09 P'!"l 16 PM 3 : 17

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "09 P'!"l 16 PM 3 : 17"

Transcription

1 NOV : CYRUS J. NOWNEJAD ( State Bar No ) LAW OFFICES OF CYRUS & CYRUS, PLC 993 South Santa Monica Boulevard Beverly Hills, CA 901 Ph : (310) Fax : (310) Attorneys for Plaintiff Tila Nguyen P.01 i P'!"l 16 PM 3 : 17 SkP ; `1{ {O J i y!ai T SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TILA NGUYEN, an individual, vs. Plaintiff, SHAWNE MERRIMAN, an individual ; and DOES 1 through 0, inclusive, Defendants. CASE N cu-po-ctl FOR : 1. ASSAULT. BATTERY 3. FALSE IMPRISONMENT. INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS. DOMESTIC VIOLENCE (Civil Code Section ) PLAINTIFF TILA NGUYEN alleges as follows, based on infonnation and belief : GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 1. Plaintiff Tila Nguyen aka Tila Tequila (" Plaintiff ') is, and at all times mentioned herein, was a resident of Los Angeles County, in the State of California.. Defendant Shawne Merriman ("Defendant") is, and at all times mentioned herein, was a resident of San Diego County, in the State of California. -1-

2 NOV : F'. bz 3. The true names and capacities of the Defendants sued herein as DOES I through 0 ("Does"), inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiff who therefore has sued said Defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff will seek leave to amend this Complaint to set forth their true names and capacities when the same are ascertained. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that each of the Defendants sued herein as a Doe is, and at all times material hereto was, legally responsible in some manner for one or more of the acts, omissions, breaches, occurrences, losses and damages herein complained of, and further, that each Doe is, and at all times material hereto was, acting as an agent, servant, employee, representative, managing agent, partner, principal alter ego, affiliate, or co-conspirator of one or more of the other Defendants, with the knowledge, consent, and ratification of such other Defendants in causing or permitting the acts, omissions, breaches, occurrences, losses and damages herein complained o Plaintiffs are informed and believe that each of the Does 1 through 0 is a business, form unknown, whose principle place of business in Los Angeles County, and each of the Does 10 through 0 are individuals who reside in Los Angles County.. Plaintiff is, and at all times mentioned herein, was a famous model for Playboy and television personality, in the State of California. Plaintiff has appeared in numerous productions as a host and/or actress, including, but not limited to, "I Now Pronounce You Chuck & Larry," "A Shot at Love with Tila Tequila," "A Shot at Love with Tila Tequila," "MTV Video Music Awards 008," "MTV Spring Break : Tila Tequila's Spring Break Fantasy Couple," "Tila Tequila's New Year's Eve Masquerade 008," and "Pants-Off Dance-Off." Attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit 1 is a sampling of Plaintiff's credits as an actress and photographs of Plaintiff.. Defendant is, and at all times mentioned herein, was a leading NFL professional football player that is an outside linebacker for the San Diego Chargers, in the State of California. --

3 NOV : 11 P. a.i Attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Exhibit are pictures of Defendant. 6. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereupon alleges as follows : STATEMENT OF FACTS Plaintiff and Defendant met on July, 009, and began spending time together periodically. On or about Friday, September, 009, Plaintiff and Defendant spent the evening together in Plaintiffs hotel room. Plaintiff planned to spend the next few days with Defendant in his home, and moved her belongings to his home the following morning. 8. On the night of September, 009, Plaintiff and Defendant began to dispute regarding Defendant's temper, his drug use and derogatory comments toward Plaintiff. Plaintiff told Defendant that she refused to take any drugs. Defendant was upset by her response and told Plaintiff, "You don't have a choice." 9. After leaving a nightclub co-owned by Defendant around 1 :30 AM, Plaintiff got into a car with Defendant, Jay Rich, Amanda, Krystelle and Cindy and headed to Defendant's home. Defendant's friends, Randy and Chris, followed in a separate car. Shortly after arriving to Defendant's home, Plaintiff and Defendant entered into another dispute. In the time that they had dated and stayed the night together, Plaintiff had begun to notice that Defendant had a short temper and that he acted with a lot of disrespect towards her and women in general. In fact, Defendant nay ac q-_"--d 0 -,. k--qme "Lights Out" for his hard hits and aggressive demeanor. Defendant also made numerous attempts to force i, ;~ Irtiff to do things against her will. However, Plaintiff told Defendant that it was not acceptable to speak to her in that,o=o of disrespect. Moreover, Defendant made derogatory remarks to Plaintiff and humiliated her because of her bisexuality. Plaintiff, a Women's Rights and Gay Rights Supporter, tried to explain to Defendant that her bi-sexuality did not give him a right to speak to her in such a disrespectful manner. Plaintiff then told Defendant she was against his personal drug use (steroids, ecstasy, pot), his -3-

4 NOV : P violent behavior, hearing that Defendant had slept with a minor (Amanda), and Jay Rich's manufacturing of ecstasy in Defendant's home with Defendant's consent and aid. Plaintiff was upset at having just learned of Defendant's aforementioned admissions and surreptitious conduct. As a result, Plaintiff told Defendant that she wanted to leave and go to her home. 10. Defendant, afraid that Plaintiff would disclose said surreptitious conduct and admissions to the public, refused to let Plaintiff leave his home. Defendant began to chase Plaintiff down the hall. As she was leaving, he grabbed Plaintiff by her arms, and as she tried to break free, Defendant continued to hold her and shake her like a "rag doll." Defendant weighs 80 pounds and is 6'" while Plaintiff is '1 1 " and weighs 93 pounds. (See pictures of Defendant's size, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein as Exhibit 1). Defendant is also known to be one of the strongest and fastest line backers in the NFL. Defendant next aggressively and forcefully threw Plaintiff to the couch, causing her fear, apprehension, and bodily harm to her jaw, neck, anus and back. Defendant then began to choke Plaintiff until she almost passed out. Tears began to come down Plaintiff's face as she begged hiin to let her go. Plaintiff could not breathe, and her vision began to black out. Plaintiff thought Defendant was going to kill Plaintiff when Defendant was choking her. Nevertheless, Defendant continued to choke Plaintiff. 11. When Defendant finally released his hold on Plaintiff's neck, she went over to where her belongings were, as well as the other house guests. Amanda immediately reached out to Plaintiff so that she could leave Defendant's home. Meanwhile, the Defendant and the other house guests associated with Defendant began to yell and scream. Out of fear and apprehension, Plaintiff and Amanda ran directly to the bathroom, located in Defendant's bedroom, and locked the door. Their fears continued to grow and they began to cry as the other guests made numerous attempts to open the bathroom door. Plaintiff made every effort to keep her and Amanda safe by --

5 NOV : P.0 keeping the bathroom door shut. 1. After a while, Plaintiff could hear that Defendant and the other house guests had moved over to the kitchen area. Amanda then stepped out of the bathroom for a moment, when Defendant, Jay and Randy barged into the bathroom and locked the door behind them. They told Plaintiff that she needed to talk to Defendant. However Plaintiff refused, and before long Jay and Randy walked out and left Defendant with Plaintiff. Defendant' s aggressive intimidation continued towards Plaintiff. Shortly thereafter, Defendant began to punch his hands together aggressively in front of Plaintiff. Defendant progressively got louder as he continued to yell at Plaintiff. Feeling completely unsafe and terrified, Plaintiff ran out of the bathroom towards the kitchen in search of Amanda for help. Plaintiff never saw Amanda again. 13. As Plaintiff went outside to the pool area, she was followed by Defendant once again. home. Plaintiff reiterated to Defendant that she simply wanted to get her suitcase and leave his However, when Plaintiff asked Defendant' s friends and family about her suitcase, no one would admit to taking it. Additionally, they all ignored Plaintiff' s cries for help to keep Defendant away from Plaintiff. Then, as Plaintiff tried to inquire about Amanda's whereabouts, Defendant 's family and friends (i.e., Jay Rich, Krystelle, Randy and Defendant ) started to come towards her in what appeared to be an entrapping and threatening manner until she was cornered. Plaintiff told them that if they did not back away from her and give her back her things, she would call 'Lc p. -!ice since she was afraid from e -erything that had transpired earlier. The moment one person took a step closer to Plaintiff, she called the police. Yet it was not until Plaintiff said, "Hello, " into the phone that everyone backed off from Plaintiff. The first moment she could, Plaintiff ran outside of Defendant 's home. 1. Plaintiff remained in a state of fear while she waited for the police to arrive. Plaintiff asked the woman who answered the 911 call to stay on the line with her because --

6 NOV : P.06 1 Defendant would not leave her alone. Defendant just kept telling Plaintiff, "I'll give you your 3 things back if you let me just talk to you" to attempt to persuade Plaintiff not to speak to the public about Defendant's aforementioned admissions and surreptitious conduct. But when Plaintiff told Defendant that at this point she just wanted her suitcase back, Defendant told her that he would not give it back to her. Before long, the woman on the line finally stated to Plaintiff that the Deputy had arrived to Defendant's gated house. Plaintiff could see the flashing lights and immediately ran over towards the lights. 1. The police officers quickly separated Defendant and Plaintiff. Plaintiff asked the police officers for their help to get her suitcase out of Defendant's home. However, her suitcase was not brought out. Plaintiff then started talking to the police officers. They asked her if she had been drinking that night, wherein she truthfully responded, "Absolutely not." They next asked her to fill out some paperwork. After a couple of hours passed, Plaintiff got her suitcase back from Defendant with the help of police. With Defendant standing nearby her suitcase, Plaintiff began to calmly exchange words with Defendant in the presence of the police officers. It was at this time that Defendant made a minimum of three admissions in the presence of three to five police officers that he had in fact choked Plaintiff earlier that evening. When Plaintiff asked the police officers to take note of Defendant's admissions, they quickly advised Defendant to stay quiet. 16. Shortly thereafter, Plaintiff asked the police officers to call the ambulance for her since Plaintiffs pain had escalated as time went on. After having spent about three hours with the police officers, Plaintiff was finally taken to the hospital. Meanwhile, Defendant was arrested and taken away by the police. Defendant posted bail. 17. As a result of the violent assault and battery committed on the evening of September, 009, Defendant caused Plaintiff to suffer fear, apprehension, and emotional -6-

7 NOV :6 r.e'r distress. Further, as a result of the physical attack by Defendant, Plaintiff has suffered great 3 6 bodily harm, deep humiliation and embarrassment. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (ASSAULT) 18. Plaintiff re-alleges Paragraphs 1-17 of the General Allegations and incorporates them by reference, as though fully set forth at length herein. 19. On or about September, 009, at the approximate hour of 11 :00 p.m., Plaintiff and Defendant entered into a dispute regarding Defendant's temper, his drug use and derogatory comments toward Plaintiff. Plaintiff clearly expressed that she did not want to take any drugs being offered to her. Upset by her response, Defendant firmly told Plaintiff, "You don't have a choice." 0. On or about September 6, 009, at the approximate hour of 1 :30 a.m., Plaintiff, Defendant and Defendant's brother arrived at Defendant's home. At said time and place, Defendant and Plaintiff entered into a dispute regarding Defendant's personal drug use of steroids, ecstasy and pot, his violent behavior, his allegedly having slept with a minor, as well as Defendant's brother's involvement with and manufacturing of drugs. This upset Defendant because he did not want Plaintiff to disclose this information to the public, and in response, he threatened Plaintiff and began to chase her down the hall. 1. On two separate occasions, Defendant intended to cause and did cause Plaintiff to suffer the apprehension of a harmful contact.. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's conduct, Plaintiff suffered extreme mental anguish and physical pain. These injuries have caused Plaintiff to suffer general damages in an amount to be determined by proof at trial. Plaintiff does not know at this time the exact amount of expenses that have been incurred and that will be incurred in the fixture. -7-

8 NOV :6 P As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's conduct, Plaintiff was required to obtain medical services and treatment in an amount to be determined by proof at trial, and will, in the future, be compelled to incur additional obligations for medical treatment in an amount to be determined by proof at trial. Plaintiff does not know at this time the exact amount of expenses that have been incurred and that will be incurred in the future.. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's conduct, Plaintiff is also entitled to recover punitive damages. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (BATTERY). Plaintiff re-alleges Paragraphs 1- of the General Allegations and the First Cause of Action, and incorporates them by reference, as though fully set forth at length herein. 6. After Plaintiff told Defendant that she wanted to leave Defendant's home, Defendant intentionally struck Plaintiff when he chased her down the hall, grabbed her by the arms, forcefully shook her and then choked her. The force used by Defendant caused Plaintiff to be thrown against Defendant's couch and damage her neck, arms and back. Plaintiff was left with a significant amount of bruises. 7. Defendant struck Plaintiff without her consent. 8. Defendant intended to cause and did cause a harmful contact with Plaintiff's person. 9. As a direct and proximate result of said acts by Defendant, Plaintiff suffered injuries to her jaw, neck, arms and back. Plaintiff also suffered extreme mental anguish and physical pain and suffering. These injuries have caused Plaintiff to suffer general damages in an amount to be determined by proof at trial. Plaintiff does not know at this time the exact amount of expenses that have been incurred and that will be incurred in the future. -8-

9 NOV :6 V1. e7 30. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's conduct, Plaintiff was required to 3 6 obtain medical services and treatment in an amount to be determined by proof at trial, and will, in the future, be compelled to incur additional obligations for medical treatment in an amount to be determined by proof at trial. Plaintiff does not know at this time the exact amount of expenses that have been incurred and that will be incurred in the future. 31. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant's conduct, Plaintiff is also entitled to recover punitive damages. THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION (FALSE IMPRISONMENT) 3. Plaintiff re-alleges Paragraphs 1-31 of the General Allegations and the First and P Second Causes of Action, and incorporates them by reference, as though fully set forth at length herein. 33. Soon after Plaintiff and Defendant began to dispute on the evening of September 6, 009, Plaintiff told Defendant she wanted to leave his home. Defendant intentionally prevented Plaintiff from leaving his home when he grabbed her by the arms, shook her, threw her against the couch and choked her. Unable to breathe and with tears running down her face, Plaintiff began to black out. Finally, Defendant released his hold on Plaintiff's neck. 3. Defendant continued to physically restrain Plaintiff from leaving his home, while making vocal threats, throughout the evening. As a direct result of Defendant's conduct, Plaintiff, who was in great fear for her physical safety, was compelled to remain in Defendant's home against her will. 3. As a direct and proximate result of said acts by Defendants, Plaintiff suffered injury to her physical and mental health, embarrassment, humiliation, fear, anxiety, emotional distress and injury to her reputation. As a result, Plaintiff is entitled to compensatory damages -9 -

10 NOV :6 P.10 1 under Civil Code Section Based on Defendant's conduct, Plaintiff is also entitled to punitive damages under Civil Code Section 39. Plaintiff does not know at this time the exact amount of expenses that have been incurred and that will be incurred in the future. FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION (INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS) 36. Plaintiff re-alleges Paragraphs 1-3 of the General Allegations and the First, Second and Third Causes of Action, and incorporates them by reference, as though fully set forth at length herein. 37. Defendant's conduct was outrageous when he chased Plaintiff down the hall, grabbed her by the arms, forcefully shook her, threw her against the couch and then choked her. 38. Defendant acted intentionally when he committed assault, battery and false imprisonment against Plaintiff. 39. As a result of Defendant's conduct, Plaintiff suffered severe emotional distress. 0. The conduct of the Defendant was the proximate cause of the emotional distress that Plaintiff has suffered. 1. As a direct and proximate result of said acts by Defendant, Plaintiff is entitled to recover for her emotional distress, particularly the mental anguish, shock, distress, humiliation, fright, anxiety, shame, apprehension and emotional embarrassment Plaintiff has suffered. Moreover, Plaintiff is entitled to recover for any bodily harm which has resulted from her emotional distress. Plaintiff is also entitled to recover any economic losses which have resulted from her emotional distress or its physical consequences, including but not limited to, Plaintiff's medical expenses, Psychiatric expenses, hospitalization, loss of earnings, and loss of earning capacity. Plaintiff does not know at this time the exact amount of expenses that have been incurred and that will be incurred in the future

11 NOV :7 P.11 1 FIFTH CAUSE OF ACTION (DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, Civil Code Section ) 3. Plaintiff re-alleges Paragraphs 1-1 of the General Allegations and the First, Second, Third and Fourth Causes of Action, and incorporates them by reference, as though fully set forth at length herein. 3. California Civil Code Section provides that "(a) A person is liable for the tort of domestic violence if the plaintiff proves both of the following elements : (1) The infliction of injury upon the plaintiff resulting from abuse.... () The abuse was committed by the defendant, a person having a relationship with the plaintiff....". Plaintiff and Defendant were involved in a dating relationship on or about ~, o m ma ~ a i.. N September -6, 009. During that time period, Plaintiff moved her belongings to Defendant's home and was spending the night in Defendant's home. Moreover, Plaintiff and Defendant were spending all of their free-time together.. Defendant intentionally, or at a minimum recklessly, caused and/or attempted to cause great bodily injury to Plaintiff when Defendant when he chased Plaintiff down the hall then grabbed Plaintiff by her arms, shook her, threw her against the couch and choked her until she almost blacked out. 6. Defendant also intentionally, or at a minimum recklessly, placed Plaintiff in reasonable apprehension of imminent serious bodily injury to herself when Defendant chased Plaintiff down the hall then grabbed Plaintiff by her arms, shook her, threw her against the couch and choked her until she almost blacked out. 7. As a result of Defendant's conduct, Plaintiff suffered injuries to her jaw, neck, anus and back. 8. The conduct of the Defendant was the proximate cause of the injuries that Plaintiff -11 -

12 NOV :7 P.1 has suffered. 9. As a direct and proximate result of said acts by Defendant, Plaintiff suffered extreme mental anguish and physical pain and suffering. Thus, Plaintiff is entitled to general damages, special damages, and punitive damages pursuant to Civil Code Section 39. Moreover, the court may grant Plaintiff equitable relief, an injunction, costs, and any other relief that the court deems proper, including Plaintiff s reasonable attorney's fees. Plaintiff does not know at this time the exact amount of expenses that have been incurred and that will be incurred in the future. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against Defendants, and each of them, for : On the FIRST COUNT : 1. For general damages for mental anguish and physical pain according to proof,. For special damages for medical and related expenses according to proof, and 3. For lost wages according to proof. On the SECOND COUNT : 1. For general damages for physical injuries and mental anguish according to proof,. For special damages for medical and related expenses according to proof, and 3. For lost wages according to proof. On the THIRD COUNT : 1. For general damages for injury to her physical and mental health, embarrassment, humiliation, fear, anxiety, emotional distress and injury to her reputation according to proof;. For special damages for medical and related expenses according to proof, and 3. For lost wages according to proof. H -1-

13 NOV :7 P.13 TOTAL P.13 1 On the FOURTH COUNT : For general damages for emotional distress, particularly the mental anguish, shock, distress, humiliation, fright, anxiety, shame, apprehension and emotional embarrassment according to proof,. For special damages for medical and related expenses according to proof, and 3. For lost wages according to proof; On the FIFTH COUNT : 1. For general damages for extreme mental anguish and physical pain and suffering according to proof;. For special damages according to proof ; 3. For punitive damages according to proof;. For Attorney's fees ;. For an injunction ; and 6. For such other and further relief as the court may deem proper. On ALL COUNTS : 1. For interest at the legal rate according to proof ;. For costs of suit incurred herein ; and 3. For such other and further relief as the court may deem proper. Dated : November 16, 009 LAW OFFICES OF CYRUS & CYRUS, PLC By : L C Nownejad, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiff TILA NGUYEN -13-

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL BRANCH -- UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CENTRAL BRANCH -- UNLIMITED JURISDICTION DLS/D ERFSIFIED LEGAL SERVICES, INC 1-0- FILro CIVIL SUSINESS OFFICE ; 1- RAL DIVISION 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 P. CHRISTOPHER ARDALAN, SB# ARDALAN & ASSOCIATES, PLC 0 Canoga Ave., Suite Woodland Hills, CA 1 Telephone:

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service Case Case 2:08-cv-02695-STA-tmp 2:08-zz-09999 Document Document 806 1 Filed Filed 10/15/2008 Page Page 1 of 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE WESTERN DIVISION

More information

Case 2:19-cv RSWL-SS Document 14 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:164

Case 2:19-cv RSWL-SS Document 14 Filed 02/19/19 Page 1 of 12 Page ID #:164 Case :-cv-000-rswl-ss Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 0 Genie Harrison, SBN Mary Olszewska, SBN 0 Amber Phillips, SBN 00 GENIE HARRISON LAW FIRM, APC W. th Street, Suite 0 Los Angeles, CA 00 T:

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA FOR SANTA CRUZ COUNTY 1 1 1 Darrell J. York, Esq. (SBN 1 Sarah L. Garvey, Esq. (SBN 1 Law Offices of York & Garvey 1 N. Larchmont Blvd., #0 Los Angeles, CA 000 Telephone: ( 0- Facsimile: ( -0 Email: djylaw@gmail.com Email:

More information

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1. Deadline UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/24/18 Page 1 of 10 Page ID #:1. Deadline UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00 Document Filed 0// Page of Page ID #: 0 LAW OFFICES OF PERRY C. WANDER Perry Wander, Esq. (SBN: ) Wilshire Blvd., Penthouse Beverly Hills, CA 0 Telephone: -- Facsimile: -- pcwlaw@msn.com pcwlawyer.com

More information

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7

Case 3:14-cv BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7 Case 3:14-cv-01601-BR Document 1 Filed 10/09/14 Page 1 of 7 PAMELA S. HEDIGER, OSB #913099 pam@eechlaw.com LAURIE J. HART, OSB #052766 laurie@eechlaw.com PO Box 781-0781 Telephone: 541.754.0303 Fax: 541.754.1455

More information

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5

Case3:05-cv WHA Document1 Filed02/14/05 Page1 of 5 Case:0-cv-00-WHA Document Filed0//0 Page of Wayne Johnson, SBN: Law Offices of Wayne Johnson P.O. Box 0 Oakland, CA 0 (0) - Attorney for Plaintiffs 0 LYNART COLLINS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES - CENTRAL DISTRICT GHAZIAN LAW GROUP NIKI GHAZIAN, SBN PATRICK SANTOS, SBN Century Park East Seventeenth Floor #0 Los Angeles, CA 00 Phone: () 0- Attorneys for Plaintiff NICHOLAS GOODWIN SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

More information

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM

INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM To: Jeffrey F. Rosen, District Attorney From: Cindy Seeley Hendrickson, Supervising Deputy District Attorney; Lindsay Walsh, Deputy District Attorney Cc: James Gibbons-Shapiro, Assistant

More information

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 Case: 1:12-cv-04082 Document #: 1 Filed: 05/25/12 Page 1 of 24 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION LORETTA MURPHY, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v.

More information

Case 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION

Case 5:17-cv Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION Case 5:17-cv-00007 Document 2 Filed in TXSD on 01/17/17 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LAREDO DIVISION MARCEL C. NOTZON, III, Individually vs. CAUSE NO. CITY

More information

Case 1:11-cv JBS-AMD Document 37 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Case 1:11-cv JBS-AMD Document 37 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID: 223 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 111-cv-02300-JBS-AMD Document 37 Filed 06/27/12 Page 1 of 16 PageID 223 MARK B. FROST & ASSOCIATES BY Mark B. Frost BY Ryan M. Lockman Pier 5 at Penn s Landing 7 N. Columbus Blvd. Philadelphia, PA

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case:-cv-0-VC Document Filed// Page of RACHEL LEDERMAN (SBN 0) Rachel Lederman & Alexsis C. Beach Attorneys at Law Capp Street San Francisco, CA Telephone:..00; Fax:..0 Email: rachel@beachledermanlaw.com

More information

Case 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17

Case 2:17-cv JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17 Case 2:17-cv-14382-JEM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/01/2017 Page 1 of 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO.: KELLY DOE, vs. Plaintiff, EVAN CRAMER,

More information

Case 3:15-cv JLS-JMA Document 1 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JURISDICTION AND VENUE

Case 3:15-cv JLS-JMA Document 1 Filed 06/26/15 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JURISDICTION AND VENUE Case :-cv-0-jls-jma Document Filed 0// Page of Andrew C. Schwartz (State Bar No. ) A Professional Corporation North California Blvd., Walnut Creek, California Telephone: () - Facsimile: () - schwartz@cmslaw.com

More information

Case 1:14-cv Document 10 Filed in TXSD on 09/25/14 Page 1 of 11

Case 1:14-cv Document 10 Filed in TXSD on 09/25/14 Page 1 of 11 Case 1:14-cv-00133 Document 10 Filed in TXSD on 09/25/14 Page 1 of 11 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BROWNSVILLE DIVISION DIGNA O. QUEZADA CUEVAS, Plaintiff, v.

More information

GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY PH: F: Attorneys for Plaintiff

GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY PH: F: Attorneys for Plaintiff POMPELIO, FOREMAN & GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY 07981 PH: 973-240-7313 F: 973-240-7316 Attorneys for Plaintiff SANDY ZIOLKOWSKI, vs. Plaintiff, DREW UNIVERSITY, KIRSTEN

More information

Case: 3:12-cv JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/21/12 1 of 7. PageID #: 1

Case: 3:12-cv JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/21/12 1 of 7. PageID #: 1 Case: 3:12-cv-02380-JZ Doc #: 1 Filed: 09/21/12 1 of 7. PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION ALFONSO VASQUEZ-PALAFOX, ) ) No. Plaintiff, )

More information

Case 1:12-cv JEB Document 1 Filed 01/17/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, v. No.

Case 1:12-cv JEB Document 1 Filed 01/17/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Plaintiff, v. No. Case 1:12-cv-00066-JEB Document 1 Filed 01/17/12 Page 1 of 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LAWRENCE MILLER 1285 Brentwood Road, NE Apartment # 3 Washington, DC 20019, Plaintiff,

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY NO. Plaintiff CESAR SANCHEZ-GUZMAN, by and through his attorneys, hereby states

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY NO. Plaintiff CESAR SANCHEZ-GUZMAN, by and through his attorneys, hereby states 1 CESAR SANCHEZ-GUZMAN, v. BRYAN SINGER, SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON FOR KING COUNTY Plaintiff, Defendant. NO. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES Plaintiff CESAR SANCHEZ-GUZMAN, by and through his attorneys,

More information

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1

Case 6:14-cv JDL Document 1 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 Case 6:14-cv-00227-JDL Document 1 Filed 03/26/14 Page 1 of 11 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION ROBERT SCOTT MCCOLLOM Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF BUTTE UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 1 1 1 0 1 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. 1) Americans for Safe Access Webster St., Suite 0 Oakland, CA Telephone: () - Fax: () 1-0 Counsel for Plaintiffs IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.:

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON. Case No.: IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT CHARLESTON DREW WILLIAMS, JASON PRICE, COURTNEY SHANNON vs. Plaintiffs, CITY OF CHARLESTON, JAY GOLDMAN, in his individual

More information

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID #: 0 Morris S. Getzels, Esq. (SBN 0 MORRIS S. GETZELS Law Office 0 Tampa Avenue, Suite 0 Tarzana, CA - Telephone ( -0 or ( -000 Facsimile ( - email: morris@getzelslaw.com

More information

Case3:09-cv EMC Document1 Filed08/28/09 Page1 of 8

Case3:09-cv EMC Document1 Filed08/28/09 Page1 of 8 Case:0-cv-00-EMC Document Filed0//0 Page of LAW OFFICES OF PANOS LAGOS Panos Lagos, Esq. / SBN 0 Woodminster Lane Oakland, CA 0 ( 0)0-0 ( 0)0-FAX panoslagos@aol.com Attorney for Plaintiff, OSCAR JULIUS

More information

Case 4:04-cv SBA Document 48-1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 13

Case 4:04-cv SBA Document 48-1 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 13 Case :0-cv-00-SBA Document - Filed 0//0 Page of Andrew C. Schwartz (State Bar No. ) Thom Seaton (State Bar No. ) A Professional Corporation California Plaza North California Blvd., Walnut Creek, California

More information

Case 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7

Case 2:06-cv FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7 Case 2:06-cv-05977-FSH-PS Document 20 Filed 01/10/08 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY -------------------------------------------------------X SALEEM LIGHTY, -against- Plaintiff,

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA HELENA DIVISION Case 6:13-cv-00042-DLC Document 17 Filed 05/28/14 Page 1 of 9 LINDLIEF HALL LAW OFFICE BRENDA LINDLIEF HALL P.O. Box 44 Helena, MT 59624 (406) 459-8309 (telephone) blh@blhmtlaw.com (email) Attorney for

More information

FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

FOR THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) LAWYERS 0 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE P.O. BOX 1 SANTA MONICA, CALIFORNIA 00-1 TEL. ( -00 FAX. ( - BROWNE GREENE, State Bar No. 1 MARK T. QUIGLEY, State Bar No. Plaintiffs Attorneys for (SPACE BELOW FOR

More information

Plaintiff. Defendants.

Plaintiff. Defendants. Case 4:15 Document 39 Filed 06/18/15 Page 1 of 16 PageID #: 296 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION Plaintiff, vs. MIKE RIBEIRO and TAMARA WILLIAMS, CIVIL

More information

)(

)( Case 1:07-cv-03339-MGC Document 1 Filed 04/26/07 Page 1 of 20 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK -----------------------------------------------------------)( LUMUMBA BANDELE, DJIBRIL

More information

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11

Case 3:18-cv JSC Document 1 Filed 05/02/18 Page 1 of 11 Case :-cv-0-jsc Document Filed 0/0/ Page of WILLIAM C. JOHNSON, ESQ. (State Bar No. ) BENNETT & JOHNSON, LLP 0 Harrison Street, Suite 00 Oakland, California Telephone: (0) -00 Facsimile: (0) -0 william@bennettjohnsonlaw.com

More information

EFiled: Jan :11AM EST Transaction ID Case No. S19C ESB IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

EFiled: Jan :11AM EST Transaction ID Case No. S19C ESB IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE EFiled: Jan 23 2019 09:11AM EST Transaction ID 62887905 Case No. S19C-01-045 ESB IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE THERESA COLLINS AND VIRGINIA : COLLINS, AS GUARDIAN AD LITEM : FOR K.C.,

More information

COPY 1AR ) Dept.: P52 ) 2. INTENTIONAL INFLICTION COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 17 ) 4. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 19 )

COPY 1AR ) Dept.: P52 ) 2. INTENTIONAL INFLICTION COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 17 ) 4. PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 19 ) 1 Alvin B. Sherron, Esq. (State Bar No. 106598) LAW OFFICES OF ALVIN B. SHERRON 2 COPY D 1055 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 1702i jrnia Los Angeles, California 90017 Tel: (213) 482-3236 1AR 09 2017 4 Fax:

More information

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/12/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1

Case: 1:12-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 06/12/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 Case: 1:12-cv-04546 Document #: 1 Filed: 06/12/12 Page 1 of 7 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION JOSEPH J. SMITH ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs.

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA ; SBN Allison K. Aranda, Esq.; SBN 0 LIFE LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION Post Office Box Ojai, California 0- (0) -0 LLDFOjai@earthlink.net Attorney for Plaintiffs SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/19/ :09 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/19/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 12/19/ :09 PM INDEX NO /2016 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 33 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 12/19/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK PATRICIA RYBNIK, Plaintiff, -against- Index No. 158679/2016 MW 303 Corp. d/b/a MANHATTAN WEST HOTEL CORP., CYMO TRADING CORP., DANIEL DANSO, YOUNG

More information

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE. vs.

STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE. vs. STATE OF MICHIGAN IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF WAYNE HOWARD LINDEN, as Personal Representative for the Estate of I NAYAH WRIGHT TRUSSEL, and JANEE WRIGHT-TRUSSEL, Individually, vs. Plaintiffs,

More information

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA UNLIMITED JURISDICTION

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF ALAMEDA UNLIMITED JURISDICTION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOSEPH D. ELFORD (S.B. NO. 189934) Americans for Safe Access P.O. Box 427112 San Francisco, CA 94142 Telephone: (415) 573-7842

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO (Central Courthouse)

SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO (Central Courthouse) Daniel M. Gilleon (SBN 00) Samuel A. Clemens (SBN ) The Gilleon Law Firm Columbia Street, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 1 Tel:.0. Fax:.0. Ed Chapin (SBN ) West Broadway, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 1 Email: echapin@sanfordheisler.com

More information

GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY PH: F: Attorneys for Plaintiff S.P., a fictitious name

GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY PH: F: Attorneys for Plaintiff S.P., a fictitious name POMPELIO, FOREMAN & GRAY, L.L.C. 760 ROUTE 10 WEST, SUITE 203 WHIPPANY, NEW JERSEY 07981 PH: 973-240-7313 F: 973-240-7316 Attorneys for Plaintiff S.P., a fictitious name S. P., a fictitious name, vs. Plaintiff,

More information

9/10/2018 4:20 PM 18CV40045 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH

9/10/2018 4:20 PM 18CV40045 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH /0/0 :0 PM CV00 0 0 BLANCA AGUIRRE, IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE STATE OF OREGON Plaintiff, vs. PORT OF PORTLAND, a Municipal Corporation, DOES through, POLLIN HOTELS II, LLC, an Oregon limited liability

More information

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATE DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI SOUTHERN DIVISION MONICA DANIEL HUTCHISON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case No.: 09-3018-CV-S-RED vs. ) ) Jury Trial Demanded TEXAS COUNTY,

More information

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1

Case: 1:16-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 Case: 1:16-cv-08107 Document #: 1 Filed: 08/16/16 Page 1 of 14 PageID #:1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, EASTERN DIVISION LAFAYETTE THOMAS, ) ) Plaintiff, )

More information

Plaintiff, )( CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:11-CV-523. against defendants City of Houston, Officer H.J. Morales, individually and in an official capacity,

Plaintiff, )( CIVIL ACTION NO.: 4:11-CV-523. against defendants City of Houston, Officer H.J. Morales, individually and in an official capacity, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DIVISION OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION HATICE CULLINGFORD, )( V. )( THE CITY OF HOUSTON, TEXAS, )( OFFICER H. J. MORALES JR., and JOHN DOE OFFICERS; )( Plaintiff, )( CIVIL

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI CENTRAL DIVISION CYNTHIA HUFFMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) Case No. 01-3144-ODS ) NEW PRIME, INC. d/b/a/ PRIME, INC. ) Serve Registered

More information

COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

COMPLAINT DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 THE PARTIES. HEATHER MONASKY (hereinafter referred to as MONASKY ), is an individual, who was employed by THE MATIAN FIRM, APC, and Shawn Matian. Hereinafter referred to as DEFENDANTS..

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY Case 1:07-cv-00158-RBK-JS Document 14 Filed 01/10/2008 Page 1 of 10 Joseph C. Grassi, Esquire BARRY, CORRADO, GRASSI & GIBSON, P.C. 2700 PACIFIC AVENUE WILDWOOD, NEW JERSEY 08260 (609) 729-1333 (phone)

More information

9:12-cv CWH-BM Date Filed 09/18/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 BEAUFORT DIVISION

9:12-cv CWH-BM Date Filed 09/18/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 BEAUFORT DIVISION 9:12-cv-02690-CWH-BM Date Filed 09/18/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT DIVISION Antonia DeNicola, CIVIL ACTION NO. Plaintiff, v. Town of Ridgeland,

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-00-ajb-ksc Document Filed // Page of R. Dale Dixon, Jr., (SBN ) dale@daledixonlaw.com Phillip A. Medlin (SBN ) phillip@daledixonlaw.com LAW OFFICES OF DALE DIXON 0 W. Broadway, Suite 00 San Diego,

More information

Summary of Investigation SiRT File # Referral from RCMP - PEI December 4, 2017

Summary of Investigation SiRT File # Referral from RCMP - PEI December 4, 2017 Summary of Investigation SiRT File # 2017-036 Referral from RCMP - PEI December 4, 2017 John L. Scott Interim Director June 12, 2018 Background: On December 4, 2017, SiRT Interim Director, John Scott,

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 11. Deadline

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 11. Deadline Case 1:18-cv-00674 Document 1 Filed 01/25/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SANDEEP REHAL, Plaintiff, - against - HARVEY WEINSTEIN, THE WEINSTEIN COMPANY LLC, THE

More information

Case 3:15-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 PageID.1 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:15-cv AJB-KSC Document 1 Filed 10/16/15 PageID.1 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-ajb-ksc Document Filed 0// PageID. Page of 0 0 Daniel M. Gilleon (SBN 00) The Gilleon Law Firm 0 Columbia Street, Suite 00 San Diego, CA 0 Tel:.0./Fax:.0. dmg@mglawyers.com Steve Hoffman (SBN

More information

INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2018

INDEX NO /2017 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 65 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/06/2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------------------X LINDA KIRSCH, Plaintiff, Index No. 155451/2017 SECOND AMENDED -against-

More information

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8

9:12-cv PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8 9:12-cv-02672-PMD-BHH Date Filed 09/17/12 Entry Number 1 Page 1 of 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA BEAUFORT DIVISION JULIE BANGERT, ) Civil Action #: ) PLAINTIFF,

More information

Case 4:08-cv CW Document 19 Filed 07/22/2008 Page 1 of 12

Case 4:08-cv CW Document 19 Filed 07/22/2008 Page 1 of 12 Case :0-cv-00-CW Document Filed 0//00 Page of JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar # BENJAMIN NISENBAUM, Esq./State Bar # LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre Oakport Street, Suite 0 Oakland,

More information

Plaintiff, Joseph DiNoto, by and through his attorney, avers the following against the PARTIES

Plaintiff, Joseph DiNoto, by and through his attorney, avers the following against the PARTIES LIEBLING MALAMUT, LLC Adam S. Malamut - Attorney ID No.: 019101999 Keith J. Gentes - Attorney ID No.: 036612009 1939 Route 70 East, Suite 220 Cherry Hill, NJ 08003 856.424.1808 856.424.2032 (1) WWW.1,1\41awN.I.com

More information

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1

Case: 1:15-cv Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 Case: 1:15-cv-01061 Document #: 1 Filed: 02/03/15 Page 1 of 10 PageID #:1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION KEVIN TAPIA and FELIPE HERNANDEZ, ) No. ) Plaintiffs,

More information

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY PETITION

IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY PETITION JANE DOE, v. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF JACKSON COUNTY, MISSOURI AT KANSAS CITY Plaintiff, YAHKHAHNAHN AMMI, Serve at: 9821 E 60th Street #7 Kansas City, MO 64133 Defendant. PETITION Case No. Division JURY

More information

Filing # E-Filed 01/30/ :14:22 AM

Filing # E-Filed 01/30/ :14:22 AM Filing # 84113459 E-Filed 01/30/2019 10:14:22 AM IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ELEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEANTE JOSEPH, KIDANYS CRUZ, CHANTAE ANDERSON and EUGENE ANDERSON,

More information

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS X : : : : : : : : : : : : : X

Case 1:18-cv Document 1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS X : : : : : : : : : : : : : X Case 118-cv-10076 Document 1 Filed 01/16/18 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS STEPHEN HEASLEY and ANDREW BORG, v. Plaintiffs, VISTAPRINT CORPORATE SOLUTIONS, INC.,

More information

2:16-cv HAB # 1 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION

2:16-cv HAB # 1 Page 1 of 9 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION 2:16-cv-02046-HAB # 1 Page 1 of 9 E-FILED Friday, 19 February, 2016 02:32:45 PM Clerk, U.S. District Court, ILCD IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS URBANA DIVISION

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )_ ) ) ) ) )

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE, CENTRAL JUSTICE CENTER ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )_ ) ) ) ) ) ATTORNEY LAW OFFICES OF ATTORNEY 123 Main St. Suite 1 City, CA 912345 Telephone: (949 123-4567 Facsimile: (949 123-4567 Email: attorney@law.com ATTORNEY, Attorney for P1 SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF

More information

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/29/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/29/2017

FILED: NEW YORK COUNTY CLERK 11/29/ :47 PM INDEX NO /2015 NYSCEF DOC. NO. 52 RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/29/2017 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Index No.: 451193/2015 COUNTY OF NEW YORK ------------------------------------------------------------------X Date Purchased: July 17, 2013 FEROZ ALAM, Plaintiff

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: 1. BREACH OF IMPLIED CONTRACT 2. TRESPASS TO CHATTEL Case :-cv-0 Document Filed // Page of Page ID #: Bobby Saadian, Esq. SBN: 0 Colin M. Jones, Esq. SBN: WILSHIRE LAW FIRM 0 Wilshire Blvd., th Floor Los Angeles, California 000 Tel: () - Fax: () - Attorneys

More information

CAUSE NO. JANE DOE, Individually and as IN THE DISTRICT COURT Next Friend of JOHN DOE, a Minor Child, Plaintiffs,

CAUSE NO. JANE DOE, Individually and as IN THE DISTRICT COURT Next Friend of JOHN DOE, a Minor Child, Plaintiffs, CAUSE NO. JANE DOE, Individually and as IN THE DISTRICT COURT Next Friend of JOHN DOE, a Minor Child, Plaintiffs, v. OF DR. JEFFREY D. CONE, MD Defendant. POTTER COUNTY, TEXAS PLAINTIFFS ORIGINAL PETITION

More information

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/09/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. Plaintiffs, Defendants.

Case 1:15-cv Document 1 Filed 11/09/15 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO. Plaintiffs, Defendants. Case 1:15-cv-01021 Document 1 Filed 11/09/15 Page 1 of 13 A. R. JR., A. R., And F. R., minor children By their next friend, Teresa Romero, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

More information

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/19/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 3:18-cv Document 1 Filed 09/19/18 Page 1 of 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0 Document Filed 0// Page of 0 JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq./ State Bar # BENJAMIN NISENBAUM, Esq./State Bar # LATEEF H. GRAY, Esq./State Bar #00 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre

More information

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:16-cv GMN-VCF Document 1 Filed 04/26/16 Page 1 of 10 Case :-cv-00-gmn-vcf Document Filed 0// Page of JOSEPH A. GUTIERREZ, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 0 COLLIN M. JAYNE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. MAIER GUTIERREZ AYON 00 South Seventh Street, Suite 00 Las Vegas, Nevada

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 1 CALIFORNIA STREET, SUITE 00 SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA PH (1) -00 FX (1) -01 www.rezlaw.com 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 DAVID A. LOWE (SBN 1) Email: dal@rezlaw.com MICHELLE G. LEE (SBN 1) Email: mgl@rezlaw.com

More information

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE JURISDICTION

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF ORANGE JURISDICTION 1 M.E. STEPHENS (SBN 149649) SHELBY L. STUNTZ (SBN 231594) 2 STOCK STEPHENS, LLP 110 W. "C" STREET, SUITE 1810 3 SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 Tel: (619) 234-5488 4 Fax: (619) 234-8814 5 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF,

More information

Case 2:10-cv TS Document 2 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 9

Case 2:10-cv TS Document 2 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 9 Case 210-cv-01126-TS Document 2 Filed 11/15/10 Page 1 of 9 MARK A. FLORES (8429) CORPORON & WILLIAMS, P.C. Attorney for Plaintiff 405 South Main Street, Suite 700 Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 Telephone 801-328-1162

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES WITH JURY DEMAND Antrobus et al v. Apple Computer, Inc. et al Doc. 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION Lynette Antrobus, Individually c/o John Mulvey, Esq. 2306 Park Ave., Suite 104

More information

Courthouse News Service

Courthouse News Service UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X JANE DOE, -against- Plaintiff, COUNTY OF ULSTER, ULSTER COUNTY SHERIFF S DEPARTMENT,

More information

Case 4:08-cv RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION

Case 4:08-cv RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION Case 4:08-cv-00139-RCC Document 1 Filed 02/25/08 Page 1 of 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA TUCSON DIVISION GEORGE VICTOR GARCIA, on behalf of himself and the class of

More information

TAMALA BEMIS, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF EUGENE, OFFICER BRAD HANNEMAN, NO. 622, and TEN UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS [ DOES 1-10], inclusive, Defendants.

TAMALA BEMIS, Plaintiff, vs. CITY OF EUGENE, OFFICER BRAD HANNEMAN, NO. 622, and TEN UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS [ DOES 1-10], inclusive, Defendants. Case :-cv-0-jr Document Filed 0/0/ Page of 0 Jeff Dominic Price SBN 00 Broadway, Suite Santa Monica, California 00 jeff.price@icloud.com Tel. 0.. Attorney for the plaintiff TAMALA BEMIS, Plaintiff, vs.

More information

Case 3:12-cv DRH-PMF Document 2 Filed 05/08/12 Page 1 of 25 Page ID #3

Case 3:12-cv DRH-PMF Document 2 Filed 05/08/12 Page 1 of 25 Page ID #3 Case :-cv-00-drh-pmf Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID # Case :-cv-00-drh-pmf Document Filed 0/0/ Page of Page ID # UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLIONIS ALEXANDER BRICKHOUSE, Individually,

More information

Plaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege

Plaintiffs, by their attorney, NORA CONSTANCE MARINO, ESQ. complaining of the defendants herein, respectfully show this Court, and allege NEW YORK STATE COURT OF CLAIMS --------------------------------------------------------------X JANET E. ENOCH, STEVE O. HINDI, and MICHAEL KOBLISKA, Claimants, -against- THE STATE OF NEW YORK, T. D AMATO,

More information

Case 1:13-cv MKB-RER Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiff, Defendants. REYES, M.J PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

Case 1:13-cv MKB-RER Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1. Plaintiff, Defendants. REYES, M.J PRELIMINARY STATEMENT Case 1:13-cv-00076-MKB-RER Document 1 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 12 PageID #: 1 tv 13-0076 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------- Y ANAHIT PAPILLA x r COMPLAINT AND JURY

More information

Law Offices of Cyrus & Cyrus

Law Offices of Cyrus & Cyrus Law Offices of Cyrus & Cyrus November 25, 2009 PRIVILEGED EVIDENCE CODE 1152(a), 1154 www.4tube.com Re: Cease and Desist Use of Tila Nguyen s (aka Tila Tequila) Video or Notice of Intent to Sue www.4tube.com

More information

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. DIVISION JASMINE EDWARDS AND DEMONYA WILLIAMS VERSUS

STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. DIVISION JASMINE EDWARDS AND DEMONYA WILLIAMS VERSUS 19 TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FOR THE PARISH OF EAST BATON ROUGE STATE OF LOUISIANA NO. DIVISION JASMINE EDWARDS AND DEMONYA WILLIAMS VERSUS ABC INSURANCE COMPANY, XYZ INSURANCE COMPANY, FOUNDATION OF

More information

led FEB SUPERIOR COURl l.h '-.. irornia BY DEPUTY 1. GENERAL NEGLIGENCE 2. WILLFUL MISCONDUCT 3. WRONGFUL DEATH 4.

led FEB SUPERIOR COURl l.h '-.. irornia BY DEPUTY 1. GENERAL NEGLIGENCE 2. WILLFUL MISCONDUCT 3. WRONGFUL DEATH 4. 0 0 Benjamin P. Tryk, Esq. () John R. Waterman, Esq. () TRYK LAW, P.C. N. Howard St., Ste. 0 Fresno, California 0 Telephone: () 0-0 Facsimile: () -0 Email: ben@tryklaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs, MABEL

More information

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY OF SHASTA PRESS RELEASE NO CRIMINAL CHARGES IN CLUB ICE DEATH. The Facts

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE OF THE COUNTY OF SHASTA PRESS RELEASE NO CRIMINAL CHARGES IN CLUB ICE DEATH. The Facts OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY COUNTY OF SHASTA Gerald PRESSC. RELEASE Benito District Attorney Robert J. Maloney Assistant District Attorney PRESS RELEASE NO CRIMINAL CHARGES IN CLUB ICE DEATH The Facts

More information

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8

3:17-cv MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8 3:17-cv-02281-MGL Date Filed 06/29/18 Entry Number 55 Page 1 of 8 IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT for the DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA COLUMBIA DIVISION Amanda Santos and Deryck Santos ) as parents and guardians

More information

Case 2:17-cv JAM-EFB Document 1 Filed 10/31/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Case 2:17-cv JAM-EFB Document 1 Filed 10/31/17 Page 1 of 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case :-cv-0-jam-efb Document Filed // Page of Jack Duran, Jr. SBN 0 Lyle D. Solomon, SBN 0 0 foothills Blvd S-, N. Roseville, CA -0- (Office) -- (Fax) duranlaw@yahoo.com GRINDSTONE INDIAN RANCHERIA and

More information

Case 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

Case 9:15-cv DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case 9:15-cv-80521-DMM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/23/2015 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA JEAN PAVLOV, individually and as Personal Representative

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION. Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. v. JANE DOE, Individual And As Next Friend Of LISA DOE, AND LISA DOE, Individual, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS GALVESTON DIVISION Plaintiffs, CIVIL ACTION NO. v.

More information

Case 4:08-cv SNL Document 1 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION

Case 4:08-cv SNL Document 1 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION Case 4:08-cv-00364-SNL Document 1 Filed 03/17/2008 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION BRETT DARROW, Plaintiff, JURY TRIAL DEMANDED v. Cause No.

More information

This Document Is Presented Courtesy of

This Document Is Presented Courtesy of This Document Is Presented Courtesy of Workplace Champions Protecting Your Civil Rights Contact us: 1-2-331-83 Or visit us online: www.employmentlawgroup.com The Employment Law Group, P.C., has reproduced

More information

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA THIRD DIVISION SARAH COFFEY, KRIS HERMES, and ) COMPLAINT ERIN STALNAKER, ) ) DEMAND FOR JURY Plaintiffs, ) TRIAL v. ) ) DAVID LANGFELLOW, in his individual

More information

Case 3:17-cv JCS Document 1 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 8

Case 3:17-cv JCS Document 1 Filed 06/15/17 Page 1 of 8 Case :-cv-00-jcs Document Filed 0// Page of C. YONG JEONG, ESQ. (SBN ) jeong@jeonglikens.com AMY CHOE, ESQ. (SBN 0) amy.choe@jeonglikens.com JOHN R. BALDIVIA, ESQ. (SBN ) john.baldivia@jeonglikens.com

More information

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10

Case 2:17-cv Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10 Case 2:17-cv-00377 Document 1 Filed in TXSD on 12/12/17 Page 1 of 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION DEVON ARMSTRONG vs. CIVIL ACTION NO.

More information

FACTS COMMON TO ALL COUNTS

FACTS COMMON TO ALL COUNTS Gregg D. Trautmann, Esq. TRAUTMANN AND ASSOCIATES, LLC 262 East Main Street Rockaway, New Jersey 07866 (973) 627-8000 Attorney for Plaintiffs ROBERT A. PROCHAZKA by and through his Co-Attorneys-In-Fact

More information

TORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce

TORT LAW. By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce TORT LAW By Helen Jordan, Elaine Martinez, and Jim Ponce INTRO TO TORT LAW: WHY? What is a tort? A tort is a violation of a person s protected interests (personal safety or property) Civil, not criminal

More information

CLAIMANT S ADDRESS: c/o Rachel Lederman, Attorney at Law, 558 Capp Street, San Francisco, CA

CLAIMANT S ADDRESS: c/o Rachel Lederman, Attorney at Law, 558 Capp Street, San Francisco, CA JAMES B. CHANIN (SBN# 76043) Law Offices of James B. Chanin 3050 Shattuck Avenue Berkeley, California 94705 510.848.4752; fax: 510.848.5819 jbcofc@aol.com RACHEL LEDERMAN (SBN #130192) Rachel Lederman

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 06-cv-01964-WYD-CBS STEVEN HOWARDS, v. Plaintiff, IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO VIRGIL D. GUS REICHLE, JR., in his individual and official capacity,

More information

Case 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION

Case 2:10-cv HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION Case 2:10-cv-01141-HGB-ALC Document 1 Filed 04/20/10 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA JANET DELUCA CIVIL ACTION VERSUS CITY OF COVINGTON, RICHARD PALMISANO, JACK WEST,

More information

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X

Summons SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE X SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WAYNE --------------------------------------------------------------------X JANET E. ENOCH, STEVE O. HINDI, AND MICHAEL KOBLISKA, - against Plaintiff(s),

More information

4:15-cv TGB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 05/29/15 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

4:15-cv TGB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 05/29/15 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION 4:15-cv-11949-TGB-EAS Doc # 1 Filed 05/29/15 Pg 1 of 9 Pg ID 1 DOMINIQUE RONDEAU, individually; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION -v- Plaintiff, No. Hon. DETROIT

More information

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION Case 1:13-mi-99999-UNA Document 2231 Filed 10/18/13 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION MARTHE BIEN-AIME, R.N., * * Plaintiff, * * CIVIL ACTION

More information