In the Supreme Court of State of Ohio. Motion for a Stay from any Muskingum County Decision from case No Jv0984OOp28 while this case is
|
|
- Domenic Shaw
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 j N G?^ In the Supreme Court of State of Ohio Christopher M. Baisley Case No: Appellant vs Yvonne Ward (Amended Copy to Ohio Supreme Court Ruling) Appellee Motion for a Stay from any Muskingum County Decision from case No Jv0984OOp28 while this case is pending before this court The Appellant Christopher M. Baisley Motion for a Stay for any Muskingum County Decision from the Case Jv while this case is pending before this court. The lower court has made ruling on this case that Appellant feels strongly doesn't have jurisdiction of the case, at least not at this time, which will also will be appealed upon a final order from Muskingum County Domestic Relation Court Judge. The Appellee has been properly served and has not made a response on this matter, and therefore waived their rights in accordance to the rules of Ohio Supreme Court. Similar issues with Appeal Court proceeding. The Appellant moved to strike any motion filed as results from Appellee or her Council response. The Appellant asked this honorable court till they make a ruling on Appellant motion, or motion for Appellant to proceed with his arguments with this court, should they accept this case, that an order of Stay be Granted from Muskingum County Domestic Relation Court and retroactive of filing date with this court starting of October 29,2013. W^ JAN 13 20b4 CLERK OF COURT REME COURT OF OHIO E- 4^^1 P'<...,. r 3/, CLER {? 13K '^ f r< r^ { fy 3^: 3^ s4t 6 B ;^^E M E C' 0 U i4'3 0 ^^0 H 10
2 Fact of the case reason behind such request: 1. The Judgment order of November 13th, 2013 from Domestic Relations Court. This order has be Motion to Strike against, And motion to set aside, no hearing was scheduled, instead the court and Council made a decision to make such order from magistrate order which was filed against by the Appellant. This order came after the filing of the Appeals Court of 5th District, and Ohio Supreme Court. This was taken by the Appellant as a retaliation act for exercise his rights and Challenge the ruling based upon the law set by State of Ohio of not having a Discovery Phase, The Motion that was exercise was under Ohio Procedure 53 which the Domestic Relations Court never let happened. Instead of schedule for a hearing they had sided with Magistrate and council both which is issues brought before the Supreme Court of Ohio. 2. June 7t", 2013 a motion to set aside the Magistrate order by Appellant to Muskingum County Domestic Relations Court, never answers by the court, nor set for a hearing instead making a bias decision. ( November 13ih,2013) 3. July 8`,2013 Motion to Strike the Magistrate order due to a new witness filed by Appellant in Muskingum County Domestic Relation Court never answer by the court, nor set for a hearing instead making a bias decision. ( November 13th 2013) 4. The Appellant original agrees to have Pre- trial until this order came about. When the Court threaten sanctions as a punishment as a forcible act, instead of mediation act, and after the discovery of order the court signed that was objected in timely manner, At this point the Appellant knew that he wouldn't be getting a fair hearing, and had withdrawal any talk at this time and moved forward with his motion filed with Ohio Supreme Court. 5. It was the Appellee Council that pushed the paperwork as he signed the order with the Domestic Relations Court referring to November 13th, Knowing they missed the deadline to make any response now in this case with the Ohio Supreme Court. This order has been file for
3 Relief of Judgment by Appellant to the Domestic relation Court of Muskingum County as of November 15th, To date as the other motion filed by Appellant has not been answered. But the Courts are answer and Granted most of Appellee motion with lower courts as they showing. 6. Appellant understands this would qualify as Professional and Ethical Conduct by the Attorney and the Courts, which is separate from this issues brought before this court, but ask to preserved the integrity of the case the Appellant moves for an order of Ohio Supreme Court to Grant the Motion of Stay of the Case No Jv till they had the opportunity to review the complaint brought before them. Appellant moves in matter of Justice, but as well as unbiased decision and the same protection as any other pro sec or attorney would have.the Appellant requests that this honorable court would stop any type of retaliations by Muskingum County Domestic Relations Court since they have now showed a pattern since the filing with this court. Respectfully Submitted Christopher M. Baisley A copy of this motion has been served upon Appellant Council Brian Benbow 605 Market Street, Zanesville Ohio, postage prepaid on January 10i`', 2014 A Copy of this has been served upon Domestic Relation Court 22 N. Fifth Street, Zanesville Ohio, postage prepaid on January 10th,2014
4 q r.. 10, I ^.j _ _. ^ ^ -- ^.... IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT OF MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISION GHRI atopher M BALSLEY Plaintiff/Petitioner I Case fva. ]V vs- JUDGE: JEFFREY A. HOOPER YVONNE E LACEY Defendant/Petitioner II NOTICE This case is assigned for a pre-trial confen-ence on JANUARY 15, AT 4:00 P.M. before Judge Jeffrey A. Hooper in the Domestic Relations Coi-irt at 22 N. Fifth Street, Zariesviile; Ohio Counsel of record and all parties shall attend this conference. Failure of a party to attend the conference without leave of court shall result in the imposition of appropriate sanctions. '!f ^_AL i ori M. Shook, Assignment Comr-iissioner for Judge Jeffrey A. Hooper CHRISTOPHER M BALSLEY YVONNE E LACEY represented by BRIAN VJ BENBOW REQUEST FOR SERVICE TO THE CLERK: Please serve a copy of this Notice upon counsel of record for each party by i-egudar mail. If a party does not have counsel of record, please serve a copy of the order on the party by regular mail at his or her last kriown aeids-ess.
5 In the Court of Common Pleas Domestic Relations Court ^ XV^ Christopher M. Balsley Plaintiff Case No: Jv0984"28 Judge: Jeff rtoopev^ ^ :. 1BS. Motion for Relief of Judgment Yvonne Ward Defendant The Plaintiff moves for the court to Grant Motion under Ohio Civil procedure 60 to Grant Relief of Judgment signed by this court on November 13, This case has been appealed to the Supreme Court of Ohio. The Plaintiff has attached document of Notice of Appeal to this. The Ohio Supreme Court has held that, "[olnce a case has been appealed, the trial court loses jurisdiction except to take action in aid of the appeal." In re S.J.,106 Ohi St.3d 11, 2005-Ohio-3215, 829 N.E.2d 1207, The trial court [only] retains jurisdiction over issues not inconsistent with the appellate court's jurisdiction to reverse, modify, or affirm the judgment appealed from." Id., State ex rel. Electronic Classroom of Tomorrow v. Cuyahoga City. Court of Common Pieas,129 Ohio St.3d 30, 2011-Ohio-626, 950 N.E.2d 149. If Denied the Plaintiff moves to have 10 days from time of denial to make objection, and moves for a final order from this court. The Plaintiff moves for Relief of Judgment signed by this court on November 1.3th, Respectfully Submitted Christopher M. Baisley 2476 Michael Drive Zanesville Ohio, Certificate of Service has been made to council Brian Benbow by U.S. mail, Postage prepaid to his office 605 Market Street, Zanesville Ohio, on November 15, 2013
6 :J (`^ S,," fi ^ VS' P L S t1f: 5^^[3 flff r^ l.... ^ 2^i;7 ^i:3v 13 P1^ 1? JZ II4 THE COMMON PLEAS COURT T0 D D ML`SI{.IINGUM COUNTY, OHIO CLERK DOMESTIC IZELATIONS DIVISION Christopher M. I3alsley CASE NO. JV vs. Plaintiff, Judge Wk%9't"" ; Yvonne W. Lacy (Ward) Defendant. JUDt7TMI:NT ENTRY ADOPTING THE JUNF, 7, 2013 MAGISTRAT'E'S DECISION This inatter came before Magistrate Thomas J. Tompkins for hearing on May 3, 2013, upon the parties' cross motions seeking sanctioils under Civ. R. I I and/or R,C. 232a.5 1. Mr, I3alsley appeared tivithout counsel. Attoz7ley Brian W. Benbow appeared for Ms. Ward. The Magistrate issued a Decision on Jline 7, loldizig as follows: "Mr. Balsley asserts that Ms. «7ard's counse1, Brian W. Bei1bow, should be sanctioned luider Citi% R. 11 and/or R.C because Mr. Benbo^v allegedly did not serve Mr. Balsley with the docun:ents filed \vith the Clerk oi1 11/30/2012 (ṈNotice of Appearance, Motion for in: camera interview, and Ms. Ward's ti-vitness list) as iizdicated by Mr.l3enbow's certificate of service filed the same day. Attached to each of the docunients in question is a certificate of service sigited by Mr. BenboNvi certifying that a copy of the document ^^ras served upon Mr. Balsley by regular mail at 2476 Michael Drive, Zanesville, OI-I on November 30, Ivlr. Balsley asserts that he didiaot receive any of tnesedocutiaents by i17ai1. I-ie did not shonv tl7at the documeiits Nvere not actually inailed to him, asceztitied by Mr. Benbow, oirly that he did not receive them through the inail. He
7 adinits that he obtained copies of all of the documentsfrom the Clerk of Courts. Moreover, he fails to show how he was prejudiced in any way as a result of this event. Mr. Balsley asserts that Mr. Benbow should be sanctioned under Civ. R, 11 and/or R.C because he filed Ms. Ward's wititess list on 11/30/2012 for the purpose of delaying the proceedings. Mr. Balsley failed to show that the voluntary disclosure of witnesses, even if it did contain inaccurate information, caused any delay in these proceedings or was filed u=ith the purpose of causing a delay.?vlr. Balsley asserts that Mr. Benbow should be sanctioned under Civ. R. 11 and/or R.C because Mr. Benbow filed Ms. Ward's motion to modify pareriting time on 03/18/2013 with the intcnt to harass Mr. Balsley. Mr. Baisley failed to show th it the motion was filed for any purpose other than to bring to the Court's attention Ms. Ward's request to modily the parenting tinxe oi-der. Therefore, 1111r. Balsley's request for sanctions is denied. Mr. Betlbotiv asserts that Mr. Balsley should be saiictioned under: Civ. R. 11 azid/or R.C because he has repeatedly filed docunients that contain fal.se allegatiozls that Mr. Benbow has enaaged in unethicalbehavior.ms. NVard has incurredattoiney fees in respoi-tdixtgto these filings. Many of the documeiits filed by Mi. Balsley aresimply unintelligible. Mr_ 13alsley's 12/06/2012 filinc, captioned as "Ethical Issue of Counsel" lias already been stricken. In his 12/10/2012 "'Motion to Sanction NIs. Ward's Counsel", Mr. Balsley requests that tile Court sanction INTs. Ward andmr. Benbow for uneihical conduct Mr. Benbow allegedly committed ciurine a time pei iod before N1i. BalslLy re-opeited this case by filing a contempt zilotion on 2
8 November 14, Not only is this "Motion" for sanetions based upon allegations regarding events that occurred prior to the filing of the instant action, it implores this Court "to get involved in Ethical issues" regarding Mr. Benbow --- something that is outside the scope of this Court's jurisdiction. Mr. Balsley's 12/10/2012``Contra Motion of Defendants Ethical Issue of Counsel" contains a rambling series of allegations about Mz. Benbow that have no relevance whatsoever to Mr. Balsley's pending motions of 11 / 14/2012. In the last paragraph of this document, Mr. Balsley makes clear that his p-ltrpose in filirig the document is to inf7uence the Court in the pending action by informing the Court of what he alleges to be Mr. Benbow's unethical behavior "past azid present." Regardless of whether he violated Civ. R. I l in filing the two documents described above, and regardless of the veracity of his allegations about Mr. Benbow's conduet, Mr. Balsley clearly violated R.C by filing these documeaits. Both doclunents fall within the followiilg definitioiz of frivolous conduct: "It [the filing] obviously serves inerely to harass or maliciously injt?.re another pai-ty to the civil action or appeal or is fcir another improper purpose, including, but not limited to, causing unnecessary delay or a needless increase in the cost of 1id.gation." R.C (A)(2)(a)(i). Neither of the dociunents described above had any legitimate purpose in the pending actions: Mr. Balsley lilecl tllezn to enlbarrass or harass Mr. Benbow and/or to prejudice the Coui-t agaizist Ms. 'A'ard by uiaking allegafaons of ethical inisconduct against her legal counsel. ivls> VVa.rd ineurred attoitleyfees in the azllor.znt of $ as result ofiklr. Balsley's :frivolous conduct. 3
9 While Mr. Benbow can and should be expected to withstand even «nfounded personal allegations of inisconduct from an opposing pro se party without causing his client to inccir additional expense, Mr. Balsley's allegations were so obviously an attempt to iinpresperly influenee the Court in the pending action that it was both appropriate and reasonable for Mr. Benbow to expend time to respond. The sum of $ is reasonable. Therefore, Mr. Balsley is hereby ordered.to pay Ms. Ward the sum of $ Judgment shall be entered against Mr. Balsley and in favor of Ms. Ward in said amount." This matter coilsequently came before this Court upon this Court's own Motion to Adopt the Magistrate's Decision. Neither party filed objections. For the foilowing reasons, the Magistrate's Decision is hereby AD+DP'I'EV. Pursuant to Civ.R. 53(F)(4)(a), `:[tjhe court may adopt the magistrate's decision ifno ^A`ritten objections are filed uilless it deterniinesthat there is an error of law or other defect on the face of thc magistrate's decision." See, e.g., Stcrte ext e. Booher v. Honda ofarn. lllfg., Inc, (2000), 88 Ohio St.id 52, 5' ) -54 (coixclusioils of law by inagistrate to which no objection was nlade could not be raised as an ei-zor on appeal), Groz.r One Recrlt},, Inc. v. Dixie Iaat'1 Co. (Apr. 14, 1998), Franklin App. No. 9 7APE , Ohio App. LEXIS 1628, uxu eported, A litrao v. Poriicrnte Contrcacto^-s. Inc. (Sept. 11, 1997), Fiankiin App. No. 97APG02-221; 1997 Ohio App. LEXIS 4101, unreportecl; Hcrsh tz. Hcrsh (May 1, 1998), Montgonlety App. No , 1998 Ohio App, LEXIS185I. uiueported; R. G. Real E"state Holcling, I1?c. v. l4.,l. i:t'ognet. (Apr. 24, 1998), Montgomery App. No, 16737, 1998 Ohio App. LEXIS 1733, unreported..^,'ar zlrcmclj)poz`nte Assocs. v. Brannon (Jai ), MontgonzeryApp. No , 1998 Ohio App. LEXIS 2i 1, unreported (apipellai?.t w11o failed 4
10 to file objections to the magistrate's report waived the right to contest either the factual or legal iindings of the trial court). Upon a careful review of the record, there are no errors of law or other defects in the Magistrate's Decision, Because no written objectiozls were filed by June 21, 2013, this Court hereby ADOP'I'S the Magistrate's Decision in its entirety as if fully rewritten herein. There being z1o just cause for delay, judgment of $ is rendered in favor of Defenciant. Mi. Balsley is hereby ordered to pay Ms. Ward the sum of $ Judgment shall be entered against Mr. Baisley aild in favor of Ms. Ward in said ainount, 11!Ir. Baisley's request for sanctions i^ denied. IT IS SO OIZDER:ED. REs ctfuiltsii ^d, E F^vr` Bi,iai W. Be yow ) Benbow Law Ofiices Attorney for Defendant 605 Market St. Zanesville, OH Phone: (740) Fas: (740) Enlail: b«-b 1_97+cyahoo.coin Reguest for Sei vice; Please issue a copy of tliis ordqr or decision oi1 the follo^ving: Clixistophet Balsley Plaintiff I3rian)V. Benbow Attorney for Defendant 5
In the Supreme Court of State of Ohio. Motion for an Emergency Expedite for Stay preceding from any Muskingum County Decision from case
f^ 3r 5 o-.^^ c Christopher M. Baisley In the Supreme Court of State of Ohio Case No:. v; u ^^......,..,; :+isti.,^"5^ j ^ ^ 3^.Y^ ^i S : i Appellant VS CL :RK s^ COURT SUPREME COURT OF OH O Yvonne 104/ard-
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as Harris v. MC Sign Co., 2014-Ohio-2888.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO GARY HARRIS, : O P I N I O N Plaintiff, : (ATTORNEY JOSEPH T. GEORGE, : CASE NO. 2013-L-115
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Brown v. Carlton Harley Davidson, Inc., 2014-Ohio-5157.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101494 BRUCE ANDREW BROWN, ETC., ET
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Hardy v. Hardy, 2008-Ohio-1925.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 89905 ROSA LEE HARDY PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. JOSEPH HARDY, JR.
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Cleveland v. Abrams, 2012-Ohio-3957.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 97814 CITY OF CLEVELAND PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. IAN J.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as Sloan v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr., 2003-Ohio-2661.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT Theodore C. Sloan, Jr., : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 02AP-962 v. : (C.C. No. 94-10277)
More information329 E. Main Street 1231 East Broad Street Lancaster, OH Columbus, OH 43205
[Cite as Vizzo v. Morris, 2012-Ohio-2141.] COURT OF APPEALS FAIRFIELD COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JAMES A. VIZZO Plaintiff-Appellee -vs- CHRISTINA M. MORRIS Defendant-Appellant JUDGES Hon. W.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO ex rel. RICHARD F. : Case No. 2013-0295 DAVET P.O. Box 10092 : Original Action in Prohibition and Cleveland, Ohio 44110 : Mandamus Arising From Cuyahoga
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOCKING COUNTY. : Defendant-Appellee. : FILE-STAMPED DATE: : APPEARANCES
[Cite as Amos v. McDonald's Restaurant, 2004-Ohio-5762.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT HOCKING COUNTY Linda Diane Amos, : : Plaintiff-Appellant, : : Case No. 04CA3 vs. : : McDonald
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as Herb v. Loughlin, 2012-Ohio-4351.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT STEVEN M. HERB JUDGES Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellant Hon. Sheila G. Farmer,
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Edwards v. Lopez, 2011-Ohio-5173.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95860 BRUCE EDWARDS, ET AL. PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS vs. ANNARIEL
More informationCase No tt gbc *uprerne Court of tjio. SUSAN GWINN, et al., Appellees, OHIO ELECTIONS COMMISSION, et al., Appellants.
Case No. 2010-928 3tt gbc *uprerne Court of tjio SUSAN GWINN, et al., Appellees, V. OHIO ELECTIONS COMMISSION, et al., Appellants. On Appeal from the Franklin County Court ofappeals, Tenth Appellate District,
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State ex rel. Ford v. Adm. Judge of Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 2013-Ohio-4197.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100053
More informationCase 4:04-cv RAS Document 41 Filed 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION
Case 4:04-cv-00256-RAS Document 41 Filed 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION E-DATA CORPORATION VS. Case No. 4:04cv256 CINEMARK
More informationSTATE OF OHIO JEREMY GUM
[Cite as State v. Gum, 2009-Ohio-6309.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92723 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. JEREMY GUM DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationPLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
ll>.'f.i. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO r.` r C^.^a Angela R. Granata, pro se Plaintiff-Appellant Case No. 2014-0157 FULL PANEL REVIEW REQUESTED vs John Stamatakos, et al. Defendants-Appellee Appeal from
More informationSupreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed March 16, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2015
Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed March 16, 2015 - Case No. 2015-0303 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2015 R. Lotus Justice: : Relator, : : Case No. 215-0303 vs. : : Franklin County Court of Common
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Appellant, : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO CV 8176
[Cite as Maga v. Brockman, 185 Ohio App.3d 666, 2010-Ohio-382.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO MAGA, : Appellant, : C.A. CASE NO. 23495 v. : T.C. NO. 2008 CV 8176 BROCKMAN et al.,
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Jenkins, 2008-Ohio-6149.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 90640 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. RICHARD B. JENKINS,
More informationOR G NAL MAY CLERK AW11" Appellant, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO EXREL. RENEE ENGELHART,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO OR G NAL STATE OF OHIO EXREL. RENEE ENGELHART, vs. Appellant, On Appeal from the Cuyahoga County Court of Appeals Eighth Appellate District HONORABLE NANCY MARGARET. Court
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as McCoy v. Cicchini Ents., Inc., 2012-Ohio-1182.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT SARAH McCOY, et al., -vs- Plaintiffs-Appellees CICCHINI ENTERPRISES, INC., et al.,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO
[Cite as In re Foreclosure of Liens, 2015-Ohio-1258.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT LAKE COUNTY, OHIO IN THE MATTER OF THE: : O P I N I O N FORECLOSURE OF LIENS AND FORFEITURE OF
More information[Cite as State ex rel. Johnson v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 2004-Ohio-2648.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as State ex rel. Johnson v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 2004-Ohio-2648.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT State of Ohio ex rel. John A. Johnson, Relator, v. No. 03AP-466 Ohio
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT
[Cite as Harris v. Harris, 2004-Ohio-4084.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 83526 MARLENE HARRIS JOURNAL ENTRY Plaintiff-Appellee AND vs. OPINION GARY HARRIS [Appeal by
More informationAND OPINION DATE OF ANNOUNCEMENT OF DECISION: AUGUST 10, 2006
[Cite as Steindler v. Meyers, Lamanna & Roman, 2006-Ohio-4097.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 86852 SHIRLEY STEINDLER Plaintiff-appellee vs. MEYERS, LAMANNA & ROMAN,
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO
ALEXEI G. ESTRADA, M.D. Plaintiff 92663465 92663465 1 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO Case No: CV-14-834630 Judge: MICHAEL E JACKSON ERICA J. GLANCY, M.D. Defendant JOURNAL ENTRY PLAINTIFF
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Huffman v. Cleveland, Parking Violations Bur., 2016-Ohio-496.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 103447 FORDHAM E. HUFFMAN vs.
More information[Cite as State v. Abrams, 2011-Ohio-103.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA. JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No.
[Cite as State v. Abrams, 2011-Ohio-103.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 94637 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. DANT_ ABRAMS DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationMemorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer
Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU 1995-2002 Court Filings 2000 Trial 4-23-1999 Memorandum in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Amended Answer Terry H. Gilbert Counsel for
More informationp L DD 0q^^/41, CLERK OF COURT SUPREME COURT OF OHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO State ex rel., McGRATH Case No
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 0q^^/41, State ex rel., McGRATH V. Relato THE EIGHTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, Case No. 2010-1860 Original Action in Mandamus and Procedendo Respondent. MOTION TO DISMISS
More informationSTATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DECISION AND JOURNAL ENTRY
[Cite as DaimlerChrysler Fin. Servs. N. Am. v. Hursell, 2011-Ohio-571.] STATE OF OHIO ) IN THE COURT OF APPEALS )ss: NINTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF SUMMIT ) DAIMLERCHRYSLER FINANCIAL SERVICES NORTH
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT
[Cite as Tornstrom v. DeMarco, 2002-Ohio-1102.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 79521 TODD TORNSTROM, ET AL. JOURNAL ENTRY Plaintiffs-Appellants/ Cross-Appellees AND vs.
More informationAL Case IvO: 3f-%^ RESPON1JENT. Mathias H. Heck Jr. Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney PO Box 972 Dayton, Ohio Appellee. 1 F t.,.
"GJ.. ',f,i IN THE OHIO SUPREME COURT THE STATE OF OHIO EX REL GEORGIANNA I. PARIST 257 REGENCY RIDGE DR. DAYTON, OHIO 45459 AL Case IvO: RELATOR VS. MATHIAS H. HECK jr. MONTGOMERY COUNTY PROSECUTING ATTORNEY
More informationUSIRI MACHSHONBA CLEVELAND METROPOLITAN HOUSING AUTHORITY
[Cite as Machshonba v. Cleveland Metro. Hous. Auth., 2011-Ohio-6760.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 96811 USIRI MACHSHONBA vs. PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE
More informationCASE NO: FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER. 1. Any prior order referring this case to Senior Judge Sandra Taylor is hereby VACATED.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 16 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA IN AND FOR MONROE COUNTY CASE NO: Vs. Plaintiff Defendants / FORECLOSURE SCHEDULING ORDER THIS CASE having been reviewed by the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. CHAMPAGNE COUNTY COURT, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT and
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Glenda S. Hall-Davis, Appellant, SUPREME COURT CASE NO. 09-0506 V. ON APPEAL FROM THE Honeywell, Inc., CHAMPAGNE COUNTY COURT, SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT and Administrator,
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as Howell v. Canton, 2008-Ohio-5558.] COURT OF APPEALS STARK COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JOYCE HOWELL Plaintiff-Appellant -vs- THE CITY OF CANTON, ET AL. Defendants-Appellees JUDGES: Hon.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. Now comes the Respondent, the Honorable James M. Burge, Judge of the Lorain
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO OVP k4e JERRY L. HARPER CASE NO. 13-0705 Relator V. JUDGE JAMES M. BURGE, et al. MOTION TO DISMISS ORIGINAL ACTION IN MANDAMUS Respondent Now comes the Respondent, the Honorable
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Bonner, 2011-Ohio-843.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95244 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. CHRISTOPHER J. BONNER
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO PERRIN G. MARCH, IV, as the Successor Trustee of the Perrin G. March, III, Revocable Trust, and PERRIN G. MARCH, IV, as the
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO RESPONDENT OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO CHARLES DAVID FOOCE, Petitioner, CASE NO. 2008-1810 V. THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY, Respondent. Original Action in Mandamus RESPONDENT OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY'S MOTION TO DISMISS
More informationSTATE OF OHIO JEFFREY SIMS
[Cite as State v. Sims, 2009-Ohio-2132.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 91397 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. JEFFREY SIMS DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationSTATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT OUTAGAMIE COUNTY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR STAY OF DISCOVERY
Case 2012CV001704 Document 367 Filed 03-27-2019 Page 1 of 6 FILED 03-27-2019 Clerk of Circuit Court Outagamie County 2012CV001704 STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT OUTAGAMIE COUNTY WML GRYPHON FUND, LLC,
More informationThe Ohio Court of Appeals Fifth District
The Ohio Court of Appeals Fifth District Domestic Relations Appeals NOTICE: Effective April 30, 2014 The Fifth District Court of Appeals has amended the Docketing Statement (Local Rule 6). The Amended
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO CR 3440
[Cite as State v. Layman, 2008-Ohio-759.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 22307 v. : T.C. NO. 2006 CR 3440 MICHAEL L. LAYMAN : (Criminal
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
^. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO James Daniel Hughes, et al., : On Appeal from the Franklin Appellees, County Court of Appeal, : Tenth Appellate District V. Court of Appeals Gilbane Building Company, et
More informationSANDRA HAVEL VILLA ST. JOSEPH, ET AL.
[Cite as Havel v. St. Joseph, 2010-Ohio-5251.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 94677 SANDRA HAVEL vs. PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE VILLA ST. JOSEPH,
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No Plaintiff-Appellee : JOURNAL ENTRY. vs. : AND
[Cite as State v. Quran, 2002-Ohio-4917.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA No. 80701 STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee : JOURNAL ENTRY vs. : AND KHALED QURAN, : OPINION Defendant-Appellant
More information825 I Cascade Plaza 5017 Cemetary Road Akron, Ohio Hilliard, Ohio 43026
[Cite as Williams v. Brown, 2005-Ohio-5301.] COURT OF APPEALS MUSKINGUM COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT WILLIE WILLIAMS Appellant/Cross-Appellee -vs- MARCY BROWN, et al. Appellee/Cross-Appellant
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 4, 2005 Session
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE April 4, 2005 Session JAMES SAFFLES, ET AL. v. ROGER WATSON, ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Monroe County No. 13,811 Jerri S. Bryant, Chancellor
More information12PREM;^O ^, Q^0 APR CLERK OFCOURT IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
[State of Ohio ex rel.]david Fox, Relator, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2008 vs. Case No. 08-0626 Franklin County Common Pleas Court, Original Complaint in Mandamus Respondent. MOTION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDENT
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT TONI BARRON (DOTSON) Appellant -vs- RODNEY BARRON Appellee JUDGES Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Hon. Patricia A. Delaney, J. Hon. Craig R. Baldwin,
More informationSupreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed January 08, Case No IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
Supreme Court of Ohio Clerk of Court - Filed January 08, 2015 - Case No. 2014-0485 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO SRMOF 2009-1 Trust, : : Case No. 2014-0485 Plaintiff-Appellee, : : On Appeal from the Butler
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO CP-00950
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI CASE NO. 2009-CP-00950 MARVIN ARTHUR APPELLANT VS. TUNICA COUNTY MISSISSIPPI AND TUNICA COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. APPELLEES 011 Appeal from tile Circllit COllrt of TUl1ic(/
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Case: 16-40563 Document: 00513754748 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/10/2016 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT JOHN MARGETIS; ALAN E. BARON, Summary Calendar United States Court of Appeals
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT. Judge John A. Connor, : (REGULAR CALENDAR) D E C I S I O N. Rendered on June 8, 2006
[Cite as [State ex rel.] Evans v. Connor, 2006-Ohio-2871.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO TENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT [State ex rel.] Dennis Evans, : Relator, : v. : No. 05AP-1052 Judge John A. Connor, :
More informationCLL-REA 01, aaollr SUPREME CtlURs-" 01"OHI
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO JEFFREY C. KEITH Petitioner, -vs- SUPREML COURT NO. On Appeal from the Eleventh District Court of Appeals Court of Appeals No. 2009-T-0056 Decision rendered December 21, 2009
More informationLUANN MITCHELL, GUARDIAN FOR BERTHA WASHINGTON WESTERN RESERVE AREA AGENCY ON AGING
[Cite as Mitchell v. W. Res. Area Agency on Aging, 2009-Ohio-5477.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 91546 LUANN MITCHELL, GUARDIAN FOR
More informationNO. COA NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS. Filed: 17 September v. New Hanover County Nos. 11 CVM 1575 JOHN MUNN, 11 CVM 1576 Defendant.
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3)
More informationSTATE OF OHIO JAMAR TRIPLETT
[Cite as State v. Triplett, 2009-Ohio-2571.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 91807 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. JAMAR TRIPLETT
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2013 RESPONDENT'S MOTION TO DISMISS RELATOR'S ACTION IN MANDAMUS
4 I ^^. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 2013 Edward Jackson, Case No. 13-0086 -vs- Relator, ORIGINAL ACTION Ronald J. Obrien and Judge David Cain et. al., Respondents.. Court of Appeals Case No. 89AP-1015
More informationCLERK RULE 1 EFFECTIVE APRIL 1, 2014 RULE 1. INITIATING MEDIATION IN MATTERS BEFORE THE CLERK
CLERK RULE 1 EFFECTIVE APRIL 1, 2014 RULE 1. INITIATING MEDIATION IN MATTERS BEFORE THE CLERK A. PURPOSE OF MANDATORY MEDIATION. These Rules are promulgated pursuant to N.C.G.S. 7A-38.3B to implement mediation
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA APPEAL NO.: 01-57AP JOHN SHARPE. Appellant-Petitioner, STATE OF FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE FOURTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT OF FLORIDA APPEAL NO.: 01-57AP JOHN SHARPE Appellant-Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA Appellee-Respondent. A DIRECT APPEAL FROM THE COUNTY COURT, FOURTH
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO 3 " -
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO ^^ James A. Lucido, 3 " - ^^^ Appellant,. On Appeal from the Stark County Court vs.. of Appeals, Fifth Judicial District Utterback Dental Group, Inc., Court of Appeals Appellee..
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO THE STATE OF OHIO EX REL JEFFREY MORROW Relator, V. THE HONORABLE MARY R. KOVACK Judge of the Court of Common Pleas Domestic Relations Division Respondent. CASE NO.
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO. Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO v. : T.C. NO. 12CR684
[Cite as State v. Haney, 2013-Ohio-1924.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR MONTGOMERY COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO : Plaintiff-Appellee : C.A. CASE NO. 25344 v. : T.C. NO. 12CR684 BRIAN S. HANEY : (Criminal appeal
More informationMILLING AWAY LLC UGP PROPERTIES LLC, ET AL.
[Cite as Milling Away, L.L.C. v. UGP Properties, L.L.C., 2011-Ohio-1103.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95751 MILLING AWAY LLC PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
[Cite as Fluitt v. Fluitt, 2014-Ohio-4442.] COURT OF APPEALS DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT KRISTEN FLUITT : JUDGES: : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. Plaintiff-Appellee : Hon. Sheila G. Farmer,
More informationNo CV IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS AUSTIN, TEXAS. Appellants, Appellee. APPELLEE S OPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL AS MOOT
No. 03-14-00635-CV IN THE THIRD COURT OF APPEALS OF TEXAS AUSTIN, TEXAS 3/2/2015 1:33:41 AM MICHAEL LEONARD GOEBEL AND ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS OF 207 CAZADOR DRIVE, SAN MARCOS, TEXAS 78666, Appellants, v.
More informationSTATE OF IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LAKE COUIIML CIVIL DIVISION. 4iv'7C.. /L. 14't0 h'o'i. Pro ye Defendant
STATE OF 01110 IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF LAKE COUIIML CIVIL DIVISION E 0 BRYAN ANTHONY REO, Case No. 15CV001 IM DEC to P : 3 V. Plaintiff, MARTIN LINDSTEDT, Defendant. Hon. Richard L. (0,UREEN G.
More informationRWEV. E r r` ORIGI` AL SUP ^^^^ A, 3 CLERK OF COURT 3EME C URT OF OHIO JAN CLERK OF COURT SUPREME i:uur1 0F OHIO
ORIGI` AL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE OF OHIO, ex rel. 13 0 63 Edward Verhovec, Relator/Appellant vs. WASHINGTON COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT On Appeal from the Washington GENERAL DIVISION County Court
More informationUNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER
Case: 12-2238 Document: 87-1 Page: 1 10/17/2013 1067829 9 12-2238-cv Estate of Mauricio Jaquez v. City of New York UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY
More informationAPPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT
MARICOPA COUNTY JUSTICE COURT How to APPEAL A FORCIBLE DETAINER JUDGMENT Justice Court in Maricopa County June 23, 2005 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED FORM (# MARICOPA COUNTY JUSTICE COURT Either party may appeal
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO ^ ^ ^^ Cinseree Johnson, Relator : OHIO SUPREME COURT : CASE NO: 12-1776 vs. : (Original Action in Prohibition) John Bodovetz, et al., ^ Respondents ^ _ MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT MRK TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. : : ACCELERATED DOCKET
[Cite as MRK Technologies, Ltd. v. Accelerated Systems Integration, Inc., 2005-Ohio-30.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 84747 MRK TECHNOLOGIES, LTD. : : ACCELERATED DOCKET
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS FRANKLIN COUNTY, OHIO DOUGLAS P. LABORDE, ET AL., : CASE NO. 12-CV-8517 : PLAINTIFFS, : : V. : JUDGE COCROFT : THE CITY OF GAHANNA, ET AL., : : DEFENDANTS. : DECISION AND ENTRY
More informationNo A IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. STATE OF KANSAS Plaintiff-Appellant. AMY JEAN ROTH Defendant-Appellee
FILED OCT 14 2D15 No. 15-113923-A HEATHER L. SMITII CLERK OF APPELLATE COURTS IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS STATE OF KANSAS Plaintiff-Appellant V. AMY JEAN ROTH Defendant-Appellee BRIEF
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JACKSON COUNTY : DECISION AND JUDGMENT ENTRY APPEARANCES:
[Cite as Davis v. Remy, 2006-Ohio-5030.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT JACKSON COUNTY Alton Davis, : Plaintiff-Appellant, : Case No. 05CA16 v. : Teresa Remy, : DECISION AND
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. St. Martin, 2012-Ohio-1633.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 96834 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. JEFFREY ST.
More informationSTATE OF OHIO FRANK RAMOS, JR.
[Cite as State v. Ramos, 2009-Ohio-3064.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 92357 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. FRANK RAMOS, JR.
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Totty, 2014-Ohio-3239.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 100788 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. JASON TOTTY DEFENDANT-APPELLANT
More informationCOURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT. EBBETS PARTNERS, LTD. : : Plaintiff-Appellee : JOURNAL ENTRY : -vs- : AND : RONALD FOSTER : OPINION
[Cite as Ebbets Partners, Ltd. v. Foster, 2002-Ohio-6324.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 80728 EBBETS PARTNERS, LTD. : : Plaintiff-Appellee : JOURNAL ENTRY : -vs- : AND
More informationNAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CUERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio Court of Common Pleas
NAILAH K. BYRD CUYAHOGA COUNTY CUERK OF COURTS 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, Ohio 44113 Court of Common Pleas ANSWERS Electronically Filed: September 26,2016 11:12 By: SAMANTHA A. VAJSKOP 0087837 Confirmation
More informationSTATE OF OHIO, COLUMBIANA COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT
[Cite as State v. Mace, 2007-Ohio-1113.] STATE OF OHIO, COLUMBIANA COUNTY IN THE COURT OF APPEALS SEVENTH DISTRICT STATE OF OHIO, ) ) CASE NO. 06 CO 25 PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, ) ) - VS - ) O P I N I O N )
More informationState's Objections to Discovery and Motion for Protective Order
Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU 19952002 Court Filings 2000 Trial 7281999 State's Objections to Discovery and Motion for Protective Order William D. Mason Cuyahoga County Prosecutor Marilyn
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
ORlGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO BANK OF NEW YORK, AS TRUSTEE FOR * Case No. 2012-0897 THE CERTIFICATEHOLDERS CWALT, INC. ALTERNATIVE LOAN TRUST 2006-30T1, * MORTGAGE PASSTHROUGH On Appeal from the
More informationIN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OHIO KAREN PRASSER, v. PLAINTIFF/COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT, CITY OF SOLON, ET AL DEFENDANTS/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFFS. Case No. CV 13-802183 JUDGE MICHAEL E. JACKSON
More informationAUTO CONNECTION, LLC LONNIE PRATHER
[Cite as Auto Connection, L.L.C. v. Prather, 2011-Ohio-6644.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION Nos. 96564 and 96736 AUTO CONNECTION, LLC PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. BRIEF OF APPELLANT ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
E-Filed Document Jan 13 2014 16:30:11 2013-CA-01004 Pages: 21 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI ARTHUR GERALD HUDSON and LINDA HUDSON VS. LOWE S HOME CENTER, INC. APPELLANT CAUSE NO. 2013-CA-01004
More informationCLERK UF ta(3urf SIIPREME COURT OF OHIO
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO THE DISPATCH PRINTING CO., et al. Plaintiffs-Appellees, Case No. 11-1006 -vs-. On Appeal From The Court Of Appeals Of Franklin County, Ohio, RECOVERY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, et
More information[Cite as James V. Zelch, M.D., Inc. v. Regional MRI of Orlando, Inc., 2003-Ohio-1362.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT
[Cite as James V. Zelch, M.D., Inc. v. Regional MRI of Orlando, Inc., 2003-Ohio-1362.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO, EIGHTH DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA NO. 81826 JAMES V. ZELCH, M.D., INC. : ET AL. : : JOURNAL
More informationORIGINAL SEP CLERK OF COURT SEP CLERK OF COURT SUPREME CUURT OF OHIO SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. (App. No A-0049) Appellant.
ORIGINAL IN THE OHIO SUPREME COURT STATE OF OHIO, Appellee, Case No. (App. No. 2010-A-0049) -vs- On Appeal From The Ashtabula County Court Of Appeals, Eleventh Appellate District BRIAN O. DRUKTENIS, Appellant.
More informationCLERK OF COURT SURREME COURTOFOHIO IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO. [State ex. rel.] Jenkins Smith, Case No Original Action in Mandamus
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO [State ex. rel.] Jenkins Smith, V. Relator, The Honorable Judge Nodine Miller (retired), et al, Case No. 09-0353 Original Action in Mandamus Respondents. RESPONDENTS JUDGE
More informationAppellants, On Appeal from the Pickaway County Court of Appeals, v. Fourth Appellate District
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO Mark R. Wellman, et al., 08-0903 Appellants, On Appeal from the Pickaway County Court of Appeals, v. Fourth Appellate District National City Mortgage Company, Court of Appeals
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as Charter One Bank v. Tutin, 2007-Ohio-999.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 88081 CHARTER ONE BANK PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. SANDRA
More informationCourt of Appeals of Ohio
[Cite as State v. Velazquez, 2011-Ohio-4818.] Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 95978 STATE OF OHIO PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE vs. NELSON VELAZQUEZ
More information***Please see Nunc Pro Tunc Entry at 2003-Ohio-826.*** IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY APPEARANCES
[Cite as State v. Clark, 2002-Ohio-6684.] ***Please see Nunc Pro Tunc Entry at 2003-Ohio-826.*** IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT PICKAWAY COUNTY State of Ohio, : : Plaintiff-Appellee,
More informationDodge County. 1) Rules of Decorum. (Sixth Judicial District)
Dodge County (Sixth Judicial District) 1. Rules of Decorum 2. Civil Practice 3. Rules of Criminal Procedure 4. Rules of Family Court Procedure 5. Filing of Papers by Electronic Filing and Facsimile Transmission
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO
!r 0r^ IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO STATE EX REL. RICIIARD L. CURLEY, Relator, V. Case No. 2013-1896 Original Action in Replevin NINTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS, Respondent. 1VIOT`ION TO DISMISS OF RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE STATE COURT OF GWINNETT COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA
IN THE STATE COURT OF GWINNETT COUNTY STATE OF GEORGIA MIDLAND FUNDING LLC ASSIGNEE OF CHASE BANK(USA, N.A., Plaintiff v. Civil Action No 10-07271-4 JILL SHERIDAN, Defendant DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR AN AWARD
More information