IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN
|
|
- Magdalene Copeland
- 5 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN FRIDAY,THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 16TH KARTHIKA, 1940 OP(KAT).No. 53 of 2018 ORDER IN OA 1659/2015 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED PETITIONER/RESPONDENT: THE SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION P.S.C OFFICE, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC RESPONDENT/APPLICANT: RADHA.S D/O.BHAGYALAKSHMI, SERAMBI,MEENAKSHIPURAM POST, CHITTOOR TALUK,PALAKKAD, PIN , NOW RESIDING AT ADDITIONAL WOMEN'S HOSTEL, UNIVERSITY OF KERALA, MARIYAVATTOM CAMPUS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA BY ADV. SRI.S.K.ADHITHYAN THIS OP KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON , ALONG WITH OP(KAT).54/2018, OP(KAT).55/2018, OP(KAT).56/2018, THE COURT ON PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
2 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN FRIDAY,THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 16TH KARTHIKA, 1940 OP(KAT).No. 54 of 2018 ORDER IN OA 1990/2015 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT: THE SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PATTOM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC RESPONDENTS/APPLICANT & 2ND RESPONDENT: 1 LAKSHMANAN.K POOLAKKAD HOUSE, ELAPPULLY P.O, PETTA, PALAKKAD (MOB ) 2 THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADVS. SRI.S.K.ADHITHYAN DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.) SRI.K.SUDHINKUMAR SRI.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM ABDUL SAMAD SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) SRI.SABU PULLAN SRI.S.VIBHEESHANAN THIS OP KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON , ALONG WITH OP(KAT).53/2018, OP(KAT).55/2018, OP(KAT).56/2018, THE COURT ON PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
3 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN FRIDAY,THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 16TH KARTHIKA, 1940 OP(KAT).No. 55 of 2018 THE ORDER IN OA 2214/2015 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED PETITIONER/RESPONDENT NO.3: THE SECRETARY, KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, P. S. C. OFFICE, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC RESPONDENTS/APPLICANT & RESPONDENTS 1 & 2: 1 LAKSHMI C, AGED 26 YEARS, W/O. DARSHAN LAL M. NAIR,'PULARI' ANRA 101, AMALA BHAVAN ROAD, KADAVANTHRA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI (PHONE ). 2 STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION DIRECTORATE OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADVS. SRI.S.K.ADHITHYAN DR.K.P.SATHEESAN (SR.) SRI.K.SUDHINKUMAR SRI.MUHAMMED IBRAHIM ABDUL SAMAD SRI.P.MOHANDAS (ERNAKULAM) SRI.S.VIBHEESHANAN THIS OP KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON , ALONG WITH OP(KAT).53/2018, OP(KAT).54/2018, OP(KAT).56/2018, THE COURT ON PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
4 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.G.ARUN FRIDAY,THE 18TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 / 16TH KARTHIKA, 1940 OP(KAT).No. 56 of 2018 ORDER IN OA 2485/2016 of KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED PETITIONER/1ST RESPONDENT: THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PATTOM P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC RESPONDENTS/APPLICANT & RESPONDENTS 2 & 3: 1 BABITHA S., D/O. PODIYAPPAN, AGED 41 YEARS, 'CHITHIRA', T.C.38/1773, KAILASANAGAR KNR 95, POOJAPPURA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION VIKAS BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM BY ADVS. SRI.T.P.DEYANANTHAN SRI.A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PANICKER SRI.S.KRISHNALAL THIS OP KERALA ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON , ALONG WITH OP(KAT).53/2018, OP(KAT).54/2018, OP(KAT).55/2018, THE COURT ON PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
5 5 C.T.RAVIKUMAR & V.G.ARUN, JJ O.P.KAT Nos.53, 54, 55 & 56 of Dated this the 18 th day of January, 2019 'CR' JUDGMENT V.G.ARUN, J. These original petitions are being considered together, since the issue to be considered is common, though decided under different orders of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal. O.P.KAT No.53 of 2018 arises from the order of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal in O.A.No.1659 of O.P.KAT No.54 of 2018 from the order on O.A.No.1990 of 2015, O.P.KAT No.55 of 2018 from O.A.No.2214 of 2015 and O.P.KAT No.56 of 2018 from order on O.A.No.2485 of Out of the four cases, O.A.Nos.1990 and 2214 of 2015 were decided by the Tribunal under a common order. For the
6 6 sake of convenience, the parties are described as per their status in the original applications. 2. The applicants before the Tribunal, the party respondents in these original petitions, had submitted applications seeking appointment to the post of Lecturer in various subjects under the Kerala Collegiate Education Department, notified by the Public Service Commission as per Gazette notification dated , wherein the last date for submission of application was fixed as The qualification prescribed under the notification are as follows: 1) Masters Degree in the subject concerned with not less than 55% marks or its equivalent and good academic record. 2) Must have passed a comprehensive test in the subject concerned specifically conducted for the purpose by UGC or by any agency duly constituted by the State Government in this behalf.
7 7 All the applicants have the prescribed qualification of Masters Degree and have acquired NET qualification, which is a comprehensive test in the subject concerned specifically conducted for the purpose by the UGC. Even though the applicants had the requisite qualifications, they were unable to upload their NET qualification, allegedly due to technical glitch in the PSC Website. Though the applicants intimated the PSC about the difficulty experienced by them in uploading their NET qualification and uploaded the qualification later, their applications were rejected at various stages of the selection process stating the reason that the NET qualification was claimed subsequently. The original applications were therefore filed challenging the rejection and for a direction to the Public Service Commission to allow the applicants to participate in the selection procedure for the post to which they had submitted applications seeking
8 8 appointment. 3. The main contention urged by the applicants was that, even though they had submitted the NET qualification at the time of one time registration, the same was not uploaded. Therefore, the request made by the applicants for accepting their NET qualification cannot be treated as a subsequent claim. 4. The Public Service Commission had opposed the original applications contending that even though the last date for receipt of application was , the applicants had uploaded their NET qualification only subsequently. The PSC relied on paragraphs 15 and 16 of the general conditions in the notification, which reads as under: 15. Candidates are required to acquaint themselves with the instructions given in the notification, General conditions and Website for filling up the application form. They will not get an opportunity to rectify any mistake in the
9 9 application later. 16. Claims made subsequent to the application will not be considered under any circumstances. Proof submitted without proper claim in the application also will not be considered. It was therefore contended that since the applicants were themselves aware of the fact that they had not entered their NET qualification as on the last date of receipt of application, the action of the PSC in having rejected the applications cannot be found fault with. In one of the original applications, the PSC had filed an additional reply statement stating that, the Commission had, as per decision No.14 dated , decided to admit the applications ignoring the subsequent claim if the qualification could be proved at the time of certificate verification, subject to the other criteria for selection being satisfied. It was also stated that the benefit of decision No.14 dated cannot be extended to the candidates who had applied for the post of
10 10 Lecturer in Commerce, Chemistry, Psychology and Mathematics, since the interview for the said subjects was completed before decision No.14 was taken by the Commission. The contention of the Public Service Commission, based on notification No.14 dated , was relied on by the applicants to point out that the decision itself is proof of the fact that there were technical flaws in the PSC Website, making it impossible for the applicants to upload their NET qualification. It was contended that curtailment of the benefit of decision No.14 to the applicants, on the ground that the interview for appointment to the subject for which they had applied was over, while granting the benefit to the candidates of other subjects, amounted to unreasonable classification and discrimination. 5. The Tribunal, after detailed consideration of all relevant aspects and the arguments advanced, came to the
11 11 conclusion that the Public Service Commission having decided to reconsider the applications of candidates possessing the required qualification before the last date of submission of the application, subject to such qualification being proved at the time of certificate verification, the applicants would also be entitled to the benefit of such consideration. The Tribunal had also taken note of the fact that even though the interview for the post of Lecturer in English was conducted before taking decision No.14, the benefit of the decision was subsequently extended to the candidates who had applied for the post of Lecturer in English. 6. In all cases except one, the Tribunal passed interim orders permitting the applicants to participate in the selection process and directing their names to be included in the select list. In the case of the applicant in O.A.No.1990 of
12 (1 st respondent in O.P.KAT No.54 of 2018), since no interim order was issued, permitting the applicant to participate in the selection process, the Tribunal directed the PSC to arrange the conduct of interview of that applicant within a period of two months and to include him in the rank list based on his performance in the selection process. After final hearing of the original applications, the Tribunal went on to hold that since the Commission had decided to consider the candidature of those candidates, who could prove their qualification at the time of verification of the certificate, the applicants, who are similarly situated, are also entitled to be included in the rank list based on their performance in the selection process. 7. In these original petitions, the PSC has assailed the findings of the Tribunal mainly on the ground that reliance could not have been placed on decision No.14 dated
13 of the Commission, for granting reliefs to the applicants. It is contended that decision No.14 relates to claims made as equivalent/higher to required qualification, that too before the last date for receipt of application and that the decision was not applicable to the posts for which the applicants had applied, since the interview for those posts were over before decision No.14 was taken by the Commission. It is also contended that the claim of the applicants that they were unable to upload their NET qualification due to technical glitches in the website of the Commission is wrong. Placing reliance on paragraphs 15 and 16 of the general conditions of the notification, it is contended that it was the duty of the candidate to have ensured that the qualification is uploaded before the last date for submission of application and that the Tribunal should not have granted any concession in that regard.
14 14 8. By order dated , this Court had directed the learned Standing Counsel to produce the relevant files bearing No.GRIIC (2)2279/16/GW, wherein decision No.14 dated was taken and file No.GRIIB (3) 1138/13/GW, wherein an order was passed by the Chairman of the Commission on Accordingly, the files were produced and we have perused the same. Page 3 of file No. GRIIC (2)2279/16/GW is a note submitted by the Joint Secretary (Government Recruitment) of the Commission, regarding subsequent claims of candidates, for consideration in the meeting of the Commission to be held on In the note, it was pointed out that after the introduction of the online application process from onwards, there was an omission to include the declaration software which provided an opportunity for the candidate to declare himself to be having all the requisite qualification and that such
15 15 declaration software was introduced only in June, It is therefore pointed out that in the applications submitted during the period from to June, 2016, a technical flaw had crept in, in the form of an entry to the effect, 'not claimed'. It was suggested that with respect to the posts notified between and June 2016, the short lists of which have not been published, the applications could be accepted if, at the time of certificate verification, it is proved that the candidate had acquired the qualification before the last date for submission of application and that the candidate had uploaded such qualification in any of the links to the profile before the last date. The Commission had taken decision No.14 dated , after considering the note. Decision No.14 has been produced as additional document in these original petitions. 9. The proceedings dated of File No.GR II
16 16 C (2) 2279/16/GW would reveal that, as far as applicants to the post of Lecturer in English are concerned, the Commission had decided to give effect to the interim orders of the Tribunal by interviewing those candidates and, if found eligible, to include those candidates in the rank list and to report compliance to the Tribunal with a request to close the original applications. These proceedings, which was approved by the Chairman of the Commission, was subsequent to the conduct of interview to the post of Lecturer in English. In such circumstances, can the PSC contend that decision No.14 is not applicable insofar as the applicants are concerned, since the interview for appointment with respect to their subject was conducted prior to decision No.14. The answer can only be in the negative since any decision to the contrary would result in unreasonable classification of the applicants resulting in
17 17 hostile discrimination, in violation of the principle of equality propounded in Article 14 of the Constitution of India. There is yet another reason for us to refuse to accept the explanation offered by the Public Service Commission. From the proceedings which culminated in decision No.14, it is evident that the failure to upload NET qualification along with their applications was not attributable to the candidates. In such circumstances, it would be unjust and arbitrary to reject the applications submitted by those candidates, for the only reason that their NET qualification was not uploaded. In this context, it would be appropriate to refer to the decision of the Apex Court in Union of India v. Sadhana Khanna [(2008) 1 SCC 720], wherein it was held that the mistake committed by the department cannot be permitted to recoil on the employee. Adopting the principle laid down in the aforementioned decision, it has to be held
18 18 that the error in the software of the Public Service Commission cannot be taken as a reason to reject the applications of the candidates. 10. As far as the question of reasonableness of classification is concerned, we are guided by the following decisions of the Apex Court. The Apex Court in State of Kerala v. N.M.Thomas [(1976) 2 SCC 310] considered the impact of discrimination on the equality principle enunciated under Article 14 of the Constitution and held as follows: Discrimination is the essence of classification. Equality is violated if it rests on unreasonable basis. The concept of equality has an inherent limitation arising from the very nature of the constitutional guarantee. Those who are similarly circumstanced are entitled to an equal treatment. Equality is amongst equals. Classification is, therefore, to be founded on substantial differences which distinguish persons grouped together from those left out of the groups and such differential attributes must bear a just and rational relation to
19 19 the object sought to be achieved. Again in Deepak Sibal and others v. Punjab University and another [(1989) 2 SCC 145], it was observed by the Honourable Supreme Court as under: In considering the reasonableness of classification from the point of view of Article 14 of the Constitution, the Court has also to consider the objective of such classification. If the objective be illogical, unfair and unjust, necessarily the classification will have to be held as unreasonable. 11. A reading of the decisions of the Honourable Supreme Court starting from Budhan Choudhary v. State of Bihar [AIR 1955 SC 191] to Shayara Bano and others v. Union of India and others [(2017) 9 SCC 1] shows that, for the purpose of passing the test of permissible classification two conditions must be fulfilled, viz; i) that, the classification must be founded on an intelligible differentia which distinguishes persons or things that are grouped together from others left out of the group and ii)
20 20 that the differentia must have a rational relation to the object sought to be achieved by the statute in question. Therefore, it has to be considered as to whether the rejection of applications submitted by the applicants for the reason that the NET qualification was not uploaded along with their applications and that the interview for the purpose of appointment to the subjects for which the applications had been submitted was over by the time decision No.14 was taken by the Commission, while at the same time accepting the application of certain other similarly situated candidates, would pass the twin test of permissible reasonableness. 12. The reason for rejecting the applications is that the applicants had claimed the NET qualification subsequently. In the light of decision No.14 and the note available in File No.GRIIC (2)2279/16/GW, there cannot be any doubt that, failure to upload the NET qualification was
21 21 not for reasons attributable to the applicants. The Commission having decided to process the applications of other candidates, who had also uploaded their NET qualification subsequently, refusal to accept the applications of the applicants would amount to discrimination. The explanation offered by the Commission that, in the case of those candidates whose applications were subsequently accepted, the interview was yet to be conducted, whereas in the case of the applicants, the interview had already been conducted, cannot also be accepted. The reason being that, in the case of appointment to the post of Lecturer in English, the applications of some of the candidates were accepted and processed, resulting in their inclusion in the rank list, in spite of the interview having been conducted. Even otherwise, the classification of applicants on the basis of the conduct of interview, prior and subsequent to decision No.14
22 22 of the Commission, has no rationale or nexus with the objective that is sought to be achieved by such classification. Hence, the reasoning adopted by the PSC for such classification and consequential rejection of applications, does not satisfy the twin test of reasonableness. Therefore, there is no valid ground to interfere with the findings of the Tribunal and resultantly, the original petitions are dismissed. Sd/- C.T.RAVIKUMAR JUDGE Scl/ Sd/- V.G.ARUN JUDGE
The Ministry Of Communications vs Thursday on 1 October, 2010
Kerala High Court The Ministry Of Communications vs Thursday on 1 October, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON & THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE
More information3. The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer South Western Railway Hubli Division, Hubli PETITIONERS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17 TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2014 PRESENT THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA WRIT PETITION NOS.
More information(BY SRI GANGADHAR SANGOLLI, ADVOCATE)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015 PRESENT THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR AND THE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE B. VEERAPPA WRIT PETITION No.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5850 OF 2011 DIRECTOR GENERAL, CRPF & ORS...
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5850 OF 2011 DIRECTOR GENERAL, CRPF & ORS....APPELLANTS VERSUS JANARDAN SINGH & ORS....RESPONDENTS J U D G M E N
More informationJ U D G M E N T. 2. These two appeals have been filed against. the identically worded judgments of High Court. of Madhya Pradesh dated
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.871 OF 2018 arising out of SLP (C)No. 26528 of 2013 THE STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS MANOJ
More informationThe petitioner in W.P.No.7724/2018 has assailed. Rule 5 of the Karnataka Selection of Candidates for. Admission to Government Seats in Professional
1 BVNJ: 22/02/2018 W.P.No.7724/2018 C/W. W.P. Nos.8182, 8184, 8204, 8206, 8207, 8507, 8508, 8509, 8556, 8569, 8571, 8573 & 8698 of 2018 The petitioner in W.P.No.7724/2018 has assailed Rule 5 of the Karnataka
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD Special Civil Application No of 2015 AUTOMARK INDUSTRIES (I) LTD Vs STATE OF GUJARAT AND 3 Harsha Deva
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD Special Civil Application No.13641 of 2015 AUTOMARK INDUSTRIES (I) LTD Vs STATE OF GUJARAT AND 3 Harsha Devani & A G Uraizee, JJ Appellants Rep by: Mr SN Soparkar,
More informationUnion Of India vs Satish Kumar Ranjan on 21 September, 2016
Madras High Court In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated: 21.09.2016 C O R A M The Honourable Mr.Justice S.MANIKUMAR and The Honourable Mr.Justice N.AUTHINATHAN Writ Petition No.239 of 2016 1.
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N.
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 4 TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR. JUSTICE K.N. PHANEENDRA W.P. Nos. 63936/2012 & 64365/2012 (S-REG) BETWEEN: 1. RAMA S/O. NARAYAN
More informationTHE WEST BENGAL COLLEGE SERVICE COMMISSION REGULATION NO. 1
THE WEST BENGAL COLLEGE SERVICE COMMISSION REGULATION NO. 1 Regulations regarding manner of selection of Persons for Appointment to the posts of Assistant Professors, Principals and Librarians in Government
More information24 Appeals and Revision
24 Appeals and Revision The assessee is given a right of appeal by the Act where he feels aggrieved by the order of the assessing authority. However, the assessee has no inherent right of appeal unless
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER. Date of decision: February 01, WP(C) No /2005
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Date of decision: February 01, 2008 WP(C) No. 20210/2005 Union of India & Anr...Petitioners through Mr. J.P. Sharma, Advocate Versus Y.R.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No of 2018) VERSUS
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 5710 OF 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 1395 of 2018) Meena Verma Appellant(s) VERSUS State of Himachal
More informationStanding Counsel for TNPSC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 15.09.2011 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.CHANDRU W.P.No.20439 of 2011 and M.P.No.1 of 2011 E.Bamila.. Petitioner Vs. The Secretary, Tamil Nadu Public
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT ( THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH ) WRIT PETITION (C) NO. 2973/2006 Sri Ajit Kumar Kakoti Lecturer, Son of Late Padmadhar Kakoti, Assam Textile
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO OF Vs.
NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION PETITION FOR SPECIAL LEAVE TO APPEAL (CIVIL) NO. 33281 OF 2016 Thahira. P...Petitioner Vs. The Administrator, UT of Lakshadweep
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) PRINCIPAL SEAT AT GUWAHATI (EXTRAORDINARY WRIT JURISDICTION) WP(C) No.2855 of 2010 Ramesh Goswami Writ Petitioner
More informationHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI. KANUBHAI M PATEL HUF - Petitioner(s) Versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 5295 of 2010 WITH SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5296 OF 2010 AND SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5297 OF 2010 HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA
More information108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. CWP No.9382 of 2015
CWP No.9382 of 2015-1- 108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.9382 of 2015 Mr. Harpreet Singh and ohters Vs. The Council of Architecture and others Present:- Mr. Anil Malhotra,
More informationPUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION BARADARI GARDEN, PATIALA WEBSITE :
PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION BARADARI GARDEN, PATIALA- 1470 WEBSITE : http://ppsc.gov.in S Adv. No. 07 The Punjab Public Service Commission invites Application Forms from eligible candidates for recruitment
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE. P.S.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE. P.S.GOPINATHAN THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF APRIL 2012/23RD CHAITHRA 1934 OP
More informationTHE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
1 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM: NAGALAND: MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Sri Rajesh Jaiswal, S/o Sri Radha Raman Jaiswal, Resident of Thana Back Road, Ward No. 11, New Amolapatty, Golaghat-785621.
More informationState Of Bihar And Another Vs Bal Mukund Sah And Others
State Of Bihar And Another Vs Bal Mukund Sah And Others CASE NUMBER Civil Appeals No. 9072 of 1996 EQUIVALENT CITATION 2000-(004)-SCC-0640-SC 2000-LIC-1389-SC 2000-AIR-1296-SC 2000-(002)-SCALE-0415-SC
More informationThe Labour Court. Workplace Relations Act Labour Court (Employment Rights Enactments) Rules 2016
The Labour Court Workplace Relations Act 2015 Labour Court (Employment Rights Enactments) Rules 2016 These Rules are made pursuant to section 20 of the Industrial Relations Act 1946 as amended by section
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL. W.P.Nos.50029/2013 & 51586/2013 (CS-RES)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 5 TH DAY OF APRIL, 2014 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE B.S.PATIL W.P.Nos.50029/2013 & 51586/2013 (CS-RES) BETWEEN 1. SRI H RAGHAVENDRA RAO S/O
More informationPETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. 1. The petitioner is filing the present Writ Petition under Article 32 of the
PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 32 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA TO, HON BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA AND HIS COMPANION JUDGES OF THE HON BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. The humble petition of the Petitioner above
More information: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.
: 1 : IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 23 RD DAY OF JUNE, 2016 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWDA CRIMINAL PETITION NO.100004/2016 BETWEEN: SMT.SHAKUNTALA W/O
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 7 th January, W.P.(C) 5472/2014, CM Nos /2014, 12873/2015, 16579/2015
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 7 th January, 2016 + W.P.(C) 5472/2014, CM Nos. 10868-69/2014, 12873/2015, 16579/2015 ASHFAQUE ANSARI... Petitioner Through: Mr. V. Shekhar,
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : DELHI SIKH GURUDWARA MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE (ELECTION OF MEMBERS) RULES, 1974 Judgment Reserved on: 17.12.2012 Judgment Delivered on: 20.12.2012 W.P.(C) 1074/2012
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO: OF In the matter:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD DISTRICT: AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO: OF 2018 In the matter: i) Article 226 and 14 of the Constitution of India. ii) The Advocates Act, 1961 iii) The
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO(S). 11 OF Versus
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION REPORTABLE TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) NO(S). 11 OF 2017 LT. CDR. M. RAMESH...PETITIONER(S) Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) (WITH I.A.
More informationBar & Bench (
In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 06.11.2017 Coram The Honourable Mr.Justice T.S.SIVAGNANAM W.P.No.28181 of 2017 & WMP.No.30311 of 2017 Mr.Thiagarajan Kumararaja...Petitioner Vs 1.Union
More informationNOTIFICATION NO. PSC/EXAM/09/2017 DATED:
NOTIFICATION NO. PSC/EXAM/09/2017 DATED: 03-02 - 2017 Applications through online mode are invited from the permanent residents of Jammu & Kashmir State possessing the prescribed academic qualifications
More informationCentral Administrative Tribunal - Delhi
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Rajeev Kumar Manglik vs The Director General Of Works on 26 May, 2014 Central Administrative Tribunal Principal Bench New Delhi O.A.No.1599/2013 MA 1216/2013 Order
More informationNOTIFICATION NO. PSC/EXAM/23/2017 DATED:
NOTIFICATION NO. PSC/EXAM/23/2017 DATED: 24-04-2017 Applications through online mode are invited from the permanent residents of Jammu & Kashmir State for appearing in the competitive examination for direct
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR. WRIT PETITION Nos /2015 (T-RES)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5 TH DAY OF MARCH, 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR WRIT PETITION Nos.8854-8874/2015 (T-RES) BETWEEN: M/S.PAHARPUR COOLING TOWERS
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.9681/2009 Judgment decided on:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI : NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.9681/2009 Judgment decided on: 11.03.2011 RAJEEV KUMAR MISHRA...Petitioner Through: Mr Rakesh Kumar Khanna, Sr. Adv. with Mr Piyush
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT. Writ Petition (C) No.606 of 2016
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No.606 of 2016 Sri Bhabesh Das Son of Late Dhruba Das Vill Kulhati, No.2 Hidalghurisupa Police
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Non Reportable CIVIL APPEAL No. 10956 of 2018 (Arising out of S.L.P. (Civil) No. 1045 of 2016) Sabha Shanker Dube... Appellant Versus Divisional
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO OF 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2764 OF 2015 The Chamber of Tax Consultants & Others.. Petitioners. V/s. Union of India & Others.. Respondents.
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + W.P. (C.) No /2009 & CM. No.15749/2009. Date of Decision :
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P. (C.) No. 13870/2009 & CM. No.15749/2009 Date of Decision :- 17.02.2010 Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & anr.. Petitioners Through Ms. Ruchi
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.PATIL AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE PRADEEP D. WAINGANKAR
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13 TH DAY OF MAY 2014 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.K.PATIL AND THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE PRADEEP D. WAINGANKAR BETWEEN WRIT APPEAL NO.2828
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION & CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 Judgement delivered on: O.M.P.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION & CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 Judgement delivered on: 04.12.2014 O.M.P. 412/2012 HARYANA STATE SMALL INDUSTRIES & EXPORT CORPORATION LTD. Through:
More informationTHE TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION
THE TAMIL NADU ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION (Constituted under Section 82(1) of the Electricity Act, 2003) (Central Act 36 of 2003) PRESENT : Thiru S. Kabilan Thiru B. Jeyaraman - Chairman - Member
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2018 / 20TH AGRAHAYANA, 1940 WP(C).No. 5507 of 2018 PETITIONER: RASITHA
More informationON THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE
UNITED NATIONS United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo UNMIK NATIONS UNIES Mission d Administration Intérimaire des Nations Unies au Kosovo PROVISIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF SELF GOVERNMENT Law
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 1) + W.P.(C) 3073/2017 2) + W.P.(C) 3074/2017 3) + W.P.(C) 3075/2017 4) + W.P.(C) 3076/2017 5) + W.P.(C) 3077/2017 6) + W.P.(C) 3078/2017 7) + W.P.(C) 3079/2017
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development Bank of India ( SIDBI)
Review Petition No. 73/2013 (Arising out of Misc. Case No. 705/2013 In FAO 6/2013) IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (The High Court of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram and Arunachal Pradesh) Small Industries Development
More informationCase No. 17 of Shri. V.P. Raja, Chairman Shri. Vijay L. Sonavane, Member. Reliance Infrastructure Ltd., Santacruz (E).
Before the MAHARASHTRA ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION World Trade Centre, Centre No.1, 13 th Floor, Cuffe Parade, Mumbai 400005. Tel. 022 22163964/65/69 Fax 22163976 Email: mercindia@mercindia.org.in
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7262/2014
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 7262/2014 Pronounced on: 03.02.2015 PRINCE KUMAR & ORS.... Appellant Through: Mr.Anil Sapra, Sr.Adv. with Mr.Tarun Kumar Tiwari, Mr.Mukesh Sukhija, Ms.Rupali
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) AIZAWL BENCH W.P.(C) No. 86 of 2012 1. Mr. C.Rohmingliana, Proprietor of C.R. Store Champhai Bethel Veng, Champhai.
More informationWITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.1692 OF 2016 (Arising Out of SLP (C) No of 2012) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.1693 OF 2016 (Arising Out of SLP (C) No.
1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.1691 OF 2016 (Arising Out of SLP (C) No.27550 of 2012) RAM KUMAR GIJROYA DELHI SUBORDINATE SERVICES SELECTION
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 4619/2003. versus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 9 th August, 2010 W.P.(C) 4619/2003 DR.JAIPAL & ANR. Through Mr.Arvind Gupta with Mr.Bipin Singhvi and Mr.Ankit Chaudhary, Advocates GOVT. OF N.C.T.
More information% W.P.(C) No. 5513/2004
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Judgment delivered on: November 27, 2015 % W.P.(C) No. 5513/2004 M/S MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI... Petitioner Through: Ms. Saroj Bidawat, Advocate. versus
More informationGovernment of Punjab Department of Rural Development & Panchayats. Notification. The 25th May, 2006.
Government of Punjab Department of Rural Development & Panchayats Notification The 25th May, 2006. No.G.S.R.23/PA.9/94/Ss.196 and 227/2006.- With reference to the Government of Punjab, Department of Rural
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2017 {Arising out of SLP(C) No of 2016}
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9288 OF 2017 {Arising out of SLP(C) No.30562 of 2016} K. SUBBARAYUDU AND OTHERS...Appellants Versus THE SPECIAL DEPUTY
More informationTHE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985 ACT NO. 13 OF 1985 [27th February, 1985.]
THE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNALS ACT, 1985 ACT NO. 13 OF 1985 [27th February, 1985.] An Act to provide for the adjudication or trial by Administrative Tribunals of disputes and complaints with respect to recruitment
More information$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE. versus
$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 8444/2011 Date of Decision: 29 th September, 2015 REHABILITATION MINISTRY EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY... Petitioner Through Mr.
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO(s). 9921-9923 OF 2016 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No(s).10163-10165 of 2015) GOVT. OF BIHAR AND ORS. ETC. ETC. Appellant(s)
More informationTHE HOMOEOPATHY CENTRAL COUNCIL ACT, 1973 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS
THE HOMOEOPATHY CENTRAL COUNCIL ACT, 1973 ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY SECTIONS 1. Short title, extent and commencement. 2. Definitions. CHAPTER II THE CENTRAL COUNCIL AND ITS COMMITTEES
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL Nos OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) Nos.
1 Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL Nos. 691-693 OF 2017 (ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) Nos. 21462-64 OF 2013) State of Tripura & Ors..Appellants Versus
More informationANNEX V PROCEDURAL RULES ON CONCILIATION AND ARBITRATION OF CONTRACTS FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENT FUND (EDF)
ANNEX V PROCEDURAL RULES ON CONCILIATION AND ARBITRATION OF CONTRACTS FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENT FUND (EDF) I. INTRODUCTION Article 1 - Scope of application. Article 2 - Definitions. Article
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. National Council for Teacher Education and others. Versus
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 1125-1128 OF 2011 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition Nos.17165-17168 of 2009) National Council for Teacher Education
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR,
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MEGHALAYA, MANIPUR, TRIPURA, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) WP (C) No. 3522/2000 1. Dhansiri Valley Project Oil and Natural Gas Commission
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO OF 2018 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS.
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4001 OF 2018 [@ SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS. 15765 OF 2017] REJI THOMAS & ORS. Appellant(s) VERSUS THE STATE
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN W.P.NO.29574/2015(S-RES)
1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3 RD DAY OF AUGUST 2015 BEFORE THE HON BLE MR.JUSTICE RAGHVENDRA S. CHAUHAN W.P.NO.29574/2015(S-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. IRANNA KESARALLI S/O. SHIVANANDAPPA
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS OF A. RAJAGOPALAN ETC...Appellant VERSUS
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS.251-256 OF 2015 A. RAJAGOPALAN ETC....Appellant VERSUS THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THIRUCHIRAPALLI DISTRICT & ORS. & ETC....Respondents
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
Page 1 IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM; NAGALAND; MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition (C) No. 1961 of 2010 Smt. Padma Rani Mudai Hazarika - Versus - - Petitioner Union of India
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.33/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 12th December, 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER W.P.(C) No.33/2013 DATE OF DECISION : 12th December, 2013 DR. ATUL BHARDWAJ Through: Mr. Rajpal Singh, Advocate.... Petitioner Versus GOVERNMENT
More information[TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (i)] Ministry of Corporate Affairs.
[TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (i)] Ministry of Corporate Affairs Notification New Delhi, the.., 2015 G.S.R..(E).- In exercise of the powers conferred
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. CIVIL APPEAL NO Of 2011 SRI MAHABIR PROSAD CHOUDHARY...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS
1 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA REPORTABLE CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8320 Of 2011 SRI MAHABIR PROSAD CHOUDHARY...APPELLANT(S) VERSUS M/S. OCTAVIUS TEA AND INDUSTRIES LTD. AND ANR....RESPONDENT(S)
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. W.P.(C) 2877 of 2003 & CM APPL No. 4883/2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2877 of 2003 & CM APPL No. 4883/2003 Reserved on: February 9, 2010 Date of decision: February 22, 2010 DR. RAVINDER SINGH... Petitioner Through: Mr. Manoj
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 ARB.P. 63/2012 Date of Decision : December 06, 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 ARB.P. 63/2012 Date of Decision : December 06, 2012 M/S RURAL COMMUNICATION & MARKETING PVT LTD... Petitioner Through:
More informationMaharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, Mumbai.
Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission, Mumbai. Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory Commission (Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum & Ombudsman) Regulations, 2003 ELECTRICITY ACT, 2003 No.MERC / LEGAL
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS OF 2009 C.N. ANANTHARAM PETITIONER
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (C) NOS.21178-21180 OF 2009 C.N. ANANTHARAM PETITIONER VERSUS M/S FIAT INDIA LTD. & ORS. ETC. ETC. RESPONDENTS
More informationAN APPROACH TO INDIAN CONSTITUTION
AN APPROACH TO INDIAN CONSTITUTION Author Prabhat Shukla INTRODUCTION The constitutional preamble gives Indians the rights of liberty in that liberty of thought of expression etc, equality equality of
More informationPRADEEP KUMAR MASKARA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.
PRADEEP KUMAR MASKARA & ORS. Vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL NOS.9844-9846 OF 2014 (Arising out of Special Leave Petition
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Order Reserved on: Date of Decision: January 03, 2007 WP(C) No.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI SUBJECT : SERVICE MATTER Order Reserved on: 29.11.2006 Date of Decision: January 03, 2007 WP(C) No.6327/1999 Harpal... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sanjay Ghose, Advocate
More informationORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK
ORISSA HIGH COURT: CUTTACK O.J.C. No. 2408 of 1998 In the matter of an application under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India. ---------- Puspanjali Mishra Petitioner -versus- Vice-Chancellor,
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2018
MEMORANDUM OF WRIT PETITION (Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS (Special Original Jurisdiction) W.P. No. of 2018 Revenue Bar Association New No. 115
More informationIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5953 OF 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Sujit Shinde & Anr. Vs. WRIT PETITION NO.5953 OF 2014 Union Public Service Commission (UPSC) and Anr... Petitioners wp5953-14.doc..
More informationDRAFT RULES UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, Draft National Financial Reporting Authority Rules, 2013
DRAFT RULES UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 Draft National Financial Reporting Authority Rules, 2013 In exercise of the powers conferred by clause (b) to (d) of sub section (2) of section 132, clause, sub
More informationWRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). 71/2019
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL JURISDICTION REPORTABLE WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO(S). 71/2019 RAHUL DUTTA & ORS. PETITIONER(S) VERSUS THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS. RESPONDENT(S) WITH W.P.(C) No. 92/2019
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. Civil Appeal No.4278 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Non-Reportable Civil Appeal No.4278 of 2018 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.30503 of 2015) DR.SHADAB AHMED KHAN & ANR. APPELLANT (S) Versus PROF.
More informationTHE HIGH COURT OF KERALA Kochi : No. A /2012 Date : NOTIFICATION
THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA Kochi : 682 031 No. A1-18120/2012 Date : 12.04.2012 NOTIFICATION Sub:- High Court Summer Vacation, 2012 sitting of Vacation Judges regarding. Ref:- High Court Notification No:
More informationIN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition No of 2016
IN THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (THE HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Writ Petition No. 1246 of 2016 Shri Abdul Kadir Mazumdar, Son of late Basir Uddin Mazumdar, Village Uttar Krishnapur,
More informationPUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION BARADARI GARDEN, PATIALA- 147001 WEBSITE : http://ppsc.gov.in S Adv. No. 06 The Punjab Public Service Commission invites Online Application Forms from eligible candidates
More informationJAMMU AND KASHMIR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Polo Ground Srinagar, Kashmir
JAMMU AND KASHMIR PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Polo Ground Srinagar, Kashmir - 190001 www.jkpsc.nic.in NOTIFICATION NO. PSC/EXM/2013/80 D A T E D : 1 0. 0 9. 2 0 1 3 ---- JAMMU & KASHMIR STATISTICAL CUM EVALUATION
More informationSLP(C) No. 3052/08 etc. ITEM NO.66 COURT NO.10 SECTION XVII SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
SLP(C) No. 3052/08 etc. ITEM NO.66 COURT NO.10 SECTION XVII SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No(s).3052/2008 (From the judgement and order dated
More information2010 No. 791 COPYRIGHT
STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2010 No. 791 COPYRIGHT The Copyright Tribunal Rules 2010 Made - - - - 15th March 2010 Laid before Parliament 16th March 2010 Coming into force - - 6th April 2010 The Lord Chancellor
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.2631 OF State of Bihar & Ors.
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) No.2631 OF 2009 State of Bihar & Ors. Petitioners Vs. Mithilesh Kumar Respondent ALTAMAS KABIR, J. J
More informationTHE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY PART III SECTION 4 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY NEW DELHI, JUNE 1, 2018
THE GAZETTE OF INDIA EXTRAORDINARY PART III SECTION 4 PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY NEW DELHI, JUNE 1, 2018 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE BOARD OF INDIA NOTIFICATION Mumbai, the 31 st of May, 2018 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
More informationARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW. ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 86 of Tuesday, this the 01 st day of December 2015
1 ARMED FORCES TRIBUNAL, REGIONAL BENCH, LUCKNOW ORIGINAL APPLICATION No. 86 of 2015 Tuesday, this the 01 st day of December 2015 Hon ble Mr. Justice D.P. Singh, Member (J) Hon ble Air Marshal Anil Chopra,
More informationBar & Bench ( IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : DATE OF DECISION :
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS RESERVED ON : 27.07.2018 DATE OF DECISION : 03.08.2018 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.Nos.25455, 25456, 25729, 26654, 26655, 26932, 27106 to 27108,
More informationBar & Bench ( Rabiul Islam Sarkar Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors.
1 30.07.2018 Sl. No.21 Ct.12 BM WP 5082 (W) of 2018 Rabiul Islam Sarkar Vs. State of West Bengal & Ors. Mr. Washef Ali Mondal Mr. Arindam Chattopadhyay for the petitioner for the State Mr. Kanak Kiran
More informationNOTIFICATION MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL POLICY AND PROMOTION INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY APPELLATE BOARD
PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA, EXTRAORDINARY, PART II, SECTION 3, SUB-SECTION (i) MINISTRY OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRY (Department Of Industrial Policy And Promotion ) NOTIFICATION NEW DELHI, THE 5 th
More informationArrangement of Sections
317 KARNATAKA ORDINANCE NO. 2 OF 2002 THE KARNATAKA DETERMINATION OF SENIORITY OF THE GOVERNMENT SERVANTS PROMOTED ON THE BASIS OF RESERVATION (TO THE POSTS IN THE CIVIL SERVICES OF THE STATE) ORDINANCE,
More informationTO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA PART II, SECTION-3, SUB-SECTION (i)
TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA PART II, SECTION-3, SUB-SECTION (i) GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION New Delhi, dated the 2015 NOTIFICATION G.S.R..In exercise of the powers conferred
More information* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI. + Writ Petition (Civil) No. 2174/2011
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + Writ Petition (Civil) No. 2174/2011 Commissioner of Income Tax (Ghaziabad)...Petitioner Through Ms. Rashmi Chopra, Advocate. VERSUS Krishna Gupta & Ors. Through..Respondent
More informationIN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 20 OF Vs. DEVAS MULTIMEDIA P. LTD...
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 20 OF 2011 ANTRIX CORP. LTD....PETITIONER Vs. DEVAS MULTIMEDIA P. LTD....RESPONDENT J U D G M E N T ALTAMAS
More information