Masterclass Cartel Investigations
|
|
- Rosanna Cummings
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Masterclass Cartel Investigations 11 June
2
3 Set-up 6 topics 30 minutes per topic Frank Wijckmans introduces the topic and chairs debate 1 or 2 panelists provide their do s and don ts in respect of the topics Other panelists to comment / Q&A 3
4 Panelists PUBLIC ENFORCERS Felix Agerbeek (European Commission) Xavier Lewis (European Commission) 4
5 Panelists PRIVATE PRACTITIONERS James Venit (Skadden Arps) Angel Valdes Burgui (Lupicinio) Ros Kellaway (Eversheds) Konstantin Jörgens (Garrigues) Hans Gilliams (Eubelius) Filip Tuytschaever (contrast) 5
6 Program PART I ( am) I. Detection of cartels / leniency II. Cartel investigation / dawn raids & RFI s III. Procedure before the European Commission / settlement BREAK (11.00 am am) 6
7 Program PART II (11.30 am pm ) I. European Commission is heading towards a fining decision / what to do II. Procedures before the Court III. Private damages PRESENTATION OF LEEN HOEBRECHTS CHARITY (01.00 pm pm) 7
8
9 Overview Detection of cartels (Leniency) Cartel investigations (Dawn Raids & RFIs) Procedure before Commission (Settlements) The Commission is heading towards a fining decision Procedure before European Courts Damages actions 9
10 1. Detection of cartels (Leniency) Legislation Commission Leniency Notice Commission Notice on Immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases [2006] OJ C298/17 Key points General condition: genuine cooperation Full immunity: first in Reduction of fines: evidence with significant added value First (after immunity applicant): 30-50% Second: 20-30% Subsequent: up to 20% Partial immunity: first in with evidence increasing gravity or duration 10
11 1. Detection of cartels (Leniency) Legislation Commission Leniency Notice Commission Notice on Immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases [2006] OJ C298/17 Key points General condition: genuine cooperation Full immunity: first in Reduction of fines: evidence with significant added value First (after immunity applicant): 30-50% Second: 20-30% Subsequent: up to 20% Partial immunity: first in with evidence increasing gravity or duration 11
12 1. Detection of cartels (Leniency) 12
13 MASTERCLASS CARTEL INVESTIGATIONS. 11th June 2015 Panel: Detection of cartels (leniency) What to do once you are a leniency applicant by Ángel Valdés (Lupicinio International Law Firm) High level of coordination of the legal team. Internal Response Team. On-going internal research. HR management. Qualification of the conduct as a cartel. Communication plan. Remaining in the cartel. Collecting evidence about damages.
14 Overview Detection of cartels (Leniency) Cartel investigations (Dawn Raids & RFIs) Procedure before Commission (Settlements) The Commission is heading towards a fining decision Procedure before European Courts Damages actions 14
15 2. Cartel investigations (Dawn Raids) Legislation Council Regulation 1/2003 Article 20 Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty [2002] OJ L1/1 Explanatory note Explanatory note to an authorization to conduct an inspection in execution of a Commission decision under Article 20(4) of Council Regulation No 1/2003 [2013] Key points Without notice to the undertaking Inspection mandate Entering premises and land, examining books, Sealing of premises (risk of fine) Private houses Access to all electronically stored data Full cooperation IT staff (e.g. blocking accounts) Assistance external lawyers (e.g. shadowing) 15
16 2. Cartel investigations (Dawn Raids) Legislation Council Regulation 1/2003 Article 20 Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty [2002] OJ L1/1 Explanatory note Explanatory note to an authorization to conduct an inspection in execution of a Commission decision under Article 20(4) of Council Regulation No 1/2003 [2013] Key points Without notice to the undertaking Inspection mandate Entering premises and land, examining books, Sealing of premises (risk of fine) Private houses Access to all electronically stored data Full cooperation IT staff (e.g. blocking accounts) Assistance external lawyers (e.g. shadowing) 16
17 2. Cartel investigations (Dawn Raids) 17
18 2. Cartel investigations (RFIs) Legislation Council Regulation 1/2003 Article 18 Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty [2002] OJ L1/1 Key points Statement of legal basis and purpose of request Request for information (questions and documents): Voluntarily RFI RFI by decision RFI under Leniency Notice Risk of fine (1% worldwide turnover) 18
19 2. Cartel investigations (RFIs) Legislation Council Regulation 1/2003 Article 18 Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty [2002] OJ L1/1 Key points Statement of legal basis and purpose of request Request for information (questions and documents): Voluntarily RFI RFI by decision RFI under Leniency Notice Risk of fine (1% worldwide turnover) 19
20 2. Cartel investigations (RFIs) 20
21 Overview Detection of cartels (Leniency) Cartel investigations (Dawn Raids & RFIs) Procedure before Commission (Settlements) The Commission is heading towards a fining decision Procedure before European Courts Damages actions 21
22 3. Procedure before EC (settlement) Legislation Commission Regulation 622/2008 Commission Regulation (EC) No 622/2008 of 30 June 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 773/2004, as regards the conduct of settlement procedures in cartel cases [2008] OJ L171/3 Commission Notice on settlement Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 in cartel cases [2008] OJ C167/1 Key points Only cartel cases Aim: simplification of the administrative proceedings Three formal bilateral meetings No negotiating/bargaining (but information and hearing) Acknowledgement of liability 10% fine reduction Less detailed decision (private damages) 22
23 3. Procedure before EC (settlement) Legislation Commission Regulation 622/2008 Commission Regulation (EC) No 622/2008 of 30 June 2008 amending Regulation (EC) No 773/2004, as regards the conduct of settlement procedures in cartel cases [2008] OJ L171/3 Commission Notice on settlement Commission Notice on the conduct of settlement procedures in view of the adoption of Decisions pursuant to Article 7 and Article 23 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 in cartel cases [2008] OJ C167/1 Key points Only cartel cases Aim: simplification of the administrative proceedings Three formal bilateral meetings No negotiating/bargaining (but information and hearing) Acknowledgement of liability 10% fine reduction Less detailed decision (private damages) 23
24 MASTERCLASS CARTEL INVESTIGATIONS Contrast, Brussels, 11 June 2015 Screening of the perfect settlement case: - Do not rush, but make clear that you are serious about settling - While there are no formal negotiations taking place, consider carefully the arguments raised in the bilateral discussions with the Commission because these may be of relevance if the company opts out - Assess the adverse consequences of dropping out: If the Commission wants to settle, it may be more receptive to defense arguments than in standard proceeding, thereby lowering the fine. Conversely, the fine may increase as a consequence of additional information acquired - Use the possibility of holding informal technical discussions (non-papers) to clarify issues outside the three rounds of bilateral discussions (in an effort to alter the Commission s initial position on key issues)
25 MASTERCLASS CARTEL INVESTIGATIONS Contrast, Brussels, 11 June 2015 Hybrid Settlements: - Assess whether pursuing the standard procedure is worthwhile - The effect on private claims - Rights of defense may be compromised when a settlement decision against other defendants is adopted prior to their receipt of an SO
26 3. Procedure before EC (settlement) Make sure that your client is committed to settling Exercise your client s rights, but do not mistake the settlement procedure for a bargaining process Bear in mind that without prejudice works both ways
27 Break 11.00u 11.30u
28 Overview Detection of cartels (Leniency) Cartel investigations (Dawn Raids & RFIs) Procedure before Commission (Settlements) The Commission is heading towards a fining decision Procedure before European Courts Damages actions 28
29 4. The Commission is heading towards a fining decision Legislation Fining Guidelines Point 37 Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation No 1/2003 [2006] OJ C210/2 Key points Departing from general methodology of setting fines Reduced or increased fine Particularities of a given case 29
30 4. The Commission is heading towards a fining decision Legislation Fining Guidelines Point 37 Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation No 1/2003 [2006] OJ C210/2 Key points Departing from general methodology of setting fines Reduced or increased fine Particularities of a given case 30
31 Calculation of fine Not profit Presumption that all sales on market affected by cartel Up to 30% Numerous relevant factors but not exhaustive and no relative weighing Conduct, role played, profit obtained, size, market share, threat of infringement, content of conduct, intensity, market affected, damage done Non tax deductible Payable regardless of appeal
32 What if we are unable to pay the fine? No requirement for SO to mention fine (range) that will be imposed GC traditionally limits itself to light judicial review Inability to pay application? Commission discretion Only where fine would irretrievably eliminate undertaking specific economic and social context request during admin procedure Commission can deny request where made after fine decision Discuss ITP/ATP with case team after SO and before fine decision? Disclosure/confirmation of fine range? Which gravity percentage? Further clarity on criteria used by DG COMP for evaluating inability to pay a given amount?
33 Relevant provisions (1) In exceptional cases, the Commission may, upon request, take account of the undertaking's inability to pay in a specific social and economic context (EU Commission, Fining Guidelines, September 2006, point 35) the reduction of a fine pursuant to point 35 of the 2006 Guidelines [ ] is subject to [ ] the submission of a request during the administrative procedure (GC, Team Relocations, 16 June 2011, T-204/08, para 171); The requirement is not impossible to satisfy, including at the stage of the administrative procedure, since, in the light of the information which must appear in the SO and what is stated concerning the method of calculating the fines contained in the 2006 Guidelines, the undertaking in question will be able to assess, before the adoption of the [fine] decision [ ], whether it is reasonably possible to foresee that the fine which could be imposed on it risks [ ] irretrievably jeopardising its economic viability [ ] (ECJ, Team Relocations, 11 July 2013, C-444/11P, para 185)
34 Relevant provisions (2) [The SO] will indicate the essential facts and matters of law which may result in the imposition of a fine, such as the duration and gravity of the infringement [ ] Although under no legal obligation [ ], the Commission will endeavour to include in the [SO] matters relevant to any subsequent calculation of fines, including the relevant sales figures [ ] and the year(s) that will be considered for the value of such sales. [The SO] will also inform parties that in exceptional cases, [the Commission] may, upon request, take account of the undertaking's inability to pay [ ]. The undertakings making such a request should be prepared to provide, detailed and up-to-date financial information [ ]. Usually, [DG Comp] will be in contact with the parties in order to collect additional information [ ] which will allow the parties to bring further relevant information to the attention of the Commission. [ ] The assessment of the financial situation is carried out for all undertakings that have made an inability to pay request close to the adoption of the decision [ ], irrespective of when the request was submitted (DG COMP, Art 101 Best Practices, OJ 20 October 2011, 2011, point 87-88)
35 Overview Detection of cartels (Leniency) Cartel investigations (Dawn Raids & RFIs) Procedure before Commission (Settlements) The Commission is heading towards a fining decision Procedure before European Courts Damages actions 35
36 5. Procedure before Courts Legislation TFEU Articles 256, 261 and 263 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union [2010] OJ C83 Regulation 1/2003 Article 31 Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty [2002] OJ L1/1 Key points General Court Within 2 months First instance Full jurisdiction (but only marginal review in cases of complex economic assessments) Court of Justice Within 2 months Points of law Refers back to General Court Statute of the Court of Justice Articles Statute of the Court of Justice [2010] OJ C83 36
37 5. Procedure before Courts Legislation TFEU Articles 256, 261 and 263 Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union [2010] OJ C83 Regulation 1/2003 Article 31 Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty [2002] OJ L1/1 Key points General Court Within 2 months First instance Full jurisdiction (but only marginal review in cases of complex economic assessments) Court of Justice Within 2 months Points of law Refers back to General Court Statute of the Court of Justice Articles Statute of the Court of Justice [2010] OJ C83 37
38 5. Procedure before Courts 38
39 Overview Detection of cartels (Leniency) Cartel investigations (Dawn Raids & RFIs) Procedure before Commission (Settlements) The Commission is heading towards a fining decision Procedure before European Courts Damages actions 39
40 6. Damages actions Legislation Private Damages Directive Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union [2014] OJ L349 Key points National Courts Cartel decision = (prima facie) evidence of infringement Need to prove damage + causal link Disclosure of relevant evidence (black vs grey category) Every participant responsible to compensate for the harm in full (joint and several liability) Recourse action Passing on defense 40
41 6. Damages actions Legislation Private Damages Directive Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and the Council of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union [2014] OJ L349 Key points National Courts Cartel decision = (prima facie) evidence of infringement Need to prove damage + causal link Disclosure of relevant evidence (black vs grey category) Every participant responsible to compensate for the harm in full (joint and several liability) Recourse action Passing on defense 41
42 6. Damages actions COMP/ Elevators and escalators, paragraph 660 In this case, the Commission did not attempt to demonstrate the precise effects of the infringement since it is impossible to determine with sufficient certainty the relevant competitive parameters (price, commercial terms, quality, innovation, and others) in the absence of the infringements. However it is obvious that the infringements did have an actual impact. The fact that the various anticompetitive arrangements were implemented by the cartel participants in itself suggests an impact on the market, even if the actual effect is difficult to measure, because it is, in particular, not known if and how many other projects were subject to bid-rigging, nor how many projects may have been subject to allocation between cartel members without there being a need for contacts between them.
43 6. Damages actions Private action damages directive: What does it mean for victims? Right to full compensation Proof of infringement Irrefutable and prima facie evidence Access to documents Presumption of harm Joint and several liability Prescription Quantification? Empowerment of national courts / claim acquisition vehicles / ADR
44 6. Damages actions Private action damages directive: What does it mean for infringers? Full compensation, not multiple damages Leniency applicants/settling infringers preferred over non-cooperating infringers Protection from disclosure Limited liability only for immunity recipient Passing-on defense Prescription
45
46 Charity Leen Hoebrechts CAW
47 Remainder of 2015 program Masterclass Cartel Investigations (EN) (18 June 2015) Help, I am a shareholder (NL) (10 September 2015) Ins & outs of distribution agreements (NL) (22 October 2015) 47
48
49 Minervastraat ZAVENTEM T +32 (0) F +32 (0)
Antitrust: Commission introduces settlement procedure for cartels frequently asked questions (see also IP/08/1056)
MEMO/08/458 Brussels, 30 th June 2008 Antitrust: Commission introduces settlement procedure for cartels frequently asked questions (see also IP/08/1056) Why does the Commission introduce a settlement procedure?
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES
5.12.2014 L 349/1 I (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES DIRECTIVE 2014/104/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 26 November 2014 on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law
More informationPE-CONS 80/14 DGG 3B EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 24 October 2014 (OR. en) 2013/0185 (COD) PE-CONS 80/14 RC 8 JUSTCIV 80 CODEC 961
EUROPEAN UNION THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT THE COUNCIL Brussels, 24 October 2014 (OR. en) 2013/0185 (COD) PE-CONS 80/14 RC 8 JUSTCIV 80 CODEC 961 LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMTS Subject: DIRECTIVE OF THE
More informationWhy is the Commission proposing to introduce a settlement procedure? Does the settlement procedure imply negotiations?
MEMO/07/433 Brussels, 26 th October 2007 Antitrust: Commission calls for comments on a draft legislative package to introduce settlement procedure for cartels frequently asked questions (see also IP/07/1608)
More informationECN MODEL LENIENCY PROGRAMME
ECN MODEL LENIENCY PROGRAMME I. INTRODUCTION 1. In a system of parallel competences between the Commission and National Competition Authorities, an application for leniency 1 to one authority is not to
More informationEFTA Surveillance Authority Notice on Immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases
EFTA Surveillance Authority Notice on Immunity from fines and reduction of fines in cartel cases A. The present notice is issued pursuant to the rules of the Agreement on the European Economic Area (EEA
More informationCompetition: revised Leniency Notice frequently asked questions (see also IP/06/1705)
MEMO/06/469 Brussels, 7th December 2006 Competition: revised Leniency Notice frequently asked questions (see also IP/06/1705) The European Commission has taken another important step to uncover and put
More informationBid-rigging and deterrence under EU law. ICN Cartel Workshop, Ottawa Kris Van Hove 5 October 2017
Bid-rigging and deterrence under EU law ICN Cartel Workshop, Ottawa Kris Van Hove 5 October 2017 Treatment of bid-rigging under EU competition law Bid-rigging is a violation of Article 101 TFEU: can take
More informationGeneral Overview of the EU Cartel Settlement Procedure. Jean-François Bellis (Partner, Van Bael & Bellis, Brussels)
General Overview of the EU Cartel Settlement Procedure Jean-François Bellis (Partner, Van Bael & Bellis, Brussels) 1 In the framework of its ongoing efforts to improve and streamline the procedure for
More informationThe economic analysis of interaction of fines and damages under European and American antitrust laws
The economic analysis of interaction of fines and damages under European and American antitrust laws Abstract Administrative bodies, courts, companies and lawyers widely accept in our days the significant
More informationDamages Directive 2014/104/EU:
Damages Directive 2014/104/EU: More compensation for victims / Stronger enforcement overall (public & private) Luke Haasbeek Policy Officer European Commission, DG Competition Private Enforcement Unit
More informationCOMMISSION OPINION. of
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 5.5.2014 C(2014) 3066 final COMMISSION OPINION of 5.5.2014 Opinion of the European Commission in application of Article 15(1) of Council Regulation (EC) 1/2003 of 16 December
More informationANTI-CARTEL ENFORCEMENT TEMPLATE. CARTELS WORKING GROUP Subgroup 2: Enforcement Techniques
ANTI-CARTEL ENFORCEMENT TEMPLATE CARTELS WORKING GROUP Subgroup 2: Enforcement Techniques Austria 20/07/2016 ICN ANTI-CARTEL ENFORCEMENT TEMPLATE IMPORTANT NOTES: This template is intended to provide information
More informationACTION FOR DAMAGES AND IMPOSITION OF FINES
ACTION FOR DAMAGES AND IMPOSITION OF FINES Mario Siragusa 1, 2 1. INTRODUCTION This paper is aimed at discussing some of the legal issues related to the interaction between public and private enforcement.
More informationECN RECOMMENDATION ON COMMITMENT PROCEDURES
ECN RECOMMENDATION ON COMMITMENT PROCEDURES By the present Recommendation the ECN Competition Authorities (the Authorities) express their common views on the need for making commitments binding and enforceable
More informationJune 3, Introduction
JOINT COMMENTS OF THE AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION S SECTION OF ANTITRUST LAW AND SECTION OF INTERNATIONAL LAW ON COMISIÓN NACIONAL DE COMPETENCIA S DRAFT REVISION OF THE NOTICE ON LENIENCY June 3, 2013 The
More informationPrivate Actions for Infringement of Competition Laws in the EU: An Ongoing Project
Private Actions for Infringement of Competition Laws in the EU: An Ongoing Project Dr Stanley Wong, StanleyWongGlobal (of the Bars of British Columbia and Ontario) Innovation and Competition Policy in
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL DECISION
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 30.3.2012 COM(2012) 152 final 2012/0076 (NLE) Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken on behalf of the European Union within the Association Council set
More informationTHE EU PRIVATE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE PRACTICAL INSIGHTS
THE EU PRIVATE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE PRACTICAL INSIGHTS Minutes of the Closed Workshop 2015 Frank Wijckmans Maaike Visser Sarah Jaques Evi Noël Cambridge Antwerp Portland Ltd Sheraton House Castle Park Cambridge
More informationSelf-Assessment of Agreements Under Article 81 EC: Is There a Need for More Commission Guidance?
OCTOBER 2008, RELEASE TWO Self-Assessment of Agreements Under Article 81 EC: Is There a Need for More Commission Guidance? Michele Piergiovanni & Pierantonio D Elia Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP
More informationPresident's introduction
Croatian Competition Agency Annual plan for 2014-2016 1 Contents President's introduction... 3 1. Competition and Croatian Competition Agency... 4 1.1. Competition policy... 4 1.2. Role of the Croatian
More informationComments on DG Competition s Guidance on procedures of the Hearing Officers in proceedings relating to Articles 101 and 102 TFEU *
Comments on DG Competition s Guidance on procedures of the Hearing Officers in proceedings relating to Articles 101 and 102 TFEU * Introduction White & Case welcomes this opportunity to comment on DG Competition
More informationPRACTICAL LAW COMPETITION AND CARTEL LENIENCY MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL GUIDE The law and leading lawyers worldwide
PRACTICAL LAW MULTI-JURISDICTIONAL GUIDE 2012 COMPETITION AND CARTEL LENIENCY The law and leading lawyers worldwide Essential legal questions answered in 31 key jurisdictions Rankings and recommended lawyers
More informationCouncil Regulation (EC) No 2532/98 (23 November 1998)
Council Regulation (EC) No 2532/98 (23 November 1998) Caption: Council Regulation (EC) No 2532/98 of 23 November 1998 concerning the powers of the European Central Bank to impose sanctions. Source: Official
More informationCOMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 5.3.2018 C(2018) 1231 final COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of 5.3.2018 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council on
More informationThe UK implements the EU Antitrust Damages Directive
The UK implements the EU Antitrust Damages Directive January 10, 2017 The Damages Directive 1 seeks to promote private enforcement of EU competition law before national courts across the European Union
More informationQuantifying Harm for Breaches of Antitrust Rules A European Union Perspective
EU-China Trade Project (II) Beijing, China 24 May 2013 Session 5: Calculation of Damages in Private Actions Quantifying Harm for Breaches of Antitrust Rules A European Union Perspective Wolfgang MEDERER
More information10821/16 CDP/LM/vpl DGG 3 B
Council of the European Union Brussels, 5 July 2016 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2016/0195 (NLE) 10821/16 RC 6 PROPOSAL From: date of receipt: 28 June 2016 To: No. Cion doc.: Subject: Secretary-General
More informationNewsletter Competition law amendment may 2017
Newsletter Competition law amendment 2017 1 MaY 2017 in force On 1 May 2017, significant changes to Austrian competition law enter into force by means of the Cartel and Competition Law Amendment Act 2017
More informationProposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 18.6.2014 COM(2014) 358 final 2014/0180 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Regulation (EU, EURATOM) No 966/2012 on the
More informationCase T-67/01. JCB Service v Commission of the European Communities
Case T-67/01 JCB Service v Commission of the European Communities (Competition Article 81 EC Distribution agreements) Judgment of the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), 13 January 2004 II-56 Summary
More informationSwedish Competition Act
Swedish Competition Act Swedish Competition Act 1 Swedish Competition Act List of Contents Chapter 1 Introductory provision 3 Chapter 2 Prohibited restrictions of competition 5 Chapter 3 Actions against
More informationRules of evidence (including cross-border evidence) in civil proceedings Q&A: Russian Federation
Rules of evidence (including cross-border evidence) in civil proceedings Q&A: Russian Federation by Alexey Chernykh, LECAP Country Q&A Law stated as at 31-Jul-2018 Russian Federation This Q&A provides
More informationCover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation
Cover Page The handle http://hdl.handle.net/1887/30219 holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation Author: Wilman, F.G. Title: The vigilance of individuals : how, when and why the EU legislates
More informationAnthony Norton Norton's Inc. Criminalisation of cartel behaviour: Implications for corporates in South Africa
Anthony Norton Norton's Inc Criminalisation of cartel behaviour: Implications for corporates in South Africa Criminalisation of Cartel Behaviour implications for Corporates in South Africa 31 August 2016
More informationEU Competition Law Sanctions, Remedies & Procedure. Prof. Dr. juris Erling Hjelmeng 15 October 2013
EU Competition Law Sanctions, Remedies & Procedure Prof. Dr. juris Erling Hjelmeng 15 October 2013 Enforcement pluralism Regulation of market conduct EU Commission General surveillance of compliance with
More informationInterinstitutional File: 2012/0011 (COD)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 May 2015 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2012/0011 (COD) 8371/15 LIMITE DATAPROTECT 63 JAI 259 MI 272 DIGIT 25 DAPIX 68 FREMP 88 COMIX 197 CODEC 610 NOTE From:
More informationRestraints of trade and dominance in Switzerland: overview
GLOBAL GUIDES 2015/16 COMPETITION AND CARTEL LENIENCY Country Q&A Restraints of trade and dominance in Switzerland: overview Nicolas Birkhäuser Niederer Kraft & Frey Ltd global.practicallaw.com/5-558-5249
More informationJoined Cases C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P to C-208/02 P and C-213/02 P. Dansk Rørindustri and Others v Commission of the European Communities
Joined Cases C-189/02 P, C-202/02 P, C-205/02 P to C-208/02 P and C-213/02 P Dansk Rørindustri and Others v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal Competition District heating pipes (pre-insulated
More informationNavigating the Globe: Cartel Enforcement Around the World
Navigating the Globe: Cartel Enforcement Around the World Chapter 13: Germany Presented by the Cartel and Criminal Practice Committee and the International Committee July 18, 2013 Presenters Moderator:
More informationPrivate actions for breach of competition law
Private actions for breach of competition law What will be the impact of the recent reform proposals? August 2013 There is already a steady stream of private competition law actions now being brought in
More informationCOMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. Proposal for a DIRECTIVE / /EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Proposal for a Brussels, 4.9.2009 COM(2009) 446 final 2009/0123 (COD) C7-0126/09 DIRECTIVE / /EC OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of [ ] on uniform procedures
More informationAntitrust: policy paper on compensating consumer and business victims of competition breaches frequently asked questions (see also IP/08/515)
MEMO/08/216 Brussels, 3 rd April 2008 Antitrust: policy paper on compensating consumer and business victims of competition breaches frequently asked questions (see also IP/08/515) What is the White Paper
More informationProposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Strasbourg, 11.6.2013 COM(2013) 404 final 2013/0185 (COD) C7-0170/13 Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on certain rules governing actions for damages
More informationWorksheets on European Competition Law
Friedrich Schiller University of Jena From the SelectedWorks of Christian Alexander Winter February, 2018 Worksheets on European Competition Law Christian Alexander Available at: https://works.bepress.com/
More informationStrategic choices in antitrust investigations: litigation versus commitments & settlements. Pranvera Këllezi Attorney at Law, Geneva
Strategic choices in antitrust investigations: litigation versus commitments & settlements Pranvera Këllezi Attorney at Law, Geneva 14 March 2014 2 Assessment of the investigation Control over process
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 13 April 2015 (OR. en)
Conseil UE Council of the European Union Brussels, 13 April 2015 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2012/0011 (COD) 7722/15 LIMITE PUBLIC DATAPROTECT 43 JAI 216 MI 209 DIGIT 13 DAPIX 52 FREMP 69 COMIX 154
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL DECISION
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 27.10.2015 COM(2015) 549 final 2015/0255 (NLE) Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union, in the European Committee for
More informationREPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 25.1.2018 COM(2018) 40 final REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL AND THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE on the implementation of the
More informationCOMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2013) XXX draft COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard
More informationPROCEDURE OF SETTING FINES IMPOSED PURSUANT TO THE ACT ON THE PROTECTION OF COMPETITION
PROCEDURE OF SETTING FINES IMPOSED PURSUANT TO THE ACT ON THE PROTECTION OF COMPETITION Article 1 Introduction 1.1 The purpose of this Directive of the Chairman (hereinafter referred to as the Directive
More informationEU-China Trade Project (II) Leniency Policy and Practice
EU-China Trade Project (II) Leniency Policy and Practice Eva-Maria Schulze - German Federal Cartel Office - EU-China Workshop on Anti-Competitive Agreement Cases - Shenzhen/Guangdong Province 2 what is
More informationRegulation 1/2003: a modernised application of EC competition rules
Competition Policy Newsletter Regulation 1/2003: a modernised application of EC competition rules In February 1997, DG Competition started internal works on the reform of Regulation 17. The starting point
More information2. PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO THE PROCEDURAL REGULATION ARTICLE
RESPONSE TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION S CONSULTATION ON PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS TO REGULATION 773/2004 AND THE NOTICES ON ACCESS TO THE FILE, LENIENCY, SETTLEMENTS AND COOPERATION WITH NATIONAL COURTS Freshfields
More informationENFORCEMENT GUIDE STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES & GUIDANCE ON THE EXERCISE OF ENFORCEMENT POWERS. September
ENFORCEMENT GUIDE September 2018 STATEMENT OF PRINCIPLES & GUIDANCE ON THE EXERCISE OF ENFORCEMENT POWERS - 1 - GLOSSARY OF TERMS AML/ATF Anti-Money Laundering & Anti-Terrorist Financing The AML/ATF The
More informationCOMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, XXX [ ](2013) XXX draft COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No /.. of XXX supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard
More informationThe Antitrust Review of the Americas
GlobaL Competition Review Special report The international journal of competition policy and regulation The Antitrust Review of the Americas Published by global competition review in association with 2008
More informationOpinion 3/2016. Opinion on the exchange of information on third country nationals as regards the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS)
Opinion 3/2016 Opinion on the exchange of information on third country nationals as regards the European Criminal Records Information System (ECRIS) 13 April 2016 The European Data Protection Supervisor
More informationProposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 30.1.2019 COM(2019) 53 final 2019/0019 (COD) Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on establishing contingency measures in the field of social
More informationBULGARIA: PRIVATE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE IMPLEMENTED
BULGARIA: PRIVATE DAMAGES DIRECTIVE IMPLEMENTED BACKGROUND On 3, a new Law for Amendment and Supplementation ("New Law") of the Competition Protection Act ("CPA") was published in the Bulgarian Official
More informationCOMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 4.5.2016 C(2016) 2658 final COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of 4.5.2016 amending Delegated Regulation (EU) No 640/2014 supplementing Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013
More informationCase C-397/03 P. Archer Daniels Midland Co. and Archer Daniels Midland Ingredients Ltd v Commission of the European Communities
Case C-397/03 P Archer Daniels Midland Co. and Archer Daniels Midland Ingredients Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (Appeals Competition Cartels Synthetic lysine market Fines Guidelines on the
More informationPublic access to documents containing personal data after the Bavarian Lager ruling
Public access to documents containing personal data after the Bavarian Lager ruling I. Introduction I.1. The reason for an additional EDPS paper On 29 June 2010, the European Court of Justice delivered
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union L 84/1 REGULATIONS
31.3.2009 Official Journal of the European Union L 84/1 I (Acts adopted under the EC Treaty/Euratom Treaty whose publication is obligatory) REGULATIONS COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 260/2009 of 26 February
More informationComments on the proposal for a directive on representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers
Comments on the proposal for a directive on representative actions for the protection of the collective interests of consumers I. Introduction On April 11, 2018, the European Commission presented the New
More informationDamages Actions for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules
European Commission DG Competition Unit A 5 Damages for breach of the antitrust rules B-1049 Brussels Stockholm, 14 July 2008 Damages Actions for Breach of the EC Antitrust Rules White Paper COM(2008)
More informationEXECUTIVE SUMMARY. 3 P a g e
Opinion 1/2016 Preliminary Opinion on the agreement between the United States of America and the European Union on the protection of personal information relating to the prevention, investigation, detection
More informationANTI-CARTEL ENFORCEMENT TEMPLATE. CARTELS WORKING GROUP Subgroup 2: Enforcement Techniques
ANTI-CARTEL ENFORCEMENT TEMPLATE CARTELS WORKING GROUP Subgroup 2: Enforcement Techniques The Netherlands 1x/01/2016 ICN ANTI-CARTEL ENFORCEMENT TEMPLATE IMPORTANT NOTES: This template is intended to provide
More informationPUBLIC COUNCILOF THEEUROPEANUNION. Brusels,25February2014 (OR.en) 6795/14 InterinstitutionalFile: 2010/0209(COD) LIMITE
ConseilUE COUNCILOF THEEUROPEANUNION Brusels,25February2014 (OR.en) PUBLIC 6795/14 InterinstitutionalFile: 2010/0209(COD) LIMITE MIGR24 SOC151 DRS28 CODEC512 WTO77 SERVICES19 NOTE From: To: No.Ciondoc.:
More informationpublic consultation on a draft Regulation of the European Central Bank February 2014
public consultation on a draft Regulation of the European Central Bank establishing the framework for cooperation within the Single Supervisory Mechanism between the European Central Bank and national
More informationOfficial Journal of the European Union. (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES
21.5.2016 L 132/1 I (Legislative acts) DIRECTIVES DIRECTIVE (EU) 2016/800 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 11 May 2016 on procedural safeguards for children who are suspects or accused persons
More informationCLASS ACTION DEVELOPMENTS IN EUROPE (April 2015) Stefaan Voet. Recommendation on Common Principles for Collective Redress Mechanisms
CLASS ACTION DEVELOPMENTS IN EUROPE (April 2015) Stefaan Voet Recommendation on Common Principles for Collective Redress Mechanisms In June 2013, the European Commission published its long-awaited Recommendation
More informationEuropean Commission s investigative powers and the
European s investigative powers and the rights of defence A Lexis PSL document produced in partnership with Two types of inspections Content of inspection decisions The s powers of inspection Limits to
More informationAn overview of EC Regulation 1/2003 as the new implementing regulation for the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty
An overview of EC Regulation 1/2003 as the new implementing regulation for the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty Matthew Gream March 2003 1.
More informationNotice of 16 May 2011 on the Method Relating to the Setting of Financial Penalties
RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE Notice of 16 May 2011 on the Method Relating to the Setting of Financial Penalties I. The legal provisions applicable to the setting of financial penalties 1. Pursuant to Section I
More informationRules of Procedure ( Rules ) of the Unified Patent Court
18 th draft of 19 October 2015 Rules of Procedure ( Rules ) of the Unified Patent Court Preliminary set of provisions for the Status 1. First draft dated 29 May 2009 Discussed in expert meetings on 5 June
More informationECB-PUBLIC. Recommendation for a
EN ECB-PUBLIC Frankfurt, 16 April 2014 Recommendation for a Council Regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 2532/98 concerning the powers of the European Central Bank to impose sanctions (ECB/2014/19) (presented
More informationTable of Contents. Chapter one. General Issues
Table of Contents Introductory remarks... 13 FOREWORD... 15 Chapter one General Issues JUDICIAL REVIEW IN EUROPEAN UNION COMPETITION LAW: A QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE ASSESSMENT... 21 Introduction...
More informationPUBLIC. Brussels, 29 November 2005 COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION /05 Interinstitutional File: 2003/0255 (COD) LIMITE
Conseil UE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 29 November 2005 14881/05 Interinstitutional File: 2003/0255 (COD) LIMITE PUBLIC CODEC 1085 TRANS 252 SOC 463 COVER NOTE Subject : Proposal for a European
More informationAdopted text. - Trade mark regulation
Adopted text - Trade mark regulation The following document is an unofficial summary of the text adopted by the legal affairs committee (JURI) of the European Parliament from 17 December 2013. The text
More informationChecklist for a Consortium Agreement for ICT PSP projects
DG COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS, CONTENT & TECHNOLOGY ICT Policy Support Programme Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme Checklist for a Consortium Agreement for ICT PSP projects Version 1.0 (28-02-2008)
More informationECN RECOMMENDATION ON THE POWER TO ADOPT INTERIM MEASURES
ECN RECOMMENDATION ON THE POWER TO ADOPT INTERIM MEASURES By the present Recommendation the ECN Competition Authorities (the Authorities) express their common views on the power to adopt interim measures.
More informationProposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 27.11.2013 COM(2013) 824 final 2013/0409 (COD) Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on provisional legal aid for suspects or accused persons
More informationon the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights
Opinion of the European Data Protection Supervisor on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning customs enforcement of intellectual property rights THE EUROPEAN
More informationANTI-CARTEL ENFORCEMENT TEMPLATE. CARTELS WORKING GROUP Subgroup 2: Enforcement Techniques
ANTI-CARTEL ENFORCEMENT TEMPLATE CARTELS WORKING GROUP Subgroup 2: Enforcement Techniques ITALY date of completion 9/12/2015 ICN ANTI-CARTEL ENFORCEMENT TEMPLATE IMPORTANT NOTES: This template is intended
More informationInformation Notice. Information Notice. Reference: ComReg 17/49
Information Notice Response to Department of Jobs, Enterprise and Innovation Consultation on Proposed European Directive Empowering National Competition Authorities to be more Effective Information Notice
More informationThe Impact of the CDC Hydrogen Peroxide Judgment on Present and Future Arbitration Agreements
The Impact of the CDC Hydrogen Peroxide Judgment on Present and Future Arbitration Agreements Pascal HOLLANDER HANOTIAU & VAN DEN BERG Brussels SCC-CEA Joint Conference Stockholm 28 April 2017 CONTEXT:
More information(Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS
L 115/12 Official Journal of the European Union 27.4.2012 II (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) No 363/2012 of 23 February 2012 on the procedural rules for the recognition
More informationTHE REVIEW OF THE DE MINIMIS NOTICE
THE REVIEW OF THE DE MINIMIS NOTICE Maria Gaia Pazzi Keywords: European Commission, The Minimis Notice, Agreement of Minor Importance by Object Restriction, Expedia Case, Block Exemption Regulations 1.
More informationSearch Warrants & Dawn Raids: Before, During, and After
US and EU Cartel Investigations: A Webinar Series Search Warrants & Dawn Raids: Before, During, and After Thursday, April 25, 2013 arnoldporter.com US and EU Cartel Investigations: A Webinar Series Search
More informationSTATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 47 of 2018 EUROPEAN UNION (NON-AUTOMATIC WEIGHING INSTRUMENTS) REGULATIONS 2018
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS. S.I. No. 47 of 2018 EUROPEAN UNION (NON-AUTOMATIC WEIGHING INSTRUMENTS) REGULATIONS 2018 2 [47] S.I. No. 47 of 2018 EUROPEAN UNION (NON-AUTOMATIC WEIGHING INSTRUMENTS) REGULATIONS
More informationJUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 4 June 2015 (*)
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Second Chamber) 4 June 2015 (*) (Reference for a preliminary ruling Status of third-country nationals who are long-term residents Directive 2003/109/EC Article 5(2) and Article 11(1)
More informationhaving regard to the Commission proposal to Parliament and the Council (COM(2013)0161),
P7_TA-PROV(2014)0118 Community trade mark ***I European Parliament legislative resolution of 25 February 2014 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Council
More informationWorking Party No. 3 on Co-operation and Enforcement
Unclassified DAF/COMP/WP3/WD(2015)25 DAF/COMP/WP3/WD(2015)25 Unclassified Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 02-Oct-2015
More informationChoice of Forum: Considerations from a Practitioner s Perspective
Choice of Forum: Considerations from a Practitioner s Perspective Dr Ulrich Classen Director MaCCI Law and Economics Conference on Cartel Damages in Europe: The New Framework after the Directive Session
More informationCOMMISSION REGULATION (EU)
L 176/16 EN Official Journal of the European Union 10.7.2010 COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) No 584/2010 of 1 July 2010 implementing Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards
More information10622/12 LL/mf 1 DG G 3 A
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 31 May 2012 Interinstitutional File: 2011/0373 (COD) 2011/0374 (COD) 10622/12 CONSOM 86 MI 394 JUSTCIV 212 CODEC 1499 NOTE from: Council Secretariat to: Working
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 12 June 2015 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 12 June 2015 (OR. en) Interinstitutional File: 2013/0255 (APP) 9372/15 EPPO 30 EUROJUST 112 CATS 59 FIN 393 COPEN 142 GAF 15 NOTE From: To: Subject: Presidency Council
More informationLIMITE EN COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION. Brussels, 12 February /13 Interinstitutional File: 2010/0210 (COD) LIMITE MIGR 15 SOC 96 CODEC 308
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 12 February 2013 6312/13 Interinstitutional File: 2010/0210 (COD) LIMITE MIGR 15 SOC 96 CODEC 308 NOTE from: Presidency to: JHA Counsellors on: 15 February 2013
More informationProposal for a COUNCIL DECISION
EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 21.3.2013 COM(2013) 152 final 2013/0085 (NLE) Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION authorising Member States to ratify, in the interests of the European Union, the Convention concerning
More information