E-Filed Document Jun :00: CC Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "E-Filed Document Jun :00: CC Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI"

Transcription

1 E-Filed Document Jun :00: CC Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CC OVER THE RAINBOW DAYCARE vs. VS. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY AND TEMPESTT GRIFFIN APPELLANT CAUSE NO CC APPELLEES BRIEF OF APPELLEE, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FORREST COUNTY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED OF COUNSEL: ALBERT BOZEMAN WHITE ASSISTANT ANT GENERAL COUNSEL MS BARNO ANNA CRAIN CLEMMER STAFF ATTORNEY MS BAR NO MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY POST OFFICE BOX 1699 JACKSON, MS Telephone: (601) Facsimile: (601)

2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS..... i CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS... ii TABLE OF CASES AND OTHER AUTHORITIES... iii STATEMENT OF THE ISSUE... 1 STATEMENT OF THE CASE... 2 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT... 5 ARGUMENT... 7 CONCLUSION CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE... 13

3 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE ST ATE OF MISSISSIPPI OVER THE RAINBOW DAYCARE vs. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY AND TEMPESTT GRIFFIN APPELLANT CAUSE NO CC APPELLEES CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES The undersigned counsel of record certifies that the following listed persons have an interest in the outcome of this case. These representations are made in order that the justices of the Supreme Court and/or the judges of the Court of Appeals may evaluate possible disqualification or recusal. 1. Mississippi Department of Employment Security, Appellee 2. Albert Bozeman White, Assistant General Counsel for Appellee 3. Anna Crain Clemmer, Staff Attorney for the Appellee 4. Christopher D. Nobles, Attorney for Appellant/Employer 5. Ms. Tempestt Griffin, Claimant 6. Honorable Robert Helfrich, Forrest County Circuit Court Judge This the 17th day of June, Isl Albert Bozeman White Albert Bozeman White Assistant General Counsel (MSB #7132) Mississippi Department of Employment Security Anna Crain Clemmer Staff Attorney (MSB #104279) Mississippi Department of Employment Security H

4 TABLE OF CASES AND OTHER AUTHORITIES CASES PAGE Allen v. Mississippi Employment Security Commission So. 2d 904 (Miss. 1994) Barnett v. Mississippi Employment Security Commission So. 2d 193 (Miss. 1991) Booth v. Mississippi Employment Security Commission So. 2d 422 (Miss. 1991) Brandon v. Mississippi Employment Security Commission So. 2d 341 (Miss. 2000) Little v. Mississippi Employment Security Commission... 5,9, So. 2d 1258 (Miss. Ct. App. 1999) Mississippi Department of Employment Security v. Johnson So. 2d 1273 (Miss. Ct. App. 2007) Richardson v. Mississippi Employment Security Commission, So. 2d 31 (Miss. 1992) OTHER AUTHORITIES Mississippi Code Annotated (A)(I)(b) Mississippi Code Annotated (A)(I)(c) 1 3,5 Mississippi Code Annotated... 5, Mississippi Code Annotated Mississippi Code Annotated , 10 4, 7 Mississippi Department of Employment Security Regulation... I, 5, 6, 8, 9, Uniform Rules of Circuit & County Court Practice... 4, 7 Rule 5.01, 5.02, 5.03 and 5.05 iii

5 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OVER THE RAINBOW DAYCARE APPELLANT VS. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY AND TEMPESTT GRIFFIN CAUSE NO CC APPELLEES BRIEF OF APPELLEE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY [Hereinafter also "MDES"] STATEMENT OF ISSUE I. Whether the Board of Review decision should be affirmed, finding the Employer, OVER THE RAINBOW DA YCARE, failed to participate the Administrative Law Judge's hearing on September 4, 2014, and thus failed to prove by substantial evidence that the Claimant, TEMPESTT GRIFFIN, was discharged for disqualifying misconduct under Mississippi Code Annotated Section (A)(I)(b) (Rev. 2007)? 2. Whether the Board of Review's decision is supported by substantial evidence and should be affirmed, because the Employer, OVER THE RAINBOW DA YCARE, defaulted by failing to participate and offer proof at the Administrative Law Judge's hearing on September 4, 2014, pursuant to the provisions of Mississippi Department of Employment Security Regulation (December I, 2007)?

6 STATEMENT OF THE CASE TEMPESTT GRIFFIN [hereinafter also "Claimant"] was employed as care giver for OVER THE RAINBOW DA YCARE [hereinafter also "Employer"] from January 6, 2014, until July 17,2014, when she was discharged. (R. Vol. 2, p. 1, 10-12). Ms. Griffin was discharged due to an alleged physical altercation with the owner, her supervisor. (R. Vol. 2, p ,29-35). After her discharge, Ms. Griffin filed for unemployment benefits. (R. Vol. 2, p. 1). A Claims Examiner investigated by interviewing Ms. Griffin and Renee Causey, owner and Ms. Griffin's supervisor. (R. Vol. 2 p. 7-9). Based on the information obtained, the Claims Examiner determined that Ms. Griffin was discharged due to misconduct and disqualified her from receiving benefits. (R. Vol. 2, p. 10, 11). Ms. Griffin appealed. (R. Vol. 2, p. 14). The Employer and Claimant notified that an appeal had been filed; and that the hearing would be "de novo," meaning that the Judge could only consider the evidence presented at the hearing in making hislher decision. (R. Vol. 2, p ). Subsequently, the telephonic hearing was scheduled for September 4,2014. (R. Vol. 2, p ). The notice of hearing informed the parties of the issue(s) to be considered, and that the Employer had the burden of proving misconduct. The notice further provided that if a party had not heard from the ALJ within ten (10) minutes of the hearing start time, he/she should call the provided MDES phone number. (R. Vol. 2, p ). On the date and time of the hearing, the Administrative Law Judge ["ALJ"] convened the hearing. (R. Vol. 2, p ). Ms. Griffin only participated and testified. The ALJ attempted to contact the Employer multiple times, but could not reach anyone. (R. Vol. 2, p ). Strangely, it appeared that someone was answering the Employer's phone number but then immediately hanging up without ever inquiring as to who was calling. Pursuant to the Employment Security Lmv statutes and regulations, the ALJ further found

7 that the since Employer failed to participate, it failed to meet its burden of proving that Ms. Griffin was discharged due to misconduct, as defined by the Employment Security Law, and case authorities. Thus, Ms. Griffin was awarded benefits. (R. Vol. 2, p ). The Employer appealed. (R. Vol. 2, p. 34) After carefully reviewing the record, the Board of Review affirmed the ALJ's decision. (R. Vol. 2, p. 40, 42). The ALJ's fact findings and conclusion were as follows, in pertinent part, to-wit: CASE HISTORY The claimant timely appealed a determination of the Mississippi Department of Employment Security which concluded that the claimant was discharged for misconduct connected with the work. A telephonic hearing before the Administrative Law Judge was held on 09/04/2014 at which time only the claimant participated in the hearing. The employer did not provide a representative or a telephone number at which to be contacted for the hearing. In the absence of the employer, no testimony was taken. ISSUE The issues to be considered in this case are whether the claimant is entitled to benefits based on the reason for separation from employment, and whether the employers experience rating record is chargeable for benefits which may be paid to the claimant. FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the record, the Administrative Law Judge finds that the claimant was discharged from employment by the employer. REASONING AND CONCLUSION Section A (I) (c) of the Mississippi Employment Security Law provides that the burden of proof to establish misconduct shall be on the employer. The Administrative Law Judge, after careful review of the case and the applicable Law, is of the opinion the burden of proof as required in Section A (I) (c) 3

8 of the law was not met by the employer and misconduct connected with the work has not been established. Therefore, a disqualification is not in order. DECISION Reversed. If otherwise eligible, the claimant is entitled to the receipt of benefits based on the job separation. The employer's account is chargeable for any benefits paid within the current benefit year. (R. Vol. 2, p ). The Employer then appealed to the Circuit Court of Forrest County, Mississippi. (R. Vol. 2, p , R. Vol. I, p. 6-14). In so doing, counsel for the Employer inappropriately attached an Incident Report, in which Ms. Causey filed a simple assault charge against Ms. Griffm. (R. Vol. I, p ). Doing so was inappropriate, because Mississippi Code Annotated Section (Rev. 2007) provides that appeal from MDES decision shall be upon the record made before the MDES and shall be confined to questions of law only. Doing so was also inappropriate, because Uniform Circuit Court Rules, Rule No. 5.01, 5.02, 5.03 and 5.05 provide that appeals from administrative agencies shall be on the record made before the administrative agency only and not de novo. According to this statute and the Uniform Circuit Court Rules, MDES filed its Answer and the record on November 17,2014. (R. Vol. I, p ). Subsequently, prior to any Briefs being filed, on November 20, 2014, the Forrest County Circuit Court entered its Order affirming the MDES decision. (R. Vol. I, p ). The Employer then appealed to this Honorable Court. (R. Vol. I, p ). 4

9 SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT Pursuant to Mississippi Code Annotated Section A(I)(c) (Rev. 2007), an employer has the burden of proving misconduct. Further, the case authorities provide that an employer must prove misconduct by clear and convincing substantial evidence. See Brandon v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Comm'n, 768 So. 2d 341 (Miss. 2000) (employer's burden of proof not met regarding alleged violation of policy). Further, pursuant to its rule-making authority, MDES adopts Unemployment Insurance Regulations. Miss. Code Ann (Rev. 2007). Appeal Regulation provides that the Appeals Department may make an informal disposition by default when the party with the burden of proof fails to appear. A copy thereof is attached hereto as Exhibit "A." Thus, failure to appear or participate is a default; and a default ruling may be entered. Pursuant to this statute, the determination as the Employer's default is within MDES's authority to determine under Mississippi Code Annotated Sections and (Rev. 2007), and the Regulation making authority of MDES; and is in fact mandated under the applicable case authorities applicable to the facts of this case. In, Little v. Mississippi Employment Security Comm'n, 754 So. 2d 1258 (Miss. Ct. of App. \999), the Court of Appeals addresses a case in which the employer failed to appear and testify. This case is directly on point on the obligation of the party with the burden of proof appearing and testifying to meet their statutory burden of proof. Id. In this case, the Court reverses MESC (now MDES) for finding misconduct where the employer failed to appear and testify. In so ruling, the Court stated that in the absence of evidence offered by the employer, the Claimant was 5

10 not required to testify. The Court further holds that where an employer fails to appear and offer evidence, the employer does not meet its burden of proving misconduct by clear and convincing evidence as a matter of law. Id. Thus, conforming to this decision, MOES appropriately holds in this case that the Employer fails to meet its burden of proof, reversing the Claims Examiner decision. (R. Vol. 2, p ). In the instant case, Ms. Griffin only was available to testify at the hearing. Further, the ALJ followed MOES procedure in repeatedly attempting to contact the Employer at the phone number provided. The record reflects that the All followed MDES procedure by recessing the hearing for ten (10) minutes, reconvening the hearing, and again attempting several times to contact the Employer. Unemployment Insurance Reglliation Further, the record reflects that the call was answered, and then immediately disconnected by the answering party. (R. Vol. 2, p , 23-29). Incredulously, as set out in counsel for the Employer's brief, the Employer representative was apparently available to testify, and admitted answering the phone. However, after answering the AU's call, she immediately hung up, and did so without first determining the identity of the caller. Thus, the Employer representative obviously received the hearing notice, and was available to testify, but to her detriment failed to take the call and participate in the hearing. Based upon the case authorities as set out herein, and the Employer's failure to offer any testimony at the hearing de novo, the Board of Review correctly found that the Employer failed to meet its burden of proving that Ms. Griffin's committed disqualifying misconduct. Thus, this Honorable Court should affirm the Circuit Court and MOES decisions. 6

11 In the event the Court finds that the Employer demonstrated good cause for not participating in the hearing, which MDES opposes, this matter should be remanded by the Court to the MDES to conduct a de novo hearing with both parties participating, and a decision. Further, MDES opposes the Court giving any consideration to any evidentiary documents submitted by counsel for the Employer that were not made a part of the record before MDES, because doing so is inappropriate under the statutes and Uniform Circuit CalirI Rilles. Id. at Should the Court find that such document should be considered, again, this matter should be remanded by the Court to the MDES to conduct a de novo hearing with both parties participating, and a decision. ARGUMENT Standard of Review The Employer's appeal is governed by Mississippi Code Annotated Section (Rev. 1995), which provides for an appeal to the Circuit Court by any party aggrieved by the decision of the Board of Review. Section states that the appeals court shall consider the record made before the Board of Review and. absent fraud. shall accept the findings of fact if supported by substantial evidence. and the correct law has been applied. (Emphasis added). Richardson v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Comm'n, 593 So.2d 31 (Miss. 1992); Barnett v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Comm'n, 583 So.2d 193 (Miss. 1991); Booth v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Comm'n, 588 So.2d 422 (Miss. 1991). Further, a rebuttal presumption exists in favor of the Board of Review's decision and the challenging party has the burden of proving otherwise. Allen v. Mississippi Employment Sec. Comm'n, 639 So.2d 904 (Miss. 1994). The appeals court must not reweigh the facts nor 7

12 insert its judgment for that of the agency. [d. Facts In the instant case, Ms. Griffin only was available to testify at the hearing. Further, the ALJ followed MDES procedure in repeatedly attempting to contact the Employer at the phone number provided. The record reflects that the ALJ followed MDES procedure by recessing the hearing for ten (10) minutes, reconvening the hearing and again attempting several times to contact the Employer. Unemployment Insurance Regulation Further, the record reflects that the call was answered, and then immediately disconnected by the answering party. (R. Vol. 2, p , 23-29). Incredulously, as set out in counsel for the Employer's brief, the Employer representative was apparently available to testify, and admitted answering the phone. However, after answering the ALJ's call, she immediately hung up, and did so without first determining the identity of the caller. Thus, the Employer representative obviously received the hearing notice, and was available to testify, but to her detriment failed to take the call, and failed to participate. Argument and Authorities The critical issue is whether the Employer met its burden of proving misconduct by clear and convincing evidence by appearing and testifying at the hearing. The Employer was given notice, but failed to participate in the hearing and testify. The hearing notice provided that the hearing would be to determine the reason for separation, and whether its account would be chargeable. (R. Vol. 2, p ). Since hearings before the MDES are "de novo," the Employer's failure to ofter any proof is tantamount to a default under both case law and the 8

13 Department's Regulations. Unemployment Insurance Regulations (December I, 2007). Regarding the Employer' s burden of appearing at the hearing and making out a clear and convincing case establishing misconduct, in Little v. Mississippi Emplovment Securitv Comm'n, 754 So. 2d 1258 (Miss. Ct. of App. 1999), the Court of Appeals addresses a case in which the employer failed to appear and testify. This case is directly on point. In this case, the lillie, supra, the Claims Examiner disqualified the claimant based on committing disqualifying misconduct. The claimant appealed. The employer failed to appear and testify. The MDES referee (now ALJ) nevertheless took testimony from the claimant; and based on that testimony alone affirmed the Claims Examiner's decision, finding that claimant committed disqualifying misconduct. Id. at In reversing the Court held stated as follows: Id. at "In the absence of evidence of misconduct established by KFC, Little was not required to offer rebuttal evidence or an explanation. The requirement by the referee that Little offer evidence to rebut KFC's allegation of misconduct, when no evidence of misconduct had been offered, was an improper shifting of the burden of proof... We find this action to be contrary to the provision of the Unemployment Compensation Act... When the improperly obtained evidence is excluded, there is no substantive evidence to support denial of benefits. Accordingly, the Court reverses and renders Judgment for Little." Lillie was a unanimous decision. Regarding application of Unemployment Insurance Regulations, Appeal Regulation provides that the Appeals Department may make an informal disposition by default when the party with the burden of proof fails to appear. Thus, failure to appear or participate is a default; and a default ruling may be entered. Pursuant to this statute, the determination as the Employer's 9

14 default is within MDES's authority to determine under Mississippi Code Annotated Sections and (Rev. 2007), and the Regulation making authority ofmdes; and is in fact mandated under the case authorities applicable to the facts of this case. Lillie. supra. The Court of Appeals applied this Regulation in Miss. Dept. Employment Sec. v. Johnson, 977 So. 2d 1273 (Miss. Ct. of App 2007). In this case, the Claims Examiner disqualified the claimant for misconduct. The claimant appealed. However, neither the claimant nor the employer participated at the hearing; and the Administrative Appeals Officer (now All) affirmed finding that the claimant abandoned her appeal applying Appeal Regulation On further appeal by the claimant, the Circuit Court however reversed and awarded claimant benefits, finding that the employer failed to present any evidence of misconduct. On appeal by the employer to the Court of Appeals, the Court reversed the Circuit Court reinstating the Board of Review's decision, finding that pursuant to Appeal Regulation , the claimant had abandoned her appeal. Id. at Further, counsel mistakenly references the MDES website arguing that the website provides that if a party does not appear, the decision will be made on the testimony of the appearing party, or record previously made. Counsel for Claimant misinterprets this website information. This information is accurate where a claimant failed to appear or participate, in which case the earlier decision, i.e. the Claims Examiner's decision, would be applied, because the claimant would have effectively abandoned hislher appeal. However, pursuant to the Little and Johnson cases, this information would not apply where an employer alone fails to appear and participate, and the Claims Examiner's previous ruling was that the claimant had committed misconduct. 10

15 Website infonnation is just that, infonnation. It is not designed, and cannot be, comprehensive of all MDES statutes, Regulations and applicable case authorities. Thus, any reliance in this matter on what the website reflects is inappropriate. The statutes, Regulations and applicable case authorities control. Further, counsel for the Employer does not allege any reliance on the website by the Employer representative for not participating in the hearing. In the instant case, the Employer has effectively abandoned its appeal by failing to participate in the hearing; and this Honorable Court should affinn. However, counsel for the Employer argues that since the Employer representative was available to testify, but mistakenly did not take the ALJ's phone call, the Employer presumably had good cause for not participating. However, neither this excuse nor any other good cause excuse, would entitle the Court to apply the oral statements made to the Claims Examiner as evidence, which are not evidence to be considered by the ALJ, as the statute calls for a de novo ALJ hearing. Further, there is no statute, rule of evidence or Regulation that entitles counsel for the Employer to request this Court to admit the Incident Report into evidence on an appeal, or in any way rely upon, or request that the Court consider that Incident Report in making its decision. In that regard, doing so would be inappropriate, because the Claimant has not had an opportunity to rebut said Incident Report, or present any evidence of her own. In the event the Court finds that the Employer demonstrated good cause for not participating in the hearing, which MDES opposes, this matter should be remanded by the Court to the MDES to conduct a de novo hearing with both parties participating, and a decision. Further, MDES opposes the Court giving any consideration to any evidentiary documents submitted by 11

16 counsel for the Employer that were not made a part of the record before MDES; and asserts that doing so is inappropriate under the statute and Uniform Circuit Courl Rules. Should the Court find that such document should be considered, again, this matter should be remanded by the Court to the MDES to conduct a de novo hearing with both parties participating, and a decision. CONCLUSION The testimony does not support a finding that the Employer proved Ms. Griffin was discharged due to misconduct by any evidence, much less by clear and convincing substantial evidence. Further, the Employer has defaulted by failing to participate in the hearing, entitling MDES to dismiss this matter and award benefits to the Claimant. Where the Board of Review's decision is supported by the evidence and follows the law, the appeals court should accept the Board's Findings of Fact and Decision, and Circuit Court's ruling; and affirm. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITIED, this the 17th day of June, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENTSECUruTY OF COUNSEL: Albert Bozeman White MDES Assistant General Counsel MSB No Post Office Box 1699 Jackson, MS Phone: By: /s/ Albert Bozeman White ALBERT BOZEMAN WHITE Assistant General Counsel 12

17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Albert Bozeman White, Attorney for Appellee, Mississippi Department of Employment Security, do hereby certify that I have this day electronically filed the foregoing pleading with the Clerk using the MEC system, with a copy having been mailed via the USPS, postage prepaid, to the following: Christopher D. Nobles, Esq. Roberts and Associates P. 0. Box 1953 Hattiesburg, MS Honorable Robert Helfrich Circuit Court Judge, Forrest County Post Office Box 309 Hattiesburg, MS Tempestt Griffin 514 N. George A venue Petal, MS This the 17th day of June, Isl Albert Bozeman White ALBERT BOZEMAN WHITE 13

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Apr 8 2016 14:20:08 2015-CC-01422 Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY vs. VS. ARDERS

More information

1- IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CC BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY

1- IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CC BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY 1- IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2008-CC-02142 MARGIE BROWN PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT VS. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY AND W AL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC. DEFENDANT/APPELLEES

More information

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY STATE A TE OF MISSISSIPPI ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY STATE A TE OF MISSISSIPPI ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Sep 11 2015 14:30:20 2014-CC-00928 Pages: 22 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BOARD OF SUPERVISORS vs. VS. MISSISSIPPI

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK DANTRE FLUKER APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-CP-1182-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V. CAUSE NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V. CAUSE NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Aug 5 2014 01:08:18 2014-CA-00054-COA Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DENNIS TERRY HUTCHINS APPELLANT V. CAUSE NO. 2014-CA-00054-COA

More information

E-Filed Document Sep :10: CA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.

E-Filed Document Sep :10: CA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. E-Filed Document Sep 24 2015 10:10:03 2015-CA-00526 Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2015-CA-00526 S&M TRUCKING, LLC APPELLANT VERSUS ROGERS OIL COMPANY OF COLUMBIA,

More information

COPy IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

COPy IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COPy IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TAURUS CALDWELL VS. FILED MAY 202008,,"HCE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURr ~OURT OF APPEALS APPELLANT NO. 2008-CP-0150 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jun 11 2015 15:58:25 2014-CC-00928 Pages: 23 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JACKSON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI VERSUS MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURITY APPELLANT

More information

THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI ALBERT ABRAHAM, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2009-CP-01759 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF DESOTO COUNTY BRIEF FOR APPELLANT Oral Argument Requested

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Mar 13 2017 09:59:29 2015-CP-01388-COA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DANA EASTERLING APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01388-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Feb 4 2016 13:24:50 2015-CP-00758-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RICKY EUGENE JOHNSON APPELLANT vs. VS. NO.2015-CP-00758 ST ATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI FILED OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI r;~~' ~\~/~I,,I - "-- MAURICE GRAY APPELLANT FILED VS. FEB 252008 NO.2007-CA-0160-COA OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2009-CP-01387 HARRISON LEWIS, JR. APPELLANT VS. AZHARPASHA APELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LAUDERDALE COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO: 2009-CA AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC. APPELLEE'S BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO: 2009-CA AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC. APPELLEE'S BRIEF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI PHILVESTER AND JOYCE WILLIAMS VS. AMERICA'S HOME PLACE, INC. APPELLANTS CAUSE NO: 2009-CA-01107 APPELLEE APPELLEE'S BRIEF James D. Bell, MSB #..., BELL & ASSOCIATES,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SYLVESTER YOUNG, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2009-CP-2026 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY and JOHN D.

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY and JOHN D. E-Filed Document Jan 12 2017 15:26:19 2016-CA-01085 Pages: 15 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2016-CA-01085 MARLIN BUSINESS BANK APPELLANT V. STEVENS

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP-00950

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP-00950 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2009-CP-00950 MARVIN ARTHUR APPELLANT VS. TUNICA COUNTY MISSISSIPPI AND TUNICA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. APPELLEES 011 Appeal from tile Circllit COllrt of TUl1ic(/

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NUMBER 2015-KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NUMBER 2015-KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR APPELLANT E-Filed Document Mar 22 2016 11:54:28 2015-KA-00623-COA Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NUMBER 2015-KA-00623 DENNIS THOMPSON APPELLANT V. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CASE NO KA HOSAN M. AZOMANI, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CASE NO KA HOSAN M. AZOMANI, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI E-Filed Document Dec 12 2016 13:11:01 2015-CT-00050-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 2015-KA-00050 HOSAN M. AZOMANI, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee PETITION FOR WRIT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Aug 28 2015 11:05:44 2014-KA-01230-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TIMMY DAVIS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-01230 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO IA SCT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO IA SCT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2008-IA-01191-SCT SHANNON HOLMES AND STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY APPELLANTS VS. LEE MCMILLAN APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT OF HINDS

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED E-Filed Document Jan 13 2014 16:30:11 2013-CA-01004 Pages: 21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA HUDSON VS. LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2013-CA-01004

More information

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT NO EC ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT NO EC ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT IN THE MISSISSIPPI SUPREME COURT ANDREW THOMPSON, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2007-EC-01989 CHARLES LEWIS JONES APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COAHOMA COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Aug 21 2014 17:48:58 2014-KA-00188-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JEFFREY ALLEN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-00188-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CC GLENN TODD WILSON APPELLANT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CC GLENN TODD WILSON APPELLANT MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS APPELLEE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CC-00288 GLENN TODD WILSON APPELLANT v. MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS APPELLEE On Appeal From the Circnit Conrt of Forrest County, Mississippi

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CA CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT E-Filed Document Dec 2 2016 16:11:11 2016-CA-00678 Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CA-00678 CITY OF JACKSON, MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT VS BEN ALLEN, INDIVIDUALLY AND

More information

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff E-Filed Document May 10 2016 11:30:53 2015-CA-01496 Pages: 9 IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS 2015-CA-01496 JOSHUA HOWARD Appellant-Defendant v. THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee-Plaintiff BRIEF OF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Dec 1 2014 16:28:06 2013-KA-01785-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TREVOR HOSKINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-KA-01785-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Feb 26 2015 11:04:08 2014-CP-00755-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ROY DALE WALLACE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-0755-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI VINCENT BAILEY APPELLANT VS. NO. 2010-CP-0699 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2007-CP JOHN HENRY ADAMS APPELLANT. vs. GLORIA GIBBS, DIRECTOR OF RECORDS APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2007-CP JOHN HENRY ADAMS APPELLANT. vs. GLORIA GIBBS, DIRECTOR OF RECORDS APPELLEE , - IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2007-CP-00623 JOHN HENRY ADAMS APPELLANT vs. GLORIA GIBBS, DIRECTOR OF RECORDS APPELLEE On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Sunflower County, Mississippi

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP STEVEN EASON APPELLANT. On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP STEVEN EASON APPELLANT. On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2008-CP-01499 STEVEN EASON APPELLANT vs. CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, ALICIA BOX and RONALD KING APPELLEES On Appeal From the Circuit Court of Greene County, Mississippi

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE

BRIEF OF THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Dec 22 2016 15:32:53 2016-CA-01085 Pages: 15 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI MARLIN BUSINESS BANK vs. STEVENS AUCTION COMPANY AND JOHN D. STEVENS APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 20I6-CA-OI 2016-CA-011085

More information

REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS

REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS E-Filed Document Jan 3 2017 15:44:13 2016-WC-00842-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI SHANNON ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION, INC. and ASSOCIATED GENERAL CONTRACTORS OF MS, INC. APPELLANTS

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 22 2015 12:14:02 2015-CP-00008-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY HOLTON APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00008 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Feb 27 2017 15:41:09 2016-CA-01033-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL ISHEE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-CA-01033-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO.: 2013-IA SCT BRIEF OF APPELLANT INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL. ERIC C. HAWKINS Post Office Box 862

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO.: 2013-IA SCT BRIEF OF APPELLANT INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL. ERIC C. HAWKINS Post Office Box 862 DOROTHY ANN GLENN IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI 1 NO.: 2013-IA-01112-SCT APPELLANT v. ANDREW POWELL APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL ERIC C. HAWKINS Post Office Box 862 Green~ TE~~~

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEALED FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WARREN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPEALED FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF WARREN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT E-Filed Document May 6 2014 13:34:19 2013-CA-01501 Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CLARENCE JONES VERSUS STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT 2013-CA-01501 APPELLEE APPEALED FROM THE

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA-00442

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO CA-00442 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CAUSE NO. 2009-CA-00442 LA V ADA THOMAS APPELLANT VERSUS FIRST FEDERAL BANK FOR SAVINGS APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Oct 13 2015 14:04:25 2013-CP-02023-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI COURTNEY ELKINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-02023-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Jan 8 2016 13:04:43 2014-KA-01838-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ROBERT W. TRIPLETT a/k/a ROBERT WARREN TRIPLETT, JR. a/k/a ROBERT TRIPLETT, JR. a/k/a

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Apr 4 2017 16:36:59 2016-CP-01145-COA Pages: 19 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI THOMAS HOLDER APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-CP-01145 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

E-Filed Document Jun :06: KA COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY

E-Filed Document Jun :06: KA COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY E-Filed Document Jun 21 2017 11:06:32 2016-KA-01267-COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI HUNTER LANE SARRETT vs. VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT NO. 2016-TS-01267-COA APPELLEE APPELLANT'S

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 8 2015 13:57:01 2014-CP-00165-COA Pages: 7 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NATHANIEL WALDEN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-00165-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-0547 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA-0547 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Nov 2 2015 14:15:34 2013-CT-00547-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MILTON TROTTER APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CA-0547 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE SUPPLEMENTAL

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CT SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jul 29 2016 14:31:24 2014-CT-00615-SCT Pages: 8 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2014-CT-00615-SCT WILLIAM MICHAEL JORDAN APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE SUPPLEMENTAL

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DERRICK POSS APPELLANT VS. NO.2008-CP-1686-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,

More information

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,302 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. CRYSTAL NICOLE KURI, Appellant,

NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION. No. 117,302 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. CRYSTAL NICOLE KURI, Appellant, NOT DESIGNATED FOR PUBLICATION No. 117,302 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS CRYSTAL NICOLE KURI, Appellant, v. STATE OF KANSAS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, EMPLOYMENT SECURITY BOARD OF REVIEW, Appellee.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OTTIS J. CUMMINGS, JR. NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OTTIS J. CUMMINGS, JR. NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Apr 8 2016 16:33:38 2015-CP-01418-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI OTTIS J. CUMMINGS, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01418-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

No. 45,122-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * *

No. 45,122-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA * * * * * Versus * * * * * Judgment rendered April 14, 2010. Application for rehearing may be filed within the delay allowed by art. 2166, La. C.C.P. No. 45,122-CA COURT OF APPEAL SECOND CIRCUIT STATE OF LOUISIANA JERRY W. BAUGHMAN

More information

E-Filed Document Oct :50: CA Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

E-Filed Document Oct :50: CA Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Oct 20 2014 14:50:37 2014-CA-00381 Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI PATRICK W. DECKARD VS. LESA M. DECKARD APPELLANT CAUSE NO.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Dec 28 2015 17:29:25 2014-KA-00664-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES JOHNSON APPELLANT V. 2014-KA-00664-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE MOTION FOR

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LARRY W. BROWN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2008-CP-0789 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM HOOD,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Mar 2 2018 13:44:46 2017-KA-00853-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHN WARE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-00853 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA COA VICTOR BYAS AND MARY BYAS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA COA VICTOR BYAS AND MARY BYAS CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES E-Filed Document Feb 24 2017 16:23:57 2015-CA-00749-COA Pages: 6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2015-CA-00749-COA IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF VIVIAN BYAS, DECEASED VICTOR BYAS

More information

COMES NOW Appellant, Douglas Michael Long, Jr. (hereinafter Doug ), by

COMES NOW Appellant, Douglas Michael Long, Jr. (hereinafter Doug ), by E-Filed Document Feb 28 2017 15:47:26 2015-CT-00527-SCT Pages: 7 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI DOUGLAS MICHAEL LONG, JR. APPELLANT VS. CAUSE NO.: 2015-CA-00527 DAVID J. VITKAUSKAS APPELLEE PETITION

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE N ca NO.2014-ca-00984

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE N ca NO.2014-ca-00984 E-Filed Document Dec 23 2014 11:31:08 2014-CA-00984 Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE N0.2014-ca-00984 NO.2014-ca-00984 VIRGINIA ROSS, on behalf of all beneficiaries of SCOTT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Sep 30 2016 10:44:44 2016-KA-00422-COA Pages: 17 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAIRUS COLLINS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2016-KA-00422 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 14 2015 11:36:28 2014-KA-01327-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MAURICE TOWNSEND APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-KA-01327-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

NO KA COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE.

NO KA COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE. E-Filed Document May 29 2015 11:28:47 2013-KA-02000-COA Pages: 11 NO. 2013-KA-02000-COA IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRYN ELLIS APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE. ON APPEAL

More information

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

REPLY BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jul 10 2017 16:56:22 2016-KA-01527-COA Pages: 9 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI RODISE JENKINS APPELLANT V. NO. 2016-KA-01527-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE REPLY

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Apr 6 2016 16:21:36 2014-KA-01520-COA Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI KENNY STEWART APPELLANT V. NO. 2014-KA-01520-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO KA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Mar 1 2018 15:21:48 2017-KA-01141-COA Pages: 15 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CRAYTONIA BADGER APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-KA-01141 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT, MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS

IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLANT, MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS VS. STEVE LACROIX APPELLANT 2008-CA-01744 APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLANT, MARSHALL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON APPEAL

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES ALBERT WIGGINS VS. BILLY RAY PERRY APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2006-CA-01126 APPELLEE BRIEF OF APPELLEE ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED LINDSEY C. MEADOR MEADOR & CRUMP P.O.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF OF APPELLEE N THE SUPREME COURT OF MSSSSPP COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MSSSSPP EMC ENTERPRSES, NC., a Louisiana corporation APPELLANT VS. CVL ACTON NO. 2007-CC-01770 MSSSSPP DEPARTMENT OF EMPLOYMENT SECURTY APPELLEE

More information

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CA-OI040

SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CA-OI040 SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF MISSISSIPPI 2011-CA-OI040 SHEILA DANETTE WELLS APPELLANT VS. FRANK PRICE and PHIL PRICE d/b/a PRICE CONSTRUCTIOCOMPANY CANTON SHEET METAL AND ROOFING APPELLEES

More information

v. No CA SCT DOROTHY L. BARNETT, et al. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY NO CIV ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

v. No CA SCT DOROTHY L. BARNETT, et al. ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF HINDS COUNTY NO CIV ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED E-Filed Document May 30 2017 17:35:20 2013-CT-01296-SCT Pages: 11 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MISSISSIPPI VALLEY SILICA COMPANY, INC. APPELLANT v. No. 2013-CA-01296-SCT DOROTHY L.

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI JADONNA PEARSON VERSUS LIGHTHOUSE POINT CASINO APPELLANT NO.2009-WC-00908COA APPELLEE APPELLEE'S SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S REPLY BRIEF Mark W. Verret

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No TS CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR CERTIORARI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No TS CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PETITION FOR CERTIORARI E-Filed Document Jun 1 2018 09:30:47 2016-CT-00928-SCT Pages: 6 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No. 2016-TS-00928 CURTIS RAY MCCARTY, JR. APPELLANT VS. ARTHUR E. WOOD, III, AND PAULA WOOD APPELLEES

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CASE NO.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. E-Filed Document Aug 18 2017 15:49:36 2016-CP-01539 Pages: 17 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2016-CP-01539 BRENT RYAN PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT v. LOWNDES COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER, ET AL.

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DONALD GREGORY CHAMBLISS NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DONALD GREGORY CHAMBLISS NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 29 2015 16:09:56 2015-CP-00263-COA Pages: 11 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DONALD GREGORY CHAMBLISS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-00263-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO TS-01200

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO TS-01200 E-Filed Document Mar 21 2014 23:59:24 2013-CA-01200 Pages: 16 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2013-TS-01200 HARVEY HALEY APPELLANT VS. ANNA JURGENSON; AGELESS REMEDIES FRANCHISING, LLC; AGELESS

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 6 2016 12:52:15 2015-CP-01248-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MICHAEL BRIAN BALLE APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CP-01248-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2016-CP HENRY HINTON APPELLANT BRIAN LADNER APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2016-CP HENRY HINTON APPELLANT BRIAN LADNER APPELLEE E-Filed Document May 2 2017 15:48:02 2016-CP-01494 Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2016-CP-01494 HENRY HINTON APPELLANT v. BRIAN LADNER APPELLEE ON APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT

More information

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED

ORAL ARGUMENT NOT REQUESTED IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.2008-TS-01434 JERMORRIS PILCHER APPELLANT VS. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, CIRCUIT COURT OF LEFLORE COUNTY,

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Jun 1 2015 20:59:33 2013-KA-02110-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NATHANIEL HAMPTON APPELLANT V. NO. 2013-KA-02110-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF

More information

E-Filed Document May :25: CA Pages: 18. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006

E-Filed Document May :25: CA Pages: 18. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006 E-Filed Document May 12 2014 14:25:52 2013-CA-01006 Pages: 18 2013-CA-01006 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI No.: 2013-CA-01006 C.H. MILES APPELLANT V. BRENDA C. MILES APPELLEE APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document May 3 2017 12:58:02 2015-CA-01650-COA Pages: 8 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI 2015-CA-01650 DERRICK DORTCH APPELLANT vs. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE MOTION FOR REHEARING

More information

E-Filed Document Dec :19: CA Pages: 17

E-Filed Document Dec :19: CA Pages: 17 E-Filed Document Dec 1 2017 18:19:55 2016-CA-01082 Pages: 17 IN THE MISSISSIPPI, SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 2016-CA-01082 TONY L. AND LINDA SMITH APPELLANTS VS. JOHN HENDON, UNION PLANTERS BANK, NA FIRST AMERICAN

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2013 CT SCT 2013-CT SCT. MILTON TROTTER, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2013 CT SCT 2013-CT SCT. MILTON TROTTER, Appellant. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee E-Filed Document Apr 4 2016 16:50:10 2013-CT-00547-SCT Pages: 15 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI No.2013 CT-00547-SCT 2013-CT-00547-SCT MILTON TROTTER, Appellant v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, Appellee BRIEF

More information

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT

BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT E-Filed Document Feb 2 2018 15:26:36 2017-KA-01455-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LADALE AIROSTEVE HOLLOWAY APPELLANT v. No. 2017-KA-01455-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING

IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI MOTION FOR REHEARING E-Filed Document Apr 18 2017 16:31:28 2016-WC-00346-COA Pages: 5 IN THE MISSISSIPPI COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI V. v. MID PRODUCTS d/b/a MODERN LINE (Date of Injury: 05, 05-15-12) 15,

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISsOE) PY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT LISA L.

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISsOE) PY STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT LISA L. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISsOE) PY SHAUN DERRELL SPRATT APPELLANT VS. NO.2007-CA-0791-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT JIM

More information

FILED MAR BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REOUESTED IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. CASE NO tlb2082 NANCYLOIT

FILED MAR BRIEF OF THE APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REOUESTED IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. CASE NO tlb2082 NANCYLOIT e O"y IN THE SUPREME COURT FOR THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2007-tlb2082 NANCYLOIT APPELLANT VERSUS HARRIS D. PURVIS AND BRJ INC. FILED MAR 3 1 2008 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURf COURT OF APPEAlS

More information

REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS

REPLY BRIEF FOR APPELLANTS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI WOODKREST CUSTOM HOMES INC., NATIONWIDE CUSTOM CONSTRUCTION, LLC and ROBERT KRESS, SR. individually APPELLANTS VS. CAUSE NO.: 2008-TS-00846 JAMES COOPER

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2016-TS SCT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2016-TS SCT E-Filed Document Apr 6 2017 10:50:18 2016-CA-00444 Pages: 16 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO: 2016-TS-00444-SCT L. H. MANNING, VIRGINIA WARREN, JOHN HENRY MANNING, EVA MANNING, GEANNIE JONES, AND

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0239-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0239-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Apr 22 2014 15:58:43 2013-CP-00239-COA Pages: 14 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI SHELBY RAY PARHAM APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-0239-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

WRIT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANDATE (MANDAMUS)

WRIT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANDATE (MANDAMUS) SAN MATEO COUNTY LAW LIBRARY RESEARCH GUIDE #13 WRIT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MANDATE (MANDAMUS This resource guide only provides guidance, and does not constitute legal advice. If you need legal advice you need

More information

Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, Table of Contents

Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, Table of Contents Administrative Rules for the Office of Professional Regulation Effective date: February 1, 2003 Table of Contents PART I Administrative Rules for Procedures for Preliminary Sunrise Review Assessments Part

More information

E-Filed Document Jun :33: KA COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO.

E-Filed Document Jun :33: KA COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. E-Filed Document Jun 2 2017 08:33:26 2017-KA-00177-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2017-KA-00177-COA CHRISTOPHER ALLEN JOINER APPELLANT V. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSIS~P py FILED AUG orefice OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSIS~P py FILED AUG orefice OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE ,. IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSIS~P py JUDY WILBANKS VS. FILED AUG - 6 2008 orefice OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT COURT OF APPEALS APPELLANT NO.2008-CA-01l9-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY LEWIS WASHINGTON NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY LEWIS WASHINGTON NO CP COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Jul 30 2014 19:56:53 2013-CP-02159-COA Pages: 12 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY LEWIS WASHINGTON APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-02159-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE

More information

APPELLATE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF

APPELLATE BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF POST-CONVICTION RELIEF E-Filed Document Sep 23 2015 13:42:39 2015-CA-00502-COA Pages: 18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI Trial Court Nos. 2006-109; 2006-157 / No. 2015-CA-00502-C0A NEDRA PITTMAN, Petitioner

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JAMES DA YID BRYANT, JR. V. PAMELA RENA SMITH BRYANT -e: APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2011-CA-00669 APPELLEE CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS The undersigned

More information

%QlW+u ' I IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT TIMOTHY DUPUIS NO CA-1635-COA VS. APPELLEE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI

%QlW+u ' I IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLANT TIMOTHY DUPUIS NO CA-1635-COA VS. APPELLEE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI %QlW+u ' I IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI TIMOTHY DUPUIS APPELLANT VS. NO. 2006-CA-1635-COA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CA STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE E-Filed Document Dec 15 2015 17:02:31 2015-CA-00502-COA Pages: 10 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NEDRA PITTMAN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2015-CA-00502 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF RANKIN COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI E-Filed Document Mar 29 2018 15:36:58 2017-KA-01112-COA Pages: 13 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JEFFREY MARTIN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2017-TS-01112 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE APPEAL

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0467 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP-0467 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT E-Filed Document Jul 29 2014 14:11:45 2013-CP-00467 Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI JOHNNY YEARBY, JR. APPELLANT VS. NO. 2013-CP-0467 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR

More information

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO CP STATE OF MISSISSIPPI BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE DOES NOT REQUEST ORAL ARGUMENT E-Filed Document Dec 16 2014 18:57:22 2014-CP-00558 Pages: 13 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI BARRON BORDEN APPELLANT VS. NO. 2014-CP-00558 STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE BRIEF FOR THE APPELLEE APPELLEE

More information