Police V Chatoorsing P. and Anor THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS. Police. 1. CHATOORSING Parvesh 2. CHATOORSING Pahalad
|
|
- Joel Foster
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Police V Chatoorsing P. and Anor 2017 INT 442 CN 46/2016 In the matter of: - THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS Police JUDGMENT Accused 1 stands charged as follows: V 1. CHATOORSING Parvesh 2. CHATOORSING Pahalad Count 1: whilst being two individuals, wilfully and fraudulently abstracting certain articles not belonging to him, in breach of Sections 301(1) and 305 (1) (b) of the Criminal Code. Count 2 (alternate): wilfully, unlawfully and without sufficient excuse or justification found to have in his possession several articles which have been abstracted by means of a crime to the prejudice of other persons in breach of Sections 40, 301(1), 306 and 305 (1) (b) of the Criminal Code. Count 4: wilfully and unlawfully agreeing with another person to do an act which is unlawful breach of section 109(1) of the Criminal Code (Supplementary) Act of the Criminal Code. Accused 2 stands charged in respect of Count 3 with wilfully, unlawfully and knowingly receiving an article abstracted by means of crime in breach of Sections 40, 301 and 305 (1) (b) of the Criminal Code. The pleaded not guilty to their respective charges. Accused 1 was not represented. Accused 2 was represented by Mr L. Servansingh. During the year 2013, several larcenies occurred at St Paul and the surrounding places. Mrs Tapesur deposed to the effect that a larceny occurred at her place at St Paul between 6 th of
2 October and 7 th of October 2013, during which were taken away golden jewels, watches, perfumes and several other articles to the value of 100,000 rupees. Mr Jeenarain also revealed that a robbery occurred at his place in Eau Coulee following which an IPad, jewelleries and a mobile phone were taken away. On the 17 th of December 2013, police remitted the IPad to him. Pc Prayagsing explained that on the 9 th of October 2013 at hours, he went for a search at the place of accused 1 at St Paul. In presence of Accused 1, he secured several mobile phones. He asked the accused about their origin, but he could not give any explanation. For the present case, he secured a mobile phone make Nokia, which was returned the owner after the enquiry was made. Mr L. Boodhoo was prosecuted before the Intermediate Court for several of those larceny cases. In respect of count 1, he went to steal at Eau Coulee and his friend accused 1 was in his company. He also conspired with accused 1 to rob a house at St Paul. Mr Boodhowa was equally prosecuted before the Intermediate Court for being in unlawful possession of an IPad which was stolen at the place of Mr Jeenarain. Police secured the IPad behind his house. One Bachan was interested in buying the IPad and he went to see him. But the said Bachan did not buy it. He identified accused 2 as Bachan. In his statements to the police, Accused 1 denied that he went to steal in company of Witness L. Boodhoo. He however agreed that he was in possession of a mobile phone make Nokia which he bought at 1,500 rupees from one Arvind since it was an old one. He also denied that he conspired with the witness to steal at St Paul. Accused 2 is the father of accused 1. He denied that he bought any IPad from one Shaffick Boodhowa, his son s neighbour. Accused 1 was explained of his rights to adduce evidence and he elected to speak from the dock. He never stole any article in company of witness Boodhoo. Accused 2 did not adduce any evidence. Learned Counsel for accused 2 submitted that Count 3 be dismissed since there is not the least evidence that accused 2 received an abstracted article. Accused 1 Count 1: The larceny For the offence of larceny to be constituted, three elements should exist: 1. Fraudulent abstraction, 2. of anything belonging to another person, 3. with the fraudulent intent.
3 The court finds it relevant to refer to Garçon, Code Penal Annoté, art. 379 note 358: En principe général, l'intention est juridiquement réalisée lorsque l'agent commet, avec connaissance, le fait défendu par la loi dans les conditions où elle le défend. Particulièrement, en matière de vol, elle consistera à usurper la possession de la chose d'autrui, animo domini, sachant qu'elle appartient à autrui. Il faut d'abord que l'agent ait su: 1º. qu'il enlevait une chose; 2º. qu'il l'enlevait contre le gré du propriétaire; 3º. que la chose enlevée ne lui appartenait pas. Mais cette simple connaissance ne suffit pas; il faut encore un dolus specialis, consistant ici dans la volonté de l'agent de s'approprier la chose, ou plus exactement, d'usurper la possession civile de cette chose, animo domini. C'est ce dolus specialis que l'art. 379 a soin de marquer en exigeant que la soustraction soit frauduleuse. It has been amply proved that a larceny occurred at the place of Mr Jeenarian at Eau Coulee, whereby several articles were stolen. To prove the abstraction, the prosecution s case rested mainly upon the testimony of witness L. Boodhoo, who identified accused 1 and confirmed that they went together to steal at Eau Coulee. But, the court has borne in mind that witness L. Boodhoo was a participant to the offence and the need to consider the danger of acting upon his uncorroborated evidence. In DPP V Subrattee 2010 SCJ 207, the Court on appeal made the following observations: In general, however, at common law one credible witness is sufficient (vide DPP v Hester [1973 A.C 296], Lord Diplock at p 324). With the development of the common law, the corroboration requirement is said to be required in such categories of cases which include the evidence of a complainant in sexual cases, the evidence of an accomplice when called by the prosecution and the evidence of children. Apart from these established categories, the authorities have established the need for a corroboration warning where the evidence of a witness is suspect and which would include the evidence of a co-accused, the evidence of mental patients and the evidence of witnesses who may have improper motives or interests of their own to serve (Beck [ WLR 461]; Spencer [1987 AC 128] and Brown [1992 Crim LR 178])
4 The court has borne in mind the need for a warning and finds that the testimony of witness L. Boodhoo can be relied upon. The record shows, he has oft been referred to as the friend of accused 1 and there is no evidence or circumstances from which the court can deduce that there could have been a false allegation. There is also no reason for the court to believe that the witness is lying and the court finds that much weight can be attached to his testimony. Furthermore, the court considers that accused 1 did not challenge the testimony of the witness in court with the result that his evidence remained unrebutted. Despite being explained of his rights to adduce evidence, accused 1 did not depose and barely made a denial statement from the dock. By choosing not to depose and being exposed to crossexamination, the court considers that the defence has not been able to raise a doubt as to the veracity of the testimony of witness Boodhoo. Consequently, the court holds that the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable in respect of count 1 and finds accused 1 guilty as charged in respect of that count. Accordingly, count 2, which is the alternate count, is dismissed. Count 4: The conspiracy Section 109 of the Criminal Code (Supplementary) Act reads: Any person who agrees with one or more other persons to do an act which is unlawful, wrongful or harmful to another person, or to use unlawful means, in the carrying out of an object not otherwise unlawful, shall commit an offence Three elements have to be proved. There has to be: 1. an agreement 2. by two or more persons 3. to do an unlawful act. The issue is whether there was an agreement. In Archbold 2015, Digital Edition at paragraph 33-14, I read: The agreement may be proved in the usual way or by proving circumstances from which the jury may presume it: R. v. Parsons (1763) 1 W.Bl. 392; R. v. Murphy
5 (1837) 8 C. & P Proof of the existence of a conspiracy is generally a matter of inference, deduced from certain criminal acts of the parties accused, done in pursuance of an apparent criminal purpose in common between them : R. v. Brisac (1803) 4 East 164 at 171, cited with approval in Mulcahy v. R. (1868) L.R. 3 H.L. 306 at 317. Overt acts which are proved against some defendants may be looked at as against all of them, to show the nature and objects of the conspiracy: R. v. Stapylton, Esdaile and Brown (1857) 8 Cox 69. Witness L. Boodhoo, deposed to the effect that he conspired with accused 1 to steal in a house at St Paul. The accused has denied any participation. For reasons already stated above, the court has no qualm in preferring the testimony of witness Boodhoo. Accused 1 on the other hand did not challenge the version of the witness and the court finds that no weight can be attached to his denial. The court therefore holds that the prosecution has proved its case beyond reasonable doubt in respect of Count 4 and finds accused 1 guilty as charged. Accused 2 Count 3: Knowingly receiving an article Garraud in his Droit Penal Francais, Vol 3, ss 944 stated: "Il faut un fait matériel de recel... Recéler une chose... dans l'acception juridique de l'article 62, c est simplement la détenir, dans une intention frauduleuse sachant qu'elle a été détournée... Il faut, mais il suffit, que la chose ait été reçue par le recéleur et qu'il ait exercé une véritable détention sur les objets dont l'origine est délictueuse..." "Le titre de la détention est sans importance sur la constitution du recel. Il résulte du seul fait de la prise de possession d'un objet, que l'on sait avoir une origine furtive, avec l'intention de s'associer au délit." (Emphasis is mine) To establish receiving, it is necessary to establish possession in the sense of control by the accused: R. v. Wiley (1850) 2 Den. 37; and R. v. Watson [1916] 2 K.B. 385, 12 Cr.App.R. 62, CCA. Since it is necessary to establish control of the goods by the accused, proof that he has physically handled them is neither necessary nor sufficient. The accused might have handled the goods physically without being in control of them or have been in control of the goods without physically handling them. In the present case, the prosecution is relying upon the evidence of witness Boodhowa to prove that accused 2 unlawfully received an IPad, which has been abstracted by means of larceny committed by two individuals. However, the witness stated in court that he went to see accused 2 and showed him the IPad, but accused 2 did not buy it. His inconsistent
6 statement was put to him but he maintained that he did not sell the IPad to Accused 2. The record equally shows that the IPad was recovered at the place of witness Boodhowa, behind his house, following which he was later prosecuted for being in possession of stolen property. The accused having denied receiving the IPad, the court finds that there is no evidence on record that he received the property at any point in time. The prosecution has therefore failed to prove this count beyond reasonable doubt against accused 2. The court therefore dismisses Count 3 against accused 2. B.R.Jannoo- Jaunbocus (Mrs.) Magistrate Intermediate Court (Criminal Division) This 13 th December 2017.
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS
S.Boodhoo v R. Ram and anor 2017 INT 196 Cause Number : 186/2012 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS Seewan Boodhoo Plaintiff Judgment v. 1. Ravind Ram 2. Top Turf Defendants The Plaintiff claims from
More informationHave improved knowledge of how to review, analyse and present cases for a bail application and to oppose adjournment applications
Have improved knowledge of how to review, analyse and present cases for a bail application and to oppose adjournment applications Better awareness of witness care and handling of exhibits How to manage
More informationIN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS. Police v/s 1. Peroomal Veeren 2. Vishnu Dusorath 3. Gilbert Noel Louise
Police v Veeren Peroomal & ors 2017 INT 197 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS C N 156-2012 Police v/s 1. Peroomal Veeren 2. Vishnu Dusorath 3. Gilbert Noel Louise Judgment All three Accused stand
More informationTitle VIII. Of Exchange (Art )
Louisiana State University Law Center LSU Law Digital Commons Book III Compiled Edition of the Civil Codes of Louisiana (1940) Title VIII. Of Exchange (Art. 2660-2667) Louisiana Recommended Citation Louisiana,
More informationSITUATION EN CÔTE D IVOIRE AFFAIRE LE PROCUREUR c. LAURENT GBAGBO ANNEXE 3 PUBLIQUE EXPURGÉE
ICC-02/11-01/11-647-Anx3-Red 16-05-2014 1/9 NM PT SITUATION EN CÔTE D IVOIRE AFFAIRE LE PROCUREUR c. LAURENT GBAGBO ANNEXE 3 PUBLIQUE EXPURGÉE Tableau recensant les erreurs commises par la victimes lorsqu
More informationForm 1 - CHARGING or REVIEW of CHARGING DECISION
Form 1 - CHARGING or REVIEW of CHARGING DECISION DEFENDANT(s) NAME(s) Mr Green and Mr Yellow EVIDENTIAL STAGE Refer to the evidence and determine if a reasonable prospect of conviction: Mr Green On 17
More informationHassan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Hassan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Between Ali Abdi Hassan, applicant, and The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, respondent [1999] F.C.J. No. 1359 Court File No. IMM-5440-98
More informationTHE JERSEY LAW COMMISSION
THE JERSEY LAW COMMISSION CONSULTATION PAPER CORROBORATION OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL TRIALS JERSEY LAW COMMISSION CONSULTATION PAPER No 3/2008/CP December 2008 The Jersey Law Commission was set up by a Proposition
More informationThe Law on Corroboration in Fiji and Vanuatu. * Sofia Shah
The Law on Corroboration in Fiji and Vanuatu * Sofia Shah In any criminal case evidence is required to find a person guilty of an offence or to acquit the person of the alleged offence. Common law has
More informationTHE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KELEN LETWLED KASAHUN TESSMA (AYELE) - and - THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER
Date: 20031002 Docket: IMM-5652-02 Citation: 2003 FC 1126 Ottawa, Ontario, this 2 nd day of October, 2003 Present: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KELEN BETWEEN: LETWLED KASAHUN TESSMA (AYELE) Applicant - and
More informationPOLICE v. GOOLAUP N. S.
P v. GOOLAUP A. H. 2013 LPW 27 Cause Number 12895/12 POLICE v. GOOLAUP N. S. In the District Court of Lower Plaines Wilhems (Rose Hill) In the matter of:- POLICE v Nundkumar Sanjay GOOLAUP Judgment The
More informationBAYER CROPSCIENCE LP v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, AND THE COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS
[Abstract prepared by the PCT Legal Division (PCT-2018-0002)] Case Name: BAYER CROPSCIENCE LP v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA, AND THE COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS Jurisdiction: FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL (CANADA)
More informationWeek 5 cumulative project: immigration in the French and Francophone world.
IPA Worksheet for Novice High French Students Theme : Immigration to the French Hexagon French 1103: An Accelerated Introduction to French in the World is designed for students with three to four years
More informationPOLICE VS BUNDHOO KARUNA
POLICE VS BUNDHOO KARUNA 2017 INT 133 POLICE VS BUNDHOO KARUNA Cause Number: 737/15 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS In the matter of:- POLICE VS BUNDHOO KARUNA Judgment INTRODUCTION The Accused
More informationNellie Taptaqut Kusugak, O. Nu. Commissioner of Nunavut Commissaire du Nunavut
THIRD SESSION FOURTH LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF NUNAVUT TROISIÈME SESSION QUATRIÈME ASSEMBLÉE LÉGISLATIVE DU NUNAVUT HOUSE BILL BILL 9 AN ACT TO AMEND THE NUNAVUT ELECTIONS ACT AND THE PLEBISCITES ACT PROJET
More informationVOTES and PROCEEDINGS
No. 12 VOTES and PROCEEDINGS OF THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY PROVINCE OF SASKATCHEWAN SECOND SESSION TWENTY-EIGHTH LEGISLATURE Wednesday, November 15, 2017 1:30 p.m. PRAYERS PRESENTING PETITIONS Petitions
More informationCommon law system foundations for excluding evidence obtained illegally or unfairly and the relevant case law
Katarzyna Piątkowska Common law system foundations for excluding evidence obtained illegally or unfairly and the relevant case law Keywords: improperly, unfairly, illegally obtained evidence, admissibility,
More informationBUSINESS LAW. Chapter 8 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes
BUSINESS LAW Chapter 8 Criminal Law and Cyber Crimes Learning Objectives List and describe the essential elements of a crime. Describe criminal procedure, including arrest, indictment, arraignment, and
More informationQuestion 3. What crimes, if any, can Deanna and Alma reasonably be charged with, and what defenses might each assert? Discuss.
Question 3 Deanna, a single mother of ten-year old Vickie, worked as a cashier at the local grocery store. Deanna had recently broken off her relationship with Randy, a drug addict who had been violent
More informationPolice v Nylprakash Nunkoo IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PAMPLEMOUSSES NYPRAKASH NUNKOO
Police v Nylprakash Nunkoo 2016 PMP 310 Police v Nylprakash Nunkoo IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF PAMPLEMOUSSES CN: 1666/13 POLICE V NYPRAKASH NUNKOO JUDGMENT Accused stands charged of having on the 9 th of
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE LORDS OF THE JUDICIAL COMMITTEE OF THE PRIVY COUNCIL, Delivered the 21st October 2004
Dosoruth v. Mauritius (Mauritius) [2004] UKPC 51 (21 October 2004) Privy Council Appeal No. 49 of 2003 Ramawat Dosoruth v. Appellant (1) The State of Mauritius and (2) The Director of Public Prosecutions
More informationINDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION VIS BEEKHY Nasser Osman
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS C N 1620/12 INDEPENDENT COMMISSION AGAINST CORRUPTION VIS BEEKHY Nasser Osman JUDGMENT The accused stands charged with the offence of Limitation of payment in cash
More informationActs I assent. RAJKESWUR PURRYAG 27 July 2012 President of the Republic
346 Acts 2012 THE CERTIFICATE OF CHARACTER ACT 2012 Act No. 18 of 2012 I assent RAJKESWUR PURRYAG 27 July 2012 President of the Republic Section 1. Short title 2. Interpretation 3. Delegation of powers
More informationContact Person. Address nam. SNP 33 Postal Code
Bonjour, Une nouvelle réponse a été soumise pour votre questionnaire 'Rapport national relatif à la mise en œuvre de la Convention de la Haye de 1954 et ses deux Protocoles de 1954 et 1999'. Cliquer sur
More informationJUDGMENT. Sugar Investment Trust (Appellant) v Jyoti Jeetun (Respondent)
[2011] UKPC 47 Privy Council Appeal No 0099 of 2010 JUDGMENT Sugar Investment Trust (Appellant) v Jyoti Jeetun (Respondent) From the Supreme Court of Mauritius before Lord Hope Lord Clarke Lord Dyson Sir
More informationStanding Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics
Standing Committee on Access to Information, Privacy and Ethics ETHI NUMBER 031 2nd SESSION 41st PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE Wednesday, February 4, 2015 Chair Mr. Pierre-Luc Dusseault 1 Standing Committee on
More informationV. v. FAO. 124th Session Judgment No. 3880
Organisation internationale du Travail Tribunal administratif International Labour Organization Administrative Tribunal V. v. FAO 124th Session Judgment No. 3880 THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, Considering
More informationChapter 10 The Criminal Law and Business. Below is a table that highlights the differences between civil law and criminal law:
Chapter 10 The Criminal Law and Business Below is a table that highlights the differences between civil law and criminal law: Crime a wrong against society proclaimed in a statute and, if committed, punishable
More informationWhere did the law of evidence come from/why have the law of evidence? Check on the power of executive government (Guantanamo Bay).
INTRODUCTION: Where did the law of evidence come from/why have the law of evidence? Check on the power of executive government (Guantanamo Bay). Courts deal with serious business. The law of evidence excludes
More informationJames Gelsthorpe. DX: Leeds Park Square T: +44 (0) E: F: +44 (0)
James Gelsthorpe Park Square Upon Tyne Contents Crime... 1 Relevant Experience... 1 Regulatory... 2 Representative Cases... 2 Civil... 2 Relevant Experience... 3 Appointments & Memberships... 3 II Park
More informationICC Electronic data approaches Senegal
ICC Electronic data approaches Senegal ASP.net's user name Submitted on Language BCFP_SN 4/1/2016 6:58:34 PM fr-fr 1. I.1 Is the notification document available in electronic form in your country? 2. I.2
More informationPOLICE VS BUNGAROO PRATIMA
POLICE VS BUNGAROO PRATIMA 2017 INT 86 POLICE VS BUNGAROO PRATIMA Cause Number: 452/15 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS In the matter of:- POLICE VS BUNGAROO PRATIMA Judgment INTRODUCTION The Accused
More informationVorlesung / Course Introduction to Comparative Law and Unification of Law Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung und Rechtsvereinheitlichung
Prof. Dr. Alexander Trunk Vorlesung / Course Introduction to Comparative Law and Unification of Law Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung und Rechtsvereinheitlichung Summer term 2018 http://www.eastlaw.uni-kiel.de
More information???IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS?????(Criminal Division)? In the matter of :-???????C.No.313/2010
ICAC v B.M Seedeer 2012 INT 92???IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS?????(Criminal Division)? In the matter of :-???????C.No.313/2010???ICAC v Bhye Mamed SEEDEER J U D G M E N T?Accused, a Road Traffic
More informationCONTRACT LAW (2) Il est précisé que le thème «CONTRACT LAW» est abordé à travers 2 fiches, cette fiche étant la seconde. I. VALIDITY OF THE CONTRACT
CONTRACT LAW (2) Il est précisé que le thème «CONTRACT LAW» est abordé à travers 2 fiches, cette fiche étant la seconde. Plan : I. VALIDITY OF THE CONTRACT II. LEGALITY OF THE SUBJECT MATTER III. REALITY
More informationSeptember 1, 2015 Le 1 er septembre 2015 DISCLOSURE
OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL CABINET DU PROCUREUR GÉNÉRAL PUBLIC PROSECUTIONS OPERATIONAL MANUAL MANUEL DES OPÉRATIONS DE POURSUITES PUBLIQUES TYPE OF DOCUMENT TYPE DE DOCUMENT : Policy Politique CHAPTER
More informationModèle de Contrat d Agent Commercial pour l Inde
Modèle de Contrat d Agent Commercial pour l Inde Modèle de Contrat d Agent Commercial utilisé lorsqu une société étrangère désigne un agent commercial en Inde afin que celui-ci fasse la promotion et vende
More informationIRVING MITCHELL KALICHMAN
IRVING MITCHELL KALICHMAN MISE EN GARDE Le Barreau de Montréal organise de nombreuses activités et conférences à l'intention de ses membres. Certains conférenciers acceptent gracieusement que le Barreau
More informationTHE LAW COMMISSION SIMPLIFICATION OF CRIMINAL LAW: KIDNAPPING AND RELATED OFFENCES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHILD ABDUCTION
THE LAW COMMISSION SIMPLIFICATION OF CRIMINAL LAW: KIDNAPPING AND RELATED OFFENCES EXECUTIVE SUMMARY CHILD ABDUCTION PART 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This is one of two summaries of our report on kidnapping and
More informationBILL. J U L i, '9~~ 3' session 50' Legislature, Nouveau-Brunswick, 34 Elizabeth II, 1985
3rd Session, 50th Legislature, New Brunswick, 34 Elizabeth II, 1985 3' session 50' Legislature, Nouveau-Brunswick, 34 Elizabeth II, 1985 BILL AN ACT TO AMEND AN ACT RESPECTING THE NEW BRUNSWICK MEDICAL
More informationADVANCE QUESTIONS TO RWANDA
ADVANCE QUESTIONS TO RWANDA CANADA Le Rwanda a-t-il l intention de réviser la Loi portant sur la répression du crime d idéologie du génocide? Le Rwanda pourrait-il préciser la portée juridique du terme
More informationREPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES
REPORTS OF INTERNATIONAL ARBITRAL AWARDS RECUEIL DES SENTENCES ARBITRALES Giorgio Uzielli Case Decision No. 229 29 July 1963 VOLUME XVI pp. 267-271 NATIONS UNIES - UNITED NATIONS Copyright (c) 2006 GIORGIO
More informationCircuit Court, S. D. New York. May 19, 1881.
193 v.7, no.2-13 UNITED STATES V. BORGER. Circuit Court, S. D. New York. May 19, 1881. 1. INFORMATION REFUSAL TO PLEAD. The refusal of a defendant to plead to a criminal information will not defeat the
More information* REPORT. EN United in diversity EN A7-0052/
EUROPEAN PARLIAMT 2009-2014 Session document 10.11.2009 A7-0052/2009 * REPORT on the initiative of the French Republic with a view to adopting a Council decision on the use of information technology for
More informationAnti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001
Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 2001 Chapter 24 - continued PART 6 WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION Amendment of the Biological Weapons Act 1974 and the Chemical Weapons Act 1996 43 Transfers of
More informationD. HURNAM & ANOR v THE MASTER & REGISTRAR
D. HURNAM & ANOR v THE MASTER & REGISTRAR 2017 INT 254 D. HURNAM & ANOR v THE MASTER & REGISTRAR Cause Number: 1611/12 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS (Civil Division) In the matter of: 1. Devendranath
More informationCase Name: Lorenzo v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
1 sur 7 2016-01-28 16:34 Case Name: Lorenzo v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Between Arthur Eisma, Lorenzo, Applicant, and The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, Respondent [2016]
More informationSUPREME COURT OF CANADA. City of Lévis Appellant and Louis Tétreault Respondent and Attorney General of Canada Intervener
SUPREME COURT OF CANADA CITATION: Lévis (City) v. Tétreault; Lévis (City) v. 2629-4470 Québec Inc., 2006 SCC 12 [2006] S.C.J. No. 12 DATE: 20060413 DOCKET: 30380, 30381 BETWEEN: AND BETWEEN: City of Lévis
More informationOPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SAGGIO delivered on 23 September 1999 *
OPINION OF MR SAGGIO CASE C-7/98 OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL SAGGIO delivered on 23 September 1999 * 1. In this case the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) has requested a preliminary ruling on three questions
More informationc 50 Truck Transportation Amendment Act, 1991/ Loi de 1991 modifiant la Loi sur le camionnage
Ontario: Annual Statutes 1991 c 50 Truck Transportation Amendment Act, 1991/ Loi de 1991 modifiant la Loi sur le camionnage Ontario Queen's Printer for Ontario, 1991 Follow this and additional works at:
More informationPresentation to Ottawa Chapter of the Marketing Research and Intelligence. Rick Hobbs / Sebastien Dallaire
Orange Crush Presentation to Ottawa Chapter of the Marketing Research and Intelligence Association September 22, 2011 Rick Hobbs / Sebastien Dallaire Final Results 40 th General Election Federal Election
More informationJERSEY LAW COMMISSION TOPIC REPORT NO. 2 - October 1999
JERSEY LAW COMMISSION TOPIC REPORT NO. 2 - October 1999 REPORT DÉGRÈVEMENT To be laid before the States by the President of the Legislation Committee pursuant to the Proposition to establish the Commission
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT. Defendant COUNT 1
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO SAN BERNARDINO DISTRICT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Scot Matthew Spencer, Felice G. Luciano vs. Plaintiff Defendant COURT CASE NO. FSB1301129
More informationCompliance and Enforcement Policy under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012
Compliance and Enforcement Policy under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 January 2016 This page has been left intentionally blank Document Information Disclaimer This policy is not a substitute
More informationFRANCOPHONE EDUCATION AUTHORITIES REGULATION. Authority: School Act, s. 175
Authority: School Act, s. 175 B.C. Reg. 212/99... Effective July 9, 1999 Editorial Edits by Registrar of Regulations... Effective December 22, 1999 Amended by B.C. Reg. 277/02... Effective October 11,
More informationSTEERING COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS COMITE DIRECTEUR POUR LES DROITS DE L'HOMME (CDDH)
Strasbourg, 13 April 2017 CDDH-SOC(2017)003 STEERING COMMITTEE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS COMITE DIRECTEUR POUR LES DROITS DE L'HOMME (CDDH) DRAFTING GROUP ON SOCIAL RIGHTS GROUPE DE REDACTION SUR LES DROITS SOCIAUX
More informationBOOK REVIEWS. Political Responsibility my Responsibility, maybe not my Fault
META: RESEARCH IN HERMENEUTICS, PHENOMENOLOGY, AND PRACTICAL PHILOSOPHY VOL. IV, NO. 1 / JUNE 2012: 215-221, ISSN 2067-3655, www.metajournal.org Political Responsibility my Responsibility, maybe not my
More informationSHELDON THOMAS. and THE QUEEN : March 11; October
GRENADA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.11 OF 2002 BETWEEN: SHELDON THOMAS and THE QUEEN Before: The Hon. Sir Dennis Byron The Hon. Mr. Albert Redhead The Hon. Mr. Ephraim Georges Appellant Respondent
More informationJury Directions Act 2015
Examinable excerpts of Jury Directions Act 2015 as at 10 April 2018 1 Purposes 3 Definitions Part 1 Preliminary The purposes of this Act are (a) to reduce the complexity of jury directions in criminal
More informationDecision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber
Decision of the Dispute Resolution Chamber passed in Zurich, Switzerland, on 13 August 2015, in the following composition: Geoff Thompson (England), Chairman Jon Newman (USA), member Mario Gallavotti (Italy),
More informationSeventh Supplement dated 6 May to the Euro Medium Term Note Programme Base Prospectus dated 5 June 2014 BNP PARIBAS. (incorporated in France)
Seventh Supplement dated 6 May 2015 to the Euro Medium Term Note Programme Base Prospectus dated 5 June 2014 BNP PARIBAS (incorporated in France) (as Issuer) 90,000,000,000 EURO MEDIUM TERM NOTE PROGRAMME
More informationCorrigé du bac 2017 : Anglais LV1 Séries S-ES-L Polynésie
Corrigé du bac 2017 : Anglais LV1 Séries S-ES-L Polynésie BACCALAURÉAT GÉNÉRAL SESSION 2017 ANGLAIS LANGUE VIVANTE 1 Durée de l épreuve : 3 heures Séries ES et S coefficient : 3 Série L Langue vivante
More informationCrimes (Sexual Offences) Act 1991
No. 8/1991 TABLE OF PROVISIONS PART 1 PRELIMINARY Section 1. Purposes 2. Commencement PART 2 AMENDMENT OF THE CRIMES ACT 1958 3. New Subdivisions (8) to (8F) inserted in Division 1 of Part I (8) Sexual
More informationOccupational injuries scheme not inconsistent with European Convention on Human Rights - Saumier v France
Trinity College Dublin, Ireland From the SelectedWorks of Mel Cousins 2017 Occupational injuries scheme not inconsistent with European Convention on Human Rights - Saumier v France Mel Cousins Available
More informationIRVING MITCHELL KALICHMAN
IRVING MITCHELL KALICHMAN MISE EN GARDE Le Barreau de Montréal organise de nombreuses activités et conférences à l'intention de ses membres. Certains conférenciers acceptent gracieusement que le Barreau
More informationICAC v Boutanive. In the Intermediate Court of Mauritius (Criminal Division) Independent Commission Against Corruption. Jean Roland BOUTANIVE
ICAC v Boutanive 2012 INT 240 Cause Number: 859-2009 In the matter of: In the Intermediate Court of Mauritius (Criminal Division) Independent Commission Against Corruption v Jean Roland BOUTANIVE Judgment
More informationThe Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 202) CRIMINAL LAW
The Law Commission (LAW COM. No. 202) CRIMINAL LAW CORROBORATION OF EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL TRIALS REPORT ON A REFERENCE UNDER SECTION 3( l)(e) OF THE LAW COMMISSIONS ACT 1965 Presented to Parliament by the
More informationStanding Committee on Public Safety and National Security
Standing Committee on Public Safety and National Security SECU NUMBER 055 1st SESSION 42nd PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE Monday, March 6, 2017 Chair Mr. Robert Oliphant 1 Standing Committee on Public Safety and
More informationThe Saskatchewan Gazette PUBLISHED WEEKLY BY AUTHORITY OF THE QUEEN S PRINTER/PUBLIÉE CHAQUE SEMAINE SOUS L AUTORITÉ DE L IMPRIMEUR DE LA REINE
THE SASKATCHEWAN GAZETTE, 5 MAI 2017 287 The Saskatchewan Gazette PUBLISHED WEEKLY BY AUTHORITY OF THE QUEEN S PRINTER/PUBLIÉE CHAQUE SEMAINE SOUS L AUTORITÉ DE L IMPRIMEUR DE LA REINE PART II/PARTIE II
More informationVorlesung / Course Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung Introduction to Comparative Law
Prof. Dr. Alexander Trunk Vorlesung / Course Einführung in die Rechtsvergleichung Introduction to Comparative Law Winter term (WS) 2015-2016 http://www.eastlaw.uni-kiel.de 20.10.2015: Basic questions and
More informationGUTTOO C. v THE STATE OF MAURITIUS
GUTTOO C. v THE STATE OF MAURITIUS 2017 SCJ 57 Record No. 103243 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MAURITIUS In the matter of:- C. Guttoo Plaintiff v The State of Mauritius Defendant JUDGMENT The plaintiff is claiming
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Mullen [2006] QCA 317 PARTIES: R V MULLEN, Todd Kenneth (applicant) FILE NO/S: CA No 175 of 2006 DC No 3220 of 2005 DC No 1341 of 2006 DC No 1512 of 2006 DC No
More informationPolice Station Advice Advising on Silence
6873 Crim Practitioners Guide 13/1/06 3:55 pm Page 1 Police Station Advice Advising on Silence by Professor Ed Cape on behalf of the Law Society Criminal Law Committee Criminal Practitioners Newsletter
More informationThe Law Commission. Corroboration of Evidence in Criminal Trials LONDON : HMSO. Working Paper No. 1 15
The Law Commission Working Paper No. 1 15 Corroboration of Evidence in Criminal Trials LONDON : HMSO @ Crown copyright 1990 First published 1990 ISBN 0 11 730197 3 THE LAW COMMISSION WORKING PAPER NO.
More informationEVIDENCE ACT LAWS OF GRENADA REVISED EDITION CHAPTER 92. Amended by Act No. 7 of 1968 Act No. 12 of 1990 Act No. 9 of 1995 Act No.
LAWS OF GRENADA REVISED EDITION EVIDENCE ACT CHAPTER 92 Amended by Act No. 7 of 1968 Act No. 12 of 1990 Act No. 9 of 1995 Act No. 26 of 2000 Printed and published with the authority of the Government of
More informationRegional Seminar for Certain African Countries on the Implementation and Use of Several Patent-Related Flexibilities
REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA Regional Seminar for Certain African Countries on the Implementation and Use of Several Patent-Related Flexibilities Topic 13: The Effective Administrative Process for the Grant
More informationAPPLICATION PACK. Overseas Criminal Record Check. France
APPLICATION PACK Overseas Criminal Record Check France Guidance Notes for the Organisation requesting the check To initiate a criminal record check a copy of the completed GBG application form that has
More informationStanding Committee on the Status of Women
Standing Committee on the Status of Women FEWO NUMBER 065 1st SESSION 41st PARLIAMENT EVIDENCE Thursday, March 21, 2013 Chair Ms. Marie-Claude Morin 1 Standing Committee on the Status of Women Thursday,
More informationMoothoo R v Osprey Co Ltd & Anor
Moothoo R v Osprey Co Ltd & Anor 2004 SCJ 308 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MAURITIUS CHAMBERS In the matter of:- MOOTHOO RAJEN Applicant V OSPREY CO. LTD & ANOR Respondents IPO THE PS MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT
More informationCAISSE D'AMORTISSEMENT DE LA DETTE SOCIALE. Établissement public national administratif (French national public entity)
SECOND PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT DATED 27 DECEMBER 2011 TO THE BASE PROSPECTUS DATED 30 MAY 2011 CAISSE D'AMORTISSEMENT DE LA DETTE SOCIALE Établissement public national administratif (French national public
More informationEASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN REVIEW NO
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA EASTERN CAPE DIVISION, GRAHAMSTOWN REVIEW NO. 20170040 Delivered: 9 May 2017 In the matter between: THE STATE and ANDA NKALA Accused REVIEW JUDGMENT Bloem J. [1] The accused
More informationSUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CITATION: R v Angus [2000] QCA 29 PARTIES: R v ANGUS, Christopher Carl (appellant) FILE NO/S: CA No 340 of 1999 DC No 104 of 1999 DIVISION: PROCEEDING: ORIGINATING COURT: Court
More informationCPS Guidance on: Joint Enterprise Charging Decisions Document July 2012
CPS Guidance on: Joint Enterprise Charging Decisions Document July 2012 1/20 December 2012 Joint Enterprise charging decisions Principal, secondary and inchoate liability Contents Introduction Concerns
More informationIN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE MARCH 1998 SESSION
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE MARCH 1998 SESSION FILED May 20, 1998 Cecil Crowson, Jr. Appellate Court Clerk STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) ) C.C.A. NO. 03C01-9710-CR-00443 Appellee,
More informationJurisdiction. Burden of Proof
Jurisdiction Queensland - Evidence Act (Qld) 1977 Commonwealth Evidence Act (Cth) 1995 Offences against the Commonwealth but tried in a State court - Evidence Act (Qld) 1977 (s79 Judiciary Act (Cth) 1903)
More informationPROCESS FOR PASSAGE OF A PRIVATE BILL IN THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF MANITOBA
PROCESS FOR PASSAGE OF A PRIVATE BILL IN THE LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF MANITOBA A Private Bill relates directly to the affairs of an individual or group of individuals, including a corporation, named in
More informationCalifornia Bar Examination
California Bar Examination Essay Question: Criminal Procedure/Criminal Law And Selected Answers The Orahte Group is NOT affiliated with The State Bar of California PRACTICE PACKET p.1 Question Vicky operates
More informationCRIM EXAM NOTES. Table of Contents. Weeks 1-4
CRIM EXAM NOTES Weeks 1-4 Table of Contents Setup (jurisdiction, BOP, onus)... 2 Elements, AR, Voluntariness... 3 Voluntariness, Automatism... 4 MR (intention, reckless, knowledge, negligence)... 5 Concurrence...
More informationMANICKAVASAGAR KANAGENDREN. and. THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION and THE MINISTER OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
Date: 20150407 Docket: A-265-14 Citation: 2015 FCA 86 CORAM: DAWSON J.A. STRATAS J.A. BOIVIN J.A. BETWEEN: MANICKAVASAGAR KANAGENDREN Appellant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION and THE MINISTER
More informationCRIME AND SECURITY (JERSEY) LAW 2003
CRIME AND SECURITY (JERSEY) LAW 2003 Revised Edition Showing the law as at 1 January 2014 This is a revised edition of the law Crime and Security (Jersey) Law 2003 Arrangement CRIME AND SECURITY (JERSEY)
More informationCheck against delivery!
Check against delivery! WATER, PEACE AND SECURITY Briefing by Mr. Danilo Türk Chairman of the Global High Level Panel on Water and Peace At the Open debate on Water, Peace and Security The Security Council
More informationVICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC. AND VICTORIA'S SECRET (CANADA) CORP. and THOMAS PINK LIMITED REASONS FOR ORDER AND ORDER
Current Judgment No. 2014-004 Date: 20140122 Docket: T-1274-13 Citation: 2014 FC 76 Toronto, Ontario, January 22, 2014 PRESENT: The Honourable Mr. Justice Hughes BETWEEN: VICTORIA'S SECRET STORES BRAND
More informationICAC v LUTCHMEENARAIDOO HARISHCHANDRAH 2009 INT 266
ICAC v LUTCHMEENARAIDOO HARISHCHANDRAH 2009 INT 266 CN : 1151/07 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF MAURITIUS In the matter of :- ICAC V Harishchandrah Lutchmeenaraidoo Judgment The accused stands charged with
More informationPART 2: THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS. The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Criminal Justice System
PART 2: THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Chapter 2: The Human Rights Act 1998 and the Criminal Justice System Outline 2.1 Introduction 2.2 The European Convention on Human Rights the essential background
More informationImpeachment with prior convictions This is an opinion poll about what the law should be, not what it is.
Impeachment with prior convictions This is an opinion poll about what the law should be, not what it is. In general, it would be good policy to allow the prosecution to impeach the testimony a person accused
More informationInvestigation into an access to information request for the Long-gun Registry Investigation Report
Investigation into an access to information request for the Long-gun Registry Investigation Report 3212-01427 Special Report to Parliament by Suzanne Legault Information Commissioner of Canada May 2015
More informationNOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS, OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 203 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011.
NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAME, ADDRESS, OCCUPATION OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS, OF COMPLAINANT PROHIBITED BY S 203 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND CA254/2014 [2015]
More informationArchived Content. Contenu archivé
ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It is not subject
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN RICHARD NOEL. And MARLON RAWLINS P.C. #16750
REPUBLIC OF TRINIDAD AND TOBAGO Mag. App. No. 63 of 2015 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL BETWEEN RICHARD NOEL Appellant And MARLON RAWLINS P.C. #16750 Respondent PANEL: A. Yorke Soo Hon, J.A. P. Moosai, J.A. APPEARANCES:
More informationCONSEIL DE L'UNION EUROPÉENNE. Bruxelles, le 18 mai 2009 (19.05) (OR. en) 8671/09
CONSEIL DE L'UNION EUROPÉENNE Bruxelles, le 18 mai 2009 (19.05) (OR. en) 8671/09 OMBUDS 9 INST 61 INF 99 API 50 JUR 182 NOTE POINT "I/A" du: groupe "Information" aux: Coreper (2 ème partie) / Conseil n
More information