases. The first phase involved widening Evelyn Gandy Parkway to four lanes and reconstructing the access ramps between Interstate 59 and Evelyn Gandy Parkway. The second phase of the project involves the construction ofa flyover, an elevated roadway, which will assist the traffic in existing Interstate 59 and entering on Highway 42. (Tr , 100; R.E. 14). One ofu,e flyovers wi ll be constructed on Defendant's property and wi ll be approximately thirty-six feet in height. (Tr. ) 07; R.E. 15). Also acquired were certain access rights which prevented Appellee from accessing its property along a service road after construction. During construction, the property could be accessed by an existing drive located at the southern boundary of Appellee's property. After construction, a new access road, constructed by Appellant, will provide access to the remaining property near the same location. (Tr ; Exhibit P-l; R.E. 16). Mr. Jonathon NuH (hereinafter "Null"), Appellant's expert appraisal witness, testified that the highest and best use of the property was commercial. (Tr. 13 1; R,E. 17). Nu ll, utilizing the comparable sales method, offered four (4) comparable sales in support of his value. The Court allowed three (3) of Null's sales into evidence, including the subject property, which sold in 2006 for the amount of$ I,353, (Tr ; R.E. 18). From these sales, Null adopted a value of $60, per acre or $ 1,41 1, in the before condition. (Tr. 173; R.E. 19). In the after condition, Null stated that there were no damages to the remainder because the highest and best use and access remained essentially the same. Null used the same three sales to adopt a $60, per acre value in the after condition for the 11.5 acres remaining, which totaled $721,200,00. Null lhen deducted from his after val ue the cost to construct a service road similar Page 3 of 13

8 to that which existed in the before condhion in the amount of$75,ooo.00, and also deducted the loss of use under tl,e service road in the amount of$30, Null further deducted $30, from the after value to pay for paved access into the remaining property. Null then subtracted his after value $585, from his before value, and testified to the amount of $826, as just compensation. (Tr ; R.E. 20). Appellee's first witness was Mr. Louis J. Tortorich, Jr., who is managing member of Appellee. Mr. Tortorich testified that Appellee purchased the property to develop commercial out-parcels which they would then lease to businesses such as fast food companies, hotels, and other related businesses. When asked how the acquisition would impact his development plans, he slated as follows: (Tr ; R.E. 21). My personal opinion is that no one in their right mind would want to use what is remaining for what we intended from the beginning. Appellee then called Mr. John Stribling, who is a real estate broker and owner of Stribling Realty. Mr. Stribling testified that. after the taking, the remainder would not be a viable site for commercial real estate. (Tr. 255; R.E. 22). Appellee's final witness was Mr. Joe Parker (hereinafter "Parker"). who was admitted as an expert in the field of real estate appraisal. Parker also testi_fied that he adopted the comparable sales approach in appraising the subject property and appraised thc property as commercial development. (Tr ; R.E. 23). Before Parker testified as to specific sales, the sales were proffered to the Court outside the presence ofajury. Parker submitted twcnty-tlrree comparable sales to the Court, including twelve (12) in the before condition, and eleven (11) in the after condition. Of the twelve (12) salcs offered to support Parker's valuation in the before condition, Page 4 of 13

9 the Court allowed four (4) sales into evidence. As to Parker's sales in the after condition, one was witlldrawn by Appellee and all others were deemed inadmissible. (Tr ; R.E. 24). Using the four (4) sales allowed by the Court, Parker testified to a $2.25 per square foot value for the land, or a before value of$2,305, He then deducted $20, from that amount for the demolition ofa old house and shed 011 the propel1y, Ieaving a total before value of $2,285, (Tc. 38 1; R.E. 25). Regarding the after condition, Parker testified that the highest and best use of the property would change to "some potential future use". (Tr. 382; R.E. 26). When Parker was asked on direct examination abo ut the value of the remaining property. counsel for Appellant herein objected because he had not provided any data to support his auer value. (Tr ; R.E. 27). Counsel for Appellant also objected because this testimony differed from Appellee's Statement of Values, and moved to strike Parker's testimony. The Court overruled the Motion. (Tr I; R.E. 28). Parker fai led to ofier sales or other market data to support an after value, testifying as follows : Q: As a professional appraiser, knowing the information you sat through and listened to and the information that has been fum ished to you in this case, are yoll in a position to give an expert opinion as to the after value of this property? A : Yes sir. Q: Okay, and what would that value be? A: Zero. (Tc. 39 1; R.E. 29). The Court supported its ruling by stating that Mr. Tortorich had testified that the property had "no value". (Tc. 389; R.E. 30). At the conclusion of the trial, the jury then awarded Appellee $1,620, (Tr. 433; R.E. 31). Page 5 of 13

10 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT The Trial Court abused its discretion by allowing Parker to testify that Appellee's remaining 11.5 acres had no value. Mississippi Rule of Evidence 702 requires expert testimony to be based upon sufficient facts or data and the product of reliable principles and methods as a prerequisite to admission into evidence. Parker submitted no comparable sales or other market data to support his opinion that the remaining 11.5 acres had no value whatsoever. Thus, Parker's opinion was based upon unsuppoited speculation, and should not have been allowed into testimony. Because Parker's testimony was inadmissible, the jury verdict was unsubstantiated by the evidence, and a Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or, at the least, a New Trial should have been ordered. I. ARGUMENT. THE TlUAL COURT ABUSED ITS DISCRETION BY ALLOWING APPELLEE'S EXPERT TO TESTIFY TO THE VALUE OF APPELLEE'S REMAINING PROPERTY WITHOUT PROVIDING ANY MARKET DATA TO SUPPORT THE VALUE. A. Standard of Review. A trial court's decision to admit expert testimony is reviewed on an abuse of discretion standard. Adcock v. Miss. Transp. Comm'n, 981 So.2d 942, 946 (Miss. 2008). An abuse of discretion standard requires reversal if the trial court's discretion is found to be arbitrary and clearly erroneous. ~ Troupe v. McAuley, 955 So.2d 848, 856 (Miss. 2007). Merely speculative expert opinions should not be admitted, GulfSolllh Pipeline Co., LP v. Pitre, 35 So.3d 494 (Miss. 2010) (citing Edmonds v. State, 955 So.2d 787, 792 (Miss. 2007». B. Applicable Law. When palt of larger tract of land is taken for public use, the owner should be awarded the difference between the fair market value of the whole tract immediately before the taking, and Page60f 13

11 the fair market value of that remaining immediate after the taking. Miss. State Hwy. Comm'n v. Hillman, 198 So. 565, 569 (Miss. 1940). as follows: Mississippi Rule of Evidence 702 governs the admission of expclt testimony, and reads If scientific, technical, or other special.ized knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education, may testify thereto in Ole form of an opinion or otherwise, if (I) the testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data, (2) the testimony is the product of reliable principles and methods, and (3) the witness has applied the principles and methods reliably to the facts of the case. Under Mississippi Rule of Evidence 702, the Trial Court must determine whether the proffered testimony is relevant, and then whether the proffered testimony is reliable. Mississippi Transp. Comm'n v. McLemore, 863 So.2d 31, 38 (Miss. 2003). There must be a "valid scientific connection to the pertinent inquiry" as a pre-condition to admissibility. The party offering the expert's testimony must show that the expert has based his testimony on the methods and procedures of science, not merely his subjective beliefs or unsupported speculation. McLemore, 863 So.2d at 36. There are tluee accepted standards in detennining fair market value for real properly, (I) the cost approach, (2) the income capitalization approach, and (3) the market data or comparative sales approach. Pitre, 35 So.3d at 498 (citing Rebelwood, Ltd. v. Hinds County, 544 So.2d 1356, 1360 (Miss. 1989)). As to the determination of fair market value of the property in the after condition, this Court has held that it is an abuse of discretion to admit values of property in the after condition with no supporting comparable sale or other market data. Pitre a1499. Page 7 of 13

12 C. Argwnent. Although Parker's testimony was relevant, it was not re liable, and the Trial COUIt abused its discretion ill allowing Parker to testify that Appellee's property in the after condition was valueless. Parker admittedly used the comparable sales approach to value the subject property in the before condition, but did not offer any comparable sales or other market data to support a value in the after condition. Appellee's Second Amended Statement of Values indicated that the value of Appellee's remaining property was $30, and there is nothing in the record to suggest Parker did not intend to testify to this value prior to taking the witness stand. However, when the Court excluded all of Parker's sales in the after condition, Parker was forced to change his testimony, and, instead of admitting that he could 110t testify to a value in the after condition, he concocted a value which had no scientific basis, was speculative, and was contrary to Appellee's pleadings. Parker's desperate, last-minute attempt to justify an after value can only be described as subjective. At best, Parker's testimony seems to be relying on the testimony of the landowner, Mr. Tortorich, and the real estate broker, Mr. Stribl.ing. However, the record reflects that neither of these witnesses gave an opinion as to the value oftlle property in the after condition, and that the Trial Court was mistaken as to Mr. Tortorich's testimony. Mr. Tortorich merely stated that he could not use the property in the after condition for Appellee's original intended purpose. No value was given by him. [n Hemphill v. Mississippi State Highway Comm'n, 145 So.2d 455 (Miss. 1962). This COUl1 states as follows:,.. it is difficult to conceive of such a thing as property wholly separated from the element of value. Page 8 of 13

13 Further, in Mississippi State Highway Comm'n v. Stou!, 134 So.2d 467 (Miss. 1961), the COllrt, in addressing ajury instrllction, stated as follows: It was error to tell the jury that the land would be of no value to Appellee. He will still OWl] the land even ifhe cannot get to it. There was no proof that it would not have some market value. It cannot be said as a matter of law that lack of access to a tract of land completely destroys its value. Because Parker provided no comparable sales or other market data to support his contention that the property was valueless in the after condition, and because the Court all owed Parker to testify based on the incorrect recollection that Mr. Tortorich had testified as to value of the remaining property, the Trial Court abused its discretion and was clearly erroneous in allowing Parker to testify that Appellee's remaining property was valueless. II. ARGUMENT. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN NOT GRANTING APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL. A. Applicable Law. A Motion for New Trial is a challenge to the weight of the evidence and is reviewed under an abuse of discretion standard. Adcock, 98 1 So.2d at 949 (citing Johnson v. St. Dominic's - Jackson Memorial Hospital, 967 So.2d 20, 23 (Miss. 2007)). A new trial is warranted only if the verdict is contrary to the substantial weight of the evidence. Jd. B. Argument. The substantial weight of tile evidence established just compensation in the amollnt of $826, Appellant's expert appraiser performed a before and after appraisal which met the requirements of Mississippi Rule of Evidence 702 and other applicable law. Appellee's expert appraiser, as set forth above, did not present an opinion that met the requirements of Mississippi Page 9 of 13

14 Rule of Evidence 702. Therefore, the only proper opinion of value that was before the Court was Mr. Null's value of$826, The jury returned a verdict of$i,620,060.66, which is twice the amount of Null 's opinion. Considering that the Appellee only paid $1,353, for the entire propelty in 2006, and also considering that Appellee retained ownershi p to 11.5 acres, the jury verdict is clearly contrary to the substantial weight of the evidence. Therefore, the Court erred in not granting Appellant a New Trial on this matter. III. ARGUMENT. THE TRIAL COURT ERRED IN NOT GRANTING APPELLANT'S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT. A. Applicable Law. A de novo standard of review is applied to a trial court's denial ofajudgment notwithstanding the verdict. Johnson v. St. Dominic's - Jackson Memorial Hospital, 967 So.2d 20, 22 (Miss. 2007). A motion for JNOV is a challenge to the legal sufficiency of the evidence, and this Court will affirm the denial ofa JNOV if there is substantial evidence to support the verdict. Adcock v. Miss. Transp. Comm 'n, 981 So.2d at 947 (Miss. 2008). "Substantial evidence" is information of such quality and weight that reasonable and fair-minded jurors in the exercise of impartial judgment might have reached different conclusions. The evidence is viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict. Adcock at 947. The Trial Court erred in denying Appellant's Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict because there was not substantial evidence to support the verdict. Parker's after value was not based upon market data or any other accepted principle or method; therefore, Parker should not have been allowed to present his opinion of just compensation to the jury. In contrast, Appellant's appraiser did perform a before and after valuation based on comparable sales, which Page 10 of 13

15 properly suppol1ed his opinion of just compensation 0[$826, The jury verdict in this matter was $ 1,620, Since Parker's testimony was erroneously admitted, the verdict was based upon insufficient evidence, lacking the quality and weight necessary to reach an impartial verdict. In fact, the only evidence of val ue that was before the Court in accordance with Mississippi Rule of Evidence 702 was the opinion of Null, and Null's opinion should have been the only value considered by the jury. Because the only substantial evidence as to value was the value being offered by Null, and because the jury verdict was more than twice of Null 's opinion, the Tri al Court erred in not entering a judgment notwithstanding the verdict in the amount of $826, CONCLUSION The Trial Court abused its discretion and was clearly erroneous in allowing the landowner's expert appraiser to testify that the property remaining the after condition was valueless. Similar to the testimony in Pitre, Supra, Parker provided no comparable sales or market data to SUppOJ1 his lack of value in the after condition. Further, Appellee's witnesses did not testify that the property had no value in the after condition, and the Trial Court erred in justifying the a1iowance of Parker's opinion upon this misconstrued testimony. By allowing Parker to testify, the Court a1lowed the jury to consider an opinion of the expert that was unreliable, not based upon sufficient facts or data, and not the product of any principle or method. Based upon the foregoing, Appellant herein would respectfully request that this matter be reversed and a verdict rendered for Appellee in tbe amount of$826,035.00, as testified to by Appellee's expert appraisal witness; or~ alternatively, that this matter be reversed and remanded for a new Lrial requiri ng the expert appraiser for Appellee to testify in accordance with a propcr Page 11 of 13

16 before and after appraisal consistenl with Mississippi Rule of Evidence 702. And if Appe ll ant has prayed for wrong or insufficient relief, Appellant prays for such relief to which it may be entitled. Respectfully submitted this the 4'" day of February, MISSISSIPPI TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION BY: s/christopher M. Howdeshell Its Attorney Page 120f 13

17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Christopher M. Howdeshell, do hereby ce1tify that on thjs day, I electronically filed the foregoing pleading or other paper wilh the Clerk of the Court using MEC System which sent notification of such filing to the following: prepaid to: L isa A. Reppeto, Esq. Jones Walker, LLP Post Office Box 427 Jackson, MS Further I hereby certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service, postage Honorable Michael W. McPhail Forrest County Court Judge Post Office Box 190 Hattiesburg, MS This, the 4th day of February, s/christopher M. Howdeshell Prepared by: Christopher H. Howdeshell MSB #10688 Pittman Law Firm Post Office Drawer Hattiesburg, MS Telephone: (601) Facsimile: (601) Page 13 of 13

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA BROWN LAKELAND PROPERTIES and CHARLES H. BROWN Appellants. RENASANT BANK Appellee

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA BROWN LAKELAND PROPERTIES and CHARLES H. BROWN Appellants. RENASANT BANK Appellee E-Filed Document Aug 30 2017 17:21:30 2016-CA-01448-COA Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CA-01448 BROWN LAKELAND PROPERTIES and CHARLES H. BROWN Appellants v. RENASANT BANK Appellee

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V. CAUSE NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V. CAUSE NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Aug 5 2014 01:08:18 2014-CA-00054-COA Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DENNIS TERRY HUTCHINS APPELLANT V. CAUSE NO. 2014-CA-00054-COA

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA-00598

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA-00598 E-Filed Document Jun 8 2016 13:37:33 2015-CA-00598-SCT Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2015-CA-00598 THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, BY AND THROUGH DELBERT HOSEMANN, IN HIS

More information

E-Filed Document Sep :10: CA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.

E-Filed Document Sep :10: CA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. E-Filed Document Sep 24 2015 10:10:03 2015-CA-00526 Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2015-CA-00526 S&M TRUCKING, LLC APPELLANT VERSUS ROGERS OIL COMPANY OF COLUMBIA,

More information

E-Filed Document Jun :00: CC Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

E-Filed Document Jun :00: CC Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jun 17 2015 16:00:09 2014-CC-01798 Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2014-CC-01798 OVER THE RAINBOW DAYCARE vs. VS. MISSISSIPPI

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jan 8 2016 13:04:43 2014-KA-01838-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ROBERT W. TRIPLETT a/k/a ROBERT WARREN TRIPLETT, JR. a/k/a ROBERT TRIPLETT, JR. a/k/a

More information

V. NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING STANDARD OF REVIEW ARGUMENT

V. NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING STANDARD OF REVIEW ARGUMENT E-Filed Document Oct 27 2015 16:20:26 2013-KA-01758-COA Pages: 5 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DILLARD HARVEY APPELLANT V. NO. 2013-KA-01758-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE MOTION

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2015-CA-00903

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2015-CA-00903 E-Filed Document May 23 2016 10:57:29 2015-CA-00903-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2015-CA-00903 MARKWETZEL APPELLANT VERSUS RICHARD SEARS APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO IA SCT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO IA SCT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2008-IA-01191-SCT SHANNON HOLMES AND STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLANTS VS. LEE MCMILLAN APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF HINDS

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA TODD KUHN and ANGELA T. KUHN BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA TODD KUHN and ANGELA T. KUHN BRIEF OF APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jun 8 2017 11:12:57 2017-CA-00092 Pages: 20 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-CA-00092 CHERYL L. HIGH APPELLANT v. TODD KUHN and ANGELA T. KUHN APPELLEES Appeal from the Harrison

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. Cause No KA KIMBERLY ANN WHITEHEAD, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI. Cause No KA KIMBERLY ANN WHITEHEAD, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee E-Filed Document May 1 2015 11:58:24 2014-KA-00697 Pages: 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI Cause No. 2014-KA-00697 KIMBERLY ANN WHITEHEAD, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee APPEAL FROM

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Feb 2 2018 15:26:36 2017-KA-01455-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LADALE AIROSTEVE HOLLOWAY APPELLANT v. No. 2017-KA-01455-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

llpage IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CA APPELLANT BENNIE E. BRASWELL, JR.

llpage IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CA APPELLANT BENNIE E. BRASWELL, JR. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CA-02000 BENNIE E. BRASWELL, JR. APPELLANT V. BETH STINNETT, D.D.S., INDIVIDUALLY AND D /B/ A FAMILY DENISTRY APPELLEES

More information

COMES NOW Appellant, Douglas Michael Long, Jr. (hereinafter Doug ), by

COMES NOW Appellant, Douglas Michael Long, Jr. (hereinafter Doug ), by E-Filed Document Feb 28 2017 15:47:26 2015-CT-00527-SCT Pages: 7 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI DOUGLAS MICHAEL LONG, JR. APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO.: 2015-CA-00527 DAVID J. VITKAUSKAS APPELLEE PETITION

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Aug 23 2017 16:38:55 2017-KA-00181-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI EDDIE EARL DAVIS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-00181 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jun 1 2015 20:59:33 2013-KA-02110-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NATHANIEL HAMPTON APPELLANT V. NO. 2013-KA-02110-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Dec 22 2016 15:32:53 2016-CA-01085 Pages: 15 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MARLIN BUSINESS BANK vs. STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY AND JOHN D. STEVENS APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 20I6-CA-OI 2016-CA-011085

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI ALBERT ABRAHAM, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2009-CP-01759 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DESOTO COUNTY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT Oral Argument Requested

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KM-1129-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KM-1129-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jun 16 2014 10:52:26 2013-KM-01129-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI D'ANDRE TERRELL APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-KM-1129-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA-00442

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA-00442 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2009-CA-00442 LA V ADA THOMAS APPELLANT VERSUS FIRST FEDERAL BANK FOR SAVINGS APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CASE NO KA HOSAN M. AZOMANI, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CASE NO KA HOSAN M. AZOMANI, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI E-Filed Document Dec 12 2016 13:11:01 2015-CT-00050-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 2015-KA-00050 HOSAN M. AZOMANI, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee PETITION FOR WRIT

More information

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Apr 8 2016 14:20:08 2015-CC-01422 Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY vs. VS. ARDERS

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Sep 30 2016 10:44:44 2016-KA-00422-COA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAIRUS COLLINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-KA-00422 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP STEVEN EASON APPELLANT. On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP STEVEN EASON APPELLANT. On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP-01499 STEVEN EASON APPELLANT vs. CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, ALICIA BOX and RONALD KING APPELLEES On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Jan 13 2014 16:30:11 2013-CA-01004 Pages: 21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA HUDSON VS. LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2013-CA-01004

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SYLVESTER YOUNG, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2009-CP-2026 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Mar 13 2017 09:59:29 2015-CP-01388-COA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DANA EASTERLING APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01388-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA ON APPEAL ApPEAL FROM THE SPECIAL COURT OF EMINENT DOMAIN, DESOTO COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA ON APPEAL ApPEAL FROM THE SPECIAL COURT OF EMINENT DOMAIN, DESOTO COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document May 15 2014 09:38:09 2013-CA-01161 Pages: 26 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2013-CA-01161 LAVON W. COLEMAN APPELLANT v. MISSISSIPPI TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION APPELLEE ON

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED

ORAL ARGUMENT IS NOT REQUESTED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIAN ROBISON, et al APPELLANTS VS. NO. 2009-CA-00383 ENTERPRISE RENT -A-CAR COMPANY APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISsOE) PY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT LISA L.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISsOE) PY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT LISA L. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISsOE) PY SHAUN DERRELL SPRATT APPELLANT VS. NO.2007-CA-0791-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM

More information

v. No CA SCT DOROTHY L. BARNETT, et al. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY NO CIV ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

v. No CA SCT DOROTHY L. BARNETT, et al. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY NO CIV ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED E-Filed Document May 30 2017 17:35:20 2013-CT-01296-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI VALLEY SILICA COMPANY, INC. APPELLANT v. No. 2013-CA-01296-SCT DOROTHY L.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jul 29 2016 14:31:24 2014-CT-00615-SCT Pages: 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CT-00615-SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE SUPPLEMENTAL

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI 2014-CA BRIEF OF APPELLANT GORDON KLEYLE ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI 2014-CA BRIEF OF APPELLANT GORDON KLEYLE ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Jun 16 2015 22:15:54 2014-CA-01673 Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI 2014-CA-01673 GORDON KLEYLE APPELLANT/PLAINTIFF vs. MYRNA DEOGRACIAS & PHILIP DEOGRACIAS, Individually

More information

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT NO EC ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT NO EC ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT ANDREW THOMPSON, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2007-EC-01989 CHARLES LEWIS JONES APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL

More information

E-Filed Document Dec :19: CA Pages: 17

E-Filed Document Dec :19: CA Pages: 17 E-Filed Document Dec 1 2017 18:19:55 2016-CA-01082 Pages: 17 IN THE MISSISSIPPI, SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 2016-CA-01082 TONY L. AND LINDA SMITH APPELLANTS VS. JOHN HENDON, UNION PLANTERS BANK, NA FIRST AMERICAN

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Apr 1 2015 20:02:54 2014-KA-00588-COA Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-KA-00588-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

THE CONDEMNEE S PERSPECTIVE OF DIRECTED VERDICT, MOTIONS FOR MISTRIAL,

THE CONDEMNEE S PERSPECTIVE OF DIRECTED VERDICT, MOTIONS FOR MISTRIAL, THE CONDEMNEE S PERSPECTIVE OF DIRECTED VERDICT, MOTIONS FOR MISTRIAL, AND JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT IN ACTIONS FOR CONDEMNATION by Brandon L. Bowen Sarah MacKimm Jenkins & Bowen, P.C. 15 South

More information

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jul 10 2017 16:56:22 2016-KA-01527-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RODISE JENKINS APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01527-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE REPLY

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Nov 14 2017 13:53:28 2017-KA-00436-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JULIUS BENDER APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-00436-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Dec 28 2015 17:29:25 2014-KA-00664-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES JOHNSON APPELLANT V. 2014-KA-00664-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE MOTION FOR

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Nov 2 2015 18:30:21 2015-KA-00898-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GREGORY LORENZO PRITCHETT APPELLANT V. NO. 2015-KA-00898-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

F DD JUL CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Case No

F DD JUL CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Case No. 2007-1141 NANCY ROUDEBUSH WHITNEY AND THOMAS R. ROUDEBUSH, etal. Appellants vs. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO Appellee MEMORANDUM OF APPELLEE BOARD

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Feb 27 2017 15:41:09 2016-CA-01033-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL ISHEE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-CA-01033-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CC-002S8 c;oii-~ TERRY H. LOGAN, SR. AND BEVERLY W. LOGAN CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CC-002S8 c;oii-~ TERRY H. LOGAN, SR. AND BEVERLY W. LOGAN CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2013-CC-002S8 c;oii-~ TERRY H. LOGAN, SR. AND BEVERLY W. LOGAN 1PELLANTS V. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND MISSISSIPPI TRANSPORT A TION COMMISSION

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 14 2015 11:36:28 2014-KA-01327-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MAURICE TOWNSEND APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-01327-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CA-OI040

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CA-OI040 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CA-OI040 SHEILA DANETTE WELLS APPELLANT VS. FRANK PRICE and PHIL PRICE d/b/a PRICE CONSTRUCTIOCOMPANY CANTON SHEET METAL AND ROOFING APPELLEES

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA COA VICTOR BYAS AND MARY BYAS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA COA VICTOR BYAS AND MARY BYAS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES E-Filed Document Feb 24 2017 16:23:57 2015-CA-00749-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA-00749-COA IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF VIVIAN BYAS, DECEASED VICTOR BYAS

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DBA MID-SOUTH FORESTRY; MID-SOUTH FORESTRY, INC.; AUG RICHARD CHISM, INDIVIDUALLY AND

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DBA MID-SOUTH FORESTRY; MID-SOUTH FORESTRY, INC.; AUG RICHARD CHISM, INDIVIDUALLY AND COpy IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GLEN D. JACKSON APPELLANT v. NO. 2oo8-CA-00376 CHARLES CARTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS CAPACITY AS A REGISTERED FORESTER AND FILED DBA MID-SOUTH FORESTRY;

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-CP-1182-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP-01387 HARRISON LEWIS, JR. APPELLANT VS. AZHARPASHA APELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT E-Filed Document Dec 2 2016 16:11:11 2016-CA-00678 Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CA-00678 CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT VS BEN ALLEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 22 2015 12:14:02 2015-CP-00008-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY HOLTON APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00008 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

NO KA COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE.

NO KA COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE. E-Filed Document May 29 2015 11:28:47 2013-KA-02000-COA Pages: 11 NO. 2013-KA-02000-COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE. ON APPEAL

More information

(oae SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2012-CA-748 VERSUS

(oae SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2012-CA-748 VERSUS SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI (oae RANDOLPH MAY, ET AL. VERSUS ADIRONDACK TIMBER I, LLC APPELLANTS NO.2012-CA-748 APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF PIKE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI SITTING IN THE SPECIAL

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Aug 28 2015 11:05:44 2014-KA-01230-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TIMMY DAVIS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-01230 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

THE CONDEMNOR S PERSPECTIVE OF DIRECTED VERDICT, MOTIONS FOR MISTRIAL,

THE CONDEMNOR S PERSPECTIVE OF DIRECTED VERDICT, MOTIONS FOR MISTRIAL, THE CONDEMNOR S PERSPECTIVE OF DIRECTED VERDICT, MOTIONS FOR MISTRIAL, AND JUDGMENT NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT IN ACTIONS FOR CONDEMNATION by C. Bradford Sears, Jr. Sanders, Haugen & Sears, P.C. 11 Perry

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO: 2009-CA AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC. APPELLEE'S BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO: 2009-CA AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC. APPELLEE'S BRIEF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI PHILVESTER AND JOYCE WILLIAMS VS. AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC. APPELLANTS CAUSE NO: 2009-CA-01107 APPELLEE APPELLEE'S BRIEF James D. Bell, MSB #..., BELL & ASSOCIATES,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. v. NO CA COA R.M. SMITH INVESTMENTS, L.P.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. v. NO CA COA R.M. SMITH INVESTMENTS, L.P. E-Filed Document Jan 13 2016 21:53:42 2015-CA-00199-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PEARLIE WRIGHT APPELLANT v. NO. 2015-CA-00199-COA R.M. SMITH INVESTMENTS, L.P. APPELLEE

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document May 11 2017 16:34:51 2016-KA-01329-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI GEROME MOORE APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01329-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document May 5 2014 14:44:19 2013-KA-02048-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CLARENCE DWAYNE JEFFERSON APPELLANT V. NO. 2013-KA-02048-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TUNICA COUNTY Cause No BRIEF OF APPELLEE ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 11TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TUNICA COUNTY Cause No BRIEF OF APPELLEE ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VS. ONE 1970 MERCURY COUGAR, YIN # OF9111545940 ONE 1992 FORD MUSTANG, YIN #FACP44E4NF173360 ONE FORD MUSTANG $355.00 U.S. CURRENCY AND WILLIE HAMPTON

More information

Cite as 2019 Ark. 95 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS

Cite as 2019 Ark. 95 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS Cite as 2019 Ark. 95 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-18-47 Opinion Delivered: April 11, 2019 KW-DW PROPERTIES, LLC; DEBRA A. LANG, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS WHITE COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR; SUE LILES, IN

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document May 22 2017 21:22:44 2016-KA-01351-COA Pages: 16 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES LEE BRENT APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01351-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

APPELLEES MOTION FOR REHEARING

APPELLEES MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Jun 21 2016 15:53:08 2014-CA-01613-COA Pages: 20 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CA-01613 TERRY E. HARRIS vs. EDDIE MICHAEL, JR.,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Nov 2 2015 07:21:41 2014-KA-01098-COA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2014-KA-01098-COA SHERMAN BILLIE, SR. APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Dec 1 2014 16:28:06 2013-KA-01785-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TREVOR HOSKINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-KA-01785-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Sep 21 2016 16:19:34 2016-KA-00260-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMIE ROSEBUR APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-KA-00260-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

E-Filed Document May :25: CA Pages: 18. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006

E-Filed Document May :25: CA Pages: 18. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006 E-Filed Document May 12 2014 14:25:52 2013-CA-01006 Pages: 18 2013-CA-01006 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006 C.H. MILES APPELLANT V. BRENDA C. MILES APPELLEE APPELLEE

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Nov 12 2014 12:40:07 2014-KA-00266-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STEWART CHASE VAUGHN APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-KA-0266-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

PETITION FOR REHEARING

PETITION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Mar 6 2018 19:55:11 2016-KA-00932-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-KA-00932-COA JACARRUS ANTYONE PICKETT APPELLANT V. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Mar 2 2018 13:44:46 2017-KA-00853-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHN WARE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-00853 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Apr 28 2015 16:28:45 2014-KA-01783-COA Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ANDREW GRAHAM APPELLANT v. No. 2014-KA-1783-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Apr 6 2016 16:21:36 2014-KA-01520-COA Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI KENNY STEWART APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-KA-01520-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Oct 13 2015 14:04:25 2013-CP-02023-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURTNEY ELKINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-02023-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THE ESTATE OF ELSIE LUSTER THROUGH ITS ADMINISTRATOR, LARRY GUSMAN VERSUS MARDI GRAS CASINO CORP. APPELLANT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI r;~~' ~\~/~I,,I - "-- MAURICE GRAY APPELLANT FILED VS. FEB 252008 NO.2007-CA-0160-COA OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

More information

V. CASE NO CA-00669

V. CASE NO CA-00669 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES DAVID BRYANT, JR. APPELLANT V. CASE NO. 2011-CA-00669 PAMELA RENE SMITH BRYANT APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM THE CHANCERY COURT OF LAWRENCE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO IA-1414-SCT CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO IA SCT BRIEF OF APPELLANTS (NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO IA-1414-SCT CONSOLIDATED WITH CASE NO IA SCT BRIEF OF APPELLANTS (NO. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI ONNAM BILOXI, LLC VERSUS RAS FAMILY PARTNERS, LP and RAY S. SIMS RAS FAMILY PARTNERS, LP and RAY A. SIMS VERSUS ONNAM BILOXI, LLC CONSOLIDATED WITH APPELLANTDEFENDANT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. NO CA-Ol CA APPELLEE'S BRIEF

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. NO CA-Ol CA APPELLEE'S BRIEF E-Filed Document Feb 2 2017 11:57:54 2016-CA-01131 Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2016-CA-Ol131 2016-CA-01131 JONATHAN GRIFFITH vs. VS. MERLENE WALL APPELLANT APPELLEE

More information

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF BRIEF OF APPELLEE/CROSS APPELLANT H&E EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC. ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

REPLY IN SUPPORT OF BRIEF OF APPELLEE/CROSS APPELLANT H&E EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC. ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Aug 17 2016 15:50:02 2015-CA-01412-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2015-CA-01412 20IS-CA-01412 BAR-TIL, BAR-TTL, INC., Appellant/Cross-Appellee

More information

IN THE. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2011-CA AND MISSISSIPPI STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD, ET AL

IN THE. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2011-CA AND MISSISSIPPI STATE OIL AND GAS BOARD, ET AL ~L-rP-r IN THE. SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JONES COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AND MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, ET AL VERSUS APPELLANTS NO.2011-CA-00712 AND MISSISSIPPI STATE OIL AND GAS

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NUMBER 2015-KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NUMBER 2015-KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR APPELLANT E-Filed Document Mar 22 2016 11:54:28 2015-KA-00623-COA Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NUMBER 2015-KA-00623 DENNIS THOMPSON APPELLANT V. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Aug 21 2014 17:48:58 2014-KA-00188-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JEFFREY ALLEN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-00188-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

E-Filed Document Jun :06: KA COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY

E-Filed Document Jun :06: KA COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY E-Filed Document Jun 21 2017 11:06:32 2016-KA-01267-COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI HUNTER LANE SARRETT vs. VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT NO. 2016-TS-01267-COA APPELLEE APPELLANT'S

More information

CAUSE NO CA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI REBUILD AMERICA, INC. ROBERT McGEE, MATTIE McGee, ET. AL.

CAUSE NO CA IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI REBUILD AMERICA, INC. ROBERT McGEE, MATTIE McGee, ET. AL. CAUSE NO. 2009-CA-01188 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI REBUILD AMERICA, INC. Appellant v. ROBERT McGEE, MATTIE McGee, ET. AL. Appellee BRIEF OF APPELLEE Jeffrey D. Rawlings (MSB Jon J. Mims (MSB Rawlings

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2010-CA-OI624-COA BRIEF OF APPELLEES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2010-CA-OI624-COA BRIEF OF APPELLEES /' ~ ~'. '\.. ' ' IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2010-CA-OI624-COA FILE':';, MAY 262011 om.. af the Clerk 8up... COurt Courto'~I. MATT BROWN & HOLLI BROWN

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. E-Filed Document Aug 18 2017 15:49:36 2016-CP-01539 Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CP-01539 BRENT RYAN PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT v. LOWNDES COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER, ET AL.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CHARLES GREEN, Appellant Versus MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and Christopher Epps, Commissioner, James M. Holman Superintendent, and Chandra Berryman, Legal

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CHRISTOPHER THOMAS LEWIS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CHRISTOPHER THOMAS LEWIS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CHRISTOPHER THOMAS LEWIS APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-KA-1l19-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Feb 26 2015 11:04:08 2014-CP-00755-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ROY DALE WALLACE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI EMMA WOMACK, ET AL.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI EMMA WOMACK, ET AL. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CIlY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI VS. APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2oo8-TS-01997 EMMA WOMACK, ET AL. APPELLEE On Appeal From The Circuit Court of Hinds County, Mississippi Cause Number351-98-816CIV

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0239-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0239-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Apr 22 2014 15:58:43 2013-CP-00239-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SHELBY RAY PARHAM APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-0239-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2007-KA COA VERSUS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2007-KA COA VERSUS CO,d""'Y.. ~.,"", 6',,s IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2007-KA-00236-COA FILED BOBBY L. TRAVIS MAR a 6 2008 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT APPELLANT COURT OF APPEALS VERSUS STATE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 6 2016 12:52:15 2015-CP-01248-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL BRIAN BALLE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01248-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-CA CITY OF WATER VALLEY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-CA CITY OF WATER VALLEY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jun 23 2016 20:34:03 2015-CA-01808 Pages: 14 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ARLENE CAROTHERS APPELLANT VS. CITY OF WATER VALLEY, MISSISSIPPI 2015-CA-01808 APPELLEES BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VIJAY PATEL INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR AND WRONGFUL DEATH HEIR OF NATWAREL PATEL

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VIJAY PATEL INDIVIDUALLY AND AS ADMINISTRATOR AND WRONGFUL DEATH HEIR OF NATWAREL PATEL E-Filed Document Aug 24 2015 15:39:23 2015-CA-00371 Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VIJAY PATEL INDIVIDUALLY PLAINTIFFS AND AS ADMINISTRATOR AND WRONGFUL DEATH HEIR OF NATWAREL

More information

BRIEF OF APPELLEE BEFORE THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BELL SOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. VS. LARRY B.

BRIEF OF APPELLEE BEFORE THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BELL SOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. VS. LARRY B. BEFORE THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BELL SOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. A SELF-INSURER APPELLANT VS. LARRY B. HARRIS APPELLEE CAUSE NO. 2012-WC-01975-COA APPEAL FROM ORDER OF WORKERS'

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA-00121

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA-00121 ~ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2008-CA-00121 REBUILD AMERICA, INC. APPELLANT VERSES ROBERT K. MILNER AND WIFE, PATRICIA K. MILNER AND W ACHOVIA BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO FIRST

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jun 14 2017 16:56:06 2016-KA-01711-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NATHANIEL MCKEITHAN APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01711-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Oct 21 2014 07:12:28 2013-KA-02103-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DARRELL ROSS BROOKS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-KA-02103 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information