FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/28/ :44 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 16 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/28/2017
|
|
- Norma Caldwell
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK x NUE RESOURCE FUNDING, LLC, Index No.: /2016 a New Jersey Limited Liability Company, Plaintiff, FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT - against - LONE KAT INDUSTRIES, LLC a California Limited Liability Company Defendant x Plaintiff, NUE RESOURCE FUNDING, LLC, by and through undersigned counsel, hereby files this First Amended Complaint against LONE KAT INDUSTRIES, LLC, and in support thereof, alleges as follows: OVERVIEW 1. This is a lawsuit for Fraudulent Inducement, Breach of Contract and Conversion. THE PARTIES 2. Plaintiff, NUE RESOURCE FUNDING, ( NRF or Plaintiff ) is a limited liability company duly organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey, with a principal address located at 195 Route 9 South, Suite #105, Manalapan, NJ 07726; 3. Defendant, LONE KAT INDUSTRIES, LLC ( LKI or Defendant ) is a limited liability company duly organized under the laws of the State of California, with a principal address located at 1460 W. Washington Blvd., Los Angeles, CA JURISDICTION AND VENUE
2 4. Jurisdiction and venue are proper with this Court pursuant to the Mutual Agreement and Global General Release, attached hereto as Exhibit A, which serves as an underlying basis for the initiation of this lawsuit. Specifically, Paragraph 18 of the Settlement Agreement states the following: Jurisdiction. Any legal action arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be brought exclusively in the District, County, or Supreme Court located in the State of New York, New York County, to which each party hereby accepts and submits to its exclusive personal jurisdiction and venue, and waives any and all objections or defenses thereto. A. Preliminary Factual Background STATEMENT OF FACTS 5. At some point in time in September 2015, NRF contacted and retained LKI for the purpose of creating shirts, pants, and sports bras (collectively, the Products ). The parties agreed that the Products would be completed within three weeks. 6. In furtherance thereof, NRF paid LKI Five Thousand, Eight Hundred Forty-Two Dollars, and Fifty Cents (USD $5,842.50) as upfront payment for completion of the Products (the Upfront Payment ). 7. However, notwithstanding LKI s assertion that the Products would be completed within three weeks, as of the date of this Complaint, the Products have yet to be completed and delivered to NRF as planned. This is despite numerous assurances from LKI, through Dana Smith and LKI s legal counsel, that the Products had been created and shipped to NRF. In fact, on January 20, 2016, Smith sent the undersigned three tracking numbers that purportedly demonstrated delivery of the Products. However, none of the Products have been delivered.
3 8. Prior to the initiation of this lawsuit, NRF attempted on multiple occasions, in good faith, to negotiate with LKI a completion date for the Products, or in the alternative, the return of the Upfront Payment delivered by NRF for the completion of the Products. 9. During such negotiations, LKI routinely made promises and/or assertions to NRF regarding when the Products will be completed. As an example thereof, upon request for an update regarding the delay surrounding the completion of the Products, on or around November 24, 2015, LKI stated that the Products would be ready for shipment within 7-9 days. Yet, upon the arrival of the ninth day, rather than deliver the shipment as promised, LKI instead told NRF that the entirety of the shipment would not be ready as promised, and that the items that were ready would require additional payment before shipment would be made. 10. In relation to such discussions, NRF, by and through undersigned counsel, delivered to LKI a letter on December 7, 2015, wherein an express demand was made that LKI immediately refund the Upfront Payment ( Initial Demand Letter ). A true and correct copy of the Initial Demand Letter is attached hereto as Exhibit B. 11. In response, LKI asserted a number of meritless defenses as to why LKI was not in breach of the agreement entered into between the parties for the creation of the Products, refused to comply with the demands stated within the Initial Demand Letter, and failed to deliver the Products (wholly or partially completed) to NRF. 12. As a result thereof, NRF, by and through undersigned counsel, delivered a response letter to LKI on December 8, 2015, responding to LKI s meritless defenses, and further reiterating NRF s demands made in the Initial Demand Letter ( Response Letter. ) A true and correct copy of the Response Letter is attached hereto as Exhibit C.
4 13. NRF contracted in good faith with LKI for the purpose of creating the Products, which were to be completed shortly thereafter within three weeks, and has steadily engaged LKI in discussion in order to receive a completion date regarding the Products, or a return of the Upfront Payment made by NRF towards the completion of same due to the fact that, as of the date of this Complaint, LKI has failed to perform as promised. 14. As a result thereof, rather than seeking judicial intervention due to not wanting to bother the Court with an issue that surely should have been resolved through mutual cooperation of the parties, on or around January 15, 2016, NRF and LKI entered into a Mutual Agreement and Global General Release (the Settlement Agreement ). B. The Settlement Agreement. 15. The Settlement Agreement contains several terms and conditions governing the delivery of the Products from LKI to NRF. 16. Specifically, Paragraph 2 of the Settlement Agreement reads as follows: Delivery of Goods. On or before January 19, 2016, Upon the execution of this Agreement by the parties, LKI shall deliver the following (collectively, the Materials ) to NRF to the address listed in Section 6 of this Agreement, via United Parcel Service, U.S. Postal Service, Federal Express, or other similar delivery service, and shall provide NRF with a tracking number once shipment is complete: a) All shirts completed by LKI pursuant to NRF s request(s); b) All uncut fabric created as a result of or related to the Products; and c) All samples created by LKI for the purpose of completing the Products pursuant to NRF s request(s). LKI shall bear the cost of the initial delivery. 17. However, on January 19, LKI failed to deliver the Materials as agreed upon pursuant to the terms contained in the Settlement Agreement.
5 18. Furthermore, rather than provide a tracking number detailing the delivery of the Materials as required pursuant to the paragraph 2 of the Settlement Agreement, the tracking numbers provided by LKI simply details that LKI made pre-shipment arrangements in printing out labels regarding delivery of the Materials. However, LKI failed to ship the Materials as required. 19. Thus, on January 21, 2016, correspondence was issued to LKI stating that LKI was in breach of the Settlement Agreement due to its failure to perform pursuant to Paragraph 2 as stated therein. Furthermore, written demand was made stating that if undersigned counsel did not receive confirmation of actual shipment of the Materials, a lawsuit would be filed against LKI. 20. Nonetheless, LKI failed to provide confirmation of actual shipment of the Materials. Furthermore, LKI failed to provide the Products as originally bargained for by NRF. 21. As a result thereof, NRF has been substantially harmed by LKI s willful and wanton behavior in failing to provide the Products or ship the Materials as promised, thus leaving NRF without the goods originally sought from LKI, despite the fact NRF paid the Upfront Payment as required. 22. Not only has LKI failed to perform with regard to the completion and delivery of the Products, as a result of entering into and executing the Settlement Agreement, it follows that LKI has also materially breached the provisions contained therein. 23. Time and time again, NRF has materially relied upon the promises made by LKI in order to manage and operate its business. Additionally, the provisions contained in the Settlement Agreement specifically, the delivery of the Materials on or by a certain date
6 served as material inducements for NRF to enter into and execute the Settlement Agreement with LKI. 24. However, due to the subsequent acts taken by LKI i.e. the failure to deliver the Materials by or on the date provided and the failure to provide a tracking number detailing that delivery of the Materials would, or will, actually take place it follows that LKI made such assertions with the requisite knowledge that it would not be able to perform same, and did so only to avoid the initiation of litigation by NRF. 25. Despite the good faith and willing nature shown by NRF in order to resolve the underlying issue and preempt the need for judicial intervention, LKI has acted in direct contravention of the agreement entered into and executed by the parties, and has blatantly refused to abide by the express provisions contained therein. C. Issue of Double Payment. 26. On or around February 22, 2016, NRF examined and reconciled its accounting statements and discovered a major issue with regard to the Upfront Payment provided to the LKI for the creation of the Products, which NRF had yet to receive and still has yet to receive as of the date of this Amended Complaint. 27. Upon delivery of the Upfront Payment, NRF contacted LKI to confirm that LKI had received the check. In response, Dana Smith, principal owner of LKI, stated that LKI had not effectively completed depositing the check, and that NRF should wire the money directly instead, as the bank was in possession of the check constituting the Upfront Payment and would not let him re-deposit. Dana Smith then provided NRF with wiring instructions to a Bank of America account.
7 28. Rather than wiring the money, at Dana Smith s direct request, NRF issued another check made payable to a Jamie Suh ( Second Check ). In addition, Dana Smith asked that tracking be sent as soon as possible. Both were provided by NRF, and the Second Check was deposited by LKI. 29. However, soon thereafter, the check previously provided by NRF for delivery of the Upfront Payment was also deposited by LKI. 30. Therefore, due to LKI s failure to perform as originally bargained for by NRF and provide the Products, it follows that LKI was wrongfully paid twice. 31. LKI, by and through its owner Dana Smith, improperly led NRF to believe that the first check constituting the Upfront Payment could not be deposited. Nonetheless, LKI proceeded to deposit the first constituting the Upfront Payment despite already receiving payment for the Products by way of the Second Check. 32. Shortly after discovering this transgression, NRF, by and through undersigned counsel, issued a written demand to LKI, demanding that the Upfront Payment be returned immediately, as LKI had no right to deposit same based upon its prior deposit of the Second Check. 33. In response, LKI stated that it would be investigating the matter and rectifying any issue with regard to receipt of double payment. 34. After conducting its investigation, LKI acknowledged that it had wrongfully deposited the Upfront Payment due to already depositing the Second Check, and stated that the monies contained therein would be returned to NRF. 35. However, despite this promise to remedy its prior wrong, upon the date the money was to be returned to NRF, no check was received, nor was any tracking number provided
8 symbolizing the mailing of same. As of the date of this Complaint, LKI has still failed to provide a check for the money rightfully due and owned by NRF. 36. Thus, as a direct and proximate result of LKI s breach of the Settlement Agreement, LKI s wrongful retaining of money rightfully owned by LKI by way of wrongfully depositing the Upfront Payment in spite of also depositing the Second Check, and LKI s fraudulent inducement of NRF into entering into and executing the Settlement Agreement, NRF has suffered substantial damages. 37. Furthermore, as a direct and proximate result of LKI s acts complained of herein, NRF has had to retain the undersigned counsel, and has agreed to pay its reasonable attorney s fees and costs incurred as a result of this action. 38. All conditions precedents have been satisfied prior to the filing of this Complaint. COUNT I FRAUDULENT INDUCEMENT 39. Plaintiff hereby re-alleges and incorporates the allegations contained in paragraph 1 though 38 as if fully stated herein and further alleges as follows: 40. This is a count for fraudulent inducement against LKI. 41. On or around January 11, prior to execution of the Settlement Agreement, LKI, by and through LKI s attorney, assured NRF that the Materials were in existence and ready to be shipped. 42. As a result of this assurance, rather than filing a lawsuit against LKI, NRF agreed to enter into and execute the Settlement Agreement so that it may receive the Materials and proceed with the future management and operation of its business. 43. In addition to the foregoing assurance made to NRF, LKI espoused multiple other declarations and assertions regarding the promise of shipment of the Materials within the time
9 frame detailed by the Settlement that appear to have been made solely for the purpose of avoiding the initiation of a lawsuit by NRF. 44. On January 19, knowing that was the day delivery of the Materials was to be made, LKI failed to perform as required by the terms contained in Paragraph 2 of the Settlement Agreement. 45. Furthermore, as of the date of this Complaint, LKI has failed to provide a tracking number signifying that shipment of the Materials has been made, or that delivery will be effected, instead electing to provide a tracking number that details that LKI has only made preshipment arrangements by printing labels. 46. As of the date of this Complaint, the only information provided by the tracking number sent by LKI to NRF for the purpose of signifying shipment of the Materials states as follows: The U.S. Postal Service was electronically notified by the shipper on January 20, 2016 to expect your package for mailing. This does not indicate receipt by the USPS or the actual mailing date. Delivery status information will be provided if/when available. (emphasis added). 47. Thus, based on the fact this message appears, it follows that LKI has provided no information regarding shipment of the Materials, nor have the Materials been sent to USPS for the purpose of delivering same to NRF. 48. NRF materially relied on LKI s misrepresentation regarding the availability of the Materials and that the Materials would be shipped pursuant to the terms contained in Paragraph 2 of the Settlement Agreement, and such reliance served as a material inducement for NRF entering into and executing the Settlement Agreement. 49. Based on LKI s subsequent acts in failing to deliver the Materials and providing a tracking number that signified no arrangement(s) for shipment of the Materials had been made, it
10 follows that LKI made such assertions knowing them to be false and incapable of being performed. 50. Furthermore, it follows that LKI made such assertions for the sole purpose of avoiding the initiation of a lawsuit by NRF. 51. On top of the false statements of material fact alleged by LKI in order to induce NRF into executing the Settlement Agreement, LKI also made false statements of material fact in order to induce NRF to provide the Second Check. 52. Upon asking whether LKI had received the Upfront Payment, LKI informed NRF that the bank was unable to deposit the Upfront Payment, and directed NRF to issue the Second Check. 53. At LKI s direction, and advisement that the Upfront Payment could not be deposited, NRF provided LKI with the Second Check, which was deposited by LKI. 54. Nonetheless, shortly thereafter, LKI proceeded to deposit the first check that served as providing the Upfront Payment. 55. Furthermore, upon being informed of the issue of double payment, LKI stated that it would look into the matter. Upon discovery that it had in fact received double payment, LKI stated that the issue would be rectified and a check would be sent to NRF in order to rectify the issue. 56. Nonetheless, as of the date of this Complaint, LKI has yet to deliver a check or tracking number symbolizing the issuance of money rightfully owned by NRF. 57. As a direct and proximate result of LKI s misrepresentations made to NRF in order to induce execution of the Settlement Agreement, NRF has been substantially harmed.
11 WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth herein, NRF demands judgment against LKI in the principal amount of at least $15,000.00, plus prejudgment interest, post judgment interest, in addition to punitive damages and all other such relief as this Court deems proper and just. COUNT II BREACH OF CONTRACT 58. Plaintiff hereby re-alleges and incorporates the allegations contained in paragraph 1 though 38 as if fully stated herein and further alleges as follows: 59. This is a count for breach of the Settlement Agreement against LKI. 60. NRF and LKI entered into and executed the Settlement Agreement on or around January 15, As a result thereof specifically, Paragraph 2 of the Settlement Agreement LKI was to deliver the following Materials to NRF on or before January 19, 2016: (i) all shirts competed by LKI pursuant to NRF s request(s); (ii) all uncut fabric created as a result of or related to the Products; and (iii) all samples created by LKI for the purpose of completing the Products pursuant to NRF s request(s). 62. However, LKI failed to deliver the Materials or provide a tracking number signifying shipment of the Materials as required. 63. Furthermore, the tracking number provided by LKI simply details that LKI made pre-shipment arrangements in printing out labels regarding delivery of the Materials. However, as of the date of this Complaint, the Materials have yet to be shipped. 64. Upon execution, the Settlement Agreement creates a valid, binding legal agreement amongst the parties. 65. Nonetheless, LKI materially breached the provisions contained in the Settlement Agreement when it failed to deliver the Materials as required pursuant thereto.
12 66. As such, NRF has failed to receive the benefits originally bargained for when it entered into the arrangement with LKI for the completion and delivery of the Products despite providing the Upfront Payment, and as a result thereof, has been substantially harmed. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth herein, NRF demands judgment against LKI in the principal amount of $5,842.50, plus prejudgment interest, post judgment interest, and all other such relief as this Court deems proper and just. COUNT III CONVERSION 67. Plaintiff hereby re-alleges and incorporates the allegations contained in paragraph 1 though 38 as if fully stated herein and further alleges as follows: 68. This is a count for conversion against LKI. 69. Prior to the execution of the Settlement Agreement, NRF provided LKI with an Upfront Payment in order complete and deliver the Products. 70. Due to the fact NRF had yet to receive the Products despite LKI s multiple assurances regarding when such would be delivered, by and through the Initial Demand Letter and the Response Letter, NRF demanded that LKI return NRF s Upfront Payment. 71. Furthermore, upon examining its accounts, NRF realized that LKI had received additional payment in the form of the Second Check. Upon such discovery, NRF informed LKI of same, who then stated that it would return the amount of money constituting the Upfront Payment in order to rectify this issue. 72. However, as of the date of this Complaint, LKI has refused to do either of the following: (i) complete and deliver the Products; or (ii) return the Upfront Payment to NRF.
13 73. Additionally, as of the date of this Complaint, LKI has failed to provide a check or tracking number signifying the delivery of the check meant to remedy the issue of double payment. 74. Due to LKI s illegal retention of the Upfront Payment and Second Check, LKI has exercised dominion over property that should be rightfully possessed by NRF specifically, the (1) the Second Check; and (2) the Upfront Payment or, in the alternative, the Products and has blatantly refused to abide by NRF s multiple demands for delivery of either items. 75. As a result of LKI s refusal to return the Upfront Payment despite the issuance of multiple demands regarding same, NRF has been substantially deprived of its superior right of possession in and to the Upfront Payment, or alternatively, the Products. WHEREFORE, for the reasons set forth herein, NRF demands judgment against LKI in the principal amount of $11,685.00, plus prejudgment interest, post judgment interest, in addition to punitive damages and all other such relief as this Court deems proper and just. February 28, 2017 Respectfully submitted, /Jason B. Belzer/ JASON B. BELZER New York Bar No.: jasonbelzer@gmail.com HEITNER LEGAL, P.L.L.C. Attorney for Plaintiff 1736 NE 7 th Street Fort Lauderdale, Florida Phone: Fax: By:
14 Darren A. Heitner Florida Bar No.: Pro Hac Vice
Attorney for Plaintiff WORLD LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER
RICHARD T. BAUM State Bar No. 0 0 West Olympic Boulevard Suite 00 Los Angeles, California 00 Tel: ( -0 Fax: ( - Attorney for Plaintiff WORLD LOGISTICS SERVICES, INC. SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/02/ /15/ :56 02:55 AM PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 149 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/02/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/02/2015 09/15/2016 10:56 02:55 AM PM INDEX NO. 651899/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 149 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/02/2015 09/15/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT. ) [Unlimited Jurisdiction] ) ) Case No.:
SINGH, SINGH & TRAUBEN, MICH AEL A. T RAUBEN (SBN: 00 S. Beverly Drive, Suite 00 Beverly Hills, California 0 Tel: --0 Fax: -- mtrauben@singhtraubenlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs SANDBOX LLC and JUSTIN
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT
Exhibit S SHIPPING and TRANSIT, LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA vs. Plaintiff, TRIPLE7VAPING.COM, LLC, Case No. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Defendant. / COMPLAINT
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION
Case 3:10-cv-00252 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 06/29/10 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION HUNG MICHAEL NGUYEN NO. an individual; On
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )_ ) ) ) ) )
ATTORNEY LAW OFFICES OF ATTORNEY 123 Main St. Suite 1 City, CA 912345 Telephone: (949 123-4567 Facsimile: (949 123-4567 Email: attorney@law.com ATTORNEY, Attorney for P1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF
More informationCase 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Case 1:18-cv-00978 Document 1 Filed 04/26/18 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA WOODLAND DRIVE LLC 1209 Orange Street Wilmington, DE 19801 v. Plaintiff, JAMES
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 02/06/ :34 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 02/06/2017
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------------X PAUL KRUG, v. Plaintiff, NICHOLAS J. STONE and JONATHAN KRIEGER, Individually,
More informationCase 2:14-cv JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227
Case 2:14-cv-00799-JRG-RSP Document 9 Filed 08/08/14 Page 1 of 5 PageID #: 227 ECLIPSE IP LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION Plaintiff, v. LUXI
More informationCase 1:17-cv WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 1:17-cv-04831-WHP Document 1 Filed 06/27/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK POWER PLAY 1 LLC, and ADMIRALS ECHL HOCKEY, LLC, v. Plaintiffs, NORFOLK
More informationPRECIOUS METALS STORAGE AGREEMENT
PRECIOUS METALS STORAGE AGREEMENT This PRECIOUS METALS STORAGE AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) is dated as of, 201_, by and between TRANSCONTINENTAL DEPOSITORY SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/ :40 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/04/2016 02:40 PM INDEX NO. 159321/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/04/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ORIGINAL COMPLAINT
Case 4:11-cv-00346 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 01/26/11 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION F. B. LACY V. CA REPUTABLE RARE COINS, LLC and
More informationCase 9:16-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6
Case 9:16-cv-80588-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/15/2016 Page 1 of 6 SHIPPING and TRANSIT, LLC, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA vs. Plaintiff, STATE
More informationDENISE CANTU, IN THE DISTRICT COURT. VS. JUDICIAL DISTRICT JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., LIONOR DE LA FUENTE and CARLOS I. URESTI
CAUSE NO. C-0166-17-H DENISE CANTU, IN THE DISTRICT COURT Plaintiff VS. JUDICIAL DISTRICT JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., LIONOR DE LA FUENTE and CARLOS I. URESTI Defendants. HIDALGO COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S ORIGINAL
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/25/2012 INDEX NO /2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/25/2012
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 07/25/2012 INDEX NO. 652582/2012 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/25/2012 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ARTISTS RIGHTS ENFORCEMENT CORP., v.
More informationDOCKET NO.: HEARING DATE : SIR: at nine o clock in the forenoon or as
LAW OFFICES OF MYRON D. MILCH, PC Continental Plaza III 433 Hackensack Avenue Second Floor Hackensack, N. J. 07601 Tel. (201) 342-2868 Fax (201) 342-7391 NJ Attorney ID no. 269021971 Attorney for Plaintiff
More informationPRECIOUS METALS STORAGE AGREEMENT
PRECIOUS METALS STORAGE AGREEMENT This PRECIOUS METALS STORAGE AGREEMENT (this Agreement ) is dated as of, 201_, by and between TRANSCONTINENTAL DEPOSITORY SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
More informationCLASS ACTION COMPLAINT - 1 -
1 1 1 Plaintiff Marcel Goldman ( Plaintiff ), on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, complains and alleges the following: INTRODUCTION 1. This is a class action against The Cheesecake
More information~/
STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF: AGENCY FILE NO. L13-3-1123 SECURITY NETWORKS, LLC, RESPONDENT. --------------------------~/ ASSURANCE
More informationCase 1:10-cv TSE-TCB Document 1 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA COMPLAINT
Case 1:10-cv-00302-TSE-TCB Document 1 Filed 03/30/10 Page 1 of 7 FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA (Alexandria Division) - 2010 MAR 30 P h 58 FEI COMPANY, an
More informationPLAINTIFFS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT 2 AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL. Makovsky, and as Agent for Keith Makovsky, Kurt Makovsky, and William Makovsky, as
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15 TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA KARL MAKOVSKY, as Personal Representative of the Estate of JEAN IRENE MAKOVSKY, and as Agent for KEITH MAKOVSKY,
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 03/21/ :25 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/21/2017 EXHIBIT E
EXHIBIT E Case 114-cv-08406-VSB Document 40 Filed 03/20/15 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DEMOND MOORE and MICHAEL KIMMELMAN, P.C. v. Plaintiffs, IOD INCORPORATED
More informationCOMPLAINT (Jury Trial Demanded)
Case 1:08-cv-00684-NCT -PTS Document 1 Filed 09/23/08 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:08CV684 STATIC CONTROL ) COMPONENTS,
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ST. JOHNS COUNTY, FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, STATE OF FLORIDA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. WINDOW VISIONS,
More informationCase 5:16-cv Document 1 Filed 03/29/16 Page 1 of 16
Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of ANNE M. ROGASKI (CA Bar No. ) HIPLegal LLP 0 Stevens Creek Blvd., Suite 0 Cupertino, CA 0 annie@hiplegal.com Phone: 0-- Fax: 0-- Attorneys for Plaintiff Huddleston
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/26/2010 INDEX NO /2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/26/2010
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/26/2010 INDEX NO. 650457/2010 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/26/2010 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK DAS COMMUNICATIONS, LTD. Plaintiff,
More informationLIQUID ASSET STORAGE a division of Sokolin LLC 445 Sills Rd., Unit K, Yaphank, NY PHONE: (631) FAX: (631)
LIQUID ASSET STORAGE a division of Sokolin LLC 445 Sills Rd., Unit K, Yaphank, NY 11980 PHONE: (631) 613-6315 FAX: (631) 613-6316 LIQUID ASSET STORAGE AGREEMENT This Liquid Asset Storage Agreement (this
More informationFiling # E-Filed 04/10/ :26:28 AM
Filing # 87751951 E-Filed 04/10/2019 11:26:28 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA FLORIDA SPINE & ORTHOPEDICS INC., a Florida Corporation, Plaintiff,
More informationCase 1:12-cv Document 1 Filed 03/30/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case 1:12-cv-10578 Document 1 Filed 03/30/12 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS NEW ENGLAND CONFECTIONERY COMPANY, INC., v. Plaintiff, ALLIED INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TWENTIETH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR LEE COUNTY, FLORIDA STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Plaintiff, vs. CASE NO.: 05-CA-004652
More information: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Plaintiff Said Hakim (Plaintiff) by his attorneys, Law Offices of Ian L. Blant, and
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK SAID HAKIM, and SAID HAKIM on behalf of RANELL FREEZE COMPANY, and SAID HAKIM on behalf of RANELL FREEZE CORPORATION, Against Plaintiffs, KAMRAN
More informationCase 0:18-cv UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/12/2018 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Case No.
Case 0:18-cv-60530-UU Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/12/2018 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. ENVISION HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, and SHERIDAN HEALTHCORP,
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION ROBERT MCKEAGE, ) JANET MCKEAGE, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 6:12-CV-3157 ) BASS PRO SHOPS ) OUTDOOR WORLD,
More informationFrom Article at GetOutOfDebt.org
Case 12-01861-DHS Doc 1 Filed 08/23/12 Entered 08/23/1215:20:33 Desc Main Document Page 1 of 19 LAW OFFICES OF SCOTT J. GOLDSTEIN, LLC 3175 Route 10 East, Suite 300C Denville, New Jersey 07834 Tel: 973-453-2838
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE
FOR SETTLEMENT PURPOSES ONLY -- WITHOUT PREJUDICE STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS IN THE MATTER OF: AG Case # L07-3-1132 Comcast Corporation Respondent. / ASSURANCE
More informationFILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 03/17/ :14 AM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/17/2016
FILED: RICHMOND COUNTY CLERK 03/17/2016 04:14 AM INDEX NO. 150318/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 03/17/2016 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF RICHMOND ----------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationFIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED 12/2/2014 5:31 PM 01-CV-2014-904803.00 CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA ANNE-MARIE ADAMS, CLERK IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JEFFERSON COUNTY, ALABAMA BIRMINGHAM DIVISION Genesis
More informationFiling # E-Filed 01/31/ :35:29 PM
Filing # 51875490 E-Filed 01/31/2017 03:35:29 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION SHARON MEMMER, individually and on behalf of all others
More informationEX EXHIBIT LICENSE AGREEMENT
EX-10 27 EXHIBIT 10.10 LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made as of the 29th day of April 1999, by and between Famous Fixins, Inc. ("Licensee"), a corporation organized under the laws of
More informationGeneral Information. Applicant s Current Full Legal Business Name: Tax ID #:
This Credit Application is submitted to "WaterFurnace which is defined as any and all of the following NIBE Industrier AB subsidiaries and / or affiliates: WaterFurnace Renewable Energy, Corp., and WaterFurnace
More informationPID Reimbursement Agreement The Villages of Fox Hollow Public Improvement District No. 1
PID Reimbursement Agreement The Villages of Fox Hollow Public Improvement District No. 1 This PID Reimbursement Agreement The Villages of Fox Hollow Public Improvement District No. 1 (this "Agreement")
More informationCONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE
CONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE THIS CONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE ("Agreement") is entered into on this day of, 20, by and between BROWARD COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("COUNTY''
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
David L. Kagel (Calif. Bar No. 1 John Torbett (Calif. State Bar No. Law Offices of David Kagel, PLC 01 Century Park East, th Floor Los Angeles, CA 00 Telephone: ( -00 Fax: ( - Attorneys Admitted Pro Hac
More informationCAUSE NUMBER PLAINTIFF S FIRST AMENDED ORIGNAL PETITION AND REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY AND REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
CAUSE NUMBER 2018-51603 STERLING GREEN COMMUNITY IN THE DISTRICT COURT IMPROVEMENT ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, vs. 55 th JUDICIAL DISTRICT DOROTHY MALVEAUX Defendant. OF HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFF S FIRST
More informationIN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE SIXTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PINELLAS COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL ACTION STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, CASE NO. v. Plaintiff,
More informationCourthouse News Service
~ Ronald J. Tocchini CSBN Lilia G. Alcaraz CSBN 0 L Street Suite 0 Sacramento, California - USA Telephone: ( ) - Facsimile: ()- Attorneys for MARIA CHAVEZ Supertor Court Of Califs? ila, Sacramento Da,rmi&
More informationCase 5:15-cv BLF Document 1 Filed 11/05/15 Page 1 of 18
Case :-cv-00-blf Document Filed /0/ Page of BURSOR & FISHER, P.A. L. Timothy Fisher (State Bar No. ) Julia A. Luster (State Bar No. 0) North California Boulevard, Suite 0 Walnut Creek, CA Telephone: ()
More informationCase 0:18-cv FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2018 Page 1 of 5
Case 0:18-cv-60589-FAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2018 Page 1 of 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT LAUDERDALE DIVISION CASE NO.: FREDNER BOURSIQUOT,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
CASE 0:10-cv-01025-RHK-LIB Document 7 Filed 06/21/10 Page 1 of 17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA John Ellering; Karen Ellering; Select Associates Realty, LLC; EJK, Inc., v. Plaintiffs,
More informationCourthouse News Service
RENZO RANGEL Plaintiff, vs. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE 11TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA ISOLA CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., a Florida not-for-profit corporation, MULTIPLE
More informationCase 2:18-cv JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 12/14/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1
Case 2:18-cv-17206-JLL-JAD Document 1 Filed 12/14/18 Page 1 of 12 PageID: 1 GREGG F. PASTER & ASSOCIATES Gregg F. Paster, Esq. (GP0977) 530 Sylvan Avenue-Suite 201 Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632 201-489-0078
More informationFiling # E-Filed 07/11/ :27:15 PM
Filing # 43783444 E-Filed 07/11/2016 03:27:15 PM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE NINTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR ORANGE COUNTY, FLORIDA RAINMAKER GROUP CONSULTING LLC, a limited liability Company, EMERGING
More information11 CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT
The Honorable Carol Murphy 2 7 8 IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF THURSTON JASON BEECHLER, on behalf of himself and al others similarly situated. No. -2-0- CLASS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Case :-cv-00-dad-bam Document Filed 0// Page of 0 EILEEN R. RIDLEY, CA Bar No. eridley@foley.com FOLEY & LARDNER LLP CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 00 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 0-0 TEL:.. FACSIMILE:..0 KIMBERLY A. KLINSPORT,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FT. LAUDERDALE DIVISION CASE NO.:
JAMAAL ANDERSON, JACOB BELL, DERRICK GAFFNEY, TAVARES GOODEN, FRANK GORE, SANTONIO HOLMES, GREG JONES, JEVON KEARSE, KENARD LANG, RAY LEWIS, BRANDON MERIWEATHER, SANTANA MOSS, CLINTON PORTIS, LITO SHEPPARD,
More informationSample STATE OF NEW YORK CREDITOR. ,, SUMMONS Plaintiff, Index No. -vs- Date Filed: DEBTOR d/b/a. ,, Defendant. TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT:
STATE OF NEW YORK SUPREME COURT COUNTY OF CREDITOR,, SUMMONS Plaintiff, Index No. -vs- DEBTOR d/b/a,, Defendant. TO THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT: Date Filed: YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to submit
More informationFILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/08/ /30/ :11 03:00 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/08/2015
FILED: KINGS COUNTY CLERK 06/08/2015 10/30/2015 05:11 03:00 PM INDEX NO. 507018/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 13 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/08/2015 10/30/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF KINGS -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationCase 7:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Case 7:18-cv-00321 Document 1 Filed 01/12/18 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MARTIN ORBACH and PHILLIP SEGO, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
More informationAGREEMENT WITH BUILDER THIS AGREEMENT MADE BETWEEN:
AGREEMENT WITH BUILDER THIS AGREEMENT MADE BETWEEN: LUX RESIDENTIAL WARRANTY PROGRAM INC., a federally incorporated corporation doing business in Atlantic Canada AND BUILDER COMPANY NAME: ADDRESS: POSTAL
More informationARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL
ARBITRATION RULES FOR THE TRANSPORTATION ADR COUNCIL TABLE OF CONTENTS I. THE RULES AS PART OF THE ARBITRATION AGREEMENT PAGES 1.1 Application... 1 1.2 Scope... 1 II. TRIBUNALS AND ADMINISTRATION 2.1 Name
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/07/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 164 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/07/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK VERIFIED REPLY TO 89 BOWERY AND HUA YANG'S COUNTERCLAIMS IN VERIFIED AMENDED ANSWER Index No. 150738/2017 Plaintiff, 93 BOWERY HOLDINGS LLC ("93
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/15/ :32 PM INDEX NO /2018 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/15/2018
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK THE ART COLLECTION INC., Plaintiff, Index No. SUMMONS Plaintiff designates New York County as the place of trial DAVID BENRIMON, DAVID BENRIMON
More informationIN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT, OHIO EASTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Cleveland Browns Football Company LLC v. Telantis Group Corporation Doc. 1 Case 1:07-cv-02648-PAG Document 1 Filed 08/31/2007 Page 1 of 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT, OHIO EASTERN
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/29/ :33 PM INDEX NO /2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/29/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 05/29/2015 09:33 PM INDEX NO. 654255/2013 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/29/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationPROCEDURES RE: VACATION OF PLATTED ALLEY OR STREET IN UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF ELKHART COUNTY, INDIANA (As of January 1, 1991)
PROCEDURES RE: VACATION OF PLATTED ALLEY OR STREET IN UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF ELKHART COUNTY, INDIANA (As of January 1, 1991) 1. Any person who owns or in interested in a parcel of real estates located
More informationCase 1:14-cv JPO Document 2 Filed 03/04/14 Page 1 of 14. Civil Action No. COMPLAINT
Case 1:14-cv-01482-JPO Document 2 Filed 03/04/14 Page 1 of 14 Tr r` r' 0 1 CVN.Lit ' UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BEST BRANDS CONSUMER PRODUCTS INC., Civil Action No. Plaintiff,
More informationCase: 6:12-cv ART Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/19/12 Page: 1 of 16 - Page ID#: 1
Case: 6:12-cv-00058-ART Doc #: 1 Filed: 03/19/12 Page: 1 of 16 - Page ID#: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY SOUTHERN DIVISION AT LONDON TRINITY COAL CORPORATION
More informationCourthouse News Service
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION UNITES STATES POSTAL SERVICE, * * Plaintiff, * * vs. * CASE NO. * CHILD SUPPORT SERVICES OF * ATLANTA, INC., and
More informationCase 2:17-cv EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION
Case 2:17-cv-01100-EJF Document 2 Filed 10/02/17 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION Trent Baker Baker & Associates PLLC 358 S 700 E B154 Salt Lake City,
More informationVOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT. The State of Florida Department of Financial Services, Division of Unclaimed Property, 200
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES Division of Unclaimed Property In Re: Case No. (Print Name of Holder) Respondent/Holder. / VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT The State of Florida Department of Financial Services,
More informationStreamNet, Inc Las Vegas Blvd. Las Vegas, Nevada Company Direct: (702)
StreamNet, Inc. 7582 Las Vegas Blvd. Las Vegas, Nevada 89123 http://www.streamnet.tv Company Direct: (702) 721-9915 SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT Common Stock Shares 200 to 3,600,000 Subject to the terms and
More informationCase 9:17-cv RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 9:17-cv-80918-RLR Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 08/04/2017 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA DYLAN KAPLAN, on behalf of himself and all others similarly
More informationAuditor Commitment and Approval Form
Auditor Commitment and Approval Form Firm Name Firm Website Name of Person Conducting the Audit Name of Privacy+ Applicant Company to Be Audited Third party-audit of the Privacy+ requirements must be performed
More informationGREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC.
GREATER ATLANTIC LEGAL SERVICES, INC. CHANCERY ABSTRACT REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC., vs. Plaintiff, EARL FAULK, his heirs, devisees and personal representatives and his, hers, their of any of their
More informationCase: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1
Case: 1:16-cv-02212 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/12/16 Page 1 of 16 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SIOUX STEEL COMPANY A South Dakota Corporation
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/19/ :05 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/19/2015
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 06/19/2015 12:05 PM INDEX NO. 651388/2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 3 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 06/19/2015 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------------------X
More informationSTATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS. Respondents. I ASSURANCE OF VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE
STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS IN THE MATTER OF: AG Case# Ll0-3-1025 INVESTIGATION OF Law Offices of Thomas W. Dvorak, P.A. and Thomas W. Dvorak, Respondents.
More informationCase 2:14-cv JLR Document 24 Filed 08/31/15 Page 1 of 44 THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART 2
Case :-cv-0-jlr Document Filed 0// Page of THE HONORABLE JAMES L. ROBART UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 0 STATE OF WASHINGTON, v. Plaintiff, INTERNET ORDER LLC also
More informationFILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/ :59 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2016 EXHIBIT 2
FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 10/19/2016 04:59 PM INDEX NO. 653169/2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 11 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 10/19/2016 EXHIBIT 2 [FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 08/29/2016 02:33 PMl NYSCEF DOC. NO. 6 INDEX
More informationthejasminebrand.com SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS, INC., thejasminebrand.com
Case 1:14-cv-02606-SCJ Document 1 Filed 08/13/14 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NOTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION TADDRICK MINGO v. Plaintiff, SO SO DEF PRODUCTIONS,
More informationUpon reading and filing the annexed affidavit of plaintiff,
PRESENT: At IAS Part 7 of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, held in and for the County of Bronx, at the courthouse located at 851 Grand Concourse, Bronx, New York, this dayof, 2017. HON. WILMA
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. [Complaint Filed 11/24/2010] [Alameda County Case No.
RANDALL CRANE (Cal. Bar No. 0) rcrane@cranelaw.com LEONARD EMMA (Cal. Bar No. ) lemma@cranelaw.com LAW OFFICE OF RANDALL CRANE 0 Grand Avenue, Suite 0 Oakland, California -0 Telephone: () -0 Facsimile:
More informationColonial Surety Company 123 Tice Blvd Suite 250 Woodcliff Lake, NJ (800) Fax (877) LOST INSTRUMENT APPLICATION
Colonial Surety Company 123 Tice Blvd Suite 250 Woodcliff Lake, NJ 07011 (800) 221-3662 Fax (877) 269-1531 LOST INSTRUMENT APPLICATION Application Information Applicant s Name: Name to Appear on Bond,
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
XXXXXX XXXXXX in propria persona 1 1 1 1 1 WILLIAM SILVERSTEIN, an individual, vs. Plaintiff, WORLD WIDE WEB ENTERPRISES, LC, a Florida Corporation, ROBERT SMOLEY, an individual, DARIN GREY, an individual,
More informationEQUIPMENT LEASE ORIGINATION AGREEMENT
EQUIPMENT LEASE ORIGINATION AGREEMENT THIS EQUIPMENT LEASE ORIGINATION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made as of this [ ] day of [ ] by and between Ascentium Capital LLC, a Delaware limited liability
More informationCourthouse News Service
SCANNED ON 512112009..? # www.courthousenews.com SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK RICHARD GREEN, Index No. - against - Plaintiff, GIUSEPPE CONCEPCION, PROARATE.COM, INC., AND EROS
More informationUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION KING S HAWAIIAN BAKERY SOUTHEAST, INC., a Georgia corporation; KING S HAWAIIAN HOLDING COMPANY, INC., a California corporation;
More information) SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT COMPLAINT FOR:
FREEDMAN & T AITELMAN, LLP Bryan J. Freedman, Esq. (SBN 151990 2 David M. Marmorstein, Esq. (SBN 192993 1901 Avenue ofthe Stars, Suite 500 3 Los Angeles, California 90067 Tel: (310 201-0005 4 Fax: (310
More informationSOUTHERN GLAZER S WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC. EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION POLICY
SOUTHERN GLAZER S WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC. EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION POLICY Southern Glazer s Arbitration Policy July - 2016 SOUTHERN GLAZER S WINE AND SPIRITS, LLC. EMPLOYMENT ARBITRATION POLICY A. STATEMENT
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WEST DISTRICT
[prior firm redacted] Mary F. Mock (CA State Bar No. ) Attorneys for Defendant LAWYERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, WEST DISTRICT BRUCE
More informationP H I L L I P S DAYES
Case :-cv-0000-nvw Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 P H I L L I P S DAYES NATIONAL EMPLOYMENT LAW FIRM A Professional Corporation 0 North Central Avenue, Suite 00 Phoenix, Arizona 0 Telephone: -00-JOB-LAWS
More informationl 00% USA MARK LICENSE AGREEMENT
l 00% USA MARK LICENSE AGREEMENT This Agreement is effective as of ("Effective Date"), by and between l 00% U.S.A., LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, with its principal offices located at 3187
More information~/
STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LEGAL AFFAIRS OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN THE MATTER OF: NORTH FLORIDA LUBES, INC. d/b/a TEXACO XPRESS LUBES, a/k/a HA VOLINE XPRESS LUBES ----------------------~/
More informationAgreement for EDGAR Filing Services
4747 North 7 th Street, Suite 170, Phoenix, AZ 85014 Phone: 602-485-1346 Fax: 602-788-0423 Email: Salli@firstamericanstock.com Website: www.firstamericanstock.com Agreement for EDGAR Filing Services Acknowledgement
More information(01/31/13) Principal Name /PIA No. PAYMENT AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT No.
PAYMENT AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT No. THIS PAYMENT AND INDEMNITY AGREEMENT (as amended and supplemented, this Agreement ) is executed by each of the undersigned on behalf of each Principal (as defined below)
More informationPlaintiffs, Plaintiffs Cat Cora and Cat Cora, Inc. (collectively, Cora ), by their attorneys Oved & SUMMARY OF ACTION
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------X CAT CORA and CAT CORA, INC., -against- Plaintiffs, Index No: /2017 COMPLAINT
More informationCase 1:11-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
Case 1:11-cv-23619-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 10/06/2011 Page 1 of 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA MAINSTREAM ADVERTISING, INC., a California corporation, Plaintiff,
More informationSecurity Agreement Assignment of Hedging Account (the Agreement ) Version
Security Agreement Assignment of Hedging Account (the Agreement ) Version 2007 1 Please read carefully, sign and return to [ ] ( Commodity Intermediary ) WHEREAS, the undersigned debtor ( Debtor ) carries
More informationSUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO. Case No.
1 1 1 1 0 1 Joshua H. Haffner, SBN 1 (jhh@haffnerlawyers.com) Graham G. Lambert, Esq. SBN 00 gl@haffnerlawyers.com HAFFNER LAW PC South Figueroa Street, Suite Los Angeles, California 001 Telephone: ()
More information