Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
|
|
- Jane Berry
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 1 of 18 DAVID MICHAEL SMITH, PH.D, PLAINTIFF, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION V. NO. 3:13-cv-307 COLLEGE OF THE MAINLAND AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR COLLEGE OF MAINLAND, DR. BETH LEWIS, PRESIDENT OF COLLEGE, AND DR. AMY LOCKLEAR, IN THEIR INDIVIDUAL AND OFFICIAL CAPACITIES, DEFENDANTS. PLAINTIFF S, DAVID MICHAEL SMITH, ORIGINAL COMPLAINT DAVID MICHAEL SMITH, hereinafter and sometimes referred to as Plaintiff, files this his original complaint complaining with regards to his termination of his employment. It is Plaintiff s position his termination was in violation of his federal rights (First Amendment). This lawsuit is brought against COLLEGE OF THE MAINLAND, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF COLLEGE AND INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS, DR. BETH LEWIS AND DR. AMY LOCKLEAR, in their individual and official capacities. All Defendants are hereinafter and sometimes referred to as Defendants. Plaintiff would submit and show unto the Court as follows: JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Jurisdiction vests with this Court under 28 United States Code sections 1331 (federal question) and 1343 (civil 1
2 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 2 of 18 rights cases; First Amendment); U.S. CONST. Amend. I. 2. This complaint is also brought pursuant to 42 United States Code section All actions giving rise to this matter occurred in Galveston County, Texas. PARTIES 4. Plaintiff, David Michael Smith, is a resident of the County of Galveston at all times material to this action, and at one time was an employee of Defendant College of the Mainland a governmental entity, until his termination from his employment. It is Plaintiff s belief his termination was in retaliation of his exercising and fighting to protect his and others First Amendment rights. 5. Defendant, Dr. Beth Lewis, is the President of the College of Mainland, at all times material to this action. 6. Defendant, Dr. Amy Locklear, serves in the position of Vice President for Instruction. 7. College of the Mainland is an educational institution located primarily in Texas City, Texas. The College is a twoyear college formed under Texas law. The College and its Trustees are in actuality one in the same. UNDERLYING FACTS 8. Plaintiff has previously filed two other cases seeking 2
3 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 3 of 18 to enforce and protect his and others First Amendment rights (David Michael Smith, Ph.D. v. The College of the Mainland, et al.; in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Galveston Division; Case Number 3:11-cv-286 and David Michael Smith and Rona Smith v. The College of the Mainland, et al.; in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Galveston Division, Cause No. 3:09- CV-152). 9. In the initial lawsuit (3:09-cv-152), Plaintiffs brought a claim seeking a temporary restraining order and temporary injunction pending a final trial. The underlying facts asserted in the first lawsuit contended Defendants undertook actions which violated Plaintiff s free speech rights and allegations Defendants actions constituted a prior restraint and targeted speech, which was in disagreement with the Board s positions (citing Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of Virginia, 515 U.S. 819, 828 (1995); City of Madison v. Wis. Emp. Ref. Comm n, 429 U.S. 167, 174 (1976); Pickering v. Bd. of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 568 (1968). 10. The subject violation related to the Plaintiff attempting to address the Board in the public comments section of the Board Meeting of June 22, 2009, and policies enacted by the Board smacked of viewpoint discrimination. 3
4 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 4 of Plaintiff asserted in the original claim that each Board meeting constituted a lost opportunity for Plaintiff to speak to their elected officials during the public comment section. In addition, Plaintiff(s) asserted they did not have an adequate remedy under law to speak, address and/or criticize their public officials once any given Board meeting has passed. 12. On January 20, 2010, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (Case 3:09-cv-00152, doc. 22). The report was issued after the taking of testimony and argument in the Temporary Injunction hearing on January 14, The Report and Recommendation recommended granting the preliminary injunction to enjoin the Defendants from (1) excluding members of the public from speaking at COM Board Meetings during the public comment portion of the meeting on matters of public concern relevant to the limited forum of the board meeting on the basis of the content or viewpoint of their speech, and (2) limiting the number of persons who may speak at COM board meetings during the public comment of the meeting on the same matters of public concern relevant to the limited forum of the board meeting (id. at p. 6 of Report and Recommendation). 14. This Court accepted the Report and Recommendation on February 9, 2010 (Case 3:09-cv-00152, doc. 24). After this 4
5 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 5 of 18 Court s order, the parties resolved the matter by the payment of Plaintiff s attorneys fees. 15. On June 23, 2011, Plaintiff brought the second lawsuit (David Michael Smith, Plaintiff v. The College of the Mainland, et al., Defendants; in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; No. 3:11-286). The second lawsuit alleged in part the following: On or about June 23, 2010, Plaintiff was issued a Level 1 Disciplinary Letter referencing College Policy DH (EXHIBIT), Employee Standards of Conduct, Exhibit E, the Faculty Code of Professional Ethics, President Michael Elam and Department Chair Pam Millsap told Dr. Smith that he had violated Item #1 in the Faculty Code, which states, The professional educator shall treat all persons with respect, dignity, and justice, discriminating against no one on any arbitrary basis such as veteran s status, people with disabilities, and any such category against which discrimination is prohibited by state or federal laws. Plaintiff ha[d] previously filed a First Amendment complaint against the College when its Board or Board Chair sought to prohibit him and his wife from speaking. 5
6 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 6 of 18 In addition, the Union had previously filed a lawsuit directed against Elam s grievance and nonrenewal policies. The case was filed November 2009 in the state forum (Cause No. 09-cv-2148; COM-Unity v. College of the Mainland; in the 56th District Court of Galveston County, Texas). The resolution of the case involved revision of the College policies. The College of Mainland had allowed dues deductions for the union for 29 years at the time. The Board did not change the policy. Defendant Elam simply modified the policy with respect to Defendant s union (along with one other state union and a teachers association), by interpreting the policy as giving him the authority to end deductions. Defendant Elam ended the deductions in April At the regular Board meeting on June 28, 2010, the Board voted to restore the union s deductions. Plaintiff contended the reprimand was placed on his employment file to serve as a prelude to termination. Plaintiff contended the Defendants actions worked to chill Plaintiff s right of speech, assembly and association (this related to Plaintiff appearing at a June 17, 2010 board meeting). 6
7 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 7 of 18 In addition, on July 29, 2011, Defendant Chair, Dr. Millsap, presented Plaintiff with an unsigned draft of his job evaluation for September December 2009 and for all of Upon a review of the evaluation, Plaintiff noticed that Millsap had tendered to him his first negative remarks on a job evaluation in the thirteen years of his employment at the College. The evaluation gave Plaintiff a 2 score, meaning needs some improvement in accepts changes in work environment, procedures and work assignments in a positive way. The stated reason given was the Level 1 discipline in June 2010, a matter related in this lawsuit. Plaintiff informed by Dr. Millsap that he had disrupted the meeting. Plaintiff reminded Dr. Millsap that he had sued over the disciplinary action; Dr. Millsap responded, If you win the lawsuit, we can change the score. Dr. Millsap gave Plaintiff a 3 score (meaning, meets performance standards ) in working relationships with students is positive, supportive, and cooperative. The evaluation listed some positive student comments and also some negative comments 7
8 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 8 of 18 criticizing Dr. Smith s viewpoint. Millsap commented that Plaintiff need not change his political ideology but I think there is a way to make the students more comfortable. Plaintiff was also given a 3 score in serves on committees when elected or requested. Millsap explained that his service with the Union was not considered a College committee or organization. Millsap s statement actually represents a new interpretation of policy at the College. Under Annual Improvement Objectives or Goals, Millsap listed 2 for Objectives and Action Plan. Millsap wrote that Dr. Smith should 1. Refrain from insubordinate speech and behavior; 2. Comply with College policy; 3. Exercise academic responsibility in conjunction with academic freedom. Emphasis added. 16. This Court entered a Memorandum and Order (No. 3:11-286, doc. 38) on December 3, 2012, in which the Court granted in part and denied in part the Defendant s Motion for Summary Judgment. This Court explained, Although the College admits that Smith was reprimanded because he spoke, it argues that Smith was reprimanded only because of the allegedly disruptive 8
9 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 9 of 18 manner in which he spoke and not because of the content of his speech. But the following facts are more than enough evidence to allow a reasonable jury to find in favor of Smith on this element: the timeline of what transpired at the meeting, the controversial nature on which Smith spoke, and the fact that the object of Smith s criticism, Elam, filed the complaint that resulted in the reprimand. (id. at p. 17). 17. After the Court s Memorandum and Opinion was issued, the parties settled the second lawsuit. Retaliation and Adverse Action for Exercising his Rights 18. On May 21, 2013, Plaintiff received a Disciplinary Level 4 from Dr. Amy Locklear, Vice President of Instruction. The disciplinary action was dated May 20, The document alleges Plaintiff had been: Insubordinate in violation of COM Policy DM (Local). In violation of the College District s Code of Ethic, as prohibited in DM (Local) and DH (Local). The violation asserted no facts to support the violations but simply attached exchanges between Plaintiff and Defendant Lewis, the President of the institution. The first exchange was dated March 23, 2013, wherein Plaintiff asserted the President s previous to faculty and staff had several substantial 9
10 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 10 of 18 omissions and even misleading statements. Plaintiff requested the President to send a follow-up message which clearly acknowledges our rights regarding elections as well as the statutory prohibition. Plaintiff signed the David Michael Smith, Ph.D., Professor of Government, President COM-Unity. After his to Defendant Lewis, Plaintiff did not receive a response and then followed his to the President with an dated April 1, 2013, to all faculty and staff seeking to explain their rights under state and federal law (in particular the right of the employees under the First Amendment) with regards to elections. Defendant Lewis responded to the March 23, on April 23, She disagreed with Plaintiff s stating her initial to COM employees was sufficiently clear and did not warrant further explanation. In her , Defendant Lewis then writes, When I failed to do as you instructed, you sent an to all COM employees criticizing my failure to follow your directive and providing all employees with your interpretation of the policy. This and other communications you have sent 10
11 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 11 of 18 recently have been inappropriate, and in many cases, insubordinate. Defendant Lewis also criticized Plaintiff for distributing leaflets during COM s Homecoming event. Plaintiff responded to Defendant Lewis on the same day and reminded the President of the instruction of his right to criticize your actions and the Board s actions stating those rights were protected by the First Amendment and academic freedom. Plaintiff also reminded Lewis of his right as to leaflets and agreed to a compromise position even with his belief the President was misreading the policy. And finally, Plaintiff wrote, The College has already had to settle the two lawsuits I filed after being mistreated by the Board and/or the President. I urge you to avoid such misconduct towards me in the future. 19. The proposed termination was allegedly pursuant to College policy, DM (Local). The policy provides an employee may be dismissed for one of the following reasons and then list fifteen grounds, including unsatisfactory job performance, insubordination, use of profane and abusive language, physical or mental condition that results in the employee inability to 11
12 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 12 of 18 perform the assigned job function, moral turpitude, insufficient notification to employee s immediate supervisor regarding personal absences, giving false reason for paid leave, falsification of application of employment, excessive absences, theft, physical violation of disruption of the work environment, violation of the College s District s code of ethics, violation of the core value and standards of conduct, intimidation or coercion of one employee by another due to the member status in any organization or because of race, color, religion, gender, etc., or any other basis prohibited by law, failure to report any arrest or conviction subsequent to employment by the College or inappropriate or unauthorized use of College District equipment or resources. 20. In the letter of termination, Plaintiff is accused of insubordination in violation of DM (Local). The document provides, Our investigation has revealed a pattern of behavior in which you routinely challenge directives and requirements from your supervisors. The document then sets out five (5) incidents, including i) challenging Dr. Locklear s directive that all faculty complete training in Quizdom, a new software program (no date is provided with respect to this allegation; albeit the College administrator would later admit Smith actually did undertake such a requirement); ii) demanding that 12
13 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 13 of 18 Dr. Millsap, as Department Chair, hold a Department meeting to address your concerns with administrative matters, including COM hiring practices, on or about March 6, 2010 (this allegations never was part and parcel of any faculty evaluation, in addition, the actions of Plaintiff is consistent with his role as President of the employee union, COM-Unity and his role as a professor with the institution); iii) stating you would refuse to comply with Student Learning Outcomes established by the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board in correspondence to Dr. Locklear and Dr. Millsap on or about May 10, 2012 (this allegation also was never brought up in an employee evaluation); iv) on April 1, 2013 that he sent an to Dr. Lewis requesting she clarify her to all employees regarding political activities and Plaintiff then sending an to all employees criticizing Dr. Lewis failure to comply with your request and providing his own interpretation of the policy (this action is consistent with Plaintiff s role as President of the employee union and his free speech rights; v) threatening the administration and co-workers with legal action if they fail to accommodate his request. 21. On the same date of the Disciplinary Action, Defendant Lewis accepted the recommendation of Locklear and recommended the termination of Plaintiff. 13
14 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 14 of Plaintiff is a tenured professor and as such his status is governed by College Policy DDB (Local), which provides that a faculty member who has been granted tenure shall have the status and responsibilities of a ranked member of the College District staff and shall continue employment until he or she: 1. voluntarily Resigns from employment of the College District; 2. Retires; 3. Is dismissed for cause; 4. Is released due to program closure; or 5. Dies. 23. A hearing before a hearing examiner took place on June 20, The examiner issued a report on July 16, The examiner made findings of fact but did not make a recommendation and/or findings whether the Administration had met its burden in the proposed termination. 24. On August 1, 2013, the parties appeared before the Board of Trustees to argue their respective positions with regards to the proposed termination. The Board of Trustee voted and approved the proposed termination. 25. The actions of the Defendants were in direct violation of Plaintiff s First Amendment rights as a union official and as an employee speaking on matters of public concern. The actions of Defendants constitute recent and direct violation of the two previous Court orders and/or settlements concerning the same parties. 14
15 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 15 of Texas law provides that the evaluation of tenured faculty member shall be based on the professional responsibility of the faculty member, in teaching, research service and administration, and include peer review of the faculty member (Texas Education Code, section ). Texas law also provides evaluation process should commonly encompass commonly recognized academic due process rights, including the manner and scope of the evaluation, the opportunity to provide documentation during the evaluation process, and before a faculty member may be subject to disciplinary action on the basis of an evaluation conducted pursuant to this section, notice of specific charges and an opportunity for hearing on those charges. Id. And finally, the Texas law provides a tenured faculty member can be subjected to revocation of tenure or other appropriate disciplinary action if incompetency, neglect of duty, or other good cause is determined to be present. Id. 27. Academic freedom includes the freedom to express ones views on (1) on academic matters in the classroom and in the conduct of research, (2) on matters having to do with their institution and its policies; (3) on issues of public interest generally, and to do so even if their views are in conflict with one or another s perceived wisdom. 15
16 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 16 of Defendants conduct is in violation of basic and fundamental Constitutional rights and represents a prior restraint on Plaintiff s speech. 29. Defendants conduct discriminates on the basis of content of speech and the message it conveys. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of Virginia, 515 U.S. 819, 828 (1995); City of Madison v. Wis. Emp. Ref. Comm n, 429 U.S. 167, 174 (1976); Pickering v. Bd. of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 568 (1968). 30. Defendants have violated Plaintiff David Michael Smith s free speech rights as a public employee speaking on matters of public concern. 31. Defendants actions are inconsistent with the settlement agreements in this matter and the history of the case and constitute retaliation for Plaintiff s previous assertion of his rights. 32. The actions of the Defendants have a chilling effect on the rights of union membership, free speech and free association. PRAYER FOR RELIEF 33. Plaintiff prays for declaratory judgment and a finding that the Defendant s actions violated the Plaintiff s First Amendment rights. 34. Plaintiff prays for actual damages, including lost 16
17 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 17 of 18 wages, past, present and future. Plaintiff also anticipates the loss of benefits associated with the loss of his employment. It is Plaintiff s anticipation these losses over the course of his tenure are approximately $700, (estimated loss over the work-life expectancy of Plaintiff; $59, annual salary), with an additional loss of $175, $250, in loss benefits. 35. Plaintiff prays for compensatory damages ($750,000.00) associated with the actions taken by Defendants herein. Plaintiff has suffered stress, depression, anger, worry, emotional loss associated with his termination. The emotional distress associated with the actions of Defendants has also affected Plaintiff physically. 36. A finding that Defendants conduct discriminates on the basis of content of speech and the message it conveys. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of Virginia, 515 U.S. 819, 828 (1995); City of Madison v. Wis. Emp. Ref. Comm n, 429 U.S. 167, 174 (1976); Pickering v. Bd. of Educ., 391 U.S. 563, 568 (1968). 37. Declaratory judgment and the enforcement of Plaintiff s rights under the last settlement agreement of the parties and/or a finding that Defendants actions have a chilling effect on the rights of union membership, free speech 17
18 Case 3:13-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 08/23/13 Page 18 of 18 and free association. 38. Plaintiff prays for reasonable and necessary attorneys fees. The anticipated fees will range from $250, $350, Plaintiff prays for all matters in equity and law to which Plaintiff may be deemed entitled. 40. Plaintiff prays for pre and post-judgment interest and costs of court. 41. Alternatively, Plaintiff requests to be placed on an expedited docket to resolve these most important issues. DATE: August 23, Respectfully submitted, A JURY TRIAL IS DEMANDED /s/ ANTHONY P. GRIFFIN ANTHONY P. GRIFFIN ATTORNEY-IN-CHARGE A GRIFFIN LAWYERS 1115 TWENTY FIRST STREET GALVESTON, TEXAS FACSIMILE NO STATE BAR NO FEDERAL I.D. NO ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF DAVID MICHAEL SMITH c:word.smith_david_[third_claim]_plaintiff_original_complaint_[third_complaint] 18
Case 1:19-cv LY Document 1 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:19-cv-00411-LY Document 1 Filed 04/12/19 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION MARK GARCIA, Plaintiff CIVIL NO. -v- JURY DEMAND ORACLE
More informationCORRECTIVE ACTION/DISCIPLINARY-GRIEVANCE ACTION POLICY Volunteer Personnel
Virginia Beach Department of Emergency Medical Services CASS # 106.03.01/ 106.3.01 Index # Administration CORRECTIVE ACTION/DISCIPLINARY-GRIEVANCE ACTION POLICY Volunteer Personnel PURPOSE: To provide
More informationCase 4:15-cv RLY-DML Document 1 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1
Case 4:15-cv-00093-RLY-DML Document 1 Filed 07/17/15 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA AT NEW ALBANY LINDA G. SUMMERS, ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) CASE
More informationEmployee COMPLAINT FORM - LEVEL ONE. 1. Name: 2. Address: 3. Telephone number: ( ) 4. Campus:
EXHIBIT A Employee COMPLAINT FORM - LEVEL ONE To file a formal complaint, please fill out this form completely and submit it by hand delivery, fax, or U.S. mail to the appropriate administrator within
More informationDATE ISSUED: 10/17/ of 4 UPDATE 98 DGBA(LEGAL)-P
(LEGAL) UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION TEXAS CONSTITUTION FEDERAL LAWS SECTION 504 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT TITLE IX The District shall take no action abridging the freedom of speech or the right of
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SANDRA DILAURA and : Civil Action No. 03-2200 JEFFREY DILAURA, w/h, and : THE UNITED STATES EQUAL : EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY : COMMISSION,
More informationCase: 4:15-cv BYP Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/11/15 1 of 18. PageID #: 1
Case: 4:15-cv-00476-BYP Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/11/15 1 of 18. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION TERESE MOHN, ) on behalf of herself and all
More informationCase 0:16-cv JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 1 of 11
Case 0:16-cv-63007-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/22/2016 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION RAPHAEL U. ESTEVEZ, CASE NO.: Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
2:18-cv-10407-AJT-APP Doc # 1 Filed 02/02/18 Pg 1 of 27 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION PAMELA SMOCK, v. Plaintiff, Case No. Hon. MARK SCHLISSEL, REGENTS
More informationRULES OF UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA. Faculty: Definition of Just Cause, Termination, Suspension, and Other Disciplinary Action,
RULES OF UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 6C1-7.048 Academic Affairs; Suspension, Termination, and Other Disciplinary Action for Faculty: Definition of Just Cause, Termination, Suspension, and Other Disciplinary
More informationChapter 19 Procedures for Disciplinary Action and Appeal
Chapter 19 Procedures for Disciplinary Action and Appeal Bargaining unit refer to contract 19.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS ON DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS 19.1.1 DISCIPLINARY ACTION ONLY PURSUANT TO THIS RULE: A permanent
More informationNO. V. JUDICIAL DISTRICT. CORRIE LONG, DAVID TANG AND MICHAEL P. FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, P.C. Defendants. OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
NO. Filed 11 November 8 A4:32 Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County ED101J016581958 By: Nelson Cuero ROBERT C. PRUETT, JONATHAN IN THE DISTRICT COURT M. RADER AND EDWARD MATA Plaintiffs, V. JUDICIAL
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, WESTERN DIVISION KIRK CHRZANOWSKI, ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) No. 12 CV 50020 ) LOUIS A. BIANCHI, individually and in ) Judge: his
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ANGELINA ADAMS, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 16-2689 HASKELL INDIAN NATIONS UNIVERSITY, and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and SALLY JEWELL, in
More informationVOLUNTARY SEPARATION AGREEMENT AND RELEASE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TRAVIS
AND RELEASE STATE OF TEXAS KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF TRAVIS THIS ( Agreement ) is made by and between the MANOR INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT ( District ), a political subdivision of the
More informationCase: 5:15-cv SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2
Case: 5:15-cv-01425-SL Doc #: 1 Filed: 07/20/15 2 of 9. PageID #: 2 3. At all times material herein, Suarez Corporation was Stewart s employer within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. 623 et seq. 4. At all times
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
1 1 1 GARY BOSTWICK, Cal. Bar No. 000 JEAN-PAUL JASSY, Cal. Bar No. 1 KEVIN VICK, Cal. Bar No. 0 BOSTWICK & JASSY LLP 0 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 00 Telephone: --0 Facsimile:
More informationAttorney Grievance Commission of Maryland. Administrative and Procedural Guidelines
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland Administrative and Procedural Guidelines ADOPTED - AUGUST 14, 2001 [Amendments Adopted - May 8, 2002; April 10, 2003; January 1, 2004; June 16, 2004; April 4,
More informationCase: 1:14-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/18/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1
Case: 1:14-cv-01159 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/18/14 Page 1 of 15 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LAURA KUBIAK, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF CHICAGO,
More informationCase 1:18-cv XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2018 Page 1 of 17
Case 1:18-cv-20412-XXXX Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 02/01/2018 Page 1 of 17 KIM HILL, Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MIAMI DIVISION vs. Case No.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
GREGORY SMITH Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 1350 Pennsylvania Ave NW Washington, DC 20004 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JEANETTE MYRICK, in her individual capacity, 1901
More informationOFFICE OF EQUITY & DIVERSITY
OFFICE OF EQUITY & DIVERSITY OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING COMPLAINTS OF DISCRIMINATION EFFECTIVE: MARCH 1, 2006 OPERATING PROCEDURES FOR PROCESSING COMPLAINTS OF DISCRIMINATION INTRODUCTION Without
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:11-cv-00101-L Document 1 Filed 02/03/11 Page 1 of 19 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) SATERA WASHINGTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) ) (2)
More informationDATE ISSUED: 7/10/ of 5 UPDATE 105 DFBB(LOCAL)-A1
Reasons The recommendation to the Board and its decision not to renew a contract under this policy shall not be based on an employee s exercise of Constitutional rights or based unlawfully on an employee
More informationCase 1:16-cv Document 1 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 23
Case 1:16-cv-08620 Document 1 Filed 11/04/16 Page 1 of 23 Michael Faillace [MF-8436] Michael Faillace & Associates, P.C. 60 East 42nd Street, Suite 2540 New York, New York 10165 (212) 317-1200 Attorneys
More informationCase 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7
Case 4:16-cv-02909 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/29/16 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY. FAYETTEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS and VICKI THOMAS
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY TIM HOLLIS PLAINTIFF v. NO. CV FAYETTEVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, ARKANSAS and VICKI THOMAS DEFENDANTS COMPLAINT FOR BREACH OF CONTRACT,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BATON ROUGE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA BATON ROUGE DIVISION TERRANCE PATRICK ESFELLER ) Civil Action Number Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) SEAN O KEEFE ) in his official capacity as the Chancellor
More informationEMPLOYMENT CONTRACT: LIBRARIAN Catholic Schools of the Archdiocese of Galveston Houston
EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT: LIBRARIAN Catholic Schools of the Archdiocese of Galveston Houston THIS CONTRACT is entered into in the City of, Texas, by and between School within the Archdiocese of Galveston Houston,
More informationCase 8:11-cv PJM Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND
Case 8:11-cv-01195-PJM Document 1 Filed 05/05/11 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND RUTH JOHNSON 9727 MOUNT PISGAH ROAD, APT #611 SILVER SPRING, MD 20903, Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-00498-RP Document 1 Filed 06/13/18 Page 1 of 13 LISA COLE, Plaintiff, v. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION AMERICAN LEGION AUXILIARY DEPARTMENT
More informationCase 3:14-cv L Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1
Case 3:14-cv-02223-L Document 1 Filed 06/18/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHER DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION Plaintiff,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION
CAROL A. SOBEL (SBN ) YVONNE T. SIMON (SBN ) LAW OFFICE OF CAROL A. SOBEL Santa Monica Boulevard, Suite 0 Santa Monica, California 00 T. 0-0 F. 0-0 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON NADEL IONA BARRETT, I. INTRODUCTION
Case :-cv-00-smj ECF No. filed /0/ PageID. Page of 0 THOMAS G. JARRARD Law Office of Thomas G. Jarrard, PLLC 0 N. Washington Street Spokane, WA Telephone:..0 MATTHEW Z. CROTTY Crotty & Son Law Firm, PLLC
More informationDATE ISSUED: 7/12/ of 6 UPDATE 105 DFBB(LOCAL)-X
Reasons The recommendation to the Board and its decision not to renew a contract under this policy shall not be based on an employee s exercise of Constitutional rights or based unlawfully on an employee
More informationCase 4:12-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/04/12 Page 1 of 6
Case 4:12-cv-01680 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/04/12 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION MICHELLE LYONS Plaintiff v. CIVIL ACTION NO.
More informationCOMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, SS. ) JACQUELINE CREAVEN, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CITY OF BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS, ) ED DAVIS, in his official capacity as Boston ) Police Commissioner and in his individual
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF HAWAII FOUNDATION LOIS K. PERRIN # 8065 P.O. Box 3410 Honolulu, Hawaii 96801 Telephone: (808) 522-5900 Facsimile: (808) 522-5909 Email: lperrin@acluhawaii.org Attorney
More information1/29/2019 8:49 AM 19CV04626
// : AM CV0 1 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH 1 KAON-JABBAR EAST EL, an individual, v. Plaintiff, UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., a foreign business corporation, Defendant.
More informationCase 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 02/03/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cv-00240 Document 1 Filed 02/03/17 Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MELIKT MENGISTE, 401 N St. N.W., Unit 401-303 Washington, D.C. 20010, v. Plaintiff,
More informationCase 9:16-cv RLR Document 246 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2017 Page 1 of 12
Case 9:16-cv-80655-RLR Document 246 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/21/2017 Page 1 of 12 JAMES TRACY, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 16-CV-80655-ROSENBERG/HOPKINS Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION FRANK H. STEPHENSON Plaintiff, v. Case No.: FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES, A subdivision of the
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Case 5:10-cv-00480-L Document 1 Filed 05/10/10 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA (1) DETROY JARRETT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. v. ) ) (1) UHS
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 2:10-cv-02371-WEB -KMH Document 1 Filed 07/08/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS WANDA HILL ) and DR. ROBIN BOWEN ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) WASHBURN UNIVERSITY,
More informationSTATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO CP-45-
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA ) IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS ) THIRD JUDICIAL CIRCUIT COUNTY OF WILLIAMSBURG ) C/A NO. 2018-CP-45- ANDRE L. WEATHERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) SUMMONS ) WILLIAMSBURG COUNTY SCHOOL
More informationPROCEDURE ETH-151P-01 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION AND RESOLUTION
PROCEDURE ETH-151P-01 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY COMPLAINT INVESTIGATION AND RESOLUTION Authorized by the following policies: ETH-151 Equal Opportunity ETH-152 Reasonable Accommodations for Qualified Applicants
More informationCase: 1:08-cv Document #: 222 Filed: 02/14/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:2948
Case: 1:08-cv-01423 Document #: 222 Filed: 02/14/11 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:2948 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LORETTA CAPEHEART, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION MELLONY BURLISON and DOUGLAS ) BURLISON, as parents and next friends ) of C.M. and H.M., minors, ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) COMPLAINT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
Anthony J. Palik (SBN 01 LAW OFFICES OF FERNANDO F. CHAVEZ, INC. 0 Ninth Street, Suite Sacramento, CA Office: ( -1 Fax: ( - Attorneys for Plaintiff Jack Nichols UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT
More informationPMI MEMBER ETHICAL STANDARDS MEMBER ETHICS CASE PROCEDURES
PMI MEMBER ETHICAL STANDARDS MEMBER ETHICS CASE PROCEDURES The following ethics case procedures are the only rules for processing possible violations of the ethical standards promulgated by the Project
More informationCase 1:18-cv RP Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION
Case 1:18-cv-00434-RP Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION OLGA ZUNIGA, Plaintiff, V. TEXAS COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS and JUSTICE
More informationBEFORE THE ARBITRATOR
BEFORE THE ARBITRATOR In the Matter of the Arbitration of a Dispute Between SHEBOYGAN COUNTY INSTITUTIONS EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 2427, AFSCME, AFL-CIO Case 265 No. 52330 MA-8920 and SHEBOYGAN COUNTY Appearances:
More informationCase: 1:13-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1
Case: 1:13-cv-05315 Document #: 1 Filed: 07/25/13 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOHN BUENO, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, )
More information2:18-cv PDB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 03/06/18 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION CASE NO.
2:18-cv-10735-PDB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 03/06/18 Pg 1 of 16 Pg ID 1 TARA EDWARDS, Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. SCRIPPS MEDIA, INC., d/b/a WXYZ-TV,
More informationSTOCKTON UNIVERSITY POLICY. Campus Conduct Code POLICY:
STOCKTON UNIVERSITY POLICY Campus Conduct Code Policy Administrator: Executive Vice President and Chief of Staff Authority: N.J.S.A. 18A: 64-6 Effective Date: January 29, 1975; February 16, 2011, May 2,
More informationAccountability Report Card Summary 2018 Wisconsin
Accountability Report Card Summary 2018 Wisconsin Wisconsin has an evenly balanced state whistleblower law: Scoring 70 out of a possible 100; Ranking 8 th out of 51 (50 states and the District of Columbia).
More informationCase 1:15-cv KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9
Case 1:15-cv-23825-KMW Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/13/2015 Page 1 of 9 UNTIED STATE DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA (Miami Division) Case No: DAVID BALDWIN, vs. COMPLAINT Plaintiff,
More informationTitle IX Investigation Procedure
Title IX Investigation Procedure The Title IX Coordinator may modify these procedures and communicate the changes at any time as deemed appropriate for compliance with federal, state, local law or applicable
More informationCase 5:12-cv LS Document 1 Filed 03/19/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case 5:12-cv-01380-LS Document 1 Filed 03/19/12 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CIVIL DIVISION LEIF HENRY, : : No. Plaintiff : : v. : : CITY OF
More informationCase 1:15-cv WJM-MJW Document 1 Filed 08/17/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Case 1:15-cv-01775-WJM-MJW Document 1 Filed 08/17/15 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 8 Civil Action No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO ERIC VERLO; JANET MATZEN; and FULLY INFORMED
More informationCase 4:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8
Case 4:17-cv-02226 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 07/20/17 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case Case 1:09-cv-05815-RBK-JS 1:33-av-00001 Document Document 3579 1 Filed Filed 11/13/09 Page Page 1 of 1 of 26 26 Michael W. Kiernan, Esquire (MK-6567) Attorney of Record KIERNAN & ASSOCIATES, LLC One
More informationCONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT WITH SUPERINTENDENT
CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT WITH SUPERINTENDENT THIS CONTRACT is made by and between the Board of Education of the Scotts Bluff County School District 79-0031, a/k/a Mitchell Public Schools, hereinafter referred
More informationCAUSE NO CV ANNA DRAKER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS
CAUSE NO. 06-08-17998-CV ANNA DRAKER IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF VS. MEDINA COUNTY, TEXAS BENJAMIN SCHREIBER, a minor, LISA SCHREIBER, RYAN TODD, a minor, LISA TODD, and STEVE TODD 38TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT
More informationCase 5:14-cv DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION
Case 5:14-cv-00801-DAE Document 4 Filed 11/10/14 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SAN ANTONIO DIVISION EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action
More informationAGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE. This Agreement and General Release ( Agreement ) is made and entered into by and
AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE This Agreement and General Release ( Agreement ) is made and entered into by and between Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey ( Rutgers or University ) and ( Participant
More informationCourthouse News Service
0 0 PAMELA Y. PRICE, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. 0 JESHAWNA R. HARRELL, ESQ. (STATE BAR NO. PRICE AND ASSOCIATES A Professional Law Corporation Telegraph Avenue, Ste. 0 Oakland, CA Telephone: (0-0 Facsimile: (0
More informationCase 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION
Case 5:17-cv-00007 Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION MARCEL C. NOTZON, III, Individually vs. CAUSE NO. CITY
More informationSOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS. Policy Manual
SOUTH DAKOTA BOARD OF REGENTS Policy Manual SUBJECT: NUMBER: 1. Purpose of Regulations The South Dakota Board of Regents has a legal obligation to implement federal, state, and local laws and regulations
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION
Case 4:18-cv-00154-RH-CAS Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TALLAHASSEE DIVISION KIRK B. REAMS Plaintiff, v. Civil Action Case
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI AT HARRISONVILLE SUSAN EDMONSOND, Plaintiff, v. Case No. CASS COUNTY, MISSOURI JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Serve Clerk of the County Commission: 102 East Wall Street
More informationCase 1:11-cv JTN Doc #1 Filed 10/04/11 Page 1 of 10 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
Case 1:11-cv-01061-JTN Doc #1 Filed 10/04/11 Page 1 of 10 Page ID#1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN MARK LASTER, vs. Plaintiff, CITY OF KALAMAZOO, a municipal corporation,
More informationUpdates Fact Sheet No: September 2015
Updates Fact Sheet No: 15-15 September 2015 C hapter 56 of the Laws of 2015 includes a number of amendments to New York State (NYS) Education Law that address teacher preparation and certification, tenure,
More informationINDIANA UNIVERSITY Policy and Procedures on Research Misconduct DRAFT Updated March 9, 2017
INDIANA UNIVERSITY Policy and Procedures on Research Misconduct DRAFT Updated March 9, 2017 Policy I. Introduction A. Research rests on a foundation of intellectual honesty. Scholars must be able to trust
More informationEMPA Residency Program. Harassment Policy
EMPA Residency Program Harassment Policy (Written to conform to Regents Procedural Guide 3/74; amended 9/93; 10/95; 9/97) CHAPTER 14: ANTI-HARASSMENT (6/05; 12/05) 14.1 RATIONALE. The purpose of this policy
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
Case 3:17-cv-05595 Document 1 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 22 PageID: 1 Michael P. Hrycak NJ Attorney ID # 2011990 316 Lenox Avenue Westfield, NJ 07090 (908)789-1870 michaelhrycak@yahoo.com Counsel for Plaintiffs
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CLAUDE GRANT, individually and on behalf ) of all others similarly situated, ) ) NO. Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) METROPOLITAN
More informationOffice of Equal Opportunity Procedures I. PURPOSE
Office of Equal Opportunity Procedures 2013-2014 I. PURPOSE The Office of Equal Opportunity establishes these Procedures to assist in carrying out its responsibilities in the administration and enforcement
More informationRANDOLPH EASTERN SCHOOL CORPORATION Teaching Position Application 731 N. PLUM ST. UNION CITY, IN PHONE:
Teaching Position Application 731 N. PLUM ST. UNION CITY, IN 47390 PHONE: 765-964-4994 The Randolph Eastern School Corporation does not discriminate in hiring or employment on the basis of race, color,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION V. CAUSE NO.: COMPLAINT (JURY TRIAL DEMANDED)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI NORTHERN DIVISION ERICA N. STEWART PLAINTIFF V. CAUSE NO.: TAROLD DURHAM and BELHAVEN UNIVERSITY DEFENDANTS COMPLAINT (JURY
More information2:18-cv CSB-EIL # 1 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION COMPLAINT
2:18-cv-02186-CSB-EIL # 1 Page 1 of 11 E-FILED Friday, 06 July, 2018 11:28:40 AM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIVIL DIVISION CHARLES TAYLOR ) 1524 NOVA AVENUE ) CAPITOL HEIGHTS, MD 20743 ) ) ) ) Individually and as ) Class Representative ) ) PLAINTIFF )
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:12-cv-00738-MJD-AJB Document 3 Filed 03/29/12 Page 1 of 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Melissa Hill, v. Plaintiff, Civil File No. 12-CV-738 MJD/AJB AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEMAND
More informationCase 3:08-cv CRW-CFB Document 1 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 1 of 12
Case 3:08-cv-00141-CRW-CFB Document 1 Filed 11/07/2008 Page 1 of 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA-DAVENPORT DIVISION MELISSA ROSE WALDING MILLIGAN, Plaintiff, No.
More informationDocument XVIII PROCEDURES FOR DISMISSAL FOR CAUSE AND IMPOSITION OF MAJOR SANCTIONS. Introduction
Document XVIII PROCEDURES FOR DISMISSAL FOR CAUSE AND IMPOSITION OF MAJOR SANCTIONS Introduction The University is a community of scholars dedicated to the advancement of knowledge. Among the functions
More informationCONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT WITH SUPERINTENDENT
CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT WITH SUPERINTENDENT THIS CONTRACT is made by and between the Board of Education of the Hall County School District 0082, a/k/a, hereinafter referred to as the Board, and Matt Fisher,
More informationOlympia School District Complaint Procedures: Discrimination and Sexual Harassment-Personnel
Olympia School District Complaint Procedures: Discrimination and Sexual Harassment-Personnel DISCRIMINATION Olympia School District does not discriminate in any programs or activities on the basis of sex,
More informationCourt of Appeals. First District of Texas
Opinion issued August 25, 2011 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas NO. 01-06-00490-CV THE UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON, Appellant V. STEPHEN BARTH, Appellee On Appeal from the 113th District
More informationCase 4:16-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 10/24/16 Page 1 of 9
Case 4:16-cv-03138 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 10/24/16 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION CHUN SHENG YU, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO.:
More informationCase 3:15-cv EDL Document 1 Filed 12/09/15 Page 1 of 16
Case :-cv-0-edl Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 Jinny Kim, State Bar No. Alexis Alvarez, State Bar No. The LEGAL AID SOCIETY EMPLOYMENT LAW CENTER 0 Montgomery Street, Suite 00 San Francisco, CA 0 Telephone:
More informationCase 4:04-cv SBA Document 48-1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case :0-cv-00-SBA Document - Filed 0//0 Page of Andrew C. Schwartz (State Bar No. ) Thom Seaton (State Bar No. ) A Professional Corporation California Plaza North California Blvd., Walnut Creek, California
More informationMineral County Schools Bylaws & Policies
Mineral County Schools Bylaws & Policies 1422 - NONDISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY The Board of Education does not discriminate in the employment of administrative staff on the basis of
More informationCase 5:19-cv HNJ Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 20
Case 5:19-cv-00070-HNJ Document 1 Filed 01/14/19 Page 1 of 20 FILED 2019 Jan-14 AM 08:02 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHEASTERN
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. v. No. 2:06-cv ILRL-KWR
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA ----------------------------------------------------------------X HOPE MEDICAL GROUP FOR WOMEN, and K.P., M.D., Plaintiffs, v.
More informationCHAPTER XV PROHIBITED DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT
CHAPTER XV PROHIBITED DISCRIMINATION AND HARASSMENT 15001. POLICY. The policy of the Los Angeles Community College District is to provide an educational, employment and business environment free from Prohibited
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION
Case 1:13-tc-05000 Document 66 Filed 09/24/13 Page 1 of 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION ) ROBERTA IMOGENE JONES, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) CLASS ACTION v. ) )
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 15, 2005 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE September 15, 2005 Session LAWRENCE COUNTY EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, ET AL. v. THE LAWRENCE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court
More informationCase 2:16-cv JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS
Case 2:16-cv-02339-JTM-TJJ Document 1 Filed 05/25/16 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS ASIA BLUNT ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No. v. ) ) PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF ) KANSAS
More informationAASB BOARDMANSHIP SERIES DEVELOPING EXCELLENT SCHOOL BOARD LEADERS THROUGH
AASB BOARDMANSHIP SERIES DEVELOPING EXCELLENT SCHOOL BOARD LEADERS THROUGH QUALITY TRAINING, ADVOCACY AND SERVICES PROBATIONARY & CONTRACT PRINCIPALS THIRD EDITION 2017 www.alabamaschoolboards.org Published
More informationAttorney Grievance Commission, et al. v. Ty Clevenger, No. 64, September Term, 2017
Attorney Grievance Commission, et al. v. Ty Clevenger, No. 64, September Term, 2017 JURISDICTION WRIT OF MANDAMUS ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION INVESTIGATIONS The Court of Appeals held that Bar Counsel
More information