Case: 1:14-cv SPM Doc. #: 30 Filed: 03/01/16 Page: 1 of 11 PageID #: 1424

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "Case: 1:14-cv SPM Doc. #: 30 Filed: 03/01/16 Page: 1 of 11 PageID #: 1424"

Transcription

1 Case: 1:14-cv SPM Doc. #: 30 Filed: 03/01/16 Page: 1 of 11 PageID #: 1424 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION VICKIE SANDERS, Plaintiff, vs. Case No. 1:14CV169SPM SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. JUDGMENT In accordance with the oral opinion entered on February 25, 2016, a transcript of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that under 42 U.S.C. 1383(c(3 and Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g, the final decision of the defendant Commissioner of Social Security denying disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits to Plaintiff Vickie Sanders is REVERSED. This action is remanded to the Defendant for further proceedings consistent with the court s Oral Opinion. Dated March 1, SHIRLEY PADMORE MENSAH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2 Case: 1:14-cv SPM Doc. #: 30 Filed: 03/01/16 Page: 2 of 11 PageID #: 1425 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION VICKIE SANDERS, Plaintiff, VS. No. 1:14-CV-169(SPM CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, Defendant. FOR THE PLAINTIFF: OPINION OF THE COURT BY THE HONORABLE SHIRLEY P. MENSAH FEBRUARY 25, 2016 ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI JEFFREY J. BUNTEN 211 S. Broadway, Suite 2400 St. Louis, MO ( FOR THE DEFENDANT: SARAH E. PRESTON SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION Office of the General Counsel Region VII, Federal Office Building 601 E. Twelfth Street, Suite 535 Kansas City, MO ( Proceedings recorded by mechanical stenography; transcript produced by computer. DEBORAH A. KRIEGSHAUSER, FAPR, RMR, CRR Federal Official Court Reporter 111 South Tenth Street, Third Floor St. Louis, MO (

3 Case: 1:14-cv SPM Doc. #: 30 Filed: 03/01/16 Page: 3 of 11 PageID #: (PROCEEDINGS BEGAN AT 3:30 PM. 2 THE CLERK: All rise. This Honorable Court is again 3 in session. 4 THE COURT: Good afternoon. 5 MS. PRESTON: Good afternoon, Your Honor. 6 MR. BUNTEN: Good afternoon, Your Honor. 7 THE COURT: All right. We are back on the record in 8 the case of Vickie Sanders versus Carolyn Colvin, the Acting 9 Commissioner of the Social Security Administration. This is 10 Case No. 1:14-CV-169(SPM. 11 Counsel, please announce your presence for the 12 record. 13 MR. BUNTEN: This is Jeffrey J. Bunten, attorney for 14 the Plaintiff. 15 MS. PRESTON: This is Sarah Preston, attorney for 16 Defendant. 17 THE COURT: All right. The Plaintiff in this case is 18 appealing the Social Security Administration's denial of her 19 applications for disability insurance benefits and 20 supplemental security income. We had oral argument this 21 morning at which the chief issues raised in Plaintiff's appeal 22 were addressed. Those issues are whether the RFC is supported 23 by some medical evidence as required in cases such as Nevland, 24 Lauer and Singh; whether the ALJ failed to adequately assess 25 the Plaintiff's credibility; and whether the hypothetical

4 Case: 1:14-cv SPM Doc. #: 30 Filed: 03/01/16 Page: 4 of 11 PageID #: posed to the vocational expert captured the concrete 2 consequences of Plaintiff's impairments. The Commissioner did 3 concede during oral argument that if the RFC is not supported 4 by substantial evidence, then the hypothetical posed to the 5 vocational expert is also -- is also inadequate. 6 I have considered all of the arguments made this 7 morning during oral argument as well as the administrative 8 record, the written submissions of the parties, and I am ready 9 to rule. 10 Based on everything that I've reviewed, I am going to 11 reverse the Commissioner's decision and remand this case for 12 further proceedings. 13 I agree with the Plaintiff that the ALJ's decision is 14 not supported by substantial evidence because the RFC does not 15 appear to be supported by some medical evidence of the 16 Plaintiff's ability to function in the workplace in light of 17 her medical impairments. 18 When this case was remanded back to the Commissioner 19 from this Court by Judge Jean Hamilton in February of 2012, 20 Judge Hamilton held that with respect to Plaintiff's physical 21 impairment, the ALJ, quote, "provided no rationale for his RFC 22 determination," and I supplied the "RFC." And that's at 23 Transcript 899 of the record. 24 After outlining a number of findings from the medical 25 records, Judge Hamilton wrote, quote, "The medical record

5 Case: 1:14-cv SPM Doc. #: 30 Filed: 03/01/16 Page: 5 of 11 PageID #: reveals that Plaintiff received regular treatment for her back 2 pain and migraine headaches," closed quote. Noting that 3 Plaintiff's treatment consisted of epidural injections and 4 prescriptions for multiple narcotic pain medications, she 5 concluded that, quote, "Significant findings were observed on 6 objective testing, including CT scans and MRIs, and on 7 physical examination. Plaintiff's impairments, therefore, 8 would be expected to produce significant pain and 9 limitations," closed quote. And that's at 900 of the 10 administrative record. 11 As Judge Hamilton correctly noted, under Nevland, 12 quote, "an ALJ has a duty to obtain medical evidence that 13 addresses the claimant's ability to function in the 14 workplace," closed quote. In light of the foregoing 15 significant medical findings, Judge Hamilton held that in the 16 absence of any opinion from a physician, treating or 17 consulting, regarding Plaintiff's ability to function in the 18 workplace with her physical impairments, the ALJ's Residual 19 Functional Capacity assessment fails Lauer's test that the 20 Residual Functional Capacity be supported by some medical 21 evidence. 22 Notwithstanding Judge Hamilton's ruling that a 23 medical opinion about Plaintiff's ability to function in the 24 workplace was necessary to comply with Lauer, given the 25 significant medical findings, on remand, the Commissioner did

6 Case: 1:14-cv SPM Doc. #: 30 Filed: 03/01/16 Page: 6 of 11 PageID #: not obtain an opinion from any medical source, treating or 2 consulting. Rather, Judge Hanekamp's opinion explicitly 3 states that his RFC assessment, like the prior judges, was 4 based upon (1 the fact that no doctor or other 5 similarly-qualified person ever said Plaintiff could not do 6 activities within the RFC; (2 the objective medical evidence; 7 (3 the Judge's own belief that Plaintiff does not have 8 clinical signs typically associated with chronic severe 9 musculoskeletal pain of the back, knees, feet or hips; (4 the 10 fact that the treatment offered Plaintiff was relatively 11 conservative; specifically Judge Hanekamp found no surgery had 12 been offered for Plaintiff's back, knees or hips; and (5 13 Claimant's poor credibility with respect to the level of 14 activity she's capable of in light of her impairments. 15 I recognize the Plaintiff has the burden to prove 16 that she is disabled. I'm also aware, as we discussed on the 17 record during oral argument, that the Eighth Circuit and this 18 Court have previously held that objective medical findings can 19 be sufficient to constitute medical evidence in support of a 20 finding that a claimant can perform light or medium work. 21 However, after reviewing the cases that have reached that 22 conclusion, I find that they are distinguishable from this 23 case. 24 Specifically during the recess, I reviewed cases 25 such as Steed versus Astrue, Flynn versus Astrue, and

7 Case: 1:14-cv SPM Doc. #: 30 Filed: 03/01/16 Page: 7 of 11 PageID #: Thornhill v. Colvin. The medical findings in those cases were 2 not nearly as significant as those here. In Steed, for 3 example, even though the medical evidence was silent with 4 regard to work-related restrictions, such as the length of 5 time the plaintiff in that case could sit, stand and walk and 6 what amount of weight she could carry, the Eighth Circuit 7 upheld the ALJ's finding that the plaintiff could perform 8 light work based on largely mild or normal objective findings 9 regarding her back condition. 10 Similarly, in Flynn, a 2008 case, the Eighth Circuit 11 held that the physician's observations that the claimant had 12 normal muscle strength and mobility constituted medical 13 evidence supporting the ALJ's conclusion that the claimant 14 could lift 20 pounds occasionally and 10 pounds frequently. 15 And in a 2013 decision, District Judge Carol Jackson 16 in this court held in Thornhill v. Colvin that the medical 17 records showing that physical examinations have been 18 essentially unremarkable and revealed normal independent gait 19 with no evidence of spine or joint abnormality or range of 20 motion limitation or muscle tenderness constituted medical 21 evidence in support of a finding that the claimant in that 22 case could perform medium work. 23 We don't have such mild findings in this case. Here, 24 as Judge Hamilton's opinion points out and as Plaintiff 25 argued, there are significant medical findings. Those

8 Case: 1:14-cv SPM Doc. #: 30 Filed: 03/01/16 Page: 8 of 11 PageID #: findings include a moderate disk bulge that, quote, 2 "obliterates the space with the nerve root, a herniated disk 3 with radiculopathy and with a neurologic deficit and moderate 4 spinal canal stenosis." These are conditions that would be 5 expected to produce significant pain and limitations. 6 Indeed, there is significant evidence in this record 7 that Ms. Sanders was consistently found to have a limited 8 range of motion or range of motion with pain. And on physical 9 examination she was also found to have muscle weakness or 10 tenderness at various points in time. 11 Given those findings, it was not sufficient under 12 these circumstances for the ALJ to do what Judge Hanekamp did; 13 i.e., presume that Plaintiff could function at a light work 14 capacity simply because no doctor said she could not. Rather, 15 under Nevland, it was incumbent on the Commissioner to obtain 16 some medical evidence of Plaintiff's ability to function in 17 the workplace in light of those significant medical findings. 18 The Commissioner argued in its brief and at oral 19 argument that the ALJ's credibility analysis was adequate and 20 supports the RFC determination. I agree with the Commissioner 21 that there was ample evidence in the record to support the 22 ALJ's conclusion that the Plaintiff was not entirely credible, 23 including evidence that Plaintiff engaged in drug-seeking 24 behavior and at times may have exaggerated her symptoms. 25 However, as this Court and other courts within the Eighth

9 Case: 1:14-cv SPM Doc. #: 30 Filed: 03/01/16 Page: 9 of 11 PageID #: Circuit have held, a credibility finding cannot substitute for 2 medical evidence to support a finding that a claimant has a 3 particular Residual Functional Capacity to work. In other 4 words, there may well be substantial evidence to support the 5 Commissioner's conclusion that Plaintiff's claims about the 6 severity of her limitations are not entirely credible. 7 However, given the significant medical findings in this case, 8 without an opinion from a qualified source, the conclusion 9 that Plaintiff can function at the capacity described by 10 Judge Hanekamp is not supported by substantial evidence. 11 I find that the reasoning from Judge Hamilton's 12 earlier decision applies with equal force here because the 13 deficiency identified by Judge Hamilton was not addressed by 14 Judge Hanekamp or the Commissioner. I am remanding this case 15 for further proceedings not inconsistent with this decision. 16 So for all of the reasons stated in this oral opinion 17 as well as the reasons set out in the Plaintiff's brief and 18 stated on the record at oral argument, the Commissioner's 19 decision is not supported by substantial evidence as a whole. 20 As such, I will reverse the decision of the Social Security 21 Administration and remand this case for further proceedings. 22 I will issue a judgment consistent with this opinion 23 and will attach a transcription of this oral opinion to the 24 judgment so the parties have a written record of the reasons 25 for my decision.

10 Case: 1:14-cv SPM Doc. #: 30 Filed: 03/01/16 Page: 10 of 11 PageID #: Thank you, both, very much and I hope you have a 2 great afternoon. 3 MR. BUNTEN: Thank you, Your Honor. 4 MS. PRESTON: Thank you, Your Honor. 5 (Hearing adjourned at 3:46 PM

11 Case: 1:14-cv SPM Doc. #: 30 Filed: 03/01/16 Page: 11 of 11 PageID #: CERTIFICATE OF OFFICIAL REPORTER I, Deborah A. Kriegshauser, Federal Official Realtime Court Reporter, in and for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, do hereby certify that pursuant to Section 753, Title 28, United States Code, that the foregoing is a true and correct transcript of the stenographically-reported proceedings held in the above-entitled matter and that the transcript page format is in conformance with the regulations of the Judicial Conference of the United States. Dated this 29th day of February, /s/ Deborah A. Kriegshauser DEBORAH A. KRIEGSHAUSER, FAPR, RMR, CRR FEDERAL OFFICIAL COURT REPORTER

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT ** James Gonzales applied for disability and supplemental security income

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT ** James Gonzales applied for disability and supplemental security income JAMES GONZALES, FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT February 19, 2013 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court v. CAROLYN

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION Sexton v. Berryhill Doc. 37 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION MARGARET SEXTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 4:16CV197 HEA ) ) NANCY A. BERRYHILL 1, ) Acting Commissioner

More information

The plaintiff seeks review of the Commissioner of Social Security's decision denying her

The plaintiff seeks review of the Commissioner of Social Security's decision denying her Brent v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ANGELA BRENT, -X -against- Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER 17-CV-7289 (AMD) NANCY A.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV GNS-LLK

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV GNS-LLK Mason v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY BOWLING GREEN DIVISION CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:16-CV-00048-GNS-LLK BRANDON L. MASON PLAINTIFF v. NANCY

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE MEMORANDUM OPINION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE MEMORANDUM OPINION Scott v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of Doc. 21 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE KISHIA DANIELLE SCOTT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 3:18-cv-28-HBG

More information

Ernestine Diggs v. Commissioner Social Security

Ernestine Diggs v. Commissioner Social Security 2011 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-7-2011 Ernestine Diggs v. Commissioner Social Security Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil No. 3:18-cv RJC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil No. 3:18-cv RJC ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Jackson v. Berryhill Doc. 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION Civil No. 3:18-cv-00002-RJC CYNTHIA JACKSON, v. Plaintiff, NANCY A. BERRYHILL,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON ELAINE STUMP, Plaintiff, Case No. 3:16-cv-460 vs. COMMISISONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, District Judge Thomas M. Rose Magistrate

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION at LONDON PETER LEE EPPERSON, PLAINTIFF,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION at LONDON PETER LEE EPPERSON, PLAINTIFF, Epperson v. SSA Doc. 14 CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-228-GWU UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION at LONDON PETER LEE EPPERSON, PLAINTIFF, VS. MEMORANDUM OPINION MICHAEL J.

More information

Love v. Berryhill Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) )

Love v. Berryhill Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) Love v. Berryhill Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE EASTERN DIVISION JAMES LOVE, Plaintiff, v. No. 17-1204-TMP NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION BELINDA BEARDEN PLAINTIFF

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION BELINDA BEARDEN PLAINTIFF Bearden v. Social Security Administration Commissioner Doc. 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS TEXARKANA DIVISION BELINDA BEARDEN PLAINTIFF vs. Civil No. 4:18-cv-04080

More information

Menkes v. Comm Social Security

Menkes v. Comm Social Security 2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 1-30-2008 Menkes v. Comm Social Security Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 07-2457 Follow

More information

Yi Chen v Clark 2015 NY Slip Op 30840(U) April 2, 2015 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: /11 Judge: Wilma Guzman Cases posted with a

Yi Chen v Clark 2015 NY Slip Op 30840(U) April 2, 2015 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: /11 Judge: Wilma Guzman Cases posted with a Yi Chen v Clark 2015 NY Slip Op 30840(U) April 2, 2015 Supreme Court, Bronx County Docket Number: 307014/11 Judge: Wilma Guzman Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U), are

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 ROLANDO ARREDONDO, v. Plaintiff, CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. Case No. :-cv-00-epg ORDER REGARDING

More information

Donatelli v. Comm Social Security

Donatelli v. Comm Social Security 2005 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-15-2005 Donatelli v. Comm Social Security Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 04-2828 Follow

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Mosley v. Berryhill Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Marlene M., Case No. 18-cv-258 (TNL) Plaintiff, v. ORDER Nancy Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F OPINION FILED SEPTEMBER 10, 2003

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F OPINION FILED SEPTEMBER 10, 2003 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F101031 JAY ELLIOTT, EMPLOYEE MAVERICK TRANSPORTATION, INC., EMPLOYER LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INS. CO., INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS LISA DELK, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED April 26, 2011 v No. 295857 Wayne Circuit Court STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE LC No. 07-727377-NF INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

More information

Bryan Szallar v. Commissioner Social Security

Bryan Szallar v. Commissioner Social Security 2015 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 11-24-2015 Bryan Szallar v. Commissioner Social Security Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2015

More information

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Northern District Court Case No. 4:11-cr JST USA v. Su. Document 193. View Document.

PlainSite. Legal Document. California Northern District Court Case No. 4:11-cr JST USA v. Su. Document 193. View Document. PlainSite Legal Document California Northern District Court Case No. :-cr-00-jst USA v. Su Document View Document View Docket A joint project of Think Computer Corporation and Think Computer Foundation.

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE Wright v. Colvin Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE LINDA MARIE WRIGHT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) C. A. No. 15-1040-RGA/MPT ) CAROLYN W. COLVIN ) Acting Commissioner

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F613876 HUONG NGUYEN, EMPLOYEE FM CORPORATION, EMPLOYER S.B. HOWARD & COMPANY, INC., CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION 4:08-CV-132-D ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION 4:08-CV-132-D ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Shaw v. Astrue Doc. 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION 4:08-CV-132-D RANDOLPH SHAW, Plaintiff/Claimant, MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of

More information

Plaintiff, 1:16-cv (SDA) Defendant. Plaintiff, Maria C. Gutierrez ( Gutierrez ), brings this action pursuant to 205(g) of the

Plaintiff, 1:16-cv (SDA) Defendant. Plaintiff, Maria C. Gutierrez ( Gutierrez ), brings this action pursuant to 205(g) of the Gutierrez v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 35 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Maria C. Gutierrez, 1/9/2018 -against- Commissioner of Social Security, Plaintiff, 1:16-cv-06673

More information

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before HOLMES, PORFILIO, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT ORDER AND JUDGMENT * Before HOLMES, PORFILIO, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. JERRY L. HARROLD, FILED United States Court of Appeals UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS Tenth Circuit Plaintiff-Appellant, FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT November 12, 2008 Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court v.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case Number BC v. Honorable David M.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case Number BC v. Honorable David M. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION SANDRA M. FORD, Plaintiff, Case Number 00-10486-BC v. Honorable David M. Lawson COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. /

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G DAVID WILLHITE, EMPLOYEE

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G DAVID WILLHITE, EMPLOYEE NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G309093 DAVID WILLHITE, EMPLOYEE TRANE/INGERSOLL RAND, EMPLOYER TRAVELERS INSURANCE, CARRIER/TPA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT

More information

Lorraine Dellapolla v. Commissioner Social Security

Lorraine Dellapolla v. Commissioner Social Security 2016 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-1-2016 Lorraine Dellapolla v. Commissioner Social Security Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2016

More information

Benedetto v. Comm Social Security

Benedetto v. Comm Social Security 2007 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-14-2007 Benedetto v. Comm Social Security Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 06-4185 Follow

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS NATALYA PROHKOROVA, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 17-30064-MGM ) UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY ) OF AMERICA, ) Defendant. ) ROBERTSON, M.J.

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F307580 TEENA E. McGRIFF, EMPLOYEE ADDUS HEALTHCARE, INC., EMPLOYER AMERICAN CASUALTY CO. OF READING, PENN.,

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F OPINION FILED MAY 3, 2006

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F OPINION FILED MAY 3, 2006 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F502587 BEN LAMMERS, EMPLOYEE HOME DEPOT, INC., EMPLOYER AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO., INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS Lattanzio v. Colvin Doc. 24 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS JOEL RAMON LATTANZIO, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 15 C 11868 ) CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner

More information

Kathleen Beety-Monticelli v. Comm Social Security

Kathleen Beety-Monticelli v. Comm Social Security 2009 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 8-28-2009 Kathleen Beety-Monticelli v. Comm Social Security Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket

More information

2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works.

2011 Thomson Reuters. No Claim to Orig. US Gov. Works. Page 1 United States District Court, E.D. New York. Linda MIANO, Plaintiff, v. Joanne BRANHART, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. Civ.A. 05-5904(DRH). March 14, 2007. Jeffrey Delott, Jericho,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE OCTOBER 13, 2000 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE OCTOBER 13, 2000 Session IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE OCTOBER 13, 2000 Session TOMMY C. SMITH, v. CONTINENTAL CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY AND LEGGETT AND PLATT, INC.,

More information

JOHN KANASOLA, v. 6:16-CV-0264 (TWD) COMM R OF SOC. SEC.,

JOHN KANASOLA, v. 6:16-CV-0264 (TWD) COMM R OF SOC. SEC., Kanasola v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JOHN KANASOLA, Plaintiff, v. 6:16-CV-0264 (TWD) COMM R OF SOC. SEC., Defendant. APPEARANCES:

More information

Gist v. Comm Social Security

Gist v. Comm Social Security 2003 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-24-2003 Gist v. Comm Social Security Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket 02-3691 Follow this

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE XXXXX OF XXXXX

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE XXXXX OF XXXXX IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE XXXXX OF XXXXX Firstname Lastname, ) No. XXXXX ) Plaintiff, ) Hon. XXXXX, ) United States District Judge v. ) ) Hon. XXXXX, JO ANNE B. BARNHART, ) United States

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE WILBUR v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JEREMY W., ) ) Plaintiff ) ) v. ) 2:18-cv-00195-DBH ) SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION ) COMMISSIONER,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No Engel v. Social Security, Commissioner of Doc. 26 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION TERRY L. ENGEL, v Plaintiff, Case No. 17-13595 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F HERBERT AYERS, Employee. TYSON FOODS, INC., Employer RESPONDENT #1

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F HERBERT AYERS, Employee. TYSON FOODS, INC., Employer RESPONDENT #1 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F607026 HERBERT AYERS, Employee CLAIMANT TYSON FOODS, INC., Employer RESPONDENT #1 TYNET, Carrier RESPONDENT #1 SECOND INJURY FUND RESPONDENT

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 23, 2010

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION OPINION FILED NOVEMBER 23, 2010 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F907651 EARL BEARD, EMPLOYEE PACE INDUSTRIES, LLC EMPLOYER ZURICH INSURANCE, INSURANCE CARRIER/TPA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED

More information

Case 3:15-cv JST Document 79-1 Filed 11/08/16 Page 1 of 83. Exhibit 1

Case 3:15-cv JST Document 79-1 Filed 11/08/16 Page 1 of 83. Exhibit 1 Case 3:15-cv-00623-JST Document 79-1 Filed 11/08/16 Page 1 of 83 Exhibit 1 Case 3:15-cv-00623-JST Document 79-1 Filed 11/08/16 Page 2 of 83 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

More information

: : Plaintiff, : : : Defendant. : Plaintiff Victor Mangum filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g)

: : Plaintiff, : : : Defendant. : Plaintiff Victor Mangum filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g) Mangum v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------------------------X : VICTOR MANGUM, : : Plaintiff, : :

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F208147 ELTON W. COTTON, EMPLOYEE ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EMPLOYER PUBLIC EMPLOYEE CLAIMS DIVISION,

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F & F OPINION FILED MAY 20, 2004

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F & F OPINION FILED MAY 20, 2004 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F008686 & F100390 BATHEL A. CUPPLES, EMPLOYEE ROLLISON SEED COMPANY, EMPLOYER AG-COMP SIF FUND, CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F CURTIS JONES, EMPLOYEE CRAWFORD COUNTY, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO.

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F CURTIS JONES, EMPLOYEE CRAWFORD COUNTY, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F704625 CURTIS JONES, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT CRAWFORD COUNTY, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. 1 AAC RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES, TPA RESPONDENT NO. 1 SECOND

More information

Torres v. Comm Social Security

Torres v. Comm Social Security 2008 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 5-29-2008 Torres v. Comm Social Security Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 07-2204 Follow

More information

Geske Garcia v. Colvin Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO DIVISION MEMORANDUM-OPINION AND ORDER

Geske Garcia v. Colvin Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO DIVISION MEMORANDUM-OPINION AND ORDER Geske Garcia v. Colvin Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO DIVISION TERESA MARGARET GESKE GARCIA, v. Plaintiff, CAROLYN W COLVIN, Commissioner of the Social Security

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [Cite as State ex rel. Ohio State Univ. v. Indus. Comm., 2007-Ohio-3733.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio ex rel. : The Ohio State University, : Relator, : v. No.

More information

Sandoval v Urena 2017 NY Slip Op 31588(U) July 28, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Paul A. Goetz Cases posted

Sandoval v Urena 2017 NY Slip Op 31588(U) July 28, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: /13 Judge: Paul A. Goetz Cases posted Sandoval v Urena 2017 NY Slip Op 31588(U) July 28, 2017 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158177/13 Judge: Paul A. Goetz Cases posted with a "30000" identifier, i.e., 2013 NY Slip Op 30001(U),

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Case :-cv-00-jlq Document Filed 0// 0 REBECCA A. YOUNG, vs. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON Plaintiff, UNITED OF OMAHA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. NO. :-CV-00-JLQ MEMORANDUM

More information

Talip v. Astrue Doc. 28

Talip v. Astrue Doc. 28 Talip v. Astrue Doc. 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------x CINDAMANNIE TALIP, : : Plaintiff, : : OPINION AND ORDER

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE November 29, 2005 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE November 29, 2005 Session IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT NASHVILLE November 29, 2005 Session ROBERT MERRIMON v. BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE, INC. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE HASSAPELIS v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER Doc. 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE MICHAEL H., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 2:17-cv-0447-JAW ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Richardson v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 17 CHARLES E. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION vs. Civil Action 2:15-cv-3049

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. Case No. 8:08-cv-1998-T-26TBM REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION. v. Case No. 8:08-cv-1998-T-26TBM REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION O'Hagin v. Commissioner of Social Security et al Doc. 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION CHRISTINE O HAGIN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:08-cv-1998-T-26TBM MICHAEL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MEMORANDUM OPINION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE MEMORANDUM OPINION Drevas v. Colvin Doc. 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE STEPHEN JAMES DREV AS, Plaintiff, v. : Civil Action No. 1:15-194-RGA CAROLYN COL VIN, Acting Commissioner of Social

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 3: 11-CV RE. Plaintiff, Defendant.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON 3: 11-CV RE. Plaintiff, Defendant. Brainard v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration Doc. 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON SHARON BRAINARD, 3: 11-CV -00809 RE Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. MICHAEL

More information

Plaintiff Debra Mercado seeks judicial review under 42 U.S.C 405(g) of the

Plaintiff Debra Mercado seeks judicial review under 42 U.S.C 405(g) of the Mercado v. Colvin Doc. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------x DEBRA MERCADO, Plaintiff, 16-cv-6087 (PKC) -against- MEMORANDUM

More information

IN THE SUPREME OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE ALMA PRISCILLA GROOMS } MAURY CIRCUIT

IN THE SUPREME OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE ALMA PRISCILLA GROOMS } MAURY CIRCUIT IN THE SUPREME OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE FILED July 22, 1999 ALMA PRISCILLA GROOMS } MAURY CIRCUIT Cecil W. Crowson } No. Below Appellate 7727 Court Clerk Plaintiff/Appellee } } Hon. Jim T. Hamilton vs.

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G DAMARIS HAMPTON, EMPLOYEE

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G DAMARIS HAMPTON, EMPLOYEE NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G704189 DAMARIS HAMPTON, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT NORTHPORT HEALTH SERVICES, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT GALLAGHER BASSETT

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F AAC RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES INSURANCE CARRIER OPINION FILED AUGUST 4, 2004

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F AAC RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES INSURANCE CARRIER OPINION FILED AUGUST 4, 2004 BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F011651 JENNINGS WRIGHT CRAWFORD COUNTY JUDGE AAC RISK MANAGEMENT SERVICES INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE May 26, 2009 Session

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE May 26, 2009 Session IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT KNOXVILLE May 26, 2009 Session REGINALD G. PECK v. HOCHMAN FAMILY PARTNERS, L.P., ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Chancery

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY NIELSEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Doc. 26 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY JOAN M. NIELSEN, v. Plaintiff, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. HONORABLE

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS WEST PALM BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE

STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS WEST PALM BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE STATE OF FLORIDA DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS OFFICE OF THE JUDGE OF COMPENSATION CLAIMS WEST PALM BEACH DISTRICT OFFICE Johnathon M. Spain, Employee/Claimant, vs. General Caulking and Coatings,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Austin v. Colvin Doc. 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI NORTHERN DIVISION TONYA S. AUSTIN, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COL VIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BEFORE THE HONORABLE DEBORAH RYAN, JUDGE DEPARTMENT NO.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BEFORE THE HONORABLE DEBORAH RYAN, JUDGE DEPARTMENT NO. THIS TRANSCRIPT IS PROTECTED UNDER GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION (d) 0 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA BEFORE THE HONORABLE DEBORAH RYAN, JUDGE DEPARTMENT

More information

STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS.

STATE OF ILLINOIS ) ) SS. 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 STATE OF ILLINOIS SS. COUNTY OF COOK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY COUNTY DEPARTMENT-CRIMINAL DIVISION THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Case No. 1 CR -01 Plaintiff, VS RYNE SANHAMEL,

More information

Case 2:15-cv CM Document 22 Filed 07/21/16 Page 1 of 23 PageID 865 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION

Case 2:15-cv CM Document 22 Filed 07/21/16 Page 1 of 23 PageID 865 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION Case 2:15-cv-00185-CM Document 22 Filed 07/21/16 Page 1 of 23 PageID 865 WILLIAM MICHAEL WATSON, JR., Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION v. Case No:

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G106281 DEBRA BRADSHAW, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT EMERGENCY MEDICAL TRANSPORT, INC., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. 1 CHARTIS

More information

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the parties consented to have a United States

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(c), the parties consented to have a United States Frederick v. Colvin Doc. 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CHRISTOPHER J. FREDERICK, Plaintiff, 16-CV-898-MJR DECISION AND ORDER -v- COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 1 Defendant.

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. G407607 & G609143 JOYCE BAINES, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT RED APPLE ENTERPRISES, LTD., EMPLOYER RESPONDENT NO. 1 BRIDGEFIELD

More information

LIST OF AVAILABLE MATERIAL JANUARY NOVEMBER 2018 ITEM NUMBERS

LIST OF AVAILABLE MATERIAL JANUARY NOVEMBER 2018 ITEM NUMBERS LIST OF AVAILABLE MATERIAL JANUARY NOVEMBER 2018 ITEM NUMBERS 2180-2197 Absenteeism 2185. The ALJ found that the claimant could perform sustained work on a regular basis, but it did not consider the claimant

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION. v. Case No: 2:16-cv-784-FtM-CM OPINION AND ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION. v. Case No: 2:16-cv-784-FtM-CM OPINION AND ORDER Paul v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION PATRICIA PAUL, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:16-cv-784-FtM-CM COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEX S NOV FORT WORTH DIVISION. MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEX S NOV FORT WORTH DIVISION. MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER Musial v. Astrue Doc. 26 LOUISE MUSIAL, VS. Plaintiff, MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. U.S. DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F DEBBIE L. HALL, EMPLOYEE PROFESSIONAL EDUCATORS, EMPLOYER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F DEBBIE L. HALL, EMPLOYEE PROFESSIONAL EDUCATORS, EMPLOYER BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F309361 DEBBIE L. HALL, EMPLOYEE PROFESSIONAL EDUCATORS, EMPLOYER CUNNINGHAM LINDSEY, CARRIER/TPA CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F FAYETTEVILLE VETERANS HOME PUBLIC EMPLOYEE CLAIMS DIVISION, INSURANCE CARRIER

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F FAYETTEVILLE VETERANS HOME PUBLIC EMPLOYEE CLAIMS DIVISION, INSURANCE CARRIER BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F706853 LISA EAGLE FAYETTEVILLE VETERANS HOME PUBLIC EMPLOYEE CLAIMS DIVISION, INSURANCE CARRIER CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED

More information

UNITED STATES COURT OF VETERANS APPEALS. No On Appellee's Motion for Summary Affirmance. (Submitted July 24, 1991 Decided December 13, 1991)

UNITED STATES COURT OF VETERANS APPEALS. No On Appellee's Motion for Summary Affirmance. (Submitted July 24, 1991 Decided December 13, 1991) UNITED STATES COURT OF VETERANS APPEALS No. 90-673 LAWRENCE E. WILSON, APPELLANT, V. EDWARD J. DERWINSKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE. On Appellee's Motion for Summary Affirmance (Submitted

More information

Mitchell v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION

Mitchell v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner Doc. 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION Mitchell v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner Doc. 11 FILED 2016 Jul-11 PM 01:26 U.S. DISTRICT COURT N.D. OF ALABAMA UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA MIDDLE DIVISION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No Honorable Thomas L.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case No Honorable Thomas L. Armour v. SSA, Commissioner of Doc. 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION WILLIAM N ARMOUR, v Plaintiff, Case No. 17-13671 Honorable Thomas L. Ludington COMMISSIONER

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION Edmondson v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION AMY L. EDMONDSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CIVIL NO. 1:16cv142 ) CAROLYN

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS KAREN HARRIS-HOLLOWAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED March 23, 2017 v No. 330644 Washtenaw Circuit Court AT&T SERVICES INC., and GREGORY LC No. 14-000111-NI LAURENCE

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. E VIRGINIA L. KING, EMPLOYEE

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. E VIRGINIA L. KING, EMPLOYEE BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. E903202 VIRGINIA L. KING, EMPLOYEE CLAIMANT BIRDNEST, INC., d/b/a WILLOW OAKS ACRES, EMPLOYER RESPONDENT FREMONT PACIFIC, CARRIER RESPONDENT

More information

v. ) ORDER ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner ofthe Social Security ) Administration, ) ) Defendant. )

v. ) ORDER ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner ofthe Social Security ) Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) Epperson v. Astrue Doc. 39 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA NORTHERN DIVISION No.2:11-CV-12-D SANDRA EPPERSON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F111222 JUDITH WRIGHT, EMPLOYEE TWIN LAKES NURSING & REHABILITATION CENTER, EMPLOYER PACIFIC EMPLOYERS INSURANCE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. v. No. 3:18-cv-160-BN MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION. v. No. 3:18-cv-160-BN MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Lafond v. Berryhill Doc. 21 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION MARIA L., Plaintiff, v. No. 3:18-cv-160-BN NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM OPINION. Plaintiff, Toi R. Howard, seeks judicial review of a

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA MEMORANDUM OPINION. Plaintiff, Toi R. Howard, seeks judicial review of a HOWARD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Doc. 13 TOI R. HOWARD, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action No. 11-716 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

More information

Laura Russo v. Comm Social Security

Laura Russo v. Comm Social Security 2011 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 4-6-2011 Laura Russo v. Comm Social Security Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No. 10-2772 Follow

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F PAUL CUNNINGHAM, Employee. KEN S TRUCK & REFRIGERATION SERVICE, Employer

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F PAUL CUNNINGHAM, Employee. KEN S TRUCK & REFRIGERATION SERVICE, Employer BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F304082 PAUL CUNNINGHAM, Employee KEN S TRUCK & REFRIGERATION SERVICE, Employer FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT

More information

Case3:15-cv JST Document36 Filed07/17/15 Page1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case3:15-cv JST Document36 Filed07/17/15 Page1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-00-JST Document Filed0// Page of UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 0 KEVIN HART, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Defendant. Case No. -cv-00-jst ORDER DENYING

More information

Besignano v. Astrue Doc. 23

Besignano v. Astrue Doc. 23 Besignano v. Astrue Doc. 23 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------x JAMES BESIGNANO, : : Plaintiff, : : OPINION AND ORDER

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY WEIST v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Doc. 9 NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ANDREW WEIST, Civil Action No. 2:16-cv-05439-SDW Plaintiff, v. OPINION COMMISSIONER

More information

LIST OF AVAILABLE MATERIAL JANUARY OCTOBER 2018 ITEM NUMBERS

LIST OF AVAILABLE MATERIAL JANUARY OCTOBER 2018 ITEM NUMBERS LIST OF AVAILABLE MATERIAL JANUARY OCTOBER 2018 ITEM NUMBERS 2180-2195 Absenteeism 2185. The ALJ found that the claimant could perform sustained work on a regular basis, but it did not consider the claimant

More information

LIST OF AVAILABLE MATERIAL JANUARY DECEMBER 2018 ITEM NUMBERS

LIST OF AVAILABLE MATERIAL JANUARY DECEMBER 2018 ITEM NUMBERS LIST OF AVAILABLE MATERIAL JANUARY DECEMBER 2018 ITEM NUMBERS 2180-2200 Absenteeism 2185. The ALJ found that the claimant could perform sustained work on a regular basis, but it did not consider the claimant

More information

NO. 47,037-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * Versus * * * * * *

NO. 47,037-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * Versus * * * * * * Judgment rendered April 11, 2012. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by Art. 2166, LSA-CCP. NO. 47,037-WCA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * ALVIN

More information

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F GARY BORCHERT, Employee. AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, Carrier

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F GARY BORCHERT, Employee. AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, Carrier BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION WCC NO. F404328 GARY BORCHERT, Employee MERCY HEALTH, Employer AIG CLAIMS SERVICES, Carrier CLAIMANT RESPONDENT RESPONDENT OPINION FILED JULY 18, 2005

More information

Morse v. Astrue Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION. Plaintiff

Morse v. Astrue Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION. Plaintiff Morse v. Astrue Doc. 20 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION DAVID J. MORSE, Plaintiff VS. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner, Social Security Administration,

More information