MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT
|
|
- Chastity Goodwin
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 CENTRAL AUTHORITY EAW Office of the Public Prosecutor at the Amsterdam International Centre for Mutual Legal Assistance (IRC) Kasper van der Schaft 05/07/2016 BRX MUTUAL RECOGNITION AND THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT
2 International Center for legal assistance (IRC) Amsterdam (5 prosecutors, 11 assistant-prosecutors and 16 administrative assistants) pagina 2/x Central authority incoming EAW s in the Netherlands Executing extradition requests EJN contact points Advising on issuing requests, advising on the Dutch (legal) system Acting in cooperation with a unit from the police Amsterdam on all kind of requests for legal assistance, most common: Interview suspects and witnesses (possibly by videoconferencing) Searching places, other seizure (e.g. by prosecutor or court order) Telecommunications; wire tapping (direct to requesting state possible), historical records Observation, controlled delivery Taking fingerprints and sharing them Sending exhibits (proof), photos and documents (e.g. files) Freezing and confiscation assets, digital data Service of judicial documents Afdeling Communicatie
3
4 Public Prosecutor at IRC Amsterdam (EAW) Different function in court, at the IRK (International Court Chamber) No accusation, no burden of proof Representing the position of the Netherlands in court, as well as representing the issuing authority/country
5 SCHENGEN/EU No border controls Free movement (stolen) goods and (criminal) people Free movement of judicials decisions in criminal matters
6 BASE OF THE EAW: MUTUAL TRUST and MUTUAL RECOGNITION TRUST COMES ON FOOT AND LEAVES ON HORSEBACK Mutual recognition (5) The objective set for the Union to become an area of freedom, security and justice leads to abolishing extradition between Member States and replacing it by a system of surrender between judicial authorities. Further, the introduction of a new simplified system of surrender of sentenced or suspected persons for the purposes of execution or prosecution of criminal sentences makes it possible to remove the complexity and potential for delay inherent in the present extradition procedures. Traditional cooperation relations which have prevailed up till now between Member States should be replaced by a system of free movement of judicial decisions in criminal matters, covering both pre-sentence and final decisions, within an area of freedom, security and justice. High level of confidence and Human Rights (10) The mechanism of the European arrest warrant is based on a high level of confidence between Member States. Its implementation may be suspended only in the event of a serious and persistent breach by one of the Member States of the principles set out in Article 6(1) of the Treaty on European Union ( ).
7
8
9 -
10 Differences EAW and traditional extradition Directly between judicial authorities Relatively quick (60-90 days is prescribed), > 90 free! Less grounds for refusal (MT/HmRi) 32 list offences (no check of double criminality) Standardized form MoJ does not decide and does not communicate
11 EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON EXTRADITION (and protocols thereto) Member-States: Council of Europe (this is including Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, Ukrain, Russia, Turkey, Iceland, Balkan-States, Albania and EU) and outside Council of Europe: Israel, South-Africa and South-Korea (art 30). Predecessor FD-EAW. Very simular refusal grounds, except: - Offences punishable with at least 12 months in both States - accessory extradition (1 is enough) - Statute of limitation checked regardless of jurisdiction
12 10. Overzicht van de landen van wie EAB's zijn ontvangen Land Naam Totaal Polen België Bondsrepubliek Duitsland Frankrijk Groot-Brittannië Italië Hongarije Roemenië Litouwen Spanje Oostenrijk Zweden Bulgarije Tsjechië Portugal Letland Finland Denemarken Griekenland Ierland Luxemburg Slowakije Estland Kroatië Slovenië Malta Cyprus 1 1 Totaal
13 Legality principle vs discretionairy principle Mandatory prosecution (PL/D/AT/FI/SVE/IT/ESP/PT/GR) or discretionary prosecution (NL/B/FR/DK/IE/UK/LUX) Proportionality System proportionality (stelselevenredigheid)
14
15
16 EAW s sent by NL België 507 (1:2) (ratio issued:received) Duitsland 343 (1:2,7) Bulgarije 165 (3:1) Spanje 159 (2:1) Frankrijk 137 (1:2) Roemenië 136 (1,2:1) Polen 63 (1:23) Hongarije 53 (1:3,5) Italië 23 (1:10) Portugal 20 (1:1,5) Oostenrijk 19 (1:3) Denemarken 16 (1:1,3) Litouwen 13 (1:8,5) GB 1323/IER 242/CY 84/LO 262
17 LOST IN TRANSLATION Importance of speaking the same legal language. Translation can make the difference between a surrender or refusal, Yes can be No and No can be Yes Google translation?
18 Duidelijk? (Clear?) IRC EUV ETM IRK IVS SIS AIRS 552p EHRM (KB)EAB WETS EVRM WOTS VTBS VOGP ECJ KMAR SUO UNTOC EBB JIT EOB EJN MLA EVIG EGTUL CPT ETC
19 -
20
21 Voorbeeld Polen 3
22
23
24 PROCEDURES Accellerated procedure: Only with the consent of the wanted person, consent must be expressed in front of a investigating judge or a IRC prosecutor Consent is binding The prosecutor decides within 10 days (refusal grounds art 6, 9, 11) Waive of specialty in NL Prohibited by Dutch law in case of a running Dutch prosecution/ execution of a sentence Normal procedure: Court of Amsterdam, 3 judges decide, within days, > 90 Free! Rule of speciality applies
25 GROUNDS FOR REFUSAL (optional = mandatory) Based on articles 2, 3 and 4 of FD) Offences punishable with at least 12 months (art. 7 OLW) Double criminality (art. 2 en 7 OLW) In absentia verdicts (art. 12 OLW) Surrender of Dutch Nationals and (EU-)residents (art. 6 OLW) Ne bis in idem (art. 9 OLW) Statute of limitation (art. 9 OLW) Insufficient data (art 2 OLW) Territoriality (art. 13 OLW) Violation of human rights (art. 11 OLW) (not in FD!) Claim of innocence (art. 26 OLW) (not in FD!)
26 10. Overzicht van de landen van wie EAB's zijn ontvangen Land Naam Totaal Polen Bondsrepubliek Duitsland België Frankrijk Italië Groot-Brittannië Hongarije Litouwen Roemenië Spanje Oostenrijk Zweden Tsjechië Bulgarije Portugal Letland Finland Denemarken Griekenland Luxemburg Slowakije Ierland Estland Malta Slovenië Cyprus 1 1 Kroatië 0 0 Totaal
27 Kidnapped on their way to court
28
29 DOUBLE CRIMINALITY Two ways to approach double criminality in the FD (art. 2) 1) List of offences (art. 2 sub 2 FD) ticked: - No verification double criminality - At least punishable by 3 years of imprisonment - Still double criminality for nationals 2) No offence from the list (art. 2 sub 1 and 4 FD): - Verification double criminality - Punishable with imprisonment of at least 12 months (in 2 states)? (Verdicts: at least 4 months imprisonment applied) Art. 7 OLW
30 EXAMPLE 1) a package of weed A Polish national (Thomasz D.), living in Poland, travelled by car to the Netherlands and bought in a coffeeshop 25 grams of marihuana. He brought this in his car back to Poland and sells it in a period of 3 weeks to 10 different persons in Poland. The Polish police somehow detects the transactions and the Polish judge issues an EAW, because Thomasz cannot be found in Poland. A year later Thomasz is sitting on a bench in a park in Amsterdam, and - after smoking some joints - is talking in Polish to himself. A Dutch police-officer asks how he is doing and asks him to identify himself. After identification he is arrested on the basis of the EAW. Will the surrender be allowed by the Court in Amsterdam?
31 EXAMPLE 2) aiding prostitution Estonia issues an EAW. This is the offence: Mr. A. has been found guilty of committing an offence by way of him, in a group of persons, working together with others, on the date of pimping Anne O. to work as a prostitute in the Federal Republic of Germany. Qualification: aiding prostitution No listed offence is ticked. Can we agree with the surrender under Dutch Law?
32 EXAMPLE 2) aiding prostitution
TRACTATENBLAD VAN HET. Europees Verdrag betreffende uitlevering; Parijs, 13 december 1957
83 (1957) Nr. 34 TRACTATENBLAD VAN HET KONINKRIJK DER NEDERLANDEN JAARGANG 2012 Nr. 113 A. TITEL Europees Verdrag betreffende uitlevering; Parijs, 13 december 1957 B. TEKST De Engelse en de Franse tekst
More informationTRACTATENBLAD VAN HET KONINKRIJK DER NEDERLANDEN. JAARGANG 2006 Nr. 169
21 (1995) Nr. 3 TRACTATENBLAD VAN HET KONINKRIJK DER NEDERLANDEN JAARGANG 2006 Nr. 169 A. TITEL Overeenkomst opgesteld op grond van Artikel K.3 van het Verdrag betreffende de Europese Unie aangaande de
More information8414/1/14 REV 1 GS/mvk 1 DG D 2B
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 15 May 2014 8414/1/14 REV 1 COPEN 103 EJN 43 EUROJUST 70 NOTE From : General Secretariat To : Working Party on Cooperation in Criminal Matters (Experts on the European
More informationReport on Eurojust s casework in the field of the European Arrest Warrant
Report on Eurojust s casework in the field of the European Arrest Warrant 26 May 2014 REPORT ON EUROJUST S CASEWORK IN THE FIELD OF THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT This report concerns Eurojust s casework
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 28.9.2017 SWD(2017) 320 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Replies to questionnaire on quantitative information on the practical operation of the European arrest warrant
More informationGeneral Secretariat delegations Report on Eurojust's casework in the field on the European Arrest Warrant
026945/EU XXV. GP Eingelangt am 26/05/14 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 26 May 2014 10269/14 EUROJUST 103 COP 160 COVER NOTE From : To : Subject : General Secretariat delegations Report on Eurojust's
More informationProposal for a Council Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between the Member States (2001/C 332 E/18)
27.11.2001 Official Journal of the European Communities C 332 E/305 Proposal for a Council Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between the Member States (2001/C
More information11500/14 GS/mvk 1 DG D 2B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 3 July 2014 11500/14 COPEN 186 EJN 69 EUROJUST 126 NOTE From: General Secretariat To: Working Party on Cooperation in Criminal Matters (Experts on the European Arrest
More informationEJN Regional Meetings
Page 1/8 6-8 Oct 2010 Austria Innsbruck AT, CZ, DK, FI, DE, NL, SI, Liechtenstein, Switzerland Trans-border investigative measures and the Role of EJN The meeting achieved its aim of strengthening cooperation
More informationOVERQUALIFICATION as an indicator of labor market integration of highly educated immigrants: findings from the Labour Force Survey in Belgium
OVERQUALIFICATION as an indicator of labor market integration of highly educated immigrants: findings from the Labour Force Survey in Belgium Johan.Geets@ua.ac.be Policy Research Centre on Equal Opportunities
More informationSpain 2 vs France 4. -A murder case-
Spain 2 vs France 4 -A murder case- WHY TO EXECUTE 1. Reasons relating to the OBJECTIVES OF FD 2002/584/JHA on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States; 2. Reasons
More informationdr Tomasz Ostropolski Head of Unit, European Criminal Law Ministry of Justice, Poland BRUXELLES, 12 JUNE 2013
dr Tomasz Ostropolski Head of Unit, European Criminal Law Ministry of Justice, Poland BRUXELLES, 12 JUNE 2013 Territoriality Personality - active personality (ex-)prohibition of extradition of own nationals
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels 2 September /11 CRIMORG 124 COPEN 200 EJN 100 EUROJUST 122
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels 2 September 2011 13691/11 CRIMORG 124 COP 200 EJN 100 EUROJUST 122 NOTE from: the Polish delegation to: delegations No. prev. doc.: 14240/2/07/ CRIMORG 158 COP 144
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT. Accompanying document to
EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11.4.2011 SEC(2011) 430 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying document to the third Report from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council
More informationREPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL
EN EN EN EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11.4.2011 COM(2011) 175 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL On the implementation since 2007 of the Council Framework Decision
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 2 May /12 COPEN 97 EJN 32 EUROJUST 39
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 2 May 202 9200/2 COPEN 97 EJN 32 EUROJUST 39 NOTE From : General Secretariat To : Working Party on Cooperation in Criminal Matters (Experts on the European Arrest
More informationCOMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 28.9.2017 SWD(2017) 319 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Replies to questionnaire on quantitative information on the practical operation of the European arrest warrant
More informationEJN Regional Meetings
Page 1/15 6-8 Oct 2010 Austria Innsbruck AT, CZ, DK, FI, DE, NL, SI, Liechtenstein, Switzerland Trans-border investigative measures and the Role of EJN The meeting achieved its aim of strengthening cooperation
More informationSolution approaches. Workshop ERA Helsinki Defence Counsel. A), I. Request for information issue
Solution approaches Workshop ERA Helsinki 10.12.2011 DR. CLIFF GATZWEILER Defence Counsel A), I. Request for information issue A. Criminal investigation procedure in Norway I. The prosecutor requests mutual
More informationREPORT. On the operation of the European Arrest Warrant Act (as amended) in the year 2015 made to the Houses of the
REPORT On the operation of the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 (as amended) in the year 2015 made to the Houses of the Oireachtas by the Central Authority in the person of the Minister for Justice and
More informationInternational Cooperation in Criminal Matters. Mutual Legal Assistance
International Cooperation in Criminal Matters Mutual Legal Assistance Mutual Legal Assistance Outline of Presentation Overview MLA: When? & Why? What are possible? Existence of a national law Existence
More informationThe information contained in this table should be updated on a yearly basis. Procedure for search (asset-tracing) and seizure
Netherlands national procedures for mutual legal assistance on laundering, search, seizure and confiscation of proceeds of crime (ETS No. 141) Updated 09/06/2017 The information contained in this table
More informationStatewatch briefing on the European Evidence Warrant to the European Parliament
Statewatch briefing on the European Evidence Warrant to the European Parliament Introduction The Commission s proposal for a Framework Decision on a European evidence warrant, first introduced in November
More informationAct on the Amendments to the Act on Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters with Member States of the European Union
Act on the Amendments to the Act on Judicial Cooperation in Criminal Matters with Member States of the European Union Article 1 (1) This Act regulates the judicial cooperation in criminal matters between
More informationSeminar 4: Collecting evidence throughout the European Union II: The European Evidence Warrant and New Instruments in this Field
With financial support from the Criminal Justice Programme of the European Union Seminar 4: Collecting evidence throughout the European Union II: The European Evidence Warrant and New Instruments in this
More informationNe bis in idem. From obstacle to extradition to fundamental right not to be prosecuted twice within the EU
Ne bis in idem Old principles in new clothes From obstacle to extradition to fundamental right not to be prosecuted twice within the EU European Jurisdictional Conflicts Transfer of Proceedings I The Sources
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES
1.5.2014 L 130/1 I (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES DIRECTIVE 2014/41/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 3 April 2014 regarding the European Investigation Order in criminal matters THE EUROPEAN
More informationProcedure and upcoming tools for simplification. The European Investigation Order
Procedure and upcoming tools for simplification The European Investigation Order Todays presentation General introduction Issuing and executing EIO Practical tools to facilitate the use of EIO EIO Directive
More informationCriminal Procedure Code No. 301/2005 Coll.
Criminal Procedure Code No. 301/2005 Coll. P A R T F I V E L E G A L R E L A T I O N S W I T H A B R O A D CHAPTER ONE BASIC PROVISIONS Section 477 Definitions For the purposes of this Chapter: a) an international
More informationTHE SUPREME COURT THE MINISTER FOR JUSTICE EQUALITY AND LAW REFORM AND JOHN RENNER-DILLON
THE SUPREME COURT 104/10 Murray C.J. Denham J. Finnegan J. BETWEEN THE MINISTER FOR JUSTICE EQUALITY AND LAW REFORM APPLICANT/RESPONDENT AND JOHN RENNER-DILLON RESPONDENT/APPELLANT Judgment of Mr Justice
More informationTHE FIFTH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION LAW OF (English translation) ΓΕΝ (Α) L.94 ISBN NICOSIA
REPUBLIC OF CYPRUS 127(I) of 2006 THE FIFTH AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION LAW OF 2006 (English translation) Office of the Law Commissioner Nicosia, January, 2010 ΓΕΝ (Α) L.94 ISBN 978-9963-664-18-4 NICOSIA
More informationCriminal Procedure Code. Surrender
1 Extract from Estonian Criminal Procedure Code (Unofficial translation) Surrender Subdivision 1 - General Provisions 490. European arrest warrant The European arrest warrant is a request submitted by
More informationA comparative analysis of the implementation of Article 4 (6) Framework Decision 2002/584 Resocialization above surrender?
Jan Jippe Arends, Heleen Kesler, Leonie Lunshof, Alexandra Oswald, Kasper van der Schaft A comparative analysis of the implementation of Article 4 (6) Framework Decision 2002/584 Resocialization above
More informationIII ACTS ADOPTED UNDER TITLE VI OF THE EU TREATY
5.12.2008 Official Journal of the European Union L 327/27 III (Acts adopted under the EU Treaty) ACTS ADOPTED UNDER TITLE VI OF THE EU TREATY COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 2008/909/JHA of 27 November 2008
More informationSlide 2 We will discuss different areas where co operation with the judicial authorities may be important for prosecutors of environmental crime.
Slide 1 There is an increase in environmental law having transboundary implications. This is particularly the case in transfrontier shipment of waste but many pollution offences particularly those involving
More informationOfficial Gazette of the Kingdom of the Netherlands
Official Gazette of the Kingdom of the Netherlands Year 2004 JE MAINTIENDRAI 195 Act of 29 April 2004 implementing the Framework Decision of the Council of the European Union on the European arrest warrant
More informationBulgaria International Extradition Treaty with the United States
Bulgaria International Extradition Treaty with the United States September 19, 2007, Date-Signed May 21, 2009, Date-In-Force Message from the President of the United States January 22, 2008.--Treaty was
More informationAd Hoc Query on refusal of exit at border crossing points and on duration of stay. Requested by SI EMN NCP on 5 th August 2011
Ad Hoc Query on refusal of exit at border crossing points and on duration of stay Requested by SI EMN NCP on 5 th August 2011 Compilation produced on 11 th November 2011 Responses from Austria, Bulgaria,
More informationA Guide to The European Arrest Warrant October 2012
A Guide to The European Arrest Warrant October 2012 About Fair Trials International Fair Trials International (FTI) is a non-governmental organisation that works for fair trials according to internationally
More informationOFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOSOVA / No. 33 / 2 SEPTEMBER 2013, PRISTINA
OFFICIAL GAZETTE OF THE REPUBLIC OF KOSOVA / No. 33 / 2 SEPTEMBER 2013, PRISTINA LAW NO. 04/L-213 ON INTERNATIONAL LEGAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS Assembly of Republic of Kosovo, Based on Article
More informationTHE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN FACTS & FIGURES
THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS IN FACTS & FIGURES 2017 This document has been prepared by the Public Relations Unit of the Court, and does not bind the Court. It is intended to provide basic general
More informationExtradition Law. Approved on May 4, 1960
Extradition Law Approved on May 4, 1960 Chapter 1: Extradition Conditions Article 1- If there is a extradition treaty concluded between Iran and foreign states, extradition should be performed according
More informationC 12/10 EN Official Journal of the European Communities
C 12/10 EN Official Journal of the European Communities Programme of measures to implement the principle of mutual recognition of decisions in criminal matters (2001/C 12/02) INTRODUCTION The issue of
More informationProposed Framework Decision on European arrest warrants
Statewatch post 11.9.01 analyses: No 3 Proposed Framework Decision on European arrest warrants Analysis by Steve Peers, Reader in Law, Essex University How will the EU s new proposal on arrest warrants
More informationAUSTRIA ISSUING AUTHORITIES VALIDATING AUTHORITIES RECEIVING AUTHORITIES EXECUTING AUTHORITIES CENTRAL/SPECIFIC AUTHORITIES. Updated 18 December 2018
Updated 18 December 2018 Competent authorities, languages accepted, urgent matters and scope of the EIO Directive 1 of the instrument in the EU Member States - as notified by the Member States which have
More informationIntroduction. The European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 The European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 came into operation on 1 January 2004.
REPORT On the operation of the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 (as amended) for the year 2017 made to the Houses of the Oireachtas by the Central Authority in the person of the Minister for Justice and
More informationDelegations will find attached the declassified version of the above document.
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 27 February 2009 5370/2/08 REV 2 CRIMORG 85 COPEN 28 EJN 70 EUROJUST 93 DECLASSIFICATION of document: ST 5370//08 REV RESTREINT UE dated: 2 December 2008 new classification:
More informationOverview ECHR
Overview 1959-2016 ECHR This document has been prepared by the Public Relations Unit of the Court, and does not bind the Court. It is intended to provide basic general information about the way the Court
More informationConference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption
United Nations * Conference of the States Parties to the United Nations Convention against Corruption Distr.: General 25 February 2014 Original: English Implementation Review Group Fifth session Vienna,
More informationPart II Application of mutual recognition to the transfer of judgments of conviction in the context of EU law
PART II APPLICATION OF MUTUAL RECOGNITION TO THE TRANSFER OF JUDGMENTS OF CONVICTION IN THE CONTEXT OF EU LAW Dr. Tony Marguery, LLM Dr. Ton van den Brink Dr. Michele Simonato 17 The discussion concerning
More informationSeminar 4: Collecting evidence throughout the European Union II: The European Evidence Warrant and New Instruments in this Field
With financial support from the Criminal Justice Programme of the European Union Seminar 4: Collecting evidence throughout the European Union II: The European Evidence Warrant and New Instruments in this
More informationIMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT AND JOINT INVESTIGATION TEAMS AT EU AND NATIONAL LEVEL
STUDY Policy Department C Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs IMPLEMENTATION OF THE EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT AND JOINT INVESTIGATION TEAMS AT EU AND NATIONAL LEVEL CIVIL LIBERTIES, JUSTICE AND HOME
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 November /07 COPEN 146 EJN 32 EUROJUST 60
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 12 November 2007 14308/07 COP 146 EJN 32 EUROJUST 60 NOTE from : General Secretariat to : Delegations No. prev. doc.: 11788/07 COP 110 EJN 22 EUROJUST 41 + ADD 1
More information5859/3/15 REV 3 SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 22 July 2015 (OR. en) 5859/3/15 REV 3 COPEN 25 EUROJUST 22 EJN 9 NOTE From: To: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations No. prev. doc.: 5859/2/15 REV 2 COPEN
More informationJUSTICE. The European Arrest Warrant. Jodie Blackstock Senior Legal Officer (EU: Justice and Home Affairs)
JUSTICE The European Arrest Warrant Jodie Blackstock Senior Legal Officer (EU: Justice and Home Affairs) he Framework Decision The Council Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant and surrender
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 18 July 2007 *
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 18 July 2007 * In Case C-288/05, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 35 EU, from the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany), made by decision of 30 June 2005, received
More informationDeveloping best practice amongst defence lawyers and access to justice in European arrest warrant cases. Interim Report
Developing best practice amongst defence lawyers and access to justice in European arrest warrant cases Interim Report Introduction The European arrest warrant has been in force since 2003. Much research
More information14032/11 GS/np 1 DG H 2B
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 12 September 2011 14032/11 CRIMORG 144 COP 212 EJN 104 EUROJUST 126 NOTE from: Slovenian delegation to: Delegations No. prev. doc.: 7301/2/08 REV 2 CRIMORG 44 COP
More information13955/16 SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B
Council the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2016 (OR. en) 13955/16 COPEN 316 EUROJUST 135 EJN 64 NOTE From: To: General Secretariat the Council Delegations No. prev. doc.: 5776/2/15 REV 2 Subject:
More information9 th International Workshop Budapest
9 th International Workshop Budapest 2-5 October 2017 15 years of LANDNET-working: an Overview Frank van Holst, LANDNET Board / RVO.nl 9th International LANDNET Workshop - Budapest, 2-5 October 2017 Structure
More informationCAC/COSP/IRG/2011/CRP.4
27 May 2011 English only Implementation Review Group Second session Vienna, 30 May-3 June 2011 Item 2 of the provisional agenda Executive summary: Spain Legal system According to the Spanish Constitution
More information(Non) Ne bis in idem. European Jurisdictional Conflicts Transfer of Proceedings
(Non) Ne bis in idem European Jurisdictional Conflicts Transfer of Proceedings Copyright Schomburg 2012 Overview Evolution of this principle ne bis in idem: From obstacle to extradition to individual fundamental
More informationREPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 5.2.2014 COM(2014) 57 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on the implementation by the Member States of the Framework Decisions 2008/909/JHA,
More information14328/16 MP/SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 17 November 2016 (OR. en) 14328/16 COPEN 333 EUROJUST 144 EJN 70 NOTE From: To: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations No. prev. doc.: 6069/2/15 REV 2 Subject:
More informationMoscow (Russian Federation) 9 10 November Contribution presented by the Ministry of Justice of
English only / Anglais seulement HIGH-LEVEL CONFERENCE OF THE MINISTRIES OF JUSTICE AND OF THE INTERIOR Moscow (Russian Federation) 9 10 November 2006 IMPROVING EUROPEAN CO-OPERATION IN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE
More informationLMG Women in Business Law Awards - Europe - Firm Categories
LMG Women in Business Law Awards - Europe - Firm Categories Welcome to the Euromoney LMG Women in Business Law Awards submissions survey 1. Your details First Name Last Name Position Email Address Firm
More informationThe European Arrest Warrant: Part of the Anti-terrorism Emergency Package?
The European Arrest Warrant: Part of the Anti-terrorism Emergency Package? Prof. Dr. Gert Vermeulen Ghent University, Institute for International Research on Criminal Policy 4 th Eurojustice Conference,
More information13515/16 SC/mvk 1 DG D 2B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2016 (OR. en) 13515/16 COPEN 302 EUROJUST 132 EJN 61 NOTE From: To: General Secretariat of the Council Delegations No. prev. doc.: 5859/3/15 REV 3 Subject:
More informationOverview ECHR
Overview 1959-2017 ECHR This document has been prepared by the Public Relations Unit of the Court, and does not bind the Court. It is intended to provide basic general information about the way the Court
More informationDelegations will find the text of this Resolution in annex II and are invited to present their comments at the COPEN meeting of 28 May 2014.
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 20 May 2014 9968/14 COPEN 153 EUROJUST 99 EJN 57 NOTE from: to: Subject: Presidency Delegations Issues of proportionality and fundamental rights in the context of
More informationScope of the obligation to provide extradition
chapter 4 International criminal justice cooperation 131 Tool 4.2 Extradition Overview This tool discusses extradition, introduces a range of resources to facilitate entering into extradition agreements
More informationEuropean judicial systems
European judicial systems Edition 2008 (data 2006): Efficiency and quality of justice European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ) 10. Prosecutors 10.1. Introduction In Recommendation 2000(19),
More informationCOUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (2002/584/JHA)
2002F0584 EN 28.03.2009 001.001 1 This document is meant purely as a documentation tool and the institutions do not assume any liability for its contents B COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION of 13 June 2002 on
More informationConsidering the Impact of a UK Opt Out of Pre Lisbon Treaty Policing and Criminal Law Measures 1. Purpose of Paper
1. Purpose of Paper 1.1 This paper is intended to brief ACPO Cabinet re the potential impacts on policing of the UK exercising rights under the Lisbon Treaty to opt out of pre Lisbon Treaty EU policing
More informationEUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC) COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE OPERATION OF EUROPEAN CONVENTIONS ON CO-OPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS (PC-OC)
http://www.coe.int/tcj Strasbourg, 16 September 2016 [PC-OC/PC-OC Mod/ 2015/Docs PC-OC Mod 2016/ PC-OC Mod (2016) 05 Add] PC-OC Mod (2016) 05 Addendum English only EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 9 March 2006 *
VAN ESBROECK JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 9 March 2006 * In Case C-436/04, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 35 EU from the Hof van Cassatie (Belgium), made by decision of 5 October
More informationPoland International Extradition Treaty with the United States MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
Poland International Extradition Treaty with the United States July 10, 1996, Date-Signed September 17, 1999, Date-In-Force MESSAGE FROM THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES TRANSMITTING EXTRADITION TREATY
More informationLead Department Ref. Date of Publication Decision Ministry of 14722/09 20/10/2009 Did not opt in: Link to Written Ministerial Statement
JHA (Title V) opt-in and Schengen opt-out decisions taken between 1 December 2009 and the present (decisions taken by the previous Government are in italics). Only final decisions on UK participation are
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 23 November /11 COPEN 338 EUROJUST 200
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 23 November 2011 17457/11 COPEN 338 EUROJUST 200 NOTE From : To : Subject : General Secretariat Delegations MEETING OF THE CONSULTATIVE FORUM OF PROSECUTORS GENERAL
More informationCOUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 1 March /05 ADD 1 LIMITE COPEN 42
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 1 March 2005 6815/05 ADD 1 LIMITE COPEN 42 ADDENDUM TO THE COVER NOTE from: Secretary-General of the European Commission, signed by Ms Patricia BUGNOT, Director
More informationYour questions about: the Court of Justice of the European Union. the EFTA Court. the European Court of Human Rights
Your questions about: the Court of Justice of the European Union the EFTA Court the European Court of Human Rights the International Court of Justice the International Criminal Court CJEU COURT OF JUSTICE
More informationKorea-Philippines Extradition Treaty
The Asian Development Bank and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development do not guarantee the accuracy of this document and accept no responsibility whatsoever for any consequences of
More informationWelcome and key note address
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Mr Francisco Fonseca Morillo Deputy Director-General for Justice and Consumers Welcome and key note address Ensuring cross-border justice for all in the EU: sharing practices and experiences
More informationTRACTATENBLAD VAN HET. Verdrag tot invoering van een eenvormige wet op wisselbrieven en orderbriefjes; (met Bijlagen en Protocol) Genève, 7 juni 1930
3 (1930) Nr. 2 TRACTATENBLAD VAN HET KONINKRIJK DER NEDERLANDEN JAARGANG 2014 Nr. 95 A. TITEL Verdrag tot invoering van een eenvormige wet op wisselbrieven en orderbriefjes; (met Bijlagen en Protocol)
More informationEuropean patent filings
Annual Report 07 - European patent filings European patent filings Total filings This graph shows the geographic origin of the European patent filings. This is determined by the country of residence of
More informationPrisoner Transfer, Material Detention Conditions & Sentence Execution In The European Union A Journey Bound For Choppy Waters?
Prisoner Transfer, Material Detention Conditions & Sentence Execution In The European Union A Journey Bound For Choppy Waters? Neil Paterson & Marije Knapen 11 September 2010 1 Key Themes Background extension
More informationTRACTATENBLAD VAN HET KONINKRIJK DER NEDERLANDEN. JAARGANG 2008 Nr. 77. Verdrag inzake verkeerstekens; (met Bijlagen) Wenen, 8 november 1968
64 (1968) Nr. 5 TRACTATENBLAD VAN HET KONINKRIJK DER NEDERLANDEN JAARGANG 2008 Nr. 77 A. TITEL Verdrag inzake verkeerstekens; (met Bijlagen) Wenen, 8 november 1968 B. TEKST De Engelse en de Franse tekst
More informationThe Principle of Ne Bis in Idem in Criminal Matters in the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union
The Principle of Ne Bis in Idem in Criminal Matters in the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union September 2017 This document provides an overview of the case law of the Court of Justice
More informationItaly International Extradition Treaty with the United States
Italy International Extradition Treaty with the United States October 13, 1983, Date-Signed September 24, 1984, Date-In-Force 98TH CONGRESS 2d Session SENATE LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL THE WHITE HOUSE, April
More informationL 350/72 Official Journal of the European Union
L 350/72 Official Journal of the European Union 30.12.2008 COUNCIL FRAMEWORK DECISION 2008/978/JHA of 18 December 2008 on the European evidence warrant for the purpose of obtaining objects, documents and
More informationEUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC) COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE OPERATION OF EUROPEAN CONVENTIONS ON CO-OPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS (PC-OC)
http://www.coe.int/tcj Strasbourg, 18 October 2016 [PC-OC/PC-OC Mod/ 2015/Docs PC-OC Mod 2016/ PC-OC Mod (2016) 05 rev Add] PC-OC Mod (2016) 05rev Addendum EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC) COMMITTEE
More informationTRACTATENBLAD VAN HET KONINKRIJK DER NEDERLANDEN. JAARGANG 2009 Nr. 35
76 (1970) Nr. 4 TRACTATENBLAD VAN HET KONINKRIJK DER NEDERLANDEN JAARGANG 2009 Nr. 35 A. TITEL Europees Verdrag inzake de internationale geldigheid van strafvonnissen; (met Bijlagen) s-gravenhage, 28 mei
More informationWHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel. Findings of the first round of reporting.
WHO Global Code of Practice on the International Recruitment of Health Personnel. Findings of the first round of reporting. Dr Galina Perfilieva WHO Regional Office for Europe Negotiations and adoption
More informationThe Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court. Dr. Leonard Werner-Jones
The Unitary Patent and the Unified Patent Court Dr. Leonard Werner-Jones Background The Past: No centralization at all Prosecution country-by-country Litigation country-by-country Patents actions 2 Background
More informationEUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC) COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE OPERATION OF EUROPEAN CONVENTIONS ON CO-OPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS (PC-OC)
Strasbourg, 9 September 2014 [PC-OC/Docs 2013/ PC-OC(2013)10 ADD rev. 2] PC-OC(2013)10ADD rev.2 EUROPEAN COMMITTEE ON CRIME PROBLEMS (CDPC) COMMITTEE OF EXPERTS ON THE OPERATION OF EUROPEAN CONVENTIONS
More informationINTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS
INTERNATIONAL JUDICIAL COOPERATION IN CRIMINAL MATTERS Semi final A EU legislation and national legislative approach on taking account of convictions handed down in Member States in the course of new criminal
More informationAdministrative Sanctions in European law Ljubljana, March Answers to questionnaire: Germany
Seminar organized by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia and ACA-Europe Administrative Sanctions in European law Ljubljana, 23 24 March 2017 Answers to questionnaire: Germany Seminar co-funded
More informationREPORT. On the operation of the European Arrest Warrant Act (as amended) in the year 2011 made to the Houses of the
REPORT On the operation of the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003 (as amended) in the year 2011 made to the Houses of the Oireachtas by the Central Authority in the person of the Minister for Justice and
More informationEUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT (EAW)
EUROPEAN ARREST WARRANT (EAW) 1. What is the implementing legislation of the Member State for the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant and surrender procedures between Member States (the Framework
More informationLAW ON THE COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA
Strasbourg, 6 December 2000 Restricted CDL (2000) 106 Eng.Only EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) LAW ON THE COURT OF BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 2 GENERAL
More information