May 14, Honorable David D. Furman Superior Court of New Jersey Middlesex County Court House New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903

Size: px

Start display at page:

Download "May 14, Honorable David D. Furman Superior Court of New Jersey Middlesex County Court House New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903"

Phillip Harper
5 years ago
Views:

1 o

2 08873 May 14, 1976 Honorable David D. Furman Superior Court of New Jersey Middlesex County Court House New Brunswick, New Jersey Re: Urban League, et al. vs. Borough of Carteret, et al Docket No. C Dear Judge Furman: In regard to letters of May 12, 1976 and enclosures from Daniel A. Searing, Esq., attorney for plaintiffs, this is to advise that I specifically object to all of the paragraphs of the proposed form of judgment and demand a hearing thereon. In addition thereto, I enclose herewith my own motion to settle the form of the order in accordance with the order which I previously submitted to Your Honor on March 18, 1976, a copy of which is attached hereto. I am not setting a date in my motion to settle the form of the order in view of the fact that no date is set in Mr. Searing's motion, and I assume you will want to hear all applications to settle the form of the order or to enter orders on the same day. Sincerely yours JJV:AMS Enclosures cc: All Counsel of Record CA001988N{QM}

3 JOHN J. VAIL, ESQ. 121 North Broadway South Amboy, New Jersey Attorney for Defendant City of South Amboy SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY CHANCERY DIVISION-MIDDLESEX COUNTY DOCKET NO. C URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER NEW BRUNSWICK, et al., vs. Plaintiffs, THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF CARTERET, et al., Civil Action NOTICE OF MOTION Defendants. TO: Daniel A. Searing, Esq. National Committee against Discrimination in Housing, Inc H Street NW Washington, D.C Attorney for Plaintiffs SIR: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on a date to be fixed by the court, the undersigned attorney for the defendant City of South Amboy will move before the Honorable David D. Fufman, Judge, Superior Court, at the Court House, New Brunswick, New Jersey, for

4 the entry of an order fixing the form of judgment in accordance with the order attached hereto. Upon the said return date, I will rely upon the transcript of the proceedings which took place at the time the matter was settled between the plaintiffs and the defendant City of South Amboy. In addition thereto, as an officer of the court, I specifically represent to the court that the City of South Amboy is proceeding in due course to adopt the amendments to the zoning ordinance as agreed to by plaintiffs, that approval has been received from the Middlesex County Planning Board of the amendments in toto, and a favorable recommendation is expected from the South Amboy Planning Board, at which time the amendments will be introduced and adopted by the Governing Body of the City of South Amboy. Dated: May 14,

5 JOHN J* VAIL, ESQ. 121 Morth Broadway South Amboy, Sew Jersey Attorney for Defendant City of South Asboy SUPERIOR COURT OF KEW JERSEY CHANCERY BIVISIOH-HIDBLESEX COUHTY DOCKET HO. C USBAH LEAGUE OF C&SATER NEW BR0NSWICS, et ax.» Plaintiffs, vs. THE MAYOR Mm COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF CART1EET, et al.,. Dofendants. Civil Action JUDGMENT This matter hsviag been brought on bofore the court by Joha J. Vail, Bsq., attorney for dofeadaat City of Sooth Asaboy, a aunicipal corporation, ia the presence of Mark Sloane, Esq. sad Baniol Searing, Esq., attorneys for the plaintiffs, on defeadant City of South Aaboy's motion for the execution of an order dismissing this suit against it totally upon the grounds that settleneat negotiations ware entered into between plaintiff's attorneys and th defendant's attorney, which settlement negotiations

6 resulted in an offer being ma.de by the city through its attorney, which offer was accepted by the plaimiffs through their attorneys, as aore particularly set forth in tha transcript of the proceedings attached hereto; and good cause having been, shown, it is hereby on this day of March, 1976; ORDERED that th court finds aad «2etermines that the plaintiffs have settled their case against the City of South Aaboy, based upon the transcript of the proceedings attached hereto, and the suit by plaintiffs against the City of South Aaboy is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice and without costs. FUJtTHBS ORDERED that upoa adoption of the zoning ordinance incorporating the asteadaents set forth in the transcript, the City of South Aaboy provide affidavit of publication of sase to plaintiffs' attorneys within tea days thereof. DAVID 0. FU8MAM, J.S.C

SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY DOCKET NO. URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER NEW BRUNSWICK, etc., et al., Plaintiffs,

M- B \ % V SUPREME COURT OF NEW JERSEY DOCKET NO. URBAN LEAGUE OF GREATER NEW BRUNSWICK, etc., et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action vs. * THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE : BOROUGH OF CA?~E?J5T, et al., Defendants.