Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS"

Transcription

1 Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) EXERGEN CORPORATION ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. 1:13-cv DJC THERMOMEDICS, INC. and ) SANOMEDICS INTERNATIONAL ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED HOLDINGS, INC. ) ) Defendants. ) ) EXERGEN CORPORATION S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Exergen Corporation ( Exergen ) for its Complaint against Defendants Sanomedics International Holdings, Inc. ( Sanomedics ) and Thermomedics, Inc. ( Thermomedics ) alleges as follows. Exergen states that it has received Defendants written consent to file this amendment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(2). PARTIES 1. Plaintiff Exergen Corporation ( Exergen ) is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and having its principal place of business at 400 Pleasant Street, Watertown, Massachusetts, within this judicial district. 2. Defendant Sanomedics International Holdings, Inc. ( Sanomedics ) is, upon information and belief, a corporation organized under the laws of Delaware having its principal executive offices at 80 SW 8th Street, Suite 2180, Miami, Florida, and doing business in this judicial district, including business related to the claims asserted in this Complaint. 3. Defendant Thermomedics, Inc. ( Thermomedics ) is, upon information and

2 Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 2 of 12 belief, a wholly owned subsidiary of Sanomedics International Holding, Inc. Thermomedics is a corporation organized under the laws of Nevada having its principal executive offices at 444 Brickell Avenue, Suite 415, Miami, Florida, and doing business in this judicial district, including business related to the claims asserted in this Complaint. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 4. This action is for patent infringement. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C and 1338(a). 5. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants. Defendants have conducted and solicited and continue to conduct and solicit business in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Defendants have caused and are continuing to cause tortious injury in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Upon information and belief, Defendants, directly or through intermediaries, use, offer for sale, import, or distribute to others for such purposes, infrared thermometers, in the United States and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 6. Venue in this district is proper under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b) and (c) and 1400(b), as inter alia, Defendants are subject to personal jurisdiction in this district. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 7. On August 31, 2010, United States Patent No. 7,787,938 ( the 938 Patent ), entitled Temporal Artery Temperature Detector, was lawfully issued. 8. A copy of the 938 Patent is attached as Exhibit A and incorporated herein. 9. Exergen is the sole owner of the 938 Patent and all rights of recovery thereunder. 10. The 938 Patent has not expired and is in full force and effect. 11. Exergen has marked its products in connection with the 938 patent in compliance with 35 U.S.C. 287(a). 12. On September 18, 2001, United States Patent No. 6,292,685 ( the 685 Patent ), 2

3 Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 3 of 12 entitled Temporal Artery Temperature Detector, was lawfully issued. 13. A copy of the 685 Patent is attached as Exhibit B and incorporated herein. 14. Exergen is the sole owner of the 685 Patent and all rights of recovery thereunder. 15. The 685 Patent has not expired and is in full force and effect. 16. Exergen has marked its products in connection with the 685 Patent in compliance with 35 U.S.C. 287(a). 17. Sanomedics has made, used, has offered for sale, and/or has sold infrared thermometers the use of which infringes the 938 Patent and the 685 Patent, including but not limited to, by selling thermometers sold under the name Sanomedics Non-Contact Thermometer ( Sanomedics Thermometer ). 18. Thermomedics has made and is making, has used and is using, has offered and is offering to sell, and/or has sold and is selling infrared thermometers the use of which infringes the 938 Patent, including but not limited to, by selling thermometers sold under the name Caregiver ( Caregiver Thermometer ). 19. The instructions provided to consumers with the Sanomedics Thermometer explicitly instruct users to use the product in an infringing manner. A copy of the instruction manual ( Sanomedics Manual ) has been attached as Exhibit C and is incorporated herein. 20. On information and belief, Sanomedics has tested the Sanomedics Thermometer in a manner as described in the Sanomedics Manual. 21. Through sale of the Sanomedics Thermometer along with the Sanomedics Manual, Sanomedics has shown a specific intent for customers to follow the instructions. This occurred subsequent to Sanomedics having actual notice of the asserted patents and with no license or other authorization from Exergen. Sanomedics has evidenced a specific intent for its 3

4 Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 4 of 12 customers to use the Sanomedics Thermometer to infringe the asserted patents. 22. The Sanomedics Manual states, on page 2, It is essential to use the Talking Non- Contact Thermometer in the way it was intended. You are therefore advised to read this instruction manual and the safety precautions carefully before use. Sanomedics intended for users to follow this instruction. 23. Sanomedics specifically intended for users to use the Sanomedics Thermometer as directed. 24. The individuals performing the acts constituting direct infringement of the 685 and 938 Patents with respect to the Sanomedics Thermometer, are, in addition to Sanomedics personnel, individuals who use the Sanomedics Thermometer. 25. Because Sanomedics marketed the Sanomedics Thermometer for home use, the users include consumers, such as individuals who use the product to take a child s temperature at home. 26. Because Sanomedics also marketed the Sanomedics Thermometer for use by professionals, the users include individuals working in a clinical setting, such as nurses or medical assistants. 27. The Sanomedics Manual instructs users to perform underlying acts of direct infringement including on page 3, where users are instructed in HOW TO TAKE A TEMPERATURE as follows, Aim at the FOREHEAD, over the right temple*, holding the unit approximately 2 inches (5 cm) from the body. Press the thermometer s measurement button and the temperature is instantly displayed. 28. The Sanomedics Manual also instructs users to perform underlying acts of direct infringement on page 4, where users are instructed Aim towards the temple as described above, 4

5 Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 5 of 12 keeping the unit at a distance of 5 cm (2 inches) from forehead, and press the Scan button. Results will be displayed or spoken in one second. 29. The Sanomedics Manual provides further evidence of how the device functions in an infringing manner in use on page 3 by explaining, When the user aims the thermometer at the temple (see below), this activates the radiation (energy) sensor. The temperature measurement is taken instantly by detection of the infrared heat generated by arterial blood flow. Body heat can therefore be measured without any interference from the heat of the surrounding environment. 30. The Sanomedics Manual instructs users to perform acts that directly infringe claims of the 938 Patent including 26, 29, 31, 32, and The Sanomedics Manual instructs users to perform acts that constitute direct infringement of claims of the 685 Patent including 27, 28 and The Sanomedics Thermometer is not a staple item of commerce and has no substantial noninfringing use. The Sanomedics Thermometer is intended to be used in an infringing manner. This is evidenced in part by the Sanomedics Manual, which instructs the users to take the temperature at the temple. 33. The instructions provided to consumers with the Caregiver Thermometer explicitly instruct users to use the product in an infringing manner. A copy of the instruction manual ( Caregiver Manual ) has been attached as Exhibit D and is incorporated herein. 34. Thermomedics has tested the Caregiver Thermometer for compliance with ASTM and ISO standards. 35. On information and belief, Thermomedics has tested the Caregiver Thermometer in a manner as described in the Caregiver Manual. 5

6 Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 6 of Through sale of the Caregiver Thermometer along with the Caregiver Manual, Sanomedics shows a specific intent for the users to follow the instructions. This has occurred subsequent to Thermomedics having actual notice of the 938 Patent, and with no license or other authorization from Exergen. Thermomedics evidences a specific intent for its customers to use the Caregiver Thermometer to infringe the 938 Patents. 37. The Caregiver Manual states, on page 4, Read this manual thoroughly prior to using. Use this product only for its intended use. Thermomedics intended for users to follow this instruction. 38. Thermomedics specifically intended for users to use the Caregiver Thermometer as directed. 39. The individuals performing the acts constituting direct infringement of the 938 Patent, with respect to the Caregiver Thermometer, are, in addition to Thermomedics personnel, individuals who use the Caregiver Thermometer product. Because Thermomedics markets the product for clinical use, the users include those who work in a clinical setting, such as nurses or medical assistants. 40. The Caregiver Manual instructs users to perform underlying acts of direct infringement including on page 7, where users are instructed to Aim at center forehead area 1/2 to 2 away from skin surface (1.2 to 5 cm). Be sure thermometer is perpendicular to skin surface (at right angle). Press and release POWER button. Hold thermometer in place until a double audio beep is heard and the temperature is displayed on the LCD. 41. The Caregiver Manual instructs users to perform acts that directly infringe claims of the 938 Patent including 51 and The Thermomedics website displays an electronic training presentation with a 6

7 Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 7 of 12 voice-over which demonstrates how the Caregiver Thermometer should be used. The website is This presentation instructs users to perform acts that directly infringe claims of the 938 Patent including 51 and The Caregiver Thermometer is not a staple item of commerce and has no substantial noninfringing use. The Caregiver Thermometer is intended to be used in an infringing manner. This is evidenced in part by the Caregiver Manual, which states, under Intended Use, the statement Caregiver is an infrared thermometer for body surface and forehead temperature measurement for infants and adults without contact to the human body. It can be used by consumers in a household environment and by doctors in a clinic as a reference. 44. Defendants have been aware of the existence of the 938 Patent since at least as early as about October 2012, when counsel for Exergen notified them about it through a letter identifying particular patent claims. 45. Defendants have been aware of the existence of the 685 Patent since at least as early as about October 2012, when counsel for Exergen notified them about it through a letter identifying particular patent claims. 46. On information and belief, Defendants were aware of the existence of the 685 Patent earlier than October 2012, when contacted by Exergen, because in 2005, Thermomedics Chief Technology Officer Gary J. O Hara served as an expert for defendants sued by Exergen for infringement of patents including the 685 Patent. out herein. COUNT I INFRINGEMENT OF THE 938 PATENT 47. Exergen incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs as though fully set 48. On information and belief, Defendant Thermomedics has been and is using the 7

8 Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 8 of 12 Caregiver Thermometer in a manner which infringes the 938 Patent. Thermomedics has engaged in this conduct willfully, with knowledge of the 938 Patent. 49. On information and belief, Defendant Sanomedics has used the Sanomedics Thermometer in a manner which infringes the 938 Patent. Sanomedics has engaged in this conduct willfully, with knowledge of the 938 Patent. 50. On information and belief, Defendant Thermomedics has been and is contributorily infringing and/or actively inducing others, including end users, to infringe the 938 Patent, and sells the infringing thermometers with the knowledge and intent that they will be used by end users and that such use infringes the 938 Patent, and the intent that such thermometers are especially designed to be and are used in a manner which infringes the 938 Patent. As evidenced by, inter alia, the instructions for use, such thermometers are, and are known and intended by Defendant Thermomedics to be, especially made and adapted for use in practicing a method of use that infringes the 938 Patent, constituting a material part of the invention of the patent, and not being staple items or commodities of commerce suitable for substantial noninfringing use. 51. On information and belief, Defendant Sanomedics has been and is contributorily infringing and/or actively inducing others, including end users, to infringe the 938 Patent, and sells the infringing thermometers with the knowledge and intent that they will be used by end users and that such use infringes the 938 Patent, and the intent that such thermometers are especially designed to be and are used in a manner which infringes the 938 Patent. As evidenced by, inter alia, the instructions for use, such thermometers are, and are known and intended by Defendant Sanomedics to be, especially made and adapted for use in practicing a method of use that infringes the 938 Patent, constituting a material part of the invention of the 8

9 Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 9 of 12 patent, and not being staple items or commodities of commerce suitable for substantial noninfringing use. 52. Sanomedics is a direct competitor of Exergen with respect to the subject matter of the 938 patent. 53. Thermomedics is a direct competitor of Exergen with respect to the subject matter of the 938 patent. 54. On information and belief, Defendants were aware of the existence of the 938 Patent and their infringement of the 938 Patent has been intentional, deliberate, and willful. 55. By reason of the aforesaid infringement, Exergen is damaged and is entitled to damages adequate to compensate for Defendants infringement. 56. Defendants infringement of the 938 Patent has caused and is causing irreparable injury to Exergen, for which Exergen has no adequate remedy at law. Defendants will continue their unauthorized conduct unless enjoined by this Court. out herein. COUNT II INFRINGEMENT OF THE 685 PATENT 57. Exergen incorporates by reference the preceding paragraphs as though fully set 58. On information and belief, Defendant Sanomedics has used the Sanomedics Thermometer in a manner which directly infringes the 685 Patent. Sanomedics has engaged in this conduct willfully, with knowledge of the 685 Patent. 59. On information and belief, Defendant Sanomedics has contributorily infringed and/or actively induced others, including end users, to infringe the 685 Patent, and has sold the infringing thermometers with the knowledge and intent that they will be used by end users and that such use directly infringes the 685 Patent, and the intent that such thermometers are 9

10 Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 10 of 12 especially designed to be and are used in a manner which directly infringes the 685 Patent. As evidenced by, inter alia, the instructions for use, such thermometers are, and are known and intended by Defendant Sanomedics to be, especially made and adapted for use in practicing a method of use that directly infringes the 685 Patent, constituting a material part of the invention of the patent, and not being staple items or commodities of commerce suitable for substantial noninfringing use. 60. Sanomedics is a direct competitor of Exergen with respect to the subject matter of the 685 Patent. 61. On information and belief, Sanomedics was aware of the existence of the 685 Patent and its infringement of the 685 Patent has been intentional, deliberate, and willful. 62. By reason of the aforesaid infringement, Exergen is damaged and is entitled to damages adequate to compensate for Sanomedics infringement. 63. Sanomedics infringement of the 685 Patent has caused and is causing irreparable injury to Exergen, for which Exergen has no adequate remedy at law. It will continue its unauthorized conduct unless enjoined by this Court. PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Exergen respectfully requests this Court to grant the following relief, and any other relief the Court may deem proper: 1. Enter judgment in favor of Exergen determining that both Defendants induce infringement of, and have induced infringement of, the 938 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(b); 2. Enter judgment in favor of Exergen determining that Sanomedics induces infringement of, and has induced infringement of, the 685 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(b); 10

11 Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 11 of Enter judgment in favor of Exergen determining that both Defendants contributorily infringe, and have contributorily infringed, the 938 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(c); 4. Enter judgment in favor of Exergen determining that Sanomedics contributorily infringes, and has contributorily infringed, the 685 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(c); 5. Enter judgment in favor of Exergen determining that Sanomedics has infringed the 685 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(a). 6. Enter judgment in favor of Exergen determining that both Defendants have and/or do infringe, the 938 Patent in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(a). 7. Permanently enjoin both Defendants and their officers, agents, divisions, affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, employees, and representatives, and all those controlled by or acting in concert or privity with them from infringing, inducing the infringement, and/or contributing to the infringement of the 938 Patent; 8. Permanently enjoin Sanomedics and its officers, agents, divisions, affiliates, subsidiaries, successors, employees, and representatives, and all those controlled by or acting in concert or privity with it from infringing, inducing the infringement, and/or contributing to the infringement of the 685 Patent; 9. Award Exergen damages in an amount to be determined at trial; and 10. Award Exergen treble damages for willful infringement pursuant to 35 U.S.C

12 Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 17 Filed 08/14/13 Page 12 of 12 Exergen hereby demands a trial by jury. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Date: August 14, 2013 Respectfully submitted, EXERGEN CORPORATION By its attorneys, /s/ Meredith L. Ainbinder Kerry L. Timbers (BBO # ) Robert M. Asher (BBO # 22865) Meredith L. Ainbinder (BBO # ) SUNSTEIN KANN MURPHY & TIMBERS LLP 125 Summer Street Boston, MA Tel: (617) Fax: (617) mainbinder@sunsteinlaw.com CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that this document filed through the ECF system will be sent electronically to the registered participants as identified on the Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) on the above date / /s/ Meredith L. Ainbinder Meredith L. Ainbinder 12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS EXERGEN CORPORATION Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. THERMOMEDICS, INC. AND SANOMEDICS INTERNATIONAL JURY TRIAL DEMANDED HOLDINGS, INC. Defendant.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS EXERGEN CORPORATION Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. KAZ USA, INC. a JURY TRIAL DEMANDED Defendant. EXERGEN CORPORATION S COMPLAINT FOR PATENT

More information

Case 1:15-cv RGS Document 10 Filed 12/02/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:15-cv RGS Document 10 Filed 12/02/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:15-cv-13387-RGS Document 10 Filed 12/02/15 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) EXERGEN CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) 1:15-cv-13387 v. ) ) MICROLIFE CORPORATION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 186 Filed 04/29/11 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 17113 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE AUGME TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. PANDORA MEDIA,

More information

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:14-cv Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION Case 1:14-cv-00149 Document 1 Filed 02/18/14 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:14-cv-00149

More information

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT Case 1:16-cv-00275-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/19/16 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Boston Scientific Corporation and Boston Scientific Scimed, Inc.,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS LEXINGTON LUMINANCE LLC, v. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. AMAZON.COM, INC. and AMAZON DIGITAL SERVICES, INC., Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS BEIJING CHOICE ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., v. Plaintiff, CONTEC MEDICAL SYSTEMS USA INC. and CONTEC MEDICAL SYSTEMS CO., LTD.,

More information

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT

Case 6:15-cv Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT Case 6:15-cv-00042 Document 1 Filed 01/13/15 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ADAPTIX, INC., Plaintiff, v. ERICSSON, INC., TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET

More information

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:06-cv SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:06-cv-00107-SD Document 1-1 Filed 01/10/2006 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SYNERGETICS, INC., CIVIL ACTION Plaintiff, v. Case No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS LEXINGTON LUMINANCE LLC, v. GOOGLE, INC., Plaintiff, Defendant. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

More information

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ).

Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC ( Plaintiff ) complains and alleges as follows against Defendant Gimme Gimme, LLC ( Defendant ). 0 0 Robert J. Lauson (,) bob@lauson.com Edwin P. Tarver, (0,) edwin@lauson.com LAUSON & TARVER LLP 0 Apollo St., Suite. 0 El Segundo, CA 0 Tel. (0) -0 Fax (0) -0 Attorneys for Plaintiff Privacy Pop, LLC

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION ILIFE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, v. NINTENDO OF AMERICA, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-4987 Jury Trial Demanded PLAINTIFF

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 Page ID #: 0 Randall J. Sunshine (SBN ) rsunshine@linerlaw.com Ryan E. Hatch (SBN ) rhatch@linerlaw.com Jason L. Haas (SBN 0) jhaas@linerlaw.com LINER LLP 00 Glendon

More information

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15

Case 2:16-cv RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15 Case 2:16-cv-01011-RJS Document 2 Filed 09/29/16 Page 1 of 15 A. John Pate (Utah Bar No. 6303) jpate@patebaird.com Gordon K. Hill (Utah Bar No. 9361) ghill@patebaird.com PATE BAIRD, PLLC 36 West Fireclay

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION RIDDELL, INC., v. Plaintiff, RAWLINGS SPORTING GOODS COMPANY, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No.: Jury Trial Demanded

More information

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS

Case 1:17-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Case 1:17-cv-00242-LY Document 1 Filed 03/17/17 Page 1 of 22 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS Synergy Drone, LLC, Civil Action No. 1:17-cv-00242 v. Plaintiff, The Honorable

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK COMPLAINT Case 1:14-cv-08423-GBD Document 2 Filed 10/22/14 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Marshall Feature Recognition, LLC Plaintiff, V. Terra Holdings, LLC, 14-civ-8423

More information

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. COMPLAINT and Jury Demand Case 1:15-cv-10597 Document 1 Filed 02/27/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS DUNE JEWELRY, INC. Plaintiff, v. REBECCA JAMES, LLC, Defendant. Civil Action No. 1:15-cv-10597

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE 0:09-cv-03335-DWF -TNL Document 3 Filed 04/09/10 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA 3M Innovative Properties Company and 3M Company, vs. Plaintiffs, Tredegar

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Plaintiff, for its complaint, by and through its attorney, alleges that: Lester Electrical Inc., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA Plaintiff, V. Diversified Power International, LLC and Nivel Parts & Manufacturing Co., LLC COMPLAINT Defendants.

More information

Case 2:16-cv DSC Document 1 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:16-cv DSC Document 1 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:16-cv-00526-DSC Document 1 Filed 04/27/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA WELL SERVICE GROUP, INC., MATTHEW WHEELER, CHRIS ALLEN and SHANA

More information

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:10-cv Document 1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:10-cv-11064 Document 1 Filed 06/22/10 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS PETEDGE, INC., Civil Action No. Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v. HAMMACHER, SCHLEMMER &

More information

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5

Case 1:11-cv REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5 Case 1:11-cv-00636-REB Document 1 Filed 12/15/11 Page 1 of 5 Lane M. Chitwood, ISB No. 8577 lchitwood@parsonsbehle.com Peter M. Midgley, ISB No. 6913 pmidgley@parsonsbehle.com John N. Zarian, ISB No. 7390

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: Ronald P. Oines (State Bar No. 0) roines@rutan.com Benjamin C. Deming (State Bar No. ) bdeming@rutan.com RUTAN & TUCKER, LLP Anton Boulevard, Fourteenth

More information

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:17-cv-01310-UNA Document 1 Filed 09/15/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE DEXCOM, INC., v. AGAMATRIX, INC., Plaintiff, Defendant. C.A. No.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE TELA INNOVATIONS, INC., v. Plaintiff, TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING COMPANY, LIMITED and TSMC NORTH AMERICA, Defendants. C.A. No. JURY

More information

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:11-cv LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:11-cv-00916-LPS Document 14 Filed 01/30/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 59 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Digital CBT, LLC Plaintiff, C.A. No. 11-cv-00916 (LPS) v. Southwestern Bell

More information

case 3:14-cv TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA

case 3:14-cv TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA case 3:14-cv-00575-TLS-CAN document 1 filed 03/21/14 page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA RICHARD GRAMM and HEADSIGHT, INC., v. DEERE AND COMPANY, Plaintiffs, Defendant.

More information

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 1:18-cv YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 1:18-cv-01161-YK Document 1 Filed 06/07/18 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA TECHNICAL LED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC., Plaintiff, Civil Action

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP.,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION INTEX RECREATION CORP., Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP Tarifa B. Laddon (SBN 0) 0 S. Bundy Dr., Suite Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: 0-00- Fax: 0-00- Tarifa.laddon@faegrebd.com R.

More information

Case5:14-cv PSG Document1 Filed10/10/14 Page1 of 10. Attorneys for Plaintiff ENPHASE ENERGY, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Case5:14-cv PSG Document1 Filed10/10/14 Page1 of 10. Attorneys for Plaintiff ENPHASE ENERGY, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case:-cv-0-PSG Document Filed0/0/ Page of 0 0 DANIEL JOHNSON, JR. (State Bar No. 0) MICHAEL J. LYONS (State Bar No. 0) DION M. BREGMAN (State Bar No. 0) Palo Alto Square 000 El Camino Real, Suite 00 Palo

More information

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this

PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT. Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this 1 PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT Plaintiff Newthink, LLC ( Plaintiff ), by and through its undersigned counsel, files this Original Complaint against Defendant Viewsonic Corporation ( Defendant or Viewsonic

More information

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 52

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 52 Case 2:15-cv-00366 Document 1 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 52 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 INTELLICHECK MOBILISA, INC., a Delaware

More information

Case 2:14-cv SPC-CM Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 2:14-cv SPC-CM Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 2:14-cv-00180-SPC-CM Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 12 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA ) CANVS Corporation ) 13650 Fiddlesticks Boulevard ) Suite

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff,

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE OPTICAL DEVICES, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT TOSHIBA CORPORATION AND TOSHIBA AMERICA INFORMATION

More information

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:11-cv ECR -PAL Document 1 Filed 02/25/11 Page 1 of 6 Case :-cv-00-ecr -PAL Document Filed 0// Page of 0 0 Brandon C. Fernald (Nevada Bar #0) FERNALD LAW GROUP LLP 00 West Sahara Ave., Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada 0 Tel: (0) 0-00 Fax: (0) 0-0 Email: brandon.fernald@fernaldlawgroup.com

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION Blackboard Inc., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. ) v. ) ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED TechRadium, Inc., ) ) Defendant. ) BLACKBOARD

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants. COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION. Plaintiffs, Defendants. COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION BAXTER INTERNATIONAL INC., BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, AND BAXTER HEALTHCARE S.A, v. Plaintiffs, JOHNSON &

More information

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1

Case 2:16-cv Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 Case 2:16-cv-01358 Document 1 Filed 12/05/16 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 AXCESS INTERNATIONAL, INC., IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION v. Plaintiff, DUAL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT SAPPHIRE DOLPHIN LLC, Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE v. BOSTON ACOUSTICS INC., C.A. No. TRIAL BY JURY DEMANDED Defendant. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

More information

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

Case 8:17-cv EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION Case 8:17-cv-01346-EAK-JSS Document 114 Filed 07/30/18 Page 1 of 11 PageID 2433 STEVEN J. KANIADAKIS Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION v. Case No: 8:17-cv-1346-T-17-JSS

More information

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:12-cv JCM-VCF Document 1 Filed 11/13/12 Page 1 of 10 Case :-cv-0-jcm-vcf Document Filed // Page of R. Scott Weide, Esq. Nevada Bar No. sweide@weidemiller.com Ryan Gile, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 0 rgile@weidemiller.com Kendelee L. Works, Esq. Nevada Bar No. kworks@weidemiller.com

More information

Case 2:13-cv JRG Document 18 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 105

Case 2:13-cv JRG Document 18 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 105 Case 2:13-cv-00750-JRG Document 18 Filed 01/06/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 105 Babbage Holdings, LLC, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISON Plaintiff, v. Activision

More information

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 1

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 1 Case 2:17-cv-01457 Document 1 Filed 03/02/17 Page 1 of 21 PageID: 1 Thomas R. Curtin George C. Jones GRAHAM CURTIN A Professional Association 4 Headquarters Plaza P.O. Box 1991 Morristown, New Jersey 07962-1991

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CIVIL CASE NO. Wi-LAN USA, INC. and Wi-LAN, INC., v. Plaintiffs, TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON, and ERICSSON INC. Defendants. COMPLAINT This

More information

Case 1:99-mc Document 689 Filed 12/01/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:99-mc Document 689 Filed 12/01/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:99-mc-09999 Document 689 Filed 12/01/11 Page 1 of 6 PageID #: 64196 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IVOCLAR VIVADENT AG, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. JURY TRIAL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION Case 3:11-cv-00621-CRS-DW Document 1 Filed 11/04/11 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE DIVISION MESH COMM, LLC Plaintiff, Civil

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Case 1:18-cv-11065 Document 1 Filed 05/22/18 Page 1 of 14 R. Terry Parker, Esquire Kevin P. Scura, Esquire RATH, YOUNG & PIGNATELLI, P.C. 120 Water Street, 2nd Floor Boston, MA 02109 Attorneys for Plaintiff

More information

Case 1:18-cv FDS Document 1 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:18-cv FDS Document 1 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:18-cv-10091-FDS Document 1 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS * POINTCARE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., * * Plaintiff, * * v. * Docket No.: * MASSACHUSETTS

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION T-REX PROPERTY AB, Plaintiff, v. CBS Corporation, Defendant. CIVIL ACTION NO. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Case 1:18-cv-05640-SCJ Document 1 Filed 12/11/18 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION TECHNICAL LED INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability

More information

Case 2:15-cv RSM Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:15-cv RSM Document 1 Filed 05/01/15 Page 1 of 8 Case :-cv-00-rsm Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 0 PACIFIC BIOSCIENCE LABORATORIES, INC., a Washington corporation, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Plaintiff, MICHAEL

More information

Case 1:13-cv SS Document 1 Filed 09/11/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:13-cv SS Document 1 Filed 09/11/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION Case 1:13-cv-00800-SS Document 1 Filed 09/11/13 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION CROSSROADS SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Apple, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc. et al Doc. 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN APPLE INC. v. Plaintiff, MOTOROLA, INC. and MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC. Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) )

More information

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6

Case 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6 Case 9:16-cv-80588-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6 SHIPPING and TRANSIT, LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA vs. Plaintiff, STATE

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service -\ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA PICTURE PATENTS, LLC, ) ) \.L Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Case No. j.'o&cv o?&>4' MONUMENT REALTY LLC, ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ) Defendant.

More information

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:14-cv RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11 Case 3:14-cv-00151-RS-EMT Document 1 Filed 03/28/14 Page 1 of 11 SPIKER, INC. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PENSACOLA DIVISION v. Civil Action No.

More information

Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 118 Filed 09/15/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

Case 1:13-cv DJC Document 118 Filed 09/15/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Case 1:13-cv-11243-DJC Document 118 Filed 09/15/15 Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS EXERGEN CORP., Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 13-11243-DJC THERMOMEDICS, INC., et

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:11-cv-03855-RLV Document 62 Filed 03/01/12 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CANON INC., v. Plaintiff, COLOR IMAGING, INC. and

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION TRUDELL MEDICAL INTERNATIONAL, Plaintiff, D R BURTON HEALTHCARE LLC, v. Defendant. Case No.: 4:18-CV-00009

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA SIEMENS MEDICAL SOLUTIONS USA, INC., v. Plaintiff, EV PRODUCTS INC., KROMEK LIMITED, KROMEK GROUP PLC, and NOVA R&D, INC., Defendants. No.:

More information

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:10-cv GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:10-cv-00544-GMS Document 1-3 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 71 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE APPLE INC., vs. Plaintiff, High Tech Computer Corp., a/k/a

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE AMPEX CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. ) v. ) ) MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED CORPORATION and ) MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC

More information

Case 2:16-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Case 2:16-cv MRH Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Case 2:16-cv-01594-MRH Document 1 Filed 10/19/16 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MINELAB ELECTRONICS PTY LTD, v. Plaintiff, XP METAL DETECTORS and

More information

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:16-cv-00975-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/16 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1 GODO KAISHA IP BRIDGE 1, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Plaintiff, Case No. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

More information

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1

Case: 1:17-cv Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1 Case: 1:17-cv-02403 Doc #: 1 Filed: 11/15/17 1 of 12. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ETi SOLID STATE LIGHTING, INC., ) CASE NO. 1:17-cv-2403

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS VICTORIA DIVISION MARK N. CHAFFIN Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED MICHAEL R. BRADEN and LBC MANUFACTURING Defendants.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, Defendants. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE TELA INNOVATIONS, INC., v. Plaintiff, HTC CORPORATION and HTC AMERICA, INC., Defendants. C.A. No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0 Document Filed /0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Rodger K. Carreyn (Bar No. 0) rcarreyn@perkinscoie.com One East Main Street, Suite Madison, WI Telephone: 0--0 Facsimile: 0-- Michael J. Song (Bar No.

More information

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION

Case 1:18-cv LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION Case 1:18-cv-00245-LY Document 1 Filed 03/20/18 Page 1 of 7 HARK N TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Utah corporation, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AUSTIN DIVISION v. Plaintiff,

More information

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1 Case: 1:16-cv-10629 Document #: 1 Filed: 11/15/16 Page 1 of 8 PageID #:1 Gaelco S.A., a Spanish Corporation, and IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

More information

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION

Case 2:13-cv RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Case 2:13-cv-00157-RAJ Document 1 Filed 08/30/10 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION TRITON TECH OF TEXAS, LLC, v. Plaintiff, NINTENDO OF

More information

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227

Case 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227 Case 2:14-cv-00799-JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227 ECLIPSE IP LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Plaintiff, v. LUXI

More information

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION

Case 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION Case 2:17-cv-01100-EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION Trent Baker Baker & Associates PLLC 358 S 700 E B154 Salt Lake City,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Aloft Media LLC v. Yahoo!, Inc. et al Doc. 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ALOFT MEDIA, LLC, v. Plaintiff, YAHOO!, INC., AT&T, INC., and AOL LLC,

More information

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:16-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:16-cv-00237-UNA Document 1 Filed 04/07/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE FRESENIUS KABI USA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. MAIA PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., Defendant.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case:-cv-00-DMR Document Filed0// Page of 0 ANTON HANDAL (Bar No. ) anh@handal-law.com PAMELA C. CHALK (Bar No. ) pchalk@handal-law.com GABRIEL HEDRICK (Bar No. 0) ghedrick@handal-law.com 0 B Street, Suite

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION CHARLES C. FREENY III, BRYAN E. FREENY, and JAMES P. FREENY, Plaintiffs, Case No. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v. HTC AMERICA,

More information

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1

Case 6:17-cv Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 Case 6:17-cv-00203 Document 1 Filed 04/05/17 Page 1 of 10 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION FALL LINE PATENTS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. CINEMARK

More information

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION

Case 1:07-cv MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Case 1:07-cv-00852-MRB Document 6 Filed 11/06/2007 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ESCORT, INC., Plaintiff, V. COBRA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION,

More information

Case 2:15-cv TSZ Document 15 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:15-cv TSZ Document 15 Filed 12/18/15 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case :-cv-00-tsz Document Filed // Page of HONORABLE THOMAS S. ZILLY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 G Genuine Guide Gear Inc., a Canadian corporation v.

More information

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1

Case: 1:17-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 Case: 1:17-cv-02083 Document #: 1 Filed: 03/16/17 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION IVOCLAR VIVADENT AG, IVOCLAR VIVADENT,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION Case 6:10-cv-00068-LED Document 1 Filed 02/27/2010 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION SONIX TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD v. Plaintiff, VTECH ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS INERGETIC AB Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv-1686 v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED MURATA ELECTRONICS NORTH AMERICA, INC. Defendant. COMPLAINT

More information

Case 2:08-cv DF-CE Document 1 Filed 03/04/2008 Page 1 of 8

Case 2:08-cv DF-CE Document 1 Filed 03/04/2008 Page 1 of 8 Case 2:08-cv-00093-DF-CE Document 1 Filed 03/04/2008 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION e.digital CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. AVID TECHNOLOGY,

More information

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

Case 1:17-cv Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case 1:17-cv-11922 Document 1 Filed 10/05/17 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS AVIGILON CORPORATION and AVIGILON USA CORPORATION, INC., v. Plaintiffs, CANON INC., Defendant.

More information

Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1

Case 3:16-cv N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1 Case 3:16-cv-00364-N Document 1 Filed 02/09/16 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION NAUTILUS HYOSUNG INC., Plaintiff, v. DIEBOLD,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA Case 2:13-cv-01106-UNAS-AKK Document 1 Filed 06/12/13 Page 1 of 152 FILED 2013 Jun-12 PM 02:40 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA

More information

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

Case 1:17-cv UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Case 1:17-cv-01481-UNA Document 1 Filed 10/20/17 Page 1 of 8 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE FOREST LABORATORIES, LLC, FOREST LABORATORIES HOLDINGS, LTD., ALLERGAN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA WI-LAN USA, INC. and WI-LAN INC., v. Plaintiffs, Case No. COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT JURY TRIAL DEMANDED TOSHIBA CORPORATION; TOSHIBA

More information

Case: 5:17-cv DCR Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/06/17 Page: 1 of 5 - Page ID#: 1

Case: 5:17-cv DCR Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/06/17 Page: 1 of 5 - Page ID#: 1 Case: 5:17-cv-00011-DCR Doc #: 1 Filed: 01/06/17 Page: 1 of 5 - Page ID#: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY LEXINGTON DIVISION CHRISMAN MILL FARMS, LLC Plaintiff, Case No. v.

More information

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 2:15-cv Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 Case 2:15-cv-00898 Document 1 Filed 05/29/15 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION AUTOMATION MIDDLEWARE SOLUTIONS, INC., v. Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT Vincent E. McGeary Gibbons P.C. One Gateway Center Newark, New Jersey 07102-5310 Phone: 973-596-4500 Fax: 973-596-0545 Of Counsel: Michael W. Shore Alfonso Garcia Chan Patrick J. Conroy Justin Kimble Ari

More information

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1

Case 1:16-cv JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 Case 1:16-cv-00215-JMS-MJD Document 1 Filed 01/26/16 Page 1 of 15 PageID #: 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA INDIANAPOLIS DIVISION CUMMINS LTD. and CUMMINS INC. vs. Plaintiffs

More information

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LANHAM ACT AND TRADEMARK INFRINGMENT Case 1:10-cv-10370-RWZ Document 1 Filed 03/02/2010 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS BRAVADO INTERNATIONAL GROUP MERCHANDISING SERVICES, INC., Plaintiff, CIVIL

More information

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6

Case 4:14-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6 Case 4:14-cv-02578 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 09/08/14 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION BELFER COSMETICS, LLC Plaintiff, vs. Case No.

More information

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/06/11 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1

Case: 1:11-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 09/06/11 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1 Case: 1:11-cv-06192 Document #: 1 Filed: 09/06/11 Page 1 of 20 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION ) ) FELLOWES, INC., ) ) Civil Action

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA CEDAR RAPIDS DIVISION WEEMS INDUSTRIES, INC. d/b/a LEGACY MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Case No. 1:16-cv-109LRR v. Plaintiff, COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY

More information

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:14-cv JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 1:14-cv-05919-JEI-KMW Document 1 Filed 09/23/14 Page 1 of 6 PageID: 1 Lawrence C. Hersh Attorney at Law 17 Sylvan Street Suite 102B Rutherford, New Jersey 07070 Telephone: (201)507-6300 Fax: (201)507-6311

More information