PLAINTIFF.CLAIMANT DOE 114'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PREJUDGMENT ATTACHMENT OT'PROPERTY
|
|
- Karen Muriel McLaughlin
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 :47 PM HennePin CountY, MN STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Doe 114, Jason Mclean, Plaintiff; Defendant. Case Type: Personal Injury Court File No.: 27-CV-16'1712 Judge Frank J. Magill, Jr, PLAINTIFF.CLAIMANT DOE 114'S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PREJUDGMENT ATTACHMENT OT'PROPERTY INTRODUCTION plaintiff-claimant seeks an order of prejudgment attachment upon any and all of Defbndant-Respondcnt's nonexempt property situated in the State of Minnesota, Respondent has or.is about to move nonexempt propcrty with the intent to deloy or defrnud Claimant or for the purpose of placing the property beyond the reash of Claimant. Thus, to protect Claimant's interests, an order of prejudgment attachment is necessary. FACTS In 2015 and 2016, Claimant and four other individuals sued Respondent alleging that he sexually abused them as minors during his tenure as a Company Actor and employee of Defendant Children,s Theatre Company.l Respondent is an adult male former resident of Hennepin County, Minnesota. At all times material, Respondent was an actor or employee of Children's Theatre. 1 Claimant,s counsel has filed identical Memoranda of Law in Support of Motions for Orders of Prejudgment Attaclrment in the four filed rnatters involving Respondent: Laura Adams v, Children's Theatre Campany and Jaso-n Mclean,2j-CV-lS-20713; Doe 76 v. Childien's ifheatre Company and Jason Mclean,21'CV'15'21165; Doe I I6 v. Children's Theape Company and Jason McLean,27-CY ; and Doe I I4 v, Jason Mclean,27'CV'16'1712. Claimants' briefs filed in each'matter are identical; the factual circumstances are the same, and each Claimant makes the same request of the Coutt.
2 :47 PM Since Claimant commenced her action against Respondent, Respondent has failed to comply with the legal process. Despite Claimant's counsel's good faith effort to confer with Respondelt and secure his timely deposition, Respondent has refused to appear. After a hearing on Claimant's motion to compel on July 1.7,2017, this Court ordered Respondent to appear for his deposition on August 22,2017. Ultil approximately July 2017, Respondent owned and operated two prominent businesses in the heart of Minneapolis' Dinkytown neighborhood and personally owned one valuable property located at325l4th Avenue Southeast, Minneapolis, Miruresota55414, This property includes the land and the building in which Respondent ran his business, the Loring Pasta Bar. According to Hennepin County's property tax records for 2016, the property's2016 estimated market value was $1,505,000. (Ex. A to Affidavit of Molly Burke). And for 2017,the property's estimated market value is $1,550,000, (Ex. B to Affidavit of Molly Burke). In July 2017, Respondent sent a letter to Claimant's counsel stating that he had acquired the funds necessary to hire an attorney and was in the process of doing so. (Ex. I to Affidavit of Plaintiff-Claimant Laura Adarns). According to a July 2017 newspaper al'ticle, Respondent sold his business, the Varsity Theater, to a real estate tirm for $2.51 million. (Ex. 2 to Affidavit of Plaintiff-Claimant Laura Adams). According to a newspaper article dated Augvst 2, 2017, Respondent entered into an agreement to sell his other business, the Loring Pasta Bar, and the property in which it operated located at 325 l4th Avenue Southeast, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414,to three longtirne managers for an undisclosed amount. (Ex. 3 to the Affidavit of Plaintiff' Claimant Laura Adams). This property is nonexempt property personally owned by Respondent and subiect to attachment. 2
3 27-CV-16-',1712 Bl17120'17 4:47 PM Hennepin CountY, MN ARGUMNNT I. An Order of Prejudgment Attachment is Necessary to Protect Claimantts Interests. The purpose ancl intent of an order ofprejudgment attachment is to provide security for the satisfaction of a judgment that may be issued, and to preserve the status quo' Minn. Stat. $ , subd. 1 (2016); ln Re llstate ol'rosenberbor,495 N.W.zd234,235 (Mimr' Ct. App. 1993), A claimant may obtain an order of prejudgment attachment by demonstrating that one or more of the circumstances listed in Minn. Stat. $ are present and that claimant has a probability of success on the merits. Minn, Stat. $ , subd. 3 (2016). A. Respondent Has Sold or is About to Sell Nonexempt Property to Delay or Defraud Clnimant and Place Non-Exempt Property Beyond Claimant's Reach. A claimant may obtain prejudgment attachment "when the respondent has assigned, secreted, or disposed of, or is about to assign. secrete, or dispose of, any of the respondent's nonexempt property, with intent to delay or defraud the respondentos creditors.n' Minn. Stat. $ , subd. 1(1). Additionally, prejudgment attachment is warranted "whenthe respondenthas converted or is about to convert any of the respondent's nonexempt property into money or credits, for the purpose of placing the property beyond the reach of the respondent's creditors."!f,, subd. I (3). Here, sutficient facts satisfy the grounds for prejudgment attachment. Respondent sold or is about to sell two prominent Minneapolis businesses and one valuable, nonexempt property, He has done so within weeks of Claimant's counsel's filing of a Motion to Compel his appearance at his deposition. In July 20lT,Respondent received $2.51 million in gross proceeds from his sale of the Var.sity Theater. (8x.2). Nevertheless, Respondent subsequently entered into an agreement to sell the Loring Pasta Bar and the nonexempt property located at located at 325 l4th Avenue Southeast, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55414, where the Loring Pasta Bar was located. (Ex. 3). 3
4 '17 4:47 PM This nonexempt property is valuable. The property's 2016 estimated market value was $1,505,000, and the property's 2017 estirnated market value is $1,550,000. (Exs, A, B). The sale price was not disclosed. Btrt Respondent's sale of the property to three longtime managers indicates a lack of motivation to obtain the best price possible. Whether an intent to delay creditors exists is a question of fact for the trial court. Dannheim I)cv.. Inc. v. Mogler,412 N.W.2d398,400 (Minn. Ct. App. 1937). But, when a respondent transferred his interest in a contract fur the sale of real estate within days after receiving notice of his deposition in a civil casc pending against hirn, this was sufficient evidence of intent to delay creditors..loncs v. Stoneking, Civ. File No ,2006WL , at *2 (D. Minn. Sept. 12, 2006). Here, Respondent has taken steps to sell nonexempt property 'after months of refusing to participate in the legal process, failing to appear multiple times lbr his deposition, and within weeks of Claimant seeking to compel his deposition. Respondent's intent is to delay and defraud Clairnant. Moreover, the sale of the nonexempt property is unnecessary for Mclean to pay for his legal clefense. Ct. Kclkinni v. Rielim, No. 27-CV ,2014WL , at *2 (Mirur. Dist. Ct, June 27,2014) (denying claimant's motion fbr prejudgment attachment when respondent used money 1lorn the sale of nonexempt property to pay his criminal defense attorney). Signifrcantly, befbre selling the nonexempt property, Respondent informed Claimant's counsel that he had the t'unds to hirc counscl and was in the prooess of doing so. (Ex. l). Thus, in the two months since Claimant's counsel filed a motion to compel his attendance at his deposition, Respondent has disposed of a substantial portion of his nonexempt assets by selling or entering an agreement to sell the building located at 325 l4th Avenue Southeast, Minneapolis, Minnesota The circumstances surrounding the transf'er of this building 4
5 8l' :47 PM constitute extrinsic evidence of Respondent's actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud Claimant, and his pulpose of placing the property beyond the reach of Claimant. B. Claimant is Likely to Succeed on the Merits. Claimant is likely to succeed on the merits of her case. Claimant Laura Adams testified under oath at her deposition on May 24,2017 and described Respondent's sexual abuse of her when she was a minor. Additionally, Claimants Doe 76,Doe ll4, and Doe 116 are able to testify under oath about Respondent's sexual abuse of them when they were minors. In sum, Respondent has or is about to assign, secrete, or dispose of nonexempt property with the intent to delay or defi'aud Claimant or has converted or is about to convert nonexernpt property for the purpose of placing the property beyond the reach of Claimant. Additionally, Clainrant has a probability of succeeding on the merits. Thus, to protect Claimant's interests, an order of prejudgment attachment is necessary. IL Alternatively, the Court is Empowered to Enter an Order the Court Deems Appropriate to Protcct Claimant's Interests. Alternatively, ifthe Court declines to orderprejudgment attachment, Claimantrespectfully requests that the Court enter an order to protect Claimant's rights to the extent possible pursuant to Miruresota Statutes $ , subdivision 4. The Court may require Respondent to post a bond in the amount set by the Court; restrain Respondent from selling, disposing, or otherwise encumbering property; or include any other provision the Court deems appropriate to protect Claimant's interests. Mirur, Stat. $ , subd. 4. CONCLUSION Claimant respectfully requests that the Court order the attachment of all nonexempt property belonging to Respondent, Alternatively, should the Court decline to order prejudgment attachment, Claimant requests that the Court order Respondent to post a bond in an amount 5
6 27-CV-'t :47 PM reasonably equivalent to the value of Respondent's total assets; resuein Respondent fiom selling, disposing, or otherwise encunboring any of his pl'opefiy; or grant any other relief the Court deems apprcpriate to protect Claimant's interests. Dated; August 17,2017, JEFF ANDERSON & ASSOCIATES, P.A. Jeflley #2057 Molly K. # Jackson Street, Suite 100 St, Paul, MN (6sI) j eff@andersonadvocates. com molly@andersonadvocates. com Attorneys for Plaintiff-Claimant Doe 114 6
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Document Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: Paul Hansmeier, BKY No. 15-42460 Debtor. TO: PLAINTIFF RANDALL L. SEAVER, TRUSTEE, BY HIS ATTORNEY, MATTHEW D. SWANSON
More informationThe above-entitled matter came before the Honorable Susan M. Robiner on January 20,
STATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Jay Nygard and Kendall Nygard, Plaintiffs, v. CONTEMPT ORDER Penny Rogers and Peter Lanpher, Defendants. Judge Susan M. Robiner
More informationInformation & Instructions: Seizure of debtor's property prior to judgment
Information & Instructions: Seizure of debtor's property prior to judgment 1. Texas law provides for sequestration of the defendant's property. Garnishment provides for seizure of the debtor's monies held
More informationCriminal Statutes of Limitations Minnesota Last Updated: December 2017 Soliciting, Inducement, and Promotion of Prostitution; Sex Trafficking
Criminal Statutes of Limitations Minnesota Last Updated: December 2017 Soliciting, Inducement, and Promotion of Prostitution; Sex Trafficking limitations for commission of the offense or within three years
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Document Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: Paul Hansmeier, BKY No. 15-42460 Debtor. Randall L. Seaver, Trustee, Plaintiff, REPLY BRIEF OF DEFENDANT PADRAIGIN BROWNE
More information1. YOU ARE BEING SUED. The Plaintiffs have started a lawsuit against you. The 2. YOU MUST REPLY \YITHIN 20 DAYS TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS.
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Personal Injury Doe 84, Court File No.: Plaintiff, v SUMMONS The Children's Theatre Company, a Minnesota Non-Profit
More informationPROCEEDINGS TO REDUCE TAX JUDGMENT SALE REDEMPTION PERIOD TO FIVE WEEKS. For Property in Hennepin County
PROCEEDINGS TO REDUCE TAX JUDGMENT SALE REDEMPTION PERIOD TO FIVE WEEKS For Property in Hennepin County A lien attaches to real property every year on January 2 for the amount of property taxes due. If
More information[ ] WARRANT [ ] ORDER OF DETENTION v. [ ] AMENDED COMPLAINT
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF ISANTI DISTRICT COURT TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FILE NO. COUNTY ATTORNEY FILE NO. 14-0125 CONTROLLING AGENCY: MN062095Y CONTROL NUMBER: 12000578 State of Minnesota, Plaintiff,
More information(2) Date of entry of judgment or date of service of notice of filing of order from which appeal is taken:
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS Appellate Court No.: Court File No.: 27-CV-17-145 Scott Kowalewski, Respondent, v. BNSF Railway Company, APPELLANT S STATEMENT OF THE CASE Date Judgment Entered:
More informationPlaintiff John David Emerson, for his Complaint against Defendant Timothy
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF DAKOTA DISTRICT COURT FIRST JUDICIAL DISTRICT John David Emerson, Court File No.: vs. Plaintiff, Case Type: OTHER CIVIL Timothy Leslie, Dakota County Sheriff, COMPLAINT FOR
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2016).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2016). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A16-1885 Sarah B. Janecek, petitioner, Appellant,
More informationCourt File No.: 27-CV APPEARANCES. The above-entitled matter came before the Honorable Michael K. Browne, Judge of
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN Friends of the Terrace LLC, Plaintiff, DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Judge Michael K. Browne Case Type: Civil Other/ Misc. ORDER v. BRE Non-Core 2 Owner
More informationShow Your Clients the Money: Enforcing Judgments in Minnesota
Show Your Clients the Money: Enforcing Judgments in Minnesota Thursday, January 29, 2015 2.0 CLE credits applied for. MBCLE Event Code: 201019 PENDING AGENDA 2:00-400 PM Docketing the Judgment Transcribing
More informationPROCEEDINGS TO REDUCE MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE REDEMPTION PERIOD TO FIVE WEEKS. For Property in Hennepin County Foreclosed by Advertisement
PROCEEDINGS TO REDUCE MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE REDEMPTION PERIOD TO FIVE WEEKS For Property in Hennepin County Foreclosed by Advertisement The redemption period following a mortgage foreclosure by advertisement
More informationStaying on Schedule: Understanding and Amending the Scheduling Order in Minnesota State Courts
Staying on Schedule: Understanding and Amending the Scheduling Order in Minnesota State Courts Jason Raether Introduction From the time the initial summons and complaint are served until final judgment
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiffs, Defendant.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA American Civil Liberties Union of Minnesota, National Congress of American Indians, and Bonnie Dorr-Charwood, Richard Smith and Tracy Martineau,
More informationPlaintiff, ORDER FOR RESTITUTION. Hennepin County Government Center on the parties post-trial submissions. Pursuant to its
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN State of Minnesota, DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Civil Other/Misc. Court File No. 27-CV-14-12558 Judge James A. Moore vs. Plaintiff, ORDER FOR
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, EMANUEL ANTONIO PATTERSON DOB: 04/26/1993 1252 Moore Lake Drive Fridley, MN 55432 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A Ann M. Firkus, Appellant, vs. Dana J. Harms, MD, Respondent.
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A17-1088 Ann M. Firkus, Appellant, vs. Dana J. Harms, MD, Respondent. Filed April 30, 2018 Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded Jesson, Judge Hennepin
More informationCASE 0:15-cv DWF-JSM Document 1-1 Filed 12/24/15 Page 1 of 14 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) THIS SUMMONS IS DIRECTED TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT:
CASE 0:15-cv-04502-DWF-JSM Document 1-1 Filed 12/24/15 Page 1 of 14 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT CASE TYPE: CONTRACT Minnesota Vikings Football Stadium,
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-2041 Thomas M. Fafinski, Respondent, vs. Jaren
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No CIV-HURLEY
1 of 7 7/28/2009 11:06 AM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 99-8364 CIV-HURLEY JUAN ROMAGOZA ARCE, NERIS GONZALEZ, and CARLOS MAURICIO, v. Plaintiffs, JOSE GUILLERMO GARCIA
More informationPart 36 Extraordinary Remedies
Alberta Rules of Court 390/68 R427-430 Part 36 Extraordinary Remedies Replevin Recovery of personal property 427 In any action brought for the recovery of any personal property and claiming that the property
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Lakes and Parks Alliance of Minneapolis, a Minnesota non-profit corporation File No. 0:14-cv-03391-JRT-SER Plaintiff, vs. Federal Transit Administration,
More informationThis matter came on for court trial before the Honorable Mark A. Labine, Referee of District Court, on December 13, 2017.
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DISTRICT COURT IX of North Minneapolis, Court File: 27-CV-HC-17-5608 Plaintiff(s), vs. DECISION AND ORDER ON PETITION FOR RELIEF UNDER Mahmood
More informationCASE 0:18-cv JNE-SER Document 1 Filed 04/16/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:18-cv-01025-JNE-SER Document 1 Filed 04/16/18 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA FINAL EXIT NETWORK, INC., v. Plaintiff, LORI SWANSON, in her official
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, MARCUS TERRELL FISCHER DOB: 02/01/1999 3927 6TH ST N MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55412 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor
More informationMinnesota s Open Meeting Law
Minnesota s Open Meeting Law I. The Open Meeting Law in General The Open Meeting Law requires that public business be conducted in public. With limited exceptions, all school board meetings must be open
More informationTO: The Honorable Judge County District Court, and the above-named defendant and his attorney, Assistant Public Defender, Minnesota
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF XXXXX DISTRICT COURT XXXX JUDICIAL DISTRICT ---------------------------------- State of Minnesota, Plaintiff vs. XXXX XXXX XXXX Defendant. MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S
More informationJune 15, Thank you for your correspondence of April 24, In your letter you present the following facts: FACTS AND BACKGROUND
SCHOOL ELECTIONS: PETITIONS: Petition Rules promulgated by the Secretary of State generally apply to petition for school district referendum. School district clerks should perform the functions of filing
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, ANTHONY LAMONT FOOTE DOB: 08/05/1992 608 SELBY AVE #4 St. Paul, MN 55101 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, ZHAXI TAXING DOB: 05/03/1976 6938 MEADOWBROOK BLVD ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55426 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, BENJAMIN LOVE DOB: 11/27/1972 5649 34TH AVE S #2 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55417 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, SILAS TIMOTHY MCDOUGAL DOB: 11/10/1998 304 26th AVE N Minneapolis, MN 55411 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor
More informationUnemployment Compensation Discovery Request Instructions
Unemployment Compensation Discovery Request Instructions If you have a case pending at the unemployment compensation Appeals Office, you will need to request discovery from your former employer Discovery
More informationCase: 1:18-cv ACL Doc. #: 31 Filed: 01/04/19 Page: 1 of 13 PageID #: 321
Case: 1:18-cv-00165-ACL Doc. #: 31 Filed: 01/04/19 Page: 1 of 13 PageID #: 321 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION CARDINAL HEALTH 110, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, )
More informationCase 1:17-cr ABJ Document 19 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:17-cr-00201-ABJ Document 19 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PAUL J. MANAFORT, Jr., and RICHARD W. GATES III, Crim.
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 1 May Appeal by plaintiff from order entered 19 April 2006 by Judge
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationAdopted: August 1996 Wheaton ISD #803 Policy 401
Adopted: August 1996 Wheaton ISD #803 Policy 401 Revised: August 2000, November 2018 401 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY I. PURPOSE The purpose of this policy is to provide equal employment opportunity for
More informationMINNESOTA. Chapter Title: DOMESTIC ABUSE Section: 518B.01. As used in this section, the following terms shall have the meanings given them:
518B.01 Domestic Abuse Act. Subdivision 1. Short title. MINNESOTA Chapter Title: DOMESTIC ABUSE Section: 518B.01 This section may be cited as the Domestic Abuse Act. Subd. 2. Definitions. As used in this
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, MELISSA MAE WASKIEWICZ DOB: 12/31/1975 4655 Lyndale Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55419 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District
More informationPENAL CODE SECTION
1 of 11 1/17/2012 7:34 PM PENAL CODE SECTION 186.11-186.12 186.11. (a) (1) Any person who commits two or more related felonies, a material element of which is fraud or embezzlement, which involve a pattern
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, JOSHUA CHIAZOR EZEKA DOB: 02/12/1996 2107 Oliver Ave N Minneapolis, MN 55411 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor
More informationNo In The. Supreme Court of the United States. Joseph Wayne Hexom, State of Minnesota, On Petition for A Writ of Certiorari
No. 15-1052 In The Supreme Court of the United States Joseph Wayne Hexom, Petitioner, v. State of Minnesota, Respondent. On Petition for A Writ of Certiorari BRIEF IN OPPOSITION JENNIFER M. SPALDING Counsel
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION
Lee et al v. FedEx Corporation et al Doc. 145 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE ) Cause No. 3:05-MD-527 RM SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT
More informationIn re: ) Case No Debtor. ) MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF TRUSTEE, OR ALTERNATIVELY, FOR CONVERSION OF CASE
IN TilE IJ1ITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION In re: Case No. 12-40164-659 Chapter!! BURTON DOUGLAS MORRISS, Judge Kathy A. Surratt-States Debtor. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT
More informationApp. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No Kathleen Uradnik, Plaintiff-Appellant
App. 1 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT No. 18-3086 Kathleen Uradnik, Plaintiff-Appellant Interfaculty Organization; St. Cloud State University; Board of Trustees of the Minnesota
More informationPROCEDURES FOR OBTAINING ORDER
PREJUDGMENT PRESERVATION OF DEFENDANT S PROPERTY/ASSETS TO SATISFY ANTICIPATED RESTITUTION S Current through 2010. OF EXPEDITED S California Cal. Penal Code 186.11 When defendant has been charged with
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, CHANCE DECHRISTIAN ADAMS DOB: 08/22/1990 914 Woodhill Court Hopkins, MN 55343 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor
More information15-CR Filed in Ninth Judicial District Court 10/11/ :54 PM Clearwater County, MN. 10/13/2017 5:13 PM Clearwater County, MN
Electronically Served 10/13/2017 5:13 PM 15-CR-16-414 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF CLEARWATER STATE OF MINNESOTA, vs. Plaintiff, ANNETTE MARIE KLAPSTEIN, EMILY NESBITT JOHNSTON, STEVEN ROBERT LIPTAY, and
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, MARIE JESSICA HALL DOB: 12/17/1991 7700 Penn Avenue S Apt 147 Richfield, MN 55423 Defendant. Prosecutor File No. Court File No.
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Minnesota, State of v. CMI of Kentucky, Inc. Doc. 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA State of Minnesota, by Michael Campion, its Commissioner of Public Safety, File No.: 08-CV-603 (DWF/AJB)
More informationSTATEMENT OF FACTS. Paula Prescott. After their relationship ended in 2009, Ms. Prescott obtained a Harassment
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN - Plaintiff, vs. State of Minnesota and Deborah A. Styles, in her individual and official capacities, Defendants. DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT PLAINTIFF'S
More informationCase 1:18-cv DLH-CSM Document 12 Filed 05/07/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Case 1:18-cv-00057-DLH-CSM Document 12 Filed 05/07/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA Shingobee Builders, Inc., Case No. 1:18-cv-00057-DLH-CSM v. Plaintiff, North
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, MAI VU VANG DOB: 04/05/1969 5140 JAMES AVE N Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, NATALIIA MYKHAYLIVNA KARIA DOB: 08/17/1974 2712 Humboldt Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55408 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial
More informationBRIDGING THE GAP. Chapter 4. March 13, :45-1:45pm Pre- and Post- Judgment Collection Seth Chastain, Levy - von Beck & Associates
BRIDGING THE GAP March 13, 2015 Chapter 4 12:45-1:45pm Pre- and Post- Judgment Collection Seth Chastain, Levy - von Beck & Associates PowerPoint 1. Pre- and Post-Judgment Collections Handouts There is
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, SONAM TSERING DOB: 02/21/1981 885 LONG POND RD PLYMOUTH, MA 02360 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor File
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT. Martin M. Harstad, et al. RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR REVIEW. Respondents, Appellate Case No.
STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT November 2, 2017 Martin M. Harstad, et al. Respondents, v. City of Woodbury, Appellant. RESPONSE TO PETITION FOR REVIEW Appellate Case No. A16-1937 Date of Filing of
More informationSETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT This SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ( the Agreement ), is entered into as of October 18, 2017 ( Effective Date ), by and between John David Emerson ( Emerson ) and Timothy Leslie, in his official
More informationstates upon oath: ), and/or 2. I am the tenant with the right to live at the property at the following address:
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF DISTRICT COURT JUDICIAL DISTRICT DIVISION: CASE TYPE:, Plaintiff, v., Defendant. VERIFIED PETITION FOR EMERGENCY RELIEF, LOCKOUT, OR CONSTRUCTIVE LOCKOUT, AND RELATED CLAIMS
More informationCase 5:18-cv TES Document 204 Filed 04/15/19 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION
Case 5:18-cv-00388-TES Document 204 Filed 04/15/19 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION VC MACON GA, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 5:18-cv-00388-TES
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-2052 Joseph W. Frederick, Appellant, vs. Kay
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, SAMUEL DAVID RONNEBERG DOB: 11/14/1990 17601 KETTERING TRAIL LAKEVILLE, MN 55044 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District
More informationFILE #53-CV Rodrigo Esparza, Maria de Jesus de Pineda, Timoteo Martin Morales, And Oscar Basavez Conseco, Plaintiffs, ORDER.
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF NOBLES Rodrigo Esparza, Maria de Jesus de Pineda, Timoteo Martin Morales, And Oscar Basavez Conseco, Plaintiffs, -vs- IN DISTRICT COURT FIFTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT FILE #53-CV-18-751
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No. 08-SC-5348 (ADM/JSM)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. i. i. 2.,..J. 4. 6. 7. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Civil No. 08-SC-5348 (ADM/JSM Plaintiff~ THOMAS JOSEPH PETTERS; PETTERS COMPANY, INC.,
More informationUNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
Document Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA In Re: Bankruptcy No. 68-00039 Great Plains Royalty Corporation, Chapter 7 Debtor. Great Plains Royalty Corporation, / Plaintiff,
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2014). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A15-0147 Todd Anderson, Appellant, vs. Patricia Lloyd,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * KIRK and AMY HENRY, ) ) 2:08-CV PMP-GWF ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER ) )
Case :0-cv-00-PMP -GWF Document Filed 0// Page of 0 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * * KIRK and AMY HENRY, ) ) :0-CV-00-PMP-GWF ) Plaintiffs, ) ORDER ) ) vs. ) ) FREDRICK RIZZOLO aka
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, LINCOLN FINIS BOWMAN DOB: 09/03/1971 8561 SAVANNAH OAKS LANE WOODBURY, MN 55125 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2012). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A13-1344 Discover Bank, Respondent, vs. Crysone C.
More informationPost-Judgment Civil Procedure
Post-Judgment Civil Procedure Rebecca Glisan rebecca.glisan@txstate.edu Copyright 2016. All rights reserved. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic
More informationDECISION AND ORDER. ( BCTA ) and Frank Bennett (collectively, Plaintiffs ) filed a Motion for Temporary Injunction
STATE OF WISCONSIN, CIRCUIT COURT, BROWN COUNTY BROWN COUNTY TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION and FRANK BENNETT, FILED 03-01-2018 Clerk of Circuit Court Brown County, WI 2018CV000013 Plaintiffs, v. BROWN COUNTY and
More informationDecember 21, I thank you for your letter dated December 12, BACKGROUND
LEGISLATURE: LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR: INCOMPATIBLE OFFICES: Last elected president of state senate becomes lieutenant governor as a result of vacancy in that position; strong argument can be made president
More informationTo: Morgan Smith, th Street SE, Minneapolis, MN For the purpose of these discovery requests, the following definitions apply:
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Chris Gregerson, Plaintiff, Case Type: OTHER CIVIL Court File No.: 27-CV-09-13489 Judge: John Q. McShane v. Morgan Smith, Boris
More informationMinnesota Open Meeting Law
Minnesota Open Meeting Law AMC County Government 101 January 26, 2017 PRESENTED BY: Sonya Guggemos and Jennifer Wolf Staff Counsel for Risk Control The information contained in this document is intended
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor File No. 18A06751 Court File No. 27-CR-18-14222 State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, IVAN GIOVANNI HERNANDEZ-ENRIQUEZ
More informationSMALL CLAIMS AND LAW MAGISTRATE MANUAL LASALLE COUNTY
SMALL CLAIMS AND LAW MAGISTRATE MANUAL LASALLE COUNTY This manual has been published by Greg Vaccaro for the use in the LaSalle County Court System PART ONE: INTRODUCTION 1. IN GENERAL This booklet is
More informationPetitioners, Defendants.
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Torrens Robert T. Ruhland and Rhonda G. Ruhland, v. Petitioners, 101 Farms, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company,
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM. ZURICH INSURANCE (GUAM), INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, VS. VIVIAN J. SANTOS, Defendant- Appellant.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF GUAM Q[ fr?cc'.'z,-- ' ' :i-i- LC, l -7 -' * -.-. ". i:rt:- ' ZURICH INSURANCE (GUAM), INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, VS. VIVIAN J. SANTOS, Defendant- Appellant. Supreme Court Case No.:
More informationFourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas OPINION No. 04-12-00321-CV In The Matter of the Guardianship of Carlos Y. BENAVIDES, Jr. From the County Court at Law No. 2, Webb County, Texas Trial Court No.
More informationState of Minnesota In Supreme Court
NO. A14-1957 State of Minnesota In Supreme Court KSTP-TV, vs. Respondent, Metropolitan Council, Petitioner. RESPONSE OF KSTP-TV TO METROPOLITAN COUNCIL'S PETITION FOR REVIEW Mark R. Anfinson (#2744) Lake
More informationCase Doc 110 Filed 02/03/16 Entered 02/03/16 12:32:37 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Document Page 1 of 13 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: Chapter 7 Paul Hansmeier, BKY 15-42460-KHS Debtor. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER At Minneapolis, Minnesota, February, 2016.
More informationGreg Copeland, et al., Appellants, vs. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc., d/b/a KSTP-TV, et al., Respondents. C COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA
Greg Copeland, et al., Appellants, vs. Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc., d/b/a KSTP-TV, et al., Respondents. C4-94-1629 COURT OF APPEALS OF MINNESOTA 526 N.W.2d 402; 1995 Minn. App. 23 Media L. Rep. 1441 January
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. ORDER This matter came before the Court on the Plaintiffs Motion for Modification of
CASE 0:14-md-02522-PAM Document 656 Filed 12/02/15 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re: Target Corporation Customer Data Security Breach Litigation MDL No. 14-2522 (PAM/JJK)
More informationI WANT YOU TO REMEMBER IT'S "BAIL" BEFORE "JAIL" SO YOU BETTER NOT "FAIL." OSCAR MADISON
I WANT YOU TO REMEMBER IT'S "BAIL" BEFORE "JAIL" SO YOU BETTER NOT "FAIL." OSCAR MADISON ORIGINS Originally, money bail was developed in the Anglo-Saxon period in England (410-1066) as a means of settling
More informationSUPREME COURT OF ALABAMA
Rel: April 20, 2018 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 5, 2009 Session. LAFOLLETTE MEDICAL CENTER, et al., v. CITY OF LAFOLLETTE, et al.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE August 5, 2009 Session LAFOLLETTE MEDICAL CENTER, et al., v. CITY OF LAFOLLETTE, et al. Direct Appeal from the Chancery Court for Campbell County No. 14,922
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Plaintiff(s) Case No: 09-cv-3332 MJD/JJK
Case 0:09-cv-03332-MJD-JJK Document 351 Filed 07/23/10 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA U.S. COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION, v. Plaintiff(s) Case No: 09-cv-3332 MJD/JJK
More informationPART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS
PART 6: RESOLVING ISSUES AND PRESERVING RIGHTS What this Part is about: This Part is designed to resolve issues and questions arising in the course of a Court action. It includes rules describing how applications
More informationinjunction. The Bankruptcy Court, however, did not follow the required rules. Specifically, the
Case 3:16-cv-00763-JAG Document 25 Filed 02/08/17 Page 1 of 6 PageID# 2784 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division LEMBERG LAW, LLC, et al.. Appellants,
More informationSTATE OF MINNESOTA DISTRICT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF RAMSEY. Case Type: Civil/Other. Andrew Cilek and Minnesota Voters Alliance,
STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF RAMSEY Andrew Cilek and Minnesota Voters Alliance, DISTRICT COURT SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Civil/Other v. Plaintiffs, SUMMONS Office of the Minnesota Secretary of
More informationCOURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA D058284
Filed 7/19/11; pub. order 8/11/11 (see end of opn.) COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA In re the Marriage of DELIA T. and ISAAC P. RAMIREZ DELIA T. RAMIREZ, Respondent,
More informationThis opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2016).
This opinion will be unpublished and may not be cited except as provided by Minn. Stat. 480A.08, subd. 3 (2016). STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS A16-1434 Mark Molitor, Appellant, vs. Stephanie Molitor,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:13-cv-02630-ADM-JJK Document 16 Filed 02/05/14 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA Maria Twigg, Civ. No. 13-2630 ADM/JJK Plaintiff, v. U.S. Bank, NA, as Trustee for the
More informationWESTERN PLYMOUTH NEIGHBORHOOD ALLIANCE COMMENTS ON PETITION TO WITHDRAW APPLICATIONS
STATE OF MINNESOTA OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE HEARINGS FOR THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSON In the Matter of the Application for a Certificate of Need for the Hollydale 115kV Transmission Line Project in the
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, JOHNATHAN BPIERRE MORRIS DOB: 05/30/1988 818 LOGAN AVE N Minneapolis, MN 55411 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, YEVGENIY SAVENOK DOB: 08/07/1985 17190 PARK CIRCLE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55346 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor
More informationCASE 0:15-cv SRN-SER Document 1-1 Filed 09/25/15 Page 1 of 12
, - v CASE 0:15-cv-03737-SRN-SER Document 1-1 Filed 09/25/15 Page 1 of 12 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF HENNEPIN DISTRICT COURT FOURTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT Case Type: Breach of Contract SolutionTech, Inc.,
More informationFILED Court Administrator JUL -I ''-.-)
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp july 11, 2011 Special
More information