[2009] QSC 262 SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CIVIL JURISDICTION DAUBNEY J. No 6855 of 2009 GREEN GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED
|
|
- Arron Lambert Page
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 [2009] QSC 262 SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CIVIL JURISDICTION DAUBNEY J No 6855 of 2009 RE: GREEN GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED GRANT THORNTON (QLD) PTY LTD (ACN ) Applicant and GREEN GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED (ACN ) Company and CRAIG FRANCIS CARROLL Third Party BRISBANE..DATE 20/08/2009 JUDGMENT 1-1
2 HIS HONOUR: This is an application by Grant Thornton (Qld) Pty Ltd for the winding up of the respondent, Green Global Technologies Limited. The basis upon which it is sought to wind up the respondent is a contention that the respondent is deemed insolvent by reason of a failure to meet a statutory demand which it is alleged was served on the respondent. Accordingly, the applicant proceeds to seek the winding up of the respondent under part 5.4 of the Corporations Act. It is contended on behalf of the applicant that the respondent was served with a statutory demand dated 12 March 2009, together with a supporting affidavit sworn 12 March 2009, by which demand was made for the payment of the sum of $29,150 within 21 days. It is asserted that service of that statutory demand and supporting affidavit occurred by posting the statutory demand and supporting affidavit by prepaid ordinary post to the respondent's registered office. The registered office of the respondent, according to ASIC searches, is at a firm of accountants at Robina. When the matter first came on before me, a service issue was raised on behalf of the respondent, which contended by reference to an affidavit of the accountant, whose address is the registered office, that the statutory demand had not in fact been received. In reliance on that evidence, the respondent filed a cross application seeking a permanent stay, or alternatively, an injunction to restrain the winding up of the respondent in insolvency. Further factual issues were sought to be raised on behalf of 1-2 JUDGMENT
3 the respondent which involve a contention by the respondent that the debt claimed under the statutory demand is disputed, and goes to the circumstances under which the applicant contends the debt is payable to it. It is unnecessary, for present purposes however, for me to descend into any further detail concerning that factual dispute or indeed whether the respondent would otherwise be entitled to raise such a factual dispute on the present application. It is, however, necessary for me to say something further about the preliminary point raised on behalf of the respondent concerning alleged non-service of the statutory demand. For completeness, at this stage, I should observe that after I heard argument on the matter, and then reserved the matter to peruse the material in further detail, the parties were requested to make further submissions to me on the question of adequacy of the evidence before me concerning the proof of service of the statutory demand. Each of the parties has had the opportunity to put on further written submissions, and each has had the opportunity to make further oral submissions before me today, particularly in respect of that point. I have already noted that the respondent disputes having received the statutory demand. An affidavit by the respondent s accountant, Mr Goldspring, confirms that he practices as an accountant at a named address at Robina, and that those premises, and his office, are the registered office 1-3 JUDGMENT
4 of a number of companies including the respondent. He says that when he commenced practicing as an accountant from those premises substantial problems arose with the delivery of post to the physical address of the company, and to overcome that difficulty the body corporate, which controls the common property of the building, installed a system of building mail boxes. He says those were constructed in the basement of the building about 12 months ago. Mr Goldspring asserts in his affidavit that over the last six to 12 months, and certainly during the period when the statutory demand was alleged to have been posted to his office, all mail which was addressed to the "physical" address of the building (by which I infer he means the street address notified as the registered office in the ASIC records) would be deposited by the postman in the basement mail boxes. He says each of the mail boxes has the business name of the recipients clearly identified on the front of them. Mr Goldspring also deposes to his internal business systems by which a dedicated member of the secretarial staff (the same member each time) goes to the building mail boxes, and also to his post office box everyday and collects mail from both locations. He describes the process by which all collected articles of mail are opened by his staff and then given to him personally on a daily basis. He further deposes that when documents are received in relation to companies' affairs, he ensures that those pieces of correspondence are brought to the attention of the relevant principal officer in each case. 1-4 JUDGMENT
5 Specifically in relation to statutory demands, Mr Goldspring says that his procedure upon receiving a statutory demand is to immediately telephone the responsible officer of the relevant company and to advise of receipt of the statutory demand. He says that where possible he arranges for an immediate electronic or facsimile dispatch of such documents to the responsible company officer, and that is followed up by mailing a hard copy of the documents. He deposes: "From my memory, and from the records of the company, I am able to state that no statutory demand was ever received by me or by Green Global Technologies Ltd at my address from Grant Thornton (Qld) Pty Ltd or from any solicitor acting for that company." The affidavit of Mr Goldspring goes to non-receipt of the statutory demand. However, the authorities which analyse the dichotomy between delivery, which is statutorily deemed to occur consequent upon the posting of an article for service (in reliance on section 109X of the Corporations Act), and non-receipt of that article make it clear that once it is proved that a document is sent by post the statutory presumption of service can be overcome by proof of nondelivery as opposed to mere assertion of non-receipt. Cases of non-delivery include those in which it is able to be proved that an envelope has been returned to the serving party and marked: "Return to sender". The authorities in that regard include, but are not limited to, the recent judgment of Justice White in Re: Pacific Mobile Phones Pty Ltd 1-5 JUDGMENT
6 [2008] QSC 210, and Workers Compensation [Victoria] Limited v Carousel Bar Pty Ltd [1999] VSC 227, each of which adopted and apply the observations by the High Court in Fancourt v Mercantile Credits Limited [1983] 154 CLR 87, particularly in the passage at pages In the present case, as I have already noted, the applicant contends that a statutory demand was served on the respondent by post. It is unnecessary for present purposes for me to make any final decision as to whether Mr Goldspring's affidavit is sufficient evidence of non-delivery as opposed to non-receipt because, the challenge to service by post having squarely been raised on the material, the anterior question, namely, whether service by post had been proved by the applicant, came sharply into focus. Hence the request for the parties to address me further, specifically in relation to the question of the adequacy of that proof. In that regard the only evidence of proof of the service of the statutory demand by post is contained in an affidavit of service by a solicitor within the office of the applicant's solicitors, Mr Edgecombe. Relevantly Mr Edgecombe deposes: "I did on the 13th of March 2009 cause a letter dated 13 March 2009 enclosing the Creditor's Statutory Demand for Payment of Debt dated 12 March 2009 and an Affidavit of Debt of Ramesh Benedict sworn on the 12th of March 2009 to be forwarded by prepaid post, pursuant to the provisions of the Corporations Act 2001, to the registered office of GREEN GLOBAL TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED(ACN ). Exhibited hereto and 1-6 JUDGMENT
7 marked GME1, GME2 and a GME3 respectively are copies of the said letter, Creditor's Statutory Demand for Payment of Debt and Supporting Affidavit." The exhibits to that affidavit include a letter dated 13 March 2009 addressed to: "The Directors, Green Global Technologies Limited, Goldspring and Co. HQ Building Suite 44/58 River Walk Avenue, Robina Town Centre, Qld, 4230". I am satisfied on the evidence before me that this was the registered office of the respondent company as at the date of that letter. The question then is whether the affidavit of Mr Edgecombe, and in particular the statement to which I have just referred, is sufficient evidence of proof of posting to enable the applicant to invoke the benefit of deemed service pursuant to section 109X of the Corporations Act. The short answer, it seems to me, is that it is not. In that regard the judgment of Barrett J in Pearlburst Pty Ltd v Summers Resort Group Pty Ltd [2007] NSWSC 1126 is instructive. In that case the affidavit of service of the statutory demand was by the solicitor for the applicant. His Honour extracts the relevant part of that affidavit of service at [18] in his judgment. The affidavit of service in that case exhibited copies of letters and other documents which were exhibited to the affidavit and included specifically a deposition that one of the exhibited documents was a "Letter that I caused to be sent by prepaid ordinary post to the plaintiff at its registered office on 15 August 2007 which enclosed the original of the 1-7 JUDGMENT
8 document, a true copy of which appears as annexure B to this affidavit". At [22] - [24] of his judgment, Barrett J referred to a number of previous authorities which had considered the proof necessary and adequate to prove service by post and said: "Section 109X (1)(a) of the Corporations Act says that a document may be served on a company by 'posting it to the company's registered office'. Proof of service of a document on a company by 'posting it to the company's registered office' involves proof of the several elements identified by Debelle, J in Dwyer v Canon Australia Pty Ltd [2007] SASC 100 (at [6]): In order to be able to establish service by post upon a company it is therefore necessary to prove that the letter was:. Properly addressed;. Pre-paid;. Posted as a letter and;. Sent to the registered office of the company. Service by post will not be established unless each of those facts has been proved. 1-8 JUDGMENT
9 [23] To like effect our observations of Brereton J, in Northumbrian Ice Cream Co Ltd v Breakaway Vending Pty Ltd [2006] NSWC 1216 at [12] concerning service by post: Proof of service by post requires, at least:. Proof that the envelope bore the correct name and address;. Proof that the envelope contained the relevant document to be served;. Proof that the envelope bore the correct cost of postage and;. Proof that the envelope was placed in the post. [24] In the present case, there is no direct evidence about what appeared on the face of the envelope; there is only evidence of what appeared on the letter of 15 August Indeed, there is no direct evidence of the existence of any envelope in that, while it is said in Mr Bailey's affidavit that the letter was sent by prepaid post, there is no explicit statement that the letter (and the Annex B documents said to have been enclosed with it) were put into any envelope. There is no evidence of the amount or value of any stamp of franking affixed to any such envelope, and there is no direct evidence that anyone lodged any stamped or franked envelope (and contents) at any post office or in any post box." 1-9 JUDGMENT
10 Having made those observations, his Honour found that with the evidence in that state before him he could not find that the statutory demand was, as contemplated by section 109X (1)(a), posted to the company's registered office. I am left in a similar state so far as the evidence of service by post in this matter is concerned. I have already referred to the only deposition relied on to prove service of the statutory demand by post. There is no evidence before me of any of the processes within the applicant's solicitor's office which could give me any proper basis for concluding that posting of the documents in question in an envelope addressed to the registered office of the respondent company actually occurred. Accordingly, I find that the applicant has not proved service of the statutory demand by post. In those circumstances, the application to wind up the respondent company fails in limine. There is no basis for the only contention relied on by the applicant for the winding up of the respondent, viz, deemed insolvency arising from non-compliance with the statutory demand in question. Accordingly the winding up application will be dismissed.... HIS HONOUR: The applicant will pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application including any reserved costs to be assessed JUDGMENT
11 JUDGMENT
This hearing has been adjourned by the Federal Court to be heard on 23 October 2017 at 11.30am AWST.
13 October 2017 To Creditors Empire Oil Company (WA) Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (Administrators Appointed) ARBN 009 475 423 (EOC) Empire Oil & Gas NL (Administrators Appointed) ACN 063
More informationState Reporting Bureau
[233 QSC >86 Queensl Government Department of Justice Attorney-General Transcript of Proceedings Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must not be made or sold without the
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: Doolan and Anor v Rubikcon (Qld) Pty Ltd and Ors [07] QSC 68 SANDRA DOOLAN AND STEPHEN DOOLAN (applicants) v RUBIKCON (QLD) PTY LTD ACN 099 635 275 (first
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Maclag (No 11) P/L & Anor v Chantay Too P/L (No 2) [2009] QSC 299 PARTIES: MACLAG (NO 11) PTY LTD ACN 010 611 631 AS TRUSTEE FOR THE BURNS FAMILY TRUST (first plaintiff)
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Castillon v P & O Ports Ltd [2005] QCA 406 PARTIES: LEONARD CASTILLON (plaintiff/respondent) v P & O PORTS LIMITED ACN 000 049 301 (defendant/appellant) FILE NO/S:
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: Highvic Pty Ltd & Ors v Quarterback Group Pty Ltd & Anor [2012] QSC 8 HIGHVIC PTY LTD (Applicant/First Plaintiff) AND BRIAN FRANCIS GEANEY (Second Plaintiff)
More informationState Reporting Bureau
State Reporting Bureau 1^003] QSC. M-G Queensl Government Department of Justice Attorney-General Transcript of Proceedings Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must not be
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: Gladstone & District Leagues Club Ltd v Hutson & Ors [2007] QSC 010 GLADSTONE & DISTRICT LEAGUES CLUB LIMITED ACN 010 187 961 (applicant) v ROBERT HUTSON
More informationDISTRICT COURT, FAMILY DIVISION CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA
Village Center Circle, Suite 0 Las Vegas, NV Telephone: (0) - Fax: (0) -0 MOT STANDISH LAW GROUP, LLC THOMAS J. STANDISH, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. tjs@juww.com Village Center Circle, #0 Telephone: (0)- Facsimile:
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Matrix Projects (Qld) Pty Ltd v Luscombe [2013] QSC 4 PARTIES: MATRIX PROJECTS (QLD) PTY LTD ACN 089 633 607 trading as MATRIX HOMES (Applicant) v TONY JASON LUSCOMBE
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Eyears v Zufic [2016] QCA 40 PARTIES: MARINA EYEARS (applicant) v PETER ZUFIC as trustee for the PETER AND TANYA ZUFIC FAMILY TRUST trading as CLIENTCARE SOLICITORS
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: FILE NO: 4490 of 2010 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: John Holland Pty Ltd v Schneider Electric Buildings Australia Pty Ltd [2010] QSC 159 JOHN HOLLAND
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: In the matter of: ACN 103 753 484 Pty Ltd (in liq) formerly Blue Chip Development Corporation Pty Ltd [2011] QSC 64 TERRY GRANT VAN DER VELDE AND DAVID MICHAEL
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
3. No SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Civcrush Pty Ltd v Yeo & Co Pty Ltd (Administrators Appointed) & Anor [2017] QSC 225 PARTIES: CIVCRUSH PTY LTD ACN 603 902 692 (applicant) v YEO & CO PTY LTD
More informationIMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE. Allen Dodd as trustee for the Dodd Superannuation Fund v Shine Corporate Ltd
IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE Allen Dodd as trustee for the Dodd Superannuation Fund v Shine Corporate Ltd Supreme Court of Queensland Proceeding No. 10009/2017 THE SHINE CORPORATE LTD CLASS ACTION Please read
More informationCB Richard Ellis(B)Pty Ltd Standard Conditions for the Purchase of Goods and Services ( Conditions )
CB Richard Ellis(B)Pty Ltd Standard Conditions for the Purchase of Goods and Services ( Conditions ) 1 Definitions and Interpretation 1.1 In these Conditions the following words have the following meanings:
More informationState Reporting Bureau
State Reporting Bureau Transcript of Proceedings Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must not be made or sold without the written authority of the Director, State Reporting
More informationDeed poll. Federation Limited ACN (FL)
Deed poll Federation Limited ACN 114 757 783 (FL) 62 Charlotte St Brisbane Q 4000 GPO Box 1279 Brisbane Q 4001 T +61 7 3831 8999 F +61 7 3831 1121 www.mcmahonclarke.com Liability limited by a scheme approved
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: Conveyor & General Engineering Pty Ltd v Basetec Services Pty Ltd and Anor [2014] QSC 30 CONVEYOR & GENERAL ENGINEERING PTY LTD ACN 091 865 235 (Applicant)
More informationState Reporting Bureau
[2.003] 0 SC 056 State Reporting Bureau Queensland Government Department of Justice and Attorney-General Transcript of Proceedings Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Bettson Properties Pty Ltd & Anor v Tyler [2018] QSC 153 PARTIES: BETTSON PROPERTIES PTY LTD ACN 009 873 152 AND TOBSTA PTY LTD ACN 078 818 014 (applicants) v PAULINE
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Nadao Stott v Lyons and Stott (as executors) [2007] QSC 087 PARTIES: NADAO STOTT (under Part IV, sections 40-44, Succession Act 1981) (applicant) AND FILE NO/S: BS
More informationAT MELBOURNE BUSINESS LIST BUILDING CASES DIVISION Case No. CI JOHN ARVANITIS AND GEORGE ARVANITIS --- HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHELTON.
!Undefined Bookmark, I IN THE COUNTY COURT OF VICTORIA AT MELBOURNE BUSINESS LIST BUILDING CASES DIVISION Not Restricted Case No. CI-05-04479 AGE OLD BUILDERS PTY LTD (ACN 068 142 638) Plaintiff V JOHN
More informationIN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CHURCHILL
Case No. Dept. No. The undersigned hereby affirms that this document does not contain the social security number of any person. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 IN THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: FILE NO/S: No 3696 of 2018 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: Midson Construction (Qld) Pty Ltd & Ors v Queensland Building and Construction Commission
More informationState Reporting Bureau
JaaoTp SC 3G State Reporting Bureau Queensland Government Department of Justice and Attorney-General Transcript of Proceedings Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must not
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: GSM (Operations) Pty Ltd v Suwenda [] QSC 33 PARTIES: GSM (OPERATIONS) PTY LTD ACN 085 9 803 (first plaintiff) BILLABONG INERNATIONAL LIMITED ACN 084 923 956 (second
More informationSUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES
SUPREME COURT - NASSAU COUNTY - IAS PART 56 PART RULES & PROCEDURES Justice: HON. THOMAS RADEMAKER Secretary: MARILYN McINTOSH Part Clerk: TRINA PAYNE Phone: (516) 493-3420 Courtroom: (516) 493-3423 Fax:
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: FILE NO/S: DIVISION: PROCEEDING: Vadasz v Bloomer Constructions (Qld) Pty Ltd [2009] QSC 261 MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER VADASZ TRADING AS AUSTRALIAN PILING COMPANY
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CIV UNDER the Companies Act NZ WINDFARMS LIMITED Plaintiff
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CIV 2008-463-566 UNDER the Companies Act 1993 BETWEEN AND NZ WINDFARMS LIMITED Plaintiff CONCRETE STRUCTURES (NZ) LIMITED Defendant Hearing: 26 March 2009
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Donovan v Donovan [09] QSC 26 PARTIES: LYNDA JANE DONOVAN (AS EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF RONALD JOSEPH DONOVAN) (applicant/cross-respondent) v HELGA DONOVAN (AS EXECUTOR
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: David & Gai Spankie & Northern Investment Holdings Pty Limited v James Trowse Constructions Pty Limited & Ors [2010] QSC 29 DAVID & GAI SPANKIE & NORTHERN
More informationADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN. Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017
ADMINISTRATIVE RULES FOR CONTESTED CASE HEARINGS MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT SYSTEM OF MICHIGAN Effective June 1, 2016 Amended June 19, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1 Scope... 3 Rule 2 Construction of
More informationSupplementary Notice of Annual General Meeting
Supplementary Notice of Annual General Meeting This supplementary Notice of AGM together with Explanatory Memorandum is supplemental to the original Notice of AGM and original Explanatory Memorandum dated
More informationDeed poll. Federation Limited ACN (FL)
Deed poll Federation Limited ACN 114 757 783 (FL) 62 Charlotte St Brisbane Q 4000 GPO Box 1279 Brisbane Q 4001 T +61 7 3831 8999 F +61 7 3831 1121 www.mcmahonclarke.com Liability limited by a scheme approved
More informationPLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: Waterman & Ors v Logan City Council & Anor [2018] QPEC 44 NORMAN CECIL WATERMAN AND ELIZABETH HELEN WATERMAN AS TRUSTEE UNDER INSTRUMENT
More informationDesign and Construct Contract - Standard User Funding Agreement
QCA Draft 8 September 2014 Aurizon Network Pty Ltd [insert Trustee] Design and Construct Contract - Standard User Funding Agreement (amended form of AS 4902-2000) Ref: QRPA15047 9101397 11391098/5 L\313599357.2
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Taylor v Company Solutions (Aust) Pty Ltd [2012] QSC 309 PARTIES: FILE NO/S: 12009 of 2010 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: DAVID JAMES TAYLOR, by his Litigation Guardian BELINDA
More informationPatrick Anthony Gleeson Christina Adrienne Gleeson Geoffrey David Harrison Melbourne Senior Member R Walker Hearing ORDER
VICTORIAN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CIVIL DIVISION DOMESTIC BUILDING LIST VCAT REFERENCE NO. D138/2003 CATCHWORDS Terms of settlement terms not complying with statutory requirements of a domestic
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Oliver v Samios Plumbing Pty Ltd [2016] QCA 236 PARTIES: DANIEL FREDERICK OLIVER TRADING AS TOP PLUMBING (applicant) v SAMIOS PLUMBING PTY LTD ACN 010 360 899 (respondent)
More informationNorthern Iron Creditors' Trust Deed
Northern Iron Creditors' Trust Deed Northern Iron Limited (Subject to Deed of Company Arrangement) Company James Gerard Thackray in his capacity as deed administrator of Northern Iron Limited (Subject
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Perpetual Limited v Registrar of Titles & Ors [2013] QSC 296 PARTIES: PERPETUAL LIMITED (ACN 000 431 827) (FORMERLY KNOWN AS PERPETUAL TRUSTEES AUSTRALIA LIMITED (ACN
More informationFEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Caratti v Commissioner of Taxation [2016] FCA 754 File number: NSD 792 of 2016 Judge: ROBERTSON J Date of judgment: 29 June 2016 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE application
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Gemini Nominees Pty Ltd v Queensland Property Partners Pty Ltd ATF The Keith Batt Family Trust [2007] QSC 20 PARTIES: GEMINI NOMINEES PTY LTD (ACN 011 020 536) (plaintiff)
More informationARRIUM FINANCE PTY LIMITED (SUBJECT TO DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT) ACN (AND EACH OF THE COMPANIES LISTED IN SCHEDULE ONE)
Federal Court of Australia District Registry: Victoria Division: Corporations List No. VID 608 of 2017 IN THE MATTER OF ARRIUM FINANCE PTY LIMITED (SUBJECT TO DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT) ACN 093 954 940
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Tynan & Anor v Filmana Pty Ltd & Ors (No 2) [2015] QSC 367 PARTIES: DAVID PATRICK TYNAN and JUDITH GARCIA TYNAN (plaintiffs) v FILMANA PTY LTD ACN 080 055 429 (first
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: Jackson-Knaggs v Queensland Newspapers P/L [2005] QCA 145 MARK ANDREW JACKSON-KNAGGS (applicant/respondent) v QUEENSLAND BUILDING SERVICES AUTHORITY (first
More informationJUDGMENT/ORDER. Black J makes orders in accordance with Orders 10 and 11 of the Short Minutes of Order initialled by him and placed in the file.
Form 43 UCPR 36.11 D00012I7MO Issued: 23 November 2018 4:46 PM JUDGMENT/ORDER COURT DETAILS Court Supreme Court of NSW Division Equity List Corporations List Registry Supreme Court Sydney Case number 2018/00361179
More informationState Reporting Bureau
State Reporting Bureau jaooi] osc 34 4 Queensland Government Department of justice and Attorney-General Transcript of Proceedings opyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must
More informationEnd User Licence Agreement
End User Licence Agreement TMMR Pty Ltd ACN ACN 616 198 755 Articles to assist you with the implementation of this agreement: Bespoke end user licence agreements for the istore by Dundas Lawyers Legal
More informationState Reporting Bureau
Qsc 34^ State Reporting Bureau Queensland Government Department of justice and Attorney-General Transcript of Proceedings >pyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must not be
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: Burragubba & Anor v Minister for Natural Resources and Mines & Anor (No 2) [2017] QSC 265 ADRIAN BURRAGUBBA (first applicant) LINDA BOBONGIE, LESTER BARNADE,
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: DPP (Cth) v Corby [2007] QCA 58 PARTIES: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS (COMMONWEALTH) (applicant) v SCHAPELLE CORBY (respondent) FILE NO/S: Appeal No 1365 of 2007
More informationNOTICE OF FILING AND HEARING
NOTICE OF FILING AND HEARING This document was lodged electronically in the FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA (FCA) on 2/06/2016 5:09:01 PM AEST and has been accepted for filing under the Court s Rules. Filing
More informationDESWIK STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS (TRAINING ONLY)
DESWIK STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS (TRAINING ONLY) THIS AGREEMENT is made between Deswik Mining Consultants (Pty) Ltd, a company incorporated in South Africa with registration number 2007/001686/07 and
More informationSTATEMENT OF INSOLVENCY PRACTICE 4 (E & W)
STATEMENT OF INSOLVENCY PRACTICE 4 (E & W) DISQUALIFICATION OF DIRECTORS ENGLAND AND WALES Introduction 1. This statement of insolvency practice is one of a series issued by the Council of the Society
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Three P/L v Body Corporate for Savoir Faire Community Titles Scheme 3841 [2008] QCA 167 PARTIES: THREE PTY LTD ACN 069 497 516 (respondent/plaintiff/respondent) v
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Westfield Ltd v Stockland (Constructors) P/L & Ors [2002] QCA 137 PARTIES: WESTFIELD LTD ACN 000 317 279 (applicant/applicant) v STOCKLAND (CONSTRUCTORS) PTY LIMITED
More informationASX BENCHMARK DATA SUBSCRIBER TERMS AND CONDITIONS
ASX BENCHMARK DATA SUBSCRIBER TERMS AND CONDITIONS These terms and conditions govern any end user subscription access or use of ASX Benchmark Data. 1. Subscription Service We will use reasonable endeavours
More informationVariance 2018 Bargersville Board of Zoning Appeals Application Kit
Variance 2018 Bargersville Board of Zoning Appeals Application Kit Step 1: Application In order to file the application, the applicant must make an appointment with the Town Planner by calling (317) 422-3103
More informationSA ADJUDICATION APPLICATION FORM
SA ADJUDICATION APPLICATION FORM Note: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2009 (SA) The claimant hereby applies for adjudication under the Act of the referenced payment claim. The
More informationPLANNING INSTITUTE OF AUSTRALIA ACN: CONSTITUTION
PLANNING INSTITUTE OF AUSTRALIA ACN: 151 601 937 CONSTITUTION Date: 30 November 2017 PLANNING INSTITUTE OF AUSTRALIA INDEX TO CONSTITUTION 1 NAME... 1 2 CAPACITY... 1 3 OBJECTS... 1 4 NOT FOR PERSONAL
More informationFor personal use only
Form 603 Corporations Act 2001 Section 671B Notice of initial substantial holder To Company Name/Scheme Shine Corporate Ltd ACN/ARSN 162 817 905 1. Details of substantial holder (1) Name Shine Corporate
More informationDated: Dated: DEFINITIONS
INITIAL INTERROGATORIES WITH PROOF OF SERVICE TO: PROPOUNDING PARTY: RESPONDING PARTY: The Propounding Party requests that the Responding Party respond to the following interrogatories in accordance with
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: Body Corporate for Sun City Resort CTS 24674 v Sunland Constructions Pty Ltd & Ors (No 2) [2011] QSC 42 BODY CORPORATE FOR SUN CITY RESORT CTS 24674 (plaintiff)
More informationState Reporting Bureau
[sooi] asc 07} State Reporting Bureau Queensland Government Department of justice and Attorney-General Transcript of Proceedings Copyright in this transcript is vested in the Crown. Copies thereof must
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: LQ Management Pty Ltd & Ors v Laguna Quays Resort Principal Body Corporate & Anor [2014] QCA 122 LQ MANAGEMENT PTY LTD ACN 074 733 976 (first appellant) LAGUNA
More informationONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST
Court File No. CV-15-10832-00CL ONTARIO SUPERIOR COURT OF JUSTICE COMMERCIAL LIST THE HONOURABLE REGIONAL SENIOR JUSTICE WEDNESDAY, THE 21st DAY OF OCTOBER, 2015 MORAWETZ \o Er) 71 Ri- IN THE MATTER OF
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: The Public Trustee of Queensland as a Corporation Sole [2012] QSC 178 RE: THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF QUEENSLAND AS A CORPORATION SOLE (applicant) FILE NO/S: 4065
More informationState of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department P.O. Box 7288, Capitol Station Albany, NY
State of New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division Third Judicial Department P.O. Box 7288, Capitol Station Albany, NY 12224-0288 Robert D. Mayberger Clerk of the Court (518) 471-4777 fax (518) 471-4750
More informationIN THE MATTER OF JOHN PETTIT PTY LTD (SUBJECT TO A DEED OF COMPANY ARRANGEMENT)
Form 2 (rule 2.2) Originating process IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES EQUITY DIVISION NUMBER: ;)0 (4-/ (S'.3 (2? SYDNEY REGISTRY CORPORATIONS LIST IN THE MATTER OF JOHN PETTIT PTY LTD (SUBJECT
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Tropac Timbers P/L v A-One Asphalt P/L [2005] QSC 378 PARTIES: TROPAC TIMBERS PTY LTD ACN 108 304 990 (plaintiff/respondent v A-ONE ASPHALT PTY LTD ACN 059 162 186
More informationREAD THIS BEFORE COMPLETING THE FORMS!!! INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING
READ THIS BEFORE COMPLETING THE FORMS!!! INSTRUCTIONS FOR MOTION TO CONTINUE HEARING WARNING!!! YOU SHOULD CONSULT AN ATTORNEY BEFORE USING THESE FORMS. THESE FORMS DO NOT CONTAIN ANY LEGAL ADVICE. ALL
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: T&M Buckley Pty Ltd v 57 Moss Rd Pty Ltd [2010] QDC 60 PARTIES: T&M BUCKLEY PTY LTD t/as SHAILER CONSTRUCTIONS (ABN 66 010 052 043) Plaintiff/Applicant v 57 MOSS
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: Bourne v Queensland Building and Construction Commission [2018] QSC 231 KATRINA MARGARET BOURNE (applicant) v QUEENSLAND BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION COMMISSION
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A GARNISHMENT OF PERSONAL EARNINGS OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR (Ohio Rev. Code Chapter 2716 et seq.) (REVISED 2/3/2015)
Tom Orlando, Clerk of Court Lorain County Justice Center, Room 105 Elyria, OH 44035 PH: (440 329-5536 INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A GARNISHMENT OF PERSONAL EARNINGS OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR (Ohio Rev. Code Chapter
More informationFEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA APC Logistics Pty Ltd v CJ Nutracon Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 136 AGREEMENT TO ARBITRATE whether or not agreement to arbitrate reached between parties by the exchange of e-mails whether
More informationINSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A GARNISHMENT OF PROPERTY OTHER THAN PERSONAL EARNINGS OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR
Ron Nabakowski, Clerk of Courts Lorain County Justice Center, Room 105 Elyria, OH 44035 PH: (440 329-5536 INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING A GARNISHMENT OF PROPERTY OTHER THAN PERSONAL EARNINGS OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR
More informationConstitution Indigenous Community Volunteers Limited. ACN Corporations Act 2001 Company Limited by Guarantee
Constitution Indigenous Community Volunteers Limited ACN 093 123 418 Corporations Act 2001 Company Limited by Guarantee Contents Page 1. PRELIMINARY 2 2. MEMBERS 3 3. PROCEEDINGS OF MEMBERS 4 4. GIFT FUND
More informationConstitution of Kiwanis Australia District Charitable Foundation Ltd
Constitution Constitution of Kiwanis Australia District Charitable Foundation Ltd john.emerson@freehills.com 101 Collins Street Melbourne Vic 3000 Australia GPO Box 128A Melbourne Vic 3001 Australia Sydney
More informationRULES FOR ARBITRATION BETWEEN THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS AND PRIVATE PARTIES
RULES FOR ARBITRATION BETWEEN THE BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS AND PRIVATE PARTIES Effective March 23, 2001 Scope of Application and Definitions Article 1 1. These Rules shall govern an arbitration
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: PARTIES: Pilot Farm Holdings Pty Ltd v Inbiz Investments Pty Ltd as Trustee for the Pilot Farm Unit Trust [2011] QSC 99 PILOT FARM HOLDINGS PTY LTD (applicant) v INBIZ
More informationBELIZE BANKRUPTCY ACT CHAPTER 244 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSIDIARY LAWS AS AT 31ST OCTOBER, 2003
BELIZE BANKRUPTCY ACT CHAPTER 244 REVISED EDITION 2003 SHOWING THE SUBSIDIARY LAWS AS AT 31ST OCTOBER, 2003 This is a revised edition of the Subsidiary Laws, prepared by the Law Revision Commissioner under
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Schepis & Anor v Esanda Finance Corp Ltd & Anor [2007] QCA 263 PARTIES: ANTHONY SCHEPIS (first plaintiff/first appellant) MICHELE SCHEPIS (second plaintiff/second
More informationSTATEMENT OF INSOLVENCY PRACTICE 4 DISQUALIFICATION OF DIRECTORS ENGLAND AND WALES
STATEMENT OF INSOLVENCY PRACTICE 4 DISQUALIFICATION OF DIRECTORS ENGLAND AND WALES New legislative provisions for the reporting obligations of insolvency office holders on the conduct of those who formerly
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Witheyman v Van Riet & Ors [2008] QCA 168 PARTIES: PETER ROBERT WITHEYMAN (applicant/appellant) v NICHOLAS DANIEL VAN RIET (first respondent) EKARI PARK PTY LTD ACN
More informationEXPERT EVIDENCE THE RULES FOR EXPERT EVIDENCE IN AUSTRALIA
EXPERT EVIDENCE THE RULES FOR EXPERT EVIDENCE IN AUSTRALIA Dr Donald Charrett, Barrister, Arbitrator and Mediator Melbourne TEC Chambers INTRODUCTION In a previous paper, the author reviewed various current
More informationDISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND
DISTRICT COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Stankovic v SS Family Pty Ltd & Anor [2018] QDC 54 PARTIES: MILJAN STANKOVIC (Plaintiff/Respondent) v SS FAMILY PTY LTD ACN 117 147 449 (Trading as Trendbuild ) (Defendant/Applicant)
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: RCR O Donnell Griffin Pty Ltd ACN 003 905 093 v Forge Group Power Pty Ltd and Ors [2015] QSC 186 PARTIES: RCR O Donnell Griffin Pty Ltd ACN 003 905 093 (Applicant)
More informationCEMETERY AND FUNERAL SERVICES
P.O. Box 9244 Victoria, B.C. V8W 9J2 Phone: (604) 320-1664 Fax: (250) 920-7181 Toll free 1 888 777-4393 www.consumerprotectionbc.ca CEMETERY AND FUNERAL SERVICES SAMPLE CARE FUND TRUST AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT
More informationNo Fault Divorce under 3301 (d) of the Divorce Code LIVING SEPARATE AND APART
No Fault Divorce under 3301 (d) of the Divorce Code LIVING SEPARATE AND APART Section 1 - Complaint Preparation Complete the following forms in order and print the number of copies indicated on each form:
More informationEopply New Energy Technology Co Ltd v EP Solar Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 356 (19 April 2013)
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgibin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/fca/2013/356.html?stem=0&synonyms=0&query=title%28eopply%2 0%29 Eopply New Energy Technology Co Ltd v EP Solar Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 356 (19 April 2013)
More informationFiling an Answer to the Complaint or Moving to Dismiss under Rule 12
ADVISORY LITIGATION PRIVATE EQUITY CONVERGENT Filing an Answer to the Complaint or Moving to Dismiss under Rule 12 Michael Stegawski michael@cla-law.com 800.750.9861 x101 This memorandum is provided for
More informationJudgment delivered on the 21st day of February locations throughout Australia but, so far as relevant here, at its office at 345 Queen
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND Brisbane CA No 10157 OF 2002 Before McPherson JA Davies JA Philippides J [St George Bank Ltd v McTaggart & Ors; [2003] QCA 59] BETWEEN AND AND AND ST
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Cox v Strategic Property Group Pty Ltd & Anor [2011] QSC 111 PARTIES: FILE NO/S: 1561/11 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: PETER JAMES COX (applicant) v STRATEGIC
More informationSTANDARD CONSULTANCY AGREEMENT
STANDARD CONSULTANCY AGREEMENT BMT WBM PTY LTD ABN 54 010 830 421 Full Legal Name of Client: ACN/ABN: Contract Ref: (If Applicable) AGREEMENT PARTICULARS Formation of Agreement Date: The Parties BMT WBM:
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: Hatton v Westaway [2005] QSC 051 PARTIES: FILE NO/S: 504 of 2002 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: ELAINE JOAN HATTON (Plaintiff) v LESLIE WESTAWAY and MARGARET
More informationFair Work Commission Rules 2013
Fair Work Rules 2013 as amended made under section 609 of the Fair Work Act 2009 This compilation was prepared on 7 January 2015 taking into account amendments made by the Fair Work Amendment (General
More informationSTATEMENT OF INSOLVENCY PRACTICE 4 (SCOTLAND) DISQUALIFICATION OF DIRECTORS
STATEMENT OF INSOLVENCY PRACTICE 4 (SCOTLAND) 1 INTRODUCTION DISQUALIFICATION OF DIRECTORS 1.1 This Statement of Insolvency Practice is to be read in conjunction with the Explanatory Foreword. 1.2 This
More information