9 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING NO.'~ PROVISIONS 10 MENCHIE'S GROUP, INC. (MENCHIE'S GROUP, INC.)

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "9 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING NO.'~ PROVISIONS 10 MENCHIE'S GROUP, INC. (MENCHIE'S GROUP, INC.)"

Transcription

1 STATE OF WASHINGTON HING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 8 9 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING NO.'~ PROVISIONS 10 MENCHIE'S GROUP, INC. (MENCHIE'S GROUP, INC.) ASSURANCE OF 11 DISCONTINUANCE The State of Washington, by and through its attorneys, Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney 15 General, and Rahul Rao, Assistant Attorney General, files this Assurance of Discontinuance (AOD) 16 under RCW , PARTIES In January 2018, the Attorney General initiated an investigation into Menchie's 19 Group, Inc, relating to its hiring practices Menchie's Group, Inc, is a California corporation with its principal office or place 21 of business in Ventura Boulevard, Suite 200, Encino, CA. Menchie's Group, Inc. is in the 22 business of franchising Menchie's Frozen Yogurt Stores ("Menchie's Stores"), For the purposes of this AOD, Menchie's Group, Inc. includes its directors, 24 officers, managers, agents acting within the scope of their agency, and employees as well as its 25 successor and assigns, controlled subsidiaries, divisions, groups, affiliates, partnerships, and joint ventures. M EN C H 1 E' S GROUP, INC. I ATrORNEY GL'NERAL OF WASHINGTON AmA ndivision e 300 Filth Avenue, u, Suite 3000 Senitle, OVA 9S)

2 l II. I1INEST1IGATION Menchie's Group, Inc. does not have any Menchie's Store operating in 3 Washington that are operated by Menchie's Group, Inc. Currently, there are 31 Menchie's Stores 4 located in Washington which are owned and operated by franchisees. In addition, there are 14 5 Franchise Agreements for Menchie's Stores to be operated in Washington, which have been 6 signed by Menchie's Group, Inc. and franchisees where the Menchie's Stores have not opened 7 Yet For years, Menchie's Group, Inc. has included language in its franchise 9 agreements that restricted a franchisee's ability to solicit or hire workers from Menchie's Group, 10 Inc. or its affiliates ("no-poaching provision"). Specifically, the standard Menchie's Group, Inc.. I 1 franchise agreement stated the following: 12 You may not employ or seek to employ, directly or indirectly, any person who is at the time or was at any time during the prior 6 months was employed in any type of managerial position by us or our affiliates unless you compensates us for all costs and 14 expenses incurred in losing and replacing the employee up to a maximum of $25,000, plus attorneys' fees and expenses. 15 The no-poaching provision restricted franchisees from hiring employees from Menchie's Group, Inc, or its affiliate-owned stores. 2.3 The Attorney General asserts that the foregoing conduct constitutes a contract, 18 combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade in violation of the Consumer Protection Act, 19 RCW Menchie's Group, Inc. expressly denies the conduct described above constitutes a contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade in violation of the Consumer Protection Act, RCW , or any other law, and expressly denies it has engaged in conduct that 23 constitutes a contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade. Menchie's Group, Inc. 24 enters into this AOD to avoid protracted and expensive litigation. Pursuant to RCW , 25 neither this'aod nor its terms shall be construed as an admission of law, fact, liability,. misconduct, or wrongdoing on the part of Menchie's Group, Inc. MENCHIE'S GROUP, INC. 2 AITORNEYGENERALOFWASHINGTON ri b Division 300 Fifih Avenue, Suite 2000 Scnitle, WA (206), ()422348v.3

3 I 2.5 Prior to being contacted by the Washington Attorney General's office regarding 2 the no-poaching provision, Menchie's Group, Inc. had already notified by its franchisees 3 that it will not enforce the no-poaching provision in their Franchise Agreements. Historically, 4 Menchie's Group, Inc. has never enforced the no-poaching provision and in fact, has allowed 5 one of its employee to work for a franchisee without requiring the franchisee to pay Menchie's 6 Group, Inc. any money as provided for under the no-poaching provision , 3.1 Subject to Paragraph 2.4 above, Menchie's Group, Inc. agrees: It will no longer include no-poaching provisions in any of its future 10 franchise agreements; It will not enforce no-poaching provisions in any of its existing franchise 12 agreements, and will not seek to intervene or defend in any way the legality of any no-poaching provision in any litigation in which a franchisee may claim third-party beneficiary status rights to 14 enforce an existing no-poaching provision; It will notify all of its existing franchisees of the entry of this AOD and 16 provide them a copy upon request by the franchisee; It will notify the Attorney General's Office if it learns of any effort by a 18 franchisee in Washington to enforce any existing no-poaching provision Within 90 days of entry of this AOD, Menchie's Group, Inc. will attempt to have 20 all existing franchise agreements with entities in Washington amended to remove any no- 21 poaching provisions in its existing franchise agreements. If any franchise owner is unwilling to 22 consent to the change to its franchise agreement, prior to the 90-day deadline, Menchie's Group, 23 Inc. shall provide the name and address of the resisting franchisee and the name and address of 24 the franchisee's registered agent to the Office of the Attorney General. 25 VIENCHIE'S GROUP, INC. 3 ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WASHINGTON Antitrust Division 800 FiNt Avcnue, Suite 2000 Smile, WA

4 1 3.3 As they come up for either renewal or renegotiation during the ordinary course o 2 business, Menchie's Group, Inc. will amend its existing franchise agreements on a nationwide 3 basis to remove any no-poaching provision, a, 3.4 Within 30 days of the conclusion of the time periods referenced in this section III 5 Menchie's Group, Inc, will submit a declaration to the Attorney General's Office signed under 6 penalty of perjury stating that all provisions of this agreement have been. satisfied. 7 IV. ADDITIONAL PROVISIONS This AOD is binding on, and applies to Menchie's Group, Inc, including each of 9 its respective directors, officers, managers, agents acting within the scope of their agency, and 10 employees, as well as their respective successors and assigns, controlled subsidiaries, divisions, 11 groups, affiliates, partnerships, and joint ventures, or other entities through which Menchie's 12 Group, Inc. may now or hereafter act with respect to the conduct alleged in this AOD_ 4.2 This is a voluntary agreement-and it shall not be construed as an admission of 14 law, fact, liability, misconduct, or wrongdoing on the part of Menebie'.s Group, Inc. By entering 15 into this AOD, Menchie's Group, Inc. neither agrees nor concedes that the claims, allegations 16 and/or causes of action which have or could have been asserted by the Attorney General have 17 merit and Menchie's Group, Inc. expressly denies any such claims, allegations, and/or causes of 18 action. However, proof of failure to comply with this AOD shall be prfma facie evidence of a 14 violation ofrcw , thereby placing upon the violator the burden of defending against 20 imposition by the Court of injunctions, restitution, costs and reasonable attorney's fees, and 21 appropriate civil penalties under the Consumer Protection Act Menchie's Group, Inc. will not, nor will it authorize any of its officers, employees, 23 representatives, or agents to state or otherwise contend that the State of Washington or the Attorney 24 General has approved of, or has otherwise sanctioned, the conduct described in Paragraph 22 with 25 respect to the no-poaching provision in Menchie's Group, Inc.'s franchise agreement- MC GROUP, INC. 4 ATTORNEY UENEFALOFWASIIINGTON Mt Division 800 Fifth ~ih Avcmic, e suite 2000 Seau1:, WA (206)

5 1 4.4 This AOD resolves all issues raised by the State of Washington and the Antitrust 2 Division ofthe Attorney General's Office under the Consumer Protection Act and any other related 3 statutes pertaining to the acts set forth in Paragraphs above that may have occurred before 4 the date of entry of this AOD and concludes the investigation thereof. Subject to Paragraph 4.2, the 5 State of Washington and the Antitrust Division of the Attorney General's Office shall not file suit o 6 take any further investigative or enforcement action with respect to the acts set forth above that 7 occurred before the date of entry of this AOD. 8 9 APPROVED ON this day of JUDGE/COURT COMMISSIONER MENCHIE'S GROUP, INC. 5 ATTORNEY GGNEI'.AL OF WASHINGTON Antitrust Division 300 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2000 Scuttle, WA %,.3

6 1 2 3 Presented by: ROBERT W. FERGUSON' Attorney Genera! 4 5' RABUL R Z 1CR A Nn ~ X75_ Assistant Attorney General 6 Antitrust Division Office of the Attorney General Fifth. Avenue, Suite Seattle, WA (206) rahulr@atg.wa.gov Attorneys for State of Mashington Agreed to and approved for entry by: Menchie's Group, Inc I t r.~ MA'fllyn Natlr6nson NO BarNS Lathrop Gage, UP 7701 Forsyth Blvd., Suite 500 St. Louis, MO (314) 6-25 mnathanson@lathropgage.com RYAN, SWANSON, EVEI AND, PLLC q~7 l~cvin Collette, p Third Avenue, Suite 3400 Seattle, WA (206) collette@,ryanlaw.com Attorneys for 4enchie's Group, Inc. 25 imenchie's GROUP, INC. 6 ATTORNEY GEIMERAl. OF %V,gSHINGrON Antitrust Division 300 FiRb Avenue, Suite 2000 Senttic, WA SS

8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING NO. 9 PROVISIONS IHOP FRANCHISOR LLC 10 ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 11 I. PARTIES

8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING NO. 9 PROVISIONS IHOP FRANCHISOR LLC 10 ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 11 I. PARTIES 1 2 3 4 5 6 STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 7 8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING NO. 9 PROVISIONS IHOP FRANCHISOR LLC 10 ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE The State of Washington (State), by and through

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO.

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 9 10 11 12 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING PROVISIONS NO. PLANET FITNESS FRANCHISING LLC ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 13 The State of

More information

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. NO. 'zo't~% 4. The State of Washington (State), by and through its attorneys, Robert W.

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. NO. 'zo't~% 4. The State of Washington (State), by and through its attorneys, Robert W. 1 REC I ~ u. l E 2 3 NOV 2 20 F 4 5 % T gist- Cow Cie (f 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 8 9 12 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING PROVISIONS NO. 'zo't~% 4 ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 14 15

More information

BUDGET BLINDS, LLC'S ASSURANCE 9 POACHING PROVISIONS OF DISCONTINUANCE

BUDGET BLINDS, LLC'S ASSURANCE 9 POACHING PROVISIONS OF DISCONTINUANCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ~- ' ~ 8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO ASSURANCE 9 POACHING PROVISIONS OF DISCONTINUANCE 10 The State of Washington (State), by and through its attorneys,

More information

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. General (the Attorney General ), and Eric S. Newman, Assistant Attorney General, files this

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. General (the Attorney General ), and Eric S. Newman, Assistant Attorney General, files this 1 2 3 4 5 6 STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 7 8 9 10 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING PROVISIONS NO. DISCONTINUANCE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 The State of Washington, by and

More information

8 No. IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING 9 PROVISIONS WINGSTOP RESTAURANTS INC. ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 10

8 No. IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING 9 PROVISIONS WINGSTOP RESTAURANTS INC. ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON 7 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 8 No. IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING 9 PROVISIONS DISCONTINUANCE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 The State of Washington,

More information

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. General (the Attorney General ), and Eric S. Newman, Assistant Attorney General, files this

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. General (the Attorney General ), and Eric S. Newman, Assistant Attorney General, files this 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 8 9 10 11 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING PROVISIONS NO. DISCONTINUANCE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The State of Washington, by

More information

I. PARTIES. dba Denny's, relating to certain provisions utilized in its franchise agreements.

I. PARTIES. dba Denny's, relating to certain provisions utilized in its franchise agreements. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 8 9 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING NO. PROVISIONS 10 DFO, LLC DBA DENNY'S ASSURANCE OF 11 DISCONTINUANCE 12 13 The State of Washington (State),

More information

20 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. GNC is a global specialty retailer of health, wellness and

20 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. GNC is a global specialty retailer of health, wellness and 1 2 3 4 5 6 STATE OF WASHINGTON 7 IJNG COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO NO. POACHING PROVISIONS 9 GENERAL NUTRITION CORP. (GENERAL NUTRITION CORP. d/b/a/ GNC 10 d/b/a GNC) ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE

More information

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNT' SUPERIOR COURT r? NO. 5 5Z - 4 5LA. 1. t3 t 2- r b I i tala' 5. L_ L-C- QUIZ HOLDINGS, LLC ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNT' SUPERIOR COURT r? NO. 5 5Z - 4 5LA. 1. t3 t 2- r b I i tala' 5. L_ L-C- QUIZ HOLDINGS, LLC ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNT' SUPERIOR COURT r? IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING PROVISIONS NO. 5 5Z - 4 5LA 1. t3 t 2- r b I i tala'

More information

PROVISIONS JAMBA JUICE COMPANY'S ASSURANCE OF 14 DISCONTINUANCE. Assurance of Discontinuance ("AOD") pursuant RCW

PROVISIONS JAMBA JUICE COMPANY'S ASSURANCE OF 14 DISCONTINUANCE. Assurance of Discontinuance (AOD) pursuant RCW 1 2 3 4 5 6 STATE OF WASHINGTON 7 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING NO. 9 PROVISIONS JAMBA JUICE COMPANY'S ASSURANCE OF 14 DISCONTINUANCE I 12 13 14 15 The State of Washington,

More information

STATE OF WASHINGTON DING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING I NO. PROVISIONS A&W RESTAURANTS, INC. ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE

STATE OF WASHINGTON DING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING I NO. PROVISIONS A&W RESTAURANTS, INC. ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 1 2 3 4 STATE OF WASHINGTON DING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1 10 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING I NO. PROVISIONS ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 The State of Washington (State),

More information

NO. VALVOLINE INSTANT OIL 10 CHANGE FRANCHISING, INC. ASSURANCE OF 11 DISCONTINUANCE

NO. VALVOLINE INSTANT OIL 10 CHANGE FRANCHISING, INC. ASSURANCE OF 11 DISCONTINUANCE 1 2 3 4 5 STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 8 9 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING PROVISIONS NO. VALVOLINE INSTANT OIL CHANGE ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE The State of Washington (State), by and

More information

8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO 9 POACHING PROVISIONS ANYTIME FITNESS, LLC 10 ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 11

8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO 9 POACHING PROVISIONS ANYTIME FITNESS, LLC 10 ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 STATE OF WASHINGTON 7 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO NO. 9 POACHING PROVISIONS ANYTIME FITNESS, LLC 10 ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 The State of Washington,

More information

L PARTIES. Pizza LLC ("Domino's") and other quick service restaurant franchisors relating to certain

L PARTIES. Pizza LLC (Domino's) and other quick service restaurant franchisors relating to certain 1 2 3 5 1 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 8 9 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING NO. PROVISIONS DOMINO'S PIZZA LLC ASSURANCE OF 11 DISCONTINUANCE 13 The State of Washington, by and through its

More information

8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING Wei PROVISIONS 9 LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, 10 INC. ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 11 I. PARTIES

8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING Wei PROVISIONS 9 LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, 10 INC. ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 11 I. PARTIES 1 2 3 4 5 6 STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 7 8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING Wei PROVISIONS 9 LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, 10 INC. ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 11 12 13 The State of Washington

More information

on,~3p TIN STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO, The State of Washington, by and through its attorneys, Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney

on,~3p TIN STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO, The State of Washington, by and through its attorneys, Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney _! on,~3p 1 2 TIN 3 4 5 6 7 STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 8 9 10 11 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING PROVISIONS (LA QUINTA FRANCHISING, LLC) NO, 1,8-2-5630 3 8 SEA LA QUINTA FRANCHISING, LLC

More information

The State of Washington, by and through its attorneys, Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney

The State of Washington, by and through its attorneys, Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney 1 2 3 4 5 6 STATE OF «TASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 7 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO-POACHING NO. J- 8-2-57770-8 PROVISIONS JACK IN THE BOX, INC. 9 (JACK IN THE BOX, INC.) ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 10 11

More information

8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING NO. 9 PROVISIONS BURGER KING CORPORATION 10 ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 11 I. PARTIES

8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING NO. 9 PROVISIONS BURGER KING CORPORATION 10 ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 11 I. PARTIES 1 2 3 4 5 6 STATE OF WASHINGTON 7 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING NO. 9 PROVISIONS BURGER KING CORPORATION 10 ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 11 12 13 The State of Washington (State),

More information

NO. 9 PIZZA HUT, LLC ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 10. Assurance of Discontinuance ("AOD") pursuant RCW

NO. 9 PIZZA HUT, LLC ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 10. Assurance of Discontinuance (AOD) pursuant RCW 1 2 3 4 5 6 STATE OF WASHINGTON 7 KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 8 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING PROVISIONS NO. 9 PIZZA HUT, LLC ASSURANCE OF DISCONTINUANCE 10 11 12 The State of Washington, by and through

More information

Assurance of Discontinuance ("AOD") pursuant to RCW I. PARTIES

Assurance of Discontinuance (AOD) pursuant to RCW I. PARTIES 1 2 3 5 6 STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 7 IN RE: FRANCHISE NO POACHING NO. 8 PROVISIONS 9 LLC AND BASKIN-ROBBINS FRANCHISING LLC ASSURANCE 10 OF DISCONTINUANCE 11 12 The State of Washington,

More information

NO Attorney for Judgment Creditor: Audrey Udashen 23 Assistant Attorney General

NO Attorney for Judgment Creditor: Audrey Udashen 23 Assistant Attorney General I STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, NO. 10 CONSENT DECREE V. PROVIDENCE HEALTH & 1 SERVICES-WASHINGTON; SWEDISH HEALTH SERVICES; 1 SWEDISH EDMONDS 1 Defendant.

More information

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DISCONTINUANCE V.

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT DISCONTINUANCE V. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 9 STATE OF WASHINGTON, NO. 10 Plaintiff, ASSURANCE OF 11 DISCONTINUANCE V. 12 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 13 Respondent. 14 15 The State of Washington

More information

STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. Defendants.

STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. Defendants. 1 4 5 6 STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT STATE OF WASHINGTON, NO. 1--4- SEA 11 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 4 LG ELECTRONICS, INC., et al., Plaintiff, Defendants. SETTLEMENT AND CONSENT DECREE REGARDING

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING 1 2 3 4 ITS IONG 00t:NTY, Y NWON SH NOV 6 4 ftl"10m COM FMK X_ 7 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 23 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING STATE OF WASHINGTON, NO. -2-931-1

More information

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1 1 1 1 STATE OF WASHINGTON, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT Plaintiff, FORM GIANT, LLC., also known as change-my-address.com and Change My Addresschange-of-address.us, an Ohio Limited

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE

STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS IN THE MATTER OF CVS Pharmacy, Inc. Case No. L07-3-1011 / ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE The Office of the Attorney General,

More information

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING

NOTICE OF PENDENCY AND PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND SETTLEMENT HEARING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOSHIBA ENTITIES AND THE STATE OF ILLINOIS REGARDING CRT ANTITRUST LITIGATION

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOSHIBA ENTITIES AND THE STATE OF ILLINOIS REGARDING CRT ANTITRUST LITIGATION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOSHIBA ENTITIES AND THE STATE OF ILLINOIS REGARDING CRT ANTITRUST LITIGATION This Settlement Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into this 'l day of January 2018,

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. An Agreement among the Offices of the Attorneys General of the States and

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. An Agreement among the Offices of the Attorneys General of the States and ------------------------------------------------------ : : In the Matter of : NFL Ticketing Investigation : : : ------------------------------------------------------ : SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT An Agreement

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WALLA WALLA. Plaintiff, Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WALLA WALLA. Plaintiff, Defendant. I. INTRODUCTION ,1 2 3 4 5 6 COiliiTy CUER 211 OCT P!2: 11 11 E3Y------- t,ui; ;=T Ct3UNTY OCT 007017 ATC CRS! evil Rights 7 8 9 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WALLA WALLA STATE

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. Plaintiff, Defendant.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY. Plaintiff, Defendant. IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY 1 FOLWEILER CHIROPRACTIC, PS, a Washington professional services corporation, vs. Plaintiff, No. --- SEA STIPULATION OF SETTLEMENT 0 1 PROGRESSIVE

More information

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION

NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING YOUR ESTIMATED PAYMENT INFORMATION SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ARTHUR HATTENSTY, ET AL. V. BESSIRE AND CASENHISER, INC., ET AL. CASE NO. BC540657 A court authorized this notice. This is not a solicitation

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING. DISCONTINUANCE WEIDNER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC, Defendant.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING. DISCONTINUANCE WEIDNER PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC, Defendant. L' 1 2 3 INt couyp IN ~ JAIL SUPEiit R CC)U T CLERK 5 13 1 15 1 1 2 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF KING STATE OF WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, NO. -2-00- SEA V. ASSURANCE

More information

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al.

NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al. NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT Berta Martin Del Campo v. Hometown Buffet, Inc., et al. United States District Court, Central District of California Case No. 2:14-cv-04378 (RGk) SHx THIS NOTICE

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE STATE OF WASHINGTON, NO Plaintiff, I.

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE STATE OF WASHINGTON, NO Plaintiff, I. FILED JAN 2 6 TIMOTHY W. FITZGERALD SPOKANE COUNTY CLERK 7!, 8 91 10 11 12 16' 21 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF SPOKANE STATE OF WASHINGTON, NO. 0336- V. Plaintiff,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN LEGAL NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENTS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN LEGAL NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN LEGAL NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENTS If you were employed as a Registered Nurse by a hospital in the Detroit area between December

More information

Your legal rights may be affected even if you do not act. Please read this Notice carefully. YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES

Your legal rights may be affected even if you do not act. Please read this Notice carefully. YOUR RIGHTS AND CHOICES Authorized by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action Involving Stericycle, Inc. BASIC INFORMATION 1. What is this Notice about? A Court

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Office of Inspector General (OIG-HHS) of the Department of Health and Human

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Office of Inspector General (OIG-HHS) of the Department of Health and Human SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement (Agreement) is entered into among the United States of America, acting through the United States Department of Justice and on behalf of the Office of Inspector

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into among the United

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into among the United SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement ( Agreement ) is entered into among the United States of America, acting through the United States Department of Justice and on behalf of the Department of

More information

~/

~/ STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF: Case No. L09-3-1236 NATIONWIDE FINANCIAL SOLUTIONS, LLC, and STEPHEN BLOOM, individually, Respondents

More information

Between. (the "Plaintiffs") and

Between. (the Plaintiffs) and CANADIAN INVERTERS CLASS ACTIONS NATIONAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made as of December 2, 2016 Between SHERIDAN CHEVROLET CADILLAC LTD., THE PICKERING AUTO MALL LTD. and SERGE ASSELIN (the "Plaintiffs") and

More information

Office of the Attorney General State of Florida Department of Legal Affairs

Office of the Attorney General State of Florida Department of Legal Affairs In the Matter of Map Destinations, et. al. Office of the Attorney General State of Florida Department of Legal Affairs SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement is entered into between Plaintiff,

More information

NOTICE MEMBERS OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASS ARE ENCOURAGED TO READ AND CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE MATTERS DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE.

NOTICE MEMBERS OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASS ARE ENCOURAGED TO READ AND CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE MATTERS DESCRIBED IN THIS NOTICE. NOTICE TO: ALL INDIVIDUALS AND BUSINESSES WHO PURCHASED PACKAGED ICE FROM A RETAILER (E.G., SUPERMARKET, GROCERY STORE OR GAS STATION) MADE BY ARCTIC GLACIER INC., ARCTIC GLACIER INTERNATIONAL INC., ARCTIC

More information

SUGGESTED AMENDMENT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (CR)

SUGGESTED AMENDMENT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL RULES (CR) 0 (a) Scope. This rule applies if a case schedule or court order requires mediation. On a party s motion for good cause or on its own initiative, the court may order any parties to mediate pursuant to

More information

Connecticut Multiple Listing Service, Inc.

Connecticut Multiple Listing Service, Inc. Connecticut Multiple Listing Service, Inc. DATA ACCESS AGREEMENT CTMLS 127 Washington Avenue West Building, 2 nd floor North Haven, CT 06473 203-234-7001 203-234-7151 (fax) www.ctstatewidemls.com 1 DATA

More information

DISCOVERY CLEAN WATER ALLIANCE ADMINISTRATIVE LEAD AGREEMENT

DISCOVERY CLEAN WATER ALLIANCE ADMINISTRATIVE LEAD AGREEMENT DISCOVERY CLEAN WATER ALLIANCE ADMINISTRATIVE LEAD AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and between CLARK REGIONAL WASTEWATER DISTRICT, Clark County, Washington {"CRWWD") and the DISCOVERY

More information

~/

~/ STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS In the Matter of: AG Case Number: L12-3-1013 KNIVES4WHOLESALE, LLC, d/b/a KNIVES4WHOLESALE, K4W, JASON SAAKES, an Individual,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF ST. LOUIS STATE OF MISSOURI NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT The case is Latta, et al. v. Hannibal Board of Public Works, et al. Case No. 16SL-CC01881 A Court authorized

More information

~/

~/ STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF: AG CASE NO. L12-3-1046 Groundhog Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Merchant Lynx Services and John Kucyk, Individually,

More information

Case 3:10-md RS Document Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO

Case 3:10-md RS Document Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO Case 3:10-md-02143-RS Document 2260-3 Filed 04/03/17 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO IN RE OPTICAL DISK DRIVE ANTITRUST LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT

More information

~/

~/ STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS In the Matter of: AG Case Number: L14-3-1026 RESORTS NATIONWIDE, INC. and JAMES NOVILLO, an individual, Respondents. ----------------------------~/

More information

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND GENERAL RELEASE (the "Agreement") is entered into, effective August 24, 2015 (the "Effective Date"), by Dr. Arthur Hall, Ph.D. ("Dr. Hall"),

More information

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MANUFACTURED HOUSING' DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MANUFACTURED HOUSING' DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MANUFACTURED HOUSING' DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM In the Matter of the Complaints of Della Dewey and Mary Lou Divelbiss Against View Vista Mobile Home Park. NOTICE

More information

~/

~/ STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE MATTER OF: NORTH FLORIDA LUBES, INC. d/b/a TEXACO XPRESS LUBES, a/k/a HA VOLINE XPRESS LUBES ----------------------~/

More information

Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. Please read this Notice carefully.

Your legal rights are affected whether you act or don t act. Please read this Notice carefully. If you received treatment through a Swedish Health Services Emergency Department and were uninsured, you could be entitled to benefits under a class action settlement. The King County Superior Court authorized

More information

Case 2:06-cv RSM Document 30 Filed 05/04/2006 Page 1 of 6

Case 2:06-cv RSM Document 30 Filed 05/04/2006 Page 1 of 6 Case :0-cv-00-RSM Document 0 Filed 0/0/00 Page of 0 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Plaintiff, SECURE COMPUTER, LLC., et al., Defendants.

More information

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MANUFACTURED HOUSING DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MANUFACTURED HOUSING DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON MANUFACTURED HOUSING DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROGRAM In the Matter of the NOTICE OF VIOLATION Complaint of Kathleen L. David Against RCW 59.30.040 Spanaway Village

More information

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1

PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 PLAINTIFF S EXHIBIT 1 In The Case Of Kevin Burkhammer, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v. Allied Interstate LLC; and, Does 1-20, Inclusive, 15CV0567 KAZEROUNI LAW GROUP, APC

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE

STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE ... l STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS In the Matter of: Debt Settlement USA, Inc. AG Case Numbers: LI0-3-1005 Respondent ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE PURSUANT

More information

Applicant Co Applicant. Address. City State Zip. Home Phone# Cell Phone# Address Birth Date DL# SS# Sponsor Name

Applicant Co Applicant. Address. City State Zip. Home Phone# Cell Phone#  Address Birth Date DL# SS# Sponsor Name LLR INC. INDEPENDENT CONSULTANT PROGRAM APPLICATION & AGREEMENT Applicant Co Applicant Address City State Zip Home Phone# Cell Phone# Email Address Birth Date DL# SS# Sponsor Name Effective Date This LLR

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiffs, )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. Plaintiffs, ) SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ex rel. DANIEL E. LUNGREN, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; S. KIMBERLY BELSHE, DIRECTOR OF HEALTH

More information

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. THIS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT. THIS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT THIS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made as of August 20, 2007 by and between MOST V AMERIKU (hereinafter MVA ) on the one hand and OLEG KAPANETS (hereinafter

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF KERN, NORTH KERN DISTRICT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1 1 1 LAW OFFICES OF DAVID KLEHM David Klehm (SBN 0 1 East First Street, Suite 00 Santa Ana, CA 0 (1-0 Attorneys for Plaintiff, GLOBAL HORIZONS, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA GLOBAL HORIZONS,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION : : : : : : : : : : : SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION IN RE: AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION In Re: Wire Harness THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: Truck and Equipment Dealer Cases :

More information

FULL AND COMPLETE RELEASE. WHEREAS, on or about,, (" ), an adult resident citizen of County,, was. involved in an automobile accident on in

FULL AND COMPLETE RELEASE. WHEREAS, on or about,, ( ), an adult resident citizen of County,, was. involved in an automobile accident on in FULL AND COMPLETE RELEASE WHEREAS, on or about,, (" ), an adult resident citizen of County,, was involved in an automobile accident on in County,, when the car he was driving collided with a vehicle driven

More information

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 STATE OF WASHINGTON, I NO. 9 Plaintiff, V. COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE 10 AND OTHER RELIEF UNDER THE 11 PROVIDENCE HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, SERVICES-WASHINGTON; SWEDISH RCW 19.86

More information

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGMENT SUMMARY INTRODUCTION

STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT JUDGMENT SUMMARY INTRODUCTION 1 2 5 6 THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Plaintiff, v. 10 AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, et 11 al., 12 Defendants. STATE OF WASHINGTON KING COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT NO. 10-2-216-SEA CONSENT DECREE AGAINST CHIMEI INNOLUX

More information

Non-Circumvention, Non Disclosure & Working Agreement / Irrevocable Master Fee Protection Agreement Page 1 of 10

Non-Circumvention, Non Disclosure & Working Agreement / Irrevocable Master Fee Protection Agreement Page 1 of 10 INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (I.C.C 400/500/600) NON-CIRCUMVENTION, NON-DISCLOSURE & WORKING AGREEMENT (NCNDA) IRREVOCABLE MASTER FEE PROTECTION AGREEMENT (IMFPA) BUYER SELLER TO SELLER Tel Email

More information

ONTARIO GASOLINE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made on June 4, Between JAMES LORIMER. (the "Plaintiff. and

ONTARIO GASOLINE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT. Made on June 4, Between JAMES LORIMER. (the Plaintiff. and ONTARIO GASOLINE CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT Made on June 4, 2013 Between JAMES LORIMER (the "Plaintiff 1 ) and CANADIAN TIRE CORPORATION, LIMITED (the "Settling Defendant") TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION

More information

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE

Case 2:07-cv RAJ Document 87 Filed 03/27/2009 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE Case :0-cv-0-RAJ Document Filed 0//0 Page of The Honorable Richard A. Jones UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 IN RE: WSB FINANCIAL GROUP SECURITIES LITIGATION Master

More information

~/

~/ STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF: Case No. L13-3-1044 BIOMAX CORP. and JORGE DIAZ Respondents -----------------------------------~/ ASSURANCE

More information

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc.,

EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc., Cornell University ILR School DigitalCommons@ILR Consent Decrees Labor and Employment Law Program Summer --0 EEOC v. Pacific Airport Services, Inc., Judge Ramona V. Manglona Follow this and additional

More information

~/

~/ STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF: HYPER GROUP LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, TONY PARDO, Individually and d/b/a FIRST CHOICE

More information

METER DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN AMEREN SERVICES COMPANY AND

METER DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN AMEREN SERVICES COMPANY AND METER DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN AMEREN SERVICES COMPANY AND THIS METER DATA MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) is entered into this day of, (the Effective Date ), by and between,

More information

Orange County Florida Code of Ordinances CHAPTER 2 ADMINISTRATION, ARTICLE X - LOBBYING ACTIVITIES

Orange County Florida Code of Ordinances CHAPTER 2 ADMINISTRATION, ARTICLE X - LOBBYING ACTIVITIES Orange County Florida Code of Ordinances CHAPTER 2 ADMINISTRATION, ARTICLE X - LOBBYING ACTIVITIES ARTICLE X. - LOBBYING ACTIVITIES Sec. 2-351. - Definitions. Black-out period means the period between

More information

~/

~/ STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF GOLDEN TRIANGLE PROPERTIES, INC. d/b/a ACE HARDWARE SUPERSTORE and ACEHARDWARESUPERSTORE.COM, and COREY

More information

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * IN THE MATTER OF: L VNV FUNDING LLC; and RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES * LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, * CFR-FY2012-012 Respondents * * * * BEFORE THE MARYLAND STATE COLLECTION AGENCY LICENSING BOARD IN THE OFFICE

More information

United States District Court for the Central District of California

United States District Court for the Central District of California United States District Court for the Central District of California NOTICE OF PROPOSED CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT WITH CERTAIN DEFENDANTS AND FINAL APPROVAL HEARING In re Aftermarket Automotive Lighting Products

More information

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS, COLLECTIVE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT

NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS, COLLECTIVE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT This notice is being sent pursuant to court order. This is not a solicitation from a lawyer. NOTICE OF PENDING CLASS, COLLECTIVE AND REPRESENTATIVE ACTION SETTLEMENT Rainoldo Gooding, et al v. Vita-Mix

More information

~/

~/ STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF: AG CASE NO. L13-3-1083 Danik Spa, Inc. d/b/a Danik Med Spa, Respondent --------------------------------------~/

More information

Certified Partner Agreement. THIS AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made and entered into on, between the City of Sacramento ( City ) and BACKGROUND

Certified Partner Agreement. THIS AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made and entered into on, between the City of Sacramento ( City ) and BACKGROUND Certified Partner Agreement THIS AGREEMENT ( Agreement ) is made and entered into on, between the City of Sacramento ( City ) and ( Owner ). BACKGROUND A. City operates a website ( City Website ) that

More information

THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED OPERATING AGREEMENT HRCP II, L.L.C. November 1, 2016

THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED OPERATING AGREEMENT HRCP II, L.L.C. November 1, 2016 THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED OPERATING AGREEMENT OF HRCP II, L.L.C. November 1, 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1 ORGANIZATIONAL MATTERS... 3 1.01 Formation... 3 1.02 Name... 3 1.03 Principal Office... 3

More information

Anticipated payment date: Ten (10) days after the Class Action Settlement becomes final and any appeals are exhausted.

Anticipated payment date: Ten (10) days after the Class Action Settlement becomes final and any appeals are exhausted. NOTICE OF CLASS ACTION PROPOSED SETTLEMENT AND FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING This Notice concerns a proposed class action settlement ( Class Action Settlement ) in a lawsuit entitled Palombaro v. Emery Federal

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF ST. CLAIR COUNTY THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT STATE OF ILLINOIS JOHN STELL and CHARLES WILLIAMS, ) JR., on behalf of themselves individually ) and as class representatives on

More information

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12

Case 3:11-md DMS-RBB Document 108 Filed 12/18/12 Page 1 of 12 Case :-md-0-dms-rbb Document 0 Filed // Page of 0 0 In re GROUPON MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA No. :-md-0-dms-rbb ORDER APPROVING

More information

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANN I. JONES RAYMOND E. McKOWN GREGORY W. STAPLES Federal Trade Commission 11000 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 13209 Los Angeles, California 90024 (310) 235-4040 JOHN ANDREW SINGER Federal Trade Commission 6th

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 07-00200-06-CR-W-FJG ) MICHAEL FITZWATER, ) ) ) Defendant.

More information

Project 23a3: Sonar for the Visually Impaired Final Design Report

Project 23a3: Sonar for the Visually Impaired Final Design Report Project 23a3: Sonar for the Visually Impaired Final Design Report ENGR 461 June 6, 2014 Project Sponsor: Quality of Life Plus Lab Group Members: Anastasia Newark Edwin Ng Scott Terhorst WARNING: By reading

More information

PROMISSORY NOTE SECURED BY DEED OF TRUST Condominium Conversion BMR Program

PROMISSORY NOTE SECURED BY DEED OF TRUST Condominium Conversion BMR Program DO NOT DESTROY THIS NOTE: WHEN PAID, THIS NOTE AND DEED OF TRUST SECURING THE SAME MUST BE SURRENDERED TO CITY FOR CANCELLATION BEFORE RECONVEYANCE WILL BE MADE. PROMISSORY NOTE SECURED BY DEED OF TRUST

More information

CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT CENTRAL ARIZONA GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT P.O. Box PHOENIX, ARIZONA

CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT CENTRAL ARIZONA GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT P.O. Box PHOENIX, ARIZONA CENTRAL ARIZONA WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT CENTRAL ARIZONA GROUNDWATER REPLENISHMENT DISTRICT P.O. Box 43020 PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85080-3020 APPLICATION TO ENROLL AS A MEMBER SERVICE AREA OF THE CENTRAL ARIZONA

More information

pacemakers and implantable eardioverter defibrillators ("ICDs").

pacemakers and implantable eardioverter defibrillators (ICDs). SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This Settlement Agreement ("Agreement") is entered into among the United States of America, acting through the United States Department of Justice and on behalf of the Office of Inspector

More information

~/

~/ STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS In the Matter of: AG Case Numbers: Ll0-3-1 113 CLICK INKS.COM, LLC, a Florida Corporation, Respondent ----------------------~/

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR CITRUS COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR CITRUS COUNTY CIVIL DIVISION FERNANDO MONROY and EDITH MONROY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, IN AND FOR CITRUS COUNTY

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, SS. ' SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT : = ) ^

COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, SS. ' SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT : = ) ^ COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS SUFFOLK, SS. ' SUPERIOR COURT DEPARTMENT OF THE TRIAL COURT : = ) 13-3973 ^ COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) CIVIL ACTION NO. _ ) v. ) ) MYLAN SPECIALTY L.P.

More information

Case 2:14-cv SJO-FFM Document 27 Filed 10/14/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:773

Case 2:14-cv SJO-FFM Document 27 Filed 10/14/14 Page 1 of 7 Page ID #:773 Case :-cv-0-sjo-ffm Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: JEFFREY D. NADEL, ESQ. 000 VENTURA BLVD., SUITE 0 ENCINO, CA -- S.B.#0 ATTORNEY FOR ALEJANDRO ALEX TREJO, THIRD PARTY CLAIMANT 0 0 UNITED STATES

More information

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB

Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB Couser v. DISH One Satellite, LLC United States District Court for the Central District of California Case No. 5:15-cv-2218-CBM-DTB If you received more than one call to your telephone from DISH One Satellite,

More information

WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

WYNN RESORTS, LIMITED (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of Report (Date of earliest event

More information

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Case 3:18-cv-01099-NJR-RJD Document 19 Filed 06/12/18 Page 1 of 18 Page ID #348 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS TODD RAMSEY, FREDERICK BUTLER, MARTA NELSON, DIANE

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI WESTERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) No. 07-00200-01-CR-W-FJG ) WILLIAM ENEFF, ) ) ) Defendant. )

More information