REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
|
|
- Anis Spencer
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (recommended length: 4 pages). 3. Please write in English or French. Should this not be possible, the report can be written in another language but the summary must be in English or French. 4. Please read the guidelines for drafting the report (in Annex). Feel free to add any other relevant information in your report. 5. The summary shall contain a synthesis of the most important information of the report. 6. Please note that NO NAMES, neither yours nor the ones of the persons you met during your exchange, should appear in the report in order to ensure anonymity 1. Initials can be used when necessary. Identification of the participant Name: First name: Nationality: German Country of exchange: Netherlands Publication For dissemination purposes and as information for future participants in the Programme please take note that, unless you indicate otherwise, EJTN may publish your report in its website. In this case the report will remain anonymous and your name and surname will not appear. To this aim, please do not mention any names in the reports. Initials can be used instead. Please tick this box if you do not wish for your report to be published For completion by EJTN staff only Publication reference: 1 To that purpose, the first page of this report will be taken out before any possible publication Réseau Européen de Formation Judiciaire/ (aisbl) Rue du Luxembourg 16B, B-1000 Bruxelles; Tel: ; Fax: ; exchanges@ejtn.eu
2 For completion by EJTN staff only Publication reference: Identification of the participant Nationality: German Functions: Public Prosecutor Length of service: 3 years 6 months Identification of the exchange Hosting jurisdiction/institution: SSR / Public Prosecution Service of the Netherlands District Maastricht City: The Hague / Maastricht Country: Netherlands Dates of the exchange: Type of exchange: one to one exchange group exchange general exchange specialized exchange (please specify : ) I. Programme of the exchange REPORT During the first week of the exchange in The Hague/Utrecht we had several presentations regarding the law system of the Netherlands and its organization as well as presentations regarding the Dutch public prosecution service. Furthermore we visited several international institutions such as the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), the International Criminal Court (ICC) and Eurojust. At the ICTY and the ICC we had the chance to attend a court session in the trials against Radovan Karadzic (ICTY), charged with genocide, persecutions, extermination, murder, deportation etc. during the Yugoslavian war in the 1990 s, and against Jean-Pierre Bemba Gombo (ICC), charged with crimes against humanity, rape, murder, etc. during an armed conflict in the Central African Republic in 2002/2003. In the second week I stayed at the public prosecution service of the Netherlands District Maastricht along with two other colleagues. During that week we had the chance to gain a deeper insight into the work of the public prosecution service in the Netherlands as well as into the euregional and international cooperation between the police forces and the public prosecution services between the Netherlands and
3 the other countries of the EU. We had the opportunitiy to meet several dutch colleagues working for the prosecution office in Maastricht and/or for the police in the District of Maastricht/Province of Limburg. We got an explanation of the organization and structure of the public prosecution service of Maastricht as well as presentations regarding the euregional/international cooperation of the police and the public prosecution services. Therefore we visited several euregional institutions such as the Bureau of Euregional Cooperation (BES), the Euregional Police Information and Coordination Centre (EPICC) and the International Legal Assistance Centre (IRC). Furthermore we had the chance to visit the Joint Hit Team in Stein (an international drug squad) and a detention centre for juveniles. We attended several criminal court sessions, spoke to an investigative judge and to a prosecutor working with the "ZSM"- proceeding (this is kind of a speed-proceeding handling all minor offences that do not need be brought to court). II. The hosting institution I attended the exchange programme along with about 30 other colleagues ((future) public prosecutors, judges and trainers) from 17 different countries of the EU. The first week of the exchange took place in The Hague/Utrecht. We were hosted by the SSR (Studiecentrum Rechtspleging =Training and study centre for the judiciary) which is responsible for the initial training and continuous education for judges, public prosecutors and legal administrative staff. The initial training of judges and prosecutors in the Netherlands used to last six years followed by a one-year probation period before the trainees are appointed as a judge or prosecutor. Recently this initial training was reformed with the aim to achieve more variety in the training depending on the talents and experiences/former careers of each individual trainee. Therefore the initial training now lasts between one year and four years depending on the above mentioned circumstances. Besides the initial training the SSR also offers continuous education for judges and prosecutors as well as customized advice and training, coaching and peer assessment. The second week we were divided into smaller groups and hosted by different courts or prosecution services throughout the Netherlands. I stayed at the public prosecution service in Maastricht along with two other colleagues. The public prosecution service of the Netherlands employs more than people in total, including about 800 public prosecutors. The public prosecution service stands under the authority of the Minister of Security and Justice. The highest authority of the prosecution service is the Board of Prosecutors Generals that lays down the general policy on investigations and prosecutions and defines the priorities of the crimes to fight. The public prosecution service of the Netherland has recently been centralized. There is now one national public prosecution service with ten regional offices, one national unit working on all severe crimes like terrorism, etc. and one national unit handling certain special crimes like environmental crime, tax fraud, etc. The public prosecution service of Maastricht employs about 30 prosecutors and 250 legal assistance staff. It is divided into four departments, one working the minor/common crimes, one doing the moderately severe and severe crimes, one department for policy and strategy and one department for the appeals. The whole exchange (the stay during the first week as well as during the second week) was very well organized. Throughout our stay we were hosted by very friendly colleagues who did their best in making our stay a very personal and enriching experience. III. The law of the host country The judiciary map of the Netherlands had very recently (April 2013) been reformed with the objective of delivering a higher quality and efficiency of case handling and to speed up the procedures. Instead of 19
4 there are now 11 district courts and 32 instead of the former 53 locations in the country and 4 instead of the former 5 courts of appeal. Each court has a three person board with the president as chair. The board is responsible for the personel, financial matters, organization, quality, housing, security and information technology of the court. That means that each court organises itself more or less independently. On a national level there is the Council for the Judiciary that consists of four full-time members (2 judicial and 2 non-judicial) who are nominated by the Minister of Security and Justice after an extensive consultative process within the Judiciary and who are appointed by the Crown. The Council for the Judiciary prepares the judiciary budget that is decreed by law on an annual basis, distributes these financial resources among the courts, delivers operational support to the courts, gives advise regarding new legislation and functions as a spokesperson for the judiciary. Within the criminal law system the public prosecution service and the criminal law courts together make up the judiciary. The public prosecution service investigates crimes, prosecutes the offenders and supervises the enforcement of the sentences. It is responsible for protecting the rights of both victims and defendants throughout the judicial process. The public prosecution service leads the investigation of criminal offences. The police have to render account for their actions to a public prosecutor. The dutch criminal law system is based on the principle of opportunity. That means that the public prosecution service decides who has to appear before a court and on what charge. Not all cases are brought to court. The prosecution service can decide how to deal with minor crimes without necessarily bringing them to court. It has the competence to drop the charges not only in the case that there is not sufficient evidence, but also in the case of minor offences and/or the offender has made good the damage. The public prosecutor can also impose a sanction (fine or community service) at his own discretion without the involvement of the court. Only if the offender does not pay the fine or does not do the community service, the case is taken to court. In the case of severe crimes, etc. the prosecutor will of course charge the suspect and bring him/her to court. The decision of the prosecutor how to deal with a case is made on either an individiual basis or by policy (i.e. policy to tolerate certain drug offences). If a case is taken to court the defendant is sent a letter containing the indictment and stating when the case is to be heard. Usually the suspect appears in court for the trail. However, if he/she does not appear he/she can still be trialed and sentenced if he/she has received the above mentioned letter stating the date of the trial. Relatively minor offences are heard by a single judge court, more serious offences are heard by three judges. The sanctions that are imposed by the court (fines, community service/rehabilitation and imprisonment - it is possible to give a part of the sanctions on probation) are executed by the public prosecution service. The dutch criminal law system also knows the "investigative judge". The main tasks of this judge are to deal with presented suspects and to decide if they have to go to provisory custody or not, to hear witnesses and to undertake all urgent investiagitve measures like house searches. In the Netherlands an arrested suspect has to be presented to a judge within three days after the arrest. If the judge decides that the suspect has to stay in prison, the provisory custody lasts for 14 days. If it shall last longer than that period of time, the suspect has to be presented to a board of three judges. They can order the suspect to be kept in prison for up to three months. This period of time can be prolonged three times. Within 104 days the case has to be brought to court at least with a provisory indictment and a proforma public trial. IV. The comparative law aspect in my exchange Compared to the german criminal law system the dutch criminal law system shows more similarities than differences. The most important difference however is the opportunity principle of the dutch criminal law system in contrast to the principle of legality of the german criminal law system. According to the principle of legality the prosecution service in Germany has to respond to every criminal act that comes to the knowledge of the police or the prosecution service. It can decide to drop a case (i.a. minor charges) or
5 to offer a suspect to drop a case under certain conditions (i.a. if the suspect does good the damage or pays a certain amount of money to a social or public institution), but it can not impose any penalties at its own discretion. In the german criminal law system only a court can do so. Therefore the case has to be taken to court. However, to speed up the proceedings it is not always necessary that there is a public trial. On request of the public prosecution service the court can impose a sanction in a written procedure. In that case the suspect is sent a penalty order stating the charges and the imposed sanction. If the suspect does not accept the penalty order he/she can appeal against it within two weeks. The dutch criminal law system does not know these kind of written procedure at court. Last year however, the dutch criminal law system implemented a kind of accelerated procedure called "ZSM", which means "as fast as possible". The main aim of that procedure is to speed up the proceedings, give a fast decision to minor cases (regularly within several hours or days) and to minimize the number of cases that are taken to court. You now find ZSM-institutions all over the country, often located in a police station, that are working on seven days a week, 12 hours a day. The decision how to deal with a case is made by the public prosecutor on an very individual basis, taking into account the personal and financial situation of the offender as well as the interests of the victim. Therefore professionals from other authorities and related fields (i.a. parole board, social service, psychologists, lawyers) work alongside with the public prosecutor at ZSM. The role of the investigative judge is also a bit different in the dutch law system. One of the main tasks of the dutch investigative judge is the hearing of witnesses. On request of the public prosecutor, the lawyer or the court the investigative judge hears the witnesses during the ongoing investigation before the public trial starts. The witnesses are regularly not heard again by the deciding judge in the public trial. Instead the written statement or a summary of it is read in the court session. That results in the investigative judge playing a far more important role in the dutch law system than in the german one. In Germany usually all witnesses have to be heard in the public trial. In the dutch law system even statements of witnesses that have only been heard by the police can be read in the court session. Altogether the dutch criminal law system seems a bit less formal than the german one. V. The European aspect of my exchange During my stay in the Netherlands I had a lot of opportunities to learn about the international cooperation. Not only on a large scale like at Eurojust, the ICC and ICTY, but also on a smaller scale. Maastricht and the whole province of Limburg is a very unique part of the Netherlands as this area has longer borders with its neighbouring countries, like Germany and Belgium, than with the rest of the Netherlands. This unique location attracts not only tourists and professionals to go from one country to the other but also criminals. To fight cross-border crimes effectively, a strong cooperation between the police forces and the public prosecution services of all countries involved is essential. In the province of Limburg there are several euregional institutions such as the Bureau of Euregional Cooperation (BES), the Euregional Police Information and Coordination Centre (EPICC) and the International Legal Assistance Centre (IRC) where professionals from all neighbour states work alongside their dutch colleagues in the police or the public prosecution service (liassion officers). All of these institutions have more or less the same purpose: To support and improve the international justice cooperation in the Euregions and to fight cross-border criminality effectively. Therefore they assist the countries involved with mutual legal assistance requests, start up and execute joint cross border criminality analyses, investigations and enforcement projects in the Euregion.
6 VI. The benefits of the exchange During my stay in the Netherlands I leaned a lot about the dutch criminal law system and the international and euregional cooperation between the member states of the EU. Especially in the first week of the exchange I met colleagues of many other member states and gained a lot of information not only about the law system in the Netherlands but also of the different law system of the other countries. I realized that we all are more or less facing the same challenges, sometimes presenting different solutions for them. The different national law systems within in the EU seem to share more similarities than differences but it is theses (small) differences, that are important to know about when we work together. Only when we know how our colleagues work in the neighbour countries and why they work this way, we can work together effectively. The exchange helped me to gain this understanding. On the small scale I was very impressed by the "ZSM"-procedure in the Netherlands. I think that in Germany it often takes too much time to give a decision to an offence, even to smaller ones. The reason for this might be that our law system is more formal than the dutch one. Given our current law system we do not have the legal possibility to offer a procedure like "ZSM" in Germany as only the judge, but not the public prosecutor, can impose punishments. Still, I think we can learn from the "ZSM"-procedure how to work efficiently along with the reprentatives of all other relevant professions and authorities to offer quick and individuell responses to common offenses. VII. Suggestions As everything was so very well organized during this exchange, I do not have any suggestions for further improvements. I'd like to express my gratitude to everyone involved in arranging the programme for the two weeks and in organizing our stay.
7 SUMMARY I attended the exchange programme along with about 30 other colleagues ((future) public prosecutors, judges and trainers) from 17 different countries of the EU with the first week of the exchange taking place in The Hague/Utrecht, where we were hosted by the SSR (Studiecentrum Rechtspleging =Training and Study Centre for the Judiciary) which is responsible for the initial training and continuous education for judges, public prosecutors and legal administrative staff, and the second week taking place in a smaller group along with two other colleagues at the Public Prosecution Service in Maastricht/Province of Limburg. During these two weeks we had several presentations regarding the organization of the dutch judiciary, the dutch criminal law system, the public prosecution service and the international and euregional cooperation. We visited several international institutions like the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), the International Criminal Court (ICC), Eurojust, the Bureau of Euregional Cooperation (BES), the Euregional Police Information and Coordination Centre (EPICC) and the International Legal Assistance Centre (IRC). In several meetings and conversations with the dutch colleagues working for the prosecution office in Maastricht and/or for the police in the District of Maastricht/Province of Limburg I gained a better insight into the dutch law system, the structure of the public prosecution service in the Netherlands and into the daily work of my dutch collegueas regarding not only dutch legal matters but also regarding the international/euregional cooperation in fighting crossborder crimes. As the exchange also offered many opportunities to speak to my other colleagues from the other participating member states of the EU, I did not only learn about the dutch criminal law system but also about the law systems in other european countries. I realized that our law systems share more similarities than differences and that we all struggle with the same challenges and demands: Offer a quick but profound decision for crimes with taking into account all the involved interests (offenders, victim, society) and facing cutbacks in the financial and personal infrastructure all at the same time. Our law systems sometimes offer different solutions for these challenges. By learning about my international colleagues' way of work and organization, I was able to extend my expertise by identifying where both the german system of law as well as my daily work can be improved.
8 ANNEX GUIDELINES FOR DRAFTING THE REPORT I- Programme of the exchange Institutions you have visited, hearings, seminars/conferences you have attended, judges/prosecutors and other judicial staff you have met The aim here is not to detail each of the activities but to give an overview of the contents of the exchange. If you have received a programme from the hosting institution, please provide a copy. II- The hosting institution Brief description of the hosting institution, its role within the court organisation of the host country, how it is functioning III- The law of the host country With regard to the activities you took part in during the exchange, please develop one aspect of the host country s national law that you were particularly interested in. IV- The comparative law aspect in your exchange What main similarities and differences could you observe between your own country and your host country in terms of organisation and judicial practice, substantial law..? Please develop. V- The European aspect of your exchange Did you have the opportunity to observe the implementation or references to Community instruments, the European Convention of Human Rights, judicial cooperation instruments? Please develop. VI- The benefits of the exchange What were the benefits of your exchange? How can these benefits be useful in your judicial practice? Do you think your colleagues could benefit of the knowledge you acquired during your exchange? How? VII- Suggestions In your opinion, what aspects of the Exchange Programme could be improved? How?
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchanges@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (recommended
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchanges@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (recommended
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchanges@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (recommended
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchange@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (at
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
Ejtn European Judicial Training Network [logo of the EU] With the support of the European Union REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchanges@ejtn.eu)
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchanges@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (recommended
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchange@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (at
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchanges@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (recommended
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchanges@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (recommended
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchanges@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (recommended
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchanges@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (recommended
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchanges@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (recommended
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchange@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (at
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchanges@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (recommended
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchanges@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (recommended
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchanges@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (recommended
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchange@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (at
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchanges@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (at
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchange@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (at
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchanges@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (recommended
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchanges@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (at
More informationNETHERLANDS INTERNATIONAL FRAMEWORK EUROPEAN FRAMEWORK
This document is a summary of the national report written in the framework of the European project «My Lawyer, My Rights», 2017. NETHERLANDS Interviewees Youth lawyers: 4 Other professionals: 3 1 prosecutor
More informationEU update (including the Green Paper on the Presumption of Innocence) ECBA Conference, Edinburgh April 2006
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE GENERAL JUSTICE, FREEDOM AND SECURITY Directorate D Internal security and criminal justice Unit D/3 Criminal justice Brussels, 21 April 2006 EU update (including the Green
More informationAct on the Amendments to the Act on Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters with Member States of the European Union
Act on the Amendments to the Act on Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters with Member States of the European Union Article 1 (1) This Act regulates the judicial cooperation in criminal matters between
More informationAn Introduction. to the. Federal Public Defender s Office. for the Districts of. South Dakota and North Dakota
An Introduction to the Federal Public Defender s Office for the Districts of South Dakota and North Dakota Federal Public Defender's Office for the Districts of South Dakota and North Dakota Table of Contents
More informationLEGISLATIONS IMPLEMENTING THE ICTY STATUTE THE CONFEDERATION OF SWITZERLAND
LEGISLATIONS IMPLEMENTING THE ICTY STATUTE Member States Cooperation THE CONFEDERATION OF SWITZERLAND Federal order on cooperation with the International Tribunals for the Prosecution of Serious violations
More information(Statute of the International Tribunal for Rwanda)
Statute of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Genocide and Other Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of Rwanda
More informationREPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY
REPORT ON THE EXCHANGE AND SUMMARY Instructions: 1. The report must be sent to the EJTN (exchange@ejtn.eu) within one month after the exchange. 2. Please use the template below to write your report (at
More informationMinimum Age of Criminal Responsibility (MACR) Comparative Analysis International Profile - Germany
March 2016 Minimum Age of Criminal Responsibility (MACR) Comparative Analysis International Profile - Germany Yanna Papadodimitraki, CYCJ This international profile presents information and evidence on
More informationTerrill: World Criminal Justice Systems, 8th Edition
Terrill: World Criminal Justice Systems, 8th Edition Chapter 2 Multiple Choice 1. The French Constitution contains a Bill of Rights. 2. The president of France is limited to two consecutive terms in office.
More informationConvention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950, CETS 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (1950, CETS 005) Usually called the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), it establishes a number of fundamental rights and
More informationReport on Eurojust s casework in the field of the European Arrest Warrant
Report on Eurojust s casework in the field of the European Arrest Warrant 26 May 2014 REPORT ON EUROJUST S CASEWORK IN THE FIELD OF THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT This report concerns Eurojust s casework
More informationLegal Studies. Total marks 100. Section I Pages marks Attempt Questions 1 20 Allow about 30 minutes for this section. Section II Pages 9 21
2016 HIGHER SCHOOL CERTIFICATE EXAMINATION Legal Studies Total marks 100 Section I Pages 2 6 20 marks Attempt Questions 1 20 Allow about 30 minutes for this section Section II Pages 9 21 General Instructions
More informationThe Criminal Justice System: From Charges to Sentencing
The Criminal Justice System: From Charges to Sentencing The Key Principles The aim the system is to protect and to regulate society, to punish offenders and to offer rehabilitation; The Government, through
More informationApplication for the purpose of residence of exchange within the context of the Working Holiday Program or Working Holiday Scheme
Application for the purpose of residence of exchange within the context of the Working Holiday Program or Working Holiday Scheme Read the explanation before you start to fill out the form. For whom is
More informationCED/C/NLD/1. International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance
United Nations International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance Distr.: General 29 July 2013 Original: English CED/C/NLD/1 Committee on Enforced Disappearances Consideration
More informationSection 810. This booklet explains the 810 process, what your rights are and how to get legal help.
INFORMATION FOR FEDERAL PRISONERS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA Section 810 The Criminal Code of Canada allows a judge or justice of the peace to require you to enter into a recognizance (like a peace bond) if there
More informationDETENTION PERIODS. This document is provided as general guidelines only.
DETENTION PERIODS This document is provided as general guidelines only. The document includes a summary of the following: Powers Periods excluded in calculating the detention period Powers of arrest Powers
More informationPractice sheet on RESTORATIVE JUSTICE
Practice sheet on RESTORATIVE JUSTICE This document includes a series of concrete ideas on the legal and practical implementation of Article 12 of the Victims Directive, and not only, concerning restorative
More informationCatching up with crime and sentencing. Catching up with crime and sentencing
Booklet Catching up with crime and sentencing Catching up with crime and sentencing Improving public attitudes to the Criminal Justice System: The impact of information What do do we we know about crime?
More informationEUI Working Group on International Criminal Law Meeting of on Issues of Sentencing in International Criminal Law
EUROPEAN UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE DEPARTMENT OF LAW EUI Working Group on International Criminal Law Meeting of 19.01.2005 on Issues of Sentencing in International Criminal Law Presentation by Silvia D Ascoli
More informationScope of the obligation to provide extradition
chapter 4 International criminal justice cooperation 131 Tool 4.2 Extradition Overview This tool discusses extradition, introduces a range of resources to facilitate entering into extradition agreements
More informationCompetent authorities and languages accepted for the European Investigation Order in criminal matters
Updated 26 February 2018 Competent authorities and languages accepted for the European Investigation Order in criminal matters - as notified by the Member States which have transposed the Directive 2014/41/EU
More informationSTANDARD REPORT (TRAINERS)
ANNEXE 7 European Judicial Training Network Exchange Programme for Judicial Authorities STANDARD REPORT (TRAINERS) Please download this document from the EJTN website (www.ejtn.eu) and return it duly completed
More informationCriminal Procedure in the Czech Republic Common Rules and Institutions of Criminal Procedure
Czech Criminal Justice System Jaroslav Fenyk Criminal Procedure in the Czech Republic Common Rules and Institutions of Criminal Procedure Fundamental Principles of the Czech Criminal Procedure Legality
More informationCAC/COSP/IRG/2011/CRP.4
27 May 2011 English only Implementation Review Group Second session Vienna, 30 May-3 June 2011 Item 2 of the provisional agenda Executive summary: Spain Legal system According to the Spanish Constitution
More informationS G C. Reduction in Sentence. for a Guilty Plea. Definitive Guideline. Sentencing Guidelines Council
S G C Sentencing Guidelines Council Reduction in Sentence for a Guilty Plea Definitive Guideline Revised 2007 FOREWORD One of the first guidelines to be issued by the Sentencing Guidelines Council related
More informationImplementation of the Child
Implementation of the Child Justice Act, 2008 (Act 75 of 2008) Portfolio Committee on Correctional Services. Joint meeting with the Portfolio Committee on Justice and Constitutional Development on the
More informationTREATMENT OF CONVICTS WHILE IN THE CORRECTIONAL CENTRE DUBRAVA
FACULTY OF LAW MASTER STUDIES PROGRAM: CRIMINAL LAW TREATMENT OF CONVICTS WHILE IN THE CORRECTIONAL CENTRE DUBRAVA Mentor: Prof..Dr. Rexhep GASHI Candidate: Rasim SELMANI Prishtina 2014 1 CONTENT INTRODUCTION
More informationORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE PROSECUTION OFFICE IN LATVIA
64 ORGANIZATION AND FUNCTIONS OF THE PROSECUTION OFFICE IN LATVIA Rudite Abolina 44 Recent political, economic and social developments in Europe and the world in general have resulted in important institutional
More informationAlternatives to imprisonment
Alternatives to imprisonment Conference Penal enforcement system: present situation and future perspectives Vilnius, 10 th of February 2009 Dr Fabienne Hariga HIV expert, Prison UNODC Vienna Related UNODC
More informationGeneral Secretariat delegations Report on Eurojust's casework in the field on the European Arrest Warrant
026945/EU XXV. GP Eingelangt am 26/05/14 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 26 May 2014 10269/14 EUROJUST 103 COP 160 COVER NOTE From : To : Subject : General Secretariat delegations Report on Eurojust's
More informationYOU VE been CHARGED. with a CRIME What YOU. NEED to KNOW
YOU VE been CHARGED with a CRIME What YOU NEED to KNOW 1 This booklet is intended to provide general information only. If you require specific legal advice, please consult the appropriate legislation or
More informationMUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE GUIDELINES
1. Introduction MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE GUIDELINES These guidelines are designed to give a broad overview of the essential provisions of the principal pieces of legislation routinely employed by Her Majesty
More informationSTATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL TRIBUNAL FOR THE FORMER YUGOSLAVIA
UNITED NATIONS International Tribunal for the Prosecution of Persons Responsible for Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law Committed in the Territory of the Former Yugoslavia since 1991
More informationApplication for the purpose of stay Intra Corporate Transfer (Directive 2014/66/EU) (recognised sponsor) 1 Who can submit this application?
Application for the purpose of stay Intra Corporate Transfer (Directive 2014/66/EU) (recognised sponsor) 1 Who can submit this application? You can only use this form if the IND has acknowledged you as
More informationJUDICIARY IN FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION
JUDICIARY IN FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION Small-scale comparative research on anticorruption practices and role and status of judges in fight against corruption The reform of judiciary in Serbia is conducted
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 5 March 2007 (06.03) (OR. en,de) 5325/07 ADD 2 COPEN 7
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 5 March 2007 (06.03) (OR. en,de) 5325/07 ADD 2 COPEN 7 ADDENDUM TO INITIATIVE From : German and French delegations Dated : 15 January 2007 Subject : Draft Council
More informationCompetent authorities and languages accepted for the European Investigation Order in criminal matters
Updated 10 January 2018 Competent authorities and languages accepted for the European Investigation Order in criminal matters - as notified by the Member States which have transposed the Directive 2014/41/EU
More informationWHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW
PROBATION IN NEBRASKA WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW If you are convicted of a criminal offense in the State of Nebraska you may be sentenced to serve a period of time on probation in addition to, or in lieu of,
More informationResolution adopted by the Human Rights Council on 29 September /16. Human rights in the administration of justice, including juvenile justice
United Nations General Assembly Distr.: General 9 October 2017 A/HRC/RES/36/16 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty-sixth session 11 29 September 2017 Agenda item 3 Resolution adopted by the Human
More informationApplication for the purpose of stay Intra Corporate Transfer/Mobile ICT (Directive 2014/66/EU) (sponsor)
Please use this form if the foreign national holds an Intra Corporate Transfer permit issued by another Member State. Application for the purpose of stay Intra Corporate Transfer/Mobile ICT (Directive
More informationINITIATIVE FOR A DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the European Protection Order
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 5 January 2010 17513/09 COPEN 247 Subject: INITIATIVE FOR A DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the European Protection Order 17513/09 OD/NC/eo
More informationARTICLE 95 INSPECTION
ARTICLE 95 INSPECTION Report of the Schengen Joint Supervisory Authority on an inspection of the use of Article 95 alerts in the Schengen Information System Report nr. 12-04 Brussels, 19 March 2013 Contents
More informationApplication for the purpose of residence of exchange (recognised sponsor) 1 Who can submit this application? 2 Details of the recognised sponsor
You cannot use this form if the exchange youngster has the Argentinian or South Korean nationality. The exchange youngster must submit an application at the Dutch embassy in Buenos Aires or Seoul. Application
More informationList of issues in relation to the initial report of Belize*
Advance unedited version Distr.: General 10 April 2018 Original: English English, French and Spanish only Human Rights Committee List of issues in relation to the initial report of Belize* Constitutional
More informationThis section covers coordination of services between agencies and the youth correctional system. STANDARDS
Child and Family Services PROGRAM STANDARDS MANUAL Section: 701 Effective: Oct 1/88 Revised: Sep 20/99 Page: 1 Subject: SERVICES TO YOUNG OFFENDERS This section covers coordination of services between
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF ORANGE VEHICLE CODE MISDEMEANOR GUILTY PLEA FORM. 1. My true full name is
For Court Use Only 1. My true full name is 2. I understand that I am pleading GUILTY / NOLO CONTENDERE and admitting the following offenses, prior convictions and special punishment allegations, with the
More informationLondon Criminal Courts Solicitors Association. Response to the Sentencing Advisory Panel Consultation Paper on Bail Act Offences
London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association Response to the Sentencing Advisory Panel Consultation Paper on Bail Act Offences 1 The London Criminal Courts Solicitors Association (LCCSA) represents the
More information14328/16 MP/SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 17 November 2016 (OR. en) 14328/16 COPEN 333 EUROJUST 144 EJN 70 NOTE From: To: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations No. prev. doc.: 6069/2/15 REV 2 Subject:
More informationInternational covenant on civil and political rights CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 40 OF THE COVENANT
UNITED NATIONS CCPR International covenant on civil and political rights Distr. GENERAL CCPR/C/BRA/CO/2 1 December 2005 Original: ENGLISH HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Eighty-fifth session CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS
More informationMICHIGAN PRISONERS, VIOLENT CRIME, AND PUBLIC SAFETY: A PROSECUTOR S REPORT. PAAM Corrections Committee. Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan
MICHIGAN PRISONERS, VIOLENT CRIME, AND PUBLIC SAFETY: A PROSECUTOR S REPORT PAAM Corrections Committee Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan July 2018 MICHIGAN PRISONERS, VIOLENT CRIME AND PUBLIC
More informationJUVENILE MATTERS Attorney General Executive Directive Concerning the Handling of Juvenile Matters by Police and Prosecutors
JUVENILE MATTERS Attorney General Executive Directive Concerning the Handling of Juvenile Matters by Police and Prosecutors Issued October 1990 The subject-matter of this Executive Directive was carefully
More informationSentencing Chronic Offenders
2 Sentencing Chronic Offenders SUMMARY Generally, the sanctions received by a convicted felon increase with the severity of the crime committed and the offender s criminal history. But because Minnesota
More informationInternational legal assistance in criminal matters
International legal assistance in criminal matters Abstract Nada Simjanoska International legal cooperation between states, international organizations and institutions of international character today
More informationAd-Hoc Query on foreign resident inscription to municipal/local elections. Requested by LU EMN NCP on 20 th December 2011
Ad-Hoc Query on foreign resident inscription to municipal/local elections Requested by LU EMN NCP on 20 th December 2011 Compilation produced on 3 rd February 2012 Responses from Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria,
More informationResolution adopted by the General Assembly on 21 December [on the report of the Third Committee (A/65/457)]
United Nations General Assembly Distr.: General 1 April 2011 Sixty-fifth session Agenda item 105 Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 21 December 2010 [on the report of the Third Committee (A/65/457)]
More informationCriminal Justice A Brief Introduction
Criminal Justice A Brief Introduction ELEVENTH EDITION CHAPTER 10 Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections What is Probation? Community corrections The use of a variety of officially ordered program-based
More informationDEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 820 NORTH FRENCH STREET WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801
KATHLEEN JENNINGS ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 820 NORTH FRENCH STREET WILMINGTON, DELAWARE 19801 CIVIL DIVISION (302) 577-8400 CRIMINAL DIVISION (302) 577-8500 FRAUD DIVISION (302) 577-8600
More informationSTATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT vs. * FOR * * CASE NO.
STATE OF MARYLAND * IN THE * CIRCUIT COURT vs. * FOR * * CASE NO. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * EXAMINATION OF DEFENDANT PRIOR TO ACCEPTANCE
More information30/ Human rights in the administration of justice, including juvenile justice
United Nations General Assembly Distr.: Limited 29 September 2015 A/HRC/30/L.16 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirtieth session Agenda item 3 Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil,
More informationCriminal Law: Implications after road death or injury
InformatIon Handbook 1 Criminal Law: Implications after road death or injury Produced in partnership with www.emsleys.co.uk Criminal Law: Implications after road death or injury CONTENTS: Introduction..............................................................3
More informationTHE SPANISH JUDICIARY: STRUCTURE, ORGANIZATION, GOVERNMENT
25 THE SPANISH JUDICIARY: STRUCTURE, ORGANIZATION, GOVERNMENT Ignacio Pando Echevarría 27 This presentation refers to the structure, organization and governance of the Spanish judiciary with a special
More informationAnnex. Twelfth United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice
Annex General Assembly resolution 65/230 Twelfth United Nations Congress on Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice The General Assembly, Emphasizing the responsibility assumed by the United Nations in the
More informationThe Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 15.b of the Statute of the Council of Europe
Recommendation Rec(2006)13 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the use of remand in custody, the conditions in which it takes place and the provision of safeguards against abuse (Adopted
More informationIdentifying Chronic Offenders
1 Identifying Chronic Offenders SUMMARY About 5 percent of offenders were responsible for 19 percent of the criminal convictions in Minnesota over the last four years, including 37 percent of the convictions
More informationSlide 2 We will discuss different areas where co operation with the judicial authorities may be important for prosecutors of environmental crime.
Slide 1 There is an increase in environmental law having transboundary implications. This is particularly the case in transfrontier shipment of waste but many pollution offences particularly those involving
More informationDOWNLOAD PDF STEVENS ON INDICTABLE OFFENCES AND SUMMARY CONVICTIONS
Chapter 1 : Criminal Offence Penalty Chart Note: Citations are based on reference standards. However, formatting rules can vary widely between applications and fields of interest or study. The specific
More informationInterstate Transfer Application Kit
Interstate Transfer Application Kit This information kit is designed to help prisoners understand the process of applying for interstate transfer on legal or welfare grounds. This includes an explanation
More informationConvention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
UNITED NATIONS CAT Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment Distr. GENERAL CAT/C/CR/31/6 11 February 2004 ENGLISH Original: FRENCH COMMITTEE AGAINST TORTURE
More informationPRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I. Judge Péter Kovács, Presiding Judge Judge Marc Pierre Perrin de Brichambaut Judge Reine Alapini-Gansou
ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18-16 13-06-2018 1/8 EC PT Original: English No.: ICC-RoC46(3)-01/18 Date: PRE-TRIAL CHAMBER I Before: Judge Péter Kovács, Presiding Judge Judge Marc Pierre Perrin de Brichambaut Judge
More informationMassachusetts Overhauls Accessibility to Criminal Information of Applicants and Employees
CLIENT ALERT Massachusetts Overhauls Accessibility to Criminal Information of Applicants and Employees On Friday, August 6, 2010, Governor Deval Patrick signed a bill (the Bill ) that amends a number of
More informationAct No. 403/2004 Coll. Article I PART ONE BASIC PROVISIONS
Act No. 403/2004 Coll. of 24 June 2004 on the European Arrest Warrant and on amending and supplementing certain other laws The National Council of the Slovak Republic has enacted this Act: Article I PART
More informationUK EMN Ad Hoc Query on settlement under the European Convention on Establishment Requested by UK EMN NCP on 14 th July 2014
UK EMN Ad Hoc Query on settlement under the European Convention on Establishment 1955 Requested by UK EMN NCP on 14 th July 2014 Reply requested by 14 th August 2014 Responses from Austria, Belgium, Estonia,
More informationOVERCROWDING OF PRISON POPULATIONS: THE NEPALESE PERSPECTIVE
OVERCROWDING OF PRISON POPULATIONS: THE NEPALESE PERSPECTIVE Mahendra Nath Upadhyaya* I. INTRODUCTION Overcrowding of prisons is a common problem of so many countries, developing and developed. It is not
More informationAN ACT. Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of Ohio:
(131st General Assembly) (Amended Substitute Senate Bill Number 97) AN ACT To amend sections 2152.17, 2901.08, 2923.14, 2929.13, 2929.14, 2929.20, 2929.201, 2941.141, 2941.144, 2941.145, 2941.146, and
More informationSTATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS FOR VICTIM TO SIGN: I,, victim of the crime of, (victim) (crime committed) committed on, by in, (date) (name of offender,
More information- To provide insight into the extent to which crimes are committed during unsupervised
Summary Reason and research questions When an accused is sentenced, for example to a conditional hospital order, he is at liberty within certain limits to institute appeal to the court of appeal or Supreme
More informationLegal Studies. Total marks 100. Section I Pages marks Attempt Questions 1 20 Allow about 30 minutes for this section
2013 H I G H E R S C H O O L C E R T I F I C A T E E X A M I N A T I O N Legal Studies Total marks 100 Section I Pages 2 6 20 marks Attempt Questions 1 20 Allow about 30 minutes for this section General
More informationCriminal Law Implications after Road Death or Injury.
INFORMATION HANDBOOK No 1 Criminal Law Implications after Road Death or Injury. CADD contact numbers: Help Line: 0845 1235542 (Local Rate) Office Phone & Fax: 0845 1235541 / 43 Address: CADD, PO Box 62,
More information