Case BLS Doc 426 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE.

Transcription

1 Case BLS Doc 426 Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 6 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: JMO WIND DOWN, INC., Debtor. Chapter 11 Case No (BLS) Re: DI 408 NON-PARTY DANIEL MATTES' MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA OF EDUARDO SAVERIN Daniel Mattes, a non-party to the above-referenced bankruptcy case ("Bankruptcy Case"), through his undersigned counsel, hereby submits this motion (the "Motion") for entry of an order quashing Creditor and Interested Party Eduardo Saverin's ("Saverin") Subpoena to Appear and Testify at a Hearing or Trial in a Bankruptcy Case (Or Adversary Proceeding) (the "Subpoena") and stating that he is not required to attend a deposition scheduled for October 14, 2016 at 10:00 A.M. pursuant to a Notice of Deposition ("Notice of Deposition") served by Saverin on October 12, In support of this Motion, Mr. Mattes respectfully states as follows: I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This Court has jurisdiction over this Motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157 and Venue of the Debtor's Chapter 11 case in this district is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C and This is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157(b). 2. The statutory predicates for the relief sought herein are Rules 26, 30 and 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Federal Rules"), Rules 7026, 7030, and 9016 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure ("Bankruptcy Rules"), Rule of the Local Rules of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware ("Local Bankruptcy Rules" or "LBR"), and Section 105(a) of the Bankruptcy Code.

2 Case BLS Doc 426 Filed 10/13/16 Page 2 of 6 II. PROCEDURAL STATUS 3. On March 21, 2016 (the "Petition Date"), the Debtor filed a voluntary petition for relief pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the "Bankruptcy Court"). 4. The Debtor continues to operate its business as debtor-in-possession pursuant to Sections 1107(a) and 1108 of the Bankruptcy Code. The U.S. Trustee appointed a Committee of Equity Security Holders ("Committee") in this case on April 15, 2016 [Doc. 132]. III. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 5. On September 1, 2016, Debtor JMO Wind Down, Inc. (the "Debtor") filed its Amended Plan of Liquidation of JMO Wind Down, Inc. Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code [Doc. 345] (the "Plan"). On September 1, 2016, the Debtor also filed its Disclosure Statement for the Amended Plan of Liquidation of JMO Wind Down, Inc. Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code [Doc. 347] (the "Disclosure Statement"). The hearing on the confirmation of the Debtor's Plan and the approval of its Disclosure Statement is set for October 17, 2016 in the Bankruptcy Court. [Doc. 344]. 6. On October 11, 2016, Ampalu Investment GmbH ("Ampalu") and Samirana Investment Corp. ("Samirana") filed their Objection to Debtor's Amended Plan of Liquidation and Disclosure Statement for the Amended Plan of Liquidation [Doc. 399] ("Objection"). Mr. Mattes was not a party to the Objection, although he did file a Declaration in support of the Objection. [Doc. 400]. 7. On October 12, 2016, counsel for Saverin served Mr. Mattes with the Notice of Deposition, seeking to compel Mr. Mattes to appear for a deposition on Friday, October 14, 2016 at 10:00 AM in the offices of Landis Rath & Cobb LLP, located at 919 Market Street, Suite

3 Case BLS Doc 426 Filed 10/13/16 Page 3 of , Wilmington, Delaware [Doc. 405]. A true and correct copy of the Notice of Deposition is attached hereto as Exhibit On October 11, 2016, counsel for Saverin also served Mr. Mattes with the Subpoena, commanding him to appear at the hearing on the confirmation of the Debtor's Plan and the approval of the Disclosure Statement on October 17, 2016 at 10:00 A.M. in the Bankruptcy Court. A true and correct copy of the Subpoena is attached hereto as Exhibit On October 13, 2016, Connor Bifferato, counsel for Mr. Mattes, informed Michelle Smith, counsel for Saverin, that Mr. Mattes lives in Austria and will be unable to participate in a deposition on October 14th. A true and correct copy of Mr. Bifferato's October 13, to Ms. Smith is attached hereto as Exhibit 3. V. RELIEF REQUESTED 10. Mr. Mattes respectfully requests that this Court quash the Subpoena and instruct Mr. Mattes that he is under no obligation to appear for a deposition pursuant to the Notice of Deposition for two reasons. First, Mr. Mattes received less than seven days notice of the deposition and therefore was not provided reasonable notice under the Local Bankruptcy Rules. Second, Mr. Mattes is not a party to the Objection and therefore has not personally submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court. Because Mr. Mattes is a non-party and not a citizen or resident of the United States, he cannot be served under Bankruptcy Rule 9016, which incorporates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45. Rather, he must be served through letters rogatory issued through formal diplomatic channels. VI. BASIS FOR RELIEF A. Saverin Failed to Provide Reasonable Notice of the Deposition Under the Local Rules

4 Case BLS Doc 426 Filed 10/13/16 Page 4 of The Notice of Deposition is improper because it failed to provide Mr. Mattes with reasonable notice. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, "[a] party who wants to depose a person by oral questions must give reasonable written notice to every other party." FED. R. CIV. P. 30(b)(1). Unless otherwise ordered by the Court, "'reasonable notice' for the taking of depositions... shall not be less than seven (7) days." LBR In the present case, Saverin served Mr. Mattes with the Notice of Deposition on Wednesday, October 12, 2016 for a deposition on Friday October 14, Thus, Mr. Mattes only received two days, or less than 48 hours, advanced notice of the deposition. Such notice is unreasonable under any circumstance pursuant to the Local Bankruptcy Rules, however it is particularly unreasonable because Mr. Mattes lives in Vienna, Austria and cannot easily travel across the globe on two days notice to sit for a deposition in Wilmington, Delaware. 13. Because it is unreasonable to demand that Mr. Mattes travel from Vienna, Austria to Delaware on less than 48 hours notice to appear at a deposition, the Court should quash the subpoena and state that Mr. Mattes is under no legal obligation to appear at the deposition on Friday, October 14, B. The Notice of Deposition and the Subpoena Were Not Properly Served on Mr. Mattes 14. The Notice of Deposition should be disregarded and the Subpoena should be quashed for the additional reason that they were not properly served on Mr. Mattes. Mr. Mattes is a resident of Austria and a non-party to the Bankruptcy Case. Although Mr. Mattes submitted a declaration in support of the Objection filed by Ampalu and Samirana, he has not personally objected to either the Plan or the Disclosure Statement. As such, service of a subpoena on Mr. Mattes under Bankruptcy Rule 9016 is improper.

5 Case BLS Doc 426 Filed 10/13/16 Page 5 of Bankruptcy Rule 9016, which incorporates Federal Rule 45, governs service of a subpoena in a bankruptcy case. However, Bankruptcy Rule 9016 only pertains to individuals located within the United States or "to a United States national or resident who is in a foreign country." FED. R. CIV. P. 45(b)(3). See also 28 U.S.C. 1783(a) ("A court of the United States may order the issuance of a subpoena requiring the appearance as a witness before it, or before a person or body designated by it, of a national or resident of the United States who is in a foreign country."). 16. For non-united States citizens residing in foreign countries, such as Mr. Mattes, the service provisions of Federal Rule 45 and Bankruptcy Rule 9016 are inapplicable. Rather, service is dictated by any agreements in place between the United States and the relevant country. In this case, Austria is not a party to any international service of process treaties, so Mr. Mattes can only be served by making a request through letters rogatory using formal diplomatic channels. See FED. R. BANKR. P. 7004(f)(2)(b); 22 C.F.R ("In its broader sense in international practice, the term letters rogatory denotes a formal request from a court in which an action is pending, to a foreign court to perform some judicial act. Examples are... the serving of a summons, subpoena, or other legal notice."). 17. Because Saverin has neither sought nor obtained letters rogatory, service of both the Notice of Deposition and the Subpoena on Mr. Mattes were improper. VII. CONCLUSION 18. For the reasons set forth herein, Mr. Mattes respectfully requests that the Court enter an order, substantially in the form submitted herewith, quashing the Subpoena and ordering that Daniel Mattes is under no legal obligation to appear for the deposition set on October 14,

6 Case BLS Doc 426 Filed 10/13/16 Page 6 of at 10:00 A.M. in Wilmington, Delaware pursuant to the Notice of Deposition, and granting such other and further relief as may be just and equitable. Dated: October 13, THE BIFFERATO FIRM, P.A. /s/ Thomas F. Driscoll III Ian Connor Bifferato (DE Bar No. 3272) Thomas F. Driscoll III (DE Bar No N. Orange Street 4th Floor, The Mill Wilmington, Delaware Telephone: (302) Facsimile: (302) cbifferato@tbf.legal tdriscoll@tbf.legal -and- Charles E. Dorkey III Gary W. Marsh Bryan E. Bates Matthew M. Weiss DENTONS US LLP 1221 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York Telephone: (212) Facsimile: (212) charles.dorkey@dentons.com gary.marsh@dentons.com bryan.bates@dentons.com matthew.weiss@dentons.com Attorneys for Daniel Mattes

7 Case BLS Doc Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 10

8 Case BLS Doc Filed 10/13/16 Page 2 of 10

9 Case BLS Doc Filed 10/13/16 Page 3 of 10

10 Case BLS Doc Filed 10/13/16 Page 4 of 10

11 Case BLS Doc Filed 10/13/16 Page 5 of 10

12 Case BLS Doc Filed 10/13/16 Page 6 of 10

13 Case BLS Doc Filed 10/13/16 Page 7 of 10

14 Case BLS Doc Filed 10/13/16 Page 8 of 10

15 Case BLS Doc Filed 10/13/16 Page 9 of 10

16 Case BLS Doc Filed 10/13/16 Page 10 of 10

17 Case BLS Doc Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 3 PROPOSED ORDER

18 Case BLS Doc Filed 10/13/16 Page 2 of 3 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: JMO WIND DOWN, INC., Chapter 11 Case No (BLS) Debtor. ORDER QUASHING SUBPOENA OF EDUARDO SAVERIN Upon consideration of Non-Party Daniel Mattes' Motion to Quash Subpoena of Eduardo Saverin (the "Motion"); 1 and upon consideration of the proceedings before the Court related to the Motion; and the Court having found that (i) the Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157 and 1334; (ii) this is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 157(b); (iii) venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C and 1409; (iv) the Motion is in full compliance with all applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, Bankruptcy Rules, Local Bankruptcy Rules of the District of Delaware, and orders and procedures of this Court; (v) proper and adequate notice of the Motion, the deadline to file any objections to the Motion, and any hearing thereon was given, and no other or further notice is necessary; and (vi) the legal and factual bases set forth in the Motion establish just cause for the relief granted herein; and after due deliberation and sufficient cause appearing therefor; IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 1. The Motion is granted in its entirety. 2. Creditor and Interested Party Eduardo Saverin's ("Saverin") Subpoena is hereby quashed. 1 Capitalized terms used herein but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Motion.

19 Case BLS Doc Filed 10/13/16 Page 3 of 3 3. Daniel Mattes is under no legal obligation to appear for the deposition set on October 14, 2016 at 10:00 A.M. in Wilmington, Delaware pursuant to the Notice of Deposition. 4. The terms and conditions of this Order shall be immediately effective and enforceable upon its entry. 5. This Court shall retain jurisdiction to resolve all matters arising out of or related to the Motion or this Order. SIGNED this day of October, THE HONORABLE BRENDAN LINEHAN SHANNON UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY JUDGE MWEISS\ \V-2-2 -

20 Case BLS Doc Filed 10/13/16 Page 1 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Thomas F. Driscoll III, hereby certify that on this 13 th day of October, 2016, a copy of the foregoing Non-Party Daniel Mattes' Motion to Quash Subpoena of Eduardo Saverin was caused to be served on the attached service list via CM/ECF and U.S. Mail. /s/ Thomas F. Driscoll III Thomas F. Driscoll III (#4703)

21 Case BLS Doc Filed 10/13/16 Page 2 of 3

22 Case BLS Doc Filed 10/13/16 Page 3 of 3 ADAM LANDIS, ESQ. KERRI MUMFORD, ESQ. JAMES GREEN, ESQ. LANDIS RATH & COBB LLP 919 MARKET STREET, SUITE 1800 P.O. BOX 2087 WILMINGTON DE JAMES COOK C/O JMO WIND DOWN, INC. NATIONAL CORPORATE RESEARCH, LTD. 850 NEW BURTON ROAD, SUITE 201 DOVER, DE STEPHEN STUUT C/O JMO WIND DOWN, INC. NATIONAL CORPORATE RESEARCH, LTD. 850 NEW BURTON ROAD, SUITE 201 DOVER, DE KATE ROGGIO BUCK, ESQ. MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP RENAISSANCE CENTRE 405 N. KING STREET, 8TH FLOOR WILMINGTON, DE PENG-TSIN ONG C/O JMO WIND DOWN, INC. NATIONAL CORPORATE RESEARCH, LTD. 850 NEW BURTON ROAD, SUITE 201 DOVER, DE WARD W. BENSON, ESQ. TRIAL ATTORNEY, TAX DIVISION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE P.O. BOX 227, BEN FRANKLIN STATION WASHINGTON, DC SCOTT WEISS, C/O JMO WIND DOWN, INC. NATIONAL CORPORATE RESEARCH, LTD. 850 NEW BURTON ROAD, SUITE 201 DOVER, DE 19904