IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR
|
|
- Clemence Hart
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Filed 2/24/09 In re J.I. CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule (a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule (b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR In re J.I., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, v. J.I., Plaintiff and Respondent, Defendant and Appellant. A (Sonoma County Super. Ct. No J) The minor, J.I., admitted the Welfare and Institutions Code section petition allegation that she received stolen property (Penal Code 496, subd. (a)), and was referred to probation for a report and recommendation regarding her suitability for a deferred entry of judgment (DEJ) pursuant to section 790 et seq. Upon receipt of the probation department s report and recommendation against granting DEJ, the juvenile court found the minor unsuitable for DEJ, ordered that the minor be made a ward of the court, and placed her in the home of her father (with additional days of home detention, among other conditions). The minor appeals, contending that the juvenile court did not have discretion to deny DEJ, as the district attorney s office had failed to comply with mandatory requirements of section 790 et seq. We disagree and affirm. 1 All further section references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code, unless otherwise indicated. 1
2 I. BACKGROUND The minor s younger brother was taking care of victim Carol Maloney s cats while the victim and her son were away for the weekend. Upon the Maloneys return, they noticed that two rings (valued at $2,000) and some cash were missing from their residence. The minor s mother, contacted by the police during their investigation, indicated that the minor s younger brother said that the minor was showing off the rings while at Alicia Park and may have been auctioning them off. When interviewed by the police, the minor claimed that she borrowed a ring from the victim s house, planning to return it, and that she lost it during a water balloon fight at Alicia Park. The rings were later recovered from a local jewelry store; a person named Michael Csito had sold the rings and a gold chain to the jeweler for $35. A section 602 petition, alleging that the minor received stolen property in violation of Penal Code section 496, subdivision (a), was filed in juvenile court. The minor admitted the allegations of the petition. Prior to her admission, the prosecutor indicated that his office, in the rush to file the petition, had failed to file the appropriate DEJ paperwork, but that the minor appeared to be eligible for DEJ. The court accepted the minor s admission and referred the matter to the probation department for preparation of a disposition and suitability for DEJ report. Based upon the minor s history and family situation, the probation department recommended against granting DEJ; the court followed that recommendation and denied DEJ. The juvenile court declared the minor to be a ward of the court, placed her in her father s home, and ordered her into the intensive supervision program. This timely appeal followed. II. DISCUSSION A. Failure of District Attorney to Comply With Mandates re: DEJ. The minor contends that the failure of the district attorney to comply with certain mandates regarding the DEJ program left the juvenile court without discretion to find her unsuitable for DEJ. We reject this contention. In juvenile cases, DEJ involves two determinations: eligibility and suitability. Section 790 provides in part that (a)... [T]his article shall apply whenever a case is 2
3 before the juvenile court for a determination of whether a minor is a person described in Section 602 because of the commission of a felony offense, if all of the following circumstances apply: [ ] (1) The minor has not previously been declared to be a ward of the court for the commission of a felony offense. [ ] (2) The offense charged is not one of the offenses enumerated in subdivision (b) of Section 707. [ ] (3) The minor has not previously been committed to the custody of the Youth Authority. [ ] (4) The minor s record does not indicate that probation has ever been revoked without being completed. [ ] (5) The minor is at least 14 years of age at the time of the hearing. [ ] (6) The minor is eligible for probation pursuant to Section of the Penal Code. [ ] (b) The prosecuting attorney shall review his or her file to determine whether or not paragraphs (1) to (6), inclusive, of subdivision (a) apply. If the minor is found eligible for [DEJ], the prosecuting attorney shall file a declaration in writing with the court or state for the record the grounds upon which the determination is based, and shall make this information available to the minor and his or her attorney. Upon a finding that the minor is also suitable for [DEJ] and would benefit from education, treatment, and rehabilitation efforts, the court may grant [DEJ]. Under this procedure, the court may set the hearing for deferred entry of judgment at the initial appearance under Section 657. The court shall make findings on the record that a minor is appropriate for [DEJ] pursuant to this article in any case where [DEJ] is granted. ( 790, subds. (a) & (b).) In In re Luis B. (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th 1117 (Luis B.), the court explained the DEJ procedure. The DEJ provisions of section 790 et seq. were enacted as part of Proposition in March The sections provide that in lieu of jurisdictional and dispositional hearings, a minor may admit the allegations contained in a section 602 petition and waive time for the pronouncement of judgment. Entry of judgment is deferred. After the successful completion of a term of probation, on the motion of the prosecution and with a positive recommendation from the probation department, the court is required to dismiss the charges. The arrest upon which judgment was deferred is deemed never to have occurred, and any records of the juvenile court proceeding are 3
4 sealed.... (Id. at pp , citing Martha C. v. Superior Court (2003) 108 Cal.App.4th 556, 558.) California Rules of Court, rule sets forth the procedures for consideration of whether DEJ should be granted. (b) Procedures for consideration ( 790) [ ] Before filing a petition alleging a felony offense, or as soon as possible after filing, the prosecuting attorney must review the child s file to determine if the requirements of [ 790, subd. (a)] are met. If the prosecuting attorney s review reveals that the requirements of (a) have been met, the prosecuting attorney must file Determination of Eligibility Deferred Entry of Judgment Juvenile (form JV-750) with the petition. [ ] (1) If the court, the prosecuting attorney, and the child s attorney agree that the child should receive a [DEJ, the hearing under this rule must proceed on an expedited basis. [ ] (2) If the court, the prosecuting attorney, and the child s attorney do not agree that the child should receive a [DEJ], the court may examine the record and make an independent determination. If it is determined that the child should not receive a [DEJ], the case must proceed under chapter 14, articles 1 through 4, of this division. [ ] (c) Citation ( 792) [ ] The court must issue Citation and Written Notification for Deferred Entry of Judgment Juvenile (form JV-751) to the child s custodial parent, guardian, or foster parent. The form must be personally served on the custodial adult at least 24 hours before the time set for the appearance hearing. [ ] (d)... (2) If the child waives the right to a speedy disposition hearing, the court may summarily grant the [DEJ]. [ ] (3) When appropriate, the court may order the probation department to prepare a report with recommendations on the suitability of the child for [DEJ] or set a hearing on the matter, with or without the order to the probation department for a report. (Rule 5.800(b), (c) & (d), italics omitted.) The juvenile court then has the ultimate discretion to rule on the suitability of the minor for DEJ after consideration of the factors specified in section 791 and rule (Luis B., supra, 142 Cal.App.4th at p ) The juvenile court may grant DEJ to the minor summarily under appropriate circumstances..., and if not must conduct a hearing at which the court shall consider the declaration of the prosecuting attorney, any report 4
5 and recommendations from the probation department, and any other relevant material While the court retains discretion to deny DEJ to an eligible minor, the duty of the prosecuting attorney to assess the eligibility of the minor for DEJ and furnish notice with the petition is mandatory, as is the duty of the juvenile court to either summarily grant DEJ or examine the record, conduct a hearing, and make the final determination regarding education, treatment, and rehabilitation.... (Ibid., citing section 791, subd. (b), italics omitted.) The court is not required to ultimately grant DEJ, but is required to at least follow specified procedures and exercise discretion to reach a final determination once the mandatory threshold eligibility determination is made. [Citation.] (Ibid., italics added.) In the present case, the parties agree that the district attorney failed to strictly comply with the mandated procedures set forth in sections 790, subdivision (b) and 791, subdivision (a), and California Rules of Court, rule 5.800, subdivision (b). In sum, these sections and rule require that the district attorney determine whether the minor is eligible for DEJ and, if so, to file a written declaration with the juvenile court indicating the grounds upon which the determination was made, and make this information available to the minor and his attorney ( 790, subd. (b)), and to serve a written notification of eligibility on the minor, indicating fully a description of the procedures for deferred entry of judgment ( 791, subd. (a)). 2 The district attorney failed to file such a written declaration, but rather represented verbally in open court that the minor appeared to be eligible. The minor and her attorney did not object to this verbal representation, nor did they request that the district attorney state his reasons for that determination of eligibility, nor did they request that the district attorney file the written declaration mandated by the statute and rule Instead, the court and the minor accepted the district attorney s 2 Rule requires that the district attorney, after reviewing the minor s file regarding eligibility for DEJ, file a Determination of Eligibility Deferred Entry of Judgment Juvenile (form JV-750) with any section 602 petition which alleges a felony offense. Form JV-750 sets forth the factors contained in section 790, subdivision (a), for use in determining if the minor is eligible for DEJ. 5
6 preliminary determination of eligibility, the minor admitted the allegations of the section 602 petition, and the court proceeded to refer the matter to the probation department for review and recommendation regarding the minor s suitability for DEJ. Luis B., supra, 142 Cal.App.4th 1117, upon which the minor relies on appeal, involved a situation where the district attorney did not review the minor s eligibility for DEJ at all or make any recommendation regarding it, and where the juvenile court similarly failed to consider DEJ as an option for the minor. In the present case, however, the district attorney did make such an initial determination regarding the minor s eligibility, and the trial court fully complied with its mandates under section 790 et seq. to determine the minor s suitability for DEJ. The minor s lack of objection to this procedure may well have lulled the juvenile court into accepting the verbal representation of eligibility by the district attorney, rather than the court requiring written notice as contemplated by the statutes and Rules of Court. This error could easily have been rectified, had the minor objected, prior to the minor s admission of the allegations of the section 602 petition. We agree with respondent that the minor, by failing to object below, has forfeited her right to raise this issue on appeal. (In re Sheena K. (2007) 40 Cal.4th 875, ) Even if the issue was not forfeited by the minor s failure to object below, prejudice from the prosecutor s failure to formally comply with sections 790, subdivision (b) and 791, subdivision (a), and rule has not been demonstrated. The minor, without citation to authority, maintains that the error is jurisdictional and responds to respondent s contention that no prejudice has been shown by arguing that the juvenile court lacked discretion to decide one way or the other whether [the minor] was suitable for DEJ. The minor then articulates her argument that the district attorney s failure to file a written declaration regarding her eligibility for DEJ prejudiced her because, The statement itself would have been significant it in effect would have shown [the minor] was a low-level offender, who had not previously been declared a ward of the court, was not charged with a section 707(b) offense, had not been committed to the Youth Authority, had not had probation revoked, and was eligible for probation. 6
7 ( 790, subd. (a)). The minor s argument demonstrates exactly why the failure of the district attorney to comply with the requirement of filing a written declaration is not prejudicial all of the information required to be included in the written declaration, articulated above by the minor, goes to the issue of the minor s eligibility, not her suitability, for DEJ. Further, all of this information was before the court in the probation officer s report, at the time the juvenile court made the determination of unsuitability. We fail to see how the lack of a written declaration from the district attorney detailing the same information could have or would have benefitted the minor; it was not the minor s eligibility for DEJ, but rather her suitability, that caused the juvenile court to determine not to grant the minor DEJ. In addressing the minor s suitability for DEJ, the probation officer indicated in his report that: It is felt that the minor s needs for supervision and support are well beyond the scope of DEOJ. She has also failed to take responsibility for her actions and has not expressed any remorse, even blaming the victim for a lack of cooperation when she called to apologize. The officer detailed the minor s on-going truancy (the subject of a previous section 601 petition), that she began smoking marijuana at age 12 and did so every other day, that both parents claimed the other had ongoing substance abuse issues, that the minor had been attending family and individual counseling over the years, and that the minor resumed taking an antidepressant when detained in juvenile hall. Based upon this history, the probation officer felt the minor s parents would benefit from assistance such as family coaching, anger management, and parenting classes. CPS records indicated that there were 13 referrals regarding the minor between 1999 and She was raped when she was 13, and her boyfriends were 27 and 24 years of age, both with criminal histories. At the disposition hearing, the probation officer indicated that the minor was stabilizing somewhat, but in her past here recently she has been out of control... with issues of truancy, use of marijuana, hanging out with older boys and men, run-aways from home.... [ ] There s a lot of family issues in the past with this young lady.... And she s had some run-aways from each parent.... The probation officer went on to 7
8 recommend intensive supervision and, with some hesitation due to her family history, placement in her father s home. The officer concluded, So we feel that regarding the issue of [DEJ], it s not appropriate. This young lady has too many issues to deal with on that program. The court then denied DEJ, finding the minor unsuitable due to her continuing status and delinquency issues, including her truancy and substance abuse, and anger issues. Given the recommendation from probation regarding the minor s suitability for DEJ, we fail to see how the failure of the district attorney to file a written statement regarding her eligibility for that program would have had any impact on the court s decision. 3 B. Failure of Juvenile Court to Determine if Wobbler Offense Felony or Misdemeanor. The minor also contends, and respondent concedes, that the juvenile court erred by failing to expressly exercise its discretion to determine if the wobbler offense that the minor admitted, a violation of Penal Code section 496, subdivision (a), was being designated a felony or a misdemeanor. The juvenile court failed to indicate whether this wobbler offense was being designated a felony or a misdemeanor, both at the time of the minor s admission, and at disposition. The case must therefore be remanded for that determination. ( 702; In re Manzy W. (1997) 14 Cal.4th 1199, ) 3 Respondent claims that the minor does not contend on appeal that the court abused its discretion in declining to find her suitable in light of the social study. Indeed the minor indicates in a footnote, If the court did have discretion to find [the minor] unsuitable for DEJ, it abused its discretion. However, the minor fails to develop this argument any further. Based upon the above information before the juvenile court regarding the minor s suitability for DEJ, we cannot say its decision finding unsuitability was an abuse of discretion, as its decision was not so irrational or arbitrary that no reasonable person could agree with it. (People v. Carmony (2004) 33 Cal.4th 367, 377; In re Sergio R. (2003) 106 Cal.App.4th 597, 607 [review of juvenile court s determination of suitability for DEJ for abuse of discretion].) 8
9 III. DISPOSITION The matter is remanded to the juvenile court for determination of whether the violation of Penal Code section 496, subdivision (a), admitted by the minor, is a misdemeanor or felony. In all other respects, the judgment is affirmed. Sepulveda, J. We concur: Reardon, Acting P.J. Rivera, J. 9
CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT. (Sacramento)
Filed 7/18/07 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION * IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) In re C.W., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE,
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 6/29/15 In re Christian H. CA1/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE A154389
Filed 3/28/19 Opinion following supplemental briefing CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE In re J.C., a Person Coming Under
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN
Filed 5/15/17; pub. order 5/30/17 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. B271406 (Los Angeles
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ----
Filed 5/30/18 In re J.V. CA3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR A123145
Filed 1/12/11 P. v. Small-Long CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR A122523
Filed 10/30/09 P. v. Bolden CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Filed 6/16/11 In re Jazmine J. CA1/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
More informationISSUES IN JUVENILE DELINQUENCY DISPOSITIONS INTRODUCTION. In fashioning dispositions, the juvenile court s goal is ostensibly twofold: (1) to
ISSUES IN JUVENILE DELINQUENCY DISPOSITIONS By Lori Quick I. INTRODUCTION In fashioning dispositions, the juvenile court s goal is ostensibly twofold: (1) to serve the best interests of the delinquent
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR
Filed 9/28/09 P. v. Taumoeanga CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
More informationI. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Filed 7/13/07 In re Michael A. CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 5/10/10 In re N.E. CA1/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 5/19/11 In re R.L. CA1/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE A121535
Filed 4/13/09 In re E.G. CA1/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationCERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Filed 10/23/15 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, E062760 v. TIMOTHY WAYNE PAGE, (Super.Ct.No.
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE A113716
Filed 3/29/07 P. v. Lopez CA1/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationCALIFORNIA JUVENILE COURT PROCESS FOR DELINQUENCY CASES
Juvenile Court Jurisdiction CALIFORNIA JUVENILE COURT PROCESS FOR DELINQUENCY CASES Juvenile justice refers to juvenile court proceedings in which a minor is alleged to have committed an act that would
More informationFOUR EASY STEPS TO UNDERSTANDING DETERMINATE SENTENCING LAW
FOUR EASY STEPS TO UNDERSTANDING DETERMINATE SENTENCING LAW By Jonathan Grossman The courts have recognized the determinate sentencing law (DSL) is a legislative monstrosity which is bewildering in its
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE A115807
Filed 10/19/07 P. v. Hosington CA1/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO A126207
Filed 4/15/10 In re Armani T. CA1/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE A123432
Filed 4/1/10 P. v. Jeter CA1/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR A126254
Filed 7/7/10 In re Louis R. CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR A105113
Filed 4/22/05 P. v. Roth CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationLITIGATING JUVENILE TRANSFER AND CERTIFICATION CASES IN THE JUVENILE AND CIRCUIT COURTS
LITIGATING JUVENILE TRANSFER AND CERTIFICATION CASES IN THE JUVENILE AND CIRCUIT COURTS I. OVERVIEW Historically, the rationale behind the development of the juvenile court was based on the notion that
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE
Filed 3/20/09 P. v. Turner CA1/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationSTATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS FOR VICTIM TO SIGN: I,, victim of the crime of, (victim) (crime committed) committed on, by in, (date) (name of offender,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Filed 4/4/19 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX In re J.G., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. 2d Juv. No. B287487
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT. (Sacramento) ----
Filed 12/29/08; pub. order 1/23/09 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- SIXELLS, LLC, Plaintiff and Appellant, C056267 (Super.
More information2. FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR RULES
2. FELONY AND MISDEMEANOR RULES 2.1 CITATION These felony and misdemeanor rules should be cited as "Marin County Rule, Felony/Misdemeanor" or "MCR Crim" followed by the rule number (e.g., Marin County
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, No. A144157 v. Plaintiff and Respondent, Related Writ Petition Pending A145069
More informationHOUSE BILL No December 14, 2005, Introduced by Rep. Condino and referred to the Committee on Judiciary.
HOUSE BILL No. HOUSE BILL No. December, 00, Introduced by Rep. Condino and referred to the Committee on Judiciary. A bill to amend PA, entitled "The code of criminal procedure," by amending sections and
More informationHOW PROPOSITION 21 AMENDED WELFARE AND INSTITUTIONS CODE SECTION 777 AND CHANGED PROBATION VIOLATION PROCEDURES FOR JUVENILE WARDS
HOW PROPOSITION 21 AMENDED WELFARE AND INSTITUTIONS CODE SECTION 777 AND CHANGED PROBATION VIOLATION PROCEDURES FOR JUVENILE WARDS By Kathryn Seligman, FDAP Staff Attorney Updated January 2004 Welfare
More informationOVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM. Laura Lothman Lambert Director, Juvenile Division
OVERVIEW OF THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM Laura Lothman Lambert Director, Juvenile Division YOUTH IN THE JUVENILE JUSTICE SYSTEM What qualifies for a civil citation? CIVIL CITATION Most misdemeanors and
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR A105255
Filed 4/21/05 P. v. Evans CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationOptions of court at dispositional hearing. If in its decree the juvenile court finds that the child comes within the purview of this chapter,
635.060 Options of court at dispositional hearing. If in its decree the juvenile court finds that the child comes within the purview of this chapter, the court, at the dispositional hearing, may impose
More informationSection 1 - Are You Eligible?
These are the instructions for completing the Orange County Superior Court forms entitled (Form No. L-0408.1), Notice of Filing (Form No. L-0409), Proof of Service- (Form No.L-0801), and the Certificate
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE A106090
Filed 7/29/05 P. v. Ingwell CA1/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE
Filed 12/18/09 P. v. Carrigg CA1/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationCERTIFICATION PROCEEDING
CERTIFICATION PROCEEDING PURPOSE: TO ALLOW A JUVENILE COURT TO WAIVE ITS EXCLUSIVE ORIGINAL JURISDICTION AND TRANSFER A JUVENILE TO ADULT CRIMINAL COURT BECAUSE OF THE SERIOUSNESS OF THE OFFENSE ALLEGED
More informationINTHE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO A114344
Filed 11/19/07 P. v. Anderson CA1/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for
More informationThe Family Court Process for Children Charged with Criminal and Status Offenses
The Family Court Process for Children Charged with Criminal and Status Offenses A Brief Overview of South Carolina s Juvenile Delinquency Proceedings 2017 CHILDREN S LAW CENTER UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
Filed 11/30/17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S230793 v. ) ) Ct.App. 4/2 E062760 TIMOTHY WAYNE PAGE, ) ) San Bernardino County Defendant and Appellant.
More informationSTATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRIME VICTIMS BILL OF RIGHTS REQUEST TO EXERCISE VICTIMS RIGHTS FOR VICTIM TO SIGN: I,, victim of the crime of, (victim) (crime committed) committed on, by in, (date) (name of offender,
More informationCALIFORNIA PENAL CODE SECTION MISDEMEANORS
CALIFORNIA PENAL CODE SECTION 853.5-853.85 MISDEMEANORS 853.5. (a) Except as otherwise provided by law, in any case in which a person is arrested for an offense declared to be an infraction, the person
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO
Filed 6/24/15; pub. order 7/17/15 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Appellant, E061733 v. ZACKARIAH WILLIAM
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
Filed 5/10/18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Appellant, ) ) S237602 v. ) ) Ct.App. 4/2 E064099 STEVEN ANDREW ADELMANN, ) ) Riverside County Defendant and Respondent. )
More informationThis section covers coordination of services between agencies and the youth correctional system. STANDARDS
Child and Family Services PROGRAM STANDARDS MANUAL Section: 701 Effective: Oct 1/88 Revised: Sep 20/99 Page: 1 Subject: SERVICES TO YOUNG OFFENDERS This section covers coordination of services between
More information80th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Regular Session. Senate Bill 966 SUMMARY
Sponsored by COMMITTEE ON JUDICIARY 0th OREGON LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY--0 Regular Session Senate Bill SUMMARY The following summary is not prepared by the sponsors of the measure and is not a part of the
More informationAPPLICABLE STATUES. Determinate sentence transfer hearings are governed by the following statutes:
APPLICABLE STATUES Determinate sentence transfer hearings are governed by the following statutes: Texas Family Code ' 54.11. Release or Transfer Hearing (a) On receipt of a referral under Section 61.079(a),
More informationJuvenile Law. Protection of the Public. Before Adjudication: Custody, Detention, Deferred Prosecution and Other Preliminaries
Before Adjudication: Custody, Detention, Deferred Prosecution and Other Preliminaries By: Cynthia Porter Gore* Presiding Judge, Allen Municipal Court 301 Century Pkwy Allen, TX 75013 Mobile: 214-680-7008
More informationDeferred Entry of Judgment: An Overlooked and Undervalued Benefit of Proposition 21
Comments Deferred Entry of Judgment: An Overlooked and Undervalued Benefit of Proposition 21 By LARON HOGG HAUGHT* IN MARCH OF 2000, the voters of California passed Proposition 21, the "Gang Violence and
More informationMEMORANDUM RE: MENTAL HEALTH DIVERSION (PENAL CODE )(AB 1810)
MEMORANDUM FROM: J. RICHARD COUZENS Judge of the Placer County Superior Court (Ret.) DATED: July 13, 2018 RE: MENTAL HEALTH DIVERSION (PENAL CODE 1001.35-1001.36)(AB 1810) AB 1810, an omnibus mental health
More informationIN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN THE COMMONWEALTH COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA Jacob C. Clark : : v. : No. 1188 C.D. 2012 : Submitted: December 7, 2012 Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, : Department of Transportation, : Bureau of Driver Licensing,
More informationProposition 57: November 8, 2016, General Election Analyzed by Garrick Byers, Statute Decoder November 9, 2016 Table of Contents
Proposition 57: November 8, 2016, General Election Analyzed by Garrick Byers, Statute Decoder November 9, 2016 Table of Contents Summary... 3 1. Juveniles.... 3 2. Prisoners... 3 3. Regulations to be written
More informationThe Intersection of Immigration Law with CA State Law
The Intersection of Immigration Law with CA State Law January 16, 2015 Raha Jorjani, Office of the Alameda County Public Defender Agenda Overview of Immigration Consequences of Criminal Convictions. Post-Conviction
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2015 H 1 HOUSE BILL 399. Short Title: Young Offenders Rehabilitation Act. (Public)
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION H 1 HOUSE BILL Short Title: Young Offenders Rehabilitation Act. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Representatives Avila, Farmer-Butterfield, Jordan, and D. Hall
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA D062951
Filed 3/12/13 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ENTENTE DESIGN, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. D062951 (San Diego County Super. Ct. No.
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE A125781
Filed 9/30/10 P. v. Romero CA1/3 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 122C Article 5 1
Article 5. Procedure for Admission and Discharge of Clients. Part l. General Provisions. 122C-201. Declaration of policy. It is State policy to encourage voluntary admissions to facilities. It is further
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT
Filed 7/18/17 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. B268667 (Los Angeles
More informationAN ACT IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
AN ACT Codification District of Columbia Official Code 2001 Edition Summer 2013 IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA To create limited liability for employers who hire or retain returning citizens
More informationCERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 5/27/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PAUL DAVID CARMONA, JR. et al.,
More informationJuvenile Scripts SCRIPT FOR DETENTION HEARING...2 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION HEARING IN WHICH THE RESPONDENT PLEADS TRUE...7
Juvenile Proceedings Scripts - Table of Contents Juvenile Scripts SCRIPT FOR DETENTION HEARING...2 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION HEARING IN WHICH THE RESPONDENT PLEADS TRUE...7 SCRIPT FOR AN ADJUDICATION
More informationA BILL IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
0 0 A BILL - IN THE COUNCIL OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA To create limited liability for employers who hire or retain returning citizens if the employer has taken certain steps to make a good-faith determination
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2013 H 2 HOUSE BILL 725 Committee Substitute Favorable 6/12/13
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 1 H HOUSE BILL Committee Substitute Favorable /1/1 Short Title: Young Offenders Rehabilitation Act. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: April, 1 1 1 1 A BILL TO BE
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO Opinion Number: Filing Date: August 17, 2012 Docket No. 30,788 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, v. Plaintiff-Appellee, ADRIAN NANCO, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL FROM
More informationCERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 9/15/08 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. TIMOTHY ALLEN MILLIGAN, G039546
More informationALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1
ALABAMA VICTIMS RIGHTS LAWS1 Constitution Art. I, 6.01 Basic rights for crime victims. (a) Crime victims, as defined by law or their lawful representatives, including the next of kin of homicide victims,
More informationColorado Legislative Council Staff
Colorado Legislative Council Staff Distributed to CCJJ, November 9, 2017 Room 029 State Capitol, Denver, CO 80203-1784 (303) 866-3521 FAX: 866-3855 TDD: 866-3472 leg.colorado.gov/lcs E-mail: lcs.ga@state.co.us
More informationPROBATION QUARTERLY REPORTS
THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA PROBATION QUARTERLY REPORTS Application Guide DIVISION OF STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION June 2012 Table of Contents Probation Consolidation... 6 Comments Regarding Column and
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS 444444444444 NO. 07-0322 444444444444 IN RE JAMES ALLEN HALL 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444 ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS 4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444
More informationCOMPREHENSIVE SENTENCING TASK FORCE Diversion Working Group
COMPREHENSIVE SENTENCING TASK FORCE Diversion Working Group RECOMMENDATION PRESENTED TO THE CCJJ November 9, 2012 FY13-CS #4 Expand the availability of adult pretrial diversion options within Colorado
More informationFlorida Senate SB 170 By Senator Lynn
By Senator Lynn 1 A bill to be entitled 2 An act relating to the sentencing of youthful 3 offenders; amending s. 958.04, F.S.; 4 prohibiting the court from sentencing a person 5 as a youthful offender
More informationFAMILY COURT LOCAL RULES DELINQUENT AND UNDISCIPLINED JUVENILES JUVENILE COURT 28 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT TABLE OF CONTENTS
FAMILY COURT LOCAL RULES DELINQUENT AND UNDISCIPLINED JUVENILES JUVENILE COURT 28 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT TABLE OF CONTENTS Rule 1. Scope, Construction and Enforcement Rule 2. Appointment of Counsel Rule
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO A106894
Filed 1/9/06 P. v. Carmichael CA1/2 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationOver 18 Proceedings in Juvenile Court
Over 18 Proceedings in Juvenile Court 19 th ANNUAL JUVENILE LAW CONFERENCE PROFESSOR ROBERT O. DAWSON JUVENILE LAW INSTITUTE February 22 24, 2006 Westin Park Central Hotel Dallas, Texas Gracie G. Lewis
More informationOffice of the District Attorney Record Retention and Destruction Schedule
Homicides and Life Sentences Homicide cases and cases where the defendant is sentenced to life in prison P.C. 667.5, P.C. 190.7, P.C. 290, P.C. 290.08, G.C. 68152(e)(2), G.C. 26202, Historic Criminal cases
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX
Filed 5/2/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SIX THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, 2d Crim. No. B282787 (Super. Ct. No.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT
Filed 11/16/12 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION EIGHT COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Petitioner, v. B239849 (Los Angeles County Super.
More informationLAFLA Volunteer Expungement Guide
LAFLA Volunteer Expungement Guide Road Map (1) Incarceration Rates, Criminal Records, and Employment (2) Expungement and Reduction: Nature & Scope of Remedies (3) Law Related to Expungements: Pen. Code
More informationThe Revised Interstate Compact for Juveniles (ICJ) Guide. What is the purpose of the Revised Interstate Compact for Juveniles (ICJ)?
The Revised Interstate Compact for Juveniles (ICJ) Guide What is the purpose of the Revised Interstate Compact for Juveniles (ICJ)? The Revised ICJ is utilized when one state transfers their supervision
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. HENRY ARSENIO LARA II, Defendant and Appellant. S243975 Fourth Appellate District, Division Two E065029 Riverside County Superior
More informationNOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FIVE A114558
Filed 5/2/08 P. v. Jackson CA1/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationCriminal Gangs/Gang-Free Zones
Criminal Gangs/Gang-Free Zones This legislation enacts a number of provisions about gang-related offenses. For example, it creates an offense for aspiring to commit or committing certain crimes as a member
More informationCOPY IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT. (Sacramento) ----
Filed 5/9/08 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION COPY IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT (Sacramento) ---- CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL et al., Petitioners, C055614 (Super. Ct.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR
Filed 9/24/09 P. v. Laureano CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationIC Chapter 16. Problem Solving Courts
IC 33-23-16 Chapter 16. Problem Solving Courts IC 33-23-16-1 "Board" Sec. 1. As used in this chapter, "board" refers to the board of directors of the judicial conference of Indiana under IC 33-38-9-4.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR A113296
Filed 4/25/08 P. v. Canada CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res
More informationSTANDARDS GOVERNING THE USE OF SECURE DETENTION UNDER THE JUVENILE ACT 42 Pa.C.S et seq.
STANDARDS GOVERNING THE USE OF SECURE DETENTION UNDER THE JUVENILE ACT 42 Pa.C.S. 6301 et seq. Preamble The purpose of Pennsylvania s juvenile justice system is to provide programs of supervision, care
More information! CASENOTE JAMES GRAFTON RANDALL, ESQ. LAWATYOURFINGERTIPS.COM
Filed 5/24/12! CASENOTE JAMES GRAFTON RANDALL, ESQ. LAWATYOURFINGERTIPS.COM A C.C.P. SECTION 998 OFFER MUST CONTAIN A STATUTORILY MANDATED ACCEPTANCE PROVISION OR IT IS INVALID CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO O RIGrNAL IN RE: H.V., adjudicated delinquent child. Case No. 2012-1688 On Appeal from the Lorain County Court of Appeals Ninth Appellate District C.A. CaseNos. 11CA010139
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 15A Article 46 1
Article 46. Crime Victims' Rights Act. 15A-830. Definitions. (a) The following definitions apply in this Article: (1) Accused. A person who has been arrested and charged with committing a crime covered
More informationGENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 2017 H 1 HOUSE BILL 280. Short Title: Juvenile Justice Reinvestment Act. (Public)
GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF NORTH CAROLINA SESSION 01 H 1 HOUSE BILL 0 Short Title: Juvenile Justice Reinvestment Act. (Public) Sponsors: Referred to: Representatives McGrady, Lewis, Duane Hall, and S. Martin
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Tokar, 2009-Ohio-4369.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 91941 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. JEFFREY TOKAR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationPRESENT: Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, Goodwyn, and Millette, JJ., and Carrico and Russell, S.JJ.
PRESENT: Koontz, Kinser, Lemons, Goodwyn, and Millette, JJ., and Carrico and Russell, S.JJ. DWAYNE JAMAR BROWN OPINION BY v. Record No. 090161 JUSTICE S. BERNARD GOODWYN January 15, 2010 COMMONWEALTH OF
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
Filed 6/15/15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S202921 v. ) ) Ct.App. 4/1 D057392 ERIC HUNG LE et al., ) ) San Diego County Defendants and Appellants. )
More informationTYPE OF OFFENSE(S) AND SECTION NUMBER(S) LIST OFFENSE(S), CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S) 3. CASE NUMBER(S) AND DATE(S)
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA Reserved for Clerk s File Stamp COUNTY: PLAINTIFF: COUNTY OF EL DORADO PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEFENDANT: ADVISEMENT OF RIGHTS, WAIVER, AND PLEA FORM FOR FELONIES
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR A111525
Filed 8/18/06 P. v. Johnson CA1/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE
Filed 6/13/17; pub. order 7/6/17 (see end of opn.) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE SANTA ANA POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION et al., Plaintiffs and
More information