United States of America v. Darren David Chaker United States District Court Southern District of Texas - Houston Division Case No.
|
|
- Eileen Walton
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 United States of America v. Darren David Chaker United States District Court Southern District of Texas - Houston Division Case No. H S EXPERT REPORT OF ERIN ELIZABETH JONES I. SCOPE OF ENGAGEMENT I have been retained by Darren Chaker to perform an analysis and provide opinions related to the case of the United States v. Darren David Chaker. To the extent that additional or updated information is made available for review and such additional or updated information impacts my findings, I may update this report II. CREDENTIALS Attached hereto as Exhibit A is my curriculum vitae setting forth relevant experience and qualifications. I am an attorney licensed in the State of Texas and I am admitted to practice before all federal courts in Texas as well as federal courts in Illinois, Delaware, Nevada and New York. I was admitted to practice in This is my twelfth year of practice with over 95% of my practice dedicated to bankruptcy and bankruptcy related litigation. The remaining 5% would be for commercial litigation not related to a bankruptcy case. My practice is primarily dedicated to the representation of interested parties in bankruptcy cases and bankruptcy related litigation. The largest part of my practice is representing bankruptcy trustees. I regularly represent bankruptcy trustees, estates, and other fiduciaries in bankruptcy proceedings. I also file bankruptcy cases for individuals and corporations as debtors in bankruptcy. In my practice of representing bankruptcy debtors, I regularly interview clients regarding their assets, debts, and other aspects of their financial condition. I represent creditors making claims in bankruptcy cases but I do not represent financial institutions. I have represented many bankruptcy estates and bankruptcy trustees to investigate and prosecute fraud claims. I have prosecuted dozens of fraud and fraudulent transfer claims in my years of practice. I often represent bankruptcy estates and bankruptcy trustees to find and recover assets that have been concealed or fraudulently removed from the reach of creditors. I have prosecuted claims seeking exception from discharge and dischargeability on the basis of fraud and misrepresentation. I have represented clients seeking to revoke a debtor s discharge for fraudulent concealment. I have successfully defended debtors in suits by creditors and/or trustees seeking an exception to discharge on the basis of fraud and misrepresentation. 1
2 III. MATERIALS REVIEWED The materials reviewed in connection with the preparation of this report are set forth on the attached Exhibit B. IV. BACKGROUND FACTS / TIMELINE OF KEY EVENTS 1. September 24, 2004: Darren Chaker ( Chaker ) acquired real property at Pampass Pass, Houston, Texas ( Pampass Pass Property ). Chaker was the borrower on the note and deed of trust for the Pampass Pass Property. 2. April 28, 2005: Nevada Spendthrift Trust ( Trust ) created. Chaker is the primary trustee and primary beneficiary of the Trust. Core Capital, LLC ( Core ) membership interests are assets of the Trust. 3. April 28, 2005 / May 3, 2005: Core formation documents executed on April 28, On May 3, 2005 Core is formed as a Nevada Limited Liability Company by filing formation documents. The Trust is a member of Core. Chaker is not individually a member of Core. Operating Agreement of Core indicates Pampass Pass Property was contributed to the Trust by Core. 4. September 6, 2005: Chaker conveyed to Core all individual right, title, and interest in the Pampass Pass Property. 5. December 5, 2006: Bankruptcy Case No filed for Darren Chaker individually ( First Bankruptcy Case ). This is Chaker s first bankruptcy case. Thomas Frederick Fred Jones, III and the firm of Bayley and Galyen appeared as counsel for Chaker in that case. In connection with preparing this report, I reviewed the bankruptcy schedules and statement of financial affairs filed in the First Bankruptcy Case and the docket sheet in the First Bankruptcy Case, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. 6. March 6, 2007: Bankruptcy Case No filed for Darren Chaker individually ( Second Bankruptcy Case ). This is Chaker s second bankruptcy case. Thomas Frederick Fred Jones, III and the firm of Bayley and Galyen appeared as counsel for Chaker in that case. In connection with preparing this report, I reviewed the bankruptcy schedules and statement of financial affairs filed in the Second Bankruptcy Case and the docket sheet in the Second Bankruptcy Case, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. 7. August 7, 2007: Bankruptcy Case No filed for Core Capital, LLC ( Core Capital Bankruptcy Case ). Thomas Frederick Fred Jones, III and the firm of Bayley 2
3 and Galyen appeared as counsel but employment denied. In connection with preparing this report, I reviewed the voluntary petition in the Core Capital Bankruptcy Case and the docket sheet in the Core Capital Bankruptcy Case, both of which are incorporated herein by reference. There are no bankruptcy schedules or statement of financial affairs filed in the Core Capital Bankruptcy Case. 8. In addition to the foregoing key facts, I reviewed and relied upon documents and facts set forth in documents and sources described on the list attached as Exhibit B to this report. V. SUMMARY OPINIONS AND BASES A. Did Mr. Chaker s Bankruptcy Counsel Exercise an Appropriate Standard of Care in his Representation of Mr. Chaker? In my opinion, bankruptcy counsel, which was the same in all three cases did not exercise an appropriate standard of care in the representation of Chaker and/or Core Capital, LLC. From a review of the schedules and statements of financial affairs, there are numerous errors that are obvious without any background knowledge regarding Chaker s financial condition. Some of these are common errors seen regularly in many cases which indicate a substandard level of care and attention to detail. The clerical errors also indicate a lack of familiarity with the computer program which creates the schedules and statements and a lack of understanding of how to properly fill out schedules and how the various sections of the schedules and statements interrelate to one another. It is possible to input data into one section of the software and if the proper radio buttons are not clicked, that same information may not appear in other places in the schedules. The schedules in all three cases appear to be created using the Bankruptcy Pro 1 (a/k/a Legal Pro) or Best Case 2 software, which I am familiar with and have used in my practice. There are other more substantive errors, which after reviewing the record, indicate a lack of diligence or care on the part of the attorney. Bankruptcy is not a practice area to dabble in. While I do not believe board certification is necessary to provide an appropriate standard of care for clients, I do believe that a consumer or commercial bankruptcy practice is too specialized of a practice area for the occasional practitioner. I believe the same is true for para-professional and administrative staff. The technical parts of the bankruptcy process are administrative in nature and it is heavily regulated by rules and procedures that must be followed carefully to be entitled to the relief requested. In addition to mastering the administrative aspects of a bankruptcy case, counsel must
4 also be well versed in their understanding of laws relating to property rights and property exemptions arising under various state and federal laws. The laws concerning property rights and exemptions are intricate and one must have mastery of these concepts in order to adequately represent a client in bankruptcy. Where there is real property and/or trust interests involved, I am certain that legal research would be required in order to ensure compliance with disclosure requirements under the bankruptcy forms. The record is absent of any evidence that Chaker s attorney did any research or diligence concerning the existence of the trust and the relationship to Chaker or Core Capital. The record indicates that such information was disclosed to Chaker s counsel. In my opinion, failing to exercise any diligence on this topic falls below the appropriate standard of care. I have developed a system for client interviews and information exchange to promote accuracy and compliance with the applicable laws concerning bankruptcy petition, schedules, and statements. I have developed this practice over a decade based upon my experiences filing bankruptcy cases and reviewing schedules and statements prepared by other attorneys. I regularly confer with other bankruptcy professionals to compare notes and many other attorneys use similar procedures to safeguard the integrity of the bankruptcy process. While there is no specific manner in which an attorney is required to interview his/her client, there are some basic steps which are common and every attorney should follow to ensure best practices. When preparing a bankruptcy case for a person or entity, I employ the following techniques to obtain the best result possible: (i) (ii) First, I require the prospective client to physically come to the office and have a face-to-face consultation with an attorney. I do not charge for consultations. I do not limit time for consultations. I do not believe that it is effective for the consultation to be done with a paralegal or legal assistant. At the conclusion of the initial consultation, I provide the prospective client with an extensive homework worksheet, information regarding where and how to obtain approved credit counseling, written materials explaining the various chapters of bankruptcy, and a questionnaire used by bankruptcy trustees. The questionnaire used by bankruptcy trustees is especially helpful because it is designed to help identify issues concerning asset transfers and trust interests. In my representation of bankruptcy trustees, I have found that it is not uncommon for a debtor to omit an interest from his/her schedules and statements but disclose it on the questionnaire. This is why I believe this is a helpful tool because it aids the client in understanding the extent and nature of disclosure required in a bankruptcy case. Unfortunately, this questionnaire is only officially used in chapter 7 cases. However, I give this questionnaire to all clients regardless of the chapter of bankruptcy which is appropriate for them because I believe the information it asks for is just another way to verify information in the schedules 4
5 and statements. The information sought by this questionnaire is just another layer of diligence that an attorney should perform. (iii) If the prospective client hires the firm, it is the firm s standard practice to provide a written engagement letter and a copy of the Texas Lawyers Creed. (iv) It is the firm s standard practice to require the client to provide all the information and documents requested in the homework worksheet before preparing the schedules and statements. I believe that when the material is provided in a piecemeal fashion, there is more opportunity for mistake, error, or inconsistency. (v) Once all the information is provided by the client, an attorney reviews and analyzes the information and if there are questions will call the client to clarify or verify information. In a typical bankruptcy case, a client will have at least 2-3 interactions with an attorney before preparation of schedules begin (some times more; rarely less). It is standard for attorneys to search various public information databases and other investigatory tools to verify the information provided by the Debtor. I do not believe that this has to be an exhaustive effort by an attorney, but there must be some external verification of data provided by a debtor in order to exercise an appropriate standard of care. (vi) It is the firm s standard practice for an attorney to enter the information provided by the client into the bankruptcy program to ensure proper categorization and scheduling of data. I do believe that data entry can be competently performed by a paralegal or legal assistant as long as the legal decisions are made by an attorney, the attorneys selections are clear to the person doing the data entry, and a lawyer carefully reviews the paralegals work through a quality control process. Based upon the records reviewed, I see no indication of attorney involvement in the preparation of the schedules and statement of financial affairs. (vii) Once a substantially completed draft of the schedules are ready, the client will come to the office for a face-to-face meeting with an attorney to review the draft schedules. Occasionally, a draft of the schedules is ed to the client in advance so that they may look over the schedules and provide comments in advance of the meeting. However, it is absolutely critical to meet the client in person to go through each page of the bankruptcy schedules. At the review meeting, an attorney will go page by page with the client and explain what each page means and make any corrections or revisions. If additional information is necessary, that information is required to be provided before preparing a final draft. (viii) When a final draft of the schedules is ready to be signed, the client must come to the office and sign the schedules in the office. I do not believe an attorney is exercising an appropriate standard of care by receiving a signature via electronic means when initiating a bankruptcy case. Unless the debtor signs the document where indicated and initials each page, there is really no way to verify that the 5
6 debtor actually read each and every page of the schedules prior to signing. Moreover, if an attorney does not see a debtor sign a document with his or her own eyes, there is no way to verify the debtor actually signed the schedules. As I appreciate the rules, an attorney must have an original wet copy of signed petition, schedules, and statements before filing a bankruptcy case. Attorneys are required to maintain original signatures in their files. When a case is filed electronically, the local bankruptcy rules require that an original Declaration of Electronic Filing of Bankruptcy Petition, Lists, Statements, and Schedules to be filed within 5 business days. Part II of the Declaration is a Declaration of Attorney which states: I declare UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY that: (1) I will give the debtor(s) a copy of all documents referenced by Part I herein which are filed with the United States Bankruptcy Court; and (2) I have informed the debtor(s), if an individual with primarily consumer debts, that he or she may proceed under chapter 7, 11, 12 or 13 of title 11, United States Code, and have explained the relief available under each chapter. This declaration must be signed and attested to by the filing attorney. Upon signing this document, an attorney is promising to provide the Debtor with a copy of the bankruptcy petition, schedules and statement of financial affairs. The records reviewed in this case indicate Chaker did not receive a full copy of his petition, schedules and statement of financial affairs to review. The records reviewed in this case indicate that Chaker did not receive a copy of his petition, schedules, and statement of financial affairs before signing the signature pages. The records reviewed indicate that Chaker was only provided with signature pages and did not have an opportunity to review his schedules and statement of financial affairs prior to them being filed in the First Bankruptcy Case. In my opinion, any attorney who would file a bankruptcy case without their client having seen and approved each and every page of the bankruptcy filing prior to the actual filing, has failed to exercise the appropriate standard of care. The schedules and statements in the Second Bankruptcy Case appear to be identical to the schedules and statements in the First Bankruptcy Case. According to the records reviewed, there is no indication of Chaker s consent to the filing of the Second Bankruptcy Case. The evidence indicates that he believed his First Bankruptcy Case was going to be reinstated. There is no indication of signatures provided for the filing of the Second Bankruptcy Case. As I understand the information I reviewed, there are no original signatures in existence for the Second Bankruptcy Case. Additionally in the Second Bankruptcy Case it appears as if there is no money paid by Chaker prior to the filing. Upon the filing of a Second Bankruptcy Case, Chaker would have had to file another filing fee and administrative fee. In 2007, the filing fee for a chapter 13 was $189 and the administrative fee was $39. I am not aware of any firm that will advance the 6
7 filing fee in a chapter 13 case. The fact that Chaker s attorneys advanced the filing fee is further indicia that the Second Bankruptcy Case was filed without Chaker s knowledge. It also suggests to me that Chaker believed the Second Bankruptcy Case filing was just a reinstatement of the First Bankruptcy Case. In my opinion Chaker s attorney did not exercise a reasonable standard of care in filing a Second Bankruptcy Case without Chaker s consent and signature. Indeed, in my opinion such conduct is fraudulent. If there were errors or omissions in schedules not signed or authorized to be filed by Chaker, those statements could not be made with fraudulent intent because they never should have been made absent Chaker s consent and authorization. The standard of care that a filing attorney must exercise is governed by, among other things, the following statutes and rules: 11 U.S.C. 707(b)(4)(C) states in pertinent part: (C) (i) (ii) (I) (II) The signature of an attorney on a petition, pleading, or written motion shall constitute a certification that the attorney has performed a reasonable investigation into the circumstances that gave rise to the petition, pleading, or written motion; and determined that the petition, pleading, or written motion is well grounded in fact; and is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law and does not constitute an abuse under paragraph (1) 11 U.S.C. 707(b)(4)(D) states in pertinent part: (D) The signature of an attorney on the petition shall constitute a certification that the attorney has no knowledge after an inquiry that the information in the schedules filed with such petition is incorrect. Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9011 states in pertinent part: (a) Signing of papers Every petition, pleading, written motion, and other paper, except a list, schedule, or statement, or amendments thereto, shall be signed by at least one attorney of record in the attorney's individual name. A party who is not represented by an attorney shall sign all papers. Each paper shall state the signer's address and telephone number, if any. An unsigned paper shall be stricken unless omission of the signature is corrected promptly after being called to the attention of the attorney or party. (b) Representations to the court 7
8 By presenting to the court (whether by signing, filing, submitting, or later advocating) a petition, pleading, written motion, or other paper, an attorney or unrepresented party is certifying that to the best of the person's knowledge, information, and belief, formed after an inquiry reasonable under the circumstances, (1) it is not being presented for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation; (2) the claims, defenses, and other legal contentions therein are warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law or the establishment of new law; (3) the allegations and other factual contentions have evidentiary support or, if specifically so identified, are likely to have evidentiary support after a reasonable opportunity for further investigation or discovery; and (4) the denials of factual contentions are warranted on the evidence or, if specifically so identified, are reasonably based on a lack of information or belief. The following cases interpret the extent to which various courts believe an attorney must inform and advise his/her client in a bankruptcy case: In re Withrow, 391 B.R. 217, (Bankr.D.Mass 2008) : Inasmuch as Rule 9011 and the 707(b)(4)(C) standard is to be a reasonable one, it must be tested objectively. Id. Accordingly, it seems to this Court that the answers to at least the following questions are germane to a Rule 9011 and 707(b)(4)(C) analysis: (1) did the attorney impress upon the debtor the critical importance of accuracy in the preparation of documents to be presented to the Court; (2) did the attorney seek from the debtor, and then review, whatever documents were within the debtor's possession, custody or control in order to verify the information provided by the debtor; (3) did the attorney employ such external verification tools as were available and not time or cost prohibitive (e.g., on-line real estate title compilations, on-line lien search, tax scripts ); (4) was any of the information provided by the debtor and then set forth in the debtor's court filings internally inconsistent that is, was there anything which should have obviously alerted the attorney that the information provided by the debtor could not be accurate; and (5) did the attorney act promptly to correct any information presented to the Court which turned out, notwithstanding the attorney's best efforts, to be inaccurate. These questions can be further simplified and reduced to one question, their common denominator: Did the attorney do his or her level best to get it right? More cannot, and should not, be asked of any attorney. And when an attorney appears to have provided less, an inquiry under Rule 9011 and 707(b)(4)(C) is proper. In re Trudell, 424 B.R. 786, 791 (Bankr.W.D.MI 2010): Whether Rule 9011 applies to statements of affairs and schedules is debatable. However, Section 707(b)(4)(D), which was added to the Code as part of the 2005 amendments, unquestionably imposes a duty upon the debtor's attorney to ensure the accuracy of his client's schedules. 8
9 A reading of the statutes, rules, and small sample of cases on the issue reveal that it is expected for an attorney to employ a process with as many safeguards as possible to avoid material errors and omissions in a bankruptcy filing. Errors and omissions regularly occur in bankruptcy cases. I have yet to attend a panel of 341 creditors meetings where debtors are not sent home to make corrections and amendments to their schedules and statements. I would estimate, in my experience, that errors and omissions occur in at least 30-40% of cases filed (if not more). I have seen cases in which the errors and omissions are far more material than in the Chaker case without so much as a second glance. In my opinion, most of the errors and omissions that I see in bankruptcy cases appear to stem from a combination of factors, including: (1) consumer debtors fundamental lack of understanding of financial documents and concepts; (2) consumer debtors stress and anxiety over the bankruptcy process and financial pressures; and (3) attorneys failure to do an adequate investigation and interview of the client to obtain facts necessary to discover information necessary to prepare an accurate filing. In my opinion, most of the errors and omissions that I see in typical consumer bankruptcy cases are inadvertent and can be remedied with simple amendments. In relation to the third factor cited above, this problem appears to be more prevalent in cases where debtors are represented by lawyers who lack sufficient experience in bankruptcy and in cases where debtors are represented by firms that have a high volume practice. In light of the low success rates for chapter 13 cases and the fact that attorneys are paid as the case progresses, the profit margins are very thin. In order to maintain competitiveness, firms delegate a substantial amount of work to paralegals which should be performed by attorneys. While there are many reputable firms that do high volume bankruptcy filings and have very competent staff who do excellent work, there are many that do a very poor job of representing clients adequately. In an effort to promote accuracy, fairness and to improve professionalism among the consumer bankruptcy bar, the Southern District of Texas has implemented substantial changes to local procedures and practices since There have been many changes to the chapter 13 practice since The problems with inaccuracies and inconsistencies were exacerbated by the amendments to the Bankruptcy Code in October 2005 and the implosion of the subprime market. The amendments to the Bankruptcy Code (referred to as BAPCPA ) were substantial and included many new concepts, forms, and requirements. As the effective date of BAPCPA approached in October 2005, there was a proliferation of filings. In the period right after the BAPCPA amendments were effective, there were cases filed under the old rules and cases filed under the new rules and the melding of the two regimes proved to be very challenging to bankruptcy professionals. The changes to the Bankruptcy Code were significant and there was a certain sense of chaos and uncertainty in the time frame. Moreover, the bankruptcy computer programs used to generate schedules were constantly changing and updating to 3 There have also been many changes to rules and local procedures to improve professionalism, fairness, and accuracy among lawyers practicing in commercial bankruptcy cases as well. The improvements made to local practices were not limited to consumer cases. 9
10 accommodate the changes to the Bankruptcy Code. As the subprime crisis grew and foreclosures increased, the Southern District of Texas standardized many forms and practices to cut down on inaccuracies and to improve professionalism on the debtor and creditor sides of the cases. The Official Forms for the petition, schedules, and statements are more or less the same (with a few very notable changes). What was confusing during that time frame was how to fill them out accurately in light of all the changes to the code and local practices. In my opinion and experience, most consumer debtors do not have a sophisticated understanding of the official forms for the bankruptcy petition, schedules, and statements. Consumer debtors often do not understand their own financial documents. Consumer debtors often do not understand what constitutes an asset or property interest. Consumer debtors rarely understand that lawsuits are assets and this must be explained to them carefully. Consumer debtors often believe that if an asset has no value then it is not an asset. Consumer debtors tend to equate value with the need for disclosure. In my opinion, it is a lawyer s duty to provide sufficient instruction to a client to help them understand this. I do not believe that failing to do so is fraudulent on the part of the attorney but it does indicate inadequate representation falling below the standard of care. A client must be interviewed properly and assisted in understanding exactly what information is sought and required. Clients must be cautioned of the importance and need for full disclosure. Based upon the records reviewed, it does not appear as if Chaker received an adequate amount of instruction concerning the nature and extent of disclosure required in his case. The records reviewed do not indicate that Chaker was counseled regarding how the trust should be disclosed. The records reviewed indicate that the trust was disclosed to Chaker s attorneys. The records reviewed do not indicate any follow up effort by the attorneys to understand the nature of the trust so that it could be adequately addressed on the schedules and statement of financial affairs. The records reviewed do not indicate counseling for Chaker concerning the consequences of errors and omissions. In my opinion, it does not appear that Chaker was adequately advised or informed of the nature and extent of disclosure required. However, all of the counseling in the world would not help to ensure proper disclosure if a debtor is deprived of the opportunity to review schedules and statements before filing and certainly if not given the opportunity to sign the schedules and statements before filing. Finally, Debtors do not actually fill out their own forms for filing. Debtors are asked for data and information and then that data and information has to be interpreted by a lawyer and then plugged in to software to generate the forms that are filed. If the lawyer or his/her staff (i) do not get the right information from the client; (ii) do not properly interpret the information given; (iii) do not properly apply the law; or (iv) fail to include the information on the schedules and statements; then it is not only possible but probable that the client will not understand or even notice the error(s) on their filed documents. This appears to be the case based upon the records reviewed. It appears as if the information concerning the existence of the trust and the rental of the Pampass Pass Property were disclosed to the attorneys. It appears from the 10
11 attorney s notes that he was aware of the existence of the property and trust and that he failed to make inquiry. The records reviewed indicate that Chaker provided information of another attorney familiar with the trust to his bankruptcy attorney. The record indicates that his bankruptcy attorney made no inquiry to the Nevada attorney. In my opinion, it falls below the standard of care for Chaker s attorneys to have failed to inquire further regarding the nature of the trust and/or to disclose its existence in various places in the schedules and statements. B. Are the alleged errors/omissions of Mr. Chaker in his bankruptcy cases material? (1) Did Chaker conceal and fail to disclose membership interest and association with Core Capital? Based upon the records reviewed, Chaker was not a member of Core Capital. Accordingly, I do not believe he had a property interest in Core Capital to disclose. I do not believe it is an error or omission and certainly not material to fail to disclose something in which the debtor has no property interest under 11 U.S.C. 541 and applicable state law. It appears as if the income received from the rental of the property was disclosed in Schedule I as current income from a source other than wages. While the interest in the rental income may not be disclosed in all the right places in the schedules, it is disclosed in at least one very prominent place. In my opinion, the disclosure of the income by Chaker in Schedule I is not consistent with concealment. Chaker did not conceal or fail to disclose membership interest and association with Core Capital because it was disclosed to his attorneys. Chaker did not conceal or fail to disclose membership interest and association with Core Capital because he never signed the petition, schedules, or statements in the Second Bankruptcy Case which was filed without his consent. (2) Did Chaker conceal funds obtained from rental income from Pampass by failing to disclose in Schedule G and Statement of Financial Affairs (Question No. 1 Income from Operation of Business)? It appears as if the income received from the rental of the property was disclosed in Schedule I as current income from a source other than wages. While the interest in the rental income may not be disclosed in all the right places in the schedules, it is disclosed in at least one very prominent place. In my opinion, the disclosure of the income by Chaker in Schedule I is not consistent with concealment. If Chaker is not the leasing party for the Pampass Pass Property, then it would not be appropriate to include the lease on Schedule G. Chaker did not conceal or fail to disclose rental income from Pampass because it was disclosed to his attorneys. Chaker did not conceal or fail to disclose rental income from Pampass because he never signed the 11
12 petition, schedules, or statements in the Second Bankruptcy Case which was filed without his consent. (3) Did Chaker falsely testify in the Second Bankruptcy Case when he stated that the Pampass Pass Property never leased out prior to January 2007? Based upon a review of the transcript of the hearing in the Second Bankruptcy Case, it appears that Chaker stated the he had not leased the Property prior to Given that Chaker did not personally own the Pampass Pass Property, he would not have been the leasing party. Accordingly, I do not believe this is a false statement. I also note from the record of that hearing that Chaker appears to not be familiar with the schedules and statements filed in the case (consistent with not having seen them before being filed) and appears to be quite confused. (4) Did Chaker falsely testify in the Core Capital Bankruptcy Case when he said if I was asked the question of if its rented or who owns it, yeah, absolutely, I would have said that s Core Capital? Based upon the records reviewed, it appears as if Chaker did everything he knew to do to disclose the existence of the trust, Core Capital, and the rental income to his attorneys. It appears as if Chaker relied on counsel to ensure that property interests were adequately disclosed. It appears from the record that the income from the rental of the Pampass Pass Property was disclosed. The records reviewed indicate that Chaker was never asked who owns the Pampass Pass Property. The records review only discussion concerning the income and feasibility of a chapter 13 plan based on that income. In my opinion, it is not false testimony for Chaker to state what he would have done in a hypothetical scenario. (5) Did Chaker intentionally fail to attend the 341 creditors meeting as part of the scheme or artifice? Many debtors inexcusably and inexplicably miss their scheduled 341 meetings or arrive late. In my opinion, an unacceptable number of debtors miss their scheduled 341 meetings. I did not find any evidence that Chaker purposefully missed his 341 meeting of creditors. I believe it is the attorneys responsibility to communicate these dates to clients to ensure their compliance with attending the meeting. I do not see any evidence indicating that Chaker s attorneys informed Chaker of his meeting time and date. My firm sends a letter and to every client with information about the date, time and location of their 341 meeting as well as information about where to park, how to get through security at the courthouse, and what materials they should bring. A review of the record indicates that Chaker did not receive the notices of his 12
13 341 meetings at the address listed in the petition. The P.O. Box address given by his attorneys was forwarding to Chaker s proper address and it took months for Chaker to receive mail. It also appears as if faxes were sent to the wrong fax number and therefore fax notice was not accomplished. It does not appear from the records reviewed that Chaker had actual notice of the 341 meeting dates and therefore it is my opinion that he did not purposefully fail to attend those meetings as part of a fraudulent scheme. (6) Did Chaker file the chapter 13 to obtain the automatic stay as part of the scheme or artifice? The primary reason for filing a chapter 13 case is to obtain the automatic stay to prevent the foreclosure of a home or repossession of a car. The Bankruptcy Code is designed precisely to afford debtors this protection. If a debtor is a repeat filer with no hope of reorganization, the debtor will not get the benefit of the automatic stay beyond 30 days. In the case of a repeat filer, if the circumstances have not substantially changed between filings to justify an extension of the automatic stay beyond 30 days, there really is no benefit to the subsequent filing. It is a perfectly legitimate reason to file a bankruptcy case to prevent a foreclosure. Moreover, the evidence in this case indicates that the income from the rental of the Pampass Pass Property were to be used under the chapter 13 plan to pay the secured creditor. The record indicates that the chapter 13 case was filed to become current on a going forward basis and to catch up the arrearage on the Pampass Pass Property. In my opinion, if a chapter 13 case is filed (even a repeat filing) and the plan is to pay the mortgage, the clear purpose of the chapter 13 case is reorganization. It is not fraudulent to seek to reorganize mortgage debt through a chapter 13 plan; indeed it is the purpose of chapter 13 to do so. C. Did Chaker s attorney exercise appropriate standard of care in the maintenance and retention of the client file? It appears from the records reviewed that Chaker s attorneys failed to maintain the client files. The records reviewed indicate that documents in the file were destroyed and or deleted. The records reviewed indicate that it was Bayley and Galyen s policy to retain such files. The records reviewed indicate that notwithstanding the firm s policy to retain such files, those files were nevertheless destroyed and/or deleted. The record reviewed also indicates alterations to the parts of the file that exist. The local rules of this district clearly require retention of original documents. See In my opinion, Chaker s 13
14 attorneys conduct in destroying, deleting, or altering his file and failing to maintain original signatures falls far below the appropriate standard of care. Index of Exhibits 1. Exhibit A - Curriculum Vitae of Erin E. Jones 2. Exhibit B - Index of Documents Reviewed 14
Case Document 23 Filed in TXSB on 06/18/13 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 13-80149 Document 23 Filed in TXSB on 06/18/13 Page 1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION ENTERED 06/18/2013 ) IN RE ) ) CURTIS COLTON
More informationscc Doc 51 Filed 07/16/15 Entered 07/16/15 15:54:38 Main Document Pg 1 of 23
Pg 1 of 23 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) SABINE OIL & GAS CORPORATION, et al., 1 ) Case No. 15-11835 (SCC) ) Debtors. ) (Joint Administration Requested)
More informationFederal Rules of Civil Procedure
1 of 7 10/10/2005 11:14 AM Federal Rules of Civil Procedure collection home tell me more donate search V. DEPOSITIONS AND DISCOVERY > Rule 26. Prev Next Notes Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery;
More informationCase JDP Doc 77 Filed 09/27/11 Entered 09/27/11 14:10:45 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 5
Document Page 1 of 5 David W. Newman, ISBN 8251 Mary P. Kimmel, ISBN 3786 Office of the United States Trustee United States Department of Justice 720 Park Blvd, Ste 220 Boise, Idaho 83712 (208) 334-1300
More informationRule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ]
Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure [ Proposed Amendment ] (a) Required Disclosures; Methods to Discover Additional Matter. (1) Initial Disclosures. Except to the extent
More informationrdd Doc 825 Filed 12/11/17 Entered 12/11/17 16:29:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 4
17-22770-rdd Doc 825 Filed 12/11/17 Entered 12/11/17 16:29:55 Main Document Pg 1 of 4 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) 21st CENTURY ONCOLOGY HOLDINGS,
More informationCase KRH Doc 1 Filed 06/22/16 Entered 06/22/16 16:42:55 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 6
Document Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division In re: Chapter 11 HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY, INC., et al., Debtors. 8 Case No.: 15-32919-KRH
More informationCase KRH Doc 1 Filed 06/22/16 Entered 06/22/16 17:28:53 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9
Document Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division In re: Chapter 11 HEALTH DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY, INC., et al., Debtors. 5 Case No.: 15-32919-KRH
More informationCase LSS Doc 322 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 14-10791-LSS Doc 322 Filed 01/12/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: DYNAVOX, INC., et al., 1 Chapter 11 Case No. 14-10791 (LSS) Debtors. (Jointly
More informationCase 2:05-cv TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-00195-TJW Document 211 Filed 12/21/2005 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION DIGITAL CHOICE OF TEXAS, LLC V. CIVIL NO. 2:05-CV-195(TJW)
More informationSupplement to Report on Legal Opinions to Third Parties in Georgia Real Estate Secured Transactions
Supplement to Report on Legal Opinions to Third Parties in Georgia Real Estate Secured Transactions This Supplement to Report on Legal Opinions to Third Parties in Georgia Real Estate Secured Transactions
More informationAMENDMENT (To amend, circle or identify item(s) being amended.) TERMINATE RELATIONSHIP (eg: employment, sponsorship, etc) SURRENDER
FORM MU4 Date of filing (MM/DD/YYYY): MULTISTATE UNIFORM INDIVIDUAL LICENSURE FORM NEW APPLICATION AMENDMENT (To amend, circle or identify item(s) being amended.) ESTABLISH RELATIONSHIP TERMINATE RELATIONSHIP
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 191 North First St., SAN JOSE, CA 95113
1 1 1 1 1 HI&RH Prince Anthony-Victor III: Guancione, Sui Juris, the natural man Rosalie Aubreé Guancione Sui Juris, the natural woman (aka HI&RH Empress Aubreé Regina Dei Gratia, c/o U.S.P.O. Postmaster,
More informationCase Doc 65 Filed 11/08/17 Entered 11/08/17 14:21:15 Desc Main Document Page 6 of 24
Document Page 6 of 24 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION In re BESTWALL LLC, 1 Chapter 11 Case No. 17-31795 Debtor. NOTICE, CASE MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE
More informationCase 1:14-cv RMB-JS Document 38 Filed 06/28/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 241
Case 1:14-cv-08115-RMB-JS Document 38 Filed 06/28/16 Page 1 of 17 PageID: 241 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE GLENN M. WILLIAMS : Civil No. 14-8115 (RMB/JS)
More informationAMENDMENT (To amend, circle or identify item(s) being amended.) SURRENDER
FORM MU2 Date of filing (MM/DD/YYYY): MULTISTATE UNIFORM FORM FOR CONTROL PERSON NEW APPLICATION AMENDMENT (To amend, circle or identify item(s) being amended.) SURRENDER OTHER (review jurisdiction-specific
More informationPRACTICE GUIDE JEFFREY P. NORMAN UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE
PRACTICE GUIDE JEFFREY P. NORMAN UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE The following is intended to serve as an informational guide to common issues encountered in the Shreveport and Monroe Bankruptcy Courts.
More information: : Upon the motion dated as of November 8, 2010 (the Motion ), 1 of Ambac Financial
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x In re AMBAC FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., Debtor. ---------------------------------------------------------------x
More informationOfficial Form 410 Proof of Claim
Claim #135 Date Filed: 10/17/2017 Fill in this information to identify the case: Toisa Limited Debtor United States Bankruptcy Court for the: Southern District of New York (State) Case number 17-10184
More informationBEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD BRENT LAVELLE BARBOUR VSB DOCKET NO.: ORDER OF REVOCATION
V I R G I N I A: BEFORE THE VIRGINIA STATE BAR DISCIPLINARY BOARD IN THE MATTER OF BRENT LAVELLE BARBOUR VSB DOCKET NO.: 16-102-106014 ORDER OF REVOCATION This matter came on to be heard on February 16,
More informationWASHINGTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CIVIL PROCEDURES (Revised June, 2012)
WASHINGTON COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT CIVIL PROCEDURES (Revised June, 2012) 1 I. PRETRIAL PROCEDURE A. FILING PAPERS All documents submitted for filing should be hole-punched at the head of the document with
More informationCase KJC Doc 108 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Chapter 11
Case 16-11247-KJC Doc 108 Filed 06/29/16 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: INTERVENTION ENERGY HOLDINGS, LLC., et al., Chapter 11 Case No. 16-11247(KJC) Debtors.
More informationNACC Standards for Child Welfare Law Attorney Specialty Certification California Specific
NACC Standards for Child Welfare Law Attorney Specialty Certification California Specific Section 1 General Principles Section 2 Standards for Certification Part 5 Examination Part 6 Writing Sample Part
More informationAmendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (Effective December 1, 2007)
Amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (Effective December 1, 2007) The attached amendments to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure were approved by the Judicial Conference at its
More informationCase 0:06-cv JIC Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2013 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 0:06-cv-61337-JIC Document 86 Entered on FLSD Docket 06/27/2013 Page 1 of 10 KEITH TAYLOR, v. Plaintiff, NOVARTIS PHARMACEUTICALS CORPORATION, Defendant. / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT
More informationFor Preview Only - Please Do Not Copy
Information & Instructions: Sample Bankruptcy Filing Instructions For A Chapter 11 Case SAMPLE BANKRUPTCY FILING INSTRUCTIONS FOR A CHAPTER 11 CASE 1. The following instructions explain the fees, order
More informationJUDICIARY OF GUAM ELECTRONIC FILING RULES 1
1 1 Adopted by the Supreme Court of Guam pursuant to Promulgation Order No. 15-001-01 (Oct. 2, 2015). TABLE OF CONTENTS DIVISION I - AUTHORITY AND SCOPE Page EFR 1.1. Electronic Document Management System.
More informationIN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO ENTRY
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT, PREBLE COUNTY, OHIO IN THE MATTER OF THE CIVIL AND CRIMINAL LOCAL RULES: ENTRY The following local rules are adopted to govern the practice and procedures of this Court, subject
More informationWe are pleased to greet you as a prospective client of this firm. We thank you sincerely for selecting this law firm for your legal needs.
Attorneys: William H. Kain Michael P. Burke Stephanie R. Holguin Andrew Smith RE: Attached fee agreement Dear Prospective Client: We are pleased to greet you as a prospective client of this firm. We thank
More informationCase Document 173 Filed in TXSB on 07/16/13 Page 1 of 92 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Case 09-36608 Document 173 Filed in TXSB on 07/16/13 Page 1 of 92 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: Case No. 09 36608 SHONTEL & SARIKA BRADLEY, Chapter 7
More informationLOCAL BANKRUPTCY RULE NOTICES OF CLAIMS BAR DATES IN CHAPTER 11 CASES
LBR 3001-1 LOCAL BANKRUPTCY RULE 3001-1 NOTICES OF CLAIMS BAR DATES IN CHAPTER 11 CASES In all chapter 11 cases where the court orders a bar date for the filing of claims, the debtor in possession or the
More informationCase Doc 52 Filed 10/01/15 Entered 10/01/15 16:38:57 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 9
Document Page 1 of 9 David H. Bundy (AK Bar 7210043) DAVID H. BUNDY, P.C. 310 K Street, Suite 200 Anchorage, Alaska 99501 Telephone: (907) 248-8431 Facsimile: (907) 248-8434 Timothy A. ( Tad ) Davidson
More informationMOTION OF THE OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS FOR AN ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES FOR COMPLIANCE WITH 11 U.S.C.
KRAMER LEVIN NAFTALIS & FRANKEL LLP 1177 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036 Telephone: (212) 715-3275 Facsimile: (212) 715-8000 Thomas Moers Mayer Kenneth H. Eckstein Robert T. Schmidt Adam
More informationThe Proposed National Chapter 13 Plan And Related Proposed Amendments to Bankruptcy Rules
The Proposed National Chapter 13 Plan And Related Proposed Amendments to Bankruptcy Rules Presented by: Hon. William Houston Brown United States Bankruptcy Judge, Retired williamhoustonbr@comcast.net and
More informationCase tmb7 Doc 16 Filed 12/05/13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ) ) ) ) ) ) MOTION
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Michael Fuller, Oregon Bar No. 09357 Trial Attorney for Ms. Hunt OlsenDaines, PC PO Box 2316 Portland, Oregon 97208 Michael@UnderdogLawBlog.com Mobile 503-201-4570 Fax 503-362-1375
More informationSigned June 24, 2017 United States Bankruptcy Judge
The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described. Signed June 24, 2017 United States Bankruptcy Judge IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE NORTHERN
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT LOCAL RULES WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT LOCAL RULES WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS November 7, 2005 i LOCAL COURT RULES OF THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ii UNITED STATES DISTRICT
More informationSenate Bill No. 72 Senators Care and Amodei
Senate Bill No. 72 Senators Care and Amodei CHAPTER... AN ACT relating to business entities; adopting the Uniform Limited Partnership Act (2001) and providing for its applicability on a voluntary basis;
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION In Re: ) ) Case No. 99-57163 BRANDON KEV ROSENBERG and ) JULIE ANN ROSENBERG ) ) Chapter 7 Debtors ) - - - - - - - - - - -
More informationCase Doc 1 Filed 03/24/16 Entered 03/24/16 13:35:52 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Document Page 1 of 18 In Re: Paul Hansmeier, Debtor. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Chapter 7 Bankruptcy No. 15-42460 Daniel M. McDermott, United States Trustee, Plaintiff, Adv. No.
More informationScott Gessler. Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
STATE OF COLORADO Scott Gessler Secretary of State Department of State 100 Broadway Suzanne Staiert Suite 00 Denver, CO 00 Deputy Secretary of State Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Office of the Secretary
More informationIN THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE
COURT CODE: 1780 Your Name: Address: City, State, Zip: Phone: Email: Self-Represented IN THE FAMILY DIVISION OF THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF WASHOE
More informationCase Doc 554 Filed 08/07/15 Entered 08/07/15 18:36:50 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 15
Case 13-31943 Doc 554 Filed 08/07/15 Entered 08/07/15 183650 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 15 B104 (FORM 104) (08/07) ADVERSARY PROCEEDING COVER SHEET (Instructions on Reverse) ADVERSARY PROCEEDING NUMBER
More informationCase Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 1 of 18
Case 18-30197 Document 763 Filed in TXSB on 11/06/18 Page 1 of 18 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 LOCKWOOD HOLDINGS, INC., et
More informationThe court annexed arbitration program.
NEVADA ARBITRATION RULES (Rules Governing Alternative Dispute Resolution, Part B) (effective July 1, 1992; as amended effective January 1, 2008) Rule 1. The court annexed arbitration program. The Court
More informationRULES GOVERNING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION
RULES GOVERNING ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION A. GENERAL PROVISIONS Rule 1. Definitions. As used in these rules: (A) Arbitration means a process whereby a neutral third person, called an arbitrator, considers
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE. Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PATENT CASE SCHEDULE Event Service of Complaint Scheduled Time Total Time After Complaint Answer or Other Response to Complaint 5 weeks Initial
More informationCase Document 593 Filed in TXSB on 03/16/18 Page 1 of 9
Case 17-36709 Document 593 Filed in TXSB on 03/16/18 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION In re: Chapter 11 COBALT INTERNATIONAL ENERGY,
More informationSEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA
SEMINOLE TRIBE OF FLORIDA Tribal Court Small Claims Rules of Procedure Table of Contents RULE 7.010. TITLE AND SCOPE... 3 RULE 7.020. APPLICABILITY OF RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE... 3 RULE 7.040. CLERICAL
More information1 of 1 DOCUMENT. Collier Consumer Bankruptcy Forms. Copyright 2009, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., a member of the LexisNexis Group.
Page 1 1 of 1 DOCUMENT Collier Consumer Bankruptcy Forms Copyright 2009, Matthew Bender & Company, Inc., a member of the LexisNexis Group. Part CS6 Modifying, Maintaining and Enforcing the Automatic Stay
More informationCase KJC Doc 441 Filed 09/11/18 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 17-12913-KJC Doc 441 Filed 09/11/18 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Dex Liquidating Co. (f/k/a Dextera Surgical Inc.), 1 Debtor. ) ) ) ) ) ) )
More informationSUPREME COURT OF COLORADO
Chief Justice Directive 11-02 SUPREME COURT OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE CHIEF JUSTICE Reenact and Amend CJD 11-02 for Cases Filed January 1, 2012 through June 30, 2015 I hereby reenact and amend CJD 11-02
More informationCase KJC Doc 317 Filed 08/29/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 16-10284-KJC Doc 317 Filed 08/29/16 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: WAVE SYSTEMS CORP., Case No. 16-10284 (KJC) Debtor. Chapter 11 NOTICE OF (I)
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cv-00978 Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WOODLAND DRIVE LLC 1209 Orange Street Wilmington, DE 19801 v. Plaintiff, JAMES
More informationLand Trust Agreement. Certification and Explanation. Schedule of Beneficial Interests
Certification and Explanation This TRUST AGREEMENT dated this day of and known as Trust Number is to certify that BankFinancial, National Association, not personally but solely as Trustee hereunder, is
More informationCase Doc 17 Filed 05/17/16 Entered 05/17/16 11:26:57 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13
Document Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: BKY No. 15-42460 ADV No. 16-04018 Paul Hansmeier, Debtor. Randall L. Seaver, Trustee, vs. Plaintiff, Paul Hansmeier and
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Plaintiff, Civil Action File No.: v. Defendant. CONSENT PROTECTIVE ORDER By stipulation and agreement of the parties,
More informationCase acs Doc 52 Filed 08/20/15 Entered 08/20/15 16:11:30 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY
Case 14-34747-acs Doc 52 Filed 08/20/15 Entered 08/20/15 16:11:30 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY In re: ) ) CLIFFORD J. AUSMUS ) CASE NO. 14-34747 ) CHAPTER 7
More information* ALL FORMS ARE COMPLETED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH NMLS THIS FORM IS FOR INSTRUCTIONAL PURPOSES ONLY * (E) State/Province of Birth ( ) -
NMLS INDIVIDUAL FORM UNIFORM BIOGRAPHICAL STATEMENT AND CONSENT FORM The NMLS Individual Form is the universal form used by individuals required to submit biographical and other information to a state
More informationRULE TITLE AND SCOPE
RULE 7.010. TITLE AND SCOPE (a) Title. These rules shall be cited as Florida Small Claims Rules and may be abbreviated Fla. Sm. Cl. R. These rules shall be construed to implement the simple, speedy, and
More informationBERMUDA BERMUDA PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY ACT : 29
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA BERMUDA PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY ACT 2011 2011 : 29 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Citation Interpretation TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 PRELIMINARY PART 2 ESTABLISHMENT
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Joseph v. Fresenius Health Partners Care Systems, Inc. Doc. 0 0 KENYA JOSEPH, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA Plaintiff, RENAL CARE GROUP, INC., d/b/a FRESENIUS
More informationBankruptcy Section Seminar Sign Here, Please: The Use of Digital Signatures in Nebraska
2017 NSBA Annual Meeting Bankruptcy Section Seminar Sign Here, Please: The Use of Digital Signatures in Nebraska Samuel Turco, Jr. Sam Turco Law Offices October 13, 2017 Embassy Suites La Vista Sign Here,
More informationAMERICAN EXPRESS ISSUANCE TRUST
AMERICAN EXPRESS ISSUANCE TRUST RECEIVABLES PURCHASE AGREEMENT between AMERICAN EXPRESS TRAVEL RELATED SERVICES COMPANY, INC. and AMERICAN EXPRESS RECEIVABLES FINANCING CORPORATION V LLC Dated as of May
More informationTEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PART V - RULES OF PRACTICE IN JUSTICE COURTS [RULES 523 to 591. Repealed effective August 31, 2013]
TEXAS RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE PART V - RULES OF PRACTICE IN JUSTICE COURTS [RULES 523 to 591. Repealed effective August 31, 2013] RULE 500. GENERAL RULES RULE 500.1. CONSTRUCTION OF RULES Unless otherwise
More informationSubmitted October 12, 2017 Decided. Before Judges Alvarez and Nugent.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION This opinion shall not "constitute precedent or be binding upon any court." Although it is posted on the internet, this opinion is binding
More informationCorrection to Correct Way to Correct Incorrect Documents The Scrivener s Error Revisited By W. Paul Lewis, Title Counsel, Pinehurst & Wilmington
Correction to Correct Way to Correct Incorrect Documents The Scrivener s Error Revisited By W. Paul Lewis, Title Counsel, Pinehurst & Wilmington Mistakes are meant for learning and not repeating. At least
More informationTexas Rules of Civil Procedure Part V. When it is concerning matters of law, go first to the specific then to the general
Texas Rules of Civil Procedure Part V When it is concerning matters of law, go first to the specific then to the general On Eviction Cases, Go First To 510 Series of Rules Then to the 500 thru 507 Series
More informationNC General Statutes - Chapter 84 Article 1 1
Chapter 84. Attorneys-at-Law. Article 1. Qualifications of Attorney; Unauthorized Practice of Law. 84-1. Oaths taken in open court. Attorneys before they shall be admitted to practice law shall, in open
More informationELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENT TO CHAPTER 15
C H A P T E R 15 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENT TO CHAPTER 15 UNIFORM PARTNERSHIP ACT (1914) Part I PRELIMINARY PROVISIONS 1. Name of Act This act may be cited as Uniform Partnership Act. 2. Definition of Terms
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Document Page 1 of 30 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA HARRISONBURG DIVISION IN RE: JESSICA DAWN SCOTT, Debtors. JUDY A. ROBBINS, United States Trustee For Region Four, v. Plaintiff,
More informationAGREEMENT FOR SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR SERVICE
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICE AGREEMENT FOR SERVICE In order to receive various information services ( Information Service(s) ) from First American CREDCO/Executive Reporting Services, a division of First American
More informationDAYTON CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE NEWSLETTER
DAYTON CHAPTER 13 TRUSTEE NEWSLETTER Jeffrey M. Kellner, Trustee Scott G. Stout, Staff Attorney Linda S. Wright, Operations and Personnel Manager December 15, 2003 DAYTON, OH HAPPY HOLIDAYS FROM THE CHAPTER
More informationFORM OF SECURITY INTEREST OPINION
I have not prepared an outline discussing the purpose and structure of legal opinions in secured transactions. The reason is simple. This task has been done well by various authors, task forces and committees
More information11 USC 361. NB: This unofficial compilation of the U.S. Code is current as of Jan. 4, 2012 (see
TITLE 11 - BANKRUPTCY CHAPTER 3 - CASE ADMINISTRATION SUBCHAPTER IV - ADMINISTRATIVE POWERS 361. Adequate protection When adequate protection is required under section 362, 363, or 364 of this title of
More informationSECURING EXECUTION OF DOCUMENT BY DECEPTION
AN ACT Relating to the fraudulent exercise of certain governmental functions and the fraudulent creation or use of certain pleadings, governmental documents, and records; providing penalties. BE IT ENACTED
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA SUMMARY OF BANKRUPTCY LOCAL RULE CHANGES The United States Bankruptcy Court s local rules were updated on January 1, 2016 pursuant to General Order 2015-04.
More informationSigned November 1, 2016 United States Bankruptcy Judge
Case 15-40289-rfn11 Doc 3439 Filed 11/01/16 Entered 11/01/16 10:39:45 Page 1 of 50 The following constitutes the ruling of the court and has the force and effect therein described. Signed November 1, 2016
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Office of the Clerk. After Opening a Case Pro Se Appellants (revised December 2012)
Case: 13-55859 05/16/2013 ID: 8632114 DktEntry: 1-2 Page: 1 of 16 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT Office of the Clerk After Opening a Case Pro Se Appellants (revised December 2012)
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA. No.: TERRI HAYFORD, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Case :-cv-00-dkd Document Filed /0/ Page of 0 0 0 James X. Bormes (pro hac vice admission pending) LAW OFFICE OF JAMES X. BORMES, P.C. Illinois State Bar No. 0 South Michigan Avenue Suite 00 Chicago, Illinois
More informationBERMUDA BERMUDA PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY ACT : 29
QUO FA T A F U E R N T BERMUDA BERMUDA PUBLIC ACCOUNTABILITY ACT 2011 2011 : 29 1 2 2A 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 TABLE OF CONTENTS PART 1 PRELIMINARY Citation Interpretation Meaning of Public Interest
More informationPaxForex Introducing Broker Agreement
PaxForex Introducing Broker Agreement PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING: 1. WHEREAS the IB is interested to introduce new clients to the company subject to the terms and conditions of the present agreement. 2. WHEREAS
More informationCase LSS Doc 166 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE : : : : : : : Chapter 11
Case 17-11249-LSS Doc 166 Filed 07/31/17 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re FIRSTRAIN, INC., Debtor. 1 Chapter 11 Case No. 17-11249 (LSS) Re Dkt Nos. 12,
More informationAPR 28 LIMITED PRACTICE RULE FOR LIMITED LICENSE LEGAL TECHNICIANS. B. Definitions. For purposes of this rule, the following definitions will apply:
APR 28 LIMITED PRACTICE RULE FOR LIMITED LICENSE LEGAL TECHNICIANS A. Purpose. The Civil Legal Needs Study (2003), commissioned by the Supreme Court, clearly established that the legal needs of the consuming
More informationrbk Doc#81-1 Filed 09/14/17 Entered 09/14/17 14:55:48 Exhibit A Pg 1 of 8 EXHIBIT A
17-51926-rbk Doc#81-1 Filed 09/14/17 Entered 09/14/17 14:55:48 Exhibit A Pg 1 of 8 EXHIBIT A 17-51926-rbk 17-51926-rbk Doc#81-1 Claim#1-1 Filed 09/14/17 Filed 09/11/17 Entered 09/14/17 Main Document 14:55:48
More informationETHICS OPINION
ETHICS OPINION 101216 Facts: The Montana Supreme Court has requested members of the Bar comment about proposed changes to the Montana Rules of Professional Conduct and Civil Procedure. The proposed changes
More informationCase Document 90 Filed in TXSB on 03/04/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 10-30835 Document 90 Filed in TXSB on 03/04/10 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ENTERED 03/04/2010 IN RE ) ) NEW LUXURY MOTORS,
More informationCase KG Doc 553 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
Case 18-10122-KG Doc 553 Filed 09/17/18 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Chapter 11 PES HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., 1 Case No. 18-10122 (KG Debtors. (Jointly
More informationCase Document 45 Filed in TXSB on 05/10/13 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
Case 12-35920 Document 45 Filed in TXSB on 05/10/13 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ENTERED 05/10/2013 IN RE ALEXANDER B. WATHEN, CASE
More informationEleventh Judicial District Local Rules
Eleventh Judicial District Local Rules Table of Contents Standardized Practice for District Court Criminal Sessions... 11.3 Order for Non-Appearing Defendants/ Respondents and Non-Complying Defendant/
More information2:16-ap Doc#: 1 Filed: 10/06/16 Entered: 10/06/16 16:16:02 Page 1 of 17
2:16-ap-01097 Doc#: 1 Filed: 10/06/16 Entered: 10/06/16 16:16:02 Page 1 of 17 B1040 (FORM 1040) (12/15) ADVERSARY PROCEEDING COVER SHEET (Instructions on Reverse) ADVERSARY PROCEEDING NUMBER (Court Use
More informationCHAPTER ACTIONS
ACTIONS AT LAW 231 CHAPTER 1000. ACTIONS Subchapter Rule A. CIVIL ACTION... 1001 B. ACTION IN TRESPASS... 1041 C. ACTION IN EJECTMENT... 1051 D. ACTION TO QUIET TITLE... 1061 E. ACTION IN REPLEVIN... 1071
More informationLouisiana Last Will and Testament of
Louisiana Last Will and Testament of I,, resident in the City of, County of, State of Louisiana, being of sound mind, not acting under duress or undue influence, and fully understanding the nature and
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
91318140 LAURA PETRAS Plaintiff CENLAR FSB, ET AL Defendant 91318140 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO 21)15 OCT 15 P & 53 Case No: CV-13-818963 Judge: MICHAEL E JACKSON JOURNAL ENTRY
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION. Chapter 9 Hon. Steven W. Rhodes
In re: CITY OF DETROIT Debtor. / UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION Case No. 13-53846-SWR Chapter 9 Hon. Steven W. Rhodes CLASS CLAIMANTS MOTION FOR ALLOWANCE
More informationInvestments, Life Insurance & Superannuation Terms of Reference
Investments, Life Insurance & Superannuation Terms of Reference These Terms of Reference apply to those members of the Financial Ombudsman Service Limited who have been designated as having the Investments,
More informationGREEN ELECTRONICS COUNCIL UL ECOLOGO/EPEAT JOINT CERTIFICATION LICENSE AND PARTICIPATING MANUFACTURER AGREEMENT
GREEN ELECTRONICS COUNCIL UL ECOLOGO/EPEAT JOINT CERTIFICATION LICENSE AND PARTICIPATING MANUFACTURER AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, including all Schedules and Exhibits attached hereto (this Agreement ), is
More informationCase Document 618 Filed in TXSB on 10/15/12 Page 1 of 9
Case 12-36187 Document 618 Filed in TXSB on 10/15/12 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION IN RE: Case No. 12-36187 ATP OIL & GAS CORPORATION
More informationDRAFT BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE DRAFT St. John's Law School, Fall Semester, Monday, 5:40-6:40 PM, Eastern Time August 31 - November 30
DRAFT BANKRUPTCY PROCEDURE DRAFT St. John's Law School, Fall Semester, 2015 BANK 3040 / CRN 76143 Professor Ahern Monday, 5:40-6:40 PM, Eastern Time August 31 - November 30 SYLLABUS AND ASSIGNMENTS Introduction
More informationAttorney Grievance Commission v. Mark Kotlarsky, Misc. Docket No. 30, September Term Opinion by Hotten, J.
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Mark Kotlarsky, Misc. Docket No. 30, September Term 2016. Opinion by Hotten, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE SANCTIONS DISBARMENT Court of Appeals disbarred from practice of law
More information