FRANK RIDEAU DOCKET NO. 623,918 SEC th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "FRANK RIDEAU DOCKET NO. 623,918 SEC th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER"

Transcription

1

2 FRANK RIDEAU DOCKET NO. 623,918 SEC. 23 VERSUS USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY and FRANCIS GAUTHIER 19 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE STATE OF LOUISIANA JOINT PRETRIAL ORDER NOW INTO COURT, through their respective counsel of record, come plaintiff, FRANK RIDEAU, and defendants, UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (hereinafter referred to from time to time as USAA ) and FRANCIS GAUTHIER, who jointly submit this Pre-Trial Order: A. CONCISE SUMMARY OF FACTS/CONTENTIONS OF PLAINTIFF FRANK RIDEAU: On March 21, 2013, Plaintiff, Frank Rideau, was injured when Francis Gauthier, operating his 2008 Dodge pickup, was making an unprotected left turn into the path of Mr. Rideau s vehicle when he struck the front drivers side of Mr. Rideau s vehicle. Frances Gauthier is presumed to be at fault. Frank Rideau sustained ongoing injuries and a loss of wages and earning capacity, and he continues to require medical treatment for his injuries. On the date of this accident, there was in full force and effect a policy of automobile liability insurance issued by defendant, USAA, insuring the 2008 Dodge pickup operated by Mr. Gauthier. B. CONCISE SUMMARY OF FACTS/CONTENTIONS OF DEFENDANTS USAA CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY AND FRANCIS GAUTHIER: Defendants deny any and all fault and/or liability on the part of Francis Gauthier and USAA and further deny that plaintiff was injured in the accident sued upon herein or, in the alternative, that he was injured to the extent claimed. Defendants further aver that plaintiff is under a continuing duty to mitigate his damages and any evidence showing otherwise is admissible to prove lack of mitigation. Defendants further aver that plaintiff suffered from a pre-existing condition which was not caused or aggravated by the accident sued upon and that the medical expenses claimed by plaintiff herein are unreasonable and/or are not subject to the collateral source rule. Defendants further aver that plaintiff s alleged injuries were caused and/or aggravated by an intervening and/or superseding event or occurrence. Defendants have prayed for a trial by jury herein in the original answer filed by defendants herein. Defendants contend that plaintiff s petition should be dismissed at plaintiff s costs for the reasons set forth above. C. ESTABLISHED FACTS: 1. A motor vehicle accident took place on or about March 21, 2013, involving a vehicle operated by Frank Rideau and a vehicle operated by Francis Gauthier on Essen Lane in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. 2. During the subject incident, Mr. Gauthier was operating a 2008 Dodge pickup truck. 3. At the time of the accident at issue, USAA had in full force and effect a policy of automobile insurance, number U71022, which extended liability coverage to Francis P. Gauthier in the amount of $500, per person/1 million dollars per accident. In addition, during the same time frame, USAA had

3 in full force and effect an umbrella policy which extended additional liability coverage to Francis P. Gauthier in the amount of one million dollars. D. CONTESTED ISSUES OF FACT: 1. Liability on the part of defendants. 2. The amount and extent of damages, personal injury, or property damage sustained by the plaintiff. 3. The nature, extent, and source of the injuries alleged by the plaintiff. 4. If plaintiff was injured, the amount which will adequately compensate him. 5. Cause of the accident. E. CONTESTED ISSUES OF LAW: 1. All of those inherent in the pleadings on file as they relate to the contested issues of fact above; and 2. All issues of law necessary for determination of fault. F. EXHIBITS OF PLAINTIFF: PLAINTIFFS MAY INTRODUCE THE FOLLOWING EXHIBITS. EXHIBIT AUTHENTICITY AND/OR ADMISSIBILITY HAVE NOT YET BEEN STIPULATED. 1. A copy of any subject police report; 2. A certified copy of the USAA Casualty Insurance Company policy; 3. A copy of any other pertinent insurance policies; 4. Medical records and bills from all of plaintiffs treating physicians, including but not limited to those identified in Plaintiffs Witness list and/or discovery responses: Hennessy Physical Therapy, Bone and Joint Clinic, Orthopedic Care Center, Baton Rouge Imaging, Medical Center of Lafayette, DPI Anesthesia, Barczyk Chiropractic Group, Zachary Orthopedic Care Center, Dr. Rani Whitfield, Louisiana Medical Clinic. 5 Medical records of and all of the medical providers unnamed in the Witness List; 6. Any and all employment records, wage records, income tax records, earnings record 7. Reports of any experts; 8. Photos, videos, diagrams of the accident, accident scene; property damage and injuries; 9. Property damage estimate, invoices and records; 10. Employment and driving records of Francis Gauthier; 11. Depositions and/or statements of any party and/or witness not available at trial;

4 12. Medical records and bills of any other medical care providers who may have treated plaintiff prior and subsequent to the accident in question; 13. Discovery propounded by any party and responses thereto; 14. Any and all pleadings filed in this lawsuit; 15. Itemization of medical bills; 16. Itemization of Lost Earnings and Earning Capacity 17. Any and all impeachment materials; and 18. Any other exhibit listed and/or introduced by any other party. Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement and amend. G. EXHIBITS OF DEFENDANTS: DEFENDANTS MAY INTRODUCE THE FOLLOWING EXHIBITS. EXHIBIT AUTHENTICITY AND/OR ADMISSIBILITY HAVE NOT YET BEEN STIPULATED. 1. Any exhibit listed by any other party. 2. Any and all discovery pleadings exchanged during the course of this suit. 3. Photographs of vehicles and/or accident scene. 4. Any discovery documents exchanged. 5. Any documents received via subpoena duces tecum, including, but not limited to, documents and/or medical records from any and all healthcare providers of plaintiff, Frank Rideau or Lujiwiana Rideau, including, but not limited to, medical records of the following: a. Dr. Hebert Dunaway b. Orthopedic Care Center of Louisiana c. Louisiana Medical Clinic d. Dr. David Wyatt e. Barczyk Chiropractic Clinic f. Diversified Professionals g. Baton Rouge Imaging h. Hennessy Physical Therapy i. Dr. Rani Whifield j. Bone & Joint Clinic k. Dr. James Smith, DDS l. Walgreen s Pharmacy m. Medical Center of Lafayette

5 6. Any depositions taken in connection with this matter. 7. Any impeachment evidence. 8. The policy of insurance issued by United Services Automobile Association to Francis Gauthier. 9. Any documents reviewed or referenced by any expert in this case. 10. Any expert report. 11. Any demonstrative evidence, as necessary. 12. Plaintiff s state and federal income tax records, including W-2s and 1099s for the years 2009 through the year of trial. 13. All employment records of plaintiff, including, but not limited to, records of the following: a. Money Time Tax Services b. Lincoln Heritage Life Insurance c. East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriff s Office d. International Business Machines e. Any other employer of Frank Rideau 14. Medical records of EMS Medical Services 15. Medical records of any physician who has treated plaintiff prior to the accident sued upon 16. Records of all healthcare insurers of plaintiff prior to and subsequent to the date of the accident sued upon. 17. Copies of all pleadings and suit records from plaintiff s prior lawsuits. 18. Copies of all settlement documents from plaintiff s prior claims and lawsuits. 19. All prescription records of plaintiff. 20. Copies of all of plaintiff s cell phone records on the date of the accident. 21. Copies of plaintiff s credit card records from Records of New York Life Insurance Company regarding wage loss claim. 23. Any other exhibit listed and/or introduced by any other party. Defendant reserves the right to supplement this exhibit list as information becomes or is made available. H. WITNESSES OF PLAINTIFF:

6 PLAINTIFF MAY CALL THE FOLLOWING WITNESSES 1. Frank Rideau; 2. Francis Gauthier, on cross-examination; 3. Officer Robert Devore, Baton Rouge Police Department, Badge No. P6661; 4. A representative of USAA Casualty Insurance Company; 5. A representative of Roadrunner Towing; 10. Any representative from Hennessy Physical Therapy; 11. Dr. Kevin McCarthy and/or any representative from Bone and Joint Clinic; 12. Dr. William Armington, and/or a representative from Baton Rouge Imaging; 13. Any representative from Orthopedic Care Center; 14. Any representative from Medical Center of Lafayette; 15. Any representative from DPI Anesthesia; 16. Any representative from Barczyk Chiropractic Group; 17. Any representative from Zachary Orthopedic Care Center; 18. Dr. Rani Whitfield; 19. Any representative from Louisiana Medical Clinic; 24. Friends and family of Frank Rideau; 25. Employers, supervisors and co-workers of Frank Rideau, including but not limited to those from any of the employers identified in discovery or in this pre-trial order by any party; 26. Experts to be identified, including but not limited to the following: accident reconstructionist, economist, vocational rehabilitation counselor and life care planners; 27. Any witness necessary for impeachment or rebuttal; 28. Any witness necessary to authenticate any exhibits; and 29. Any other witness listed by any other party. 30. Gorman & Gorman, Inc. - Life Care Planning 31. Bob Gisclair - Vocational Rehabilitation 32. Randolph Rice - Economist 33. Dr. David Barczyk - Biomechanics 34. Richard L. Fox - Accident Reconstruction 35. Blake Palmintier - Multi-Media/Demonstratives

7 Plaintiff reserves the right to supplement and amend. I. WITNESSES OF DEFENDANTS: DEFENDANTS MAY CALL THE FOLLOWING WITNESSES 1. Dr. Hebert Dunaway 2. A representative of all employers re: wage loss issues 3. Maurice Landie re: wage loss issue 4. Richard Harrington re: wage loss issue 5. Francis Gauthier re: facts 6. A representative of EMS re: medicals 7. Robert Devore, Baton Rouge City Police, re: facts 8. Frank Rideau re: facts 9. Lujiwiana Rideau re: facts 10. Defense economic expert (possibly Mr. Dan Cliffe) if plaintiff produces an economist report. 11. Defense vocational expert (possibly Larry Stokes) if plaintiff produces a vocational rehabilitation expert report. 12. Defense expert for each and every expert named by plaintiff in response to interrogatories, if plaintiff produces reports for same. 13. Dr. Curtis Partington re: IME analysis of diagnostic films 14. IME for orthopedic surgeon 15. Any physician who has treated plaintiff prior to or subsequent to the date of the accident sued upon. 16. Dr. David Wyatt 17. Dr. James Smith 18. Dr. Rani Whifield 19. Dr. Reagan Armington 20. Dr. Kevin McCarthy 21. A representative of Walgreen s Pharmacy 22. A representative of any and all healthcare providers pertaining to introduction of records 23. Dr. Robert Lecky

8 24. Dr. Jason Collins 25. Holly Raggio Guidry, D.C. 26. A representative of United Services Automobile Association 27. Any witness listed by any other party 28. Any witness necessary to introduce any exhibit Defendants reserve their right to supplement this witness list as information becomes or is made available, with proper notice to opposing counsel. J. OTHER MATTERS: There are discovery issues outstanding at this time with regard to documentation that has not been furnished to defendants, although requested. Also, experts have been listed by plaintiff who may be called, however, no reports have been furnished and it is unknown at this time if the plaintiff has retained any or all of the experts listed in response to discovery. Whether or not defendants retain experts in the same field would be dependent upon whether or not plaintiff does in fact intend to call any or all of the expert witnesses listed in response to discovery. K. ESTIMATED TRIAL TIME: The parties believe that this matter can be tried to a jury in 3 to 5 days. Spencer Calahan Injury Lawyers, LLC Brady K. Patin, Bar Roll No Spencer Calahan Injury Lawyers 827 St. Louis Street Baton Rouge, LA Telephone: (225) Facsimile: (225) KINCHEN, WALKER, BIENVENU, BARGAS, REED& HELM, L.L.C. VALERIE BRIGGS BARGAS La. Bar Roll # Jefferson Highway Building III, Suite F Baton Rouge, LA Telephone: (225) Facsimile: (225)

Medical Record Discovery Issues in the Motor Vehicle Case

Medical Record Discovery Issues in the Motor Vehicle Case Medical Record Discovery Issues in the Motor Vehicle Case Angela Lucero Kranovich & Lucero Jason Posner Posner Law Firm Judge Youlee Yim You Multnomah County Circuit Court Multnomah Bar Association Continuing

More information

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant :

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO. : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant : IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS BELMONT COUNTY, OHIO : Plaintiff : vs. : FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER : Case No. Defendant : This action came before the court at a final pretrial conference held on at a.m./p.m.,

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2013

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2013 INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2013 FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 07/31/2013 INDEX NO. 500743/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 5 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/31/2013 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS BERGMANN DHAITI and NOYESSE DHAITI, -against-

More information

THE COURTS. Title 252 ALLEGHENY COUNTY RULES. Title 231 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Title 249 PHILADELPHIA RULES

THE COURTS. Title 252 ALLEGHENY COUNTY RULES. Title 231 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE. Title 249 PHILADELPHIA RULES Title 231 RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PART I. GENERAL [231 PA. CODE CH. 400] Rule 400.1, Temporary Provisions for Philadelphia County; No. 296, Doc. No. 5 Order Per Curiam And Now, this 2nd day of July, 1998,

More information

FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 09/26/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/26/2016

FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 09/26/ :45 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/26/2016 FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 09/26/2016 01:45 PM INDEX NO. 607940/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 15 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/26/2016 1 of 20 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ROXANNE CHRISTIAN and

More information

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 10/28/ :08 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016 FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 10/28/2016 03:08 PM INDEX NO. 25877/2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 12 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/28/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX CARL BAILEY, Plaintiff, Index No.:

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2013 CW 0863 R GERALD BELL, SR. AND LULAROSE S. BELL VERSUS

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2013 CW 0863 R GERALD BELL, SR. AND LULAROSE S. BELL VERSUS --- ------~-------- STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2013 CW 0863 R GERALD BELL, SR. AND LULAROSE S. BELL VERSUS LOUISIANA STATE POLICE AND WEST BATON ROUGE PARISH SHERIFF'S OFFICE On Application

More information

C :21:00: Case Settled - This matter came on for a two-day bench trial. Present in court: Mr. Roy Maughan, Jr. and Mr.

C :21:00: Case Settled - This matter came on for a two-day bench trial. Present in court: Mr. Roy Maughan, Jr. and Mr. C645329 2018-03-15 10:21:00: Case Settled - This matter came on for a two-day bench trial. Present in court: Mr. Roy Maughan, Jr. and Mr. Joshua Roy, counsels for plaintiff; Mr. Jake Airey and Mr. Jimmy

More information

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FULTON COUNTY, OHIO. Judge

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FULTON COUNTY, OHIO. Judge IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF FULTON COUNTY, OHIO TOBY ROSS 691 S. Elliston Trowbridge Rd Elmore, OH. 43416 and TAMRA ROSS 691 S. Elliston Trowbridge Rd Elmore, OH 43416 v. Plaintiffs, IBRAHIM BOATENG 324

More information

PLAINTIFF RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT LINDA LAJOIE FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION

PLAINTIFF RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT LINDA LAJOIE FIRST REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: 2014 CA 2505 ON JOSE GILBERTO SERRANO, Plaintiff, vs. PUNITIVE DAMAGES PERSONAL INJURY HERITAGE PARTNERS

More information

Interrogatories. As I have previously written, interrogatories are one. The building blocks of your client s case. Discovery. by Thomas J.

Interrogatories. As I have previously written, interrogatories are one. The building blocks of your client s case. Discovery. by Thomas J. 12 The Journal of the Virginia Trial Lawyers Association, Volume 24 Number 4, 2013 Discovery Interrogatories The building blocks of your client s case by Thomas J. Curcio As I have previously written,

More information

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :37 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2017

FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 03/15/ :37 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/15/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF QUEENS VERTULIE O. PIERRE-LOUIS, Plaintiff, Index No.: 710940/2016E -against- FLAMBOUYANT TRANSPORTATION INC., EUGENE C. HAMILTON, and ALYSSA LOUISE DEVOE,

More information

CONTENTS. How to use the Lake Charles City Court...2. What is the Lake Charles City Court?...2. Who may sue in Lake Charles City Court?...

CONTENTS. How to use the Lake Charles City Court...2. What is the Lake Charles City Court?...2. Who may sue in Lake Charles City Court?... CONTENTS Page How to use the Lake Charles City Court...2 What is the Lake Charles City Court?...2 Who may sue in Lake Charles City Court?...3 Who may be sued in Lake Charles City Court?...3 What kind of

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION NO. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA IN RE: KATRINA CANAL BREACHES CONSOLIDATED LITIGATION CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-4182 "K" (2) PERTAINS TO: BARGE Mumford v. Ingram C.A. No. 05-5724 Boutte

More information

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

CASE NUMBER: DIV 71. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows: Plaintiff(s), vs. Defendant(s). / IN THE COUNTY COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: DIV 71 UNIFORM ORDER REGARDING SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL, PRE-TRIAL

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STANDING ORDER FOR CIVIL JURY TRIALS BEFORE DISTRICT JUDGE JON S. TIGAR A. Meeting and Disclosure Prior to Pretrial Conference At least

More information

F 3.201(2)(A) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS ) JOHN D. DOE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THOMAS M. SMITH, ) ) Defendant.

F 3.201(2)(A) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS ) JOHN D. DOE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THOMAS M. SMITH, ) ) Defendant. F 3.201(2)(A) IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF SHAWNEE COUNTY, KANSAS ) JOHN D. DOE, ) ) Case No. Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THOMAS M. SMITH, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Interrogatories from Plaintiff to Defendant 1. Please

More information

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRE-TRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRE-TRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR OSCEOLA COUNTY, FLORIDA., CASE NO. -CA- CIVIL DIVISION 20 Plaintiff, vs., Defendant. / UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL AND PRE-TRIAL

More information

Case: 3:13-cv SA Doc #: 47 Filed: 11/03/14 1 of 7 PageID #: 220 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION

Case: 3:13-cv SA Doc #: 47 Filed: 11/03/14 1 of 7 PageID #: 220 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION Case: 3:13-cv-00016-SA Doc #: 47 Filed: 11/03/14 1 of 7 PageID #: 220 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI OXFORD DIVISION JOHNNYE H. PASS and FAITH PASS-BASS PLAINTIFFS v. CASE

More information

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY

TEXAS DISCOVERY. Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY TEXAS DISCOVERY Brock C. Akers CHAPTER 1 LAW 2. 1999 REVISIONS TO TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE GOVERNING DISCOVERY 3. DISCOVERY CONTROL PLANS 4. FORMS OF DISCOVERY A. Discovery Provided for by the Texas

More information

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS

RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS RULES OF SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA PART ONE RULES APPLICABLE TO ALL PROCEEDINGS Rule 1:18. Pretrial Scheduling Order. A. In any civil case the parties, by counsel of record, may agree and submit for approval

More information

SUMMARY JURY TRIAL PART: QUEENS COUNTY SUPREME COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES

SUMMARY JURY TRIAL PART: QUEENS COUNTY SUPREME COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES SUMMARY JURY TRIAL PART: QUEENS COUNTY SUPREME COURT RULES AND PROCEDURES Nature of the Binding Summary Jury Trial: A summary jury trial is generally a oneday jury trial with relaxed rules of evidence

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Aubin et al v. Columbia Casualty Company et al Doc. 140 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA WILLIAM J. AUBIN, ET AL. VERSUS CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-290-BAJ-EWD COLUMBIA CASUALTY COMPANY,

More information

FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER JUDGE

FREDERICKA HOMBERG WICKER JUDGE JASMINE RAYMOND VERSUS DEPOSITORS INSURANCE COMPANY, RUBBER & SPECIALTIES, INC., AND LANCE M. COOK NO. 17-CA-132 FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF LOUISIANA ON APPEAL FROM THE TWENTY-FOURTH JUDICIAL

More information

BLAKE ROBERTSON NO CA-0975 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL LAFAYETTE INSURANCE COMPANY FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * *

BLAKE ROBERTSON NO CA-0975 VERSUS COURT OF APPEAL LAFAYETTE INSURANCE COMPANY FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * * * BLAKE ROBERTSON VERSUS LAFAYETTE INSURANCE COMPANY * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2011-CA-0975 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO. 2008-176,

More information

ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND DIRECTING PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows:

ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND DIRECTING PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE. It appearing that this case is at issue and can be set for trial, it is ORDERED as follows: IN THE CIRCUIT COURT, SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR FLAGLER COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 0000-CA-000 DIVISION: 49, and, Plaintiff, Defendant. / ORDER SETTING TRIAL AND DIRECTING PRE-TRIAL PROCEDURE

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-2231 MEMORANDUM RULING

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-2231 MEMORANDUM RULING Lopez v. Esparza et al Doc. 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION JORDAN LOPEZ CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:14-cv-2231 VERSUS JUDGE MINALDI RAFAEL ESPARAZA, ET AL MAGISTRATE

More information

Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)

Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j) Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j) Under amended Supreme Court Rule 213(j) (eff. January 1, 1996), "[t]he Supreme Court, by administrative order, may approve standard forms of interrogatories

More information

IN THE STATE COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA

IN THE STATE COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA IN THE STATE COURT OF DEKALB COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA PATRICK C. DESMOND AND MARY C. DESMOND, INDIVIDUALLY, AND MARY C. DESMOND, AS ) Civil Action No. 10A28641-2 ADMINISTRATRIX OF THE ESTATE OF PATRICK

More information

It is hereby STIPULATED by and between all parties to the within action that disclosure shall proceed and be completed as follows:

It is hereby STIPULATED by and between all parties to the within action that disclosure shall proceed and be completed as follows: FILED: ORANGE COUNTY CLERK 01/10/2017 04:17 PM INDEX NO. EF006661-2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 40-1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/10/2017 COMPLIANCE CONFERENCE DATE (all parties shall appear): SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE

More information

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar.

being preempted by the court's criminal calendar. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF IDAHO IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF «County» «PlaintiffName», vs. «DefendantName», Plaintiff, Defendant. Case No. «CaseNumber» SCHEDULING

More information

On Appeal from the Office of Workers Compensation Administration District 9 Docket No

On Appeal from the Office of Workers Compensation Administration District 9 Docket No STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2011 CA 1242 KENNETH ABNEY VERSUS GATES UNLIMITED LC Judgment Rendered ry 0 4 On Appeal from the Office of Workers Compensation Administration District

More information

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :17 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018

FILED: BRONX COUNTY CLERK 01/26/ :17 PM INDEX NO /2016E NYSCEF DOC. NO. 48 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 01/26/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF BRONX MARIA L. GONZALEZ, Index No.: 21159/2016E -against- Plaintiff, DEMAND FOR VERIFIED BILL OF PARTICULARS HAFEEZA REALTY LLC., MOHAMMED AHSANUDDIN, and

More information

Judge Declan P. Mansfield Judicial Practice Preferences Section H, J3 & J7

Judge Declan P. Mansfield Judicial Practice Preferences Section H, J3 & J7 Judge Declan P. Mansfield Judicial Practice Preferences Section H, J3 & J7 Judicial Assistant: Donna Belcher dbelcher@jud6.org (727) 847-8172 Office Telephone Number (727) 815-7100 Hearing Line Number

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT SLAYTER TRUCKING COMPANIES, LLC **********

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT SLAYTER TRUCKING COMPANIES, LLC ********** STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 16-98 DAVID PAUL CROSS VERSUS SLAYTER TRUCKING COMPANIES, LLC ********** APPEAL FROM THE OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION - # 2 PARISH OF RAPIDES, NO. 14-02511

More information

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO. Case No.: ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF LUCAS COUNTY, OHIO KENNETH E. EGELAND 6022 321st Street Toledo, OH 43611 and JOAN EGELAND 6022 321st Street Toledo, OH 43611 vs. Plaintiffs, ANGELICA LEAL 4806 Bowen Road Toledo,

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 07-225 MAY YEN, ET AL. VERSUS AVOYELLES PARISH POLICE JURY, ET AL. ********** SUPERVISORY WRIT FROM THE TWELFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF AVOYELLES,

More information

CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NUMBER: UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY., Counsel of Record. The following interrogatories are pattern interrogatories, which the undersigned

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY., Counsel of Record. The following interrogatories are pattern interrogatories, which the undersigned , SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY Plaintiff, Case No. 1 v., Defendant. DEFENDANT TO PLAINTIFF TO: AND TO:, Plaintiff;, Counsel of Record. The following interrogatories are pattern interrogatories,

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2015

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/ :18 PM INDEX NO /2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2015 FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/09/2015 04:18 PM INDEX NO. 154070/2014 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 25 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/09/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -------------------------------------x

More information

19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT EXCEPTION OF PRESCRIPTION AND, ALTERNATIVELY, EXCEPTION OF NO CAUSE OF ACTION

19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT EXCEPTION OF PRESCRIPTION AND, ALTERNATIVELY, EXCEPTION OF NO CAUSE OF ACTION BETTY JO STORY VERSUS LOUISIANA AUCTIONEER'S LICENSING BOARD DOCKET NUMBER 633073 SEC. 24 19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE STATE OCT 23?fi1A STATE OF LOUISIANA BY 1l2.. u,~ DY CLERK

More information

COMPULSORY MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS

COMPULSORY MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS GUIDELINES FOR COUNSEL REGARDING COMPULSORY MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO FLA. R. CIV. P. 1.360(A)(1)(A) & IF ORDERED (B), AS WELL AS 1.360(B) AND 1.390(B) & (C) [For counsel appearing before

More information

DOMESTIC RELATION CASES ARE GOVERNED BY SUGGESTED GUIDELINES AND PRACTICES IN DOMESTIC RELATIONS CASES

DOMESTIC RELATION CASES ARE GOVERNED BY SUGGESTED GUIDELINES AND PRACTICES IN DOMESTIC RELATIONS CASES SUGGESTED PRACTICES AND PROCEDURES IN CIVIL CASES IN THE CIRCUIT COURTS OF RICHMOND, CHESTERFIELD, COLONIAL HEIGHTS, AND HENRICO The following information and suggested practices and procedures are provided

More information

* * * * * * * APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO , DIVISION G-11 Honorable Robin M. Giarrusso, Judge

* * * * * * * APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS PARISH NO , DIVISION G-11 Honorable Robin M. Giarrusso, Judge FAITH BROOKS, ET AL. VERSUS ZULU SOCIAL AID AND PLEASURE CLUB, INC., ET AL. * * * * * * * * * * * NO. 2012-CA-1307 COURT OF APPEAL FOURTH CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA APPEAL FROM CIVIL DISTRICT COURT, ORLEANS

More information

APPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS. Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury

APPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS. Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury APPENDIX II. INTERROGATORY FORMS Form A. Uniform Interrogatories to be Answered by Plaintiff in All Personal Injury Cases (Except Medical Malpractice Cases): Superior Court All questions must be answered

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 12, 2005 Session

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 12, 2005 Session IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 12, 2005 Session RHONDA D. DUNCAN v. ROSE M. LLOYD, ET AL. Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Davidson County No. 01C-1459 Walter C. Kurtz,

More information

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER MEDIATION AND HEARING PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS

RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER MEDIATION AND HEARING PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS RULES OF THE TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT CHAPTER 0800-02-21 MEDIATION AND HEARING PROCEDURES TABLE OF CONTENTS 0800-02-21-.01 Scope 0800-02-21-.13 Scheduling Hearing 0800-02-21-.02

More information

RELATES TO: KRS , , , , , , STATUTORY AUTHORITY: KRS , (1), (3), 342.

RELATES TO: KRS , , , , , , STATUTORY AUTHORITY: KRS , (1), (3), 342. 1 1 1 0 1 LABOR CABINET DEPARTMENT OF WORKERS CLAIMS (Amendment) 0 KAR :0. Procedure for adjustments of claims. RELATES TO: KRS.00,.,.0,.,.0,.00,.,.,.,.,.,.0 STATUTORY AUTHORITY: KRS.0,.0(1),.0(),.(1)

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. DIVISION JASMINE EDWARDS AND DEMONYA WILLIAMS VERSUS

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. DIVISION JASMINE EDWARDS AND DEMONYA WILLIAMS VERSUS 19 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. DIVISION JASMINE EDWARDS AND DEMONYA WILLIAMS VERSUS ABC INSURANCE COMPANY, XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY, FOUNDATION OF

More information

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the

GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION. damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing products; that many of the GENERAL ORDER FOR LUCAS COUNTY ASBESTOS LITIGATION It appearing that there are certain actions pending in this Court in which plaintiffs claim damages for alleged exposure to asbestos or asbestos-containing

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS GUARDIAN ANGEL HEALTHCARE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED March 14, 2013 v No. 307825 Wayne Circuit Court PROGRESSIVE MICHIGAN INSURANCE LC No. 08-120128-NF COMPANY,

More information

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED

UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND REQUIRING PRETRIAL MATTERS TO BE COMPLETED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO. CIVIL DIVISION 37 Plaintiff(s), vs. Defendant(s). / UNIFORM ORDER SETTING CASE FOR JURY TRIAL; PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE

More information

Request for, Objections to and Hearings on

Request for, Objections to and Hearings on GUIDELINES FOR COUNSEL REGARDING COMPULSORY MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO FLA. R. CIV. P. 1.360(A)(1)(A) & IF ORDERED (B), AS WELL AS 1.360(B) AND 1.390(B) & (C) 1 [For counsel appearing before

More information

Litigation ATTORNEY CLIENT RELATIONS GENERAL PROCEDURES & PRACTICE. continued on page 2

Litigation ATTORNEY CLIENT RELATIONS GENERAL PROCEDURES & PRACTICE. continued on page 2 Litigation Hundreds of Louisiana litigators already successfully modify Texas forms to work in Louisiana. ProDoc makes it far easier by combining hundreds of forms from its Texas Litigation Library with

More information

The Honorable Janice G Clark Judge Presiding

The Honorable Janice G Clark Judge Presiding STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NO 2011 CA 0007 JAMES A WILSON AND BRENDA M WILSON VERSUS STATE OF LOUISIANA THROUGH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND DEVELOPMENT Judgment Rendered AUG

More information

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION [Required For Bench Trials over two (2) hours]

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION [Required For Bench Trials over two (2) hours] NO. IN THE COUNTY COURT Plaintiff(s), V. AT LAW NO. 1 Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION [Required For Bench Trials over two (2) hours] This Final Pretrial Submission must be filed

More information

Court Records Glossary

Court Records Glossary Court Records Glossary Documents Affidavit Answer Appeal Brief Case File Complaint Deposition Docket Indictment Interrogatories Injunction Judgment Opinion Pleadings Praecipe A written or printed statement

More information

PERSONAL INJURY DEFENSE. Six Humble Suggestions. Successfully. By Clifford L. Harrison

PERSONAL INJURY DEFENSE. Six Humble Suggestions. Successfully. By Clifford L. Harrison Six Humble Suggestions Successfully Defending a Minor By Clifford L. Harrison A defense damages theme must be tailored to engage a jury s sense of injustice over making a defendant even a large corporation

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/20/ :40 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/20/2016

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/20/ :40 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/20/2016 FILED NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/20/2016 1040 AM INDEX NO. 152848/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 RECEIVED NYSCEF 05/20/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ZOE DENISON, Plaintiff, INDEX

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA ADVANCED 3-D DIAGNOSTICS, INC., as assignee of Marck Chery, CASE NO.: 2014-CV-000058-A-O Lower Case No.: 2013-SC-001600-O

More information

Judgment Rendered September

Judgment Rendered September NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT NUMBER 2006 CA 2351 ADRIAN SLAUGHTER VERSUS SAFEWAY INSURANCE COMPANY OF LOUISIANA ET AL Judgment Rendered September 14 2007

More information

Case 3:13-cv JJB-SCR Document 27 09/20/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 3:13-cv JJB-SCR Document 27 09/20/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Case 3:13-cv-00139-JJB-SCR Document 27 09/20/13 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MARGARET HERSTER AND SCOTT SULLIVAN CIVIL ACTION NO.: 3:13-CV-00139 VERSUS BOARD OF

More information

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy Information or instructions: Plaintiff's original petition-auto accident 1. The following form may be used to file a personal injury lawsuit. 2. It assumes several plaintiffs were rear-ended by an employee

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION CAROLYN WHITE, Individually, and as Executrix of the ESTATE OF JERE F. WHITE, Deceased, Plaintiff, v. TENOLD TRANSPORTATION

More information

OFFI t. : fl LEO. MARTHA MURPHY, Individually and as duly appointed Personal Representative of the Estate of John M. "Mike" Murphy, deceased,

OFFI t. : fl LEO. MARTHA MURPHY, Individually and as duly appointed Personal Representative of the Estate of John M. Mike Murphy, deceased, Murphy v. Svoboda et al Doc. 83. fl LEO lj.s. DISTRI T COURT DISTRIC T OF HEOR :\ SKA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT,. FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA i.' l 5 NOV 16 PM 2: 03 MARTHA MURPHY, Individually

More information

MONTANA UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES

MONTANA UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES MONTANA UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES Rule 1 Form of Papers Presented for Filing. (a) Papers Defined. The word papers as used in this Rule includes all documents and copies except exhibits and records on

More information

Judge Declan P. Mansfield Judicial Practice Preferences Section H, J3 & J7

Judge Declan P. Mansfield Judicial Practice Preferences Section H, J3 & J7 Judge Declan P. Mansfield Judicial Practice Preferences Section H, J3 & J7 Judicial Assistant: Donna Belcher dbelcher@jud6.org (727) 847-8172 Office Telephone Number (727) 815-7100 Hearing Line Number

More information

Standard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j)

Standard Interrogatories. Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j) Standard Interrogatories Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j) Under Supreme Court Rule 213(j), "[t]he Supreme Court, by administrative order, may approve standard forms of interrogatories for different classes

More information

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION (CPS Trial)

NO. V. AT LAW NO. 1. Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS. FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION (CPS Trial) NO. IN THE COUNTY COURT Plaintiff(s), V. AT LAW NO. 1 Defendant(s). ELLIS COUNTY, TEXAS FINAL PRETRIAL SUBMISSION (CPS Trial) This Final Pretrial Submission must be filed no later than nine (9) days before

More information

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WAYNE ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY

STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WAYNE ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY [Cite as Webster v. Davis, 2011-Ohio-1536.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF WAYNE ) MARK WEBSTER Appellant C.A. No. 10CA0021 v. DANIEL A. DAVIS, et al. Appellees

More information

STATE OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. Plaintiff, Defendants.

STATE OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT. Plaintiff, Defendants. [YOUR NAME] [YOUR ADDRESS] Telephone: [YOUR PHONE NUMBER] [YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS] Fax: [YOUR FAX NUMBER] STATE OF ARIZONA MARICOPA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 1 1 1 1 1, a [single/married man/woman], v. Plaintiff,

More information

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT. Petitioner, Department of Health, by and through its undersigned

STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT. Petitioner, Department of Health, by and through its undersigned DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC MEDICINE PETITIONER, V. CASE NO. 2017-15058 NATHALIE BLUM, D.C. RESPONDENT. ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLAINT Petitioner, Department of Health, by and

More information

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/08/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/08/2017

FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/08/ :39 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 9 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/08/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS ELIMIR PILAZA, Plaintiff, Index No. 506405/2017 -against- FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., FRESENIUS NATIONAL MEDICAL CARE HOLDINGS, INC., SHIEL

More information

OCT Judgment Rendered:

OCT Judgment Rendered: STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2014 cw 0298 JESSIE MAY PERKINS, JESSIE HARVEY, JR., EVA MAE BURNETI, CHARLES RAY HARVEY, PRESTON HARVEY, MINNIE H. JOHNSON, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF

More information

ADVANCED DISCOVERY TECHNIQUES

ADVANCED DISCOVERY TECHNIQUES III. ADVANCED DISCOVERY TECHNIQUES DEPOSITION STRATEGIES A. START EARLY The most important aspect of a successful trial lawyer s practice is thorough preparation. Even the most eloquent and ingenious lawyers

More information

THE STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS

THE STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS THE STATE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR ADMINISTRATIVE LICENSE SUSPENSION HEARINGS TITLE 1, PART 7 CHAPTER 159 (Effective January 20, 2009) TABLE OF CONTENTS SUBCHAPTER A. GENERAL...

More information

Case 2:13-cv MLCF-JCW Document 1 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA COMPLAINT

Case 2:13-cv MLCF-JCW Document 1 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA COMPLAINT Case 2:13-cv-05430-MLCF-JCW Document 1 Filed 08/14/13 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NORVEL LASSERE VERSUS KEITH CARROLL, ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST PARISH SHERIFF MICHAEL

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS

STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS E & L TRANSPORT COMPANY, L.L.C., Plaintiff-Appellant, UNPUBLISHED June 25, 2002 v No. 229628 Calhoun Circuit Court WARNER ADJUSTMENT COMPANY, 1 LC No. 99-003901-NF and

More information

Judgment Rendered FEB I

Judgment Rendered FEB I NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL FIRST CIRCUIT 2005 CA 1981 AMITECH U S A LTD VERSUS NOTTINGHAM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Gt Judgment Rendered FEB I 4 2007 On Appeal from the

More information

Civil Procedure. The Origin of a Lawsuit. The Resolution of Private Disputes Chapter 2 Part 2 Civil Procedure

Civil Procedure. The Origin of a Lawsuit. The Resolution of Private Disputes Chapter 2 Part 2 Civil Procedure The Resolution of Private Disputes Chapter 2 Part 2 Civil Procedure Civil procedure is the set of legal rules governing the conduct of a trial court case between two private parties. Civil Procedure Adversarial

More information

PREPARING FOR TRIAL. 3. Opponent s experts identified, complete Rule 26 responses received and, if possible and necessary, experts have been deposed.

PREPARING FOR TRIAL. 3. Opponent s experts identified, complete Rule 26 responses received and, if possible and necessary, experts have been deposed. 1 PREPARING FOR TRIAL I. To Be Completed 60 Days Before Trial The following is a list of things that we should endeavor to have done 60 days before trial. While we cannot control what deadlines the court

More information

HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47

HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47 HAWAII ADMINISTRATIVE RULES TITLE 12 DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS SUBTITLE 7 BOARDS CHAPTER 47 LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS APPEALS BOARD RULES OF PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE Subchapter 1

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,184 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. JONATHAN EDWARDS, Appellant, MIKE T. LOGAN, Appellee.

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 118,184 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. JONATHAN EDWARDS, Appellant, MIKE T. LOGAN, Appellee. NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 118,184 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS JONATHAN EDWARDS, Appellant, v. MIKE T. LOGAN, Appellee. ATTORNEY GENERAL DEREK SCHMIDT, Intervenor/Appellee. MEMORANDUM

More information

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF CLAIMS Board of Claims Act Board of Claims Rules of Procedure (Printed August 1, 2001) TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 1 Page Board of Claims Act 2 Board of Claims

More information

Case 3:14-cv RGJ-KLH Document 130 Filed 06/07/16 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 3765 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA

Case 3:14-cv RGJ-KLH Document 130 Filed 06/07/16 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 3765 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Case 3:14-cv-02853-RGJ-KLH Document 130 Filed 06/07/16 Page 1 of 1 PageID #: 3765 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION LOUISIANA CLEANING SYSTEMS, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NO JWD-RLB ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NO JWD-RLB ORDER Landry et al v. Farmland Mutual Insurance Company et al Doc. 62 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA NATALIE LANDRY, ET AL. VERSUS FARMLAND MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION

More information

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5

Case 2:05-cv TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5 Case 2:05-cv-00195-TJW Document 212 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DIGITAL CHOICE OF TEXAS, LLC V. CIVIL NO. 2:05-CV-195(TJW)

More information

LAWRENCE COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT LOCAL RULES RULE ONE

LAWRENCE COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT LOCAL RULES RULE ONE LAWRENCE COUNTY MUNICIPAL COURT LOCAL RULES All Local Rules of Court will become effective upon approval by the Supreme Court Committee on technology and the Court. A. TERMS, HOURS, AND SESSIONS RULE ONE

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY., Counsel of Record. The following interrogatories are pattern interrogatories, which the undersigned

SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY., Counsel of Record. The following interrogatories are pattern interrogatories, which the undersigned , SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY Plaintiff, Case No. v., Defendant. PLAINTIFF TO DEFENDANT TO: AND TO:, Defendant;, Counsel of Record. The following interrogatories are pattern interrogatories,

More information

Colorado Supreme Court

Colorado Supreme Court FROM THE COURTS COURT BUSINESS Colorado Supreme Court Rule 55. Court Order Supporting Deed of Distribution Rule 56. Foreign Personal Representatives Rule 57. Reserved Rule 58. Reserved Rule 59. Reserved

More information

GUIDELINES FOR COUNSEL REGARDING COMPULSORY MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO

GUIDELINES FOR COUNSEL REGARDING COMPULSORY MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO GUIDELINES FOR COUNSEL REGARDING COMPULSORY MEDICAL EXAMINATIONS CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO FLA. R. CIV. P. 1.360(a)(1)(A) & IF ORDERED (B), AS WELL AS 1.360(b) AND 1.390(b) & (c) 1 [For counsel appearing before

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY Plaintiff(s, Case No. v. Division 3 Defendant(s. CIVIL CASE MANAGEMENT SCHEDULING ORDER Now on this day of, 20, this matter is called and

More information

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy

For Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy Information & Instructions: Temporary restraining order for a divorce petition 1. Include this form if a temporary restraining order is needed to protect either persons or property. Information & Instructions:

More information

LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT. [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana]

LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT. [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana] LOCAL RULES OF THE DISTRICT COURT [Adapted from the Local Rules for the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana] Local Rule 1.1 - Scope of the Rules These Rules shall govern all proceedings

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT

STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA COURT OF APPEAL, THIRD CIRCUIT 04-1151 WASTE MANAGEMENT OF LOUISIANA, LLC VERSUS TADLOCK PIPE & EQUIPMENT, INC. ********** APPEAL FROM THE FOURTEENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT PARISH OF

More information

Have you received a request for discovery?

Have you received a request for discovery? Have you received a request for discovery? *What is it? -Discovery simply is asking for more information from you. This type of request is a general document and its form is not tailored to individual

More information

BRADFORD COUNTY LOCAL CIVIL RULES. 1. Upon the filing of a divorce or custody action pursuant to the Pennsylvania Rules of

BRADFORD COUNTY LOCAL CIVIL RULES. 1. Upon the filing of a divorce or custody action pursuant to the Pennsylvania Rules of BRADFORD COUNTY LOCAL CIVIL RULES Local Rule 51 These rules shall be known as the Bradford County Rules of Civil Procedure and may be cited as Brad.Co.R.C.P. Local Rule 205.2(b) 1. Upon the filing of a

More information

Initial Pre-hearing Arbitration Scheduling Order. Parties

Initial Pre-hearing Arbitration Scheduling Order. Parties IN THE MATTER OF: Claimant(s): Respondent(s): Case Number: Initial Pre-hearing Arbitration Scheduling Order Parties This case was filed under the American Arbitration Association Expedited Commercial Rules.

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case Number Honorable David M.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Plaintiff, Case Number Honorable David M. Grange Insurance Company of Michigan v. Parrish et al Doc. 159 GRANGE INSURANCE COMPANY OF MICHIGAN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION v. Plaintiff, Case Number

More information

APPEARANCES. Law Offices of James B. Weeks Greensboro, North Carolina

APPEARANCES. Law Offices of James B. Weeks Greensboro, North Carolina STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF GUILFORD IN THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS 14DOJ08259 Waseen Abdul-Haqq Petitioner v. N C Sheriffs Education And Training Standards Commission Respondent PROPOSAL

More information