UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
|
|
- Lewis Newton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 HATTON, PETRIE & STACKLER APC Attorneys at Law 0 Birch Street, Suite 00 Newport Beach, CA 0 Telephone: ( - GREGORY M. HATTON, CAL. BAR NO. 0 ARTHUR R. PETRIE, II, CAL. BAR NO. Attorneys for Defendant NATIONAL PYGMY GOAT ASSOCIATION DEBRA HOSLEY, et al., etc. vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, NATIONAL PYGMY GOAT ASSOCIATION, Defendant. - - No. -CV-00-H-BLM REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED (FRCP (b( Case No. -CV-000-H-BLM
2 Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION... II. DISCUSSION... A. PLAINTIFFS RELIANCE ON ABRAHAM IS MISPLACED... B. AS A MATTER OF LAW, THE NPGA DID NOT CONSPIRE WITH ANYONE... C. NPGA IS A CORPORATION, AND PLAINTIFFS HAVE THE BURDEN OF PROVING FACTS SUFFICIENT TO OVERCOME THE BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE.... D. NPGA DOES NOT COMPETE WITH PLAINTIFFS, SO THEY LACK STANDING TO BRING ANTITRUST CLAIMS... E. PLAINTIFFS ADMIT THEY HAVE NO FACTS SUPPORTING THEIR CLAIMS TO INTERFERENCE WITH PROSPECTIVE ECONOMIC ADVANTAGE... 0 III. CONCLUSION Case No. -CV-000-H-BLM
3 Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases Abraham & Veneklasen Joint Venture v. American Quarter Horse Association (N.D. Tex. May, 0 0 WL 0..., Eldridge v. Tymshare, Inc. ( Cal.App.d... Fornaseri v. Cosmosart Realty & Bldg. Corp. ( Cal.App.... Hatley v. American Quarter Horse Association (th Cir. F.d..., Jack Russell Terrier Network of North. Cal. v. American Kennel Club, Inc. (th Cir F.d 0..., Jessup v. The American Kennel Club, Inc. (S.D.N.Y. F.Supp.d...,,, Other Authorities Corley & O Neal, Federal Pleading Standards and the business judgment rule after Twombly and Iqbal (00 vol., No., J. Sec. Law, Reg. & Comp., p. 0..., - - Case No. -CV-000-H-BLM
4 Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 I. INTRODUCTION Relying principally on an inapt case and foggy representations as to factual allegations, which can be found nowhere in their complaint plaintiffs argue: ( As a matter of law, the NPGA is a conspiracy of its members (Opp :-; ( This court cannot concern itself with the so-called rule of reason in evaluating a motion to dismiss under Rule (b( (Opp :-0; ( NPGA is not a corporation and so cannot claim protection of the Business Judgment Rule and, further, any discussion of the Rule must await summary judgment (:-:; ( Plaintiff s have standing because they compete with the NPGA in the breeding, registration, and sale of pygmy goats (Opp :-; ( Plaintiff s claims for Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage should survive, despite a lack of supporting facts in the complaint, because Plaintiffs will show specific incidents where they were harmed. (Opp :. None of plaintiffs arguments are availing. The motion should be granted and the case dismissed. II. DISCUSSION A. Plaintiffs Reliance on Abraham is Misplaced Plaintiffs tent-pole case Abraham & Veneklasen Joint Venture v. American Quarter Horse Association (N.D. Tex. May, 0 0 WL 0 lets them down. It has nothing to do with the issues posed by this motion. - - Case No. -CV-000-H-BLM
5 Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Abraham focuses on a rule related to the technological process of producing horses, whose physical characteristics are indistinguishable from some of the breed s champions. (Id. at *. But herein, plaintiffs challenge a rule barring registration of individual goats who subjectively do not meet the NPGA breed standard. This case is far from Abraham (a trial court summary judgment decision, which is currently stayed on appeal and very similar to Hatley v. American Quarter Horse Association (th Cir. F.d (a case that remains good law, a case cited in our motion. In Abraham plaintiffs challenged an AQHA rule barring registration of clones, or their offspring. This case raises the question of whether a dominant horse breed registry violates antitrust law by refusing to register clones of registered horses. A clone is an identical genetic twin of its one parent. (Id. at *. Abraham therefore dealt with a rule against a technological process of producing identical copies of horses, which were already recognized as exemplars of the breed. Nowhere in the complaint do plaintiffs allege they want to produce clones of conforming goats. By contrast, the challenged rule here is directed at maintaining the gene pool of registered pygmy goats by denying registration and related benefits, on a subjective basis, to non-conforming goats. The Abraham court expressly recognized the distinction: Reproductive limitations do not on their face promote a clearly defined breed like many physical limitations do. Certainly, a line must be drawn somewhere to distinguish between a traditionally non-white breed and others. Yet where a breed is already physically and genealogically defined, there may be few If Hatley and Abraham weren t factually disparate, the Abraham court would have been obliged to follow Hatley. Plaintiffs don t even try to distinguish Hatley. - - Case No. -CV-000-H-BLM
6 Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 justifiable reasons to exclude animals that fit these parameters so perfectly that they are indistinguishable from some of the breed s champions. (Id. at *. As in Hatley, Jessup v. The American Kennel Club, Inc. (S.D.N.Y. F.Supp.d, and Jack Russell Terrier Network of North. Cal. v. American Kennel Club, Inc. (th Cir F.d 0, 0, not every philosophical disagreement between groups of well-intentioned people dedicated to a breed gives rise to an antitrust case. B. As a matter of law, the NPGA did not conspire with anyone The complaint establishes that proponents and opponents of amending the breeding standard battled over the issue for several years. During that time each provided the NPGA board with voluminous information. Ultimately, the board adopted a new standard. This open, obvious philosophical dispute between members holding different opinions as to what is, and what is not, a conforming pygmy goat, is a part of NPGA s mission, and no conspiracy. (Jack Russell, supra, 0 F.d at pp The fact that the NPGA board ultimately sided with plaintiffs opponents does not mean the NPGA unlawfully conspired with those opponents. As noted in Hatley the definition of the breed is an inquiry the organization ought to be able to pursue. (Hatley, supra, F.d at -. Jack Russell was a (b( case. - - Case No. -CV-000-H-BLM
7 Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Jessup, supra, F.Supp.d, a summary judgment case, dealt with similar facts. The Jessup plaintiffs were owners and breeders of purebred Labrador Retrievers, mostly bred from English bloodlines. Plaintiffs claimed: [R]ival breeders and sellers of Labs conspired to cause one defendant, the Labrador Retriever Club ( LRC, to recommend, and the other defendant, the American Kennel Club ( AKC, to adopt, a new rule concerning breed standards for AKC-registered, purebred Championship Stock Labrador Retrievers ( Champion Labs. The new breed standard requires Labs to be of a certain height in order to compete in AKC dog shows for the title of Champion Lab. The attainment of that title increases the market value of a purebred Lab. Plaintiffs allege that the new rule operates to exclude from the market for Champion Labs a large number of the dogs that plaintiffs breed from English bloodlines, but includes in the market the narrower and taller Labs more recently developed in the United States that are bred and sold by plaintiffs competitors. (Id. at p.. At the time the AKC registered breeds of purebred dogs. The majority of these had parent clubs that assumed primary responsibility for promoting and advancing each club s particular breed. The LRC is such a parent club Back in the AKC approved a breed standard for Labs, which included the following: Height at Shoulders Dogs ½ inches to ½ inches; bitches ½ inches to ½ inches. (Id. at p. There was no indication, however, whether this was a recommendation or a requirement. - - Case No. -CV-000-H-BLM
8 Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 As a practical matter, from to height was considered only one among many attributes for judges to consider. Dogs like those belonging to plaintiffs, which fell below the height standard, were able to place and even win in dog show competitions based on superior quality in other facets of the breed standard. (Id. at p.. In the AKC began revising all breed standards to a standardized format. In August the LRC submitted to the AKC directors a proposed, revised breed standard. It proposed changes not relevant to the Jessup decision. It retained the height specifications, but again with no guidance as to whether they were mandatory. Following multiple letters in opposition to the proposed changes, the AKC returned the proposal to the LRC for further consideration. In January, the LRC submitted a second proposed revised standard to the AKC board of directors. It retained the height specifications stated in the standard, but now provided these were mandatory. Specifically, it provided that any deviation from the height specification would constitute a disqualifying fault. (Id. at p.. After multiple letters protesting the changes, the LRC further amended its submission to limit its application to dogs over months of age, and further that dogs within ½ inch of the standard would not be disqualified on the basis of height. Before the AKC board could vote on the LRC s revised proposal counsel for plaintiffs wrote a letter threatening legal action. Nevertheless the AKC went ahead and adopted the new standards, including the mandatory height specifications as amended. (Id. at p Case No. -CV-000-H-BLM
9 Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Plaintiffs sued, complaining their dogs no longer complied with AKC standards: Plaintiffs contend that the new height requirement does not properly establish the height standard of the Labrador Retriever breed, precisely because the shorter Labs bred and owned by plaintiffs from English bloodlines do not grow to that size. (Id. at p.. The Jessup court noted plaintiffs lack of direct evidence of any express agreement between AKC and LRC to restrain or monopolize trade. In such a context, if defendants can demonstrate they had no rational motive to participate in an anti-competitive conspiracy, and that the conduct at issue is consistent with permissible activity under the antitrust laws, such conduct does not give rise to an inference of conspiracy unless plaintiffs come forward with evidence that tends to exclude permissible explanations for the conduct. (Id. at p.. The Jessup court found plaintiffs failed to produce evidence doing so: Defendants are not-for-profit corporations that exist for the purpose of maintaining definitive and uniform breed standards for purebred dogs. The LRC deals strictly with purebred Labs, while the AKC deals with all varieties of purebred dogs including Labs. As such, the AKC and LRC are not competitors in the alleged market for Champion Labs, and plaintiffs have expressly admitted that the LRC and AKC's economic interests, if anything, would favor more not less competition among breeders, which would lead to greater revenues from registration and entry fees at the various dog shows. Defendants therefore have no inherent economic motive to participate in an anti-competitive conspiracy with plaintiffs' competitors. (Id. Setting breed standards was a legitimate and necessary function of the LRC and the AKC, and it remains so for NPGA herein. Without some definitive breed standard set by the LRC and AKC, there could not be competition among Lab owners and breeders because there would be no uniform standard against which to measure the relative quality of Labrador Retrievers. - - Case No. -CV-000-H-BLM
10 Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0// Page 0 of 0 0. Moreover, any standards inevitably provide competitive advantages to dogs that meet the standards and corresponding disadvantages to dogs that do not meet the standards. (Id. at pp. -, original emphasis. Similarly, here, without standards there could be no competition among breeders of pygmy goats. And plaintiffs admit, indeed they argue, that by cutting the pool of potential registrants, the NPGA action hurts itself financially. (Opp. :-. Why would it conspire to do that? Defendant does not today enjoy the benefit of burden shifting attendant a motion for summary judgment, but it is revealing that plaintiff is unable to plead facts demonstrating the board s actions are unprotected by the Business Judgment Rule? The NPGA s adoption of the rule was the product of a protracted, public, deliberative process. As discussed below, plaintiffs must plead facts demonstrating a plausible claim for relief, including facts overcoming the presumptions of the Business Judgment Rule. (Corley & O Neal, Federal Pleading Standards and the business judgment rule after Twombly and Iqbal (00 vol., No., J. Sec. Law, Reg. & Comp., p. 0 ( Federal Pleading. Plaintiff claims defendant is not a corporation, and so its board s judgment is not so protected. This is false. Attached as Exhibit is a printout from the Washington Secretary of State showing NPGA is a Washington non-profit corporation. Defendant requests judicial notice of its status. (FRE 0(b. - - Case No. -CV-000-H-BLM
11 Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 C. NPGA is a corporation, and plaintiffs have the burden of proving facts sufficient to overcome the Business Judgment Rule. As noted in footnote, and demonstrated in Exhibit, the NPGA is a corporation. (Even were it not, its lack of traditional corporate structure would be no barrier to traditional analysis of board action. (Jack Russell, supra, 0 F.d at p. 0, fn.. Setting and maintaining breed standards is squarely within the NPGA s mission. (Comp. 0 Courts impose stricter pleading requirements in cases attacking board action that is admittedly within the scope of its authority. General charges of fraud, conspiracy, and bad faith on the part of the corporate directors are insufficient in the absence of allegations of specific facts adequate to show the basis for the general charges. Plaintiffs must demonstrate some reasonable possibility of success. (Eldridge v. Tymshare, Inc. ( Cal.App.d, ; cf Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly (00 0 US,, Ashcroft v. Iqbal (00 US, -. The complaint must plead specific acts or conduct on the part of the directors that could be said to constitute fraudulent or dishonest acts or gross abuse of their authority or discretion with respect to the corporation. (Eldridge, supra, Cal.App.d at. To warrant interference by this court in favor of plaintiffs a case must be made out which plainly shows that an action is so far opposed to the true interests of the corporation itself as to lead to the clear inference that no one so acting could have been influenced by any honest desire to secure such interest, but that he or she must have acted with an intent to serve some outside purpose, regardless of the consequences to the corporation. (Fornaseri v. Cosmosart Realty & Bldg. Corp. ( Cal.App.,, citations omitted. - - Case No. -CV-000-H-BLM
12 Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 The business judgment rule precludes courts from reviewing the conduct of corporate directors and officers unless a plaintiff first overcomes the presumptions that such actions were taken on an informed basis, in good faith, and in the honest belief their actions were taken in the best interests of the company. It is impossible to determine whether, as required by Twombly and Iqbal, there is a reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged without considering whether those presumptions may be rebutted under the facts alleged in the complaint. If there are no well-pleaded facts to rebut the presumptions of the business judgment rule, there can be no plausible claim for liability. (Corley et al., Federal Pleading, supra, J. Sec. Law, Reg. & Comp. at p.. D. NPGA does not compete with plaintiffs, so they lack standing to bring antitrust claims Plaintiffs blandly assert that Plaintiffs and Defendants are obviously competitors in that they both breed, register and compete in the target pygmy goat market. (Opp :-. Maybe plaintiffs here refer to the Doe defendants. They cannot be talking about the NPGA. Plaintiffs complaint alleges that NPGA registers pygmy goats, and that plaintiffs breed and sell them. Their complaint is that the NPGA has adopted a rule precluding registration of their goats, affecting the profitability of breeding and selling them. This does not make NPGA and plaintiffs competitors. - - Case No. -CV-000-H-BLM
13 Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 E. Plaintiffs admit they have no facts supporting their claims to Interference with Prospective Economic Advantage In the motion, NPGA pointed out the plaintiffs had pled only a hypothetical claim based on future relationships foregone by as-yet unidentified buyers, who would refuse to buy as-yet unborn goats. (Mot. :-. This is not enough. And plaintiffs know it. Hoping to avoid dismissal, they argue, if allowed to survive, they will show specific incidents where they have had to refund money for goats sold that cannot now be registered. (Opp. : :. III. CONCLUSION Plaintiffs refer, obviously without citation, to facts pled in the complaint, which a searching examination of the complaint cannot find. And plaintiffs boldly state principles of law without any supporting authority. The NPGA did not and could not conspire with its board members to commit an anti-trust violation. The NPGA was in the middle of a dispute between factions of its members: Plaintiffs who wanted to continue breeding Grey/Brown Agoutis and proponents of amending the breed standard to stop the practice. The dispute had to end somehow plaintiffs are simply unhappy to be on the wrong side of the NPGA s decision. Dated: April, 0 HATTON, PETRIE & STACKLER By: /S/ Arthur R. Petrie, II Attorneys for Defendant NATIONAL PYGMY GOAT ASSOCIATION Case No. -CV-000-H-BLM
14 Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0// Page of
15 Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 PROOF OF SERVICE USDC, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I am employed in the County of Orange, State of California. I am over the age of and not a party to the within action; my business address is 0 Birch Street, Suite 00, Newport Beach, CA 0 On the date indicated below, I served the foregoing document described as REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM UPON WHICH RELIEF CAN BE GRANTED (FRCP (b( on interested parties in this action by placing a true and correct copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope addressed as follows: [X] SEE ATTACHED SERVICE LIST ELECTRONICALLY through the Courts CM/ECF System [X] (FEDERAL: I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this court at whose direction the service was made. I declare that the information herein is true and correct under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States. Executed on April, 0, at Newport Beach, California. /s/ Arthur R. Petrie, II 0 -- PROOF OF SERVICE
16 Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0// Page of SERVICE LIST 0 0 Edward W. Burns BURNS, SCHALDENBRAND, RODIGUEZ Sportfisher Drive, Suite 0 Oceanside, CA 0 Tel: 0-- Fax: 0-- ewburns@bsrlawyers.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs: Debra Hosley; Amber Waves; Donna Elkins; Proverbial Pygmies; Barbara Crane; Critter Craze Ranch; Mike Heim; Citrus Lane Pygmies; Rhonda Moore; # Moore Kidd; Chelsea Bates; Picture Perfect Pygmies -- PROOF OF SERVICE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 BURNS, SCHALDENBRAND, RODRIQUEZ Cynthia B. Schaldenbrand, Esq. (SBN 00 Edward W. Burns, Esq. (SBN 0 Sportfisher Drive, Suite 0 Oceanside, California 0
More informationCase 3:14-cv H-BLM Document 1 Filed 02/07/14 Page 1 of 23
Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 BURNS, SCHALDENBRAND, RODRIQUEZ Edward W. Burns, Esq. (SBN Sportfisher Drive, Suite Oceanside, California Telephone: (0 - Facsimile: (0 - ewburns@bsrlawyers.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,
Case :-cv-000-h-blm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 0 DEBRA HOSLEY, et al., vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, NATIONAL PYGMY GOAT ASSOCIATION; and DOES TO 0,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division -
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - Alexandria Division - IN RE: BLACKWATER ALIEN TORT CLAIMS ACT LITIGATION Case No. 1:09-cv-615 Case No. 1:09-cv-616 Case No. 1:09-cv-617
More informationZervos v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Dist. Court, D. Maryland In Re: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 10)
Zervos v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Dist. Court, D. Maryland 2012 MEMORANDUM JAMES K. BREDAR, District Judge. CHRISTINE ZERVOS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Defendant. Civil No. 1:11-cv-03757-JKB.
More informationCase 1:14-cv WYD-MEH Document 26 Filed 07/17/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:14-cv-00262-WYD-MEH Document 26 Filed 07/17/14 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6 Civil Action No. 14 cv 00262-WYD-MEH MALIBU MEDIA, L.L.C., v. Plaintiff, RICHARD SADOWSKI, Defendant. IN THE UNITED STATES
More informationCase 1:12-cv ABJ Document 14 Filed 06/19/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:12-cv-01369-ABJ Document 14 Filed 06/19/13 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DELONTE EMILIANO TRAZELL Plaintiff, vs. ROBERT G. WILMERS, et al. Defendants.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Case :0-cv-000-KJD-LRL Document Filed 0//0 Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 0 THE CUPCAKERY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ANDREA BALLUS, et al., Defendants. Case No. :0-CV-00-KJD-LRL ORDER
More informationCase 2:11-cv DDP-MRW Document 23 Filed 02/19/13 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:110 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-ddp-mrw Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #:0 O NO JS- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 JULIE ZEMAN, on behalf of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. Plaintiff, USC
More informationindependent software developers. Instead, Plaintiffs attempt to plead that they are aggrieved direct
In re Apple iphone Antitrust Litigation Doc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 IN RE APPLE IPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION Case No.: -cv-0-ygr ORDER GRANTING APPLE S MOTION TO
More informationCase: 3:11-cv wmc Document #: 82 Filed: 06/20/12 Page 1 of 12
Case: 3:11-cv-00001-wmc Document #: 82 Filed: 06/20/12 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN BASHIR SHEIKH, M.D., v. Plaintiff, GRANT REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER,
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 9 Filed: 04/11/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:218
Case: 1:13-cv-01569 Document #: 9 Filed: 04/11/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:218 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION PAUL DUFFY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. )
More informationCase 2:18-cv KJD-CWH Document 7 Filed 12/26/18 Page 1 of 7
Case :-cv-0-kjd-cwh Document Filed // Page of 0 MICHAEL R. BROOKS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 HUNTER S. DAVIDSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 KOLESAR & LEATHAM 00 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 DEWAYNE JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. MONSANTO COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Case No. -cv-0-mmc ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND; VACATING
More informationSTATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF CHARLESTON ) NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS COUNTY OF CHARLESTON ) NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT ) Peter T. Phillips, ) Civil Action No. 15-CP-10- ) Plaintiff ) vs. ) COMPLAINT ) (Jury Trial Requested)
More informationCase 3:10-cv L Document 22 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID 101 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Case 3:10-cv-00546-L Document 22 Filed 08/19/10 Page 1 of 9 PageID 101 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MICHAEL RIDDLE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:10-CV-0546-L
More informationCase 1:13-cv RHB Doc #14 Filed 04/17/14 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#88
Case 1:13-cv-01235-RHB Doc #14 Filed 04/17/14 Page 1 of 8 Page ID#88 TIFFANY STRAND, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Plaintiff, CORINTHIAN COLLEGES,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION. ) No. 2:10-cv JPM-dkv
West et al v. Americare Long Term Specialty Hospital, LLC Doc. 36 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION LINDA WEST and VICKI WATSON as ) surviving natural
More informationCase 1:10-cv CFL Document 41 Filed 09/27/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
Case 1:10-cv-00733-CFL Document 41 Filed 09/27/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ) AEY, INC., ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 10-733 C ) (Judge Lettow) UNITED STATES, ) Defendant. ) ) DEFENDANT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KEVIN T. LEVINE, an individual and on behalf of the general public, vs. Plaintiff, BIC USA, INC., a Delaware corporation,
More informationCase: 4:15-cv RWS Doc. #: 30 Filed: 05/04/15 Page: 1 of 2 PageID #: 183
Case: 4:15-cv-00464-RWS Doc. #: 30 Filed: 05/04/15 Page: 1 of 2 PageID #: 183 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION GRYPHON INVESTMENTS III, LLC, Plaintiff, Case No.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Presently before the Court is Defendants Connecticut General
Mountain View Surgical Center v. CIGNA Health and Life Insurance Company et al Doc. 1 O UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 1 MOUNTAIN VIEW SURGICAL CENTER, a California
More informationThe Implications Of Twombly And PeaceHealth
Portfolio Media, Inc. 648 Broadway, Suite 200 New York, NY 10012 www.law360.com Phone: +1 212 537 6331 Fax: +1 212 537 6371 customerservice@portfoliomedia.com The Implications Of Twombly And PeaceHealth
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LINDA PERRYMENT, Plaintiff, v. SKY CHEFS, INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-00-kaw ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PARTIALLY DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
1 1 1 1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiff, LOUIS V. SCHOOLER and FIRST FINANCIAL PLANNING CORPORATION, dba Western Financial
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-cv-446-MOC-DSC
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:13-cv-446-MOC-DSC UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION,
More informationADRIENNE RODRIGUEZ, MEMORANDUM Plaintiff, AND ORDER - versus - 13-CV-6552 (JG) Defendants.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK FOR ONLINE PUBLICATION ONLY ADRIENNE RODRIGUEZ, MEMORANDUM Plaintiff, AND ORDER - versus - 13-CV-6552 (JG) THE CITY OF NEW YORK; RAYMOND W. KELLY,
More informationCase: 1:15-cv Document #: 31 Filed: 01/20/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:144
Case: 1:15-cv-03693 Document #: 31 Filed: 01/20/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:144 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DAVID IGASAKI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) )
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. CIV S KJM-KJN
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, vs. Plaintiff, GENDARME CAPITAL CORPORATION; et al., Defendants. No. CIV S--00 KJM-KJN
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA SHELL GULF OF MEXICO, INC., and SHELL OFFSHORE, INC., vs. Plaintiffs, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, INC., et al., Case No. 3:12-cv-0096-RRB
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Radke, v. Sinha Clinic Corp., et al. Doc. 55 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. ) DEBORAH RADKE, as relator under the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL ACTION NO Baylson, J. July 25, 2018
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LAWRENCE POPPY LIVERS, on his own behalf and on behalf of similarly situated persons v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-4271 NATIONAL COLLEGIATE
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 8:12-cv-00215-FMO-RNB Document 202 Filed 03/17/15 Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:7198 Present: The Honorable Fernando M. Olguin, United States District Judge Vanessa Figueroa None None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter
More informationUnited States District Court
Case:-cv-0-WHA Document Filed0/0/ Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 ERNEST EVANS, THE LAST TWIST, INC., THE ERNEST EVANS CORPORATION, v. Plaintiffs,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION. Plaintiffs,
Flagstone Development, LLC et al v. Joyner et al Doc. 132 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA BILLINGS DIVISION FLAGSTONE DEVELOPMENT, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:12-CV REDRIDGE FINANCE GROUP, LLC
Leed HR, LLC v. Redridge Finance Group, LLC Doc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:12-CV-00797 LEED HR, LLC PLAINTIFF v. REDRIDGE FINANCE GROUP,
More informationCase 9:09-cv RC Document 100 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 991 **NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION**
Case 9:09-cv-00124-RC Document 100 Filed 08/10/12 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 991 **NOT FOR PRINTED PUBLICATION** IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION UNITED
More informationUnited States District Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 GABY BASMADJIAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, v. Plaintiff, THE REALREAL,
More informationCase 3:13-cv FJS-DEP Document 24 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 7. Plaintiff,
Case 3:13-cv-00318-FJS-DEP Document 24 Filed 04/28/15 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK RYNONE MANUFACTURING CORP., Plaintiff, v. 3:13-CV-318 (FJS/DEP) HSB STONE CORP.,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Shockley v. Stericycle, Inc. Doc. 39 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION CHRISTOPHER SHOCKLEY, v. Plaintiff, STERICYCLE, INC.; ROBERT RIZZO; VICKI KRATOHWIL; and
More informationCase 1:18-cv CRC Document 12 Filed 11/08/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cv-02047-CRC Document 12 Filed 11/08/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA KEVIN FAHEY, On behalf of the general public of the District of Columbia, Plaintiff,
More informationCase 4:16-cv JSW Document 32 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-jsw Document Filed /0/ Page of NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 DAVID R. REED, v. Plaintiff, KRON/IBEW LOCAL PENSION PLAN, et al., Defendants.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SUSAN HARMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GREGORY J. AHERN, Defendant. Case No. -cv-00-mej ORDER RE: MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT Re:
More informationCase 2:10-cv RLH -PAL Document 29 Filed 12/02/10 Page 1 of 8
Case :0-cv-0-RLH -PAL Document Filed /0/0 Page of 0 SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 shawn@manganolaw.com SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD. 0 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 0 Las Vegas, Nevada -0 (0) - telephone
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 21 Filed: 03/27/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:84
Case: 1:16-cv-04522 Document #: 21 Filed: 03/27/17 Page 1 of 5 PageID #:84 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LISA SKINNER, Plaintiff, v. Case No.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DEREK GUBALA, Case No. 15-cv-1078-pp Plaintiff, v. TIME WARNER CABLE, INC., Defendant. DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT S MOTION TO DISMISS
More informationCase 4:12-cv MWB-TMB Document 32 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 412-cv-00919-MWB-TMB Document 32 Filed 11/15/12 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LINDA M. HAGERMAN, and CIVIL ACTION NO. 4CV-12-0919 HOWARD
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENWOOD DIVISION
Wanning et al v. Duke Energy Carolinas LLC Doc. 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENWOOD DIVISION John F. Wanning and Margaret B. Wanning, C/A No. 8:13-839-TMC
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION
Case 4:12 cv 00659 SWW Document 2 Filed 10/25/12 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS WESTERN DIVISION TERESA BLOODMAN, * * Plaintiff, * vs. * No. 4:12-cv-00659-SWW
More informationCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL. CASE NO.: CV SJO (JPRx) DATE: December 12, 2014
Page 1 of 6 Page ID #:215 CENTRAL OF CALIFORNIA Priority Send Enter Closed JS-5/JS-6 Scan Only TITLE: Linda Rubenstein v. The Neiman Marcus Group LLC, et al. ========================================================================
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY AMY VIGGIANO, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF ALL OTHERS SIMILARLY SITUATED Civ. Action No. 17-0243-BRM-TJB Plaintiff, v. OPINION
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., a national banking ) Association, as successor-in-interest to LaSalle ) Bank National Association,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-psg-jpr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 0 BENJAMIN C. MIZER Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General EILEEN DECKER United States Attorney JOHN R. TYLER Assistant Director, Federal
More informationCase 5:16-cv AB-DTB Document 43 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:192 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case 5:16-cv-00339-AB-DTB Document 43 Filed 07/29/16 Page 1 of 9 Page ID #:192 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JS-6 CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No.: ED CV 16-00339-AB (DTBx)
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA PAUL REIN, Plaintiff, v. LEON AINER, et al., Defendants. Case No. -cv-0-jd ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
More informationCase 3:17-cv RS Document 33 Filed 08/28/17 Page 1 of 8
Case :-cv-0-rs Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 TODD GREENBERG, v. Plaintiff, TARGET CORPORATION, Defendant. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA I. INTRODUCTION Case No. -cv-0-rs
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO CIV-MARRA/HOPKINS OPINION AND ORDER
Ninghai Genius Child Product Co., Ltd. v. Kool Pak, Inc. Doc. 42 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 11-61205-CIV-MARRA/HOPKINS NINGHAI GENIUS CHILD PRODUCT CO. LTD., vs.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
PATROSKI v. RIDGE et al Doc. 25 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SUSAN PATROSKI, Plaintiff, 2: 11-cv-1065 v. PRESSLEY RIDGE, PRESSLEY RIDGE FOUNDATION, and B.
More informationCase 1:14-cv MPK Document 45 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 1:14-cv-00215-MPK Document 45 Filed 09/23/15 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TINA DEETER, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Civil Action No. 14-215E
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Case No. 12-cv HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION ELCOMETER, INC., Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 12-cv-14628 HON. GERSHWIN A. DRAIN TQC-USA, INC., et al., Defendants. / ORDER DENYING
More informationCase 3:10-cv MLC -DEA Document 10 Filed 06/24/10 Page 1 of 8 PageID: 112
Case 310-cv-00494-MLC -DEA Document 10 Filed 06/24/10 Page 1 of 8 PageID 112 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ROBERT JOHNSON, et al., CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-494 (MLC)
More informationCase 1:12-cv CM Document 50 Filed 10/26/12 Page 1 of 12
Case 1:12-cv-04873-CM Document 50 Filed 10/26/12 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, SUCCESSOR TO WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., SUCCESSOR
More informationCENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:488 CENTRAL OF CALIFORNIA Priority Send Enter Closed JS-5/JS-6 Scan Only TITLE: Linda Rubenstein v. The Neiman Marcus Group LLC, et al. ========================================================================
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MEMORANDUM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION LORRIE THOMPSON ) ) v. ) NO. 3-13-0817 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL AMERICAN MORTGAGE EXPRESS ) CORPORATION, et al. ) MEMORANDUM
More informationCase 1:09-cv NMG Document 29 Filed 12/01/2009 Page 1 of 12. United States District Court District of Massachusetts MEMORANDUM & ORDER
Case 1:09-cv-10555-NMG Document 29 Filed 12/01/2009 Page 1 of 12 STEPHANIE CATANZARO, Plaintiff, v. EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC., TRANS UNION, LLC and VERIZON NEW ENGLAND, INC. Defendants. GORTON,
More informationCivil Action No (JMV) (Mf) Plaintiffs alleges that Defendant has wrongfully
Not for Publication UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ELIZABETH JOHNSON, Plaintiff V. ENCOMPASS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 17-3527 (JMV) (Mf) OPINION Dockets.Justia.com
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA INTRODUCTION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA NORINE SYLVIA CAVE, Plaintiff, v. DELTA DENTAL OF CALIFORNIA, Defendant. Case No. -cv-0-who ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS Re: Dkt. No.,,
More informationCase 3:15-cv MMC Document 113 Filed 11/22/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-mmc Document Filed // Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KAPU GEMS, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. DIAMOND IMPORTS, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No.
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff,
0 BENJAMIN C. MIZER Acting Assistant Attorney General JOSEPH H. HARRINGTON Assistant United States Attorney, E.D.WA JOHN R. TYLER Assistant Director KENNETH E. SEALLS Trial Attorney U.S. Department of
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Plaintiffs,
Case :-cv-0-ajb-bgs Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 ROSE MARIE RENO and LARRY ANDERSON, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Plaintiffs, NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:15-cv-05617 Document #: 23 Filed: 10/21/15 Page 1 of 9 PageID #:68 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION THOMAS HENRY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
More informationUnited States District Court
Case:-cv-0-WHA Document Filed/0/ Page of IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 0 LORINDA REICHERT, v. Plaintiff, TIME INC., ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE OF THE TIME
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTHERN DIVISION NO. 2:14-CV-60-FL ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Hovey, et al v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, et al Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTHERN DIVISION NO. 2:14-CV-60-FL DUCK VILLAGE OUTFITTERS;
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ADVANCED PHYSICIANS S.C., VS. Plaintiff, CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL., Defendants. CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:16-CV-2355-G
More information3:14-cv MGL Date Filed 10/23/14 Entry Number 24 Page 1 of 5
3:14-cv-01982-MGL Date Filed 10/23/14 Entry Number 24 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Melinda K. Lindler, Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action
More informationCase: 1:16-cv CAB Doc #: 26 Filed: 11/14/17 1 of 7. PageID #: 316 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:16-cv-02739-CAB Doc #: 26 Filed: 11/14/17 1 of 7. PageID #: 316 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION TOWNE AUTO SALES, LLC, CASE NO. 1:16-cv-02739 Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ARC:ELIK, A.$., Plaintiff, v. C.A. No. 15-961-LPS E.I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM ORDER At Wilmington this 29th
More informationCase 3:13-cv L Document 109 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID 3052
Case 3:13-cv-02920-L Document 109 Filed 08/21/15 Page 1 of 11 PageID 3052 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION INFECTIOUS DISEASE DOCTORS, P.A., Plaintiff, v.
More informationCase 3:11-cv BEN-MDD Document 29-1 Filed 03/05/12 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-0-ben-mdd Document - Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 John Karl Buche (SBN ) BUCHE & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Prospect, Suite 0 La Jolla, California 0 () - () -0 Fax jbuche@buchelaw.com Attorneys for Moving Defendant
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Yeti Coolers, LLC v. RTIC Coolers, LLC Doc. 32 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION YETI COOLERS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. 1:16-CV-264-RP RTIC COOLERS, LLC, RTIC
More informationCase 4:15-cv ALM-CAN Document 13 Filed 09/17/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 58 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Case 4:15-cv-00571-ALM-CAN Document 13 Filed 09/17/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 58 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION PRUVIT VENTURES, LLC, Plaintiff, vs. AXCESS GLOBAL
More informationCase 2:09-cv GCS-MKM Document 24 Filed 12/22/2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case 2:09-cv-11239-GCS-MKM Document 24 Filed 12/22/2009 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION BRIAN MCLEAN and GAIL CLIFFORD, Plaintiffs, vs. Case No.
More informationCase 3:11-cv RBL Document 13 Filed 11/08/11 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA. Defendants.
Case :-cv-0-rbl Document Filed /0/ Page of HONORABLE RONALD B. LEIGHTON RUDOLPH B. ZAMORA JR., v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA Plaintiff, CITY OF BONNEY LAKE, BONNEY
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 21 Filed: 12/12/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:61 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:16-cv-04979 Document #: 21 Filed: 12/12/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #:61 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KENYA and APRIL ELSTON ) as legal guardians of their
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS GLENN E. SHEALEY, Plaintiff, v. FEDERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and CHUBB GROUP OF INSURANCE COMPANIES, Defendants. SAYLOR, J. Civil Action No. 12-10723-FDS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ROBERT FEDUNIAK, et al., v. Plaintiffs, OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY, Defendant. Case No. -cv-000-blf ORDER SUBMITTING
More informationCase Doc 28 Filed 04/08/16 EOD 04/08/16 16:05:16 Pg 1 of 10 SO ORDERED: April 8, James M. Carr United States Bankruptcy Judge
Case 15-50150 Doc 28 Filed 04/08/16 EOD 04/08/16 16:05:16 Pg 1 of 10 SO ORDERED: April 8, 2016. James M. Carr United States Bankruptcy Judge UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
More informationCase 0:16-cv WPD Document 64 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/19/2017 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:16-cv-61856-WPD Document 64 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/19/2017 Page 1 of 11 JENNIFER SANDOVAL, vs. Plaintiff, RONALD R. WOLFE & ASSOCIATES, P.L., SUNTRUST MORTGAGE, INC., and NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Tan v. Grubhub, Inc. Doc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 ANDREW TAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. GRUBHUB, INC., et al., Defendants. Case No. -cv-0-jsc ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS MOTION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :-cv-000-teh Document Filed 0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TERRY COUR II, Plaintiff, v. LIFE0, INC., Defendant. Case No. -cv-000-teh ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION
Kinard v. Greenville Police Department et al Doc. 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Ira Milton Kinard, ) ) Plaintiff, ) C.A. No. 6:10-cv-03246-JMC
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
Case:-cv-000-LHK Document Filed0// Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Cz 00 ALEXANDER LIU, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. For the Northern District of California 11. No.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 MICHAEL ALLAGAS, ARTHUR RAY, AND BRETT MOHRMAN, et al., v. Plaintiffs, BP SOLAR INTERNATIONAL INC., HOME
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY : : : : : : : : : : : : :
OLIREI INVESTMENTS, LLC v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 14 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY OLIREI INVESTMENTS, LLC v. Plaintiff, LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
More informationCase: 1:15-cv Document #: 32 Filed: 12/07/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:86
Case: 1:15-cv-07588 Document #: 32 Filed: 12/07/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:86 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JANE DOE, a Minor, by and through
More informationCase 2:16-cv R-JEM Document 41 Filed 12/14/16 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:1285
Case :-cv-00-r-jem Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: JS- 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LIFEWAY FOODS, INC., v. Plaintiff, MILLENIUM PRODUCTS, INC., d/b/a GT S KOMBUCHA
More informationCase: 1:15-cv CAB Doc #: 14 Filed: 06/22/15 1 of 7. PageID #: 87 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION
Case: 1:15-cv-00273-CAB Doc #: 14 Filed: 06/22/15 1 of 7. PageID #: 87 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JOHNNY HAMM, CASE NO. 1:15CV273 Plaintiff, JUDGE CHRISTOPHER
More informationPlaintiff, : : : : John Sgaliordich is an individual investor who alleges that various investment
-VVP Sgaliordich v. Lloyd's Asset Management et al Doc. 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------ X JOHN ANTHONY SGALIORDICH,
More informationCase 5:10-cv HRL Document 65 Filed 10/26/17 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case :0-cv-0-HRL Document Filed 0// Page of 0 E-filed 0//0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 HAYLEY HICKCOX-HUFFMAN, Plaintiff, v. US AIRWAYS, INC., et al., Defendants. Case
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA VERSUS NO ORDER AND REASONS ON MOTION
Case 2:15-cv-01798-JCW Document 62 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA CANDIES SHIPBUILDERS, LLC CIVIL ACTION VERSUS NO. 15-1798 WESTPORT INS. CORP. MAGISTRATE
More information