JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 15 February 2007 *

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 15 February 2007 *"

Transcription

1 RUMA JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 15 February 2007 * In Case C-183/06, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Finanzgericht München (Germany), made by decision of 23 February 2006, received at the Court on 13 April 2006, in the proceedings RUMA GmbH v Oberfinanzdirektion Nürnberg, THE COURT (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Schintgen, President of the Chamber, A. Borg Barthet (Rapporteur) and E. Levits, Judges, * Language of the case: German. I

2 Advocate General: V. Trstenjak, Registrar: R. Grass, JUDGMENT OF CASE C-183/06 having regard to the written procedure, after considering the observations submitted on behalf of: RUMA GmbH, by M. Beer, Rechtsanwalt, the Hungarian Government, by J. Fazekas, acting as Agent, the Commission of the European Communities, by J. Hottiaux, acting as Agent, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, avocat, having decided, after hearing the Advocate General, to proceed to judgment without an Opinion, gives the following Judgment 1 This reference for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of headings 8529 and 8538 of the Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1789/2003 of 11 September 2003 (OJ 2003 L 281, p. 1) ('the CN'). I

3 RUMA 2 The reference was made in the course of proceedings between RUMA Finanzierungs- & Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbh ('RUMA') and the Oberfinanzdirektion Nürnberg (Principal Revenue Office, Nuremberg 'the Oberfinanzdirektion') regarding the tariff classification of a keypad membrane for a mobile telephone with organiser functions. Legal context 3 The Combined Nomenclature, established by Regulation No 2658/87, is based on the Harmonised Commodity Description and Coding System ('the HS ') drawn up by the Customs Cooperation Council (now the World Customs Organisation) and established by the International Convention concluded at Brussels on 14 June 1983 and approved on behalf of the Community by Council Decision 87/369/EEC of 7 April 1987 (OJ 1987 L 198, p. 1). It uses the 6-digit headings and subheadings of the HS and only the seventh and eighth digits forming subdivisions are specific to it. 4 The version of the Combined Nomenclature applicable at the time of the facts in the main proceedings is set out in Annex I to Regulation No 1789/2003. Part Two of that annex includes Section XVI, 'Machinery and mechanical appliances; electrical equipment; parts thereof; sound recorders and reproducers, television image and sound recorders and reproducers, and parts and accessories of such articles', which contains two chapters, Chapter 85 of which is entitled 'Electrical machinery and equipment and parts thereof; sound recorders and reproducers, television image and sound recorders and reproducers, and parts and accessories of such articles'. I

4 JUDGMENT OF CASE C-183/06 5 Chapter 85 of the CN contains inter alia the following headings and subheadings: '8525 Transmission apparatus for radio-telephony, radio-telegraphy, radio-broadcasting or television, whether or not incorporating reception apparatus or sound recording or reproducing apparatus; television cameras; still image video cameras and other video camera recorders; digital cameras: Transmission apparatus incorporating reception apparatus: For cellular networks (mobile telephones) 8529 Parts suitable for use solely or principally with the apparatus of headings 8525 to 8528: 8529 Other: Parts of apparatus of subheadings , , , and '. I

5 RUMA 6 Heading 8537 of the CN is entitled 'Boards, panels, consoles, desks, cabinets and other bases, equipped with two or more apparatus of heading 8535 or 8536, for electric control or the distribution of electricity...'. 7 Heading 8538, entitled 'Parts suitable for use solely or principally with the apparatus of heading 8535, 8536 or 8537', includes inter alia the following subheadings: Other: Other: Other'. 8 All the sections and, within each section, all the chapters of the CN are preceded by some notes, namely section or chapter notes. Note 2 to Section XVI of the CN provides inter alia: I

6 JUDGMENT OF CASE C-183/06 (a) Parts which are goods included in any of the headings of Chapter 84 or 85 (other than headings 8409, 8431, 8448, 8466, 8473, 8485, 8503, 8522, 8529, 8538 and 8548) are in all cases to be classified in their respective headings. (b) Other parts, if suitable for use solely or principally with a particular kind of machine, or with a number of machines of the same heading... are to be classified with the machines of that kind or in heading 8409, 8431, 8448, 8466, 8473, 8503, 8522, 8529 or 8538 as appropriate... 9 The general rules for the interpretation of the CN, which are in Part One, Section I, A, of the CN, state inter alia: 'Classification of goods in the Combined Nomenclature shall be governed by the following principles: 1. The titles of sections, chapters and sub-chapters are provided for ease of reference only; for legal purposes, classification shall be determined according to the terms of the headings and any relative section or chapter notes and, I

7 RUMA provided such headings or notes do not otherwise require, according to the following provisions. 3. When... goods are prima facie classifiable under two or more headings, classification shall be effected as follows: (a) the heading which provides the most specific description shall be preferred to headings providing a more general description For legal purposes, the classification of goods in the subheadings of a heading shall be determined according to the terms of those subheadings and any related subheading notes and, mutatis mutandis, to the above rules, on the understanding that only subheadings at the same level are comparable. For the purposes of this rule, the relative section and chapter notes also apply, unless the context requires otherwise.' 10 Council Regulation (EC) No 2505/96 of 20 December 1996 opening and providing for the administration of Community tariff quotas for certain agricultural and industrial products (OJ 1996 L 345, p. 1), as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 2243/2004 of 22 December 2004 (OJ 2004 L 381, p. 1) ('Regulation No 2505/96'), I

8 JUDGMENT OF CASE C-183/06 includes, in Annex I, serial number relating to keypads, the relevant parts of which for the case in the main proceedings are the following: 'Serial number CN code Taric subdivision Description Keypads, ex ex comprising a layer of silicone and polycarbonate keytops or wholly of silicone or wholly of polycarbonate, including printed keys, For the manufacture or repair of mobile radio-telephones of subheading ' 11 Commission Regulation (EC) No 1578/2006 of 19 October 2006 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2006 L 291, p. 3), provides inter alia in the second and third recitals of the preamble: '(1) In order to ensure uniform application of the Combined Nomenclature annexed to Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87, it is necessary to adopt measures concerning the classification of the goods referred to in the Annex to this Regulation. I

9 RUMA (3) Pursuant to those general rules, the goods described in column 1 of the table set out in the Annex to this Regulation should be classified under the CN codes indicated in column 2, by virtue of the reasons set out in column 3 of that table/ 12 The annex to Regulation No 1578/2006 provides inter alia the following: 'Description of the goods Classification (CN Code) Reasons ( 1 ) (2) (3) 1. Keypad membrane (dimensions: approximately 65 x 40 x 1 mm) made of polycarbonate, without any electric conductive elements. The product has moulded keys on one side and non-conductive contact on the other side. pins Le classement est determine par les règles générales 1 et 6 pour ľinterprétation de la nomenclature combinée, par la note 2 b) de la section XVI, ainsi que par le libellé des codes NC 8529, et The product has printed keycaps constituting an alpha/ numeric keyboard, call buttons and other features typical of mobile telephones. Classification is determined by General Rules 1 and 6 for the interpretation of the Combined Nomenclature, Note 2 (b) to Section XVI and the wording of CN Codes 8529, and The dispute in the main proceedings and the question referred for a preliminary ruling 13 In August 2004, RUMA applied for binding tariff information concerning a keypad membrane which it described as a 'mobile telephone keypad in the form of a contact pad'. I

10 JUDGMENT OF CASE C-183/06 14 In tariff information of 28 September 2004, the Oberfinanzdirektion classified the product in question under subheading of the CN as a part suitable for use solely with the apparatus of heading 8537'. 15 As it was of the opinion that that keypad membrane should be classified under subheading of the CN as a part for products of heading 8525, RUMA lodged an objection against that binding tariff information. As that objection was rejected, RUMA brought an action before the Finanzgericht München (Finance Court, Munich). 16 The national court describes the products in question as follows: According to the information sheets, photographs and sample product submitted to the Zolltechnische Prüflings- und Lehranstalt (Customs Testing and Teaching Institution) the disputed product, "a mobile telephone keypad in the form of a contact pad", is a keypad made of polycarbonate. That polycarbonate membrane has moulded keys on its upper side and non-conductive contact pins on its underside. When a key is pressed the non-conductive contact pin operates a contact point on a I

11 RUMA contact membrane which lies under the polycarbonate membrane and which is not the subject of the binding tariff information. The keypad membrane is used as a pad to operate and cover the keys of mobile telephones/ 17 The national court takes the view that, according to note 2(b) to Section XVI of the CN, the product in question should be classified not on the basis of which of the machines listed in that section it is ultimately intended for use with, but on the basis of the machine which it is directly intended for use with. It considers a keypad membrane serves the direct purpose of completing a keyboard in accordance with heading 8537 with the result that the product in question should be classified under heading 8538 of the CN. 18 According to the national court, such a classification is confirmed by Regulation No 2243/2004 pursuant to which, under serial number , 'keypads... wholly of polycarbonate, including printed keys, for the manufacture or repair of mobile radio-telephones' are classified under heading 8538 of the CN. 19 Nevertheless, the national court considers that it is prevented from confirming the binding tariff information issued by the Oberfinanzdirektion inter alia on account of the fact that the Customs Tariff and Statistical Nomenclature Committee has been dealing with the tariff classification of the disputed product for years, but has not managed to come to a decision. 20 In those circumstances, the Finanzgericht München decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following question to the Court for a preliminary ruling: I

12 JUDGMENT OF CASE C-183/06 'Is the [CN] to be interpreted as meaning that keypads which have non-conductive contact pins on the underside are to be classified under heading 8538?' The question referred for a preliminary ruling Observations submitted to the Court 21 RUMA submits that the keypad membrane at issue in the main proceedings is a 'part' of a mobile telephone and must therefore be classified as such. According to RUMA, that membrane is necessary for the use of a mobile telephone with organiser functions and as it has been adapted especially for that purpose it cannot be used other than as part of a mobile telephone. Furthermore, it fulfils a protective function, in particular as it prevents dust from entering the mobile telephone. 22 RUMA is of the opinion that the keypad membrane at issue should therefore be classified under heading 8529 of the CN, as it is a part suitable for use solely with apparatus of heading It adds that classifying that membrane as part of a keyboard under heading 8538 of the CN would amount to categorising a mobile telephone keypad as an independent piece of apparatus, which cannot be the case given that the keypad obtains its function only when it is incorporated into the mobile telephone. I

13 RUMA 23 The Commission of the European Communities observes inter alia that it follows from the very wording of subheading that it includes the keypad membrane at issue in the main proceedings. The fact that that membrane is manifestly not an independent object, but a part of a mobile telephone, is a decisive factor according to the Commission. Firstly, the membrane is essential as it plays a direct role in the use of the mobile telephone. Secondly, it protects it from moisture and dust, thus preserving its ability to function. 24 The Commission adds that, according to Case C-339/98 Peacock [2000] ECR I-8947, paragraph 21, the term part' implies a "whole" for the operation of which the part is essential'. It takes the view that a mobile telephone is such a whole' as it is a piece of apparatus which is complete and directly operational from a technical point of view and the keypad membrane is essential for it to function. 25 The Hungarian Government observes that a part of a piece of apparatus covered by heading 8525 should, given the principles set out in the explanatory notes to the CN and the HS, be classified under heading It adds that, in accordance with the general rules for the interpretation of the CN, heading 8538 should be ruled out as regards the keypad membrane at issue in the main proceedings, since the wording of heading 8529 describes the product concerned most precisely as a part suitable for use with the apparatus of heading I

14 JUDGMENT OF CASE C-183/06 The Court's answer 26 The national court is essentially asking whether the keypad membrane at issue in the main proceedings should be classified under subheading of the CN as part of a keyboard in accordance with heading 8537 or under subheading as part of a mobile telephone in accordance with heading It should be noted at the outset that it is settled case-law that, in the interests of legal certainty and ease of verification, the decisive criterion for the classification of goods for customs purposes is in general to be found in their objective characteristics and properties as defined in the wording of the relevant heading of the combined nomenclature and of the notes to the sections or chapters (see, inter alia, Case 0396/02 DFDS [2004] ECR I-8439, paragraph 27; Case C-495/03 Intermodal Transports [2005] ECR I-8151, paragraph 47; and Case C-445/04 Possehl Erzkontor [2005] ECR I-10721, paragraph 19). 28 In the present case, clearly the keypad membrane at issue in the main proceedings is not expressly referred to either in the wording of the headings of the CN or in that of the notes to the sections or chapters. 29 The wording of heading 8529 of the CN under which, according to RUMA, the keypad membrane at issue in the main proceedings comes refers to '[p]arts suitable for use solely or principally with the apparatus of headings 8525 to 8528', which inter alia includes mobile telephones. The wording of heading 8538, under which the keypad membrane should, according to the Oberfinanzdirektion, be classified, relates to '[p]arts suitable for use solely or principally with the apparatus of heading 8535, 8536 or 8537', which include inter alia '[b]oards, panels, consoles, desks, cabinets and other bases, equipped with two or more apparatus of heading 8535 or 8536, for electric control or the distribution of electricity'. I

15 RUMA 30 According to note 2(b) to Section XVI of the CN, '[o]ther parts, if suitable for use solely or principally with a particular kind of machine, or with a number of machines of the same heading..., are to be classified with the machines of that kind or in heading 8409, 8431, 8448, 8466, 8473, 8503, 8522, 8529 or 8538 as appropriate. 31 It must be borne in mind that the term 'part' implies a whole for the operation of which the part is essential (Peacock, paragraph 21, and Case 0276/00 Turbon International [2002] ECR I-1389, paragraph 30). 32 In this connection, it must be noted that the assembling of the keypad membrane at issue in the main proceedings with the other components of a mobile telephone serves to ensure that it is a functional unit. The term 'functional unit', as defined by the case-law of the Court, applies where a machine or appliance consists of separate components which are designed to contribute together to a single clearly defined function (Case 223/84 Telefunken Fernseh und Rundfunk [1985] ECR 3335, paragraph 29). 33 In the present case, the membrane plays a direct role in the use of the mobile telephone, in that it makes it possible to activate the contact points and thereby access the mobile telephones various functions. It is impossible to access the various functions of the telephone without the keypad membrane at issue in the main proceedings. Consequently, it is unquestionably an essential component for the operation of the mobile telephone. I

16 JUDGMENT OF CASE C-183/06 34 On the other hand, a mobile telephone keypad is not a functional unit which is distinct from the piece of apparatus into which it is incorporated inasmuch as it cannot be used independently or for a function other than that which may be performed by the telephone as a whole (see, inter alia, to that effect, Telefunken Fernseh und Rundfunk, paragraph 31). 35 According to the wording of point 3(a) of the general rules for the interpretation of the CN in Part One, Section I, A, of the CN, which specifically covers the situation where goods are prima facie classifiable under two or more headings, 'the heading which provides the most specific description shall be preferred to headings providing a more general description'. In the present case, it must be pointed out that, as regards the objective characteristics and properties of the keypad membrane at issue in the main proceedings, and in particular given the fact that it refers expressly to '[p]arts of apparatus of subheadings ', namely to parts of mobile telephones, subheading provides a more specific description than subheading which covers a much wider and more varied range of goods, as shown by its title read in conjunction with that of heading The intended use of a product may also constitute an objective criterion for classification if it is inherent to the product, and that inherent character must be capable of being assessed on the basis of the product's objective characteristics and properties (see Case C-459/93 Thyssen Haniel Logistic [1995] ECR I-1381, paragraph 13). 37 In the present case, the construction of the keypad membrane at issue in the main proceedings, in particular its shape, which is specially adapted to a type of mobile telephone, and its method of operation preclude any use of that membrane other I

17 RUMA than as a component of that telephone. The characteristics of the keypad membrane also have the function of ensuring that the telephone has a certain imperviousness as they prevent in particular dust and moisture from entering it. 38 It follows from the above considerations that the keypad membrane at issue in the main proceedings must be classified under subheading of the CN as part of a mobile telephone in accordance with heading That finding is not called into question by the national court's view that the classification of the keypad membrane at issue in the main proceedings under heading 8538 of the CN is confirmed by Regulation No 2505/96, in which, under serial number ,'keypads... wholly of polycarbonate, including printed keys, for the manufacture or repair of mobile radio-telephones' are classified under heading 8538 of the CN, given that that provision, which was inserted into Annex I to Regulation No 2505/96 by Regulation No 2243/2004, was not applicable at the time of the facts in the main proceedings. Furthermore, it must, for the sake of completeness, be added that Regulation No 1578/2006, which has a date of adoption later than that of Regulation No 2243/2004, expressly provides for the classification of keypad membranes of polycarbonate, without any conductive elements and with moulded keys on one side and non-conductive contact pins on the other side, under subheading of the CN. 40 In the light of all those considerations, the answer to the question referred for a preliminary ruling must be that the CN must be interpreted as meaning that keypad membranes of polycarbonate which have moulded keys on their upper side and nonconductive contact pins on their underside and are intended for incorporation into mobile telephones are covered by subheading I

18 JUDGMENT OF CASE C-183/06 Costs 41 Since these proceedings are, for the parties to the main proceedings, a step in the action pending before the national court, the decision on costs is a matter for that court Costs incurred in submitting observations to the Court, other than the costs of those parties, are not recoverable. On those grounds, the Court (Fifth Chamber) hereby rules: The Combined Nomenclature in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1789/2003 of 11 September 2003, must be interpreted as meaning that keypad membranes of polycarbonate which have moulded keys on their upper side and non-conductive contact pins on their underside and are intended for incorporation into mobile telephones are covered by subheading , [Signatures] I

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 18 July 2007 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 18 July 2007 * OLICOM JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 18 July 2007 * In Case C-142/06, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC, by Østre Landsret (Denmark), made by decision of 9 March 2006, received

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 19 October 2000 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 19 October 2000 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 19 October 2000 * In Case C-339/98, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty (now Article 234 EC) by the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) for a

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 7 February 2002 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 7 February 2002 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 7 February 2002 * In Case C-276/00, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty (now Article 234 EC) from the Hessisches Finanzgericht, Kassel (Germany),

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 10 May 2001 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 10 May 2001 * VAUDE SPORT JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 10 May 2001 * In Case C-288/99, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Hessisches Finanzgericht, Kassel, Germany, for a preliminary ruling

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 18 April 1991 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 18 April 1991 * JUDGMENT OF 18. 4. 1991 CASE C-219/89 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 18 April 1991 * In Case C-219/89, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Bundesfinanzhof (Federal

More information

INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE HARMONIZED COMMODITY DESCRIPTION AND CODING SYSTEM. (done at Brussels on 14 June 1983) PREAMBLE

INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE HARMONIZED COMMODITY DESCRIPTION AND CODING SYSTEM. (done at Brussels on 14 June 1983) PREAMBLE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE HARMONIZED COMMODITY DESCRIPTION AND CODING SYSTEM (done at Brussels on 14 June 1983) PREAMBLE The Contracting Parties to this Convention, established under the auspices

More information

Official Journal of the European Union L 220. Legislation. Non-legislative acts. Volume August English edition. Contents REGULATIONS

Official Journal of the European Union L 220. Legislation. Non-legislative acts. Volume August English edition. Contents REGULATIONS Official Journal of the European Union L 220 English edition Legislation Volume 61 30 August 2018 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1207 of 27 August

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 16 September 1999 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 16 September 1999 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 16 September 1999 * In Case C-392/97, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty (now Article 234 EC) by the Bundesgerichtshof, Germany, for a preliminary

More information

24/6/2015 eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/txt/html/?uri=celex:62006cj0412&qid= &from=it

24/6/2015 eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/txt/html/?uri=celex:62006cj0412&qid= &from=it Case C 412/06 Annelore Hamilton v Volksbank Filder eg (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart) (Consumer protection Contracts negotiated away from business premises Directive

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 12 June 2008 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 12 June 2008 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 12 June 2008 * (Trade marks Directive 89/104/EEC Article 5(1) Exclusive rights of the trade mark proprietor Use of a sign identical with, or similar to, a mark in

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second 18 September 1990 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second 18 September 1990 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second 18 September 1990 * Chamber) In Case C-265/89, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Tariefcommissie (Administrative Court of last instance in

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 25 January 2007 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 25 January 2007 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 25 January 2007 * In Case C-321/03, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC, by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division (United

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 16 March 2006 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 16 March 2006 * JUDGMENT OF 16. 3. 2006 CASE C-94/05 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 16 March 2006 * In Case C-94/05, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany),

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 19 June 2003 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 19 June 2003 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 19 June 2003 * In Case C-410/01, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Bundesvergabeamt (Austria) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 10 December 1987*

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 10 December 1987* JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 10 December 1987* In Case 232/86 REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Finanzgericht (Finance Court) Berlin for a preliminary ruling in

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 8 February 1990 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 8 February 1990 * JUDGMENT OF 8. 2. 1990 CASE C-233/88 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 8 February 1990 * In Case C-233/88 REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Tariefcommissie (administrative

More information

ORDER OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 5 February 2004 *

ORDER OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 5 February 2004 * STREAMSERVE v OHIM ORDER OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 5 February 2004 * In Case C-150/02 P, Streamserve Inc., represented by J. Kääriäinen, advokat, with an address for service in Luxembourg, appellant,

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 8 February 2001 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 8 February 2001 * JUDGMENT OF 8. 2. 2001 CASE C-350/99 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 8 February 2001 * In Case C-350/99, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Arbeitsgericht Bremen, Germany, for a preliminary

More information

Page 1 of 6 IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 11 September 2007 (*) (Trade marks Articles 5(1)(a)

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. 8 April 2003 (1) and THE COURT,

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. 8 April 2003 (1) and THE COURT, 1/8 IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 8 April 2003 (1) (Trade marks - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 7(1) -

More information

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 10.12.1998 COM(1998) 729 final 98/0337 (ACC) Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) amending Regulation (EC) No 70/97 concerning the arrangements applicable

More information

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL TIZZANO delivered on 25 April

OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL TIZZANO delivered on 25 April OPINION OF MR TIZZANO JOINED CASES C-260/00 TO C-263/00 OPINION OF ADVOCATE GENERAL TIZZANO delivered on 25 April 2002 1 I Introduction 1. These proceedings arise out of disputes between Lohmann GmbH &

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 16 September 2004*

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 16 September 2004* JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 16 September 2004* In Case C-404/02 REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC, from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division,

More information

International Convention on the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System

International Convention on the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System International Convention on the Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding System PREAMBLE The Contracting Parties to this Convention, established under the auspices of the Customs Co-operation Council,

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 24 June 2004 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 24 June 2004 * JUDGMENT OF 24. 6. 2004 CASE C-49/02 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 24 June 2004 * In Case C-49/02, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Bundespatentgericht (Germany) for a preliminary

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 18 December 2007 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 18 December 2007 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 18 December 2007 * In Case C-62/06, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal), made by decision of

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 13 February 1996 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 13 February 1996 * VAN ES DOUANE AGENTEN v INSPECTEUR DER INVOERRECHTEN EN ACCIJNZEN JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 13 February 1996 * In Case C-143/93, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Tariefcommissie,

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 12 February 2015 (*)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 12 February 2015 (*) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 12 February 2015 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling Articles 56 TFEU and 57 TFEU Directive 96/71/EC Articles 3, 5 and 6 Workers of a company with its seat in

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 23 February 1999 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 23 February 1999 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 23 February 1999 * In Case C-63/97, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty by the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 19 April 2012 (*)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 19 April 2012 (*) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 19 April 2012 (*) (Directives 2000/43/EC, 2000/78/EC and 2006/54/EC Equal treatment in employment and occupation Worker showing that he meets the requirements listed

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 25 June 1998 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 25 June 1998 * DUSSELDORF AND OTHERS v MINISTER VAN VOLKSHUISVESTING, RUIMTELIJKE ORDENING EN MILIEUBEHEER JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 25 June 1998 * In Case C-203/96, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 21 November 2002 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 21 November 2002 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 21 November 2002 * In Case C-356/00, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Toscana (Italy) for a preliminary

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 8 November 1990 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 8 November 1990 * JUDGMENT OF 8. 11. 1990 CASE C-231/89 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 8 November 1990 * In Case C-231/89, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Bundesfinanzhof (Federal Finance Court)

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 11 March 2003 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 11 March 2003 * JUDGMENT OF 11. 3. 2003 CASE C-40/01 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 11 March 2003 * In Case C-40/01, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) for a preliminary

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 22 June 1999 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 22 June 1999 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 22 June 1999 * In Case C-342/97, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty (now Article 234 EC) by the Landgericht München I (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 22 February 2005 * APPEAL under Article 49 of the EC Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 15 April 2002

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 22 February 2005 * APPEAL under Article 49 of the EC Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 15 April 2002 JUDGMENT OF 22. 2. 2005 CASE C-141/02 Ρ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 22 February 2005 * In Case C-141/02 P, APPEAL under Article 49 of the EC Statute of the Court of Justice, brought on 15 April

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 15 July 2004 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 15 July 2004 * JUDGMENT OF 15. 7. 2004 CASE C-443/02 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 15 July 2004 * In Case C-443/02, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Tribunale di Pordenone (Italy) for a preliminary

More information

IPPT , ECJ, Montex v Diesel

IPPT , ECJ, Montex v Diesel European Court of Justice, 9 November 2006, Montex v Diesel TRADEMARK LAW Transit to a Member State where the mark is not protected Trade mark proprietor can prohibit transit of goods bearing the trade

More information

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 19 December 2013 *

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 19 December 2013 * Reports of Cases JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 19 December 2013 * (Area of freedom, security and justice Regulation (EC) No 810/2009 Articles 21(1), 32(1) and 35(6) Procedures and conditions for

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 17 March 2005 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 17 March 2005 * GILETTE COMPANY AND GILETTE GROUP FINLAND JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 17 March 2005 * In Case C-228/03, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC by the Korkein oikeus (Finland),

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 11 December 2003 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 11 December 2003 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 11 December 2003 * In Case C-127/00, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 9 March 2006 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 9 March 2006 * WERHOF JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 9 March 2006 * In Case C-499/04, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany), made by decision

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 1 April 1993 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 1 April 1993 * HEWLETT PACKARD FRANCE v DIRECTEUR GÉNÉRAL DES DOUANES JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 1 April 1993 * In Case C-250/91, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Tribunal

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition) 17 September 2003 (1) (Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Access to documents - Nondisclosure of a document originating from a

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 19 September 2006 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 19 September 2006 * I-21 GERMANY AND ARCOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 19 September 2006 * In Joined Cases C-392/04 and C-422/04, REFERENCES for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht

More information

Page 1 of 7 IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Second Chamber) 20 April 2005 (*) (Community

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 16 September 1999 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 16 September 1999 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) 16 September 1999 * In Case C-27/98, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty (now Article 234 EC) by the Bundesvergabeamt, Austria, for a preliminary

More information

Summary of the Judgment

Summary of the Judgment Case C-346/06 Dirk Rüffert, in his capacity as liquidator of the assets of Objekt und Bauregie GmbH & Co. KG v Land Niedersachsen (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Celle) (Article

More information

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Becker Vale Pty Ltd v Chief Executive Officer of Customs [2015] FCA 525 Citation: Appeal from: Parties: Becker Vale Pty Ltd v Chief Executive Officer of Customs [2015] FCA 525

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 11 October 2007 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 11 October 2007 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 11 October 2007 * In Case C-98/06, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Articles 68 EC and 234 EC from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden), made by decision of 8 February

More information

JUDGMENT OF CASE 180/83

JUDGMENT OF CASE 180/83 JUDGMENT OF 28. 6. 1984 CASE 180/83 In Case 180/83 REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Arbeitsgericht [Labour Court] Reutlingen, Federal Republic of Germany, for a preliminary

More information

Before : LORD JUSTICE PATTEN LORD JUSTICE LEWISON and LORD JUSTICE NEWEY Between :

Before : LORD JUSTICE PATTEN LORD JUSTICE LEWISON and LORD JUSTICE NEWEY Between : Neutral Citation Number: [2018] EWCA Civ 1221 IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION) ON APPEAL FROM THE UPPER TRIBUNAL (TAX AND CHANCERY CHAMBER) Judge Timothy Herrington and Judge Ashley Greenbank [2016]

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 17 June 1999 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 17 June 1999 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 17 June 1999 * In Case C-260/97, REFERENCE to the Court under the Protocol of 3 June 1971 on the interpretation by the Court of Justice of the Convention of 27 September

More information

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 22 March

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 22 March Reports of Cases JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 22 March 2017 1 (References for a preliminary ruling Judicial cooperation in criminal matters Directive 2012/13/EU Right to information in criminal

More information

Classification of Parts and Accessories in the Customs Tariff. In Brief

Classification of Parts and Accessories in the Customs Tariff. In Brief Ottawa, May 13, 2014 Memorandum D10-0-1 Classification of Parts and Accessories in the Customs Tariff In Brief The editing revisions made in this memorandum do not affect or change any of the existing

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 20 March 2003 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 20 March 2003 * JUDGMENT OF 20. 3. 2003 CASE C-291/00 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 20 March 2003 * In Case C-291/00, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Tribunal de grande instance de Paris (France) for a preliminary

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 26 November 1996 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 26 November 1996 * JUDGMENT OF 26. 11. 1996 CASE C-68/95 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 26 November 1996 * In Case C-68/95, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty by the Hessischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof, Germany,

More information

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 15 October 2015 *

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 15 October 2015 * Reports of Cases JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 15 October 2015 * (Reference for a preliminary ruling Judicial cooperation in criminal matters Directive 2010/64/EU Right to interpretation and translation

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 23 April 1991 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 23 April 1991 * JUDGMENT OF 23. 4. 1991 CASE C-41/90 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 23 April 1991 * In Case C-41/90, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Oberlandesgericht München,

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber) 27 February 2002 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber) 27 February 2002 * STREAMSERVE v OHIM (STREAMSERVE) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber) 27 February 2002 * In Case T-106/00, Streamserve Inc., established in Raleigh, North Carolina (United States of

More information

Equal treatment for men and women - Public servant - Part-time employment - Calculation of length of service

Equal treatment for men and women - Public servant - Part-time employment - Calculation of length of service Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 2 October 1997 Hellen Gerster v Freistaat Bayern Reference for a preliminary ruling: Bayerisches Verwaltungsgericht Ansbach Germany Equal treatment for men and

More information

English (en) ECLI:EU:C:2008:189

English (en) ECLI:EU:C:2008:189 InfoCuria Case law of the Court of Justice English (en) Home > Search form > List of results > Documents Language of document : English ECLI:EU:C:2008:189 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 3 April

More information

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 17 October 2013 *

Reports of Cases. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 17 October 2013 * Reports of Cases JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 17 October 2013 * (Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations Articles 3 and 7(2) Freedom of choice of the parties Limits Mandatory

More information

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice.

IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice. Page 1 of 8 IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice. ORDER OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 28 June 2004 (1) (Appeal Regulation (EC) No 40/94

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 11 December 2003 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 11 December 2003 * SCHNITZER JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 11 December 2003 * In Case C-215/01, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Amtsgericht Augsburg (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings

More information

Page 1 of 9 IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 14 December 2006(*) (Community trade mark Article

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 4 May 1999 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 4 May 1999 * JUDGMENT OF 4. 5. 1999 JOINED CASES C-108/97 AND C-109/97 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 4 May 1999 * In Joined Cases C-108/97 and C-109/97, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty (now Article

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 7 October 2004 * ACTION for annulment under Article 230 EC, lodged at the Court on 4 September 2002,

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 7 October 2004 * ACTION for annulment under Article 230 EC, lodged at the Court on 4 September 2002, JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 7 October 2004 * In Case C-312/02, ACTION for annulment under Article 230 EC, lodged at the Court on 4 September 2002, Kingdom of Sweden, represented by K. Renman,

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 7 January 2004 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 7 January 2004 * JUDGMENT OF 7. 1. 2004 CASE C-201/02 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 7 January 2004 * In Case C-201/02, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the High Court of Justice of England and Wales,

More information

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 26.5.2015 COM(2015) 220 final 2015/0112 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU) No 19/2013 implementing the

More information

COMMISSION DECISION. C(2013) 7709 final. of

COMMISSION DECISION. C(2013) 7709 final. of COMMISSION DECISION C(2013) 7709 final of 18.11.2013 on finding that waiver of post-clearance entry in the accounts of import duties is justified and that remission of duties is justified in a particular

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 12 March 2002 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 12 March 2002 * LEITNER JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 12 March 2002 * In Case C-168/00, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Landesgericht Linz (Austria) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 16 September 2004 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 16 September 2004 * JUDGMENT OF 16. 9. 2004 CASE C-227/01 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 16 September 2004 * In Case C-227/01, ACTION under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 7 June 2001,

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. 4 May 1999 (1) (Directive 89/104/EEC - Trade marks - Geographical indications of origin)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT. 4 May 1999 (1) (Directive 89/104/EEC - Trade marks - Geographical indications of origin) 1/12 IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 4 May 1999 (1) (Directive 89/104/EEC - Trade marks - Geographical indications

More information

composed of: D.A.O. Edward, acting for the President of the Chamber, A. La Pergola (Rapporteur), P. Jann, S. von Bahr and A.

composed of: D.A.O. Edward, acting for the President of the Chamber, A. La Pergola (Rapporteur), P. Jann, S. von Bahr and A. Judgment of the court (Fifth Chamber) 8 May 2003 Deutscher Handballbund ev / Maros Kolpak External relations - Association Agreement between the Communities and Slovakia - Article 38(1) - Free movement

More information

contract signed by includes an express reference to those general conditions. 3. In the case of a contract concluded by

contract signed by includes an express reference to those general conditions. 3. In the case of a contract concluded by CASE JUDGMENT OF 14. 12. 1976 24/76 jurisdiction upon it was in fact the subject of a consensus between the parties, which must be clearly and precisely demonstrated, for the purpose the formal requirements

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 13 December 2001 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 13 December 2001 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 13 December 2001 * In Case C-481/99, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Bundesgerichtshof (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 13 July 2006 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 13 July 2006 * GAT JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 13 July 2006 * In Case C-4/03, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling, pursuant to the Protocol of 3 June 1971 on the interpretation by the Court of Justice of the

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 19 July 2012 (*)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 19 July 2012 (*) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 19 July 2012 (*) (Judicial cooperation in civil matters Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 Jurisdiction over individual contracts of employment Contract with an embassy of

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 11 August 1995 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 11 August 1995 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 11 August 1995 * In Case C-431/92, Commission of the European Communities, represented initially by Ingolf Pernice, of the Legal Service, acting as Agent, and then by Rolf Wägenbaur,

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 14 March 2006 * ACTION under Article 228 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 14 April 2004,

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 14 March 2006 * ACTION under Article 228 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 14 April 2004, COMMISSION v FRANCE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 14 March 2006 * In Case C-177/04, ACTION under Article 228 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 14 April 2004, Commission of the European

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 15 March 2011 (*)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 15 March 2011 (*) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 15 March 2011 (*) (Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations Contract of employment Choice made by the parties Mandatory rules of the law applicable

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 27 November 2007 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 27 November 2007 * C JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 27 November 2007 * In Case C-435/06, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland), made by decision of 13 October

More information

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 January Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 January Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 January 2006 Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 49 EC - Freedom to

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 27 May 2004 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 27 May 2004 * ELSNER-LAKEBERG JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 27 May 2004 * In Case C-285/02, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Verwaltungsgericht Minden (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 11 December 2007 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 11 December 2007 * EIND JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Grand Chamber) 11 December 2007 * In Case C-291/05, REFERENCE for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC, by the Raad van State (Netherlands), made by decision of 13 July

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 21 July 2016 (*)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 21 July 2016 (*) Seite 1 von 10 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 21 July 2016 (*) (Request for a preliminary ruling State aid Aid scheme in the form of reductions in environmental taxes Regulation (EC) No 800/2008

More information

Case C-553/07. College van burgemeester en wethouders van Rotterdam. M.E.E. Rijkeboer. (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State)

Case C-553/07. College van burgemeester en wethouders van Rotterdam. M.E.E. Rijkeboer. (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State) Case C-553/07 College van burgemeester en wethouders van Rotterdam v M.E.E. Rijkeboer (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State) (Protection of individuals with regard to the processing

More information

COMMISSION v GERMANY. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 19 January 2006*

COMMISSION v GERMANY. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 19 January 2006* COMMISSION v GERMANY JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 19 January 2006* In Case C-244/04, ACTION under Article 226 EC for failure to fulfil obligations, brought on 8 June 2004, Commission of the European

More information

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber) 29 April 1999 *

ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber) 29 April 1999 * ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Third Chamber) 29 April 1999 * In Case T-120/98, Alce Sri, a company incorporated under Italian law and established in Novara (Italy), represented by Celestino Corica,

More information

Input Tax Credit. and other aspects. Goods and Services under GST

Input Tax Credit. and other aspects. Goods and Services under GST Input Tax Credit Availment, Classification Restrictions, of Jobwork and other aspects Goods and Services under GST CA Rajesh Kumar T R Basic Understanding Three elements of taxation Levy Assessment Collection

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 25 April 2002 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 25 April 2002 * GONZÁLEZ SÁNCHEZ JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 25 April 2002 * In Case C-183/00, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Juzgado de Primera Instancia e Instrucción no 5 de Oviedo (Spain)

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 12 March 2002

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 12 March 2002 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) 12 March 2002 (Directive 90/314/EEC - Package travel, package holidays and package tours - Compensation for non-material damage) In Case C-168/00, REFERENCE to the

More information

Page 1 of 7 IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Second Chamber) 13 September 2005 (*) (Community

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 19 June 2014 (*)

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 19 June 2014 (*) JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (First Chamber) 19 June 2014 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling Article 45 TFEU Directive 2004/38/EC Article 7 Worker Union citizen who gave up work because of the physical constraints

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 3 October 1985 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 3 October 1985 * JUDGMENT OF 3. 10. 1985 CASE 311/84 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 3 October 1985 * In Case 311/84 REFERENCE to the Court under Article 177 of the EEC Treaty by the Tribunal de commerce [Commercial

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 15 May 2003 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 15 May 2003 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fifth Chamber) 15 May 2003 * In Case C-160/01, REFERENCE to the Court under Article 234 EC by the Sozialgericht Leipzig (Germany) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 29 January 2004 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 29 January 2004 * JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 29 January 2004 * In Case C-209/02, Commission of the European Communities, represented by J.C. Schieferer, acting as Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg,

More information

Page 1 of 7 IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE - The information on this site is subject to a disclaimer and a copyright notice. JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) 27 April 2006 (*) (Trade marks Directive 89/104/EEC

More information

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fifth Chamber) 28 September 1999 *

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fifth Chamber) 28 September 1999 * JUDGMENT OF 28. 9. 1999 CASE T-612/97 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fifth Chamber) 28 September 1999 * In Case T-612/97, Cordis Obst und Gemüse Großhandel GmbH, a company incorporated under

More information