Insight from Horwich Farrelly s Large & Complex Injury Group
|
|
- Madlyn Douglas
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Insight from Horwich Farrelly s Large & Complex Injury Group Issue #27 01 September 2016 Alexander House 94 Talbot Road Manchester M16 0SP T F Page 1
2 Welcome to this week s edition of Insight. In this week s edition we look at cases relating to: Gaining permission to rely on expert evidence Applying the data protection regulations sensibly Failing to include credit hire in a Portal claim Should you have any feedback or comments please do not hesitate to contact me at malcolm.henke@h-f.co.uk. Malcolm Henke, Partner & Head of LACIG Civil Procedure - Expert Evidence Stoffell v De Verteuil [Lawtel 31/08/2016] looks at a judge s approach to an application to introduce an additional expert witness long after the existing evidence had been exchanged. The claimant had been injured in the accident, which occurred in September She came off her motorcycle at speed and slid along the road and into the path of the defendant motorcyclist, which collided with her, causing injuries. Liability was agreed to be 60/40 in the claimant's favour, but the causation and quantum of damages were at issue. A trial window had been set for October Each party had submitted expert evidence from a plastic surgeon and an accident reconstruction expert. The claimant wished to adduce further expert evidence regarding the protective motorcycling trousers that she had been wearing. The claimant submitted that the evidence was clearly relevant to an issue at trial, and that under CPR 35, the court should allow it to be adduced. The defendant submitted that relief from sanctions principles applied, and that the failure to adduce the evidence earlier was a serious breach for which no proper explanation had been given. The court based its approach primarily on CPR 35 rather than on relief from sanctions principles Allowing the claimant s application, the deputy High Court judge held that the evidence that the Page 2
3 claimant sought to rely on was relevant. A trial judge would wish to have it before them. It was not too late for the evidence to be adduced, as there was still sufficient time for the defendant to obtain evidence from his own experts. The court was not persuaded that that would require a detailed investigation into the composition of the trousers. Although the claimant's solicitors were to be criticised for the substantial delay, and for the failure to address that delay in the application, it was appropriate to permit the claimant to adduce the evidence. The court based its approach primarily on CPR 35 rather than on relief from sanctions principles. There would be no prejudice to the defendant, save for additional costs. Although the evidence should have been disclosed much earlier, it was material and permission was granted to adduce it. Comment This application was allowed because the judge took the view that although it was late it was clear that the additional evidence would assist the trial judge. Compliance with the court timetable is important but achieving justice between the parties remains equally desirable. Data Protection and the Provision of Personal Details We are grateful to the Association of British Investigators for drawing our attention to the case of Bangura v Loughborough University (2016) EWHC The case will be of interest to those concerned with investigating suspicious claims. The claimant had been a student at the university. In 2010 there had been various complaints of sexual assault on the campus. An informant had approached the university's security staff and said that the claimant had behaved strangely and said things which were suspicious in connection with the assaults. The police were called and the informant gave at least part of the claimant's name and his address. The university provided the police with a registration form which had been completed by the claimant and which included his full name, address and date of birth. The police attended the claimant's address and he was arrested. He was later released and never charged with any offence. The claimant subsequently brought proceedings against the university, the police and the university's student union. Against the university he alleged that the disclosure of his personal details and photos without his consent had been contrary to the Data Protection Act 1998 and amounted to a breach of contract. A Master later granted summary judgment in favour of the university and students union; the claim against the police continued. The claimant's subsequent application for permission to appeal against the Master's order was dismissed as wholly without merit. In the ongoing proceedings, a police officer produced witness statements in which he clarified that the information had been disclosed by the university in advance of a written request by the police. In the instant hearing, the claimant sought permission under CPR to reopen his application for permission to appeal against the Master's order awarding the university summary judgment. He sought permission to rely on the police officer's evidence to argue that the fact that the university had disclosed his personal information prior to any written request was contrary to its own data protection policy, which formed part of the contract between him and the university and which stipulated that any requests for disclosure had to be made in writing. He contended that he was entitled to relief for breach of the Act, breach of contract, breach of trust, and conspiracy. The police were investigating a serious series of sexual assaults which were of great concern to the whole university community Refusing the application, the High Court judge held that the claim based on the Act was unarguable. The Act clearly contemplated the data controller being exempt from the first data protection principle, namely that data had to be handled fairly and lawfully, if the information was sought by the police for the purpose of the detection of crime or for the apprehension or prosecution of offenders. There was nothing in S29 of the 1998 Act which stipulated Page 3
4 that the request had to be made in writing. The condition in Schedule 2 6(1) of the Act was plainly satisfied, namely that the processing was necessary for the purposes of legitimate interests pursued by the data controller or by the third party to whom the data was disclosed. The police were investigating a serious series of sexual assaults which were of great concern to the whole university community. Aside from the university's general desire to assist the police in the detection of crime, the situation at the time meant that there were additional reasons why the university would have been particularly keen to assist the police. The claim based on an alleged breach of contract also had no realistic prospect of success. The suggestion that the data protection policy was incorporated as a contractual document was not sustainable. The registration document did not purport to incorporate the policy as part of the contract between the student and the university, nor did the policy itself. Like many non-contractual policies, it articulated what practice the university expected to adopt. Any failure to follow through on what the policy envisaged did not necessarily mean that there was a claim for breach of contract. The policy could not be understood to mean that there would be an invariable rule that information would only be provided to the police if a written request was made in advance. Although the policy said in mandatory terms that there had to be a written request, it was inconceivable that the drafter had intended that the university would be precluded from providing information if the circumstances of the situation prevented a written request being made in advance. In any event, the loss relied on, namely the arrest, had not been caused by the disclosure given by the university. The claimant had been arrested at the address provided by the informant, so the loss would still have occurred whether or not the university gave disclosure. Since there was no arguable claim for breach of contract, there could also be no realistic prospect of success in the claims based on breach of trust or conspiracy. Comment Organisations can become obsessed with data protection regulations and hide behind them as an excuse for not providing information. This case acts as a reminder that the risk of a breach is minimal if the request for information is made by a party with a legitimate reason for seeking it; is properly considered by the data holder; and is provided for the genuine purpose of prevention or detection of a crime. Provided these criteria are satisfied this case indicates that a written request for the information is not a pre-requisite. Page 4
5 RTA Portal for Low Value Claims In Smikle v Global Logistics [Lawtel 17/08/2016] the claimant had been injured and his car damaged in a collision. He claimed damages, and in June 2015 his solicitors submitted a claim form through the Portal for low value personal injury claims arising from road traffic accidents. The claim form indicated that the claimant's car had been damaged. However, his solicitors also ticked the boxes indicating that he neither needed, nor had been provided with, an alternative vehicle. The form was supported by a statement of truth signed by the solicitors. proceedings. They were entitled to rely on a statement of truth, or a certificate signed by a solicitor, indicating that there was no claim for car hire. A signed statement of truth was deemed to be a statement made by a solicitor on behalf of the client to the effect that the document to which it was attached was both genuine and a genuine reflection of the truth. In the instant case, to go behind the statement of truth on the claim form would be to go behind the whole spirit of the CPR. It would therefore be an abuse of process for the car hire claim to proceed. In July and August the claimant submitted two further claim forms containing the same information. None of the forms indicated a claim for car hire. In fact, the claimant had been using a hire car and in August the car hire company wrote to the defendants indicating a claim for car hire. The defendants replied, but when they heard nothing further they went on to settle the Portal claim. The Stage 2 settlement pack indicated that there was no car hire claim. In January 2016 the claimant, through fresh solicitors, issued a claim for special damages, including credit hire. The defendants applied for summary judgment on the basis that the claim was an abuse of process. (The defendants) were entitled to rely on a statement of truth signed by a solicitor, indicating that there was no claim for car hire Finding in favour of the defendants, the District Judge held that the court's task was made more difficult by the claimant's failure to file a witness statement either setting out the circumstances or giving any explanation of how the instant situation had arisen. Comment This case highlights the need for a claimant s solicitor, dealing with a Portal claim, to ensure that he captures any vehicle related damages that are additional to the original claim. The rules envisage an original claim settling with credit hire charges still outstanding but, according to this case, not where the claim form expressly indicates that there is no such claim. Credit hire companies wishing to pursue claims that will go through the Portal will need to ensure that they are in contact with solicitors handling the personal injury claim. Had the car hire claim, which was significant, been indicated on the claim form, the defendants would have taken a very different approach to the conduct of the Page 5
6 Disclaimer & Copyright Notice The contents of this document are considered accurate at the time of delivery. The information provided does not constitute specific legal advice. You should always consult a suitably qualified solicitor about any individual legal matter. Horwich Farrelly Solicitors accepts no liability for errors or omissions in this document. All rights reserved. This material provided is for personal use only. No part may be distributed to any other party without the prior written permission of Horwich Farrelly Solicitors or the copyright holder. No part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical photocopying, microfilming, recording, scanning or otherwise for commercial purposes without the written permission of Horwich Farrelly or the copyright holder. Horwich Farrelly 2016 Page 6
Insight from Horwich Farrelly s Large & Complex Injury Group
Insight from Horwich Farrelly s Large & Complex Injury Group Issue #78 19 April 2018 Alexander House 94 Talbot Road Manchester M16 0SP T. 03300 240 711 F. 03300 240 712 www.h-f.co.uk Page 1 Welcome to
More informationInsight from Horwich Farrelly s Large & Complex Injury Group
Insight from Horwich Farrelly s Large & Complex Injury Group Issue #19 17 June 2016 Alexander House 94 Talbot Road Manchester M16 0SP T. 03300 240 711 F. 03300 240 712 www.h-f.co.uk Page 1 Welcome to this
More informationInsight from Horwich Farrelly s Large & Complex Injury Group
Insight from Horwich Farrelly s Large & Complex Injury Group Issue #26 11 August 2016 Alexander House 94 Talbot Road Manchester M16 0SP T. 03300 240 711 F. 03300 240 712 www.h-f.co.uk Page 1 Welcome to
More informationInsight from Horwich Farrelly s Large & Complex Injury Group
Insight from Horwich Farrelly s Large & Complex Injury Group Issue #83 08 June 2018 Alexander House 94 Talbot Road Manchester M16 0SP T. 03300 240 711 F. 03300 240 712 www.h-f.co.uk Page 1 Welcome to Insight
More informationDefence and Counterclaim Training. By Andrew Mckie Barrister Clerksroom.
Defence and Counterclaim Training. By Andrew Mckie Barrister Clerksroom Email andrewmckie@btinternet.com/ mckie@clerksroom.com Telephone Mobile: 07739 964012 Office: 0845 083 3000 Website www.clerksroom.com
More informationLEVEL 6 - UNIT 15 CIVIL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JUNE 2013
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 6 - UNIT 15 CIVIL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JUNE 2013 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points
More informationWorking at Height Seminar. The Kube, Leicester Racecourse 4 October 2018
Working at Height Seminar The Kube, Leicester Racecourse 4 October 2018 Introduction Keoghs National defendant-focused, top 100 law firm, acting for leading insurers, businesses and suppliers to the insurance
More informationThe Pre-Action Protocol for Resolution of Package Travel Claims is approved by the Master of the Rolls as Head of Civil Justice.
The Pre-Action Protocol for Resolution of Package Travel Claims is approved by the Master of the Rolls as Head of Civil Justice. The Right Honourable Sir Terence Etherton Master of the Rolls and Head of
More informationSUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST
DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998 SUBJECT ACCESS REQUEST Procedure Manual Page 1 of 22 Invest NI 1. Introduction 1.1 What is a Subject Access Request? 1.2 Routine Requests 1.3 What is an individual entitled to?
More informationLEVEL 6 - UNIT 15 CIVIL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2016
Note to Candidates and Tutors: LEVEL 6 - UNIT 15 CIVIL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2016 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points
More informationMijin Kim THE NAME AND ANY INFORMATION IDENTIFYING THE COMPLAINANT IS NOT TO BE PUBLISHED DECISION
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 73 Reference No: IACDT 014/15 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing
More informationFactsheet 48: Answering Written Questions
Factsheet 48: Answering Written Questions Last reviewed: April 2018 Official guidance relating to expert witnesses answering written questions is offered in both the civil and family arenas (see below).
More informationThe ABTA Arbitration Scheme Rules
23 rd May 2016 The ABTA Arbitration Scheme Rules 1. Introduction 1.1 This Scheme is supplied exclusively by CEDR, Europe s leading independent dispute resolution service. 1.2 The Scheme has been designed
More informationIn cases where there is no Protocol in place then parties are expected to abide by the guidelines set down in Section III of the PDPAC and Annex A.
LEVEL 6 UNIT 15 CIVIL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS JUNE 2011 Note to Candidates and Tutors: The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationPart 18 Questions in RTA Cases Where Fraud is Alleged. By Deborah Tompkinson Clerksroom August 2012
Part 18 Questions in RTA Cases Where Fraud is Alleged By Deborah Tompkinson Clerksroom August 2012 Telephone 0845 083 3000 or go to www.clerksroom.com 1 Introduction If you have got this far, then you
More informationBefore : HIS HONOUR JUDGE PLATTS Between : - and -
IN THE MANCHESTER COUNTY COURT Case No: 2YJ60324 1, Bridge Street West Manchester M60 9DJ Date: 29/11/2012 Before : HIS HONOUR JUDGE PLATTS - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : MRS THAZEER
More informationUNIT 15 CIVIL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2012
Note to Candidates and Tutors: UNIT 15 CIVIL LITIGATION SUGGESTED ANSWERS - JANUARY 2012 The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationBefore: DISTRICT JUDGE BALDWIN. (sitting as a Regional Costs Judge) Between: KARLA BATES. -and- DAVID BOURNE
IN THE COUNTY COURT SITTING AT LIVERPOOL Case No: C03SW322 C03SW323 35 Vernon Street Liverpool L2 2BX Hearing Date: 21 st February 2017 Before: DISTRICT JUDGE BALDWIN (sitting as a Regional Costs Judge)
More informationRequest under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA)
Our Ref: 005566/16 Freedom of Information Section Nottinghamshire Police HQ Sherwood Lodge, Arnold Nottingham NG5 8PP 16 January 2017 Tel: 101 Ext 800 2507 Fax: 0115 967 2896 Dear Request under the Freedom
More informationLegal Services Commission v Aaronson No1 [2006] APP.L.R. 05/24
JUDGMENT : Mr Justice Jack : QBD. 24 th May 2006. 1. On 26 August 2005 the Legal Services Commission issued a claim under Part 8 of the Civil Procedure Rules against a firm of solicitors, Aaronson & Co,
More informationBEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 47. Reference No: IACDT 034/14
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 47 Reference No: IACDT 034/14 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing
More informationThe LTE Group. Anti-Bribery Policy Produced by. The LTE Group. LTEG anti-bribery policy v4 06/2016
The LTE Group Produced by The LTE Group LTEG anti-bribery policy v4 06/2016 All rights reserved; no part of this publication may be photocopied, recorded or otherwise reproduced, stored in a retrieval
More informationBPTC syllabus and curriculum 2017/18
BPTC syllabus and curriculum 2017/18 1 Contents Civil litigation and evidence... 4 Introduction... 4 1 General Matters... 5 2 Limitation... 6 3 Pre-action Conduct... 7 4 Commencing Proceedings... 8 5 Parties...
More informationPERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS
PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS Frequently Asked Questions 1. Can I make a claim? If you have been injured because of the fault of someone else, you can claim financial compensation through the courts. 2. Who can
More informationRequest under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA)
Our Ref: 003279/17 Freedom of Information Section Nottinghamshire Police HQ Sherwood Lodge, Arnold Nottingham NG5 8PP 14 July 2017 Tel: 101 Ext 800 2507 Fax: 0115 967 2896 Dear Request under the Freedom
More informationBefore : MR JUSTICE KERR Between :
Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWHC 2745 (Admin) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION ADMINISTRATIVE COURT Case No: CO/3111/2015 Manchester Civil Justice Centre Date: 01/11/2016 Before
More informationGUIDE TO ARBITRATION
GUIDE TO ARBITRATION Arbitrators and Mediators Institute of New Zealand Inc. Level 3, Hallenstein House, 276-278 Lambton Quay P O Box 1477, Wellington, New Zealand Tel: 64 4 4999 384 Fax: 64 4 4999 387
More informationRevised and updated pre-action protocols came into effect on 6 April 2015 with little advance warning.
PRE-ACTION PROTOCOLS UPDATE Introduction Revised and updated pre-action protocols came into effect on 6 April 2015 with little advance warning. The terms of the updated protocols are important for practitioners,
More informationPERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS
PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMS Frequently Asked Questions 1. Can I make a claim? If you have been injured because of the fault of someone else, you can claim financial compensation through the courts. The dependants
More informationA BILL FOR A LAW FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL JUSTICE IN EKITI STATE EKITI STATE OF NIGERIA
A BILL FOR A LAW FOR THE ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL JUSTICE IN EKITI STATE EKITI STATE OF NIGERIA 1 EKITI STATE OF NIGERIA ADMINISTRATION OF CIVIL JUSTICE BILL, 2018 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS 1. Objectives
More informationDecision 076/ Mr David Laing and the Chief Constable of Fife Constabulary
Decision 076/2005 - Mr David Laing and the Chief Constable of Fife Constabulary Information relating to a road traffic accident Applicant: Mr David Laing Authority: The Chief Constable of Fife Constabulary
More informationSolicitor/client costs
Solicitor/client costs Judith Ayling 15 May 2018 Getting the retainer wrong Radford v Frade [2016] EWHC 1600 (QB), [2016] 4 Costs L.O. 653 (Warby J, on appeal from Master Haworth) The appellants submitted
More information2016 No. 41 POLICE. The Police (Conduct) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016
S T A T U T O R Y R U L E S O F N O R T H E R N I R E L A N D 2016 No. 41 POLICE The Police (Conduct) Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2016 Made - - - - 17th February 2016 Coming into operation - 1st June
More information2.16 Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act
POLICY AND PROCEDURE MANUAL Policy Title: Policy Section: Effective Date: Supersedes: FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AND PROTECTION OF PRIVACY ACT ADMINISTRATION 2016 02 18 2014 09 02 Area of Responsibility: VICE
More informationPRACTICE DIRECTION [ ] DISCLOSURE PILOT FOR THE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS
Draft at 2.11.17 PRACTICE DIRECTION [ ] DISCLOSURE PILOT FOR THE BUSINESS AND PROPERTY COURTS 1. General 1.1 This Practice Direction is made under Part 51 and provides a pilot scheme for disclosure in
More informationPractice direction and pre-action protocol for Clinical Negligence claims in the High Court
26 May 2010 Mrs R Johnston Secretary to the Civil Justice Reform Committee Office of the Lord Chief Justice Royal Courts of Justice Chichester Street Belfast BT1 3JF Practice direction and pre-action protocol
More informationDerbyshire Constabulary SIMPLE CAUTIONING OF ADULT OFFENDERS POLICY POLICY REFERENCE 06/122. This policy is suitable for Public Disclosure
Derbyshire Constabulary SIMPLE CAUTIONING OF ADULT OFFENDERS POLICY POLICY REFERENCE 06/122 This policy is suitable for Public Disclosure Owner of Doc: Head of Department, Criminal Justice Date Approved:
More information/...1 PRIVATE ARBITRATION KIT
1007453/...1 PRIVATE ARBITRATION KIT Introduction This document contains Guidelines, Rules and a Model Agreement in respect of private arbitrations. It is designed to assist practitioners when referring
More informationBEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL. Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 48. Reference No: IACDT 036/14
BEFORE THE IMMIGRATION ADVISERS COMPLAINTS AND DISCIPLINARY TRIBUNAL Decision No: [2015] NZIACDT 48 Reference No: IACDT 036/14 IN THE MATTER of a referral under s 48 of the Immigration Advisers Licensing
More informationSubject Access Requests and Investigations
Subject Access Requests and Investigations Date : May 19, 2016 We have been seeing a rise recently in the number and complexity of Subject Access Requests (SARs) being made under the Data Protection Act
More informationI am sorry that you are disappointed with the outcome of your request for information.
Freedom of Information Request Reference No: I note you seek access to the following information: I am sorry that you are disappointed with the outcome of your request for information. Background to your
More informationThe Privacy Policy links to the following Objective contained within the City Plan
Privacy Policy Privacy Policy City Plan Reference The Privacy Policy links to the following Objective contained within the City Plan 2013-2017. Performance is about managing our resources wisely, providing
More informationFINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (AMENDMENT) (NO.2) ACT, 2011 EXPLANATORY NOTE
FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO (AMENDMENT) (NO.2) ACT, 2011 EXPLANATORY NOTE (These notes form no part of the Bill but are intended only to indicate its general purport) The purpose
More informationPROCEDURE (Essex) / Linked SOP (Kent) Data Protection. Number: W 1011 Date Published: 24 November 2016
1.0 Summary of Changes 1.1 This procedure/sop has had an additional paragraph added at 3.8.6 relating to data processing of information by direct access to Athena. 2.0 What this Procedure/SOP is About
More informationto Headlight, Dolmans Solicitors motoring news bulletin. In this edition we cover:
Headlight motoring news welcome to Headlight, Dolmans Solicitors motoring news bulletin. In this edition we cover: case summaries exaggeration Carl Fletcher v Anthony Keatley (a minor) [2017] improper
More informationCosts E-journal. January 2013
Costs E-journal January 2013 Editorial Another year, another edition of our occasional publication, Ropewalk Chambers Costs E-journal. In this issue we consider certain points of practice and procedure
More informationGuide to Personal Injury Claims Procedure
Guide to Personal Injury Claims Procedure Second Edition John McQuater LLB, LLM Head of Litigation, Atherton Godfrey Solicitors Published by Jordan Publishing Limited 21 St Thomas Street Bristol BS1 6JS
More informationTHE LAW SOCIETY CONVEYANCING ARBITRATION RULES
THE LAW SOCIETY CONVEYANCING ARBITRATION RULES (For disputes arising under the Contract for Sale of Land 2005 Edition) Preamble The Council of the Law Society of New South Wales resolved at a meeting on
More informationSpecimen. Specimen. Specimen. Specimen. pecimen
Client Ref. No. Please use the Notes for Guidance when completing this form. Note 1. Note 2. Note 3. Note 4. Note 5. Note 6. Note 7. Note 8. Note 9. Note 10. IN THE Between PARTICULARS OF CLAIM - CONTRACT
More informationDECISION AND REASONS
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Appeal Number: DC/00011/2017 THE IMMIGRATION ACTS Heard at Field House Decision & Reasons Promulgated On 7 December 2017 On 11 December 2017 Before UPPER
More informationBorder Security Bill. 2 May Attorney-General. Border Security Bill PCO5147/13 Our Ref: ATT114/1124(19)
Border Security Bill 2 May 2003 Attorney-General Border Security Bill PCO5147/13 Our Ref: ATT114/1124(19) 1. I have considered the Border Security Bill for consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights
More informationA Candidate s Guide to the NHS Employment Check Standards
A Candidate s Guide to the NHS Employment Check Standards What are NHS Employment Checks? The NHS Employment Check Standards outline the mandatory checks employers must carry out in the appointment, and
More informationWHAT IS A CONDITION AND PROGNOSIS REPORT AND WHAT PURPOSE DOES IT SERVE IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS?
CONDITION AND PROGNOSIS REPORTS BACK TO BASICS WHAT IS A CONDITION AND PROGNOSIS REPORT AND WHAT PURPOSE DOES IT SERVE IN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS? The purpose of damages awarded in personal injury/clinical negligence
More informationPrivacy. Purpose. Scope. Policy. Appendix A
Privacy NZQA Quality Management System Policy Appendix A Purpose To ensure NZQA and personnel meet the legal obligations under the Privacy Act 1993 and in relation to its functions under section 246A of
More informationEXPLAINING THE COURTS AN INFORMATION BOOKLET
EXPLAINING THE COURTS AN INFORMATION BOOKLET AT SOME STAGE IN OUR LIVES, EVERY ONE OF US IS LIKELY TO HAVE TO GO TO COURT FOR ONE REASON OR ANOTHER. WE MIGHT BE ASKED TO SIT ON A JURY OR TO GIVE EVIDENCE
More informationThe learner can: 1.1 Distinguish between the civil and criminal jurisdiction. 1.2 Explain the scope of civil litigation.
Unit 9 Title: Civil Litigation Level: 3 Credit Value: 7 Learning outcomes The learner will: 1 Understand the context of civil litigation within the English and Welsh legal system Assessment criteria The
More informationDirectors' Duties in Guernsey
Directors' Duties in Guernsey March 2018 1. OVERVIEW 1.1 This note provides a brief synopsis of the common law duties owed by directors of companies ("companies") incorporated in the Island of Guernsey
More informationMemorandum of Understanding. between. The Legal Aid Agency (LAA) and. Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)
Memorandum of Understanding between The Legal Aid Agency (LAA) and Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) 1 Introduction 1. The Legal Aid Agency (LAA) and the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) ( the
More informationPre-Action Protocol for Professional Negligence
Page 1 of 7 Pre-Action Protocol for Professional Negligence PROFESSIONAL NEGLIGENCE PRE-ACTION PROTOCOL THIS PROTOCOL MERGES THE TWO PROTOCOLS PREVIOUSLY PRODUCED BY THE SOLICITORS INDEMNITY FUND (SIF)
More informationPROTECTION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION ACT NO. 4 OF 2013
PROTECTION OF PERSONAL INFORMATION ACT NO. 4 OF 2013 [ASSENTED TO 19 NOVEMBER, 2013] [DATE OF COMMENCEMENT TO BE PROCLAIMED] (Unless otherwise indicated) (The English text signed by the President) This
More informationTHE LMAA TERMS (2006)
THE LONDON MARITIME ARBITRATORS ASSOCIATION THE LMAA TERMS (2006) Effective for appointments on and after 1st January 2006 THE LMAA TERMS (2006) PRELIMINARY 1. These Terms may be referred to as the LMAA
More informationINTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES IN THE ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NAFTA AND THE ICSID CONVENTION BETWEEN:
INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR SETTLEMENT OF INVESTMENT DISPUTES IN THE ARBITRATION UNDER CHAPTER ELEVEN OF THE NAFTA AND THE ICSID CONVENTION BETWEEN: MOBIL INVESTMENTS CANADA INC. Claimant AND GOVERNMENT OF
More informationDISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO
DISCIPLINE COMMITTEE OF THE COLLEGE OF NURSES OF ONTARIO This decision was followed by an appeal, the results of which can be found at the end of this document. PANEL: Sarah Corkey, RN Chairperson Susan
More informationCCTV Code of Practice
CCTV Code of Practice Belfast Trust CCTV Code of Practice Introduction Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) systems are in place across the Belfast trust. These systems comprise of cameras installed at strategic
More informationLaw Society of Alberta Trust Safety Approvals Guideline
Format updated April 2016 Table of Contents...1 I. The Nature of this Guideline...1 II. Statutory Role and Mandate...1 III. Setting up as a Sole Proprietor or a Firm...2 IV. Designation of a Responsible
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN CELEST CHAITRAM AND ANDREW SAHATOO MOTOR ONE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
IN THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO CV2011-03223 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE BETWEEN CELEST CHAITRAM AND Claimant ANDREW SAHATOO MOTOR ONE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ******************************************
More informationPrivately Funded Civil Litigation CFAs and DBAs Frequently Asked Questions
Privately Funded Civil Litigation CFAs and DBAs Frequently Asked Questions Updated October 2017 The Bar Council frequently receives enquiries from barristers and clerks in relation to Conditional Fee Agreements
More informationHealth Information Privacy Code 1994
Health Information Privacy Code 1994 Incorporating amendments Privacy Commissioner Te Mana Matapono Matatapu New Zealand The Code of Practice comprises clauses 1-7 and rules 1-12. To assist with the use
More informationGuidance on the RIBA Code of Practice for Chartered Practices - complaint procedures.
Guidance on the RIBA Code of Practice for Chartered Practices - complaint procedures. Foreword The RIBA is a chartered professional body formed to advance architecture by demonstrating benefit to society
More informationMultiplex Constructions (UK) Ltd v Mott Macdonald Ltd [2007] Adj.L.R. 01/10
JUDGMENT: MR JUSTICE JACKSON: TCC. 10 th January 2007. 1. This judgment is in six parts, namely Part 1 Introduction; Part 2 The Facts; Part 3 The Present Proceedings; Part 4 The Adjudicator's Jurisdiction;
More informationBefore: HIS HONOUR JUDGE WULWIK Between: - and -
IN THE COUNTY COURT AT CENTRAL LONDON Case No: B 90 YJ 688 Thomas More Building Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 13/12/2018 Start Time: 14:09 Finish Time: 14:49 Page Count: 12 Word
More informationSPEED ENFORCEMENT GUIDELINES
Security Classification: UNCLASSIFIED Accessible on the ACPO Intranet by: All Contents may be seen by: General Public subject to Copyright Author: Kenneth Williams Force/Organisation: Norfolk Constabulary
More informationCivil Procedure Act 2010
Examinable excerpts of Civil Procedure Act 2010 as at 2 October 2018 1 Purposes CHAPTER 1 PRELIMINARY (1) The main purposes of this Act are (a) to reform and modernise the laws, practice, procedure and
More informationCuthbert v Gair (t/a The Bowes Manor Equestrian Centre) [2008] APP.L.R. 09/03
JUDGMENT : Master Haworth : Costs Court. 3 rd September 2008 1. This is an appeal pursuant to CPR Rule 47.20 from a decision of Costs Officer Martin in relation to a detailed assessment which took place
More informationInformation Sheet - 01/2012. POBAL Reconciliation of grant related income and expenditure returns to POBAL with the annual financial statements
Information Sheet - 01/2012 POBAL Reconciliation of grant related income and expenditure returns to POBAL with the annual financial statements August 2012 Consultative Committee of Accountancy Bodies in
More informationJudge rules that a judgment creditor can take control of airplane even though wrong airport address was given to court on the Writ of Control
Judge rules that a judgment creditor can take control of airplane even though wrong airport address was given to court on the Writ of Control Midtown Acquisitions LLP v. Essar Global Fund Limited [2017]
More informationData Protection Act 1998
Data Protection Act 1998 1998 CHAPTER 29 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS Part I Preliminary 1. Basic interpretative provisions. 2. Sensitive personal data. 3. The special purposes. 4. The data protection principles.
More informationAnalysis of the Workplace Surveillance Bill 2005
Analysis of the Workplace Surveillance Bill 2005 16 May 2005 Introduction This paper sets out the Australian Privacy Foundation s analysis of the Workplace Surveillance Bill 2005 (NSW). The Workplace Surveillance
More informationData Protection Policy and Procedure
Data Protection Policy and Procedure Reference No. P09:2007 Implementation date 12022008 Version Number Version 2.0 Reference No: Name. Linked documents Policy Section Procedure Section Yes Yes Suitable
More informationBefore : HHJ WORSTER Between : - and -
IN THE BIRMINGHAM COUNTY COURT Case No: 3YK 77641 App Ref: BM30181A The Birmingham Civil Justice Centre, The Priory Courts, 33, Bull Street, Birmingham B4 6DS Before : HHJ WORSTER - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationTHE LMAA SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE
THE LONDON MARITIME ARBITRATORS ASSOCIATION THE LMAA SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE and COMMENTARY (Revised 1st January 2006) 1. INTRODUCTION THE LMAA SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE These provisions shall be known as
More information68 REPORTING MONEY LAUNDERING AND FINANCING OF TERRORISM ACTIVITY AND TRANSACTIONS
68 REPORTING MONEY LAUNDERING AND FINANCING OF TERRORISM ACTIVITY AND TRANSACTIONS 6.18.1 OF SECTION 1. This section outlines the statutory provisions concerning disclosurereporting that apply to: (i)
More informationCore Worker Exemption Application Guidance for Individuals
Core Worker Exemption Application Guidance for Individuals About this guide This guide will help you to complete the Core Worker Application Form. It provides information about the Core Worker Exemption
More informationDATA PROTECTION LAWS OF THE WORLD. Ukraine
DATA PROTECTION LAWS OF THE WORLD Ukraine Downloaded: 8 December 2017 UKRAINE Last modified 25 January 2017 LAW The Law of Ukraine No. 2297 VI 'On Personal Data Protection' as of 1 June 2010 (Data Protection
More informationUNIT 15 - Civil Litigation. Suggested Answers June 2010
UNIT 15 - Civil Litigation Suggested Answers June 2010 Note to Candidates and Tutors: The purpose of the suggested answers is to provide students and tutors with guidance as to the key points students
More informationMatters relevant to allocation to a track
1 Credit Hire and Storage: Post Jackson Things You Need to Know Andrew Mckie, Barrister Clerksroom -August 2013 Telephone 07739 964012/ 0845 083 3000 Email: andrewmckie@btinternet.com/ mckie@clerksroom.com
More informationb) How many outstanding arrest warrants does Suffolk Constabulary currently have?
Freedom of Information Request Reference N o : FOI 004789-17 I write in connection with your request for information received by Suffolk Constabulary on the 2 May 2017 in which you sought access to the
More informationCCTV CODE OF PRACTICE
EDINBURGH NAPIER UNIVERSITY CCTV CODE OF PRACTICE Introduction The monitoring, recording, holding and processing of images of identifiable individuals constitutes personal data as defined by the Data Protection
More informationagainst Members of Staff
Procedural Guidance Security Marking: Police Misconduct and Complaints against Members of Staff Not Protectively Marked Please click on the hyperlink for related Policy Statements 1. Introduction 1.1 This
More informationNotice of Decision of the Northern Ireland Social Care Council s Conduct Committee
Notice of Decision of the Northern Ireland Social Care Council s Conduct Committee Name: Radu Nasca SCR No: 6005361 Date: 22 August 2014 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Conduct Committee of the Northern
More informationI refer to your recent request for information which has been handled in accordance with the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002.
Our Ref: IM-FOI-2015-1472 Sir Stephen House QPM Chief Constable FREEDOM OF INFORMATION (SCOTLAND) ACT 2002 I refer to your recent request for information which has been handled in accordance with the Freedom
More informationB e f o r e: MRS JUSTICE LANG. Between: THE QUEEN ON THE APPLICATION OF DEAN Claimant
Neutral Citation Number: [2016] EWHC 3775 (Admin) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT CO/4951/2016 Royal Courts of Justice Strand London WC2A 2LL Thursday, 15 December
More information- and - OPINION. Reasons
IN THE MATTER OF THE DATA PROTECTION ACT 1998 AND IN THE MATTER OF A PROPOSED CONTRACT B E T W E E N: Cambridge Analytica Inc - and - Claimant United Kingdom Independence Party Defendant OPINION 1. We
More informationJUDGMENT APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING ACTION AGAINST BERNARD EBBERS. On this day of, 2005, a hearing having been held before this Court to
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE WORLDCOM, INC. : MASTER FILE NO. SECURITIES LITIGATION : 02 Civ. 3288 (DLC) : : This Document Relates to: : : 02 Civ. 3288 02 Civ. 4973
More informationChildren Cases and the Recovery of a Success Fee CPR 47, CPR 21, PD21 and PD46
CPR Update Robert Mills, St John s Chambers Published on 19 th October 2015 Below the key changes to the CPR from the 78 th 81 st Updates are analysed. This is not a complete list of all changes, but is
More informationStatutory Policy No 7 DATA PROTECTION POLICY
Statutory Policy No 7 DATA PROTECTION POLICY School Staff were consulted on this document and it was accepted by the Trust. Review Cycle November 2015 3 Years CHANGES November 2015 NONE This is a model
More informationRS SHIPPING BULLETIN
1 ARBITRATION... 2 1.1 ENFORCEMENT OF PEREMPTORY ORDER... 2 2 CONTRACT... 3 2.1 AFFIRMATION... 3 2.2 BINDING CONTRACT EXCHANGE OF EMAILS... 3 3 COSTS... 5 3.1 SECURITY FOR COSTS OF COUNTERCLAIM... 5 4
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE. Between STEPHEN LORENZO LODAI. And NAGICO INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED. (formerly known as GTM INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED)
THE REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE Claim No. C.V. 2014-01715 Between STEPHEN LORENZO LODAI Claimant And NAGICO INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED (formerly known as GTM INSURANCE COMPANY
More informationPractice Direction 9A Application for a Financial Remedy. Introduction. Pre-application protocol. Costs. Procedure before the first appointment
Practice Direction 9A Application for a Financial Remedy This Practice Direction supplements FPR Part 9 Introduction 1.1 Part 9 of the Family Procedure Rules sets out the procedure applicable to the financial
More informationThe Essential Toolkit for Junior Personal Injury & Clinical Negligence Lawyers
The Essential Toolkit for Junior Personal Injury & Clinical Negligence Lawyers DATE: Tuesday, 1 May 2018 TIME: VENUE: 1.00 pm - 5.20 pm, 101 Victoria Street, Bristol, BS1 6PU After the success of and fantastic
More information