International & European Tax Moot Court Competition Official Rules

Size: px
Start display at page:

Download "International & European Tax Moot Court Competition Official Rules"

Transcription

1 International & European Tax Moot Court Competition Official Rules Part I: General Provisions Article 1. The Competition 1.1. The International & European Tax Moot Court Competition (hereafter referred to as the Competition ) is organized annually by the Institute of Tax Law of the KU Leuven and the International Bureau of Fiscal Documentation (IBFD) The Competition is governed by the Official Rules embodied in this document (hereafter referred to as the Rules ) The oral rounds of the Competition shall be held in Leuven, Belgium. Article 2. Organization 2.1. There shall be a Permanent Office ( PO ) in Leuven, Belgium. The PO is in charge of the administrative organization of the Competition. Unless otherwise indicated in these Rules, all communications with the PO shall be done by at the following address: tax.mootcourt@kuleuven.be. Any questions regarding the Competition are to be addressed to the PO. If the questions refer to the interpretation or application of the Rules, they will be send to the Arbitrator and the PO (in Cc ) who will handle them in accordance with Article 3.4 of the Rules There shall also be a Secretariat in Leuven, Belgium, responsible for all administrative matters concerning the Competition, which shall supply and distribute to the participating universities all the necessary information and provide logistic support. All communications by to the Secretariat are sent to: Ingrid.Matthys@kuleuven.be. Article 3. The Arbitrator 3.1. The Arbitrator is the Academic Chairman of the IBFD. The Arbitrator may be assisted by one or more Co-Arbitrator(s). The Arbitrator will designate the Co-Arbitrator(s) on an annual basis out of the IBFD staff in regard of his or her qualities of integrity and fair judgment. Any reference in these Rules to the Arbitrator includes a reference to the Co-Arbitrator(s) if they have been so designated The task of the Arbitrator is to guarantee that the Competition is carried out in consistency with the Rules, the overall goals and objectives of the Competition and to resolve all disputes, which would arise during the Competition When a decision has to be determined by lot, the proceedings shall be organized by the Arbitrator The Arbitrator shall serve as final arbiter of implementation and interpretation of these Rules. Any questions concerning the interpretation and application of the Rules arising during any phase of the Competition shall be addressed in writing to the PO at the following address: tax.mootcourt@kuleuven.be All decisions of the Arbitrator are final and are not subject to appeal. Any decisions by the Arbitrator shall immediately be communicated by the PO to the inquiring party (or other interested parties). The PO will also keep a record of the decisions. Article 4. Structure of the Competition The Competition shall consist of four phases: - a written phase in which a maximum of twenty-four teams have to prepare written memoranda as applicant and defendant, based upon a case on European Union and/or international tax law;

2 - a first qualifying round in which the sixteen highest ranked selected teams shall have to defend orally the arguments raised in the written memoranda, pleading both as applicant and as defendant; - a second qualifying round in which the six highest ranking teams of the first qualifying round compete against each other, pleading again both for as applicant and as defendant; - the final in which the two highest ranked teams of the second qualifying round compete for the title of Best Team. The official language of the Competition is English. All communications as well as all written memoranda and all oral pleadings shall be done in this language. Article 5. Time schedule The time schedule for each year's Competition shall be determined by the PO and shall be published on the website of the Competition at the latest on 15 August of the year in which the Competition starts. Article 6. The cases and clarifications 6.1. The cases to be argued shall consist of a hypothetical problem dealing with European Union tax law and/or international tax law. Care is to be taken to avoid that participants of one particular country would have the advantage of dealing with the question from the perspective of their national tax law. Therefore, the cases shall either deal with rules of imaginary countries to which the effective rules of European Union law or international tax law have to be applied or with the rules of existing countries, in which case all relevant national provisions for this Competition have to be included in the cases. The argumentation of the participants cannot be based on other national provisions of these countries The IBFD, under supervision and coordination of its Academic Chairman, is in charge of preparing and drafting the cases. The cases shall be well balanced and provide equal chances for success for the applicant and the defendant The case(s) for the qualifying rounds shall be distributed by the PO to all registered participants in accordance with the official Time Schedule. A new case for the final round shall be distributed to the participants to the final round immediately after the proclamation of the results of the second round. It may be decided to distribute to all competing teams some basic research materials documenting the tax laws applicable to the imaginary countries of the case The facts in the dispute that is the subject matter of the Competition are described in the case or in the clarifications given to the cases (see art. 6.6.). No additional facts may be added by the parties and, if introduced into the Competition shall be disregarded by the judges. Judges shall enforce this rule strictly in both the memorandum and oral arguments and shall evaluate the team's efforts accordingly Participants may submit to the PO up to five written requests for clarification that are pertinent to understanding the cases within the time limit indicated on the Time Schedule. The subject field of the e- mail should indicate MCC Clarifications followed by the identification of the team. Requests have to be sent to tax.mootcourt@kuleuven.be Requests for clarifications on the cases should be limited to matters with legal significance in the context of the cases and shall include a short explanation of the expected significance of the clarification. Any request that does not contain such an explanation may be ignored The clarifications, but not the explanation from the requesting team concerning the expected significance of the question for the cases will be published. Once it is done, the clarifications become part of the cases. They shall be sent by the PO to all participating teams by and published on the Competition s website. Article 7. Participation and eligibility of universities and students

3 7.1. Any university that organizes specific tax courses in European and/or international tax law either at the master level or at the doctoral level, as well as a research centre with capacity of granting official titles is eligible to participate in the Selection Procedure described in Article 8 of these Rules All participating universities must regularly pay the moot court fees. If a university is given notice by the PO that it should pay its outstanding debts to the organisation or third parties arising from the participation to a previous edition of the Competition and does not pay such amounts in full or does not give the PO a good reason for not doing so, the Arbitrator may exclude this university from participating Each participating university may enter one team. Each team may contain between two and four students, none of which have any significant working experience in the field of taxation. Part-time or fulltime short-term experience will not be considered to be significant. For purposes of verifying this condition, all students shall include at the date indicated on the Competition s website a short CV, in which they set out in detail their academic and professional career, which will be relied upon by the Arbitrator in the selection procedure. They will explicitly authorise the use of their CV for purposes connected with the moot court, including the disclosure to the sponsors of the Competition All students enrolled on a full time or part time basis in a programme of study leading to a grade, master or doctoral degree (or equivalent) in Law, Business Administration and Economics (or assimilated areas) at the participating universities are eligible to participate in the Competition Students who have participated in previous editions of the Competition in any role shall not be allowed to participate again. However, they may act as coaches The participating students shall conduct themselves in a sports(wo)manlike manner at all stages of the Competition. Article 8. Selection procedure of the university 8.1. The selection procedure is composed of (i) the automatic selection procedure, (ii) the pre-selection procedure and (iii) the final selection procedure. For registration purposes each university shall use the General Agreement Form as published on the Competition s website ( The automatic selection procedure is reserved for the six teams that have passed to the second oral qualifying round in the previous edition of the Competition. Teams that are automatically qualified can waive their right to participate in the Competition before the date indicated to that effect in the Time Schedule The pre-selection procedure: universities whose academic year starts before 15 September may apply for the pre-selection procedure. To that effect, such universities must register by sending the General Agreement Form at the date indicated on the Competition s website, for the Competition: 14 September At most three teams may qualify for this procedure. The selection will be based on the criteria set out in article 8.4. Teams that have not been selected within the pre-selection procedure remain eligible for the final selection procedure The final selection procedure: all teams that have registered (by the General Agreement Form) at the date indicated on the Competition s website, for the Competition: 1 October 2018 will be eligible for selection within the final selection procedure. The Arbitrator will select the teams, taking into consideration the following criteria (no specific order is followed): a) performance of the university in the previous editions of the Competition; b) geographical spreading; c) place of the university in the worldwide ranking of universities (

4 8.5. All decisions of the Arbitrator under this article will be communicated by the PO to the universities that applied for participation in the Competition All selected teams must register their team members at the latest at the date indicated on the Competition s website, for the Competition: 5 October 2018; in order for the Arbitrator to check whether the conditions of article of the Rules are met, alongside this registration, the CV of every team member must be submitted (see art. 7.3.). Article 9. Team composition Participating teams shall consist of not less than two students (one as applicant and one as defendant, or both students as applicant and as defendant) and no more than four students. If, at any stage, the team is reduced to one element (for whatever reason) the team is immediately disqualified Between the submission of the memoranda and the start of the qualifying rounds, a team member may be substituted (or simply withdrawn) in case of serious and/or unexpected circumstances, to be described by the team coach in writing to the PO. The final decision is to be taken by the Arbitrator and communicated to the team by the PO. Article 10. Role of the coach Each team shall have one coach, affiliated to the university taking part in the Competition. The coach must guide his team both during the written phase as during the oral phase. The coach also serves as the contact person between the organization, including the PO, and the team. The coach shall provide to the PO an address to which all communications regarding the Competition can be sent. The coach shall ensure that the instructions provided by the organization and the PO reaches timely all the team members. The coach can opt to delegate this contact person function to a team member, but also in such case remains accountable for the correct functioning of all communication with his team In order to ensure the guidance of a team throughout the Competition, the presence of the coach is required in Leuven (Belgium) during the oral phase of the Competition. In urgent/unexpected circumstances, the coach shall explain to the Arbitrator the reasons of absence. That absence may result in penalty points imposed by the Arbitrator (see Annex C) The coach can be changed until the day before the start of the oral phase of the Competition. The team must inform the PO in writing of this change as soon as possible and in any case no later than the day before the start of the oral phase of the Competition. Article 11. Team registration Registration in the Competition is a four-step process comprising: i) the submission of the general agreement form (see art. 8.1.) at the date indicated in the timetable on the Competition s website: 14 September 2018 or 1 October 2018; ii) submission of the registration form; iii) the payment of the registration fee (see art. 13); (iv) the submission of the memoranda. All these documents shall be submitted by and the payment shall be made within the time frame indicated in the Time Schedule and published on the Competition s website. Article 12. Anonymity of teams For the assessment of the written memoranda, strict anonymity of the teams is required. Upon registration each team shall be assigned an alphabet letter, which will be used throughout the Competition (namely in the communications with the PO, the Arbitrator and the judges). Team members and the coaches shall not disclose (directly or indirectly) their identity, country of origin, or the University The team members should use the team badges in all events of the Competition in particular during the oral phase For social events and event with sponsors, the teams will receive special badges that disclose the identity of the team and the team members. Such badges may not be used during the pleading sessions.

5 Article 13. Fees Each year before the start of the Competition the Institute of Tax Law of the KU Leuven shall determine the fee per participating student in the Competition which will be published on the website of the Competition. The fee for the edition of the Competition shall be split: (i) each team, with a maximum of twenty-four, selected to participate to the written phase must pay a fee of 200 EUR per student; (ii) the sixteen highest ranked teams after the written phases shall be admitted to the oral rounds in Leuven and must pay an additional fee of 250 EUR per student The fees shall be paid by bank transfer to the account of the International & European Tax Moot Court indicated on the Contact page of the website of the Competition upon receipt of an invoice issued by KU Leuven. An invoice shall be issued by the KU Leuven after it has received the completed and signed Customer Information Sheet made available on the tax moot court website. Payment shall be made within the time frame indicated on the Competition s website. The transfer shall indicate the name of the university. Failure to make the payment within due time shall lead to the exclusion of the team. In such case, the Arbitrator may decide to invite a team to replace an excluded team The registration fee of a team whose registration is withdrawn by (sent to the PO) received prior to the day, on which the memoranda are due, shall be refunded in full. Withdrawal after that date by whatever reason shall not give right to any refund. The Arbitrator may decide to invite a team to replace the one whose application was withdrawn and take all appropriate measures in order to secure a fair participation of the team to the Competition. Article 14. Outside assistance The memoranda are the exclusive work of the team members Outside assistance which would interfere with the final product is prohibited and shall be penalized by the Arbitrator Although the students should do all the research and writing of the memoranda themselves - without assistance from anyone who is not a student member of the team - faculty members, coaches or other people affiliated with the University may discuss, in abstract and general terms, some of the topics mentioned in the cases. They can also help them to identify the issues, give suggestions as to research sources, comment on the persuasiveness of the arguments the students have come up with, and give training in legal writing and/or presentation in public. Article 15. Violations of the Rules and use of opposing team s memoranda All ethical violations not related with the organization of the competition shall be sent to the PO. If they relate to the PO, they shall be referred to the Arbitrator, personally Teams who have received inappropriate outside or professional assistance or who have committed plagiarism may be disqualified and/or penalized by the Arbitrator No team shall have access to any memorandum of another team, except for the respective applicant and defendant memoranda of the opposing team on the day before the pleading session according to article of the Official Rules It is nevertheless permissible for a team to incorporate the arguments and other information from memoranda and oral arguments of other teams of which they have gained knowledge as a result of participating in the Competition. Article 16. Juries For the written and the oral phase, the juries shall consist of effective or retired members of the judiciary, members of international organizations, staff members of the IBFD, practicing or retired lawyers, or active or retired university professors who are or have been professionally active in the fields of European and/or international taxation. All juries of the written and oral phase are appointed in agreement with the Arbitrator.

6 16.2. The juries of the oral rounds will be composed of three judges. In the composition of the benches during the first and second qualifying rounds, care will be taken that as much as practical the bench includes only one judge per nationality and one member of the IBFD. Faculty advisors, team coaches and other persons directly affiliated with a team cannot act as a judge. In the composition of the bench for the final round, care will be taken that as much as practical judges will be selected who are active or retired members of the judiciary and have a different nationality Members of the jury shall disqualify themselves from judging a team if they have a current personal or professional relationship with the university, a team or any of its members and if that relationship might jeopardize their impartiality or create an appearance of impropriety. Judges should not disqualify themselves merely because they are an alumnus of a university or institution, because they have an acquaintance with a team member or other affiliation or relationship with the university or institution. The Arbitrator shall notify the jury of any potential conflict of interest and may re-organize the bench during any stage of the Competition in case an issue of impartiality may arise. This decision will immediately be reported to the PO. Part II: The written phase Article 17. Written memoranda Each team has to prepare two written memoranda, providing arguments for both the applicant (taxpayer) and the defendant (tax authorities) The memoranda are to be written in English The team memoranda shall be sent by the time indicated in the Time Schedule on the Competition s website: i) by , to the PO, in doc or docx; ii) by post, in printed format (four copies of each memorandum, in a total of eight volumes) The digital and paper copies of the memoranda shall be identical No team may revise, substitute, add to, delete or in any other manner alter its memoranda after the time limit for their submission. Revised or additional pages submitted after expiration of the deadline shall be ignored. Article 18. Assessment of the written memoranda Each memorandum shall be judged individually by two readers, acting independently and selected in agreement with the Arbitrator Each memorandum shall be graded on the basis of the depth of the factual and legal analysis, originality of the argument, quality of the structuring of the argument, thoroughness of research, clarity and style. The jury shall assess and take into account whether arguments are based on facts not found in the cases or in the clarifications and that are not logical and necessary extensions of the given facts. In order to achieve the highest level of transparency and homogeneity in grading, the jury shall be provided with a suggested grading descriptor Each judge shall grade the memorandum on 75 points, according to the criteria as set out in annex B. Hence, the maximum number of points that a team can score for the memoranda is 300 points: i) 150 points for the memorandum on behalf of the applicant, and ii) 150 points for the memorandum on behalf of the defendant The final score for a memorandum shall be the sum of the points awarded by the members of the judges. Possible penalty points are assessed and imposed by the Arbitrator and subtracted from the total score given by the jury members Scores shall be kept on official scoring forms made available by the PO to the members of the jury.

7 18.6. The scores of the readers will be kept secret and will only be accessible to the PO and the Arbitrator. The PO will send the aggregated results of the written memoranda upon request by the team coach to the PO s . Part III: The oral rounds Article 19. Oral pleadings The sixteen highest ranked teams after the written phase shall be admitted to the oral rounds in Leuven. If there is a tie, the team with the highest points on the first two bullet points mentioned in 1.1. of Annex B, i.e. knowledge of facts and depth of factual analysis and knowledge of law and depth of legal analysis, prevails. If there would still be a tie, the team proceeding to the oral rounds shall be determined by lot by the Arbitrator. There shall be three oral rounds: the first qualifying round, the second qualifying round and the final. The oral rounds are governed by the Rules set out below In each pleading session one or two team members shall present the team s oral argument for the applicant, or for the defendant. If two team members are registered for the pleading session, both have to intervene in the presentation of the arguments (before the rebuttal or surrebuttal) Every team member needs to plead at least once both during the first and second qualifying round. Therefore, in a team composed of four members, two have necessarily to plead on behalf of the applicant and the remaining two on behalf of the defendant At the latest the day before the team is due to plead in a qualifying round the team should provide the names of the students pleading as applicants and as defendants for the first and second qualifying round, by to the PO. For the final, this has to be indicated by till 23h59 of the day before the final On the day before each pleading session, every team shall receive the memorandum of the opposing team One team member (but never the coach) may sit at the bar table as team counsel. The team member acting as counsel may be different, from one pleading session to another. The counsel is not allowed to address the court. Failure to respect this rule shall be noted by the judges in the scoring sheet and may be penalised by the Arbitrator. Team members may consult the counsel at any time. Counselling shall count as pleading time There shall be no communication between the bar table and the coach and any individual attending in the audience during the hearing During the first and second qualifying rounds, the team members and the coach may only attend the oral pleadings in which their team is participating. Any infringement of this rule may lead to penalties or exclusion, to be decided by the Arbitrator In each oral pleading, each team has a total of 30 minutes (time for rebuttal and surrebuttal not included) If two team members are pleading, both of them have to intervene when presenting the oral argumentation, before the rebuttal and surrebuttal. Teams are free to allocate the time between the two team members The rebuttal (applicant) and surrebuttal (defendant) have a maximum of 10 minutes, 5 minutes each If there is no rebuttal (from the applicant) no surrebuttal is possible (from the defendant) The scope of the oral arguments is not limited to the scope of the team s submitted memorandum. The scope of the applicant s rebuttal, however, shall be limited to the scope of the

8 defendant s pleadings and the scope of the defendant s surrebuttal shall be limited to the scope of the applicant s rebuttal. Judges will take this into consideration when marking the pleadings After the oral pleading (including rebuttal and surrebuttal)), the members of the jury may ask questions to the oralists. There is no time limit for this period this Q&A During the pleadings the use of any material or exhibits other than the memoranda and supporting documents is not permitted. In addition, only hard copies of the memoranda and the supporting documents are allowed (no electronic devices) Taping and/or broadcasting of the oral arguments is not allowed. Filming during the hearings is not allowed, except if authorized by the organization and under the supervision of the Arbitrator. Photographing during the hearings is allowed insofar it does not hinder the oralists in their pleadings. The judges or the Arbitrator may instruct anyone to stop to take pictures at any time The Arbitrator is responsible for keeping track of time and for collecting the score sheets Teams shall plead in front of both courts in the qualifying rounds. Article 20. Scoring of the oral arguments Each pleading shall be judged individually by three members of the jury. A grade of maximum fifty (50) points per team member pleading shall be awarded by each judge, according to the criteria as set out in Annex B. The judges have access to the written memoranda before each pleading If, in a pleading session, a team is composed by two oralists, the total score of the team on that pleading session is divided by two After the second qualifying round and prior to the final, the Arbitrator will have a briefing with all teams, except for those qualifying for the final, and the PO will make all rankings public. Scores of individuals and the respective team will be sent by the PO to the team coach at the end of the competition. The score of the final will not be made public. There will be only an announcement of the winning team. Article 21. The first qualifying round For the first qualifying round, the teams shall be paired by lot. The draw shall take place in a public session to which all teams are invited and that will be held in Leuven (Belgium) on the day preceding the start of the oral phase of the Competition Every team admitted to the qualifying round shall plead twice, once as applicant and once as defendant. In principle, each team shall argue once per day. In exceptional circumstances (such as e.g. due to the number of participants in the Competition), the pleading of one team twice on the same day will be decided by the Arbitrator The PO will publish the pleading schedule, i.e. the day and hour a team shall present its arguments, on the Competition s website the day before the first and second qualifying rounds. Article 22. Second qualifying round The six teams with the highest second round admission ranking score shall proceed to the second round. The second round admission ranking score of a team is the total score of the pleading of the team in the first qualifying round, multiplied by factor 3, and the total score on the written memoranda If two or more teams have an equal second round admission ranking score, the team with the highest score in the first qualifying round shall be ranked higher. If this operation still results in a draw, rank shall be determined by lot.

9 22.3. If for any reason one of the selected teams cannot participate to the second round, or if a team should be disqualified, it shall be replaced by the initially non-qualifying team with the highest second round admission ranking score Every team admitted to the second round shall plead twice, once as applicant and once as defendant. The teams shall be paired by lot. If it appears that two teams paired by lot have pleaded against each other in the qualifying round, a redraw will take place. Article 23. The final The two teams with the highest final admission ranking score proceed to the final. The final admission ranking score of a team consists of the total score of the pleading of the team in the second round If two or more teams have an equal final admission ranking score, the teams with the best scores in the memoranda will be ranked higher. If these two teams still have the same overall score in the memoranda, the team proceeding to the final shall be chosen by lot under the supervision of the Arbitrator A toss coin shall decide which team shall argue the side of the applicant (taxpayer) and which team the side of the defendant (tax authorities). Each team shall prepare its written memoranda which shall duly reflect the arguments put forward during the Final. The memoranda shall be delivered to the PO s inbox at the time mentioned in the official schedule of the competition. Failure to do so may lead to penalty points in accordance with the annexes The team with the highest final score wins the Competition. The final score is the total score of the team for its oral pleading session in the final. In case of a draw, the team with the highest "final admission ranking score" wins the Competition. Article 24. Complaints procedure If a team wishes to make a complaint during the written or oral phase of the Competition, the coach of the team shall inform the PO by , at earliest convenience. The PO, also at earliest convenience, shall forward the complaint to the Arbitrator, who will take a decision in his discretion. The Arbitrator informs the PO about his decision. The PO shall inform the coach of the team who raised the issue by . If the Arbitrator considers it necessary, other teams may be informed of the content of the reply. Part IV: Awards Article 25. Awards The following awards are given at the end of the Competition: 1. The award for the winning team, granted to the team that wins the final. 2. The award for the second best team, granted to the other finalist. 3. The award for the best pleading team, granted to the team with the highest score in the qualifying round and second round. 4. The award for the best individual applicant granted to the student with the highest individual score in the qualifying round and second round for his pleadings on behalf of the applicant. 5. The award for the best individual defendant granted to the student with the highest individual average score in the first and second qualifying round for his pleadings on behalf of the defendant. 6. The award for the best memorandum on behalf of the applicant, granted to the team with the highest score on the memoranda presented on behalf of the applicant. 7. The award for the best memorandum on behalf of the defendant, granted to the team with the highest score on the memoranda presented on behalf of the defendant. 8. The award for the best oral team on behalf of the applicant is won by the team which has the highest average score in qualifying round and second round for his pleadings on behalf of the applicant.

10 9. The award for the best oral team on behalf of the defendant is won by the team which has the highest average score in the qualifying round and second round for his pleadings on behalf of the defendant. The awards for the best oral team on behalf of the applicant or the defendant can only be granted to teams who had more than one person pleading as applicant or defendant. The Arbitrator may choose to grant a Special Achievement Award for the team that has excelled in fair play. Part V: Final provisions Article 26. Revision of rules The Rules may only be revised after the end of an annual Competition. ANNEX A 1. Every team shall submit two memoranda, one on behalf of the applicant (the taxpayer) and one on behalf of the defendant (the tax authorities). The memoranda shall be submitted: i) by (digital version in doc or docx); ii) by normal post (four hard copies of each of the memoranda, in total or eight hard copies). 2. Hard copies of memoranda shall be bound or stapled securely so that the binding or stapling shall hold throughout the Competition. 3. Each Memorandum is to contain the following parts in the following order: External cover Internal cover Table of contents List of sources (treaties, case law, doctrine, etc.); Statement of facts Issues Arguments Annexes (optional) Table of abbreviations 4. The colour of the external cover shall be red for the applicant (taxpayer) and blue for the defendant (tax administration). The participating teams shall not disclose their identity, directly or indirectly, in the memoranda. The sole element for identification of the team in the cover shall be the alphabetic letter received upon registration, to clearly in the middle at the bottom on the cover. On the central middle of the cover the team shall also indicate whether the memorandum is submitted on behalf of the applicant or the defendant. In the upper centre corner of the cover shall also appear the name and year of the Competition. 5. The internal cover shall present the same information as the external cover. 6. The memoranda shall be typed on standard international A4 paper (21 x 29 ¾ centimetres) on one side. The font and size of the text of all parts of the memorandum shall be in Times New Roman, 12- point (except for the footnotes that should be 10-point). The text of all parts of the memorandum shall be 1,5 spaced, except for the footnotes that may be single-spaced. Margins should be 2 cm on both sides and 3 cm at the top and the bottom. 7. Each page shall be numbered in Arabic numbers in the middle at the top. The different parts of the memorandum have to be numbered consecutively in capital Roman numbers. Also, paragraphs shall be numbered in Arabic numbers. Finally, also the footnotes have to be numbered consecutively throughout the whole document.

11 8. The table of contents shall refer to the page numbers. 9. The list of sources shall contain all legal authorities cited in any section of the memorandum. This list shall include a description adequate to allow a reasonable reader to identify and locate the authority in publications of general circulation. The rendition of sources in footnotes has to be the same as the rendition of these sources in the list of sources. Account should be taken that the style of citation of judicial decisions or articles in legal journals that is common in one country may not be intelligible to participants in the Competition from other countries. 11. The statement of the facts shall be limited to the stipulated facts and necessary inferences from the Case and respective clarifications. 12. In the issues section, all relevant juridical questions and topics of the Case shall be enumerated and summarized. 13. The argument section (see Annex A.4.g) shall be limited to 12,000 words, footnotes included. Substantive, affirmative legal arguments or legal interpretation of the facts of the Case may only be presented in this section. 14. Memoranda can include annexes up to a maximum of five pages. ANNEX B 1. Assessment of the written memoranda: 1.1. Each member of the jury in charge of marking the memoranda shall assess it on a maximum of 75 points, to be attributed based on the following criteria: Knowledge of facts and depth of factual analysis: up to 15 points; Knowledge of law and depth of legal analysis: up to 15 points; Originality of the argument: up to 15 points; Clarity and well-organized structure of the organization: up to 15 points; Extent and use of research: up to 7,5 points; Grammar and style: up to 7,5 points; 1.2. If the memorandum contains arguments based on facts that are neither found in, nor are logical and necessary extensions of, the facts given in the Case or in the clarifications, the jury shall inform the PO shall pass on this information to the Arbitrator, who, after consultation of the jury, can sanction this infraction. Those extra facts and the reasoning based on them should not be taken into account in grading. 2. Assessment of the oral pleadings (first and second qualifying round and final) Each member of the jury shall assess the oral pleadings of the team members of the applicant and the defendant on a maximum of 50 points, to be granted according to the following criteria: Knowledge of law: up to 10 points; Application of law to facts: up to 10 points; Ingenuity and ability to answer questions: up to 10 points; Clarity and structure of the argument: up to 10 points; Skills of pleading and speaking: up to 10 points; ANNEX C Penalty points

12 The following infractions shall be sanctioned by the following penalty points or by disqualification, subject to the appreciation of the Arbitrator: 1. Delayed submission of the memoranda of the qualifying rounds, by (see articles of the Official rules) one working day delay: up to 5 penalty points; two working days delay: up to 20 penalty points; three working days late: up to 50 penalty points; Four working days delay: up to 50 penalty points or disqualification, to be decided by the Arbitrator on the basis of the explanations provided writing by the coach of the team. 2. Delayed submission of the memoranda for the final: up to 50 penalty points depending on the delay and on the reasons argued by the team for the delay 3. Disclosure of the identity of the team in the memorandum (see article of the Official Rules): up to 50 penalty points, to be decided by the Arbitrator, based on the type of the disclosure. 4. Formal infractions to articles 2-10 and 12 of Annex A: up to 15 penalty points per infraction. 5. Exceeding the maximum number of words of the argument section or the annexes (see section 13 of Annex A): a) 5 penalty points per set of 250 words started for the first two sets of 250 words; b) 10 penalty points per set of 250 words started for the next two sets of 250 words; c) 20 penalty points for each following set of 250 words started after that. 6. Any other infringement of the rules may be penalized by the Arbitrator up to 50 penalty points per infringement (and not per rule infringed; therefore, if a rule is infringed more than once, the team may be penalized more than once).

Article I. Function. Article II. Organisation

Article I. Function. Article II. Organisation International Rules of Procedure Chapter I. General Provisions Article I. Function 1. The Telders International Law Moot Court Competition (hereinafter to be referred to as the Competition ) shall be held

More information

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE LEIDEN-SARIN INTERNATIONAL AIR LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION (August 2015)

RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE LEIDEN-SARIN INTERNATIONAL AIR LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION (August 2015) RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE LEIDEN-SARIN INTERNATIONAL AIR LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION (August 2015) Chapter I. General Provisions Article 1 Function a. The present Rules govern the procedure of the Leiden-Sarin

More information

International Migration and Refugee Law Moot Court VU Amsterdam Migration Law Clinic 2019 RULES

International Migration and Refugee Law Moot Court VU Amsterdam Migration Law Clinic 2019 RULES International Migration and Refugee Law Moot Court VU Amsterdam Migration Law Clinic 2019 RULES 1 Content 1. General... 4 1.1 Moot court Overview... 4 1.2 Timetable... 4 1.3 Registration... 4 1.4 Team

More information

Round of the Americas

Round of the Americas Rules of Procedure Round of the Americas Pace Law School White Plains, NY March 1-3, 2013 International Criminal Court Trial Competition Please note: These rules apply to the Round of the Americas held

More information

Round of the Americas

Round of the Americas Rules of Procedure Round of the Americas Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University White Plains, New York March 16-18, 2018 International Criminal Court Trial Competition Please note: These rules

More information

Rules of Procedure. International Criminal Court Moot Court Competition ICC Moot Court Competition

Rules of Procedure. International Criminal Court Moot Court Competition ICC Moot Court Competition Rules of Procedure International Criminal Court Moot Court Competition 2015 Table of Contents Chapter 1: General Rules... 3 Art. 1 - Object... 3 Art. 2 - Subject... 3 Art. 3 - Interpretation of the Rules...

More information

THE RULES OF THE EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS MOOT COURT COMPETITION

THE RULES OF THE EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS MOOT COURT COMPETITION THE RULES OF THE EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS MOOT COURT COMPETITION 7 TH EDITION 2018 PREFACE The European Court of Human Rights is an international court based in Strasbourg. It consists of a number of judges

More information

The Wilson Moot Official Rules 2018

The Wilson Moot Official Rules 2018 W M ilson oot The Wilson Moot Official Rules 2018 Table of Contents Page I. INTERPRETATION... - 1 - A. Purposes and Objectives...- 1 - B. Interpretation of Rules...- 1-1. Referees... - 1-2. Rules...- 1-3.

More information

October 4, rd Annual Dean Jerome Prince Memorial Evidence Competition

October 4, rd Annual Dean Jerome Prince Memorial Evidence Competition Meredith Cohen 2018 Prince Competition Coordinator October 4, 2017 33 rd Annual Dean Jerome Prince Memorial Evidence Competition Dear Moot Court Board Director: The Brooklyn Law School Moot Court Honor

More information

Official Rules of the National Professional Responsibility Moot Court Competition

Official Rules of the National Professional Responsibility Moot Court Competition Official Rules of the National Professional Responsibility Moot Court Competition I. Executive Board A. "Executive Board" Defined The Executive Board is responsible for organizing and administering the

More information

Rules of the European Human Rights Moot Court Competition

Rules of the European Human Rights Moot Court Competition Rules of the European Human Rights Moot Court Competition Preface The European Court of Human Rights is an international court based in Strasbourg. It consists of a number of Judges equal to the number

More information

The Julius Alexander Isaac Diversity Moot Official Rules 2016 Black Law Students Association of Canada I. INTERPRETATION

The Julius Alexander Isaac Diversity Moot Official Rules 2016 Black Law Students Association of Canada I. INTERPRETATION The Julius Alexander Isaac Diversity Moot Official Rules 2016 Black Law Students Association of Canada A. Purposes and Objectives I. INTERPRETATION The Julius Alexander Isaac Moot is administered by the

More information

LOCAL ARBITRATION MOOT COMPETITION 2017 PROCEDURAL RULES. TITLE I General Rules

LOCAL ARBITRATION MOOT COMPETITION 2017 PROCEDURAL RULES. TITLE I General Rules LOCAL ARBITRATION MOOT COMPETITION 2017 PROCEDURAL RULES TITLE I General Rules PART I Organization and structure Art. 1 The Local Arbitration Competition (hereinafter LAMC ) is a team Moot Court Competition

More information

European Law Moot Court The Rules

European Law Moot Court The Rules European Law Moot Court Rules Overhaul made by Georges Vallindas, President, Elske Raedts, Written Proceedings Phase Manager, and the European Law Moot Court Society in 2015. To use, reproduce and get

More information

42 nd Annual ROBERT F. WAGNER NATIONAL LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION

42 nd Annual ROBERT F. WAGNER NATIONAL LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION N EW Y O R K L A W S C H O O L M OO T C O U RT A S S O C I AT I O N 42 nd Annual ROBERT F. WAGNER NATIONAL LABOR & EMPLOYMENT LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2018 COMPETITION RULES N EW Y O R K L A W S C H

More information

CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL MOOT COMPETITION ON MARITIME ARBITRATION MARCH 2011 THE RULES MOOT DIRECTOR DMYTRO KOVAL

CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL MOOT COMPETITION ON MARITIME ARBITRATION MARCH 2011 THE RULES MOOT DIRECTOR DMYTRO KOVAL CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL LAW AND JUSTICE INTERNATIONAL MOOT COMPETITION ON MARITIME ARBITRATION 18-20 MARCH 2011 THE RULES MOOT DIRECTOR DMYTRO KOVAL EMAIL: dmytriy.koval@gmail.com MOOT COORDINATOR ANTHONY

More information

Inaugural Hon. Michael Kirby Contract Law Moot. Melbourne, Australia September 2011 THE RULES

Inaugural Hon. Michael Kirby Contract Law Moot. Melbourne, Australia September 2011 THE RULES Inaugural Hon. Michael Kirby Contract Law Moot Melbourne, Australia 28-30 September 2011 THE RULES Organised by: Victoria Law School Victoria University 1 INTRODUCTION I. The Hon. Michael Kirby Contract

More information

FRANK A. SCHRECK GAMING LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION

FRANK A. SCHRECK GAMING LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION I E T Y O F A D V O C A C S O T E S 3RD ANNUAL FRANK A. SCHRECK GAMING LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2018 COMPETITION RULES 4505 S. Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154 SchreckMCC@law.unlv.edu https://www.law.unlv.edu/frank-schreck-gaming-law-moot-court-competition

More information

X NLS-TRILEGAL INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION MOOT, 2017

X NLS-TRILEGAL INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION MOOT, 2017 X NLS-TRILEGAL INTERNATIONAL ARBITRATION MOOT, 2017 RULES OF THE COMPETITION 11 TH 14 TH MAY, 2017 IN ASSOCIATION WITH TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. DEFINITIONS... 5 2. INTERPRETATION... 7 3. ELIGIBILITY... 7 4.

More information

Asia-Pacific Moot Court Rounds 2013 OFFICIAL RULES (2013)

Asia-Pacific Moot Court Rounds 2013 OFFICIAL RULES (2013) Asia-Pacific Moot Court Rounds 2013-4th d Inter-university Round in Japan - OFFICIAL RULES (2013) GENERAL 1. The Moot Court Competition shall be conducted under the auspices of the International Committee

More information

THE LASKIN 2018 OFFICIAL RULES

THE LASKIN 2018 OFFICIAL RULES THE LASKIN 2018 OFFICIAL RULES Table of Contents 1. GENERAL... 1 1.01 Overview... 1 1.02 Purposes and Objectives of the Competition... 1 1.03 Definitions... 1 1.04 Administration of the Competition...

More information

ALL INDIA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2018

ALL INDIA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2018 ALL INDIA MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2018 BY SOCIETY OF MOOTERS UNIVERSITY LAW COLLEGE, BENGALURU GENERAL MANUAL ON RULES AND REGULATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 General Rules Page No.3 2 Date and Venue Page

More information

Asia-Pacific Moot Court Rounds 2017 OFFICIAL RULES (2017)

Asia-Pacific Moot Court Rounds 2017 OFFICIAL RULES (2017) Asia-Pacific Moot Court Rounds 2017-8 th Inter-university Round in Japan - OFFICIAL RULES (2017) GENERAL 1. The Moot Court Competition shall be conducted under the auspices of the International Committee

More information

Table of ConTenTs. Rules 2-11

Table of ConTenTs. Rules 2-11 Table of ConTenTs Particulars Page No. Rules 2-11 1. Administration 2 2. Eligibility for Participation 2 3. Registration 2 4. Anonymity of Teams 3 5. Clarification 3 6. Official Language 4 7. Accommodation

More information

Powered by TCPDF (

Powered by TCPDF ( Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org) RULES OF THE COMPETITION TABLE OF CONTENTS I. ADMINISTRATION AND GRIEVANCE REDRESSAL... 1 II. ELIGIBILITY & TEAM COMPOSITION... 1 III. LANGUAGE, DRESS CODE AND CONDUCT...

More information

2018 Tullis Moot Court Competition Rules

2018 Tullis Moot Court Competition Rules 2018 Tullis Moot Court Competition Rules 1. Teams 1.1. Every participating student shall participate in this Competition through participation in a Tullis team. Tullis Teams must consist of two second-year

More information

Twelfth Annual WILLEM C. VIS INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MOOT. Vienna, Austria. October March Oral Arguments March 2005

Twelfth Annual WILLEM C. VIS INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MOOT. Vienna, Austria. October March Oral Arguments March 2005 Twelfth Annual WILLEM C. VIS INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MOOT Vienna, Austria October 2004 - March 2005 Oral Arguments 18-24 March 2005 THE RULES Organized by: Institute of International Commercial

More information

2 nd DR. GURJEET SINGH MEMORIAL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY AND JUDICIAL ACADEMY, ASSAM 20 th - 22 nd APRIL, 2018

2 nd DR. GURJEET SINGH MEMORIAL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY AND JUDICIAL ACADEMY, ASSAM 20 th - 22 nd APRIL, 2018 2 nd DR. GURJEET SINGH MEMORIAL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2018 NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY AND JUDICIAL ACADEMY, ASSAM 20 th - 22 nd APRIL, 2018 RULES & REGULATIONS KNOWLEDGE PARTNERS PART I DEFINITIONS

More information

PRESENTED BY: APPELLATE MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2013 RULES

PRESENTED BY: APPELLATE MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2013 RULES PRESENTED BY: APPELLATE MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2013 RULES RULE I. ORGANIZATION The National Animal Law Competitions (NALC) are an inter-law school competition comprised of three separate events: Legislative

More information

NATIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN LAW STUDENT ASSOCIATION ANNUAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION OFFICIAL RULES

NATIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN LAW STUDENT ASSOCIATION ANNUAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION OFFICIAL RULES NATIONAL NATIVE AMERICAN LAW STUDENT ASSOCIATION ANNUAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION OFFICIAL RULES (As Amended by the NNALSA Board of Directors, November 10, 2016) 1 Table of Contents Mission Statement..5 SECTION

More information

RULES AND REGULATIONS

RULES AND REGULATIONS RULES AND REGULATIONS Introduction Moot courts or mock trials are usually based on hypothetical cases involving emerging or unsettled areas of law. I. Aim and Purpose a. To expose students pursuing the

More information

The 10 th Red Cross International Humanitarian Law (IHL) Moot (2016)

The 10 th Red Cross International Humanitarian Law (IHL) Moot (2016) The 10 th Red Cross International Humanitarian Law (IHL) Moot (2016) An Inter-University Competition for Mainland China General Matters The Rules 1. The 10 th Red Cross International Humanitarian Law Moot

More information

THE RULES WILLMS & SHIER ENVIRONMENTAL LAW MOOT OFFICIAL COMPETITION RULES 2017

THE RULES WILLMS & SHIER ENVIRONMENTAL LAW MOOT OFFICIAL COMPETITION RULES 2017 THE RULES WILLMS & SHIER ENVIRONMENTAL LAW MOOT OFFICIAL COMPETITION RULES 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 PURPOSE...1 2 DEFINITIONS...1 3 INTERPRETATION...1 3.1 REFEREE... 1 3.2 AUTHORITY TO INTERPRET THE RULES...

More information

COMPETITION, 2016 RULES & REGULATIONS THE TAMIL NADU DR. AMBEDKAR LAW UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE IN LAW CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, INDIA

COMPETITION, 2016 RULES & REGULATIONS THE TAMIL NADU DR. AMBEDKAR LAW UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE IN LAW CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, INDIA THE 10 TH PRO BONO ENVIRO NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2016 2 ND 4 TH DECEMBER, 2016 RULES & REGULATIONS THE TAMIL NADU DR. AMBEDKAR LAW UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF EXCELLENCE IN LAW CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU,

More information

14TH NATIONAL IHL MOOT COURT COMPETITION (2017)

14TH NATIONAL IHL MOOT COURT COMPETITION (2017) OFFICIAL RULES FOR THE 14th NATIONAL IHL MOOT COURT COMPETITION 18-19 November 2017, Ahmad Ibrahim Kulliyyah of Laws, International Islamic University Malaysia Index: Chapter I: Rules for Registration

More information

The 7 th Annual Michael Kirby Contract Law Moot Melbourne, Australia September 2017 THE RULES

The 7 th Annual Michael Kirby Contract Law Moot Melbourne, Australia September 2017 THE RULES The 7 th Annual Michael Kirby Contract Law Moot Melbourne, Australia 25-28 September 2017 THE RULES Organised by: College of Law and Justice, Victoria University Moot Coordinator Vivi.Tan@vu.edu.au Ph:

More information

KSHAN 13 th NATIONAL TRIAL & APPELLATE MOOT COURT COMPETITION th, 17th & 18th MARCH 18 RULES

KSHAN 13 th NATIONAL TRIAL & APPELLATE MOOT COURT COMPETITION th, 17th & 18th MARCH 18 RULES KSHAN 13 th NATIONAL TRIAL & APPELLATE MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2018 16th, 17th & 18th MARCH 18 RULES VENUE G. H. RAISONI LAW SCHOOL 345, SHRADDHA HOUSE, KINGSWAY, NAGPUR- 440014, MAHARASHTRA E- mail:- raisonilawschool@gmail.com

More information

STUDIES 2 ND VIVEKANANDA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION 7 TH - 9 TH NOVEMBER, 2014 [1]

STUDIES 2 ND VIVEKANANDA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION 7 TH - 9 TH NOVEMBER, 2014 [1] VIVEKANANDA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES 2 ND VIVEKANANDA INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL STUDIES INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION 7 TH - 9 TH NOVEMBER, 2014 [1] Vivekananda Institute of Professional

More information

RULES AND REGULATIONS

RULES AND REGULATIONS RULES AND REGULATIONS Event: 14th Nani Palkhivala Memorial National Taxation Moot Court Competition - 2018 Dates: 6th to 8th April, 2018 Venue: School of Law, SASTRA Deemed to be University, Thirumalaisamudram,

More information

PRESENTED BY: HOSTED BY: APPELLATE MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2011 COMPETITION RULES

PRESENTED BY: HOSTED BY: APPELLATE MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2011 COMPETITION RULES PRESENTED BY: HOSTED BY: APPELLATE MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2011 COMPETITION RULES RULE I. ORGANIZATION The National Animal Law Competitions (NALC) are an inter-law school competition comprised of three

More information

6 TH RMLNLU SCC ONLINE COURT COMPETITION, 2018 RULES INTERNATIONAL MEDIA LAW MOOT. March 9 11, 2018

6 TH RMLNLU SCC ONLINE COURT COMPETITION, 2018 RULES INTERNATIONAL MEDIA LAW MOOT. March 9 11, 2018 6 TH RMLNLU SCC ONLINE INTERNATIONAL MEDIA LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2018 March 9 11, 2018 RULES TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. DEFINITIONS...2 2. TEAM COMPOSITION AND ELIGIBILITY...3 3. LANGUAGE...3 4. REGISTRATION...4

More information

Centre for Competition Law and Policy. The National University of Advanced Legal Studies

Centre for Competition Law and Policy. The National University of Advanced Legal Studies FIRST EDITION, 2017 APRIL 7-9, 2017 KOCHI, KERALA Organised by: Centre for Competition Law and Policy The National University of Advanced Legal Studies OFFICIAL RULES 1 1. REGISTRATION a) Participation

More information

NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2017 RULES

NATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2017 RULES FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS BAR ASSOCIATION AND THE LAW AND TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTE OF THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA, COLUMBUS SCHOOL OF LAW 3600 JOHN MCCORMACK ROAD, N.E. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20064 NATIONAL

More information

THE OFFICIAL BLACK LAW STUDENTS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA (BLSAC) JULIUS ISAAC ALEXANDER DIVERSITY MOOT RULES Academic Year

THE OFFICIAL BLACK LAW STUDENTS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA (BLSAC) JULIUS ISAAC ALEXANDER DIVERSITY MOOT RULES Academic Year THE OFFICIAL BLACK LAW STUDENTS ASSOCIATION OF CANADA (BLSAC) JULIUS ISAAC ALEXANDER DIVERSITY MOOT RULES 2012 2013 Academic Year Preamble The BLSAC Diversity Moot is designed to promote advocacy and excellence

More information

CONSTITUTION OF AN ORGANIZING COMMITTEE CONDUCT OF THE INTERNAL TRIAL ADVOCACY RANKING ROUNDS

CONSTITUTION OF AN ORGANIZING COMMITTEE CONDUCT OF THE INTERNAL TRIAL ADVOCACY RANKING ROUNDS RULES INTERNAL TRIAL ADVOCACY RANKING ROUNDS 2016 2017 CONSTITUTION OF AN ORGANIZING COMMITTEE 1. An organizing committee independent of the participants of the Internal Trial Advocacy Ranking Rounds2016

More information

4th AURO NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2018 RULES OF THE COMPETITION

4th AURO NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2018 RULES OF THE COMPETITION 4th AURO NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2018 RULES OF THE COMPETITION DEFINITIONS 1. A.L.C (Auro Litigiosus Commitee) :- A.L.C means the official body designated to conduct and regulate all the moot court

More information

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Moot Competition 2017, 28-29_Oct_NLU Delhi

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Moot Competition 2017, 28-29_Oct_NLU Delhi 1 P a g e INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY MOOT COMPETITION 2017 28-29 October, New Delhi, INDIA Organized by: - Centre for Transnational Commercial Law National Law University, Delhi. INDIA Supported by: - The

More information

COMPETITION MANUAL. (Rules and Registration Form)

COMPETITION MANUAL. (Rules and Registration Form) 3 rd IIT LAW SCHOOL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2016 (11 th to 13 th November, 2016) COMPETITION MANUAL (Rules and Registration Form) 3 rd IIT LAW SCHOOL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2016 INDEX

More information

Fourteenth Annual WILLEM C. VIS INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MOOT. Vienna, Austria. October April 2007

Fourteenth Annual WILLEM C. VIS INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MOOT. Vienna, Austria. October April 2007 Fourteenth Annual WILLEM C. VIS INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MOOT Vienna, Austria October 2006 - April 2007 Oral Arguments 30 March 5 April 2007 THE RULES Organized by: Institute of International

More information

RULES OF THE COMPETITION

RULES OF THE COMPETITION 20 TH D.M. HARISH MEMORIAL GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2019 8 TH - 10 TH FEBRUARY, 2019 RULES OF THE COMPETITION HOSTED BY: IN ASSOCIATION WITH: D. M. HARISH FOUNDATION

More information

2010 BFSU Intellectual Property Moot Court Competition OFFICIAL RULES. January 2010

2010 BFSU Intellectual Property Moot Court Competition OFFICIAL RULES. January 2010 2010 BFSU Intellectual Property Moot Court Competition OFFICIAL RULES January 2010 This Competition is organized by Beijing Foreign Studies University (BFSU), School of Law, with an aim to promote legal

More information

WAVES In association with. West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata

WAVES In association with. West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata BITS Pilani - K.K. Birla Goa Campus WAVES 2017 In association with West Bengal National University of Juridical Sciences, Kolkata LEX OMNIA MOOT COURT 2017 1. Eligibility and Participation: 1.1. All Law

More information

SURANA & SURANA NATIONAL CORPORATE LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2013 RULES AND REGULATIONS

SURANA & SURANA NATIONAL CORPORATE LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2013 RULES AND REGULATIONS SURANA & SURANA NATIONAL CORPORATE LAW MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2013 15-17 February 2013 RULES Host & Joint organiser Joint Organiser Surana & Surana International Attorneys JSS Law College, Mysore Venue

More information

DR.AMBEDKAR GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE CHENNAI

DR.AMBEDKAR GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE CHENNAI DR.AMBEDKAR GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE CHENNAI 600 104 MOOT COURT SELECTION ROUNDS OCTOBER 20, 2016 RULES 1. ELIGIBILITY Students pursuing three or five year courses of the LL.B. degree in the academic year

More information

COMPETITION MANUAL. (Rules and Registration Form)

COMPETITION MANUAL. (Rules and Registration Form) 2 nd IIT LAW SCHOOL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2015 (6 th to 8 th November 2015) COMPETITION MANUAL (Rules and Registration Form) NMCC-II, 6-8 November 2015 INDEX 1. GENERAL... 2 2. ELIGIBILITY AND

More information

6 TH RGNUL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2017

6 TH RGNUL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2017 6 TH RGNUL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2017 31 st March - 2 nd April, 2017 RULES & REGULATIONS 1. INTRODUCTION a) Short Title: These Rules shall be called the 6 th RGNUL National Moot Court Competition

More information

RULES OF THE COMPETITION

RULES OF THE COMPETITION 19 TH D.M. HARISH MEMORIAL GOVERNMENT LAW COLLEGE INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2018 9 TH - 11 TH FEBRUARY, 2018 RULES OF THE COMPETITION HOSTED BY: IN ASSOCIATION WITH: D. M. HARISH FOUNDATION

More information

Sixteenth Annual WILLEM C. VIS INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MOOT. Vienna, Austria. October April Oral Arguments 3-9 April 2009

Sixteenth Annual WILLEM C. VIS INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MOOT. Vienna, Austria. October April Oral Arguments 3-9 April 2009 Sixteenth Annual WILLEM C. VIS INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION MOOT Vienna, Austria October 2008 - April 2009 Oral Arguments 3-9 April 2009 THE RULES Organized by: Association for the organisation

More information

RULES OF THE 44 th ANNUAL NATIONAL TRIAL COMPETITION

RULES OF THE 44 th ANNUAL NATIONAL TRIAL COMPETITION RULES OF THE 44 th ANNUAL NATIONAL TRIAL COMPETITION Sponsored by: Texas Young Lawyers Association and American College of Trial Lawyers 2013 TEXAS YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION Article I. General 1.1 The

More information

NINTH JUSTICE HIDAYATULLAH MEMORIAL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION (HNMCC), 2017

NINTH JUSTICE HIDAYATULLAH MEMORIAL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION (HNMCC), 2017 NINTH JUSTICE HIDAYATULLAH MEMORIAL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION (HNMCC), 2017 General Rules for HNMCC 2017: i. Organizers means the Hidayatullah National Law University, Naya Raipur. ii. Participating

More information

1 ST DACET-INTERSCHOOL DEBATE RULES MODIFIED OXFORD-OREGON FORMAT (for reference use only)

1 ST DACET-INTERSCHOOL DEBATE RULES MODIFIED OXFORD-OREGON FORMAT (for reference use only) 1. DEFINITIONS 1 ST DACET-INTERSCHOOL DEBATE RULES MODIFIED OXFORD-OREGON FORMAT (for reference use only) The following terms have the corresponding meanings: "Tournament Director" means the person appointed

More information

ASCENT MOOT COURT COMPETITION RULES AND REGULATIONS

ASCENT MOOT COURT COMPETITION RULES AND REGULATIONS ASCENT MOOT COURT COMPETITION RULES AND REGULATIONS PRELIMINARY: The Moot Court Society of Symbiosis Law School, Noida is organizing ASCENT Moot Court Competition on Sunday 22.07.2012 at 08.00 hrs IST.

More information

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE

ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Last Revised 12/1/2006 ADR CODE OF PROCEDURE Rules & Procedures for Arbitration RULE 1: SCOPE OF RULES A. The arbitration Rules and Procedures ( Rules ) govern binding arbitration of disputes or claims

More information

WIPO WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANISATION ARBITRATION RULES

WIPO WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANISATION ARBITRATION RULES APPENDIX 3.17 WIPO WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANISATION ARBITRATION RULES (as from 1 October 2002) I. GENERAL PROVISIONS Abbreviated Expressions Article 1 In these Rules: Arbitration Agreement means

More information

CLOSING ARGUMENT COMPETITION 2014 RULES

CLOSING ARGUMENT COMPETITION 2014 RULES CLOSING ARGUMENT COMPETITION 2014 RULES PRESENTED BY HOSTED BY Northwestern University School of Law Table of Contents RULE I. ORGANIZATION... 3 RULE II. PARTICIPATION... 3 A. Competitor Eligibility....

More information

COMPETITION MANUAL. (Rules and Registration Form)

COMPETITION MANUAL. (Rules and Registration Form) 1 st IIT LAW SCHOOL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2014 (14 th to 16 th November 2014) COMPETITION MANUAL (Rules and Registration Form) 1 st IIT LAW SCHOOL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2014 INDEX

More information

(B) Serve as a point of contact between the Board and the University of Richmond School of Law (the Law School );

(B) Serve as a point of contact between the Board and the University of Richmond School of Law (the Law School ); Moot Court Bylaws, last updated January 18, 2016. I. The Executive Board. A. Officers. The Executive Board of the Moot Court Board (the Executive Board ) shall consist of the following officers: 1. President.

More information

VITSOL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION

VITSOL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION VITSOL NATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION ON MARCH 1-3, 2019 PRIZE MONEY RS. 100000 /- IS SPONSORED BY THE COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA. CONTENT MOOT PROPOSITION.. 2 RULES OF THE COMPETITION....6 IMPORTANT

More information

APPENDIX B: BRIEF WRITING COMPETITION AMCA BRIEF WRITING COMPETITION RULES AMCA BRIEF WRITING COMPETITION CERTIFICATION FORM

APPENDIX B: BRIEF WRITING COMPETITION AMCA BRIEF WRITING COMPETITION RULES AMCA BRIEF WRITING COMPETITION CERTIFICATION FORM APPENDIX B: BRIEF WRITING COMPETITION The AMCA National Brief Writing Competition is separate from the Oral Argument Competition at the National Tournament. Any two-person team meeting eligibility rules

More information

(b) Participation is restricted to bona-fide law students either enrolled in the 3-year L L.B law course or the 5-year integrated law course.

(b) Participation is restricted to bona-fide law students either enrolled in the 3-year L L.B law course or the 5-year integrated law course. CHECKMATE 2014 ARMY INSTITUTE OF LAW RULES FOR THE COMPETITION 1. GENERAL 1.1 DATE AND VENUE: The Checkmate 2014 - Army Institute of Law National Moot Court Competition will be held from 21-23 February,

More information

THE KERALA LAW ACADEMY MOOT COURT SOCIETY

THE KERALA LAW ACADEMY MOOT COURT SOCIETY THE KERALA LAW ACADEMY MOOT COURT SOCIETY 28 th ALL INDIA MOOT COURT COMPETITION 2017 OFFICIAL RULES 1. Date and venue: The 28th All India Moot Court Competition under the auspices of the Kerala Law Academy

More information

BD9. Proposal of Amendments to the Guidelines for ICOH Congress Organization. ICOH 2012 March 18, 2012 Cancun

BD9. Proposal of Amendments to the Guidelines for ICOH Congress Organization. ICOH 2012 March 18, 2012 Cancun BD9 Proposal of Amendments to the Guidelines for ICOH Organization ICOH 2012 March 18, 2012 Cancun Proposal of Amendments to the Guidelines for ICOH Organization Original text in left column. Proposal

More information

[Rules and Regulations]

[Rules and Regulations] BHU, (Uttar [Rules and Regulations] Mahamana Malaviya National Moot Court Competition, 2013 On the auspicious occasion of Mahamana Pt. Madan Mohan Malaviyaji s 150th Birth Anniversary, Law School, Banaras

More information

4 TH UPES NATIONALTRIAL ADVOCACY COMPETITION RULES, 2018

4 TH UPES NATIONALTRIAL ADVOCACY COMPETITION RULES, 2018 4 TH UPES NATIONALTRIAL ADVOCACY COMPETITION RULES, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 4 TH UPES NATIONAL TRIAL ADVOCACY COMPETITION, 2018... 1 CHAPTER 1: THE COMPETITION... 3 I. AIM AND PURPOSE... 3 II. LANGUAGE:...

More information

FEDERATION EUROPEENNE D' ASSOCIATIONS NATIONALES D'INGENIEURS Association Sans But Lucratif (en abrégé: FEANI)

FEDERATION EUROPEENNE D' ASSOCIATIONS NATIONALES D'INGENIEURS Association Sans But Lucratif (en abrégé: FEANI) FEDERATION EUROPEENNE D' ASSOCIATIONS NATIONALES D'INGENIEURS Association Sans But Lucratif (en abrégé: FEANI) EUROPEAN FEDERATION OF NATIONAL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATIONS Not-for-Profit Association (abbreviated

More information

NEW YORK STATE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT POLICY MANUAL

NEW YORK STATE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT POLICY MANUAL NEW YORK STATE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT POLICY MANUAL DECEMBER 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTORY NOTE 1 SECTION 1: STAFF 1.1 Administrator s Authority; Clerk of the Commission 2 1.2 Court of Appeals

More information

CONSTITUTION VERSION ON

CONSTITUTION VERSION ON CONSTITUTION VERSION ON 14.10.2016 CONSTITUTION CHAPTER TITLE 1 TABLE OF CONTENT CHAPTER I IDENTITY - PURPOSE 3 CHAPTER II MEMBERS 5 CHAPTER III CONTINENTAL CONFEDERATIONS 11 CHAPTER IV CONGRESS 13 CHAPTER

More information

By-Laws of AIESEC Manitoba

By-Laws of AIESEC Manitoba By-Laws of AIESEC Manitoba By-Law One Name and Object of the Organization Article 1.1 Name The name of the organization shall be AIESEC Manitoba, where AIESEC stands for the International Association for

More information

KANSAS HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF COMPETITION Adopted by the Young Lawyers Section of the Kansas Bar Association January, 2015 RULES

KANSAS HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF COMPETITION Adopted by the Young Lawyers Section of the Kansas Bar Association January, 2015 RULES KANSAS HIGH SCHOOL MOCK TRIAL RULES OF COMPETITION Adopted by the Young Lawyers Section of the Kansas Bar Association January, 2015 RULES Rule 1.1. Governing Rules The Kansas High School Mock Trial program

More information

WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER

WIPO ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION CENTER For more information contact the: World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) and Mediation Center Address: 34, chemin des Colombettes P.O. Box 18 CH-1211 Geneva 20 Switzerland WIPO ARBITRATION AND

More information

STANDARD ELECTORAL CODE

STANDARD ELECTORAL CODE STANDARD ELECTORAL CODE A. PREAMBLE (PRELIMINARY REMARKS) Organising elections in an association necessitates a long and complex procedure that, among other components, includes: a) complete understanding

More information

RULES OF THE 42nd ANNUAL NATIONAL TRIAL COMPETITION

RULES OF THE 42nd ANNUAL NATIONAL TRIAL COMPETITION RULES OF THE 42nd ANNUAL NATIONAL TRIAL COMPETITION Sponsored by: Texas Young Lawyers Association and American College of Trial Lawyers Fort Worth, Texas March 22-26, 2017 2013 TEXAS YOUNG LAWYERS ASSOCIATION

More information

The Rules of Procedure of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia

The Rules of Procedure of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia The Rules of Procedure of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Slovenia Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, No. 86/07, 54/10 and 56/11. On the basis of the second paragraph of Article

More information

European Cheerleading Association (ECA) Statutes

European Cheerleading Association (ECA) Statutes European Cheerleading Association (ECA) Statutes Article 1 - Title - Membership - Legal Seat 1 The name of the association is European Cheerleading Association (ECA). The association is non profit making.

More information

CHAPTER I NAME - REGISTERED OFFICE - OBJECT - DURATION

CHAPTER I NAME - REGISTERED OFFICE - OBJECT - DURATION BY-LAWS International Association of Young Lawyers ( A.I.J.A. ) Registered office: Avenue de Tervueren 231, 1150 Brussels COORDINATED STATUTES IN FORCE since 27 August, 2016 CHAPTER I NAME - REGISTERED

More information

ASEAN PROTOCOL ON ENHANCED DISPUTE SETTLEMENT MECHANISM WORKING PROCEDURES FOR APPELLATE REVIEW (drawn up pursuant to paragraph 8 of Article 12 of the Protocol) Definitions 1. In these Working Procedures

More information

1 OJ L 3, , p. 1

1 OJ L 3, , p. 1 COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 2245/2002 of 21 October 2002 implementing Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 on Community designs (OJ EC No L 341 of 17.12.2002, p. 28) amended by Commission Regulation (EC)

More information

Statutes of MedTech Europe AiSBL

Statutes of MedTech Europe AiSBL Statutes of MedTech Europe AiSBL [The official text will be in French English convenience translation for information purposes only] Adopted on 30 November 2016 TITLE I. NAME. LEGAL FORM. TERM. REGISTERED

More information

39 TH MORRIS B. MYEROWITZ MOOT COURT COMPETITION

39 TH MORRIS B. MYEROWITZ MOOT COURT COMPETITION 39 TH MORRIS B. MYEROWITZ MOOT COURT COMPETITION Sponsored by: The University of Maryland School of Law Moot Court Board RULES AND PROCEDURES January-March 2008-1 - I. Introduction A. This document, the

More information

Notre Dame Law School Moot Court Board Bylaws

Notre Dame Law School Moot Court Board Bylaws Notre Dame Law School Moot Court Board Bylaws Article I: Official Name The name of this organization shall be the Notre Dame Law School Moot Court Board (the Board ). Article II: Objectives and Purposes

More information

2017 High School Moot International Criminal Court Competition Overview

2017 High School Moot International Criminal Court Competition Overview 2017 High School Moot International Criminal Court Competition Overview The High School Moot International Criminal Court (ICC) Competition is designed to introduce high school students to the work of

More information

Singapore Patents Rules as amended by S 739 of 2014 ENTRY INTO FORCE: Nov 13th, 2014

Singapore Patents Rules as amended by S 739 of 2014 ENTRY INTO FORCE: Nov 13th, 2014 Singapore Patents Rules as amended by S 739 of 2014 ENTRY INTO FORCE: Nov 13th, 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS PRELIMINARY 1. Citation 2. Definitions 2A. Definitions of examination, search and supplementary examination

More information

feaco European Federation of Management Consultancy Associations feaco

feaco European Federation of Management Consultancy Associations feaco feaco FEDERATION EUROPEENNE DES ASSOCIATIONS DE CONSEILS EN ORGANISATION CONSTITUTION AS MODIFIED BY DECISION OF THE PRESIDENTS ON 24 November 2005 ENGLISH VERSION http://www.feaco.org/ feaco@feaco.org

More information

COMPETITION GUIDELINES

COMPETITION GUIDELINES 1. GENERAL COMPETITION GUIDELINES 1.1. DATE AND VENUE: The 7 th K.R.Ramamani Memorial Taxation Moot Court Competition will be held on March 3 rd, 4 th and 5 th 2017 at the School of Excellence in Law,

More information

CODATA Constitution (Statutes and By-Laws)

CODATA Constitution (Statutes and By-Laws) Page 1 of 16 CODATA Constitution (Statutes and By-Laws) Preamble Recognizing a world-wide demand for useful, reliable and readily available research data, CODATA was established in 1966 by the International

More information

7th GNLU International Moot Court Competition 2015

7th GNLU International Moot Court Competition 2015 THE RULES OF THE 7 th GNLU INTERNATIONAL MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2015 1. DEFINITIONS 1.1. "Case Clarification & Correction" (hereinafter referred to as "Clarifications") means the official clarifications

More information

CODATA Constitution (Statutes and By-Laws)

CODATA Constitution (Statutes and By-Laws) Page 1 of 13 CODATA Constitution (Statutes and By-Laws) Preamble Recognizing a world-wide demand for useful, reliable and readily available scientific and technological data, the International Council

More information

SYMBIOSIS LAW SCHOOL, NOIDA MOOT COURT SOCIETY NASCENT MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2015

SYMBIOSIS LAW SCHOOL, NOIDA MOOT COURT SOCIETY NASCENT MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2015 NASCENT MOOT COURT COMPETITION, 2015 RULES & REGULATIONS INTRODUCTION: Moot court society of Symbiosis Law School, NOIDA (hereinafter MCS-SLSN) announces its annual edition of NASCENT Moot Court Competition

More information

WIPO Mediation, Arbitration, Expedited Arbitration and Expert Determination Rules and Clauses. Alternative Dispute Resolution

WIPO Mediation, Arbitration, Expedited Arbitration and Expert Determination Rules and Clauses. Alternative Dispute Resolution WIPO Mediation, Arbitration, Expedited Arbitration and Expert Determination Rules and Clauses Alternative Dispute Resolution 2016 WIPO Mediation, Arbitration, Expedited Arbitration and Expert Determination

More information

General guidance on EFSA procurements

General guidance on EFSA procurements General guidance on EFSA procurements For potential tenderers when considering the submission of a tender in response to a procurement procedure of the European Food Safety Authority Updated February 206

More information