IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE, PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCE ACT (POCSO) MIZORAM, AIZAWL
|
|
- Benedict Taylor
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 1 IN THE COURT OF SPECIAL JUDGE, PROTECTION OF CHILDREN FROM SEXUAL OFFENCE ACT (POCSO) MIZORAM, AIZAWL BEFORE Mrs. Lucy Lalrinthari Special Judge, POCSO Act Aizawl Judicial District, Aizawl SC. No.56 of 2015 Criminal Trial No.503/2015 u/s8 of POCSO Act,2012 Ref: W.PhailengPS C/No.1/15 dt State of Mizoram Vrs RodinglianaS/o Samuela (L) of HaleluiVeng, W.Phaileng - Accused PRESENT For the Prosecution : Mrs.K.Lalremruati,Ld.Spl.P.P. For the Accused : Mr.C.Zoramchhana,Ld.Counsel. Date of Hearing : Date of Judgment : JUDGMENT & ORDER 1. The prosecution story of the case is that on 8 th Jan. 2015PC.Lalramthara S/o Ringliana, W.Phaileng, Halleluiveng lodged First Information Report to the Offficer-in-Charge of West Phaileng Police Station stating that on (Thursday) at about 2:00 pm one Page 1 of 9
2 2 Rodingliana of W.Phaileng, Halleluiveng had sexually assaulted his daughterx 15 yrs at their residence to dishonor her modesty. He forcibly grabbed her breast and also kissed her lip. Hence, W.Phaileng-PS C/No. 1/15 dt u/s 354-A IPC R/w 8 of POCSO Act was registered against the suspected accused Rodingliana. 2. During the course of investigation, the complainant PC.Lalramthara 42 yrs S/o Ringliana, W.Phaileng, Halleluivengwasthoroughly examined and recorded his statement. The place of occurrence i.e, residence of complainant was also visited and drawn a rough sketch map. The statement of the minor victim Vanhmingliani 15 yrs D/o PC.Lalramthara was carefully recorded as well as the statement of witnesses namely (I) Lalrinpuii 43 yrs (mother of the victim) and (II) Lallawmawmi 18 yrs (sister of the victim). On , the victim Vanhmingliani was forwarded to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mamit Court with a prayer for record of her statement as required by section 164 IPC. Her statement was recorded by Julie Lalrinzami, Judicial Magistrate, 1 st Class, Mamit Court which corroborated her statement made before police. Therefore, it has been ascertained from investigation that on at about 2:00 pm while the victim Vanhmingliani was alone at their house in the bedroom, the suspected accused Rodingliana 19 yrs S/o Samuel-a (L), W.Phaileng, HalleluiVeng entered in the bedroom and came to her. On entering, he then sexually assaulted her by touching her breast and kissing her lip in order to outrage her modesty. While they were struggling, the victims mother Lalrinpuii came inside the room and stopped the accused from his shameful doing. 3. On , the suspected accused Rodingliana was arrested after informing him the ground of his arrest. He was thoroughly interrogated and he admitted his guilt in the case. On , he was forwarded to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mamit Court with a prayer for judicial remand. 4. Therefore, from the above mentioned investigation and circumstances, a prima facie case under sections 354-A IPC R/w 8 of POCSO Act are found well established against the accused Rodingliana 19 yrs S/o Samuel-a (L), W.Phaileng, Halleluiveng. Hence, case I/O submitted charge-sheet against accused Rodingliana. 5. As per procedure u/s 207/208 of Cr.P.C., all the police reports and its connected documents were furnished to the accused. The accused being a poor villager, having no Page 2 of 9
3 3 regular income and being a scheduled tribe, Advocate C.Zramchhana is appointed to defend the accused u/s 304 Cr.P.C. 6. The Ld. Spl. P.P. Mrs.K.Lalremruati opened her case and stated that the prosecution established a strong prima facie- case against the accused and there is sufficient ground to frame charge u/s 8 of POCSO Act Also heard the Ld. Counsel for the accused Mr. C.Zoramchhana, who mildly objected to framing of charge. After hearing both parties this court found there is sufficient reason to proceed with the case. So charge u/s 8 of POCSO Act 2012 has been framed, read over to the accused in the language known to him, to which the accused pleaded not guilty and claimed for trial. 7. Trial proceeds. In order to bring home the charge against the accused the prosecution examined the following PWs before the court. 8. PW No.1 PC. Lalramtharaidentified the accused Rodingliana, who is also hailing from their village, West Phaileng and he stated that he is a daily labourer and hehas three children. The victim is the middle one and she is about 15 years old. On he went to work at their neighbor s house and at about 5:00PM he returned home. When he returned home his wife informed him that while he was away at work, she attended functions of memorial stone of death persons being performed in the neigbourhood. She left the victim alone at home and when she came back she called for the victim but she did not reply. She look for her and she found the victim and the accused at their bedroom and she show the accused was being pushed away by her daughter and she enquired what was going on the victim informed her that the accused tried to sexually assaulted her by touching her breast and kiss her, she could not shout as the accused strangled her on the neck. The victim was still crying and when he asked her about the incident she could not make any reply to him. And so he decided to go to the police and report the matter, he, on the same night they went to West Phaileng police station and submitted FIR.Exbt-P-1 is the FIR submitted by him and Exbt-P-1-A is his signature. On Cross-examination PW No.1 stated that he was not present at the PO when the incident happened. Whatever hehas stated above was what was told to him by his wife and hehas no receive any information directly from his daughter.as far as he know he did not find any marks of violence/assault on the body of his daughter when he went home on the day of incident.he also did not receive any statement/confession admitting his guilt regarding the incident from the accused. It is not a fact that Exbt-P-1 is false and Exbt-P-1-A is not his signature. 9. PW No.2 Victim (X)identified the accused and stated that on her father was working away from home and her mother attended a ceremony of erecting stone for death person in the neighborhood. Her elder sister had gone to carry water from the water point. At that time, accused Rodingliana had come to their house and asked her elder sister to carry water from the water point. She thought Rodingliana had gone to the water point with her elder sister. Her elder sister asked her to clean the bedroom and bathroom. Their bed room is in the upper storey of her house and the kitchen is in the down floor. She went up to the upper storey and entered into her bedroom to clean the bedroom. The accused Rodingliana immediately entered the bedroom and sexually assaulted her by touching Page 3 of 9
4 4 herbreast and kissing her on her lips. She resisted and do not want to have any sexual relation with him. But he strangled her throat and she could not breathe. At the same time the accused Rodingliana told her if she did not surrender to his sexual desire he would make public and her reputation would suffer. However, she gathered her strength and kicked him with her leg. Luckily her mother came home and called for her then the accused stop assaulting her. She then narrated the whole incident to her mother. Her mother scolded the accused and the accused begged the forgiveness of her mother. However, her mother replied that they will discuss the matter in the family circle they only they will decide. Her father then submitted FIR to the O/C, West Phaileng PS. On Cross-examination PW No.2 stated that she hasno affair with the accused.it is a fact that there was no eye witness to the incident. The accused is used to come to their house quite often and he was courting her.there are three bedrooms and sitting room in the upper floor of their house. It was not unusual on the part of the accused to come up to the upper floor of their house.she did not know whether her elder sister saw the accused coming up to the upper floor after her. She had no secret liking for the accused but the present case was initiated only after her mother came to know about the same.it is not a fact that the accused simply sit by her side without committing an offence.she did not know whether the accused used to enter the bedroom even on previous occasions with the cognizance of her family members. 10. PW No.3 Lalrinpuiiis mother of victim X, sheidentified the accused present in the court this day who is also hailing from their village West Phaileng. Shehas three children and the victim in the instant case is the middle one. She was born on 6 April On she went to attend a ceremony of erecting stone of a dead person in their neighborhood. The victim and her elder sister were staying at home. At around 2 pm she went back home but she saw no one inside the house. Their bedroom is in the upper storey of the house and she went up in the bedroom and search for her daughter and when she entered her daughter s bedroom she saw her victim daughter sitting on the bed and the accused was standing beside the bed. Her victim daughter was crying and when she saw her she called her and told her that the accused had sexually assaulted by touching her breast and also kissed her. She scolded the accused and the accused stated to her that he did not do any harm to the victim. She was very angry and when her husband return from work she inform him about the incident and after having discussion with their other family member they decided to submitted FIR to the police and submitted FIR to the police. On Cross-examination PW No.3 stated that she did not see the accused committing any sexual offence on her daughter when she reached the PO. It is not a fact that her daughter was having an affair with the accused for quite a long time. It is not a fact that the victim turned hostile towards the accused only after she caught them staying together red handed. It is a fact that she did not hear any sound or cry for help even from her daughter before she entered the bedroom. It is a fact that the age difference of her daughter with that of the accused is only three years and as such both of them are teenagers. It is not a fact that her daughter did not tell her why she was crying. She did not find any mark or sign of violence or assault on the clothes of her daughter even when she entered the bedroom. None of her clothes were also opened to show that she recently was touch on her breast by the accused. It is not a fact that she depose wrongly before the court today just to save the case of her daughter without any basis. 11. PW No.4Lallawmawmiis the elder sister of victim X, she identified the accused Rodingliana who present in the court this day. On , her mother went to attend a ceremony erecting tomb stone at their neighborhood. Her younger sister and she stayed at Page 4 of 9
5 5 home. She asked her younger sister to clean the bedroom. Their bedroom is in the upper storey of the house. Her victim sister went up to their bedroom for cleaning. At that time the accused was also present at their house. Meanwhile she was cleaning a kitchen and she saw the victim went up to their bedroom and she went out of the house to fetch water. When she returned home her mother was already at home and her mother told her that the accused had sexually assault her younger sister by touching her breast and kissing her. On Cross-examination PW No.4 had stated that it is a fact the accused used to come to their house very often and it was not unusual for the accused to go up-stair in their house. It is not a fact that the reason why she did not too much care when she saw the accused going up-stair was that he was having an affair with the victim. Whatever story she stated about the story was told to her by her mother and she have not personally seen the accused committing the alleged offence on her sister victim. It is not a fact that she deposed falsely in the court this day. 12. PW No. 5 LalsangberaSailo case I/O had stated that he know the accused Rodingliana present in the court this day. During the year 2015 he was posted at W.Phaileng Police Station as O/C. On an FIR was received from PC.Lalramthara S/o Ringliana, W. Phaileng, Hallelui Veng and in the FIR he stated that on around 2:00pm the accused Rodingliana had sexually assaulted his daughter aged about 15 yrs old at their resident by touching her breast and kissed her on her lip. W.Phaileng PS C/No 1/15 dt u/s 354A IPC r/w 8 of POCSO Act was registered against the accused. He took up the case for investigation. During the course of his investigation, the complainant PC. Lalramthara was examined and recorded his statement. He also visited the PO and drawn a sketch map. The minor victim girl was also examined and recorded her statement. He also recorded the other civilian witnesses. He sent the victim to Judicial Magistrate for recording her statement. He arrested the accused and he admitted his guilt before him. On completion of his investigation, he found prima facie case against the accused u/s 354A IPC r/w 8 of POCSO Act and he submitted charge-sheet before the court.exbt-p-2 is the charge-sheet submitted by him andexbt-p-2-a is his signature. On Cross-examination PW No.5 had stated that it is not a fact that the accused did not admit the commission of the alleged offence during his investigation. It is a fact that there was no statement from the witnesses examined by him during his investigation regarding the cry for help on the part of the victim before mother of the victim entered the bedroom.it is not a fact that there is no statement from mother of the victim that she saw the accused committing the charge offence.it is not a fact that he did not find prima facie case against the accused. It is a fact that the prima facie in the present case was based on the statement given by the accused, the victim and other witnesses. It is a fact that no medical examination of the victim was conducted. It is not a fact that there would not be any case regarding in the present incident had they not been caught by mother of the victim inside the bedroom. It is a fact that he was not present at the PO at the time of the incident and as such he did not see the accused committing the alleged offence.it is not a fact that Exbt. P-2 is false and Exbt. P-2-A is not his signature.it is not a fact that he deposed falsely in the court this day. Page 5 of 9
6 6 13. After the prosecution evidence is closed, the accused is examined u/s 313 of Cr.P.C. as follows:- Examination of Accused u/s 313 Cr.P.C: Q.1. The evidence against you is that the victim is well acquainted with you and she is your neighbour. What do you say? Ans :Yes, I have visited the residence of victim almost every day. Q.2.The evidence against you is that on at about 2:00 pm, you visited the house of victim. What do you say? Ans :Yes, it is true. Q.3.On this day at about 2:00 pm, the victim was alone in the house mopping the 1 st floor of the house her elder sister was carrying water from water point, so seizing the opportunity you had sexually assaulted her, by touching at her breast through her clothing, kiss her at her lips, embraced her. What do you say? Ans :Yes, it is true, we often had private moments like this, but on this day her mother came home and caught us so they made a complaint. Q.4. Do you have any other thing to say before the court? Ans :Yes, I do not forced her in any manner. Now his parents pardoned me before the YMA & VCP. Hence, I made a prayer before the court to sentence me to imprisonment already undergone. I did not have any sexual intercourse with her. Q.5. Do you want to adduce defence evidence? Ans :No. 14. After examination of accused is over, the parties are heard on the point of argument. The Ld. Spl. P.P. submitted that the accused did not denied that he had kiss the victim, and touched at her breast, which is an offence under POCSO Act 2012 as the victim X is only 17 years and did not attained 18 years and hence the accused be punish accordingly. On the other hand, the Ld. Counsel for the accused submitted that the accused and the victim had love affair, and the complainant had submitted compromise letter written in the presence of local leaders like Village council secretary and the President of YMA. The complainant fully forgive the accused and does not want his detention in the judicial custody any longer, as the complainant had no grievance with the accused and they reach amicable settlement being in the same village and in the neighbourhood. Also, the accused and the victim girl are being teenagers, i.e victim 17 years and accused 19 years only, the accused Page 6 of 9
7 7 may be forgiven. Criminal case is filed when the complainant had grievances against the accused. Now they have settled their grievances and it is confirmed by the compromise letter submitted by the complainant. Hence, he prayed the court that the imprisonment already undergone by the accused might satisfied the court. 15. After hearing both parties on the point of argument, and on perusal of the case record and in consideration of all the evidences on record, and on the accused own admission, I am convinced that the accused had really kiss the victim and touch at her breast, and thereby committed offence u/s 8 of POCSO Act. And I therefore convicted him accordingly. On the question of sentence, the accused and the prosecution are heard as per section 235(2) of Cr.P.C. The accused pleaded leniency as he was already forgiven by the victim and her father complainant. There is no hard feeling between them, as they are in love. The Ld. Spl.P.P. also did not pressed for harsh punishment as the complainant had submitted a compromise letter pleading for the cause of the accused. The complainant specifically submitted that he forgive the accused in the name of God, and he had no illfeeling against the accused and did not want further punishment to the accused. On hearing both parties on the question of sentence, and on perusal of the case record, the accused had been in prison from to On consideration of the fact that the complainant pleaded for the cause of the accused, and he specifically stated that he had no desire to inflict punishment to the accuse any further, and so in my considered opinion, Justice is already met by the imprisonment already undergone by the accused. I sentence him accordingly. There is no seized article. Give copy of this order to all concern. Given under my hand and seal of this court today the 28 th April Sd/-LUCY LALRINTHARI Special Judge, POCSO Act Aizawl Judicial District, Aizawl, Mizoram. Page 7 of 9
8 8 Memo No Dated Aizawl the 28 th April Copy to:- 1) Rodingliana C/o Mr.C.Zoramchhana, Advocate. 2) Mrs.K.Lalremruati, Ld.Spl.P.P, POCSO Act. 3) DSP Prosecution. 4) O/C W.Phaileng P/S. 5) Special Superintendent, Central Jail Aizawl. 6) In charge, Judicial Section. 7) Case reco 8) rd. 9) Guard file. PESHKAR Page 8 of 9
9 9 APPENDIX A. PROSECUTION EXHIBIT Exbt. P-1 - FIR Exbt. P-1 A - Signature of PW No.1 Exbt. P-2 Charge-sheet Exbt. P-2-A - Signature of PW No.5 DEFENCE EXHIBIT- None B. Exhibit produced by witnesses - None C. Court Exhibit - None D. Prosecution witnesses : PW No.1 is PC.Lalramthara. PW No.2 is Victim (X). PW No.3 is Lalrinpuii. PW No.4 is Lallawmawmi. PW No.5 is LalsangberaSailo. E. DEFENCE WITNESSES - None F. COURT WITNESSES - None PESHKAR Page 9 of 9
IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE; MIZORAM, AIZAWL. BEFORE Mrs. Lucy Lalrinthari District & Sessions Judge Aizawl Judicial District, Aizawl
1 IN THE COURT OF DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE; MIZORAM, AIZAWL BEFORE Mrs. Lucy Lalrinthari District & Sessions Judge Aizawl Judicial District, Aizawl Sessions Case No.51 of 2014; Criminal Trial No.838/2014
More informationIN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE AIZAWL JUDICIAL DISTRICT, AIZAWL, MIZORAM. Sessions Case No. 30 of 2015 Crl Tr. No.
1 IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE AIZAWL JUDICIAL DISTRICT, AIZAWL, MIZORAM. Present : Shri Vanlalenmawia, MJS Additional Sessions Judge, Aizawl Judicial District, Aizawl. Sessions Case No. 30
More information-:1:- IN THE COURT OF SH. NARINDER KUMAR ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE FAST TRACK COURTS ROHINI DELHI
-:1:- IN THE COURT OF SH. NARINDER KUMAR ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE FAST TRACK COURTS ROHINI DELHI SC No. 100/2 dated 20/12/2006 Date of Decision: 02/04/2007 State Versus 1. SURESH S/o Sh. Sukhbir Singh R/o
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam: Nagaland: Meghalaya:Manipur: Tripura:Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam: Nagaland: Meghalaya:Manipur: Tripura:Mizoram & Arunachal Pradesh) (AIZAWL BENCH) CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION No.4 of 2011(J) Sh.Krosnunnapara -Vs- State
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G.RAMESH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED: THIS THE 18 TH DAY OF APRIL 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G.RAMESH BETWEEN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 3638 OF 2009 THE STATE OF
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM:NAGALAND:MEGHALAYA:MANIPUR: TRIPURA: MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM:NAGALAND:MEGHALAYA:MANIPUR: TRIPURA: MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL REVISION No.236 of 2004 Ala Uddin Laskar, Son of late Yusuf Ali Laskar, Village-Gangpar
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH. Crl. Appeal No.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH Smt. Moni Orang - Versus The State of Assam - Appellant - Opposite party BEFORE HON
More informationBEFORE HON BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. AJIT SINGH HON BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJIT BHUYAN
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, ARUNACHAL PRADESH AND MIZORAM) Criminal Appeal No. 129(J) of 2013 Appellant/Accused. Brindaban Mandal and another Respondents. The State of Assam
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh ) Crl.Appeal No.101 of 2009
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh ) Crl.Appeal No.101 of 2009 Sri Ratia Gowala S/O Sri Kishan Gowala R/O Nimana Garh T.E. P.S. Mathurapur, Dist.-Sivasagar,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE K. N. KESHAVANARAYANA. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.882/2005 (C)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2012 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR JUSTICE K. N. KESHAVANARAYANA BETWEEN: CRIMINAL APPEAL No.882/2005 (C) Amjad, S/o Sabjan,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.13/2012 The State of Mizoram. Appellant. -Versus 1. Sh. David Lalthuammawia, 2. Sh. B. Lalruatfela,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Crl. Leave Petition 28/2014 Smt. Rekha Bhargava, Wife of Sri Amrit Bhargava, D/o. Sri Satya Narayan Bhargava,
More informationDate of hearing Date of judgment JUDGMENT AND ORDER.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya,Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 52(J) O5 Md. Muslemuddin..Appellant Versus- State of Assam...
More informationBar & Bench (
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 456 OF 2019 (Arising out of S.L.P (Crl.) No. 208 of 2019) PERIYASAMI AND ORS....APPELLANTS Versus S. NALLASAMY...RESPONDENT
More informationIN THE COURT OF KUSHAL SINGLA, PCS. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE Ist CLASS, CHANDIGARH.
IN THE COURT OF KUSHAL SINGLA, PCS. JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE Ist CLASS, CHANDIGARH. Crl. Case No : 572 Date of Instt. : 17.2.2016 Date of decision : 12.6.2017 State Versus Rohit Sharma s/o Sh. MM Sharma r/o
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT: ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Criminal Appeal No. 43 of 2013 Abdul Baten Appellant -Versus- State of Assam & 15 Others Respondents -BEFORE-
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) Criminal Appeal No. 188 (J) of 2007 Shri Ajit @ Anil Mahapatra. Versus The State
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Criminal Appeal (J) No. 63 of 2014 Bhupen Doley, Son of Late Punya Doley, Resident of Jon Misuk, Sisi Kolghor,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA. CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2785/2009
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 03 RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015 BETWEEN BEFORE THE HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE RATHNAKALA CRIMINAL APPEAL No.2785/2009 1. BASU SHANKRAPPA CHAVAN @ LAMANI,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Crl. Revision 11/2004 Sri Pintu Das, Son of Late Arun Das Resident of Philobari
More informationCRIMINAL SECTION FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs)
I) BAIL U/S.439 OF Cr.P.C. :- CRIMINAL SECTION FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (FAQs) 2. Sessions Court's order dismissing the bail 4. No Court fees in case the petitioner is in Jail. Note :- Important information
More informationJ U D G M E N T (Arising out of SLP(Crl.) No. 5124/06) A.K. MATHUR, J.
Supreme Court of India State Of West Bengal vs Dinesh Dalmia on 25 April, 2007 Author: A Mathur Bench: A.K.Mathur, Tarun Chatterjee CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 623 of 2007 PETITIONER: State of West Bengal
More informationIN THE COURT OF THE ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE: BHUBANESWAR. PRESENT:- Sri I.K. Das LLB, Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar.
1 IN THE COURT OF THE ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE: BHUBANESWAR. PRESENT:- Sri I.K. Das LLB, Addl. Sessions Judge, Bhubaneswar. Crl. Appeal No. 2/18 of 2012 (Arising out of judgment dtd. 12.4.12 in GR case No.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2014 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF JUNE, 2014 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE BUDIHAL R.B. CRIMINAL PETITION NO.2758/2014 BETWEEN: INDRANI BENJAMIN, W/O S.B.SELVARAJ,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh)
1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Meghalaya, Manipur, Tripura, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Criminal Revision No.543 of 2004 & Criminal Revision No.590 of 2004 Criminal
More informationLegislative Brief The Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill, 2012 and Ordinance, 2013
Legislative Brief The Criminal Law (Amendment) Bill, 2012 and, 2013 The Bill was introduced in the Lok Sabha on December 4, 2012 by the Minister of Home Affairs, Mr Sushil Kumar Shinde. It was referred
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 25-01-2007 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.REGUPATHI Crl. Appeal No.859 of 2000 1.Pukkraj 2.Kamalabai 3.Prakash 4.Kishore.. Appellants. Versus State rep.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No of 2015) Versus
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1525 OF 2015 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 9151 of 2015) Shamsher Singh Verma Appellant Versus State of
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MEGHALAYA; MANIPUR; TRIPURA; MIZOAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Page 1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MEGHALAYA; MANIPUR; TRIPURA; MIZOAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL APPEAL 75/2003 Sri Halla Dhar Das, Son of Late Soneswar Das, Village
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM:: NAGALAND:: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRL.A. No.36(J)/2007
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM:: NAGALAND:: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRL.A. No.36(J)/2007 MEGU MANKI -Versus- APPELLANT STATE OF ASSAM RESPONDENT PRESENT HON BLE MRS. JUSTICE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK. CRLMC No Of 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA, CUTTACK CRLMC No. 3031 Of 2006 An application under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in connection with G.R. Case No.844 of 2003 pending on the file of S.D.J.M.,
More informationJ U D G M E N T CRIMINAL APPEAL NO OF 2007 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No of 2006) Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
Supreme Court of India Shaik Mastan Vali vs State Of Andhra Pradesh on 3 August, 2007 Author:. A Pasayat Bench: Dr. Arijit Pasayat, Lokeshwar Singh Panta CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 1003 of 2007 PETITIONER:
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT: ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Criminal Appeal No. 357of 2013 Sri Rabindra Das Appellant -Versus- The State of Assam Respondent -BEFORE- HON
More informationSupreme Court of India. Lallu Manjhi & Anr vs State Of Jharkhand on 7 January, Author: R Lahoti Bench: R.C. Lahoti, Brijesh Kumar.
Supreme Court of India Lallu Manjhi & Anr vs State Of Jharkhand on 7 January, 2003 Author: R Lahoti Bench: R.C. Lahoti, Brijesh Kumar. CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 15 of 2002 PETITIONER: Lallu Manjhi & Anr.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : BORDER SECURITY FORCE ACT, 1968 Date of Decision: W.P.(C) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : BORDER SECURITY FORCE ACT, 1968 Date of Decision: 21.03.2012 W.P.(C) No.1616/2012 Ex. Constable Mohan Kumar Petitioner Versus Union of India & Ors. Respondents
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.672 of 2006 & CRIMINAL M.B. NO.1463 OF 2006 Date of Decision: 14th August, 2007 RADHEY SHYAM Through: Mr. R.K. Thakur
More informationStanding Order. No. Issue Date Issued By Issuing Unit Issuing Branch
Standing Order No. Issue Date Issued By Issuing Unit Issuing Branch 313/2005 21/04/2005 DCP/HDQRS, DELHI Police Head Quarters C&T/PHQ Subject : Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) for investigation of Rape
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL APPEAL (J) NO. 85 OF 2016.
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL APPEAL (J) NO. 85 OF 2016 Lakhindra Gogoi Appellant -Versus- The State of Assam Respondent BEFORE HON BLE
More informationSTATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS
STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, UNPUBLISHED September 9, 2003 v No. 235372 Mason Circuit Court DENNIS RAY JENSEN, LC No. 00-015696 Defendant-Appellant.
More informationIN T H E F IRST C L ASS M A G IST R A T E'S C O UR T. Criminal Case No. 79/94 BETWEEN: Complainant AND: F I L IPE B E C H U Defendant
IN T H E F IRST C L ASS M A G IST R A T E'S C O UR T A T L E V U K A Criminal Case No. 79/94 BETWEEN: ST A T E Complainant AND: F I L IPE B E C H U Defendant JUD G M E N T 2/12/99 The accused Filipe Bechu
More informationSultanabegum vs State Of Maharashtra on 8 February, 2007
Supreme Court of India Author: C Thakker Bench: C.K. Thakker, Lokeshwar Singh Panta CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 141 of 2006 PETITIONER: SAYARABANO @ SULTANABEGUM RESPONDENT: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DATE OF JUDGMENT:
More informationPolice v Herbert Christopher Aldo Pape
Police v Herbert Christopher Aldo Pape 2017 UPW 120 IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF UPW PROV CN 1043/17 POLICE V HERBERT CHRISTOPHER ALDO PAPE RULING On 27 June 2017, Mr Herbert Christopher Aldo Pape was provisionally
More informationLeicestershire Constabulary Counter Allegations Procedure
Leicestershire Constabulary Counter Allegations Procedure This procedure supports the following policy: Counter Allegations Policy Procedure Owner: Department Responsible: Chief Officer Approval: Protective
More informationREPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 308 OF Venkatesan.Appellant. Versus J U D G M E N T
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 308 OF 2001 Venkatesan.Appellant Versus State of Tamil Nadu.Respondent J U D G M E N T Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE. THE HON BLE Mr. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5144 OF 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25 TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE Mr. JUSTICE L. NARAYANA SWAMY CRIMINAL PETITION NO.5144 OF 2015 BETWEEN: SRI SURENDRA BABU R S/O SRI
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL APPEAL (J) NO.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) APPELLANTS 1. Sri Dharmendra Gogoi 2. Sri Chakra Bora CRIMINAL APPEAL (J) NO.14/2004
More informationNagpur Bench at Nagpur allowing Criminal Application No.380 of preferred by the first respondent and thereby quashing the
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Reportable CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1487 OF 2018 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition (Crl.) No.7933 of 2018) NARAYAN MALHARI THORAT Appellant
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI ABA No. 1051 of 2013 Umesh Prasad Gupta.. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Birbal Singh Munda... Opposite Parties Coram : HON BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY.
More informationINDIA Harjit Singh: In continuing pursuit of justice
INDIA Harjit Singh: In continuing pursuit of justice Amnesty International continues to be concerned for the safety of Harjit Singh, an employee of the Punjab State Electricity Board, who was arrested
More informationMEDIA STATEMENT CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH
MEDIA STATEMENT CRIMINAL JUSTICE BRANCH July 3, 2014 14-15 No Charges Approved in IIO Investigations Involving Police Service Dogs Victoria The Criminal Justice Branch (CJB), Ministry of Justice, announced
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Date of Decision: CRL.A. 121/2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : INDIAN PENAL CODE Date of Decision: 01.04.2014 CRL.A. 121/2010 RAHUL & ORS. Through: Mr M.L. Yadav, Adv.... Appellant versus STATE OF DELHI Through: Mr
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 3 rd DAY OF JULY, 2014 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 3 rd DAY OF JULY, 2014 BEFORE THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA BETWEEN WRIT PETITION NO.85369/2013 (GM-RES) ASHOK KADAPPA JADAGOUD
More informationJAMAICA. JEROME ARSCOTT v R. 10 November [1] On 10 February 2011, a young lady went home to find a group of police and
[2014] JMCA Crim 52 JAMAICA IN THE COURT OF APPEAL RESIDENT MAGISTRATES CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 21/2013 BEFORE: THE HON MR JUSTICE DUKHARAN JA THE HON MRS JUSTICE McINTOSH JA THE HON MR JUSTICE BROOKS JA JEROME
More information2. Heard Sri Bhola Singh Patel, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rishad Murtza, learned Government Advocate.
Case :- U/S 482/378/407 No. - 3321 of 2012 Petitioner :- Iqbal And Anr. Respondent :- The State Of U.P Thru Home Secy., U.P Govt. Lucknow And Ors. Petitioner Counsel :- Bhola Singh Patel,Pravin Kumar Verma
More informationDocument references: Prior decisions - Special Rapporteur s rule 91 decision, dated 28 December 1992 (not issued in document form)
HUMAN RIGHTS COMMITTEE Kulomin v. Hungary Communication No. 521/1992 16 March 1994 CCPR/C/50/D/521/1992 * ADMISSIBILITY Submitted by: Vladimir Kulomin Alleged victim: The author State party: Hungary Date
More informationOF LAW, KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY, KURUKSHETRA
INSTITUTE OF LAW, KURUKSHETRA UNIVERSITY, KURUKSHETRA MOOT PROPOSITION 1) Shyama, a poor boy who lived in a slum in the outskirts of the city of Brada in the Republic of Indiana. He studied in a government
More information[2001] QCA 54 COURT OF APPEAL. McMURDO P THOMAS JA WILSON J. No 238 of 2000 THE QUEEN. Applicant BRISBANE JUDGMENT
[2001] QCA 54 COURT OF APPEAL McMURDO P THOMAS JA WILSON J No 238 of 2000 THE QUEEN v S Applicant BRISBANE..DATE 21/02/2001 JUDGMENT 1 21022001 T3/FF14 M/T COA40/2001 THE PRESIDENT: Justice Wilson will
More informationTAMIL NADU S NEW INITIATIVES ON POLICE REFORMS - A COMMONER S PERSPECTIVE: EXERCISES IN SUBTERFUGE By V.P.SARATHI - July 22, 2008
TAMIL NADU S NEW INITIATIVES ON POLICE REFORMS - A COMMONER S PERSPECTIVE: EXERCISES IN SUBTERFUGE By V.P.SARATHI - July 22, 2008 The seven directives of the Supreme Court on bringing new reforms in the
More informationTHE QUEEN TOKO MARCUS PEARSON. Guilty SENTENCE OF MACKENZIE J
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND ROTORUA REGISTRY CRI-2004-070-4342 THE QUEEN 0 V TOKO MARCUS PEARSON Charges: Pleas: Counsel: Sentence: I. Burglary 2. Injuring with intent to cause grievous bodily harm
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Criminal Appeal No 1289 of SK. KHABIR Appellant(s) VERSUS J U D G M E N T
NON REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No 1289 of 2012 SK. KHABIR Appellant(s) VERSUS STATE OF WEST BENGAL Respondent(s) J U D G M E N T N. V. RAMANA,
More informationCHAPTER 17. Lunatics. Part A GENERAL. (b) Lunatics for whose detention in an asylum a reception order has been passed.
Ch. 17 Part A] CHAPTER 17 Lunatics Part A GENERAL 1. Classification Lunatics may be classed as follows: (a) Criminal lunatics. (b) Lunatics for whose detention in an asylum a reception order has been passed.
More informationEDITORIAL NOTE: NAMES AND/OR DETAILS IN THIS JUDGMENT HAVE BEEN ANONYMISED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT ROTORUA CRI [2017] NZDC 3345
EDITORIAL NOTE: NAMES AND/OR DETAILS IN THIS JUDGMENT HAVE BEEN ANONYMISED. IN THE DISTRICT COURT AT ROTORUA CRI-2016-063-001647 [2017] NZDC 3345 NEW ZEALAND POLICE Prosecutor v MANU HENARE Defendant Hearing:
More informationLAWS OF WESTERN SAMOA CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ANALYSIS PART II PROCEDURE FOR PROSECUTION OF OFFENCES. Arrest
LAWS OF WESTERN SAMOA CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ANALYSIS TITLE PART I PRELIMINARY 1. Short title and commencement 2. Interpretation 3. Application PART II PROCEDURE FOR PROSECUTION OF OFFENCES Arrest 4. Arrest
More informationThe Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO, 2012)
The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO, 2012) Need for POCSO Act, 2012: Existing laws (IPC, IT Act, 2000 and JJ Act, 2000) not enough to address sexual offences No specific provisions
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B. A. PATIL. CRIMINAL PETITION No /2016
1 Between: IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 2 ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2017 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B. A. PATIL CRIMINAL PETITION No.201293/2016 1. Budeppagouda S/o Gangannagouda
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA. v. CASE NO.: SC TH DCA CASE NO.: 5D STATE OF FLORIDA,
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA SERGIO CORONA, Petitioner, v. CASE NO.: SC06-1054 5TH DCA CASE NO.: 5D02-2850 STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent. / ON DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
More information1. The location or site where a criminal offence has taken place is called a(n)?
Canadian Law 2204 Criminal Law and he Criminal Trial Process Unit 2 Test Multiple Choice Name: { / 85} 1. The location or site where a criminal offence has taken place is called a(n)? death trap investigative
More informationindependent and effective investigations and reviews PIRC/00444/17 October 2018 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland
independent and effective investigations and reviews PIRC/00444/17 October 2018 Report of a Complaint Handling Review in relation to Police Scotland What we do We obtain all the material information from
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT GULBARGA DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2013 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ANAND BYRAREDDY BETWEEN: CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.1194 OF 2008 1. Sharnabasappa,
More informationIN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 20 OF 2009
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF BELIZE, A.D. 2010 CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 20 OF 2009 BETWEEN: MANUEL FERNANDEZ Appellant AND THE QUEEN Respondent BEFORE: The Hon. Mr. Justice Mottley President The Hon. Mr. Justice
More information$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 48/2015 Date of decision:
$~30 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CRL.REV.P. 48/2015 SHIV KUMAR & ANR. Through: Date of decision: 03.12.2015... Petitioners Mr.Vikas Padora and Mr.Vaibhav Aggarwal, Advocates. STATE versus
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981
81 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981 82 THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981 Rules Contents Page No. 1. Title 83 2. Definition 83
More informationSharda vs State Of Rajasthan on 15 December, 2009 REPORTABLE
Supreme Court of India Author:...J. Bench: Aftab Alam, Deepak Verma Crl.A.No. 699/08 1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA REPORTABLE CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.699 OF 2008 Sharda...Appellant
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM & ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Criminal Petition 21 (AP)2017 Shri Nabam Epo, S/o Lt. Nabam Echo, R/o Tayang Tarang (Emchi) village,
More informationTHE INDIAN PENAL CODE (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2016
AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 303 of 2016 45 of 1860. 5 THE INDIAN PENAL CODE (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2016 By SHRIMATI SUPRIYA SULE, M.P. A BILL further to amend the Indian Penal Code, 1860. BE it enacted
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CRIMINAL M.C. NO.3015 OF 2012 Decided on : 4th January, 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT :CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CRIMINAL M.C. NO.3015 OF 2012 Decided on : 4th January, 2013 KRANTA AAKASH @ PRAKASH KUMAR Through: Mr. Rakesh Singh, Advocate.
More informationSummary of Investigation SiRT File # Referral from RCMP - PEI December 4, 2017
Summary of Investigation SiRT File # 2017-036 Referral from RCMP - PEI December 4, 2017 John L. Scott Interim Director June 12, 2018 Background: On December 4, 2017, SiRT Interim Director, John Scott,
More informationDOMESTIC ENQUIRY NEED FOR DOMESTIC ENQUIRY
DOMESTIC ENQUIRY NEED FOR DOMESTIC ENQUIRY For the smooth functioning of an industry, the defined codes of discipline, contracts of service by awards, agreements and standing orders must be adhered to.
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, MICHAEL BRUCE CAMERON DOB: 07/16/1962 1002 MARIAN ST ST PAUL, MN 55110 Defendant. Prosecutor File No. Court File No. District Court
More informationTHE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES (TRIBUNALS) ACT, 1973
THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES (TRIBUNALS) ACT, 1973 (ACT NO. XIX OF 1973). [20th July, 1973] An Act to provide for the detention, prosecution and punishment of persons for genocide, crimes against humanity,
More informationAnil Goswami Appellant( Cr. Apl. No. 485 of 2009) Ashok Rawani Appellant(Cr. Apl. No. 625 of 2009) -Versus-
Criminal Appeal (S.J.) No.485 of 2009 With Criminal Appeal(S.J.) No. 625 of 2009 --- Against the common judgment of conviction dated 8.5.2009 and order of sentence dated 12.5.2009 passed by Shri Vijay
More informationIN THE KINGSTON-UPON-THAMES COUNTY COURT. Before: DISTRICT JUDGE JOHN SMART. - and -
IN THE KINGSTON-UPON-THAMES COUNTY COURT No. C00KT674 St James s Road Kingston-upon-Thames Surrey KT1 2AD Thursday, 13 th October 2016 Before: DISTRICT JUDGE JOHN SMART B E T W E E N : LONDON BOROUGH OF
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA. CRIMINAL PETITION No.7191/2015
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17 th DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.CHANDRASHEKARA CRIMINAL PETITION No.7191/2015 BETWEEN: HEMANTH @ HEMANTH SINGH
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CIV [2016] NZHC SHAUN JOHN BOLTON Appellant
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND CHRISTCHURCH REGISTRY CIV-2016-409-000046 [2016] NZHC 1297 BETWEEN AND SHAUN JOHN BOLTON Appellant NEW ZEALAND POLICE Respondent Hearing: 14 June 2016 Appearances: D J
More informationIN THE COURT OF SESSIONS, BAMBI THANE. At Barata
IN THE COURT OF SESSIONS, BAMBI THANE At Barata S.C. No 123 of 2014 In the matter of Sec 227, 385, 501 and 502 of BPC read with Sec 120 B and Section 34 of Barata Penal Code State of Bambi Prosecution
More informationTHE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES (TRIBUNALS) ACT, 1973
THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMES (TRIBUNALS) ACT, 1973 (ACT NO. XIX OF 1973). [20th July, 1973] An Act to provide for the detention, prosecution and punishment of persons for genocide, crimes against humanity,
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) APPELLANTS 1) Tafar Tappo 2) Milkush Lekra CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.13(J)/2005 By advocate
More informationDomestic. Violence. In the State of Florida. Beware. Know Your Rights Get a Lawyer. Ruth Ann Hepler, Esq. & Michael P. Sullivan, Esq.
Domestic Violence In the State of Florida Beware Know Your Rights Get a Lawyer Ruth Ann Hepler, Esq. & Michael P. Sullivan, Esq. Introduction You ve been charged with domestic battery. The judge is threatening
More informationCHILDREN AND YOUNG PERSONS
Print Close Ordinance Nos, 48 of 1939 13 of 1944 42 of 1944 12 of 1945 Act Nos, 47 of 1956 2 of 1978 Short title and date of operation- CHILDREN AND YOUNG PERSONS AN ORDINANCE TO MAKE PROVISION FOR THE
More informationTHE CRIMINAL LAW (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2010 BILL
DRAFT 31.3.2010 THE CRIMINAL LAW (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2010 A BILL Further to amend the Indian Penal Code, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. BE it enacted by Parliament
More informationTHE CRIMINAL LAW (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) ORDINANCE, 1968
THE CRIMINAL LAW (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) ORDINANCE, 1968 SECTIONS 1. Short title and extent. 2. Definitions. 3. Trial of scheduled offences. (W.P. Ord. II of 1968) C O N T E N T S 4. Cognizance of scheduled
More informationCRL.APPEAL No. 97/2005
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MEGHALAYA; MANIPUR; TRIPURA; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRL.APPEAL No. 97/2005 1. Abu Taher, S/o Nurul Haque 2. Basiruddin Choudhury S/o Lt. Arzad
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) CRIMINAL APPEAL 98 OF 2010 Md. Abdur Rezzak Ahmed -Accused-appellant - Versus - The State of Assam - Opposite
More informationQ. What is Bail? Q. What is a Bailable and Non-Bailable offence?
Q. What is Bail? The purpose of arrest and detention of a person is primarily to make sure that the person appears before the court at the time of trial and if he is found guilty and is sentenced to imprisonment,
More informationTHE QUEEN. D M Wilson QC for Crown C M Clews for Prisoner SENTENCE OF RANDERSON J
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND HAMILTON REGISTRY T.013648 THE QUEEN V BOWEN PUTOA NEHA MANIHERA Date: 3 February 2003 Counsel: Sentence: D M Wilson QC for Crown C M Clews for Prisoner Four years imprisonment
More informationThe Complainant submits this complaint to the Court and states that there is probable cause to believe Defendant committed the following offense(s):
State of Minnesota County of Hennepin State of Minnesota, vs. Plaintiff, YEVGENIY SAVENOK DOB: 08/07/1985 17190 PARK CIRCLE EDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55346 Defendant. District Court 4th Judicial District Prosecutor
More informationversus CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.TEJI
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Judgment delivered on : December 11, 2015 + BAIL APPLN. 1596/2015 & Crl.M.A. Nos.7527/2015 & 7810/2015 HARI SINGH Through: versus... Petitioner Mr.Deepak Prakash,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) [REPORTABLE] Case No: A59/15 JUDGMENT: 22 MARCH 2016
In the matter between: IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA (WESTERN CAPE DIVISION, CAPE TOWN) [REPORTABLE] Case No: A59/15 MOSES SILO Appellant vs THE STATE Respondent JUDGMENT: 22 MARCH 2016 HENNEY J Introduction
More informationJUDGMENT (Arising out of S.L.P. (Crl.) No of 2005) ARIJIT PASAYAT, J.
Supreme Court of India Bhupinder Singh & Ors vs Jarnail Singh & Anr on 13 July, 2006 Author: A Pasayat Bench: Arijit Pasayat, S.H. Kapadia CASE NO.: Appeal (crl.) 757 of 2006 PETITIONER: Bhupinder Singh
More informationI TE KŌTI PĪRA O AOTEAROA CA116/2017 [2018] NZCA 477. CHRISTOPHER ROBERT HALPIN Appellant. THE QUEEN Respondent JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
NOTE: PUBLICATION OF NAMES, ADDRESSES, OCCUPATIONS OR IDENTIFYING PARTICULARS OF COMPLAINANTS PROHIBITED BY SS 203 AND 204 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 2011. IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF NEW ZEALAND I TE
More information